Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-06-30 Info PacketCITY COUNCIL INFORMATION PACKET CITY OF IOWA CITY www.icgov.org June 30, 2016 IP1 Council Tentative Meeting Schedule JULY 5 WORK SESSION IP2 Work Session Agenda IP3 Memo from NDS Dir. and Development Services Coordinator: Expanded use of the Form - based code in selected neighborhoods IP4 Memo from City Clerk: Joint Meeting Agenda Items for July 18 IP5 Pending City Council Work Session Topics MISCELLANEOUS IP6 Article from Acting City Manager: The missing middle response to urban housing demand I137 Civil Services Entrance Examination: Treatment Plant Operator — Water I138 Public Notice from IDOT Interstate 80 corridor study 91.5 miles west of Herbert Hoover Highway to east of West Branch at Charles Avenue) IP9 Copy of press release: Fire Station 2 to welcome University Heights with open house IP10 Copy of press release: Dubuque Street Construction: drivers should consider alternate route into Iowa City for Jazz Festival i r City Council Tentative Meeting Schedule SP1 ^� Subject to change June 30, 2016 O CITYCITY OF IOWA CITY Date Time Meeting Location Tuesday, July 5, 2016 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Monday, July 18, 2016 4:00 PM Reception Coralville City Hall 4:30 PM Joint Entities Meeting Tuesday, July 19, 2016 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, August 2, 2016 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, August 16, 2016 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, September 6, 2016 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, September 20, 2016 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, October 18, 2016 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, November 1, 2016 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, November 15, 2016 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, December 6, 2016 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting Tuesday, December 20, 2016 5:00 PM Work Session Emma J. Harvat Hall 7:00 PM Formal Meeting � r q 7q CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org City Council Work Session Agenda Tuesday, July 5, 2016 Emma J. Harvat Hall - City Hall 5:00 PM • Questions from Council re Agenda Items • Evaluate the implementation of a Form Based Code in one or two parts of the community [IP # 3 Info Packet of 6/30] • Review Council Member Cole proposal for Rose Oaks assistance • Joint Meeting agenda items [IP # 4 Info Packet of 6/30] • Information Packet Discussion [June 23, 30] • Council Time • Meeting Schedule • Pending Work Session Topics [IP #5 Info Packet of 6/30] • Upcoming Community Events/Council Invitations r ®, CITY OF IOWA CITY IP3 '�- MEMORANDUM Date: June 29, 2016 To: Geoff Fruin, City Man From: Douglas Boothroy, Directo pa en John Yapp, Development Se ices Coc Re: Expanded use of the Form -based code iborflood & Development Services 7 selected neighborhoods The purpose of this memo is to provide information for the expanded use of the Form -based code (FBC) methodology in specific Iowa City neighborhoods. The neighborhoods suggested for the expanded FBC approach are: South district, University Impact areas, Downtown, and the Northside Marketplace area. In addition, consideration should be given to hiring a FBC consultant and establishing work program priorities. As an initial step, it's recommended that the City hire a FBC consultant to conduct a FBC pilot project to include a feasibility assessment and an initial concept plan for a "Missing Middle Housing Neighborhood" in the South District. The Missing Middle is a term used to define the type of housing in between single family dwellings and large multi -family buildings that are now rare in new neighborhoods such as duplexes, triplexes, and townhouses of a compatible scale with single family properties. BACKGROUND: Form -based Code definition FBC is an innovative alternative to conventional zoning that focuses on the physical character of buildings, their relationships to each other, and to the street; traditional 'zoning by land use' is de-emphasized in order to allow and encourage different types of residential structures in the same neighborhood. FBC results in mixed-use, compact, walkable, sustainable, "diverse by design" neighborhoods that are consistent with well-established traditional neighborhoods. It better allows communities to protect existing character of neighborhoods to ensure new development is compatible. It has been shown to be a valuable zoning tool in building strong, vibrant neighborhoods while providing numerous benefits to stakeholders. The FBC provides predictability, higher quality results, and potentially streamlines development reviews and approvals. The Peninsula and the Riverfront Crossings neighborhoods are areas where the FBC has been adopted for developing neighborhoods. DISCUSSION — FOCUS NEIGHBORHOODS: South District: The South District in particular has been identified as an area where a FBC approach will help achieve the vision of a walkable new neighborhood with housing type diversity. The South District is generally located south of Highway 6 and east of the Iowa River. While the northern half of the District has been developed, the southern half of the District is largely undeveloped — residential development proposals are anticipated due to the new elementary school, street upgrades (Sycamore Street, and the future McCollister Boulevard extension), and availability of water and sewer infrastructure. The South District Plan states June 30, 2016 Page 2 "Though the Middle Housing concept may currently be achieved through the planned development process, the City should consider a form -based code to help ensure that a true mix of housing at a compatible scale can be achieved" (page 19, South District Plan). The South District Plan also emphasizes interconnected streets, compact residential development, mixing affordable housing into the new neighborhood, diverse housing types, and walkability to Alexander School — all of which are goals a FBC can help achieve. Other focus neighborhoods that would benefit from a FBC approach are listed below It is recommended that these other focus neighborhoods be considered as part of subsequent phases in the expanded use of the FBC approach. These neighborhoods are more completely developed with more difficult land use issues to resolve and the process to build consensus would take considerable time. University Impact Areas: The University Impact Areas are the near -campus neighborhoods that have a significant amount of student rental properties. They include the Northside, Goosetown, Miller -Orchard, and College Green neighborhoods. Much of the Northside, Goosetown and College Green neighborhoods are protected by historic and conservation districts, meaning that structures cannot be demolished, constructed or added onto without review & approval from Historic Preservation staff and/or Commission. Downtown: The Downtown includes the traditional downtown area most of which is zoned CB - 10 (Central Business District). The Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan states that .. the City should pursue the creation of a form -based code to regulate all new development Downtown" (page 56, Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan). The Master Plan notes the number of buildings in the downtown that have historic value — balancing historic preservation goals with the goals of a FBC approach and the existing property rights under the CB -10 Zone would all be a part of the discussion for the downtown area. Northside Marketplace: The Northside Marketplace is a commercial / mixed-use neighborhood north of Downtown, generally bounded by Bloomington St, Jefferson St, Gilbert St and Dubuque St. The area contains a number of surface parking lots, public and private, for which development proposals could be made (there are currently no development proposals for these areas). Similar to Downtown, balancing historic preservation goals with FBC goals for redevelopment would be a discussion. NEXT STEPS — EXPANDED FORM -BASED CODE APPROACH: This outline gives a general overview of a proposed process of integrating the FBC into the zoning code and the objectives of the FBC process for focus neighborhoods. 1) Select a process that provides short-term, positive results in select focus neighborhoods, but also establishes a framework for long-term application of form -based coding in other areas. Staff recommends starting with a feasibility assessment and concept plan for the South District — this would include bringing together stakeholders (property owners, developers, and neighborhood representatives), developing a big -picture concept plan, and defining obstacles and opportunities. It is essential this effort be led by a Form Based Code consultant with expertise — anticipated cost of this step: $25,000 - $35,000. June 30, 2016 Page 3 2) Work actively with community and neighborhood stakeholders to guide the process and to build consensus to move the process forward. Working with stakeholders who have a good understanding of local conditions is important to achieve a product that can be successful. 3) Focus initial efforts in one area before proceeding to other areas of the community. 4) Follow up the initial effort with creation of a full draft Form Based Code for the South District. The Code would include new form -based zoning districts, frontage standards, building standards, thoroughfare standards, a regulating plan and other elements of a Form Based Code. Form based codes utilize a significant amount of graphics, which would be incorporated. Similar to Step #1, working with stakeholders in the area is essential for a successful code, which will take time and effort to complete. Creating a form -based code that can be integrated into the existing zoning code in a way that enables easier future application is a goal, requiring only minor changes for the use in other new neighborhoods. Anticipated cost of this step: $125,000 - $150,000. 5) As the City budget and staff time allows, provide follow-up with remaining focus neighborhoods with a similar process. RECOMMENDATION: As a first step to the expanded use of a From -based code in a selected neighborhood, it is recommended that the City hire a FBC consultant to conduct a FBC pilot project to include a feasibility assessment and an initial concept plan for a "Missing Middle Housing Neighborhood" in the South District. The South District is recommended because it is an "emerging" neighborhood (new elementary school) with great development potential and has a recently adopted shared neighborhood vision developed as part of the 2015 South District Plan Update. The South District FBC pilot project will also allow the City to test and showcase ways the FBC approach can enable a walkable neighborhood and housing type diversity without having to require a lengthy planned development rezoning process for each project. CITY OF IOWA CITY �P4 �� MEMORANDUM Date: June 23, 2016 To: Mayor and City Council From: Marian K. Karr, City Clerk Re: Joint Meeting Agenda Items for July 18 The next joint meeting with City Councils of Johnson County municipalities, the Johnson County Board of Supervisors, the Iowa City School District and neighboring school districts will be held on Monday, July 18, 2016. The meeting will be hosted by the City of Coralville in Council Chambers at 1512 7`' Street. Please come prepared to discuss agenda items you would like to include on that agenda at the next Council work session on July 5h. A complete agenda and meeting date confirmation will be available in your packet preceding the joint meeting. PENDING CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION TOPICS June 30, 2016 July 19, 2016 • Discuss creation of a Climate Change Task Force — Relates to item 4 • Undertake a project in FY 2017 that achieves a significant measurable carbon emission reduction Strategic Plan / Budget Related Topics: 1. Consider amending the City's Annexation Policy to require the provision of affordable housing in new residential/mixed-use areas (September) 2. Provide timely and appropriate input on the ICCSD's planned 2017 bond referendum 3. Significantly improve the Council and staff s ability to engage with diverse populations on complex or controversial topics 4. Set a substantive and achievable goal for reducing city-wide carbon emissions by 2030, and create an ad- hoc climate change task force, potentially under an umbrella STAR Communities committee, to devise a cost-effective strategy for achieving the goal. 5. Identify and implement an achievable goal to reduce disproportionality in arrests 6. Identify a substantive and achievable goal for the provision of affordable housing in Iowa City and implement strategies to achieve this goal (September) 7. Determine scope of Council identified on/off street parking study 8. Determine scope of Council identified housing market analysis of core neighborhoods 9. Determine scope of Council identified complete streets study 10. Determine use of affordable housing funds resulting from the sale of the Court / Linn property (September) Other Topics: 11. Discuss marijuana policies and potential legislative advocacy positions 12. Review the Child Data Snapshot (IP2 2/18) and discuss related strategies with local stakeholders 13. Discuss creation of an ad-hoc committee on social justice and racial equity CITY OF IOWA CITY UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE PENDING CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION TOPICS June 30, 2016 July 19, 2016 • Discuss creation of a Climate Change Task Force — Relates to item 4 • Undertake a project in FY 2017 that achieves a significant measurable carbon emission reduction Strategic Plan / Budget Related Topics: 1. Consider amending the City's Annexation Policy to require the provision of affordable housing in new residential/mixed-use areas (September) 2. Provide timely and appropriate input on the ICCSD's planned 2017 bond referendum 3. Significantly improve the Council and staff s ability to engage with diverse populations on complex or controversial topics 4. Set a substantive and achievable goal for reducing city-wide carbon emissions by 2030, and create an ad- hoc climate change task force, potentially under an umbrella STAR Communities committee, to devise a cost-effective strategy for achieving the goal. 5. Identify and implement an achievable goal to reduce disproportionality in arrests 6. Identify a substantive and achievable goal for the provision of affordable housing in Iowa City and implement strategies to achieve this goal (September) 7. Determine scope of Council identified on/off street parking study 8. Determine scope of Council identified housing market analysis of core neighborhoods 9. Determine scope of Council identified complete streets study 10. Determine use of affordable housing funds resulting from the sale of the Court / Linn property (September) Other Topics: 11. Discuss marijuana policies and potential legislative advocacy positions 12. Review the Child Data Snapshot (IP2 2/18) and discuss related strategies with local stakeholders 13. Discuss creation of an ad-hoc committee on social justice and racial equity The missing middle response to urban housing demand I CNU From Acting City manager PUBLIC SQUARE Single Unit Detached (/publicsquare) A CNU Journal Page 1 of 8 IP6 � -• _ Mid -Rise Courtyard Townhouse ivel Work Apartment Bungalow Court _. Triplex & Fourplex Duplex es Missing Middle Housing SYP Missing middle housing types and their location between single-family and mid -rise buildings. Opticos Design DESIGN (/PUBLICSQUARE/CATEGORY/DESIGN) The missing middle response to urban housing demand DAN PAROLEK (/node/5544) JUN. 23, 2016 0 (http://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https% 3A//www.cnu.org/node/5545&title=The%20missing%20middle%20response%20to% 20urban%20housing %20demand) 6/27/2016 The missing middle response to urban housing demand I CNU Page 2 of 8 (http://twitter.com/intent/tweet?status=The%20missing%20middle%20response% 20to%20urban%20housi ng%20demand%2Bhttps%3A//www.cnu.org/node/5545) (http://www.linkedin.com/shareArticle?mini=l&url=https% 3A//www.cnu.org/node/5545&title=The%20missi ng%20middle%20response%20to% 20urban%20housing%20demand&source=https%3A//www.cnu.org) 0 (mailto:?subject=Check%20out%2OThe%20missing%20middle%20response%20to% 20urban%20housing%20demand&body=https%3A//www.cnu.orgpublicsqua re/missing- middle-response-urban-housing-demand) The mismatch between current US housing stock and shifting demographics, combined with the growing demand for walkable urban living, has been poignantly defined by recent research and publications by the likes of Christopher Nelson and Chris Leinberger and the Urban Land Institute's publication, What's Next: Real Estate in the New Economy. Let's stop talking about the problem and start generating solutions! Unfortunately, the solution is not as simple as adding more multi -family housing stock using the dated models/types of housing that we have been building. Rather, we need a complete paradigm shift in the way that we design, locate, regulate, and develop homes. As What's Next states, "it's a time to rethink and evolve, reinvent and renew." Missing Middle housing types, such as duplexes, fourplexes, bungalow courts, mansion apartments, and live -work units, are a critical part of the solution and should be a part of every architect's, planner's, real estate agent's, and developer's arsenal. Well-designed, simple Missing Middle housing types achieve medium -density yields and provide high-quality, marketable options between the scales of single-family homes and mid -rise flats for walkable urban living. They are designed to meet the specific needs of shifting demographics and the new "O PMP O The missing middle response to urban housing demand I CNU Page 3 of 8 market demand and are a key component to a diverse neighborhood. They are classified as "missing" because very few of these housing types have been built since the early 1940's due to regulatory constraints, the shift to auto -dependent patterns of development, and the incentivization of single-family home ownership. The following are defining characteristics of Missing Middle housing: A walkable context. Probably the most important characteristic of these types of housing is that they need to be built within an existing or newly created walkable urban context. Buyers or renters of these housing types are choosing to trade larger suburban housing for less space, no yard to maintain, and proximity to services and amenities such as restaurants, bars, markets, and often work. Linda Pruitt of the Cottage Company, who is building creative bungalow courts in the Seattle area, says the first thing her potential customers ask is, "What can I walk to?" So this criteria becomes very important in her selection of lots and project areas, as is it for all Missing Middle housing. Medium density but lower perceived densities. As a starting point, these building types typically range in density from 16 dwelling units/acre (du/acre) to up to 35 du/acre, depending on the building type and lot size. It is important not to get too caught up in the density numbers when thinking about these types. Due to the small footprint of the building types and the fact that they are usually mixed with a variety of building types, even on an individual block, the perceived density is usually quite lower—they do not look like dense buildings. A combination of these types gets a neighborhood to a minimum average of 16 du/acre. This is important because this is generally used as a threshold at which an environment becomes transit -supportive and main streets with neighborhood -serving, walkable retail and services become viable. 6/27/2016 The missing middle response to urban housing demand I CNU Page 4 of 8 Small footprint and blended densities. As mentioned above, a common characteristic of these housing types are small- to medium-sized building footprints. The largest of these types, the mansion apartment or side-by-side duplex, may have a typical main body width of about 40-50ft, which is very comparable to a large estate home. This makes them ideal for urban infill, even in older neighborhoods that were originally developed as single-family but have been designated to evolve with slightly higher intensities. As a good example, a courtyard housing project in the Westside Guadalupe Historic District of Santa Fe, New Mexico sensitively incorporates 6 units and a shared community -room building onto a Y4 acre lot. In this project, the buildings are designed to be one room deep to maximize cross ventilation/passive cooling and to enable the multiple smaller structures to relate well to the existing single-family context. ia.n, ee ,h... rw wni.e ShLbw unvs DrwNe ettaAans En� solar hea(^iand udl th-south winds for cans wnt4tbn and daylighdng she coolMg Q: Bkswi ( Drought wlennv tiwwah mdaenoe: wdaWin, .. This courtyard housing project in Santa Fe, NM incorporates 6 units on a 1/4 acre lot (24 du/acre) in a form that is compatible with adjacent single-family homes. Source: Opticos. Smaller, well-designed units. One of the most common mistakes by architects or builders new to the urban housing market is trying to force suburban unit types and sizes into urban contexts and housing types. The starting point for Missing Middle housing needs to be smaller -unit sizes; the challenge is to create small spaces that are well designed, comfortable, and usable. As an added benefit, smaller -unit sizes can help developers keep their RNOWNUIR The missing middle response to urban housing demand I CNU Page 5 of 8 costs down, improving the pro -forma performance of a project, while keeping the housing available to a larger group of buyers or renters at a lower price point. Off-street parldng does not drive the site plan. The other non-starter for Missing Middle housing is trying to provide too much parking on site. This ties back directly to the fact that these units are being built in a walkalble urban context. The buildings become very inefficient from a development potential or yield standpoint and shifts neighborhoods below the 16 du/acre density threshold, as discussed above, if large parking areas are provided or required. As a starting point, these units should provide no more than i off-street parking space per unit. A good example of this is newly constructed mansion apartments in the new East Beach neighborhood in Norfolk, Virginia. To enable these lower off-street parking requirements to work, on -street parking must be available adjacent to the units. Housing design that forces too much parking on a site also compromises the occupant's experience of entering the building or "coming home" and the relationship with its context, especially in an infill condition, which can greatly impact marketability. A new mansion apartment in the East Beach project is successfully integrated into a neighborhood with mostly single-family homes. Source: Opticos. 6/27/2016 The missing middle response to urban housing demand 1 CNU Page 6 of 8 Simple construction. The days of easily financing and building complicated, expensive Type -I or II buildings with podium parking are behind us, and an alternative for providing walkable urban housing with more of a simple, cost- effective construction type is necessary in many locations. What's Next states, "affordability—always a key element in housing markets—is taking on a whole new meaning as developers reach for ways to make attractive homes within the means of financially constrained buyers." Because of their simple forms, smaller size, and Type V construction, Missing Middle building types can help developers maximize affordability and returns without compromising quality by providing housing types that are simple and affordable to build. Creating Community. Missing Middle housing creates community through the integration of shared community spaces within the types, as is the case for courtyard housing or bungalow courts, or simply from the proximity they provide to the community within a building and/or the neighborhood. This is an important aspect, in particular within the growing market of single -person households (which is at nearly 30% of all households) that want to be part of a community. This has been especially true for single women who have proven to be a strong market for these Missing Middle housing types, in particular bungalow courts and courtyard housing. Marketability. The final and maybe the most important characteristic in terms of market viability is that these housing types are very close in scale and provide a similar user experience (such as entering from a front porch facing the street versus walking down a long, dark corridor to get to your unit) to single-family homes, thus making the mental shift for potential buyers and renters much less drastic than them making a shift to live in a large mid -rise or high-rise project. This combined with the fact that many baby boomers likely grew up in similar housing types in urban areas or had relatives that did, enables them to easily relate to these housing types. 6/27/2016 The missing middle response to urban housing demand I CNU Page 7 of 8 Fourplexes like this one in the Midtown neighborhood of Sacramento are highly sought after. Source: Opticos. This is a call for architects, planners, and developers to think outside the box and create immediate, viable solutions to address the mismatch between the housing stock and what the market is demanding—vibrant, diverse, sustainable, walkable urban places. The Missing Middle housing types are an important part of this solution and should be integrated into comprehensive and regional planning, zoning code updates, TOD strategies, and the business models for developers and builders who want to be at the forefront of this paradigm shift. This article previously appeared on bettercities.com and Logos Opticos: Composing Vibrant Urban Places. e ,.: (/dan-parolek) 9 Comments A Login 6/27/2016 The missing middle response to urban housing demand I CNU Page 8 of 8 About (publicsquare/about) Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/newurbanism) Twitter (https://twitter.com/newurbanism) Public Square: A CNU Journal I Congress for the New Urbanism 6/27/2016 LEI I � i ��1301 CITY OF 1O111(A CITY 410 Easl Washington SLrcct Iowa City. Iowa 52240- 1826 (3 191 356-5000 (3191 356-5009 FAX www.Icgov.org June 28, 2016 TO: The Honorable Mayor and the City Council RE: Civil Service Entrance Examination — Treatment Plant Operator —Water Under the authority of the Civil Service Commission of Iowa City, Iowa, I do hereby certify the following named person(s) as eligible for the position of Treatment Plant Operator — Water. Katie Snyder IOWA CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION Lyra W. Dickerson, Chair 06-:1u-10 IP8 Marian Karr Subject: FW: Public Notice- Cedar/Johnson County IM -NHS -080-7(114)248--03-52 C� 1 OWA DOT �' .� SMARTER I SIMPLER I CUSTOMER DRIVEN WWWON Ref Johnson Project # IM -NHS -080-7(114)248-03-52 You are invited to attend a Public Information Meeting on July 21, 2016, between 5 and 6:30 p.m. in the Schwab Auditorium at the Coralville Public Library, 1401 Fifth St., in Coralville. The purpose of this meeting is to discuss an Interstate 80 corridor study area that extends from east of Iowa City, approximately 1.5 miles west of Herbert Hoover Highway, to east of West Branch at Charles Avenue, in Johnson and Cedar counties. No formal presentation will be made; however, general information regarding the proposed improvements will be discussed at the meeting. Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) staff will be available at the meeting to address questions, concerns, and general comments regarding the proposed improvements. More information concerning this project will be posted as it becomes available at the Iowa DOT's website: www.iowadot.goy/pim. Should you have any comments or questions prior to the Public Information Meeting, or are not able to attend, please feel free to leave comments at: httn://bit.ly/Iowadot842821. The meeting room is accessible for persons with disabilities. However, if you require special accommodations at the meeting, please notify Cathy upon receipt of this letter. Project Contact: Cathy Cutler, Transportation Planner Iowa DOT District 6 Office 5455 Kirkwood Blvd. SW Cedar Rapids, IA 52404 Phone: 319-364-0235 or 800-866-4368 Catherine. Cutler(a)dot.iowa. gov P.S. On the evening of the meeting we will ask attendees to register using Wads. By signing in electronically, you'll help us more efficiently and accurately provide you with project updates. We will have people on hand to assist you with this new process. Because this is part of a new system we are developing to better serve Iowans, we appreciate your patience and your willingness to give us feedback. Fire Station 2 to welcome University Heights with open house IP9 Q1 Receive Updates I Enter Email Address Go W Fire Station 2 to welcome University Heights with open house City of Iowa City sent this bulletin at 06/30/2016 12:35 PM CDT O SHARE Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page. City of IOWA CIN FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: June 30, 2016 Contact: Fire Chief John Grier Phone: 319-356-5256 Fire Station 2 to welcome University Heights with open house To kick off the new working relationship between the community of University Heights and the Iowa City Fire Department (ICFD), the department is hosting an open house at Fire Station 2 at 301 Emerald Street on Saturday, July 2, 2016. Residents of University Heights and the surrounding area are invited to stop by between 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. for a station lour, overview of firefighting equipment, public education materials, and a glass of lemonade. Beginning July 1, 2016, ICFD will assume emergency response duties for the University Heights community. Those responsibilities were previously contracted with the City of Coralville. For more information, contact Fire Chief John Grier at 319-356-5256 or john-grier@iowa-city.org. https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/IAIOWA/bulletins/I52c557 6/30/2016 Dubuque Street Construction: drivers should consider alternate route into Iowa City for Ja... Page 1 of 2 IP10 0 Receive Updates I Enter Email Address Go W Dubuque Street Construction: drivers should consider alternate route into Iowa City for Jazz Festival City of Iowa City sent this bulletin at 06/30/2016 11:36 AM CDT O SHARE Having trouble viewing this email? View it as a Web page. °„°, IOWA CITY FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Date: June 30, 2016 Contact: Melissa Clow Phone: 319-356-5413 Dubuque Street construction: drivers should consider alternate route into Iowa City for Jazz Festival Drivers coming to town for the Iowa City Jazz Festival should be aware that traffic is down to one lane in each direction along Dubuque Street, causing what can be long delays, as work progresses on the Iowa City Gateway Project. The Iowa City Gateway is a flood mitigation project that will raise Dubuque Street while also elevating and replacing the Park Road Bridge. Once completed, the risk of long-term closures of Dubuque Street due to flooding from the Iowa River will be greatly reduced. Dubuque Street is currently reduced to one lane of traffic in each direction between Foster Road and Ronalds Street and will remain that way through the duration of the project, which is expected to be completed in 2018. Drivers can expect a 15- to 30 -minute delay during the busy morning and afternoon commuting hours, but could experience longer delays during high traffic events like weekend festivals, including the Iowa City Jazz Festival, and Hawkeye sporting events. Drivers should be aware and plan their route in and out of Iowa City with Dubuque Street and Park Road construction in mind. https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/IAIOWA/bulletins/I52b2a5 6/30/2016 Dubuque Street Construction: drivers should consider alternate route into Iowa City for Ja... Page 2 of 2 Those who typically use Dubuque Street should consider using Dodge Street (Highway 1) as an alternative route. Drivers should also keep in mind that Park Road is currently closed west of Riverside Drive. The 2016 Iowa City Jazz Festival is set for July 1 through July 3, with fireworks scheduled to begin between 9:30 p.m. and 9:45 p.m., Sunday, July 3. For additional festival information, visit www.summerofthearts.org. To learn more about the Gateway Project, visit icgov.org/gatewavoroiact. A -1 �R1 Questions? �/l ..��� Contact Us CITY 01 IOWACITY WdKocmor tnwruu STAY CONNECTED: f IVI% a in SUBSCRIBER SERVICES: Manage Preferences I Unsubscnbe I Help https:Hcontent.govdelivery.com/accounts/IAIOWAfbulletins/I52b2a5 6/30/2016