Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-06-02 Bd Comm minutesCITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: May 26, 2015 To: Mayor and City Council From: Tim Hennes, Board of Appeals Re: Recommendation from the Board of Appeals nr_ar_m- 3b(1) At their March 24th, 2014 meeting, the Board of Appeals made the following recommendation to the City Council: Recommended by a unanimous vote (4-0) to proceed with the adoption of the proposed amendments to the 2009 International Mechanical Code that reflect the changes to commercial hood exhaust systems. Additional Action (check one) x No further action needed — Council approved in April of 2014 — Ord 14-4582 Board or Commission is requesting Council direction Agenda item will be prepared by staff for Council action MINUTES APPROVED IOWA CITY BOARD OF APPEALS MONDAY, March 24, 2014 HELLING CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL 410 E. WASHINGTON STREET IOWA CITY, IA 52240 MEMBERS PRESENT: John Roffman, Scott McDonough, Andrea French, John Gay MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Tim Hennes (Sr. Building Inspector), Sue Dulek (Asst. City Attorney), Brian Greer (Fire Marshall), Julie Tallman (Development Regulations Specialist acting as minute taker), Doug Boothroy (Director, Neighborhood and Development Services), Dave Campbell (Building Inspector) OTHERS PRESENT: Marty Christiansen and Dan Ouverson RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: Recommended by a unanimous vote (4-0) to proceed with the adoption of the proposed amendments to the 2009 International Mechanical Code that reflect the changes to commercial hood exhaust systems. CALL TO ORDER: John Roffman called the meeting to order at 4:00 PM ELECTION OF OFFICERS: French moved to elect John Roffman as chairperson of the Board of Appeals. McDonough seconded. VOTE: Roffman was elected as chairperson of the BOA by a 4-0 unanimous vote. McDonough moved to elect Andrea French as vice -chair of the Board of Appeals. Gay seconded. VOTE: French was elected vice -chair of the BOA by a 4-0 unanimous vote. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES: Minutes from 11/4/2013 meeting were reviewed. McDonough moved to adopt the minutes. French seconded. The minutes were approved by a unanimous 4-0 vote. Appeal of the decision of the Building Official or Fire Chief —120 E. Burlinaton St. — The Mill Restaurant Appealing the decision of the building inspector's decision that raised seating was required to be accessible to persons with disabilities per 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. Dulek suggested that the appellants' second point be argued first, because if the appellants are able to prove one of the exceptions (accessibility is technically infeasible, or disproportionate relative to overall cost of improvement) then Section 202 applies to the situation at hand, but this particular project is exempt. If the appellants fail to prove that one of the two exceptions apply, then discussion will return to appellants' first point, which is that the project is already in compliance with Section 202 and additional modifications are not required. Dulek felt, and the Board and appellants agreed, that beginning with the appellants' second point would be a more efficient use of time. N Appellant Christensen gave a history of the last ten years since he and Dan Ouverson purchased The Mill as a mission to save an Iowa City live music venue. After nine years of operation, they had paid off the debt one year ago. Christensen said investment in the building was difficult because the owner of the building had not been willing to sign a lease for the last six years; however, when their debt was paid off, Christensen and Ouverson decided to invest in the front and back sections of The Mill over the lull of winter break. The improvement projects included raising some of the booths in the back section to improve patrons' visibility of performers on stage. Seven booths were raised on two tiers of platforms: one tier was elevated 7" and the second was elevated 14". Christensen pointed out that the vast majority of seating was accessible, with the exception of three booths. Christensen said that building staff had prepared a plan showing how ramps could be incorporated into the design of the raised platforms and seating, so the test of "technically infeasible" could not be met; however, Christensen maintained that the ramps and their attendant handrails would have a negative impact on circulation for wait staff and patrons, and in any event where the venue needed to be exited in an emergency. Christensen also expressed his opinion that "circulation path" was not clearly defined in Section 202, and that there was a clear circulation path around the interior of the seating area except for three out of the seven booths. Hennes reviewed Section 202.4 "alterations" and the issue of disproportionality. He explained that the figure $20,000 was provided by Ouverson, so appellant had to prove that the cost of the ramps and handrails would exceed 20%, or $4,000. Hennes illustrated how building staff arrived at a means to provide an accessible route to both platforms without losing any of the seating that appellants had provided. Using the design showing full accessibility, then, appellant had to show whether cost of construction for the ramps exceeded $4,000. McDonough asked if making both raised platforms accessible would essentially provide an advantage to disabled persons. Christensen pointed out that preferred seating is usually closest to the stage, so persons with disabilities were already afforded preferred seating. Hennes returned the discussion to clarifying the definitions of technical infeasibility and disproportionality, and their applicability to appellants' appeal. Technical feasibility is, by definition, when structural changes are necessary to achieve accessibility — for instance, removing walls. Structural changes were not required in this instance so technical feasibility was not a proven exception. Disproportionality had not been proven because appellants had not provided proof that the ramps would cost more than $4,000. Hennes also pointed out that even if disproportionality was proven, then up to $4,000 would still have to be spent on accessibility improvements as part of the project. Hennes then provided some background on the progression of the project and that, while a building permit was required for the construction of the elevated platforms, no building permit was secured and that staff found out about the project from a Facebook posting. Hennes also noted that when staff notified appellants that the project required a building permit, they promptly came to the building department and secured a building permit. Roffman inquired if there was any language in Section 202 that would suggest that a ramp is not required; i.e., that accessibility was not a required element of the design for 7 booths on two raised platforms. McDonough noted that this was the discussion that would follow after consideration of whether the project met one of two exceptions: technical infeasibility, or disproportionality. Dulek and Hennes posed the question to BOA: "Does the Board agree that the ramps are either technically infeasible or disproportionate in cost?" McDonough's opinion was that at least a part of the ramp design prepared by building staff could be done for $4,000 or less, and that the design was technically feasible. Roffman noted that if this was a sports venue, the existing configuration would be acceptable 3 McDonough stated that similar to a sports arena, visibility is assured for disabled patrons because accessible seating is on the floor. Christensen said that "dining area" is not clearly defined in Section 202 and the code instructs us to refer to a collegiate dictionary definitions. Hennes stated that if this is a dining area and had we reviewed the plan prior to issuing a building permit, we would have concluded that the appellants' points 1, 2, and 3 are not applicable; i.e., that accessibility to the raised platforms would be required. Christensen replied that the entire room is a dining area, and it is largely accessible. McDonough asked why the raised seating was not considered a mezzanine, and exempt from accessibility. Hennes replied that the platforms aren't mezzanines because there is not 7 feet between them and the next lowest floor. Dulek explained that Section 202 refers specifically to "all dining areas — including raised or sunken seating and outdoor dining areas." Gay asked if the two platforms weren't really one raised dining area and if access to one of the two platforms would comply with Section 202. Roffman wondered if that was acceptable to the appellants. By providing ramp access to one of two platforms, they would not have the degree of construction from handrails and ramps that they would have from providing access to both platforms. Christensen wondered what exactly constituted a "dining area. He believed the entire 24 x 24 room is one dining area and it is 80% accessible. French stated that by code, an "altered area" such as the new raised platforms, carried with it specific requirements in Section 202. Christensen stated that the back of The Mill is almost like a dinner theatre more than a dining area. It's used for events, parties, performances. If it was called an assembly use, there would be exceptions to accessibility for fixed seating. The booths are fixed seating. Hennes said that if Section 221 applies, the code issues become more specific and require preferential seating to be accessible. The raised platforms were installed to improve line of sight, and would be considered preferential seating. Christensen replied that the best line of sight is from the floor where its fully accessible. (tie then distributed an email that The Mill had received, expressing appreciation for the venue's accessibility from a person with disabilities). Roffman said that the crux of the matter seems to be whether this is a dining area and asked the Board members if they agreed. Mcdonough said yes. Ouverson stated that the Mill is not your typical place — there's no other venue that would struggle with the obstacles we do because of space. Hennes explained that code cannot be enforced that way— also, that there was the option of enforcing the IBC in place of the ADAAG, and IBC does give us interpretations on some of these issues. The IBC states a dining area is a "special occupancy." Section 1108.2.9 of the 2009 IBC explains the applicability of accessibility to dining areas -- the commentary says "raised areas are required to be accessible" and therefore, accessible routes are required, especially in "special areas" (i.e., dining rooms). 4 Roffman stated that they were bacK to appellants' point one, whether accessibility is required, and the conclusion appears to be that accessibility is, indeed, required. Hennes said that he thought Gay's solution seemed reasonable, providing access to raised seating on one of two adjacent platforms. MOTION: McDonough motioned that the elevated seating is required to be accessible and access to the 7 inch raised platform meets the accessibility requirement. Gay seconded. VOTE: The motion passed 4-0. Christensen thanked staff for their consideration, and noted his gratitude for the opportunity to participate in a democratic process. Amendments to 2009 Mechanical Code for Tvoe I and 11 exhaust fans in commercial kitchens. Hennes distributed a memo regarding the history of concerns over noise emanating from grease exhaust fans when restaurants were adjacent to residential uses. He clarified that the new code language would apply to changes in use; changes in occupancy; and new construction. Roffman asked about buildings downtown where finding the route for a chase to exhaust through the roof could prove near impossible. Hennes said that alley access was allowed in the amendments. Boothroy explained that Historic Preservation Commission and the Planning & Zoning Commission asked staff to look into the issue, both from the perspective of using noise measurement to determine whether an exhaust was a nuisance, and from the perspective of regulating new construction in a way that future exhaust chases could be designed into buildings where tenancy might be open to a future restaurant. It was staffs conclusion that measuring decibels was less preferred; that controlling the impacts of commercial exhaust was better achieved by regulating location than by reacting to an exhaust fan after it's installed. Hennes stated that replacing existing mechanical exhaust for commercial equipment can utilize existing termination locations. There could be instances where newly -installed equipment can't utilize an existing termination, in which case they would have to terminate through the roof or into an alley. MOTION: McDonough moved that the proposed amendments to the 2009 International Mechanical Code be recommended to City Council. French seconded. VOTE: The motion was approved with a unanimous vote 4-0. Neighborhood and Development Services Boothroy introduced the BOA to the new staff organization at City Hall, under the heading of Neighborhood and Development Services. He explained that the new structure does not affect staff support of the Board of Appeals and that support would still be provided by the building inspection staff. He clarified that Planning and Building staff would be combined under the heading of Development Services. There were no questions. Roffman adjourned the meeting at 5:40. OTHER BUSINESS: None, Date XI Z O X x c p cn o D c un O muum < :3 - =r a : ° u Z II n) N o C ::3 C) :3 ; @ n) m 0 MOyjM -o < �Q - z C � N� N7yicCD CD o ��=3 m< 0 smco O N 7 CD fD d m www w N 0000 N N N m X 'fl M 0 v V m CA Z� A Z� A L Z= � 3 A C- Z Z A c R9 A N Z� �a A Z 0 A z Z A v ZCD �L A Zc lu N Z� L Cil Z� � S Z,o 1 cit X X X X �G a PL CD CL 3 n CD X CD 0 N O N O tJ� w O A) In C. O V 10 CD 0) ,rL 3b(2) MINUTES APPROVED HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APRIL 9, 2015 EMMA HARVAT HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Kent Ackerson, Thomas Agran, Esther Baker, Gosia Clore, Kate Corcoran, Andrew Litton, Pam Michaud, Ben Sandell, Ginalie Swaim, Frank Wagner MEMBERS ABSENT: Frank Durham STAFF PRESENT: Jessica Bristow, Bob Miklo OTHERS PRESENT: Alicia Trimble RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (become effective only after separate Council action) CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Swaim called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA: There was none. CONSENT AGENDA: CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS_: Swaim stated that consent agenda items are looked at to see if there are any questions or discussion. She said that if the information presented in the packet is sufficient, then the Commission can go ahead and vote. 829 Kirkwood — Landmark. MOTION: Baker moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at 829 Kirkwood Avenue, as presented in the application, with the following condition; choose color to blend in with the building with approval by staff. Litton seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 9-0 (Durham and Michaud absent). 727 Grant Street — Longfellow Historic District. MOTION: Litton moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at 727 Grant Street, as presented in the application. Clore seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 9-0 (Durham and Michaud absent). Michaud joined the meeting. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS: 429 Ronalds Street — Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation District. Miklo said this property is in the Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation District at the corner of Van Buren and Ronalds Streets. He said the property was built around the turn of the last century and has had some remodeling, including removal of the porch. Miklo said the Sanborn maps do confirm that the house had a full front porch, which is shown on the map as late as the HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION April 9, 2015 Page 2 of 6 1960s. He said it is believed that at the same time the porch was removed the house was sided with aluminum siding. Miklo said the applicant proposes to rebuild a fairly simple porch. Without a photograph of what the original porch looked like, staff feels this is a pretty good replacement. Miklo said it would have details similar to other porches in the neighborhood and fairly simple square columns with molding at the top and the bottom. He said the proposed pitch of the roof is similar to existing porches in the neighborhood, and the depth of eight feet is typical of porches in the neighborhood and similar to what is shown on the Sanborn maps. Miklo said room has been left for possible alterations in the columns. He said the applicant is looking at the appropriate spacing, given the load, so it is possible that the column spacing may change after further study. Miklo said the general concept of the porch as presented is what would be approved. He said staff recommends approval of the application. Wagner asked what material would be used for the decking. Miklo said it would be treated decking material, not tongue and groove. He said this is a conservation district, and cedar or other decking material that would be found on a back deck is allowed in a conservation district, provided it is closely spaced. MOTION: Baker moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at 429 Ronalds Street, as presented in the application, with the following condition; resolve the post spacing for review and approval by staff and chair. Ackerson seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 10-0 (Durham absent). Swaim welcomed Jessica Bristow, the new Historic Preservation Specialist, to the meeting. Miklo said the Jessica will be working part time to help review projects. She is trained as an architect and has studied art history so is well suited for the position. 725 South Summit Street — Summit Street Historic District. Miklo stated that this property is in the Summit Street Historic District and has been before the Commission in the past. He said the house was covered in asbestos siding until about ten years ago, when the siding was removed and replaced with cement or hardi-board siding. Miklo said the owners did a very good job of re-creating the historic siding details. Miklo said the proposal is to add a sunroom to the back of the house. He said it would have the appearance of a back porch and would also have a deck on the roof, and a door would be added where there is currently a window to provide access to that second floor deck. Miklo said there are a number of guidelines, detailed in the staff repbrt, that apply to additions and porches. He said staff finds that this meets the guidelines and has received information that this will be a fiberglass door that meets the guidelines. Miklo said staff recommends approval of the application without any conditions. MOTION: Michaud moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the project at 725 South Summit Street, as presented in the application. Baker seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 10-0 (Durham absent). REPORT ON CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY CHAIR AND STAFF: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION April 9, 2015 Page 3 of 6 Miklo said staff had provided a few photographs to show what was approved. Certificate of No Material Effect. 829 Kirkwood Ave. Miklo said staff and chair approved repair of soffits and trim. Wood material that matches the original design will be used. MINOR REVIEW - STAFF REVIEW. 1104 East Burlington. Miklo said this was a project on Burlington Street that is a University Neighborhood Partnership house. He said this building is being converted to single-family use, so the second floor kitchen in being converted to a bedroom with a casement window that will provide emergency egress. Miklo said it will have a partition to make it look like a double hung window. He said one of the basement windows is being replaced, as the other basement windows have already been replaced. Miklo said that was approved administratively. 620 Oakland Avenue. Miklo said this project involves radon mitigation. He said that on the back side of the house there will be a pump and a pipe that will be painted to complement or match the house that runs up the side of the house. Miklo said this is one of the items that staff is allowed to approve without review. 1113 East Collette Street. Miklo said the insurance company has told the owners of this house that they need some kind of railing for safety reasons on the concrete stairway. He said staff approved a simple, black metal pipe railing for this. 305 South Summit Street. Miklo said this is a non -historic property in the Summit Street Historic District. He said the house was built around 1960. Miklo said the proposal is to replace the existing wood windows with vinyl windows. He said that is an exception that is allowed for non -historic buildings, so staff approved that administratively. DISCUSSION OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLAN PRIORITIES AND ANNUAL WORK PROGRAM: Swaim stated that the subcommittee, chaired by Corcoran, has been handling this. Swaim said that Ackerson, Baker, Corcoran, Sandell, Alicia Trimble, and herself comprise the subcommittee. Corcoran reported to the Commission that the subcommittee has met a couple of times. She said that she and Trimble have taken on the task of reviewing the survey forms. Corcoran said HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION April 9, 2015 Page 4 of 6 that Trimble raised the possibility of finding some University student/interns who might want to get some experience to look at this. Corcoran said they also questioned why this information isn't digitized and talked about getting some kind of grant for that. Corcoran said that she and Trimble reviewed the survey forms in several sessions, and the subcommittee looked at about 25 of these and weighed in on rating whether or not a particular property had the potential to qualify for landmark status. Corcoran said that after that meeting, she and Trimble met again a few more times to look over the information and came up with about 28 more properties to be reviewed. Corcoran proposed that the subcommittee meet again and go over those properties. She said she felt the productivity of the full Committee would be enhanced if the subcommittee reviewed these additional properties. Corcoran said photographs could be prepared, and then the subcommittee could compose and finalize a list for presentation to the full Commission for the next Commission meeting in May. The other members of the subcommittee agreed to meet again. The consensus of the Commission was to postpone action until the subcommittee's report at the next meeting. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR MARCH 12,2015: MOTION: Ackerson moved to approve the minutes of the March 12, 2015 Historic Preservation Commission meeting, as written. Baker seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 10-0 (Durham absent). HISTORIC PRESERVATION INFORMATION: Iowa Preservation Summit. Miklo said the Iowa Preservation Summit is scheduled for June in Winterset. He said it is a gathering of preservation commissions' staff, developers, and property owners on a State-wide basis. Miklo said there is a lot of educational material. Miklo said that Bristow will be attending, and the City would pay travel expenses, lodging, registration, and a small per diem for meals for one or two Commission members to attend. Swaim said she had attended a couple of years ago and loved it. She said it was maybe the best conference she has ever attended. Swaim said there was a lot of nuts and bolts conversation about education and trading of ideas. Corcoran volunteered to attend the upcoming conference. Michaud said she just returned from a trip to Charleston, South Carolina and Savannah, Georgia. She said that Charleston is beautifully preserved, and their mayor has been totally dedicated to keeping historic structures, not just the mansions but other styles and modest properties as well. Michaud said that one reason they have had so much success is because of their wonderful visitors' center. She asked if Iowa City could have something like that and suggested the HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION April 9, 2015 Page 5 of 6 Unitarian Church as a location. Michaud asked if there are any ways to move ideas like this forward and if there was any response to the letter sent to the Unitarian Church. Swaim said that she and Corcoran met with the City Manager. She believes the City Manager was inviting the community, as the Commission encouraged, to send in ideas and comments on whether this is a worthy building to maintain to serve the community in different ways. She said the intent that the building can be reused seemed important to the City Manager as well as to the Commission, but people have to speak up and be involved. Swaim said she suggested that the building be used as a meeting and events place, such as for weddings, recitals, art exhibits, workshop space, etc. She said she does not think it will be hard to come up with ideas but will be difficult to come up with the force to make it happen and the finances. Corcoran said the City Manager had mentioned that there were other meeting places in Iowa City and there might not be a need for another, but she said this is a totally different type of site. She said she did not feel that this would be resolved right away. Michaud asked if the posting for the demolition permit has gone up. Miklo said it was posted, and they are required to post it for a certain number of days. Corcoran said one critical point in the Commission's letter was that the Commission did not want to see the City Council rewarding a developer by giving incentives for the property if the building is demolished. Swaim said the citizens really need to insert themselves into this conversation. Corcoran agreed and said that people will need to participate in the process. Swaim said that the letter the Commission composed was sent to the City Manager, the City Council, and the church. She said the church replied that it was looking forward to hearing any response from the City. Swaim said everyone has many ties to people in the community. She said people could get the word out there that this is a building worthy of saving and reusing. Michaud asked if anyone is associated with the Iowa City Community Foundation. She said they have fundraisers and have money at their disposal if they go through certain procedures or have a certain time frame. Michaud said she would re -contact them to see if there is any way to use that Foundation to retain the building. Miklo said Commission members were given survey forms from the Human Rights Commission. He asked Commission members to insert them in an envelope and for the last person to seal the envelope. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 6:04 p.m. Minutes submitted by Anne Schulte Z 0 N � Q O U U Z O w LU 0 >U Z r N Z N W W a U a 0 U) x x x x x 0 x x x x x x 0 x x X X x x x x X M N X X 0 X X 0 X X X X 0 N LLJ X X X X X X X X X 0 0 N X X X - X X X X X X W O M W � X W X X X X X x X x O O LU o x X X X x x x x x 0 0 x x x x x x x x x o x CD uj x 0 0 x x 0 x 0 x x 0 co N ui LU LU r X X X X X X X X O O O tp co LU X X X X X X X X X ui rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn rn W W N N N N N N N N N N N M M co M M M M M M M M ZQ ~ W W Z w Z Z Y 0 = Y Q a In OQC LU z x z w ZZ w Q O ~ Q w oC Z z ffii o a z= o z N Q V O co 3b(3) Minutes Human Rights Commission April 21, 2015 — 5:30 PM Helling Conference Room APPROVED Members Present: Orville Townsend Sr, Kim Hanrahan, Joe D. Coulter, Stella Hart, Paul Retish, Edie Pierce -Thomas, Harry Olmstead, Ali Ahmed, Shams Ghoneim. Others Present: Stan Laverman, Burns Weston, Joan Nashelsky. Staff Present: Stefanie Bowers. Recommendations to Council: No. Call to Order: Coulter called the meeting to order at 17:30. (Hart, Hanrahan, Ahmed not present). (Hart present: 17:33) Consideration of the Minutes from the March 17. 2015 & Anril 1.2015 Meetine Dates: Motion Olmstead, seconded by Townsend. Motion passed 7-0. (Not present Hanrahan, Ahmed). New Business Housing and Building Inspection Presentation Stan Laverman Senior Housing Inspector at the City discussed nuisance complaints and rental inspections of local units. The department conducts over 9000 inspections a year including housing choice voucher units. The department receives about 4000 nuisance complaints each year. The City's website has a complaint tracking page. Common complaints are tall grass and weeds and snow and ice. (Hanrahan present 17:35; Ahmed present 17:39) Vendor Request from United Action for Youth LGBTQ Summit (May 9) This is the first LGBTQ Summit United Action for Youth has sponsored. It is an all -day event open to youth and their parent and/or guardian. There is a roundtable discussion on bullying and HIV positive testing will be conducted on site. United Action for Youth does not have any other funding sources for this program. Motion Ghoneim, seconded by Pierce -Thomas to be a vendor at the event. Motion passed 9-0. Motion Townsend, seconded by Ahmed to provide funding in the amount of $125. Motion passed 8-0 (Hanrahan abstained conflict of interest -employed with United Action for Youth). Lifetime Achievement Award & Speaker Human Rights Breakfast 2015 The Commission chose to honor Heather Shank, former Human Rights Coordinator, with the Lifetime Achievement Award for 2015. Shank has done great things for human rights and has been an advocate on human rights. Commissioners will revisit at the May meeting whether to rename the Lifetime Achievement Award. At this meeting the Commission will also review past winners and also the current names of awards given to evaluate each for diversity based on race and ethnicity. Motion Ghoneim, seconded by Retish for Heather Shank to receive the Lifetime Achievement Award. Motion passed 8-1 (Ohnstead in the negative). Townsend will be the speaker for the 2015 Human Rights Breakfast which is scheduled to be held in October. Making Iowa City a Human Rights City Professor Burns Weston asked the Commission to be co-sponsors (with the University of Iowa Center for Human Rights) of making Iowa City a Human Rights City. This initiative asks local governments to be faithful to the provisions of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It involves the public sector, law enforcement, schools and governments. Ideally the Commission and the Center for Human Rights can work together to identify groups, organizations and individuals, that can either join or contribute to this initiative. This core group would then go forward with the initiative which includes submitting a resolution to the City Council. The use of the word "city" when other local governments might be asked to participate in this initiative may be problematic and should be replaced with a more regional term like "community". Motion by Olmstead, seconded by Ghoneim to partner with the University of Iowa Center for Human Rights on malting Iowa City a Human Rights Community. Motion passed 7-0. (Olmstead and Hanrahan abstained, both serve on the steering board for Making Iowa City a Human Rights Community). One Community One Book Joan Nashelsky spoke on the event and highlighted that this year might be the biggest to date. Author Bryan Stevenson will come to Iowa City to discuss his book Just Mercy: A Story of Justice and Redemption on October 4. Other sponsors of this annual event include The University of Iowa's Center for Diversity and Enrichment and the Iowa State Bar Association. Sponsorships help offset the costs to bring Stevenson to Iowa City and also for advertising the event. Motion by Olmstead, seconded Ghoniem to contribute $250 to One Community One Book. Motion passed 9-0. Establishing an Annual Disability Advocate Award Olmstead presented on creating an annual award that recognizes the contributions of a person with a disability who has actively advocated for themselves and others. The award would be given on a yearly basis at the Johnson County Americans with Disabilities Act Celebration held in July. The Commission decided that the award should be established but by a group other than them. The Commission could then be involved at some level that would be determined at a later date. Access 2 Independence and Uptown Bills were mentioned as being possible organizers of the award. Olmstead will contact Access 2 Independence to see if there is interest on its part to create an annual disability advocate award. Immigration Film Screening ofABRAZOS ABRAZOS is a documentary on how the United States immigration policies affect families. This request for sponsorship was received by the Commission within the guidelines set which is the second Tuesday of the month but because the screening date is 8 days from this Commission meeting date and the advertisements including flyers have already been distributed throughout the community and it is not clear whether any further funding is needed the Commission decided not to financially contribute but to offer support through spreading notice of the screening out to the community by email and word of mouth. Motion Pierce -Thomas, seconded by Retish to offer support of ABRAZOS through promotion with no financial commitment. Motion passed 6-3. (Ahmed, Olmstead, Ghoneim in the negative). 2 Changing Regular Meeting Start Time The Commission decided that because its monthly meetings tend to run long it would be best to start at 5:30 each month instead of 6:00. Motion Townsend, seconded by Olmstead to start the Human Rights Commission's regular meetings at 5:30 pm. Motion passed 9-0. Draft Funding Request Form Commissioners reviewed the latest draft funding form for sponsorship requests and added a provision that relates to protocol when events have been canceled. Retish requested for Commissioners to discuss funding of University of Iowa events at the next meeting. Motion by Hart, seconded by Hanrahan. Motion passed 8-1. (Olmstead in the negative). Commission Action Plan 2015 The educational outreach is when the Commission provides information to the community. This outreach offers a host of opportunities where the Commission can work with other groups like the Affordable Housing Coalition. Ghoneim will be presenting to the Coalition of Religious Communities in June. At this presentation she will discuss what the Commission does and the services it provides. Hanrahan passed out a survey/questionnaire that could be used at future Commission listening posts. The survey would provide a way to get feedback from community members. Hanrahan will forward the survey electronically to Bowers to send out to Commissioners for review. Job & Volunteer Fairs Retish reported that he and several other groups including the Shelter House are working on a Construction Job Fair to be held in late May. Retish also recently had a meeting with Systems Unlimited to assist them in an upcoming job fair. Youth Awards The Youth Awards will be held on the 13 of May. Olmstead will do the opening, Ghoneim will present the awards, Hanrahan will distribute the awards and Townsend will close the awards. Fair Housing Training This Commission sponsored training held on April 21 had full attendance and was well received by those in attendance. Education Subcommittee The Iowa City Community School District will be voting on its equity plan in the near future. The District will also have elections for the Board coming up later this year. Building Communities Community groups like the Black Voices Project are looking at ways it can assist in retaining more persons of color who move to work in Iowa City from other locations. Possible support can be offered in the way of events that orientate some of the services and programs provided in the community. Center for Human Rights There is a meeting coming up in a few weeks that both Olmstead and Ghoneim will attend. Reports of Commissioners Olmstead will be contacting the Old Brick to set up a time to try their new chair lift. Hart and Coulter both commented on the Community ID resolution that was recently passed by the Johnson County Board of Supervisors. Both Hart and Coulter believe it will benefit a lot of people in the community. Ahmed was present at the Board of Supervisor meeting when the resolution was passed. Pierce -Thomas recently received training on Safe Zones. A training on how to be a better advocate and ally for the LGBTQ community. Retish mentioned the St. Ambrose Disproportionate Minority Contact study and encouraged other Commissioners to read it. Ghoneim and Olmstead are a part of a new Gazette Newspaper Editorial Group. Adjournment: 19:59. Next Regular Meeting — May 19, 2015 at 5:30 pm. 4 COPY Community Partnering Survey Every individual has thoughts, ideas and experiences that can contribute to a better Iowa City, a city that responds to the needs of its citizens. This Community Partnering Survey is an attempt to identify concerns, challenges and thoughts people have about living in Iowa City and how Iowa City is governed and policed. This is also an attempt to understand the perceptions people have of this community and how to create opportunities for greater citizen involvement. Do you have any personal experiences with being involved in your local government? Do you have any personal experiences with the police? Positive/Negative? Do you feel that you have EASY access to City Services? Do you feel that you have opportunities for your voice to be heard by local officials? Z Al COPY Do you have ideas or thoughts about living in Iowa City that you would like to share with city officials?? Please give details. What do you think the community perception is of our local government or police? Please give details. Have you ever been a volunteer in a community-based organization? (eg, Neighborhood Watch, sports groups, charitable organizations, church groups, scouts)? Please give details. Have you ever contributed to your community or your neighborhood in an informal way (eg, building a community playground, Clean Up America Day)? Please give details. COPY Are there any community projects you'd like to become involved in? Do you have any ideas for community-based projects for Iowa City? Please give details. _ Your ideas are invaluable. Please provide any comments. Thank you for helping us by completing this Community Partnership Survey. We would like to keep you up-to-date with opportunities for community involvement. Particularly by inviting you to community forums that may interest you. Please complete this section if you would like us to keep in contact with you. (This information will only be used for the Community Partnering project). ��el" Name: Address: Phone: Human Rights Commission ATTENDANCE RECORD YEAR 2014/2015 (Meetino Date) NAME TERM EXP. 6/17/ 14 7/15/ 14 8/19/ 14 9/16/ 14 10/2/ 14 10/21/ 14 11/18/ 14 12/15/ 14 1/20/ 15 2/17/ 15 3/17/ 15 4/i/ 15 4/21 15 Edie Pierce- Thomas 1/1/2016 - - - - - - - - X O/E X X X Joe D. Coulter 1/1/2016 X O/E X X X X X X X X X X X Harry Olmstead 1/1/2016 X X X X X X X X X X O/E X X Paul Retish 1/1/2017 X O/E X O/E X O/E O/E X X X X X X Ali Ahmed 1/1/2017 X X X O/E X X X X O X O/E X X Orville Townsend, Sr. 1/1/2017 X X X X X X X X X X X X X Kim Hanrahan 1/1/2018 O/E X X X X X X X X X X X X Shams Ghoneim 1/1/2018 X X X X X X X X O/E X O/E X X Stella Hart 1/1/2018 X X X O/E X X X X X X X X X KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused NM = No meeting — = No longer a member R = Resignation 3b(4) MINUTES FINAL PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION APRIL 8, 2015 ROBERT A. LEE COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER — MEETING ROOM B Members Present: Suzanne Bender, Larry Brown, Clay Claussen, Cara Hamann, Katie Jones, Lucie Laurian, Joe Younker Members Absent: David Bourgeois, Maggie Elliott Staff Present: Mike Moran, Zac Hall Others Present: Stefanie Bowers, Karin Franklin, Shannon Greene, Del Holland, Elizabeth Kahler, Jennifer Selby, Karla Tonella CALL TO ORDER Chairman Claussen called the meeting to order at 5 p.m. RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (to become effective only after separate Council action): None OTHER FORMAL ACTION: Del Holland, member of the audience and of the Iowa City Cohousing group, asked to change the text in the final paragraph on Page 2 of the February 2015 minutes. He asked that the word "therefore" be changed to "subsequently and for unrelated reasons" in the sentence that currently reads "Therefore, the group has revised their plan. Moved by Younker, seconded by Bender to amend the minutes as reauested by Del Holland. Motion passed 7-0 Bourgeois and Elliott absent). PUBLIC DISCUSSION: Karla Tonella and Elizabeth Kahler were present from the public to talk about their concerns regarding the maintenance of Thornberry Off -Leash Dog Park. Tonella expressed that she does not approve of fees increasing but services decreasing, stating that the area is in need of reseeding. She further stated the sandy areas are taking over the grounds and that the pond is in bad shape. She asked if the pond is tested and if the results are posted. Moran noted that it is tested and that results are posted on a clipboard at the entrance to the pond. Tonella said that she has not seen the postings. She also discussed her concerns about snow removal being done poorly thereby making it necessary to park users to shovel themselves for safer walking paths. Tonella expressed her disapproval of David Bourgeois as a staff member for the dog park. Claussen suggested that she set up a meeting with staff to discuss her concerns. Kahler then spoke stating that she has been using the park since September 2014. She said that while it is a terrific park, that it needs to be maintained to stay that way. She also reiterated that it is in need of reseeding and that the sandy area is spreading. She said that she has attempted to set up a meeting with the parks superintendent but has not received a response to date. Hall was present at tonight's meeting and told Tonella and Kahler that he would set up a meeting with them. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION April 8, 2015 Page 2 of 6 BLUE ZONES DISCUSSION: Shannon Greene, Community Program Manager, is working to take Iowa City from a Blue Zones demonstration site to an official registered Blue Zones Community. Iowa City was one of ten communities selected as a Blue Zone demonstration site. To become a Blue Zones Community there are set goals that need to be achieved in the following six sectors: • 20% of citizens sign the Blue Zones Personal Pledge and complete one action • 25% of public schools become Blue Zone Schools • 50% of the top 20 employers become a Blue Zone Worksites • 25% of independently or locally owned restaurants become a Blue Zone Restaurants • 25% of grocery stores become a Blue Zone Grocery Stores • Completion of the Blue Zones Community Policy Pledge Iowa City has to achieve 17 points to become a Blue Zones Community, although beyond 17 points is even better. The Blue Zones Representatives present tonight brought to the Commission two policies for the Commissions review. Jennifer Selby presented Commission with a draft neighborhood gardens policy. Selby is working to create this program that allows a person and their neighbors to choose a piece of City property to place a neighborhood garden. The idea is that the City would till up the area and then plow it over at the end of the season; however, the neighborhood would be responsible for all of the maintenance throughout the season. Moved by Younker, approved by Brown to approve the Neighborhood Garden Policy as written in an effort to take another step towards making Iowa City a Blue Zones Community. Passed 7-0 (Bourgeois and Elliott absent). Karin Franklin with Blue Zones then presented a draft resolution to the Commission that states that it be a practice in Iowa City to provide free drinking water access in public parks. The resolution states that when a new public park space is established within the city, water lines are extended and water fountains be provided if potable municipal water lines are within 300' of the space. In the case of existing parks, public water fountains will be provided at a ratio of 1 fountain per 10 acres or less. For the parks that are larger than 20 acres, public water fountains will be provided at each major entrance into the park. When implementing this policy in existing parks, this shall be done through an annual allocation of funds in the City's 5 -year capital improvement plan. Moved by Laurian, seconded by Bentler, to accept the resolution stating that water fountains will be provided in public parks of Iowa City where feasible as written. Passed 7-0 Bourgeois and Elliott absent. INCREASING DIVERSITY ON CITY BOARDS & COMMISSIONS PRESENTATION: Stefanie Bowers, the Iowa City Human Rights/Civil Rights Coordinator, was present to discuss ways to increase diversity on boards and commissions within the city. She noted that in 2012 the City Council established the Ad -Hoc Diversity Committee to review issues relating to diversity within the City organization. This group "concluded that the City could improve its services, programs and operations as they relate to minority populations and developed a set of recommendations for the Council to consider." This group concluded that there is a lack of diversity within the boards and commissions. The City Council is in support of developing action plans to increase representation on boards and commissions, particularly persons of color. Bowers stated that it is important that boards and commissions represent everyone in the community. She said that there are many people in the community who are not informed PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION April 8, 2015 Page 3 of 6 of vacancies who are qualified to participate. She discussed plans for better communication of board vacancies. City staff is currently reviewing the applications that are used for board and commission positions in hopes to make a uniform application. The current application asks for occupation and place of employment. This is a question that has been determined not to play a role in a person's activity on a board. She noted that if a conflict of interest is a concern, it will be revealed in other questions throughout the application. While boards/commissions are discussing ways to advertise their vacancies she said to keep in mind that these ads need to include items such as the residency requirements along with the time and place of meetings. It is also important to let applicants know of the gender balance requirement. Bowers noted that some venues available for advertising vacancies include the library, city buses, Recreation Center, City Hall, Housing Authority, Senior Center, social media and news releases. She suggested that the Parks and Recreation vacancies be advertised in the departments activity guide. She also suggested that boards and commissions reach out to cultural institutions, places of worship, community events/fairs that they belong to. She noted in these discussions it is important to let others know why you joined, what your experiences have been and to share the benefits of being a member. City staff and boards/commissions will be required to present an annual equity/diversity report. The Parks and Recreation Commission will want to report what steps they are taking to encourage a more diverse board. RECREATION DIVISION REPORT Affiliate Update: Moran reported in Dyson's absence. Dyson and staff support the formation of a youth sports council advisory board. This council would assist with the formulation of a cost recovery plan. Dyson plans on creating this group in June or July. The sports council will present a final draft version of cost recovery plans to the Commission in September or October. The group will also discuss issues that include transportation challenges, low income/sponsorships for youth sports, grant applications, volunteers and more. PARKS DIVISION REPORT Garden Plots: Registration for community garden plots began on Monday, April 6. The City offers 110 plots at Wetherby Park and 36 at the new Chadek Green Park. All of the plots at Chadek Green Park have been leased. There are currently about one-third of the plots still available at Wetherby Park. Parks Equipment: The Parks Department is in the process of placing new trash receptacles in parks. The goal is to eventually replace all of the aluminum cans and the wooden crates that they sit in. These particular receptacles will not allow public to put in whole bags of trash. Hall noted that staff has already found trash bags of garbage left outside of the new containers. Bender asked if staff will be adding more recycling containers. Hall said that it is in the current CIP and as of July 1 he will have the authority to start purchasing them. Park Shelters: Park shelters were opened for rentals this week. Staff has been in the process of turning on the water at these facilities. Black Hawk Mini Park: Hall announced that the Iowa City Public Art Advisory Committee selected London's Cecil Balmond to create a pedestrian mall signature art piece. Trail Clean -Up: Hall noted that there are a number of clean-up activities scheduled in April which include Kiwanis Park along the creek, Ralston Creek behind the Recreation Center, and other activities surrounding Earth Day on April 22. Brown noted that staff may want to take a look at the bike path by the old water treatment plant. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION April 8, 2015 Page 4 of 6 DIRECTORS REPORT: Riverfront Crossings: Moran had hoped to have a design plan for Commission's review tonight; however, he did not receive in time for this meeting. He noted that the bids for the demolition came in lower than expected but the mercury abatement will cost more than expected. Once that process is going the next step is to remediate wetlands and do creek restoration. Once all of that is complete, then they can start focusing on the park. Moran will recommend phasing of this project similar to what was done for the TTRA project. Friends of Hickory Hill: Jace Werderitch, Eagle Scout, is creating a bridge design as his project. This will be in the northern portion of Hickory Hill Park. He hopes to have this complete in June. Moran has met with the Friends group to discuss the RFP process for other park updates. Neighborhood Park Updates: • Chadek Green Park Meeting: Moran announced that 65 people attended the Chadek Green Park meeting. They gave many good ideas which have been recorded. Staff will discuss the items on the list and determine which are feasible. Moran expects that there will be requests for more garden plots and will consider this for next year. There are still plots available at Wetherby Park • Reno Street: Moran will meet with the Reno Street Neighborhood on Monday at 6:30 p.m. at Horace Mann Elementary. There is a new shelter in the park and staff has moved some equipment to the front of the park. • Highland Park: Tom McInerny is leading this project. McInerny was the architect that did the work for the Ashton House and is also lives in this neighborhood. The shelter for this park is ready to be installed. • Hickory Trail Park: The shelter is ready to install. Still have some shades for the playground equipment coming. • Tower Court: The spray pad has been ordered and staff will be placing the order for the playground soon. Staff will be going to the Oaknoll Foundation to request the possible funding of some senior exercise equipment for the park. Park Si rgns: Four more signs will go up soon. These include signs for Chadek Green, Tower Court, Creekside and Willow Creek Parks. CHAIRS REPORT: Claussen asked if there will be a park adjacent to the South Sycamore Elementary School that will be opening this fall. Moran said that this is property owned by the school so will be up to them. He further noted that the Parks and Recreation Department will have a 28E use agreement with the school. Claussen noted that his daughter is the commissioner of the Iowa City Girls Softball T -Ball League. She said that numbers are down considerably (40 less than last year). She said that they lost 30 kids when Regina pulled out. He feels that the league will need some assistance in finding ways to increase the numbers and in cost recovery. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION April 8, 2015 Page 5 of 6 COMMISSION TIME/SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Laurian asked if the City would create a pedestrian master plan similar to the trails master plan. Moran said that this is something that would be up to MPO staff. Laurian has assigned a project to her students to create a preliminary design for Chadek Green Park. She asked if Moran could send her the list of ideas gathered at the neighborhood meeting. She also noted she has a group of students doing the same for City Park. Laurian addressed her concern about the lack of participation of the Parks and Recreation Commission in the planning of the construction of The Chauncey and the affects this will have on Chauncey Swan Park. She has been researching policies that other cities have in regard to shadowing. She found that there are some policies with restrictions such as no shadow between 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. Others have policies that state if a building is slated to be over six stories high, there must be a detailed shade study done. She encourages the Commission to consider writing such a policy and offered to put together a draft. Claussen noted that there just isn't much information available to them to work from. Moran said he will find out where things stand. He may ask for City staff to schedule another presentation with the Commission. Bentler suggested that perhaps the Commission and staff think about assessing a fee for the loss of the park for two years. Younker agreed with Moran that another presentation may be necessary. Laurian hopes that there is still time for the Commission to have some input. Claussen also noted that Commission will want to keep in mind the affects this construction will have on the farmers market. ADJOURNMENT: Moved by Hamann, seconded by Younker to adiourn the meetine at 6:45 p.m. Motion passed 7-0 (Boureeois & Elliott absent). PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION April 8, 2015 Page 6 of 6 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD NAME v ,� v er le ? kn ,n TERM N EXPIRE t� en kn oo °` '" C4 e4 le S Suzanne 1/1/17 X O/E X X X X X X X X X X X Bender David 1/1/15 X X X X X X X X X X X O/E O/E Bourgeois Larry Brown 1/1/18 X O/E X X X X X X X X O/E X X Clay 1/1/18 X X X X X X X X X X X X X Claussen Maggie 1/1/17 X O/E X X O/E X X X O/E X X X O/E Elliott Cara 1/1/16 X X X X X X X X X O/E X X X Hamann Katie Jones 1/1/18 X X X X X X X X X O/E X X X Lucie 1/1/15 X X X X O/E X O/E X X X X X X Laurian Joe Younker 1/1/16 O/E X X X O/E X X X X X X X X KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused NM = No meeting LQ = No meeting due to lack of quorum * = Not a member at this time 3b(5) Approved Minutes March 19, 2015 MINUTES SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION March 19, 2015 ROOM 202, IOWA CITY/JOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR CENTER Members Present: Jay Honohan, Chuck Felling, Kathy Mitchell, Margaret Reese, Jack Hobbs Members Absent: Mark Holbrook, Cheryl Clamon Staff Present: Linda Kopping, Kristin Kromray, Michelle Buhman Others Present: RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: None. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Honohan at 4:00 PM. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 19. 2015 MEETING: Hobbs noted that commissioner Clamon need to be added to the attendance record. Felling noted word change on page two (flesh to flush). Reese noted a grammar correction on page 4. Motion: To accept the minutes from the February 19, 2015 meeting as amended. Motion carried on a vote of 5/0. Reese/Hobbs. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. COMMISSION ASSIGNMENTS: Honohan will attend the next City Council meeting. Kopping will attend an upcoming board of supervisor meeting. Approved Minutes March 19, 2015 STEERING COUNCIL REPORT: The minutes from the previous meeting were distributed. Honohan noted that the Newcomers Breakfast was well attended and a nice event. Motion: To accept minutes of the Steering Council. Motion carried 5/0. Reese/Hobbs. NEW HORIZONS BAND UPDATE: Honohan reported that the Friends of the New Horizons Band hired a lawyer Assistant City Attorney, Eric Goers has contacted their lawyer and they are currently in negotiations. DISCUSSION OF RESPONSE TO AD HOC COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS: Kopping noted that there are recommendations throughout the Ad Hoc Committee report, which was included in the commission packet. Kopping distributed a preliminary plan of action outlining all of these recommendations. Kopping reviewed this document. She stated that she would like to form a committee (named Committee A) to discuss certain recommendations including current fee structure for members and the facility, changes to the current programing schedule to improve rentals and the kitchen space. Although she is not sure yet how large Committee A should be she would like representation from the commission as well as people from the steering council working committees and participants. Honohan noted that the recommendation that the city council most interested in was funding sources outside of the City of Iowa City's contribution. He thinks this is the most important recommendation in the Ad Hoc Committee report. Kopping agreed and indicated that that would be the primary focus of the plan of action. Kopping asked for commissioners to review the plan of action and let her know if they had any ideas or recommendations about how to move forward with Committee A. Kopping noted that commissioner Holbrook has expressed interest in being on Committee A and asked if any other commissioners would like to volunteer. Honohan, Felling, and Hobbs expressed interest. She reported that she has moved forward with a contract with Linda Wastyn, who will be working on a strategic plan for fundraising. Kopping is working with the city attorney's office to finalize this contract. K Approved Minutes March 19, 2015 OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW: Kopping asked if the next commission meeting could be moved to a different date. April 9th at 4pm was agreed upon. Kopping noted that it is time to start developing the Senior Center's five year goals and objectives. She is looking for a facilitator for this process and asked if anyone knows of someone who is good at this to please let her know. Kopping noted that she received the FY15 check from the Friends of the Center endowment that is held in the Community Foundation of Johnson County and that it increased 11 % over the last year to $34,250.31. The commission reviewed the additional staff reports that had been distributed Buhman reported that the Images of Aging film that was produced by SCTV, (based on interviews of Senior Center members photographed by Peter Feldstein), has been accepted into the Cedar Rapids independent film festival. The festival will occur April 17-18. Buhman and Emily Light are working to try and have some of the photographs hung at the festival as well. Motion to receive distributed staff reports. Motion carried on a vote of 5/0. Mitchell/Reece COMMISSION DISCUSSION: None. ADJOURNMENT: Motion: To Adjourn. Motion carried on a vote of 5/0. Mitchell/Hobbs LO 0 N r L L ca 2 El LO LLI a� X X X X X 0 M \ X X 1 X X X X X N LO M X X X X X N X X X X X X N co N ' Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 040 X X X X X X X M i X X X X X X X r ti i X X X X X X X ti 0 W i X X X X X X co 0 i X X X X X X X LO N X X X X X X X M N _ 00 to It Cfl 00 CO LO In x W N N N N N E N N N H a) c o Y E c O p = = N N c0 C L C) U cco c U- o O ca N m E a� Y t 0 cu Z U U cu m Y � N N x c W +p N 4)c cN 4 E 2-0.0 O O dQQZZ II II nllwgu XOOz; (D Y