The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02-06-2003 Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda Informal Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Monday, February 3, 2003 - 7:30 PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ITEMS ON THE INFORMAL AGENDA WILL BE HELD AT THE FORMAL MEETING ON THURSDAY, February 6, 2003, 7:30 P.M., Emma J. Harvat Hall Civic Center Agenda Formal Meeting Planning and Zoning Commission Thursday, February 6, 2003 - 7:30 p.m. Emma J. Harvat Hall (Civic Center) A. Call to Order B. Public Discussion of Any Item Not on the Agenda C. Announcement of Vacancies on City Boards and Commissions D. Zoning/Development Items: 1. REZ02-00020: Discussion of an application submitted by the Paddock L.L.C. for a rezoning from Factory Built Housing Residential Zone (RFBH) to Planned Development Housing Overlay 12 (OPDH-12) and an OPDH plan for Saddlebrook Addition Part 2, a 2.8 acre 26-unit multi-family housing development located on the east side of Heinz Road east of Paddock Boulevard. (45-day limitation period: February 6, 2003) 2. REZ02-00021: Discussion of an application submitted by Kevin Hanick for a rezoning from Central Business Service Zone (CB-2) to Central Business Support Zone (CB-5) for a 6,000 square foot property located at the south east comer of the Dubuque Street / Market Street intersection. (45-day limitation period: February 6, 2003) 3. REZ03-00007 Discussion of a City-initiated application for a rezoning from Central Business Service Zone (CB-2) to Central Business Support Zone (CB-5) for Block 67 of the Original Town Plat, excepting the 6,000 square foot property at 130 North Dubuque Street. (45-day limitation period: March 16, 2003) 4. REZ02-00022 Discussion of and application submitted by Arlington L.C. for an amendments to the Planned Development Housing Overlay (OPDH-8) plan for Lot 255, Windsor Ridge Part 12, a 7.93-acre, 64-unit multi-family residential development located south of Court Street and west of Arlington Drive. (45-day limitation period: February 20, 2003) 5. REZ03-00005: Discussion of an application submitted by the Historic Preservation Commission for a rezoning from Neighborhood Conservation Residential (RNC-12 & RNC-20) High Density Multifamily Residential (RM-44) and Medium Density Single Family Residential (RS-8) to Conservation District Overlay ~RNC-12/OCD, RNC- 20/OCD, RM-44/OCD & RS-8/OCD) for the designation of the College Hill Conservation District within the College Hill Neighborhood, which will consist of properties along the following streets: Iowa Avenue, Washington Street and College Street between Van Buren Street and Muscatine Avenue; Burlington Street between Summit Street and Muscatine Avenue; and Johnson Street, Dodge Street, Lucas Street, Governor Street, and Summit Street between Iowa Avenue and Burlington Street. (60-day limitation period: March 18, 2003) 6. REZ03-00001: Discussion of an application submitted by the Historic Preservation Commission for a rezoning to designate the property at 30 South Governor Street an Iowa City Historic Landmark. (60-day limitation period: March 18, 2003) 7. REZ03-00002: Discussion of an application submitted by the Historic Preservation Commission for a rezoning to designate the property located at 802 Washington Street as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. (60-day limitation period: March 18, 2003) 8. REZ03-00003: Discussion of an application submitted by the Historic Preservation Commission for a rezoning to designate the property located at 726 Iowa Avenue as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. (60-day limitation period: March 18, 2003) 9. REZ03-00004: Discussion of an application submitted by the Historic Preservation Commission combining the Longfellow Historic District and the Moffitt Cottage Historic District into one historic district named the Longfellow Historic District. (60-day limitation period: March 18, 2003) E. Other: Discussion of definition and regulation of childcare homes. F. Consideration of the January 16, 2003 Meeting Minutes. G. ADJOURNMENT Upcomi ng Planning & ZoJ~ingu Commission Meetings:,, Infor~nal 'Cancelled" March 3 March 17 March 31 April 14 April 28 President's Day Formal February 20 March 6 March 20 April 3 April 17 May 1 City of Iowa City M E MORAN DU M Date: February 6, 2003 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: John Yapp, Associate Planner Re: REZ02-00021: Rezoning Request for 130 North Dubuque Street REZ03-00007: Rezoning Request for Block 67, Original Town Plat I have discussed the 130 North Dubuque Street property with staff from the Seneca Company Environment Services Division, and the Iowa Department of Natural Resources. Seneca is the company operating the monitoring wells on the property, and would be the company to prepare and design a remediation plan for the site if it is redeveloped. Currently the site is a known contaminated site. In the language of Iowa DNR, there are contamination drivers and receptors. Common drivers are contaminated ground water or vapors from a contaminated area. Common receptors are wells, abandoned pipe systems, or basements. One of Iowa DNR's concerns is ensuring that a development project does not result in contamination drivers (e.g., vapors) finding their way into a receptor (e.g., basement). According to the Iowa DNR staff I spoke with, it would likely be cost-prohibitive to clean up the site to drinking water standards, due to the size of the plume of contamination and the relative small size of the property. Cleaning contamination to drinking water standards is required when there are wells drawing water from the area. Because no properties have wells in the vicinity, and Iowa City requires properties to use the municipal water system, the cleanup standard is less stringent. The staff l spoke with feel it is possible to develop a remediation plan (clean-up plan) for this property. The type of remediation plan being pursued for this property is an over-excavation, where more soil would be excavated than is needed for the basement. The area under the basement slab would be backfilled with gravel, and tile lines would be installed to draw off any vapors that might accumulate. Apparently over-excavation is a fairly common method of dealing with these types of properties. Iowa DNR would require additional testing during and after this process to determine the levels of contamination. The goal for the property owner is to obtain a "No Further Action" (NFA) letter from Iowa DNR. This letter would be obtained once the pollution levels are at or below acceptable standards. Iowa DNR's enforcement mechanism is to issue an administrative order requiring that the site be cleaned up, and can fine the property owner if cleanup efforts are being ignored while development activities are taking place. Iowa DNR would need to work with the Attorney General's office in order to take a property owner to court to force them to clean up a contaminated area. Iowa DNR prefers to work with the property owner and/or developer in carrying out cleanup activities, ideally during a development process that is already occurring. All parties I spoke with agree that a redevelopment of this property is a good opportunity for removing as much contaminated soil as possible. In staff's opinion, the soil contamination issue is the same regardless of the zoning of the property. Iowa DNR would treat the property the same under the CB-2 or CB-5 zones. Rezoning Request for 130 North Dubuque Street January 31,2003 Page 2 Other Contaminated Properties The Commission had asked how many other contaminated sites there are in Iowa City. According to Iowa DNR records, there are 72 properties in Iowa City that are known contaminated properties from leaking underground storage tanks (out of 186 registered underground storage tank sites). Out of these 72 contaminated sites, 47 have received a "No Further Action" status from Iowa DNR, which means no further clean-up activities are required by Iowa DNR. There are 25 properties that do require additional clean-up at some point, including the 130 North Dubuque Street property. Recommenda~tion for Rezoning Block 67 As discussed at the January 16 Commission meeting, staff is recommending all of Block 67 be rezoned from CB-2, Central Business Service zone, to CB-5, Central Business Support zone. This is due to a desire for predictability and consistency for all the properties on the block, and to avoid a "spot-zoning" of a single property zoned differently than the other properties around it. Number of Parking Spaces The Commission had asked how many parking spaces would be possible if the property were converted to a surface parking lot. Given the size and dimensions of the property, I estimate 16 parking spaces would be possible on this property, with no other buildings present. Number of Persons Permitted Per Bedroom The Commission also asked how many persons are permitted per bedroom by code. According to the Housing Code, the minimum size of a bedroom is 70 square feet. One additional person would be permitted in the bedroom for every additional 40 square feet. In other words, two people could reside in the bedroom if it were 110 square feet, three people in a 150 square foot bedroom, etc. Both the CB-2 and CB-5 zones allow up to five unrelated persons to reside in a dwelling unit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends REZ02-00021, a request for a rezoning from CB-2, Central Business Service zone, to CB-5, Central Business Support zone, for a 6,000 square foot property located at 130 North Dubuque Street, be approved, subject to a Conditional Zoning Agreement requiring staff Design Review Committee approval of any new building on the property to ensure compatibility with the historic character of the area. Staff recommends REZ03-00007, a City-initiated request for a rezoning from CB-2, Central Business Service zone, to CB-5, Central Business Support zone, for Block 67, Iowa City Original Town Plat, excepting the 6,000 square foot property at 130 North Dubuque Street be approved. Approved by: Robert Miklo, Senior Planner Department of Planning and Community Development ppdadm/mem/jy-130ndubuque.doc rY :o N3~FI8 NrA 0 :z:: 0 910z NONSN( J_S NO_L NI-lO O J_ NI'-I.' · r----! -ES NOSIOVlAI © © :~o N3UQ8 N~'A ~ -IIOz O IS NO J_ NI-IO I-- o O h o ~ ~ 1-LS NOSI(]W~ © - ~ STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Prepared by: Shelley McCafferty Item: REZ02-00022 Windsor Ridge, Part Twelve Date: February 6, 2003 Preliminary OPDH plan & rezoning GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Arlington, L.C. C/o Gary Watts 2346 Mormon Trek Boulevard Iowa City, IA 52246 Phone: 351-8811 Contact Person: Duane Musser MMS Consultants 1917 S. Gilbert Iowa City, IA 52240 Phone: 351-8282 Requested Action: Rezoning to amend the OPDH Purpose: To create a 64-unit, single-lot planned housing development Location: Court and Arlington Streets Size: 7.93 acres Existing Land Use and Zoning: Vacant, PDH-8 Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Residential; PDH-12 South: RS-5; residential East: RS-5; residential & private open space West: Public; open space Comprehensive Plan: Residential; 2-8 dwelling units per acre File Date: Jan 17, 2003 45-day Limitation Period March 3, 2003 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The applicant, Arlington, L.C., is requesting a rezoning to amend an existing Planned Development Housing Plan (PDH-8) for Lot 255 of Windsor Ridge Part Twelve located at the intersection of Court Street and Arlington Drive. The subject property was rezoned from Low Density Single Family Residential (RS-5) to Medium Density Single Family Residential (RS-8) in 1995 subject to a conditional zoning agreement requiring a future OPDH rezoning and approval of a development plan for the property. In 1999 a PDH plan for the construction of four 18-plex buildings with underground parking was approved. The applicant is now requesting that this plan be amended to allow three 12-plex units and 28 townhouse style units for a total of 64 dwellings. Because this property contains a wetland, stream corridor and fully hydric soils, a sensitive areas site plan is also required. ANALYSIS: The RS-8 zoning allows single-family lots with a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet and a minimum 45-foot lot width. The OPDH section of the zoning ordinance states that among other things it is the intent of the zone to: 1. Provide flexibility in architectural design, placement and clustering of buildings, use of open space, traffic circulation and parking and related site and design considerations; 2. Promote efficient land use with smaller utility and street networks; 3. Promote an attractive and safe living environment compatible with surrounding residential developments; and 4. Encourage infill development. In exchange for greater flexibility in the application of zoning standards. The OPDH ordinance giyes the City greater control of design issues to help assure that the resulting development is compatible with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and the character of the surrounding neighborhood, and provides amenities to the City and residents. It also provides greater flexibility to the developer by allowing alternative designs such as clustered development. It allows multifamily dwellings on a lot in which the underlying zoning would only allow single family residential, as long as the overall density does not exceed the underlying allowable density. The primary purpose of this application is to review the design of the development to ensure conformance with the neighborhood design concepts, as discussed below. The Plan's conformance with the requirements of the Zoning Chapter and other City Codes must also be evaluated. Comprehensive Plan: The Neighborhood Design Concepts discussed in the Comprehensive Plan encourage the development of neighborhoods with neighborhood commercial opportunities, diverse housing types, more efficient and compact design, interconnected street systems that provide for all modes of transportation, attractive and pedestrian-oriented streetscapes, and the inclusion of adequate parks, trails, and open space. The proposed preliminary OPDH plan has been reviewed with respect to these items, as per the conditional zoning agreement. It should be noted, however, that not every parcel can be developed to provide for all of these amenities. Rather, each proposed development should be evaluated to determine whether it would contribute toward the creation of an overall neighborhood that has these qualities, taking into account what already exists within the area. Housing Diversity/Compatibility: The Comprehensive Plan calls for the development of neighborhoods with diverse housing opportunities, but stresses the importance of quality design for multi-family development when integrated into lower density neighborhoods. The previous PDH plan was approved in part because the proposed 18-plex buildings introduced a new building type to the neighborhood. Given the adjacent land uses and the topography of the lot, it was felt that large freestanding buildings would not have a significant negative effect on future single family residential development in the vicinity. In addition, the parking was to be located below grade, which would contribute to the compatibility of the proposal with the neighborhood as well as add to the pedestrian-friendly environment of the development. The amended plan proposes the construction of three 12-plexes similar to those constructed directly north of Court Street. The applicant has also proposed two new designs for the townhouse style buildings that front Court Street, therefore adding some diversity to the area. Townhouses and apartments have been constructed on the north side of Court Street and along Camden Road. Private open space is located on the east side of Arlington Drive and public open space is located to the west. The single-family residential development that is occurring to the south, is buffered from this development by open space and a stream corridor. Given these adjacent land uses, staff feels that this proposal is compatible with the neighborhood. The Comprehensive Plan also states that multi-family housing be located at the intersection of arterial and collector streets in order to minimize traffic in single-family neighborhoods. This proposal complies with this standard since Court Street is classified as an arterial and Arlington Drive as a collector. The addition traffic generated by this development will not generate enough trips to exceed the standards for these streets. More Efficient and Compact Design: The proposed plan will result in a density of about 8 dwelling units per acre, which is more than a conventional RS-8 single-family subdivision of 5-6 units per acre. Interconnected Streets: This proposal does not include the construction of any new public streets. Berkeley Lane, located parallel to Court Street, will connect to Court Street at the western edge of the lot as well as to Arlington Drive providing adequate access to this development. A driveway to access the townhouses is proposed between Court Street and the private street which, in conjunction with the private street, will provide adequate circulation within the development. Streetscape/Pedestrian-Orientation: Staff has been working closely with the applicant on the design of the proposed townhouses and the landscaping of the site. The applicant is proposing two new designs for 6-plex townhouse style buildings that have not been constructed elsewhere. Due to the length of the Court Street frontage, Berkeley Lane and the townhouse driveway, staff has been concerned about the monotony of the streetscapes. Due to the topography of the site, a north-south street or drive to this lot at Camden Road is not viable. Therefore, in order to reduce the monotony along Court Street, a linear tree-lined alley that terminates at a picnic area is proposed. This feature will have a sidewalk with stairs. Berkeley Lane provides access to the three 12-plex buildings and their associated parking garages. Staff is somewhat concerned about the number of garage doors and the monotony of the garages along this street. The applicant is proposing to alternate different garage designs to help ameliorate this concern. The north side of the garages will be partially below grade and landscaped with shrubs, therefore reducing their visibility from the driveway and Court Street. The applicant is also providing street trees along the south side of the driveway. Staff has recommended that in order to create a more residential character and reduce the negative impact of the expanse of concrete, planting islands be added between the paired garage drives. Because these units are 23 feet wide and there will be adjacent pedestrian doors on the rear elevation, this leaves 6-8 feet of unnecessary concrete that could be landscaped. The applicant is concerned that this will make snow removal difficult. Another option staff has recommended is to use stamped and colored concrete, or pavers for the driveways and add landscaping between the buildings at the driveways. The previous OPD plan was approved in part because there was a minimal need for concrete surfacing and garages with the parking located below the buildings. An accessible trail will be located along the west edge of the property and will connect via a pedestrian bridge to an east-west trail south of the stream corridor. This trail will eventually connect with a trail in Scott Park. A sidewalk is provided south of Berkeley Lane and connects to the trail and to the Arlington Drive sidewalk. Overall, staff feels that the pedestrian connections are well-connected within the development, to the neighborhood and to adjacent properties. In addition, the pedestrian environment and streetscape should be relatively friendly and attractive, and adequate open space has been provided. Staff has recommend to the applicant that the picnic area be further developed to provide a more significant amenity. The previous PDH-8 provided a clubhouse as an amenity. Preliminary OPDH Plan: Specific Standards: The specific standards for the PDH plan including land coverage, open space, dimensional and design standards have been met. City Code Items: The proposed preliminary OPDH plan illustrates a total of 64 dwelling units on 7.93 acres. After streets are subtracted from the total acreage, the density of this development is approximately 8.5 units per acre. This falls within the density limitations of the underlying RS-8 zoning. This property is served by the existing regional detention basin located in Scott Park. No on-site storm water management is required. Variations: According to the information provided by the applicant, a three variations will be required. A dimensional variation in the required distance between principle buildings is necessary. Code requires when more than one principle building is permitted on a lot, they are to be separated by a distance equal to the height of the highest building. The distance illustrated between the townhouse style buildings is 17-20 feet, which does not comply with this code requirement. Staff feels that given the housing type and the configuration of these buildings that this variation is acceptable. All the units in this PDH plan are attached units. Townhouse units are allowed in the RS-8 zone as a provisional use. However, these units are not located on individual lots and therefore do not meet the definition of a townhouse. Apartment buildings are not allowed in the RS-8 zone. A variation is required to permit multiple townhouse-style units on the same lot as well as three 12- plex apartment buildings. Open Space: Neighborhood open space requirement for the Windsor Ridge property located south of Court Street have been satisfied with the reservation of several large areas of open space, providing a greenway and trail system throughout the development. Outlot J is also dedicated to the City and will become part of that system. The development will also have a good deal of usable private open space north of the stream corridor. Sensitive Areas: This parcel does contain a 1.5-acre wetland, stream corridor and fully hydric soils, thereby requiring a Sensitive Areas Site Plan. However, this proposal does not encroach into the stream corridor, wetland or any required buffers. Therefore, a sensitive areas overlay is not required. Relative to the previously approved site plan, this proposal does indicate more disturbance of the fully hydric soils. However, staff feels that the criteria of the Sensitive Areas Ordinance have been met. Summary: In general, staff feels that the proposed plan conforms with the neighborhood design principles contained in the Comprehensive Plan and complies with applicable City ordinances. Staff does recommend additional landscaping revisions to the townhouse driveways and the proposed picnic area. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that REZ02-00022 a rezoning to amend a Planned Development Housing Overlay (PDH-8) for Windsor Ridge, Part 12, Lot 255, a 7.93 acre development located at Court Street and Arlington Drive be approved with the following variations and subject to additional landscaping: 1. Reduction in the distance between two primary buildings on a single lot to 17 feet. 2. Multiple primary buildings located on one lot. 3. Three 12-plex multi-family buildings allowed on a lot with the an RS-8 underlying zone. DEFFICIENCIES AND DISCREPENCIES: 1. Requires final review by the City Engineer 2. Key elevations to plan 3. Improve picnic area and landscaping 4. Elevations of 12-plex buildings ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location map 2. Preliminary OPDH Plan and Sensitive Areas Development Plan 3. Grading Plan 4. Landscaping Plan 5. Building Elevations 6. Existing PDH-8 Plan Approved by: ,~--~,.,,'~ ~-~' Robert Miklo, Senior Planner, Department of Planning and Community Development Z 3 Z ,~ ~, ... ;__~::r::~.:~-:,, .,,,,,~._,oo ~,, ,,,~'..:~~~.~..'31illillll~:l~li_ /I '~U ~~'~ ~~ ~~~~~ iii. Il. ''~ . --',! .ii Iii [ir~p] ,~,:,,,l:I:~:~° I ~ 'l~';IIzl ~ I:.l. ,,--. ,,,i,, . [ :..,I ,I. I, lll,~, ill ,:, "" "',,I~~i~~i~ ~ []'"~P I' ' ~. ~ = I~l~ II1~ il l'"'l I ,lllll,:ll,:l City of Iowa City M EMORAN DU M Date: February 6, 2003 To: Iowa City Planning & Zoning Commission From: Shelley McCafferty, Associate Planner RE: REZ03-00005: College Hill Conservation District Conservation District Report: Attached is the Historic Preservation Commission report to the State Historical Society of Iowa for the proposed College Hill Conservation District. This report fulfills the requirements for the Conservation District Overlay ordinance and describes the historic and architectural significance of the proposed district; the boundaries of the district; contributing, noncontributing and key properties; the College Hill Neighborhood District Guidelines; and the design review process for a conservation district. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: One of the Housing Goals and Strategies of the 1997 Iowa City Comprehensive Plan is to: "Preserve the integrity of existing neighborhoods and the historic nature of older neighborhoods." The Plan supports the Historic Preservation Commission's efforts to meets these goals. Furthermore, the Comprehensive Plan's goals and strategies for Art, Culture & Human Development; Environmental Protection; and Land Use and Urban Patterns also support the implementation of the Iowa City Historic Preservation Plan, which was adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan. The Preservation Plan recommends the survey and evaluation of the College Hill Neighborhood, and the designation of local historic and conservation districts, and landmarks. Designation of these districts provides for the future stability of the neighborhood through careful review by the Historic Preservation Commission of exterior remodeling and new construction projects. The attached report further elaborates on this review process. Public Input: During the evaluation and nomination of the College Hill Conservation District, the Historic Preservation Commission held two informal neighborhood meetings and a public hearing that occurred during the course of two meetings. A third public meeting was held that dealt specifically with the proposed College Hill Neighborhood District Guidelines. Due to public concerns regarding the impact of the proposed district on commercial property and land values, the Commission revised the boundaries of the proposal to eliminate properties located in the CB-2 zone. The HPC also compared the assessed land values from tax records of properties in existing historic districts with properties located in the same zone, but not within a conservation or historic district. The results of this study indicated that there is some increase in the land value of properties located in the RS-8 zone. However, in the multifamily zones, there is no clear pattern that indicates that a district has a significant impact on the land values. Historic Preservation Commission Recommendation: The Historic Preservation Commission held a public hearing on this designation at its October 24, 2002 meeting. The Commission chose to continue the public hearing at its next meeting. At its November 14 meeting, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend a revised proposal for the College Hill Conservation District to the Planning and Zoning Commission and State Historical Society of Iowa, with the exception of the January 30, 2003 Page 2 College Hill Neighborhood Guidelines. On December 12, they voted 7-0 to revise and recommend these guidelines. Staff Recommendation: Staff feels that this proposed rezoning is in compliance with the goals and strategies set forth in the Iowa City Comprehensive Plan and Iowa City Preservation Plan, and supports the conservation and stabilization of this historic neighborhood. Therefore, staff concurs with the Historic Preservation Commission and recommends that REZ03-00005, a rezoning from Neighborhood Conservation Residential (RNC-12 & RNC-20), High Density Multifamily Residential (RM-44), and .Medium Density Single Family Residential (RS-8) to Conservation District Overlay (RNC-12/OCD, RNC-20/OCD, RM-44/OCD & RS-8/OCD) for the designation of the College Hill Conservation District, be approved. Attachment: College Hill Conservation District Report Approved by: Robert Miklo, S~nior Planner, Department of Planning and Community Development College Hill Conservation District Report Submitted by: Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission January 2003 Burlington Street Prepared by: Shelley McCafferty, Associated Planner City of Iowa City Planning and Community Development 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Conservation District Nomination Report College Hill Conservation District Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission January 2003 The Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission is considering the nomination of Iowa City's fourth conservation district. The proposed district will be known as the College Hill Conservation District and will consist of properties along the following streets: Iowa Avenue, Washington Street and College Street between Van Buren Street and Muscatine Avenue; Burlington Street between Summit Street and Muscatine Avenue; and Johnson Street, Dodge Street, Lucas Street, Governor Street, and Summit Street between Iowa Avenue and Burlington Street (see Attachment E). This report is intended to serve as the conservation district report required by City Code sections 14-4H, Historic Preservation Regulations, and 14-6J-4, Conservation District Overlay (OCD) Zone. Two historic and architectural surveys have been completed of the College Hill Neighborhood to identify areas potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Jan Nash, of Tallgrass Historians, L.C., completed the Survey and Evaluation of the College Hill Neighborhood in March 1994, which included the area bounded by Burlington Street, Van Buren Street, Iowa Avenue and Muscatine Avenue. In 1996, Molly Myers Naumann completed the Survey and Evaluation of the Longfellow Neighborhood Phase I, which included the south side of Burlington Street between Summit Street and Muscatine Avenue. These surveys recommended the designation of three historic (as opposed to conservation) districts: two within the College Hill Neighborhood and a third within the Longfellow Neighborhood. All three districts have since been listed on the NRHP and designated as local historic districts. The surveys found that areas adjacent to these districts were also historically significant, although not possessing the historic and architectural integrity required for a historic district. The Survey and Evaluation of the College Hill Neighborhood recommended that, subsequent to the adoption of a conservation district ordinance, these areas be considered for potential conservation district designation to "act as buffers around historic districts and individual landmarks to assure that neighboring properties do not detract from the historic sense of place of the overall neighborhood." Now that the Historic Preservation Commission has reviewed the entire College Hill Neighborhood, it has determined that a large area of College Hill will qualify as a conservation district under Iowa City's conservation district ordinance. Included in this area are five blocks of Iowa Avenue not previously surveyed professionally, but which were identified during the preparation of a Reconnaissance Survey of Iowa Avenue within the College Hill Neighborhood (Attachment B) by architectural historian Richard Carlson and Amy Smothers, members of the Historic Preservation Commission, with the assistance of staff. The Historic Preservation Commission has also recommended that three properties within the College Hill Neighborhood be designated local landmarks. Definition of a Conservation District: Conservation district designation is a tool available to the City to help preserve the existing character of a neighborhood or streetscape. Because the conservation district designation is applicable to different types of neighborhoods, there is a great deal of flexibility in how these districts may be defined and regulated. To qualify for consideration as a conservation district, a majority of buildings within a specified area must be at least 50 years old. In addition, the district must represent the traditional character of Iowa City neighborhoods through architectural characteristics and building patterns, exemplify development patterns significant in Iowa City history or tradition, or represent unique or unusual character that creates a distinctiveness. The degree to which a proposed district meets these criteria is determined by the Historic Preservation Commission, the body responsible for nominating a district for designation. Washington Street Summit Street Governor Street Washington Street Although a conservation district is administered in a manner similar to that of a historic district, the intent in creating a conservation district is to preserve neighborhood character rather than historic resources. In a historic district, the preservation of the historic character of the district is a priority, but at the same time each contributing building is treated as a historic resource in and of itself. Within conservation districts, a less restrictive set of guidelines is used for alterations to existing buildings, although for new buildings and additions, guidelines regarding building scale and mass, rooflines, and architectural compatibility will be very similar. Report I~equirements: As required by City Code section 14-6J-4, Conservation District Overlay (OCD) Zone, a conservation district report must contain the following components: A. Study of the characteristics of the proposed OCD Zone, including architectural characteristics, elements of the streetscape, physical conditions of buildings, age of buildings and property ownership patterns: Architectural historian Marlys Svensen wrote the following description of the College Hill Neighborhood in the Iowa City Historic Preservation Plan that she prepared for the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission in 1992 (see Attachment A, the National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form, Historic and Architectural Resources in College Hill, Iowa City, Iowa, 1839-1944, for additional documentation): The original town plan laid out in 1839 established a series of public open spaces scattered throughout the new capital 3 city. College Green was located in the southeast corner of the town, south of Ralston Creek. The park occupied a full block situated atop a gentle slope. Washington, Johnson, College and Dodge Streets marked its boundaries. In Iowa City's early years, the College Green neighborhood appears to have remained wild and natural. Early settlers recalled the green valley and natural springs along Ralston Creek in this area and the wildlife that frequented the park. Another remembered the park as a "wild strawberry patch and rattlesnake den." Distance from the downtown, the barrier created by the course of Ralston Creek, and the abundance of other building sites discouraged development of the College Hill area in the 1840s and 1850s. Passage over Ralston Creek during Iow water periods was made by fording but this eventually proved inadequate and crude wooden bridges were constructed. One of the earliest attempts made to develop the area came in 1853 when promoters secured permission from the new city council to construct a school in the west half of College Green to be known as the Iowa Female Collegiate Institute. Sponsors were the local I.O.O.F. lodge and $6,000 was raised for construction. When the prime leader of the project died in 1855 with the building only partially completed, the effort was discontinued. The incomplete structure was eventually razed and College Green reverted to park use. The dream of city founders for a college on College Street fell by the wayside. The decades of the 1860s and 1870s saw residential development slowly move west of the Gilbert Street-Maiden Lane industrial corridor. A few residences appeared around College Green at this time including the Archibald Younkin house (701 East College Street) in 1863 and the George Boal residence (806 East College Street). Boal, a local real estate developer and railroad promoter, had his house enlarged and updated in 1871 with a mansard roof. Thomas Carson, a banker and owner of an agricultural implement business, employed a similar design when his new house was built nearby (906 East Washington Street) in 1875. The picturesque Gothic Revival design of the Younkin house and Second Empire style of the Boal and Carson residences are not commonplace in Iowa City. Many of the most substantial residences in the College Hill neighborhood came during the 1880s and 1890s. The Italianate style and decorative elements were used for several houses from this period including the Clapp House (725 East College Street) and the Nathan Leonard House (226 South Johnson Street). Both [were] constructed in 1883 during a period of moderate growth for the city. The Queen Anne style were [sic]employed for many homes during the next decade including elaborate versions for William Musser residence (715 E. College Street) constructed in 1890 just a few blocks southeast of his retail lumber business, the Lindsay family home (930 East College Street) built in 1893, and the residence of local jewelry manufacturer, W.F. Main (932 East College Street) completed two years later. The balance of the houses in the College Hill neighborhood reflect a range of residential aesthetics held by homebuilders before World War I including American Four-Square, Georgian, Prairie, Craftsmen, Mission and Bungalow designs. The College Hill neighborhood has a strong association with the history of the State University of Iowa and providing housing for its students, faculty and administrative staff. Dozens of professors daily traversed the half dozen blocks between their homes on College Hill and their East Campus classrooms. A few examples were Nathan Leonard, a sometimes controversial professor of math and astronomy between 1873 and 1888 and later, acting president for the University; Charles Nutting, professor of zoology (922 East Washington Street); Frederick Eastman, professor of Latin (802 East Washington Street); Henry Albert, professor of pathology (221 South Lucas Street); Philip Clapp, professor of music (222 South Lucas Street); and F.J. Newberry, doctor at the SUI Hospital (919 East Burlington Street). Administrative staff included people like Charles Barter Solin, a janitor at the Dental Building for more than 40 years (106 South Dodge Street). In 1908, construction of the Rundell streetcar line from the downtown along College Street to Johnson Street and then turning onto Burlington to head east to the Rundell Addition made commuting to the East Campus even easier for students and University employees. College Hill's large residences were ideal candidates for conversion to rooming houses, fraternity and sorority houses and apartments for the burgeoning student population after the turn of the century. Former residences often played host to successive fraternity and sorority owners, more often the latter. During the peak University growth years during the 1920s, a number of new buildings were constructed for the same purpose. Several were located along the southern edge of the College Hill neighborhood on East Burlington Street. Examples of buildings built or used for sorority or fraternity purposes include 605, 620, 625, 71 I, 815, 823 and 903 East Burlington Street; 515, 527, 725, 906, 932, and 935 East College Street; and 728, 815, 828, and 91 I East Washington Street. Phi Beta Phi Sorority, an African-American Sorority, built its building at 815 in response to segregation practices in dormitories and white-only sororities. The African Methodist Episcopal Church was built a few blocks away on south Johnson Street. College Green park continued to serve as a visual anchor for the neighborhood through the years. College Street along its southern edge was one of the first residential streets to be paved in the city in 1897. Grading along Washington Street resulted in construction of a substantial stone retaining wall -not an insignificant engineering feat. Completion of the streetcar line in 1908 finished the modernization efforts. The area's wild, natural beauty recalled by early residents was transformed and the resulting urban park was a centerpiece for the College Hill neighborhood. In 1922, the Manville Heights housing development and construction of the new University hospital complex on the West Campus forced the popular summer Chautauqua to seek new grounds, [sic] College Green was selected. The lectures and literary readings of the Chautauqua found a comfortable home in this neighborhood of educators and University students. Iowa Avenue Iowa Avenue's significance lies far beyond its physical layout as the "grand boulevard" to the original State Capitol. The Iowa Avenue environment has been a valued thoroughfare, grand access and predominant element in the settlement of Iowa City. Iowa Avenue may be said to have been an apparatus responsible for providing the arenas and contexts in which people define, debate and contest their identities; produce and reproduce their living circumstances, their beliefs and values and ultimately our social order. Economic activities, social life and cultural affairs are all constructed within the civil society that has occupied Iowa Avenue. From the steps of "Old Stone Capitol" to J.W. Clark's Addition/Woodlawn, Iowa Avenue has reflected the diversity of Iowa City since its conception. In 1900 Henry F. Wickham, assistant professor of geology, lived in his parents home of 916 Iowa Avenue next to William Ryan, who "sectioned logs" for the Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railroad (B.C.R. & N.R.R.). Draughtsmen, ministers, laundresses, barbers, butchers, seamstresses, agricultural hands, tinners, painters, carpenters, grammar school teachers and equal to residents, the students of the State University of Iowa resided along Iowa Avenue. The land use of Iowa Avenue specifically for the context of the College Hill Conservation District has three influential factors: (I) the topographical power of Ralston Creek; (2) the promotion, development and investment of the B.C.R. & N.R.R.; and (3) the proximity of amenities, education, entertainment and livelihood. Beginning with Block 39 of the Original Town Plat (between Van Buren and Johnson Streets), from 1859 to 1899, Ralston Creek ran through and over Lots two, seven and six on Iowa Avenue. Just as Ralston Creek separates Block 20's Lots 1,2,3 and 4 (between Dodge and Lucas Streets), from Lots 5, 6, 7 and 8. The Houser-Marguqrdt Home at 713 Iowa Avenue, Lot 3 of Block 20, is divided from the Iowa City Mineral Spring Bottling Works on the 1899 Sanborn Map. In between North Lucas and Governor Streets, Ralston Creek splits Outlot 4, then continues to sever J.W. Clark's properties. Rendered on the 1892 Sanborn map, on East Iowa Avenue there were three places to override Ralston Creek as it wound down along South Van Buren. The 1899 Sanborn Map reveals that the South Van Buren Street crossing was covered by planks, as well as the South Johnson Street intersection; South Dodge and South Lucas Streets each possessed a wooden bridge; finally it may be surmised that Governor and Evans also required wooden bridges. By 1906 Ralston Creek had been redirected and filled in on Blocks 39 and 40; the remainder of Ralston continues to catch annual precipitation and protects surrounding properties. It should also be noted that aside from coinciding as a natural basin between the Northside and College Hill, Iowa Avenue's unique sunrise and sunset vistas provide not only pleasure, but the natural utilization of northern light. Thus, Matthew Van Eyek, Chauncey Swan, John Ronalds, Robert Ralston and perhaps even Francis Bowman should be remembered for their conception of a Jeffersonian grid laid upon the territory of Iowa City and how well it functions when Canadian Clippers whistle through or when high humidity hangs above the basin. Considering the terrain, we may grasp why civil and mechanical engineers of the railroad industry surveyed Iowa City to provide service to and from the east and the west. The Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railroad Company began purchasing rights-of-way from landowners along Iowa Avenue before 1870 and continued to purchase into 1897 (e.g., C.S. Welch sold "All of Lot I of Block 40, lying SE of Ry and 15' off Lots 6 & 7 S of r/w BCR&N Ry" on April I, 1897. Safety measures may have prompted the purchase additional footage. Former property owners may have exchanged the right-of-way for stock options or been granted position on the finance committee prior to the 1870's. Interestingly enough, many residents of College Hill associated with transportation owned and leased homes on Iowa Avenue. Archibald Younkin owned Lot 4 of Block 40 in the late 1860s; H.S. Fairall owned Lot 2 of Block 40; George Boal purchased Lots I and 2 of Outlot 3 from A.C. Younkin (treasurer for Henry Kampfer and Francis Fraer)... and later T.H. McBride would purchase I, 5 and 6 of Outlot 3 from Mollie A. Boal. Aside from lucrative investments, Iowa Avenue offered the opportunity for many Iowans to live comfortably. For example, many prodigal sons and daughters returned to Iowa City for the conveniences a larger community provides. According to Leading Events in Johnson County, Otto Henry Fink, an Iowa City native, returned to Iowa City in 1907 to open a cigar store at the St. James Hotel. Prior to that date, The Iowa City Original Town Plat Assessor's Transfer Book, Number I, page 42, shows his wife, Maggie, purchasing 50 feet East of Lot 8 from Amelia Kimball and husband on June 9, 1906. Sanborn Perris Maps of June 1899 depict the Crum-Overholt property to be the only existing structures present on Lots 7 and 8 for Block 19. The Sanborn Perris Maps of April 1906 clearly distinguish the footprint, materials and porches of 730 Iowa Avenue. This house is an example of an Eclectic, New England - Dutch Colonial type with Queen Anne Tower. Built approximately before 1906, the Otto Fink residence is significant as a distinctive type of architecture that displays a building trend, integrity of setting and feeling to the proposed conservation district. Another distinctive example of period architecture is located on the eastern corner of Govenor's Square. 943 Iowa Avenue is an Eclectic Gothic Revival that is reminiscent to A.J. Downing's pattern books. The house is very similar to the dwellings within Woodlawn, however, is scaled to fit on the boulevard terrace and take advantage of its placement on the streetscape. The site's raised elevation, setback and vegetation contribute to its cottage demeanor, and set it apart from the Woodlawn district. Amid Iowa Avenue's amiable architecture in the College Hill District, there are five houses that can be categorized National/Folk/Bungalow; eight Revivals; eleven Queen Arms; eleven Vernacular and the nineteen American Foursquare residences that have housed fraternities, boarders and extended families. Only a mere 8% of Iowa Avenue architecture is less than fifty years old (5% of no distinct style and 3% that may be considered Modern/ Commercial Period Revival). Most of the buildings have been built within the period 1860 to 1940, with the unique exceptions of the Windrem-Green house at 604 Iowa Avenue; the Crum-Overholt house at 726 Iowa Avenue; and possibly 91 I Iowa Avenue. In the 1920s, J.H. Hunzinger and Company occupied Lots 7 and 8 on the corner of North Governor Street and Iowa Avenue. Hunzinger was competitor of Fox Hutchinson and Lake Company, which was located on East Washington between South Gilbert and South Van Buren Streets. Both lumber companies were utilizing the Chicago-Rock Island-Pacific Railroad Lines formerly, the B.C.R. & N.R.R. By 1926 J.H. Hunzinger and Company had diversified from a lumber stockyard to a heat/furnace supplier, in addition to providing light and power. The south portion of Lots 7 and 8 of Block 4; 824 Iowa Avenue (820 today) and 832 Iowa Avenue occupied the lumberyard site. Between 1920 and 1926, across Governor Street on the north side of Iowa Avenue, C.H. Fairall began to sell property in the "The Fairall Division" (this Block is noted as Outlots 4 from the Original Town Plat). This block provides wonderful examples of American Foursquares that may be attributed to the Gordon-Van Tine Company, The Dunlap Company, The Radford Architectural Company, Montgomery Ward and/or the Sears, Roebuck and Company catalogs, thus reflecting the national trend toward ready-made home building during this time. What may be said of Iowa Avenue is that it represents the transition of what Allan Gowans calls, "picturesque assemblage" created by "mobocracy" (page 201 from The Comfortable House). The popularity and survival of ready- made homes reflect the confidence, frugality and hints some of the individuality of their owners. Iowa Avenue is not to be compared to "worker housing" as in West Allis, Wisconsin of the acres and acres of Sears Bungalow Models of 1900. Nor should it be liken to a social-economic "step-design" of College Hill or the Woodlawns. In fact, many of the homes of Iowa Avenue are examples of pragmatic responses by owners to the availability of the building industry's products. B. Boundaries of the proposed OCD Zone: The proposed boundaries for the College Hill Conservation District are shown in Attachment C. This map also identifies contributing, noncontributing, and key properties (key properties are those that have been listed or are eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places). A list of these properties is included as Attachment D. C. Local Landmark Nominations Three properties have been identified as key properties and are therefore eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under this proposal. These properties are: · The Stevenson-Baker House, 30 S. Governor Street, · The Haddock House (The Crag), 802 East Washington Street, and · The Crum-Overholt House, 726 East Washington Street Furthermore, three additional properties within the proposed conservation district have already been listed on the NRHP and designated local landmarks. They are: · The Lindsay House, 935 East College Street, · The Summit Apartment Building, 228 South Summit Street, and · The Windrem House, 604 Iowa Avenue. As local historic landmarks, these properties are subject to the Iowa City Preservation Ordinance and Guidelines and the Secretary of Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation. The guidelines for historic landmarks are more stringent than the guidelines for contributing properties in a conservation district so as to provide additional protection from inappropriate alterations for these significant structures. D. Guidelines for Alterations and Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings: The Commission's existing guidelines for addressing building alterations were written to apply to both historic districts and conservation districts. Although the concept of preserving the general character and feel of a neighborhood is the same for both types of districts, the specifics differ between the two. For example, more detailed guidelines are applied to individual buildings in historic districts, since, as was stated above, in a historic district, in addition to preserving the historic character of a neighborhood, concern is paid to the individual buildings as historic resources. Within conservation districts, while alterations to individual buildings are subject to review, the ~xisting guidelines contain a number of exceptions that apply to all the buildings therein. The primary guidelines for alterations and rehabilitation within the Longfellow Neighborhood, which includes the Lucas- Governor, Clark Street and Dearborn Street Conservation Districts, and the Longfellow and Summit Street Historic Districts, have already been established and are included in the Iowa City Historic Preservation Handbook. The handbook is available from the Department of Planning and Community Development, the public library, and on the City's web site at www. ICgov.org (follow the links to "Documents" and "Planning and Community Development"). This document contains guidelines and exceptions that are specific to neighborhoods the individual districts within the neighborhoods so as to preserve each district's individual character. Once finalized, the District Guidelines for the College Hill Neighborhood will also be added to the handbook. These guidelines will apply not only to the College Hill Conservation District, but also to the College Green and East College Historic Districts. E. Guidelines for Construction of New Buildings: Guidelines for new single-family and duplex buildings within the proposed conservation district are appended as Attachment E and are intended to ensure that new single-family and duplex buildings are compatible with the neighborhood in terms of architectural style, scale and site development. These guidelines also apply to new outbuildings, such as garages. The district guidelines recommend architectural styles that are appropriate to each district (for a description of styles common in Iowa City, see Architectural Styles of Iowa City, which can be found in the Iowa City Historic Preservation Handbook). Multi-family buildings proposed within the conservation district will be evaluated by the Historic Preservation Commission under the Multi-Family Construction Guidelines contained within the handbook. F. Modifications to the Dimensional Requirements of the Underlying Zoning District Based on the Prevailing Character of Existing Development: The proposed guidelines contained in Attachment E incorporate methods for calculating front yard requirements based on the prevailing characteristics of surrounding properties within the neighborhood, which may differ from the 20 feet currently required in residential zones. G. Modifications to the Off-Street Parking Requirements Which Apply to Uses in the Underlying Zone: None proposed. H. Level of Review Requirements: The City Code states that, within both historic and conservation districts, any exterior alteration or change of appearance to a designated property that requires a regulated permit and that can be seen from the public right-of- way or another property is subject to review and approval by the Historic Preservation Commission. However, unlike the historic district regulations, within a conservation district the City has the ability to specify "levels of review" for various types of building alterations. The specified levels of review help in administering the conservation district regulations by reducing the time necessary to process the less substantive applications and also by reducing the number of projects that have to go before the full Commission for review. The conservation district ordinance allows the City to specify three different levels of review for projects within conservation districts: · A "minor review" is a review conducted and approved by the Commission's staff person. · An "intermediate review" is a review conducted and approved by the staff person in conjunction with the Chair or designee. A report of approvals granted under this or the preceding category is to be made to the full Commission. A "major review" is a review conducted and approved by the full commission at a regular commission meeting, similar to a typical review of a certificate of appropriateness within a historic district. Minor Review: The following alterations in the College Hill Conservation District are proposed to be regulated under the minor review category. Some items listed do not require a building'permit for single-family or duplex buildings but may require a permit for multi-family buildings. If no building permit is required, review by the Historic Preservation Commission is not necessary. [] Roof replacement with like materials [] Window replacement for noncontributing structures [] Siding application on noncontributing structures [] Minor replacement of individual building components, such as a porch post or rail, with new components of the same materials and design Intermediate Review: The following alterations in the College Hill Conservation District are proposed to be regulated under the intermediate review category. Some items listed do not require a building permit for single- family or duplex buildings but may require a permit for multi-family buildings. If no building permit is required, review by the Historic Preservation Commission is not necessary. [] Roof replacement with a material different from the material to be replaced [] Window replacement on contributing structures [] Siding application on contributing structures [] Alterations to the rear elevation of an existing building [] Alterations to an existing garage or outbuilding located behind the rear plane of an existing primary structure [] Construction or replacement of balconies or decks that are not visible on a street elevation [] Replacement of building features not covered under a minor review, such as a front porch, with new features of the same materials and design [] Construction of new outbuildings, provided that they are located behind the rear plane of an existing primary Major Review: Any alterations within the College Hill Conservation District not otherwise listed above under Minor or Intermediate Review are to be regulated under the Major Review category. Elevated Level of Review: A minor review may be elevated to the intermediate review process if determined to be necessary by staff or if requested by an applicant. An intermediate review may be elevated to the major review process if determined to be necessary by staff or if requested by the applicant or the Commission's Chair or Designee. An applicant may appeal decisions made by the Commission under the major review process to the Board of Adjustment, as described in City Code section 14-4C-7G. Any applicant aggrieved by a decision made under the minor or intermediate review processes must request and complete a major review before appealing to the Board of Adjustment. I. Proposed Ordinance for the College Hill Conservation District Overlay (OCD) Zone: See Attachment I for the ordinance. Final approval of the ordinance by the City Attorney's Office will not occur until after the Planning and Zoning Commission review is complete. Contributing/Noncontributing Buildings: In order to administer the conservation district guidelines, buildings within the proposed district must be categorized as either contributing or noncontributing structures. A building is considered to be contributing if it adds to the qualities that make the neighborhood worthy of designation as a conservation district. Generally, a contributing structure must be more than 50 years old and retain a sense of its original appearance and site configuration. The architectural integrity of individual structures is important and can add significantly to the character of the neighborhood, but in a conservation district it is not crucial that each building exist in its original, unaltered state. Rather, if the general form, architectural character and roofline of the house remain relatively intact, even if individual details have been altered, such as replacement siding, replacement windows or front porch alterations or enclosures, the building will be considered contributing. If major changes have been made, however, the building will be considered noncontributing. This may include substantial alterations to the roofline, unsympathetic alterations to the front plane of the building, an addition that overwhelms the original structure, or major site alterations that do not fit the general character of the district. The Survey and Evaluation of the College Hill Neighborhood and the Survey and Evaluation of the Longfellow Neighborhood determined the potential of the buildings located along Washington, College, and Burlington Streets, Johnson, Dodge, Lucas, Governor and Summit Streets to Iowa Avenue, and Muscatine Avenue to contribute to a historic or conservation district. With few exceptions, the Commission has accepted these evaluations. Commission members have conducted a similar evaluation of properties not included in the College Hill survey located along Iowa Avenue and Johnson, Dodge, Lucas, Governor and Summit Streets. These evaluations have been used to characterize the properties as either contributing or noncontributing to this conservation district Of the 185 properties included in the College Hill Conservation District, 141 (76.2%) are considered to be contributing to the character of the conservation district. Six properties are identified as key, three of which have already been designated as Iowa City landmarks and are listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The other three properties have been identified as eligible for listing in the NRHP and Iowa City Historic Landmark. See Attachments F, G and H for nomination forms for these three properties. Summary: After studying the College Hill Neighborhood, the Historic Preservation Commission has concluded that the designation of this area as a conservation district is warranted. The area retains its traditional neighborhood character and a sense of time and place, and a majority of the structures within the district contribute toward this character. Conservation district designation can be an effective tool to help preserve the character and remaining historic resources of this neighborhood. Designation will also provide a buffer for the College Green, East College, Woodlawn and Summit Street Historic Districts that are adjacent to the proposed College Hill Conservation District. It is hoped that, once designated, this district will begin to experience the same type of investment and improvement that has been occurring within other designated historic districts, such as Brown Street, Summit Street and East College Street. These areas have witnessed a remarkable number of building rehabilitation efforts, and a number of property owners have credited the historic district designation as having played a major part in their decision to invest in their properties. Because they have some assurance that their neighborhood will retain the qualities that attracted them there, these property owners are more willing to make a substantial investment in their own properties, which is in turn an investment in the neighborhood. l0 I~ecommendation: The Historic Preservation Commission is of the opinion that the proposed College Hill Conservation District meets the criteria for designation as defined under City Code Section 14-4C, Historic Preservation Regulations, and 14-6J-4, Conservation Overlay Zone (OCD), and recommends that the proposed College Hill Conservation District be approved. ATTACH M ENTS: A. NRHP Multiple Property Documentation Form Historic Resources in College Hill, Iowa City, Iowa, 1839-1944. B. Reconnaissance Architectural Survey of Iowa Avenue in the College Hill Neighborhood Iowa. City Historic Preservation Commission, 2002 C. College Hill Conservation District map D. List of contributing/noncontributing properties in the College Hill Conservation District E. College Hill Neighborhood District Guidelines F. Iowa City Historic Landmark Nomination for the Haddock House, 802 Washington Street G. Iowa City Historic Landmark Nomination for the Stevenson-Baker House, 30 S. Governor Street H. Iowa City Historic Landmark Nomination for the Crum-Overholt House, 726 Iowa Avenue I. College Hill Conservation District designation ordinance J. Affidavit of public notification and mailing list K. Historic Preservation Commission minutes from October 24, November 14 and December 12, 2002. College Hill Neighborhood District Guidelines January 2003 The College Hill Neighborhood District Guidelines would apply to the College Green Historic District, East College Historic District, and the proposed College Hill Conservation District for exterior alterations to properties in these districts. If adopted, these guidelines would be added to the Iowa City Historic Preservation Handbook. Currently, neighborhood district guidelines have only been adopted for districts within the Longfellow Neighborhood. Site and Scale Guidelines for Additions, New Primary Structures, and Outbuilding Setback, Front For new primary structures, the building setback from the street should be established based upon the setbacks of existing buildings located adjacent to the proposed building. The setback of the new primary structure should conform with the average of the setbacks of the four nearest primary structures located within the same block and along the same street frontage. The setbacks of existing buildings shall be measured at the first floor wall of the main living area of the building, excluding a covered or enclosed porch. Front porches are prevalent on existing buildings within the districts. New buildings may contain covered front porches that extend into the front yard, provided they are located no closer to the street than any of the other porches along the same street frontage. Building additions should be placed at the rear of a property if possible. Additions at or near the front of an existing building shall be set back at least 18 inches from the front plane of the existing building and shall be differentiated by a change in the roofline or other means. Building Facade The total surface area of the street elevation of a new primary structure should be no more than 1200 square feet. Existing primary structures that were historically single-family houses should not be expanded in such a manner that the total surface area exceeds 1200 square feet. If the primary structure is accidentally destroyed or is a noncontributing structure that the owner wishes to demolish, and if the structure had/has a street elevation surface area of 1200 square feet or greater, it may be reconstructed with a street elevation area not to exceed the area of the pre-existing primary structure..For the purposes of enforcing this guideline, the total surface area of the street elevation shall be defined as a figure derived by calculating the surface area of all wall and roof surfaces, including window and door openings, that are visible in a measured drawing of the building elevation. Outbuildings Outbuildings, including garages, should be placed to the rear of the primary building whenever possible. Attached garages are discouraged, but if constructed should be set back at least 20 feet from the front plane of the building. Garages and other outbuildings should be clearly subordinate in size to the primary structure. Pedestrian Access A sidewalk shall be provided that connects the entrance door or porch to the public sidewalk. Vehicular Access Vehicular access should be provided from an alley if available. Driveways leading from the street to garages or parking at the rear of the property should be one-lane in width, but can be widened toward the back of the lot to provide access to multi-stall garages or parking spaces. Parking Parking spaces are not permitted between the primary structure and the street. Parking should be provided behind the primary structure on a lot wherever possible. If parking must be located along the side of an existing or new primary structure, it shall be set back from the front plane of the building a minimum of 10 feet and be screened by a decorative fence, landscaping, or a combination of a decorative fence and landscaping, and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Architectural Guidelines for New Outbuildings Building Styles New outbuildings behind contributing primary structures should reflect the style of the primary structure. New outbuildings behind noncontributing primary structures should reflect historic outbuilding styles in the neighborhood. Garage Doors Garage doors should be simple in design. Smooth or simple panel-type garage doors may be used. Garage door openings should be trimmed to match other doors and windows in the building. Single-stall garage doors are preferred to double-stall garage doors. Architectural Guidelines for New Primary Structures Building Styles Architectural style is a defining characteristic for historic and conservation districts. A new primary structure should reflect the historic styles of its neighborhood. Although new construction may adapt and mix some elements of different styles, a single style should dictate the height and mass, rooflines, fenestration, and overhangs for the new building. Please refer to the section entitled 'iArchitectural Styles in Iowa City" for examples of historic building styles. In the College Hill Neighborhood, a new building should reflect Italianate, Colonial Revival, Queen Anne, Vernacular, Craftsman, Foursquare, or Eclectic style. Building Height and Mass New single-family houses or duplexes shall be one-and-a-half, or two stories in height. On College Street only: New single-family houses and duplexes shall be two stories in height. Rooflines Rooflines should follow one of the historic building styles identified as appropriate for this district. Dormers Dormers must be in proportion to the roof's overall size. Cumulatively, they should interrupt the roof plane in which they are located no more than one third of the length of that roof. measured at the eave. They should be no closer than 3 feet to an existing gable end or hip. The face of the dormer should be narrow, rather than wide, and be cOmposed primarily of window area. Dormers in new construction should have roof pitches similar to the pitch of the main roof. Overhangs New construction should include overhangs appropriate to the historic style guiding the overall design of the building. Windows/Fenestration Window placement on the facade a new building should follow patterns established by contributing structures within the district. Window shape and placement must be consistent with other elements of the building style of the new structure. Long wall spaces without windows are inappropriate. Small decorative windows in the attic level of front gable ends are encouraged. Window trim shall be between three to four inches in width. Shutters are discouraged. In historic districts only: Windows must be double-hung or fixed-sash with an appearance and profile similar to those windows original to the district. Window design should be appropriate to the building style. Doors Exterior doors on front or side elevations of new single and duplex structures must include half or full lights and/or raised panel construction in keeping with the historic building style of the new structure. Sliding patio doors are uncharacteristic of any of the historic styles of the neighborhood and may be used only on rear elevations in conservation districts. In historic districts only: Sliding patio doors may not be used. Other more appropriate door styles that accommodate large glass area are available. Porches and Balconies Single-story, covered front porches are a key element in the College Hill neighborhood. New single-family and duplex structures should include a porch typical for the style of the house. Front porches must be roofed and supported with posts or pillars of appropriate dimensions. They may be partially screened or unscreened, but shall not be entirely enclosed with walls and/or windows. Porch flooring should be vertical-grained fir porch flooring. Posts and other accents may be wood or other durable material that accepts paint. Where a spindled railing is used, there must be a top and bottom rail and the spindles must be centered on the horizontal rails. If the space below the porch floor and above the grade is greater than 24 inches, the porch must be skirted with lattice or grilles. In the conservation district only: Dimensional lumber may be used, but the gaps between the floorboards should not exceed one-eighth inch. In the conservation district only: Poured concrete floors are permitted within conservation districts provided that the porch floor is not more than 18 inches above grade. In the conservation district only: Porches on rear elevations need not reproduce historic details. Balconies Balconies that protrude from the walls of buildings without vertical support were not common in the Longfellow neighborhood, and should not be included on the front or sides of buildings. If second-story porches are included, they must be placed above first-story porches or first-floor interior spaces. Wood Substitutes Substituting a material in place of wood is acceptable only if the substitute material retains the appearance and function of the original wood. The substitute material must be durable, accept paint, and be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Siding Horizontal siding like clapboards or cedar shingles are the preferred cladding materials for new buildings. Wood products for siding include shakes, shin.gles, and painted horizontal clapboard siding from three to six inches in width. Fibrous cement siding is an acceptable substitute for wood siding. Brick was sometimes used in the College Hill neighborhood and may be an acceptable siding material where historic brick buildings are nearby. Synthetic masonry surfaces such as artificial stone are not acceptable. In the conservation district only: Synthetic siding may be used on new structures and on noncontributing structures. City of Iowa City M E MORAN DU Date: February 6, 2003 To: Iowa City Planning & Zoning Commission From: Shelley McCafferty, Associate Planner RE: REZ03-00001:30 S. Governor Street, Stevenson Baker House REZ03-00002:802 Washington Street, The Crag/Haddock House REZ03-00003:726 Iowa Avenue, Crum-Overholt House Iowa City Landmark Nominations: Attached are the landmark nomination forms for three Iowa City properties located in the proposed College Hill Conservation District. These nomination were included in the College Hill Conservation District Report to the State Historical Society of Iowa. The Historic Preservation Commission is recommending the designation of these landmarks in response to recommendations from State Historical Society of Iowa that the HPC should nominate qualifying properties in conservation districts as landmarks to ensure they are appropriately protected. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: One of the Housing Goals and Strategies of the 1997 Iowa City Comprehensive Plan is to: "Preserve the integrity of existing neighborhoods and the historic nature of older neighborhoods." The Plan supports the Historic Preservation Commission's efforts to meets these goals. Furthermore, the Comprehensive Plan's goals and strategies for Art, Culture & Human Development; Environmental Protection; and Land Use and Urban Patterns also support the implementation of the Iowa City Historic Preservation Plan, which was adopted as part of the Comprehensive Plan. Public Input: During the evaluation and nomination of the College Hill Conservation District, the Historic Preservation Commission held two informal neighborhood meetings and a public hearing that occurred during the course of two meetings. Discussion of the proposed landmarks was included as part of the College Hill Conservation District public process. The owners of the three properties that were recommended for landmark designation were also notified of the meetings and the HPC has not received any objections from these owners. Historic Preservation Commission Recommendation: The Historic Preservation Commission held a public hearing on these designations at its October 24, 2002 meeting. At its November 14 meeting, the Commission voted 7-0 to recommend a revised proposal for the College Hill Conservation District, which included the designation of the properties at 726 Iowa Avenue, 802 Washington Street and 30 S. Governor Street as Historic Landmarks. Staff Recommendation: Staff feels that this proposed rezoning is in compliance with the goals and strategies set forth in the Iowa City Comprehensive Plan, and Preservation Plan. Therefore, staff concurs with the Historic Preservation Commission and recommends the approval of: REZ03-00001: A rezoning to designate the property at 30 South Governor Street an Iowa City Historic Landmark. January 30, 2003 Page 2 REZ03-00002: A rezoning to designate the property located at 802 Washington Street as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. REZ03-00003: A rezoning to designate the property located at 726 Iowa Avenue as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. Attachments: I. Stevenson-Baker House landmark nomination form 2. The Crag/Haddock House landmark nomination form 3. Crum-Overholt House landmark nomination form Approved by: ~,~ff~ Robert Miklo, SeniorPlanner,- - Department of Planning and Community Development Historic Landmark Nomination Form Iowa City, Iowa Date received I Name of Property Historic name: The Stevenson-Baker House Other names: 2 Location Address: 30 S. Governor Street Legal description: Governor Square W 116' of S 100' 3 Classification [] Building [] Structure [] Site [] Object 4 Function or use 5 Description ..S.t.y[e..~ .............. .M.i.d..1.9. t. h.: .c.e.n.t.u. ~.r.o..m..a.n.t! .c ...... S. i.g.n.i, fi.c.a..n.t.f.e.a.t.u..r .e.s!..D..e.c.o..r.a.ti.v.e..g. ~ ~! ~ .~ ~: .................... ..................... r.e.v.i.v.a.I. !l?.l.!a.n.a.t.e...&..G..o.t.h.i.c). ..... f.r.o..n.t.a..n.cl..s! .d.e.p.o..r.c.h, .b..a .y..w.i.n.d..o.w.: .a.p..a~.m..e.n.t. ....................... Materials: addition Foundation: Stone ........... ................ i LLLLigL's': :fi,';g ............... Roof: Asphalt shingles on north side Typ. windows: One-over-one double-hung 6 Significance Signficant person: Samuel Kirkwood Stevenson Architect: Unknown Marcia Jacobs Stevenson Helen Keller, Anne Sullivan Joseph & Matilda Baker Date constructed: 1882 Builder: David Bait 7 Iowa City criteria (check all that apply) [] A. Significant to American history, architecture, archeology and culture or Iowa City history, architecture, archaeology and culture. [] B. Possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials and workership. [] C. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. [] D. Associated with the lives of persons significant on our past. [] E. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, method of construction; represents the work of a master; possesses high artistic values; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. [] F. Has yielded or may be likely to yield information important to prehistory or history. 8 Required attachments A.A narrative providing information indicating the significance of the landmark based upon one or more the above criteria. B.Photographs showing all elevations of the building, object and/or site, and any ornamental or structural details of historic or architectural importance. C. Plat Map indicating the location of the proposed landmark D. Any additional information that may help justify the historic importance of the nominated property. Historic Landmark Nomination Form Attachments 8A Significance of the Stevenson-Baker House The Stevenson-Baker House is significant both historically and architecturally. The house was originally constructed in 1882 by David Bait, a local carpenter. The second owners of the house were Samuel Kirkwood and Marcia Jacobs Stevenson. Trained in law, S.K. Stevenson was elected superintendent of Johnson County schools in 1896 and served in that capacity until 1906. He was instrumental in the establishment of a public library in Iowa City and served on the library board for thirty-three years. His wife, Marcia Stevenson was active in the lyceum and Chautauqua movement and most notably was the lecture agent for Helen Keller and Anne Sullivan. The Stevensons built an addition to the house specifically to provide a place for Keller and Sullivan to stay as they toured and lectured throughout the Midwest. John and Matilda Baker, who later occupied the house, are largely responsible for the grassroots preservation movement in Iowa City during the 1960's. The house is also significant for its architectural fine design and craftmanship. The following information from various resources corraborate the significance of the Stevenson-Baker House. Iowa Site Inventory Form for 30 S. Governor Street, Historic and Architectural Resources in College Hill, Iowa City, Iowa Jan Nash, Tallgrass Historians LC., 1996 The architecture of this 1882 house exhibits the fine craftsmanship one might expect of a [sic] contractor building a home for himself. David Bair may have gotten the plans for his new house from one of the builder's guides or pattern books readily available in 1882. While not a precise academic version of any style, it exhibits the influence of mid- nineteenth century romantic styles (Italianate and Gothic Revival) and predates the arrival of the Queen Anne style, one of the strongest stylistic influences in the College Hill neighborhood. The projecting two-story front bay and pronounced verticality of the structure (made more so by its sitting atop a hill) give it an imposing presence. The front and side porches are decorated by dentil trim and supported by chamfered posts with heavy brackets. The house was built in 1882 by local contractor David Bair and numerous extant Iowa City houses are thought to have been constructed by him. Bair sold the house in 1898 to S.K. Stevenson and his wife, Marcia Jacobs Stevenson. Before 1898, S.K. Stevenson had served as Johnson County school superintendent and was responsible for initiating libraries in the public schools, with 95 such libraries installed during just the last two years of his term (I 893-1897). From 1897 to 1906, Stevenson was Iowa City school superintendent. At the conclusion of his school superintendent tenure, Stevenson obtained a law degree from the university's College of Law and went into private practice. Ironically, he was an elder in the First Presbyterian Church of Iowa City and active in its affairs. There are two additions to the house, a small rear (east) one-story apartment (built specifically to host Lyceum speaker Helen Keller and her companion Annie Sullivan) built by Marcia Jacobs Stevenson in c. 1912, and a larger two- story addition on the north and east built by Mrs. Nyle Jones in 1923, remain today as constructed. They are of simple design with wider eaves and flatter roofs than the main house, but covered with similar clapboard siding. While visible from the street, the impact of these additions is lessened by the fact they occur on the north side and east rear of the house, while the pubic views of the house are mainly from the west and south. Bair used fine materials for his house including at least three kinds of flooring, curly maple, quartersawn pine and birch. He included a fine built-in china cabinet and staircase (both extant) in the house. Marcia Jacobs Stevenson was active in the lyceum public education movement of the day and was employed as secretary to Helen Keller, well known lecturer, writer and educator. It is unclear whether Mrs. Stevenson was paid by a national lyceum or a local committee, or Keller herself, but Stevenson was responsible for keeping the Keller's lecture schedule as she and her companion, Annie Sullivan, traveled the lecture circuit around the Midwest. The small rear apartment on the house was added in c. 1912 to accommodate Keller and Sullivan in between lectures. With good east/west rail service provided by the Rock Island and easy connections via the Cedar Rapids and Iowa City interurban to north/south rail service, Iowa City's central location in the Midwest and the intellectual atmosphere created by the university, likely made the town the logical choice of headquarters for a Midwest lecture circuit. In 1923, the Stevensons sold the house to Mr. and Mrs. Nyle Jones. Nyle Jones had been an outstanding quarterback. Mrs. Jones rented the Keller apartment and added the larger addition to the house in 1928. She rented rooms to Stevenson-Baker House Nomination Attachments I students and the extra space also served as spillover accommodations for a nearby sorority. So much so, the house was called the Pi Phi Annex. Mrs. Jones passed along the information Mrs. Stevenson had told her about the lyceum and Helen Keller to the next owners, Joseph and Matilda (Tillie) Baker, who bought the house in 1945. The Bakers (Joseph was chairman of the university's European Literature and Thought department) were highly significant players in the preservation of Iowa City's historic architecture and are largely responsible for the modern- day, grassroots preservation movement in Iowa City. During the mid-1960s, when "urban renewal" was the nationwide trend supported by federal monies, the Bakers as a team fought a heroic (and successful) battle to save the 1855 First Presbyterian Church building from demolition. They publicly voiced their opposition in front of the congregation and in the local newspaper to the demolition plan, suggesting church officials look to the outskirts of Iowa City for their new building site. They telephoned a thousand people and obtained nearly 400 signatures on a petition. As a result of their efforts, the congregation voted for a plan which saved the old building. The Bakers then were charged by the church government with "disruption," put to trial, and found guilty. Their punishment was censure--an indefinite suspension of the privileges of church membership--and Joseph was removed as a church elder. They sued the church government in state court, seeking to restrain church officials from in-effect excommunicating them, but were unsuccessful. Though they saved the 1855 building from destruction, they paid the price by suffering a modern-day shunning. Friends of Old Brick, incorporated in 1975 and now known as Friends of Historic Preservation, was the ultimate result of the Bakers' fight. Joseph has now passed away, but Tillie survives and still resides in the house. A Century of Stories: The History of the Iowa City Public Library, 1897-1997 Lolly Parker Eggers The Iowa City Public Library Friends Foundation, 1997 Pages 50-$ I S.K. Stevenson, 1896-1929. Samuel Kirkwood Stevenson could be tagged the father and grandfather of the Iowa City Public Library. Only twenty-nine years old in 1896 Stevenson had left law school four years earlier when he was elected superintendent of schools for Johnson County. He organized and chaired the first meeting to consider establishing a public library in August of 1896, and participated in every aspect of the library's organizational activities from that first meeting until he left the board thirty-three years later at the age of sixty-two. Stevenson, a Republican repeatedly elected to the county schools office in a heavily Democratic county, was recruited by the Iowa City Board of Education to become superintendent of schools for Iowa City just four months after the public library opened. He was the chief spokesman for the public library as a support system for the public schools, and demonstrated his belief in the importance of schoolchildren's access to books and reading by establishing small lending libraries in most of the ninety-five school districts of Johnson County while he held the office of superintendent and by giving papers at meetings of the Iowa State Teachers Association on how to start school libraries. Born and raised on a farm in Scott Township and the youngest of eight children, Stevenson attended Johnson County schools. He graduated with honors from the Iowa City Academy and from the university in 1893 with a bachelor of philosophy degree. Stevenson first revealed his talents for organization and leadership during his college days. An active debater who made the commencement address for his class, he also led the Zethagathian Literary Society, organized the University Lecture Bureau, and served as business manager for the Vidette-Reporter, a student newspaper. On graduation Stevenson was elected a ruling elder of the Presbyterian Church in Iowa City and served as Sunday school superintendent for over twenty-five years. During his public school superintendency he formed the Johnson County Teacher's Association and edited the monthly paper, Johnson County Teacher. He also started an organization of Johnson County school officials to bring together the school boards in each of the county's twenty-two townships. He was known throughout the area for his Johnson County School of Methods, "largely attended by progressive teachers of eastern Iowa because of the high quality of instruction given." The chief mover behind the organizational efforts of 1896, chairing public meetings, writing bylaws, serving on all committees, and campaigning for votes for the March I, 1897 election, Stevenson took a more Iow-profile role for the next thirty-three years. Never president, he served continuously as secretary for sixteen years and for several other terms in the 1920s. He was always willing to take on special assignments and there were many such opportunities in the early years when the board managed every detail of library business. He attended nearly 90 percent of all the board meetings--more than 350--during his years of service. Stevenson left the Iowa City superintendent's job in 1906, finished law school, and practiced law in Iowa City until 1931. Stevenson-Baker House Nomination Attachments 2 In that year Stevenson was disbarred for mismanaging client funds, just five days after his chief partner in founding the library thirty-five years earlier, Judge Wade, was buried with highest honors. In the midst of accolades for Wade and public speculation about the career of Stevenson, neither man was remembered for his contribution to the public library. Stevenson moved to California in 1937 and died in San Francisco in 1938. Leading Events in Johnson County Clarence Ray Aurher Western Historaical Press Cedar Rapic, Iowa, 1912 Samuel Kirkwood Stevenson: The archives of biography are brilliantly illuminated here and there by recitals of the activities of that large company of the world's workers catalogued under the caption, "To the manor born." There is beyond question a distinct emphasis hearing upon these persons who, spite of the "prophet-not-without-honor" handicap, have risen to distinguished success in "their own country and their own house." This statement takes on peculiar force in connection with the name and record of Samuel Kirkwood Stevenson, native son of Johnson county, Iowa, pupil of its district school, student in Iowa City Academy, alumnus of State University of Iowa and graduate of its Law Department, a chosen orator of its commencement, a winner of competitive debates with rival universities, educa- tional organizer, ex-superintendent of city and county schools, or, lawyer, and man of affairs. Readers of this brief sketch of the life of Mr. Stevenson will be impelled to declare that the handicap of local familiarity has not been apparent in his winning race for success. Mr. Stevenson was fortunate in that mysterious divine lottery, parentage, being endowed with a heritage of virility from both mother and father - the former dying at the advanced age of eighty-four and the latter on December 12, 191 I, at the age of ninety. John A. Stevenson and Henrietta Griffith were the parents of eight children, of whom Samuel Kirkwood is the youngest. John A. Stevenson, father of S.K., settled in Scott township, Johnson county, Iowa, in 1856, where he pursued the occupation of farming. Samuel K. was born and raised on this farm and secured his primary education in the district school of his home township. The elder Stevenson was essentially a farmer and devoted to home and family, but his interest in public matters led him to accept the position of member of the county board of supervisors on two different occasions - first when the board was composed of one representative from each township and lastly when the number of members was limited to five. The date of Samuel Kirkwood Stevenson's birth was March I, 1867, and twenty-two years later he graduated with honor from the Iowa City Academy. June 15, 1893, he graduated from the collegiate department of the Iowa State University and was given the degree of Bachelor of Philosophy. On the third of the same month he was appointed a first lieutenant of the Iowa State National Battalion. During his graduation year he was elected a ruling elder of the First Presbyterian church of Iowa City, and has been actively identified with the work of this church ever since, serving meanwhile as its Sunday school superintendent and extending his influence to county Sunday school affairs as secretary of the Johnson County Sunday School Union. To further emphasize the year 1893 as an epochal twelve-month in his career, Mr. Stevenson was interrupted in his studies in the Law Department of the Iowa State University by election in November to the office of superintendent of schools of Johnson county on the republican ticket by the handsome majority of 725 in a strongly democratic county. He was reelected to this office in 1895, being the only member of his political party honored by the electorate that year. His interjection into the educational field (while an unwelcome interruption of his congenial legal studies) seems to have opened a period of unusual usefulness to Mr. Stevenson and gave opportunity for the exercise of exceptional talents as a schoolman. His genius for organization was manifested immediately, and with vigor. Educational meetings were held under his direction in every township of the county, a movement which quickened the interest of both patrons and teachers. The formation of the Johnson County Teachers' Association followed as a logical sequence. This organization now holds four meetings yearly and is recognized as one of the live public school factors of the state. Mr. Stevenson also promoted the organization of the Johnson County School Officials' Association, the usefulness of which has been signally demonstrated. One of the first of its kind in the state, its timeliness and utility have been proven by its large membership and activity. A marked feature of superintendent Stevenson's administration was the introduction of the school library movement in Johnson county. During the last two years of his term ninety-five school libraries were established. The value of these as aids to both teachers and pupils is unquestioned. Seeking always for the highest efficiency, Mr. Stevenson raised the standard of qualification for teachers so that the grading of Johnson county school instructors now stands second to none in Iowa. Coincident with his Stevenson-Baker House Nomination Attachments 3 general work, he was editor of the Johnson County Teacher, a monthly paper published in the interest of education. In the spring of 1897 Mr. Stevenson organized the Johnson County School of Methods, which was largely attended by the progressive teachers of eastern Iowa because of the high quality of instruction given. At the initial meeting resolutions were unanimously passed by the teachers and others expressing their commendation and appreciation of Superintendent Stevenson for making possible for them this most excellent institute of methods. During the last four months of his final term as county superintendent, from August to November, 1897, Mr. Steven- son did dual work as superintendent of schools of Iowa City, having been elected to the latter office April 28 of that year. This latter office he held continuously for nine years, his administration being characterized by the well-known originality and vigor peculiar to his work as a schoolmaster. It is not too much to say that under Mr. Stevenson's master hand the public schools of Iowa City have been put into the very first ranks of the American school system. In the year 1898 Mr. Stevenson acknowledged the force of the scriptural wisdom that "it is not good for man to be alone," and invited Miss Marcia J. Jacobs to become his life's companion. The consummation of this happy arrangement was effected August 2, and the simplest commentary on their union is to say that Mr. and Mrs. Stevenson have enjoyed thirteen years of comradeship in the sacred ministry of matrimony, unmarred and unalloyed. Upon the termination of his long administration as superintendent of Iowa. City schools, Mr. Stevenson was free to carry out his fondly cherished ambition to enter upon the practice of law. Having already completed a large part of the legal curriculum of the S. U. I., it was easy for him to finish the required course, and on June 7, 1907, he was graduated from the Law Department of the State University with the degree of Bachelor of Laws. Believing in striking while the iron is hot, Mr. Stevenson lost no time in candidating for admission to the bar, and five days after his graduation (June l 2, 1901) he was licensed to practice by the supreme court of the state of Iowa. He immediately united with the State Bar Association and hung out his shingle in the city of his alma mater. Mr. Stevenson's collegiate career was characterized by distinct evidences of proficiency. Recognition was given this by his selection as one of six out of a class of forty-eight to deliver an address on Commencement Day. He was also chosen as one of three speakers in the first joint debate between the State University of Iowa and the University of Minnesota, held at Minneapolis, the result of which was a unanimous decision for Iowa. While in student life at S. U. I., Mr. Stevenson constantly took an active interest in the affairs of the student body. He was president of the Zetagathian literary society during the fall term of 1892; business manager of the Vidette Reporter, the university paper, in 1892-93; and treasurer and one of the organizers of the University Lecture Bureau. While serving as school superintendent Mr. Stevenson read several papers on educational themes before the State Teachers' Association, the most notable being "School Libraries, How to Establish and Maintain Them," and "School Exhibitions - Are They Beneficial?" The data as well as the logic for these practical papers were undoubtedly the outcome of his personal, successful experience. Reference has already been made to his valuable work in establishing school libraries. His views on "School Exhibitions" were most likely crystallized by his personal efforts in organizing and holding school exhibitions at the Johnson county fairs. The activities of a strenuous life have not prevented Mr. Stevenson recognizing his fraternal and political obligations, evidenced by his active membership in the Masonic order, the Woodmen of the World, and the Improved Order of Red Men; well as by practical work in the membership of the state central committee of the republican party, extending into the current year of 191 I. And so, at the age of forty-four, in the full vigor of healthy, hopeful manhood, this strenuous son of Johnson county is "a prophet not without honor in his own country and in his own house" - bringing credit to the illustrious name of the great Iowa statesman, and fairly started on the highway of success, the further stretches of which may give him opportunity of yet greater service in the interest of the mighty commonwealth of his nativity. Helen and Teacher; The Story of Helen Keller and Anne Sullivan Macy Joseph P. Lash Delta/Seymour Lawrence, 1980 (In 1915, Helen Keller and Anne Sullivan were on a lecture tour during which they had the opportunity to meet several notable persons including former President Taft, Thomas Edison, Dr. Montessori and Henry Ford. At this time there was great concern and discussion regarding the war in Europe. Henry Ford had invited Helen to sail with him and others to Europe to negotiate with European leaders for peace.) Stevenson-Baker House Nomination Attachments 4 [Helen Keller's] response to Henry Ford's telegram inviting a hundred leading Americans to sail on his peace ship, the Oscar II, to meet with leading Europeans to pave the way to negotiate settlement, indicated her skeptisim of a peace negitiated by bourgeois governments. Her new lecture agent, Mrs. Marcia Stevenson of Iowa City, who was setting up Helen's winter shcedule, telegraphed in some agitation: PAPERS ANNOUNCE THAT YOU ARE GOING TO EUROP ON FORD PEACE TRIP. CITIES HAVING JANUARY DATES GREATLY ALARMED. Teacher (Anne Sullivan) wired back, WE ARE NOT GOING ON FORD PEACE TRIP. In turning down Ford, Helen was not wholly negative about his initiative. "1 sincerely hope that it may be possible to bring the war more speedily to a close." - page 445 (In 1916 Helen Keller was involved with the women's sufferage movement and the Socialsist party. There was also concern that war with Mexico could disrupt her Chautauqua lecture, but this did not materialize. By 1917,however, due to the war in Europe, the Chautauqua lectures were cancelled.) An antipreparedness Chautauqua tour that she and Teacher embarked upon in the summer of 1916 was a fiasco. They needed the money. Their arrangement with their lecture agent, Mrs. Stevenon, was 20 percent to her, the remainder to them, but they had to pay their traveling expenses. Their fees ranged from $250 to $500. They worked hard, especially on the Chautauque circuit. They had not wanted to do summer Chautauqua, but Mrs. Stevenson assured them, "There is a tremendous demand for Helen Keller's lecture on Preparedness, and of course if you want to serve that cause you will have an opportunity to reach thousands of people in the very best towns in the west." As the summer approached there was a war scare--war with Mexico. In case of war, Helen informed Mrs. Stevenson, she would cancel the Chautauqua commitments. She would lecture only on antipreparedness, and such a speech would be "untimely." Teacher was more emphatic. If there were war, Helen's speech would be considered "an act of treason" and "the people [would] not listen." Helen evidently was not prepared to go as far ah here Wobbly comrades and go against the law in the event of war. War with Mexico or not, the Chautauqua leaders told Mrs. Stevenson, there was need for "a lecture on Preparedness for Peace...Jane Addams isn't well enough to help steady the ship and she and Helen Keller are the only women the country will listen to, so there is the situation as it appears to us out here." - pages 456-45 7 The lecture circuit, they discovered, had become a victim of the war. Mrs. Stevenson sent them an appeal for help that the president of the International Lyceum and Chautauqua Associations had addressed the the White House. It lamented that because of "stringency, economy and even patriotism, many communities feel they must not have their usual Chautauquas and lecture courses. Nothing less than the advise of the President of the Country to continue these institutions can save the situation for many of us." The appeal went unheeded, and Helen and Teacher concluded that Chautauqua business looked pretty hopeless. The slump in the lecture business made them more receptive to a bid from that new El Dorado, Hollywood. And by February 1918 - close to the time when Helen proclaimed herself a "Socialist and a Bolshevik" - they were deep in negotiations to make a movie out of Helen's life. - page 495 Stevenson-Baker House Nomination Attachments 5 8B Photographs of the Stevenson-Baker House View of west side of house View of south side of house Stevenson-Baker House Nomination Attachments 6 View of northeast side of house ~'i ! ~ ... View of northwest side of house Stevenson-Baker House Nomination Attachments Historic Landmark Nomination Form Iowa City, Iowa Date received I Name of Property Historic name: The Crag, Haddock House Other names: Anomie House 2 Location Address: 802 East Washington Street Legal description: Original Town of Iowa City S 87.5' of Lot 5 Block 3 & W 20.79' of S 87.5' Lot 6 Block 3 3 Classification [] Building [] Structure [] Site [] Object 4 Function or use Historic function: Single-family residential Current function: Cooperative Housing 5 Description Style: Gothic Revival Significant features: Poured concrete walls, front ...................................................... and side porches, Gothic gable windows Materials: Foundation: Stone Walls: Concrete Alterations: Steel fire escapes, modifcation of grading Roof: Asphalt shingles on north side Typ. windows: One-over-one double-hung 6 Significance Signficant person: William Haddock Architect: Unknown Emily Humphrey Haddock Date constructed: 1891 Builder: Unknown 7 Iowa City criteria (check all that apply) [] A. Significant to American history, architecture, archeology and culture or Iowa City history, architecture, archaeology and culture. [] B. Possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials and workership. [] C. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. [] D. Associated with the lives of persons significant on our past. [] E. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, method of construction; represents the work of a master; possesses high artistic values; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. [] F. Has yielded or may be likely to yield information important to prehistory or history. 8 Required attachments A. A narrative providing information indicating the significance of the landmark based upon one or more the above criteria. B. Photographs showing all elevations of the building, object and/or site, and any ornamental or structural details of historic or architectural importance. C. Plat Map indicating the location of the proposed landmark D. Any additional information that may help justify the historic importance of the nominated property. Historic Landmark Nomination Form Attachments 8A Significance of the Haddock House (The Crag) The Haddock House was contructed in 1891 by William and Emily Humphrey Haddock, two of Iowa City's significant citizens. William Haddock served as secretary for the Board of Regents for the State University of Iowa for nearly forty years. He was very influential in the early years of the University. Having no children, Emily Haddock, with the encouragement of her husband, studied law at the University and became the first woman in Iowa allowed to practice law in the U.S. courts. The Haddocks are know for having a fondness of the prairie, which is evident in William Haddock's essay, The Prairies of Iowa and Other Notes, 1901. They constructed a small cottage they called "Bluffwood" (non-extant) located east of Iowa City. This cottage was influenced by the architecture and writings Andrew Jackson Downing, who was a proponent of the Gothic Revival Style. The Haddocks referred to their house on Washington Street as "The Crag." Like Bluffwood, the Crag was designed in the Gothic Revival Style. Particularly unique is the use of articulated concrete to simulate stone. Although not substantiated, the concrete is said to have been imported from Germany. It is also said that the house was the only example of poured, cast-in-place concrete. Examination of the exteriors walls indicates that there are simulated mortar joints and may have been poured concrete, rather then concrete block The current occupants, the River City Cooperative, have made efforts to reverse modifications to the property. The house had been converted into several apartments. The Cooperative has since removed these apartments and the house is used as a single dwelling with multiple tenants. Iowa Site Inventory Form for 30 S. Governor Street, Historic and Architectural Resources in College Hill, Iowa City, Iowa Jan Nash, Tallgrass Historians L.C., 1996 "The Crag," as the Haddocks called their house at 802 East Washington, was built of large concrete blocks, made to look like fine ashlar stone masonry. Its lines are steep and Gothic-looking. The name "The Crag" undoubtedly refers to the house's precarious-looking position on the crest of a hill. Behind (north) and to the east side of the house, the land falls quickly to the Ralston Creek flood plain. The use of concrete block as a primary wall material, such as in The Crag, was innovative in Iowa City in 1891 and never became common in the town's residential architecture, perhaps because of the severely monochromatic appearance which results. The design source for The Crag is unknown, but the Haddocks were known to be aware of and concerned with architectural design. Their c. 1875 Bluffwood cottage (demolished, 1993) was inspired by writer A.J. Downing. Additional research could discover a design source for The Crag. English architects practicing during this High Victorian period should not be overlooked. The Crag was the home of two highly significant individuals. William Haddock guided the administration of the University of Iowa for nearly forty years, serving.as liaison between the Board of Regents and a small, but growing, faculty. Researchers interested in the university's history necessarily must learn a great deal of it from William Haddock's minutes and notes. In addition to his position as Secretary to the Board of Regents, William was an attorney, having graduated from the university's law school. In 1875, William's wife, Emma Humphrey Haddock, also graduated from the law school, being one of two women to graduate in only the second class to admit women (one women had graduated from the law school before Emma). Emma Humphrey Haddock was the first woman in Iowa to be admitted to practice before the federal bar. Less is known of Emma's career as a lawyer, but she is known to have been a founder of [the] "Nineteenth Century Club" and she lectured on women's property rights. The Crag is significant on a local level under Criterion B for its association with William Haddock and Emma Humphrey Haddock. Additional research could establish statewide significance based on Emma Humphrey Haddock's role in the professional education of women, in women's rights and women's organizations. Haddock House Nomination Attachments I Annals of Iowa Volume 7, 3rd Series Pages 397-398 William j. Haddock was born near Belfast, Ireland, Feb. 28, 1832; he died in Iowa City, Iowa, Feb. 28, 1906. He came with his parents to America in 1849, and lived for some years in Philadelphia. In the spring of 1856 he came to Iowa. He lived for a short time near Iowa City, and then removed to Cedar Rapids, and later to Shueyville. In 1859, he entered the law office of G.W. and Rush Clark, lawyers, in Iowa City, to begin the study of the law, and at the same time he enrolled in the Normal Department of the State University. In 1861 he graduated from the University and was admitted to the practice of law in 1862. He was County Superintendent of Schools of Johnson County in 1863-64. In 1867 he became the partner of Mr. Rush Clark, then the leading lawyer of Iowa City. In September, 1872, he was appointed Judge of the Circuit Court of the Eighth Judicial District, but he did not find the office to his liking, and had no desire to continue in the position. He held no other political office except a commissionership to investigate the affairs of the Pawnee Indians. Judge Haddock will be long and best remembered for his years of service as the Secretary of the Board of Trustees and later of the Board of Regents of the State University. He was appointed by the Board in 1864, and continued to perform the work of that office until September, 1902. His capacity for work, and his grasp of details were such that faculties and trustees alike relied increasingly upon him and his judgment. His knowledge of law and general business practice made him invaluable to the University, both in safe-guarding its interests and in presenting its needs to legislative committees. Judge Haddock, however, was not a man who cared for business affairs and the compilation of administrative reports alone. He had a liking for the beautiful in nature and in literature, and from his pen from time to time came interesting reminiscences and literary sketches, which show the breadth and character of Judge Haddock's interests. In August, 1865, Judge Haddock was married to Miss Emma Humphrey, of Tipton, Iowa. She is credited with being the first woman admitted to practice law in the U.S. Courts, the presiding Judge at the time of her admission being John F. Dillon. A Retrospective: The State University of Iowa WJlliam J. Haddock, Iowa City, Iowa, 1904 Pages 5 7-58 The Secretary of the Board We have not referred to the Secretary of the Board of Regents lest it might be considered out of order for us to discuss that officer. But the Regents have spoken and they have a right to be heard. Besides we can heartily endorse what they said. The Regents were always right. Hence we quote the resolutions of October 3, 1902, just 'as passed by the Board at said date in relation go to the Secretary, to-wit: -- Actions of the Board of Regents, October 3, 1902 The oldest servant of this University, who for so many years has been one of its towers of strength, is compelled by impaired physical powers to lay aside his work and take a needed rest. For thirty-eight years, marking nearly the whole of the active life of the University, Judge William J. Haddock has served this Board and its predecessor, the Board of Trustees, as their Secretary. During the whole of that period the story of his life and the history of the University are inseparable. His administration of its business and financial affairs, which were so largely committed to his care and supervision during this time has been characterized, at all times, by thorough devotion, untiring zeal and strict integrity. He has been under all circumstances "the ever faithful watch-dog of the treasury. Haddock House Nomination Attachments 2 Frank and outspoken in his views and incapable of deception, he may have appeared at times to some as being brusque and abrupt, yet to all who came close enough to him to know the real man, there was revealed a heart that was ever kind, gentle, tender and true. Such being the man, it is not strange that a deep feeling of sorrow and sadness comes to the hearts of each of us, as we realize that these close and intimate ties are about to be severed. Resolved, That in accepting his resignation we desire to bear testimony to the ability, zeal and integrity with which he always discharged every duty imposed upon him and assure him that though he may go, that his good works will ever remain to bless and praise him. Resolved, That he will carry with him through life the love and friendship of each member of this Board, and the earnest wish that his years, and those of his faithful and devoted wife, may be many and filled with richest joys and happiness. Resolved, That this expression of our appreciation of his work and of our love and admiration for him as a man be spread upon our records, and that he be furnished with an engrossed copy certified to by the President of the Board. The foregoing resolutions were unanimously adopted by the Board of Regents, at said date; and were engrossed, and signed by the Governor as President of the Board; and presented to the Secretary as in the resolutions provided. Women Lawyers and the Orgins of Professional Identity in America The Letters of the Equity Club, 1887 to 1890 Virginia Drachman The University of A4ichigan Press Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1993 Pages 231-233 Mary Emily Humphrey Haddock In the shifting social climate of the late nineteenth century, the choice to pursue a professional career forced women to reinterpret the boundaries of women's sphere. A companionate marriage to a fellow attorney, the privacy of an office practice, and a commitment to studying legal issues affecting women allowed Emma Haddock, a pioneer woman lawyer in Iowa, to become an active member of the legal profession without sacrificing her womanhood. Throughout her life, Haddock expanded the notion of "woman's place" beyond the privacy of her home, striking a delicate balance between her career, her politics, and her private life. Mary Emily Humphrey Haddock was born in Tipton, Iowa, in 1845. She grew up and attended schools in Iowa, eventually graduating from the State University of Iowa in 1865 with a bachelor of didactics degree. On August 2, 1865, she married William J. Haddock, an Irish immigrant who had moved to Iowa to enter the legal profession. He was admitted to the bar in 1861 and joined the firm of G.W. and Rush Clark, where he had read law in preparation for the bar examination. The firm changed its name to Clark and Haddock and existed until the death of the senior partner in 1879. As a young bride, Emma Haddock devoted herself to the traditional role of homemaker. The couple never had any children and Haddock found teaching school to be unfulfilling. After ten years of living in a traditional Victorian marriage where her life revolved around housekeeping and advancing her husband's career, Haddock yearned for other activity. Feeling trapped, she discussed the problem with her husband who encouraged her to enroll in the law school at the State University of Iowa to prepare herself for office work in a legal practice. Emma Haddock studied law while continuing to perform all of her usual household and wifely duties. The demands of full-time study and housework tasks threatened her health, but she completed the program and graduated in 1875, just two years after fellow Equity Club member Mary B. Hickey Wilkinson, the first woman graduate of the State University of Iowa Law School. Haddock was admitted to the bar in Iowa shortly after graduation and became the first woman to practice law in the state. Another year of study at the law school earned her a certificate for special proficiency in law. Haddock House Nomination Attachments 3 With academic credentials in hand, Haddock joined her husband's firm, pursuing a career in office practice. Most of her work consisted of assisting with her husband's cases. She conducted legal research, wrote briefs, and helped to prepare cases. Haddock's interest in legal research was increasingly directed towards laws that directly affected women. Aware of women's ignorance of the law, she began to teach women about their legal rights. She sought invitations to speak to women's organizations about the financial and legal matters incumbent upon married women. She was founder and first president of the Nineteenth Century Club, the first women's literary club in Iowa City. Using the club as a platform, she delivered a series of lectures on the property rights of women in Iowa. She also traveled to the Women's Congress of Louisville, Kentucky, in 1886 to speak on "Women as Landholders in the West." In this way, she used her professional expertise to help other women better understand the American legal system and its effects on their personal lives. In 1887, Judge Haddock left his practice to work full time as an administrator at the State University of Iowa. Emma Haddock went with him to work as his assistant. They remained at the university until retiring in 1902. Haddock's position in the university combined with her years of experience as a practicing attorney won her a three-year appointment from the state supreme court to examine students of the university for graduation and admission to the bar. Haddock had a reputation among Iowa's young female attorneys as a woman lawyer they could turn to for advice and counsel. Her status as a pioneer set an example for other female attorneys to follow. Her lectures on women's rights increased her popularity among the region's middle-class women's groups. When she died of a spinal disorder in a Los Angeles sanitarium on March 3 I, 1907, she left behind many devoted women friends who were grateful for the friendship she shared with them. Selected Sources Information on Mary Emily Haddock is in Phebe A. Hanaford, Daughters of America (I 882). She is included in Lelia J. Robinson, "Women Lawyers in the United States" (2 Green Bag [1890]). There are several obituaries on Haddock, including "Death of Mrs. Haddock" (Iowa City Citizen [April I, 1907]; "Mrs. Haddock Died in West" (Iowa City Republican [April I, 1907]); "Mrs. Haddock is No More" (Iowa City Press [April I, 1907]); and "Mrs. Haddock Buried Yesterday" (Iowa City Citizen [April 8, 1907]). Haddock is mentioned in 16 Annals of Iowa (1928) and in the History of Johnson County, Iowa (1883). She is also included in Teresa Opheim, "Portias of the Prairie: Early Woman Graduates of the University Law Department" (67 The Palimpsest [1986]). The Green Bag: A Useless But Entertaining Magazine for Lawyers Volume II Edited by Horace W. Fuller The Boston Book Company, Boston, Mass. 1890 Page 22 Women Lawyers in the United States By Lelia J. Robinson, LL.B. Mrs. Mary E. Haddock, of Iowa City, a graduate of the class of '75, is a woman of whom I have often heard, and always in terms of highest respect and deepest affection. She seems to be a sort of mother in Israel to young women lawyers of Iowa. Mrs. Haddock writes me that after graduating in 1875, she took an extra year's course, receiving a certificate of special proficiency. She was admitted to practice in the Iowa State courts in 1875, and later in the United States Circuit and District Courts. She practiced law in her husband's office in Iowa City from 1875 till June, 1887, devoting herself principally to office work and briefing cases. In 1887 it became necessary for Mr. Haddock, who is secretary of the University, to devote his entire time to the management of the business of the University, and since then she has been employed with her husband in this work. She was for several years appointed by the Supreme Court to examine students of the University for graduation and admission to the bar. Haddock House Nomination Attachments 4 The Chicago Law Times Volume I Edited by Catherine V. Waite C.V. Waite & Company Chicago, Illinois 1887 Page 83 Admission of Women to the Bar In June, 1875, Emma Haddock of Iowa City, Iowa, associated in practice of law with her husband Judge Haddock, graduated from the Law Department of the State University, and was admitted to the State Bar. In November following, she was admitted to the U. S. Circuit and District Courts at Des Moines. In June, 1878, Mrs. Haddock was appointed by the Supreme Court to examine students of the University for graduation and admission to the Bar, and was re-appointed for two years following. About Haddocks Irving Weber Iowa City Press Citizen, February 22, 1992 William J. Haddock was born in Ireland, Feb. 28, 1832, near Belfast, in County Atrim. He came to America 1849. The family lived in Philadelphia for some years. In 1856, Haddock came to Iowa, lived a short time near Iowa City, and then moved to Cedar Rapids, and later to Shueyville. In 1859, he entered the law office of G.W. and Rush Clark. He was County Superintendent of Schools in Johnson County in 1863-64. In August 1865, he married Mary Emma Humphrey of Tipton. She graduated with distinction from the University of Iowa College of Law in 1875, and was the first woman to be admitted to practice law in the federal courts. Haddock later was appointed a judge in the Eighth District, but he will best be remembered for his years of service as Secretary of the Board of Trustees and later of the Board of Regents of the State University of Iowa. He was appointed secretary in 1864, serving 38 years. Haddock loved to write letters to his wife. Much of this material is printed in book form, at the Iowa State Historical Society, under the title Days O'lang Syne. In one letter, Haddock wrote about the couple's memories at Bluffwood. He describes a Christmas when their decorated Christmas tree was actually a growing Norway Spruce - "no pine limb cut off and bought at a candy store for quarter." He describes the wonderful sleigh they built in the summer kitchen and then discovered it was too large to get out. He details the pond they created by damming Ralston Creek; with a sizeable boat that provided great recreation - fishing in the spring and summer, and hunting ducks and geese in the fall. Finally, a flood washed it out. The letter was 21 pages. The Crag Irving Weber Iowa City Press Citizen, February 22, 1992 In 1891, the Haddocks built a very large house in Iowa City, on the northeast corner of Washington and Lucas streets, which they named The Crag. The house was well named as it was most austere, almost forbidding; three Haddock House Nomination Attachments stories with a steep, sharply inclined roof. Apparently they continued to use both homes, which were about as great a contrast as imaginable. Emma Haddock added her gardening touch with beautiful sunken gardens, which I remember admiring as a boy as I walked past. By that time, The Crag was owned by Professor Eastman of UI Latin Department. Art Dryer, an Iowa City plumber for more than 50 years, had worked on The Crag. He reported that the large cement squares that form the exterior of The Crag was the first utilization of cement in Iowa City. As state by Dryer the cement was imported from Germany. Dryer at one time owned the property directly north and the abstract contained much information about The Crag, since originally the two were one piece of property. The house owned by Dryer (20 S. Lucas St.) had been the Haddock's large barn, where he kept his horse and buggy. Professor Thomas H. MacBride later UI President, lived directly east of the Haddocks, on the northwest corner of Washington and Governor, now the Alpha Chi Omega Sorority, stabled his horse in the Haddock barn. After the Eastmans made The Crag their home for several decades, it became a rental property with a number of owners. When the Paul Shaws owned it, they recall the house had been made into large apartments: two on the first floor, two on the second and one on the third. Haddock House Nomination Attachments 8A Photographs of the Haddock House (The Crag) View of south side of the Haddock House Porch on sout side of Haddock House Haddock House Nomination Attachments 7 View of west side of Haddock House Porch on west side of Haddock House Haddock House Nomination Attachments Northwest side of Haddock House North side of Haddock House Haddock House Nomination Attachments East side of Haddock House Haddock House Nomination Attachments East gable of Haddock House Upstairs fireplace I~lewel post Haddock House Nomination Attachments Historic Landmark Nomination Form Iowa City, Iowa Date received I Name of Property Historic name: The Crum-Overholt House Other names: Anomie House 2 Location Address: 726 Iowa Avenue Legal description: Original Town of Iowa City E 30' Lot 7 & W 30' Lot 8 Block 19 3 Classification [] Building [] Structure [] Site [] Object 4 Function or use . _H_ i_s_t_o, r_i_c_ .f _u _n_c_ti _o_n_.'_ _S_ i_n_g_ I_e_-_f_a_m_ ~1~_ ~ ~ ?~ ........... _C. u_ _r _r _e.n.t_ .f _u_n_c_ti _o.n_ .'. _ _ _M_ _u_l_t i;_f~ I~_ ~ ~ ?~ _ ~ ~_ ~ i~_ ................ 5 Description · .S.t .y[e..'. .............. .G.r.e..e .k..R.e.v.i.v.a.I, .V. !c.t.o..r!a..n ......... S. i.g.n, i~c. a..n.t.f.e.a.t.u..r ?.s!..S.t.e.p..p.e.d.,..p.a.r.a.p..e.t..e .n.cl..w. ?! I.s..w. !t.h. ................ modifications integral chimneys; full width porch Materials: Foundation: Brick Walls: Brick Alterations: Modern addition at rear of house Roof: Asphalt shingles on north side Typ. windows: One-over-one double-hung 6 Significance Signficant person: William Crum Architect: Unknown Henry D. Overholt Date constructed: c. 1840 Builder: Unknown 7 Iowa City criteria (check all that apply) [] A. Significant to American history, architecture, archeology and culture or Iowa City history, architecture, archaeology and culture. [] B. Possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials and workership. [] C. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. [] D. Associated with the lives of persons significant on our past. [] E. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, method of construction; represents the work of a master; possesses high artistic values; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction. [] F. Has yielded or may be likely to yield information important to prehistory or history. 8 Required attachments A.A narrative providing information indicating the significance of the landmark based upon one or more the above criteria. B.Photographs showing all elevations of the building, object and/or site, and any ornamental or structural details of historic or architectural importance. C. Plat Map indicating the location of the proposed landmark D. Any additional information that may help justify the historic importance of the nominated property. Historic Landmark Nomination Form Attachments 8A Significance of the Crum-Overholt House The Crum-Overholt House is signficant both architecturally and historically. Historically, this house was orignally owned by William Crum, the editor and publisher of one of Iowa City's first newspapers, The Iowa Standard. Crum first published the Iowa Standard in October 1840. At that time the paper banner read "Printed and published simulataneoulsy at Bloomington and Iowa City by Crum and Bailey." By June 1841, the paper had moved to Iowa City and Bailey was no longer involved with its publication. The name of the paper changed to The Iowa City Standard and was located on Iowa Avenue. During the four years that Crum published the paper, the paper's office moved three times. From July 23, 1841 through January 1842, the office was located on the south side of Public Square. The January 15, 1841 issue has the office located on Clinton Street where it continued to operate until June l I, 1842 at which time it was again published from an Iowa Avenue location. The third volume of the paper began publication in December of 1842 and was printed on a larger sheet. At this time the paper's name was changed back to The Iowa Standard. In December, 1844, Crum sold the paper to Colonel A.P. Woods. The Iowa City Standard was the voice of the whig party and the banner stated it was "devoted to politics, agriculture and news." Together, with the democratic Iowa City Argus and the republican Iowa Caritol Reporter, William Crum and The Iowa Standard played a significant role in the political dialoque of the day. William Crum purchased the land where this house was constructed at the first land auction of Iowa City lots in 1939. An engraving of the Crum residence appears on the 1859 Johnson County Land Map as does an advertisement for "Wm. Crum, Book & Job Printer & Noatary Public". Furthermore, the house is clearly illustrated on the 1868 Bird's Eye View of Iowa City. On March 19, 1873 Crum sold the property to Henry D. Overholt, who was involved in the leather and tanning industry. Overholt served as postmaster from July 1889 until sometime after October of 1906. During this time a new Post Office located at Washington and Linn Street was constructed. It has not been determined what influence Overholt had in the construction of the new Post Office, which is currently used as a senior center. The house is currently owned by artist Jueng Hee Lee. Engravings from the 18$9 Johnson County Land Ivlap, courtesy SHSI This house is only one of a handful of extant houses constructed in the Greek Revival style and is particularly unique in Iowa City. The gable end walls are brick with a stepped parapet and integral chimneys. The only other house with this characteristic in Iowa City is at 630 N. Van Buren Street, which was constructed around the time of the Civl War. The engraving of the house on 1859 Johnson County Land Map likely illustrates the original design of the house. The small portico located centrally on the front of the house and the three dormers are in the Greek Revival style. The front of the house was modifidied at a later date to appeal to more Victorian tastes. The house retains its symetrical design, however a full width porch replaces the portico and the central dormer has been replaces with a larger gabled dormer with wall shingles. Crum-Overholt House Nomination Attachments A Modern addition was added to the rear of the house sometime in the late 1960s or 1970s. The east wall of this ~ addition, which is visible from the street, is constructed of red brick. The north and west walls are sided with vertical boards and battons. This addition is not historically significant. The following excerpts from various publications and sources corraborate the significance of this property. Iowa: Its History and Its Foremost Citizens, Vol. I Johnson Brigham The S.J. Clarke Publishing Co. Chicago Illinois, 1915 Pages 167-168 The Territorial Press The year 1840 ushered in several Iowa newspapers, the most notable of which was the whig Iowa Standard. Its editorial founder was William Crum. After about a half-year's experience in Bloomington (Muscatine), Crum moved his plant to Iowa City. In December 1842, the Standard was enlarged. In the following June it suspended, "owing to the great difficulty experienced in collecting means for its maintenance." The editor's keen interest in the first issue of his democratic rival, the Iowa Capital Reporter, is characteristic. Though he had "barely glanced at its editorials," he paid his respects to Ver Plank Van Antwerp, editor and office-holder, styling him "My Lord Pomposity, -- late of St. Louis." Because of his recent interference with the "loaves and fishes" which belonged to another democrat, Van Antwerp, "true to the instincts of his nature, deemed it most politic to CRINGE -- to refrain from his usual violence, etc." The result of that mere glance at Van Antwerp's editorials was nearly two columns of rapid-firing! This was in 1841; just preceding the suspension, in an issue of 1843, the editor preaches a two-and-a-half column sermon on Contentment, and the criminality of complaint! The only indication this issue reveals that the editor is "yet in his sins," is a brief editorial informing Jesse Williams, then editor of the Reporter, that "he can expect no honor or respect as editor of a public journal," being "wholly unfitted, both by nature and education, for the post," and that he had best turn his hand to some work for which he is fitted! In December, 1844, the name of Crum disappears from the heading and Colonel A.P. Wood becomes the paper's publisher, with the redoubtable William Penn Clarke as its editor. Old Stone Capitol Remembers Benjamin Franklin Shambaugh Iowa State Historical Society, 1939 Pages 168-169 Two years later Wm. Crum, editor of The Iowa Standard professed to tell why the capital was removed from Burlington. "In the first place", he said, "it was removed from Burlington, by the vote of a majority of both branches of the Legislature, and by the same vote, located at Iowa City." The removal to Iowa City under the act of January 13, 184 I, that is, "one year previous to the time specified in the bill making it the permanent seat of government, grew out of a disposition to economize, and accommodate. For three years, the regular and extra sessions of the Legislature were held at Burlington, at an average cost, for rent, of from $900 to $1,200. The bill removing it to Iowa City was conditional - authorizing the Governor to convene the Legislature at that city, provided suitable buildings should be furnished, free of charge to the Territory, which was complied with." Mr. Crum did not dispute the right of the people of Burlington to expect the legislature "for another session". But he could not admit "that its earlier removal' was a breach of faith, giving the people of Burlington just cause of complaint ... The seat of government should be located, and the sessions of the Legislature held, at a point as convenient to the people of the whole Territory as possible, and not in a corner, merely because its inhabitants would take offense at its location at another point." The editor of the Standard gave yet another reason why the capital was removed from Burlington, before the Capitol was prepared for the accommodation of the Legislature. The editor of the Hawk-Eye [who had discussed the matter] could not have failed to observe that ... the motives and actions of members were discussed with the most perfect Crum-Overholt House Nomination Attachments 2 freedom, and frequently, in their presence, were words of ridicule and condemnation uttered. Every measure before the legislature, exciting any degree of in that body, became a subject of barroom conversation, and many were the taunts and jeers thrown at him who had the misfortune to differ with them in opinion. Thus was the situation of many an honest member rendered extremely unpleasant, but 'twas borne with a resignation equal to the determination to free their successors from like insults, as soon as possible." If what Mr. Crum wrote was true, one can only marvel at the sensitiveness of the pioneer legislators of Iowa. Pages 2 70-2 7 I Early Iowa City Newspapers If community life and trends of thought and culture are mirrored by the press, then there is history in the columns of The Iowa City Standard, the Iowa City Argus, and the Iowa Capitol Reporter - newspapers published at Iowa City during the eighteen forties. During the first two years of its existence, Iowa City was without a local newspaper. For Iowa news and Iowa editorial comment the people were dependent upon the press of the towns on the Mississippi River. The Iowa Territorial Gazette and the Burlington Hawk-Eye of Burlington, the Bloomington Herald and the Iowa Standard of Bloomington, the Iowa News of Dubuque, and the Iowa Sun of Davenport had eager readers in Iowa City. Likewise, copies of such outside papers as the New York Tribune and the Prairie Farmer and such magazines as Godey's and Graham's were found in the frontier capital of Iowa. William Crum, editor of The Iowa Standard, brought his Bloomington newspaper to Iowa City in 1841, renamed it The Iowa City Standard, and published the first number on the third day of June. Strangely enough The Iowa Standard had for some time been advertised as "printed and published simultaneously at Bloomington and Iowa City." As a matter of fact there was neither printing press nor publication office in Iowa City prior to the advent of The Iowa City Standard on June 3, 1841. As a four page, six column, twenty by fifteen imperial sheet, The Iowa City Standard was published weekly on Thursday, at $2.50 in advance, $2.75 in three months, $3.00 in six months, $3.25 in nine months, and $3.50 at the expiration of the year. It was the local organ of the Whig party, and carried as a motto the words of Harrison: "1 desire you to understand the true principles of Government. I wish them carried out - I ask nothing more." Later the motto was changed to "Principles and Men". The headquarters of the paper was first on the corner of Market and Dubuque streets, then on the south side of the Public Square, next on Clinton street, and finally on Iowa Avenue. In December, 1842, the paper resumed its original name of The Iowa Standard and was enlarged to seven columns to the page. During the month of December, 1844, Crum sold out to A. P. Wood, who in turn transferred the paper to Ezra D. Garrigus & Company in March, 1846. Suspension of publication followed the transfer. After several months the paper reverted to A. P. Wood who, on June 17, 1847, leased it to Silas Foster with Easton Morris as editor. With the approaching demise of the Whig party, The Iowa Standard became the Iowa City Republican in 1849. Nineteenth Century Home Architecturre of Iowa City Margaret N. Keyes The University of Iowa Monogrph Iowa City, Iowa, 1966 pp. I10-111 (Based on Johnson County transfer records, this house was built c. 1840 by William Crum and sold to Henry Overholt in 1873. Margaret Keyes states it was constructed by Overholt in 1873.) The Overholt-Plum House Built in 1873 by Henry D. Overholt, the one-and-one half ,story house owned by Jerry L. Plum combines characteristics that are Colonial, Greek Revival, and Victorian in origin. Crum-Overholt House Nomination Attachments 3 Each of the heavy brick end walls which extends above the line of the gable roof, is stepped, and incorporates two chimney shafts, has influence that may be recognized as Dutch or Flemish Colonial. The broad porch or one-story portico is classic in origin with its round unfluted columns, plain cornice, and triangular pediment. The face of this shallow pediment is filled with rows of fish-scale shingles, a feature which appeared with the Neo-Jacobean style. The porch roof and the main roof are separated by a broad plain classic cornice which has the basic elements of a complete entablature but lacks its decorative detail. The entrance projects onto the porch and is beveled at the corners.. The roof is broken by a central gable which repeats the form of the porch pediment but is much larger in scale. The wall surface of this gable is boarded horizontally and has a small vertical sash window with a simple fiat lintel. On either side of the gable are two large dormers which have jerkin-head roofs. On the right end of the house is a one-story frame bay window, a feature which appears in several of the Victorian styles. This is half-timbered or paneled in the Neo-Jacobean style. The cornice of the bay is simple and classic in style. Crum-Overholt House Nomination Attachments 4 8A Photographs of the Crum-Overholt House View of south side of the Crum-Overholt House View of southwest side of Crum-Overholt House Crum-Overholt House Nomination Attachments View of east side of Crum-Overholt House · View of northeast side of Crum-Overholt House Crum-Overholt House Nomination Attachments North side of Crum-Overholt House Northwest side of Crum-Overholt House Crum-Overholt House Nomination Attachments City of Iowa City E ORAN DU M TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Shelley McCafferty, Associate Planner DATE: February 6, 2003 RE: Moffitt Cottage and Longfellow Historic Districts The Historic Preservation Commission is recommending an amendment that would combine the Moffitt Cottage Historic District with the Longfellow Historic District. The Moffitt Cottage Historic District contains five properties. According to State law, the Historic Preservation Commission must have a representative from each historic district. Due the small size of the Moffitt Cottage District, it has been difficult to find residents that are willing to serve on the Commission. The Moffitt Cottage Historic District is contiguous to the Longfellow Historic District, and they also possess some similar historic and architectural characteristics. Therefore, the Historic Preservation Commission feels that this amendment would be appropriate. The Commission is also recommending revising the Longfellow Neighborhood District Guidelines to include guidelines specifically for the Moffitt Cottage Historic District to ensure the future integrity of this National Register district. Historic Preservation Commission Recommendation: At its October 24, 2002 meeting the Historic Preservation Commission voted 7-0 to recommend this amendment and the revised Longfellow Neighborhood District Guidelines to the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the State Historic Society of Iowa. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that the amendment to combine the Moffitt Cottage Historic District and the Longfellow Historic District to be named the Longfellow Historic District be approved. Attachment: Longfellow Historic District Amendment Report Approved by: ~ ~ Robert Miklo, Senior'Planner, Department of Planning and Community Development Longfellow Historic District Amendment Report Submitted by: Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission 1326 Muscatine Street January 2003 Prepared by: Shelley McCafferty, Associated Planner City of Iowa City Planning and Community Development 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Historic District Amendment Report Proposed Longfellow Historic District Amendment Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission January 2003 The Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission is considering amending the Longfellow Historic District to include the five properties that comprise the Moffitt Cottage Historic District. Currently, the Longfellow Historic District consists of properties along Court, Maple, and Grant, and Rundell Streets as well as Oakland, Center, Seymour and Sheridan Avenues. The Moffitt Cottage Historic District is located at Court Street and Muscatine Avenue and is contiguous with the Longfellow Historic District (Attachment A). The Moffitt Cottage Historic District was designated an Iowa City historic district, and was listed on the National Register of Historic Place in May of 1993. These five unique cottages were constructed by local builder Howard F. Moffitt between 1939-1940. They were built in the popular Period House style, intended to evoke an image of a vernacular cottages of the English or European countryside and are locally significant under Criteria C. Moffitt implemented his typical practice of using rubble stone and salvaged material to construct these cottages. Other characteristics that make Moffitt cottages unique to their period of construction is that they had small attached garages and were constructed as rental housing, which Moffitt typically built in clusters. 1531 Center Street 621 Rundell Street 603 Rundell Street 431 Rundell Street The Longfellow Historic District was designated in January 2002 and is locally significant as an early commuter suburb. In 1910, the Rundell Land and Improvement Company purchased the franchise for the Iowa City Electric Railway Company and subdivided the Rundell Farm east of Oakland Avenue. They offered small, inexpensive lots and criticized the "crowded, dirty city" to sell suburban lots to white-collar professionals and shopkeepers. Longfellow School opened in 1919, attracting families with children to the "healthy", suburban location, while the streetcar was available for getting around, meaning people were no longer obligated to live close to jobs, shopping or entertainment. Small, affordable, neighborhood lots on Grant and Oakland soon filled with new houses. This area exemplifies the only remaining, nearly intact, streetcar suburb of the pre-automobile suburban lifestyle in Iowa City. After 1920, the scale and style of houses remained, but west of Grant, the houses also included small, discreet, attached garages. Ralston Creek was rerouted to run in the alley between Rundell and Grant, and building along Rundell Street boomed--twenty-five houses were built between 1928 and 1932. Even the Depression did not slow development. Moving east from Summit Street and south from Court Street, housing styles particular to the early twentieth-century prevail: bungalows, Craftsman-style houses, cottages inspired by English Tudor and Colonial antecedents, as well as a handful of eclectic dwellings. Approximately 20 of these small houses were constructed by Howard Moffitt, and are characterized by small attached garages and large masonry chimneys. Historic District Amendment: It has previously been established that both the Longfellow Historic District and the Moffitt Cottage District meet the criteria for Historic Preservation Overlay Zones established under Iowa City Zoning Code section 14-6J-3B. Combining these two districts into a single district named the Longfellow Historic District will not effect the Longfellow District's ability to meet these criteria. Attached are the National Register of Historic Places Nominations for both the Longfellow Historic District (Attachment B) and Moffitt Cottage Historic District (Attachment C). The Moffitt Cottage District's prominent location along Muscatine Avenue and the compact arrangement of these stone cottages make this enclave of Moffitt Cottages unique and distinctive. However, the Moffitt Cottage District shares a number of characteristics with the Longfellow Historic District. These cottages were originally constructed with attached garages, which is indicative of the early commuter suburb. The scale of the cottages is similar to those found in the Longfellow District, particularly in the eastern portion of the district. There are approximately 20 Moffitt cottages in the Longfellow District. Eleven of these are located on Rundell Street and were constructed in the Craftsman style. Also on Rundell, approximately one-half block from the Moffitt Cottage District is a stone Moffitt cottage that was constructed in the Period House style, similar to those on Muscatine Avenue. Additional masonry Moffitt cottages on Center Avenue. Located south of the Longfellow Neighborhood on Friendly Street, is another enclave of stone Period House style Moffitt cottage. Guidelines: Because of the similarities between the Moffitt Cottage and Longfellow Historic Districts, no revisions are being recommended to the contributing and noncontributing status of any of the properties within these districts. However, the Historic Preservation Commission is proposing to amend the Longfellow Neighborhood District Guidelines to include guidelines specific to the Moffitt Cottage Historic District. The purpose of these new guidelines is to ensure that the character of this NHRP district is protected and retained. Summary: Upon studying the Longfellow and Moffitt Cottage Historic District, the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission feels that combining these two districts can be justified based on the history and architectural characteristics of the districts. The revised Longfellow Neighborhood Guidelines ensure that any alterations to the NHRP Moffitt Cottage Historic District will be appropriate to the architectural and site context. ATTACHMENTS: A. Amended Longfellow Historic District map. B. Muscatine Avenue Moffitt Cottage Historic District, National Register of Historic Places Registration Form C. Longfellow Historic District, National Register of Historic Places Registration Form D. Revised Longfellow Neighborhood District Guidelines E. Longfellow Historic District amendment ordinance F. Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission public hearing minutes Longfellow Historic District tBU F~LINQTON ST Cot~:age tP l~Ii~, ;to2 [stri,:t COURT ST 104 1211 / 409 / 416 MAPL~ ST GRANT QT ~ CENTER AVE s~¥~ou~ AV~ 755 SHEFRIDAN AVE Key Structure Contributing Structure Noncontributing Structure Longfellow Neighborhood District Guidelines The Longfellow Neighborhood D/strict Guidelines currently apply to the Longfellow and Summit Street Historic Districts, and the Lucas-Governor, Clark Street and Dearborn Street Conservation Districts for exterior alterations to properties in these districts. The proposed amendment would add district guidelines for theMoffitt Cottage National Register Historic District. Longfellow Neiqhborhood District Guidelines The Longfellow Neighborhood District Guidelines apply to the Summit Street Historic District, Longfellow Historic District, Lucas-Governor Street Conservation District, Clark Street Conservation District, Dearborn Street Conservation District and Moffit Cottage National Register Historic District. They apply to single-family and duplex builidngs in these neighborhood districts. Site and Scale Guidelines for Additions, New Primary Structures, and Outbuilding Setback, Front For new primary structures, the building setback from the street should be established based upon the setbacks of existing buildings located adjacent to the proposed building. The setback of the new primary structure should conform with the average of the setbacks of the four nearest primary structures located within the same block and along the same street frontage. The setbacks of existing buildings shall be measured at the first floor wall of the main living area of the building, excluding a covered or enclosed porch. Front porches are prevalent on existing buildings within the districts. New buildings may contain covered front porches that extend into the front yard, provided they are located no closer to the street than any of the other porches along the same street frontage. Building additions should be placed at the rear of a property if possible. Additions at or near the front of an existing building shall be set back at least 18 inches from the front plane of the existing building and shall be differentiated by a change in the roofline or other means. On Summit Street only: The rear wall of the primary structures must not extend deeper than 125 feet from the front street. This restriction preserves the openness of the rear yards. Building Facade The total surface area of the street elevation of a new primary structure should be no more than 800 square feet. Existing primary structures should not be expanded in such a manner that the total surface area exceeds 800 square feet. For the purposes of enforcing this guideline, the total surface area of the street elevation shall be defined as a figure derived by calculating the surface area of all wall and roof surfaces, including window and door openings, that are visible in an accurate street elevation drawing of the building. On Governor, Bowery, and Court Streets only: The total surface area of the street elevation should be no more than 1200 square feet for a new building or for an existing building including a new addition. On Summit Street only: The total surface area of the street elevation should be no more than 1500 square feet for a new building or for an existing building including a new addition, and not less than 750 square feet for a new building. In the Moffit Cottage National Register Historic District only: The surface area of the street elevation should be no more than 450 square feet for a new building or an existing building including a new addition. Outbuildings Outbuildings, including garages, should be placed to the rear of the primary building whenever possible. Attached garages are discouraged, but if constructed should be set back at least 20 feet from the front plane of the building. In the Summit Street Historic District only: Attached garages are not allowed. Garages must be located at the rear of the property wherever possible. Garages and other outbuildings should be clearly subordinate in size to the primary structure. Pedestrian Access A sidewalk shall be provided that connects the entrance door or porch to the public sidewalk. Vehicular Access Vehicular access should be provided from an alley if available. Driveways leading from the street to garages or parking at the rear of the property should be one-lane in width, but can be widened toward the back of the lot to provide access to multi-stall garages or parking spaces. Parking Parking spaces are not permitted between the primary structure and the street. Parking should be provided behind the primary structure on a lot wherever possible. If parking must be located along the side of an existing or new primary structure, it shall be set back from the front plane of the building a minimum of 10 feet and be screened by a decorative fence, landscaping, or a combination of a decorative fence and landscaping, and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Architectural Guidelines for New Outbuildinqs Building Styles New outbuildings behind contributing primary structures should reflect the style of the primary structure. New outbuildings behind noncontributing primary structures should reflect historic outbuilding styles in the neighborhood. Garage Doors Garage doors should be simple in design. Smooth or simple panel-type garage doors may be used. Garage door openings should be trimmed to match other doors and windows in the building. Single-stall garage doors are preferred to double-stall garage doors. Architectural Guidelines for New Primary Structures Building Styles Architectural style is a defining characteristic for historic and conservation districts. A new primary structure should reflect the historic styles of its neighborhood. Although new construction may adapt and mix some elements of different styles, a single style should dictate the height and mass, rooflines, fenestration, and overhangs for the new building. Please refer to the section entitled "Architectural Styles in Iowa City" for examples of historic building styles. The architectural styles representative of each district are given below. In the Summit Street Historic District only: A new building should reflect Italianate, Colonial Revival, Queen Anne, Vemacular, Foursquare, or Eclectic style. In the Longfellow Historic District only: A new building should reflect Colonial Revival, Queen Anne, Vernacular, Foursquare, Bungalow, Craftsman, Period Cottage, or Eclectic style. In the Lucas-Govenor Conservation District only: A new building on Governor Street should reflect Italianate, Queen Anne, Vemacular, or Foursquare style. A new structure on Lucas Street should reflect Queen Anne, Vernacular, Foursquare, Bungalow, or Craftsman style. In the Clark Street Conservation District only: A new building should reflect either Colonial Revival, Queen Anne, Vemacular, Foursquare, Bungalow, or Craftsman style. In the Dearborn Street Conservation District only: A new building should reflect Vemacular, Foursquare, Period Cottage, Bungalow, Craftsman, or Eclectic style. In the Moffitt Cottage National Register Historic District only: A new building should reflect the Period Cottage style. Building Height and Mass New single-family houses or duplexes shall be one, one-and-a-half, or two-stories in height. In the Summit Street Historic District only: New single-family houses shall have two full stories in the principle portion of the building. In the Moffitt Cottaqe National Register Historic Bistrict only: New single-family houses shoall be one story in height, Rooflines Rooflines should follow one of the historic building styles identified as appropriate for this district. Dormers Dormers must be in proportion to the roof's overall size. Cumulatively, they should interrupt the roof plane no more than one third of the length of that roof measured at the eave. They should be no closer than 3 feet to an existing gable end or hip. The face of the dormer should be narrow, rather than wide, and be composed primarily of window area. Dormers in new construction should have roof pitches similar to the pitch of the main roof. Overhangs New construction should include overhangs appropriate to the historic style guiding the overall design of the building. Windows/Fenestration Window placement on the fa(;ade a new building should follow patterns established by contributing structures within the district. Window shape and placement must be consistent with other elements of the building style of the new structure. Long wall spaces without windows are inappropriate. Small decorative windows in the attic level of front gable ends are encouraged. Window trim shall be between three to four inches in width. Shutters are discouraged. In historic districts only: Windows must be double-hung or fixed-sash with an appearance and profile similar to those windows original to the district. Window design should be appropriate to the building style. Doors Exterior doors on front or side elevations of new single and duplex structures must include half or full lights and/or raised panel construction in keeping with the historic building style of the new structure. Sliding patio doors are uncharacteristic of any of the historic styles of the neighborhood and may be used only on rear elevations in conservation districts. In historic districts only: Sliding patio doors may not be used. Other more appropriate door styles that accommodate large glass area are available. Porches and Balconies Single-story, covered front porches are a key element in the Longfellow neighborhood. New single-family and duplex structures should include a porch typical for the style of the house. Front porches must be roofed and supported with posts or pillars of appropriate dimensions. They may be partially screened or unscreened, but shall not be entirely enclosed with walls and/or windows. Porch flooring should be vertical-grained fir porch flooring. Posts and other accents may be wood or other durable material that accepts paint. Where a spindled railing is used, there must be a top and bottom rail and the spindles must be centered on the horizontal rails. If the space below the porch floor and above the grade is greater than 24 inches, the porch must be skirted with lattice or grilles. In conservation districts only: Dimensional lumber may be used, but the gaps between the floorboards should not exceed one-eighth inch. In conservation districts only: Poured concrete floors are permitted within conservation districts provided that the porch floor is not more than 18 inches above grade. In conservation districts only: Porches on rear elevations need not reproduce historic details. In the Moffitt Cottage National Re.qister Historic District only: Traditional front porches were not used in this district and should not be used on new structures. Balconies Balconies that protrude from the walls of buildings without vertical support were not common in the Longfellow neighborhood, and should not be included on the front or sides of buildings. If second-story porches are included, they must be placed above first-story porches or first-floor interior spaces. Wood Substitutes Substituting a material in place of wood is acceptable only if the substitute material retains the appearance and function of the original wood. The substitute material must be durable, accept paint, and be approved by the Historic Preservation Commission. Siding Horizontal siding like clapboards or cedar shingles are the preferred cladding materials for new buildings. Wood products for siding include shakes, shingles, and painted horizontal clapboard siding from three to six inches in width. Fibrous cement siding is an acceptable substitute for wood siding. Brick was sometimes used in the Longfellow neighborhood and may be an acceptable siding material where historic brick buildings are nearby. Synthetic masonry surfaces such as artificial stone are not acceptable. In conservation districts only: Synthetic siding may be used on new structures and on noncontributing structures. City of Iowa City MEMORANDUM January 30, 2003 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From' Karen Howard - Associate Planner Re: Childcare Homes Staff recently received a request from a child care provider to change Iowa City's regulations regarding childcare homes to match recent changes to State law. The state changed the regulations to allow home-based childcare providers to care for up to 16 children provided they meet certain facility requirements and provider qualifications. Prior to the change, the maximum number of children in home-based care was 11. There are several zoning regulations in Iowa City that prevent a provider from taking advantage of the changes to the state law: · The Code defines a "childcare home" as a home-based childcare facility for a maximum of 11 children. These are regulated as permitted accessory uses in residential zones. · A "childcare center" is defined as a nonresidential childcare facility for 12 or more children. · In single family residential zones there can be no more than one principal use per lot. These provisions prevent a provider from establishing a "childcare center" in their home, even though childcare centers are permitted in all single family residential zones by special exception. A provider that wants to take care of more than 11 children in their own home could not apply for a special exception for a childcare center, merely because they reside on the premises. According to Housing and Inspection Services, there have been some problems with allowing large home-based childcare facilities as permitted accessory uses with no consideration for the lot size, size of the home, traffic, etc. As a consequence, we were planning to make some changes to the regulation of childcare homes as a part of the Code Rewrite project. It also seems reasonable to change the City's Code to be reasonably consistent with the new state regulations. However, if we wait to make these changes as a part of the larger Code Rewrite Project, childcare providers such as Ms. Russell, will not be able to take advantage of the changes made to the state regulations until the new Code is adopted. Recommendation: Maintain "childcare homes" as a permitted accessory use, but regulate them more carefully based on the number of children being cared for. Staff recommends that the Code be amended as follows: · Childcare homes that provide care for up to 8 children would remain a permitted accessory use. · Childcare homes that provide childcare for 9-16 children would be considered an accessory use, but must meet the following standards: ,/' The home must provide a fenced outdoor play area of not less than 50 square feet per child based on the maximum number of children in care at any one time. ,/' The home must contain 35 square feet of accessible, usable interior floor space per child, excluding kitchen, bathrooms, and halls. ,/' The home must have a working fire extinguisher, smoke detectors, and two direct exits. ,/ The operation and maintenance of the childcare home must meet all applicable State requirements. Based on state requirements the childcare home may have one nonresident caregiver in addition to the primary resident caregiver. Approved by: Robert Miklo, Senior Planner, Department of Planning and Community Development Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Dear Members of the Iowa City Planning and Zoning Commission: A new bill, Senate File 2205, concerning Child Development Homes, became effective, on December 1,2002, for the state of Iowa. However, because of some of the Iowa City regulations, very few Iowa City residents will be able to benefit from the new changes in the state law. Therefore, I would like. to request to have this matter discussed at the next meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. I discussed this new bill with Ms. Karen Howard, Associate Planner and Ms. Jann Ream, Code Enforcement Assistant. Ms. Howard said she thought it would be "reasonable" to have the Iowa City regulations match the state of Iowa laws regarding Child Development Homes and she suggested that I write a letter to you requesting to have this subject put on the agenda of the meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. I provide a valuable service to many parents who work in Iowa City and I have a waiting list of more parents who would like to enroll their children. As you may know, there is a shortage of high quality child care in Iowa City. If the Iowa City regulations matched the state of Iowa laws regarding Child Development Homes, some other well-qualified, experienced, registered child care providers and I would be able to provide excellent child care for more families. Allowing highly-qualified child care providers to care for more children could strenghen the local economy because more parents could go to work and have peace of mind as they work, knowing their children were receiving excellent care. The new state law not only allows registered child care providers to care for more children but it also increased the training requirements for those child care providers who want to care for more children. The training requirements are the highest for those registered child care providers who want to care for a total of 16 children with two adult registered child care providers present. In fact, the law reads, "If more than 8 children are present, both (adult) providers must be preSent.".' Both. registered child care providers must be at least "21 .years old; have either 5 years experience working directly with children in Child care, or have earned a CDA or 2 or 4 year child-care-related degree AND 4 years experience working directly with children in child care." Those registered as joint child care providers who have fulfilled the above requirements are now allowed by the state to care for a total of 16 children. However the current Iowa City regulations prevent people like myself, (a licensed teacher) from expanding our businesses to accomodate more families. Since child care is such an important service to the community, we hope you will review the current regulations and make adjustments so more families can be served in high quality Child Development Homes. I am enclosing a copy of the letter I received from Jody Caswell, Program Manager, Child Care Unit for the Iowa Department of Human Services. Ms. Caswell included information concerning the new state regulations, requirements and number of children allowed in each category of Child Development Homes. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, V alerie M.. Russell STATE O F i OWA :ii THOMAS J. VlLSACK, GOVERNOR DEPARTMENT Of HUMAN SERVICES SALLY J. PEDERSON, LT. GOVERNOR JESSIE K. RASMUSSEN, DIRECTOR November 27, 2002 ' Dear registered child care home provider: As you are aware, in the last legislative session, a new bill was passed that changed the way child care homes are regulated in Iowa. The bill, Senate File 2205, included the following changes: · Any person caring for six or more children at any one time MUST be registered with the Department of Humar~ Services. · Rather than the current seven categories of child care home registration (family, group, group/joint, Levels 1-4), there will now be three categories of Child Development Homes- A, B, and C. The Child Development Home title makes it clear that you are doing more than just "caring" for children - you are helping to guide their development. Providers will qualify for specific categories of Child Development Homes based on their experience and education. Providers with more experience and education will be allowed to care for more children. · Registrations will be renewed every two years rather than yearly. · Smoking is prohibited in child development homes during the hours of operation in areas where child care is provided. This new system will become effective December 1, 2002. When your current registration is renewed, you will be registered as a Child Development Home provider. WHAT CATEGORY OF HOME WILL YOU QUALIFY FOR? As a currently registered provider, you will be "grandfathered" into the new categories: · If you are currently registered as a family, group, or Level 1-3 child care home, you may choose to register as a Child Development Home A or B provider, even if you do not meet all of the provider requirements. · If you are currently registered as a group/joint or Level 4 provider, you may choose to register as a Child Development Home A, B, or C provider, even if you do not meet all of the provider requirements. You must, however, meet all the facility requirements for the category of home at which you choose to register. When your registration is due for renewal, you will need to let the local DHS office know which category you want to register at. 1305 E WALNUT STREET - DEs MOINES, IA 50319-0114 HOW DO YOU BECOME REGISTERED? In order to become registered, you will need to contact either your local Department of Human Services office or your local Child Care Resource and Referral agency. They will send you an application that will ask for information about your child care experience and education, and you will need to list all persons living in your home. There is no fee for applying. After you return the application, DHS will complete criminal, child abuse, and sex offender record checks on you and your household members. If you or a member of your household have a criminal or child abuse history, you will be asked to provide additional information so that this situation can be evaluated. This evaluation will determine if any restriCtions on providing child care are necessary. Included with this letter are charts showing the number of children allowed in care and the provider, facility, and training requirements for each category of child development homes. You must meet all the provider and facility requirements in order to qualify for registration at a certain category. If you have questions about the new registration system, either your local Department of Human Services office or your local Child Care Resource and Referral agency can provide information and support in helping you understand what the changes mean for your child care business. Sincerely, Program Manager Child Care Unit Iowa Department of Human Services 515-281-3186 jcaswel@dhs.state.ia.us CHILD DEVELOPMENT HOMES Number of Children Allowed. in Care Category A Category B Category C Under 24 4 at a time- 4 at a time - 4 at a time months Only 3 may bc Only 3 may be under the Both providers must be under the age of 18 age of 18 months , present When 4 children months under the age of 18 months are in care. Under school 12 age, including 6 6 If more than 8 are present, under 24 both providers must be months present. School-aged 2 for less than 2 4--- 2 for less than 2 hours (kindergarten hours at a time Can be full-'time in child at a time or a higher care when no school. grade) Assistant required if more than 8 are present for more than 2 hours at a time. Additional 0 2 at any one time 2 at any one time part-time Maximum 16 capacity 8 12 If more than 8 children are present, both providers must be present. I' ~imum for 12~ 16 inclement 8 If more than 8 children are If more than 8 are present, weather and present, must have a 14 must have 18-year-old emergency year-old assistant, assistant. school closings I Note: These numbers include'the provider's infant and preschool children. Category B & C providers may use up to 180 part-time hours per month. These children may be any age (not to exceed the maximum number of children under 24 months).* CHILD DEVELOPMENT HOMES Facility, Provider, and Training Requirements Category Facility Requirements Provider Qualifications .... Training Requirements · Fire extinguisher · 18 years old · .Within 1st 3 months: A · Smoke detectors · 3 reference letters · Mandatory reporter training · First aid with rescue breathing · 1 st year of registration: 12 hours training, 2 hours must be health and safety · 2nd year and following: 12 hours of training B · 35 square feet per · 20 years old · Within 1 st 3 months: child indoors · High school diploma or · Mandatory reporter · 50 square feet of GED training child space outdoors · Have either: · First aid with rescue · Quiet area for sick · 2 years experience breathing children working directly with · 1 st year of registration: · Fire safety: children in child care, or 12 hours training, 2 hours · Fire extinguisher · CDA or 2- or 4 -year must be health and safety · Smoke detectors degree in child care · 2nd year and following: · Two direct exits related field AND 1 year 12 hours oftraining of experience working directly with children in child care . C · 35 square feet per · 21 years old · Within 1st 3 months .~ ~? child indoors · High school diploma or · Mandatory reporter · 50 square feet of GED training child space outdoors · Have either: · First aid v/ith rescue · Quiet area for sick · 5 years experience breathing children working directly with · 1st year of registration · Fire safety: children in child care, or 12 hours training, 2 hours · Fire extinguisher · CDA or 2- or 4-year must be health and safety · Smoke detectors child-care-related degree · 2nd year and following · Two direct exits AND 4 years experience 12 hours of training working directly with children in child care