HomeMy WebLinkAboutMann Site Options School BoardHorace Mann Elementary
Joint Work Session April 4, 2017
Iowa City Community School District
City of Iowa City, City Council
A
Alaa.
A
ria a
AN"t"'I North
5
h �
...,
s � S
o.
as
a • a P PKK'+ -5a"' �y _ ',��
i i �
as
a • a P PKK'+ -5a"' �y _ ',��
i i �
—z 61=
Ml ]/LS 411'.I1:9M
it
CITY OF IOWA CITY
Horace Mann Elementary
BLDD Educational Adeauacies
J U Iv 201
Schools Ranged from 60.6 to 96.E (ioo) _
Gymnasium, Lunchroom/Multi-purpose Room
ADA, Entrance, Elevator, Admin Office
Staff/Visitor Parking
Undersized Pre -K, K, Music Rooms
Dedicated Art Room
Public Access to Media Center
Soft Play/ Playground Areas/Green Space
Horace Mann Elementary
To Make Mann Equitable (Education &Programs
Acquire Adjacent Properties
Increased Use of North Market Square Park
Building Addition,10,000 sq. Ft.
Gymnasium, 4,900 sq. Ft.
Media Center, 2,500 sq. Ft. Net +2 Classrooms
Admin Office, Nursing Office, 1,875 sq. Ft.
Circulation, Storage & Restrooms, 725 sq. Ft.
Inv
A
9
R,
N
AG
NORTH MARKET
iJ 'LL PARK �8
�"ar "'. ■ Owe ori': .,tom
SQUARE
. , ....
a
Park Playground Structure x,:
t
Iowa City CommunitySchool District
Horace Mann Elementary
Elementary School
Site Comparisons
Building
2014-2015
2015-2016
2016-2017
Site Square
Footprint
Foot priat%of
Enroll
Enroll
Enroll
Avg. Enroll
Site Acreage
Footage
Building Sq. Ft.
Sq.Ft.
Site
Parking Stalls
ADA
223
222
242
229
1.65
2074
(9)
31,910
(7) 13,422
(9)
18.6794(9)
n
23
+2 (9)
378
431
431
¢47
644203
(2)
67,714
(1) 52288
W
8.a5%(3)
95
102
7 W
311
22
261
281
57
248,292
(7)
42,314
(4) 32,094
(5)
12.9394(7)
39
41
+2 (6)
407
395
32
393
9.0
392,040
(4)
36,878
(5) 36,878
(4)
941%(4)
68
72
+4 (3)
237
239
237
238
3.6
156,816
(8)
31,604
(8) 23,818
(7)
x5.19%(8)
35
36
+1 (8)
329
338
335
334
8.1
352,836
(6)
35,356
(6) 13,941
(8)
39594(2)
59
61
+2 (5)
405
442
441
429
83
364548
(5)
46,25•
(3) 46,25•
(3)
12,7994(6)
74
n
+3 (2)
220
212
215
212
20.4
888,624
W
28,213
(9) 28,213
(6)
3.1794(1)
67
69
+2 (4)
378
262
311
317
9 5
411820
(3)
511051
(2) 511051
(2)
12.3.94(5)
53
56
+3 (7)
Total Play
Total Sq.Ft.
Soft Fall Play
Hard Surface
Hard + Soft
Useable Green
Green+ Soft+
Sq. Ft./
Sq.Ft.
Play Sq.Ft.
Sq.Ft.
Space Sq.Ft.
Hard
Student
5,920
(9)
15,930
(6) 21,850
(8)
4,728 (9)
26,98(9)
116 (9)
17,405
(2)
29,481
(2) 46,886
(2)
198,170 (1)
245,056(1)
569 (4)
7,709
(7)
21,186
(4) 28,895
(5)
75,240 (7)
104,135(7)
370 (7)
12,383
(5)
23,244
(3) 35,627
(3)
154,589 (5)
190,216(5)
484 (5)
6,872
(8)
9,497
(8) 16,369
(9)
22,166 (8)
38,535(8)
162 (8)
13,809
(4)
14,020
(7) 27,829
(6)
165,762 (3)
191591(4)
580 (3)
10,616
(6)
20,623
(5) 31,239
(4)
12,368 (2)
201607(3)
474 (6)
16,wo
(3)
8,905
(9) 24,905
(7)
111596 (6)
136,50"1(6)
643 (2)
a8,1o9
W
34,229
W 52,338
W
164,005 (4)
216343(2)
682 (a)
MANN
LINCOLN
HOOVER
LONGFELLOW
LUCAS
LEMME
TWAIN
ALEXANDER
SHIMEK
Site Acreage
0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0
Building Footprint % of Site
SHIMEK
LONGFELLOW
ALEXANDER
LEMME
TWAIN
LUCAS
HOOVER
LINCOLN
MANN�......................................L....................................L....................................L....................................L...................................�.uu
i i i i i
0.00 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.000/0 10.00% 12.00% 1400% 16.00% 18.0045 20.0046
MANN
LINCOLN
HOOVER
LUCAS
LEMME
ALEXANDER
LONGFELLOW
SHIMEK
TWAIN
Sq. Ft. Play/Hard/Green Spaces / Student
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Parking Stalls
MANN
LINCOLN
HOOVER
TWAIN
LONGFELLOW
SHIMEK
LEMME
LUCAS
ALEXANDER
Iowa City CommunitySchool District
Horace Mann Elementary
Site Improvement Options
07
Kill
y I .
Flo. ti —
CHURCH STREET' - -
Existing Site Plan---�
Desired Parcels
�➢k HARD PLAY Existing 1
15,555 SF •, ,+G
➢ Acreage 1.65
EXISTING ➢ Total Site
➢ Soft Play ,•, HELEMENTARY MANN.'- ''� `d
'
SCHOOL �x ,P 1.65 Acres
'�
211
31550 Sq. Ft.NkI
a
mai
"! F STAFF PARKING y
➢Pros
➢ Hard Surface PlayLocation
15, 555 Sq. Ft. i k
q F Hard Surface
R s4"
➢ Green Space FAIRCHILD '' ➢ Cons
41728 Sq. Ft STT �,.`'
� Small Site
Lack of Parking
KETPAR •...� e
➢ Parking Stalls E
v, Bus Drop-off
21 + 2 ADA .�� Parent Drop-off
d - N MARKET SGIUV
z Small Green
m� Small Soft Play
Option "A"
➢ Acreage 2.823
➢ Soft Play
141000 Sq. Ft.
➢ Hard Surface
Play
171280 Sq. Ft.
➢ Parking Stalls
60+2ADA
0,000
SOFT PLAY
5.210 SF
' PARENT D
x, ��III€ill
:ISTIN6
"Y PAR
PLAY
Desired Parcels
➢ 630 Fairchild
➢ 618-620 Fairchild
➢ 619 Fairchild
➢ 623 Fairchild
➢ 427 N Dodge
➢ Fairchild Street
➢ Pros
Hard Surface+
Play Areas+
Parent Drop-off
Bus Drop-off
Parking
Park Synergy
➢ Cons
Cost/Process
N
z
0,000
SOFT PLAY
5.210 SF
' PARENT D
x, ��III€ill
:ISTIN6
"Y PAR
PLAY
Desired Parcels
➢ 630 Fairchild
➢ 618-620 Fairchild
➢ 619 Fairchild
➢ 623 Fairchild
➢ 427 N Dodge
➢ Fairchild Street
➢ Pros
Hard Surface+
Play Areas+
Parent Drop-off
Bus Drop-off
Parking
Park Synergy
➢ Cons
Cost/Process
Option "B"
➢ Acreage 2.256
➢ Soft Play
151650 Sq. Ft.
➢ Hard Surface
Play
161010 Sq. Ft.
➢ Parking Stalls
49+2ADA
CHURCH STREET -
.;�wyy�YB`bi d
f (n
z , > SOFT PLAY
. O _.__y T _ 7 650 SF $.
0 r�
i
XISTING
-RACE Mp ��
LEMENTA
ROPOSED SCHOOL.
10,000 SF
BUILDING
N M{kRKC„�,Uq* ADDITION
NY
' PARENT DROP DEE
t
0
O
�p
j YfOT OT N..
HARD PLAY
T D T j D
9,430 SF
FAIRCHILD
STREET'
E
N MARKET
z
m�
-ISTING CHURCH
PARKING
UAQ
�.
Desired Parcels
➢
630
Fairchild
➢
618-620 Fairchild
➢
619
Fairchild
➢
623
Fairchild
➢
427
N Dodge
➢ Pros
Hard Surface+
Play Areas+
Parent Drop-off
Bus Drop-off
Parking
➢ Cons
Traffic Flow
Cost/Process
Option«C„
_ __ ..�,:.��:-.
"'
�
� . ,
Desired Parcels
zur a�
�'sti
➢
618-620 Fairchild
➢
Acreage 1.98
r
�
➢
619 Fairchild
HSTINC'i
���
➢
623 Fairchild
➢Soft
Play
PROPOSE
'. ACE Mp �rgk
CHO L
t,lw➢
427 N Dodge
71650 Sq. Ft.
10,000
BUILDIsG
UYLDING
�.i mew
PARENT DROP OFF
-mi 5`
➢
Pros
➢
Hard Surface
Ttl
M
Hard Surface -
Play
SOFTPLAY
RED
,�A HOUSE_
�'
Play Areas -
14, 530 Sq. Ft.
6,23o SFS
Parent Drop-off
FAIRCHILD
FAIRCHILD�TREET
Bus Drop-off
➢
Parking Stalls
STREET
�„;
"'
; n
Parking
49 + 2 ASA
OR T
PROPOSED 30 STALLS
_
➢
s
Cons
E
-
Traffic Flow
-,
`ISTINC CHURCH
PARKING
�+
Use of Park
NMARKET
Cost/Process
Option "D"
➢ Acreage 1.933
➢ Soft Play
71950 Sq. Ft.
➢ Hard Surface
Play
11440 Sq. Ft.
➢ Parking Stalls
37+2ADA
FAIRCHILD
STREET.
E
��
I
`3
m ;
2010 SF
Play Areas-
EXISTING
v
' ri
�4'tb-�
v i`�
HORACE MAu.��
s l
ELEMENTA I r„+
Cons
?ROPOSED SCHOOL'
710,000 SF
wn
v
77RLAY�
�;T y
6,230 SF M,i^>3W
PARENT DROP OFF
Do
HARD PLAY
9430SF
r �
rF�
FAIRCHILD: STREET
EXISTING HOUSES
EXISTING CHURCH
PARKING:.... i.
z
N MARKET SQUARE
m
Desired Parcels
➢ 630 Fairchild
➢ 618-620 Fairchild
pp ➢
Pros
Hard Surface -
w
rm.
Play Areas-
Parent Drop-off
Bus Drop-off
➢
Cons
' Less Parking
Traffic Flow
Use of Park
Cost/Process
CtURCH`$7�iEE'f
Option 64 E))
O PROPOSED 34 STALLS
➢ Acreage 1.84 . - ° PARENT CROP OFF
..
m HARD PLAY.,
� 5.785 SF EXISTING
FORAGE MAN
➢ Soft Play PU$L PROPOSED ELSCHOOL'
31720 Sq. Ft. SCHOOL 0,000 SF
BUILDING R
N MARKET SQUARE ADDITION
z
PARENT DROP OFF R
➢ Hard Surface
EXI$TI U'
Play 1 BASKETBALL $OFT PLAY SOFT PLAY > RED HOUSE
a
COURTS 6,230SF 3,720 SF �\
5,785 Sq. Ft.
FAIRCHILD irya'"'V FAIRCHILD STREET
STREET
➢ Parking Stalls �„;�,� �_
37 + 2 ADANORTH xP�3E
MARKET PARK x,' '
y
$JMARKETS {{
Desired Parcels
➢ 618-620 Fairchild
➢ Pros
t
Parent Drop-off
Bus Drop-off
2
➢
Cons
Less Parking
Less Hard Play
Less Soft Play
Traffic Flow
Increased Use
of Park
Cost/Process
Option T"
➢ Acreage 2.256
➢ Soft Play
191230 Sq. Ft.
➢ Hard Surface
Play
14710 Sq. Ft.
➢ Parking Stalls
44+2ADA
&A A
N MARKET SOUAF
t
z
0
O
S
2
O
z
I
SOFT PLAY HARD PLAY
7,650 SF 6.580 SF
10,000 SF
BUILDING
ADDITION
SOFT PLAY
5,080 SF
EXISTING
HORACE MANN
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
HARD PLAY SOFT PLAY
8,130 SF 6,500 SF
�E1
FAIRCHILD: STREET
c_
N PROPOSED 30 STALLS
-ISTING CHURCH
PARKING
Desired Parcels
➢
630
Fairchild
➢
618-620 Fairchild
➢
619
Fairchild
➢
623
Fairchild
➢
427
N Dodge
➢ Pros
Hard Play ++
Soft Play ++
Parent
Drop-off
Bus Drop-off
Parking
➢ Cons
Traffic Flow
Option "G"
➢ Acreage 1.94
➢ Soft Play
221560 Sq. Ft.
➢ Hard Surface
Play
11,085 Sq. Ft.
➢ Parking Stalls
16+2ADA
FAIRCHILD
STREET'
E
SQUARE
Desired Parcels
SFsv ➢ 630 Fairchild
➢ 618-620 Fairchild
10,000
SOFT PLAY
9,370 SF
FAI
➢ Pros
Hard Surface -
Play Areas -
Parent Drop-off
Bus Drop-off
➢ Cons
Less Parking
Traffic Flow
Cost/Process