HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-08-2004 Airport Commission IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION
AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING
1801 S. RIVERSIDE DRIVE
THURSDAY, APRIL 8, 2004-5:45 P.M.
I. Determine Quorum
II. Changes/Amendments to Minutes of March 11, 2004, meeting
III. Review of Expenditures
IV. Public Discussion—Items Not on Agenda
V. Unfinished Items for Discussion/Action:
VI. Items for Discussion/Action:
a. Environmental Assessment - H.R. Green Co.
b. Obstruction mitigation project -Stanley Engineering
c. Aviation Commerce Park (ACP)
Prospects/activity report
ii. RFP—Real estate broker
d. Runway 07 project - Earth Tech
Earth Tech contract
e. Strategic Plan
Schedule
f. FY 2005 budget
VII. Chairperson's Report
VIII. Commission Members' Reports
IX. Administrative Report
X. Set Next Regular Meeting for May 13, 2004 at 5:45 p.m.
XI. Adjournment
?oSTrD
30 (hAe O/1-
It n
Agenda summary-08 April 2004
a. Environmental Assessment:The final preliminary draft report has been reviewed by the
Federal Aviation Administration. Mark Schenkelberg,the FAA Environmental Officer,
was contacted on March 29 to discuss a completion schedule. He has sent comments to
H.R. Green to be incorporated into the report. A public hearing will be scheduled.
Comments from the hearing will be included in the report and, if there are no significant
objections,a FONSI can be issued to complete the project. Someone from H.R. Green
will be invited to the meeting to make a report.
b. Obstruction mitigation project: A construction plan has been designed for mitigating
the obstructions. This will be an agenda item until the project is completed.
c. Aviation Commerce Park At the March meeting,the Commission voted to recommend
to the Council to sign a 90-day agreement with Iowa Realty to market the Aviation
Commerce Park. The ACP real estate listing will be a three-way agreement between
Iowa Realty,the Airport Commission and the City Council.This is scheduled for the
Council meeting of April 61. An updated appraisal has been ordered.
d. Runway 07 project: O'Neil met with Earth Tech in January and has negotiated a
contract for consultant fees for Phase I of the project. The agreement has been reviewed
by the City Attorney's office and sent to the FAA for review as to the amount of the fees
and the form of contract. The agreement will be contingent on receiving a grant for the
project. The FAA has recommended the agreement not be signed until the
Environmental Assessment has been completed to make sure the Scope of Services for
the project matches the recommendations from the EA.
e. Strategy/business plan:At the March meeting,the Commission discussed how to
proceed with the plan. The Commission will bring a list of potential facilitators and a list
of possible"stakeholders"to the next meeting. The Commission expressed a desire to
proceed quickly with developing the plan. Chairperson Hartwig has sent a letter to the
Council updating them on the Commission's intentions.
f. FY 2005 budget: At their public hearing for the FY 2005 budget,the Council mandated
that the Commission reduce their budget by$10,000. The Commission will discuss the
FY 2005 budget. A copy of the budget passed by the Council was sent to the
Commission on March 25.
IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION
April 2004 Airport Expenditures Account 46110 Amount
121745 Midwest Janitorial Mar.service 185.00
121746 City of Iowa City Sewer&water—Mar. 211.57
121747 PES Repair-Jet A pump 249.85
The above listed expenditures were reviewed at the Iowa City Airport Commission meeting on April
8,2004.
MINUTES
IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION
THURSDAY,MARCH 11,2004—5:45 P.M.
IOWA CITY AIRPORT TERMINAL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Randy Hartwig,Daniel Clay,John Staley, Carl Williams
STAFF PRESENT: Sue Dulek,Ron O'Neil
CALL TO ORDER:
Vice-chairperson Hartwig called the meeting to order at 5:45 p.m.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The minutes of the February 12 and February 20, 2004,Commission meetings were approved
with some minor changes.
REVIEW OF EXPENDITURES:
O'Neil reviewed the check requests for March with the Commission.Hartwig asked about the bill
for the 100LL tank. O'Neil said the main filters for the 12,000-gallon tank are normally changed
annually.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION—ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA:
No items were presented.
UNFINISHED ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION/ACTION:
No items were presented.
ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION/ACTION:
a. Bid opening, roof project,Bldgs.B& C—Darren Sellers,from H.R. Green,was present to
review the bids and make a recommendation to the Commission. The Commission received
one bid. The engineer's estimate was about$48,000 per building. O'Neil said the grant was
for a maximum of$50,000, and required a local match of 30%. The total funds available for
the project would be$72,500. O'Neil said that if the bid was too high to do both buildings,
one building and some hard surfaced floors could be done with the grant and another grant
would be applied for to renovate the other building.
Sellers read the bid. For bid item#I,hangar building B,the bid was$ 74,425 and bid item
#2,hangar building C,was $ 83,600. Clay asked why Sellers thought the bid was so high?
Sellers said he wasn't sure. He said the contractor might have a lot of work already. He said
with only one bid, it is difficult to tell. Sellers said he was surprised there was only one bid.
He said two other contractors had expressed interest.
Hartwig asked how soon something had to be done with the roofs? O'Neil said there were
no major leaks. The reason they were doing the project was because the buildings were 35
1
years old,starting to need additional maintenance and a grant for 70% of the project was
available through the Iowa Department of Transportation.
Sellers said they have been getting good bids on projects. He said he needs to call the
contractor and see why the bid was so much higher than the estimate. Staley asked how
many contractors there are in the area that can do the job? Sellers said most roofers would
tell you they can do the job,but he would be hesitant to hire just anyone.
Hartwig asked what the timeframe was for going out to bid again? O'Neil said he could
advertise again and have bids for the April or May meeting. Sellers said he needs to find out
why his estimate is so low. Staley asked if there were any elements that could be listed as
alternates to reduce the bid price? Sellers said he had done that by listing each building
separately.
Sellers recommended giving him an opportunity to contact the contractors to see if he needs
to revise his estimate. O'Neil said he did not think the Commission could afford to accept
the bid. He said if lower bids were not received when the Commission bid the project again,
they would have to return the$50,000 grant. Clay made a motion to reject the bid.
Williams seconded the motion and it passed 4—0.
Sellers will discuss the project with O'Neil after he has talked to the contractor. He said if it
is bid again,he will try to get more contractors to bid. Clay asked O'Neil about a leaky roof
on another building. O'Neil said since that was not on the agenda,he would talk to Clay
after the meeting.
b. Environmental Assessment project— O'Neil said he had circulated a memo to the
Commission updating them on the project. The draft report is at the FAA in Kansas City.
There are some public notice timeframes that needed to be followed and those time periods
for comments from various state and federal agencies are running now.
c. Aviation Commerce Park(ACP)— (Because of a possible conflict of interest,Williams
said he would not take part in the discussion.) Scott Byers,from Iowa Realty,requested to
address the Commission. Byers said Iowa Realty has represented the Aviation Commerce
Park for over a year. He said a past Commission agreed to extend the leasing part of the
agreement. But there are three parties that have to enter into the agreement,Iowa Realty,the
Commission and the City Council. He said the listing would be a high priority for his firm.
He said they would like to transition new people into the assignment. He said he would like
to suggest a 90-day agreement. If the Council and Commission were comfortable with the
direction things were going, a longer agreement could be signed.
Clay asked if the agreement was for leasing or selling? Byers said it was for both,but the
lease option did not seem very feasible. Buyers said he likes the project and thinks it is a
good location. He thinks it would be a good area for warehousing,general contractors and
light distribution. Clay asked if there was a change in marketing strategy? Buyers said
having new people would offer additional ideas. He said they would see if there are any
contractors or local developers that would be interested in the property. There may have to
be some creative flexibility in marketing the property.
O'Neil said he would recommend the Commission come to a consensus on what they wanted
to do and forward that as a recommendation to the Council. There is not a current agreement
• 2
with anyone to market the property. O'Neil said the Commission could sign another
agreement with Iowa Realty or readvertise for another realtor.
Staley made a motion to send a recommendation to the Council for a 90-day agreement with
Iowa Realty to market the Aviation Commerce Park. After 60 days,the Commission will
review the progress to see if a recommendation for a longer agreement should be negotiated.
Clay seconded the motion. During discussion, Clay asked Byers if he thought 90 days was
enough time to show the Commission they should have a longer agreement? Byers said he
thought it was and they would be very aggressive in their marketing during those three
months. Clay asked Byers if he could produce an executive summary of a marketing plan to
help Clay understand what Iowa Realty planned to accomplish. Byers said he would provide
that. Hartwig call for the vote and the motion passed 3 —0,with Williams abstaining.
O'Neil said that on the chance the Commission wanted to go out for proposals,he contacted
the Library to see if they had developed an RFP for their new commercial space. They did
not put together an RFP. They sent letters to realtors that they thought would be interested in
their project and selected from the responses which companies they wanted to interview.
O'Neil said he would work with Cook Appraisals to update the appraisal on the property.
d. Runway 07 project—Earth Tech O'Neil said he left that on the agenda, in case there was
some last minute action for the Commission to take. The FAA recommended not signing a
contact until the EA is completed.
e. Obstruction mitigation project-O'Neil said Stanley Consultants had sent a summary of the
project for the Commission. O'Neil reminded the Commission this was a State grant and
there will not be enough money to reduce all of the obstructions. Hartwig asked if there has
been an obstruction mitigation project in the past? O'Neil said there has not been a project
that addressed all of the obstructions. O'Neil said the Building Department is more aware of
what is required for air space studies than in the past and there is less likelihood than in the
past that a building permit would be issued without an airspace study being conducted first.
f. Strategic planning— Hartwig said this is on the agenda as a reminder that the Commission
needs to continue to move ahead to develop a plan. He said he personally believes it is
important for the Airport to have a plan. He thinks a subcommittee should meet before the
next meeting to narrow the list of items for the Commission to discuss. Dennis Gordon,
from Gordon Aircraft, said he would be willing to help as a representative of tenants on the
Airport. He said other tenants and volunteers should be involved.
Staley said the information O'Neil gave the Commission at the last meeting would be a good
guide for moving forward with the project. He said it points out the advantages of having a
facilitator to help get things started. Gordon said he thinks there are facilitators available.He
said there are some pilots on the Airport that could facilitate the project. Staley asked O'Neil
if there was any money for a facilitator? O'Neil said the Commission did not have any
money budgeted. Clay said there would be some merit in having someone that is not
connected with the Airport moderate the discussion.
Clay said he thinks the plan will be the most important thing the Commission does over the
next couple of years. It will be used for planning and public relations with the Council and
the people of Iowa City. Clay said he likes of idea of starting with a task force and
subcommittee. He questioned who the other participants should be.
3
O'Neil said the most difficult and time-consuming part of the project is the initial
information gathering meetings. He said you need to start with a group of about 20 people
and a list of basic ideas. The main group breaks into smaller groups, a subject is discussed
and then the facilitator is responsible for combining the ideas of each group. You then move
on to the next subject. This takes a lot of time. O'Neil said it is important to invite a list of
all the community"players"that have an interest in making the Airport successful. The
airport is much larger than the tenants of the Airport.
After something is drafted, it is taken out for public comment. After that,you have another
refinement period. This all takes time. O'Neil suggested constructing a timeline with a
target date for the project. O'Neil said that not only should the Commission have a timeline
for the Strategic Plan,but also for the recommendations from the ABS report. He said it has
been unfairly reported that the Commission hasn't and isn't going to do anything with the
report. He said that is simply not true. The Commission went through the entire report,
addressed all of the recommendations and commented on what the intentions were for the
actionable suggestions. He said the actionable items should be prioritized.
O'Neil said he would review the Commission's comments and have a schedule for them at
the next meeting. Staley said the Commission should be thinking about who the
stakeholders are in this project. Clay said there should be involvement from someone with
marketing experience and someone with experience in media relations. He said it is obvious
that the media is presenting a limited view and it does not necessarily reflect the views of the
Commission. Staley said it is important to contact the City Manager and ask him what City
staff he thinks it would be helpful to include on the task force.
Clay said that in the next couple of weeks,the Commission members could send O'Neil a
list of whom they think should be included in the list of stakeholders. This would help the
Commission decide how they would want to break down the tasks of constructing the plan.
O'Neil said Thrower compiled a list of people ABS was supposed to contact for their report.
O'Neil said he doesn't know how many they contacted, but it would be a good list to start
with. O'Neil said he would suggest having the initial meeting with the facilitator before the
summer months because it is more difficult to get people to participate during the summer.
Clay asked it the Conunission should meet again before their next regular meeting to
expedite the process? Staley said that by the next meeting,the Commission should have an
idea of the makeup of the group they would like to have participate. At the April meeting,
the Commission should decide when they want have their initial meeting with the facilitated
group. O'Neil said he is meeting with Atkins tomorrow and O'Neil will discuss the idea of a
facilitator with him. He reminded the Commission that the City Manager advocated having
a facilitated group instead of hiring ABS. O'Neil said he thought Atkins would still be in
favor of having a facilitator. Clay and Staley said the Commission should be looking a
facilitator.
O'Neil said the initial meeting should be scheduled for about 4 hours. He said he thought
the facilitator would be important for the first two or three meetings. After the raw data is
collected, it will be up to the Commission to take the lead in completing the project. Gordon
said there should be one person responsible for moving the group forward with the project.
That could be the Commission chairperson or the Airport Manager. Hartwig suggested that
the Airport Manager direct the project. Clay said he would like to see the Commission
members develop their list of task force members and list of potential facilitators to discuss
at the next meeting.
4
Staley asked if the recommendations from ABS were prioritized? O'Neil said the list was in the
Commission's packet and he suggested looking through the list and prioritizing the suggestions.
He said if the Commission members would send their prioritized list to him,he will have it for
the Commission at their next meeting.
g. State AIP and Vertical Infrastructure grant applications—O'Neil said there was a list of
grant eligible projects in the Commission packet. O'Neil said he met with some State
legislators on March 9 and they did not seem optimistic that funds would be appropriated for
the State AIP fund. The application is for projects if money is appropriated. O'Neil said
there are three projects he would suggest applying for.
One is to move the ASOS equipment from the south part of the field to a more central
location. This equipment will have to be moved before Mormon Trek is completed across
the south border of the Airport. If a grant can not be secured,it will have to be included as
part of the Public Works project. Mother project is to move the VASI lights from Runway
18 to Runway 30. O'Neil said the VASI lights and the ASOS are FAA facilities and even if
a grant is offered,the FAA will need to approve moving the equipment. The third project is
to replace some of the signs on the airside of the Airport.
In the Vertical Infrastructure grant,O'Neil suggested applying for funds to rehab another
hangar building roof. O'Neil said the bid just received for Building B was too high to
accept, but H.R.Green will see if there is some way to change the specifications to fit within
the budgeted amount.
Clay asked if there were any plans to replace the asphalt around the north t-hangars? O'Neil
said that area and the tie down ramp were the worst surface areas on the Airport. He said
replacing the asphalt around the hangars is not eligible for a grant. It would be a local cost.
Clay made a motion for a resolution to support the AIP grant application. Hartwig seconded
the motion and at roll call vote, the motion passed 4—0.
Staley made a motion for a resolution to support the Vertical Infrastructure application.
Williams seconded the motion and at roll call vote,the motion passed 4—0.
h. FY 2005 budget revision -Hartwig said he would suggest O'Neil identify some items for
the Commission to discuss. O'Neil said he would review what he understood had happened
to the budget. The City Council held their public hearing for the City budget. After the
hearing, a motion was made by a Council member to reduce the budget by$ 10,000. The
motion passed. O'Neil said the Commission worked as hard on this budget as any that he
could remember,knowing that the City budget in general was going to be difficult to
balance. Even though there are increases beyond the Commission's control,such as
electricity, sewer,water, etc.,the Commission still reduced the budget by 8%. O'Neil said
it would be difficult to reduce the budget by$ 10,000. There is no projects to eliminate.
Small amounts will have to be taken from several line items.
Clay asked if,other than the comment they wanted to send a message, did the Council object
to something in the budget or think the Commission was spending money frivolously?
O'Neil said he was not at the budget hearing,but it was his understanding that a statement
was made that the action was taken to"send a massage". Clay asked if the Council could cut
5
the budget without notifying them they were going to take that action? Dulek said they were
dealing with the budget in general and could discuss any department's budget.
O'Neil explained the budget process to the Commission. He said the Commission receives a
proposed budget from Finance in October. They review and revise the budget and it is
returned to Finance. O'Neil said he meets with the Finance Director and City Manager to
review the submitted budget. They may recommend some changes before it is sent to the
Council. In January,the Council holds a budget meeting for boards and commissions.
O'Neil said he attended the meeting and there was no suggestion that the Council wanted
additional reductions. O'Neil said it is unusual that a Council would change the budget after
the boards and Commissions meeting,without any additional discussion with the
Commission.
Jack Young said he was at the meeting and the motion was made to reduce the budget to
send the message that the Council was unhappy that none of the recommendations from the
ABS report had been acted on yet. The Council member that made the motion wanted to
give the money to Parks and Recreation. They decided this would take another motion. It
was a unanimous vote to reduce the Airport budget by$10,000. Clay said they might have
been unhappy that they perceived the Commission was not doing anything with the report,
although the Commission has started action on some of the recommendations. Williams
asked if the Commission would want to meet with the Council to discuss the budget with
them?
O'Neil said he would review the budget again to see where the budget can be reduced. He
said it would more than likely have to come from several line items, such as reducing the
amount budgeted for natural gas and hope we have a mild winter. He said there is a small
capital project,but it is not enough to cover the entire amount. It is a project that has been in
the budget for the last several years and removed every year. The asphalt sealing has been
deferred every year and the asphalt is now near a point where it needs to be replaced.
Clay said one of the things in the ABS report was a recommendation to improve direct
communications between the Council and the Commission. Cutting the budget to send a
message is not improving direct communications. This is a new Commission and there is an
opportunity to establish a more positive working relationship. He said he is disappointed the
Council chose this way to communicate instead of more positive communication. He said it
leaves him with some confusion on how the Council wants to communicate.
Williams said that for the Council to arbitrarily cut $10,000 without knowing how that will
affect the budget makes it difficult for the Commission. Clay said there was no direction
from the Council that the budget was high. Staley asked for the budget to be sent to the
Commission before the next meeting so they could review it and make suggestions. O'Neil
said he has not received notification that there was to be a cut,but that he has already started
to look for ways to reduce the budget or increase the revenues.
O'Neil said that when the Commission hired ABS, one of the main objectives was for ABS
to use their nation-wide experience to suggest additional revenue sources for the Airport.
There is nothing in the report that the Commission had not discussed before they hired ABS.
Clay asked about renegotiating the FBO lease?O'Neil said he discussed reopening the lease
with Jet Air and they were not interested. O'Neil said he is somewhat puzzled why ABS
would even suggest that. From a practical standpoint,why would a company reopen lease
negotiations,knowing that the Commission's intention was to try to increase the rent?
6
The Finance Department is installing a new accounting system and O'Neil will attend training on
how to access the various reports through the City's Intranet system.
SET NEXT MEETING:
The next regular Airport Commission meeting is scheduled for April 8,2004,at 5:45 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 7:58 p.m.
Randy Hartwig,Chairperson
• 9
rr+ ritrr
MAR 2 9 2004
U.S. Department
Of Transportation ` V la II 4
Central Region
Federal Aviation Iowa, Kansas 901 Locust
Administration Missouri,Nebraska Kansas City,Missouri 64106-2325
March 25, 2004
Mr. Joe Trnka
Howard R. Green Company
PO Box 9009
Cedar Rapids, IA 52404 •
Dear Mr. Tmka:
Draft Environmental Assessment
Iowa City Municipal Airport
I have the following comments on the draft environmental assessment:
1) Page 1. There appears to be confusion over my comments on the proposed federal
action. See Chapter 3 of FAA Order 5050.4A for specific details. Typically, the EA
will state that the airport sponsor is requesting federal environmental approval for the
development analyzed in the EA. In this case, it is the developments as described in
paragraph 2.2.1 and paragraph 2.2.1.5.
2) Page 4 and Section 4(f) Evaluation. Alternatives typically are eliminated from
consideration because they are not prudent or feasible or because of environmental
impacts. Several of the alternatives were eliminated due to high costs that make them
not prudent.
3) Page 6. Paragraph 2.1.6. It should be noted that this alternative fails to meet the stated
purpose and need.
4) Page 7. The Old United Hangar also is in the Runway Object Free Area that is required
to be kept free of all above ground objects.
5) Page 13. Paragraph 2.2.2. It should be noted that the no action alternative fails to meet
the stated purpose and need but is further analyzed in accordance with FAA Order
5050.4A.
6) Figures 12 and 13. Provide the year or the conditions for the contours. Generally, this
•
would be stated as year 2020 or long-range condition.
7) Page 31. The sponsor needs to provide a compatible land use assurance letter per Section
511(a)(5) of the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982. This is typically
provided in an Appendix and referenced in the Compatible Land Use Section.
8) Page 33. Environmental Justice needs to be addressed as part of Social Impacts or as a
stand-alone environmental consequence category.
9) Page 49. Chapter 6.0. Cover Page and elsewhere should read Section 4(f)Evaluation not
Statement. •
10) Page 49. The Section 4(f) Evaluation should provide enough detail of the projects to let
the reader know what is being proposed instead of just referring the reader to Chapter
Two. It can be stated that a detailed description is available in Chapter Two.
11) Appendix A needs to be eliminated, as obstruction removal is no longer part of this EA.
After incorporation of the comments, the public involvement process may be started.
If you want to discuss these comments, please contact me at 816-329-2645.
Sincerely,
Mark H. Schenkelberg, P.E.
Environmental Specialist
Cc: Mr. Ron O'Neil, Iowa City Municipal Airport
C
Stanley Consultants INC
A Stanley Group Company
Erg neer Emrronmental and Conswaurn Semces Woddaide
March 26,2004
Mr.Ron ONeil
Airport Manager
Iowa City Airport
1801 South Riverside Drive
Iowa City,IA 52246
Dear Mr.O'Neil:
Subject: Iowa City Airport Obstruction Mitigation
Tree Removal and Obstruction Lighting
Bidding Procedures and Contract Document Information
Your instructions are requested concerning the provisions about bonds and insurance coverage that are to
be incorporated in the construction Contract for the above Project. Enclosed you will find copies of the
following:
• Standard General Conditions of the Construction Contract(EJCDC No.C-700,2002 Edition)
("General Conditions"). Your attention is directed particularly to Article 5 that deals with bonds
and insurance and Article 16 that deals with Dispute Resolution.
• Proposed Instructions to Bidders("Instructions")which deals with bonds and insurance.
• Proposed Supplementary Conditions which deals with bonds insurance and dispute resolution.
• "Owner's Instructions to Engineer Concerning Bonds and Insurance for Construction" form letter.
• Forms of Bid Bond(2), Construction Performance Bond and Construction Payment Bond which
have been endorsed by the EJCDC and other professional societies and which we propose
including in the Bidding Documents.
The language proposed for inclusion in the Supplementary Conditions and Instructions is based on the
standard language contained in the EJCDC's Guide to the Preparation of Supplementary Conditions
(EJCDC No. C-800,2002 Edition)and Guide to the Preparation of Instructions to Bidders(No. C-200,
2002 Edition),both of which are carefully interrelated with the General Conditions.
The General Conditions and proposed Supplementary Conditions have been prepared on the assumption
that the Contractor will provide liability insurance and the Owner will provide property insurance for this
Project. This is the customary way to handle the coverages, but you may prefer another arrangement for
this Project. For example,you may want the Contractor also to provide the property insurance. If this is
the case, significant changes in the language relating to property insurance in the General Conditions,
Supplementary Conditions and Instructions to Bidders will be required. See Paragraph SC-5.06 of Guide
to Preparation of Supplementary Conditions enclosed.
Stanley Building•225 Iowa Avenue•Muscatine,IA 52761 •phone 563.264.6600-fax 563.264,6658
Internet-www.stanleygraup.com
e
March 26, 2004
Page 2
You will note also that Paragraph 5.01 of the General Conditions requires a Contractor to obtain
performance and payment bonds each in an amount at least equal to the Contract Price. Paragraph 1.08 of
the Instructions to Bidders requires each Contractor to provide Bid Security equal to 5-10 percent of its
maximum Bid price.
When deciding on the types and amounts of coverage and assigning responsibility for providing the same,
it is strongly recommended that the advice of an experienced insurance counselor be obtained to avoid the
potential of later incurring an uninsured loss or one for which there is not adequate insurance protection.
The enclosed language is only an example to illustrate how to deal with the requirements as to bonding
and insurance provisions.
The discussions of coverages contained in the enclosed copy of Paragraphs SC-5.0I through 5.10 of the
Guide to the Preparation of Supplementary Conditions may prove helpful as general background, but are
not intended as a substitute for qualified insurance advice with respect to this Project.
Before finalizing the Construction Documents,we need your instructions. If you decide to follow the
usual approach as reflected in the printed General Conditions,you may find it helpful in communicating
your instructions to us to use the printed Form of Owner's Instructions to Engineer Concerning Bonds and
Insurance Regarding Construction which is enclosed. This is closely related to Article 5 of the General
Conditions as now written and is necessary for our completion of the Supplementary Conditions.
If you have any particular insurance requirements for this Project or you wish an insurance arrangement
different from that contemplated by the General Conditions,please indicate not only the types and
amounts of coverage desired, but also how the standard language should be modified, giving specific
wording for our guidance in each instance.
Please contact us if you wish to discuss this matter. To maintain project schedules we need to have your
response not later than April 12,2004. Upon receipt of your response to this request,we will integrate the
information furnished with the other information in the Contract Documents.
Sincerely,
Stanley Consultants, Inc.
&s i `AL
Catherine S. Weikel, P.E.
Project Manager
Enclosure(s): Standard General Conditions(No. C-700).
Copy of Paragraphs SC5.01 through SC5.10 and Paragraphs 16.01 through 16.02 of the
Guide to the Preparation of Supplementary Conditions(No. C-800).
Copy of Article 8 of the Guide to the Preparation of Instructions to Bidders(No.C-200).
Copy of Proposed forms of Bid Bonds,Construction Performance Bond and
Construction Payment Bond as applicable(Nos. C-430,C-435, C-610).
March 26,2004
Page 3
Form of Owner's Instructions to Engineer Concerning Bonds and Insurance for
Construction(No. C-052).
Form of Owner's Instructions Regarding Bidding Procedures and Construction Contract
Documents(No.C-050)
cc: Mike Donnelly
General Files 16335—Phase 2
csw.mjh 8e\16335 Secretary\Ltrl.doc
12 U IOWA CITY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
1801 South Riverside Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52246
Office Phone (319) 3546-5045
Item. Consider a resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City Clerk to attest to
an agreement with Iowa Realty Commercial to sell and/or lease 17 commercial lots
in the Airport's Aviation Commerce Park.
This agreement provides for a 90-day agreement for services with Iowa Realty
Commercial to sell or lease lots in the subdivision known as the Aviation Commerce
Park. The agreement provides criteria for leasing and/or selling the parcels. This is a
joint agreement between the Airport Commission, Iowa Realty and the Council. At their
March 11, 2004 meeting, the Commission voted to recommend approval of the 90-day
agreement, with the terms being the same as the original Iowa Realty agreement.
•
The following are a couple of entities that might have an interest in the success of
the Iowa City Airport:
1.Iowa City Area Chamber of Commerce
Pat Guard,President(319) 337-9637
Pat has talked recently about holding a Board meeting at the airport
2.Iowa City Area Development Corp
Joe Raso,President(319)354-3939
ICAD had a board meeting at the airport last February.
3.Iowa City-Coralville Convention&Visitors Bureau
Josh Schaumberger, Exec Director(319) 337-6592
No additional information available.
4. Community&Economic Development
Steve Nasby (356)-5248 410
Steve,is a Iowa City, City government employee.
5.Johnson County Planning& Zoning Department
Rick Dvorak,Administrator (319) 356-6083
Rick, is a Johnson County,government employee.
6. Surrounding Communities
City of Cedar Rapids
City of Coralville
City of North Liberty
City of University Heights
City of West Branch
City of Williamsburg
7. Major Employers
University of Iowa University/education 17311
University of Iowa Hospitals Health services &education 5857
Iowa City Community Schools Educational services 1600
Veteran's Administration Hospital Health services 1300
Mercy Hospital Health services 1150
Hy-Vee Grocery 1300
ACT Educational&Workforce Development programs/services 1100
Rockwell International Communications/Navigation mfg 729
Lear Automotive padded products 930
Procter&Gamble Health care &beauty products 560
City of Iowa City Governmental services 580
Systems Unlimited Assisted Living 478
Oral B Laboratories Toothbrush manufacturing 800
MCI Mass Markets Services telecommunications 633
` ' PRIMED 1O-FEB-04 11111 III 1 11-'1 1 1 11 11 11 1 I
r U CITY OF IDRA CITY
F B 0 au FIRMED BUDGET FOR FYI FY07 •
*3s15..fi'ek;..see'1V4 r ,...3 }S 414:61OW 4N/4k '•71.4"la1."- 2:4 tT 'F:.ad`-t , 4.1us1454,1. 14 r-ri:..''..'"k .arr?:i .kerv:3 -
6 le 6 1 V Ii FY02 IHC/DEC FY03 INC/DEC FY04 IHC/DEC REFI, IHC ECT -::ADMIN. IHC/DEC .,FY06.,, INC/DEC FY07 IHC/DEC
ACCWNT /p
HIKERS DESCRIPTIO/ •lii :I. ACTUAL 2 ACTUAL 2 TCDOET 2 PROPOSAL 7 BUDDET 2 PROJECTED / REJECTED 2
0 .,r; �.•4 _;s .>..r•.:• ?" s.raar.. ,166:14 �"�`"'a'.�:�a .vai+c•anes *^ Y C t y§ .=.t.'Eaci :°�5
.,..-5.,•.., 4aa0 `�iv1' rr•a•d n•..
, 46110 6110 Pernanent Full Tine 81,079 89,674 4.43 88,536 4.56 91,947 3.85 94,630 2.92 99,630 2.92 98,886 4.50 103,338 9:50
° t{ lfditl4 eIPn3eGtoln _:t2>'+� :A-_ - F=: .4.to io-"-A` ."'a- a „knn;.` 6n+" �'c�,'r
r 46m"�SOvercnre wages '-4 800 . 7 '"'XO .r0 :4: - 84 38'.'Y !4 d'D5' "- 09" :'i00 ''�'"- '"3
1 46110 6230 Longevity Pay 1,350 1,450 7.41 1,450 .00 1,950 .00 .1 450 10 1•,450 00 1450• -00
° r 46110 6310 Fica 6,527 6,812 4.37 7107 4.33 7,400 4.12 7,591 2.58 7,591 2.58 7,933 4.51 8,290 4.50
f .r'1'4-). riOa 4" .d." %-Ys " -.?� 8 '�ggy�p p ��-- 6y iy�r .. 8 n 7 3 .36"4�+.r.
46 err el 0 "'x"`0' "'QU 0 U U""m' `0•'_..'."'� �:b0 O" .000
17 46110 6410 Health,Insurance 7,539 9,919 31.57, 11,358 14,51 13;097 15.31 14;653 11:88 14,653. .11,88 16,118. 1010 16,924 5.00•
° is 46110-6420 Life Insurance 273 286 4.76 299 9.55 312 4.35 319 2.24 319 2.24 325' 188 332 2.15
1 , -1 :cr.7 :. 2 r, • Y414...1.5.1;-, 1645 ��q� '' _ r-,4 ,'_'64 7
Z' Vtfolf871`i'A t'�An`e F.< �}.$ �D . s... r ""'"."0D 0 " iii ..,. .gqDO .''a OU 0"' 0'""
21 46110 6610 Monthly Cellular/pcs 0 0 .00 150 .00 0 -100:00 325 .00 .325 .00 932 2.15 339 2.:11
Q z2.;::"1:4. . c::.'. 4;-Sr` • riAlIITtart ..s'M,:" 0. 9.+:;. I.•,.,. ip g1Y„a;31o.1n2'ES`-el0 2 ;: ';8'H:F'Sr00 ,aYe'-
4d:.,aar got r.t;.4R3 ,9too0. $ lw7ao:; 4�oowAr.:. cga "pS
25 46110 7110 Office Supplies 206 67 -67.48 133 98.51. 70 -47.37 -139 9857 . 139 .98:51 142 2.16 145 Ill
i 26 46110 7120 Books Magauces 6 Heuspapers 175 180 7.43 '188 00 196 4.26 196 00 196 .00 200 2.04 204 2.00
2 ;,i r.• r f,r n'::r:Ee'3 #""tr•-£.Dt.Irv;' 4 0:�3�^X24 o_. ar w 11M as•p14,r r:J r. 0 e05""'-rc`�7 - ...
26 ~` 'r 66 +: ',I"P 3----�8"-lY5.63'i-l1i 79:lt'""` .76 -171.. .' 0`"-"180.84- 000'0 .3.45`-'-''�"-0 ;3
2 461107153 Hisc. Pic'a1Vs rs s 31 73 135 98 28 61.64 76 171:43 29 -61.84 29 61:89, JO 345 31 3.33
961107219 A;Chenicals 440 580 31,81 255 -56.03 606 137:65 480 20,74 GO -20.79 490 218 500 '2.04
. , Ita.7A,. ?,=04511 r,A9030rw,at r.kyi.25s4 1000 3.N OOO,571 X30 .. 141;; w Qr �s, .-"2n081 x- , .y ,.
32 m r r hr ' TR f.,, 9zw. .p'4'3eL'944u4usar' b 1''R Z'08""'"""" i` T•7 3„ _,-
3z a0 rt, rhrl r .6 3.GE 93 3 . q -3 . "'4 7 ` .. .:.
33 46110 7243 Fluids Cases A Other 0 0 .00 11 .00 0 100.00 11 .00 . 11 -400 11 .DO 11 10
34 46110 7250 Saait 6 Iad Supp. 505 455 -9.90 418 -8.13 500 19.62 437 -12.60 437 -12.60 446 2.06 455 2:02
' ar r14'._zr., u - --- a'uz ,:.: . 4eg1552 16 30 419x7.5 v; 600.0 7T7. 0 71�2p r-,.2a14c44 5/9..k3:,1':$6�'�-�•�--+c'^7's-3*a
es. =t41 0� 6 8 .[ 00'00-"300 861.54 u 0 U' lit 0 .0e---'
37 46110 7286 M-se- Supplies 265 858 223.77 52 -93.99 500 861.54 450 10.00- 450 10 00 459 2.00. 968 1.46
an 46110`7208 Piper Supplies 9 17 88.89 52 205.80 18 -65.38 54 200.00 54 200:00 55 185 56 1.82
3 .. v-rr` .s,,dn,,-.,. •;" r..,.W � #:„gr. ,.r ,v ,g;I: ;i;°050 ;F.'f^*s27.174331944r14‘21 V. ,iaf�,r'D x w/ em,.:^'-d34 sT1' r
rd314rteaY v
m 6 P �'�` 1` rr +. 53'7: 52.5 2 �8 ' 5"
41" -46110 7313 Plunhany Supplies 74 7 -90.54 0 -100,00, 50 .00 0 -100.00 0 100.00 0- 00 a MO
42 '461107314 Electrical Supplies 361 279 22.71' 62 77,78 292 370.97 210 2808 210 28:08 214 no 218 1:87
. 6 .t ,,
•r ur i ' tian..atilliZa ft2g - 1s 9 � �a"`lp4 2 .. ' a .4.1,-- iw -+ t at is a° . " 4;.. .. ,s -6ttr 1om'+4'
d4 Y
A5 •46110r7321.Msnor Equip. Hep. at 48 86 79.17 82 -4.65 90- 9_76 86 -4:44 86 444 88 2.33• 90 -27
4e •'46//0/331 Auto-Alight Truck 75 22 -70.67 68 209:09` 23 -66.18 71 20070 71 20870 72 141 73 1.39
') 4 v r.4 A.,.rr ante.-I.ili, + t..:.f 00^Or �r..,m1.1 sir n 0 ,r •rr. 5.,.„rr7001.Aet, rill,, :t;..17vI , lole ara,�;.._ r ",zf+
43 � ent 27-"--'"`0 -L .O 0 .rC tl r Or r0 .ir' -:”7001.Yet'. 0 .x00"-
4s 46110 7352 Concrete 0 0. .00 162- ..00 0 100.00 169 '00 - 169 100 172 . 1,78 17,5 :74
r 55 461107352 Asphalt 43 0 300,00 73 :00 0 =100.00 76 .00 76 :00 70�- 2.63 80 `56
1 s• . -r- :-o 4aa" r n r e- . LO ODe00 --�4 r::.`W- 14'.14tx.'s'tx' r 2',':: 2149 ;....371"u�r"5.-- 4 i`:j?
f%:azt`'aS�. ,�P�yv:_r.SS"i J+..,a.,\Y ]F.Fi,
53 46110.-7343-Traffic rl. Inprav 607 1,411 132.45 318 -77.46 1,474 363:52 1,060 -2819 1,060 28409 1,981, 1:=48 1,103 2609
C .. .rale, r ?mcz5":u*,w4A;_ "Q00. OT 444.rr�^: ;037!"r ...:ii,. 44/for rtir sem:-i. �3,Cwbs , ar-.!`45'.2 . 7' '.:.DITS404",7•I. sC407:4iftau':77' .• ' •1rxv'S,3r'• "'s*14.al.7 ,..74055.. .V.-0 Imr44 r -414 , ,.,.e.112
56 461108121 Court Costs k Serv. 0 0 00 281 .00 0 '100,00 0• .00• 0 -;00 0'' 00 0 ,00
I fie 46110 8122 Attorney Services 46 39 -15.22 0 -101.00 42 :00 0 -100.00' ' 0 -100.'00' 0' .00 0 OD
;Y;;c +o-v,xyv-::-.:•r •ai.-..$r es w....as °..P* z.•Y. .r,aye•....1.1 J, I tai3::4 i J .igee x.'',:04'04..11 .3:^4.-SA4.e- v rK ,�
6 -ra•- "��'"' _._ ;-x .;
0
-
,
-.. 6 ,:;-,:r: 2m..a. ;.v-..,.., .. �; s s,uy:J.: €..tea ,:.'•xSr,"drt:e"airn8?•.Ci7 a-. ... :a` . . .'< er.� - ,. , . ... . - 4 £[4,
-� - "e - 3:.;...x.f3uvE+ .acE`l7�r •^sx"wa �iG.��.a...a.A4'o-,L'4C � _.
PRINTED 10-FED-04
z FROPOS•E6lDET FY S no?
3)i..1. ' .a -4.1 `, ;'S-alar,r,,.„ •- •, :;.Xv5.a'+ `ita4:" +G .'s;4._: :n..•.:; 0.,...• c .m� •�.g•,3u7„ .. a ',if :.i k .. .«u :Y.:.h.V.v.n, 'gar,- . ..S:ri:r• ,.. .v4..i-41.3 ,. +a Y'.':.•N:
5
a iw
ACCOUNT FY01 FY02 INC/DEC FY03 INC/DEC FY04 INC/DEC DEPT INC/DEC ADh111 INC/DEC FY06, INC/DEC Y07 INC/DEC
s NUMERS DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL 4 ACTUAL 2 MIDGET / PROPOSAL / `DODCET % PROJECTED" /. PROJECTED 2
.r+„�.._.- +mos 3^:.�CkY r-u:; M..TkN::�". a„ y...:: x*y -F:.s:�w'Sas•s�..�.tai s.' <"fir-;F•:
e
3 46110 816isa Services 0 0 00 0 975 .00 0 -100.00; 0 .00. 0 .00 0 00 0 .00
46110 81633 Management Services 65 3,591 5,424.62 6,104 89'98 0 -100.00 0 .00 0 .00 • 0 00 tl 00
1 .i.• til y.;.ua"'. i w t Sas< Os., . mss.. 61 ,07
, •..1 - e i ic i'edes .. 414 810 4°00` 8""'-1 7 .51 ,000741‘74°.40 Twu .0 36�..` 0'"""`;2 45 ' 14s"�,
46110 8167 Testing Services 610 47.34 914 49 84 1,450 58;64 1;450; .•00, 1 450 .000 1450 .00 1 450 .00
46110 8211"Telephone Rental 592 951 75.46 3420 6663�..441� ,„, 0' -10-100.00 0 .00 r D .00 8' `00 0 .00
,;"-.' ri 117PJi^PA'o�0t T^ 2+ .a'$""''_ 99 , a:'PF55.. ._2142772--- 92`-`14M--100'247r-108--4117792-102-2110-• 5"•' u,4 65 ..41167¢7 ,,, s/6 - r52 ,.. Faa=sr--T,+.>;l
r a @ 0 s.-... � x *.:,:x.`'100 1.00
1 96110 8219 PMee Equip. Charges 0 0 .00 309 .00 0 -100.00 -13 .00 •• 0 ,00 �0 ,00 0 :00
0 1 9611817.882233 Carriers • 13 3? 200.00 40 2:56 42 5:00 43 2.38 43 2.38 44 2.33 45 2.27
1 ..:.•,(it8239`A Mgathl. pm:. ,--. ..-1+- '887- 7e3 58nd3p rr 3SAy 3144 6 ms 00057f&,-.'-:'3 o or----'--382•x;. 53'S'+' •`-3 _ :419x ,„--,^-r .,:-•Ky-..,.
---'41-
22' dv 5g sb80 307 0-1-1.0030r2;000.y055 , 3 .0D�' .^ 0 100:00 6 0' 100:00' 0 • 80`-' -""00
98110 Travel Advance N 0 6 � .46:Y9 - 'X825'm"'184.98""`•7826""'�°43',2 8200 5 �"`1 t0• 80 0 ^08
a 46110 4312 Trans Transportation 1,606 329 -79.51 1,617 391.49 600 -62.89 600 .00 600 .00 611 113 623 1.96
(.) E.+ .:,y. r�'' tao :.S..;. .3." °. ,( - id " ,t5r 9 '' - 8 487 ", - ro959Q-'-^691 leg y' '- ',L
a 1 9r X00 84��^`'1`4A".`+' :"- 0iz" ',..00"'° -. -
x 98110 8316 hisc ravel Expense 0 D 00 -26 .00 0 -100.00 0 .00 0 .00 0- 00 0 ,.00
46110131r •* EBF
461108319 heals 1,200 400 -66.67 137 -65.75 250 82.98 250 .00 250 `00 255` 200 260 1.96
1 1 }'s-t+
� ` V?1"rLy in� 33- `85%, QP"'��.9"""`�4;�""lYa71 `�9'•','7�5`g "t".'45 1 ?��4�'i�"YFO YI 4 5 °� a ��03
46310 8420 Fire-6 Casualty Ins 6,572 8,796 33.24 11,619 32.04 10,115 .-12.91 13,356 32.09 13;356 =1.7.35."`"
32:04. 13;610 A.R0 13,869 1.90.
Jr., '461188430 barker s-Conp Ins. • 353 221 -37.39- 187 15:38 254 35.83 - 215 1535" ' ' 215 -15:35 226'` 'S 12 237 4.87
3 „ ''.4,;:41t.74. ••42142;"'.3' t. ...:.K+fk'ix` +-r yb 3 ' 139 ss -0Og00 .F3.5p500 -y r ,000 •yd55y9 Yz•y,,�,4, 100 8 - 50 ,{,ts0)1CF",.,^r57513.,_e001�rn- c2T„?t•.•e,i,:'Ny
s .30 ` 0 '-1000.00 46 ''.00 4 -4 00 290 0
46110 8540 Energy Craot Payback 331 332 .30 331 -.30 0 -100.00 -0: .00 - 0 .00 •� 0 .00 0 - 00
'461108550 Heating Fuel/•as 8,085 2,578 -68.11 5,510 113.73 5,510 .00 "5;551' 74 "5`551 74' 5,829 5.01 6,120 4:99
"I ...is„ , n2�' +r"°' if::: ,•.; 7:. 9. ei"Ro?l4i895 s 2 q4-�, 20 � 1 2,00+..> 1 .$w t+g
1 'id O3 .42 860 1 . 9 Od4 .fi 15`10 8d0 r---t-mi 00s""" 9
3 461108580.biter aUtility-Charge 1,321 1,222 -7.4? 993 -18.74 1,222 23.06 993 :18.71 •993 -18:79-,- 993. 00 ,993 .40
46110 8611 Vehicle Repairs 1,755 1,751 -.23 994 -93.23 1,830 84.10 • 1,039 -43.22 1,039' -93.22 1;060 2.02 1,081 1.98 •
) e `.tti3r :Ali.' 1P'' -+ =`l"•321.O.O."y'1;150,I0wJri0 25zT3 . 15 9111. .x, R Z 55�47 e1"/:,'":.ds 7, g5.+4s5'&a .' '.48�c".171 21") '` `°.1^5687`u`" -,: ,",:int
97 N'3 6 "-et. 7 ,767�P94 67 `7"9' ,990'� '8-1;526 2.01
F 46110,,8623-Rep:Df Heating Equip 544. 1,239 126.84 .724 -40,92 1,296., 77,78 745, -40:97 765 -40:97: 780, 1.94) 796 '2,05•
4.
"46110'862}Rep Df Cooling Equip 433 x472 9.01 518 475 496 -4:25 ' 544 9:68 599 ' -9:68' ' 355' 2.02 566 1:'98
c'• 1 3•:t„n, i�`- . -*L32 21. ;gin.- 6i :g:na:. `0__,_. '� ` 0 , 128
461108629 Rep.Jlaint ToOldg 1,455 9,275 537.46 1,386 85 06 9,69 599.28 1,948 -85.06 1.498 85.06. 1477- 2.00- 1,507 ,2:03
961101632 Office EquiippgnRomair 59 0 -100.00 0- CO 0 .00 '0 .00 - `0 00' ``0" 00 9 -.88
c 0 F ":3 v`r r It e p " .;'wt,t•,n:xw.5.wz�i3, , 5..::.':. , ,z. 6 `• r' 11 ,cam, 2 1 ..v •r` 1c ,�,�. ,
.46 1 od ervice •535 • 1.. • v9 ' , OTS 2 ,800 8"800 00
F Lauedgy, ,,96 11,AO 607 1,85 623 2.64 634, 177 8.95' .697.• 2,05 660. 1:96
U1 5 -96�Hahling 0 20 .00 800 3,900:00 21 97:38 `500' 2,081105 '500 2'280'95 '510 ' 2 04 520 1:96
5'....at:Tli i ,A It. ,41-41-t
- r M 00551t42.
2 8'.
6s d4 5 0623�{li�a285 " t 39 - ➢T00
12
3
461102762_Fin Processing9 20 10 14.70 51 10 00 60 0:09 88 12.95 - 13 -10.00- 21,+• 99
46230 8769 Technical Services 3,492 2 933 39:'79 2,553 12 96 3.065 20:05 2668 -12.95 2"668 =12:45 2721 1-"49 2,775 1.98
5 1`.117;k? 4.^:.'a- 1-'4(c t c`-221-.�vseel. «°'b 1 •.:,Vii"-'j`? :es ,1'331 ;;;•e-r,,.'2;'#t17.41...‘531:,C11.: . .::i` i5w 4:tue N_1 f aR-at '4i._ ,,, '-•4-0.4.11 x'; '. ''t *t5,1Me•.'i- F n.
461148824 ITS Desktop Pak 7 87411 3.55/ :11
s
5 pport490 003 31.31 2;921 259 18 535 04:00 535 00 "1535- „00 - ..590, 2:00" 550 2:00
�5 481108825 TTS"Equip Repl. CNghk 990 1,003 1.31 941 618 0 -400:00 0 00 0 •'.00'- � 0 :00' 0 a0
5 ^ii:.r:ill k?;`!r-' „_44•r ..8 ,g":;q... i.. wkea e.Vf.W . ., ,..• ?..R21s•'^•t NJ5.5•••"1.t,.F¢a`sx ;a'-,4vast, ,,,,. r _:' a, t -ur a,.•le11,..'.'& c. t•...
- .,:•g:' ;.•..4•':' :wrLa,vg •-. '4a..Q,tYC'YFi„÷,,H..a +%:9?'R. ''8"x`3* °' n <�".'zskt r.
..
fl
.. Yl..vr-a. .4,t...+:tu..%T',.4 ,1":::..-;;;.,rray nmCl ..fu_".."4-?a..
PRIMED 10-FED-04
t -CITY of IDIA CITY
- .. . ; " ' PRIITSED DDET FOR FY05 2 4,m,...3 y,a _ X 'mRM' .� !DME,dW4+x.v' ;:sJ•v3`�s �-'.-o !:_ M.:r ? 5 ,. « e,s - „ r r
, i" .i". e u- . . S k,,. i�nk _dt'
. atallananginnatrangi
s ACCOIDIT FY01 FY02 INC/DEC FY03 INC/DEC FY04 INC/DEC J)EPT INC/DEC ADEN INC/DE8 FYD4 INC/DEC FY07 INC/DEC
s EMBERS DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL Z. ACTUAL / CURET / PROPOSAL / BUDGET / PROJECTED / PRIIJECTED '2-" 7C'".v,:,.t rti-Y.t't.._' ( 1 ' 'a;3laWS'.. .-.9A.V.,,,,,.. ..sec}er ,y :, •.r it.e t,t-eftu1 .a :4,41 .3rah i'i! ..;444. i.n;-r. '} a,-. e.1• .+'` , f�5 ->�,4.'%)+ c,1: ewpr`.,.rti E+ ti.wF: .; :-a ..._..
a � SNet. ks ee5 13' I• I QD.II I ..00 I II 11 I ,I
.11 L1p
e 96310 8827 ITS He rks Cdargeback 330 360 9.09 360 .00 360 360 � 360 .� 3600
1 46110 8841 Supplg Roan Clgb2cks 4 0 -100.00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 :00 0 .00 360 .8800
.111114
�y, �
�g� ,. 3 0'•* Ieire• - i 1': `� S1 1 "s.: `rskt:._ I I n4 7- `V+1 {�vrs '3 ^.1, 11...--c.., 1 a ' y'T.vO•Y . .111 ,,s,e,, nKe, ">^•;a3! 'i.
� ` ••a 1 � ., o7ym 5gg'h5c< "'�dt` ��'-A2.20' 09 -37:11 1 .11.V.! rI I .1
-46110 8845 Calranications CM19bk 181 0 -100.00 1,512 .00 1,618 7 01 1;080 33 25 1,080 -33;25• 1,000 00 1 080 .00
1 46110 8846 Pbohe Adnin/Repl Chgback 0 0 .00 0 4.00 480 .00 0 -100.00 0 -300:00 0 .00 0 .00
(-) i-n••..:4 84 P$" r eb r :-r-"I'S' ` vg 07 .1,�,`1,BObD�'t+r as 5i 12"`�R'.''.�'$`; 1Z'P 73.3 3 16 `. 1:' 4ao's.rt .57g ..D 61 ';' ...
1 . 46110 8930'Dues F Denbarships345 D 45 7 .7 4 '601 `64`2? 1 36 1 0 0
1 345 345 .00 345 .00 1,011 193.04 .360 64.00 361 -64.29 368 1.94 375 1;90
r „ 46110 8942 Bdlitng Rental 65 0 -100.00 0 .000 .00 0 .00 0 .00 0 00 D :00
1„r,F;yu„L r"--. ' gas.4i• +S.ab�-)nTs. ?; 8r.� - ro"'°al''4a'0Oa;'7...z4t5o0 vi7.s 5a `r,_5.��. ' . « •:X ,7N - -.1-ail-,:,. nar.:,:: at-cpkra
21 a l i e ' 0 .80 0 D 0 .87 I .00 '. 0
zl 46110 8950 City Vehicle.Repl. 15,120 15,648. 3.82 17,111 9.00 16,326 -4.59 9;000 -49:87 9,000 -49.87 9,000 .DO 9,000 .8D
J 2•.r,,; ... 6q ''+. "Y#00ktI13tl J >, .. & ?D9S =S4 7D t`9• tl sDo 4k36Da:406 0M113 a 9aa P. ` 9D eis9z �e2 tra°10.3
96110 9000 Capital Dutlag 0 0 .00 0 00 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 -0 .00 0 .00
246110 9220 Contracted Inprou. 0 0 .00 0 .00 0 .00 7,000 .00 7,000 .00 43,700 524.29 0 -100:00
' ? 2 72--,,tui, l .4nS '.srs'c` .,s _ Y 1 -. in 11 ., S'. .c.c-'� '..,.,$.::ro .' 'se '0 ;:
F5F � *: 4-..-0 - IIyI. I D 0 D 0,008
'1'-DY`• cEcts 1 .11 1 III I
96110 9540 Cayyital Protects 6 000 1 433 -76.12 0 -100.00 0 :00 0 00 - .0 .00 0 00 0 DO
46110 9720 Interfund Loans 107,962 123,722 15.13 89,490 -31.31 85,940 .53 85,490 .00 85,410 .00 85,990 00 85,490 .00-
,...,1 3t9 4-. :1'r'a s1...1r- iO4,:"4,07p-:.. ,,..'.t'.'•a„ - mr+-„'2, C, q * .154-, ..,44,2 zit,40,7,::-.4,4. , ".k't' ;_...�^a.4JA"`:S ti•a*. ' 'r`.Y.to iM x> .EJ, ".s ° -A.,;;;.-;;%,m..,,
• 91 n 1 - :b06 ,56""'-37.IOD "85491 ..210 40 I I IV •i
. 01 "lY ,'41 - 0.&01
46110 TOTAL 344,932 345,021 000 310,255 -10.100 367,929 18.600 326847 -10.600 328,4$6 10600 370,263 12 600 365,294 -1.300
r} -• ''or a Cw. :Pit'elf 5"SYk :m•mwr..vs...wcr•.•->rr7Mrlg n ..: - v..,g�D , . _
- .� 3�-}:4L± ,.9Y •m."v; :" " $33.'_:'• �.. . ..SR:Y:!Fs".�,'-_sa+�-I Ie^_.,.v..c.
3
•
1 .a-r.=ca,',.. '1;.-vc 1r i.3:`'« •"(xAC'': 1 a irt' 'fh e d`.,a"@'°;•.fan 4'.W.M1,., .M*,.al''3 i ,:m^S::'bte1,-'4 44:4414...rn.4441447144W..Iran .14,---4'4' 1/4 '.: .. .,2,?,_., giath":,"fs ''al.':,
41 - ..
4.
", d ".:*e a. '. 3, `:3'. ..»k'1 ,g'?f.{"e.+s= :.41..a.%vr ,>, ..'k':kp'.-:.+imt+"s ,.tT.•n7.G::s4..,va,A.:f',:L'*e."fd.:.auY'.�xa,> ,SeS.w n . <.-
...:.fir."6R'�'r ,... .._8�'=-moi•-+.E:WR'e: - v=S>�c'
) 4 :..'.f r.wt ,,.;, M ,0.u4. -'':-.::.,:•%Moat,- 115:* •'.. `iz.12x#r-'.s�.$".$aa>:t5 s`,fl'.,s ..4i*"':rr. 'Ll.'1"1,44;"'.s 7.skStE'aT:",S1-411T,C'nskt ,*g'H''e':?.,,Mg..a ::7:& .,,:3,-sfed -if ,K1M.Tt':' '.. Si^:' r."!L
4.
5 a. IMO"71522NOFIEMMET" "s"s` .. •.. .:°>",•+:?9ea:.as-°v4-dv::..'.?•.z•:Wr-. ,;.+ e ..,rd-2k:.".:-1.0'..-..A.'". i',:`-m. :cis.: u.�.. eye: ,.. CeYvL"ax.'°.7Fa.•:` 451£?-4.;12
v {
.::-. .r :-::A:n Yr., r 'X'"uT"se•�` r"�'t..'da sn,'••21E!'iTAi kdG. d?.S'cri,;+:J�:?.:'s58:9"�.„n7..13+irxa<44?tT•.'1'' "" " .,
16"t . tea., .4 .:v;_:. 3A '-1,,- , .:,,.'zJ .,,':"4' •rn•-2,..b r• 0:>, :e) 4!7`".4,k-rel,46 'oStle,.. „ R.. "� ,sT:avalxa m','EbroRRs,Rt_:.Y ,...s _ k r
6,
6
x.1 6 ':r.`er •War-.i.,:::t:zmz:7a;!r-orw"kait:F;`.. 7':'.4:h<:1ta M{a . ..&X.4-..,7,1/4+., .04"?*,,:.`:..& it 'tY;':4` av:..V-14.,.0..".'“ .C..:.c itlat."a tk'-.+_,a555va,.1;kn ,l Gmm,. v!,..e 3s a.,,.G•' '-e.4f ::e}d 1 ee....mt'v JO
•
REVE: 03.11.04 13:51:34 - Page: 180
Iowa City General Ledger System
Feburary 2004 Revenues Summary
FY 2004 Revenue Reporting
For the period 02.01.04 to 02.29.04
Estimated YTD Period
Account Revenue Revenue Revenue Remainder
7600 Airport
560100 AIRPORT OPERATIONS
USE OF MONEY & PROP.
382100 Land Rental 10000.00 16777.34 1875.00 -6777.34 167.77
382200 Building/room Rental 150275.00 98196.41 10936.50 52078.59 65.34
384200 Vending Machine Comm 32.40 7.20 -32 .40
384900 Other Commissions 6350.00 8578.80 401.40 -2228 .80 135.10
Total USE OF MONEY & PROP. 166625.00 123584.95 13220.10 43040.05 74.17
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES
393120 General Levy 183000.00 122000.00 15250.00 61000.00 66.67
Total OTHER FINANCING' SOURCES 183000.00 122000.00 15250.00 61000.00 66.67
Total AIRPORT OPERATIONS 349625.00 245584.95 28470.10 104040 .05 70.24
iferPFEWliel
MAR 2 3 2004
_JI�I�C�u U L�
EXPE: 03.11.04 13:48:09 Page: 358
- a 9°at3 's (,n Iowa City General Ledger System
February 2004 Expenditures Summary
7.: 0 L' anL 'j; ' FY 2004 Expense Reporting
vliTh 6 , 10:3-:
i'+ ! For the period 02.01.04 to 02.29.04
V
;
.xva. ......�- _�_.__ e .
YTD Period
J'JLc IL' a ount Appropriated Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrance Balance % Used
7600 Airport
560100 AIRPORT OPERATIONS
PERSONNEL •
411000 Perm. Full Time 91947.00 60024.26 7067.20 31922 .74 65.28
413000 Temporary Employees 2728.00 1181.50 1546.50 43 .31
414100 Overtime Wages 608.00 673.68 -65 .68 110 .80
414500 Longevity Pay 1450.00 1450.00 100 .00
421100 Health Insurance 13097.00 8254.40 1029.30 4842.60 63 .03
421200 Dental Insurance 373.44 46.68 -373.44
421300 Life Insurance 312.00 314.67 -2.67 100.86
421400 Disability Insurance 645.00 427.16 53.59 217.84 66.23
422100 Fica 7400.00 4832.58 539.48 2567.42 65.31
423100 Ipers 5407.00 3582.84 407.80 1824.16 66.26
424500 Monthly Cellular/PCS 162.50 25.00 -162.50
Total PERSONNEL 123594.00 81277.03 9169.05 42316.97 65.76
SERVICES
431070 Attorney Services 42.00 42 .00
431111 Engineering Services 2000.00 5200.00 -3200.00 260.00
432020 Annual Audit 187.25 187.25 -187.25
432060 Consultant Services 14546.16 76.89 -14546.16
432070 Management Services 65.00 -65.00
433030 Long Distance Serv. 78.00 78.00
433044 Advertising 2000.00 2000 .00
435051 Wireless Phone Serv. 192.00 7.88 184.12 4.10
435055 Postage 9.90 -9.90
435057 Couriers 42.00 42 .00
435060 Legal. Publications 162.00 27.27 134 .73 16.83
436030 Transportation 600.00 227.50 372 .50 37.92
436050 Registration 665.00 90.00 575.00 13 .53
436060 Lodging 825.00 650.63 174.37 78.86
436070 Misc Travel 135.79 -135.79
436080 Meals 250.00 109.95 140.05 43.98
437010 Comp. Liability Ins. 9775.00 7797.75 1977.25 79.77
437020 Fire & Casualty Ins. 10115.00 10115.00
EXPE: 03.11.04 13:48:09 Page: 359
Iowa City General Ledger System
February 2004 Expenditures Summary
FY 2004 Expense Reporting
For the period 02.01.04 to 02.29.04
YTD Period
Account Appropriated Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrance Balance % Used
7600 Airport (CONTINUED)
560100 AIRPORT OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
SERVICES (CONTINUED)
437030 Worker's Comp Ins. 254.00 254.00
437200 Loss Reserve Payment 20000.00 35500.00 • -15500 .00 177.50
438030 Electricity 14720.00 9261.70 2474.32 5458.30 62.92
438070 Heating Fuel/gas 2707.00 3552.68 2900.15 -845.68 131.24
438080 Sewer Utility Charge 1014.00 925.60 88.40 91.28
438090 Water Utility Charge 1222.00 1015.27 206.73 83.08
439030 Testing Services 1450.00 529.00 175.00 921.00 36.48
439060 Other Prof Services 550.00 . -550 .00
441010 Vehicle Rep & Maint. 1987.00 685.21 95.92 1301.79 34.48
442010 Bldg. Rep. & Maint. 9692.00 1308.32 1012.79 8383 .68. 13 .50
442020 Repair Of Structure 1366.00 442.32 923 .68 32.38
442030 Rep Of Heating Equip 1296.00 1228.68 67.32 94.81
442040 Rep Of Cooling Equip 496.00 1396.90 -900 .90 281.63
442060 Rep Of Electric/plbg 341.00 378.00 -37.00 110 .85
443010 Equip. Rep. & Maint. 126.64 -126.64
443050 Radio Equipment Rep. 26.00 30.61 -4.61 117.73
443060 Telecom Equip. Rep. 70.00 -70.00
443080 Other Repair & Maint 6597.00 8349.27 -1752 .27 126.56
445060 Laundry Service 623 .00 570.72 111.90 52 .28 91.61
445070 Equipment Service 1321.00 540.25 58.00 780 .75 40.90
445090 Hauling 21.00 21.00
445140 Outside Printing 759.00 158.09 39.02 600.91 20.83
445190 Film Processing 10.00 10.00
445230 Technical Services 3065.00 1575.40 185.00 1489.60 51.40
445240 Word Processing 50.00 50.00
446100 City Attorney Chgbck 3162.00 384.46 2777.54 12.16
446130 ITS-PC/Peripheral Supplies 535.00 535.00 - 100.00
446140 ITS-Computer Replacement Chargeb 82.42 -82.42
446160 ITS-Network/Internet Charge 360.00 240.00 30.00 120.00 66.67
446200 Photocopying Chgback 590.00 331.12 48.28 258.88 56.12
446230 Long Distance Chargeback 4.75 -4.75
446300 Phone Equipment/Line Change 1618.00 531.25 48.05 1086.75 32.83
EXPE: 03:11.04 13:48:09Page: 360
Iowa City General Ledger System
February 2004 Expenditures Summary
FY 2004 Expense Reporting
For the period 02.01.04 to 02.29.04 -
YTD Period
Account Appropriated Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrance Balance % Used
7600 Airport (CONTINUED)
560100 AIRPORT OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
SERVICES (CONTINUED)
446310 Phone Administration/Replacement 480.00 480 .00
446320 Mail Chargebacks 553 .00 235.27 35.40 317.73 42.54
446330 Ups Chargebacks 12.00 12 .00
446350 City Vehicle Repl. 16326.00 9588.36 1203 .79 6737.64 58.73
449060 Dues & Memberships 1011.00 345.00 666.00 34.12
449140 Tools & Equip. Rent. 1430.00 1416.00 14 .00 99.02
449350 Meals (non-travel) 42.00 42 .00
Total SERVICES 121882.00 110943.37 8681.76 10938.63 91.03
SUPPLIES
452010 Office Supplies 70.00 87.52 -17.52 125.03
453030 Minor Telecom Equip. 378.00 378.00
454020 Subscriptions 184.95 -184.95
454040 Books, Mag. , Newspap 196.00 3 .45 192.55 1.76
455100 Misc. Peripherals 76.00 . 67.69 67.69 ' 8 .31 89.07
461040 Ag Chemicals 606.00 335.80 270 .20 55.41
462030 Sanit. & Ind. Supp. 500.00 192.11 37.06 307.89 38.42
465050 Other Fuels 1530.00 1156.48 197.54 373 .52 75.59
465060 Grease & Oil 31.57 -31:57
465070 Other Lubricants 63.00 63 .00
466020 Lumber/hardware 492.00 146.45 345.55 29.77
466030 Paint & Supplies 83.00 225.25 -142.25 271.39
466040 Plumbing Supplies 50.00 35.74 14.26 71.48
466050 Electrical Supplies 292.00 516.68 66.22 -224.68 176.95
' 466060 Bdlg. & Improv. Mat. 10000.00 55.95 9944.05 .56
466070 Bldg. & Const. Supp. 223 .00 557.88 7.70 -334.88 250 .17
467020 Minor Equip. Rep Mat 90.00 90.00
467100 Auto & Light Truck 23 .00 61.98 11.99 -38.98 269.48
467140 Snow Removal Equip. 142.50 -142.50
467160 General Equipment 600.00 600 .00
468010 Surfacing Materials 100.00 100 .00
468050 Sand 41.00 39.71 1.29 96.85
•
EXPE: 03.11.04 13:48:09 Page: 361
Iowa City General Ledger System
February 2004 Expenditures Summary
FY 2004 Expense Reporting
For the period 02.01.04 to 02.29.04
YTD Period
Account Appropriated Expenditures Expenditures xpenditures Encumbrance Balance % Used
7600 Airport (CONTINUED)
560100 AIRPORT OPERATIONS (CONTINUED)
SUPPLIES (CONTINUED)
469040 Traffic Ctrl. Improv 1474.00 399.58 1074.42 27.11
469190 Tools & Minor Equip. 830.00 830 .00
469210 First Aid/safety Sup 300.00 300.00
469260 Fire Ext. & Refills 51.22 -51.22
469320 Misc. Supplies 500.00 459.35 3 .15 40.65 91.87
469370 Paper Supplies 18.00 18 .00
Total SUPPLIES 18535.00 4751.86 391.35 13783 .14 25.64
OTHER FINANCIAL USES
490190 Interfund Transfers Out- Fu 85440.00 56960.00 7120.00 28480.00 66.67
Total OTHER FINANCIAL USES 85440.00 56960.00 7120.00 28480.00 66.67
Total AIRPORT OPERATIONS 349451.00 253932.26 25362.16 95518.74 72.67
•
n
a I IOWA CITY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
1801 South Riverside Drive Iowa City, Iowa 52246
Office Phone(319)356-5045
CONTACT PERSONNEL
Fort Dodge Flight Service Commission Members
800-458-4459: NOTAMS
800-992-7433: FSS John Krstenansky
1511 West Benton Street
Cedar Rapids FAA maintenance Iowa City 52246
363-7175 RES: 358-1801
Service Tech-Duane Panos BUS: 335-3234
ASOS maintenance-(319)386-7899 FAX:
Service Tech—Rich Schocke Mobile:
EMERGENCY REPAIRS Daniel Clay
3202 Friendship Street
Breese Plumbing: 338-8535 Iowa City 52245 •
Larew Co: 337-9681 RES: 341-3654
Electrical-Advanced Electric-351-6452 BUS: 335-5609
Solon Heating &Air—624-2679 FAX:
Overhead Door. 338-9747 Mobile:
Heating &Air-AAA Mechanical: 351-1843
Sewer—Roto Rooter339-1212 Carl Williams
Jet Air—248-1200 5 South 7th Avenue
Iowa City 52245
Airport maintenance RES: 354-2510
BUS: 354-8118, ext. 252
Gerry Kaefring Mobile:
Mobile: 330-2287 FAX:
Res:8284253
Ron O'Neil Randy Hartwig(Chair)
Mobile: 331-2102 629 South Riverside Drive
Res: 6242877 Iowa City, Iowa 52246
RES: 338-4372
Bus: 337-2101
FAX:
Mobile:
John Staley
314 Beldon Avenue
Iowa City, Iowa 52246
• RES: 337-3927
Bus: 356-2681
FAX:
16 Mar 04 Mobile:
,
the airport Secondly 1neadly provements, without which
all similar airports are span- the airport would have be-
sored by the counties in 'came pbsolete.The reality is
which they are located as the runways aren't long
well as a number of minder- enough to accommodate
palities ih the area served. many of today's small`'fast,
That the Atlanta consul- :jets, used for business and
Cant failed to provide.-clear` pleasure
examples is disappointing When viewed this way,
("City airport,must adopt the Iowa City Airport is do-'
new approach," March 11). ing a great job under ex •
-
Most general airports today tremely trying circum-
`.are hailing problems and ad- stances.
ressing them in .various ' Mary Hitchcock
ways. Rockfor•„.3111-, is..a } 'Iowa City
recent nearby example.Bus=
Messes there collected sev-
e'aljhundred thousands of
adllaf toattracta new niter-
ator only to find that aftet�a
couple of months the opera-
tor discontinued certain ser-
vices the businesses felt
were,critical due to'.lack of
adequate revenues.
The Atlanta airport con-
sultant's report!Was filled
with canned generalities_in-
.stead of facts and innovative-
'ideas. It is great:to say the
airliort brings ijtillibas''into
the area, but kgw.much'to.
whom?Would`much of:that
revenue still be available if
Iowa City depended solely
on the Cedar Rapids region-
al airport andother small
,fields?,Clearly the University
of••Iowa benefits, especially
the athletic program whose
donors fly in to games. Cer
Minty some larger area busi-
nesses located in Coralville
and West Branch as well as
Iowa City benefit, but little
benefit is felt by the average
taxpayer.
The airport manager and
commissioners have for
Airport received years been doing the right
• canned consulting annnd. They tried on crews
an industrial park excess •
airport land from which they
There are two main dif- received some income from
ferences between the Iowa farm operations. That rev-
City Airport and similar Mid- enue is gone, and so far the
west general airports. First, industry has not material-
in Iowa City the people who ized to contribute the larger
pay for the operations are revenue expected.They also
not the same people who planned and implemented
benefit from the operation of needed physical airport im-
. lowa City Press-Citizen: Opinion rage i or z
II
,corn M Ed. lfUl !' L HERE!
. -s• • News Sports Opinion Life
•
k . Imo Hawk Central Reports Classifieds Community
L a._
Letters Tuesday, March 23, 2004
Staff
Editorials City leaves airport in hold pattern
Writers Group Once again I must comment on the slanted way in which the Press-Citizen is
Officials reporting on the political process surrounding our airport("City airport must adopt
Editorial new approach," March 11). If the editorials and stories were to be believed, the
Notes public could assume that the volunteer Airport Commission was refusing to cede
control of the airport to the city. Worse, citizens could assume that commission
Cornfield members were refusing to implement most of the cost-cutting measures
Soul recommended by the$15,000 Airport Business Solutions report.
Subscribe
to the P-C Nothing could be further from the truth.
Jay Honeck
classified In fact,by portraying the last Airport Commission meeting as an Guest Opinion
SIRBi icRE "attempt by the commission to maintain control"in the face of
recommendations to the contrary,the Press-Citizen has twisted the facts 180 degrees away from
" reality:
career
Y I
bI eI •AirportBusiness Solutions'report clearly states that the current Airport Commission is essential 1
and should continue unchanged.
i„f •The suggestion to downgrade the commission to advisory board status came from a member of
'pm the volunteer airport commission itself-not from the city.When no other commissioner would
second the motion,it simply died on the table-hardly a power grab by the commission.
llpartmelisnm_ •Contrary to the editorial and articles,neither the city,nor Airport Business Solutions,ever has
suggested the elimination of an independent Airport Commission.
• Now let's talk about some of the other recommendations that Airport Business Solutions has made
-none of which are being acted on by the city.The report recommends that:
•City Manager Steve Atkins become a fiill-time,non-voting member of the Air-port Commission.
•The airport be aggressively marketed by the city to pilots and business nationwide.
•The airport pursue and construct an enhanced precision landing approach to allow planes to land
in all weather.
•Day-to-day operations be contracted out to Jet Air,Inc.-the airport business that already sells
gas,provides charter flights and repairs aircraft.
•The public be made aware of the contributions that the airport provides to the community and the
University of Iowa.
If the city is so worried about the day-to-day operation of the airport,why hasn't our city manager
http://www.press-citizen.com/opinion/032304guestedit.htm 3/24/2004
Iowa city rress-uittzen: opinion rage z or z .
joined the commission,as recommended?If the city is so worried about the airport making more
money,why is no one aggressively marketing it nationally?If the city is truly interested in
attracting more business to the airport,why is no one pursuing the construction of an Instrument
Landing System that could entice companies to base their aircraft here,potentially raising tens of
thousands of dollars annually?
These are the topics that need to be constructively discussed.Instead,we get a freshman city
councilor,Regenia Bailey,playing politics with the airport's future by arbitrarily cutting nearly 6
percent of its skeleton funding to the detriment of us all.
•
Here's the bottom line:The Airport Business Solu-tions report estimates that the Iowa City Airport
brings from$2 million to$2.5 million dollars directly into Iowa City every year.The annual cost
of running this facility is now$167,000 a year.That is a 1,500 percent return on our investment
an-nually.
It's clearly time for the Press-Citizen to move on to other topics.We all believe that government
can be made more efficient,and we all like to look for obvious areas of waste and fraud.However,
to concentrate such persistent and intense editorial scrutiny on such an insignificant-and
incredibly profitable-portion of our city's massive budget leads one to question the true motives
of the Press-Citizen's editorial board.
Reach Jay Honed; owner and innkeeper of The Alexis Park Inn&Suites, at
AlexisParklnn@mchsi.corn.
Let us know what you think of this story...
- ssifeds are >
press-citizens-cm
Copyright 1999 -2002 Iowa City Press-Citizen
1`.•.USPI Use of this site signifies your agreement to the
TCLSAIi'. (updated 2/1/03)
contact us at:
•
http://www.press-citizen.com/opinion/032304guestedit.httn 3/24/2004
. Airport panel tries to cope atter siasn- Dally Iowan -metro 1 arc + vs
v rk
Daily Iowan Extras:Career l Scholarships l Movies I Horoscopes l Race a Pic[Travel I GradZone
Re IP °al
e keen The Daily Iowan ,
SEC11101YS. SEARCH I 7T-1 advanced l ISLa! N' Mar 12, 2004 1 I usernan
D Home -
D Metro Home > Metro passwOI
I> Sports 1----
D
D Opinions Airport panel tries to cope after slash Iee01
D Arts
By Annie Shuppy-The Daily Iowan
D Photos Published: Friday, March 12, 2004
Iowa
D Daily Break The Iowa City Airport Commission mulled over how to cope with a$10,000 budget cut at HI: 31
its monthly meeting on Thursday. LO: 2
display ads
O 'no The Iowa City City Council voted March 2 to move$10,000 from the airport's budget to
”03..%-t0
the general fund.Airport manager Ron O'Neil said the commission will have to further
stretch an already"bare bones"budget.
assifieds i I 1
}n�Qp Ii??f/�� pp "There isn't any fluff in the budget,"he said. "This is going to be difficult." ISI
'PREG F L Some commission members said the City Council was"sending a message"to the group ='
_j4$i__ about airport management because the commission failed to adhere to a consultant's
S' recommendations for improvement.
't
"[The councilors are]unhappy because their perception is that the commission didn't do
•'41!*.P11.4.4,jy. anything,not because the commission didn't do anything,"said commission member
• Daniel Clay,adding that trying to get a point across through a budget cut is not effective Ha
communication.
`ar
Real Est:yle, O'Neil said there was"no suggestion"of an impending cut in his discussions with the city
„ Preview finance department in previous months,and he has not received any communication from
the city other than through the news media.
D Message Board "Ten thousand dollars was taken out without us knowing about it,"commission member
Carl Williams said.
FEATURES O'Neil said the commission may have to look at ways to increase revenues instead of
looking for further cuts.
Login I Register
Reader Forum Commission member John Staley said he likes the idea of trying to find new ways to
Calendar in income,including private funding. ""1
Back Issues
Archive before August
2002 O'Neil said he'd like to streamline the donation process,and other members suggested
Daily Iowan Staff naming hangars or the terminal after donors.
Advertising Rates How wou
Subscriptions Ultimately,members said,they'd like to forge a better relationship with the City Council, Hawkeye
Scholarships consideringthe commission's membershiphas changed dramaticallyin the past year.
Coach StJob Opportunities
performs:
"I think it would be key to say this is a whole new ball game,frankly,"Staley said. "We'll five years
LIMB take up the challenge and work with it." A+
http://www.dailyiowan.com/news/2004/03/12/Metro/Airport.Panel.Tries.To.Cope.After.S1a... 3/15/2004
City of Iowa City
MEMORANDUM .
ireroFinnrun
TO: Steve Atkins, City Manager - MAR 2 3 2004 I
FROM: Ron Knoche, City Engineer n
DATE: March 22, 2004 _�I�V�� U Ln1:./
RE: Mormon Trek Boulevard Extension and Runway 18/36
The Engineering Division is currently working with Earth Tech to develop the
construction plans for phase two of the Mormon Trek Boulevard Extension Project.
Phase two will extend the roadway from the west property line of the airport to Old
Highway 218 (Highway 921). This project will include two parts: 1.) culvert
construction under Mormon Trek and Old Highway 218 to accommodate Willow
Creek and 2.) pavement construction.
The current understanding between the City Council and the Airport Commission is
Runway 18/36 will remain open until the extension of Runway 07/25 is complete.
There is a possibility that the extension will be completed in the Fall of 2005, but a
more realistic completion date is the Fall of 2006. This is due to the availability of
funds from the FAA.
Under the current understanding with the Airport Commission, the pavement
construction for Mormon Trek will not be able to begin until Summer of 2006. The
construction would then be complete in Summer of 2007. There would be a year
delay in the opening of the Mormon Trek Boulevard extension from Dane Road to
Old Highway 218.
If there is a desire to bid Phase Two this Fall with both the paving and the culvert
work included in one project, then a modification to current understanding will need
to be discussed. The pavement construction will require Runway 18/36 to be closed
permanently after the work begins. The pavement construction will not begin until
the Summer of 2005. The project should be completed by the Summer of 2006.
The remaining STP Funds allocated by JCCOG for the Mormon Trek Extension will
be used for the construction of phase two. Since the STP funds are being used, the
project will have to be reviewed and let by the Iowa DOT. This requires a six-month
review process starting with submittal of a Concept Statement. The decision of
keeping the culvert and pavement construction in one contract should be decided
prior to submittal of the Concept Statement. In order to stay on schedule for a Fall
2004 letting, the Concept Statement will need to be submitted in May.
Cc: Rick Fosse, Public Works Director
Ron O'Neil, Airport Manager
Ross Spitz, Senior Engineer
Iowa Department of Transportation
800 Lincoln Way,Ames,IA 50010 515-239-1661
FAX: 515-239-1120
PE' fir
• MAR 15 NM EE
March 9,2004 11. 1
NOTICE OF 2004 PUBLIC INPUT MEETINGS
This year the Iowa Transportation Commission intends to conduct four public input meetings
around the state. These meetings are designed to allow citizens to present ideas and
comments on transportation policies and programs directly to the commissioners without
traveling to Ames.
The first public input meeting is scheduled to be April 13, 2004, in Iowa City.Three
additional meetings are tentatively planned for:
• June 2 in Decorah;
• August 10 in Ottumwa; and
• October 12 in Le Mars.
The commissioners would like to hear from representatives of regional and metropolitan
planning organizations, Iowa cities and counties, chambers of commerce, economic
development groups,modal transportation providers, and other interested groups and
individuals concerning transportation policies and programs at the meeting. The
commissioners also welcome suggestions concerning future transportation needs,policies
and programs.
Items that may be discussed at the meetings include the State Transportation Improvement
Program,transportation policies,highway, aviation, rail,river and transit issues.
To obtain a scheduled time on the agenda for the Commission meetings, please contact:
Office of Program Management
Iowa Department of Transportation
800 Lincoln Way
Ames,IA 50010
Telephone: 515-239-1148
FAX: 515-239-1975
E-Mail: donald.tebben@dot.state.ia.us
Page 2 0
March 9,2004
Please include the time period you prefer and general topic regarding transportation policies
and programs you wish to discuss with the Commission. This meeting is not intended to
address issues regarding specific projects, or issues on projects which are under construction.
The meeting rooms will generally be small; therefore,your group should be sized
accordingly. We ask that any group wishing to make a statement or presentation to the
commissioners make a written request or call for time on the agenda. The statements,
presentations, suggestions or questions should be organized to last 20 minutes or less. To
accommodate as many requests as possible, it may be necessary to further limit the amount
of time available or to ask some groups to combine their presentations.
Sincerely,
Neil Volmer, Director
Planning&Programming Division
DRT:drt
[4910-13] V
MAR 15 20041 .0
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION _ JL5171�L[ U L'SV
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2004-17143; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-9]
Modification of Class E Airspace; Iowa City, IA.
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments. •
SUMMARY: This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations, part 71 (14 CFR
71)by revising Class E airspace at Iowa City, IA. The nondirectional radio beacon
(NDB) navigation aid associated with Iowa City Municipal Airport has been
decommissioned. Standard instrument approach procedures (SIAPs)utilizing the NDB
are cancelled effective April 15, 2004. Controlled airspace extending upward from 700
feet Above Ground Level (AGL) that accommodates these SIAPs will no longer be
needed.
The intended effect of this rule is to provide appropriate controlled Class E airspace
for aircraft operating under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) at Iowa City, IA, to delete the
Hawkeye NDB and coordinates from the Iowa City, IA Class E airspace area legal
description and to bring the area into compliance with FAA Orders.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective on 0901 UTC, June 10, 2004.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or before
April 14, 2004.
04-ACE-9 2
. t
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the Docket Management System,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Room Plaza 401,400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. You must identify the docket number FAA-2004-
17143/Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-9, at the beginning of your comments. You may
also submit comments on the Internet at http://dms.dot.eov. You may review the public
docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Office(telephone 1-800-647-5527) is on the plaza
level of the Department of Transportation NASSIF Building at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic
Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520C DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-
2525.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This amendment to 14 CFR 71 revises the
Class E airspace at Iowa City, IA. The Hawkeye NDB has been decommissioned. NDB
Runway(RWY) 30 SLAP and NDB or Global Positioning System (GPS)-A SLAP that
serve Iowa City Municipal Airport are cancelled effective April 15, 2004. Controlled
airspace extending upward from 700 feet AGL that accommodates these SIAPs will no
longer be needed. The amendment to Class E airspace at Iowa City, IA provides
controlled airspace at and above 700 feet AGL to contain the remaining SIAPs that serve
Iowa City Municipal Airport. The additional Class E airspace necessary for the NDB or
GPS-A SIAP is revoked. The Hawkeye NDB and coordinates, and reference to these, are
deleted from the legal description of Iowa City, IA Class E5 airspace. These actions
bring the Iowa City, IA Class E airspace into compliance with FAA Order 7400.2E,
04-ACE-9 3
Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters. The area will be depicted on appropriate
aeronautical charts. Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9L,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated September 2, 2003, and effective
September 16, 2003, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order.
The Direct Final Rule Procedure
The FAA anticipates that this regulation will not result in adverse or negative
Comment and, therefore, is issuing it as a direct filial rule. Previous actions of this nature
have not been controversial and have not resulted in adverse comments or objections.
Unless a written adverse or negative comment, or a written notice of intent to submit an
adverse or negative comment is received within the comment period, the regulation will
become effective on the date specified above. After the close of the comment period, the
FAA will publish a document in the Federal Register indicating that no adverse or
negative comments were received and confirming the date on which the final rule will
become effective. If the FAA does receive, within the comment period, an adverse or
negative comment, or written notice of intent to submit such a comment, a document
withdrawing the direct final rule will be published in the Federal Register, and a notice of
proposed rulemaking may be published with a new comment period.
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed rulemaking by submitting
such written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire. Comments that provide the
factual basis supporting the views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically
04-ACE-9 4
. 1
invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and energy-
related aspects of the proposal. Communications should identify both docket numbers
and be submitted in triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA
to acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with those
comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made:
"Comments to Docket No. FAA-2004-17143/Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-9." The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
Agency Findings
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is
determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive
Order 13132.
The FAA has determined that this regulation is noncontroversial and unlikely to
result in adverse or negative conunents. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, I
certify that this regulation (1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under Department of Transportation (DOT)
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if
promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
Adoption of the Amendment ,
04-ACE-9 5
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71-- DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565,
3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
§71.1 [Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9L, dated September 2, 2003, and effective September 16,
2003, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.
* * * * *
ACE IA ES Iowa City, IA
Iowa City Municipal Airport, IA
(lat. 4I°38'21"N., long. 91°32'47"W.)
Iowa City VORTAC
(lat. 41°31'08"N., long. 91°36'48"W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.5-mile radius
of Iowa City Municipal Airport and within 1.8 miles each side of the Iowa City VORTAC
024°radial extending from the 6.5 mile radius of the airport to the VORTAC.
* * * * *
Issued in Kans. City, MO, on FEB 2 4 2004
� 1
Paul J. eridan
Acti ana•er Air Traffic Division,
Cen fit Retion.
prriiir
III MAR 15 2004 ill
�
PETROLEUM MARKETERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY `S' 7' 4W�. R.16, .'
465 Alice's Road, Suite H,Waukee, Iowa 50263 ` : s r.. .
Ph: 800/942-1000,515/987-0061 Fax: 515/987-0067
.„
March 11,2004
IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION
1801 S.RIVERSIDE DR.
IOWA CITY, IA 52246
Re: Inspection Report for Policy#8602487
IOWA CITY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT
1801 S RIVERSIDE DRIVE
IOWA CITY,IA 52246
Dear Policyholder:
PMMIC conducted an inspection of your underground storage tank system at the above site on 03/03/2004. Our
inspection report is attached.
We noted no deficiencies that require follow-up or correction.
If you have any questions,please contact us at 1-800-942-1000. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Patrick Rounds
CEO
Board of Directors
W.A.Krause, Chairman;M.J.Dolan,Richard D.Johnson,Ron McGauvran,Rex Ekwall,Ron Burmeister,Michael Fitzgerald
PMMIC 1r
4PMMIc Underground Storage Ta F� MAR 15 2004
Operations Inspection Re 10 t I
Facility Name: IOWA CITY MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Insured IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION
Location Address1801 S RIVERSIDE DRIVE Mailing Address: 1801 S.RIVERSIDE DR.
City, State,Zip: IOWA CITY,IA 52246 City, State,Zip: IOWA CITY,IA 52246
Phone: (319)356-5045
Facility ID: 8602487 I Date of Inspection: 03/03/2004 I Inspector Name:Heath Banks
Tank# Product Capacity ; Tank: Double Interior Corrasion TankLeak • Spill Overfill
Material Wall Lining Protection Detection<; Equipment Protection
1 Jet Fuel 10,000 Steel No No Yes ATG 15 gallon Alarm
Tank it Piping Double ' Corrosion Delivery Line Leak ` Electronic or Mechanical
Material. Nall Protection System Detection LLD;
1 FiberGlass No No Pressure LTT Mechanical
Internal Visual Inspection Yes No NA Fill/Spill Visual Inspection Yes No NA
ATG in normal status? X Spill basins clean/functional? X
Interstitial monitor in normal status? X Overfill device present/functional? X _
Rectifier operational? _ X Other Issues with fill pipe? X
Electric line leak display in normal status? X
Piping SnmpVisualInspection Yes No NA:
Contained piping sump? X
Dispenser Sump Visual Inspection YesNo NA Piping sump clean and functional? X
Containment under dispenser? X Sump sensor appears functional? X
Dispenser containment clean/functional? X
Dispenser containment sensor functional? X Submersible pump installed/operating properly? X
Shear valves properly anchored and functional? X ELLD/MLLD installed/operating properly? X
Corrosion issues at dispenser? X Corrosion issues at submersible pump? X
Piping appears functional at dispenser? X Piping appears functional at piping sump? X
Leaks present at dispenser? X Leaks present at piping sump? X
Deficiencies Noted:
None
Iowa Department of Transportation
Office of Aviation 515-239-1468
800 Lincoln Way,Ames, Iowa 50010n ;r Fax 515-233-7983
D 1FI ?'1I R r ael.marr@dot.state.ia.us
www.iawings.com
March 16, 2004 MAR 2 2004
Iowa City Municipal Airport
Ron ONeil
1801 S.Riverside
Iowa City, IA 52246
Dear Ron:
Beginning this year, the Office of Aviation will require airports to reapply each year for
continuation of their public-use landing certificates. Approximately four to six weeks prior to
your current landing certificate expiration, the office will mail your reapplication packet to you.
This packet will contain a reapplication sheet, your current FAA form 5010-1 and a CAD
drawing of your airport. After these materials are corrected and received back in the office,
applications will be reviewed and landing certificates will be awarded. Applications will be
accepted based upon adherence to the state's minimum safety standards.
Our two most common violations are: crops in the safety areas and penetrations of the 20:1
approach slopes. Crops growing taller than 12" in height should not be planted in these safety
areas. Farmers should be reminded when baling hay from these safety areas,remove the bales
immediately or they will be in violation of the 12"height restriction.
Approaches to runway ends should clear a 20:1 approach slope. Trees that penetrate this
approach area should be trimmed or removed in accordance with the necessary clearance
requirements.
For those of you with AWOS sites at your airport, this is a reminder that any growth is required
to be 100' from the site. This distance is imperative to maintain accurate weather reports and
assists us in maintaining the equipment. Access considerations should once again be considered
when planting crops near these AWOS sites.
After violations have been recognized, airport personnel will have 30 days to submit an
acceptable plan of action to the DOT's Office of Aviation. The office will review these plans
and award a conditional public-use landing certificate.
Airport managers and sponsors are reminded that observations of these standards are required to
remain open for public use. It is important that we improve the safety of Iowa's air
transportation system. Failure to meet these minimums may result in revocation of the current
landing certificate and removal from all state directories. If an airport is removed from public
use, they will be ineligible for any further state or federal assistance. As with all non-local
money,there is a 20-year grant agreement that requires airports to remain open for public use.
If they are not maintained, that money must be repaid.
Current Landing Certificates
Page 2
Please review the list of State Minimum Safety Standards and feel free to contact me at
the number listed above if you have any questions.
Sincerely/
Ath
Mike Marr, Airport Inspector
Office of Aviation
• r rt I r .
[4910-13] MAR2 2 2 U4
l.MI■ l 'R
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA-2004-17144; Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-10]
Modification of Class E Airspace; Cedar Rapids, IA
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Direct final rule; request for comments.
SUMMARY: This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations, part 71 (14 CFR
71)by revising Class E airspace areas at Cedar Rapids, IA. On February 2, 2004, The
Eastern Iowa Airport airport reference point (ARP) was redefined. This action modifies
the Cedar Rapids, IA Class E airspace areas by incorporating the revised ARP. A review
of these airspace areas revealed that the Cedar Rapids Class E airspace area extending
upward from 700 feet Above Ground Level (AGL) does not comply with FAA Orders.
The intended effect of this rule is to provide appropriate controlled Class E airspace
for aircraft operating under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) at Cedar Rapids, IA and to
bring the areas into compliance with FAA Orders.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective on 0901 UTC, June 10, 2004.
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or before
April 14, 2004.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the Docket Management System,
U.S. Department of Transportation, Room Plaza 401, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
04-ACE-l0 2
Washington, DC 20590-0001. You must identify the docket number FAA-2004-
17144/Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-10, at the beginning of your comments. You may
also submit comments on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov. You may review the public
docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1-800-647-5527) is on the plaza
level of the Depatlment of Transportation NASSIF Building at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Randolph, Air Traffic
Division, Airspace Branch, ACE-520C, DOT Regional Headquarters Building, Federal
Aviation Administration, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-
2525.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Eastern Iowa Airport ARP has been
redefined. This amendment to 14 CFR 71 modifies the legal description of the Class E
airspace designated as a surface area at Cedar Rapids, IA by incorporating the revised
ARP. This amendment also modifies the Cedar Rapids, IA Class E airspace area
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface and its legal description. The revised
ARP is incorporated, the radius of the airspace about The Eastern Iowa Airport is
decreased from a 7.4-mile radius to a 6.9-mile radius, the extension to this airspace area is
enlarged from 3 miles each side of the 271°bearing from CINDY LOM to 4 miles north
and 8 miles south of the bearing and the length of the extension is defined in relation to
the LOM. This action brings the legal descriptions of both Cedar Rapids, IA Class E
airspace areas into compliance with FAA Order 7400.2E, Procedures for Handling
Airspace Matters. The areas will be depicted on appropriate aeronautical charts. Class E
04-ACE-10 3
airspace areas designated as surface areas are published in Paragraph 6002 of FAA Order
7400.9L, dated September 2,2003, and effective September 16, 2003, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. Class E airspace areas extending upward from
700 feet or more above the surface of the earth are published in Paragraph 6005 of the
same Order. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.
The Direct Final Rule Procedure
The FAA anticipates that this regulation will not result in adverse or negative
comment and, therefore, is issuing it as a direct final rule. Previous actions of this nature
have not been controversial and have not resulted in adverse comments or objections.
Unless a written adverse-or negative comment, or a written notice of intent to submit an
adverse or negative comment is received within the comment period, the regulation will
become effective on the date specified above. After the close of the comment period, the
FAA will publish a document in the Federal Register indicating that no adverse or
negative comments were received and confirming the date on which the final rule will
become effective. If the FAA does receive,within the comment period, an adverse or
negative comment, or written notice of intent to submit such a comment, a document
withdrawing the direct final rule will be published in the Federal Register, and a notice of
proposed rulemaking may be published with a new comment period.
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to participate in this rulemaking by submitting such
written data, views, or arguments, as they may desire. Comments that provide the factual
basis supporting the views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in
04-ACE-I0 4
developing reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are specifically
invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic, environmental, and energy-
related aspects of the proposal. Communications should identify both docket numbers
and be submitted in triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA
to acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with those
comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made:
"Comments to Docket No. FAA-2004-17144/Airspace Docket No. 04-ACE-l0." The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
Agency Findings
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is
determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive
Order 13132.
The FAA has determined that this regulation is noncontroversial and unlikely to
result in adverse or negative comments. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, I
certify that this regulation(1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under Department of Transportation (DOT)
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) if
promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).
04-ACE-10 5
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as
follows:
PART 71-- DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565,
3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.
§71.1 [Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9L, dated September 2, 2003, and effective September 16,
2003, is amended as follows:
Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.
* * * * *
ACE IA E2 Cedar Rapids, IA
Cedar Rapids,The Eastern Iowa Airport, IA
(lat. 41°53'05"N., long. 91°42'39"W.)
Within a 4.4-mile radius of The Eastern Iowa Airport. This Class E airspace area is
effective during specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen.
The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in the
Airport/Facility Directory.
* * * * *
Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.
* * * * *
04-ACE=1O 6
ACE IA E5 Cedar Rapids, IA
Cedar Rapids, The Eastern Iowa Airport, IA
(lat. 41°53'05"N., long. 91°42'39"W.)
CINDY LOM
(lat. 41°53'08"N., long. 91°48'09"W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 6.9-mile radius
of The Eastern Iowa Airport and within 4 miles north and 8 miles south of the 271°
bearing from the CINDY LOM extending from the 6.9-mile radius of the airport to 16
miles west of the LOM.
* * * * *
MAR - 1
Issued in Kansas City, MO, on
�..
David W. Mope •
Acting Manager,Air Traffic Division,
Central Region. -- .