HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-19-2002 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda
Informal Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
Monday, September 16, 2002 - 7:30
Recreation Center Meeting Room B
222 South Gilbert Street
Agenda
Formal Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
Thursday, September 19, 2002- 7:30 p.m.
Emma J. Harvat Hall
(Civic Center)
A. Development Item'
1. SUB02-00015 Discussion of an application submitted by David Dunlap for a
preliminary plat of Sweet Springs, a 3-lot, 2.67-acre subdivision, and rezoning from
RS-8, Medium Density Single Family Residential to RS-8/OSA, Sensitive Areas
Overlay located at 1517 N. Dubuque Road.
(45-day limitation period October 13, 2002)
B. Code Item:
1. Discussion of amendments to the Zoning Code, Sensitive Areas Ordinance,
regarding requirements for Sensitive Areas Overlay Rezoning and Sensitive
Areas Site Plans. The amendment will generally require approval of a Sensitive
Areas Site Plan by staff unless an applicant seeks modification of a Sensitive Areas
Buffer or seeks a modification of other zoning requirements.
C. Other:
D. Consideration of the September 5, 2002 Meeting Minutes.
E. ADJOURNMENT
Upcoming Planning & Zonin= Commission Meeting, ,s:
Informal September 30 October 14 November4 November 18 December 2 December 16
Formal October 3 October 17 November 7 November 21 December 5 December 19
STAFF REPORT
To: Planning and Zoning Commission Prepared by: Shelley McCafferty
Item: SUB02-00015 Date: September 19, 2002
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Applicant: David Dunlap
1517 N. Dubuque Road
Iowa City, IA 53340
Requested Action: Preliminary subdivision plat and rezoning from RS-8
to RS-8/OSA
Purpose: To permit a 3-lot, 2.67-acre subdivision.
Location: 1517 N. Dubuque Road
Size: 2.67 acres
Existing Land Use and Zoning: RS-8, single-family residence and undeveloped
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: RS-8, Medium Density Single Family
South: CN-1, Neighborhood Commercial
East: RS-5, Low Density Single Family
West: RS-8, Medium Density Single Family
Comprehensive Plan: Single Family/Duplex Residential
File Date: August 29, 2002
45-Day Limitation Period: October 13, 2002
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
The applicant, has requested that 2.67 acres located at 1517 N. Dubuque Road be subdivided
into 3 lots and rezoned from RS-8, Medium Density Single Family, to RS-8/OSA, Sensitive Areas
Overlay. In response to a citizen complaint, the Housing and Inspections Department issued a
citation in May of this year to Mr. Dunlap for the construction of an illegal accessory structure and
failure to obtain a building permit. On June 28, 2002 the Iowa District Court for Johnson County,
Small Claims Division, issued an order to Mr. Dunlap to seek resolution to the situation by
pursuing a variance or subdivision, the deadlines of which were August 1 and September 1, 2002
respectively.
The accessory structure that the applicant constructed is a tower with an attached deck. The
maximum height permitted for an accessory structure is 15 feet. The tower is approximately 55
feet high. The maximum height permitted for a primary structure in the RS-8 zone is 35 feet.
However, under section 14-6Q-5B of City Code, the height may be increase if an additional two
feet of front, side and rear yards is provided for every one foot of increased height. It is the intent
of the applicant to subdivide the property and relocate the tower on a lot such that it meets the
dimensional requirements for a primary structure. The applicant will also have to incorporate the
tower into a habitable, primary structure that meets the City Building Code.
ANALYSIS:
Comprehensive Plan: The North District Plan depicts this area as being appropriate for single-
family/duplex residential. Furthermore, the Plan recommends Iow-density residential
redevelopment in the North Dubuque Road vicinity due to the rural character, sewer constraints
and topography of this area. The proposed 3-lot subdivision complies with the North District
Plan.
Subdivision Requirements: The purpose of subdividing a property is to create lots that have
sufficient infrastructure and a configuration that is conducive to new development. The
subdivision regulations state that side lots lines shall approximate right angles (80 o _100o) to
straight street lines. The lot lines proposed are very irregular and there is no apparent
justification for this configuration. There are no new streets proposed in this subdivision. All
three lots will need to be accessed from North Dubuque Road. The configuration of the lots
makes it difficult to access Lot 2 from North Dubuque Road. Steep slopes comprise nearly the
entire North Dubuque Road frontage of Lot 2. Regulated slopes comprise the majority of Lot 2,
which would likely make construction on this lot difficult.
The Subdivisions Regulations require that the subdivider address drainage and stormwater
management. Stormwater management has not been shown on the plat and storage
calculations have not been submitted with this application. The subdivider is also required to
provide a complete sanitary sewer system for the subdivision, including stubs to the individual lots.
The Preliminary Plat shows the sewer being extended from the private HyVee sewer on Dubuque
Road. The sewer extension needs to be from a public sewer, which is located nearby. In
addition, the sewer should extend to the north property line of Lot 3 if topography permits a gravity
flow line to this location.
As illustrated on the Preliminary Plat, the east property line corresponds with the centerline of
North Dubuque Road. The east right-of-way of North Dubuque Road will need to be dedicated
to the City. This has not been indicated on the plat.
Water: The applicant will be required to pay a water main extension fee of $395 per acre when
each lot is developed.
Sensitive Areas: Due to the critical and protected slopes on this property, a Sensitive Areas
Development Plan and rezoning are required. The applicant has illustrated the regulated slopes
and the sensitive areas buffer on the plan. However, information regarding the intended
development of the property is incomplete.
Because the areas where development may occur on the site are limited by the natural
topography, proposed new development needs to be shown on the Sensitive Areas
Development Plan. This would include driveways, building footprints and any other site
features that may impact the sensitive areas. The limits of the development areas also need to
be delineated. The plan currently shows the existing location of the tower, where it encroaches
on a protected slope and buffer. Under the Sensitive Areas Ordinance, no development activity
is allowed on natural protected slopes or within the sensitive areas buffer. Also, because the
footings are not adequate and the tower does not meet the standards of the Building Code, the
tower will need to be moved. The development plan does not indicate the new location for the
tower and its associated habitable structure.
A grading plan is required for this development plan because there are protect slopes on the
site, however no grading plan has been submitted, nor has it been incorporated into Preliminary
Plat and Sensitive Areas Development Plan. Contours on the west side of the plat are missing.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that SUB02-00015, an application by David Dunlap for a preliminary plat of
Sweet Springs, a 3-lot, 2.67-acre subdivision, and rezoning from RS-8, Medium Density Single
Family Residential to RS-8/OSA, Sensitive Areas Overlay on property located at 1517 N.
Dubuque Road be denied due to the deficiencies of this application. The applicant may
address these deficiencies and resubmit the Preliminary Plat and Sensitive Areas Development
Plan after which time staff will reconsider this recommendation.
DEFICIENCIES AND DISCRPENCIES:
1. Location map is incorrect.
2. Proposed stormwater management needs to be shown on plat.
3. Stormwater storage calculations are missing.
4. Developer needs to tap on to public sewer rather than the private HyVee sewer.
5. Sewer should extend to north property line, if topography permits.
6. R.O.W. of North Dubuque Road needs to be dedicated to the City.
7. Proposed development and construction limits needs to be shown.
8. Grading plan is required,
9. Missing contour lines.
10. No north arrow.
11. List acreage of Lot 3 on plat and total acreage in legal description.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location map
2. Preliminary Plat
Approved by: ~,
Robert Miklo, Senior Planner,
Department of Planning and Community Development
T/pcd/staffreportternplate
]Alii(] 30/SI
· : ·
· PreliminarY ~Plat & Sensitive Areas Development Plan
SWEET SP INGS FILED
·
Iowa City, Iowa
/
AUG29 PHI2:07
PLAT p]{EPARED BY: SUBDIVIDEI~ SUBDMDER'S ATTORNEY: /
~ CONSULTANTS INC. David Dunlap Philip ~ L~ff
1917 S Gilbert St 1517 N Dubuque 1M 222 S Iinn St t
IOWA CITY, IOWA, 52240 Io~m City, Ia 52240 Io'~m City, Iotm 52240 t
I
i
I F..v_] - s~ su~s C1a~ - 2,,.~
AUDITOR'S P~ 9~, ~N~ C~N~,
I ~W~ ~ A~ ~ ~ ~T ~
IN B~ ~ AT PA~ 270, ~ ~ ~C~S
~ ~E ~ C~NW ~C~'S ~.
/ by ~e
/ ,~ City of Io~ City
I ~ , .,~,
-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ WAY ~ MAY ~T.
I LEGEND AND NOTES
I I
~1 I '~~
I ~ ~ -~
/ ~ &
AT PAGE 585, RECORD~
OF mE JOHNSON COUNF
~CA~ON ~ NOT TO SC~
~l~lJI ~7~ ~1 ~~ PRElaCY P~T ~~~ MMS CONS~T~, inc. Ti~
IOWA CI~, IOWA o ~~o~~o° ~~ ol~~m~l I1
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: September 5, 2002
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Robert Miklo
Re: Sensitive Areas Ordinance
Introduction: The City Council has asked the Planning and Zoning Commission to
consider amendments to the Sensitive Areas Ordinance that would result in
applications being reviewed administratively by staff rather than requiring a
rezoning process that includes' review by the Planning and Zoning Commission
and City Council. This type of staff review process for Sensitive Areas Plans
was first recommended by the Development Regulations Analysis prepared by
Duncan and Associates (see page38 and 39 attached).
Currently the Sensitive Areas Ordinance includes a two-tier process for approval
of Sensitive Areas Plans as outlined below:
1. Sensitive Areas Site Plans are required for properties that contain
hydric soils, prairie remnants (one acre or larger), stream corridors,
archeological sites, steep slopes (18-24%) or woodlands (two acres or
larger). Staff reviews these plans to assure that they comply with the
requirements and guidelines of the ordinance. The review process is
similar to a site plan review for commercial, industrial or multi-family
buildings. These site plans often occur with subdivision plats and
building permits. Staff from Housing and Inspections, Planning, Public
Works and the Fire Department reviews the plans and informs the
applicant of any corrections needed. Once the applicant demonstrates
to the staff's satisfactions that the plan conforms to the requirements of
the Sensitive Areas Ordinance and other applicable City Codes, the
plan is approved. The Commission and City Council do not review
these plans. Generally the process takes three weeks depending on
the complexity of the project being reviewed. There have been
approximately 70 Sensitive Areas Site Plans approved since the
implementation of the Sensitive Areas Ordinance in 1996.
2. Sensitive Areas Development Plans/Overlay Rezonings are
required when development activity is proposed on properties
containing wetlands, critical slopes (25-39%), protected slopes (40%+)
and woodlands located on sites which also contain stream corridors.
The rezoning process may be waived for properties containing these
environmental features if the developer certifies that there will be no
development activity within 150 feet of a wetland or 50 feet of a
protected slope and development will not encroach into a critical slope.
The procedures for review of a Sensitive Areas Development
Plan/Overlay by the Commission and Council are the same as for a
rezoning. The process takes approximately 4 months to complete.
There have been approximately 20 properties that have had Sensitive
Areas Rezonings since 1996.
Developers have been concerned about the length of time necessary to process
a Sensitive Areas Development Plan/Overlay (4 months) when compared to a
Sensitive Areas Site Plan (3 weeks). This additional review time has been
required even in those cases when the development plan did not disturb a
protected feature and buffers, or include any waivers of other zoning
requirements. As suggested by the Development Regulations Analysis, a method
of simplifying and shortening the review process would be to eliminate the
automatic requirement for a Sensitive Areas Overlay rezoning.
Staff has prepared amendments that would require a Sensitive Areas Site Plan to
be reviewed by staff rather than automatically requiring Sensitive Areas Overlay
Rezonings in many, but not all cases. The proposed amendments are attached.
Additions to the ordinance are shown in bold print. Proposed deletions are
shown as being crossed out.
Rational for Amendments: The proposed amendments make the level of review
consistent with the amount of discretion granted to the Commission/City Council
under zoning law when applying the Sensitive Areas Ordinance to certain
development applications. For example, if a property currently requiring a
Sensitive Areas rezoning does not request a modification of a buffer, disturbance
of slopes, or removal of wetlands, review of the plan involves the application of
technical, objective standards to the pending application. This level of review is
customarily exercised by the building official, and does not represent a 'true'
rezoning in that the reviewing authority does not have unlimited discretion, but
rather, applies the existing standards to the pending application. In other words,
the scope of review exercised by the Commission/City Council in these types of
situations is limited to applying the existing standard or guideline, and therefore is
not fully discretionary (as is a 'true' rezoning). In contrast, when a development
application requests the modification of a buffer, the disturbance of slopes or
removal of wetlands, the 'scope of review granted to the Commission/City Council
is fully discretionary as to those matters, rather than involving the application of
an existing standard. This is consistent with the broader scope of
authority/discretion granted to the governing bodies in a typical rezoning
application. In short, the proposed amendments make the 'trigger point' for
Commission/City Council review consistent with the exercise of discretion such
that these bodies will review applications only when an exercise of discretion is
authorized by zoning law.
Proposed Amendments: The amendments require a Sensitive Areas Overlay
Rezoning only if a development plan requests: 1) the modification of a buffer, 2)
the disturbance of more than 35% of critical slopes on a property, or 3) the
removal of more than the percent of woodlands contained in Table I shown below
(the retention requirement table contained in the current Sensitive Areas
Ordinance), 4) the disturbance of more than 10% of a protected feature for the
installation of essential utility.
Table I- Woodland Retention Requirements:
Zone Retention Requirement
ID, RR-1 7O%
RS-5, RS-8, RS-12, 50%
RM-12, RM-20, RM-44, RNC-12, RNC-20 20%
RDP, ORP 20%
C and I 10%
The current ordinance allows disturbance of environmental features for essential
public utilities, such as storm and sanitary sewers, water mains, gas, telephone
and power lines, and storm water detention (Section 14-6K-1E-3. Uses Permitted
within Protected Sensitive Areas and Buffers). The current language is subjective
in that it provides no clear direction regarding the extent of disturbance allowed
for the installation of utilities, but merely states the impact of construction should
be minimized. To provide a clear standard for staff, the amendments would allow
a maximum of 10% of a protected sensitive area (wetland or protected slope)
and associated buffers to be disturbed to allow the installation of these utilities
without the requirement for a Sensitive Areas Overlay Rezoning. Any
disturbance greater than 10% of would require review of a Sensitive Areas
Development Plan by the Commission and approval by Council.
Development plans that include reductions in buffers or that make use of the
flexibility of the Sensitive Areas Overlay zone to modify dimensional
requirements (set backs, height limits, etc) would still be required to make
application for a rezoning to be reviewed by the Commission and City Council.
Using two recent Sensitive Areas Overlay rezoning cases, the following
examples illustrate how the proposed amendments would affect the review
process. The development plan for the APE House at 341 Riverside Drive would
be reviewed by the Commission and Council as a Sensitive Areas Overlay
rezoning, because a reduction of a protected slope buffer and a height limit
adjustment were requested by the applicant. The Lindemann Subdivision would
not have required a Sensitive Areas Overlay rezoning, because there was no
disturbance to the wetland area and its required buffer. It should be noted that
the Commission and Council would still have reviewed the annexation, zoning
and subdivision of the Lindemann development, but the Commission and
Council's review of the Sensitive Areas Overlay would have been replaced by
staff review of a Sensitive Areas Site Plan. The review process would have been
shortened by approximately 11 weeks.
Conclusion: One intent of the Sensitive Areas Ordinance was to require an
OPDH plan for properties that contained environmentally sensitive features. It
was thought that this would allow developers to use the flexibility of the OPDH
process (reduction of setbacks, increased height, clustering of dwelling units, etc)
to avoid development in environmentally sensitive areas. Having worked with the
Sensitive Areas Ordinance for over 6 years staff has observed that this has
indeed been the outcome in many cases. However, there have also been many
cases where Sensitive Areas Development plans have not sought any waivers of
zoning requirements and did not disturb a protected feature and buffers. Yet
these projects have had to go through a lengthy rezoning process. The
proposed amendments would eliminate the rezoning process in those cases but
would still require that the sensitive features be protected as specified by the
ordinance through staff approval of a Sensitive Areas Site Plan. Staff would not
recommend the elimination of the Sensitive Areas Development Plans/Overlay
Rezonings in those cases where considerable discretion is required, such as the
reduction of buffers. To eliminate the Sensitive Areas rezoning process entirely
would require the elimination of some of the flexibility built into the ordinance.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff believes that the proposed amendments
simplify the review process yet still provide protection of environmentally
sensitive features of the city. Staff recommends approval of the attached
amendments to the Sensitive Areas Ordinance.
K'a n Franklin,
~ Director,
Department of Planning and
Community Development
CHAPTER 6 I REVIEW OF SELECTED PROVISIONS EXCEPT FROH DEVELO~
REGIILATIONS ANALYSIS
6.6 ] INDUSTRIAL ZONES (ART. H)
[3] Dependin§ on presence of basement and use of bonuses.
[4] Bonus for pedestrian plazas.
Existing references in the industrial districts to the Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) manual should be revised to reflect the new North
American Industrial Classification System (NAICS).
The list of uses allowed in Ceneral Industrial zone seems rather narrow. We
believe the real issue is the ordinance's use classification system in general.
It is better than many we've seen, but it can definitely be improved.
The allowance of any `'industrial, commercial, or related use" poses a
potential threat to the purpose of the I-2 zone, which is to provide a
sanctuary for intensive industrial uses and to protect those uses from
encroachment by less intensive uses. The city should consider prohibiting
most Iow-intensity "commercial" uses in the I-2 zone. Consideration should
also be given to revising the permitted use section of the I-2 zone to be
consistent with the other zones. Currently, the I-2 zone relies on a list of
`'prohibited" uses rather than a list of expressly permitted uses.
We believe the `'P' district has an important purpose (to serve notice to
those owning or buying land in proximity to publicly owned land), but is of
little benefit to the community in its current form. It lacks any development
standards and is too open-ended in terms of the range of uses allowed.
The city should consider amending the "P" zone to be a neighborhood-
oriented zone that allows a fairly narrow range of "public" uses that are
typically located within or near residemial neighborhoods. Examples would
include schools, parks, playgrounds, fire stations and the like. More
intensive public uses, such as post offices and equipment storage yards
should be relegated to higher intensity commercial or industrial districts.
Similarly, state and federal offices should be treated just as other offices for
zoning purposes.
In terms of development standards, the ,p, zone should either limit
development intensity along the lines of a moderate density residential
zone, or require that development in the "P" zone adhere to the standards of
the most restrictive adjacent district. In any case, the city should adopt
standards for the zone and expressly state in the ordinance that all
development (whether public or private) is subject to the standards of the
ordinance.
The environmental regulations of Chapter 6 are locally referred to as the
"Sensitive Areas Ordinance." These regulations show evidence of Iowa
' 38 January 17, 2001 Development Regulations Analysis
Iowa City, Iowa
CHAPTER 6 1 REVIEW OF SELECTED PROVISIONS
6.9 I OFF-STREET PARKING
City's strong commitment to preservation of sensitive natural resource areas.
We believe, however, that they could be improved. Currently the
environmental regulations are implemented through the Sensitive Areas
Overlay (SAO) zone and the Planned Development Housing Overlay zone
(OPDH). We recommend that consideration be given to implementing the
regulations through a ~development standards" approach, while retaining
the OPDH zone as a voluntary route for developers with unique or
i n novative proposals.
Under the development standards approach, develOpers of sites containing
protected resources areas would be subject to site plan review, during
which their plans would be checked administratively for compliance with
the Sensitive Areas Ordinance. Those aggrieved by a staff decision on a
sensitive areas site plan would have the right of appeal. Rezoning would
only be required if the underlying zoning did not accommodate the
proposed development or if the developer opted to follow the OPDH route
for its increased "flexibility."
This recommendation stems largely from our belief that the use of objective
development standards will result in a more predictable outcome for all
concerned (developers, neighborhoods, and the city). It is also our
observation that the existing process tends to result in issues being raised
during the overlay rezoning process that are sometimes completely
unrelated to the site's environmental characteristics. '
We recommend that the city consider moving many of the residential design
guidelines from the Environmental Regulations article, and relocating them
to another section of the ordinance where they would have broader
applicability.
The required size of a standard parking space (90 degree) in Iowa City is 9
feet by 18 feet, although up to 50 percent of required parking spaces can be
'compact car~ spaces, which can be a small as 8 feet by 15 feet. Although
we caution against over-requiring parking or oversizing of parking lots, we
note that few modern ordinances allow such widespread use of compact
spaces, except in instances where the compact spaces are reserved for Iow-
turnover uses, such as employee parking.
In general, we believe that additional flexibility may be desirable within the
off-street parking section. Requiring special exception approval for off-site
and shared parking arrangements, for example, may work against the city's
goals regarding pedestrian-orientation and preservation of neighborhood
character and appearance. Allowing off-site parking requests to be handled
administratively, subject to specific standards may be preferable. The city
may also want to allow some additional flexibility with regard to the
location of off-site lots (currently required to be within 300 feet of the
subject use). Finally, some communities have elected to allow large
Development Regulations Analysis January 17, 2001 39
Iowa City, Iowa
14-6K-1: SENSITIVE AREAS ORDINANCE
A. Purpose: The purpose of the Sensitive Areas Ordinance is to:
1. Implement the environmental policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
2. Permit and define the reasonable use of properties which contain environmentally
sensitive features and natural resources while recognizing the importance of
environmental resources and protecting such resources from destruction.
3. Provide for ecologically sound transitions between protected environmentally
sensitive areas and urban development.
4. Protect the public from injury and property damage due to flooding, erosion, and
other natural hazards which can be exacerbated by development of environmental-
ly sensitive land.
5. Foster urban design that preserves open space and minimizes disturbance of
environmentally sensitive features and natural resources.
6. Provide for the mitigation of disturbances of environmentally sensitive features and
natural resources through requiring and implementing mitigation plans, as needed.
7. The Sensitive Areas Ordinance is intended to cover industrial and commercial
properties, as well as residential properties, unless otherwise exempted herein.
B. Definitions: The following definitions apply to the interpretation and enforcement of the
Sensitive Areas Ordinance regulations:
ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE, SIGNIFICANT: An archaeological site of prehistoric or historic
significance that is considered by the State Historic Preservation Officer to be eligible for
the National Register of Historic Places.
BUFFER: An area of land that is located adjacent to a designated sensitive area and
provides a transition area that protects slope stability, attenuates surface water flows and
preserves wildlife habitat and protected wetlands, stream corridors and woodlands.
BUFFER, NATURAL: A land area located adjacent to a protected sensitive area where
development activity such as building, grading, or clearing are prohibited unless otherwise
exempt herein.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION: Creating a new wetland, or enhancing or expanding an
existing wetland in exchange for allowing development activities to occur within an existing
wetland.
CONSTRUCTION AREA: The portion of a parcel of land where development activity,
including the temporary storage of heavy equipment, and other improvements may take
place and be located.
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY: Any human-made change to improved or unimproved real
estate, including, but not limited to the placement of manufactured housing, buildings or
other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations
and construction activities. "Development activity" does not include transfer of ownership.
DIAMETER, TREE TRUNK: The diameter of a tree trunk measured at 4 1/2 feet above
ground; if on a slope, measured from the high side of the slope. In the case of a tree with
multiple trunks, the diameter shall be the average of the diameters of all the trunks.
DIRECT DISCHARGE: The discharge of untreated surface water into a wetland from a
developed or developing property through the use of an underground pipe, culvert,
drainage tile, ditch, swale, channel or other means.
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 2 ,
FLOOD EVENT; 100 YEAR: A flood, the magnitude of which has a one percent (1%)
chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year, or which on the average will be
equaled or exceeded at least once every one hundred (100) years.
FLOOD PLAIN: Any land area susceptible to being inundated by water as a result of a
specific frequency flOod. For instance, the 100-year flood plain is the area of land
susceptible to being inundated by a 100-year flood event.
FLOODWAY: The channel of a river or stream and those portions of the flood plains
adjoining the channel which are reasonably required to carry and discharge flood waters
so that confinement of flood waters to the floodway area will not result in substantially
higher flood elevation. Where floodway data has been provided in the Flood Insurance
Study, such data shall be used to define the floodway limits.
FULLY HYDRIC SOILS: Soils susceptible to water saturation, and designated as fully
hydric soils by the USDA Soil Conservation Service as of December 1993.
GRADING: Any excavating or filling or a combination thereof, including compaction.
GROVE OF TREES: Ten or more individual trees having a diameter of at least twelve
(12) inches, and whose combined canopies cover at least fifty (50) percent of the area
encompassed by the trees.
HISTORIC OBJECT: An artifact greater than 100 years of age.
PRAIRIE REMNANT: Prairie areas that have remained relatively untouched on undevel-
oped, untilled portions of properties and contain primarily a mixture of native warm season
grasses interspersed with native flowering plants. Known extant prairie remnants are
identified on the Iowa City Sensitive Areas Inventory Map - Phase I.
PREHISTORY: Relating to or existing in times antedating written history (prior to approxi-
mately 1700 AD in Iowa City).
SENSITIVE AREAS CONSERVATION TRACT: A separate tract which protects sensitive
areas and associated buffers within planned developments, subdivisions and building site
plans; held separately from buildable lots by an incorporated homeowners' association or
a nonprofit conservation organization, or dedicated to the City.
SENSITIVE AREAS DEVELOPMENT PLAN: A plan required to be submitted and
approved in conjunction with a Sensitive Areas Overlay (OSA) rezoning that designates
protected sensitive areas and associated buffers within a planned development.
SENSITIVE AREAS INVENTORY MAP - PHASE I: The map of the Iowa City service area
with designations of potential environmentally sensitive areas, such as woodlands,
wetlands, floodplains, steep slopes, hydric soils, prairie remnants and geological, historical
and archaeological features.
SENSITIVE AREAS OVERLAY (OSA) ZONE: A planned development rezoning of a tract
of land that requires the approval of a Sensitive Areas Development Plan, which
designates protected sensitive areas and their associated buffers on said tract.
SENSITIVE AREAS, PROTECTED: Portions of a parcel of land containing environmen-
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 3
tally sensitive features that are designated on an approved Sensitive Areas Site Plan or a
Sensitive Areas Development Plan and where no development activity is allowed.
SENSITIVE AREAS SETBACK LINE: A line delineated on a proposed development plan
or site plan that establishes the no-build line around protected sensitive areas, such as
wetlands, streams, steep slopes, and woodlands, and their required buffers.
SENSITIVE AREAS SITE PLAN: A site plan for development on a tract of land that does
not require a Sensitive Areas Overlay (OSA) rezoning and is not otherwise exempt, but
which contains sensitive areas that warrant protection under an approved plan for
protecting sensitive areas on said tract.
SLOPE: An inclined ground surface, either naturally occurring or altered, with a vertical
rise of at least 10 feet, and which is not otherwise approved by the City, such as City
approval of a Grading Plan, prior to December 13, 1995.
SLOPE, ALTERED PROTECTED: Any slope of forty (40) percent or steeper created by
cutting or filling activities prior to December 13, 1995, and which is not otherwise approved
by the City.
SLOPE, CRITICAL: A slope of twenty-five (25) percent, but less than forty (40) percent.
SLOPE, PERCENT OF: The slope of a designated area determined by dividing the
horizontal run of the slope into the vertical rise of the same slope and converting the
resulting figure into a percentage value.
SLOPE, PROTECTED: Any slope Of forty (40) percent or steeper.
SLOPE, STEEP: A slope of eighteen (18) percent, but less than twenty-five (25) percent.
SLOPES, REGULATED: Slopes defined herein as steep (18-24%), critical (25-39%), and
protected (40%+).
STREAM CORRIDOR: A river, stream or drainageway shown in blue (the blue line) on
the most current U.S. Geological Survey Quadrangle Maps, and the area of its delineated
floodway. In cases where no floodway is delineated, the blue line will serve as the
centerline within a 30-foot wide stream corridor.
TREE, FOREST: Any tree two (2) inches in diameter or greater, and included on the list
of forest trees approved by the City.
WETLAND, WETLAND AREAS: Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface
or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal
circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated
soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas.
For the purposes of this Section, wetland shall mean a jurisdictional wetland that is
regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Determination of jurisdictional wetlands
shall be made either by the Corps or by a wetland specialist and accepted by the Corps.
WETLAND SPECIALIST: An individual certified as a wetland specialist by the Society of
Wetland Scientists, and/or a person who can demonstrate to the City that they have
expertise in wetland areas which may include delineation, mitigation and evaluation.
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 4
WOODED AREAS: Includes woodlands and/or groves of trees, as defined in this section.
WOODLAND, WOODLAND AREA: - Any tract of land with a contiguous wooded area not
less than two acres and containing not less than 200 forest trees per acre.
WOODLAND CLEARING: The destruction or removal of trees within woodlands subject
to this Section by physical, mechanical, chemical or other means, such that the clearing
results in a total opening in the woodland canopy of 20,000 square feet or more.
C. Applicability:
1. Sensitive Features
a. Sensitive features governed by the Sensitive Areas Ordinance include:
1) Jurisdictional wetlands as regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers.
2) Floodways designated on either the current Federal Emergency
Management Agency flood boundary and floodw.ay maps for Iowa
City and Johnson County or the Iowa City (1 inch = 100 foot scale)
flood boundary and floodway maps.
3) Drainageways shown in blue on the current U.S. Geological Survey
Quadrangle Maps.
4) Slopes 18 percent or greater.
5) Woodland areas two acres in size or greater.
6) Fully hydric soils as designated in the USDA Soil Conservation
Service Soil Survey of Johnson County, Iowa.
7) Prairie remnants as shown on the Iowa City Sensitive Areas
Inventory Map - Phase I, as amended.
8) Archaeological sites as determined by the State Historic Preser-
vation Officer or the State Archeologist.
b. Prior to woodland clearing, grading or development activity on tracts of land
or portions of tracts of land where sensitive features specified above exist,
either a Sensitive Areas Site Plan or a Sensitive Areas Overlay rezoning
application, whichever is appropriate, shall first be submitted to and
approved by the City. This application process may occur as part of site
plan review, planned development overlay zoning and/or subdivision
review. If the property is exempt, the applicant shall first apply for and
obtain approval of the exemption from the City before development activity
Occurs.
2. Sensitive Areas Site Plan
a. A property containing one or more of the following sensitive features but
which does not require a Sensitive Areas Development Plan, shall require a
Sensitive Areas Site Plan prior to development activity:
1 ) Wetlands
2) Fully hydric soils
3) Prairie remnants one acre in area or larger
4) Stream corridors
5) Archaeological sites
6) Steep slopes (18-24%)
7) Critical Slopes (25-39%)
8) Protected Slopes (40%+)
9) (2) ,,,~
Woodlands two acres in size or greater .................
~' ....... , ................... ~ .... ,...,"C~, ,"~,,, ........ ,.,,., ,.... ,.,, C,"l
as defined in the Definitions Section herein and as delineated on the maps
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 5
referenced in subsection 14-6K-1C3 of this Ordinance and/or verified as
existing on the site.
b. Recording requirement. An approved Sensitive Areas Site Plan that
contains a protected sensitive area and/or buffer, or has a designated
conservation easement, shall be recorded in the Johnson County
Recorder's Office prior to issuance of any certificate of occupancy for the
property. The recording is intended to provide notice to subsequent
property owners that environmental limitations apply to the subject
property.
c. The procedures for review and approval of a Sensitive Areas Site Plan
shall be in accordance with the Site Plan Review regulations, as specified
in Sections 14-5H-3, and 14-5H-6 through 14-5H-8 of Chapter 5, "Building
and Housing".
3. Sensitive Areas Overlay (OSA) Zone
a. A Sensitive Areas Overlay (OSA) rezoning is required prior to
development activity which includes any of the following:
1) The disturbance of a wetlands or an associated buffer,
2) The removal of portions of a woodland in excess of the
woodland retention requirements contained in Section 14-6K-
1 -J-3.
3) The disturbance of more then 35% of Critical slopes (25-39%)
contained on a property, or
4) Disturbance of a protected slope (40%+) buffer as defined in
the Definitions Section herein and as delineated on the maps referenced in
subsection 14-6K-C3 of this ordinance and/or verified as existing on the
site.
b. A Sensitive Areas Overlay rezoning requires a Sensitive Areas Develop-
ment Plan that delineates protected sensitive areas and associated buffers
in the manner of a planned development, which Plan shall be submitted
and approved as part of the rezoning.
c. Review and approval of a Sensitive Areas Planned Development shall be
by ordinance in accordance with the Planned Development Housing
Overlay Zone (OPDH) procedures, as specified in subsection 14-6J-2D of
this Chapter.
3.
D. Exemptions: The following activities are exempt from the requirements of this Section:
1. Emergency/public safety. Grading, clearing, removal or other activities required for
emergency situations involving immediate danger to life, health and safety, or
which create an immediate threat to person or property or create substantial fire
hazards.
2. Normal maintenance/expansion of existing single-family or duplex residences.
Exterior remodeling, reconstruction or replacement of single-family or duplex
residences in existence as of December 13, 1995, provided the new construction
or related activity connected with an existing single-family or duplex residence shall
not increase the footprint of the structure lying within the sensitive area by more
than a maximum total of 1000 square feet, and also provided there is no encroach-
ment by said activities, including grading, into a jurisdictional wetland, a designated
sensitive areas conservation tract and/or protected sensitive area.
3. Construction of new single-family or duplex residences. Grading, clearing or
development activities not to exceed a maximum total of 20,000 square feet in
area on a tract of land for the purpose of construction, landscaping and/or
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 6
associated improvements for one (1) single-family or duplex residence, provided
there is no encroachment by said activities into a jurisdictional wetland, a
designated sensitive areas conservation tract and/or protected sensitive area.
4. Drainage ditches/groundwater monitoring wells. Normal and routine maintenance
of existing drainage and storm water management facilities are exempt. This
exemption includes vegetative maintenance for access and storm water/flood
control purposes within and adjacent to drainageways. Except for temporary
storage outside a wetland or water body, placement of fill or dredge spoils is not
exempt under this subsection. Groundwater monitoring wells, when constructed to
standards approved by the City, are exempt.
5. Woodland management activities. Practices associated with timber management
standards as defined by the International Society of Arboriculture, or existing tree
farming operations, such as Christmas tree farming, fruit or nut tree production and
tree nurseries, during such time as the land is used for tree farming operations are
exempt.
6. Activities that disturb less than one acre of wetland provided that such activities are
approved by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers through a nationwide permit.
E. Uses Permitted Within Protected Sensitive Areas and Buffers.
Where it can be shown that a use will not be detrimental to the functioning of sensitive
areas or associated buffers, or pose a public safety hazard, the following uses are
permissible, subject to City approval during the application process set out herein:
1. Parkland, private open space, and trails that provide opportunities for environ-
mental interpretation and are designed to incorporate features that protect areas of
wildlife habitat, water quality and the natural amenities in protected sensitive areas
and buffers.
2. Stream crossings, .such as bridges, roads and culverts, and/or streambank
stabilization, which are designed to minimize the reduction of the flood carrying
capacity of the stream and are in compliance with all federal and state regulations.
3. Essential public utilities such as storm and sanitary sewers, water mains, gas, tele-
phone and power lines, and storm water detention facilities are permitted if they
are designed and constructed to minimize their impact upon the protected sensitive
areas and associated buffers. A maximum of '!0% of a wetland or a protected
slope and associated buffers may be disturbed to allow the installation of
essential utilities if approved as part of a Sensitive Areas Site Plan. The
disturbance of more than 10% of a wetland or a protected slope and
associated buffers shall require the approval of a Sensitive Areas Overlay
Rezoning by the City Council. The design and construction of utilities should also
include measures to protect against erosion, pollution and habitat disturbance, and
result in minimal amounts of excavation and filling. Upon completion of the
installation of the public facility or line, the sensitive protected areas and associated
buffers shall be restored by those persons responsible for the disturbance.
F. Submittal Requirements: Prior to development activity defined herein where a tract of land
contains the sensitive features listed in subsection 14-6K-1C, entitled "Applicability," and
where the land must be developed in accordance with the provisions of the Sensitive
Areas Ordinance and is not otherwise exempt, the Owner shall submit six copies (6) of a
Sensitive Areas Site Plan and an application for its approval to the Department of Housing
and Inspection Services, or if required, shall submit ten (10) copies of a Sensitive Areas
Development Plan and an application for a Sensitive Areas Overlay rezoning to the City
Clerk.
1. Sensitive Areas Site Plan: Submittal information for a Sensitive Areas Site Plan
shall include:
a. Submittal information required for a site plan review as specified in
subsections 14-5H-4A and 14-5H-4B, the submittal requirements listed for
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 7
Article 14-5H, entitled "Site Plan Review."
b. Delineation of sensitive areas located on the property, including:
1) Wetlands
2) Fully hydric soils
3) Prairie remnants one acre in area or larger
4) Stream corridors
5) Archaeological sites
9) Steep slopes ( 18-24 % )
10) Critical Slopes (25-39%)
11) Protected Slopes (40%+)
12) Woodlands
c. Delineation of buffer areas and/or sensitive area conservation easements.
d. Note in an accompanying letter whether archaeological site(s) exist on the
property, but do not designate the exact location on the plan.
e. Other data and information as may reasonably be required by the City,
including requiring the delineation of a construction area on the plan as well
as the location of fencing to protect sensitive features during construction.
2. Sensitive Areas Development Plan: Submittal information for a Sensitive Areas
Development Plan, which accompanies a Sensitive Areas Overlay rezoning, shall
include:
a. All the information required for a Sensitive Areas Site Plan, and
b. Submittal information required by subsection 14-6J-2D of Section 14-6J-2,
entitled "Planned Development Housing Overlay Zone (OPDH)," except in
the case of commercial and industrial development, those submittal
requirements applicable only to residential development shall not apply;
and
c. Delineation of the following sensitive areas located on the property:
1) Wetland areas.
2) Critical slopes.
3) Protected slopes.
d. Delineation of buffers and/or sensitive area conservation tracts for sensitive
areas located on the property.
e. Other data and information as may reasonably be required by the City.
'3. The City may waive any submittal requirements considered unnecessary for the
review of a specific development activity.
G. Wetlands:
1. Purpose: The purpose of regulating development in and around wetlands is to:
a. Preserve the unique and valuable attributes of wetlands as areas where
stormwater is naturally retained, thereby controlling the rate of runoff,
improving water quality, recharging groundwater resources, providing
erosion control and lessening the effects of flooding.
b. Promote the preservation of habitat for plants, fish, reptiles, amphibians
and/or other wildlife.
c. Minimize the impact of development activity on wetland areas.
d. Provide a greater degree of protection for many wetland areas above and
beyond that provided by the federal and state government.
e. Minimize the long term environmental impact associated with the loss of
wetlands.
2. Wetland Regulation by Other Agencies: The approval of a Sensitive Areas
Development Plan or a Sensitive Areas Site Plan under the provisions of this
Section is in addition to the applicant's need to obtain permits required by other
local, state, or federal agencies, and does not alter the applicant's obligation to
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 8
satisfy and obtain all other applicable local, state or federal regulations and
permits.
3. Wetland Regulations:
a. Wetland Delineation:
1) Prior to any development activity occurring on a site containing a
potential wetland as defined above or as shown on the Sensitive
Areas Inventory Map - Phase I, the property owner shall provide a
delineation of the wetland area(s) accepted by the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers prior to the submittal to the City of a Sensitive Areas
Overlay rezoning application and a Sensitive Areas Development
Plan, or a Sensitive Areas Site Plan, for City review.
2) If the property owner certifies that no development activity will occur
within one hundred fifty feet (150') of the apparent edge of a
suspected or potential wetland area(s) on the site, the requirement
for delineation by a wetland specialist or the Corps may be waived
by the City. In the case of a waiver, the property owner shall grant
an easement running in favor of the City, an approved conservation
group or other organization for the purpose of retaining the wetland
and the surrounding one hundred fifty foot (150') protection area as
undeveloped natural open space., '-""~
~.~1 I~11
.~n,, ..... .; ,,-, ~,-,n,, .... . ,h ...... ,~ ..... ~,.,,- ~ o,.,.,~.~,;,,..,. ^ .... tl,.-. PID~ '""'
VV% IVI %1 I II 1%! I1%.~ VVV%IVI II ~1 V~I~V~ ~1 I~
· . rezon:ng
~VJ~l~l I I~I lJ I I~I11
b. Wetl~nd Buffer Requirements: A one hundred foot (J00'), undisturbed,
nmur~l buffer sh~ll be m~int~ined be~een ~ny development ~otivity ~nd
"wetl~nd(sy ~s defined in the Sensitive Areas Ordinance, unless s~id
development ~otivity is exempted under subsection J4-~K-JD, entitled
"Exemptions." The required y~rds established for the b~se zoning district
sh~ll be measured from the buyer edge, ~nd sh~ll be in ~ddition t~ the
required y~rd/setb~ok ~nd sh~ll ~pply to p~rking lots ~s well. [For example,
the RS-5 zone requires 8 20-foot rear ysrd setback, which would be
measured from the outside edge of the required J00 foot buffer. As
result, no building or p~rking lot could be lo,ted within J~0 feet of the
wetl~nd.] The City m~y reduce the required nmur~l buffer b~sed on the
following oriteri~ provided that ~ Sensitive Areas Overla~ Rezo~i~g is
approved b~ the Oit~ Oooncil:
J) The required nmur~l buffer m~y be reduced by up to 50 feet if it ~n
be demonstrmed by ~ wetl~nd specialist thru the wetl~nd'
Is less th~n five ~cres in 8re~; ~nd
b) Does not contain spedes listed by the federal ~nd/or stme
government ~s endangered or thremened, or oriti~l or ~ut-
standing n~tur~l h~bit~t for those species; ~nd
o) Does not contain diverse pl~nt ~ssodmions of infrequent
occurrence or of region~l significance; ~nd
d) Is not located within ~ stresm corridor ~s defined in the
Sensitive Areas Ordinance.
2) The required nmur~l buffer m~y be reduced by up to 75 feet if it ~n
be demonstrmed by ~ wetl~nd specialist that the wetl~nd:
Smisfies the oriteri~ listed in subsection J ~bove; ~nd
b) Does not, in ~ year of ~ver~ge predpitmion, contain
standing w~ter throughout the ~lend~r year; ~nd
c) Is not ~ forested wetl~nd; ~nd
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 9
d) Does not provide a known habitat for migratory birds of local
or regional significance.
3) Buffer averaging may be permitted or required where an increased
buffer is deemed necessary or desirable to provide additional
protection to one area of a wetland for aesthetic or environmental
reasons. In this situation, the width of the required buffer around
other areas of the wetland may be reduced by up to 50 percent, but
the area of the provided buffer must be equal to or greater than the
total area of the required buffer.
v' .-,'"" -~ \', '" \"
,,' I ]?
~ND BUFFER ' % '~.~. . .~
4) In determining whether to reduce or not to reduce the required
buffer, the City shall consider the following:
a) The proposed land use of the prope~ and its potential
impact on the wetland.
b) The design and layout of the proposed development in
relation to the wetland.
c) The physical characteristi~ of the site and the wetland.
d) Any other factor related to the shod or long term environ-
mental stability and health of the wetland.
c. Design Standards:
1) No grading, dredging, clearing, filling, draining, or other develop-
ment activity shall occur within a delineated wetland or required
buffer area, unless said activity is pad of a mitigation plan as
approved under subsection 14-6K-1G4, entitled "Wetland
Mitigation," or is a permitted use, such as a trail, allowed under the
provisions of subsection 14-6K-1E, entitled "Uses Permitted Within
Protected Sensitive Areas and Buffers."
2) For prope~y not se~ed by a municipal sanita~ sewer system, the
location of septic tanks, soil absorption systems, holding tanks, or
any other element of an on-site sewage disposal system must meet
the required yard specified in the regulations of the base zoning
district, as measured from the buffer edge.
3) To mitigate negative impacts of development and limit sedimen-
tation, the direct discharge of untreated su~ace water from a
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 10
development site or a developed area into a wetland may be
prohibited. The partial treatment of storm water runoff through the
use or combined use of constructed wetlands, detention basins,
vegetative filter strips, sediment traps or other means before the
storm water runoff reaches a wetland will be considered as part of a
mitigation plan as provided in subsection 14-6K-1G4, entitled
"Wetland Mitigation." In such case, the discharge should not in-
crease the rate of flow or decrease the water quality of the wetland,
unless it can be shown by a wetland specialist that an increase in
the rate of flow will enhance rather than adversely impact the
wetland.
4) On any lot containing a wetland, erosion control measures, whether
required under Article 14-51, entitled "Grading Ordinance," or as
part of a mitigation plan approved under the provisions of the
Sensitive Areas Ordinance, shall be installed prior to any
development activity occurring on the site.
5) The planting of foreign or invasive species, including intrusive native
varieties, in wetland or buffer areas shall be prohibited. Only non-
intrusive native species shall be used to supplement existing
vegetation.
6) The removal of foreign or invasive species, including intrusive
native varieties, within a wetland or buffer area may be permitted
when approved as part of a mitigation plan as provided under
subsection 14-6K-1G4, entitled "Wetland Mitigation."
7) Where it is determined that the area occupied by the required buffer
provides little natural protection to the wetland due to previous land
disturbance, enhanced vegetative cover shall be provided within the
buffer area to help filter and slow the flow of surface water. The
enhanced vegetation shall consist of species that are known to be
non-invasive to wetland areas.
4. Wetland Mitigation: A Sensitive Areas Overlay rezoning/Sensitive Areas
Development Plan or Sensitive Areas Site Plan for property containing a wetland,
as defined in the Sensitive Areas Ordinance, shall include a mitigation plan
showing that all regulations contained in subsection 14-6K-1G3, entitled "Wetland
Regulations," will be met. Avoiding a delineated wetland area and minimizing the
impact of development on a wetland is strongly encouraged, and shall be investi-
gated before compensatory mitigation will be considered.
a. In addition to the submittal requirements contained in subsection 14-6K-IF,
entitled "Submittal Requirements," a wetland mitigation plan shall include
the following information:
1) The type and location of erosion control measures to be placed on
the property prior to any other development activity occurring on the
site.
2) The boundaries of the delineated wetland and the required natural
buffer area.
3) Certification by a wetland specialist or the U.S. Army Corps of Engi-
neers regarding the wetland delineation, if required.
4) Information regarding the characteristics of the wetland necessary
to determine the allowable buffer reduction as provided in
subsection 14-6K-1G3b, entitled "Wetland Buffer Requirements," if
a reduction is requested.
5) A storm water management plan indicating that the requirements of
Section 14-3G, entitled "Storm Water Collection, Discharge and
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 11
Runoff," and subsection 14-6K-1G3c3, which is listed under
"Design Standards" and addresses storm water runoff and
sedimentation, will be met.
b. Compensatory mitigation may be permitted only if it is clearly demonstrated
that avoiding and minimizing the impact on a wetland is unreasonable. A
permit for any development activity within a wetland area is required by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. If a permit is granted for development
activity within a wetland, compensatory mitigation shall be required based
on the following criteria, unless a greater degree of compensation is
required by the Corps:
1) Wetlands containing species listed by the federal or state govern-
ment as endangered or threatened, or containing critical or out-
standing natural habitat for those species, wetlands containing the
presence of diverse plant associations of infrequent occurrence or
of regional importance, and wetlands located within stream
corridors as defined in the Sensitive Areas Ordinance (Section 14-
6K-1) shall be considered protected, "no build" wetland areas.
Compensatory mitigation will be considered only if the wetland
disturbance is relatively small in relation to the overall wetland and if
it can be shown that the disturbance will not have an adverse
impact on the overall wetland. If compensatory mitigation is
permitted for a wetland meeting these characteristics, the required
replacement ratio of comparable habitat replaced to habitat lost
shall be at least 3:1.
2) The replacement ratio of comparable habitat replaced to habitat lost
shall be at least 2:1 for wetlands not meeting the criteria listed in
subsection 14-6K-1G4b1 above, but containing:
a) Standing water throughout the calendar year under average
precipitation,
b) Forested wetlands, and/or
c) Wetlands providing a known habitat for migratory birds of
regional or local significance.
3) Compensatory mitigation for all other wetlands regulated under the
Sensitive Areas Ordinance shall be at a ratio of at least 1:1. If said
wetland and/or the replacement habitat is enhanced to meet one or
more of the criteria listed in subsections 14-6K-1G4b1 or 14-6K-
1G4b2 above, the required replacement ratio may be reduced to
0.5:1.
c. Where compensatory mitigation is proposed, the mitigation plan specified
in subsection 14-6K-1G4, entitled "Wetland Mitigation," must be prepared
by a wetland specialist. A compensatory mitigation plan must include the
following components:
1) An assessment of the value of the wetland being replaced to
determine the appropriate replacement ratio;
2) A clear statement of the goals of the mitigation plan, including
specific statements regarding the expected rate of establishment of
a vegetative cover over specified periods of time;
3) Analysis of the soils, substrate and hydrology of the proposed site
of the constructed or expanded wetland in terms of their suitability
to provide a proper growing medium for the proposed vegetation;
4) A list of the plant species to be used, which should include only
native, non-invasive species, and their proposed locations. Tran-
splanting as much of the native vegetation from the original wetland
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 12
as possible, as well as the upper six to twelve inches of the soil is
encouraged; and
5) Provisions for monitoring the condition of the new or enhanced
wetland area for a period of five (5) years, and identification of the
party responsible for replanting in the event of poor initial growth or
predation resulting in a failure of over 30 percent of the planted
stock. Information collected during the monitoring process shall be
submitted to the City annually and include the following:
a) Data on plant species diversity and the extent of plant cover
established in the new or enhanced wetland; and
b) Wildlife presence; and
c) Data on water regimes, water chemistry, soil conditions and
ground and surface water interactions; and
d) Proposed alterations or corrective measures to address
deficiencies identified in the created or enhanced wetland,
such as a failure to establish a vegetative cover or the
presence of invasive or foreign species.
H. Stream Corridors:
1. Purpose: The purpose of regulating development in and around stream corridors
is to:
a. Preserve the value of stream corridors in providing floodwater conveyance
and storage.
b. Promote filtration of storm water runoff.
c. Reduce streambank erosion.
d. Protect and enhance wildlife habitat.
2. Stream Corridor Regulation by Other Agencies: The approval of a Sensitive Areas
Overlay rezoning/Sensitive Areas Development Plan or a Sensitive Areas Site Plan
shall be in addition to the applicant's need to obtain permits required by other local,
state or federal agencies, and does not alter the applicant's obligation to satisfy
and obtain all other applicable local, state or federal regulations and permits.
3. Stream Corridor Regulations: Any property located adjacent to the Iowa River or
another stream corridor in Iowa City will be required to submit a Sensitive Areas
Site Plan, unless said property qualifies for an exemption under subsection 14-6K-
1D, entitled "Exemptions," or is considered under a Sensitive Areas Overlay
rezoning/Sensitive Areas Development Plan review required for another sensitive
feature on the site.
4. Stream Corridor Buffer Requirements:
a. Unless exempt under subsection 14-6K-ID, entitled "Exemptions," the
following buffer requirements will be maintained; when other sensitive
features are located within a stream corridor, the most stringent required
protective buffer will apply:
1) Along the Iowa River, a 50-foot natural buffer will be maintained be-
tween any development activity and the stream corridor which
includes the floodway.
2) Along tributaries to the Iowa River that have a delineated floodway,
a 30-foot natural buffer will be maintained between any
development activity and the stream corridor which includes the
floodway. These tributaries include, but are not limited to Ralston
Creek, Willow Creek, Snyder Creek, Clear Creek and Rapid Creek.
3) Along tributaries or drainageways that do not have a delineated
floodway, a 15-foot natural buffer will be maintained between any
development activity and the stream corridor limits.
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 13
BUFFER REQUIREMENTS IN STREAM CORRIDORS
MINIMUM BUFFER BUFFER MINIMUM BUFFER
50'--IOWA RIVER MEASURED
FROM 50'--IOWA RIVER
30'-- TRIBUTARIES WITH EDGE OF 30'-- TRIBUTARIES WiTH
DELINEATED FLOODWAY STREAM DELINEATED FLOODWAY
CORRIDOR
15'-- TRIBUTARIES WITHOUT 15'-- TRIBUTARIES WITHOUT
DELINEATED FLOODWAY DELINEATED FLOODWAY
b. The City may reduce the required natural buffer based on the following
criteria:
1) The required natural buffer may be reduced by up to 50 percent if
the applicant demonstrates that the portion of the buffer being
reduced:
a) Does not contain significant existing vegetative cover, such
as native trees or prairie remnants; and
b) Does not contain other sensitive areas subject to the
requirements of the Sensitive Areas Ordinance; and
c) Enhanced vegetative cover will be provided in the remaining
buffer area.
2) The required natural buffer may be reduced by up to 100 percent if
the applicant demonstrates that:
a) The property is adjacent to or contains a stream corridor
that is located in a developed area of the City (defined as an
area of the City where platted lots abut the stream as of
December 13, 1995, the effective date of the Sensitive
Areas Ordinance); and
b) The portion of the buffer being reduced does not contain
other sensitive areas subject to the requirements of the
Sensitive Areas Ordinance; and
c) Requiring the full stream corridor buffer would preclude
reasonable use of the property; and
d) Enhanced vegetative cover will be provided in any remain-
ing buffer area, to the extent possible.
c. In determining whether to reduce the required buffer, the City shall
consider the following:
1) The proposed land use of the property and its potential impact on
the stream corridor;
2) The design and layout of the proposed development in relation to
the stream corridor;
3) The characteristics of the site and the stream corridor; and
4) Any other factor related to the short or long term environmental
stability and health of the stream corridor.
I. Regulated Slopes:
1. Purpose: The purpose of regulating development on and near steep slopes is to:
a. Promote safety in the design and construction of developments.
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 14
b. Minimize flooding, landslides and mudslides.
c. Minimize soil instability, erosion and downstream siltation.
d. Preserve the scenic character of hillside areas, particularly wooded
hillsides.
2. Regulations:
a. Steep Slopes - Any property containing steep slopes (18-24%) shall be
required to submit a Sensitive Areas Site Plan, unless said property
qualifies for an exemption under subsection 14-6K-ID, entitled
"Exemptions." The Sensitive Areas Site Plan must conform with the design
standards for regulated slopes specified in subsection 14-6K-114.
b. Critical Slopes - Any property containing critical slopes (25-39%) shall be
required to submit a Sensitive Areas Site Plan ''~ .... I'-"
...... .. rczcning
· .,~.~,'~"'""~""*;"",...,.,,~"'";*~'"',.,,.,... ,^.,"eas ,.. .. . ,.. , ,.. ~, ,n .... , ....., ,.., ,.* Plan and a Grading Plan, unless
said property qualifies for an exemption under subsection 14-6K-ID,
entitled "Exemptions." The Sensitive Areas Site n .... , ..... * Plan must
conform with the design standards for regulated slopes specified in
subsection 14-6K-114, and the Grading Plan must conform with the require-
ments of the Grading Ordinance. If the Sensitive Areas
Site Plan indicates that more than 35% of the critical slopes on a
property are to be disturbed a Sensitive Areas Overlay Rezoning
application will be required,
c. Protected Slopes - Any area designated as a natural protected slope
(40%+) shall not be graded and must remain in its existing state, except
that natural vegetation may be supplemented by other plant material. Any
such property shall be required to submit a Sensitive Areas Site
rczcning ~,-,,-,i;,.~,;,.,,., Sensitive ^,.,.oo ,.. ..... ~- .......
,-.~,~- ........ , ...... n .... i ...."+ Plan and a Grading
Plan, unless said property qualifies for an exemption under subsection 14-
6K-ID, entitled "Exemptions." Development activities may be allowed
within areas containing altered protected slopes provided that a Sensitive
Areas Overlay Rezoning is approved by the City Council and if a
geologist or professional engineer can demonstrate to the satisfaction of
the City that a development activity will not undermine the stability of the
slope and the City determines that the development activities are consis-
tent with the intent of the Sensitive Areas Ordinance.
~noroa$i~ ;n*O a ~r;H,-~l ~l,~n-- O,n, *h~, ~;*-, nnN ,,,;11 n,~*
I I I I I II I~ ~,~1 lllt. W~41 1.11~,i~ I ~1 I~.~ ~1~.~, 1.41 II.A I1111 I I~.~i II I 1~.~41~1
~11 ~w~.~411 ~Wl i iI~Wl is ~.~1 1~Wl i%Jl~l v I~ · %1 ~%.41~l ~.~ v I~1 1~4~
I%,~Vl III I~1V~,,~i i~mll Li v ~,~ · %1 ~,,~m4~ J-,~' v v ~,~lVJ~,fl I IVII& I 1~,,411, I1,,41 i~m4 ~m4 11~,,,~ Il LI I~ ~1V~VI ~ V Il I IVI
..... , ~ ....... ~O~., ,~.~,,~,.,.~ ,~.~,~ O~
~ V~l IVl~l~
3. Bu~e~ requirements: ~ bu~e~ will be required ~mund ~11 pmteoted slope~. Two
feet o~ bu~e~ will be provided fo~ each foot of ve~Jcal dse of the protected slope, up
to a maximum buffer of 50 feet The buffer area is ~o be measured from ~he ~op,
toe ~fld sides of t~e protected slope. No development ~ctivJ~, including removal of
t~ees ~nd othe~ vegetation, ~h~ll be ~llowed within the
~ro~es~ion~l enginee~ ~n demonstrate to the ~tisf~ction
development ~ctivJt~ c~n be designed to eliminate h~z~rds, the buffer requim-
men~s may be reduced provided that a Sensitive Areas Overlay Rezoning is
approved by the City Council.
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 15
BUFFER REQUIREMENTS FOR PROTECTED SLOPES
!
RI~QU~REO BUFFER ~EQUIRED BUFFER
I 2' FOR EVERY 1' OF ! 2' FOR EVERY 1' OF
I VERTICAL RISE UP TO I VERTICAL RISE UP TO
L~ MAXIMUM OF 50' I PROTECTED SLOPE (40% OR GREATER) A MAXIMUM OF 50'
TOE OF SLOPE TOP OF SLOPE
NOTE: BUFFER MAY BE REDUCED UPON REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF ,~
SPECIAL STUDY.
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 16
4. Design Standards for Regulated Slopes: The following standards shall be addressed
when either a Sensitive Areas Site Plan or a Sensitive Areas Overlay rezoning/Sensitive
Areas Development Plan for property containing regulated slopes is submitted:
a. Except for commercially or industrially-zoned properties, every lot or parcel
containing protected slopes shall have a construction area equal to at least
forty percent (40%) of the minimum lot size required by the zone in which it
is located. [For example, the construction area would be a minimum of
3,200 square feet for a lot in the RS-5 zone, where a minimum 8,000
square foot lot is required.]
b. Except for driveways and utilities installation, no grading or excavation shall
be allowed outside the construction area on lots containing protected
slopes. Grading and excavation shall be minimized on steep and critical
slopes.
c. Cut slopes shall be constructed to eliminate sharp angles of intersection
with the existing terrain and shall be rounded and contoured as necessary
to blend with existing topography to the maximum extent possible. The
City will not accept the dedication and maintenance of cut and fill slopes,
except those within the required street right-of-way.
d. Street rights-of-way and public utility corridors shall be located so as to
minimize cutting and filling.
e. To maintain the stability of ungraded areas, existing vegetation shall be re-
tained to the maximum extent possible.
J. Wooded Areas
1. Purpose: The purpose of regulating development in and around wooded areas is
to:
a. Reduce damage to wooded areas of the City, particularly wooded
wetlands, steep slopes and stream corridors.
b. Reduce erosion and siltation.
c. Minimize the destruction of wildlife habitat.
d. Encourage subdivision and site plan design which incorporate groves and
woodlands as amenities within a development.
2. Woodland/Grove Regulations:
~,v~v~ v, ~, v~,,. vv,, ,~v, ~ ~,,, ~v , ~.. v~ .v ~..,.~ ~ vv, ,v,~, wv
a. Any prope~y containing a woodland, but not othe~ise required to have a
Sensitive Areas Overlay rezoning/Sensitive Areas Development Plan, will
be required to submit a Sensitive Areas Site Plan prior to woodland
clearing or commencing any development activity, unless said prope~y
qualifies for an exemption under subsection 14-6K-ID, enti(led
"Exemptions."
b. Site plans, grading plans and subdivision plats for any prope~y containing
a grove of trees shall illustrate the grove on (he plan or plat prior to
commencement of any development ac[ivity, and will take measures to
protect and retain as much of the grove as practi~ble, unless said prope~y
qualifies for~ an exemption under subsection 14-6K-ID, entitled
"Exemptions."
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 17
IvGVI III I~IV~I 1~1%19v I tlVM~ MVW~lV~l i i I1~ I I~11 IllU] wv ~1~1 vM I IIV
I% ~ IVI IVV II II
...... w ....... ~ .......... ~ .................... ~a ~u
c. If due to site constraints or infrastructure requirements a Sensitive
Areas Site Plan for a prope~y can not adhere to the minimum
woodland retention requirements contained in section 14-6K-1~-3.
The City may approve the planting of replacement trees subject to the
requirements of section 14-6K-14-3 provided that a Sensitive Areas
Overlay Rezoning is approved by the City Council
3. Woodland Retention and Replacement Requirements
a. Sensitive Areas Development Plans and Sensitive Areas Site Plans
required to be submitted under this Section shall delineate all existing
woodlands and shall designate all woodlands that are to be protected.
The plans shall substantiate that woodlands are being retained as follows
unless a Sensitive Areas Overlay Rezoning allowing planting of
replacement trees is approved by the City Council:
Zone Retention Requirement
ID, RR-1 70%
RS-5, RS-8, RS-12, 50%
RM-12, RM-20, RM-44, RNC-12, RNC-20 20%
RDP, ORP 20%
C and I 10%
b. The required woodland area to be retained shall be delineated to include a
buffer area by measuring fifty (50) feet outward from the trunks of trees
intended to be preserved.
c. If the City determines that the required woodland area cannot be retained
due to site constraints or infrastructure requirements, replacement trees will
be planted. One tree shall be planted for every 200 square feet of
woodland removed from the otherwise required retention area.
d. Where it is not feasible to replace trees on-site, replacement trees may be
planted to supplement reforestation of an off-site woodland approved by
the City. An off-site woodland shall be either publicly owned property or
property subject to a conservation easement.
e. Replacement trees must be approved by the City, and to the extent
possible, should be of the same or equivalent species as the trees being
removed.
f. Replacement trees shall meet the specifications set forth in Section 14-6R-
5, entitled "General Tree Planting Requirements," and shall be secured by
a performance guarantee for a period of 12 months.
g. Woodland and tree protection methods for proposed development activity
shall be shown on any plan or plat required to be submitted prior to
commencement of development activity. Protection methods should
comply with generally accepted tree protection guidelines and be approved
by the City.
h. When other environmentally sensitive features regulated by the Sensitive
Areas Ordinance are present in combination with a woodland, the
Ordinance No. 95-3699
Page 18
regulations related to all the sensitive areas contained on the property will
be considered, with the most stringent regulations applying.
4. Design Standards for Woodland Retention: The following standards should be ad-
dressed when either a Sensitive Areas Site Plan or a Sensitive Areas Overlay
rezoning/Sensitive Areas Development Plan is submitted:
a. To the extent possible, woodlands located on steep and/or critical slopes
and/or within 100-year flood plains should be given the highest retention
priority when meeting the requirements of subsection 14-6K-1J3, entitled
"Woodland Retention and Replacement Requirements."
b. Street rights-of-way, public utility corridors and building sites should be
located so as to minimize their impact on woodlands and groves.
d. Where possible, woodlands and groves to be protected should be located
within designated public or private open space, either through dedication, a
conservation easement, or control by a homeowners' association.
NO CHANGES PROPOSED BEYOND THIS POINT IN THE ORDINANCE.
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM
Date: September 12, 2002
To: Planning and Zoning Commission
From: Robert Miklo
Re: Capital Improvements Plan
Staff is beginning the process of updating the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). We would like
to keep the Commission informed about the' process and seek any direction you would like to
provide regarding the priority assigned to upcoming projects. The attached list includes
projects that have already been included in the CIP. If the project is included in particular Fiscal
Year it is noted in the column on the right. Projects that are included in the CIP but which are
not yet scheduled are noted as unfunded. The list also includes projects that are proposed in
various district plans but not yet included in the CIP. The projects are organized by district plan.
We will be discussing CIP at the informal meeting on September 16.
DISTRICT CIP PROJECTS
SEPT. 2002
South District
· Gilbert Street/Sand Road improvements to ENV arterial FY0$
· ENV arterial--river to Scott/Sioux Ave Unfunded
· Sycamore--Burns to Citylimits Unfunded
· Sycamore--Citylimits to L Unfunded
· Sand Lake trail Unfunded
· Sand Hill Prairie restoration
· Willow Creek/S. Sycamore Greenway trail--Napolean Park to S. Sycamore
Greenway
· Fire Station #5
· Quarry Park (west side of sand Road)
South Central District
· WB or Dane Road sewer FY02-03
· Mormon Trek Extd. To Hwy 921 FY03-05
· Airport Master Plan--Rwy 7 ext. & relocation Dane Rd. FY05
· Willow Creek trail--Kiwanis to Napolean Unfunded
· Riverside Redevelopment Unfunded
· Fire station #6
· Sidewalks along Hwy 921--Hwy 6 to Colonial Lanes
· Sturgis Ferry Park upgrade
· Sidewalks on Hwy 1--921 to Mormon Trek Blvd.
· Streetscape on Hwy 921 entrance--Sturgis Ferry Park to Hwy 6
North District
·
· Waterworks Park--Phasel FY03
· Foster Road--Dubuque to Prairie du Chien FY05
· Foster Road intersection improvements FY05
· Dodge Street improvements FY05
· Waterworks Park--Phase II Unfunded
· Peninsula Park Unfunded
· Elevation of Dubuque Street Unfunded
· Upgrade of Taft Speedway Unfunded
· Dubuque Road upgrade (w/ sidewalks) Unfunded
· Pedestrian bridge over Iowa River @ Park Road Unfunded
· ,Dubuque Street entryway improvements Unfunded
· Iowa River Corridor trail--between Waterworks & Peninsula Unfunded
· Trail--Shimek school to Foster Road extended
· Trail--IRC on south side of Elks property
· Trail--along Williams pipeline easement
Northeast District
· Fire Station ~4 FY05
· Lower West Branch Road FY06
· Krall (Oakdale) Boulevard--Scott to Hwy 1 Unfunded
· Northeast Trunk sewer upgrade Unfunded
· Court Hill trail Unfunded
· Development of square in Windsor Ridge North
· Sidewalk gaps on First Ave and Rochester Ave
· Traffic calming on Washington St.
Southwest District
· Benton Street Park FY05
· Hwy 965--Melrose to Hwy 1 Unfunded
· IRC (west side of river)--Benton To Sturgis Ferry Park Unfunded
· Willow Creek trail--under Hwy 218 to Melrose Unfunded
· Rohret sewer (Abbey Lane ext)--west under Hwy 218 Unfunded
· Myrtle & Riverside drive signalization Unfunded
· Riverside Drive streetscape--Myrtle to Hwy 6 (sidewalks; driveway
consolidation; street trees; lights; underground utilities)
· Sidewalks on Benton--widen and install as needed, Riverside to Sunset
· Relocate fire station #2
· Lift station west of Southwest Estates
· Riverside Drive ped tunnel through RR embankment
· Ped overpass between Roosevelt school and Benton Hill park
· Upgrade Melrose to City standards--Hwy 218 to 965 alignment
· Carson Lake regional stormwater mgmt (include single loaded street and ped
trail)
· Upgrade Maier Ave to City standards
Others
· Hwy 6 sidewalk--Taylorto Sycamore Unfunded
· Hwy 6 to 4 lanes--Industrial Park Rd. to 420th St. Unfunded
· Dubuque St/Park Road intersection Unfunded
· Dubuque/Church leftturn bays Unfunded
· Hwy 6 sidewalk--Sycamore to Scott
· Court/Gilbert signalization
· Spec building forwhse/mfg
· Hummingbird Land upgrade
· Gilbert/Hwy 6 intersection improvement (believe we already added this as an
unfunded project)
· Linn Street connector
· Corps 206 project