Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-06POLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD A Board of the City of Iowa City 410 East Washington Street Iowa City IA 52240 1826 319 356 5041 May 7 2007 To City Council Complainant Stephen Atkins City Manager Sam Hargadine Chief of Police Officer s involved in complaint From Police Citizen s Review Board r C Re Investigation of PCRB Complaint 06 06 This is the Report of the Police Citizens Review Board s the Board review of the investigation of Complaint PCRB 06 06 the Complaint BOARD S RESPONSIBILITY Under the City Code of the City of Iowa City Section 8 8 7B 2 the Board s job is to review the Police Chiefs Report Report of his investigation of a complaint The City Code requires the Board to apply a reasonable basis standard of review to the Report and to give deference to the Report because of the Police Chiefs professional expertise Section 8 8 7 B 2 While the City Code directs the Board to make Findings of Fact it also requires that the Board recommend that the Police Chief reverse or modify his findings only if these findings are unsupported by substantial evidence are unreasonable arbitrary or capricious or are contrary to a Police Department policy or practice or any Federal State or local law Section 8 8 7 B 2 a b c BOARD S PROCEDURE The Complaint was received at the Office of the City Clerk on 12 14 06 As required by Section 8 8 5 B of the City Code the Complaint was referred to the Chief of Police for investigation The Chiefs Report was due on 03 14 07 and was filed with the City Clerk on 03 13 07 The Board met to consider the Chiefs Report on 04 10 07 and 05 07 07 The Board voted to review the Chiefs Report in accordance with section 8 8 7 B 1 a on the record with no additional investigation FINDINGS OF FACT A charge of excessive use of force by an ICPD officer at the complainant s residence on 10 23 06 led the Complainant to file a complaint to the ICPD The complaint was assigned to Internal Affairs who investigated and exonerated the officer s actions The Board reviewed that report including the Complainant s and the Officer s accounts of the incident The Board did not receive a complaint regarding use of excessive force On 10 24 06 officers were granted a warrant for the search of the complainant s residence The search was conducted on 10 25 06 In the complaint to the Board on 12 14 06 the Complainant alleged the search was done in retaliation of filing the complaint to the ICPD regarding an officer s behavior and that in the process of the search the investigators trashed the residence CONCLUSIONS After reviewing the Complaint and the Chiefs report the Board concluded the allegations were not substantiated The search warrant was file stamped at 1 56 P M on 10 24 06 and was part of an on going investigation The complaint against the officer s actions was not received until 2 10P M on 10 24 06 Because the search warrant was filed before the subject s complaint the search warrant could not have possibly been issued in retaliation of the complaint against an ICPD officer Photos taken of the interior of the residence showed the apartment to be in disarray prior to the search by the police Allegation 1 Retaliation NOT SUSTAINED Allegation 2 Destruction of Property NOT SUSTAINED COMMENTS None C