Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAirport Master Plan pptIowa City Municipal airport Master Plan Update November 15, 2016 City of Iowa City Organization Chart Citizens City Council Airport Commission City Manager City Manager Airport Operations Communications Office Human Resources Human Rights Iowa City Municipal Airport City Attorney City Clerk Library Board Library Library Operations Library Foundation Airport Commission Duties To exercise all the powers granted to cities and towns under Chapter 330 of the Code of Iowa, except the power to sell said airport. To annually certify the amount of taxes within the limitations of the Statutes of the State of Iowa to be levied for airport purposes. • All funds derived from taxation or otherwise for airport purposes shall be under the full and absolute control of the Airport Commission, deposited with the City Treasurer, and disbursed only on the written warrants or order of the Airport Commission. Airport Master Plan Purpose: An Airport Master Plan is a comprehensive study of an airport and describes the short (0-5 year), mid (5-10 year), and long-term (10-20 year) development plans to meet existing and future aviation demand based on identified airport safety, facility, and aviation system needs. The Airport Master Plan will provide direction and guidance to the Iowa City Airport Commission, regarding future airport preservation and development priorities for the Iowa City Municipal Airport (IOW). It will become the Airport Commission's realistic strategy for the development of the airport considering financial, environmental, and socioeconomic factors. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) outlines the requirements and process to prepare an Airport Master Plan through Advisory Circular (AC) 150/ 5070-613, Airport Master Plans. History The previous Airport Master Plan was completed in 1996. The 1996 plan called for the decommissioning of Runway 18/36, the extension of Runway 7/25 and construction of parallel taxiways for the runways. The 1996 plan also called for additional hangar construction as the demand dictated. Planning Process Master Plan Advisory Group Representatives from Airport tenants and businesses, City Administration, Economic Development, and Neighborhood representatives invited to form advisory group. Public Input 2 public meetings held during the planning phase for additional comments. Pilot/User Surveys Surveys sent to area pilots, business users and transient users to provide additional feedback regarding services/ infrastructure available and desired. Existing Airport Layout wa.a 8'-=.:�, ^G'm"'�Sa i'.: � _ r- Vis•,. i ""R tm lR,. mf S s bD ♦ ~~o . . ve i. J. R ♦ eN` i �' _ _ IanaSavd 0 J- : Airport Boundary Runway Prolection Zone (RPZ) Easemoms Y a ♦� :..�.. .�,�.. .....................i. Iowa City Municipal Airport Airport Master Plan ■13* r t Figure 4-1 Planning Considerations ._.�T A �- w - g 9� $3 _ � S r s`Awh2'�IX © Olt _ 1 � ! 1 i t ! M Fn*p p svbi y a a nw.petision 13 Q 4ks.y T.tB .+, . "b..•s P,�f �✓' i \Tpro lhto Rumay] I qqqqqq !'. vi JJ d Legend 0QD fRunway Protection Zone (RPZ) r. Parcels AirporlBoundary q FAA Airport design standards center on two key components; Critical Aircraft (aircraft family that completed 500 annual itinerant operations) Approach Types (Instrument/Visual, Precision/Non- precision) Airport Reference Code Codes referring to the characteristics of the critical a rcraft Aircraft Approach Speed (A,B,C,D) Aircraft Tail Height and Wingspan (I -VI) Critical Aircraft Category Examples A -I small f<_12.500 lbs.): Small, single-engine piston aircraft: few light multi - engine piston aircraft; Example: Mooney M20 A_II: Single-engine turboprop; agricultural aircraft; Example: Air Tractor 602 A -III Lame (>12.5001bs.1: Older, piston military or civil senior aircraft; large wingspans, slow flying; Example: Douglas DC -3 B -I small (:_12,500 lbs.): Most light multi-engme piston aircraft; Example: Cessna 414 C -I small (.-1? 500 lbs.): Small- fast turboprop aircraft and corporate jets; Example: Piaggio P. 180 Acanti B -I Large ( -12.500 lbs.): Small but heavy business jets; Example: Nath American T-39 Saberhaer B -II Small ( 12.500 lbs.): Light, multi-engime turboprop aircraft; small business jets; Example: Beechcraft C90GTt B -II Large p12,500 lbs.): Large turboprop aircraft; mid -large sized corporate jets; Example: Dassault Falcon 2000 C -I Lai at ( 1'-,500 lbs.): C -II Large (>12.SOO lbs.): Sunil. heavy. and fast Large Corporate Jets; corp ti ate jet aircraft; Example: Gulfstream III Example: Learjet 55 Hebconter: Piston and turbine rotorcraft; Example: Bell 412 B -M Large (>12.55W lbs.): Large corporate jets; large wingspans; Example: Bombardier Global 5000 Master Plan Conclusions Y ,pf c f�ti , ` • \Y ,y,. s ' �aO t 1 � », y♦r C . ^ I'I r4 oluCm ; 1 • '•. K am•ri MY x1:11 •f �' Yt�'•+ IMP tj aavu\e { i3 3 f 1 f A VA 1 • I � � • • 9 • �' \i'A _. � .. i �.�,... T� • MM1)fTi� to M.t Mt � rnau � 4lrrcftt•z, �• < i\(I M\VHat'VR •L♦1S \\ '♦* r Ali" `r•+v �•.- `.. + rr fNMu / `. frac 'aq. 1 N y'j!� e '30 r V�4'ar ik 11111 111 : iiii Runway 7/25 Aircraft Design Category changed from C -II to B -II Change reflects aircraft using the runway Does not prevent larger aircraft from using airport Change of protection zone airspace dimensions Increases available landing distance used in pilot/aircraft landing calculations • Runway 7 from 4,296' to 5,004' Runway 7/25 n 2 p � w •' i • t' r i n� 1+ / Legend C�Iy e Qr,tl, Pm� Four.AOR�� n r zak n n r i' BB nrowm 5lWe dwF.ee"a MM2y OW FW wear SYlryMJ E:l dlyyNN kmays lnsV '� t 4 �• . N6 MAWYOfbbae Rw"OOSM[ i O R Z ftOF4 F—] -' Zak IRO -Z) 0 EW � ,vcrtR>renn: AFM W,, bka CAy AM! Mi F�MAWM-- Extension of 213' Increase total landing distance to 5,2179 Potential Stopway Pavement Allows the declared distances which are important to operators to be increased • Accelerated Stop Distance Available • Takeoff Distance These can alter the aircraft's allowable loading and performance requirements for using the runway Potential Lighting Additions Operations in inclement weather Runway 12 Displaced Threshold Moves approach protection zone Eliminates many of the current obstruction items within the neighborhood Extend Runway 30 Added pavement preserves runway landing distance Runwayl2/30 Len. i =y PKIlCipe y. z:,RPz) APPY. Depo" APVG DeWT AMo obpa RLPSW CqW F4 L L M ySYqMa R"ay Sa"M RR XIA E=l l y OCstoOe R"M ftOFACoxaoe Free ZmelRO'Z; 0 800 MMMMMC= FM Sa Skif ima City y. Aviation Development Areas Reserving space for additional hangar development _ mr B p • i i i; L.d AfPYII RgapiY . `• • E" F. 'B+ • � i �;�. F Fuve Burg �v _,_ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �i i, vo —I VeM1rY Pxkiy ,:.: '��'-_ ,1. llllR IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ) ¢ • ,X * • t • � �` Bmeiy Remiaun liq RRU 1 l � � 1 q 4 � Y C 1 `�k' ♦ �� � AWOSCrinlbea 1T1 T { O �• • �; RVZ i "l T �-' �� � �, �' ru p5p5 # ` IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1111 (1 IIIIllWllllllllllllllY/I- I I ��z�:, • •.�• ••.�o O lye . _ _ /I _ • � lllllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • e'ti�..• zoo PAN Feel Viiiiii IDlllll IIIIIIIIIIII�1111 E • • ! !• • REIL Jl � ♦ wwC ` � � � - ���. -�— ..u.„ . • Somce' Jonnson Co.Wm, Iowa tarty In �_ � � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJ a�+ I I R Yry. �p Y Wept Aviation Development Area Ta i...r Wpan Y - AwM Paronan Fu . Bugig VM Paling Bu&" Resbkvon Lw (BREI Source: JMnn Cu,W, lovm CYy Potential area for non -aeronautical development opportunities. Leasing ground preserves revenue for Airport operations. Any non -aeronautical use needs to be approved by FAA. Development of area would likely end farm operations Income from development to serve as replacement of revenue loss and increased grounds keeping expenses. Non -Aeronautical Development Area � z \.I_I I _qqQIMMMIftIM._ -71 Bud" Resefceoo Lw (BRL) AwA P.remem RVZ 0 400 Fuure Bk" Vd P." \.I_I I _qqQIMMMIftIM._ Obstruction Mitigation �- n Iowa City Municipal Airport (10W) IOW 20:1 Obstructions 'Ions BOLTON Iowa City. IA �N=Z,-201 6 & MEN K cil) P �l IIIL I YD Legend 6 F�VDS 'it mmm. Emm�9AppmeO DWMe Surlace Eu qApp� FU Appr De . S.r e FU All�AAFA 0 00C Capital Improvement Funding FAA Grants contribute 90% of project costs to federal projects. Grants awarded may contain discretionary, or `non - primary entitlement' funds (or both). Non -Primary Entitlements are funds from the Airport Improvement Program and give qualified airports $1 50,000/year to use for eligible projects. • These are considered primary funds before other discretionary FAA dollars are used on projects if needed. Grants awarded based on FAA ranking criteria. Capital Improvement Funding Source State Grants Iowa DOT - Office of Aviation funding is an option for smaller projects or projects not well suited to FAA ranking criteria. State grants can contribute 70-85% of project costs based on project type. State grants are awarded based on ranking criteria. Iowa City Municipal Airport - (1O%V) Master Plan prepared. March 2016 Table 5-2 Capital Improvement Plan Sununary by Planning Period and Funding Type Project Estimated Capital FAA State Local Costs Eligible Share Share SHORT-TERM (2016-2020) Runway 12 Displaced Threshold $250,000 $225,000 50 525,000 Runway 12 Obstruction Removal $280,000 5252,000 $0 528,000 Runway 30 Obstrixtion Removal 572,000 564,800 $0 57,200 Runway 25 Obstruction Removal 56,300 $5,670 50 5630 Runway 7 Obstruction Removal & Lighting 56,300 $5,670 SO $630 Pavement Maintenance Runway 7/25 $600,000 5540,000 50 560,000 Runway 25 Threshold Relocation $250,000 $225,000 50 $25,000 Apron Expansion $1,250,000 51,125,000 50 $125,000 Runway 30 Displaced Threshold 5500,000 5450,000 $0 550,000 Environmental Assessment $150,000 5135,000 50 515,000 MIDTERM (2021-2025) Runway 7 Extension $1,170,000 51,053,000 50 5117,000 Pavement Maintenance Runway 12/30 5420,000 5378,000 $0 542,000 Taxilane Construction $235,000 $211,500 $0 $23,500 Snow Removal Equipment (SRE) Building $600,000 $540,000 50 560,000 Vehicle Parking in Existing Building Area $1,200,000 51,080,000 $0 5120,000 Environmental Assessment $150,000 5135,000 $0 515,000 Runway 7Stopway $1,180,000 $1,062,000 50 $118,000 LONGTERM (2026-2035) Runway 7 MALSF System $1,300,000 SO SO 51,300,000 Environmental Assessment $150,000 $135,000 50 $15,000 Parallel Taxiway Construction - west side $3,400,000 53,060,000 50 5340,000 Parallel Taxiway Construction - east side $3,400,000 53,060,000 SCI 5340,000 Environmental Assessment $150,000 $135,000 50 $15,000 Apron in New Building Area $3,600,000 53,240,000 $0 5360,000 Taxilanes in New Building Area $900,000 $810,000 SCI 590,000 Fuel System in New Building Area $700,000 5630,000 50 $70,000 Vehicle Parking in New Building Area 51,200,000 51,080,000 So 5120,000 Total $23,119,600 $19,637,640 SO 53,481,960 Soa-ze. Bolt= C %teak. Lac Preoued. March 2016 Grant Assurances Both State and Federal Grants come with assurances. Some, but not all, of those are: Airport will be kept open for operations Airport will be maintained for safe operations Revenues generated by the airport are used for airport purposes Non -Aeronautical land uses are permitted with fair market valuations Hazard Removal and Mitigation