HomeMy WebLinkAboutICPD Traffic Stop ReportICPD TRAFFIC STOP
ANALYSIS
ICPD STOP MAP
ral Ridge Mall®, ;
� Waterworks Prairie Park
1 Osh Sy O
Zw:e: 1 Zoos: 2 Z.One: 3 Zone: 4 Zp z S Zptt: 6 4• Zptl: 7 Z.: S
OL
Cbralville sms: � Rd ¢�
6S&.
os PN
S n 7th �*a"� s
_ 6"' y
• IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIY """
IZIW srh sr A _ Hickory Hill Park
If
�N \•� ZSe
A �.rh. �.s
Zonex 9 Zones 10 Zane:11s Zanex 12 ark Rd Zane: 14 Zonex 13 v ZoltE:'f6 "
\.. v ��
s ersity of Iowa. .... SrT:ef5f aoc W
\al $
Universityof Iowa;' Iowa City 6 a
Hospitals'and N'nics ` H
SW 27 r06 — t j O E "St Z� F. rOWT Sr .�
:17 zone: l8 Zooe:1 University :20 ZQy)e:$ zone: 22 �sl+p is 23 zone: 24
o Heights r^ 6 A/
- ✓WBenton St
'Kirkwood Ave A � C
a
m B s H
218 KN k v_� d :i --)"
Zane7'27 Zonex ffi 4 t Zane: 29 Zane: 30 Zane: 3'1 *r Zone: 32
bwa City Muni o rn
B � t
� toarhon Trekd��g4.
27 10
Zn: 34 Zr. 3 -' - eaZn: 33 40 Ht
Terry Trueblood
a e Recreation Area
> 6
�... ..
Sycamore t - -�
Li
Zone: 41 Za`tl:!! vast SW Zane: 43 : M 45 s 46 .. Zone: 47 0309r2brid: 48
C ,
z � 5
m o
n y`
:E
Zr ' 49 zml�- 50 Zrm 51 52 , Zee Z.- as Zr - 36
THE NUMBER OF STOPS BY
ZONE
45.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
Percents For Department N =12850
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 57 60 64
ral Ridge Mall®, ;
� Waterworks Prairie Park
1 Osh Sy O
Zw:e: 1 Zoos: 2 Z.One: 3 Zone: 4 Zp z S Zptt: 6 4• Zptl: 7 Z.: S
OL
Cbralville sms: � Rd ¢�
6S&.
os PN
S n 7th �*a"� s
_ 6"' y
• IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIY """
IZIW srh sr A _ Hickory Hill Park
If
�N \•� ZSe
A �.rh. �.s
Zonex 9 Zones 10 Zane:11s Zanex 12 ark Rd Zane: 14 Zonex 13 v ZoltE:'f6 "
\.. v ��
s ersity of Iowa. .... SrT:ef5f aoc W
\al $
Universityof Iowa;' Iowa City 6 a
Hospitals'and N'nics ` H
SW 27 r06 — t j O E "St Z� F. rOWT Sr .�
:17 zone: l8 Zooe:1 University :20 ZQy)e:$ zone: 22 �sl+p is 23 zone: 24
o Heights r^ 6 A/
- ✓WBenton St
'Kirkwood Ave A � C
a
m B s H
218 KN k v_� d :i --)"
Zane7'27 Zonex ffi 4 t Zane: 29 Zane: 30 Zane: 3'1 *r Zone: 32
bwa City Muni o rn
B � t
� toarhon Trekd��g4.
27 10
Zn: 34 Zr. 3 -' - eaZn: 33 40 Ht
Terry Trueblood
a e Recreation Area
> 6
�... ..
Sycamore t - -�
Li
Zone: 41 Za`tl:!! vast SW Zane: 43 : M 45 s 46 .. Zone: 47 0309r2brid: 48
C ,
z � 5
m o
n y`
:E
Zr ' 49 zml�- 50 Zrm 51 52 , Zee Z.- as Zr - 36
45.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
Percents Days N = 3650
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 57 60 64
45.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
Percents Nights N = 9200
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 57 60 64
TRAFFIC OBSERVATIONS
o. 2015 traffic observations = 27,032
o. 2007-2012 traffic observations = 28,951
► Total traffic observations = 55,983
TRAFFIC OBSERVATIONS 2007-2015
o. Zone 21 traffic observations = 11,880
► Zone 29 traffic observations = 8,114
► Other zones traffic observations = 7,038
► Spread over zones 27, 28, 30 and 38
► Observations made from 9/01/15 through 2/28/16
2015 OBSERVATIONS WE FOCUSED ON
ZONES WHERE MOST STOPS WERE MADE
Previous traffic stop observations and 2010 Census
Bureau data suggest that about 10% of the drivers on
the roads in most areas of Iowa City are minority°°°��
drivers—both days and nights.
► Percentage white
► Percentage African-American
► Percentage Hispanic/other
► Percentage Asian
► Percentage minority (total)
89.0070
04.0070
03.0070
04.0070
07.0070
ZONE 21 DAYS (DOWNTOWN AREA)
► Percentage white
► Percentage African-American
► Percentage Hispanic/other
► Percentage Asian
► Percentage minority (total)
74.00%
16.00%
02.00%
08.00%
18.00%
ZONE 21 NIGHTS (DOWNTOWN AREA)
► Percentage white
► Percentage African-American
► Percentage Hispanic/other
► Percentage Asian
► Percentage minority (total)
73.00%
23.00%
02.00%
02.00%
25.00%
ZONE 29 DAYS (BROADWAY AREA)
► Percentage white
► Percentage African-American
► Percentage Hispanic/other
► Percentage Asian
► Percentage minority (total)
68.00%
31.00%
01.00%
< 01.00%
32.00%
ZONE 29 NIGHTS (BROADWAY AREA)
► Percentage white
► Percentage African-American
► Percentage Hispanic/other
► Percentage Asian
► Percentage minority (total)
ZONE 30 DAYS & NIGHTS
78.00%
15.00%
02.00%
< 05.00%
17.00%
► Percentage white
► Percentage African-American
► Percentage Hispanic/other
► Percentage Asian
► Percentage minority (total)
ZONE 28 DAYS & NIGHTS
86.00%
13.00%
< 01.00%
< 01.00%
14.00%
Please keep in mind that roadside
observations are simply a sample of the
drivers on the roads. As such, the values
indicated in the results should be treated as
estimates with a fai
interval
generous confidence
DAYS
45.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
Percents Days N = 3650
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 57 60 64
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
nr or min
ppea--
13 20 29
21 22
27
28
percent
minority stopped
days
benchmark
► The highest degrees of disproportionality is concentrated in
areas where the fewest stops were made
► A disparity index shows that the average degree of
disproportionality across all areas of town was approximately five
percentage points higher than the corresponding benchmark
values.
► The index gives a ballpark estimate of disproportionality.
AVERAGE DISPARITY ACROSS ZONES
Zone 27 Days
Zone 27 Days
race Freq. Percent Cum.
Asian/Pacific Islander
16
7.02
7.02
Black/African American
39
17.11
24.12
Caucasian
164
71.93
96.05
Latino/Hispanic
3
1.32
97.37
Other
5
2.19
99.56
Unk
1
0.44
100.00
Total 228 100.00
Zone 28 Days
Zone 28 days
race Freq. Percent Cum.
Asian/Pacific Islander
12
4.29
4.29
Black/African American
60
21.43
25.71
Caucasian
189
67.50
93.21
Latino/Hispanic
10
3.57
96.79
Other
5
1.79
98.57
Unk
4
1.43
100.00
Total 280 100.00
Zone 30 Days
Zone 30 Days
race Freq. Percent Cum.
Asian/Pacific Islander
7
2.69
2.69
Black/African American
66
25.38
28.08
Caucasian
164
63.08
91.15
Latino/Hispanic
17
6.54
97.69
Native American/Indian
2
0.77
98.46
Other
3
1.15
99.62
Unk
1
0.38
100.00
Total 260 100.00
NIGHTS
45.00%
35.00%
30.00%
25.00%
20.00%
15.00%
10.00%
5.00%
Percents Nights N = 9200
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 57 60 64
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
Percent of Minority Drivers Stopped -- Nights
13 20 21
22 27
percent minority stoppednights benchmark
K.]
KIS:
► The highest degrees of disproportionality is concentrated in
areas where the fewest stops were made
► A disparity index shows that the average degree of
disproportionality across all areas of town was approximately five
percentage points higher than the corresponding benchmark
values.
► The index gives a ballpark estimate of disproportionality.
AVERAGE DISPARITY ACROSS ZONES
Zone 20 Nights
Zone 20 Nights
race Freq. Percent Cum.
Asian/Pacific Islander
56
11.43
11.43
Black/African American
90
18.37
29.80
Caucasian
302
61.63
91.43
Latino/Hispanic
28
5.71
97.14
Other
8
1.63
98.78
Unk
6
1.22
100.00
Total 490 100.00
Zone 27 Nights
Zone 27 Nights
race Freq. Percent Cum.
Asian/Pacific Islander
14
6.73
6.73
Black/African American
46
22.12
28.85
Caucasian
129
62.02
90.87
Latino/Hispanic
3
1.44
92.31
Native American/Indian
1
0.48
92.79
Other
10
4.81
97.60
Unk
5
2.40
100.00
Total 208 100.00
Zone 28 Nights
Zone 28 Nights
race Freq. Percent Cum.
Asian/Pacific Islander
61
10.30
10.30
Black/African American
105
17.74
28.04
Caucasian
360
60.81
88.85
Latino/Hispanic
36
6.08
94.93
Other
19
3.21
98.14
Unk
11
1.86
100.00
Total 592 100.00
Zone 30 Nights
Zone 30 Nights
race Freq. Percent Cum.
Asian/Pacific Islander
20
5.08
5.08
Black/African American
92
23.35
28.43
Caucasian
250
63.45
91.88
Latino/Hispanic
26
6.60
98.48
Native American/Indian
1
0.25
98.73
Other
2
0.51
99.24
Unk
3
0.76
100.00
Total 394 100.00
OFFICER LEVEL ANALYSIS
(% Minority / Min. Benchmark) : (% W&A / W&A Benchmark)
Kol
Disparity Index
1
Em
OUTCOMES
Minority-yes/Minority-no) : (White-yes/White-no)
► Values > 1 suggest disproportionality
ODDS -RATIOS
OR = 0.73
no yes Total
minority 545 29340 29885
white 19437 89400 99837
Total 19982 109740 129722
WARNINGS
OR = 1.28
no yes Total
minority
29371
514
29885
white
89420
19417
99837
Total
109791
19931
129722
CITATIONS
OR = 1.97
no yes Total
minority 29612 273 29885
white 99342 495 99837
Total
ARRESTS
119954 768 129722
OR = 1.99
no yes Total
minority
29688
197
29885
white
99488
349
99837
Total 129176 546 129722
SEARCH REQUESTS
citations
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
arrests
2005 2006 2007 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
2005
2006
2007
search requests
2010
2011 2012 2013
2014 2015
hit rates
a
2015
Results suggest a degree of racial disproportionality in traffic stops conducted
by the ICPD. A ballpark estimate of the level of disproportionality indicates
that minority drivers were stopped on average about five percentage points
higher than the observation benchmark values.
Comparatively little traffic stop disproportionality was found in areas of town
where the lion's share of traffic stops were made. Most disproportionality
occurred in areas where stops were less frequent.
Individual officer analyses show that two officers' disparity index values were
considerably higher than other officers' values.
SUMMARY
➢ Disproportionality in most stop outcomes decreased in recent years. The single
exception was citations, where disproportionality increased. It should be noted
however, that odds -ratio values for citations were comparatively modest.
➢ In recent years, officers were about twice as likely to arrest a minority driver as
others during a stop
➢ In recent years, officers were about twice as likely to request a voluntary search
from a minority driver as from other drivers. This occurred even though seizures
or hit rates resulting from voluntary searches were about the same for minority
and non -minority drivers.
► Overall, results suggest that the levels of disproportionality in stops and outcomes
is trending lower.
SUMMARY