Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-10-2011 Historic Preservation Commission IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Thursday, March 10, 2011 City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street Lobby Conference Room 6:00 p.m. A) Call to Order B) Public discussion of anything not on the agenda C) Certificate of Appropriateness 1. Brewery Square 2. 904 Bowery Street D) Consideration of minutes for February 10, 2011 E) Other F) Adjournment Staff Report March 10,2011 Historic Review for Brewery Square (Economy Advertising Company & Union Brewery) District: NA dassification: Local Landmark The applicant, Iowa Oty Press Otizen, is requesting approval for a proposed alteration project at Brewery Square (123 N Linn Street), two Iowa Oty Local Landmarks. The project consists of the installation of three signs on the building. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines: 10. {} T/;e Secreta!)' o/t/;e /ntenors Standards fir /re/;abilitatlon Staff' Comments Brewery Square is comprised of two local historic landmarks, the Economy Advertising Company building at 119-123 N Linn St and the Union Brewery at 127 - 131 N Linn Street and 221 - 227 E Market Street. The Economy Advertising Company building is a simple architectural design sometimes referred to as a "Commercial Brick" or "Modem-Broad Front" style. The Union Brewery is a two story Italianate commercial building, with a comer entrance. The applicant is proposing to install three signs on the second floor of the building. Sign # 1 is located on the southern portion of the east f~ade, between the bottom of the second story windows and the first story awning. This sign is proposed to be cut out metal letters that spell out "Iowa Oty Press Otizen". The letters will be backlit at night. Signs # 2 & # 3 are located on the northeast comer of the building, one on the north fa<;:ade and one on the east f~ade. These signs are proposed to be rectangular wooden signs with the PC Media logo. The signs will be externally lit from above by a goose neck light. The Iowa Oty Historic Preservation Guidelines do not address signage and commercial buildings. When this is the case, the Commission must consult the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. In general, the standards say that alterations should be compatible with the historic architecture of the building and should use historic materials. In Staff's opinion, sign # 1 (southern portion of east f~ade) is of a scale, location, and material that is appropriate for the building. However, Staff believes that there is something amiss about signs # 2 & # 3. While the material and scale seem appropriate, these signs do not appear to be compatible with the historic character of the building. Staff did a mockup of a few alternative options for these signs. The first simply changes the background color from white to cream. The second eliminates the light fixture. In staff's opinion, these changes allow the signs to blend with the historic character of the building. /recommended NotIon Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 123 N Linn Street as presented in the application with the following conditions: · The background color of the wooden signs being a cream color, similar to the background color on the La James signage on the first level of the building · The lighting for the light being incorporated into the soffits of the building, rather than a gooseneck light fixture -~~------'---~--<~~-,.^-.,"-,~~-- Application for Historic Review For Staff use: Application for alterations to the historic landmarks or properties located in a historic district or conservation district pursuant to Iowa City Code Section 14-4C. Guidelines for the Historic Review process, explanation of the process and regulations can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation Handbook, which is available in the PCD office at City Hall or online at: www.icgov.org/HPhandbook Date submitted: L 1 1--'11 1,0 l\ o Certificate of No Material Effect \B-.Certificate of Appropriateness D((Major review CJ Intermediate Review D Minor review The HPC does not review applications for compliance with building and zoning codes. Work must comply with all appropriate codes and be reviewed by the building division prior to the issuance of a building permit. Meeting Schedule: The HPC meets the second Thursday of each month. During the summer months, the HPC may also meet on the fourth Thursday. Applications are due in the PCD office by noon on Thursday two weeks prior to the meeting. See attached document for applicationd~a~h~esand meetin~dates. PrQpertY ..O\V!ler/~ppljca.ll~llJ.fortPati()l1 (Please check. primary cqntactperson) ~ Property Owner Name: Iowa City Press-Citizen (Chris Hayes) Phone Number: (319) Email: chayes((iJiowacity.gannett.com 887-5419 Address: 1725 N. Dodge St. City: Iowa City State: IA Zip Code: 52245 D Contractor / Consultant Name: Email: Phone Number: ( Address: City: State: Zip Code: Proposed Project Information Address: 123 N. Linn St. Suite 2E Use of Property: Newspaper Date Constructed (if known): Historic Designation (Maps are located in the Historic Preservation Handbook) ~ This property is a local historic landmark. OR D This Property is within a historic or conservation district (choose location): D Brown Street Historic District D College Green Historic District D East College Street Historic District D Longfellow Historic District D Woodlawn Historic District D Clark Street Conservation District D College Hill Conservation District D Dearborn Street Conservation District D Summit Street Historic District D Northside Historic District D Governor-Lucas Street Conservation District Within the district, this property is classified as: D Contributing D Noncontributing D Nonhistoric "_ _....~."^m,,__~~_.--.,.._,__~._,_...~,,~__ Application Requirements Choose appropriate project type. In order to ensure application can be processed, please include all listed materials. Applications without necessary materials may be rejected. o Addition (Typically projects entailing an addition to the building footprint such as a room, porch, deck, etc.) D Building Elevations 0 Floor Plans D Photographs D Product Information D Site Plans ~ Alteration (Typically projects entailing work such as siding and window replacement, skylights, window opening alterations, deck or porch replacementlconstruction, baluster repair, or similar. If the project is a minor alteration, photographs and drawings to describe the scope of the project are sufficient.) D Building Elevations o Construction of new building D Building Elevations D Product Information o Demolition (Projects entailing the demolition of a primary structure or outbuilding, or any portion of a building, such as porch, chimney, decorative trim, baluster, etc.) D Photographs D Proposal of Future Plans o Repair or restoration of an existing structure that will not change its appearance. D Photographs D Product Information o Other: Please contact the Preservation Planner at 356-5243 for materials which need to be included with application. ~ Photographs D Product Information D D Floor Plans Site Plans D Photographs Pr()posed Pl"oject Details Proiect Description: Adding Signage to the outside of the Brewery Square building for the Iowa City Press-Citizen. Materials to be Used: For the signage on the east facing, south end of the building we would be using metal lettering. For the signage on the north east comer of the building, we will be using wooden signs of our logo with antique style lamps above the signs for lighting purposes. Exterior Appearance Ctlanl.!:es: Attached photo shows purposed signage for the east facing, south side sign and the signage for the north east corner of the building. The east facing south side sign would be black metal lettering raised off the side of the building, which would be backlite at night. The north east corner of the building would have two wooden signs, one on the east facing wall and one on the north facing wall. There would be an antique style lamp directly above each sign that will light the signs at night. Ppdadm/histpres/appforhistoricrev - lillin.doc 23 N Linn St. Daytime ftt' . . . ~~ ..:;~~.~ - .: ....:;..~. .:1,- 1"41~'!:"" ,....._____ ~ ~'IM"V" -~,-,-,~~-",.,-"-,._,-".~,_,__"._,"".",.,.._"_~K_'~"<_~~_~_-"'_"'~'__"_ Staff Report Historic Review for 904 Bowery Street District: Governor Lucas Street Conservation District dassification: Contributing The applicant, UniverOty Neighborhood Partnership, is requesting approval for a proposed alteration project at 904 Bowery Street, a contributing property in the Governor Lucas Street Conservation District. The project consists of alterations to the garage door, replacement of the side/front door, and shortening of a window in the kitchen. March 10,2011 Applicable Regulations and Guidelines: 1'. {} /owa Oiy His tone Pn'sermtlon Guidelines fir Alterat/ons 4.3 Doors 4.5 Foundations 4.13 Wmdows Stq!7Comments This house is highly concealed from street view by trees. It is of a simple vernacular design. The main entrance faces to the east, not onto the street. The applicant is proposing three projects that affect the exterior of the property. The first is the removal of the basement garage door. There is not a fire separation between the garage area and the rest of the house, thus using this space as a garage would be dangerous to the inhabitants of the house. The applicant would like to keep a pedestrian door entrance to the basement in this location and has presented two alternatives. The guidelines recommend that the size, shape, and location of foundation openings be retained. In Staff's opinion the foundation garage opening is a defining architectural feature of this home and marks a point in history. Staff feels that the appearance of a garage opening should be maintained and that both options provided by the applicant would be appropriate. The other projects include replacement of the side/ front door and removal of a window and replacing with a shorter window in order to facilitate a kitchen remodel. The applicant has not decided on a specific door but is looking at a simply designed door with a half light. The guidelines allow for the replacement of windows and doors, but in general recommends for new windows and doors to retain the size of the existing windows unless required for egress. However, the Commission has approved window alterations when necessary to improve functionality. In order to improve the appearance and desirability of this house, a kitchen remodel is proposed, thus the applicant is proposing a shorter window to allow for a counter to be installed. In Staff's opinion, the changes to the windows and doors are compatible with the historic nature of this house, provided the doors and windows are replaced with ones that match the nature of the house. Given that the changes window and side/ front door are not on the street facing elevation, the impact to the historic integrity will be minimal. /recommended NotIon Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 904 Bowery Street as presented in the application with the following conditions: · The applicant having the option to use either alternative for the foundation opening; · The final door specifications to be approved by Staff; and · The new window retaining the appearance of the historic windows and being either solid wood or metal clad solid wood. '~'_M..-~~..'._~~._~,~,__,-",-,~~,.OY_"_~_~,,_,____ j ~ i --= -14' !~aii~'t ~...... ~~.~ -- CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: March 2, 2011 To: Christina Kuecker, Associate Planner From: David Powers, Housing Rehabilitation Specialist 904 Bowery Re: The home at 904 Bowery has been purchased through the City's UniverCity Neighborhood Partnership for rehab and resale as affordable owner occupied housing. This home will have foundation stabilization and grading work done with some service walks being redone, HVAC improvements, kitchen, and plaster repairs made as well as refinishing of all the hardwood floors in the home. On the exterior the soffits and fascia will be repaired, scraped, and repainted. All repairs will match the existing trim and crown details. The overhead door that opens onto Governor St needs to be addressed and there are two proposals for this opening. Currently the door opens into part of the basement without any fire separation between this space and the rest of the home. It cannot legally be used as a garage and it makes the basement very cold and prone to intrusion by mice and other animals. We will replace both the front and back doors with relatively simply designed ~ and % lite paneled doors. While working with the kitchen designer drawing the new layout for the cabinets and appliances in the small kitchen, we found that the best design for working with our limited space required us to change the size of one window on the north side wall of the home to allow for cabinets and countertops beneath it. The window would be reduced in height approximately six inches. The new window will match the existing window in appearance. All materials would be subject to your review and approval and we request the Historic Preservation Commission's approval for our plan. )#J ~QlLdO ...... -i ( ~ \- ~ (> ~ <t' o ~ 'C) \,L ""t "" >-..$ ~, ~ .... ...., ~~.... -. '-'-~~~~--~~---~-----""""--""""""-'---"--'"'.~------. C/) Q) ro..o Q)"O~ ..o:J~Q) +-'o>-~ CO ::> - ro ::> 2 c ~ ~ E ~ o 0 '- ..c s"O~C/) -r. Q) ~ C/) '-' Q.. ro c E Q.. ro '+- ro ~ Q)oQ)o-r. - Q....o 0 '-' ~o"O"O~ C/) -- - Q) oQ)~..c2 ::E5~~ o C/) Q) C/) 0 c2~o"O Q) ~ Q) 0 Q) rog~"Oc Q) .- c C/) '..c ro o Q) C/) +-' Q.. :;::;OQ),+-~ ro O)..c 0 Q) c+-,oQ)..c Q) ro.s"O ~Q)- C/) ..c '- Q)+-'C(C/)C/) D...s N Q5 0 Q) l::; E..c 0 ~Q) :t::::"O C/) ..c +-' Q) Q) EI-..co +-' . Q> __ ..0 C C Q) E ~ o S ..c 'C "0 ~ 0 .s.:: C/) o{5"Oo~ o Q)C/)- "O~OQ)O) Q)W:J..c~ _-r."Q) ..c-'-''-'..o I- 2 ~ .s 'i= -z~ tlO I..L.dO ~ (1 ..,j ...j ~ -..I ~ ~ ~ Q .t ~ "" .... j '<' ;:,' Lt ~ ~ ~ ..., <.:. ~ ~ f: ...... (f\ V1 \ \ \ Q ll---u ~t--=rl I \ I I I I ' I ! J .. ._.__P______..____~--._----- _C/) -cu cu s.... ~ cu cu Q) C Q. -- Q. .... cu Q) 0 C/).... s.... .... o ::J o 0 '1J'1J - Q) ~ E 1i)E .cE C/)'1J ::J C '+- cu Q)o> O>c .s :.0 C/).- cu C/) ,+-Q)~ o c 0 .... cu 0 .~ Q. '"0 C/) .... Q) cco> o Q) cu U E s.... '"0 Q) cu ::JuO> ~Q;-g >..0- o t;:: Q) '_ c s.... .c cu cu .... Q. C 0 0)00> U E c Cf) Cf) . 6> .~ .c c .c ~.~ I- ~ Cf) 1 \, fw;el>&I-r ~ uf17 (JrJ .../ http://www.realcarriagedoors.com/images/ gallery 107 02/07 022 8-CTL5 -a _ sm.jpg Page 1 of 1 2/11/2011 Page 1 of 1 f\ 1I~I!un <;:.!l'III.m DUllr uf Vermllnl ~~l.,~V\hi\W!tii'H:4!i';iil; .:';:.i;~.,.. ,_.'. I'~. I :'.t ... ..',." ~. t"\\.\\.\.... ,i.I.S.....' [oJ'!!'/; ",.~t.. ..-. \\ ,'f f .l,~i j'" ,.;,~ I ,"'~'j'l' : !.:E~3~g~\'(:~t __.,[, ' _.. _, ,"-;n.. J ;~c: ,> " ,:,)"['I! '(>"':",' /. /'\',,:':':. ", . '" " I' ,':y': ' , >1' -' f' :' I I' \, ' I ,,' I ": IL .,' . '. I .";.. _ _ _.~~~ I ~ 'r" III: III - - III~ ~ ... . .-,,, -- ~J;J""""""""~"'''' ~f ~ ,..=.:::1 u. Conversion from onglnal swing doors to new duplicate over the head sectional doors with operators. Colchester, VT. ~C,e.l>&J-r f1:'~ IJt11 trN 'II ~ http://www.moultoncustomdoor.com/system/applicationlimg/project_image _image _file_I... 2/11/2011 IIistoric Preservation ComJnission IEiIL F L\. l\1EMORANDUM Date: March 10,2011 To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Christina Kuecker, Associate Planner Re: Certificates of No Material Effect, Intermediate Reviews, and Minor Reviews The recently adopted Historic Preservation Handbook requires a report to the HPC at each meeting of any proje~ts that have been approved administratively. Below are the projects approved since the November meetmg. Certificates of No Material Effect - Chair and Staff review 1. 317 Fairchild Street - removal of non- historic applique Intermediate Review - Chair and Staff review 1. 648 S Lucas Street - porch stair and railing replacement 2. 328/330 N Linn Street - alteration to previously approved CDA - change from two windows to three windows on rear fa<;:ade 3. 938 Iowa Avenue - installation of egress windows Minor Review - Pre-approved items - Staff review 1. none MINUTES HISTORIC PRESER V A nON COMMISSION FEBRUARY 10,2011 EMMA J. HARV AT HALL PRELIMINARY MEMBERS PRESENT: Kent Ackerson, Esther Baker, Thomas Baldridge, Andrew Litton, David McMahon, Alicia Trimble, Frank Wagner MEMBERS ABSENT: William Downing, Pam Michaud, Ginalie Swaim, Dana Thomann ST AFF PRESENT: Christina Kuecker OTHERS PRESENT: Jewell Amos, Tracy Barkalow, Richard Carlson, Kevin Shannon RECOMMEND A nONS TO COUNCIL: (become effective only after separate Council action) None. CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Trimble called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA; Carlson said that he works in the south of Burlington Street area that has now been designated Riverfront Crossings. He said he has not heard anything about a historic survey of this area, although it has been a year or two since people have been pushing redevelopment of the area. Carlson said he would like to know what the status is of evaluating the historic fabric of what is remaining in that neighborhood. Kuecker said the Commission has applied twice for grants to survey that area but has not received those grants. She said that nothing has really been done since then. Kuecker said that as she has time, she selects buildings in that area and researches them so that the effort is kind of piecemeal at this time. Carlson stated that piecemeal would have worked a few years ago, but as there is a current push for redevelopment, he would really like to see something more than that. He said that he is on the State Nomination Review Committee that reviews the CLG grant applications, so he knows why the 2006 and 2007 applications were not funded. Carlson said that in 2007 he offered to write the application so that it would be more conducive to the nomination board for approval but was not taken up on his offer. Carlson said that he would really like to see something done here. He said that he would still like to help out in any way he can in writing an application for a CLG or HRDP grant. Baldridge said that as the City is starting to focus on that area, it would be appropriate for the Commission to at least try to identify buildings that should remain. Wagner said that he has wondered about the School District Administration Building and what will happen to that building. Helen Burford said that about at least one if not two preliminary studies of this location have been done. Kuecker said the Commission has not decided to apply for grants for any other areas, so this might be a year to try again for that area. CONSENT AGENDA: CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: Kuecker said that both of the projects meet the qualifications as stated in the handbook, and staff recommends approval. Historic Preservation Commission February 10, 2011 Page 2 710 Clark Street. Kuecker said this is a demolition of a garage on the rear of the property and the rebuilding of a new garage. She said the new garage meets all the Historic Preservation Handbook requirements for a new garage in a conservation district. 735 Dearborn Street. Kuecker stated that this project involves the removal of two windows and a door and installation of a sliding glass door in the location of the windows, with siding over the door opening. She said this is on the rear of a property in a conservation district. Kuecker said staff recommends approval provided the new door is trimmed to match the existing windows and door trim on the house and that the siding matches the existing siding. MOTION: Baker moved to approve the consent agenda for 710 Clark Street and 735 Dearborn Street as recommended, with the stipulation for 735 Dearborn Street that the new door is trimmed to match the existing windows and door trim on the house and that the siding matches the existing siding. McMahon seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (Downilll!. Michaud. Swaim. and Thomann absent). Kuecker gave the owners of 710 Clark Street and 735 Dearborn Street, instructions for proceeding with the project, including the requirements for both a demolition permit and a building permit. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS: 837 Maggard Street. Kuecker said this application is to make an amendment to the previously approved certificate of appropriateness for this property. She stated that in May, the Commission approved the removal of the existing siding on the house and the installation of a three- to five-inch reveal, smooth-faced fiber cement board lap siding with a minimum four-inch trim around all windows and doors. Kuecker said the applicant began this siding replacement project with a six-inch reveal, textured fiber cement board, and lap siding with three and one-half inch trim around the door and would now like to amend the previously approved certificate to allow for the material used. She said that the requirements that the Commission gave for the siding are common when looking at siding replacement, because a three- to five-inch reveal, smooth-faced, is most historically accurate and closest to the historic wood siding that would have been used. Kuecker said the reason for the smooth face requirement is because the textured fiber cement board often gives a faux wood appearance. She added that historic trim was often a minimum of four inches. Kuecker said that, in staffs opinion, the requirements of the original certificate of appropriateness were not incongruent with previous approvals by the Commission and are supported by the Siding section of the Handbook. She said that without documentation that the original siding on the house was anything different than that, she did not see a reason to change that previous approval. Barkalow, the owner of the property, distributed some photographs showing that the siding that is on there is much narrower than the existing siding that was there when he bought the property. He said he bought the stock hardi- board siding but did not realize that there is a difference between smooth versus textured siding. Barkalow said that the existing asbestos siding is not smooth in texture either, and it is also a lot wider than what he has put on there. He said the intent is to pretty this property up, and it would be very expensive now to tear the siding off another time and put back on something else. Barkalow said he would like to have the certificate amended to get this done. He said he intends to side the rest of the house to match. Barkalow said he needs to get this section complete to satisfy a rental permit, and that is why he is asking for an amendment. He said he thinks this looks a lot better and that the hardi-board will blend in quite nicely in the neighborhood here. Wagner referred to the photographs and asked if this is the only part that has been done so far. Barkalow confirmed this. He said that this was an error on his part, in that he did not fax the information over to the contractor's desk at the Menard's dealer. Barkalow said that to replace this, he would have to get all new material and start over. He said that he did not think one could tell the difference from the street between the smooth or textured or the half inch difference around the trim. Historic Preservation Commission February 10, 2011 Page 3 Baker said that, as in previous cases like this one, her concem is always the precedent that would be set. She said that every time the Commission lets something like this get by, the next person does whatever he wants to, because he thinks he can go to the Commission afterwards and ask for an amendment of the original agreement. Baker said it weakens what the Commission is trying to do. Kuecker added that when work has been done, the Commission is supposed to evaluate the application as if the work had not happened and this was a fresh application. She said the Commission should look at this application and ask if they would approve installation of a six-inch reveal, textured fiber cement board with three and one-half inch trim at all for this property. Kuecker said that they Commission should contemplate if the handbook would allow the approval of this. Wagner said that he felt that the answer was no. Wagner said that Menard's does not sell Hardi-board, which is a brand name, but they do sell a smooth, fiber cement board of the proper dimensions. MOTION: McMahon moved to approve an application for a certificate of appropriateness for 837 Maggard Street to amend the previous certificate to allow for the installation of a three- to five-inch reveal, smooth- faced fiber cement board lap siding with a minimum four-inch trim around all windows and doors. Ackerson seconded the motion. The motion failed on a vote of 0-7 (Downin2. Michaud. Swaim. and Thomann absent). CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR JANUARY 13,2011. MOTION: McMahon moved to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission's January 13, 2011 meeting, as written. Wagner seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (Downing, Michaud, Swaim, and Thomann absent). OTHER: Kuecker said that the property at 904 Bowery was recently purchased by the University Neighborhood Partnership. She said there is a garage door that enters off of Governor Street, and this cannot function as a garage, because it goes right into the basement. Kuecker said the question is what to do with this. She said that right now the door is rotted on the bottom so that critters and water get in. Kuecker said the owners would like to make it weather tight and actually don't want to have this be a garage because of the problems it would cause for the living space. She said they would like to keep this as a pedestrian door. Kuecker said that completely removing the door is probably not an option, because it is an architectural feature that would be in character with the house. She added that this is a conservation district. Kuecker said the Partnership is asking for the opinion of the Commission. She said the owners don't want to allow cars to pull in there, because any exhaust would go into the living space, nor do they intend to finish the basement. Kuecker said the door has to be replaced, however. Ackerson asked if they want it to look like the present door. Kuecker said she feels that would be the most appropriate, so that one can still see that that was at one time a garage door. Wagner said one possibility would be to build a wall- fill it in as a wall with insulation, but the exterior would still look like a garage door. He said it could have a pedestrian door that blends in. Baker suggested that one idea would be to take a look at some of the old Moffitt houses to see what kind of solutions or approaches have been taken there. Baldridge asked if the Commission needed to take a position on whether or not the owners can build a wall that would be appropriate. Kuecker said that the Partnership is looking for is ideas from the Commission that would be something the Commission could approve. She said the Partnership would then investigate the ideas to come up with the best solution. Baldridge asked if the Commission could then give approval for a significant wall to be put up, with an outside fayade to make it look like a garage door. Kuecker said the University Neighborhood Partnership has several other things with this house that need to come before the Commission and is just looking for ideas now. Baldridge asked if, in terms of the conservation district Historic Preservation Commission February 10,2011 Page 4 guidelines, there is any reason the Commission would be prevented from approving a permanent wall to be built. Kuecker confirmed that there is not. The consensus of the Commission was to suggest a wall here. The Commission discussed the potential for the property at the southwest comer of Linn and Fairchild Streets and the former Shelter House on Gilbert Street, as well as the property behind the former Shelter House. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 6:35 p.m. Minutes submitted by Anne Schulte z o en en :E :Eo oEt: uo zU ow _Et: ~w.... <CU.... >ZO Et:<cN wo enZ Ww Et:~ c..~ u<c 0:: o ~ en :I: 0 UJ UJ UJ UJ .... >< >< >< - >< >< - - - >< >< - 0 0 0 0 N M UJ UJ UJ UJ .... >< >< - >< >< - >< >< - >< - - 0 0 0 0 .... c.: >< C") ..- C'\l C") ..- ..- C'\l C'\l ..- C") C'\l W ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- - - - - - - - - - - - :E 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) C'\l C'\l C'\l C'\l C'\l C'\l C'\l C'\l C'\l C'\l C'\l Et: - - - - - - - - - - - W C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") ~ ~ ~ :E 0 Z 0 Et: == ~ w <c <c ~ w :I: ..J W Z U Z ~ ~ W ..J Et: ~ ::::i <c <c :I: j 0 0 <c 0 ::::i Et: Z W ~ Z c.. Z <c LL en 0 C) w c5 <c Z 0 <:5 Z ti en 0 Z 0 Z W Et: Et: ti Z Z :I: ::) :E <c ..J w w W 0 W 0 <c <c :E en Z :E ~ ..J ~ == l= :E :I: ~ 0 :E ~ <c u <c <c 0 (,) ~ :I: 0:: Z <c en en 0 ::::i :E :E en ~ ~ == E 2 o :J -cO 0) 0 ~z .... (.) -- 0) x g'.o UJ:;:>E ~O)O) cO)"", c-'O)E"'" 0) C (f) ro (f)5l90-' O).o......Zo O:<(III1Z II 11 ~ ~ I~ XOOZI :>.: UJ ~