Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-11-21 Public hearing(0c�_ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at 7:00 p.m, on the 21st day of November 21, 2017, in Emma J. Harvat Hall, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk; at which hearing the Council will consider: An ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 21.79 acre of property from Interim Development Multifamily (ID -RM) zone to Low Density Multifamily Residential (RM -12) zone located north and south of the intersection of South Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard. (REZ17-00001) Copies of the proposed ordinances and resolutions are on file for public examination in the office of the City Clerk, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa. Persons wishing to make their views known for Council consideration are encouraged to appear at the above-mentioned time and place. Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk Prepared by: Sarah Walz, Assistant Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240F91 ED 00001) NOV 21 2017 Ordinance No. City Clerk An ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately l(Ma7dtJ►t( *aof property from Interim Development Multifamily (ID -RM) zone to Low Density Multifamily Residential (RM -12) zone located north and south of the intersection of South Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard. (REZ17-00001) Whereas, the applicant, Southgate Development Services, L.L.C., has requested a rezoning of property located north and south of the intersection of McCollister Boulevard and South Gilbert Street from Interim Development Multi -family (ID -RM) to Low Density Multi -family (RM -12); and Whereas, the property is located in the South Planning District; and Whereas, the South District Plan, an integral part of the Comprehensive Plan, sets forth goals and objectives for creating compact and connected neighborhoods integrating a diverse mix of housing types that are compatible in scale; and whereas Whereas, the South District Plan indicates that the area directly adjacent to the intersection of McCollister and Gilbert Streets is appropriate for mufti -family development with surrounding land appropriate for Low to Medium Mixed Residential, which is intended for medium to high-density single family with opportunities for low-density mufti -family uses; and Whereas, the applicant has proposed a concept for development with a mixture of townhome-style multi- family and a mix of 4-, 8-, and 12-plex buildings, preserving open space between the existing single-family neighborhood and the proposed development; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has the reviewed the proposed rezoning and recommended that the City Council deny the application because it was incompatible with the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the owner, The Preserve @ Sandhill LLC, has agreed that the property shall be developed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto to ensure appropriate development in this area of the city. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I Approval. Subject to the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, property described below is hereby reclassified from its current zoning designation of ID -RM to RM - 12: Outlot A and Outlot B of Sandhill Estates, Part Two, as recorded in Book 470, page 230. Section It. Zoning Mao. The building official is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of the ordinance as approved by law. Section III Conditional Zoning Agreement. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Conditional Zoning Agreement between the property owner(s) and the City, following passage and approval of this Ordinance. Section IV. Certification and Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance, and record the same in the Office of the County Recorder, Johnson County, Iowa, at the Owner's expense, upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance, as provided by law. Section V. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section VI. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VII. Effective Date, This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of .20—. Ordinance No. Page 2 Jim Throgmorton, MAYOR ATTEST: Kellie Fruehling, CITY CLERK pp oved by �- Il Z�/l City Attorney's Office Prepared by: Sarah Walz, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5239 (REZ17-00001) Conditional Zoning Agreement This agreement is made between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") and The Preserve @ Sandhill LLC (herein after "Owner"), and Southgate Development Services, L.L.C. (hereinafter "Applicant'). Whereas, Owner is the legal title holder of approximately 21.79 acres of property located north and south of the intersection of S. Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard; and Whereas, the Applicant has requested the rezoning of said property from Interim Development Multi -Family (ID -RM) to Low Density Multi -Family (RM -12); and Whereas, the South District Plan, an integral part of the Comprehensive Plan, sets forth goals and objectives for creating compact and connected neighborhoods integrating a diverse mix of housing types that are compatible in scale; and Whereas, the South District Plan indicates that the area directly adjacent to the intersection of McCollister and Gilbert Streets is appropriate for multi -family development with surrounding land appropriate for Low to Medium Mixed Residential, which is intended for medium to high-density single family with opportunities for low-density multi -family uses; and Whereas, the applicant has proposed a concept for development with a mixture of townhome-style multi -family and a mix of 4-, 8-, and 12-plex buildings, arranged in a walkable pattern of similar scale to single-family development with an area of open space between the existing single-family neighborhood and the proposed development; and Whereas, the City Council has determined that, with appropriate conditions regarding the overall layout and concept for development, building design and quality of construction, and the composition of one- and two-bedroom apartments, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the Owner acknowledges that certain conditions and restrictions are reasonable to ensure the development of the property is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the need for the development to complement the adjacent single-family neighborhood as well as the adjacent natural open spaces; and Whereas, the Owner agrees to develop this property in accordance with the terms and conditions of a Conditional Zoning Agreement. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. The Preserve @ Sandhill LLC is the legal title holder of the property legally described as Outlots A and B, Sandhill Estates, Part One, as recorded in Book 47, Page 230. ppdadndegUsendhl eslale cm.doc 2. The Owner acknowledges that the City wishes to ensure conformance to the principles of the Comprehensive Plan and the South District plan. Further, the parties acknowledge that Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above the existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change. 3. In consideration of the City's rezoning the subject property, Owner agree(s) that development of the subject property will conform to all other requirements of the zoning chapter, as well as the following conditions: a. Substantial compliance with the approved concept plan with regard to street and block layout (including pedestrian street), arrangement of building types, location and size of open spaces, and sidewalk and trail connections. b. The pedestrian street must meet the standards for pedestrian streets provided in the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code. c. Townhouse and row house style multi -family buildings must comply with the attached single-family housing standards for entrances and design in the zoning code. d. Eaves and window and doorway trim will be required on all buildings according to the attached -single family housing standards. e. Building designs to be approved by the Design Review Committee for compliance with the conditions noted herewith. f. Buildings shall be constructed of durable, high-quality building materials according to table 2G-8 of the Riverfront Crossings Form -based Code. g. Landscaping must comply with recommended plant list provided by the provided by the Bur Oak Land Trust. h. Overall density of the development should not exceed: 115 units north of McCollister Blvd., at least 20% of which should be one -bedroom units—the remainder being 2 -bedroom units. 90 units south of McCollister Blvd., at least 25% of which should be one -bedroom units—the remainder being 2 -bedroom units. 4. The Owner and City acknowledge that the conditions contained herein are reasonable conditions to impose on the land under Iowa Code §414.5 (2017), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. 5. The Owner and City acknowledge that in the event the subject property is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided, all redevelopment will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 6. The parties acknowledge that this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain in full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released of record by the City of Iowa City. The parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. 7. The Owner acknowledge(s) that nothing in this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be ppdadMaggsandhill estates m.doc construed to relieve the Owner or Applicant from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. B. The parties agree that this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Applicant's expense. Dated this ZOfItday of / y J'1L—,M3E14 City of Iowa City Jim Throgmorton, Mayor Attest: Kellie K. Fruehling, City Clerk pp ved by: City Attorney's Office City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: 201T— The Prese @Sandhill LLC By: 2 STATE OF IOWA ) ) ss: JOHNSON COUNTY ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on 20_ by Jim Throgmorton and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Iowa City. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) @ Title (and Rank) 1' e- Preserve 4t Sandhill LLC,Zti%f. Acknowledgment: State of waw County of_,_bh w or-\ ppdadaVagVsandhill estates caa.dcc This r ord was acknowledged before me on Ill • U • i 'T (Date) by dfw-nj IN i I We (Name(s) of individual(s) as Mot" 41em (type of authority, such as officer or trustee) of KS G-& sotndh 111 LLC. (name of party on behalf of whom record was executed). ,VLI^Ls SUSAN J WEAVER o '�' Commission Number 794422 Notary Public in d for the State of Iowa a My Commission Expires (Stamp or Seal February E 2019 Title (and Rank) My commission expires: Z• 5 • t R ppdaOnVegVsan4N11 estates cm,doc 4 Prepared by: Sarah Walz, Assistant Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5239 (REZ17- 00001) Ordinance No. An kirdinance conditionally rezoning propdoy from Interim Development Low DIll Multifamily Residential and so h of the intersection of Mccollistk Boulevard. (REZ17-00001) approximately Multifamily (IC (RM -12) zone� South Gilldel Whereas, the ownepplicant, Southgate Developers, has re north and south of the tersection of McCollister Boulevard Development Multi -family (I M) to Low Density Multi -family (RM -1 Whereas, the property is I ated in the South Planning Dist/iegl it Whereas, the South Distri Plan, an integral part of th objectives for creating compacta connected neighborhoods are compatible in scale; and where Whereas, the South District P n indicates that McCollister and Gilbert Streets is appr riate for multi -f for Low to Medium Mixed Residential, which is opportunities for low-density multi -family u s; and Whereas, the applicant has proposed a once family and a mix of 4-, 8-, and 12-plex builds s, neighborhood and the proposed development; Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Co recommended that the City Council den th Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provic 21. acre of zone to ocated north t Street and a rezoning of property located lh Gilbert Street from Interim ensive Plan, sets forth goals and a diverse mix of housing types that area directly adjacent to the intersection of development with surrounding land appropriate for medium to high-density single family with development with a mixture of townhome-style multi- !rving open space between the existing single-family ;ion has the reviewed the proposed rezoning and application because it was incompatible with the conditions on granting a rezoning reque t, over and Ah, needs caused by the requested change and Whereas, the owner has agreed t t the property sha conditions of the Conditional Zoning greement attached area of the city. the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable /e existing regulations, in order to satisfy public be developed in accordance with the terms and kreto to ensure appropriate development in this Now, therefore, be it ordained the City Council of the Ci of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I Approval. Subject o the Conditional Zoning Ag ement attached hereto and incorporated herein, property described belo is hereby reclassified from its clkrent zoning designation of ID -RM to RM - 12: Outlot A and Outlot B of Sa dhill Estates, Part Two, as recorded'n Book 470, page 230. Section II. Zoning Map. T e building official is hereby authorized nd directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa to conform to this amendment upon the\shallbe ssage, approval and publication of the ordinance as approv d by law. Section III. Condition Zonin A reement. The mayor is hereby aed and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Co ditional Zoning Agreement between the prwner(s) and the City, following passage and approval this Ordinance. Section IV. Certifi tion and Recording. Upon passage and apprt Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized a directed to certify a copy of this ordinance, and a same in the Office of the County Recorder, J hnson County, Iowa, at the Owner's expense, he fill I passage, approval and publication of this dinance, as provided by law. Section V. eater. All ordinances and parts of ordinances ict with the provisions of this Ordinance are h reby repealed. Section VI./Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Orshall be a 'udged to be invalid or unconstitut' nal, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of thance as a w Ie or any section, provision or art thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Sectio VII. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effecits final passag approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of .20—. Ordinance No. Page 2 Prepared by: Sarah Walz, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-523Y(REZ17-00001) Conditional Zoning Agreement This agree nt is made between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, municipal corporation (hereinafter _.'ty") and Kobrin Development Company, Inc. d/b/ Southgate Development (hereinafter "Ow er"). Whereas, O er is the legal title holder of approximate 21.79 acres of property located north and south of the tersection of S. Gilbert Street and M ollister Boulevard; and Whereas, the O er has requested the Development Multi -Family (IQ -RM) to Low Density A Whereas, the South Di rict Plan, an goals and objectives for creating ompact and of housing types that are compatibilik in scale; i of said property from Interim (RM -12); and part of the Comprehensive Plan, sets forth ted neighborhoods integrating a diverse mix Whereas, the South District Plan idiCates that the area directly adjacent to the intersection of McCollister and Gilbert tr is is approprtate for multi -family development with surrounding land appropriate for Low to dium Mixed Residential, which is intended for medium to high-density single family with opportu itl s for low-density multi -family uses; and Whereas, the applicant has ropose a concept for development with a mixture of townhome-style multi -family and a ix of 4-, 8-, and 12-plex buildings, arranged in a walkable pattern of similar scale to single- f mily develop nt with an area of open space between the existing single-family neighborhoo and the propose development; and Whereas, the City Co cil has determined th t, with appropriate conditions regarding the overall layout and conce for development, building esign and quality of construction, and the composition of one- an two-bedroom apartments, th requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; d Whereas, Iowode §414.5 (2017) provides that th City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions pn granting a rezoning request, over an above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public 0eeds caused by the requested change; an Whereas, t e Owner acknowledges that certain condit ns and restrictions are reasonable to ens re the development of the property is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the nee for the development to complement the adjacent sin le -family neighborhood as well as the ad' cent natural open spaces; and Where the Owner agrees to develop this property in accordance ith the terms and conditions of Conditional Zoning Agreement. Now, theref)Sre, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the pa`r�s agree as follows: / 1. Kobrin Development is the legal title holder of the property legally described as Outlots A and B, Sandhill Estates, Part One, as recorded in Book 47, Page 230. ppdadnVa9tlsandh111 estates cza.doc 2. The Owner acknowledges that the City wishes to ensure conformance tohie principles of the Comprehensive Plan and the South District plan. Further, the pa s acknowledge that Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provides that the City of Iowa/City may impose asonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over an above the existing re ulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the reque d change. 3. In co sideration of the City's rezoning the subject pro rty, Owner agree(s) that develop ent of the subject property will conform to all of requirements of the zoning chapter, well as the following conditions: a. Substanti compliance with the approved concept Ian with regard to street and block layout (incl ing pedestrian street), arrangemen f building types, location and size of open spaces, nd sidewalk and trail connectio . b. The pedestrian treet must meet the stand ds for pedestrian streets provided in the Riverfront Crosse gs Form -Based Code. c. Townhouse and ro house style multi -f ily buildings must comply with the attached single-family housin standards for en nces and design in the zoning code. d. Eaves and window an doorway tri will be required on all buildings according to the attached -single family h sing sta ards. e. Building designs to be app ved y the Design Review Committee for compliance with the conditions noted herewit f. Buildings shall be constructe f durable, high-quality building materials according to table 2G-8 of the Riverfront ros 'ngs Form -based Code. g. Landscaping must compl with re mmended plant list provided by the provided by the Bur Oak Land Trust. h. Overall density of the velopment sho Id not exceed: 115 units north o cCollister Blvd., a least 20% of which should be one -bedroom units—the rema' der being 2 -bedroom nits. 90 units south of McCollister Blvd., at le t 25% of which should be one -bedroom units—the rd ainder being 2 -bedroom unit 4. The Owner and City acknowledge that the condition contained herein are reasonable conditions to i pose on the land under Iowa Cod §414.5 (2017), and that said conditions sat fy public needs that are caused by the reNested zoning change. 5. The Ownerfind City acknowledge that in the event the su ect property is transferred, sold, rede loped, or subdivided, all redevelopment will conrm with the terms of this Conditio I Zoning Agreement. 6. The pa ies acknowledge that this Conditional Zoning Agreements all be deemed to be a cov nant running with the land and with title to the land, and shat emain in full force and ffect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until release of record by the City f Iowa City. e parties further acknowledge that this agreement shall inure to the beneand bind successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. 7. The Owner acknowledge(s) that nothing in this Conditional Zoning Agreement ssiall be ppdadMagVsandhill esWes c..doc 2 construed to relieve the Owner or Applicant from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. The parties agree that this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upo odoption and UD of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the ohnson County R order's Office at the Applicant's expense. Dated this \ day of City of Iowa City Attest: Kellie K. Fruehling, City Clerk by: City Attorney's Office City of Iowa City Acknowle STATE OF IOWA ) ) ss: JOHNSON COUNTY ) 20—. Kobrin Develo ent Company, Inc. By: This instrument wacknowledged before me on _ Throgmorton and Kell' Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, Kobrin evelopme State f County of ppdatlm/agtlsandhill estates =.dm Notary Public in and for the (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) Company, Inc. Acknowledgment: 3 20_ by Jim of the City of Iowa City. of Iowa This record was acknowledged before me on (Date) ppdadMagVsandh,II estates cra.doc 4 To: Planning and Zoning Commission Item: REZ17-00001 Preserve at Sandhill GENERAL INFORMATION: STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Sarah Walz Date: October 19, 2017 Applicant: Southgate Developers 775 Mormon Trek Blvd. Iowa City, IA 52246 319-339-9320 Contact: Mark Seabold Shive Hattery 2839 Northgate Drive Iowa City, IA 52245 319-354-3040 mseabold@shivehattery.com Requested Action: Purpose: Location: Size: Existing Land Use and Zoning: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: File Date: 45 Day Limitation Period: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Rezoning from ID -RM to RM -12 To allow a mix of attached housing and multi -family housing Property east of South Gilbert Street, north and south of McCollister Boulevard 21.79 acres Vacant, ID -RM North: Single -Family Residential (OPD -5) and Sand Hill Park (P-1) South: Vacant, County East: Single -Family Residential OPD -5 West: Vacant (CC -2) and City Public Works (P-1) September 14, 2017 October 30, 2019 The applicant, Southgate Developers, has requested a conditional rezoning for 21.79 acres of land from Interim Development Multi -family (ID -RM) to Low -Density Multi -family (RM -12) at the intersection of South Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard. The applicant has indicated a desire develop the properties with a mix of row house and townhome-style multi -family units and small to medium size multi -family buildings—four-, eight- and twelve-plexes. The submitted concept plan shows a total of 196 dwelling units. Open space to accommodate stormwater management and a small park is located between the single-family neighborhood on McCollister Court and the new development with Preserve Way proposed as a single -loaded street north of McCollister Blvd. An extension of Covered Wagon Drive, south of McCollister Boulevard, would also be a single -loaded street with the area to the north providing stormwater detention for an existing subdivision. A pedestrian street at the center of the development provides connection between Gilbert Street and the established The applicants held an open house on October 10 to introduce their concept. Property owners within 300 feet of the proposed rezoning were invited to attend. ANALYSIS: Comprehensive Plan: The subject properties are located in the South Planning District. The Comprehensive Plan (South District Plan) designates these properties as appropriate for Low to Medium Density Mixed Residential with Multi -family housing along both the north and south side of McCollister at the intersection with South Gilbert Street. The plan describes "Low to Medium Mixed Residential' as follows: "Intended for medium- to high-density single family residential development, including small lot detached single family units, zero lot line development, duplexes and townhouses. Suitable for sites where a single loaded street is desirable to provide visibility and access to public open space or where clustering is desirable to protect sensitive environmental features. Low density multi -family structures may also be considered if buildings are designed in a manner that is compatible in scale and design to the lower scale residential buildings in the neighborhood (e.g. triplexes, four-plexes, or six-plexes). Higher density housing should be located at the edges of neighborhoods, principally in areas with good street connectivity, access to open space or parks, trails, and transit." [page 52, South District Plan] The "New Residential Development' section of the plan calls for compact and connected neighborhoods, integrating a variety of housing types to serve residents at the various stages of life, with a mix of multi -family and attached housing in areas along busier street frontages or in areas bordering open space. The additional density is, in part, intended to improve the feasibility of transit service and enhance market potential for nearby commercial areas. The plan refers to "Missing Middle" housing types that are similar in scale and character to single-family detached housing—ranging from duplexes and triplexes to smaller multi -family apartment buildings. The plan calls for blocks and buildings of exceptional design to maintain an attractive residential character along streets and provide safe and inviting living environments for residents. The plan encourages and landscaped front yards or courtyards with parking located to the rear of building to enhance the park like setting and to encourage walking and biking. The applicant has proposed a concept plan that includes a variety of attached and multi -family housing types arranged in a block pattern that is walkable in scale and integrated with adjacent streets. The concept includes a pedestrian street that connects into the neighborhood trail system and preserves open space and includes common green space within the central blocks to serve as an amenity for the residents. The concept shows transitions from lower density—a mix of townhome style units and four-plexes at its north end to eight-plexes just north of McCollister Boulevard, leading to twelve-plexes along the south property line. An east -west pedestrian street is proposed midway between where Preserve Way and McCollister Blvd. intersect with Gilbert St. The pedestrian street provides access from the existing neighborhood trail through the center of the proposed development to Gilbert Street. The pedestrian street will be treated as a public street in terms of setback and orientation of buildings, location and screening of adjacent parking areas, and required lighting and landscaping. The pedestrian street must conform to standards for pedestrian streets provided in 3 the Riverfront Crossings Plan. Current Zoning: The purpose of the Interim Development Zone (ID) is to provide for areas of managed growth in which agricultural and other non -urban uses of land may continue until such time as the City is able to provide City services and urban development can occur. The Interim Development Zone is the default zoning district, to which all undeveloped areas should be classified until City services are provided. Upon provision of City services, the City or the property owner may initiate rezoning to zones consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, as amended. The current ID zoning allows only limited uses, such as agricultural uses by right, so a rezoning is necessary to allow development of this property. Proposed Zoning: The purpose of the Low Density Multi -Family Residential (RM -12) zone is to provide for the development of high density, single-family housing and low density, multi -family housing. This zone is intended to provide a diverse variety of housing options in neighborhoods throughout the city. Careful attention to site and building design is important to ensure that the various housing types in any one location are compatible with one another. The applicant is seeking a conditional rezoning from Interim Development Multi -family (ID -RM) zone to Low Density Multi -family (RM -12) zone in order to allow for the development of a concept plan with a mix of multi -family uses, including 12-plexes, 8 plexes, 4-plexes, and townhouse style multi -family buildings. The area north of McCollister Blvd. contains 13.9 acres (12.8 acres net) with 109 units of housing (9 units/acre net). The area south of McCollister Blvd. contains 7.9 acres (6.4 acres net) with 87 dwelling units shown (11 units/acre net). The applicant has indicated a desire to limit the number of units north of McCollister Blvd to no more than 115 units. No such density restriction is proposed for area south of McCollister. More than one fifth of the units (22%) north of McCollister Blvd. are one -bedroom units with the remaining being two-bedroom units. South of McCollister Blvd. more than a quarter of the units are one -bedroom units (27%). Given the growth in the student housing market, even in locations some distance from the university campus, staff recommends limiting the development to one - and two-bedroom units, which provide more affordable housing type and adds to the diversity of housing options available in this part of the South District. The applicant has indicated that the concept plan relies on waivers of the principal building setback standards along McCollister Blvd. (reducing the 40 ft setback from arterial streets to 25 ft.) and along Preserve Way and Covered Wagon (reducing the setback for multi -family structures from 20 ft to 15 ft). Waivers will be requested through Planned Development (OPD/RM-12). Compatibility with the Neighborhood: The proposed development is set at a slightly lower elevation than existing single-family homes on McCollister Court. The concept plan shows a single loaded street that, in combination with the open space area set aside for stormwater detention, provides more than 100 feet of separation between the existing single-family development the proposed development. South of McCollister Blvd., a stormwater basin to the east of Covered Wagon provides additional separation between single-family and multi -family uses. Townhome and row house style multi -family buildings along with three four-plex buildings line Preserve Way, facing toward the existing single-family housing on McCollister Court. Higher density multi -family units are placed near the intersection of Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard, and at the interior of the development, along the pedestrian street. Row house type multi -family buildings line both sides of McCollister Blvd. transitioning to eight- and twelve- plexes to the south. The proposed row house style units have detached garages located immediately to the rear. 4 Surface parking for the townhomes and other apartment buildings is located at the center of the each block and must be set behind the front face of the buildings and screened from view of the public street or pedestrian street. The concept plan shows compliance with these requirements except for two small areas of parking on lots 1 and 2, where parking areas do not appear screened from Gilbert Street. These areas would need to be screened from view, a low wall or fence is recommended in order to define the private space. The proposed concept shows some detached garages within each parking area, however these are not immediately adjacent to the dwelling units. The applicant has indicated that the concept focuses on the property's location close to Trueblood Recreation Area, access to the regional bike trail system along with the ample open space within and surrounding the development to attract residents who, perhaps, are less reliant on cars or for whom open space is a higher priority than sheltered or attached parking. Both the RM -12 zone and the South District Plan call for careful attention to site and building design. In order to achieve higher density development and acceptance of higher density housing types, the plan calls for "exceptional building design." This is emphasized in areas that provide the entrance to the central neighborhoods along McCollister Blvd. and in areas adjacent to Trueblood Recreation Area. The plan notes the substantial public investment in the surrounding trail system, parks, and the new south elementary, which have set the stage for higher quality development in this area of the South District. While the applicant has proposed a "modern farmhouse" style, neighbors have expressed concern with the design of the buildings in terms of their lack of variation and articulation across so many buildings and blocks. The uniformity in design of the various buildings types across the 5 -block development area reduces the sense of diversity of housing envisioned in the concept and does not, in the view of staff, complement the character and diversity of housing styles in the adjacent neighborhood. Staff has not reviewed detailed plans for the buildings as part of, however concepts are shown with the application and were presented at the neighborhood open house. All buildings are required to meet the multi -family design standards. Staff recommends the following additional standards to ensure that the proposed multi -family housing types are similar in character to single-family detached housing and provide a thoughtful transition to the existing single-family neighborhood. • Building entrances: Buildings must be oriented to the street (including the pedestrian street) with the street facing fagades featuring a main entrance. The multi -family standards recommend that the main entrance be designed a with a canopy, pilasters and pediments, or transom windows. Staff recommends that all building entrances include awnings or other protection from weather as the concept plan does not provide attached or covered parking for all units. This will also provide additional articulation to the buildings (see below). • Building articulation: In the RM -12 zone, street facing walls that are greater than 50 feet in length must be articulated with bays, recesses, or projections. For attached single- family housing, the code stipulates that when 4 or more units are attached, the units must be articulated through various changes in building material (brick, stone or other masonry material) and/or by distinguishing each unit architecturally through a change in street facing wall -plane with a corresponding job in the roofline. Given the number of multi -family buildings proposed for the site, greater articulation seems appropriate to mimic or complement the diverse character of nearby single-family housing. Staff recommends that townhome and row house -style units meet the design feature standards in the zoning code. • Building design: The design standards for attached single-family units require eaves of no less than 12 inches. This articulation would complement the adjacent single-family 5 neighborhood and reduce long-term maintenance for roofs and siding material in our climate. Staff recommends that all buildings follow the standards for eaves as well as the Central Planning District guidelines with regard to trim elements. These elements in combination with the requirements for entrance awnings can help to provide additional articulation and are not inconsistent with the agrarian vernacular that is inspiration for the development. • Building designs to be approved through design review. Buildings should be constructed of durable, high quality building materials. The standards in table 2G-8 of the Riverfront Crossings Form -based Code will serve as a reference. Given the location of the property, adjacent to Sand Prairie Park and Trueblood Recreation Area, staff recommends that landscape screening be designed to complement the prairie landscape that characterizes these open spaces. The applicant should rely on guidelines provided by the Johnson County Recommended Plant List provided by the Bur Oak Land Trust. We have relied on this standard in other areas adjacent to permanent natural open space. Traffic Implications: South Gilbert Street is a north -south arterial street, designed to accommodate high traffic volumes across the city, providing a connection to the Downtown and University campus. McCollister Boulevard is also designated as an arterial, providing connections to Mormon Trek Blvd. and Old Highway 218/Riverside Drive to the west. A planned eastward extension of McCollister Blvd. to S. Sycamore Street is schedule in the 2018-2019 Capital Improvement Program, with construction in 2019. Most vehicle traffic from the proposed development will likely travel on Gilbert to and from the Downtown/campus area and commercial areas on Highways 6 and 1 or west on McCollister to 218 or Riverside Drive. Until such time as the McCollister Blvd. extension is completed, some portion of east -west vehicle traffic will rely on Langenberg Avenue, a residential street for which traffic calming measures (speed humps) have been installed. Transit service is not currently available to this location, though the extension of McCollister may increase the opportunity for service. A 2016 traffic study determined that a traffic signal or roundabout is warranted at the intersection of South Gilbert St. and McCollister Blvd. due to crash history and peak hour delays. The City has also received numerous complaints from regarding pedestrians having difficulty crossing the intersection to access Trueblood Recreation Area. An improved intersection will be included in the McCollister extension project. An ongoing study of the Gilbert Street corridor also indicates that the portion of the roadway, south of Highway 6, may be appropriate for a road diet. A four- to three- lane conversion could improve the overall safety of the roadway and provide opportunity for pedestrian refuge islands making it easier for pedestrians to cross. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of REZ17-00001, to conditionally rezone from Interim Development Multi -family (ID -RM) to Low Density Single-family (RM -12) for 21.79 acres of property located adjacent to the intersection of South Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard, subject to the following conditions: Substantial compliance with the concept plan submitted with regard to street and block layout (including pedestrian street), building types, building locations, location of surface parking areas and covered parking, location and size of open spaces, and sidewalk and trail connections. 0 The proposed pedestrian street must meet the standards for pedestrian streets provided in 0 the Riverfront Crossings Plan. • Townhouse and row house style multi -family buildings must comply with the attached single- family housing standards for entrances and design in the zoning code. • Eaves and window and doorway trim will be required on all buildings according to the attached -single family housing standards. • Building designs to be approved through design review. • Buildings shall be constructed of durable, high quality building materials. • Landscaping must comply with recommended plant list provided by the Johnson County Recommended Plant List provided by the Bur Oak Land Trust. • Overall density of the development should not exceed • 115 units north of McCollister Blvd., 20% of which should be one -bedroom units—the remainder being 2 -bedroom units. • 90 units south of McCollister Blvd., 25% of which should be one -bedroom units—the remainder being 2 -bedroom units. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Concept Plan 3. Correspondence Approved by: John Yapp, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services III --I P i � 0�1 rte, "� C!a 4y Lill R55lCHD ��`iyar 2 PAIn - C.Pi atG.'> .�It�m !�'j;a; of R 5,..,. n' 019 a Ja r c �Csy q PI P� Qc ; RS5... : MOME't c)UR7 S .a.' n m P7 P1 ii !1 .. iq� r;a!ti N� am OPD5 RS8 ;a' < ,. f�� OPO/R512 >> �� •� a '`, �'�rT� � S ��t P,� k s 1 I trD�'� RS72 t�t+t !D -RM "'�� GOVF33EA'klPA. Y w RSe rp Pi i'014 �, jib# .., —.- P1 Pa An application submitted by Southgate Developers for a rezoning of 21.88 acres located west of Gilbert St. along McCollister Blvd from interim Development -Multifamily Residential (ID -RM) to Low Density Multi -family Residential zone with a Planned Development overlay (OPD -12). South District Plan Map I Medlum Density Shgle-FaMW IlesllesDal wMedlum Density Wed gestlertlal uMiamgy lr .Wclal iced Use/Nelghborhpud mmmerclal bed lee Commercial haul hk Part[/Open Space Nateopen Space/SeelMweArea her public Property stork Plnperty - /N\ Curranly Zoned heedm De�ekPmem baaesensty (IDAM) nih. N Wks sJ in Ore$Wh pend Fbn to b LewMedFm� D fty We Rosiclo M. Thv mmar d Glben eM IMGMIelerb MI®kE In tlw FnuM DWM %an a be MMFFamay 'An in"Mant goaldere Cly$ camas smiue Plan is to manage uitan gmMh by enmursoi, rumPe$l srd mnm$ted nelghbahoods' The S Uu Dhlyd Plan has de Mk ansa as en opportunity Mr lawb medium dere, housing. '..OpmrtuWh. W tawnhomes, dlryleaes, eM ameesory apadmenh, m wal as mue-family buildings In order b serve residents ftvc Whmd Mair Iifellmes' SOUTH DISTRICT PLAN MAP SouthiGate PRESERVE SANDHILL. OCOMPARIES IOTyA 1 11r.1111". SHPJCfIATTC-FZY meh ale-0`0-12 s e..-mepeler OeaSNpnon- -a'm Me--pmuntl the IEap nl walkable nplgM1hmncoea, wueypNI pnC �.a �sr !M b::,: i AWE ,�. 1} u•~kN�" V �I}�Ri eau ^ see�eens '. . L GENERAL CONCEPT SITE PLAN PARKING .ANALYSIS l PRESERVE SANDHILL N wwMr GYM YPeeVTs lowd CITY. IOwA r mum parting a,eaaene ma,ppMeb g,p.m apacpe. (P Them 'I, ems lNerMMln me pga mmupn larye vnrMo'pe bbotn'he ranee. .�� r IYeeaui t. thePhet -h.p .—IN.W 1,0.1 1-— the neNnl cnmete,al the tee. lelatee b he Tehry Tmpbbcd Re eaxm Centr am provmn. .-MW hom GAbert It". la the Sem Na E.Iahe Ncehbeh. b,y . A Slagle allele of meleMla -Wlnbd vementL ee.., Inert pen,,, Trail Extension/ Pedestrian Street _ Neighborhood Park Protected Trail Crossing) Traffic Calr�6i Prairie Buffer Existing Landscaping Buffer ,op4t T- °� OeaSNpnon- Me--pmuntl the IEap nl walkable nplgM1hmncoea, wueypNI pnC !M b::,: i AWE ,�. 1} u•~kN�" V �I}�Ri eau ^ see�eens '. . L GENERAL CONCEPT SITE PLAN PARKING .ANALYSIS l PRESERVE SANDHILL lowd CITY. IOwA t OSouthGate CO NteA N IE5 SHPJCFIA=--RY u .f lrf .vu.f a osteo..,.. OeaSNpnon- Me--pmuntl the IEap nl walkable nplgM1hmncoea, wueypNI pnC the W"Ing MIMIe-mMo Pm5e s58,,,,l seeks b _,,e eandomlNume bywng pmhpalonalx. 1p 1t e, artemeryn Na bMbg ro MIn emaPer mom te—, ,ap., l The wdMmelaamry Nehh, eealgns are aaletl lmasmalbr Mo story teeleemM context The Wlk'n, 1ont on atreeR pntl W nfth,n tt.I, nne t mum parting a,eaaene ma,ppMeb g,p.m apacpe. (P Them 'I, ems lNerMMln me pga mmupn larye vnrMo'pe bbotn'he aloes' em _4ZIs CRaI'ng a vanne..d mlgnlprnwy. R"shtb1I0h,, thePhet -h.p .—IN.W 1,0.1 1-— the neNnl cnmete,al the tee. lelatee b he Tehry Tmpbbcd Re eaxm Centr am provmn. .-MW hom GAbert It". la the Sem Na E.Iahe Ncehbeh. b,y . A Slagle allele of meleMla -Wlnbd vementL ee.., Inert pen,,, end xvMer bxtlm. r.m Nm the almga ��> IIbwe mmm Mlha dr L4ftp the aulmmeetI by Pe n. laM ' Niee e- c«room nbine naseeeeNlWaedsam wmeroeatane llrNg epaWem .d , s malNellcf wurryvee. by N addgns fro RM -12 zoning requirements 1 - Revise building setback along McCollister Boulevard from 40' to 25' 2 - Revise building setback along "r Preserve Way from 20'to 15' f ' 3- Revise building setback along �t Covered Wagon Drive from 20'to 15' 4 - Restrict density on north she to 115 units za— from RM -12 allowed 200 units OSouthGate CO NteA N IE5 SHPJCFIA=--RY u .f lrf .vu.f a osteo..,.. � r�e-arlo. wrr� erg 7•Iwll�A••M Awl `� afrlVl�.�yYf� �q���•Ilr�f�wYry�..yyy�r F W 1i1n1F1�rreAleelW�e a'ry :Terry TYuabload ?, :f. Reeration Ares ---- T1all Extension/ Pedestrian Street Neighborhood Park a -\. Protected Trall Crossing/ Traffic Calrprtg� j - ' -� Prairie Buller - Existing Landscaping Buffer P - 1. o npn q w u N I Ix d IgAwrMeee muM•b lNlnp ene m M gMdll MIRe feJS e.M eeeW la pmWEe rb A t y rgp k bah 1 IAee ext empty neelen baMing A•e n —11.,m pa Th rlee MI m Iy W b ry ee lg are ke b A Iwo glory �, b. I . m e�b ryen moa n n mw�n. eneen gee _ p nI o e Ly pa=a rn emm 1nl wAA m. a mrpge ry M Mu me - ea.I gee ma � an+p m.reee IymWrRVJ.R I.ervlMq m. xI. a nAy ane win. ae. al wrxo-rm me eAe. nI. ew reryln,eAlo,b R -0-a nn or.we.A. beNN M1om GAG.n 5nnr1 o me $ext Hit EElele N geWCN Lepie. i y R Aryl pM mnlnrinlrt M111M cement MNrE bM1ip mrLY page , Ml ry eye p mmcM1eeMcnM bwal ehu lu ilre ehryle ' rom.aue e. nena. are e, nomaee er pr. ne, lewn ene gee.. >S faganlnlum. Amer e.lerlm eetleaM eiewele e,Une lMn9 epeceeio �,.� \ IM1e Merlar c'arMxNe. Variations from RM -12 zonino reauirements 1 - Revise building setback along .� McCollister Boulevard from 40'to 25' 2 - Revise building setback along Preserve Way from 2010 15' k1Z / 3 - Revise building setback along l Z • Covered Wagon Drive from 20' to 15' \ + ' 4 -Restrict density on north site to 115 ands from RM -12 allowed 200 units wr�llr elY.M0.13 l.ea�•Y.IPAs i urnS..Pi'reua-ler va �V�>M�rAus�wlyM��_yM�n�W^fie AtywW --may Iu Allq waw newn Ia rweW -1^1 . X AWMM rIIW NAwvn ffwYMFY GENERAL CONCEPT SITE PLAN - ()CTOHE.R 2t11 • IiN FIGH ROI: HUOf? NICE 1ING QP SwthGate C OM V1M16f PRESERVE SANDHILL 5HIVEFIATTC--RY V, w i looking east down Preserve Way New 3 - looking west down Pedestrian Walkway View,f - looking Bust along souni side of prnr-adv GENERAL CONCEPT BUILDING IMAUES - OCrOBER 2017-NEI(MBOR11OOD MEF'rIN(1 PRESERVE SANDHILL 0SouthGate Iowa o rc. idrv+a SHVC-FIATTCFZY modem funn house desm oondomsmum inferiors neighborhood park a DESIGN IMAGERY PRESERVE SANDHILL a.FA.ate e o thGat IES It)Wi 1:I1 V. IINVA — 11-1- Y 1--l". •,�/.S+ LMS `'y r - r vol .M1 i p _ AFRIAI VIE\1' - OC.T08M 2017 NPK,IIlIM, C0M.AMate ® COM NIFS PRESERVE SA N D H 1 L L SHIVEFIATTCRY �F � � (IIIIIII `VIII IIIII�I�I�����I �'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII��..�II� I lill"I r. n.��.l a a ..,.411 �. =1 TYPIULRGNMGUSE6UIWMG WIIP FWRRGWi1W5E5PNG1W0FIATS WTIIATTAWEO GA PoPi TYPI W. RPNNGUSE SUILGMG WITH FWR RG W H W SES ANG M'G FlATS M'IRI ATIARIE) G4¢ PoRi h�IIIIIIIIII IEEEI III�III��I � I�IEfllllllllllllfl 1WFLVEIMRBNLdNG-FROMFIF/ATIGRPNDPACRELEYATIONPRESINpAR A2.01Z Sarah Walz From: glennlynn2006@yahoo.com Sent: Thursday, October 05, 2017 5:53 PM To: Sarah Walz Cc: kalpal2@brentopaimer.com; ahachtman3@yahoo.com;joleah-shaw@uiowa.edu Subject: Re; Sandhill Estates Rezoning H1 Sarah. The "Good Neighbor" meeting will be our 3rd or 4th that has been held. I can speak for the neighborhood because we have had so many meetings already. We were told by Southgate after the first round of meetings that they would entertain duplex/zero lot style housing which was well received by the neighborhood. At the last meeting, an entirely different concept was proposed. Not well received. I was told by Southgate that the city is pushing this development style. No one here wants this type of development. No one. Not sure what the meetings accomplish other than to tell us what you plan to do. It will negatively Impact our property values. The townhouse concept will be cheap homes that attract neighbors we don't want. And when they don't sell, they will be rented attracting the same. I will certainly be at the meeting and will be front and center in fighting this development any way 1 can. Glenn Sarah Walz From: Shaw, Joleah A <joleah-shaw@uiowa.edu> Sent: Friday, October 06, 2017 10:00 AM To: Sarah Walz Cc: kalpal2@brentopaimer.com; ahachtman3@yahoo.com; glennlynn2006@yahoo.com Subject: RE; [External] Re: Sandhill Estates Rezoning Hello Sarah.... My name is Joleah Shaw .... and I am the secretary of the Sandhill Estates Homeowners Association. I was unable to attend the re -zoning meeting. However, I can assure you that Glenn is speaking for our entire neighborhood, The last presentation of condos/townhouses did not go over well at the last "good neighbor" meeting and that Is to put it quite mildly. The residents have been even more vocal about their opposition during HOA meetings and general conversations between the residents/neighbors of Sandhill Estates. It's to our understanding that all of the other "parts" of Sandhill Estates will be single family homes and we were all originally presented with the idea that the newest additions to Sandhill Estates near Gilbert Street would be the same or would be zero lot/duplex units. The most recent plans of condos/townhouses/apartment buildings seems to be a very "UN -INVITING" entrance to our neighborhood with large parking lots, large garages, and garbage dumpsters. As you can imagine we are having a difficult time In figuring out how these multi -unit buildings would fit into our homeowner's association. Clearly our HOA rules and covenants would not "fit" these new additions.... especially if they are multi -unit buildings and eventually become rental property. I am confident in saying that I speak for most of our HOA that we are wanting the new development near Gilbert Street/McCollister Blvd to remain uniform with the rest of our neighborhood as single family homes ... or at the very least zero lot/duplexes. I too will make every effort to attend the "good neighbor" meetings. Thank youl -Joleah Shaw 785 McCollisterCt Iowa City, IA 52240 319-321-9025 Sarah Walz From: Sue Gnewuch <Isgnewuch@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2017 9:25 AM To: Sarah Walz Subject: Preserve@Sandhill Hi, Sarah. Thanks for the Information you were able to provide at our neighborhood meeting last night. We realize that this project will go forward in the near future, but were wondering if we have any input in the asethetics of the design of the buildings. We think that In order to preserve our property values, that is a concern for us. The pictures appear to show very inexpensive units and don't seem to us to represent the neighborhood look. Any recommendations about what to do with our concerns? Thanks in advance! Sincerely, Sue and Loren Gnewuch 720 McCollister Ct Iowa City, IA 52240 Bob Miklo From: Richard Stapleton <rich.stapleton73@gmai1.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2017 7:34 PM To: Bob Miklo Subject: Zoning Meeting 10/19 Dear Mr. Milklo, I am writing to you as my wife and I are unable to attend the Zoning meeting on 10/19/2017. We are strongly opposed to the rezoning proposal by SouthGate. We do not wish any new homes, especially multi -family homes to be built in the proposed area until the city provides us along with our neighbors with a solution to the traffic concerns in our neighborhood. As it is, it is nearly impossible to cross Gilbert from McCollister Blvd during morning and evening rush hour. The traffic cutting through on Langenberg is horrible. There have been several times when I have nearly been hit by cars crossing the road or stopping to get the mail. We believe this issue should be resolved and home should be built on the current empty lots before any rezoning is considered. Sincerely, Richard Stapleton and Poorani Sekar 1153 La nge n be rg Ave. Iowa City, IA 52556 (641) 233-8959 PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY OF101i,4 CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within hvo hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on NOW-Mbv'r 5 "'l (Date) by L%'5 k a0 K0 to &A and Sak%W hXK AW JW&M hOAIA (name(s) of individual property owner(s)). 4JAI RICHARDARTHUR COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY COMM•IS t IONan2o EXPIRES oAvr o1 Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) ofperson(s)) as CS 0 LM (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 0212013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REA ZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY 0F10F4:4 CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property.. ` 1 Property INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on ao (Date) by jEW+tFr& Cuf0d W%*&tfcrt and KopyE4tsEuF W�vaaE� (name(s)of individual property owner(s)). i RICHARDARTHUR - COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 fi) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES _. oa - s . ao ao Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa n Y=.4 w AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): ,<n m (T7 �'i m o STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: `' w This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 0712013 Cc: CA—PCD- Council -Media File PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL I I IOWA CITY IOWA + CITY OFJOR74 CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: 1215 ' `C'(� cor, By: By: INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on V'40yEr.tber 5't' 010104 (Date) by &tGw1N 1L EY/N LN n n and (name(s) of individual property owner(s))- RICHARD ARTHUR COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 0.a S•aoa-o I'7 Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by I., (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File _co r - 7 -.< r M •rn s d rb This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by I., (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF R !ZONE% TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL II I IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY oFlolt:t CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: (RLZ1?-00D01 This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: Pro] By: By: 735 MCCOLLISTER CT INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on N cy er•..be ✓ `k' t a0 l+ (Date) by AwEfe `xx-sokw1 GOt fc and &ftL'pRy AtwheS Ca.E (name(s) of individual property owner(s)). RICHARD ARTHUR " COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY COMMIS ION EXPIRES oa• 1 45. a0aa Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me (name(s) of person(s)) as N 1'J ci W CD <.a (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REA ZONE% ;. TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL � z� IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY OF104Y.4 CnY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: a • . . 1� a J • • ��11 This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa, Property Address: 15 S M C Property Owner(s): A� DA -e Cyr t•{ c—k y e Y— IJyw By. By: i' l L, STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on N uvemaelt 5 r`` 2.0+4 (Date) by Aimee HeLmw gWCKNEiI and Awya9w M1L!lAEL U444GKNEIL (narne(s)of individual property owner(s)). RICHARD ARTHUR COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Notary Public m an or the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATME, SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File N cs r— sn if This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF RE ZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY 0F101-+4 CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: 6" 1i R I M1 I W. W. in 70 111 • 4 . A& A This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: G% � awl4 -,/* 74 5-2z40 Pro] 0 By: 11� 117 \`/ tTiT;\ if i;Z•) i� ;7111`ZI]57`►I Ol {7il�i STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on W O V E &A G E iR 50' tAh*.I. HE/LCW'%L and individual property owner(s)). Nrpu� RICHARD ARTHUR �1 Q COMMISSION NUMBER 714145 MY COMMISSION EXPIAE:S. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) of person(s)) as _ (Date) by (name(s) of (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA— PCD - Council - Media File N C� J J .� c) {r w a M c�T C3 co 00 y w (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA— PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF RE ZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA C11 -Y OF10WA C17Y We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: 25-S I a�� t C+ By: By: INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OVVNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on t4we^10t V y`* I ap t'4 (Date) by 401-61111 &14V4 *%%W and pAI ,%Ah*j E %API (name(s) of individual property owner(s)). RICHARDARTHUR At COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY CoISSION EXPIRES ow► Or- IS•.1nap T14.- e -- Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: CD ..k; s co <J r - m This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA - PCD - Council - Media File PROTi 1N ST OF RE ZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA C 1Y' CI; Y DF70it,9 CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: (RLZ1?-0000) This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address:_ Property Owner(s): By: By: o�Y INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on Noyernbe•/ 4 , ay 1•k (Date) by V.%M W%yiTow PNS. Af C and Nma9r qi"E ?PA-me0. (name(s) of individual property owner(s)). n RICHARD ARTHUR MMISSION NUMBER 714445 COMMISSION EXPIRES �-t5 ao3o Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) ofperson(s)) as ty �{ (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa trustee) of Orifi: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONING /'� TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ' IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY OF101RA CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: Jill Paz" M I M6 Jill 1111 This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: 813 MCCOLLISTER CT Property Owner(s): MITCHELL. LISA M By: (XAA� Y i By: INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on twoyc L►+4LL %Ow as►��tcwE�� and (na (Date) by individual property owner(s)). RICHARD ARTHUR.v C3 bLCOMMISSION NUMBER 714445 A MY COMMISSION EXPIRES c 1 ,=u �OWe. p3 S -r?oa p Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Y 2-4 -, n w AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S):m s M c�? CO STATE OF IOWA ) 4r JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: o This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of Pcrson(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA - PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL AIL, IOWA CITY, IOWA -� CITY OF10TV4 CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: � 2' [-� e- C' Au w Property O er(s):_ R•kr, q�,pl �r,,)fl� NL�tar. By: By: I7►1I7\L l ±' Y• .Ick, STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on NO%lew.. DeV LIQ" , a0104 (Date) by E�tt ',�SAn Nt\SOW and RYwM MtCNgEt. NElS01J (name(s)of individual property owner(s)). RICHARDARTHUR .9 -i COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY CpQ��A1MISSION EXPIRES Cpl.1!S•aNan �l ^l Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) ofperson(s)) as _ N a cn M C7J (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA -PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY 01`1041{I CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: >. _ .� �•, ■ . . V. A � . • X11 This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 4145 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: 8`l•3 iiA.cCp(w= (nor+, INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on tJ uv a V- b a '-1 r%" 3 01-4 ) b Altx y �'t+��hF...4r and �Jo..� �ihGKTM✓c�J ((Date) individual property owner(s)).of RICHARD ARTHUR Ee COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Abao Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) ofperson(s)) as (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File N 0 > .c rn .a (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF RE, ZOMING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 17 V I IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY OFIOR14 CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: X5 3 Ac6711:54er Ct Property owner By: By: INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on NaNty�her/ yN' r *NO 1Ir (Date) by OW&"? W04K&vn S%AAOT and (name(s) of individual property owner(s)). 1*RICHARD ARTHUR COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 12 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES owP o e. • l5 - Hca' Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: 0 v.., =icr _< m 0 0 s L w f' Fn .7 This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by r--> (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST JI EST OJL` REZOLV [NG TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY OF 101-V4 CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fom-ths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: Wpo Iu c Lo ll ia¢w C4. INDIVEDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on 0 a%jt 0k!ge o 4. 2.0%-4 (Date) by i2eAEtt 71 MGtMm 1>0M%1C and K%maeok N1ta.E OO►;%\C (name(s) of individual property owner(s)). E RICHARD ARTHUR COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY CG MI3 IO��ORES o 1 .4 . Notary Public iiand for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: 0 :c _ r W co a This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONING \ Ag' TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA CIT oY F10iit CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: $ G X 1" ' c. L o Uv4Cr Li - Property Owner(s): By: By: INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY Osla NFR(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on Nt7Jewobe r LA" , aO \� (Date) by Zwet�Itty LEsttR � 6*bE 7Eu4lG.ete�n (name(s)of individual ndrooerty owner(s)). RICHARD ARTHUR �~�t COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES �owP �• t'6. 01080 — a .A– Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA – PCD - Council - Media File J 4C-) w =4ni = M CO This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA – PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY OFIOR''4 CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: 873 MCCOLLISTER CT Owner(s): WATSON, BETH A INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on tto lewJoe v q , aOI-+ (Date) by Vj'Etv► IRyl.1 and (name(s) of individual property owner(s)). �Wk RICHARD ARTHUR $ t° COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY COMM �S,ION EXPIRES Notary Public in anfor the State of Iowa bbbwww►►►��� ?. > 7 0{ —n �� AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): {r ri s CIO 0 STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA +� CITYOF10MI CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: 1141 This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: 883 PropertyOwner(s): "i1¢.aGti S-TR-o.i �auv1 By: By: A e m e'K INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on 1J cNcvwb e%/ I$tj^ay t-4 (Date) by -WO MrGMwE•. ^tA it and _Mft y AwIU t K,_b..►Ep_ (name(s)of individuR property owner(s)). RICHARDARTHUR $ COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Oi• 13.80 P.). o. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: K x 0 t n s 00 Ij ED This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA - PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REA ZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL I I IOWA CITY, IOWA a t, CITY OF101Vl CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: Pro] By: By: INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OVdNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on _ J'E " EMMeea and individual p operty er(s)). E RICHARDARTHUR COMMISSION NUMBER 714445MY COMMISSION EXPIRES O.l • I S Novew.bef os"". aota N `•� A r Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTI3ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) ofpeison(s)) as (Date) by (type of authority (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa 9Y6 _ (Date) by (narne(s) of such as officer, trustee) of Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File C3 _•moi � w such as officer, trustee) of Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL I' I IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY OFIOW.t CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: _ . . •.waS Min M. 111111 • 1111 1 11 This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: BR3 ,4-,t, Z-r-ic.e_w AvnT%+u42 INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OVVMR(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on tJ o v e..be, `'tr`' , P o 1-1(Date) by Ztc#t+f h GnK-, P%P-T+kUP and f alt GLft frUDf,.j4- PrK�tt U Q� (name(s) of individual property owner(s)). COMMISSON UMBER 65080 Notary Public in and for the State of Io a, MY COMMISSION EXPIRES N AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): o STATE OF IOWA ) Ii{' o -n JOHNSON COUNTY) as: i <r^ rn F` This instrument was acknowledged before me onate b ? ' ^ � ) Y (name(s) of persou(s)) as (type of authority, such as office# trustee) of (name of property owner) . n Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 0011 Cc: CA - PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OFEZOI`\JI NG TO: HONORABLE 1VIAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY IOWA CIT} OFIOLKtCITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: 101. 4 . =469=0%J • • X111 This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: al INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY' OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on Noyevwbc .A %U I a0"4 (Date) by iZOwtA�.O .SRKE� 1ir►y and k%49aw •THoWR5 (name(s)of individual property owner(s)). RM&qTHUR ER 714445 EXPIRES4 �� Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGINING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) ofperson(s)) as (Date) by 1 1w (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File Q C) —+ • rn (Date) by 1 1w (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL'Ali IOWA CITY, IOWA I 3 CITY OFIOT-V4 CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: Property r 1001 LANGENBERG AVE KASPAREK, TIMOTHY A KP%5PA9-EK, %-uttt P INDIVIDUAL. PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by \-01L\ N%I* KP,'* Q RRA �(- and (name(s) of individual property owner(s)). RICHARD ARTHUR gAh COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 oWP MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 0.1 . 0.6 • a*" Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa `= C:) W -n AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S):r -i n STATE OF IOWA JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: cn This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA - PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL j / _ IOWA CITY IOWA CITY OFIOYV,t CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of properly which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: Pro] By: By: 957 LANGENBERG AVE INDIVIDUAL, PROPERTY OVVNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on Drz "3 E le. q r h 0" 1 &ep-.np,�f 02T1'L and individual property owner(s)). .01�t RICHARDARTHUR COMMISS10N NUMBER 714445 MY COMM SI N EXPIRES 11 �oavP D 'a-• l 5S.� a o Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: _ (Date) by (name(s) of This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa trustee) of Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA I �- CITY OFIOWA CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: Sou Gllberi-Streel etrrJ Pf dolbsbr BOuleyarA (BE7- 00601 This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: _7,.n m L Co j i ST,P* LS Pro. to 0 INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: Ac ca This instrument was acknowledged before me on c c)n-e_f Z3 Z.(---)) (Date) by 1.0'rev. >`_ G-1,nP L-k:)i1Q 1A_ and � � K . (�ytp �3u f k (name(s) of individual property owner(s)). WEND^l Notary Public ' d for the State V Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) ofperson(s)) as (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA-. CITY 0FlowizIrY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: ' 6w" Grik%cit Swtet M" "a .vd rR&Zt-l-otaW This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address:_ V33 1-A C eon k i �tr C t . Prol M INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on WOV4tVf0DQ40' y r aolq- 'Um AW&VAC Ju OAF -pot and individual property er(s)). RICHARD ARTHUR COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Notary Public m and for the State of Iowa 01-1 S-�Z AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) as: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Ce: CA - PCD - Council - Media File N O j :rtc� C o �C rn v w T (Date) by (name(s) of This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Ce: CA - PCD - Council - Media File P12+LYid'p ST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA v- J ClTrorrowAcrry We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: Ltt _WAhO (kVZ-17cP6cJ This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths ofail tite members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: �� 141k c. _Cv{�-tSi,_ PropertyOwner(s):)=E2 o "T1 By:t By- - —� -- F --'o M INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): - STATEr, JOHNSONAGOUNTY) ss: -'Cn C'_O✓"),�,�` /J Th' instrument was acknowledged before me on / VJ V'-e1'A'b ee- f q' i� O q (Deft) by c Vl -- — ._ _ Pa et . .. �__.._ and (name(s) of JACCUELINE MIAON Notary Public . State of Georg,a Fulton County MY Commission Expires Oct 1, 20+9 N Publi in and for the State ofdawa C�yrZ�t A AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) ofperson(s)) as (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of ----- — _ ___ (name of property owner) , Rotary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd folder Cc: CA — PCD - Council -Media File 021:013 PROTEST OF RE ZONING c ,r TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL�A _ IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY OFIOA,t CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: iR�Zi�-0000�� This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. `�J L Property Address: (/ 5� �'1'/ 146 GJ IIOAL'/ ViDl VIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: 0 :i1 w m r M 0 This instrument was acknowledged before me on N p V ernb a t %6 1 a u \ r (Date) by "rc of %.yv%v-% ►aaE0. yow %T'S and G wLt-i t-OwS y0gWCS (name(s) of individual property owner(s)). RICHARD ARTHUR COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 My COMMISSION EXPIRES a b ^ = Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) of person(s)) as (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa trustee) of Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA - PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL I I IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY OFIOWA CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: (RUI?-D000) This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa Property Address: 935 LANGENBERG AVE Property Owner(s): PHOU, YAO V :m % r1 INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OVY ER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on N w c. 'O. k s" '>0 11- (Date) by Yo.o S'r T? V L4 and (name(s) of individual property owner(s)). RICHARD ARTHUR . AS" COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 II 1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File N 7"< :<t— M -o 1 m n w m This instrument was acknowledged before me on N w c. 'O. k s" '>0 11- (Date) by Yo.o S'r T? V L4 and (name(s) of individual property owner(s)). RICHARD ARTHUR . AS" COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 II 1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA ! CITY OF70Y11,1 CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: Sil 111(rA Smiley VL NL4(-l-DO061, This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: Property gwner(s): 979 LANGENBERG AVE MARTIN J INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: t This instrument was acknowledged before me on N uv cvr%a e✓ \y r auk-' (Date) by L.ovctrc� Mrt:,E t?kOTItEVR and (name(s)of individual property owner(s)). RICHARD ARTHUR 2� COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa ca -1. J a_D AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) as: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) of person(s)) as (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA - PCD - Council - Media File .J "l 7+Z T This instrument was acknowledged before me on N uv cvr%a e✓ \y r auk-' (Date) by L.ovctrc� Mrt:,E t?kOTItEVR and (name(s)of individual property owner(s)). RICHARD ARTHUR 2� COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa ca -1. J a_D AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) as: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) of person(s)) as (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA - PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONING : 0 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 11 ,I IOWA CITY, IOWA C17 Y OFIOid,t CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: MR5311011 . • • lO 1 - • �� I / I • This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: 100 LANGENBERG AVE Property er( B?kSLER, TINVTHYJ r-oQErTA c-3 0 --n -< By: a+ -n M INDIVIDUAL, PROPERTY OVJIYER(S): rn STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on N oJew.bey ako�+ (Date) by t,o a e'rrA FA YE BAS5 L -E- P- and (name(s) of individual property owner(s)). IC THUR � V" COMMMISSIONION NUMBER 714445 J\ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Da.- 15 aoxc-) Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) ofperson(s)) as Orig: Subd Folder Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa 02/2013 PROTEST OF REZONING TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 11 3 I IOWA CITY, IOWA CII POFI0IV.1 CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: s _ .• �•, ■ . . 11 • � . � �1/• This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: Property Owner(s; By: 2 �L By: ZA,4� 1031 LANGENBERG AVE INDIVIDUAI, PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on N ov e,y, Ozs er 1L1, a0 1 � (Date) by N.cr�u.gs Jnv SciwtcyE2 and STEPHANIE kwrt &Hu1CeL2 (name(s)of individual property owner(s)). RICHARDARTHUR COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 I MY COMMISSION EXPIRES --� o a - l �+ - �ZZ Notary Public m anc1 for e tate of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) of person(s)) as (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File PROTEST OF REZONWG TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL 1 I IOWA CITY, IOWA' Cl; Y OFI01-V4 CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: (1RLZ1?- 0000j This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: raw 1043 LANGENBERG AVE Owner(s): WOODROFFE, LISA M INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on Ny�1tv"�e a k'-%, as \"A- (Date) by L- b^ M^c%E WOVOROFFE and 9-oNCE U1NUnw4 Wouowo FFE (name(s)of individual property owner(s)). RICHARD ARTHUR COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Not Public in and for the State of Iowa war. oa.Is -aao AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OVv ER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) ofperson(s)) as (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File N rn ci o -n m rn 9 C1.4 m This instrument was acknowledged before me on Ny�1tv"�e a k'-%, as \"A- (Date) by L- b^ M^c%E WOVOROFFE and 9-oNCE U1NUnw4 Wouowo FFE (name(s)of individual property owner(s)). RICHARD ARTHUR COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES Not Public in and for the State of Iowa war. oa.Is -aao AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OVv ER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) ofperson(s)) as (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File MINUTES PRELIMINARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OCTOBER 19, 2017 — 7:00 PM — FORMAL MEETING E M M A J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Carolyn Dyer, Ann Freerks, Mike Hensch, Phoebe Martin, Max Parsons, Mark Signs, Jodie Theobald MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Sara Hektoen, Bob Miklo, Jann Ream, Sarah Walz OTHERS PRESENT: Mark Seabold, Jerry Waddilove, Glenn Lynn, Joleah Shaw, Heidi Zahner, Robert Domsic, Kevin Engleberg, Richard Arthur, David A. Morales, Doug Brown, Pat McAllister RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: By a vote of 3-3 (Signs recused; Freerks, Dyer, Martin voting against approval) the Commission failed to recommend approval of REZ17-00001, to conditionally rezone from Interim Development Multi -family (ID -RM) to Low Density Single-family (RM -12) for 21.79 acres of property located adjacent to the intersection of South Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard, subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Report. By a vote of 7-0 the Commission recommends approval of amendments to City Code Sections 14 -5B -4E, Illumination Requirements, City Code Section 14-5B-8A&B, Signs permitted in Interim Development, Overlay Planned Development, and Residential zones. CALL TO ORDER: Freerks called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. ----,> REZONING ITEM (REZ17-00001) Discussion of an application submitted by Southgate Developers for a rezoning of approximately 21.79 acres from Interim Development -Multi -family (ID -RM) zone to Low Density Multi -family (RM -12) zone located north and south of the intersection of South Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard. Signs recused himself from this item to avoid conflict of interest. Walz began the staff report showing an aerial view of the location. She also showed a map of the surrounding zoning. The current zoning of the location is ID -RM, which is a default zone; once the required utilities and roads have reached a location it is then considered Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 2 of 21 appropriate for rezoning. Across the street there is a small CC -2 zone for future commercial use; along the river is mostly publicly zoned property (parkland property, streets department, parks and recreation department, and the Sandhill Prairie Park preserve area). There is a developed portion of Sandhill Estates to the east however the only connection eastlwest from Gilbert Street to Sycamore Street is Langenberg Avenue (until McCollister Boulevard is completed) which led to more traffic on Langenberg Avenue than was anticipated and planned for. McCollister Boulevard will be extended in the near future and that will provide the east/west arterial street that is needed. The Applicant has requested a conditional rezoning for the 21.79 acres to RM -12 zone (Low -Density Multi -family) intended to provide for high density, single-family housing or low density multi -family housing. It is intended to provide diverse housing options in neighborhoods throughout the City. The description in the Code mentions that careful attention to site and building design is important to ensure that various housing types in any one location are compatible to on another. The Applicant would like to build a mix of multi- family uses which include a variety of more traditional multi -family buildings (4-plexes, 8- plexes, and 12-plexes), and also townhome or row house style housing. The area north of McCollister Boulevard has 13.9 acres of land with 109 units proposed on that portion. The area south of McCollister Boulevard is 7.9 acres with 87 dwelling units for a total of 196 units as shown in the concept plan. Walz noted that more than one-fifth of the units (about 22% north of McCollister Boulevard) are proposed as one -bedroom units and south of McCollister Boulevard the number of one -bedroom units is 27% and the remaining are two- bedroom units. This information is relevant given that the current student housing market extends well beyond what is thought of as traditional student housing area. One- and two- bedroom units are typically desirable by a more diverse population, including empty - nesters, retirees, or young working professionals. Walz also pointed out that the concept plan shows preserved open space on the property between the existing single-family neighborhood along McCollister Court and also open space retained within the new development for the enjoyment of the new development as well. A proposed road, Preserve Way, would provide a 26- or 28- foot wide single -loaded street, north of McCollister. Open space is preserved between the single-family housing and the proposed development. Walz noted there would also be an extension of Covered Wagon Drive and Preserve Way also extends south. Additionally the concept features a pedestrian street, which helps break the subdivision into five walkable areas keeping the vehicle parking for each area in the center of each area. A pedestrian streets is appropriate in this area because along an arterial street the block lengths are longer. A pedestrian street is treated like a roadway in regard to building setbacks, lighting, street trees, etc. Walz stated the South District Plan shows the area at the intersection of McCollister Boulevard and Gilbert Street as appropriate for multi -family housing on either side of the street surrounded by low to medium mixed residential. Low to medium mixed residential means a variety of residential including small lot detached single-family units, zero lot line development, duplexes and townhouses. Higher density housing should be located at the edges of neighborhoods, principally in areas with good street connectivity, access to open space or parks, trails, and transit. The "New Residential Development' section of the plan calls for compact and connected neighborhoods, integrating a variety of housing types to serve residents at the various stages of life, with a mix of multi -family and attached housing in areas along busier street frontages or in areas bordering open space. The additional density is, in part, intended to improve the feasibility of transit service and enhance market potential for Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 3 of 21 nearby commercial areas. The plan refers to "Missing Middle" housing types that are similar in scale and character to single-family detached housing -ranging from duplexes and triplexes to smaller multi -family apartment buildings. The plan calls for blocks and buildings of exceptional design to maintain an attractive residential character along streets and provide safe and inviting living environments for residents. Walz acknowledged that she has answered an number of phone calls over the past few days about "Missing Middle" housing types and the City is in the process of going through a "Missing Middle" plan process. Currently is no form -based code to govern missing middle development and it is not anticipated to be complete for a few years. The "Missing Middle" provides a variety of housing that is not being seen in newer neighborhoods. What the Applicant has provided are examples of the "Missing Middle" housing concepts, smaller block sizes, framing the streets with houses, having the parking to the rear, and very pedestrian oriented. How this proposal differs from what would be included with the form - based code is the "Missing Middle" housing types would be on their own individual lots with their own parking provided on each, whereas in this case the housing is all on one property with centralized the parking within block. Freerks commented that "Missing Middle" should also include single-family homes. Walz said that is sometimes correct, however in this case the parcel of land is somewhat uniquely shaped and the row homes or townhouses fill in the area. In the larger picture, this concept is intended to transition the single-family area to the east. Walz stated that in terms of compatibility with the neighborhood the adjacent single-family development is at somewhat of a higher elevation. The Applicant has tried to create a transition between the neighboring houses with the open area and with the single loaded street fronting the housings on the street. The Applicant has also designed buildings with a smaller footprint trying to stay similar in the scale to the larger single-family homes in the neighborhood and breaking up the roof lines to not make the buildings not so out of character with the single-family homes. Walz reiterated that the South District Plan does call for "exceptional building design" and the Applicant has proposed a "modern farmhouse" style about which staff did have some concerns. The designs will need to meet the multi -family standards because these are all multi -family buildings and also Staff believes the row house and townhouse buildings should meet the standards the City would use for the true single-family attached housing in order to make them more compatible with the single-family housing nearby. Staff therefore has included conditions in their recommendations to address those things. Walz noted that in conversations she has had with neighbors who have called into the City part of the concern is the uniformity of the proposed housing across the site that doesn't seem to reflect the variety of housing designs in the existing neighborhood. Staff believes it can work with the developer to create a better transition through design and the multi -family design standards should help with that. The additional standards Staff recommends are listed in the Staff report. Lastly, Walz addressed the traffic implications and acknowledged the Commission has received a few letters regarding traffic in the area. Traffic concerns also came up at the open house that the applicant hosted. South Gilbert Street is a north -south arterial street, designed to accommodate high traffic volumes across the city, providing a connection to the Downtown and University campus. McCollister Boulevard is also designated as an arterial, providing connections to Mormon Trek Boulevard and Old Highway 218/Riverside Drive to the west. A Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 4 of 21 planned eastward extension of McCollister Boulevard to South Sycamore Street is schedule in the 2018-2019 Capital Improvement Program, with construction in 2019. A 2016 traffic study determined that a traffic signal or roundabout is already warranted at the intersection of South Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard due to crash history and peak hour delays. The City has also received numerous complaints from pedestrians having difficulty crossing the intersection to access Trueblood Recreation Area. An improved intersection will be included in the McCollister Boulevard extension project. Staff believes most vehicle traffic from the proposed development will likely travel on Gilbert to and from the Downtown/campus area and commercial areas on Highways 6 and 1 or west on McCollister Boulevard to 218 or Riverside Drive. However, until such time as the McCollister Boulevard extension is completed, some portion of east -west vehicle traffic will rely on Langenberg Avenue, a residential street for which traffic calming measures (speed humps) have already been installed. Staff recommends approval of REZ17-00001, to conditionally rezone from Interim Development Multi -family (ID -RM) to Low Density Single-family (RM -12) for 21.79 acres of property located adjacent to the intersection of South Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard, subject to the following conditions: • Substantial compliance with the concept plan submitted with regard to street and block layout (including pedestrian street), building types, building locations, location of surface parking areas and covered parking, location and size of open spaces, and sidewalk and trail connections. • The proposed pedestrian street must meet the standards for pedestrian streets provided in the Riverfront Crossings Plan. • Townhouse and row house style multi -family buildings must comply with the attached single family housing standards for entrances and design in the zoning code. • Eaves and window and doorway trim will be required on all buildings according to the attached -single family housing standards. • Building designs to be approved through design review. • Buildings shall be constructed of durable, high quality building materials. • Landscaping must comply with recommended plant list provided by the Bur Oak Land Trust. • Overall density of the development should not exceed o 115 units north of McCollister Boulevard, at least 20% of which should be one - bedroom units -the remainder being 2 -bedroom units. o 90 units south of McCollister Boulevard, at least 25% of which should be one - bedroom units -the remainder being 2 -bedroom units. Freerks asked if the density would be about 9.3 if all space were used, Walz confirmed that is correct. Freerks asked how long Preserve Way would be. Walz said it fits the standard along an arterial street and the pedestrian street breaks up the long block and is treated as if it were a vehicle street. Freerks asked if all 196 units are housed in multi -family structures and Walz confirmed that is correct. Walz explained they meet the classification for multi -family because although they are townhouse style or appearance they are not on individual lots. Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 5 of 21 Hensch asked about road widths on Preserve Way and the parking implications of each. Walz stated that the City Code Standard denotes the parking allowances based on road width. He supported some parking on the street for visitors. Hensch stated he would then be in favor of stating the road width should only be 26 feet wide therefore allowing only parking on one side and to slow traffic down. Hensch also noted that pictures don't show clearly if all the structures are unique or if there are repeating patterns. He feels it would have more acceptability to the surrounding neighborhood if the buildings had some uniqueness to them and yet still stay with that "farmhouse design". He was concerned that all of the buildings would end up looking the same, like the Keokuk Street apartments or Pheasant Ridge. Ann agreed, stating that she did not feel the designs even met the basic code. Hensch stated that he would be ok with all of the buildings having the same footprint, but that different materials and colors should be used to distinguish the buildings from one another. Ann suggested that they may want to give the developer more time to provide that type of information and that they may want to defer voting on this application tonight. Walz stated that the applicant would be able to address the design questions. Parsons asked if the McCollister Boulevard extension were to be delayed would the City be willing to put a temporary traffic signal at the Gilbert Street intersection. Walz said it is possible to separate out the project but that would be decided by Council with recommendations from the City Engineer. Freerks opened the public hearing Mark Seabold (Shive Hattery) walked through the process they have gone through for this project. They have been working on this project for over a year with Southgate Development and hosted a neighborhood meeting about ten months ago where they received some review comments from the neighborhood and that led them to then go work with Opticos and City Staff. Working with City Staff has been about a nine month process. He began by showing the Commission the original design they started with and how it changed through the process from the input they received. The original intention was to provide a smaller scale of connected residences that were consistent with the growing market of young professionals, empty nesters, and other people looking for smaller scale homes. He attended a tiny -house meeting that Johnson County held and over 100 people were present listening and were very interested in a smaller scale of living and how to accomplish it. Therefore they feel that there is a viable market for homes with a smaller footprint. The other goal of this development was to capitalize on the Terry Trueblood Recreation Area, it is a great amenity in the area with lots of natural features, as well as capitalize on the development at Gilbert and Highway 6. Seabold showed the Commission the original concept plan they presented last winter at the neighborhood meeting. It was comprised of row house units with parking located in-between them, what they were trying to do was have an open front and back of the building, so there would be green views out both sides, public and private green space behind each building. All the homes were two bedroom units and all in the 1000 square foot range with open floor plans on the first floor and two bedrooms on the second floor. In the original plan they also included some more traditional apartments 8-plex and 12-plex buildings to be located south of McCollister Boulevard. With the two-bedroom units there were 344 bedrooms in the concept. Additionally in the original plan they were using the stormwater detention area between the existing neighborhood and this new neighborhood as the buffer zone with the back of their Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 6 of 21 homes backing up to the back of these new units. There would still be a minimum of 150 feet between the neighborhoods. Some of the feedback at the original neighborhood meeting Seabold heard was it looked too much like an apartment complex, they didn't like the large parking lots, and the concerns about visibility and traffic. When Seabold then met with City Staff, he heard a lot of the same concerns so they went back to the drawing board. At the same time, the City had hired Opticos to review the Northside and Southside District Plans and Seabold was able to consult with them to get a rough concept of how to incorporate a "Missing Middle" concept for this site, knowing there is a lot of single-family residential adjacent to the area. They then went back and created a plan with a variety of buildings, pushed closer to the streets, and having parking in-between creating the blocks that were shown on the plan. They are still multi -family buildings but at a smaller scale and reflect the residential scale of the neighborhood. So between neighborhood comments, City Staff input, and working with Opticos they came up with a new concept plan (the one currently before the Commission). There are four different styles of units, fronting streets in different ways, and pushed the single loaded street all the way to the east. Seabold addressed Hensch's question about the street width and stated the intention is for it to be a 26 foot wide street with parking only on one side and to control traffic on that street. They then designed the prairie buffer very similar as Opticos suggested as a linear area that is a lush green space reflecting the area and incorporates a public park as an in-between zone. The minimum dimension is now 230 feet from the new buildings to the backs of the existing single- family homes. There is a pedestrian street running down the center of the site to have a more walkable area for not only this development but the extended neighborhoods. There should not be any need for guests to park on McCollister Court, as there will be plenty of parking along the Preserve Way in this development. Seabold noted the plan is five areas, everything is a two-story height except for the four buildings on the south side of McCollister Boulevard, which are three -stories. All the one - bedroom units are located on a second story, there is a larger footprint for the two-bedroom units so the second story can be stepped back to accommodate one -bedroom units. That will minimize the scale of the of the apartment buildings. The four -unit types are two-bedroom townhomes with garages. There are two-bedroom two-story row houses at either end of the pedestrian street as well the north side. There are also two-bedroom flats which are ADA accessible, and the one -bedroom flats are typically located on the second levels. So in the new plan, instead of 344 bedrooms the number of apartments increased but the number of bedrooms decreased. So really the area is less dense than the original plan. Seabold also stated they have no intention of doing any three-bedroom units. Seabold noted that contained within the parking areas are some building forms buried in there and those are single story garages that can be used for resident use. Also attached to all those garages will be garbage and recycling centers so it won't be a stand -along dumpster enclosure, it will be incorporated into the design. Seabold stated they will be asking for waivers when they go forward with the zoning request. At this time they are just asking for a conditional zoning tonight to pursue this concept plan. When they move forward they will work with City Staff on architecture design for multi -family as Walz noted in the Staff report. So far, the development team has really just done massing studies, with 2 -story buildings, multiple roof lines, and porches jutting out. The waivers requested would be to reduce the setbacks along McCollister Boulevard, Preserve Way, and Covered Wagon Drive from 40 feet to 25 feet to create a more walkable neighborhood scale. Seabold reiterated Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 7 of 21 they want to limit the density, with a RM -12 zoning the north site could have around 200 units on it and they are only asking for 115, though they currently have 109 units shown. Seabold next showed the Commission some conceptual imagery, they are looking at simple forms for the architecture, simple interiors with a lot of open space, smaller livable units, and natural outdoor areas. He noted a concern from the neighborhood meeting was the plan looked to modern, Seabold stated that there will be different materials on each building, different colors, and roof line shifts, etc. to show five different unique designs. The next step would be for them to pursue more design details. Seabold said the process has been great, they have learned a lot through their work with Opticos and the City. He understands the neighbors' concerns and they feel they have addressed the concerns by providing a smaller scale multi -family residential option. Freerks asked if Opticos recommended all multi -family buildings and Seabold confirmed they did. The design team was trying to find some areas for duplexes, but Opticos sees the existing single family as part of the whole thing and they are trying to blend from Gilbert up to the single- family neighborhood. He stated that its not a true "Missing Middle". Freerks stated that she didn't see this as the "Missing Middle', and cautioned that they have to be careful if they are going to try to sell this concept to the community and are creating a huge neighborhood of all multi -family. She is concerned about this advice from Opticos. Seabold noted that Opticos looked at the whole area, not just their development, as an area, and even recommended extending McCollister Court to connect the new development to the existing single-family neighborhood but that did not work into the developments plans. They knew the reaction they would get, and they didn't want it anyway. They did agree on the pedestrian connection though. Hensch reiterated that the concept of "Missing Middle" is critical and the first one the City does needs to be done right so the public accepts the concept and sees the benefits. Hensch asked about stormwater and where the detention would be for this development. Seabold showed on the map the area, it is a bit wild and overgrown now and they would manicure it a bit better. The stormwater basin will also accommodate the runoff water from the neighborhood to the east. Hensch asked about the three-story buildings south of McCollister Boulevard and if the third story would be stepped back. Seabold confirmed it would be and showed a rough diagram of the building. Hensch reiterated how important it is to him that there be the unique exterior finishes to keep the area from looking like one large apartment complex. Seabold agreed and said there will be five distinct building types and would be placed appropriately through the development to make it look unique. He agreed with the conditions in the staff recommendation, and would move forward with design accordingly, noting that the Keokuk Street apartments were a perfect example of what they did not want to do. Martin asked who Seabold envisions as the target occupant of these units. Seabold said it would be young professionals are just starting out and can't afford the bigger houses, or others that just want a smaller home. They may not all be rentals, some may be condos and sold. Martin noted that if there are no three-bedroom units then they are specifically ruling out families with more than one child. Seabold said they are avoiding three-bedroom units to rule out college student living but the two-bedroom units would be ideal for a small family starting out. Martin asked if the upper level one -bedroom units would have elevator access. Seabold said they would not, ADA units would be accommodated on the lower levels. Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 8 of 21 Freerks asked staff to explain the current ID -RM zoning and the South District map that denotes it as low to medium density mixed residential with multi -family just at the corner intersections. She stated that while the Comprehensive Plan is conceptual and not always followed exactly, the zone should not be taken as an indication that that this whole area would become RM -12 or multi -family. Hektoen stated that the ID designation doesn't guarantee that the entire area will be multi -family. Freerks didn't think so and wanted to make sure everyone understood that what the Commission must decide tonight is what the density in this area should be. Walz noted that is where the Comprehensive Plan focuses to see what is really contemplated for an area. Typically along arterial streets, specifically at major intersections, there is normally higher density (examples are intersections of Rochester and First Avenues, Court Street and Scott Boulevard). Then as you move away from the intersection the density should step down into lower density and eventually single-family housing. Hektoen stated that any rezoning has to comply with the comprehensive plan. And so sometimes there is an ID designation made when land has been annexed and then the comprehensive plan changes over time. Freerks stated that the ID designation is a placeholder. Walz said that sometimes land doesn't get developed for 20-30 years, and in the meantime the goals of the City change, and so current ID designation may or may not be appropriate when the land is ready for development. But here the comprehensive plan does articulate that some multi -family is appropriate at this intersection. Theobald asked to hear more about the parking and garages. Seabold showed on the concept plan the locations. Theobald asked how many spaces are provided per each unit. Seabold stated per zoning regulations, two bedroom units get two parking spaces and one -bedroom units get one space. As for garage spaces, they are working towards having enough garage spaces to accommodate about half of the required parking spaces. They are hoping a lot of the tenants will be cyclists and outdoor enthusiasts (due to the location) and are not reliant on vehicular transportation and hoping to get public transportation down there. Theobald expressed some doubt about attractive the parking situation will be to people who are older or people who are used to having a garage close to their unit. Martin added that this is Iowa and we do have to deal with winter weather. Jerry Waddilove (Southgate Companies) added that in the townhome style units there are two - car detached garages about 10 feet behind each unit, so several units will have very close garages. Waddilove stated that Southgate Companies has been in business in Iowa City since 1952. They have provided quality homes and workplaces for Iowa City since that time. Real estate development requires being sensitive to market dynamics. While Southgate initially considered duplexes and zero -lot lines for these outlots the local real estate market has experienced change, which has lead them to the concept plan that is presented this evening. Southgate is looking to provide a variety of housing types with The Preserve at Sandhill to provide an opportunity a diversity of socially economic status while allowing residents the opportunity to start and age all in the South District of Iowa City. What they offer at The Preserve at Sandhill meets the Comprehensive Plan and South District Plan that was approved in 2015. As noted on the South District Plan map The Preserve at Sandhill fits within the density noted of approximately 184 to 308 dwelling units. The subdivision is located close to the trails that lead to downtown so their hope is that residents will be able to walk or bike to downtown as well as to restaurants, grocery and retail. The additional density has the potential to make feasible district wide desirable amenities such as mass transit loop, retirement housing, Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 9 of 21 and healthcare facilities. One of the other things that has been mentioned is the housing that is provided in Sandhill Estates, The Preserve at Sandhill is part of the larger Southgate development of Sandhill Estates, which includes a total of approximately 160 acres. Taking a wider lens view Southgate will project to develop this land into approximately 12'/2 mixed - housing multi -family (the project applied for this evening). 22% of that is 35 acres of The Sandhill Prairie part, and 65% of it will be single family detached housing. Southgate is vested in the neighborhood, Southgate paid for and provided a connection to the multi -use trail from McCollister Court cul-de-sac (which wasn't required). Southgate has also begun internal discussions to collaborate with the City and the neighbors to review trail stormwater issues southwest of McCollister Court. Lastly, their Navigate Homes is building and selling up to $325,000 homes in Sandhill Estates Part Three. Southgate would like to be a part of making housing relatively affordable in Iowa City, the smaller homes in The Preserve at Sandhill contribute to this goal. The objective is to target young professionals, empty nesters, bankers, nurses, retired professors, UI personnel as well as PhD and other graduate students. The Preserve at Sandhill is sensitive to the neighborhood by providing a single loaded street closest to the residential neighborhood and providing clustered density as opposed to duplexes backing up to the neighbors. There is also approximately 200 to 230 feet distance between buildings with this concept. Their hope is property values would not be impacted, it has been studied quite a bit as people have brought true low-income housing plans in front of the Commission and Council. There is research in Younkers, New York that shows property values did not decline when low-income housing was provided in the community. Glenn Lynn (725 McCollister Court) is the founding homeowner on McCollister Court and is totally against this whole development. He is not naive enough to think this area will not get developed. The good neighbor meetings started about five or six years ago, they discussed development with Southgate, acknowledged they were receptive to duplexes or zero -lot lines to keep the roof line low so they could still see the park. Lynn felt everyone was on board with that concept and can't believe this is where they are at today. He is not sure who is driving this concept but it is not what the neighborhood discussed and were on board with. Lynn has numerous concerns. The architect keeps talking about simple and all he sees in this design is cheap. Most of the people in Lynn's neighborhood built custom homes and to see the cement board siding on these proposed buildings painted reeks of cheap. Lynn believes it will have an impact on the property values and it won't be positive. Lynn also is unsure where the market for these units will come from, they are building $350,000 homes on Langenberg Avenue and they sell like hotcakes so the story about cheap and small doesn't make sense. Lynn noted that his home has a walkout basement and no sump pump but has never had an issue with water. He is concerned that a development of this size behind him could impact his home. If his basement floods he will be the first one to the City to say he told you so. Lynn feels the planning approach appears to be backwards. They first build a subdivision with custom homes and then decide to build this type of development next to it, it is backwards. If they were to build the townhomes first, they would not be able to sell the custom home lots. Lynn noted he would like to file a protest and will pick up paperwork for that. Hektoen noted that they can file a protest with the City Council. If 20% or more of the land within 200 feet sign the protest then it will require a super majority at the City Council. It needs to be filed with the City Clerk before the close of the public hearing on the rezoning. Contact the City Clerk's office for details and information on the filing of the protest. He can guarantee that nobody in that neighborhood wants this. He looks out his backyard and has an open field and now all of the sudden he is faced with this. Joleah Shaw (785 McCollister Court) is the co-director of Sandhill Estates Homeowners Association with Lynn and reiterated that all the neighbors share the concerns Lynn voiced. Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 10 of 21 They are worried about the apartment complex feel of the proposed neighborhood. They were told originally it would be duplexes and zero -lots to be a buffer between a higher traffic street such as Gilbert Street and their street McCollister Court. Her backyard will face these buildings, right now she can see the lake at Terry Trueblood and soon could be looking at the roofs of apartment buildings. Shaw worries that the drawings are very deceiving. They have presented a park area or open space between the backyards and this complex but the space isn't really that big. Currently she allows her kids to play on the trail/sidewalk but there is no way she will allow that once the new apartment complex goes up. Shaw also mentioned the parking. Everyone knows with parking in apartment complexes there is always some issue with parking overflow into into more single-family home areas. There is a walking path that goes right by her house to McCollister Court and she knows people will park in front of her house on McCollister Court and walk down the hill to the apartment complex. That will bring a lot of traffic to her dead-end cul-de-sac street. Shaw notes that 196 units presented as row or townhouse buildings but in reality a row or townhouse is like the ones on Mormon Trek or Scott Boulevard which are two or three bedroom units and sell for $250,000. That is a totally different buyer versus a $90,000 one -bedroom condo in an apartment looking building. So the look of the row houses or townhomes on Scott Boulevard are much different looking than the apartment style homes that are proposed here. It just simply doesn't fit in with the single family homes that are right next door. Homes on her street are over $300,000 in assessed value and in the backyard they want to put a $90,000 one -bedroom unit. She doesn't see how that fits in. Shaw also asked about the Homeowners Association. They are all Sandhill Estates, so where does this development fit in. How do the apartment building owners or tenant renters fit in with the single- family homeowners when they have a $300,000 house and this person has a one -bedroom, $90,000 apartment. Southgate suggested they break off into a separate homeowners association but then they would have no control over what goes on in their backyards. They have covenants, rules, regulations for fences, backyards, siding on shed, etc. There are even some neighbors that are a little upset about all the rules they have as homeowners. Shaw also mentioned with the 2019 McCollister Boulevard extension, Alexander Elementary is right there in the backyard, and their homes are within the two mile distance so all of the children in the neighborhood would have to walk to school. Adding 196 units will add a lot of traffic and make it unsafe for children to walk to school. With regards to stormwater, even though there are areas set up for stormwater she can personally say her backyard is a lake if there is a large downpour. The walking path closer to Gilbert Street also floods where there is a lot of rain. Shaw reiterated her concern about a $90,000 unit in the backyard of a $300,000 house and stormwater concerns. She noted that lots of neighbors have the same concern and she would be signing the protest as well. Heidi Zahner (894 McCollister Court) and her husband and three children purchased their home a year ago in August, moving here from another community. From the good neighbor meetings she has attended she has learned they have some very passionate neighbors. They have a very diverse neighborhood unlike anywhere else in Iowa City. She is excited about the possibilities for development but she just doesn't think this plan is going to meet the needs of the area. She also thinks that in 20 years if this development is not done right it can really hurt their neighborhood and that side of town. When she was looking to move into Iowa City her husband did not want to move anywhere south of Highway 6. But they discovered this gem of a neighborhood and amazingly found a home in the low $200,000's. That could not be found anywhere else in Iowa City that would give her the diversity and amazing neighborhood that McCollister Court could. Her youngest child goes to Alexander Elementary which is less than two miles away. She is in fourth grade so Zahner does not allow her daughter to walk by herself because of the traffic on Langenberg Avenue. Adding all these additional units to the area could Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 11 of 21 really hurt the neighborhood. Zahner's biggest concern is that her family invested in this neighborhood with the belief that this whole area of town is changing, and becoming rejuvenated. She would like it to be accessible to all income levels, but the "Missing Middle" is supposed to have the single-family homes in it so it is a community. This development feels too huge. Zahner said she and her husband are opposed to this plan and are pleased to hear the Commission raise some of the same concerns as the neighbors have. Robert Domsic (860 McCollister Court) began by stating he is also opposed to this development. When he purchased his house in 2009, the realtor, who is still the acting realtor for Southgate, told them this land would never be developed. Even not believing that and knowing that the land would someday be developed, he would expect the density of the land reduced much like all the other neighbors discussed before him. Domsic doesn't believe the proposal will be appealing to the masses or the intended populations. When he looks at was is being proposed here, he sees 192 additional units going into this area. He also looks at the other development that is happening in the neighborhood. Southgate is also developing phase two and phase three that will increase dramatically the traffic on Langenberg Avenue. Everyone knows the connection through Langenberg Avenue is an infrastructure issue that cannot support additional traffic. Domsic said it is hard to describe to people how bad the situation on that street is, throughout Langenberg Avenue people park on both sides of the street and the street is very narrow. Speed humps had to be installed because people were driving through too quickly. Even when Domsic is just trying to get to his mailbox people pull out in front of him almost causing an accident about once per week. Additionally the intersection between McCollister Boulevard and Gilbert Street is also a very unsafe intersection. In the last year he has seen school buses get in accidents there, cars being t -boned in the intersection, and it is not safe. With 192 added units and 330+ bedrooms there would be an active population of 500- 600 people living in this area. Additionally Southgate has a 260 more single-family home subdivision planned and adding that density to this area without the infrastructure it will be a disaster. Yes there are future intentions to put a stop light there, there are future intentions to extend McCollister Boulevard but there are also potential future delays. Domsic hopes the Commission can see it would not be wise to develop this neighborhood like this without the proper infrastructure in place first. Another issue to think about is the potential school density. If families with children come to this area there could be an issue with capacity at the school. Alexander Elementary has a capacity for 500 students and in 2016 they had roughly 406 students enrolled. This level of development may push that way above capacity. Domsic also noted that this area is the habitat for a threatened species, the ornate box turtle which has lived here much longer than any of us have. It would be sad to see the habitat destroyed. Urban development is the biggest threat and losing this area could be instrumental in their extinction. Additionally the developer is requesting easements for the frontages and that is an indication that the square footage of the acreage is not large enough for what their intended proposal is. Domsic urges the Commission to think about why those distances were put in place to begin with along such a busy intersection. If an easement of this level is granted, you would be setting the precedent of what would happen for all of the multi -family housing that will be developed in the surrounding area. In the South District Plan, the area north of McCollister Boulevard by the McCollister Farm is also noted as multi -family, and south of McCollister where the quarry used to be is also noted as multi -family. If the easement is allowed for this development, the easement would have to be allowed for the future developments as well and it would impact the safety of all those areas in the South District Plan. Miklo clarified that the easement Domsic was referring to is the 40 foot setback normally required from an arterial street. Miklo also said the area to the north by McCollister Farm would Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 12 of 21 require rezoning to become multi -family zoning. Kevin Engleberg (172 Hawkeye Court) lives in the Aspire Apartments and just moved to Iowa City as a graduate student. He supports this type of development. When he moved to town as a graduate student he was looking for places to live and knew he didn't want to live downtown with the undergraduates and the higher cost of living and was looking for a place like is described in tonight's concept plan. What he is hearing for others in the room tonight is they don't want any multi -family housing next to where they live. Admittedly Engleberg said he came to the meeting tonight for a class project, not this agenda issue, but now feels like Iowa City community doesn't want graduate students next to them. As far as diversity, what has been said tonight is that everyone wants $250,000 and $300,000 homes next to them, single-family homes, and for someone in graduate school he cannot afford a $250,000 home. With concerns about access to the water, sight lines, etc. this land is not owned by the homeowner's association, the people that own it are the developers and this is what they want to do with the land. Engleberg noted that given his position in life this development would be beneficial for him and for the community. He encourages the Commission to support this project and to see it move forward. The Comprehensive Plan denotes multi -family. Engleberg acknowledged the building design could be changed, the amount of units could change, but it should be a multi- family area. The area is close to downtown, arterial streets, and it convenient for people like him and he would probably live somewhere like this. Richard Arthur (893 McCollister Court) and his home is on the corner of McCollister Court and Covered Wagon where they bought the lot and built a custom home. They were told, like others, that the area in discussion tonight would never be developed. He understands that perhaps he shouldn't have believed what a realtor would tell him, but there was a sign on the corner of South Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard for years that said "live where the bass are jumping". If a sign has been put up that said "live where you can see multi -family housing" his family would not have bought that lot and they wouldn't have built their custom home. Arthur respects the opinion of the last speaker, but students are transient. Arthur and his wife have lived in their home for nine years and hope to live there another 30 but this development changes their neighborhood. He wants to be surrounded by single-family homes, single story zero -lot lines, duplexes, etc. Homes that will blend with the feel of the neighborhood. He really feels he was deceived by Southgate, the neighborhood has been going to meetings with Southgate and repeating for six or seven years to look to developing single family. Southgate has said the market for zero -lot and duplexes won't sell, they said they were bankrupt and if the neighborhood didn't deal with them, they would have to deal with another developer. Arthur reiterated he feels deceived from the moment he bought his lot and built his home. David A. Morales (301 Hawk Ridge Drive) also came to this meeting as part of an assignment for a class at The University of Iowa College of Law and based on what he has heard today he would agree with many of the homeowners today that this multi -complex project is not good for the neighborhood. Not just because there are many issues with the concern of the easements and nearby structures that would be developed, but also because of the nature of what the project would build. It would bring in a majority of empty nesters, graduate students, etc. Morales stated that graduate students are not a quiet bunch, they are busy with all sorts of things going on in their lives, and the lifestyle would not mesh well with the neighboring neighborhoods. It would not only create a nuisance in not only what their activities would produce but also create nuisances on what types of people that would be invited to the property. It would create situations that would be very unsafe for neighboring families and children. Morales strongly suggests that the Council vote against this multi -family complex. Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 13 of 21 Freerks closed the public hearing, noting that there were several topics to discussion and suggesting that a motion to defer may be appropriate. . Hensch moved to recommend approval of REZ17-00001, to conditionally rezone from Interim Development Multi -family (ID -RM) to Low Density Single-family (RM -12) for 21.79 acres of property located adjacent to the intersection of South Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard, subject to the conditions listed in the Staff Report. Theobald seconded the motion. Hensch noted that this item is just for conditional rezoning it doesn't seem like the time to be in the weeds discussing specific designs. He has lived south of Highway 6 on Pepper Drive since 1993 and understands the south side of Iowa City. His backyard has been a soybean and corn field every year since 1993 but he is fully aware that someday it will be developed. He has been lucky and appreciative it hasn't happened yet, but will not be surprised when it does. Everyone in Iowa City wants to live in a residential neighborhood of only single-family homes, that is understandable, but one of the key focuses of the Commission has always been the "Missing Middle" and the need to have homes for people of varying incomes in nice safe accommodations and areas that everyone else lives in. There are lots of blue collar people who work hard in Iowa City and deserve to live in Iowa City as well and not have to drive from adjacent counties to be able to work in Iowa City. Hensch supports this concept. Freerks wants to address the issue of single-family. The discussion is not whether this has to be single-family, but what about this piece of property as a whole and does it really do what we want it to do density wise completely. Freerks does not feel like she has enough information to be ready to make a decision in favor of something like this right now. Freerks does not believe this concept is a "Missing Middle" and to state that would be false and would be selling something that, as a whole, is not accurate. Every single unit in the plan is in a multi -family structure. Even looking at the area in a larger picture, yes, there are single-family structures around, but in the Comprehensive Plan she doesn't believe it was the intention to have all multi- family in this area. Yes, the design details could be worked out later, but what the Comprehensive Plan asks for is "exceptional design quality." If that does not happen, then there needs to be a Comprehensive Plan change. This doesn't meet the minimum standards. Freerks is also concerned about the traffic. She feels there needs to be a controlled intersection at Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard before this whole area is developed and the City needs to commit to that. This is a very serious issue, especially with a school nearby. Martin stated that when she hears the "Missing Middle" and she is looking at overhead view of the land that is in this concept plan is larger than the single-family neighborhood next to it. Therefore it doesn't appear to have the flow necessary to transition from multi -family to single- family. Martin noted that this is a parcel of land owned by somebody else and they can do with it what they want to do with it. Freerks interjected what they can do what thecommunity allows them to do with it. Martin agreed, but nevertheless in some format it will be developed. However, how that happens should be very thoughtful. Martin's initial reaction to the concept was "wow — that is a lot in a small space". It is very dense. In the bigger picture it is not a flow, it is just dense and bigger than the single-family area. She cannot support this concept as it stands right now. Freerks also has concerns that in order to make this concept happen there needs to be waivers Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 14 of 21 She noted that it appears so many times lately that people don't even want to meet the minimum requirements for developing and in this case to have the setback reduced to 25 feet in order to squeeze things in is a concern. Freerks does not feel there should be 12-plexes in this area. It could be reduced to 8-plexes and with a little bit of redesign, the density could be brought down a little bit. It could then still be a development for entry level housing. Freerks doesn't have a concern with $90,000 units in this area; doesn't have a problem with a mix of housing types, but rather reiterated her concern is the size and density of this concept so close to the single-family homes. She doesn't think this current concept is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The details will be where it becomes palatable for everyone and beneficial for everyone. Freerks stated that she does have a 12-plex in her own backyard and she has no issue with it. If there were multiple 12-plexes in her backyard, she might think twice about wanting to live there. It is all about balance between long-term and short-term residents. She thinks there are lots of potentially beautiful green space here, but this concept is just not quite right. Theobald disagrees. One thing that has always concerned her about the Terry Trueblood area is the City has a beautiful park with a lot of money put into it but there are no affordable neighborhoods around it with access to the park. This development allows opportunities to make that happen. Theobald stated that she also lived in a similar situation, although it was all zero -lot lines. The zero -lot lines all quickly became rental properties and they had no access to single-family and were completely isolated. She sees this development as having potential, if it is handled correctly, to be able to integrate with the single-family and to provide housing for a diverse group of people and access to the park. She admits she was concerned when she looked at the concept plan, it did remind her of Pheasant Ridge Apartments. Theobald noted that she lives in a cement board house between Pheasant Ridge and the Finkbine Apartments and she gets along just fine. With the right design guidelines followed there is a chance for this development to be very attractive with staffs recommended conditions, and at this time does not have concerns and will support this. Freerks commented that she wanted to make sure the missing middle is done right, and this is not the missing middle to her. Hensch agrees, and reiterated that this is a conditional rezoning and all the details are not worked out. He feels the developers need to be held accountable during the design phase to make sure they do follow all guidelines but wants to see this move forward. He added that this development will not be built in a year, so hopefully the build -out will happen at the same time as the road and intersection improvements. . Freerks just doesn't want to rush this and feels the Commission should take two meetings to discuss. Dyer would like to also see some changes and lower density. She is concerned about the traffic and lack of signals or even stop signs at that intersection. She visits Terry Trueblood a lot and coming out of McCollister onto Gilbert Street is frightening at times. She would like to see McCollister Boulevard extended before this development happens and to also see this development go up in phases perhaps. Dyer stated she actually likes the design of the buildings and don't look like every other apartment building in Iowa City and actually do look like farmhouses. The thought of requiring eaves and trim around the windows makes her think this will look like every other apartment complex in Iowa City. Dyer also is not quite ready to approve this item as presented today but is in favor of expanding the number of moderately- priced Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 15 of 21 homes in Iowa City. There just are not enough. Huge numbers of people who work at The University of Iowa live far away which makes for long commutes and excessive use of cars. Iowa City really does need housing like this that is affordable. She is prepared to vote for deferral, but is not opposed to the concept. Parsons also agrees with the concept, but his one concern might be the flow from multi -family to single-family. Overall this is a great concept and just needs a little more detail. He is leaning toward voting for this rezoning, but if they did decide to defer, he is open to discuss some more of those ideas to work out the kinks. Parsons stated he also thinks the intersection at Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard should be improved before any development happens because it is a busy intersection. Parsons noted that the P&Z review limitation period expires before their next meeting and asked how that would affect things if they deferred consideration of the rezoning.. Freerks said the applicant could waive the limitation period. She reminded the commission that a three/three vote would be a denial. Hektoen confirmed that four votes in favor of a rezoning is required for approval. Freerks noted that the motion was to approve, but it could be withdrawn. Theobald said she supports the application, but knows good things often come with further scrutiny, so she could go along with deferral. Freerks said she didn't want the application to languish, but that it warranted further examination to make sure it was consistent with the comprehensive plan. She asked if Hensch wanted to withdraw his motion and allow another meeting to allow more time for the developer to address some of the concerns. Hensch indicated that he would not withdraw his motion. A vote was taken and the motion failed with a 3-3 vote. (Freerks, Martin, Dyer opposed). Signs rejoined the meeting. CODE AMENDMENT: Discussion of amendments to City Code Sections 14 -5B -4E, Illumination Requirements, City Code Section 14-5B-8A&B, Signs permitted in Interim Development, Overlay Planned Development, and Residential zones and 14 -5B -8E to increase the size and type of signs for institutional uses and to allow internal illumination in the Planned High Density Multifamily zone; and Sign Standards in the Central Business zones, and the South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth story. Ream noted that the application is a long description for some very simple concepts they wish to change in the Code. Most of the requests have been from religious institutions, both existing and new churches, that brought to light some inadequacies in the Sign Code. As explained in the memo a facia sign in most residential zones was limited to four square feet and only one sign was allowed. Most of the churches in Iowa City do not comply with the Sign Code, and not that permits were issued in error, permits were just never issued. However with the construction of some new churches and inquiries on what signage could be done it was apparent to Ream that adjustment needed to be made to the Sign Code. The proposed change is not great, 12 square feet is not a large sign but having a 12 square foot sign on the wall of the church and a monument sign out closer to the roadway seems to be reasonable. The second major change is due to having a couple of institutional uses in a PRM zone, which Prepared by: Sarah Walz, Assistant Planner, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5239 (REZ17- 00001) Ordinance No. An ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 21.79 acre of property from Interim Development Multifamily (ID -RM) zone to Low Density Multifamily Residential (RM -12) zone located north and south of the intersection of South Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard. (REZ17-00001) Whereas, the applicant, Southgate Developers, has requested a rez Hing of property located north and south of the intersection of McCollister Boulevard and South Gilbert Stre t from Interim Development Multi- family (ID -RM) to Low Density ultkfamily (RM -12); and Whereas the property is to ed in the South Planning District; and Whereas, the South District Ian, an integral part of the Comp hensive Plan, sets forth goals and objectives for creating compact and nnected neighborhoods integr ng a diverse mix of housing types that are compatible in scale; and whereas Whereas, the South District Pla indicates that the area irectly adjacent to the intersection of McCollister and Gilbert Streets is approp ' to for multi -family dev opment with surrounding land appropriate for Low to Medium Mixed Residential, ich is intended for edium to high-density single family with opportunities for low-density multi -family uses, and Whereas, the applicant has proposed a co pt for develo ment with a mixture of townhome-style multi- family and a mix of 4-, 8-, and 12-plex buildings, reserving pen space between the existing single-family neighborhood and the proposed development; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commis on h s the reviewed the proposed rezoning and determined by a vote of 3-3, recommended denial; an Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2017) provides th the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and a e existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the owner has agreed that the property hall developed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Conditional Zoning Agreement attac ed heret to ensure appropriate development in this area of the city. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Counci of the City of I a City, Iowa: Section I Approval. Subject to the Condition Zoning Agreem t attached hereto and ftorporated• herein, property described below is hereby reclas led from its current oning designation of ID$M to RM- 12:CS s=c7 Z ry C Outlot A of Sandhill Estates art One, as recorded in Boo 47, page r Outlot B of Sandhill Section II. Zoning Map. The building of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform of the ordinance as approved by law. and Two, as recorded in Book ir M _ 3 ficial is hereby authorized and directed to`ohange the zoning ap this amendment upon the final passage, approval aedd publication Section III. Conditional Zonin A 6 ment. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Conditional V6 ment. Agreement between the property owner(s) and the City, following passage and approval of this Ordinance. Section IV. Certification And Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance, and record the same in the Office of the County Recorder, Johnson County, Iowa, at the Owner's expense, upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance, as provided by law. Section V. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section VI. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Ordinance No. Page 2 Section VII. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of 20 Jim Throgmorton, MAYOR ATTEST Approves City Attoi _ ti _m V r— �rn -v M — Q T� Prepared by: Sarah Walz, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5239 (REZ17-00001) Conditional Zoning Agreement This agreement is made between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City") and Southgate Development (hereinafter "Owner"). Whereas, Owner is the legal title holder of approximately 21.79 acres of property located north and south of the iMersection of S. Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard; and Whereas, the Own r has requested the rezoning of said property from Interim Development Multi -Family (ID M) to Low Density Multi -Family (RM -12); and Whereas, the City Coun has determined that, with appropriate conditions regarding the overall layout and concept for velopment, building design and quality of construction, and the composition of one- and two-bed1roorn apartments, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2 7) provides at the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezo , g request over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the r uested hange; and Whereas, the Owner acknowledges at certain conditions and restrictions are reasonable to ensure the development of the p rty is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the need for the development to complenNnt the adjacent single-family neighborhood as well as the adjacent natural open spaces; and Whereas, the Owner agrees to develop tPis projslerty in accordance with the terms and conditions of a Conditional Zoning Agreement. / r Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual�romises coni fined herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Southgate Development is the leg4 title holder of the property legally described as Outlot A of Sandhill Estates, Part O e, as recorded in Bok 47, Page 230; and Outlot B of Sandhill Estates Part One as rec rded in Book 47, Page X30 2. The Owner acknowledges that t e City wishes to ensure co formance to the principles of the Comprehensive Plan and he South District plan. Furthe the parties acknowledge that Iowa Code §414.5 14ing ) provides that the City of owa City may impose reasonable conditions on a rezoning request, over nd above the existing regulations, in order to satipublic needs caused by the requested change. 3. In consideration of the City's rezoning the subject property, Owner agree(s) that development of the subject property will conform to all other requirements otihe zoning chapter, as well as the following conditions: c �, a 0 a. Substantial compliance with the concept plan submitted with T�ga-M to et and block layout (including pedestrianstreet), building types, k dirtg, locgTMs, location of surface parking areas and covered parking, locatiorf*d sye of"en �3:,=>Z N Qn M ppdadm agVc ditional zoning agreementAm spaces, and sidewalk and trail connections. b. The proposed pedestrian street must meet the standards for pedestrian streets provided in the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based Code. c. Townhouse and row house style multi -family buildings must comply with the attached single-family housing standards for entrances and design in the zoning code. d. Eaves and window and doorway trim will be required on all buildings according to the attached -single family housing standards. e. Building dei ns to be approved by the Design Review Committee for compliance wit the conditions noted herewith. f. Buildings shall be constructed of durable, high quality building materials; the standards in table 2 -8 of the Riverfront Crossings Form -based Code will serve as a reference. g. Landscaping must co ly with recommended plant list provided by the Recommended Plant List p vided by the Bur Oak Land Trust. h. Overall density of the develo ment should not exceed 115 units north of McColh ter Blvd., no I ss than 20% of which should be one -bedroom units—the rem finder bein bedroom units. 90 units south of McCollister B d., no I ss than 25% of which should be one - bedroom units—the remainder in a bedroom units. 4. The Owner and City acknowledge that the nditions contained herein are reasonable conditions to impose on the land undef to a Code §414.5 (2017), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are coised by the requested zoning change. 5. The Owner and City acknowledge th in the eve t the subject property is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided, al redevelopme will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 6. The parties acknowledge that thi Conditional Zoning reement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the la and with title to the la , and shall remain in full force and effect as a covenant with itle to the land, unless or ntil released of record by the City of Iowa City. The parties further acknoy4edge that this agreement shall inre to the benefit of and bind all successors, represery(atives, and assigns of the parties. 7. The Owner acknowl6dge(s) that nothing in this Conditional Zning Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner or Applicant from complying1with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. N 8. The parties agree that this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incomerated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon aq4ptiorr. 1 publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in th§,_1 n Coyer Recorder's Office at the Applicant's expense.�-- r) rn Dated this day of 20. :<m s rn YY y. pp°admlagVconditionel zoning agmemenL°oc 2 (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) Southgate Development Acknowledgment: State of _ County of This record was acknowledge efore meeh (Date) by Na (s) of individual(s) as (type of authority, such as officer or trustee) of (name of party on behalf of whom record was executed). Public in and for the State of Iowa or Seal) Title (ankRank) My commi4ion expires: DDdadnVagUwndi1iona1 zoning ago3e tdm 4 N m 0 � J Z ac C;1 r M ar N D CA ro DDdadnVagUwndi1iona1 zoning ago3e tdm 4 City of Iowa City Jim Throgmorton, Mayor Attest: Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk Approved by: City Attorney's Office City Of Iowa City Acknowledgement: STATE OF IOWA ) ) ss: JOHNSON COUNTY ) 0 This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 20_ by Jim Throgmorton and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Iowa City. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Sea]) Title (and Rank) Corporate Acknowledgement: STATE OF IOWA ) ) ss: JOHNSON COUNTY ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on as 20_ by of Inc. Notary Public in and for said County and State ppdadnVagVcondilionel zoning agreement.doc 3 O nC rn m D Ln This instrument was acknowledged before me on , 20_ by Jim Throgmorton and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Iowa City. Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Sea]) Title (and Rank) Corporate Acknowledgement: STATE OF IOWA ) ) ss: JOHNSON COUNTY ) This instrument was acknowledged before me on as 20_ by of Inc. Notary Public in and for said County and State ppdadnVagVcondilionel zoning agreement.doc 3 i r CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (319)356-5000 (319(356-5009 FAX www. icgov. o rg Late Handouts: Information submitted between distribution of packet on Thursday and close of business on Monday. .....................................................................wage............ Consent Calendar 4d Resolutions and Motions Item 4d(9) Data Driven Justice Agreement — See redlined update Exhibit A 4f Correspondence Item 4f(4) Bill Ackerman: Nov. 21 work session — Lusk Avenue Abomination 6a S. Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard (Preserve at Sandhill) — See additional correspondence Item 8 Revised TIF Policies — See additional correspondence Item 9 Rental Permit Requirements — See additional correspondence �)a PROTEST OF IEZONUjt& Handouts Distributed TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL IOWA CITY, IOWA Zo k -x !-"16, mITY OF IOWA CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the propoPecg zeoLg change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: I 6-qi• �IM0.9I/1• This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. 1079 LANGENBERG AVE Property Address: Property OwRner(s): ARAKSAROD, PAULA a By: t&WCI kMk �S2 C:) M By: 7 G N o S e m INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): s STATE OF IOWAc- JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on ?ak..R Rn.wtco'400 and individual property owner(s)). RICHARD ARTHUR " COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 MY COMMISSIQN EXPIRES oa-io-aua O 140%jc. ,>e+ A0, oto r'+ Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) as: _ (Date) by (name(s) of This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) ofperson(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File trustee) of 02/2013 PROTEST OF REZONING "ajC rtailaouts Uistributed TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL j IOWA CITY, IOWA x \ o \ ,--I CITY OFIOWA CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in posed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior bound es o the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: Property 1 1 . S ► CTON-140CF-WO , LAUGHLIN, NAOMI A INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on — individual L4K9��:M and individual property owner(s)). WOJCwyw t`3, aol-;� �?W RICHARDARTHUR g�� COMMISSION NUMBER 714445 �1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES /owP O a -1 an Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNII9TG FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) as: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) ofperson(s)) as �D x _ (Date) by (name(s) of (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa trustee) of Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File %10 (NI PROTEST OF R-E-A-Q&TWdouts Distributed � � TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL l t I s I IOWA CITY, IOWA C1; } OFIOI.174 CITY We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the �Dropg)ed zoning change, or the owners of property which is located within two hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the property for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: (RLZI?-00001 This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. Property Address: 745 MCCOLLISTER CT Property wner(s): WOODY. GILMER D By.—C= By. _ ait INDIVIDUAL, PROPERTY OWNER(S): :<r STATE OF IOWA JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on 0 W e^`3 ed `I • Date) by and .1ojL* hN�E yj000:. (name(s)of individual property owner(s)). '� 714445 -9VIRICHARDARTHUR COMMISSION NUMBER EXPIRES u JW MY COMMISSION gyp. tea- i - d!J 10 Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa AUTHORIZED REPRESEN'T'ATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (Date) by (name(s) of person(s)) as (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig: Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File G PROT'ESTt of RE outs Distributed TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL _ j ` • j IOWA CITY, IOWA CITY OFIOTIV i CITY (Date) We, the undersigned, being the owners of property included in the proposed zoning change, or the owners of property urk;i h ;0 tncafPrt nrifmnfan h„nrlrrrl fort of the rgtrrinr hrn,ndariec of the nrnnerty for which the zoning change is proposed, do hereby protest the rezoning of the following property: (FRF—Z.1-2- 0000) This protest is signed and acknowledged with the intention that such rezoning shall not become effective except by the favorable vote of at least three-fourths of all the members of the council, all in accordance with Section 414.5 of the Code of Iowa. N STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on XPIKes CUANULEIe -fO6iN and individual property owner(s)). ERICKAARTHUR COMMISSION NUMBER 731437 m �OWP Property dress: 10 5 L " be rCk ZE L -� --4 _ prnparfy }amt+r(c)_-$�.!!.•I me�.s i T�i b'I 1� re — N 1� i 4C) O By: N� - INDIVIDUAL PROPERTY OWNER(S): STATE OF IOWA ) JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on XPIKes CUANULEIe -fO6iN and individual property owner(s)). ERICKAARTHUR COMMISSION NUMBER 731437 MY COM IS ION EXPIRES �OWP I oB 2al 11 120 12011 1V Uta1�' 1" I1U311: 111 i1liLL Ll/r � n..,s.. r r- V3L JU1LG Vl ll/�WCL AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SIGNING FOR PROPERTY OWNER(S): n.,TATF OT7 TnWA 1 JOHNSON COUNTY) ss: This instrument was acknowledged before me on (name(s) ofperson(s)) as _ (Date) by (name(s) of (Date) by (type of authority, such as officer, trustee) of (name of property owner) . Notary Public in and for the State of Iowa Orig. Subd Folder 02/2013 Cc: CA — PCD - Council - Media File Southgate Developers has submitted a request to the city for rezoning approximately 21.79 acres of property located on the north and south of the intersection of South Gilbert St. and IIhMlHmTdMs Distributed We oppose this rezoning change for reasons including the following: • No real "phase in" between the single-family homes that currently make up the neighborhood, and the dense multi -family units proposed in the request. • The designs presented in Southgate's proposal appear to be inexpensive unii`t`QQh\\none of the decorative finishes that are evident in the custom homes in the rest of this a . Wother project nearby (Keokuk Street Apts) built (in 1995) and managed by Southgate shows maintenance issues that would certainly harm property values of homes in the neighborhood. Traffic and parking are already major concerns in this area, partly because McCollister does not connect to Sycamore Street and people have to travel down Langenberg to reach Gilbert St. and c—� McCollister Blvd. These buildings would exacerbate this problem. C:) C ^' o o =n �t • , NAME ADDRESSG:. 16 ok(2,-) K" -(,2 -r A�17l f yo � I',vG lA�\ atv/J 1021 (o✓ered Oa ren (7r. r G' "Ea Illy UA ep . �t • , NAME ADDRESS ku,1 io3 oye/\ L Voss tivr ��� 0tA I �v+son <3 oka�A< <� qnqul /01/2 oeh L lc� q 7 1La /� 1- N 1/ L Oxz k \ O is 1 h-C � o C4 JA 'r'0 Ci4� couY1 i 1 Richard & Ericka Arthur 893 McCollister Ct Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Concerns with rezoning S Gilbert Street & McCollister Blvd (REZ17-00001) Late Handouts Distributed 1)/-1 7 (Date) 1. 1 don't find that the construction contemplated by S&G for the land related to this rezoning fulfills either the goals of the city or acknowledges the viewpoint of the existing neighbors a. Their plan doesn't fulfill the goals of the City as presented in their South District Plan adopted in 2015. A part of Iowa City's Comprehensive Plan, the South District Plan adopted in 2015, describes a concept coined "Middle Housing". On page 19, it states that "multi -family buildings should be designed to be similar in scale (width, depth, height) to single-family homes." Going on it states, "unit sizes may need to be smaller, but should be designed with similar attention to detail and quality construction." Lastly it states, "concentrations of one housing type in any one area should be avoided as this may create an obstacle to connectivity and can upset the balance of long- and short-term residents." "Higher density Middle Housing types must be thoughtfully designed so that they maintain an attractive residential character along streets and provide safe and inviting environments for the residents." ii. I have concerns that the buildings described in the proposal from S&G do not fulfill with the, "similar in scale to single-family home requirement." The row houses, the block apartment buildings, and the three-story apartment structures do not blend with the existing neighborhood nor do they appear as existing single-family homes. I am concerned that S&G is requesting reduced setbacks along McCollister Blvd and South Gilbert because they want as many units as they can squeeze into this space instead of respecting the concept of less units and higher quality construction. b. I don't find that the construction contemplated by S&G for this land acknowledges any of the sentiments of the existing property owners I. My wife and I and most of our neighbors feel like we were misled both verbally by our realtors, visually by a sign that the realtors erected at the entrance of SandHill estates stating, "Live where the Bass are jumping", and lastly through written covenants that S&G representative authored in their Restrictions & Covenants recorded by Kimberly Painter on June 14, 2004. Prior to purchasing my lot, I was provided The Declarations of Restrictions & Covenants — SandHill Estates Part One, "This Declaration is made by SG&M Properties LLC, which describes in 1.03 and I quote "Sandhill Estates takes its name from a prairie feature around which the subdivision and subsequent parts of Sandhill Estates are platted and developed. Living in proximity to a prairie has u[ ique acts. The presence of the prairie will likely encourage the presence cdlifg-phich might not be present in areas without this feature and resideni)_ pd tl�be respectful of and careful of such wildlife. The Declarant and su�e��ueAkbwn are bound by an agreement with the Iowa Department of Natpc�l�,Resoources o:7 :X Z w Q 0 w safely capture and relocate any ornate box turtles found upon property." It goes on to state, "The prairie is not a park and will likely have only very limited recreational uses." I could not have more excited to have a "protected" prairie in my back yard. As a property owner on McCollister Ct, I was led to believe that there would be future housing developments, but that the construction envisioned would occur between my home and Weatherby Park, not between my home and Terry Trueblood Recreation Area. The prairie that we were told we were bound to respect and preserve is now being developed into high density apartment buildings. ii. Had S&G first constructed these contemplated high-density housing units that they envision for the site, and then tried to sell their lots, they would have sold at a steep discount to what they charged. One of their best-selling points for SandHill estates was the view, the natural/rural feel to the properties. Like the Restrictions & Covenants state, living with a prairie in my back yard is a unique experience; at night we hear coyotes. I am sure that had I known that 216 one/two-bedroom apartments were going to be built directly behind our house, we would have passed on purchasing our lot and building our custom-built home. How can S&G as signatories to those Restrictions & Covenants develop a site plan that essentially destroys the habitat prairie that houses the wild life that they had us agree to be bound to respect as members of the Homeowners Association? 2. 1 don't find that the infrastructure exists to absorb the added stresses which would be caused by the approving of the rezoning; improvements to the infrastructure should occur first a. Archibald Alexander, a brand-new elementary school is currently at full capaciri— overflow is being absorbed but only through the use of two temporary buildings; There is a planned expansion to the "new school" and from what I've heard, that expansion has been fast tracked but introducing 216 units in the near future could only further exasperate this already stressed component of the education infrastructure b. The intersection of McCollister Blvd and South Gilbert Street is dangerous. There have been many accidents at this intersection as it is, without adding additional vehicles to the traffic mix. The bus that my children ride to school was jack knifed in that intersection. There are 267 proposed parking spaces in the north and south site. Those additional motorists will just add to the number of accidents at this intersection until the city develops plans to address the problem. c. My neighborhood in the morning and the evening has become a danaerous commuter throughway. McCollister Blvd was designed for high-speed commuters, but currently sits incomplete. That road should be completed before any additional stressing factors are added to the neighborhood, regardless of the rezoning application. Traffic currently performs a dangerous S turn right next to my house driving east on McCollister Blvd turning onto Covered Wagon and then east again onto Langenberg Avenuereach Sycamore Street. o =+ > D4 n� N :=in ,<r— Inn = M O � C.J a o rV 1. My wife is from Mexico and we try to travel there at least once a year. It is customary practice to see speed bumps throughout their cities and towns. I always rationalized their need for those speed deterrents as poor planning on the part of their city planners. Their roads were too narrow, there was not enough setback from structures, and the vehicles were practically driving next to sidewalks; so, for public safety their cities installed "speed bumps" so that traffic had to slow down. Shortly after Langenberg Avenue connected Covered Wagon "Gilbert Street' to Sycamore, a new East-West throughway was opened which many vehicles use to shorten their commute by avoiding all the stop lights on Hwy 6 as they zip from one end of Iowa City to the other. The city recognized the dangers of this new commuter's route, and shortly afterwards installed six traffic calming devices. This decision led me to revisit my previous hypothesis that the speed bumps were not the result of poor planning, but rather were a precursor of some yet unfinished high-speed road designed for higher speed traffic and the speed bumps were just a band aid for public safety in the interim. 2. Lastly, our children are picked up by the school bus at the end of the driveway of our home. On multiple occasions, vehicles have treated the flashing lights and stop signs on their bus as nothing more than a yield sign and have then proceeded to drive around their stopped bus. 3. 1 know that it is planned that McCollister Blvd will eventually continue to Sycamore Street; but as with the dangerous situations created by connecting Langenberg Avenue, perhaps, any rezoning should wait until after the planned street infrastructure is present to support thl�, rezoning, let alone alleviate the current problem. d. Public Transportation: The closest bus stop from the proposed rezoninoithe 20--n minute walk over to Baculis Mobile Home Park or 20 north to the cornou ate and Gilbert Street. Perhaps, a bus route which makes a stop at the corn�gSo r Gilbert and McCollister Blvd could be operational fthen revisit the pfopedv rn s Q rezoni u�� D o I��(ilr�i�V�lll��f�II��III���f�IlVl�ll�lil�llli Doc 10: D18598640008 Tvoe: aEU Pecorded: Ofi/Ia/2004 at 02:50:34 pp Fee Amt: 151.00 Paae I of B J.0son County Iowa 1(13erly A. Painter County A910rde- &3748 PD798-806 rre r r..lateD!•. �+D�rana�. o u, ��saaaa n 1sHss�3 os -1 - DECLARATION 0.7 RESTRICTIONS b COVENANTS. EMHILL ESTATES PART ONE This Declaration is 'WdO kq S"M ?ropert_.:•s LLC ARTICLE I Recitals 1.01 ugciaranl 1.4 the r.,insx of certain r8al.estate in the County of Jo1:ns6h, Stat.O Of Iowa, aescra.b6d 'as Santihill Es-tates Part One, Iowa +'ity, Iowa, acC-j6jtiirg to "the rec�,r_ded plat thereof. 1.02 In order to establish a goneral plan for cine.impro'rement and. development Of the subdivis-141}., Dec1al:-nt desires t.o impose on certain lots within the sugdieisior, re*ti'ic'tions for the benefit preser•,t afd futurec3Welmra o'E the Mats with the subdivision, cerci for tfi 1 liQne!.,.t, of owners oi` L-t1Ire part of San�dhill Estates. S it neae'Erm a Arai.rLe. feature around w rc.. re a ;,ubs9quent pu.'-s of 3anciliill Estates are being platted and devil. ----4- yi .i:Isl in proXimity to a prairie has unique h. ipdc"ts. lite re'sen a Of t!'., prairie w; it L.ikelyeineourage the presi:nce ,of wildiife. wbic:h might not be present in areas withcuc this r,:ature and residents fieeui ca be respe.: lnl of and caieftll cf such w.i1d_ifib. The Dealer^",t and subscauAGnt awtier$' Ile bol:n<3 Cy n agleemPn:: W' -'h the !onto Department pf 1Jatvra, Resources to Safely capture .and reljuazt-o arty orfiate 'box +..!teles found upon the pxoperty, The prai:ris ire not a atk ghd •niil have :01'11y very limited recreational uses; The prairie will, be OWLe!d by! thE. Cit: to manggela�E,t and regui.a,:ion by the City thssociation prosi.yed for ereit- e. Apr>ribdio burninr„ uf. the pras e. :af Iowa City and subject and.zlot the Ueclara!lW nor Management may in=ude o ZE s ZE ca o N Definitions 2.01 ,Fuild_nq" shall .wean lett} refer tc any s ructure which is r!nnstructeo on =. '.o': wirhttl- :he Stibdiv:_s..on. 2.02 'Tetlarant" shalt mF;, and re'. c _a av M FrgPe=ties:, L.L.% , and Its-3nc^cessors grid a:;.sigas• 2.03 "Lor" sY.ai.l mev a -.-id refer to any pascal of land shown and included witi,in the. ;,:t of 5andhil_l Estates Part one to _r'. -aa City, Iowa.. 2.04 "owntx" shai'> mean and refer to lac. ::e:..:'i owner ther one or more,15ersons ui ent'it1a3, 0# a fee simple tftle tc any l+.t, as defined. in S:ectiers 243, i:.,=ludj6q ,':ot:t.ract: XenL16EEs, t;.ut exca.0;,frig those having sue- t3terest merF,_.;• ,s security for the performance of any ob1fVati0n' su-F: -:s MOT4,cla94`34. ^.±i5 "Subdivi.Sion" shall me!' and refer to Sandhill Estates -dart ,•.,= to Iowa City, Iowa. 2.05 "tissociat:Jn" shall mean and refer t=, Sandhill i'_state Owners 4S.6c'iat: _10n., '�tRTI::wE :LI Appi:cability 3.01 Declarant hereby.daClares that ali iota in the Subdivision are now held and shall betr!::sferred, said, leased, •-onveyed and occupied sub5ect ro the rc=striCtions anr.', c.::v•-%ants herein set forth which are for anti Sha�.l ir.ure tc tilt 'uene.fii of and pass wit.: a;ad ev6ry lc% and apply to ar. rind the "kilts, success,,rs in intersst and assigns of each an,.: every Often. 3.32 c.: any of the' LO!s covenants a11d agrees with Declarant, its suc,:essors r: into est and a_' tgns to use the Lots only in accordance vxth t.e ris.t:,rictiona ;,..:r-ain set forth and to retrain from ueinq the Lots in any way inconsistent with ar prohibit, -d by the prov_.ions of t:t's Deciaratida.. 3.03 Eve -0 person who: tion: cc tiex.oirmtter owns or acquires any Light, title tar" tneer@st in dr to any Lot is :and shall b% onclu3ively deemea to Nkve cans.ented and agreed to every covenant, con(otion and restriction contained herein, whether or not any reN,rence to this Declaration- is ::aniained in the instrument by wh'i'c!t such Pierson acquired an interest in said Lot. 3X4 All restrictions contained beitin shall operate as covegjnts 0 2 gn o � M "C 07C w )> o ro running With the t--, Lots and s.j_.-jjj .,:ure to cl;e benefit of all Lot- C)wn.* within SubdiviF:1;-.n, succells`C2 and assigne. 3.05 TheLie rQ:-,tr1cttx"' t'r)venanttz zir-all not be iAnding upon any .of ttie Totr. in,the 0jjbdi-fj.si%4 - 41 0c �;nu as t4tie thereto :ema.%n.q in the Nlclhant' a i,'*,'!'1(;LZ, 111A OWNERS NqSOCII 11": 7 3A.il*i Private open space and.:cvmmc,r, areas within tte subdivision, sore shown as dutlots upon t)--..; and storm toater. I.-iiir.agem-lit faollitieL located --:.thin all pa-Itts, .6f 'Sandhiil Est-E.:S, :l �. be OVned arid main-_:�ini�dj by a nen-profit-profit .I! rorporatton orga:i`zed and er._,stjnq UAder Chapter 504A, Co'd'.-. 1-f Iowa (2003), as from time to avven4ed. Certain areas of Cty right of iqa­ may � maintaine(i rhe Association pursuant to agreements With the City of:.Idwa -jtY. The name 0,.!the Asoocizit--on shall be Sandhill Esta.tes owrtot-s AsqnC"iatiW....�: of Lots shall Aut..amaticglly be..ciome members of the Asswiation upon taking title to a Lc,.. in the SLIixii-wision. 3A. 02 h1l 0%4h6rs of Lots in the '$Qbdit­; stall be bound by and comply with the provisj_oiai of the Of Ittorporation and of the Associat:cn -"d vpplir-able proiii-sions of other Associatiob JrDcumellts; and, E!I- �,greemenita.r jequiations and detarminatiOnS JaWfil. ly made by the Associatl*r.i and its directars, ofticorOr agents :;hall be binding on all s­dCh owners ar=d other ipersons. A f6ilure to cOmPlY vjtkA the 3,ylaws or the provisions Of the other Ttssocialzido br any auc-mem.-nt or determination thus lawfully 1090 p'hall ! e grounds Foi p!, icLion to recover sums due for damages �nn tho _.::trt of th-& ,A,,p.,ociat.ion or any Owner as app-.ic&v,je and ity rn.:AAtory or ol..hec iliIjurm.tive relief w­­ wativing either rew-­'lY- 3A.03 Each Ownel ca i kin q tji._,2 to a -Lot agrear th-.1C the AsSOCLaticn has and 8*riall ��Xepai4rw Z1_ pow'drs, �nJ authbri.LY granted unto it and such as ar,:- more p,irzicuiarly set forth in the Ass:,ciat4or docoMents, including but n0t limitdd to the ma kin, o as,jessmr.,,Its to carry out tZa f'InctiQ" which shall be chargf-,ab're owners ary . d which stall be ` "e -A :tin tots. 3A. 04 �f . he members vi thAssoclatiOn El-z)II consist of all Of the recc,_,d Owrvjer= of.Lots ir. sandhil-" !-'states. Membership in the AsF:�ciation shall be expAlided t_o incl.ade. owners of lots In SUbs'aqiaent parts o1- Sandhil-I E5ta.t4ej as those parts are firtal platted with. th.r b -a-14; of tho, approved PreliminayY Sandhill S C) C) > -4 3. M membership. iu th<: �•.::.:�.^-Latino shall he established btc o.z::rng �n'the public rec:;";:. f 3o4inson"Gounty, Iowa a deed y or vthe'r in:si- rument establishi ncj record title to a Lot in Ct e $sxb9tvisici^,. The memb8.r;9fh -T :h;x prior owner shall be s:l:e•ek.,; rarminat.ed. The r.:enbercg y` '-"h4 Associat.on shall be er:_itied t-) -'ast one vrta for t'2AdRlot, recce^t+.nF of the number cf __wnErs of Ltte Lot. �A.05 -Litt shape of a membex -Ln tkpe funds and assets of he Asr...Ciatiori catWot lx% :;ssignec, hypetheoated or tr.,-:-.sfor:=d in any r:�uncr E.x¢epz As an applirtc,.:.:v. to the: Lot. 3A.04 The affairs of .Chop ABs.:ciation shall be conft:pted by a Board o Bixectc.s whom shall be ^esignat,d in the raanni6t prc-r'_ded in the 6y -Laws. 3x,.0'7 the OwnerIs: of any Lot., fail to Pay Cr fee -4 When doe, the Shall 'Shall have a lien a..,-ainst Otte Lot. .his lien shall nxi_t from the data the c.r fee: is i:sposed and no filing sha.1 be necessary tc: evidence the Lien. Rowever, the Association sit".:ll"have the rigt" r�, file a n©rice o. -Lien against a Loo in the public records of •iohn'son MuiTty. A1- owners; shall premptly diseharge a:,y lien Wnr ch may hereafter be filed-;qa:nsr t eir Lot. 3A.08 In the evrr.t tire Asrs;r.iati in inc _;: s .rttorneyrs fens or other expenses of cr _ i eet•id o sums due f r.::: Lot Owner s- i , the Lot owneris) shall be -'I ab?e 'or:anti pav 7.hcse.expeAaes- 3A.1,19 The Ass0038ttcr, shall not. he liable for any injury or damage to property whAtsoavLr tcgless caused by the gross rr_gligence of the ? ss©r iatirr . IVo diminution irr as»,J'Pgent of c6mmon expense assessment:, shall be c"aimed or ..Liowed for inconvenience or discc:mfort arising fi'cni malntenir.. a of th@ common areas, or frim any atwti"gin talo t,> r,.)Mpjy wit.?' any 1,04 ordinance or orders cr a 3overnmant authority. ARTIr= TV G%rTera.l tt_•s.tric'tion�: 9.01 All the Lots herein shall be use::t s,j3lely as residential Lots and no structure shall be. constructed an any Lot other tban one :i:.t tet exceed two stories in height detached single faun ly cisaelling and having, at a minimum, a two car attached garage. 9.•02 No trailer; basement, sh,tok, gavage, ba-trior a�her outbuilding on a Lot shall at an' time he used. as 9D resi&nce temporarily at petfiarlE•retly, Tmr shat: any xesiiiehce �f _ N =gym 'a Y,1 o `u s g� w I> +tea a nater-_ be permitted. Any detached storage building!nust be located no closer to the front of the lot tbaa tile rear line cf the dwelling on Che•lot and must be sided and shingl�.d.to•march tile house eoastructed upon the lot. The maximum s_ze :aE'. a. -.y jetekoW storage buildin;, is one story, L2,D square feet, unci chars etlall by no more than. h 'buildPer if:g lot', my sxch huiLding 'Bhai7. CCmPiy with .all applicable and zoging codes. 4.03 NO use wi31 be made of any Lot, or any p='r,.ion ther�ot, or any .building or struZ"ture c1 ezeh9li, ','h' ch may be or, become ar. annoyance or nu_sanCe to tr,e neighb .6tood. 4.04 Eagh Lot Owner sha'd.l a' all times keep rued Owner :,ot and r.he Jmprovstu®nt thexan `'.n a safes, c1r_•a neat ec,d sanitary Condi tici[�. 4. 05 No industry., business,. or Pr.cfession shall be conducted,- or permdtted on ar,y Lot. which would cause an annoyance or nuistiOCe to Che neighbors or. theighUaChcoci or which would entail, more than occas -r-'441 dlients or rustomers. 9.06 No aninais:, Jive3tocic.er poll1tr,y of any kind sl.all be raised, ores o keetaomaanio kept, provided!,! t s:neyo<are n t. kept,usual bred household g y managed or maintained for :any corynerciai ; urPose. All peas ::lust c g d by their owners so that they wild riot beCbme a nuisance to the neighbors. pets which sontinuall,}�,make leu:: nois_s, damage flora of neighbors .or attack Other.pet's or'parscns ahall .be considered a nuisance. %4.07 The Qwner:g.g any Building da^n4ged by.. fire or Act of God shall . i 0� days.. :ppl ss .a:: eixterisibn of time is obtained wit'niir ninety. from t.be aeelarant, womr..e(ieeurres^saldtres:oserrerR.l orr=mov�salo bu`.l_}na and s.na'll dili•jeWt31' P completion. 4.0$ NO c-at%eslines shall he constructed, placed or erected on any Lot. 4.49 Camping tra4lejt4, mote% hom"l boats, trailers, or snowmobiles 5hai1 hot lie .allowed to. Oe stored a,jyµbere; on the Lot unless the above equipment is *:tartid in an attached garage, 4.10 No fence shall, be Const-ruct6d on any Lot In the Subdivision closer to the frgnl of ti,e pr.ogerty than the front wall of the he eigh house loceted NPon tile Lot... Pencea shall ncitermited chc tion, AllaiZed .key City Ordi:tancOM without: 'e. building p 15 C) o 9=; c 5 C-) ro =om ro o ) 0 � ca 0 b t 11C: �'. LUr•:. the aver." any 'proposed Wristrtiction is not commenced within :ane (i) : :.i• irarre ".::e oats ., :.. ;,eu.a it,:: !:_s been .,,)proved by the DeelatZUt, said apprcvr.1 .s�.a:ll lapse and it shall !-,e the responsii ii;i.ky of t11c LoL c.'.* cL. ,: reapply t'a' approval :u:ior to the aommgncemecc �%f construrt#on. Once commenced, constructioil shall proceed In a reasonably diligent manner to completion; provided, ry wirer., t:•:,:_ igggi.s�ul.Ping may be staged cite, a period not to exceed three (3! years Wity., the ptiur approval of 5.06 During const,:; -tion, it shall be the responsib4lity of each Lot pwr.ar to Insure that construction sites are kept free of ;ntightly acemulationg Gf :ublsish ane.. ..c,ar materia and that constri:,aion materiala are :sept in a -:;,. •-.rA orderly- manner. 5.07 As a part isf thrf constr ; t_.u:i, each Lot Owner and sari . owner's Eai].der or C;ntracto;- :>1:_,11 be tesponsible for erosion control both dUr-ing construction and after suci. constru:tion has beer-, comol®ted. All lots Sha!' he graded and r..aintained in such ::c• as tc minimizeRamage which mi.ghc :-=;.::: to other Lots as a resule. of erosion and :surf.: -co water drair,3 . -.. .I•.r2TICLE VI Enforcement. 6.ol viol.at�on O=:lYrru, i. of any restt.i:Ptdons "gad covenants herein cdtntained shall g•iVe to !jet)ay;.nt _,r:d every atise'r Owner orE r', for whose ben. ---tit these ue trtr:t'ons and covenants at6 Ppressly made, the right to prosAchte A Proceeding at laww or in equity against the p"rson or pej,40ns who have violated at are attempting to violate ary of these reEit..ct.ionS and covsnant9 to enjoin or crevenr =hen. fxbm doing so, ,.o cause said vioial'_or. to be remedied to redover r1am..ges for said tiridl'ati:n. 6.02 The result Qi cagey ac..': o:, -ax nmisrio!: whereby any Yestriction or covenant. hPreArl contained is violated, in whirl,:- :.i in cart, is hereby oec:aret� to Ire and to constitute a nUi's'l - and every remeiiy allowed at law or in ggrrity against any owner, shall L,.: applicable aga-inst evflry such 'result a::d may be exercised by Declarant o; by any owner of a Lot. cnr whose benefit these restrictions anti covenants are flrade. 6.03 In. any legal .o± equitable. proceeding for the enforcei4ntlorri to restrain the Violati•:u :; of this eclaration or acy here. -f, the irevailing party or parties shall be X Idd recov@,r reasonak3l.e attorneys tees, in such amount as $:4 Q' xe� by th't Court iri such p.roeeedings. All rete dies provido,e n F law air in equi.:t}•=l;a.11 be cu:culative and noe �xc]4siv-<r � m rn a C::);* w Q A O LO H.0.4 The failure cr: °clar:M or any other property Owner t:; enforce .any i estri• '.: ':r.s her-.L.-i coatained .shall in no cvent ho deemed to be a wai°.-r of 'thy 1ght to' do so thereafter nor of the fight en.-orae.,,any O:.hej ', "est.'."i":ti.on or &RTICGE V"i bntcat L4C,11 7.01 This DeG1arat7.::r., avery prevision;hoxe&f, and every corenant unci restriction, contained hers!... shall coa"nue ill full force and ef'ect for a "periut+ of twtrr',- (21) years from the date hereof unless: otherwise specifically provided. These Restrictions and Covenants may be rene.Ned by any"Qwner or the Associaticrt filing a claim as provided for in section 614.? 4 : r :;,e Code of Iowa (2003), as from, time: to tLAC amen(;ed. ARTI,'L , VIlI Val;dity 8.01 If any provisions:-bf this Declaration is held to be invalid by a court, th{: invalidity shall n>.,t=1Ft"ect the remaining prblisio•n:� whict, shall rer.,ain; In :u_'_ ;:: ;'. a and, effect. ARTIf:r:E IX n.:�-. ,:::imeat 9.01 Tilese Restrictive Cov,,n-ants1Aay. be amended by a vo_a of two- thirds of the.Lot OWIO , provided that so long as thc: Declarant holds titlr_ to any bot with;n the Sub'lifision, no such Amendment shall be effective unless consented to by the Declarant. IN WITNt'S N1HELIMP the a ds.rsi'.rred h4is wmcux"ted t..^•is Declarat_on on the day'oE �D0:4. rti e s�I.C. ar,s ;development .Coinpany, Inc., M,000,4er sy: 'Nyle t , ravetrit3tl, President oC -' z D: ` ..� STATE OF 100A 1 �n �' .9: �� I— -� m JoHN5ON COG7N'TY ) 7c 0 to )" o 8 � c - On this 4y of —s l'y 4`� r 2004, b?fare me, .3 '.3c.`,;ary pui�lic in; and. far ;+Sia county i%.m7sonally appeared [7y1ea N. Bratrexma", President. of 5.0Uth9::te Develvp:,v:nt Company, Inc., to me pek$onaliy known, who by ms boing UAy sworn, .i'd say that that ccrporaLxen is the Manager of said iinitOd -liability c-Ai:oany, and that said iszstrument was signed OR behalf of salla JWtad li.a1piltty CORTa::y b-, ei-AhOrity at it's Members abd the said blati.ger abkn-111'.Cc*d'the execution of. said in-trument to be the va7untd'Yty act and <iceed of said limited liatillity r'ompany by it voluntarily- exe.Euted; and Myles 9raveritran, did `say that he is the Pressd®nt, cf the corposatiot't axecutthg the w'i'thin and foregoin.0 instrurn.ant to which this 3s att:4<hed; tr:at. tree cctporation has no Seal; that tlty instrument was sign -ad on behalf c Lhe corporation by authority of its Board of oi'kactoi:s; and that Myles N. Braverman as President acknowjedgad the execution at. the: fore-7oi.ng irst.rument to the voluntary act and. dried ut.. the corporation, by i.: and by him lu .a y executed. Nova ry t .c in and fo id State JosePn I1oHand� �-� � Wwa n l Seal GommisaianM101number ritP11 ; Nly Commissk,n E:phoe r March 2C2005�____� 1 _ \NP=S%PEADE3f %,! a9btU' \ 'A.^uh111611:1��a\i'3 • rOne \t:oW11�CFsR+ili[3. W-0 c� G �n J X tn C:11 n w a w Tk. �f Cnnelhill _. .. 200' Buffer around Sandhill Site = 1,187,136 sq. ft. 20% of 200' Buffer Area = 237,427 sq. ft. Current Petitioners Land Area = 246,094 sq. ft. O 200 ft. Buffer Parcels Petitioned Preserve at Sandhill Site City Owned Parcels Parcels within 200' The Preserve at Sandhill Site 0 125 250 500 Feet Department: Neighborhood & Development Services Projection: NAD 1983 State Plane Iowa South This map is intended to serve as an aid in graphic representation only. This information is not warranted for accuracy or other Purposes. Ir CITY O! IOWA CM Kellie Fruehling From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear Members of the City Council, Richard Stapleton <rich.stapleton73@gmail.com> Late Handouts Distributed Monday, November 20, 2017 5:15 PM Council 11/21/17 Meeting It `a.t n (Date) I've just learned that the council may vote on the rezoning of McCollister Blvd and Gilbert. My wife and I would love to be able to attend, but due to our work schedules, this may not be possible. I do want our voices heard as both of us stand firmly against rezoning of the area by McCollister and Gilbert. We have a number of concerns that we would like to see addressed prior to vote on rezoning this area. 1) Traffic in this area is horrible. We are concerned that the population increase from apartments in this area will only cause this issue to get worse. Something needs to be done about the intersection of McCollister and Gilbert before looking at placing more residential homes in this area. 2) We are concerned that more homes will also increase traffic on our street. I've come close to being hit by cars checking my mail and almost got rear-ended twice by our mailboxes on Langenberg and Covered Wagon Drive. This is due to people speeding down Langenberg and not paying attention. We fear that apartments in the area will only increase the traffic on Langenberg causing a more dangerous situation. 3) Property Value: We are concerned that apartments in this area will bring down the value of our property. 4) Increased Crime: I've seen police patrolling our neighborhood only a couple of times in the six months that I've lived in Iowa City. I would like to know the city's plan to increase police protection for our neighborhood before any situation that would increase the population of the neighborhood. 5) Undeveloped land: There are many areas that have already been zoned for residential that have not been developed. I would recommend that these areas get developed by prior to rezoning any more land for residential development. Until these issues can be addressed, both my wife and I sand firmly against any rezoning of McCollister and Gilbert. Thank you for taking time to listen to our concerns. Sincerely, Richard Stapleton and Poorani Sekar 1153 Langenberg Ave. Iowa City, IA 52240 (641)233-8959 N *T S 0 OA425 OA85 1 1 1 1 T - L REZ17-00001 `"fit 0.17 Miles Preserve at Sandhill Offilawa 1 Prepared 6y: Sylvia 6nchner Date Prepared: November 2017 • �1 L 4. FV � y, • 4� � � N M f �M, 16 A p lSr i „,, .. A ��3p l njq� ` � � ,� x �}. 'Yk” �,r cy r ..r kid a ,. .. .[ � i - � M*x ��� I .. .� p _ .-.-�.r+mm+vAp,MNY� � f .w A L. s S �'� ti u �y y - � d* yea '�''�' 4A! �{�A Yh y m "Ld 1 r ., .. <h. 'S�nB^ d w W ..� p C 4 R� 2 X ii%"� x, �_"��W' �� t �4IX+^v �i�t i ��F �t z r u. E dT' ^ ds S v .'z _ `rYt� 2 ,�x✓xka ^yW 3 .�"r i M!� Y �x c+"ti r ' '.,+±it'"a .rm C.jfi > -g �a: �WPad �� ,r as: �Yw._ �'.,'.; �.. :.\ a .a >y�la s'wM^Ws",�s's�sa.J'k �}`� a ry R.+ F , A South District Plan Map --�------� a a A N Lm* Medium Derlsky Shgle Famity Fesdmtlal to.Medium D2rtigy Mixed Residential ■ Muhl-fanrily ■ Commercial Mixed Use /NeigMethood commercial Mixed use con0ercial ■ 50001 public Park/Opm Space M Pr Nate Open Space/ Smsitire Area public property ilkOther * Nist rk Property I PP a a A N �11111116' �(n, Tori ExtenaoN Peoesbian Street Neighbahow Park Protecteo Trail Crossng! Traffic 6alre(9 qN Prairie Buffer ... Existing Lanoscaping Buffer V o.wpmn. wFr.b..�sr.e.w.p.�+anabna w.b•bv.v F9 n�.v�•vwr. � w.r..pS.�a�v.+.mnae. InN Vobum.t bnY..N.p/�IF.OWb iIF�nGM6n.y NMry C.ip. F...bf b.viirbo Wy M �vtl mllYNpq.Nm4 V.P V�Pa�Fn.Y.bN l�.mba..i...nYaMM.Yn.I(nbq. Y'es. m�ti mFY. a.bp.mn.sanpM.ma 4�FeY.p .b p. isry lrWatl Rs bn CnY N poA. ..�w�mn am cP. sw b m s.�e w SP. wym.ma v.ob. ..nrb.b.ol�- amb unv.em.ac...r m.FG Cmtmnbn. iw.bYV CW NNF. b bYb.wp Pe.le P.nv evl'6 VariRM+m krm Rk�1) smM mnimmrba 1- Revise bul5ng setback along MCCORaa Boaevaro Ian 41Y 10 25' 2- Revise billing SGMWk along, Reserve Way from 20 W 16 3- Revise bilAng Selbeok along CavereA Wagon Drive fmm 2T to 16 a -Restrict O�n�ymnorth atetb its Wts koro RA412 alawea 200 Wits ,tunity for live/ work homes S111 PIAN- PRESENTED AT NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINTG DECEMBER 7,2010 Plu�scitve SntiuinLl. I'd:lrlli �i�M IA ddi ��IAI I IN iNlli .i". I0 y ItI IIR(A)Aq> Description Planned emuM the idea at wMl ble nelghborrmms, rouM1yeN living and me "Missing Middle" model Preserve@sandhlll seeks to provide vandominlums to young professionals, families, and empty nesters looking to live In smeller mare effldentspaces_ The varied mut&family bmlelre designs am soled fare smallertma story resleenflal mntext The buildings front an streets and peeesMan streets and surround parking areasand mom private green spa— The wodammlums mtemctwlN the site through lame windows to both the street and roudyards amseng a tunneled neighborhood Pa establishing the pmlra as bath amenity and buffer preserves the naWml ahemder of the site relates to the Terry Trueblood! Formation Center and prwmes a transition from Chat Street to the sand Mlu Estates rvelghbormo l beyond_ Aslmpie palate of materials painted Games beard sial no, metal paneling and wood screening- mlmm traditional taws farm structures The simple farms of the bmlemgs are surrounded by prairie, lawn and heel Concemmmms have eAerareecks and views to mand urangsea— to the interarrourvand_ ate PRESERVE SANDHILL OCO.P dire IOWA C=, IOWA SHIVC-FIATTERY North of McCollister _ Density and Zoning information - Current Zoning Interim Development Multi Family do RM) Parmed! z 'ng overlay Plan Development based an PC Units Planned - Me ran beemom and fz one beemam Munl[s singable units per RN-0zloweemsty-zofunits ealghtallawM as -0Height planned aoa. E South of McCollister Densly and Zoning information Current Zoning Interim Development Multi Family do RM) �e Planned Zoning Overlay Plan Development based an RM 12 Units Planned =&lran beemom singable units per W 12loweemslty-94 unit. singable units per RM-zo medium density 191 units HJnhf nllrnvM 111 M— hJnhf planned IF nlnno ith Moe ate PRESERVE SANDHILL OCO.P dire IOWA C=, IOWA SHIVC-FIATTERY Option 1 E\ M here prwdes -arking for end Iwnhouse unit J taPTtw Purple bulltlings - are carriage house - 50 foot row, assumes sitlewalk not needed on eastsitle because • of greenway trail SITE PLANT- CONCEPT BY OPTICos DESIGNT - APRIL 4, 2017 PRESERVE SANDHILL IOWA CITY, IOWA on for fire as, iffire as is not ed the plan on could be used foot setback trletl to keep the slor71per area as large as possible 40 SouthGate UM PAN I ES C - SH IVHATTE-RY Neighborhood Park Protected Trail Crossing/ Traffic Prairie Buffer Existing Landscaping Buffer s +!i 81-14 a { rsl PRI RW SANI)IIII,I, _��, rni. nvwn lwi r. 33o it�ini RP.URtx�M> o o0 Planned aroundse mesal walkamanegnbothaoek nsartyam rare and theda gMldyoungde rfessana@fanahus and s to wneortinumsN young chen 'anels families, eM empQ nesters looking I to live insmallermare Thio vared mulb it, Th buildings ea fronsaresnslaam pedes arsasmry resleand mnngaeas nail mom rmafaa green sada paean[naasGaa2and - mane panlre areas and more private greanspaaas me wmammmms interactwls the site through lame windows to both the street and waRyaNs Grab a sonnested neighborhood Re establishing the prairie as both amenityand buffer preserves the marmal aheaAerof the ste, relates to the TerryTrumi Recreation Centerana prevmns a transition from chat streetto the send Mlu Estates Nelghborhoaa beyond Aslmpie palate of materials painted Gement board sldlre, metal paneling and wood screening-mlmla traditional — farts structures The simple forms of the buildings are surrounded ey prairie, lawn and trees Condominiums have eAeaardecks and views to m and lldng spades to _ the inte;arnsartyards_ a`14 f "nations from RM -12 zonina requirements Sess _,.i 1 Revise building setback along McCollister Boulevard from 40'to 25' o2 - Revise building setback along Preserve Way from 20'to 15' 3 - Revise building setback along Covered Wagon Drive from 20'to 15' 4 - Restrict density on north site to 115 units from RM -12 allowed 200 units 21 nnnnnn 12 14 m t, oFo fz 232s— h1 -111h 2-11,111 1.1.11104 P—od (;i NERAL CONCEIT S1IL PLAN - PARKING ANALYSIS SouthGate PRESERVE SANDHILL �val IOWA Crn, IOWA SH I V C-FIATTERY S3 i ry N o o a�pJ43nos m poogaogg6laN elnsuluad eql fo'ii Ki 'I'IIHQNVS JA1dJSBdd NOSRItldWOD ,UISN3Q II!gPUeS@anaasaad modern farm house design condominium interiors neigi !L- L DESIGN IMAGERY PRESERVE SANDHILL IOWA CITY, IOWA 40 SouthGate GOMPA N'Es SH I V C-HATTC-RY View 3 - looking west down Pedestrian Walkway View 4 - looking east along south side of property GENERAL CONCEPT BUILDING IMAGES -OCTOBER 2017 NLIGHBORlIUOD MEETING PRESERVE SANDHILL 0SouthGIES at IOWAC ,, Ioww SHIVC-CFIATTouthGC-RY Neighborhood Park Protected Trail Crossing/ Traffic Prairie Buffer Existing Landscaping Buffer . r I'I11SLI1V1 S/�I�I)IIILI. Il Ali 1 11 n1 RINI vn•� i 40 It�l AI I � nRt A�M> {� o o - Planned ease mead walhamantrgndthooek wnrtyam living and _ - theMissingMiddle mmalwesana@fadhus ndempts to ovide nest young families, and empty nesters looking wnve cient8lanels, N live Insmellermere effldenfspeces_ in smaller mom me varied muio-family buuelng designs am sal d fare smallerfo story resldental some, The buildings bort an streets and pe le man streets and surround parking areas and mare private greenspaces The wmammmma interact wls the site through lame wlnaawa to both the street and wnRya & Gral a tunneled neighborhood Re Letabllshing the presa as bath amenity and buffer preserves the marmal Gm— der of the site, relates to the Ter, Trueblood moreeflan Center and prwmes a transition from Chat Street to the Sand! Hill Estates Nelghborhod be;ud_ Aslmple palate of materials painted cement board sldl no, moral paneling and wad Screening- mlmm traditional Iowa farts sourames The simple forms of the bmmmgs are surrounded by pane lawn and bees Condominiums have eAdardeeme and views to mad urangseaces to the lotdar vaurtyams Variations from RM -12 zonina requirements 1 - Revise building setback along McCollister Boulevard from 40'to 25' io 2- Revise building setback along Preserve Way from 20'to 15' d 3- Revise building setback along Covered Wagon Drive from 20'to 15' 4- Restrict density on north site to 115 units from RM -12 allowed 200 units sao,hsue- OLD -,z <.n.9 p-1.R,,,a4P.— ( I i NEPAL CONTCEI'T S1 L PLAN SouthGate PRESERVE SANDHILL � IOWA Crn, IOWA SH I V C-FIATTERY Publish 11/13 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT AND ESTIMATED COST FOR CITY OF IOWA CITY BUILDING AUTOMATION UPGRADES AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2017 IN THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA TO ALL TAXPAYERS OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY, IOWA, AND TO OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS: Public notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, will conduct a public hearing on plans, specifications, form of contract and estimated cost for the construction of the City of Iowa City Building Automation Upgrades and Improvement Projects 2017 in said City at 7 p.m. on the 21" day of November, 2017, said meeting to be held in the Emma J. Harvat Hall in City Hall in said City, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted by the City Clerk. Said plans, specifications, form of contract and estimated cost are now on file in the office of the City Clerk in City Hall in Iowa City, Iowa, and may be inspected by any interested persons. Any interested persons may appear at said meeting of the City Council for the purpose of making objections to and comments concerning said plans, specifications, contract or the cost of making said improvement. This notice is given by order of the City Coun- cil of the City of Iowa City, Iowa and as provided bylaw. KELLIE K. FRUEHLING, CITY CLERK NPH -1 r ' CITY OF IOWA CI 041 �� COUNCIL ACTION REP 11717 November 6, 2017 Resolution setting a public hearing on November 21, 2017 on plans, specifications, form of contract, and estimate of cost for the construction of the City of Iowa City Building Automation Upgrades and Improvement Projects 2017, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and directing the City Engineer to place said plans on file for public inspection. Prepared By: Brett Zimmerman - Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Kumi Morris - Facilities Manager, Jason Havel - City Engineer Ron Knoche - Public Works Director, Dennis Bockenstedt - Finance Director, Geoff Fruin - City Manager Fiscal Impact: The estimated cost for this project is $485,000, which will be funded by Account #: R4332 Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Resolution Executive Summary: This agenda item begins the bidding process for the City of Iowa City Building Automation Upgrades and Improvement Projects 2017. This project includes modifications and upgrades to temperature control systems at three buildings for the purpose of integrating existing HVAC systems into the City's existing Building Automation System. Included is related mechanical and electrical work. This work will be performed at the following three buildings: City Hall - 410 East Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Robert A. Lee Recreation Center - 220 South Gilbert Street, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Mercer Aquatic Center and Scanlon Gymnasium - 2701 Bradford Drive, Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Background / Analysis: The existing HVAC and BAS systems in City Hall, Robert A. Lee Recreation Center, Mercer Aquatic Center and Scanlon Gymnasium are reaching the end of their useful lives and require upgrades and/or replacement. This work will significantly reduce operating costs and energy consumption in these facilities. Project Timeline: Set Public Hearing — November 6, 2017 Hold Public Hearing — November 21, 2017 Bid Letting — December 14, 2017 Award Date — December 19, 2017 t r ' CITY OF IOWA CITY waft -^IN � COUNCIL ACTION REPORT Construction Start • Robert, A. Lee Recreation Center, Mercer Aquatic Center and Scanlon Gymnasium — January 15, 2018 • City Hall — July 14, 2018 Substantial Completion • Robert A. Lee Recreation Center, Mercer Aquatic Center and Scanlon Gymnasium — June 15, 2018 • City Hall — December 14, 2018 Final Completion • Robert A. Lee Recreation Center, Mercer Aquatic Center and Scanlon Gymnasium — July 13, 2018 • City Hall —January 11, 2019