Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMann Site Options School BoardHorace Mann Elementary Joint Work Session April 4, 2017 Iowa City Community School District City of Iowa City, City Council A Alaa. A ria a AN"t"'I North 5 h � ..., s � S o. as a • a P PKK'+ -5a"' �y _ ',�� i i � as a • a P PKK'+ -5a"' �y _ ',�� i i � —z 61= Ml ]/LS 411'.I1:9M it CITY OF IOWA CITY Horace Mann Elementary BLDD Educational Adeauacies J U Iv 201 Schools Ranged from 60.6 to 96.E (ioo) _ Gymnasium, Lunchroom/Multi-purpose Room ADA, Entrance, Elevator, Admin Office Staff/Visitor Parking Undersized Pre -K, K, Music Rooms Dedicated Art Room Public Access to Media Center Soft Play/ Playground Areas/Green Space Horace Mann Elementary To Make Mann Equitable (Education &Programs Acquire Adjacent Properties Increased Use of North Market Square Park Building Addition,10,000 sq. Ft. Gymnasium, 4,900 sq. Ft. Media Center, 2,500 sq. Ft. Net +2 Classrooms Admin Office, Nursing Office, 1,875 sq. Ft. Circulation, Storage & Restrooms, 725 sq. Ft. Inv A 9 R, N AG NORTH MARKET iJ 'LL PARK �8 �"ar "'. ■ Owe ori': .,tom SQUARE . , .... a Park Playground Structure x,: t Iowa City CommunitySchool District Horace Mann Elementary Elementary School Site Comparisons Building 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Site Square Footprint Foot priat%of Enroll Enroll Enroll Avg. Enroll Site Acreage Footage Building Sq. Ft. Sq.Ft. Site Parking Stalls ADA 223 222 242 229 1.65 2074 (9) 31,910 (7) 13,422 (9) 18.6794(9) n 23 +2 (9) 378 431 431 ¢47 644203 (2) 67,714 (1) 52288 W 8.a5%(3) 95 102 7 W 311 22 261 281 57 248,292 (7) 42,314 (4) 32,094 (5) 12.9394(7) 39 41 +2 (6) 407 395 32 393 9.0 392,040 (4) 36,878 (5) 36,878 (4) 941%(4) 68 72 +4 (3) 237 239 237 238 3.6 156,816 (8) 31,604 (8) 23,818 (7) x5.19%(8) 35 36 +1 (8) 329 338 335 334 8.1 352,836 (6) 35,356 (6) 13,941 (8) 39594(2) 59 61 +2 (5) 405 442 441 429 83 364548 (5) 46,25• (3) 46,25• (3) 12,7994(6) 74 n +3 (2) 220 212 215 212 20.4 888,624 W 28,213 (9) 28,213 (6) 3.1794(1) 67 69 +2 (4) 378 262 311 317 9 5 411820 (3) 511051 (2) 511051 (2) 12.3.94(5) 53 56 +3 (7) Total Play Total Sq.Ft. Soft Fall Play Hard Surface Hard + Soft Useable Green Green+ Soft+ Sq. Ft./ Sq.Ft. Play Sq.Ft. Sq.Ft. Space Sq.Ft. Hard Student 5,920 (9) 15,930 (6) 21,850 (8) 4,728 (9) 26,98(9) 116 (9) 17,405 (2) 29,481 (2) 46,886 (2) 198,170 (1) 245,056(1) 569 (4) 7,709 (7) 21,186 (4) 28,895 (5) 75,240 (7) 104,135(7) 370 (7) 12,383 (5) 23,244 (3) 35,627 (3) 154,589 (5) 190,216(5) 484 (5) 6,872 (8) 9,497 (8) 16,369 (9) 22,166 (8) 38,535(8) 162 (8) 13,809 (4) 14,020 (7) 27,829 (6) 165,762 (3) 191591(4) 580 (3) 10,616 (6) 20,623 (5) 31,239 (4) 12,368 (2) 201607(3) 474 (6) 16,wo (3) 8,905 (9) 24,905 (7) 111596 (6) 136,50"1(6) 643 (2) a8,1o9 W 34,229 W 52,338 W 164,005 (4) 216343(2) 682 (a) MANN LINCOLN HOOVER LONGFELLOW LUCAS LEMME TWAIN ALEXANDER SHIMEK Site Acreage 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 Building Footprint % of Site SHIMEK LONGFELLOW ALEXANDER LEMME TWAIN LUCAS HOOVER LINCOLN MANN�......................................L....................................L....................................L....................................L...................................�.uu i i i i i 0.00 2.00% 4.00% 6.00% 8.000/0 10.00% 12.00% 1400% 16.00% 18.0045 20.0046 MANN LINCOLN HOOVER LUCAS LEMME ALEXANDER LONGFELLOW SHIMEK TWAIN Sq. Ft. Play/Hard/Green Spaces / Student 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 Parking Stalls MANN LINCOLN HOOVER TWAIN LONGFELLOW SHIMEK LEMME LUCAS ALEXANDER Iowa City CommunitySchool District Horace Mann Elementary Site Improvement Options 07 Kill y I . Flo. ti — CHURCH STREET' - - Existing Site Plan---� Desired Parcels �➢k HARD PLAY Existing 1 15,555 SF •, ,+G ➢ Acreage 1.65 EXISTING ➢ Total Site ➢ Soft Play ,•, HELEMENTARY MANN.'- ''� `d ' SCHOOL �x ,P 1.65 Acres '� 211 31550 Sq. Ft.NkI a mai "! F STAFF PARKING y ➢Pros ➢ Hard Surface PlayLocation 15, 555 Sq. Ft. i k q F Hard Surface R s4" ➢ Green Space FAIRCHILD '' ➢ Cons 41728 Sq. Ft STT �,.`' � Small Site Lack of Parking KETPAR •...� e ➢ Parking Stalls E v, Bus Drop-off 21 + 2 ADA .�� Parent Drop-off d - N MARKET SGIUV z Small Green m� Small Soft Play Option "A" ➢ Acreage 2.823 ➢ Soft Play 141000 Sq. Ft. ➢ Hard Surface Play 171280 Sq. Ft. ➢ Parking Stalls 60+2ADA 0,000 SOFT PLAY 5.210 SF ' PARENT D x, ��III€ill :ISTIN6 "Y PAR PLAY Desired Parcels ➢ 630 Fairchild ➢ 618-620 Fairchild ➢ 619 Fairchild ➢ 623 Fairchild ➢ 427 N Dodge ➢ Fairchild Street ➢ Pros Hard Surface+ Play Areas+ Parent Drop-off Bus Drop-off Parking Park Synergy ➢ Cons Cost/Process N z 0,000 SOFT PLAY 5.210 SF ' PARENT D x, ��III€ill :ISTIN6 "Y PAR PLAY Desired Parcels ➢ 630 Fairchild ➢ 618-620 Fairchild ➢ 619 Fairchild ➢ 623 Fairchild ➢ 427 N Dodge ➢ Fairchild Street ➢ Pros Hard Surface+ Play Areas+ Parent Drop-off Bus Drop-off Parking Park Synergy ➢ Cons Cost/Process Option "B" ➢ Acreage 2.256 ➢ Soft Play 151650 Sq. Ft. ➢ Hard Surface Play 161010 Sq. Ft. ➢ Parking Stalls 49+2ADA CHURCH STREET - .;�wyy�YB`bi d f (n z , > SOFT PLAY . O _.__y T _ 7 650 SF $. 0 r� i XISTING -RACE Mp �� LEMENTA ROPOSED SCHOOL. 10,000 SF BUILDING N M{kRKC„�,Uq* ADDITION NY ' PARENT DROP DEE t 0 O �p j YfOT OT N.. HARD PLAY T D T j D 9,430 SF FAIRCHILD STREET' E N MARKET z m� -ISTING CHURCH PARKING UAQ �. Desired Parcels ➢ 630 Fairchild ➢ 618-620 Fairchild ➢ 619 Fairchild ➢ 623 Fairchild ➢ 427 N Dodge ➢ Pros Hard Surface+ Play Areas+ Parent Drop-off Bus Drop-off Parking ➢ Cons Traffic Flow Cost/Process Option«C„ _ __ ..�,:.��:-. "' � � . , Desired Parcels zur a� �'sti ➢ 618-620 Fairchild ➢ Acreage 1.98 r � ➢ 619 Fairchild HSTINC'i ��� ➢ 623 Fairchild ➢Soft Play PROPOSE '. ACE Mp �rgk CHO L t,lw➢ 427 N Dodge 71650 Sq. Ft. 10,000 BUILDIsG UYLDING �.i mew PARENT DROP OFF -mi 5` ➢ Pros ➢ Hard Surface Ttl M Hard Surface - Play SOFTPLAY RED ,�A HOUSE_ �' Play Areas - 14, 530 Sq. Ft. 6,23o SFS Parent Drop-off FAIRCHILD FAIRCHILD�TREET Bus Drop-off ➢ Parking Stalls STREET �„; "' ; n Parking 49 + 2 ASA OR T PROPOSED 30 STALLS _ ➢ s Cons E - Traffic Flow -, `ISTINC CHURCH PARKING �+ Use of Park NMARKET Cost/Process Option "D" ➢ Acreage 1.933 ➢ Soft Play 71950 Sq. Ft. ➢ Hard Surface Play 11440 Sq. Ft. ➢ Parking Stalls 37+2ADA FAIRCHILD STREET. E �� I `3 m ; 2010 SF Play Areas- EXISTING v ' ri �4'tb-� v i`� HORACE MAu.�� s l ELEMENTA I r„+ Cons ?ROPOSED SCHOOL' 710,000 SF wn v 77RLAY� �;T y 6,230 SF M,i^>3W PARENT DROP OFF Do HARD PLAY 9430SF r � rF� FAIRCHILD: STREET EXISTING HOUSES EXISTING CHURCH PARKING:.... i. z N MARKET SQUARE m Desired Parcels ➢ 630 Fairchild ➢ 618-620 Fairchild pp ➢ Pros Hard Surface - w rm. Play Areas- Parent Drop-off Bus Drop-off ➢ Cons ' Less Parking Traffic Flow Use of Park Cost/Process CtURCH`$7�iEE'f Option 64 E)) O PROPOSED 34 STALLS ➢ Acreage 1.84 . - ° PARENT CROP OFF .. m HARD PLAY., � 5.785 SF EXISTING FORAGE MAN ➢ Soft Play PU$L PROPOSED ELSCHOOL' 31720 Sq. Ft. SCHOOL 0,000 SF BUILDING R N MARKET SQUARE ADDITION z PARENT DROP OFF R ➢ Hard Surface EXI$TI U' Play 1 BASKETBALL $OFT PLAY SOFT PLAY > RED HOUSE a COURTS 6,230SF 3,720 SF �\ 5,785 Sq. Ft. FAIRCHILD irya'"'V FAIRCHILD STREET STREET ➢ Parking Stalls �„;�,� �_ 37 + 2 ADANORTH xP�3E MARKET PARK x,' ' y $JMARKETS {{ Desired Parcels ➢ 618-620 Fairchild ➢ Pros t Parent Drop-off Bus Drop-off 2 ➢ Cons Less Parking Less Hard Play Less Soft Play Traffic Flow Increased Use of Park Cost/Process Option T" ➢ Acreage 2.256 ➢ Soft Play 191230 Sq. Ft. ➢ Hard Surface Play 14710 Sq. Ft. ➢ Parking Stalls 44+2ADA &A A N MARKET SOUAF t z 0 O S 2 O z I SOFT PLAY HARD PLAY 7,650 SF 6.580 SF 10,000 SF BUILDING ADDITION SOFT PLAY 5,080 SF EXISTING HORACE MANN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HARD PLAY SOFT PLAY 8,130 SF 6,500 SF �E1 FAIRCHILD: STREET c_ N PROPOSED 30 STALLS -ISTING CHURCH PARKING Desired Parcels ➢ 630 Fairchild ➢ 618-620 Fairchild ➢ 619 Fairchild ➢ 623 Fairchild ➢ 427 N Dodge ➢ Pros Hard Play ++ Soft Play ++ Parent Drop-off Bus Drop-off Parking ➢ Cons Traffic Flow Option "G" ➢ Acreage 1.94 ➢ Soft Play 221560 Sq. Ft. ➢ Hard Surface Play 11,085 Sq. Ft. ➢ Parking Stalls 16+2ADA FAIRCHILD STREET' E SQUARE Desired Parcels SFsv ➢ 630 Fairchild ➢ 618-620 Fairchild 10,000 SOFT PLAY 9,370 SF FAI ➢ Pros Hard Surface - Play Areas - Parent Drop-off Bus Drop-off ➢ Cons Less Parking Traffic Flow Cost/Process