HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014-01-16 Info Packetoar
4k 7D
N.
'� 4%,, CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION PACKET
— tea...__
CITY OF IOWA CITY
www.icgov.org January 16, 2014
IP1 Council Tentative Meeting Schedule
JANUARY 21 WORK SESSION
IP2 Work Session Agenda
IP3 Memo from City Clerk: City Conference Board
IP4 Pending Work Session Topics
MISCELLANEOUS
IP5 Copy of letter to Council Member Dickens from ICAD Group President Mark Nolte: FY2014
Investor Update
I136 Email response from City Manager to Gregg Geerdes: Garbage Service — What's the
Problem?
IP7 Memo from Police Chief to City Manager: Gas Mileage Report
IP8 Copy of letter from City Manager to Peter Damiano, Public Policy Center: Final Draft
January 6, 2014 — Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing in Iowa City, Iowa 2013
I139 Article from City Manager: Iowans Shouldn't Have to Wonder "What If ?"
IP10 Article from the City Manager: Recognize Your Leaders
IP11 Invitation: "Growing the Local Food Movement in Johnson County Community Forum:
Share Your Vision"
IP12 Invitation: Celebration of the Young Child Legislative Breakfast
Email from Coralville City Clerk: Joint Meeting: January 27, 2014
DRAFT MINUTES
IP13 Airport Commission: December 19
IP14 Human Rights Commission: December 17
IP15 Planning and Zoning Commission: January 2 (informal)
CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION PACKET
CITY OF IOWA CITY
www.icgov.org January 16, 2014
IP1 Council Tentative Meeting Schedule
JANUARY 21 WORK SESSION
IP2 Work Sess\Sessi
IP3 Memo from ity Conference Board
IP4 Pending WTopics
MISCELLANEOUS
IP 5 Copy of letter to Council Member ickens from ICAD Gr p President Mark Nolte: FY2014
Investor Update
IP6 Email response from City Manager to regg Geer es: Garbage Service — What's the
Problem?
IP7 Memo from Police Chief to City Manager: Gas ' age Report
IP8 Copy of letter from City Manager to Peter amia o' Public Policy Center: Final Draft
January 6, 2014 — Analysis of Impediment o Fair sing in Iowa City, Iowa 2013
IP9 Article from City Manager: Iowans Shoul n't Have to Won er "What If ?"
IP10 Article from the City Manager: Recog a Your Leaders
I1311 Invitation: "Growing the Local F d Movement in Johnson Cou ty Community Forum:
Share Your Vision"
IP12 Invitation: Celebration of the oung Child Legislative Breakfast
DRAFT MINUTES
IP13 Airport Commission: ecember 19
IP14 Human Rights Co mission: December 17
IP15 Planning and Z ning Commission: January 2 (informal)
`��_,-- .. =•Qr City Council Tentative Meeting Schedule
IN
3► ON � �� Subject to change January 16, 2014
CITY OF IOWA CITY
Date Time Meeting Location
Tuesday, January 21, 2014 5:00 PM Work Session Meeting Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM Formal Meeting
Monday, January 27, 2014 4:30 PM Joint Meeting /Work Session TBA / Coralville
Tuesday, February 18, 2014 5:00 PM Work Session Meeting Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM Formal Meeting
Tuesday, March 4, 2014 5:00 PM City Conference Board Emma J. Harvat Hall
Work Session Meeting
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, March 25, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Special Formal Meeting
Tuesday, April 1, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, May 6, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, May 20, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, June 3, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, June 17, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, July 1, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, July 15, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, August 5, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, August 19, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, September 2, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, October 7, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, October 21, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, November 4, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, December 2, 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
Tuesday, December 16 2014
5:00 PM
Work Session Meeting
Emma J. Harvat Hall
7:00 PM
Formal Meeting
CITY OF IOWA CITY
410 East Washington Street
Iowa City. Iowa 52240 -1826
(319) 356 -5000
(319) 356 -5009 FAX
www.icgov.org
City Council Work Session Agenda
January 21, 2014
5:00 PM
Emma J. Harvat Hall - City Hall
410 E. Washington Street
• Questions from Council re Agenda Items
• Gateway Project design and engineering parameters [ #7 ]
• Information Packet Discussion [January 9, 16]
• Council Time
■ Meeting Schedule
■ Pending Work Session Topics [IP #4 of 1/16 Info Packet]
■ Upcoming Community Events /Council Invitations
CITY OF IOWA CITY IP3
®� MEMORANDUM
Date: January 15, 2014
To: Mayor and City Council
From: Marian K. Karr, City Clerk MA
Re: City Conference Board
It is necessary to reschedule the City Conference Board meeting originally scheduled for
February 4 at 5:00 pm. The County is available at 4:00 or 5:00 pm on Thursday, February 6.
Please check your calendars and let me know which time would work for you on the 6th. It is
necessary to set a public hearing on the Assessor's budget for March 4th, and a second
Conference Board meeting will be held prior to your regularly schedule work session.
. ®fir,
CITY OF IOWA CITY
PENDING CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION TOPICS
January 15, 2014
Pending Topics to be Scheduled
1. Discuss community business attraction and anti - piracy compact
2. Discuss Gilbert/Highland/Kirkwood neighborhood concerns
3. Review the National League of Cities Institute for Youth, Education and Families
report entitled, "City Leadership to Promote Black Male Achievement" (originally
distributed in the 5/16/2013 Information Packet)
4. Discuss recycling opportunities for multi - family housing (UISG letter in 10/1/2013
packet)
5. Discuss Council's neighborhood planning and development expectations near the
new elementary school locations
6. Review the downtown streetscape plan and discuss implementation and funding
strategy
Driving the Economy
IP5
January 6, 2014
Terry Dickens
City of Iowa City
410 East Washington Street
Iowa City, IA 52240 -1825
Dear Terry,
On behalf of the board and staff at ICAD Group, I hope this letter finds you well and off to a productive start
to the New Year.
Enclosed is our recent Investor Update documenting progress toward our five year goals. As you will see, we
are making great headway with a number of projects, including the growth of existing employers and
entrepreneurs launching new ventures. Momentum is building and we expect to make several more
announcements on projects in the coming months.
We know there are few places on the globe that offer such high levels of educational opportunity, quality of
life, and access to healthcare, arts and civic engagement in a safe, affordable and supportive environment.
The bottom line is that companies and people succeed here. But, to continue to thrive we need to be more
aggressive in how we share this story to companies and talented people.
As you know, our biggest challenge right now is making sure we have the workforce to continue this
trajectory and ensure that every company has access to the people they need to innovate and succeed.
With this in mind, you will see ICAD Group continue to partner in new ways to make sure we help align the
needs of our employers with our educational institutions, co- create opportunities to bolster and highlight the
vitality of our market and find innovative ways to help tell our story to the world.
Our biggest announcement of the New Year is the addition of Kate Moreland. Her new role will help us
ensure we are meeting your needs as investors in ICAD Group and engaging our various partners to sustain
our ability to attract talent and investment into our communities. Her new role and responsibilities also
allow our organization to dedicate more time and resources to the growing number of projects before us.
It is truly an honor for our team to work each day to grow our economy by supporting the needs of interstate
commerce companies. We cannot thank you enough for your continued trust and support for our work.
Kate will be reaching out to you soon to seek your thoughts and ideas on how we can better provide you with
a return on your investment in ICAD Group. And as always, if you have any ideas on companies we should be
talking to please let me know.
Sincerely,
Mark Nolte, ICAD Group President
(319) 354 -3939
mnolte@icadgroup.com
Cc Iowa City Area
Development Group
icadgroup.com
INTERSTATE COMMERCE AND STRATEGIC INITIATIVES
Through January 2014, we have provided significant assistance to the achievement of the following results:
JULY JULY
2012 2013
PROJECTS
TARGETED COMPANIES
NEW COMPANIES
JULY JULY JULY JULY
2014 2015 2016 2017
NUMBER OF EXPANSION /RETENTION PROJECTS
NUMBER OF HIGH;QUALITY JOBS CONTRIBUTED
19605
NUMBER OF TARGETED COMPANIES
NUMBER OF HIGH ?QUALITY JOBS CREATED
NUMBER OF NEW COMPANIES
NUMBER OF HIGH+'QUALITY JOBS ADDED
ICAD Group looks to build on the power of ideas and your participation is encouraged.
Please call (319) 354 -3939 to RSVP.
Save the Date
Monday, April 28, 2014 Spring Creative Corridor Welcome Reception
The annual Creative Corridor Spring Welcome Reception will be held from 5:00 — 7:00 p.m. at a location soon to be
announced. This networking event is organized by the Cedar Rapids Metro Economic Alliance, the Iowa City Area
Development Group and many other partners, as a way to "welcome" newcomers to the Creative Corridor. More details
will be released in March.
Thursday or Friday, May 8 or 9, 2014 Modern Marvels 2.0
Join ICAD Group, area high schools, the University of Iowa Alumni Association, and the Department of Computer
and Electrical Engineering at the University of Iowa as we transform the lower level of the Iowa City Sheraton into a
hands-on exhibit hall showcasing STEM careers and student projects. Specific event times to be announced in March.
■ t•J
170
Driving the Economy: 2012 -2017
Iowa City Area
Development Group
From: Tom Markus
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 8:27 AM
To: 'Gregg Geerdes'
Cc: Council
Subject: RE: Garbage Service - What's the Problem?
Thanks for sharing your opinions regarding the evaluation of an alternative method to processing our waste stream. At
this stage we are studying an alternative method of providing waste management services. While the system "may not
be broke" I believe we should review our services if improvements can be made that benefit the city and its' residents
and businesses. A system that increases the amount of waste material that is diverted to recycled material, that reduces
the amount of waste material buried in our landfill, that diverts material to an alternative energy source rather than
burying it in a landfill, potentially makes garbage disposal easier for our residents and businesses, and improves the
overall economics of our waste management system should be considered. At this stage we are studying the
alternative, not buying into it. The City is undergoing what I would refer to as our due diligence phase before
formulating any recommendation. The results of our review will be public and subject to the public's scrutiny before the
council would take any action on an alternative service delivery mechanism.
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Gregg Geerdes [ mailto:geerdeslaw @peoplepc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 1:36 PM
To: Tom Markus
Cc: Council
Subject: Garbage Service - What's the Problem?
Why the big need to make any changes to our garbage system? It's a service that works well as it is. Don't feel
compelled to fix what is not broken.
And, especially, do not fall into the trap of feeling the need to be the innovators who turn landfill junk into ethanol.
Ethanol from corn doesn't work without massive amounts of subsidies and ethanol from garbage is even more far-
fetched than that. There's no reason for Iowa City to be the poster boy for such a speculative endeavor.
If you want to fix a problem, help fix the problem of Iowa City having the dubious distinction of being host to so many
SINA schools. That sign of educational failure is not very consistent with being the so- called "City of Literature." And
there are other real problems in Iowa City, but garbage collection is not one of them.
I am happy to discuss more.
Gregg Geerdes
890 Park Place, Iowa City
319/354 -2375
— ;;;,--'.r.A.� CITY OF IOWA CITY IP7
Pai
MEMORANDUM
Date: January 14, 2014
To: Mr. Tom Markus
From: Chief Sam Hargadine
Re: Gas Mileage Report
At last week's staff meeting you requested information regarding the gas mileage different patrol
vehicle models average.
Ford Crown Victoria
Based on data from 14 Crown Victoria cars ranging from model years 2008 — 2011 the average
MPG was 8.899. The best car was 10.12 and the worst was 7.85 MPG. The cost per mile
ranged from .29 cents to .37 cents.
It should be noted that two of the Crown Victoria cars in the data set have been auctioned off
and are no longer in the fleet.
Ford Explorer
There are four Ford Explorer Patrol vehicles presently in service and they are all 2013 models.
The average MPG on these vehicles is 9.612. The best is 11.20 and the worst is 8.04 MPG.
The cost per mile ranged from .26 cents to .36 cents.
The advertised mileage for each vehicle is obviously much higher but police fleet vehicles
should not be compared to vehicles that are personally owned and used. Patrol vehicles are
operated 24 hours per day and much of that time is with the vehicle parked. Because of the
electronics in the vehicle (computer, RADAR, video, overhead lights and police radio) the
engine is usually left on when they are doing reports, making a cell call or even if they have to
leave the vehicle for a short period of time.
Climate is another reason why engines are left running while parked. We expect officers to do
reports in the car and remain in their beats as much as possible. The weather extremes for
both the officer and the equipment require the engine running for heat or AC.
January 15, 2014
Peter Damiano, D.D.S, MPH
Director, Public Policy Center
209 South Quadrangle
University of Iowa
Iowa City, IA 52242
Dear Dr. Damiano:
0 COPY
1 r i
Jk W1�
CITY OF IOWA CITY
410 East Washington Street
Iowa City. Iowa 52240-1826
(319) 356 -5000
(319) 356 -5009 FAX
www.icgov.org
The City of Iowa City contracted with the Public Policy Center to prepare a study report on the
analysis of impediments to fair housing within the City. City staff have reviewed the "Final
Draft January 6, 2014— Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing in Iowa City, Iowa 2013"
("Al"), authored by Jerry Anthony, Director of Housing and Land Use Policy Program.
Although members of my staff disagree with some of the conclusions and recommendations in
the Al, that is not the reason for this letter. On issues such as fair housing, it is not surprising
that opinions may differ.
The purpose of my letter is rather to convey to you the concerns of my staff with these six
aspects of the Al: a) the significant number of factual inaccuracies and notable omissions; b) its
emphasis on affordable housing rather than fair housing; c) its failure to describe the City's
residency preference; d) the late submission of the first and final drafts; e) its criticism of the
Affordable Housing Location Model; and f) its failure to disclose Jerry Anthony's role in the
Scattered Site Housing Task Force in 2004.
Factual Inaccuracies and Notable Omissions
Staff informs me of the following factual inaccuracies and notable omissions:
Page 1. The page numbers listed are incorrect for sections D, G, and H.
Page 2. Paragraph ( "Par. ") A. In the last paragraph, the Al states that the "report presents the
City of Iowa City's assessment... and the impediments to fair housing..." The report is the
assessment of the Public Policy Center, not the City.
Page 6 -Par. D. Stefanie Bowers' name is spelled incorrectly.
Page 7 -Par. G. The Al lists as a "main data source" the "Building Bylaws." There are no
"Building Bylaws." Presumably what is meant is the Building Code, which is a City ordinance
codified at Section 17 -1 of the Iowa City City Code.
- -- Page 7 -Par. G. The AI lists as -a .'. main data source" the "Scattered - Site Policy," but there is no -
"Scattered Site Policy." In November 2005, City Council in a work session reached consensus
to use the fair share matrix discussed by the Scattered Site Housing Taskforce, but City Council
never adopted a "Scattered Site Policy," which is referred to many times in the Al. The City
Council did adopt an affordable housing location model that uses GIS software in 2011, and I am
enclosing for your information a copy of Resolution No. 11 -51 adopting the model.
Page 2
Page 7 -Par. G. The correct name of the City department is the Planning and Community
Development Department.
Page 8. The first sentence states that the "report is the City of Iowa City's Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing...." The report is the assessment of the Public Policy Center, not
the City.
Page 9. The last sentence recommends that a plat would not be recorded by the County
Recorder's Office unless the City had approved private subdivision covenants. That statement
reflects a misunderstanding of how plats are recorded under Iowa law. Chapter 354 of the Iowa
Code governs the recording of plats, and the City cannot impose further legal duties on the
County Recorder in addition to those required by Section 354.18.
Page 11 -Par. A. The Al states that the City is one of three "World" Cities of Literature. The
City is one of seven UNESCO Cities of Literature.
Page 23. The Al states that the Housing Authority "owns" the public housing units. The City of
Iowa City is the owner. The Housing Authority is not a separate legal entity, as it is in many
localities, but a department within the City, such as Public Works or Parks & Recreation.
Page 35. The AI states that the Housing Authority is an "agency," but it is not. See comment
above. for Page 23.
Page 43. In the last paragraph, the Al states that the "City implemented this restriction [of a
maximum occupancy of three unrelated persons] in response to so- called `party houses'...."
Although the City has in the last ten to fifteen years stepped up enforcement of occupancy due in
part to "party houses," the City first enacted occupancy limits nearly fifty years ago. In 1966,
the City Code limited occupancy in single - family dwellings either to two or three unrelated
persons depending.on the available parking.
Page 44. In the first paragraph, the Al states that the "City adopted a policy for the location of
affordable housing for low - income residents funded by HUD, CDBG and HOME grants." That
is not accurate. Resolution No. 11 -51 states as follows:
1. The attached Affordable Housing Location Model is hereby approved and adopted for
use in all programs and projects funded with CDBG, HOME, and discretionary City
funds as follows:
a) The model is applicable to rental housing projects for new construction and
acquisition excluding assisted rental housing projects for the elderly or persons with
disabilities;
b) The model is not applicable to new construction or acquisition of owner-
occupied housing; and
c) The model is not applicable to projects to rehabilitate existing rental
housing or owner - occupied housing.
Page 3
Page 44. In the last paragraph, the Al states that the "Scattered Site policy could prevent the
location of additional ... housing...." As stated previously, the City has never adopted a
Scattered Site Policy.
Page 45. Again, the last paragraph again incorrectly attributes certain matters to the non - existent
"Scattered Site Policy."
Page 46 -Par. b. The AI fails to include two very important City programs that revitalize
neighborhoods, the UniverCity program and GRIP. Through the UniverCity program, the City
has purchased rentals, rehabs them and sells them as owner - occupied housing. Since 2010, the
City has purchased 46 houses, sold 31 to income eligible families, and is currently rehabilitating
15. The GRIP (General Rehabilitation and Improvement Program) is offered as a complement to
the federally- funded CDBG/HOME rehabilitation program without the same level of income
targeting. GRIP is designed to stabilize and revitalize neighborhoods through the broader
applicability of our Housing Rehabilitation and Historic Preservation programs.
Page 46 -Par. c. The AI incorrectly states that the Housing Authority "owns" the public housing
units.
Page 46 -Par. c. The Al states that the "waiting list for these units was closing in October 2012,"
but does not state that it was opened on October 11, 2013. Jerry Anthony acknowledged being
aware of this in an email to Steve Rackis dated 11/19/13, a copy of which is included.
Page 48. In the third full paragraph, the Al states the "664 new vouchers were issued...." That is
not correct. 664 initial (also referred to as "new ") and moving vouchers were issued. This
information was provided in an email from Steve Rackis dated 11/19/13, a copy of which is
enclosed.
Page 48. In the third full paragraph, the AI states "only 88% [of the vouchers] were utilized"
from 7/1/11 to 6/13/12, but that is not correct. In an email from Steve Rackis to Jerry Anthony
dated 11/8/13, Steve states that "88 %" were utilized. However, after reviewing a draft AI, Steve
R.ackis subsequently clarified that statement both in an in person meeting on i 1/19/13 and in an
email to Jerry Anthony. When Steve referred to an "88 %" utilization rate, he was referring to
the rate of the 664 new and moving vouchers, which represent only approximately one -half of
the vouchers. HUD's utilization rate is based on all vouchers, meaning new vouchers, moving
vouchers, as well as participants' vouchers. In an attachment from an email from Steve Rackis
to Jerry Anthony dated 11/19/13, Steve clarified that 88% was not the utilization rate of all
vouchers and stated that the "Housing Authority's utilization of HCV and VASH vouchers
(1,250 total vouchers) from 7/1/2011 - 6/30/2012 was 101 %." Despite the email. from Steve
Rackis, the Ianguage in the draft email was never changed and remained 88 %. The utilization
rate is also available in a report published by the highly respected Center for Budget and Policy
Priorities, which lists the Iowa City utilization rate as 96% for 2011 and 102% for 2012, a copy of
which is also enclosed for your reference. One wonders whether the information provided was
ignored because Jerry Anthony had already concluded that the City should make it illegal for
landlords to deny renting to someone based on the use of a voucher (See Recommendation b to
Page 4
Impediment IV on page 84); further, if vouchers are fully utilized, then there is no empirical
basis to support the recommendation.
Page 48. Also in the third full paragraph, the Al omits three common reasons that persons are
unable to utilize a voucher, bad landlord reference, bad credit, and lack of a security deposit. In
footnote 19, the Al references an email from staff on 11 /8 /13. On 11/19/13, Jerry Anthony met
with Steve Rackis to discuss the first draft of the Al, and Steve also emailed him that day to
discuss among other matters bad landlord references, bad credit, and lack of security deposit as
reasons why persons with vouchers are sometimes denied tenancy. Not only did Jerry Anthony
choose not to add those reasons in the final AI, but he cited the 11/8/13 email. In doing so, he
clearly implies that staff suggested no other reasons why a landlord may deny a voucher. Again,
one wonders whether this information regarding why a landlord may decide not to lease to a
person with a voucher was ignored because it did not support Jerry Anthony's recommendation.
Page 50. The Al states that the "preference categories 3 thru [sic) 6 are primarily based on
residency." That is not correct; the categories 2 through 6 are based on residency.
Page 50. The AI states that the "ICHA does not have demographic data on the two groups of
814 and 4,952 applicants in the waiting list." That is not accurate; the City has the data but it is
not easily accessible. See my comment below regarding Page 82.
Page 50. The AI states that there is a "residency requirement." Residency is not a requirement,
but a preference. A residency requirement is illegal.
Page 50 -Table 8. The table incorrectly includes many units that are not privately assisted units
and should be removed. The Citizen Building Apartments have been released from compliance
requirements, and the units identified as Peninsula Neighborhood are not privately owned, but
owned by the City of Iowa City.
Page 52. In the fourth paragraph, the AI states that a "property tax is levied on all real property."
That is not correct. For example, the University does not pay tax on property it uses for
educational purposes, and taxes are not levied on affordable housing providers such as The
Housing Fellowship.
Page 67- footnote 27. The correct citation for the list of protected classes in Iowa City is to Iowa
City Code Section 2 -5 -1, not to a consultant's study.
Page 68. In both the third paragraph and the last bullet point, gender identity is omitted from the
list of protected classes.
Page 69 -Par. b. The last bullet point refers to the Iowa City Housing Authority as a "social
service agency," whereas it is a department within the City.
Page 72. The first paragraph again uses the word "bylaws."
Page 76. The first paragraph again incorrectly refers to "bylaws."
Page 5
Page 79. The second paragraph's reference to 88% is not correct; see comment above regarding
page 48.
Page 79. The Al states that "f according to [the December 4, 2013 issue of the Iowa City Press -
Citizen], one reason for these layoffs was reduced program income because of a 94% voucher
utilization rate...." Not only is that a misstatement of the article, it is not true. The layoffs are
the result of the "sequestration" of federal funding as outlined in a Memorandum from City staff
to me dated November 20, 2013, a copy of which is enclosed. I am also enclosing a copy of the
newspaper article, which does not state that the utilization rate is a reason for the layoffs. The
article reports that a council member inquired whether increasing the utilization rate would
increase federal funding sufficient to prevent the layoffs, and the answer was no.
Page 79. The third paragraph notably omits three common reasons that persons are unable to
utilize a voucher, bad landlord reference, bad credit, and lack of a security deposit.
Page 82. The Al states that "[w]e were informed that ICHA does not have this information."
That is not correct. The Housing Authority has the information but it is not easily retrievable as
Steve Rackis states in an email dated 11/20/13 ( "the data regarding the P2 waiting list is a
custom report I create just for the annual report. It is time consuming, hand counting exercise, as
it is data that HUD does not require us to maintain and report. ").
Page 88. After staff reviewed a draft of Appendix 1, Karen Howard wrote Jerry Anthony a
detailed email dated 11/21/13 and provided him with the 2013 Planning and Zoning Annual
Report explaining that land is often rezoned to multi - family. Despite the data and information
provided, Appendix 1 was never changed and fails to discuss that property may be, and often is,
rezoned to multi - family. As it is, Appendix I implies that no other property can be developed
for multi - family zoning except for the locations listed. This is another instance where one
wonders whether the information was ignored because it did not support Jerry Anthony's
conclusion (See Conclusion IV on page 78).
Page 92 and Page 96. The implication based on footnotes 53 and 54 is that the information
contained in Appendix 3 is different than Appendix 6, but they are the same. Appendix 6 is the
exact language found in the City's Building Code (Section 17 -2 of the Iowa City City Code)
whereas Appendix 3 is a paraphrase of the Code section.
Additionally, there are many typographical errors throughout the report.
Emphasis on Affordable Housing
Much of the Al centers on affordable housing, and affordable housing is without a question an
issue facing Iowa City, as it is in many communities. However, the City contracted with the
Public Policy Center for a study in fair housing, not affordable housing. This distinction is
clearly set forth in the contractual agreement with the City, and an excerpt from "Scope of
Study" in Appendix A of the agreement reads as follows:
Page 6
Contractor also notes that the notion of `fair housing" is sometimes conflated with that
of "affordable housing. " "Affordable housing" refers to the ability of persons/
households /families to buy or rent housing, based on income; the term is also used to
describe housing for low - income households. Thus the two concepts of "fair housing"
and "affordable housing" while intertwined are distinctly different. And an Al study is not
a study of affordable housing. (emphasis added)
The Fair Housing Act is defined in the agreement, as well as on page 2 of the AI, as " a
condition in which individuals/ households /families of similar income levels in the same housing
market ... have a similar range of housing choices available to them regardless" of race, color,
national origin, age, creed, and other protected categories. (emphasis added)
Although it discusses affordable housing at length, the Al does not examine barriers that are
actually protected by the Fair Housing Act. For example, in the last year or so, there has been
much discussion among advocates of immigrant communities regarding issues they face in Iowa
City. There is no indication that those advocates were contacted as part of the study to inquire
about housing issues even though discrimination based on "national origin" is a fair housing
issue. Similarly, there is no indication that International Programs was contacted about possible
housing issues faced by the 3,400 international students attending Iowa.
The Al also did not delve into possible barriers to housing that persons with disabilities and the
elderly may be encountering.
Affordable Housing Model
Staff finds it ironic that the Al is critical of the Affordable Housing Model given that it is nearly
identical to a policy contained in HUD's model Al. For your information, I am enclosing copies
of pages 3 -13 and 3 -14 of HUD's Fair Housing Planning Guide. In Example 3, an impediment
to fair housing for a hypothetical state is described as follows:
The State does not have an enforceable site selection policy for affordable housing that
will compel its major cites to select sites for affordable housing located outside of
minority or low - income areas or allocate such housing on a metropolitanwide basis.
HUD's sample action in response to this impediment is stated as follows:
Enact legislation by X date mandating site selection policies for affordable housing for all
localities of 50,000 or more in population. The goal is to deconcentrate communities by
race and income and encourage the construction of affordable single - family and
multifamily housing throughout the jurisdiction.
The City's Affordable Housing Model is exactly what HUD proscribes, namely it has an
enforceable policy for affordable housing with a stated goal of deconcentrating poverty. Two of
the three goals of Resolution No. 11 -15 are that "the City does not want to further burden
neighborhoods and elementary schools that already have issues related to a concentration of
poverty" and the "City desires to have diverse neighborhoods in terms of a range of income
levels."
Page 7
It is not surprising that other communities have contacted City staff about the model, including
Danville, Illinois; Boise, Idaho; Charlottesville, Virginia; Davenport, Iowa; and Palm Beach
County, Florida. Additionally, staff have been informed that the City of Austin, Texas is using
our model as a starting point for a similar project. I also want to note that "Planning," the
magazine of the American Planning Association, featured the model in its March 2013 issue, and
I am enclosing a copy of the article for your information. Additionally, the Kirwan Institute for
the Study of Race and Ethnicity at The Ohio State University has told staff that HUD is moving
in this direction and that the City's model could be used as a national model on deconcentration.
Lack of Timeliness
The agreement provides that a first draft of the AI was to be provided to the City by
approximately June 15 and the final report by August 1. A first draft (without any conclusions
or recommendations) was not provided to City staff until November 7, and the preliminary final
draft was not provided until December 19.
Residency Preference
The Al does not fully explain the residency preference used by the Housing Authority.
Importantly, the Al does not describe how the waiting list is constantly in flux. For example,
Tenant A lives in Des Moines and submits an application for a voucher on 6/11/13. Tenant A
(who is single and disabled) goes to the bottom of the waiting list of non- residents, who are also
single and disabled. Tenant A moves to Coralville (or some other place in the service area) a
few months later and provides the Housing Authority with a change of address on 12/19/13.
Tenant A immediately moves up the waiting list and jumps in front of all the applications of
residents who are single and disabled and who submitted applications after 6/11/13. In other
words, an applicant who moves into the service area after applying is treated as if he or she
resided in the service area his or her entire life.
Furthermore, the AI does not explain why the residency preference was adopted. The reason for
adding a residency preference was a combination of staff resources, low lease up rates, people
wanting to port ( "port" is the HUD term meaning to transfer the voucher to another service area),
and wanting to assist those living in the service area. Without a residency preference, the
applications that the Housing Authority staff processed were primarily of folks who did not live
in the Housing Authority service area (Johnson County, Iowa County, and the northern part of
Washington County) and who did not want to live in the Housing Authority service area. These
persons wanted to get their vouchers and live elsewhere, but HUD regulations do not allow a
tenant to port during the first 12 months of the voucher. Therefore, staff would do all the
paperwork necessary to issue the voucher, but the person would not use the voucher because
he /she did not want to live in the Housing Authority service area, and the voucher would go
unused for a period of time.
It is also important to note that the percentage of blacks who participate in the voucher program,
as well as those who are elderly /disabled, has increased slightly since the adoption of the
Page S
preference and HUD staff who monitor the Housing Authority are fully aware of our residency
preferences.
Lack of Disclosure
In Conclusion IV on page 75, the Al contains a series of rhetorical questions following reference
to the Scattered Site Housing Task Force report from 2004. The Al should disclose that Jerry
Anthony was.a member of the Task Force and that he voted against the adoption of the final
.recommendations with one exception (namely, the recommendation to adopt inclusionary
zoning).
In conclusion, the City is not requesting any changes to the final draft of the Al or any follow -up
by the Public Policy Center.. Given the failure of the Public Policy Center to provide the services
described in Paragraph 1 of the agreement as detailed in this letter, the City does not intend to
make the final payment of $3,499 and will use the funds to complete the Al as provided in
Paragraph 13 of the agreement.
homas M. Markus
City Manager
Enc.
Copy to:
Jerry Anthony -w /enc.
Steve Rackis -w /o enc.
Stefanie Bowers -w /o enc.
Tracy Hightshoe -w /o enc.
Steve Long -w /o enc.
Doug Boothroy -w /o enc.
City Council -w /o enc.
Housing and Community Development Commission -w/o enc.
National Association of Railroad Passengers - Iowans Shouldn't Have to Wonder "What I...
FROM THE CITY MANAGER
Iowans Shouldn't Have to Wonder "What I0"
Details Published Date Written By Colin Leach Category: Blog
Page 1 of 2
IP9
NM
For many years now, rail advocates in Iowa have worked hard for the restoration of regular service to the
eastern part of the state. From 1974 to 1981, Amtrak ran the Black Hawk, which offered a daily connection
between Dubuque and Chicago. While the Black Hawk was discontinued following a decrease in Illinois state
funding, advocates have maintained that the route would be popular. In 2010, their efforts were rewarded
when the federal government issued a $230 million grant to study not just the restoration of the Chicago -
Quad Cities route, but with a further extension to Iowa City. Before long, Iowans would be able to
comfortably travel to Chicago, skipping both the drive on Interstate 80 and avoiding the hassle of trying to
find a flight through either Dubuque or Des Moines.
Unfortunately, as is often the case with rail service, politics has interfered with the expanded service. In
December, the Iowa Department of Transportation announced that budget concerns forced it to shelve plans
for passenger service between the Quad Cities and Iowa City. Office of Rail Transportation Director Tammy
Nicholson claimed that the most recent estimates would force the state to spend $72 million on the service,
a price tag far in excess of the $20 million predicted in the original estimate.
In its editorial, the Quad -City Times argued that the blame should be laid at the feet of Governor Terry
Branstad. Branstad had repeatedly gone on the record opposing any expansion of Amtrak into his state,
believing that the required investment was something the state could not afford. At an October press
conference, the Governor said that "considerable skepticism" existed about the service's feasibility, noting
that the state was already served by the California Zephyr.
Yet Branstad's argument ignores the fact that the Zephyr serves only a small number of communities in the
southern part of the state, including Osceola, Ottumwa, Creston, Mount Pleasant, and Burlington. Notably,
major population centers such as Des Moines, Iowa City, and the entire Quad Cities region are left out; thus,
the Zephyr cannot be said to adequately serve the entire state. Furthermore, the Zephyronly stops once a
http: / /www.narprail.org/ news /narp -blog/ 2484 - iowans - shouldn -t- have -to- wonder - what- if?t... 1/10/2014
rw•�
..x W tiw
�
s 1
hNf
`1.
hal
lM
V
Railroad Routes, Chicago to Quad Cities and lows City
For many years now, rail advocates in Iowa have worked hard for the restoration of regular service to the
eastern part of the state. From 1974 to 1981, Amtrak ran the Black Hawk, which offered a daily connection
between Dubuque and Chicago. While the Black Hawk was discontinued following a decrease in Illinois state
funding, advocates have maintained that the route would be popular. In 2010, their efforts were rewarded
when the federal government issued a $230 million grant to study not just the restoration of the Chicago -
Quad Cities route, but with a further extension to Iowa City. Before long, Iowans would be able to
comfortably travel to Chicago, skipping both the drive on Interstate 80 and avoiding the hassle of trying to
find a flight through either Dubuque or Des Moines.
Unfortunately, as is often the case with rail service, politics has interfered with the expanded service. In
December, the Iowa Department of Transportation announced that budget concerns forced it to shelve plans
for passenger service between the Quad Cities and Iowa City. Office of Rail Transportation Director Tammy
Nicholson claimed that the most recent estimates would force the state to spend $72 million on the service,
a price tag far in excess of the $20 million predicted in the original estimate.
In its editorial, the Quad -City Times argued that the blame should be laid at the feet of Governor Terry
Branstad. Branstad had repeatedly gone on the record opposing any expansion of Amtrak into his state,
believing that the required investment was something the state could not afford. At an October press
conference, the Governor said that "considerable skepticism" existed about the service's feasibility, noting
that the state was already served by the California Zephyr.
Yet Branstad's argument ignores the fact that the Zephyr serves only a small number of communities in the
southern part of the state, including Osceola, Ottumwa, Creston, Mount Pleasant, and Burlington. Notably,
major population centers such as Des Moines, Iowa City, and the entire Quad Cities region are left out; thus,
the Zephyr cannot be said to adequately serve the entire state. Furthermore, the Zephyronly stops once a
http: / /www.narprail.org/ news /narp -blog/ 2484 - iowans - shouldn -t- have -to- wonder - what- if?t... 1/10/2014
National Association of Railroad Passengers - Iowans Shouldn't Have to Wonder "What I... Page 2 of 2
day in each direction. This service, while essential, is no substitute for the corridor with multiple frequencies
envisioned by federal and state planners. By their very nature, corridor services offer multiple frequencies,
creating more options for travelers to choose from as well as more options for connections at their final
destination.
But the Governor has another argument against passenger rail. Many of his fellow Republicans, he notes,
have similarly rejected proposals for expanded Amtrak service in their states, and he sees no reason why he
should be an exception. After all, the argument is purportedly the same across the board: why, in an era of
tight budgets, should state governments use public funds to build out transportation infrastructure?
As NARP has argued time and again, it's a fallacy to argue that passenger rail represents a unique subsidy
of transportation. All modes of passenger transportation are subsidized, and none can exist without some
form of government support. Whether riding on highways or wandering through airports, traveling in buses
or trains, all travelers use some form of government- subsidized transportation. It's intellectually dishonest to
claim that Amtrak represents a unique public subsidy, when we know that highways and airports are even
more heavily subsidized.
Furthermore, Branstad's suggestion that Republican Governors are generally of one mind about passenger
rail doesn't hold water, and wrongly assumes that passenger rail is necessarily partisan. Perhaps he should
speak to Virginia's Bob McDonnell, who presided over that state's largest investment in transportation in
decades. McDonnell has long been a supporter of passenger rail and was a strong backer of extending
service to Lynchburg and Norfolk. Most recently, he championed a transportation bill that created a
dedicated source of funding for Amtrak services in the state, allowing the state to plan a new extension to
Roanoke.
But McDonnell isn't the only Republican to back passenger rail. In October, Michigan Governor Rick Snyder
and the Republican- controlled legislature voted to preserve state funding for the Blue Water, Pere Marquette
and Wolverine. Additionally, the state has also committed funds for track upgrades that will allow for
increased speeds and faster travel times. And to this list, we can even add states such as Pennsylvania and
Indiana, where Republican state legislators were among the most active voices calling for the preservation
of the Pennsylvanian and the Hoosier State. All of these examples show that improved passenger rail
service isn't a Democratic or Republican issue; it's an American issue.
In rejecting the Iowa City extension, Governor Branstad is missing out on an excellent opportunity to invest
in the future of the state's transportation network and offer Iowans more travel options. And worse for
Iowans, the money originally destined for Iowa hasn't been rescinded; instead, it has been reassigned to
Illinois for its own trains. Iowans will instead have to look across the Mississippi to catch a glimpse of what
might have been for their own state.
http: / /www.narprail.org/ news /narp -blog/ 2484 - iowans - shouldn -t- have -to- wonder - what- if?t... 1/10/2014
From the City Manager
Recognize Your Leaders
Submitted by: Jeff M. May (Assistant Public Works Director, City of Des Moines, Iowa) and the APWA Emergency Management
Committee
Nominee: Rick Fosse, P.E., Public Works Director, City of Iowa City, Iowa
Rick Fosse
Rick Fosse has worked for the
City of Iowa City, Iowa, since
1984, serving 14 years as City
Engineer and the past 10 years as
Public Works Director. Iowa City
has a population of 67,822 and is
home to the University of Iowa.
He received his Bachelor of Science
degree in civil engineering from
Iowa State University and started his
career working for the Iowa Natural
Resources Council in Flood Plain
Management.
Rick has been a member of APWA
since 1984. He was President of the
Iowa Chapter In 2007 and has served
as a Director, Emergency Management
Committee Chair and Iowa Chapter
Emergency Management Liaison. He
has also been active In the American
Society of Civil Engineers and has
served on the University of Iowa's
College of Engineering Advisory
Board.
The Iowa City Public Works
Department includes the following:
Administration, Engineering, Streets
and Traffic Engineering, Equipment,
Wastewater, Water, Solid Waste and
Landfill. As with most public works
departments, emergency response is a
major responsibility..
Most public works agencies are
impacted by disasters; however, most
agencies don't experience the variety
of disasters that Rick has seen during
his tenure in Iowa City. In the last
15 years, the Iowa City Public Works
Department has responded to ice
storms, a tornado, floods, straight line
winds and a landfill fire. Each disaster
creates its own unique challenges and
yet all share similar challenges.
On April 13, 2006, an EF2 tornado
struck the downtown business
district and eastern residential district
destroying businesses and homes,
Including an area dominated by
off-campus housing for University
of Iowa students. Cleanup from the
tornado took over three months. In
June 2008, unprecedented Flooding on
the Iowa River impacted the City of
Iowa City and the University of Iowa
causing widespread property damage
and forcing evacuations from entire
neighborhoods and portions of the
campus. The flood resulted in over
$1 billion of recovery and mitigation
projects for the University of Iowa
and Iowa City. Construction of these
projects will continue for several
years. On May 26, 2012, a fire started
2012 landfill fire burned for four months
January 2014 APWA Reporter 21
in a new cell at the City landfill, and
actively burned for a month, but took
four months to completely extinguish.
The fire destroyed approximately 7.5
acres of the cell's liner system.
The variety of disasters Iowa City
has experienced has provided Rick
and his staff with valuable lessons
on emergency response. While
each event has created challenges,
he recognizes a common element
in all disaster response. Effective
communications has been a key factor
in the community's ability to respond
to the variety of disasters Iowa City
has experienced. Communication
is also important in preparation for
and cleanup of disasters. Creating
relationships with the police and
fire departments and utilities
helps the community prepare for
disasters. When working with police
and fire departments It is critically
important that public works staff
understand the National Incident
Management System (NIMS) and
are able to work within the Incident
Command System. He believes it is
not only Important for public works
to be included in the police and
fire departments' tabletop exercises,
but also to include all the parties in
the development of the Emergency
Operations Plan, Evacuation
Plan, Volunteers Plan and Debris
Management Plan.
2008 flooding
22 APWA Reporter January 2014
Rick views each disaster as an
opportunity for positive change
during reconstruction and as a way
to be better prepared for the next
disaster. One of those opportunities
came from the 2006 tornado. Iowa
City was inundated with volunteers
offering assistance, but did not
have a plan In place to handle the
overwhelming response. As a result
of the post- tornado debriefing, he
recognized the need to have a plan to
receive and organize the volunteers.
Most offers of assistance were received
immediately after the disaster, while
the Public Works Department was
busy trying to open the city for basic
operations. He realized additional
resources would be needed to
coordinate the offers for assistance
at one of the busiest times for the
Public Works Department. He found a
partner in the local United Way. The
United Way has an established plan in
place to manage volunteers that also
tracks and documents the volunteers'
contributions. This partnership has
proved to be great benefit when
dealing with disasters.
Rick recognizes the valuable resource
NIMS has become for disaster
response and appreciates the help it
provides in dealing with organization,
communications and competing
priorities. Further, he believes it is
important to have depth in personnel
assignments to NIMS teams to allow
continuity for 24 -hour operations.
One of the exercises he has found
particularly important is incorporated
into the planning section of NIMS. In
this exercise you ask what if things go
worse than predicted and then prepare
for that scenario. The final step, after
you think you are prepared for the
worst, is to ask what if things go even
worse than that. This was especially
helpful during the 2008 flood.
Rick's leadership has been essential in
helping Iowa City plan for, respond
to and recover from the disasters that
have struck Iowa City. His ability to
communicate has served Iowa City
2006 tornado
very well not only during disasters,
but also during normal operations.
He seeks public input during the pre -
design phase of projects and takes that
opportunity to better understand the
issues relating to the project. He finds
the Input very valuable in dealing
with the aesthetics of a project and
helping garner support for the project.
The public input Iowa City receives
helps improve designs and provides
better end results.
Rick is a dedicated and caring leader
who sees the opportunity to learn in
every challenge he faces. His ability
to communicate allows him to share
his knowledge with others in an
entertaining and captivating manner.
His leadership has steered Iowa City
through a variety of disasters and has
made them better prepared for future
disasters that may come their way.
"When it comes to disaster Rick Fosse
is our 'Go-to Guy.' Rick is a caring,
hardworking, diligent and intelligent
manager who has a sly sense of humor.
It may be this last characteristic that
has allowed Rick to battle three floods,
one tomado, straight line winds, a major
landfill fire and ice stoma. His support for
his fellow employees and the public who
come to our aid to combat and recover
from these disasters is evident throughout
the crisis. His compassion for the victims
of these incidents is commendable. And
when the crisis is over he doesn't just do
a crisis analysis, he takes what he has
learned and shares it with our public
and other professionals in the state and
across the country so that they too might
learn from our experiences. Rick is truly a
team player but it is clear that his humble
leadership was essential in our dealing
with the disasters that have confronted
Iowa City. ° —Tom Markus, City Manager,
City of Iowa City, Iowa Q
January 2014 APWA Reporter 23
From:
Mickey Miller < mmiller @co.johnson.ia.us>
Sent:
Tuesday, January 14, 2014 4:15 PM
To:
(swisher2 @southslope.net); Chris Anderson (uhclerk @yahoo.com); Diane Bys
(shueyville @southslope.net); Merry Thomae (lonetreecity @iowatelecom.net); Michon Jackson
(mjackson @tiffin- iowa.org), Penny Jenn ( oxfordcityhall @southslope.net), Marian Karr, Tracey
Mulcahey ( tmulcahey @ci.north - liberty.ia.us); Thor Johnson (tjohnson @ci.coralville.ia.us);
Bonnie Hansen (cityhills @sharontc.net)
Subject:
JC Food Policy Council Invitation to Community Forum
Attachments:
JCFPC Forum Poster 01.14.2014.pdf
City Clerks: Please distribute to your mayors, city council members and any relevant food /ag- related boards or
commissions in your community. I have also attached an 8 %: x 11 poster you may print out and post as appropriate.
Thank you for your assistance and please contact me if you have any questions.
Mickey Miller
Grants and Communications Specialist
Johnson County, Iowa
319 - 356 -6000
mmiller@coJohnson.a.us
The Johnson County Food Policy Council cordially invites you to the free community forum
"Growing the Local Food Movement in Johnson County: Share Your Vision!"
Saturday, February 8, 2014
10 am -2 pm (check -in begins at 9:30 am)
Lunch is available free of charge to those who register by Monday, February 3
Register online at http: / /grow- local - food.eventbrite.com
Montgomery Hall, Johnson County Fairgrounds
4261 Oak Crest Hill Road, SE, Iowa City
Join the Johnson County Food Policy Council and special guests to learn about and discuss farm conservation, edible
landscapes, local food impacts and policies to support farmers in Johnson County. In addition to presentations from local
and regional local foods professionals, the forum will have plenty of opportunities for attendees to share their ideas.
The Johnson County Food Policy Council, created by the Johnson County Board of Supervisors, is a volunteer citizen -led
group with the purpose of improving dialogue and discussion and providing necessary advice on food and agriculture
issues to the County, municipalities, community boards, local agencies, nongovernmental organizations, businesses, and
other interested groups.
Keynote speaker is Kyle Richmond, a member of the Dane County, Wisconsin, Board of Supervisors, who also is a
member of both the Dane County Food Council and Madison Food Policy Council. Supervisor Richmond will share how
those bodies have worked with farmers and the community to create positive changes within the county's local foods
movement.
Grant Schultz of VersaLand a 145 -acre learning farm near Morse, will talk about soil and water conservation. VersaLand
develops code, systems, and machinery for sustainable farming systems, and shares its knowledge through public
workshops.
Fred Meyer, founder and director of Backyard Abundance, will discuss edible landscapes. Backyard Abundance is a
Johnson County environmental education nonprofit that helps build vibrant communities by creating beautiful, resilient
landscapes that provide healthy food and habitat.
Anyone with an interest in Johnson County's local foods movement should attend this forum, including farmers,
restaurateurs, environmental groups, municipal officials, students and consumers.
Please contact Mickey Miller, grants and communications specialist for the Johnson County Board of Supervisors, at 319-
688 -8011 or mmiller@co.iohnson.ia.us with any questions.
;Growing the Local Food Movement
in Johnson Count
Y
A Free Community Forum with the
Johnson County Food Policy Council
I Dam -2pm
Join Johnson County Food Policy Council.
Let's discuss how we can support local food and build an abundant community.
• Farm conservation • Edible landscapes • Local food impacts
• Policies to support farmers in Johnson County.
Local lunch provided for first 150 people who register by 2/3/14!
For more information and to register visit http:/ /grow - local - food.eventbrite.com
Questions? Contact jcfpc@co.johnson.ia.us • 319 - 688 -8011
Montgomery Hall, Johnson County Fairgrounds,
4261 Oak Crest Hill Road SE, Iowa City
From:
Laurie Nash <Inash @co.johnson.ia.us>
Sent:
Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:45 PM
To:
Matt Hayek
Cc:
Council
Subject:
Save The Date April 12 Legislative Breakfast
Attachments:
WOYCsavethedate breakfast2014.pdf
Mayor Hayek,
We know things are very busy for Iowa City and the council so before your schedule gets too
full, the Johnson County early childhood community wants to get something on your calendar.
I've attached a Save The Date for the legislative breakfast event during our annual Celebration
of the Young Child at the Iowa Children's Museum on April 12. The breakfast is an
opportunity for local elected officials and the early childhood community to have conversations
about our early childhood system. I know that you were unable to attend last year, but we had
over 1,700 guests at our Celebration and we are hoping for even more this year. There will be
additional details to follow, but for now we'd like you to save time for that important event.
In the meantime, if you have any questions about early childhood issues and how they impact
us locally, please don't hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Laurie Nash
Johnson County Empowerment/Early Childhood Iowa Area
319 - 339 -6179
SAVE THE DATE
April 12, 2014
9:00 a.m.
The Iowa Children's Museum
Celebration of the Young Child
Legislative Breakfast: A Community
Conversation About Early Childhood
Play Is Learning! Children need a strong early learning
foundation to succeed in school and life. Are Iowa's
Children getting what they need?
Sponsored by Senator Bob Dvorsky
Hosted by: The Iowa City Chapter of The IAEYC, 4Cs Community Coordinated Child Care, University of Iowa Delta Center, The
Iowa Chapter of The American Academy of Pediatrics, Johnson County
Empowerment /ECA, The Iowa City Public Library, and The Iowa Children's Museum.
E
0
U
<
LLJ
��
/
\ � \
�
_
VA
m
Marian Karr
From:
Marian Karr
Sent:
Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:47 PM
To:
Marian Karr
Subject:
FW: Joint Meeting date
From: Thor Johnson [mailto:tjohnson @ci.coralville.ia.us]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 2:45 PM
To: Andy Johnson; Bonnie Hansen (cityh ills@sharontc. net); Kelly Hayworth; Kim Colvin; L. Robertson; Lone Tree; Louise
From; M Jackson; Marian Karr; Oxford; Ryan Heiar; Solon; Steve Murley; Swisher; Thor Johnson; Tim Kuehl; Tom
Markus; Tracy Mulcahey; University Heights; University President
Subject: Joint Meeting date
The Joint Meeting is Monday, January 27th; agenda items are due Wednesday, January 22"a and the agenda will
go out Thursday, January 23`a
Thorsten J. Johnson, City Clerk
City of Coralville
P.O. Box 5127
15127 th Street
Coralville, Iowa 52241
319- 248 -1700
tjohnson a,ci.coralville.ia.us
Airport Commission IP13
December 19, 2013
Page 1
MINUTES DRAFT
IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION
DECEMBER 19, 2013 — 6:00 P.M.
AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING
Members Present: Jose Assouline (late arrival), Minnetta Gardinier, Paul Hofineyer, Howard
Horan, Chris Ogren
Staff Present: Sue Dulek, Michael Tharp
Others Present: Matt Wolford, David Hughes, Steve Eaton, John Yeomans
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (to become effective only after separate Council
action):
None.
CALL TO ORDER:
Chairperson Horan called the meeting to order at 6:05 P.M.
ADJOURN TO EXECUTIVE SESSION:
Hofineyer moved to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss strategy with Counsel in
matters that are presently in litigation or where litigation is imminent where its disclosure
would be likely to prejudice or disadvantage the position of the governmental body in
that litigation (Iowa Code Section 21.5(1)(c); seconded by Gardinier. Motion carried 4 -0;
Assouline not present. The Commission went into executive session at 6:05 pm and
returned to open session at 7:21 pm.
APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES:
Horan was absent for this portion of the meeting. Assouline arrived during this portion. Tharp
began the discussion with minutes of the November 21, 2013, meeting. Ogren moved to
approve the November 21, 2013, minutes as presented, seconded by Assouline. Motion
carried 4 -0, Horan absent.
Next the minutes of the December 10, 2013, meeting were reviewed. Ogren moved to
approve the minutes as presented; seconded by Assouline. Motion carried 4 -0, Horan
absent.
Third, the minutes of the December 17, 2013, meeting were reviewed. Gardinier moved to
approve the minutes as presented; seconded by Hofineyer. Motion carried 4 -0, Horan
absent.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION:
None.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION /ACTION:
Airport Commission
December 19, 2013
Page 2
a. Airport Farming Agreement — Tharp spoke to Members about this agreement,
noting that this amendment covers the addition of the Ruppert property to the
management agreement. John Yeomans spoke briefly to this arrangement.
i. Consider Resolution #A13 -30 Approving Amendment With Farmer's
National — Assouline moved to consider Resolution #A13 -30 as
discussed, seconded by Ogren. Motion carried 5 -0.
b. Airport Commerce Park — Tharp stated that Jeff Edberg will not be present at
this evening's meeting due to a family illness. He noted that Members do need
to approve the listing agreement extension in order to continue working with Jeff,
and that the City Council did approve this extension. Gardinier asked if Tharp
had any updates on activity or interest in lots. Tharp noted that Edberg's
message stated that currently there has been no activity.
i. Consider Resolution #A13 -31 Recommending Approval of Extension
of Listing Agreement — Hofineyer moved to consider Resolution
#A13 -31 as discussed, seconded by Ogren. Motion carried 5 -0.
C. Fly Iowa — Tharp noted that they do have a logo now for the Fly Iowa event. The
subcommittee is now going to be moving forward on their fundraising letter
campaign. Tharp shared that they have been in touch with Deb Dunkhase with
the Children's Museum and she will be at the next Fly Iowa meeting to continue
working with the committee.
d. FAA/IDOT Projects: AECOM / David Hughes
i. Runway 7/25 Parallel Taxiway — Hughes shared that the weather hasn't
been conducive to completing the punchlist on this project. It will most
likely be springtime before they are able to finish this.
ii. Roofing Rehabilitation — Hughes noted that this project is weather -
specific, as well, and it will be completed in the spring.
iii. Obstruction Mitigation — The poles were to have shipped the 10tH
according to Hughes, and he has not heard whether or not they arrived as
planned.
iv. 2014 IDOT Grant Projects — Tharp noted that these projects are ready to
accept bids and award contracts. He and Hughes spoke to these
projects, with Hughes noting that in regards to the taxiway project, low bid
was L. L. Pelling at about 10% below the estimated cost. Tharp further
clarified what the bids entail and how they were able to get the project
fully covered. Hughes next spoke to the taxiway B lighting project, noting
they received five bids. Price Industrial was the low bid on this project,
and has done work on previous Airport projects, according to Hughes.
The third project, the north t- hangar pavement maintenance, received
three bids, with L.L. Pelling being recommended for the contract. Hughes
noted that on all three projects the bids have come in much lower than
expected. A brief discussion ensued on how soon these projects might
get started this spring.
1. Taxiway B rehabilitation and overlay — Consider Resolution
#A13 -32 Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for Taxiway B
Rehabilitation and Overlay — Gardinier moved to consider
Resolution #A13 -32 as discussed, seconded by Horan.
Motion carried 5 -0.
2. Taxiway B lighting — Consider Resolution #A13 -33 Accepting
Bids and Awarding Contract for Taxiway B Lighting —
Airport Commission
December 19, 2013
Page 3
Hofineyer moved to consider Resolution #A13 -33 as
discussed, seconded by Assouline. Motion carried 5 -0.
3. North T- hangar pavement maintenance — Consider Resolution
#A13 -34 Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for North T-
Hangar Pavement Maintenance — Hofineyer moved to
consider Resolution #A13 -34 as discussed, seconded by
Ogren. Motion Carried 5 -0
e. Airport "Operations" —
i. Strategic Plan — Implementation —
1. FY2013 Annual Report - Tharp noted that he has not yet had
time to update pictures in the report, but will get this done for the
final copy. He asked Members to get any changes, additions,
suggestions, etc., to him soon as he typically prepares this for the
budget proposal sessions at the first of the year.
ii. Budget — Tharp stated that the City Council's budget process begins the
first week in January. He will let Members know more specifically the
dates that they need to be aware of.
iii. Management — Horan briefly noted the discussions they have already
had on this issue. Tharp spoke to this, as well, noting how monthly
reports can show any of vendor payments that he has approved.
1. Consider Resolution #A13 -35 Authorizing the Operations
Specialist to Approve Vendor Payments Based on Approved
Contracts — Gardinier moved to consider Resolution #A13 -35
as discussed, seconded by Horan. Motion carried 5 -0.
f. FBO / Flight Training Reports —
i. Jet Air — Matt Wolford with Jet Air reviewed the monthly reports with
Members. He noted some of the issues they have been dealing with on
the fuel system, adding that the filtration system appears to be acting up.
Wolford continued, noting that with winter has come an increase in snow
removal at the Airport. He also noted an increase in coyote sightings at
the Airport. Tharp stated that they have been in touch with Animal
Control and also the USDA office's wildlife representative to discuss
various methods of mitigation. Tharp and Wolford then responded to
Member questions regarding some of the monthly maintenance that has
occurred. Tharp then noted that he and Wolford have talked about a
possible daily rate for t- hangar rental. With a hangar coming open soon,
Tharp noted that this would give not only the Airport but also Jet Air the
opportunity to rent t- hangars on a daily basis when the need arises.
Wolford noted that they get inquires quite often about daily hangar
rentals. Gardinier asked if they don't still have a waiting list for hangars.
Tharp noted that there is a waiting list, but that having this availability for
a daily rental would be worth it in the end. After some discussion, Tharp
stated that he would work up some numbers for the next meeting, in order
to give Members a better picture of this opportunity. Gardinier then asked
some questions of Wolford regarding the upcoming Air Race Classic and
the fueling capacity at the Airport.
ii. Iowa Flight Training — None.
g. Airport 5 -Year Engineering Services Selection — Horan asked if Members
wanted to work on this this evening or defer to January. Hofineyer noted
that he thought the four presentations were great. Tharp added that there
Airport Commission
December 19, 2013
Page 4
is not a pressing need to make the choice this evening if Members
wanted to wait. Horan stated that he would prefer to defer this to
January, and others agreed.
h. Subcommittee Reports -
i. For December — None.
ii. For January – Infrastructure (Gardinier, Hofineyer, Tharp)
L Commission Members' Reports – Hofineyer shared that he was unable to fly to
Pocahontas yesterday due to the return weather being questionable. Gardinier
shared that she did some flying recently to practice instrument approaches.
They landed at the Airport after dark, and she noted how nice the lights look.
Assouline shared that he saw the local airport in Aspen recently. Horan shared
that he drove a friend to Urbana, Illinois recently to appraise three aircraft.
j. Staff Report – Tharp stated that he will be out of the office most of the time
between Christmas Eve and January 1.
SET NEXT REGULAR MEETING FOR:
The next Fly Iowa subcommittee meeting is January 7th, at 5:30 P.M. The next regular
meeting will be Thursday, January 16, 2014, at 6:00 P.M. at the Airport Terminal building.
ADJOURN:
Horan adjourned the meeting at 8:19pm
CHAIRPERSON DATE
Airport Commission
December 19, 2013
Page 5
Airport Commission
ATTENDANCE RECORD
2013
Key:
X = Present
X/E = Present for Part of Meeting
O = Absent
O/E = Absent/Excused
NM = Not a Member at this time
TERM
o
0
N
0
W
0
�
0
Cn
0
W
0
v
0
W
0
W
0
CO
O
O
N
NAME
EXP.
�
\
N
N
�
00
�
0)
N
O
—•
Co
�
N
�
Ln
-�
Co
�
,�
�
\
�
�
N
�
—
C\O
W
\
W
`
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
_�
W
03/01/13
O/E
X
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
NM
NM
Rick
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
Mascari
03/01/14
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Howard
Horan
Minnetta
03/01/15
X
X
X
O/
X
O/
X
X
X
O/
X
X
X
X
X
Gardinier
E
E
E
Jose
03/02/12
X
O/
O/
X
X
X
O/
X
X
X
X
O/
X
O/E
X
Assouline
E
E
E
E
Chris
03/01/15
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Ogren
Paul
03/01/15
NM
N
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/
X
X
X
O/E
X
Hofineyer
M
E
Key:
X = Present
X/E = Present for Part of Meeting
O = Absent
O/E = Absent/Excused
NM = Not a Member at this time
Minutes
Human Rights Commission
December 17, 2013 — 6 P.M.
Helling Conference Room
F01-lb-
IP14
Preliminary
Members Present: Harry Olmstead, Orville Townsend Sr., Paul Retish, Joe Coulter, Shams
Ghoneim, Andrea Cohen, Diane Finnerty, Jewell Amos, Kim Hanrahan.
Staff Present: Stefanie Bowers.
Recommendations to Council: Yes.
Coulter moved that the Human Rights Commission wishes to request the City to provide a description of
when and at what cost and the procedure to come into full compliance with the ADA (Ramp Inventory) to
the Commission as soon as possible. Olmstead seconded. Motion passed 8 -1. Retish voted against.
Finnerty moved to add a friendly amendment to the above motion, for the Council to respond in writing to
the Iowa City Ramp Inventory Report and indicate its response to the findings, its intended actions, and
how the findings will be prioritized in the Fiscal Year 15 budget, with target dates for implementation and
completion. Amos seconded. Motion passed 9 -0.
(See Inventory of Ramps discussion below).
Call to Order:
Chair Townsend called the meeting to order at 18:00.
Consideration of the Minutes of the October 15, 2013 (Revised) & November 19, 2013:
October 15, 2013 moved by Coulter, seconded by Hanrahan with information added under Building
Communities -- Townsend provided an update on a meeting held with Steve Rackis that discussed The
Housing Choice Program including the process and reasons why an applicant may be denied or removed
from the program. Motion passed 8 -0. Amos abstained.
November 19, 2013 moved by Olmstead, seconded by Coulter with information added under Breakfast- -
Olmstead discussed a radio interview that he and Townsend participated in where they discussed the
Human Rights Breakfast and the history of the Commission. Motion passed 8 -0. Amos abstained.
Public Comment of Items Not on the Agenda: None.
MeetinE Business:
Certificate of Appreciation
The Commission presented Diane Finnerty with a Certificate of Appreciation for outstanding
commitment and dedication to Human Rights. Finnerty's term on the Commission ends at the end of the
year.
Inventory of Ramps
Olmstead reports that the City is doing an inventory of sidewalk ramps throughout the city. The inventory
is planned to take until the end of December 2013 to complete. Olmstead believes that many of the
currently existing ramps need to be redone. Olmstead also believes that many new ramps need to be
installed throughout the City and the Commission should send a letter to that effect to the Council. More
specifically, the letter should request the city to come into compliance under the Americans with
Disabilities Act ( "ADA "). Olmstead is requesting that the letter go out now, so that the City can allocate
sufficient funds for remodeling and installing the requested ramps.
Coulter moved that the Human Rights Commission wishes to request the City to provide a description of
when and at what cost and the procedure to come into full compliance with the ADA (Ramp Inventory) to
the Commission as soon as possible. Olmstead seconded. Motion passed 8 -1. Retish voted against.
Finnerty moved to add a friendly amendment to the above motion, for the Council to respond in writing to
the Iowa City Ramp Inventory Report and indicate its response to the findings, its intended actions, and
how the findings will be prioritized in the Fiscal Year 15 budget, with target dates for implementation and
completion. Amos seconded. Motion passed 9 -0.
SEATS
Olmstead requested that this item be moved to the January 2014 meeting agenda.
Racial/Ethnic Equity Roundtable
Finnerty would like the Commission to co- sponsor and have representatives on a planning team to create
a day -long training on racial and ethnic equity (racial /ethnic roundtable) that community members and
businesses can attend. Finnerty would like to see the Commission set up a subcommittee for this purpose.
Finnerty moves that Human Rights Commission take on, as a 2014 initiative, racial and ethnic equity and
identify a representative to serve as an official conduit to a community group to do the planning for this
workshop. Olmstead seconds. Motion passed 9 -0.
Amos moves that Cohen and Townsend serve as the representatives of the Commission. Olmstead
seconds. Motion passed 9 -0.
2014 Choice Event
This fundraiser will be held in January. The funds raised will go directly to subsidize services and health
care services for underinsured women and men at the Emma Goldman Clinic. Sponsors of this fundraiser
will be listed in various literature and advertisements.
Finnerty does not feel that donating to this fundraiser falls under the Commission's charter, as it is a
private nonprofit organization and not an educational program.
Coulter moves that the Commission not fund the 2014 Choice Event and that the Commission place on
the next agenda an item regarding the formation and development of criteria for consideration of funding
requests. Commissioners agree that this is two motions. There is no second, motion fails.
Hanrahan moves to deny funding this event. Coulter seconds. Finnerty amends that the funds are denied
due to current understanding of criteria. Motion passed 6 -0. Finnerty, Townsend, Amos abstain.
Olmstead moves that the Commission develop a policy statement regarding future requests for funding of
organizations that may come before it. Coulter seconds. Motion passed 9 -0.
UI Center for Human Rights Funding Request
Olmstead suggests that personal contributions from Advisory Board Members of the Center for Human
Rights be considered contributions from the Commission. Olmstead and Ghoneim both serve on the
Center for Human Rights Advisory Board.
2
Coulter moves that the Commission goes on record as supporting the University of Iowa Center for
Human Rights. Ghoneim seconds. Motion passes 3 -2. Townsend, Amos against. Hanrahan, Finnerty,
Olmstead, Retish abstain.
International Students Subcommittee
Olmstead moves to establish a subcommittee to assist international students at the University of Iowa as
discussed in the November meeting under public comments. Olmstead, Cohen, Townsend, and Retish
will serve on the subcommittee, with Olmstead serving as the convener. Coulter seconds. Motion passed
9 -0.
Olmstead reports that a recently held `Town & Gown' meeting to assist international students was
successful. Representatives from the University, City Council, and several local organizations attended
and discussed the difficulties Chinese students face when coming here and ways to help them with the
move. Also discussed was the possibility of helping incoming students of other nationalities and meeting
with student representation from various groups about every three months or so. It is noted that the
orientation of international students is the University's responsibility and that the Commission should just
help ensure cooperation between different agencies and provide educational tools. Olmstead will notify
as to the next meeting of the subcommittee.
Structure of Human Rights Commission
Olmstead suggested at the last meeting that the Commission be increased from 9 members to 12
members. The reasons for a possible increase of Commission members is to include a student liaison,
representatives from other minority groups and to avoid what happened to Finnerty when she applied for
a second term on the Commission.
Olmstead moves to increase the Commission from 9 members to 11 members with one student liaison.
Coulter seconds. Motion fails 3 -3. Amos, Ghoneim, Retish vote against. Hanrahan, Finnerty, Townsend
abstained.
Ecological Human Rights
Coulter moves that the Commission go on record to state that the Commission appreciates Professor
Burns Weston supplying the Commission with the information on Ecological Human Rights. Hanrahan
seconds. A friendly amendment by Olmstead requesting that the article on Ecological Human Rights be
sent to the Council. No further action is requested at this time of the Council. Coulter accepts the
amendment. Motion passed 9 -0.
Subcommittees & ReDorts:
Human Rights Breakfast
The I Have a Dream slide show is currently playing on City Channel 4. Commissioners are especially
pleased with the photos and historic documents collected.
Olmstead believes there should be a clear policy against political statements at any future Awards
Breakfast. Coulter is concerned about infringing on the First Amendment. Other Commissioners agree
with Coulter and suggest that there should be suggestions against partisanship without making a solid
policy against such statements.
Commissioners also discussed the letter from the Sheraton (re: unpaid workers). Upon reading the letter it
appears that there is some confusion on the part of Sheraton between the Center for Worker Justice and
the Commission. Finnerty moves that Bowers call Sheraton on behalf of the Commission to clarify the
role of the Commission versus that of the Center for Worker Justice. Hanrahan seconds. Motion passed
9 -0.
Education
Retish is the chair for this subcommittee. Discussions at School Board meetings regarding
whether to have school on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day have been heated. Coulter moves that the
Commission continue to monitor the situation. Finnerty seconds. Motion fails 2 -6. Hanrahan, Finnerty,
Olmstead, Townsend, Ghoneim, Retish vote against. Cohen abstains.
Olmstead moves that the Commission send correspondence to the Iowa City Community School District
that says when issues arise pertaining to the minority community the school district should consult the
minority community or any of its committees. Finnerty proposes another friendly amendment to use
policies. Ghoneim seconds the motion and amendment. Motion passed 7 -0. Amos, Cohen abstain.
Immigrant
No report.
Building Communities
Retish suggests that Townsend speak with Bob Welsh regarding conditions at area trailer courts as this is
an affordable housing concern in the community.
University of Iowa Center for Human Rights
Olmstead reports that the advisory committee met and discussed the activities and programs sponsored by
the Center.
Building Blocks, Resume Training
No report.
Commission
Coulter suggests that if there is a conflict of interest, it should be given as the reason for abstention.
Hanrahan thinks that the voting has been rushed lately and would like to take more time for discussion to
improve understanding of the topics.
Amos believes that public schools should use the same holiday schedule as the federal government.
Retish will send a report from the Transition Services for Disadvantaged Young & Adults to Bowers so
that the Commission may review it.
Cohen hopes to develop a display in local school buses that contain human rights educational exhibits.
Townsend thanked the Commission for its hard work during his time as chair (2013).
Staff
Bowers discussed the number of recent abstentions citing that it is usually used if a person has a conflict
of interest when voting on a matter.
Olmstead moves to adjourn. Finnerty seconds. Motion passed.
Adjournment: 20:12
4
Next Regular Meeting — January 21, 2014
Human Rights Commission
ATTENDANCE RECORD
YEAR 2012/2013
Meetin Y, Date
NAME
TERM
EXP.
1/15/
13
1/28
113
2/19/
13
3/19/
13
4/16
113
5/21
/13
6/18/
13
7/16/
13
8/20/
13
9/17/
13
10/15/
13
11/19/
13
12/17/
13
Diane
Finnerty
1/14/14
O/E
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
Orville
Townsend, Sr.
1/1/14
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Paul Retish
1/1/14
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
X
X
X
Dan Tallon
1/1/14
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
O/E
R
R
R
R
R
Kim
Hanrahan
111115
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
Shams
Ghoneim
111115
O/E
O/E
X
X
X
O/E
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
Jessie Harper
111115
X
X
X
X
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
Jewell Amos
111115
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
Katie
Anthony
1/1/16
X
X
X
X
X
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
Joe D. Coulter
1/1/16
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
O/E
X
X
X
X
X
Harry
Olmstead
1 /1 /16
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Andrea Cohen
1/1/16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
O/E
X
X
X
X
Connie Goeb
1/1/13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Howard
Cowen
1/1/13
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
David B.
Brown
1/1/14
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
�t
Henri Harper
1/1/14
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
KEY: X = Present
O = Absent
O/E = Absent /Excused
NM = No meeting
- -- = No longer a member
R = Resignation
on
IP15
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
JANUARY 2 — 5:30 PM — INFORMAL
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL
PRELIMINARY
MEMBERS PRESENT: Carolyn Dyer, Charlie Eastham, Ann Freerks, Phoebe Martin,
Paula Swygard, Jodie Theobald, John Thomas
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Bob Miklo, Karen Howard, Eric Goers
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL:
None.
CALL TO ORDER:
The meeting was called to order at 5:30 PM.
Code Item
Discussion of Riverfront Crossings District Form -Based Zoning Code. (Available for
review at http: / /www.icaov.ora / ?id =2094)
Miklo indicated that the only item to be discussed will be this code item.
Howard said this will fit into the current Zoning Code as a stand -alone article. She said for
Riverfront Crossings Code to apply to someone's property it needs to be rezoned to one of the
sub - districts listed in the proposed Plan. She said there aren't going to be any properties subject
to this code until properties are actually rezoned.
Howard said this will be administered by a Form Based Code Committee, which is similar to a
Design Review Committee. She said anyone who has a new project that they want to build in
the Riverfront Crossings District that's been zoned Riverfront Crossings that will be reviewed
like a site plan review process through this committee. She said that the committee will be
empowered to grant some minor adjustments to accommodate challenging sites. She said the
Form Based Code Committee will also be empowered to grant up to two additional floors of
building height through the bonus height provisions, but City Council approval would be required
for bonus height more than 2 floors.
To facilitate the form -based code committee review, Howard said the Riverfront Crossings
District will also become a design review district similar to Towncrest where there is an overlay
over the entire Riverfront Crossings District and any new project that's going to be built would
be subject to design review through the form -based code committee.
Miklo said there is a lot of interest in the South Downtown area, and staff's thought was once
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 2, 2014 - Informal
Page 2 of 7
this code is adopted, the City should go in and initiate rezoning of this area. He said in other
areas it will most likely be to the advantage of the property owner to request this zoning
designation because in terms of uses it's much more flexible than the current zoning and will
allow higher densities in most areas.
Thomas said his sense is that with the exception of the South Downtown District that what will
happen is an up- zoning of the Riverfront Crossings Area, so that's the leverage they could apply
to given property, that there's more development potential.
Freerks said it's a little confusing what people might be able to do and what they want to do and
what the City really wants to see happen, particularly if the rezonings happen piecemeal over
time. Howard said it is always the option to blanket rezone more portions of Riverfront
Crossings, but they have to get this code in place first. She said staff thought it was fairer to
property owners if they knew exactly what it meant for their properties to be rezoned so those
processes can happen consecutively. She said it's a worthwhile to discuss the timing and
process for rezoning different parts of Riverfront Crossings.
Eastham asked what would happen if developers don't see enough incentives, and they insist
on rezoning to a zone that doesn't conform with the Riverfront Crossings Plan. Howard said
then staff and the Commission could recommend against such a rezoning since it would not
comply with the comprehensive plan.
Thomas said it seems as if one of the things they are trying to evaluate if this Form Based
Development Standards is consistent with Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. He said with bonus
provisions, there are a number of sites that could be built twice as high as their base height. He
said he sees a significant shortage of parking. Howard said one of the controlling factor on how
dense or tall is whether you can meet the parking requirement. She said the parking
requirements will be reviewed by the Commission at their next meeting.
Eastham said he thinks Thomas is pointing out that the Comprehensive Plan for this area
seems to provide a variegated building height, and this code seems to be headed in the
direction of a more unified heights.
Freerks said she doesn't see that it will be unified. She said there will be parking restrictions so
you are not going to see a row of eight story buildings. She said the market will drive where it
will occur first so if you want to guide where these taller buildings would be to start with that
would be something to discuss. She said she would be uncomfortable with doing that right away
because that tends to give advantages to people where it might not be necessary.
Thomas said he thought the Master Plan did articulate a range of heights, and there was
thought as to where it would be appropriate to put a taller building. He said he hasn't seen the
parking aspects of this plan so he doesn't know how that will affect density but he sees a pretty
significant change in terms of what this document will allow and the level of density that was
reflected in the Master Plan.
Martin said she thought part of the point was that they were aiming for fewer cars near the
downtown area, and the point was to get away from a one -to -one ratio. Howard said the parking
requirements will reflect that.
Freerks said they have to plan for parking, but not on a one -to -one ratio. Howard said the idea is
to take pressure off parts of the city they don't want to see redeveloped but preserved. She said
this is the area where they want to see the density occur.
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 2, 2014 - Informal
Page 3 of 7
Martin said it seems that the City could do more of dictating the parking demand. Freerks said
you can't tell someone they can't bring their car. Howard said the other difficult thing in this
market is the market for student housing, which is short term with the students being less
concerned about having a parking space on -site. She said if you want Riverfront Crossings to
accommodate the students and other populations as well, to level the playing field the same
way the City did downtown, there has to be some certain amount of minimum parking required.
She said people wanting to live near downtown more permanently will probably still have at
least one car. Howard said that requiring at least a small amount of parking will ensure that
there is some parking provided on -site so it becomes an attractive place for other populations to
live besides just students.
Thomas said people in Iowa City are pretty wedded to their cars, one reason being that other
forms of transportation in the area are not fully developed, and it's hard to get around without a
car. Theobald said the rapid expansion and growth of Coralville and North Liberty with no
connecting transportation has a big impact on so many people owning cars. Thomas said
there's going to be a bigger demand for parking downtown than he would like to see, because
you need a car.
Eastham asked how requiring on -site parking on a development in the South Downtown District
decreases the pressure to increase the vertical height. Howard said you can't put the parking
on -site because there simply isn't room. She said providing underground parking and structured
parking is much more expensive than providing surface parking. She said the other limiting
factor is that once you go above five stories, you have to do steel construction, which is a
different type of construction and more expensive than wood frame construction.
Freerks said there will be many factors that will cause developers to pause before putting an
eight story building up, and it won't be the norm.
Thomas said that there a lot of constraints on building up but you see some of them dropping
away as there are many taller buildings going up in town. He said he feels that ultimately the
question is what height do we want the buildings to be and where do those building heights
occur and at what density. He said this plan allows for fifteen story buildings along the river. He
said he would frankly just say he doesn't want that.
Martin said that building up rather than out is more environmentally friendly. Thomas said they
are all the time approving RS -5 developments on the edge of town and to him there is no
correlation at all between what we do in the center of town and what happens to the periphery
and there are also different ways of achieving that density.
Eastham said they can try to assume they know what will control these various factors or they
have to figure out a way to control these factors directly. Miklo said to keep in mind that it's not
fifteen stories everywhere, but only in certain sub - districts, and any bonus height over two
stories requires City Council approval. Eastham asked Miklo if what he's saying is that there's a
process for determining building height. Miklo said the Form -Based Committee can grant up to
two story bonuses and anything above that requires City Council approval.
Eastham asked if Level Two Design Review does not include the Planning and Zoning
Commission. Howard explained that is in the Zoning Code right now and Level One is
administrative staff approval and Level Two takes Council approval. She said it's not a rezoning,
so wouldn't require Planning and Zoning Commission review.
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 2, 2014 - Informal
Page 4 of 7
Dyer said it seems like anything back from the river won't have any access to the river except
maybe some sidewalks, and she thought one of the goals of this was to make the river part of
the city, which it hasn't been. She compared how the shore is developed in New Jersey versus
Oregon. She said it seemed like even mixed use is not going to provide any access for those of
moderate income.
Miklo said they do have a required fifty foot buffer along the river, and they anticipate putting a
trail in that buffer area. He said there are key locations in the plan showing corridors between
Riverside Drive and the river and those will be considered when redevelopment occurs.
Freerks said she is curious about offering bonuses for more public access to the river, and
height is one way to do that.
Eastham said Dyer's point is well taken that the view from the west side is going to be limited.
Freerks said they have to think how they are going to move forward to make it better. Several
Commissioners echoed her comment.
Theobald said it is part of the characteristic of this little neighborhood. She said seeing the trees
and the eagles is a big part of this area.
Freerks said many people go down to Dairy Queen to take a walk, and that is a public spot
along there.
Howard said because it's in town, the question is keeping a balance between keeping a
greenway along the river, which the City is intending to do, allowing good public access to the
greenway and allowing enough development potential to create an incentive for redevelopment
otherwise you risk leaving Riverside Drive looking just like it does now with low intensity auto -
oriented uses.
Dyer said that hypothetically you could have higher buildings on the west side of Riverside Drive
than the east side, and the ones on the west side could also have visual access to the river. She
said in New Jersey some towns have accesses to the beach every couple of blocks.
Howard said it is in the City's plans to build the rest of the west side trail from Highway 6 to
Benton Street, and there's a requirement in the Code right now that if someone redevelops their
property they have to provide pedestrian connections to all public trails.
Swygard asked why there was no minimum building height on the west side. Howard said there
are a lot of one -story buildings there and the City anticipates that there will continue to be a
demand for one -story commercial buildings on portions of the west side. She said even if the
parking requirements are lowered commercial developers will put in the parking that is needed
to attract commercial tenants, since this is an area that most people will still need to drive to,
which will likely limit the scale of the buildings in the foreseeable future.
Thomas asked about the idea of shared lots. Howard many of lots are connected so for all
intents and purposes much of the parking is already shared.
Swygard asked if the parking will all be along Riverside Drive. Howard said the zoning
requirements would require the buildings in certain portions of this to be built to the street with
the parking behind and would also allow multiple buildings on the same site. Howard said it is
difficult to get a form based code to work on the west side of Riverside Drive given the irregular
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 2, 2014 - Informal
Page 5 of 7
lot pattern.
Freerks asked how they came up with the locations for the "required storefronts" on the
regulating plan. Howard said most of these required retail frontages are clustered in the south
downtown area at the corners, and the anticipation is that as property redevelops over time the
City wants certain corners reserved for mixed use to prevent it becoming totally residential. She
said on South Gilbert Street the idea is that it's more ideal for commercial on the ground floor
because that street carries a lot of traffic. She said the area around the depot already has and
will continue to have small commercial uses to support the area. She said Riverside Drive also
carries a lot of traffic so it's also conducive to commercial, and they thought it was safe to
require that if someone was going to rebuild, it needs to be a mixed use building with ground
floor commercial space.
Eastham asked if rezoning the entire sub - district at once would create a lot grand- fathered or
non - conforming uses. Howard said most of the current allowed uses are still going to be allowed
with the new code but there might be some non - conforming structures. She said the land uses
listed in the code are pretty broad.
Swygard asked why the drinking establishments aren't addressed in the West Riverfront Zone.
Howard said they are addressed the same way they are in the CB -5 zone, which would mean
500 foot spacing between them. Swygard asked if that is spelled out in the other zones. Howard
said it doesn't have to be because it's already in the Code elsewhere.
Freerks said if there are places they really don't want to be redeveloped, perhaps that should be
mentioned somewhere in the plan. She said maybe all she's suggesting is that the landmark
properties are starred on the map.
Martin asked if the three small commercial buildings near the depot on Dubuque Street have
been designated as historic or protected in any way. Miklo said that while they would likely be
eligible for protection, they are not designated as historic and so are not protected. He said they
are currently zoned Community Commercial (CC -2).
Thomas said he thought these properties were more threatened under a form -based code than
by CC -2 zoning. Miklo said that regardless of the zoning unless they are designated historic by
the Historic Preservation Commission they are subject to redevelopment.
Freerks asked about the old waste water plant administrative building. Miklo said the plan right
now is to clear the entire site for development of the riverfront park.
Thomas asked if they are proposing to build affordable housing for a non - student population
how do they prevent that housing from being occupied by students.
Eastham said almost all the programs that provide Federal and State financial assistance for
affordable housing require the owners and managers not to rent to full -time students. Thomas
asked if that is in perpetuity. He said they would be so- called workforce housing and if the City
plays a part in that they can offer a subsidy to the developer as gap financing but the timeframe
on that has a limit. He said that subsidy ends and the housing reverts back to market forces,
and once that happens there's a high likelihood that it will be occupied by students.
Eastham said he thinks that the affordability period for the height bonus for subsidized or
affordable housing definitely needs to be tied down. Howard said the downside to putting strict
rules in the zoning code is that it may make the bonus height provision less likely to be used.
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 2, 2014 - Informal
Page 6 of 7
She said if they keep the language open and flexible, through the bonus height provisions the
City can negotiate the best deal possible for each specific case.
Thomas said he finds a ten year time frame to be insufficient. Miklo said it depends on how
much of an investment they are making in the property and how much bonus they are getting,
and it's hard to say without having all the numbers if ten years is a reasonable amount of time or
whether it should be longer based on the cost of the project.
Howard said it's going to be challenging to create affordable housing in a part of the city where
the land values are the highest so keeping the language flexible may keep all options open.
Thomas said part of the reason the land values are so high is that they are currently marketed
for student housing. He said he wants to explore ways so there's not direct competition on every
piece of property for a developer wanting to build student housing. He said if that's no longer an
option at least on certain properties, then the land values will come down.
Freerks asked if that means you tell people they can't have student housing on a particular
block.
Thomas said the means of how you do that is a question that other college towns have pursued.
He said if we don't do something like that, the market forces are creating a monopoly -run
situation where all the housing is occupied by students, and that's not what the Comprehensive
Plan endorses.
Theobald said she actually has a problem limiting the places where students can live, because
there are a lot of places where students can't afford to live in this community.
Freerks said she has a lot of trouble with someone trying to better their life by taking a class and
then being forced out of affordable housing. She doesn't know if it is a good idea to prohibit
students, because some may truly qualify for affordable housing.
Eastham said he's most interested in the fact that if we are going to have affordable housing
that we direct it at the people that need it the most.
Thomas said the issue is how they achieve balance in all the districts. He said he senses that
everyone, including Council, does not want a ghetto of high -rise student apartments in the
Riverfront Crossings area, which could be the outcome. He said he doesn't see how the rules
will be played out any differently there than they have in the University Impact Zone. He said he
understands that it's a struggle and there are a lot of students and the university hasn't provided
adequate on- campus housing.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned.
z
O
ti
O
Cl
z
Z
N
06
z
z
Z
Q
J
a
0
O
W
w
w
U
z
D
z
w
a
T
0
N
M
T
0
N
z
F-
W
w
J
O
LL
o)
N
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
T
1117
NXxxoxxx
xxXxx;xx
T
T
V-XXXXXXXII
X
X-
X
X
'I
X
x
T
Mxxxxx
X
X
p
X
x
X
x
T
o0xx0xxX;
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
T
Q
X
X
0
X
x
x
X
X
T
mW
5
LLI
X
x
x
x
X
x
,XXXXXXX
o
Z
o
nm00LO0
o
o
o
o
o
o
w
co
Xxxx0xx
w_
co
X
xxxxxxil
z
w
m�
J
f7
a
z
n
J
2
w
a
0
Lij
X
X
X
X
X
X
U
Q
Y
H
N
�_XxxxxX�
Z
a
W
co
;Xxxxxxx
W)
W
N
w
D
O
W
C4
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
0
co
X
X
X
X
X
;
x
x
/�=y=
w
(sJ
M
1-
LO
M
In
M
wo.LO
�-X00000000
000LO
000
W
W_
J
w
J
m
Ovz0am=M
a=
00-
m
w
v
=�z��Nw
ZmWIi�N0H3
CD
z
p
w
W
f�
O
LL
z
T-XXXXXXX;
x
0
1117
LO
xxXxx;xx
o
X
X-
X
X
'I
X
x
Mxxxxx
;
xx
N
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
0
><
X
X
x
X
X
T
mW
5
oomr-mmmm
7-
R
WMLoM
�- X
o
Z
o
nm00LO0
o
o
o
o
o
o
w
w_
J
z
w
m�
J
f7
a
z
J
2
w
a
U
Q
Y
H
N
Z
a
W
a>-<R4
W
N
w
D
O
W
z
a
w
LL
2
U)
n
v L
N N �
U Q N
W N
}, Y
NNW��
a Q Q Z n
II II II II
XOW
O
W
Y