HomeMy WebLinkAboutGateway Project.pptIowa City Gateway
City Council Work Session
January 21, 2014
low,a CiTv
GATEWAY Gateway Proje I
Tonight's Objective:
■ Establish the Primary Design Parameters for the Project
• Work Session
❑ Review City Council Process to Date
❑ Review Recent Activities for NEPA Process
❑ Review the Process as we Move Forward with Design
❑ Review Staff Recommendations
❑ Outline the Resolution and Options
❑ Answer Additional Questions from Council
• Formal Meeting
❑ Outline Staff Recommendations
❑ Public Input
❑ Consider Resolution Establishing Primary Design Parameters
City Council Process to Date:
■ September 17, 2013 Work Session
• Reviewed the project and Environmental Assessment Process
• Identified three primary design parameters that will need to be decided to move
into the design phase
• Answered Questions
■ October 1, 2013
• Work Session: Reviewed the three primary design parameters and staff's
recommendations. Answered questions.
• Formal Meeting: Held Public Hearing for input on the project. No action item on
the agenda.
■ January 21, 2013
• Work Session: Review the process, parameters and recommendations. Answer
questions.
• Formal Meeting: Additional public input. Consider resolution establishing the
three primary design parameters.
NEPA Cultural Resource Investigations
� and Recent Findings
■ Led by Office of State Archaeologist and Tallgrass Historians
■ Coordinated with:
• Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission
• Iowa DOT Cultural Resource staff
• State Historic Preservation Officer
• Received finding of Conditional No Effect summer 2012
• Affirmed by independent evaluation summer 2013
• Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission confirmed support, fall 2013
• Received FHWA Finding of No Significant Impact December 2013
IOWA CITY
NEPA Public Outreach.
GATEWAY
• Started April 2010
• Two public meetings: 250+ attendees
• Drop -in center + online public meeting
• Public hearing /drop -in center
• Multiple paid ads
• Multiple media stories
• Local media press releases
• City and project specific Web site*
• Mailing list of nearly 2,000*
• Neighborhood and civic group meetings*
• Multiple one -on -one meetings and calls*
■
- ► ;,
L_M
p
*Will continue in the design process
IOWA ciTV
f; ATEWAV NEPATasks
I Completed:
✓ Data collection ✓ Resource Agency coordination
✓ Flood model data updated ✓ Release NEPA document for
✓ Initial alternatives screening review
✓ Purpose and Need approved ✓ Hosted Public Hearing
✓ Two public meetings ✓ Received Federal approval
✓ Refine alternatives
✓ Screen alternatives
✓ Recommend preferred alternative
✓ Prepare NEPA document
IOWA CITY
all all
•
GATEWAY
Iowa City Gateway Project 1 Tirneframe
Oesl
n
roxlmate
a
mourns
follw teal a vrellmina
Mu
nv
-T=77,
M
]W
4P
ser
IM
rM
YT'
Jan Jm F2E F10 FM
Design $Ld p.CLIVIr 21 2] 3 le I]
20
r
3
le
I<
21
28
5
12
18
2a
PraDesl n Council Decislonon3Desl nParameters
conwpteal Design (te%)
RBags concept
Roadwaay y c concept
Concept DeveloPment(D(3e) Landscape concept
Poll Predesgn meeting
CM council worn session, Roadway Design Issues
Submit Consept Statement 0 lows DOT
Pre llmllary Design (20%)
Presminary rwdxay am bridge
Preliminary Design 1001)
WamrlSeweaDtllsy cooroiwtion
Timeframe
Finel Dasl n 8-12 months
Lapin Process
Lamascape plans
dents .Wla A 1d a,11 MAl 1 Neu you Jervis
FW fs
MVns
its
1 Mal
.hit -Is
C Counal wom session, Aesthetes aM taM
Eaawnenl end Properly
Coundl RBS Wn auMOr¢Ing Properly Acquisition
gcqul &Lion
p q isalsambl otiation
Fpm Exam Design Plans (35 % plan s)
Flaw Dam Plans feel
Field exam plans for mainly, bridge,
Omsae renew
Valtioeinginnoming
Preliminary Design Plans (7016 plans)
Prallminmy Plans (DOS)
Revised design plans her rwOway, briall eon.,
- Lightine, s wl, emenimarkl .d sound plans
Check Plans
CMCa Plans (100%plans)
Fnal oesi n fortoxdw , she
Final Plans and specmcmlons hon titling
Public Hearing and CM CoullaI Approrel of Final Plans
Flnm Plans
and Swellons
Ma DOT LeMng Prowls
C Council Resolution /Award of Pro act
Irderacson with property owners adjacent to the project
and oMer imerested pamaswill be ongoing as named
throughout the design process. The web site and whoul
Public Input Option ltlas
updates will ba used when More is new information to
share won interested parses. Communication by prone,
email or meetings Is welcomed by staff at any ame during
Me broil
Staff Recommendations for
� Primary Design Parameters
■ Level of protection for Dubuque Street
• 2008 event + 1'
■ Backwater reduction goals (Elevation of Park Road
Bridge):
• Low Steel at 200 year event +1'
■ Structural type of the bridge
• Deck Girder or Through Arch
Comparison of Levels of
Protection for Dubuque Street
IOWA CITY
Bridge Type
Low Steel Backwater Incremental
Deck Incremental Construct! Constructi
Construction
Construction
Elevation Reduction Improvement
Elevation Height of on Cost on Cost
Cost
Cost
GATEWAY
at Idyllwild in Backwater
Bridge Deck Estimate Estimate
Estimate
Estimate
Reduction
with with
with
with
Dubuque Dubuque
Dubuqueat
Dubuqueat
at at
2008 +1'
500yr +1'
100yr +1' 200yr +1'
Deck Girder
100yr +1'
3.4"
660.20
$32.67 M
$34.26 M
Deck Girder
200yr+ 1'
6.1"
2.7"
662.52
27.8"
$34.63 M
$35.01 M
M6 _ Deck Girder
2008 +1'
6.6"
0.5"
663.45
11.2"
$33.41
$35.17M
Deck Girder
SOOyr+ 1'
7.0'
0.4"
665.03
19.0"
$34.20 M
$35.01 M
$35.34 M
$36.65 M
EA Preferred
Alternative
_ Deck Arch
100yr +1'
3.6"
659.20
$36.01 M
$37.59 M
Deck Arch
200yr +1'
4.7"
1.1"
661.52
27.8"
$37.96M
$38.34M
C6 - Deck Arch
2008 +1'
5.2"
0.5"
662.45
11.1"
$36.71M
$38.48M
Deck Arch
500yr +1'
5.6"
0.4"
664.03
19.0"
$36.94 M
$38.33 M
$38.66 M
$39.98 M
Through
100yr +1'
3.4"
656.87
$35.99M
$37.58M
Arch
Through
200yr +1'
4.9"
1.5"
659.02
25.8"
$37.93 M
$38.31 M
Arch
2008 +1'
S.2"
0.3"
659.95
11.1"
$36.70M
$38.47M
Arch
`• Through
500yr +1'
5.8"
0.6"
661.53
19.0'
$36.90 M
$38.30 M
$38.63 M
$39.60 M
Arch
Comparison
Goals
and Bridge
of Backwater
Type
Reduction
Option
Bridge Type
Low Steel
Elevation
at Backwater
Dubuque
Construction
Elevation
the Dubuque
reduction at
Street
Cost Estimate
St /Park Rd
Idyllwild and
Protection
of Bridge and
Intersection
Taft
Level
Road
Speedway
protection
Deck Girder
500yr
00
and ba
reduction
.
Preferred
Recommended
Th2008 rough Arch
200yr
Arch
Recommended
Deck Girder
200yr
00
Girder
IOWA CiTY—
GATFWAY
WHEREAS, City staff has recommended that the design parameters be: (1) protect Dubuque Street to the
2008 flood elevation plus one foot and, (2) provide backwater reduction by elevating the low steel of the new
bridge to the 200 -year flood plus one foot and, (3) proceed with either the Through Arch Bridge or the Deck
Ginter Bridge; and
WHEREAS, the Council has considered the input and needs of the public; and
WHEREAS, funds for this project are available in the Iowa City Gateway Project (Dubuque St) account #
3809.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA,
THAT For purposes of the Iowa City Gateway Project, which is currently planned for bid letting in 2015, it is
in the best interests of the City of Iowa City and its citizens to establish the following design parameters:
1. The 2008 flood elevation plus one foot as the level of protection for Dubuque Street.
2. The 200 -year flood elevation plus one foot as the backwater reduction goal (low steel elevation) of the
Park Road Bridge.
3. The as the structural type of the bridge across the Iowa River.
Passed and approved this day of .20
tt
C
�� fJ -� 1