HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-10-2010 Historic Preservation Commission
IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
Wednesday, Nove nnbe r 10, 2010
Lobby Conference Room, 410 E. Washington Street
Emma J Harvat Hall
5:30 p.nn.
A) Call to Order
B) Public discussion of anything not on the agenda
C) Certificate of Appropriateness
1. 304 Brown Street
2. 610 Oakland Avenue
3. 328/330 N Linn Street
D) Discussion of 219 N Gilbert Street
E) Discussion of City High Cupola
F) Consideration of minutes for October 14, 2010
G) Other
H) Adjournment
Staff Report
Historic Review for 304 Brown Street
District: Brown Street Historic District
dassification: Contributing
The applicants, Sarah Catherall and Prof & Mrs. AC Coolidge, are requesting approval for a proposed
addition project at 304 Brown Street, a contributing property in the Brown Street Historic District. The
project consists of constructing a temporary ramp on the side of the property.
November 10, 2010
Applicable Regulations and Guidelines:
5.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Additions
5.2 Ramps and Decks
Staff Comments
This 2 Ih story cottage features Craftsman style detailing such as the wood shingle cladding, pairs of knee
brace brackets, and exposed raftertails along the porch roof edge. Double-hung windows have a 9/1
configuration and are grouped in pairs and threes giving the house a more horizontal feeling.
The applicant is proposing to install a temporary ramp on the side of the property to provide wheelchair
access. The proposed ramp is to be constructed of alwninum and can be easily removed when no longer
needed.
The guidelines recommend designing ramps so they do not detract from the historic character of the house.
The guidelines also recommend locating a new ramp on the side of the building, as much as possible.
In staff's opinion, these modifications will not significantly alter the historic character of the home and are
easily disassembled and removed when no longer needed. Staff believes that the proposed ramp seems to be
a reasonable way for the applicants to continue the use of their home.
Recommended Motion
Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 304 Brown Street as presented in the
application.
~ -: i
i
.I ..
. !
1./
I,
i-.
Ap-. .ication for Historic Re\ ~w
Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or properties
located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City
Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation
of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation
Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at:
www,icgov,orglHPl1andbook
Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. During
the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday. Applications
are due in the PCD Office by noon on Thursday two weeks prior to the meeting.
See attached document for application deadlines and meeting dates.
Applicant Information
(Please check primary contact person)
D Owner tr.:c:t.~...l.y..LXL..../t"i...C.j..~Q6.k.I..00i>.. )
Ph -:2, i~.- <';"<: 'v' -//j .'2 i-'Z~' - ...
one ........".....f....... .._........r. ....(7...... .......f:':". ..2.... ...-'.. ............. .....
.~ t.1 '1~ '.~ '\J S T
Address -....O..t... ....Q..t.:::Q.l. ..J..l.~................ ................. ....
~.~t?.V0.::"r\...l~...t...:~C~/.... '). ....:J.J+...........zip ...................
email................................................................................................
D Contractor ..J1i!.....Y.J.':f..~k..4......~.';;-....!l2.~.:1....~...
, r'tO -. ~AoI, .
Address ~.....Lr.U~.uu.':;'t.......j.;\}'-:O.~..,.~..............
,1 f,'
~'!.)..I.~~~..{,Wl\l..ta.,,:...."-.:{J..4.t....e<'l/.!lJr4 .ei{.l.~r.:-;-
Phone....p./l.............................................................................
emai ,.......f./.!.l.. ....... ....... ............,........................ ............. ...........
o Consultant ..hJ.i....~:~:}./L../..k;~?,..e.......:t..J;.~;.~..f.I.I,(!d1(.(" h
~ re~ C.W:...~.!........!.~~~Q:~....{..:...../...;.~I.f:o;;....... ...~.......... ~'
........-::7t.fJ.';~.,gc.(.-....{&.:f.!.....C,ri....:r!w2zip W:::.~..5J:4
~.o~..i.!IJ:d.....(.....\.'..I....j.\,j..J:~o.t\-,;;'t........:..Q.v.;...r.t4-"gf'lA' ......
I'~ j "
\,(!.,.f'"5 tel" ...(~').....t.v.'i\.....h..l.'1.I!.l....J..:1(.'.".~II.I..t:.5,..,ll.~-t.L.. . ..,f.'.
. .~-
email..W.~1.V:v......"l..,i.(.i-f.t..~~..O...C.;U.:..5....C.aX1.k....:,{ .
)...
?ct,!!
Application Requirements
Attached are the following items:
R Site plan
o Floor plans
o Building elevations
~ Photographs
j;Cr' Product information
o Other..............................................................................
!>,p ,
"f.
t1 '(.:-
(r ,;{,ev../ p ~
If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or
a significant alteration to an existing structure, please submit a
site plan, floor plans, building elevations and photographs.
If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure,
please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently
describe the scope of the project.
Provide a written description of the proposed project on the
second page of this application.
For Staff Use: 'III
Date submitted ..;. ...Ii. ..f..Q...........................
o Certificate of No Material Effect
)!!! Certificate of Appropriateness
;?l Major review
o Intermediate review
o Minor review
Property Information
Address of property..:3.a':!........B..1S;..a:\,A.>..lr-J.....S.T................
..,:J.4..\(~" f\~......~~..\..:C. (.....~.:::;;.E\.......................... ............. .~.........
/..J. :-"~ ..., ;
Use of property ......l.l//.ly.J:~,~.:~.~;;..h.J;~......h:~:.-:.:~~:!i......
Date constructed (if known)...l..~./i)....a...rf.f::.4..K.............
Historic Designation
o This property is a local historic landmark
OR
D This property is located in the:
g Brown Street Historic District
o College Green Historic District
o East College Street Historic District
o Longfellow Historic District
o Summit Street Historic District
o Woodlawn Historic District
o Clark Street Conservation District
o College Hill Conservation District
o Dearborn Street Conservation District
o Governor-Lucas Street Conservation District
Within the district, this property is classified as:
o Contributing
o Noncontributing
o Nonhistoric
Project Type
o Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window
replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, new
decks, porch reconstruction, baluster repair or similar)
)(' Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps)
o Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch,
chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar)
o Construction of new building
o Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not
change its appearance
o Other ..............................................................................................
Project description
~ ( , ,
.............~A........t::{:"I.!:.!...pO':l\:::~l..Y.y............;.?1".i.'l.J.../...~;;.~~....f.........cCJ,A1.V.P...,..........t........w!../!...lH..;.d?k:.Q..r.:?;L.t.....>~1
.......llo::lr<ifJ.:.....&M&..j........iC..&--:",l,.......~I.:.:J:'l..),;::\......A.1:~~....::....i.d-R.......b~.~;........L(.{.....i.:.~.;-;f......n:f::..<'1.Lr.:(.$(.....1:v4/t-:'f-
s;,-. / ii' J' , . ---rt.. :f..'" b:e-' . L Ii' r-
/1 .' ,~- A .., . . "\'.) I , '. . /. j - r,
........0. .............. ......(;.........6 .........f....J~J.,.......(lL<.J,....I........+.L..:e...~..........)-:J.I........ .. ........J.Y:......Jr....~~. ....... ..?':.........~O..-i:........
) . -., I
.6.~..f.t::A.........;:\.....g,1:A>. 'I:...e,~. .......,..,;..1-..7.. .:J.o.:.. ~ .....:~:i.j6.......CU:l..~:t....w.). '!:-i{.),::f,,:..;~lr.Y.........4;;1J.erf::....;....-I~:/...t.:/.otf.U'''''ih~-. 7"''''
. /} 0 , ? . (-iA,h,-t, >- ;1/1'1- .e./ll~)l~e~I--) '} . .' 4 / '0 .
.?U.J..u........?,i!.dt:......~.,'.L;;;.t,IA.4,,/.....Ic~.e;......~,.:L.......,:A-.....~fJCL<C&.....,;1,.~......Au.".,......p...t...""......
_ 1 '. . ,. ..,
'. './ ......".,..1.,.. _. / "/\,1'\.-/,... ,'l.f' -,-,1"-\..' '. .,./1 ,,-- .~- '. __~ ""'.
...: .4...f.....'>-~?~...W!.i:... .tt:/.fo,I.........!...~.....~.........::-....""".t'-~78..>0-.. ....."i,.. J..~.....L.. ....l..;;~....,<<:;.:..fli.. ~"......fcr:q.:..:.2..;........ ."..;. ........
or . ~'. ,.! _ II {I U ,
~ ' i' . - " If - _ ;,.- . -' I' .? r" - ' - ,.', 'f - . - ,. . ",4 -':l. C,'. tI'~~.."
..1,...O'..J:'.tt...~..~,.';}l/".~/=...J.r.-.6-....f-c.+..w...,;.{,Jj/....r,.4",/, y......(-'b.HA,.t~.t,v.e':::J:.........fr:......#'b.....;.'-t/.,..,'t..............A.7
...J4-l./fl:y.......}ff!.W\.p"'O..P1r<Of...-b.~~.....lbt,.~4....~~.:~.-.7.,J."i.....:;;:(.::,6>--~.;,."'t.:)..wr.-;;.....I.i<;;~......t....cI...L<.J,t.t..7[:.1.....df,..y..#-
........~~~:../!t~........~......II.................................................................................~t.....................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
Materials to be used
A r-l' . f
'. "" ",_.'.,. j..... ,"..[ Q ,. _ '_ - _,; ~, '_' '/ I . J~', ,-~,- .
..... ..... ..........p..\..\-K.~ ~..\..~~.........>-I.Lk:I.~..........cJ......{.,Q....:... $...f;i{,.:v.~A.....,r::l.L,'f.r.I.L..::fkl..,.\d....Jtr)--"............
I' I -1~ t /1. i. ' '. I / I~ /' '
. . '. " ~ '-.- / 'f-1. . '7/ .-., , Ik,
~.~"f;nli;:'.-t>(.......~8>i. ;,,;....,............ (\.(;........ ~.~.k':LY.:\..~ .........<4.:h:......,...k:.L...{1,. .......... .~)...:.I!::4[..,.............d.I(L.....~J&....~..............
b'-'' '. ! ., 'w.. ...... ,-.J /3 :2. II . [] 'J.~' , 17' 1/..
. r" . . .' ,,", . l. " -:,.- . ,; - -e' //i. 1 -. d71 <
.. ~ .......II~.""'.......{'X..t;{)'. .&/:._q.-r..j........:/....tp,!.,.........l..... .............. ........L........ .......k...'J.,. (.J..(;.... '.' .......?r1....~............... ...:....~.. ...i........:....=
. p. . () J ik t' tt ,.p ~ . 'AA /,
....j(:-.~.;.......t.:z".~:....O).....~I,4.':~:f..'t/ ..:.':';:.........Y?.0.~;~c..:....";;;...... .1..... ...!.6.~::.:.:~.. ...fo.-;::t.tf...;//:tf.l).. .:r.:.f.'J..i-:'J. .......~......':!/;::..y,J.............
..+~{"::.~......y..::~:;;i.v.:.l.:.~:'!-.~p...4t~_,l/.t.....J&........t?.......,l.tL1r.t;.f.:......;;.2r.;...f....t...~.....I.:'?...:J...................................................~.................
Exterior appearance changes
<', I).' {. j...t.... .
.......:"""'..~t........ .),.y.~L$.l.f.I._':?.... ...........:....................... .............................. ..... ...... ................................ ................... ................ ........................................
1 J '.. I ~ ~ <.:.'1 Iv. 'I" . ~?b'
tv_/" ~ ....'\,.. J-.- /,. T! , - , ,\ " \- ",,,A., , r-:~, I ., " J"',.~
...;......:J........J;)~,.(...(.\.~.4t/.<l4l.!JL..........h.. ...vL{:.t.r... . J,r(....:v.. . ....)........ GL.-:1J.......... ....,..:\JZ\..I...\..f.'_6(.....J.k-b...c..""d.:(r.;.J(!=. ........ ....t:1.4.~,.
I ,~r t. 0 d- u'
/..... ' ~ f " ' .,..-', "
,-,:". .f..... I '., . ." J ~. . .~'. . '. /
............~...:G>....l!.. ..... 0"""'"L::..J.4A. .. .~..-X::.d""""11-.b<,-,../..~.........R.,gl.-<f4'" 7..,......... ...L.. .,<.~.....-,.{..qf';:1:..6. ~....~Z... .......
if:. . '( h ) . . -, /.;. t/i:J::.' ,. ,;-
. /I ,. Lr . ...:: ,<. ' . .' 2 ,... /i:.-Ll:'.,.,.:r-
.... .::t..':-:'f................_A.<.~...../f;I{;j.f.l ...... J.L......~l.,l...c~...W~~.'<:~.. ~.:v.1<J........ ..K.............. ...................../................... .........
..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
October 31,2010
To the State Historical Society,
My name is Sarah Catherall and I would like you to approve a temporary handicapped
ramp which would reach from my parents' side door to their driveway. My father,
Professor Archibald Coolidge, Jr. is a retired professor of English from the University of
Iowa. He and my mother, Lillian Coolidge, live in an historic home at 304 Brown Street
in Iowa City.
Due to the fact that my parents' home is on a hill, a passerby would not be able to see
very much of the ramp from the street. The ramp we hope to install is made of aluminum,
is relatively easy to put together, and can easily be removed should the house be sold at
any time in the future.
My father is mostly homebound and uses a walker at home. But when he goes out to the
doctor or dentist, etc. he must be moved in a wheelchair by my mother, who is his sole
caretaker. She is 81. The wheelchair weighs 20 lbs. and my dad has recently been
unable to walk down the 4 steps from the side door to an awaiting wheelchair.
We would be most appreciative if you would grant our request to build a temporary 32
foot long handicapped ramp from the side door to the driveway.
Enclosed you will find photos of the house to show that one cannot see the side door
from the street and to show the actual area where the ramp would run. I have also
enclosed photos of what the ramp is likely to look like.
Your swift movement on this matter would be greatly appreciated as my dad's health
seems to be worsening and he seems to be losing more function every month. Thank you
for your kind attention to this situation.
Sincerely,
Sarah R. Catherall
3510 McGowan Blvd
Marion,IA 52302
319-491-4386
My parents' address is:
Prof. and Mrs. A. C. Coolidge
304 Brown Street
Iowa City, IA 52245-5802
338-6375
lVlUUUlar vv net:1Cnmr Kamp j - Aoapnve ACCeSS
Page 1 of 1
~ www.adaptiveaccess.com
- Modular Ramp Details #3-
Modular aluminum wheelchair ramp system.
Purchase wheelchair ramps from: http://www.adaptiveaccess.com/alum modular wheelchair ramps.php
http://www.adaptiveaccess.com/detail/modularJamp_3.htm
10/31/2010
IVIUUUHll VV 1l1;;1;;1l;llcUr !\.cUUp L. - Auapuve Access
Page 1 of 1
Close this window
~ www.adaptiveaccess.com
- Modular Ramp Details #2-
Modular aluminum wheelchair ramp system.
~I-I"':-
~l rf,d
. ..
.' ~~.~. ..~~
?! .....4. ." 7 ...... "0.. ! - L..c~
,.. '. ~~~../":i~. ";;:'k..J];t.; .~~...,~
*. '. .'. ~.~~'-;;:tI:~~" :~YJ}~;~~~t~:~~::~ "._" ~: K----~'-
Close this window
http://www.adaptiveaccess.com/detail/modularJamp_2.htm
10/31/2010
,:" . 'V'::~t.s:';~~'X-:" "
1 .~ ~.~ ~:--
. .
,.~..... ~-. ~~~
" . h' 'l~-
_-____......,.t.,~
~ ..~
~ .._..,~-~ ~
- ".~~
-..,---.-....-~~-~~-~ -. -..' ..J
::t~
---...~
::~"~
~:~<.)" ~
,,~ ~~
<:~~~~
<' ~~,' ..._ ... ..~ 1
...,~, " ' ? "'"
. >",,,,,~. : '~..c
. ........', '- ""
" 7\.' . '::
,', "
:~, t " .....",,"' '?~~
~Jl. .... '\,~ '
. : . :. \;'" "
'. .' .' \. '-'. ~l'. _
,'.> .,.:'\"''\........~~.
.4..- \. \~. ~ ,.
,>~,:,:, . \~\~ ~_. ---
'r' " . ','\, :'ibr" '... .,
;.,..7. ".' "~~ 'h"" ~~"
-', '. . \\\,. ~:'\" '" -.
.~'-..: '.'\."" .~'
. .'~',: '}:'~ v' .\"~' ". )~" ' ~..
."'-~...' . \ ,\~. ~.~
-.~,;~~_ :~ :-~17 ." "\\~ ifi -
~ 'i'" ,'l'! ~ . \I. , \' \ " I "
'" ,'", " '; .,~ !, \', .' '-
... .' i".:- ~".'''.. ';\.:; ',' \'X,^'{:q\ ''\.'' .'
:,""f~~...;t "t." :~-;~ ",~. \. ..>. ~ - ...-i(~ ~ . ...
,.:-ii ",.' .'! '::"';'" >, t' \,\\\y':\.~ '\. ~.
,~::,~.:;.,,~.:-.;;.} ~'-'J. ..\\.\'\X\~ '\"'- 1
.....J .-" ""'''1N:-1~, '.
-~~.::~oJ'~ ~~']; - ~'':-::: r ~"~~..\'~ \ ~\^,fit - ~ ~~.
..", ;~:~...< '.. ,\ N'..'~ Xi' k"~
'.:cV{~:~: ,~.-,'. '~~... ,\'\' ~ ~~~.~ \ ~~'A
. ~ ._~ ~ ........ .1,. ... .t~ \ \\ :. J. ",,, ,\"'~
,,~:t';'___~3~":J...-".: . ,~... \\' \ \ . ~ ": ,10
f)~')7{~,~j'~c< .r- '\'.'->\\;.~ I. .:,\.;:y,..~~-::~
,~~,,?;:\~,~_ .... \.\\\~ \t>;1 \'\. '" ....
.",'.;-v'~i?"-" ,,'''.' .\~\,.\ ~'" \, ~"- .
.:s'j:P:';-lJ1r::,'. 'f;, '\\'\\' ;,\,\~~,~.\.>". .~ ~~
", ''''''';V;'' '"., 'J ,. \ \~'\' '\~
.. :-;.; ",',Jf:~"'.i' :..\ "'\\\\r~' :J~5. \ '\ .~.
"'~"'''_' 'M ~..' ','.' i~ .,."".. - n
..,.c." , :>~. .. ,.,.~ 'j.\'''' '
-;-r' ;-/, .'.:',ry ~,,' .....:', .1,'\ . <, ... ~v. ,~" "",., ~
~ t~. ~ "'~/'.s.......~~., .-\: " -;'\:..... ''X: r
c. '" ~'i:~~": ~:..' ". ,\,\\~, \"\. \ ""'.' ,,,.
..... -:......"':....f~r_. :.........' \\.~\ ~ \)4 ,-,
\:.{~~;:)'< ,.~::~"-' :<~i.....,'\\\\\\~ -" ,k'\' .'
":t"".;",,,-Y"'''''''':''' C"," ',"1\\\\~\'.t\\~~~\:\~~.,
" }...."--<"... ,~..j ,q \.\ ~~~\ .
'~'^' " .-. . ....,"'\ \ \ ".\ .
.,~~ 't',,;,_ ",'j," \\:\, '\. '
;')., ~"j.,C-\ 4",.':::;' \ \ \\\ \' \' '\ .,1
t -. \.~. ~... I\l( \ .... " - .... ~
" '::~~::i ,:, \ . " \'\\ ~~ \ .\\ \ \~ ,\\1~
',:3',;;' ~~"" \\\\\,\\)~I\~~~,*'~
?,!i~~ ft '.;,,\~\\\\\\\\\\\ ~\\~~..\~\ ^',
-".';'<~"" ..;,1-' ,'" \\\ \\ '\~ \ '\ \~\
""'.".:; c.....\\.\ \\\\\\~\~; \ ~\ ~
~~", .' "\" \~~ ' \ ~
.;.i"-!:',' ".\, \ \ \ '.
. ":. ,;/" ,\'\\\\',\' ~\ \~\ \"'" "
.,1,\\,,;\\ ~~ ,\' \\;\,.~' ~
~'~\i\:-\\\~~\\\ \\l\ .'~'\ " en
.\~:,\\\\\i\~~ \\\0~\' Y\'~"
"\\\"'\\'~~i\ '\ \\\,\ < l \"\'\
,,;\:~~~~\;~~~ ~~ ~\\\\.~~~~\\ \ \\
\' ~\\\\~\ \\~\, \\\' .f,
J~\~\\\ \\\\\ '1\' \'. 'c,,;
\i\\\~\\\~\\\\ \ \ \ ~\~\\~,: . '.
,~\\\\\\\\~\\\\~.\\\ '{~\\~~
:~\~\~\~\~\\\\~\\\\~\~ ,\t~~'
\\\\\\\.\\\\\\\\\ \\~ \\\~~\\
\~;\~b\\~\ \\;~ \\\\ \ \ \0~~\'\i~~~
i~\\\~~\\\\\\~\\\\\\\\\\.\\~ \.
\~~~:\\~\\~~~\\\ \\\~
~~\~\\\\;\\\\~'\\\\\\~ :
;~\\~~\\~\\\\\\\\\\\\~~ .
i\~~\\\\~\\\\~~~~~,\\
\\\l\\~~\\\\\~~~\
~\;;\~~~~ \ \\~\ \\\\~~~\\l;
-'
,'-'... .
_ ._'-"1-- /'
',//
. .,~~ ..-
.'\,
~
'\
;~~~~
)~1f!~tt~i)
,s~;~-,~
.~.~~-:
,,!-'l'
;:1
~
~,c
"1 :
;'f
.;~
if;
'1
~
,.
.~'t.
\i
l
~\
ty.
o
~t~
.......---..
.s.~~~:.~.\:.
-. .
-:::....~ ::~,S~~;~~~;~:.:.~:__.
~,; '--~~.~,,=.~; ::~.
'-:;x;/
..;..~ ~
..{ 1t.
~'
./
'-:'~":'-'"";
...'/
/j
~
,1}.
'-~'...~,'~
./( ....
1
t"
',~
"
:.;~~
~~
,.,.-,~
'-,/.
"
};~~t:~!~t
"
.-
1~,'<
...\\i:;t'-~r~~~"
.. ::~ ': "",
'~~:.,f
.r,. !-.; ,~.
~: :
\}~+T "
t' \Y~~~.:,:':'"~~~\
. .:....'"'.:..;.. .:J;.\
'. c:'''7t-';~1
~; .:~.~' J: ~t
-", ~
--. ...
I. . '~v~-
. I -.;(}jtt' ., -.;. -"..;,~
. ". <~iJt
'\~- ~ ;, .
-. 's
, .'
-L")
..4r ',::;
..,
.~ l.~ I
'" :t...
1 t.\'
~. ,,,t< ~ .~'"'>.. .'\t~,~ -',:'
) .
,
_~ _ ce... . ; _J)1~_,,,
i, '!/S~r~~i>
.;I:
'-,~~~
..... (.., '":-,
.f;.
,.
.;' ~
';.
': ~'-~
.~ ~'~
~~ .j"- ~
i:
#l~~
f
L...~j~~,
II II'! ;: .jI'
'/"''''''',11 +;t.'ff~ '.......,
Jj; Jj .~ }'" ,~.. Ie
_ . ""'il ,',.., r-'+:~'-"".<.:":' 't
' .' /; Ii fJl' 'Wf'~':':jC:""
r..'..,..,""'.. ;!.1~..,.......,'/".ct.I....:l,.r.. ....-. .J'p....
,~. "n' tt "" '~I'
!f'" n . ..",~..,.;
;. 'ij 4;:.:..;.,.:-,_"
~"'M. ~ ~--ii II' h""
~.
~~: ~,;,-:r?~~
...... .,'"
j' .
;jo;
Staff Report
~ovennberl0,2010
Historic Review for 610 Oakland Avenue
District: Longfellow Historic District
dassification: Contributing
The applicant, Michelle Provorse, is requesting approval for a proposed alteration project at 610 Oakland
Avenue, a contributing property in the Longfellow Historic District. The project consists of window
replacement.
Applicable Regulations and Guidelines:
.f. 0 .Iowa City Htstoric Pn-sermtion Guidelines JOr Alterations
4.13 Wmdows
Staff Comments
This two-story gambrel roof house is a good example of Dutch Colonial Revival design. It features a single
story solarium to the side, banded windows across the fa~ade and the entrance off-set to the left. This
entrance is highlighted by a small porch with Neo-classical columns. Wide replacement siding alters the
appearance but does not greatly impair the integrity. It may have been a mail order house.
The applicant is proposing to replace the second story bedroom and 1 bathroom window with Quaker Brand
wood! clad windows with simulated divided lites.
The guidelines allow for the replacement of windows that match the type, size, sash width, trim, use of
divided lights, and overall appearance of the historic windows. The guidelines require that the divided lights
either be true divided lights or be created with muntin bars that are adhered to both sided of the glass, but not
with snap-in muntin bars.
In Staff's opinion, the proposed windows are compatible with the architectural styl~ of the house.
/( ecommended AI otion
Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 610 Oakland Ave as presented in the
application with the condition that the windows retain the overall appearance of the historic windows,
including type, size, sash width, trim, and use of divided lights.
AI . lication for Historic Re~ .~w
Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or properties
located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City
Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation
of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation
Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at:
www.icgov.orgIHPhandbook
Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. During
the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday. Applications
are due in the PCD Office by noon on Thursday two weeks prior to the meeting.
See attached document for application deadlines and meeting dates.
For Staff Use: I 0'. " (' /"
Db' d (. , ,~.: ~'I (.
ate su mltte ......'...:.......:::......:..........:.................
o Certificate of No Material Effect
}( Certificate of Appropriateness
~ Major review
o Intermediate review
o Minor review
Applicant Information
(Please check primary contact person)
~wner ./vl.i.cj1l/(L......tfo..Y.Y.Y5.~.................
Phone...3}.6.::..f;.:3.J ..~./.~.~.Q .......................................
Address ...tJ/L.O'....O.<<t.I~1 LU:uf...&r..!...............
1O}VKuh;r,tjt~m"p.fM?1(J
email...r?l.~.tN..ldjl{.t.cMt.k...........ftmt.!-:~.f...{j~
o Contractor ........ ....................... .................................................
Add ress ................................. ................. ................. .......................
.................................................................................zip...................
Phone........................................... ............ ..... ...... ...... ........ .......... ....
email................................................................................................
o Consultant ......... ....... ................................. ....................... .........
Add ress .................................................... .......... .......... ........ ..........
.................................................................................zip...................
Pho ne....................................................... ....................... ......... .......
email................................................................................................
Application Requirements
Attached are the following items:
o Site plan
o Floor plans
o Building elevations
o Photographs
WProduct information
o Other ................ ...... ................. .......................................
If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or
a significant alteration to an existing structure, please submit a
site plan, floor plans, building elevations and photographs.
If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure,
please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently
describe the scope of the project.
Provide a written description of the proposed project on the
second page of this application.
Property Information
. ~. A A..
Address of property ...Lo..f().......V.~1r::((V1f..:(...r.Ll(,~...~.....
~~~.~~..~~~~~;~;::::llfiJ.:~;::.:gZ5.}(i.~1:.C.~::::::::.::::::::::::
Date constructed (if known).......l1..a.t!S....................................
Historic Designation
D This property is a local historic landmark
OR
E( This property is located in the:
o Brown Street Historic District
o College Green Historic District
o East College Street Historic District
~ongfellow Historic District
o Summit Street Historic District
o Woodlawn Historic District
o Clark Street Conservation District
o College Hill Conservation District
o Dearborn Street Conservation District
o Governor-Lucas Street Conservation District
~i~n the district, this property is classified as:
Er Contributing
o Noncontributing
o Nonhistoric
~r~ct Type
(g' Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window
replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, new
decks, porch reconstruction, baluster repair or similar)
o Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps)
o Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch,
chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar)
o Construction of new building
o Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not
change its appearance
o Other ...................... ........................................................................
Project description
Pf!/fjffi,:~:5.f?p:~~~~~~1~J.~~d!~~?3f
.........6F;e~~.....fi!i;~7hi!fl....&~~U!j.......~Ma$fti;f,./n.Qp;;;J!L-
..........d...........fl()..t.........LrLrf./.~.l~.........przV.......{'fJ..r....A1.u.s...........tx...........pY.llpptd..........................
............Op:O:l...,...../rJds.....d,r/nf.......i.1./l/.rk..,............................~..........................................................................................................
Materials to be used 6. j
;;;Q'f(JIS~Cl1~~;;u;s;;imT;;;sm
...............W.t).l..d...I...clad...........~uj.Y1.d...U:s......../.......fh...................YL....t.ltdtd.........dl..v...;.'d(....................
... ............ .................................. ...c.f.!::-:s.t.-.~~~.\:..~........pl{.Y.:.... ...yv!./\.rJ..(j.~?.)............................................................... ................. .....
Exterior appearance changes
.::.:..:..:::::...::.:::]J:D.::~~::..:::::::::::.:::::.:.::::::.:::':::::'::::::::.:'::::'::"::::::::.:::':::':':::::.::::'::'::::::::::::::::::::::::::'::.::::::::::::::.::::::.:.'::':::.:::::.':':"':::'::::"::":.::.'.::'
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......"..............................................................................................................................................................................................................
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Staff Report
November 10, 2010
Historic Review for 328/330 N Linn St
District: Northside Historic District
dassification: Contributing
The applicants, Dwight Dobberstein & Nancy Parker, are requesting approval for proposed alteration,
demolition, and addition projects at 328/330 N Linn Street, a contributing property in the Northside Historic
District. The projects consist of the demolition of an existing garage, removal and reconstruction of the rear
covered entrances, and replacement of the front decks with covered porches.
Applicable Regulations and Guidelines:
4. C .Iowa Diy Htstonc Presermtion GUIdelines fOr Alterations
4.1 Balustrades and Handrails 4.10
4.7 Mass and Rooflines 4.13
5. C .Iowa Diy Htstonc Presermtion GUIdelines fOr Additions
5.1 Expansion of Building Footprint
7. C .Iowa Diy Htstonc Presermtion Guidelines fOr Demolition
7.1 Demolition of Whole Structures or Significant Features
Porches
Wmdows
Staj/'Comments
This two-story gable roof house with cross gable from the 1890s is shown as a duplex on the Sanborn maps.
h features cornice returns on the gable ends and originally had small porches at each comer. The loss of
these front porches impairs the overall integrity of the house.
The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing garage on the site, remove and reconstruct the rear-
covered entrances, and replace the front decks with covered porches to match the original building design.
The applicant proposes to construct the front porches as screened porches. The intent is to recreate the
original look of the building and will be similar to the front screened porch at the neighboring property, 326
N Linn Street. The applicant proposes to use wood storm windows, metal roofing to match the existing, and
wood clapboard siding.
In regards to the garage, the guidelines state that the decision to approve a demolition of outbuildings on
contributing properties will be made on a case-by-case basis. The commission will considerthe condition,
integrity, and architectural components of the outbuilding when making its decision. In Staff's opinion, this
garage is not an original garage and the demolition will have minimal impact on the historic integrity of this
property.
Regarding the porches, the guidelines recommend removing non-historic alterations and recommend
constructing new porches that are consistent with the historic building and rebuilding historic features that
have been removed. In Staff's opinion, the proposed porch reconstruction project helps return this house
back to its original appearance.
/recommended Notion
Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 328/330 N. Linn Street as presented in
the application with the following conditions:
· All new windows being either solid wood or metal clad solid wood and retaining the overall
appearance of the existing original windows on the property, including type, size, sash width, trim,
and use of divided lights. Divided lights may be either true divided lights or with muntin bars that
are adhered to both sides of the glass, but not with snap-in muntin bars.
ApL.ication for Historic Re ew
Application for alterations to the exterior of historic landmarks or properties
located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City
Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation
of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation
Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at:
www.;cgov.org/HPhandbook
Meeting schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. During
the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday. Applications
are due in the PCD Office by noon on Thursday two weeks prior to the meeting.
See attached document for application deadlines and meeting dates.
For Staff Use: / '.'
. 0'- /5-ltl
Date submItted .......................................................
o Certificate of No Material Effect
j( Certificate of Appropriateness
'it Major review
o Intermediate review
o Minor review
Applicant Information
(Please check primary contact person)
o Owner .~~i.~~.~.!??~.~~.:~.~~!~.~..~.~~?.y...~.~:.~~E...............
319-331-7872
Phone.. ........ .... ........................ .......... ...................... ........ ............ ....
Add ress .~.~.~..~~y.~.~p..?~.~~:... ............................ .....................
Iowa City, IA . 52245
.................................................................................Zlp...................
. parker dobberstein@yahoo.com
emall..............::-................................................................................
o Contractor ................................................................................
Address ..... ...... .......... ............ .......... ....................................... ........
.................................................................................zip...................
Phone ..............................................................................................
email................................................................................................
o Consultant .................................................................................
Address ......... .... ................ ................................ ........ ................ .....
.................................................................................zip...................
Phone..............................................................................................
..........................................................................................................
email................................................................................................
Application Requirements
Attached are the following items:
o Site plan
o Floor plans
o Building elevations
EJ Photographs
EI Product information
o Other..............................................................................
If the proposed project entails an addition, a new structure or
a significant alteration to an existing structure, please submit a
site plan, floor plans. building elevations and photographs.
If the proposed project is a minor alteration to a structure,
please provide drawings and photographs to sufficiently
describe the scope of the project.
Provide a written description of the proposed project on the
second page of this application.
Property Information
Address of property .~.?~!.~~~..~:..~!!:.~..~.~:......................................
.~9.~~ .~!~y'~..I.~. ??~.~?......................... ........... ... ..... ................ ....... .... ....
Use of property .~~~~~.~!:.~~~.I...............................................................
. 1900
Date constructed (If known)...............................................................
Historic Designation
o This property is a local historic landmark
OR
o This property is located in the:
o Brown Street Historic District
o College Green Historic District
o East College Street Historic District
o Longfellow Historic District
o Summit Street Historic District
o Woodlawn Historic District
o Clark Street Conservation District
o College Hill Conservation District
o Dearborn Street Conservation District
o Governor-Lucas Street Conservation District
Within the district, this property is classified as:
EJ Contributing
o Noncontributing
o Nonhistoric
Project Type
EJ Alteration of an existing building (ie. siding and window
replacement, skylights. window opening alterations, new
decks, porch reconstruction, baluster repair or similar)
o Addition to an existing building (includes decks and ramps)
o Demolition of a building or portion of a building (ie. porch,
chimneys, decorative trim, baluster or similar)
o Construction of new building
o Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not
change its appearance
o Other..............................................................................................
Project description
.~.:.~~~.? !!~.~.~~.~~.~~..~~~!~~i.~~..~~~~~~~~y...~.~~.~~~.~~~L..... ... ...... .......... ......... ...... ...... .............. .... .... ........ .... ...... ... ....... .... ............ ..... ........... ........ .... ...
2. Reconstruct rear covered entrances
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
.~:..~~p..I~~~ .!~?~!..?~.?~~..~~!~..~~y.~.~~.?..e?..~~.~~.~ .!~.~~~~~..?~~~!.~~.I.. ~~.i.~?!.~~..?~~~~.~:.... ................ .... ............ ......... ....... ... ......................... .......
Materials to be used
.'!:!.~~~..~~~~~..~~~~~~~.!..~~~~!.E9.9.!!~9...~~..~~~9.~..~~!~~!n.g.'..~9.9..~..9.1.~P.~~~~9..~!~!.~.g.:.........................................................
Exterior appearance changes
.~~':!.. ~~?.~~..p.~~9.~~.~.~.i.I.I..~~.~.~.~~.!.~~..~p.p.~~~~.~~~. ?.~.!.~~..~~.i.~!!~.~..~~~.~~~.~:.~:. .!.~~..~~~!~.~..i.~ .!~.~~~~.~~..!?..~.~~~~.~!~.. .... .......... ...............
.!~.~..?:.i.~~~.~! ..I.??.~. ~~. ~.~~. .~.~~!~.i.~~..~~~~. .~~..~.~g9.:.!.~.~.~~~~~..p..?~.~.~~.~.~I.~?.p..~?.~~~.~.!~~..~~.~~.~~.?~~ .!~?.~..~~.i.~.~~~ .~.~?~.!.~!!:...............
SP~~
G 1 COVER
C1 SITE PLAN
Al DEMO PLAN
A2 1 ST FLOOR PLAN
A3 2ND FLOOR PLAN
A4 ELEVATIONS
A5 ELEVATIONS
CODE INFORMATION
ZONE: RNC-12 (TWO FAMILY DUPLEX)
BUILDING AREA
LOT AREA
ALLOW ABLE BUILDING COVERAGE:
FLOOR AREA RATIO:
= 4,480 SF
= 40% MAX.
NONE
EXISTING BUILDING AREA:
EXISTING BUILDING COVERAGE
PROPOSED BUILDING AREA:
BUILDING COVERGE
~IJG!h!J:rv ~AP
= 1,980 SF (INCLUDING GARAGE)
= 44.2%
= 1,908 SF (INCLUDING PORCHES)
= 42.5%
BUILDING VOLUME
EXISTING BUILDING VOLUME = 33,695 CF
MINUS GARAGE (- 2,440 CF) = 31,255 CF
WITH PROPOSED PORCHES (+ 2,295 CF) = 33,550 CF
PARKING
EXISITNG PARKING SPACES
PROPOSED PARKING SPACES
=1
=2
VIEW FROM LINN ST.
DOBBERSTEIN -
PARKER FALL HOUSE
ADDRESS:
328/330 NORTH LINN STREET
lOW A CITY, lOW A 52245
VIEW FROM DAVENPORT ST.
DATE: 1ll-1S-to
SHEET llll.E:
COVER
SHEET NUMBER:
G1
w
w
a::
In
~
o
a..
z
w
~
o
-!6.UI .
[rr::[~:
---,-_..._.~d~
[!]
311 DAVENPORT ST.
DUPLEX RESIDENCE
OWNED BY
DWIGHT DOBBERSTEIN
AND NANCY PARKER
~.'l:\.... :
_r....
~;~:..
EXISTING
CRUSHED
GRAVEL DRIVE
(2) 9'X18'
CRUSHED GRAVEL
PARKING SPACES I
. . ~~.. .. ..~... :
J"'~I : I
"
NEW 4"CONCRETE
SIDEWALK WITH
COMPACTm ROCK
BASE.
PROPOSED
COVERED,
ENTRANCE
(PHASE 2)
I EXISTING
BUILDING
OIJTUNG
~:
~:
I ~ 330 N. UNN ST. 328 N. UNN ST.
i' I
':0
I: .
326 NORTH UNN ST.
SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE OWNED BY
DWIGHT DOBBERSTEIN
AND NANCY PARKER
I ,.' ,",
. 0.....
~ {~~~~ ,
~~.....170q Q....
I ,.:~::~:;.
. " . ~"".no..
.t ..
. ~~~~~ ,
. Q~-:~"!:~"
___u._
DATE: 1lHH010
SHEET l1Tl.E:
..\,
.~
L..
(j
NEW 4"eoNcRErE
SIDEWALK WITH
COMPACTm ROCK
BASE.
~-
LINN STREET ~
SCALE: 1 :200
DOBBERSTEIN -
PARKER FALL HOUSE
SITE PLAN
SHEET NUMBER:
328/330 NORTH LINN STREET
IOWA CITY, lOW A 52245
C1
ADDRESS:
~ ~;!~JING FIRST LEVEL PLAN
DOBBERSTEIN -
PARKER FALL HOUSE
rTl=rr====---==~1'= =====
I I I I I \..:!I'
I I I I I
I I I I I
I I , I I
, II I I
, I I I I
L .l...LJ
PARLOR
::J
[~======
PARLOR
rTTl
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I I I I
11111 ~
I I I I I
L1J=LL============ =
ADDRESS:
328/330 NORTH LINN STREET
IOWA CITY, lOW A 52245
LIVING ROOM
LIVING ROOM
r-. -,
~ 1--- ---1
5 1-------1
1-------1
I ~ :::::::::::::. _ -~-j I
I' ~----, I I
I ( I I I
'-____..J I I I
-------', I
'51 (-'0 I I
~~ _/, I
~ r;-"'J.l~ ~-I
I ~~ II ", \ ,/' -
I '" I I '#
I '===::1
I
I
I
.J
r-~ c-,
Ir '1
I' I
,I I
, I
I ,
I ,
I ,
I I
, I
I I
I I
I
I
GARAGE I
KITCHEN
<0/
--------rr""T:=P-
--------~*.,t
("\ ("\ :r:E"'1!
- ~"'0+ - - - TL"VJ.... ".T
_J.:...............:J..___~_""""'--_~_
V@
I
II
I'
"
L______________-1
L_______________~
KITCHEN III
III
il_1<=L:=i.) ~
I 'A
L---f, ,( ~
I. I ~
-_____-,_J ~-=-
1-------1
1-------1
1-------1
L_____..J
II
II
DEMO KEYNOTES
1. REMOVE EXISTING WOOD PORCH
2. REMOVE CLOSET AND DOORWAY
3. REMOVE DOOR AND PATCH OPENING
4. REMOVE EXISTING KITCHEN
EQUIPMENT
5. REMOVE EXISTING RESTROOM AND
COVERED ENTRANCE
6. REMOVE EXISTING GARAGE
DATE: 10-11;.10
SHEET lTl1.E:
DEMO PLAN
SHEET NUMBER:
A1
330 N Linn
328 N Linn
PARLOR
PARLOR
LIVING ROOM
LIVING ROOM
KITCHEN
KITCHEN
~
3
KEY NOTES
1. NEW ENCLOSED PORCH TO MATCH
ORIGINAL BUILDING DESIGN.
2. NEW CERAMIC TILE FLOOR AND
BASE.
3. NEW DBL HUNG WOOD WINDOW.
4. NEW KITCHEN COUNTER, SINK, AND
EQUIPMENT.
5. NEW COVERED ENTRANCE.
DATE: 10-1&-10
SHEET11T1.E:
DOBBERSTEIN - PARKER FALL HOUSE
2ND FLOOR REMODEL
ADDRESS:
328/330 NORTH LINN STREET
IOWA CITY, IOWA 52245
1 ST FLOOR
SHEET NUMBER:
A2
JO\
?CL../
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
'-ArnC-l
1 ACCESS I
L____-.J
'-Amc-l
1 ACCESS I
L____-.J
BEDROOM
BEDROOM
~ ~B"E~~;>ND LEVEL PLAN
GENERAL NOTES
1. PHASE 2 TO BE COMPLETED AT A
LATER DATE.
2. REPAIR ALL DAMAGED TRIMBOARD.
STRIP AND REFINISH.
3. REPLACE EXISTING WALL & CEILING
PLASTER WITH NEW GWB. PAINT.
4. SAND AND REPAINT ALL EXISTING
DOORS. REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY
DAMAGED HARDWARE.
5. PROVIDE REQUIRED OUTLETS (EVERY
12~ PER RESIDENTIAL CODE
DOBBERSTEIN - PARKER FALL HOUSE
2ND FLOOR REMODEL
ADDRESS:
328/330 NORTH LINN STREET
[OW A CITY, IOWA 52245
7'
/1
/ I-
// I
/ I
// I
/
/
/
/
r -------1----
J I
..1___ I
, I
, 1
" 1
, 1
, 1
" I
--------)11
/1
/ I
// I
/ I
// I
/ I
---T-J I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
L________I____
--,
Irll
IL-'I
---'
--,
I
I
---'
/FJ
KEYNOTES
1. REMOVE SHOWER. NEW 3'X4' TILE BASE
AND CERAMIC WALL TILE.
2. REMOVE WALL HUNG SINK.
3. REMOVE DOOR AND PATCH OPENING.
4. NEW CERAMIC TILE FLOOR AND
BASE.
5. NEW CERAMIC WALL TILE UP TO CEILlN(
6. NEW LAVATORY
7. EXISTING GARAGE AND COVERED
ENTRANCE BELOW TO BE REMOVED.
8. PROPOSED COVERED ENTRANCE BELO'
9. PROPOSED COVERED PORCH BELOW.
DATE: 1').15-10
SHEET TmE:
2ND FLOOR
SHEET NUMBER:
A3
I
/- ~. ~
I .......,
~ -.'"
--. Cu:'c~
"/.- : --..-- --
/ .-...-
-'=-.:::'=---=11 I~I I~~._.-~ ~ "1-
~\(l_ r: ...__u_ -- o'_n.._... --- n__ -::=1 ~
- - .- _. l- .- -
"
/ . "
-- ~ ==: IV ..--
=== I" F
::=::
.=cc n ..-.--...-- u._ -. F::-
~ ~ .m_ -- m ::'-= -= F
_m
--- . .-.__. - .--- -. __u
.... -. --. . ..: -- --. ....-::- -..
~'\{L_ . --..- ~ ~ ~ -'-......... ~~ .... ~ -
-~ ....-.... ~ I
" -_no -- -'-' n ....-...
--. ---._-.-.. u --
D ........- -- 0:
. ..-....,.-...-. '---
-.....
n_ --.---
--
1.=:::=. .
""" -. -- ..-- -- .n.... ..-... .1'=;;11
LYJ- ~ if .-. -~_.~_. .~-~ ~ .~
"
~ ............ffJ
DE
" I ""4EBUILD FRONT PORCHES I
I TO MATCH ORIGINAL I
BUILDING DESIGN
T L: .-..- - - - - - - - - - - :..J- -
" - - - - - - - - - L- - -
--- - - - - -
3RD
22'.1
2ND
13'-2
1ST
3'-4
GRA
0'-0
8SM
.3'.11
WEST 3/32" = 1'-0"
3RD LVL
22'-1;" _..
2ND .LYL
13'-2"
1 ST I,.'\{L
3'-4'
GRADE
0'-0"
REBUK.D FRONT PORCHES
EW COVERED TO MATCH ORIGINAL I
I ENTRANCE BUILDING DESIGN
~3~~J.' - . . - . L- -=-. = .:..:.. -=.:..:....- -=-. = .:..:.. -=-.' ..:....-- -=-. = .:..:.. -=-. ..:....-- -=-" = .:..:.. -=-.' ..:....--...J. - . . -
NORTH 3/32" = 1'-0"
DOBBERSTEIN -
PARKER FALL HOUSE
ADDRESS:
328/330 NORTH LINN STREET
IOWA CITY, IOWA 52245
DATE: 10-15--2010
SHEETTTTlE:
ELEVATIONS
SHEET NUMBBl:
A4
3RD LVL . .
22'-1'
2ND LVL . . _ . .
13'-2"
1STLVL
31-4"
GRADE
0'-0"
REPLACE EXISTING SINGLE
WlNDOWwrnt 2 DBL I
I I ENTRANCE HUNG WOOD WINDOWS
BSMT t: - . . -I- . . - . . - . . - . . - . . - . . - . . - . . - L - . . -..J. - . . -
-3'-1V;-..-.. :....:..._-.1._____________ __
EAST 3/32" = 1'-0"
3RD LVL
22'-1'; - . . - . . -
-- . - -----.
-.. -..--...--"----".-
2ND LVL
13'-2' -.. -..
i.:..o:~ -:".:-ji-
1ST LVL
3'-4". -.
GRADE
0'-0"
EBUlUD FRONT PORCHES
TOMATCHOAIGINAl I
I BUlUDlNG DESIGN
~~~1\.-.. -.. -L =.~-::....:...:::::::...:...:. = ~---.:...:::::::...:...:. =.~-::....:...:::::::...:...:. _.~---.:...:::::::...:...:.":::j.. -..-
SOUTH 3/32" = 1'-0"
DATE: 10-1&2010
SHEET TITLE:
DOBBERSTEIN -
PARKER FALL HOUSE
ELEVATIONS
SHEET NUMBER:
ADDRFiSS:
328/330 NORTH LINN STREET
IOWA CITY, IOWA 52245
AS
[ow;,
l-listoric Presetvation COnlnlission
CityTlal1. 410E Washington Sneer, Im\~l
!A5nlC
j\1EMORANDUM
Date: November 10,2010
To: Historic Preservation Commission
From: Christina Kuecker, Associate Planner
Re: 219 N Gilbert Street
The owner of 219 N Gilbert Street would like to ask advice and experiences regarding metal roofs. They
have received several different opinions about repairing/replacing our roof at 219 N. Gilbert Street.
Attached are emails from the owner regarding her request and advice that she had received from the State
Historic Preservation Office.
P~e 1 ofl
Christina Kuecker
From: Jane Murphy [murphybk@inavia.net]
Sent: Monday, November 01,201012:45 PM
To: Christina Kuecker
Subject: Re: Historic Preservation Commission
Thanks Christina. I guess I would just tell the Commission that I am appearing at your suggestion (if I
remember that correctly) to ask their advice and about their experiences with metal roofs. We have
received several different opinions about repairing/replacing our roof at 219 N. Gilbert which is not reliably
keeping out snow melt each spring. It was apparently placed on top of the previous wooden shake
shingles about 1920 or so and is rusting, particularly at the edges. I am forwarding to you in a separate
email a file from Jack Porter at the State Historical Society with his input. Just want to pick the
Commissions brains.
Jane
Jane Murphy
Murphy-Brookfield Books
219 N. Gilbert
Iowa City, IA 52245
----- Original Message -----
From: Christina Kuecker
To: Jane Murphy
Sent: Monday, November 01,201011 :03 AM
Subject: Historic Preservation Commission
Jane,
I am planning on putting you on the agenda for the next HPC meeting, but wanted to touch base on a
few things before hand. First is that I send a packet of information to the Commission preceding the
meeting. This packet helps them be prepared for the meeting. I was wondering if you wanted to put
anything in the packet regarding what you would like to gain from the meeting. An email to me would
be sufficient. I think it would be good to give them some background and guidance so they can think
about your questions prior to the meeting. I plan to send the packet out first thing Thursday morning, so
having something to me by Wednesday evening would be great. If you don't want to include anything,
let me know.
Second, the meeting was originally scheduled for November 11, but I realized that this is Veteran's Day
and a City holiday. We cannot hold public meetings on City holidays. I am in the process of trying to
reschedule the meeting for an evening earlier in the week. Once I have a date figured out, I will let you
know.
Thanks,
Christina
Christina Kuecker
Associate Planner
Gty of Iowa Gty
410 E. Washington St.
Iowa Gty, IA 52240
(319)356-5243
christina- kuecker@iowa-city.org
J:i Please consider the environment and do not print this email unless absolutely necessary.
111112010
P~ge 1 of4
Christina Kuecker
From: Jane Murphy [murphybk@inavia.net]
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 12:47 PM
To: Christina Kuecker
Subject: Fw: Referral to you from Jack Lufkin; 219 N. Gilbert; Iowa City
Here's the file from Des Moines, Christina.
Jane Murphy
Murphy-Brookfield Books
219 N. Gilbert
Iowa City, IA 52245
----- Original Message -----
From: Porter, Jack [DCAl
To: 'Jane Murphy'
Cc: Mohr. Paula [DCAl ; Christian. Ralph [DCAl ; 'Douq Steinmetz'
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 11 :20 AM
Subject: RE: Referral to you from Jack Lufkin; 219 N. Gilbert; Iowa City
Hmmm.
Well the state historic tax credit program is certainly a possibility. We would recommend either a wood
shingle roof or an architectural grade asphalt shingle roof. If you can find a photograph documenting the
metal roof was present at the turn of the century, a metal roof would be acceptable. However, the problem
with metal roofing is the appearance. The metal roofs have very high seams and very wide ridging and
are not appropriate. The appearance should be similar to what the roof looked like either when the
structure was built or as it appeared at the turn of the century. We do not recommend elastomeric
polymer coatings. Here is information about the state historic tax credit program.
http://www . iowa history. orq/h istoric-preservation/tax -i ncentives- for -reha bil itation/state-tax-
credits/index.html
Jack Co Porter
Preservation Consultant
State Historical Society of Iowa
600 East Locust
Des Moines, IA 50319
(515) 242-6152
From: Jane Murphy [mailto:murphybk@inavia.net]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21,2010 3:14 PM
To: Porter, Jack [DCA]
Subject: Fw: Referral to you from Jack Lufkin; 219 N. Gilbert; Iowa City
Mr. Porter,
I am contacting you directly as I haven't heard anything after Paula copying you with my earlier message.
My husband and I have talked to various roofing folks and home owners here in Iowa City about metal
roofs and ours in particular. Our building dates from 1847 and apparently had wooden shakes on it
before being covered by metal early in the 19th century. The shakes are still in place. We haven't been
able to find a photo before about 1930 which shows the metal roof. Would any kind of grant money or tax
incentives depend on us going back to the shake roofing? And do you have good information on the use
of Acrymax or a similar elastomeric polymer coating which has been used here locally in recent years?
Just trying to get a picture of where we should go with this. Thanks.
1111/2010
P1!ge2 of 4
Jane Murphy
Murphy-Brookfield Books
219 N. Gilbert
Iowa City, IA 52245
----- Original Message -----
From: Mohr. Paula fOCAl
To: Jane Murphv
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 1 :08 PM
Subject: RE: Referral to you from Jack Lufkin; 219 N. Gilbert; Iowa City
Yes, we do a lot of work with Tallgrass primarily National Register nominations and surveys. They are a top
notched firm.
In order for Jack to advise you, I recommend you pull together some information first (that will be his advice
anyway). Old photos, any information on historically what was the roofing material, etc.
Paula A. Mohr, Ph.D.
State Historic Preservation Office
State Historical Society of Iowa
600 East Locust Street
Des Moines, Iowa 50319-0290
(515) 281-6826 (phone)
(515) 282-0502 (fax)
paula.mohr@iowa.gov
From: Jane Murphy [mailto:murphybk@inavia.net]
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 1:02 PM
To: Mohr, Paula [DCA]
Subject: Re: Referral to you from Jack Lufkin; 219 N. Gilbert; Iowa City
Thank you, Paula. I will look forward to hearing from Jack and try to start things at this end. I noticed Tall Grass
Historians here in IC recently--do you have any experience in working with them?
Jane
Jane Murphy
Murphy-Brookfield Books
219 N. Gilbert
Iowa City, IA 52245
----- Original Message ----
From: Mohr. Paula fOCAl
To: Jane Murphv
Cc: Porter, Jack fOCAl; Lufkin. Jack fOCAl
Sent: Monday, August 30,20108:39 AM
Subject: RE: Referral to you from Jack Lufkin; 219 N. Gilbert; Iowa City
Hello, Jane,
Yes, Jack Lufkin stopped in on Thursday to talk with us about your building. I see it is
11/112010
P/!ge 3 of 4
individually listed on the National Register and that's good!
If you haven't already, you may want to look at Preservation Brief 4 at
http://www.nps.gov/history/hps/tps/briefs/brief04.htm
Have you had a roofer do an assessment? Do you know what type of roof you want to put
on? Do you have any historic photographs to show how far back the standing seam metal
roof goes back or what the original roofing material was? I think your first question is what
type of roof is appropriate for the building. I've copied Jack Porter, our preservation
consultant on this email as he is the best person to advise you on roofing materials.
As for financial incentives, there are several possibilities:
We have a grant program called Historical Resource Development Program (HRDP) for the
rehabilitation of buildings which are listed on the National Register. The next deadline will
be May 2011. The details can be found at:
http://www jowahistory .org/ about/ grants/hrd p/index.html
Your building would also be eligible for state and federal tax credits. Here's are the basics:
State historic tax credit; 25% of the qualified rehabilitation costs (basically anything attached
to the building. Site work does not qualify). The building must listed or be determined
eligible for the National Register of Historic Places but does not actually have to be listed.
Private residences, commercial properties, properties owned by nonprofits (including
churches) qualify. The project must be a substantial rehabilitation and there is a basis test
depending on whether the building is commercial or residential. The rehabilitation work
must be done according to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. Fully
refundable and credits are transferrable. More information about the state tax credit is at:
http://www jow ahistory .org/historic- preserva tion/tax - incen tives-for- rehabili ta tion/ sta te-tax-
credits/index.h trnl
Federal historic tax credit; 20% of qualified rehabilitation costs. Only depreciable properties
qualify. Can be used with the 25% state tax credit for a total of 45%. Many of the same
requirements from the state tax credit program apply to the federal credit (thus the
groundwork laid for one can be reused for the other). The building must be eligible for the
National Register or listed. Not refundable but the credit can be carried forward and used
over 20 years. The rehabilitation work must follow the Secretary of the Interior's Standards
for Rehabilitation. Can be used with the state credit for a total of 45% of the rehabilitation
costs. http://www jowahistory .org/historic-preservation/tax -incentives-for-
rehabili ta tion/ federal-tax -credi ts.h tml
I hope that helps get you started and please let us know if we can answer any questions.
Best,
Paula Mohr
11/1/2010
Page 4 of 4
Paula A. Mohr, Ph.D.
State Historic Preservation Office
State Historical Society of Iowa
600 East Locust Street
Des Moines, Iowa 50319-0290
(515) 281-6826 (phone)
(515) 282-0502 (fax)
paula. mohr@iowa.gov
From: Jane Murphy [mailto:murphybk@inavia.net]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 11:52 AM
To: Mohr, Paula [DCA]
Subject: Referral to you from Jack Lufkin
Ms. Mohr:
Old friend Jack Lufkin said I should contact you about money issues concerning our National Register property
here in Iowa City. It is the Wentz-Stach home at 219 N. Gilbert which we have owned and used for about 25
years. As I told Jack, we know the metal roof is past ignoring and really needs to be replaced but are sure we
don't have the funds which will be involved. I have no idea how old it is, but I am positive that extensive
structural repairs will need to be made when workers peel it back. Where do I start? Thanks.
Jane
Jane Murphy
Murphy-Brookfield Books
219 N. Gilbert
Iowa City, IA 52245
11/1/2010
Jerome Thompson
Interim State Preservation Officer
State Historic Preservation Office
Iowa State Historical Building
600 East Locust Street
Des Moines, IA 50319
November 2, 2010
Dear Mr. Thompson:
I am contacting you on behalf of my neighbors regarding the recent attachment of cellular antennas
to the bell tower/cupola of Iowa City High School at 1900 Morningside Drive in Iowa City. As you
are probably aware, City High was built by the Works Progress Administration in 1938. The
exterior of the building maintains its historical integrity--it does not look dramatically different today
than it did when it was built more than seventy years ago. Those of us who live nearby take immense
pride in having such a beautiful campus in our neighborhood.
Then, as now, the main architectural feature of the City High building is its cupola. In fact, one logo
of City High, carried on bumper stickers and t-shirts, is an image of the cupola. It is quite likely the
second most recognizable architectural landmark in Iowa City after the Old Capital dome. At night,
when illuminated, it is easily visible from more than a half mile away.
Along with my neighbors, I was alarmed to see the historical integrity of the building changed by the
attachment of several prominent antenna boxes. The original decorative railing was somewhat
crudely cut apart, and tall white antenna boxes installed at each comer. One comer antenna even
lacks a box cover. This has changed the appearance and proportions of the tower and diminishes its
historical aesthetics. At night, a large, dark lollipop-shaped silhouette of one of the antenna boxes is
projected onto the cupola. Please see the attached photos (daylight only).
How did this happen, and what can be done to remedy the situation? Isn't someone at the State
Preservation Office required to review plans? If so, what rationale was given for approval? Is there a
way to appeal this decision? Who do we need to contact to get changes made to protect and restore
the building?
The Iowa City Department of Planning and the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) were
contacted for input by GSS, however they were not provided any plans for review. HPC's
assumption, I believe, was that antennas would be mounted in the interior of the building as they are
at Old Brick near the University of Iowa campus. I know that the HPC provided comment to the
State Historic Preservation Office advocating that antennas be unobtrusive and that the integrity of
the historic structure and its materials be preserved.
Please know that we are not in any way opposed to communications equipment (antennas or
monopoles) being present on City High campus or its buildings. As a city planner, I work with cell
companies on a regular basis to site facilities in Iowa City. I know that the topography of City High,
along with its public zoning designation, make it an ideal and highly sought after location for
providing coverage to Iowa City's eastside neighborhoods. It has been my experience that cell
companies are nearly always willing do whatever is asked of them in order to make their antennas or
monopoles fit into a site.
My neighbors and I are not convinced that it was necessary to diminish the ristorical integrity of the
beautiful City High cupola in order to provide cell service to the area, or that the school district or
the cell companies whose equipment is housed there were advised appropriately on how to make
their antennas fit such an important historic structure.
We hope you will provide some insight into how this error can be corrected.
Sincer~ly ,
Sarah Walz, 1813 Morningside Drive
on behalf of:
Andy Tinkham, 1813 Morningside Drive
Linda Rice and Gary Larson, 1816 Morningside Drive
Susan Oliver, 1816 East College Street
Bev and Doug Weismann, 1808 East College Street
Niki, Ron, and Sophie Neems, 1810 Morningside Drive
Leah Klevar and Mark Palmberg, 1802 East College Street
Kevin and Mary Ellen Timbs, 1825 Morningside Drive
Tom and Jean Teale, 1821 Morningside Drive
c.]. Voci and Jae Jae Spoon, 1815 Morningside Drive
c.c. Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission
Iowa City Friends of Historic Preservation
June Strand, SHPO Review and Compliance Officer
Stephen G. Sordo, AICP, Federal Communications Commission
AfTE~
'I'
I
.-,,"
~
I~'
I! ~I
\\\\\\ \ \\
~
1\11 SIZeS I ens CUpOla as cell tower I 1'llCKr - ynoto ~narmg!
Page 1 01"2
flickr~,.ygJoO!
You aren't signed In Sign In Help
Upload
I Search
AfThR
Home The Tour Sign Up Explore
Photo I All sizes
License
All rights reserved by heet_myser
Download
The owner has disabled downloading of their photos
Sizes
Square
(75 x 75)
Thumbnail
(77 x 100)
Small
(185 x 240)
Medium 500
(386 x 500)
Medium 640
(494 x 640)
Large
(791 x 1024)
Looking for the HTML code and photo file link? Check out thiS F AQ.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/heet_myser/5048994917/sizes/l/in/set-72157624965176185/ 10/25/2010
IIistoric Preservation
4101'
11EMORANDUM
Date: November 10, 2010
To: Historic Preservation Commission
From: Christina Kuecker, Associate Planner
Re: Certificates of No Material Effect, Intermediate Reviews, and Minor Reviews
The recently adopted Historic Preservation Handbook requires a report to the HPC at each meeting of any
projects that have been approved administratively. Below are the projects approved since the September
meetmg.
Certificates of No Material Effect - Chair and Staff review
1. none
Intermediate Review - Chair and Staff review
1. none
Minor Review - Pre-approved items - Staff review
1. none
Alterations to previously approved COA
1. 1610 Center Ave - (Contributing, Dearborn Street Conservation District) - Chair and Staff
approval for design of previously approved front stoop.
MINUTES
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
OCTOBER 14,2010
EMMAJ. HARVATHALL
PRELIMINARY
MEMBERS PRESENT: Kent Ackerson, Esther Baker, Thomas Baldridge, Andrew Litton, Pam Michaud, Dana
Thomann, Alicia Trimble, Frank Wagner
MEMBERS ABSENT: William Downing, David McMahon, Ginalie Swaim
STAFF PRESENT: Christina Kuecker
OTHERS PRESENT: Greg Allen, Helen Burford, Cecile Kuenzli, John Roffman, Matt Roffman, Jeff
Schabilion
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (become effective only after separate Council action)
None.
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Trimble called the meeting to order at 5: 17 p.m.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA:
There was none.
CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS:
614 Iowa Avenue.
Kuecker said this is an application for a porch alteration. She said there are currently two stairways leading onto the
porch, and it appears as though some portion of the porch was removed at one point. Kuecker said the applicant
would like to remove the two staircases and build one staircase that lines up with the stairs that come from the
sidewalk, which is probably where it was historically, given the style of the house and the rest of the layout.
Kuecker said staff feels the centrally located stair would be more appropriate. She said that when this is done, the
owner will have to replace the handrail to make it meet code. Kuecker said she was concerned that the new handrail
would end up being taller than the pier portion of the column. She said it is the same height on the drawing
submitted, but she was not confident that the drawing is to scale. Kuecker said if it doesn't line up as shown in the
drawing, then the owner will have to produce a different handrail alteration.
Kuecker said staff recommends approval as submitted in the application, with the condition that the new rail tie into
the stone pier portion of the column and be constructed to appear similar to the existing historic porch railing, not
the railing on the stairs. She stated that if the railing is taller than the stone pier portion of the column, an alternative
railing design may be approved by staff.
Wagner said, looking at the way the railing is now, it might have to go higher to meet code. Kuecker confirmed that
it is going to have to go higher, but she did not know how much higher. She said it only has to be 36 inches high,
because this is a duplex. Kuecker said that when a railing is removed, the Building Department will require one that
meets code be put back.
Kuecker said there should be a way to design a handrail that still looks appropriate with the piers and the porch.
Kuecker said the other part of the application is that the applicant plans to change the doors from a flat plane to a
paneled door. She said it will have a half light.
MOTION: Baker moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the application for 614 Iowa Avenue
as presented, with the condition that the new railing tie into the stone pier portion of the column and be
constructed to appear similar to the existing historic porch railing, not the railing on the stairs. If the railing
Historic Preservation Commission
October 14,2010
Page 2
is taller than the stone pier portion of the column, an appropriate railing design may be approved by staff.
Wagner seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0 (Downine:. McMahon. and Swaim absent).
512 North Van Buren Street.
Kuecker said this application is for a porch alteration. She said the applicant is requesting alterations to the front
porch and the rear porch. Kuecker said the front porch has quite a bit of water damage. She said the owners think
they will be able to save the majority of the column, but the top and bottom may need to be reconstructed.
Kuecker said the owners plan to repair as much as possible but are afraid that once they get into the substructure of
the roof, they will find it to be beyond repair. She said if the owners are going to rebuild the entire roof, they would
like to put a steeper pitch on it to avoid the water damage that it currently has. Kuecker showed a mockup of
approximately what the porch roof would look like.
Kuecker said the owners would also be un-enclosing the porch and restoring it to its original appearance. She said
that the railings are still there under the siding. Kuecker said the porch floor and the bead board ceiling would either
be reused or replicated. She said the owners plan to reuse as much material as possible, including the portion of the
columns that can be salvaged. Kuecker said if it is found that the one column in the corner is beyond repair, the
owners feel they won't be able to match it and would like the option to use three columns that match.
Regarding the rear roof, Kuecker said the owners know that the rafters are compressed and have quite a bit of water
damage. She said the owners are requesting to rebuild the roof portion of the rear porch as well, again putting it at a
higher pitch to allow for adequate drainage.
Kuecker said that, in general, the guidelines do not allow for the alteration of porch roof pitches. She said, however,
that the new guidelines have a section stating that if the applicant can show there is a moisture problem, the
Commission can consider, on a case by case basis, alteration to a roof. Kuecker said she has visited the property and
can vouch for the amount of decay that is present. She showed a picture demonstrating the amount of decay on the
front porch and the way the porch columns are starting to collapse on themselves.
Kuecker said staff is recommending approval of this as presented in the application with the conditions that the
applicant reuse the wood columns if possible, but if it is found that the wood columns are deteriorated beyond reuse,
the deterioration must be presented to staff, and staff must approve the fiberglass columns; and all other porch
details being replicated with like materials or reusing original materials.
Michaud said she has a house with windows touching the top of a porch roof and therefore has a concern about snow
piling up. Michaud said it can be a concern. Kuecker said she believes the owners are planning to leave some space.
She said she would verify that. Kuecker said this is one of the UniverCity homes that the City has purchased to
rehab and resell.
MOTION: Michaud moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the application for 512 North Van
Buren Street as presented in the application with the following conditions: the applicant reusing the wood
columns, but if it is found that the wood columns are deteriorated beyond reuse, the deterioration must be
presented to staff, and staff must approve the fiberglass columns; and all other porch details being replicated
with like materials or reusing original materials. Litton seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of
8-0 (Downin2. McMahon. and Swaim absent).
911 East Washington Street.
Kuecker said this is an application for siding and window replacement. She said the applicant has proposed to
replace siding with aluminum siding and replace the windows with vinyl windows. Kuecker said the guidelines
disallow the installation of vinyl windows on contributing properties unless they are original to the building, and the
guidelines also disallow the application of synthetic siding, including aluminum siding, on contributing properties.
Kuecker said that, in staffs opinion, the installation of vinyl windows and the application of aluminum siding would
not be appropriate for this property. She added that, upon visual inspection by staff, the siding seems to be in
repairable condition. Kuecker said there is peeling paint that has been neglected for some time; however, there is not
Historic Preservation Commission
October 14,2010
Page 3
a substantial amount of decay on the siding to justify this replacement. She said there are decaying and neglected
storm windows, so it was difficult to assess the condition of the windows themselves.
Kuecker said staff finds that the proposal does not meet the guidelines for siding. She said that rather than the
application of aluminum siding, the guidelines indicate that the existing siding should be repaired. Kuecker said staff
also finds that the applicant has not provided evidence that the windows are deteriorated to the extent that warrants
replacement. She said that if replacement was deemed to be warranted, the proposed vinyl windows do not comply
with the guidelines, and staff recommends that both the siding and the window application be denied.
John Roffman asked if the guidelines and formulations written in the last four years were rewritten as far as the
overlaying/distinguishing the actual historic district. He said it is his understanding that about four years ago, staff
was in touch with other communities to see what they had done regarding guidelines in an overlay zone versus a
historic district and was going to come up with criteria to distinguish the two.
Kuecker replied that the guidelines were recently rewritten and were adopted by the City Council in September. She
said there is a distinguishing now between a conservation overlay and a historic district overlay. Kuecker said this
property is in a conservation district, so there are some exceptions and other guidelines for properties in
conservation districts. John Roffman said that he would like to get a copy of the new guidelines to see how they
apply. Kuecker responded that the staff report on this property was written to comply with the new guidelines. She
said the Guidelines are available to download for free or to purchase from the City for the cost of printing.
John Roffman said the siding would actually be steel siding. He said he has enough from another project to complete
this one.
Michaud asked about the siding deterioration and the possible use of hardi-plank. Kuecker said she did not see
enough deterioration to even justify the hardi-plank or the removal of historic material.
MOTION; Ackerson moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the application for 911 East
Washington Street for the siding and window replacement project as presented in the application. Michaud
seconded the motion. The motion failed on a vote of 0-8 (Downine:. McMahon. and Swaim absent).
915 East Washington Street.
Kuecker stated that this is an application for a garage demolition. She said the house that previously existed on the
property was destroyed in 1996, but the garage remains. Kuecker said the applicant proposes to demolish the garage.
Kuecker said the guidelines state that the demolition of outbuildings will be made on a case by case basis, with the
Commission considering the integrity, condition, and architectural significance of the outbuilding. She said staff
feels the condition and location of this garage do not contribute to the character of the neighborhood, and the
demolition will have minimal impact on the property or the district. Kuecker said staff recommends approval.
MOTION: Baker moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the application for the demolition of a
garage at 915 East Washington Street as presented in the application. Ackerson seconded the motion. The
motion carried on a vote of 8-0 (Downine:. McMahon. and Swaim absent).
Greg Allen. the owner of 614 Iowa Avenue. requested for the Commission to reopen the hearing and consideration
of the application for 614 Iowa Avenue.
MOTION: Baker moved to reopen the hearing regarding the consideration of the certificate of
appropriateness for the application for 614 Iowa Avenue. Wagner seconded the motion. The motion carried
on a vote of 8-0 (Downine:. McMahon. and Swaim absent).
Allen said that the staff report pointed out a possible issue regarding the railing, because it needs to be 36 inches
high. He asked if the Commission did anything to address that.
Historic Preservation Commission
October 14, 2010
Page 4
Kuecker said she was uncertain where 36 inches hits on the column and left the option open to staff approval. Allen
said he looked at every railing in every historic district in town, and the only solution he could come up with was to
add a row of blocks to the stone pier portion of the column. He said the railing will attach to the column the same
way it does now. He said he wanted to know if it would be okay to add one row of blocks to just make the columns
taller to accommodate the taller railing.
Allen said he did find at King's Building Materials a facing that matches those dimple-faced blocks. He said he
could use smaller blocks and then face it with that so it could match. Allen asked if someone had an idea where he
could find those old blocks.
Allen said he is open to suggestions. He said that right now the railing is at 30 inches so that another six inches
would be required. Allen said he would love to have a simpler solution, but he came up with what he believes will
look the best in the long run.
Baker asked if the piece that is at the top of the stone part of the pillar is also stone. Allen confirmed this. He said
that eight inches would put it two inches under the stone so that it would line up about where it is now.
Allen said the other issue is the recommendation to have the porch extended back over to that other pillar, because it
was probably that way originally. He said he would like to do that and agreed that it was probably that way
originally. Kuecker said that would be the most historically appropriate thing to do, and she would recommend
approval.
Wagner asked about, instead of raising the rail, lowering the deck of the porch four inches. Allen said he had
thought of that. He said there is about a two-inch step now out of the door. Allen said that he is concerned about the
safety issues of a drop of anything more than four inches.
Wagner said that when the cap comes off, one could put an eight-inch block on top of that and put the cap back
down. Allen said it will look exactly the same, except the stone portion will be taller and the wood portion will be a
little bit shorter.
Allen said the only other reasonable thing he came up with that would work would be to run the board through like
it is, cut slots in it, and then put the balusters, which would be wider and flatter, up through. He said then one would
put a little tulip on the end of each one. Allen said he could get 36 inches by doing that all the way over to the sides.
He said he did one of those, and it was the only way to get up above that brace and not have it look funny. Allen said
that if the Commission would approve the block, then he would do that. He said that otherwise he would pursue the
tulip option further.
MOTION: Baker moved to amend the certificate of appropriateness for the application for 614 Iowa Avenue
to include the option of restoring the porch to its full length, as would be historically appropriate, and adding
an additional row of block to the stone pier of the columns to raise the cap to allow for the 36-inch railing to
meet code. Wagner seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0 (Downine:. McMahon. and
Swaim absent).
MOTION: Wagner moved to amend the agenda order to consider Historic Preservation Awards at this point
in the meeting. Thomann seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0 (Downine:. McMahon. and
Swaim absent).
SELECTION OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION AWARDS:
Kuecker referred to the properties that were nominated for historic preservation awards. She cited the photographs
and said the staff feels all of them are appropriate to receive awards, but it is open for Commission discussion.
Kuecker said there are about 25 properties. She discussed the properties individually and their eligibility for the
awards.
Burford asked Kuecker if she had considered nominating any of the University houses. Kuecker said she discussed it
with other staff, and the consensus was to possibly present a bigger award next year for the entire project when most
Historic Preservation Commission
October 14,2010
Page 5
of the properties in the two-year program are completed or well in progress. Kuenzli suggested there might be a
bigger benefit to recognize the properties individually.
The consensus was to give awards recognizing the house on South Governor and the house on Muscatine.
MOTION: Wagner moved to approve historic preservation awards for the proposed properties plus the two
University properties, as discussed. Baldridge seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0
(Downing, McMahon, and Swaim absent).
Kuecker stated that the Margaret Nowysz was the first Chair of the Historic Preservation Commission, and
occasionally there is a person deserving of a unique award named after Nowysz. She stated that she and Burford
have discussed awarding that honor to Alice Kurtz at Weber Elementary for her efforts in historic preservation
education. Burford said that Kurtz is retiring this year. Burford added that Kurtz has been responsible for
establishing the critical Iowa Historic Education Program in which countless students have learned how to improve
architecture, how to understand history, and something about the uniqueness of Iowa City.
MOTION: Baker moved to approve the presentation of the Margaret Nowysz Award to Alice Kurtz. Litton
seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0 (Downine:. McMahon. and Swaim absent).
Consideration of Pre-Approved Items.
Kuecker said that the new guidelines changed the minor review to allow for the Commission to vote on items that
could be pre-approved. She said there can be conditions attached to the vote. Kuecker said if someone comes with a
specific item, as long as it is on the list of the Commission's pre-approved items, she can sign off on it without
having to contact the chair or bring it before the Commission.
Kuecker said these items had been typically approved with a certificate of no material effect on a fairly regular
basis, or they involve something that has received unanimous consent from the Commission every time it was
brought forward. She said she will continuously bring these items before the Commission as they come up.
Radon Mitigation Systems.
Kuecker said requests for the installation of radon mitigation systems are becoming more and more common. She
said staff recommends approval of the installation of these systems as a pre-approved item eligible for minor review
if they are located on a non-street facing elevation and on the rear of the property if possible and if the exposed
equipment and pipe are painted to match the structure.
MOTION: Wagner moved to approve placing radon mitigation systems on the list of pre-approved items
eligible for a minor review if installation of these systems is located on a non-street facing elevation and on the
rear of the property if possible and if the exposed equipment and pipe are painted to match the structure.
Baldridge seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0 (Downine:. McMahon. and Swaim
absent).
Windows.
Kuecker said staff is recommending pre-approval of the windows listed on the slides shown provided the following
conditions are met when the application is made: the applicant must demonstrate deterioration of the existing
windows; the new windows being of the same type and size as the existing windows and matching the sash width,
trim, use of divided lights and overall appearance of the historic windows; and any divided lights may be either true
divided lights or created with muntin bars adhered to both sides of the glass but not with snap-in muntin bars; and if
egress windows are required, a casement window that retains the appearance of the original window may be
approved by minor review. She said that a change in the window size would be forwarded to the higher level of
review.
Historic Preservation Commission
October 14,2010
Page 6
Kuecker described the brands and lines of windows that she is bringing forward as minor review items, starting with
the Windsor Pinnacle Series. She said they have solid wood and metal clad wood. Kuecker said that if divided lights
are required, they have to use the Windsor light, which is the muntin bar adhered to both sides of the glass.
Kuecker said any product from the Adams Architectural Millwork is acceptable, as they are solid wood windows
custom made for each property. She said that if they have divided lights, they are true divided lights.
Kuecker stated that Pella has three lines that meet the requirements, starting with the Architect series, which is solid
wood, or metal clad solid wood. She said that if divided lights are required to be used, the integral light technology
grills need to be used. Kuecker said the Designer series is metal clad solid wood. She said the only option for grills
is between the glass, so that with that series, one would have to use the one over one. She said the Pella Proline is a
metal clad solid wood, and if there are divided lights, they need to be the permanent, simulated divided light grill.
Kuecker said that Marvin Windows makes an ultimate line of windows with a tilt-pack sash replacement. She said
these are solid wood or metal clad solid wood windows. Kuecker said that if divided lights are required, it needs to
be the simulated divided light. She said they are both adhered to both sides of the glass, but one has a bar between
the two panes of glass, and the other one doesn't.
She said that Kolbe Ultra Series, Classic Series, and Heritage Series are metal clad solid wood and solid wood, and
if they are going to have divided lights, they either need the performance divided light or a true divided light.
Kuecker also included the JeldWen Sight Line EX, which is the solid wood or metal clad solid wood simulated
divided light; Tradition Plus, which is solid wood or metal clad simulated divided light; or the Custom, which is the
solid wood, metal clad, custom made windows with the simulated divided light.
Kuecker said she feels these windows meet the guidelines and are appropriate for historic structures.
MOTION: Michaud moved to approve placing the list of historically appropriate windows on the list of pre-
approved items eligible for minor review if they meet the following conditions: the applicant must
demonstrate deterioration of the existing windows; the new windows being of the same type and size as the
existing windows and matching the sash width, trim, use of divided lights and overall appearance of the
historic windows; and any divided lights may be either true divided lights or created with muntin bars
adhered to both sides of the glass but not with snap-in muntin bars; and if egress windows are required, a
casement window that retains the appearance of the original window may be approved. Wagner seconded the
motion. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0 (Downinl!:. McMahon. and Swaim absent).
Decks.
Kuecker recommended that new deck construction be a pre-approved item eligible for minor review if the following
conditions are met: the new deck is located on the rear of the structure and is set back at least eight inches from any
sidewall; the deck is attached to the building in a manner that will not damage a historic exterior wall or other
historic materials; and the railing design meets the pre-approved conditions.
Michaud asked if that means the attachment will be gapped so that there will not be snow stuck in the comer.
Kuecker responded that it means that when the owner attaches the deck to the house, he will not damage the siding
or windows; it will just usually be attaching the deck to the sill plate of the house. Michaud asked if the railing
would then just be freestanding, and Kuecker confirmed this. She said there will be a hole that goes to the sill, but
she would not consider that permanent damage to the structure.
MOTION: Wagner moved to approve placing the construction of new decks on the list of pre-approved items
eligible for minor review if they meet the following conditions: the new deck is located on the rear of the
structure and is set back at least eight inches from any sidewall; the deck is attached to the building in a
manner that will not damage a historic, exterior wall or other historic materials; and the railing design meets
the pre-approved conditions. Baldridge seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0 (Downinl!:.
McMahon. and Swaim absent).
Historic Preservation Commission
October 14,2010
Page 7
Siding Replacement.
Kuecker said this is more of a question. She said that siding has been listed in the handbook as possibly being a pre-
approved item. Kuecker asked, however, if there is any situation where the Commission would not feel it necessary
to review siding replacement.
Wagner said that there could be a case, such as the application for Washington Street, where the use of fiber cement
board could ruin the style and look of a building. He said that would be the only concern he would have in the pre-
approval of fiber cement board.
Trimble said the only time she would be really comfortable with this is for someone coming before the Commission
to replace damaged siding who wants to replace it with the same material. Kuecker asked about someone removing
synthetic siding and the possibility of pre-approving the use of fiber cement board.
The consensus of the Commission was to not place siding on the list of pre-approved items at this time.
Railings.
Kuecker said staff recommends including as a pre-approved item eligible for minor review the railing as shown in
the elevation in the Commission's packet if the following conditions are met: the house is of simple ornamentation
or the balusters being changed to match the style of the house; if the railing is for a rear deck, the simple square
spindles are appropriate for any style of house; if replacing an existing railing, the applicant must make a case for
the replacement of the historic rail, such as evidence of substantial decay or a requirement to meet current building
code standards.
Ackerson asked about the right-hand panel. Kuecker replied that it is showing that there actually has to be a bottom
rail and a top rail with spindles in between. She said there are different ways people can do this, and all three of the
panels show an appropriate way.
MOTION: Michaud moved to approve placing railings on the list of pre-approved items eligible for minor
review if they meet the following conditions: the house is of simple ornamentation or the balusters being
changed to match the style of the house; if the railing is for a rear deck, the simple square spindles are
appropriate for any style of house; if replacing an existing railing, the applicant must make a case for the
replacement of the historic rail, such as evidence of substantial decay or a requirement to meet current
building code standards. Baker seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0 (Downinl!,
McMahon, and Swaim absent).
Garages/Outbuildings.
Kuecker stated that staff recommends approving garages and outbuildings as a pre-approved item eligible for minor
review if the following conditions are met: the garage or outbuilding is located at the rear of the property, behind the
primary structure; the garage or outbuilding is accessed via an alley or an already existing curb cut/driveway; if the
garage is a two-car garage, two single-car garage doors being used; and the garage/outbuilding design being similar
to and incorporating the elements of the designs shown in the Commission's packet.
Kuecker said the designs show the following: a shingle roof with the style and pitch compatible with the primary
structure; a gable vent or window if the roof has a gable; trim, corner boards, or mitered corners to match the
primary structure, and frieze boards must be present; single garage doors either simple in design or of compatible
style; and lap siding - three to five inch reveal is typical, but should match the primary structure, wood or fiber
cement board (synthetic siding may be used in conservation districts), and if the primary structure does not have lap
siding, the outbuilding may match the primary structure or be lap siding with three to five-inch reveal.
Kuecker said if the garage/outbuilding does not meet these requirements, then the application would come before the
Commission. Male asked if windows on garages would then be treated the same as on the house. Kuecker confirmed
this. She said the applicant can do something different, but it would have to come before the Commission or before
chair and staff for property in a conservation district.
Historic Preservation Commission
October 14, 2010
Page 8
MOTION: Wagner moved to approve placing garages/outbuildings on the list of pre-approved items eligible
for minor review if the following conditions are met: the garage or outbuilding is located at the rear of the
property, behind the primary structure; the garage or outbuilding is accessed via an alley or an already
existing curb cut/driveway; if the garage is a two-car garage, two single-car garage doors being used; and the
garage/outbuilding design being similar to and incorporating the elements of the designs shown in the
Commission's packet. The designs show the following elements: a shingle roof with the style and pitch
compatible with the primary structure; a gable vent or window if the roof has a gable; trim, corner boards, or
mitered corners to match the primary structure, and frieze boards must be present; single garage doors
either simple in design or of compatible style; and lap siding - three to five inch reveal is typical, but should
match the primary structure, wood or fiber cement board (synthetic siding may be used in conservation
districts), and if the primary structure does not have lap siding, the outbuilding may match the primary
structure or be lap siding with three to five-inch reveal. Baker seconded the motion. The motion carried on a
vote of 8-0 (Downinl!. McMahon. and Swaim absent).
CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 9.2010.
MOTION: Baker moved to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission's September 9, 2010
meeting, as written. Baldridge seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0 (Downing, McMahon. and
Swaim absent).
DISCUSSION OF CITY PARK. LOG CABINS:
Kuecker said she is working with the Parks and Recreation Commission to secure a Technical Advisory Network
(TAN) grant to get an opinion regarding eligibility on the cabins. She said that would allow the City to apply for
grants or other funding associated with being eligible for the National Register. Kuecker said the cabins might not be
eligible, because they are replica log cabins and were never used as homes, but that is being looked into as part of
the process.
Kuecker said the cabins were once used for the Johnson County Historical Society's summer camps but are now in a
state of disrepair. She said that the Parks and Recreation Commission is looking for some volunteers to help
winterize the cabins to slow the decay. Kuecker asked anyone interested in volunteering for winterizing the cabins
or helping with the grant writing to let her know.
OTHER:
Kuecker stated that in every Commission packet, there will be a memo discussing any items that did not come
before the Commission.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
Minutes submitted by Anne Schulte
Z
o
m
m
:E
:EO
00::
uO
zU
OW
_0::
~wo
>uo
o::ZN
w<
mO
wZ
o::W
0.1=
u<
0::
o
....
m
J:
0)
-
N
.....
.....
.....
-
.....
.....
~ LU LU LU
..... X X X I X X I X X X
- - I -- I --
0 0 I 0 I 0
.....
0) X X X LU I X X X I LU X X LU
-- -- I I -- --
0) 0 I I 0 0
N LU I I LU
..... X X X -- I X X X I X -- X X
-- 0 I I 0
co
co X X X LU I X LU X I X LU X X
- -- I -- I --
I"'- 0 I 0 I 0
0 LU LU I I LU I
..... -- X X -- I I -- X I X X X X
(Q 0 0 I I 0 I
l"'- I I LU I LU LU
N X X X X I I -- X I -- -- X X
- I I 0 I 0 0
It)
('I) I I I LU
..... X X X X I I X X I X ....... X X
- I I I 0
It)
co X X X X X I X X I LU X X X
~ I I .......
I I 0
..... I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
..... I I
....... I Z Z Z Z I Z Z Z Z Z Z Z
('I)
..... LU LU I LU LU LU
..... I X X X X X X
I ....... ....... I -- ....... --
....... I 0 0 I 0 0 0
N
~ I LU I LU
..... I ....... X X X I X ....... X X X X X
....... I 0 I 0
.....
~
>< C") ..- N C") ..- ..- ..- N 0 N ..- C") N
W ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..-
-- -- -- ....... ....... ....... -- -- ....... -- -- ....... --
:E 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0)
N N ~ ~ N N N N ~ ~ N N N
0:: -- ....... -- -- -- -- -- -- .......
w C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C")
....
m
< ~
.... :E == 0
Z 0 0:: m ~ w < < ~
W J: ...J 0 W m Z u Z
~ .... W ...J Z 0:: :E :J < <
J: == < W < :J
W .... :J 0 0 :f 0 0::
Z m Z 0. Z < LL
0 C) W C) en < Z C ..., C) Z W ~
m 0 Z ~ 0 :J Z
0:: 0:: ~ Z Z J: 6 :E < ...J W
W W 0 W Z < 0 < < .... :E In Z
:E ~ ...J ~ == In .... :E J: Z < 0 :E ~
< U < < 0 :J .... v U 0 == J: 0::
Z < In In 0 w :J :E :E 0. m .... ....
E
2
o
::J
,,0
Ol 0
~z ....
~0>J5
W:SE
:;:'OlOl
C::Ol"""
'E-OlE":=
Ol c:: en co
en~<(,Qo_
Ol,Q zo
O:<(III1Z
II II b!:!::2: II
XOOZ
;>;
W
~