Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-05-2006 Planning and Zoning Commission PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Thursday, January 5, 2006 - 7:30 PM Formal Meeting Iowa City City Hall Emma J. Harvat Hall 410 E. Washington Street AGENDA: A. Call to Order B. Public Discussion of Any Item Not on the Agenda C. Rezoning Item: REZ05-00024: Discussion of an application submitted by Three Bulls, L.L.C. for a rezoning from Low Density Single-Family Residential (RS-5) zone to Community Commercial (CC-2) zone for 1.02 acres of property located at 3405 Rochester Avenue. (45-day limitation period: January 30, 2006) D. Development Item: SUB05-00027: Discussion of an application submitted by James Davis for a final plat of JJR Davis Fourth Addition, a 4-lot, 6.68 acre commercial subdivision located east of Mormon Trek Boulevard, south of Highway 1. (45-day limitation period: January 22, 2006) E. Consideration of the December 15, 2005 Meeting Minutes F. Other Item G. Adjournment Informal Formal March 13 STAFF REPORT To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: REZ05-00024 Olde Towne Village Prepared by: Robert Miklo Date: January 5, 2006 GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Three Bulls, LLC 2621 Catskill Court Iowa City, IA 52245 Contact Person: Sarah Swartzendruber One South Gilbert Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Requested Action: Rezoning from RS-5 to CC-2 Purpose: To add to the Olde Towne Village commercial area Location: South of Rochester Avenue, east of Scott Boulevard Size: 1.02 acres Existing Land Use and Zoning: Residential - RS-5 Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Agricultural-ID-RS East: Undeveloped - CC-2 South: Undeveloped - CC-2 West: Undeveloped - CC-2 Comprehensive Plan: Neighborhood Commercial File Date: December 15, 2005 45-day Limitation Period January 29,2006 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This property was recently purchased by the applicants. The property was previously used as a single-family residence and a non-conforming salvage yard. The applicants have cleared the site and intend to incorporate it into the adjacent Olde Towne Village development, which they also recently purchased. The land containing OldeTowne Village was annexed into the city in 2001. At that time it was zoned Community Commercial (CC-2) and Medium Density Single-family Residential (RS-8) with a Conditional Zoning Agreement (CZA) that provide specific requirements to guide the development of the property in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2 ANALYSIS: The current RS-5 zoning would allow this property to be developed with single family homes on lots containing a minimum of 8,000 square feet. The proposed CC-2 zoning is intended for major business districts that serve a significant segment of the community. Retail, office, commercial recreation and eating and drinking establishments are permitted uses. Other uses, such as vehicle service, day care and upper story residential, are provisional uses or are allowed by special exception. This property is included in the Northeast District of the Comprehensive Plan, which recommends the development of a neighborhood commercial center at the intersection of Scott Boulevard and Rochester Avenue. The Northeast District Plan recommends that this commercial center be developed in a main street or town square design that ensures a pedestrian orientation and compatibility with the surrounding neighborhoods. The Comprehensive Plan recommends incorporating on-street parking and locating parking lots behind buildings, minimal or no building setbacks from sidewalks and upper floor residential uses. The layout of the streets in the Olde Towne Village development conforms to these recommendations as specified in the CZA that was entered into at the time the property was annexed into the city. To assure that the additional area requested for rezoning is compatible with the overall concept of Olde Towne Village and the vision of the Northeast District.Plan, staff recommends that this rezoning be subject to a CZA similar to the agreement that applies to the adjacent property. We have asked the applicants to provide a concept plan showing how this property would be developed in a manner compatible with the Olde Towne Village plan. Olde Towne Village was designed with vehicular access to Rochester Avenue from Eastbury Drive and to Scott Boulevard at Middlebury Drive. Individual lots within the shopping center have access to the internal streets but do not have direct access to Scott Boulevard or Rochester Avenue. This is necessary to preserve the traffic carrying capacity and the safety of these two arterial streets and to assure that all lots within the area have access. To assure consistency with this policy, staff recommends that the CZA specify that this property will not have direct vehicular access to Rochester Avenue. The dedication of 50 feet of right-of-way from the center line of Rochester Avenue and the installation of an 8 foot side sidewalk and curb and gutter are necessary to bring this portion of Rochester Avenue to the same standard required for the adjacent property. A water main extension fee of $395 per acre will be required for this development. The sanitary sewer fee is $1263 per acre. Provided that the development conforms with the Olde Towne Village concept plan, the proposed CC-2 conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that REZ05-00024, a rezoning of 1.02 acres from RS-5 to CC-2 be approved subject to a Conditional Zoning Agreement specifying: 1) the applicant will submit a site plan demonstrating that this property will conform to the Olde Towne Village concept plan, 2) the owner will dedicate 50 feet of right-of-way for Rochester Avenue, 3) this property shall have no direct vehicular access to Rochester Avenue, 4) the owner will install curb and gutter and an 8-foot wide sidewalk on the south side of Rochester Avenue adjacent to this property and 5) the owner will pay $395 per acre in water main extension fees and $1263 per acre in sanitary sewer fees. ~ ~ tj ~ ~ ~ ~ tj ,... o o . . .mI-1S3^~ . . en a: I C - ~ o I to o N W a: Q) :::J C Q) ~ ~ s m .c: o o a: to 5f ('I) ~ ~ U o .....l ~ ~ rJ'J /'~') '. - c.:!:b. ~~. . .". .'..."""".'~"'~ p"'.> " . ~ ~\I I . 0 ~j " / /" ....../ \ I /~\\I;) ~l ./ .os...- /~"v\'J~ /" / /" I' -- ~-+-. .!' ~ . " ! ".. ~ z <( ...I n. l- n. w o z o o w (!) :3 ...I - > w z ~ o I- W C ...I o STAFF REPORT To: Planning & Zoning Commission Prepared by: Robert Miklo Date: January 5, 2006 Item: SUB05-00027 JJR Davis Fourth Addition GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: James R. Davis, Robert A Davis Jan Ellen Smith, c/o James R. Davis 4097 Kitty Lee Road Iowa City, IA 52240 Phone: 338-5327 Applicant's Engineer: MMS Consultants 1917 S. Gilbert Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Phone: 351-8282 Requested Action: Final plat approval Purpose: A 4-lot commercial subdivision Location: East of Mormon Trek Boulevard, south of Highway 1 Size: 6.68 acres Existing Land Use and Zoning: Undeveloped, CI-1 Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Airport property; P South: Undeveloped; CI-1 East: Residential, Agricultural; County RS West: Commercial & undeveloped; CH-1 Comprehensive Plan: The South Central District Plan identifies this area as appropriate for intensive or highway commercial development. File Date: December 8, 2005 45-Day Limitation Period: January 22, 2006 February 6, 2006 60-Day Limitation Period: 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: This property was annexed to Iowa City in 2003, as part of a larger annexation including property on the west side of Mormon Trek Boulevard and properties owned by the Iowa City Municipal Airport. The extension of Mormon Trek Boulevard and associated public utilities were recently completed adjacent to this property, providing the infrastructure to support commercial development. This property is zoned CI-1, Intensive Commercial, which is a zone intended to provide for those businesses characterized by outdoor display, storage and/or sales of merchandise, repair of motor vehicles, and other operations conducted in buildings that may not be completely enclosed such as contractor pre-assembly yards, hardware stores, etc. The CI- 1 zone also allows office uses. A preliminary plat was approved in November, 2004. The final plats for JJR Davis, Second and Third Additions, which include the property to the west and south were approved in April, 2005. ANAL YSIS: The final plat as submitted is in general conformance with the approved preliminary plat. Construction plans and legal papers are being reviewed by the City Engineering Division and City Attorney's office. They must be approved by staff prior to Council consideration of the final plat. The preliminary plat had indicated the use of airport property to provide for a portion of the storm water management facilities for this subdivision. The construction plans for the final plat indicate that the use of airport property is no longer necessary, but that portions of the storm water management facilities will be on the adjacent property owned by the Danes. Easements have been provided for these off site facilities. A water main extension fee of $395/ acre will be required. A sanitary sewer tap-on fee of $3,986.12 / acre will be required. The legal papers must address the developer's responsibility for improving Dane Road on the east side of this subdivision. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that SUB05-00027, a final plat of JJR Davis Fourth Addition, a 6.68- acre, 4-lot commercial subdivision, be approved, subject to legal papers and construction plans being approved prior to Council consideration. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location map 2. Final plat Approved by: Karin Fr. nklin, Director, Department of Planning and Community Development S:IPCDIStaff Raports1SUB05-00027 JJRDavis.final.doc ~ ~ t3 ~ ~ ~ ~ t3 "p- - o <c en o "p- O ,..... @: o o I 10 o CO ::> en c: o +:i =0 ~ .c: t= :::::J o LL en oS; as o a: ..., ..., z o ..... 5 o ~ ~ t: 00 lS:lI\d~:Lt:t OOlSlll 600p.JlIOCISt....IOOS'....OO....:O .# <> SJ.SnVI:>3dS ONV11~ <> I & -0 SH3NNV1d ON." <> Sl:>3J.lH:)ijV 3dV:>SONY1 <> . j .. <> SHO.Ut\~ns ONYl <> S~3NION] ,,^O <> j Z8D-IQ\: (llUl) UlOI 'AlIo UlOI W "ar- $1NJ"""" "''' lI3d 1'0-.'_" I ':>NI · SJ.NYJ:IllSNO'" STATTAT W "0"- SJ.N3"1'tOO AlIO ~ ;o-lO-l:l tJ ,\,\ .~ .!l ~ r .. ~~ &'El~U r .Ul.!l ~~llL~j Jj~r .Ils llllln~ =~ .; SolEi Ji1U ~d cd r ij:~ d~ ~"lii .lie; j !l!~~ f~.'.' 8!il<> ]~~j s,..: !5s a ! l.'i lLI\Oj , All:) II.\\Oj 0. ~ 2 :g f UOlnppv tp.Ino.!l sJAlIO 8.... .,. ,'..... /ft, .01 1;8 * I ~ ~ ~ ~ J 1-eld l-eu~.!I "'." Iii l :"j'.- !~ J ~HH~ ~ n ~o ~oz t ;€~$ ol!i.::..~-: j'1'ii~ c_ 0" o.~ .. 20U~-c -.'~:c~~l~ ~o2 ... 6 u-B.2 "-o~'" ~ g~_ ~,go: ~~ c .5..H ....6~fJ ~ ...._ D__~j I:s~ "'8'.~;Sj c 115' c N.lo~~2 ,t'oo .u -5 Da: i o.~ ~ ; -~ ~ j ~"'o ~ ~ii1go1SU 0", .... ~g~c5'i: .ti~~ !"k&-;;:lO i60Cl o-go~jli ~1:~ ii:J".... ~ "CI D li-ll.2,p,U. !iH E~~bll -8 J!m~ l' . <> a,p ~! ...5 B . ~O~_~ 0 '~lf" Ol.OIlO~.c ~ o~ c ><,- CI'l 6 U III U H &~'soi l!i ~~! tjiEoo..rf'O 'O.:~o ,p~holi= ...Uii ~'~"DiEJ!lD~ . .c >..~ t'oS~5.6&c o....c~ ~:~~i~.~ d~S ~ ~ J ~ I ! f ~ I i ~ i , .. j ~ I i I'~ 6 ~!~~! il~~; ~"8 '"~ . "-...-...-.. '-...-... -"'-'. .-l atOlllll",!~_.,~ _ ,tnit ~ i~ @b ~~ ~~ ~i~ 1:= I6Jl ~d ~~ ~~D ~8 ~~i ~~i..~ @b !'~ =;J i =;J .~ ~~~~~ Q~~S~ ~ ~ .. ;11 ~ U ~ U1 n1i i ii dl I ~ I ~ m~~!j Iii liiilll. ~ ~ J J J ~ z 11111" Ilil ,II I i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ u~M hmm~ ; ~ ~ u i <l: '"'' ''''''''''''I~ ~:!lj ~ III i . i ~ ~.t''l; e J ~ 0 ~ ~ Z +l<lo 0 .. I I : uBI; I I i w 0 i II! Ii I ; W --l MINUTES PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DECEMBER 15, 2005 EMMA J. HARVAT HALL PRELIMINARY MEMBERS PRESENT: Beth Koppes, Bob Brooks, Don Anciaux, Wally Plahutnik, Dean Shannon MEMBERS ABSENT: Ann Freerks, Terry Smith STAFF PRESENT: Sunil Terdalkar, Bob Miklo OTHERS PRESENT: Alan MacVey, Glen Meisner, Jim Kerr RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: Recommended approval by a vote of 5-0, (Freerks and Smith absent) SUB05-00020, a preliminary plat and sensitive areas site plan of Lacy's Run Addition, a 2-lot, approximately 17.94-acre residential subdivision located on Conklin Lane Recommended approval by a vote of 5-0, (Freerks and Smith absent) SUB05-00031, a preliminary plat and sensitive areas site plan of Kennedy's Waterfront Addition Part Four, a 4.91-acre, 5-lot commercial subdivision located on Southgate Avenue. CALL TO ORDER: Brooks called the meeting to order at 7:30 pm. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: There was none. SUBDIVISION ITEMS: SUB05-00020. discussion of an application submitted by Kevin Parrott for a preliminary plat of Lacy's Run Addition, a 2-lot approximately 17.94-acre residential subdivision located on Conklin Lane. Terdalkar said this was a two-lot subdivision located on Conklin Lane south of Dodge Street with St. Joseph Cemetery on its west side and Hickory Hill Park on the east and south sides and residential development on the north. The only street access would be from Conklin Lane, a 16.5-foot wide chip-seal street. There currently is a residence on the property and one additional residential lot had been proposed. Both lots would be approximately 1 acre in size. No sanitary sewer service was provided to this area by the City so both properties would use a private septic tank system. The remaining 16-acres of the subdivision would be set-aside as an outlot for future development. Most of the sensitive features located on the property were contained on Outlot A and would not be disturbed by the development. If and when future development would be proposed for this area and/or Outlot A, the street would need to be widened to City street standards to accommodate the traffic generated by the development and sanitary sewer system infrastructure would need to be installed. Because of the location of St. Joseph's Cemetery on the west side of this property, widening of the street would be difficult. Staff recommended that any right-of-way (R-O-W) acquisition be required from the properties on the east side of the street. A 50-foot wide R-O-W dedication and 10-foot wide temporary construction easement were shown on the plat along the west property boundary. A subdivision of this size would require 0.70-acres of open space be dedicated or fees in lieu of could be dedicated for the improvement of Hickory Hill Park. Water main extension fees would be required for Lots 1 and 2; infra-structure fees would be required when Outlot A was developed. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes December 15, 2005 Page 2 All deficiencies noted in the Staff Report had been resolved. Staff recommended approval of SUB05- 00020, a preliminary plat and sensitive areas site plan for Lacy's Run Addition, a 17-94-acre, 2-lot single family residential subdivision. Koppes asked where the existing house was located on the property. Miklo indicated its location on the overhead map. The property consisted of 18-acres which would be considered one lot; the current house would be separated off into a subdivision which would have one lot for it and a second lot for a new house. The large tract of land would not be developed at this time nor was it likely that it would be developed in the near future due to rugged topography of the land, lack of sewer infrastructure, street access. Koppes asked how much land was required for a sanitary sewer system. Miklo said one-acre. Public discussion was opened. Glen Meisner, MMS Consultants, said the Parrott family had obtained the 20-acre property many years ago from Mabel Conklin, after whom Conklin Lane was named. The existing home was located on Lot 1 and had been very nicely remodeled in the 1980's. It was currently owned by Wayne Parrott. Some old farm buildings were located south of Lot 1. Kevin Parrott planned to build a residential dwelling on Lot 2. Dennis Parrott owned approximately 2 acres to the south of the property. If the application was approved, there would be three brothers residing on the property which had been left to them by their parents. Outlot A, a rugged piece of land, contained steep slopes and ravines. The Parrott's had agreed to dedicate 50- feet from the west edge of the road to the east side of the property. They'd had to jog around the house so in one area there was only 48-feet of R-O-W right in front of the house. The final plat would show that if the house were removed some day and a new home constructed, the new home would have to meet the required set backs. The final plat would also show a temporary construction easement and a utility easement. Anciaux asked if a neighborhood meeting had been held. Meisner said no such meeting had been held. Koppes asked what was the strip between Lots 1 and 2. Meisner said it was the access point to Outlot A. Alan MacVev, said he owned the approximate 7-acre property immediately to the north. He asked for a clarification regarding if the road would be widened along the new development. Miklo said the R-O-W would be widened but the street would not actually be widened until such a time that the entire street was widened. The City was acquiring the actual R-O-W to allow the street to be widened in the future. MacVey said if the whole street were to be widened it would have a huge effect on his property as there were big trees that fronted along the road and the road would come right up to their house. He asked under what circumstances would the road be widened. Miklo said it would likely be widened when MacVey's property was developed; he didn't see another reason for the City to widen it. MacVey asked what would happen if the Parrott's decided to develop their property. Miklo said unless the issue with the sewer and the street widening were resolved, it was the City's position that no further development could occur on the Parrott property. That was why the outlot was being created. There was a sewer on the other side of the park that a property owner could bring up to serve the Parrott property but there would have to be some type of agreement from the owner of the MacVey property to widen Conklin Lane. Both sewer and street access would be needed to further develop the property. MacVey asked Kevin Parrott if his intention was not to go beyond the next house. Parrott said that was correct. Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes December 15, 2005 Page 3 Public discussion was closed. Motion: ~oppes made a motion to approve SUB05-00020, a preliminary plat of Lacy's Run Addition, a 2- lot approximately 17.94-acre residential subdivision located on Conklin Lane. Shannon seconded. The motion passed on a vote of 5-0, (Freerks and Smith absent). SUB05-00031, .~iscussion of an application from Paul & Mary Kennedy for a preliminary plat of Kennedy's Waterfront Addition Part Four, a 4.91-acre, 5-lot commercial subdivision located on Southgate Avenue. Terdalkar said the 5-lot approximate 4.91-acre commercial subdivision was located at the intersection of South Gilbert Avenue and Southgate Avenue. All lots would be accessed from Southgate Avenue. The South District Plan identified this area as a gateway to Iowa City and encouraged general commercial and retail development within the area. Lot 1 would not have direct driveway access to Gilbert Street. Shared access points would be created for Lots 1 & 2 and Lots 3 & 4 to limit the number of access pOints on Southgate Avenue. The 100-year flood plain was located on the site; the applicant had submitted storm water calculations to the City Engineer for approval. In 2004 a Grading and Development agreement and covenant had been established between the City and property owner. The applicant had placed a substantial amount of fill on the property and graded it without a permit. A geotechnical report would be required before any building or development activity could occur on the property to ensure the safety of construction activity and structures on this ground. The agreement and covenant should be noted on the plat and addressed in the legal papers. All deficiencies noted on the Staff Report had been resolved. Staff recommended approval of SUB05-00031, a preliminary plat and sensitive areas site plan of Kennedy's Waterfront Addition Part Four, a 4.91-acre, 5-lot commercial subdivision located on Southgate Avenue. Terdalkar said the property was currently zoned CI-1, however in the future the area could be rezoned to Community Commercial Zone (CC-2) and still be in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan goals. Miklo said the City had just received an application to rezone a property across the street to CC-2. When that particular application had been received, Staff had advised the applicant to speak with some of the other property owners in that area because rezoning just that one lot would be spot zoning. He didn't think the applicant had done so. Miklo said Staff would likely have a meeting with the surrounding property owners to see who might be interested in a CC-2 zoning before placing the item on the Commission's agenda. There would be some advantages to the CC-2 zoning as well as some disadvantages for the properties that would become non-conforming. Plahutnik asked for further information regarding the required Grading and Erosion Control plan. Miklo said some uninspected fill had been placed on this property. Since the property was located on a flood plain, a City issued permit was required. The concern was that the fill was not inspected so the City didn't know if the fill was of sufficient quality to support foundations and other infrastructure. Public discussion was opened. Glen Meisner, MMS Consultants, said he was there to answer any questions. Jim Kerr, said he owned lots to the north and to the west. During the floods of 1993 there had been flood plain issues associated with that lot. The more concrete that was added to the lot, the worse it seemed to get. He was interested in learning what was going to happen with that piece of ground. Kerr asked what sort of activities were being done to alleviate the flooding conditions. He felt additional construction would add to the flooding issues during heavy rains rather than lessen the possibility. When the new Waterfront Hy-Vee and surrounding area had been developed, Kerr had noted that this area flooded more quickly and l1e had concerns about that. Miklo said this project would be required to meet City stormwater management regulations; the applicant had submitted information to the City Engineer which was still under review. The information had not Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes December 15, 2005 Page 4 been finalized or signed off on so he suggested that Kerr might wish to visit with the City Engineer's office to get more details. Kerr asked for more information regarding the possible rezoning. Miklo said the property owner of an existing building located on the west side of Gilbert Street had applied to rezone it to CC-2. Rather than just rezone one property which would be spot zoning, Staff intended to conduct a meeting of all surrounding property owners. CC-2 zone was more of a retail zone which allowed retail, restaurants, offices; the CI-1 zone was quasi-industrial which allowed offices, light manufacturing, consignment shops, auto body shops but not retail. The more intense uses allowed for outdoor storage and their appearance was not as important as in a retail area. Staffs recommendation would depend on the interests of the property owners in the area. In the long term, it might be in the property owner's best interest in terms of their property values but in the short term some property owners might not wish to become non-confirming. Miklo said he anticipated that more action on this issue would occur mid to late January. Public discussion was closed. Brooks said he felt the stormwater management issue was critical and would become more so as more of that area was developed and paved and there would be faster run-off. The stormwater management would control how rapidly the water/run off could leave the property. It was an issue that the Commission needed to be very cognizant of in flood plain and non-flood plain areas. Motion: Anciaux made a motion to approve SUB05-00031, a preliminary plat and sensitive areas site plan for Kennedy's Waterfront Addition Part Four, a 4.91-acre, 5-lot commercial subdivision. Shannon seconded. The motion passed on a vote of 5-0 (Freerks and Smith absent). CONSIDERATION OF 12/1/05 MEETING MINUTES: Motion: Anciaux made a motion to approve the minutes as typed and corrected. Koppes seconded. The motion passed on a vote of 5-0, (Freerks and Smith absent). OTHER ITEMS: Miklo said the revised Zoning Code had been approved unanimously by City Council. It would be published in the newspaper on 12/28/05 and become effective the same date. He thanked the Commission for their hard work on the project. ADJOURNMENT: Motion: Koppes made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Anciaux seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 5-0, (Freerks and Smith absent). The meeting adjourned at 8:07 pm. Elizabeth Koppes, Secretary Minutes submitted by Candy Barnhill s:/pcd/minules/p&zJ2005/12-15-05.doc = Q .- r/} r/} .- s S Q U"O t)I:)- = Q .- CJ ~~ N ~ ~ ~ t)I:)= ="0 .- = = ~ =~ .!< ~ ~ .- U = ~ Q ~ It'l Q Q M II) ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ... ... ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ... I"- S>< ~~ ~~ ~~ ... =!:!:! ~~ ~~ ~~ ~O ... ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ... II) ~~ ... ~~ ~~ ~ ...... 0\ ... ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ...... 0\ ClO ~ ~~~ ... ~ ~ ~ QC :!!: ~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ClO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ l"- I"- ~ ~~ s::! ~ ~ ~ ~ '-Q '-Q ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ...... '-Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >< ~~ II) ... 0 I S ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~ 0 , 0 , 1::: 0 0 ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~ 0 ~ , 0 0 0 I"- ~ 0 I ... ~ ~~ 0 ~ i<l 0 0 0 0 $i 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~~ 0 0 0 I , l"- I ~ . ... ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~ 0 , 0 , ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~ , 0 0 0 0 = I I s::! ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~ I ... 0 ~ ~~ I . ~ ~ ~ . ... I I '" e.~ '" ~ 00 r-- :; ~~ ~ ~ ~ ...... ~&:l V') V') V') V') V') V') 0 0 0 0 0 00 ~ ~ 'ii = ~ Ii c = ~ ... =.&:1 .. .. = 'y E .. .&:I =... ~ .. .. .- ~ = ~ ii: .&:I Ei -< = "" VJVJ = == < ~ ~ =~ C) Z I- W w :E ...J c( :E D:: o u. - - ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ ...... ... ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !:!:!!:!:! ... 00 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ 0\ 0\ ~ s::! ~ ~ ~ ~ O~ ClO II) z::! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ClO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ClO ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ j:::: l"l ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ;:c S1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I I ClO 0 I z::! ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~ I 0 ~ . :!!: ~~ I 0 ~ ~ ~ , ~ 0 , 0 , ~ ~ 0 0 ... ~ ~~ 0 ~ 0 ...... I I l"l ClO I ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 0 0 0 , ~ 0 ~ I ... ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~ 0 I 0 r:::! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I ... U U UU I '" e.~ '" :; 00 r-- :; E2~ ~ ...... ~ ~ ...... ~&:l V') V') V') V') V') V') V') 0 0 0 0 0 00 ~ ~ ~ s = = ~ ! c .. .. = =.&:1 'y E .. .&:I =... ~ .. .. .- ~ = ~ ii: .&:I Ei -< = "" VJVJ Z = == < ~ ~ =~ C) z i= w w :E ...J c( :E D:: o u. ~ "0 .. [g bl) ~.e "'c~i ~31~:E ~..c.c 0 ~c(<z ..1\ II 1\ II :S~O~~