HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-12-19 Public hearing4 ov
Publish 12/5
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will
be held by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at
7:00 p.m. on the 19th day of December, 2017, in
Emma J. Harvat Hall, 410 E. Washington Street,
Iowa City, Iowa, or if said meeting is cancelled, at
the next meeting of the City Council thereafter as
posted by the City Clerk; at which hearing the
Council will consider:
An ordinance amending Title 14, Zoning
Code, Article 513, Sign Regulations, to
broaden the sign allowance and
illumination requirements for institutional
uses in residential, ID and OPD zones and
to allow plastic trim cap channel letters for
signs above the 5th story on high rise
buildings.
Copies of the proposed ordinances and
resolutions are on file for public examination in the
office of the City Clerk, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa.
Persons wishing to make their views known for
Council consideration are encouraged to appear
at the above-mentioned time and place.
Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk
r
=!l 4 CITY OF IOX/VA CITY 124a17
"'P�� MEMORANDUM
Date: October 27, 2017
To: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Jann Ream, Code Enforcement Specialist
Re: Continue discussion of an amendment to City Code Section 14-513-8E, Sign Standards in the
Central Business zones, and the South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park, South
Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above
the fifth story and discussion of internal illumination on upper stories of high rise buildings.
Introduction:
During the Planning & Zoning Commission's October 19, 2017 meeting, the commission voted to
separate approval of the proposed amendments to the sign code and to consider the proposed
amendment to CB zones and certain delineated Riverfront Crossings zones at the next meeting. The
commission chair, requested more information concerning how other municipalities similar to Iowa City
regulate signage on high rise buildings.
History/Background:
The memo for the October 19, 2017 meeting explained the circumstances for staff's recommendation
that plastic trim cap letters be permitted above the 51 story of a building in the CB and certain Riverfront
Crossings zones. During discussion, the commission was informed that the code allows illumination,
either external or internal, for wall (fascia) signs no matter where they are placed on the building. The
proposal before the commission was to allow plastic trim cap letters as a sign type for wall (fascia) signs
when they are above the 5t^ story of a building. Currently, that type of channel letter is prohibited in CB
and certain Riverfront Crossings zones because they are not appropriate for pedestrian oriented
storefronts.
The commission chair expressed concern about the illumination of these letters on the high rise buildings
downtown and in Riverfront Crossings. The chair requested information on how other municipalities,
similar in size and type to Iowa City, regulate this signage. Several municipalities were researched with
the results as follows:
Davenport: Population -102,612
Lighting is not specifically regulated in Davenport except for a maximum brightness in candelas (foot-
candles). The height of wall (fascia) signs in the downtown is not limited and they can be internally
illuminated. Roof signs are permitted and a roof sign is allowed on a building of any height and can be
internally illuminated.
Dubuque: Population — 58,531
In general, there is no height limit for wall (facia) signs and internal illumination is allowed. Dubuque has
very few high rise buildings. Most of their downtown is a historic district where signage is heavily
regulated — internal illumination on any sign in the historic district is not permitted.
Cedar Falls: population — 41,390
Cedar Falls has no typical high rise buildings in their downtown area. Their sign code does not regulate
lighting except to ban flashing or animated signage and making sure that any light (except for that
emanating from the sign itself) does not reflect onto adjoining premises. They allow roof signs and wall
(fascia) signs are allowed to cover up to 33% of the sign wall.
Sioux City, IA: Population 102,612
Sioux City allows roof signs but not in their downtown area. Wall (fascia) signs have no height limit and
allow internal illumination anywhere within the city. Size of wall signs is determined by street frontage.
October 27, 2017
Page 2
Staff has determined that not all internally illuminated channel letters are trim cap letters so sign installers
and their clients do have alternatives.
Recommendation: Staff recommends amending the sign code as follows:
For CB zones: Allow plastic trim cap letters in CB zones but only when the building is more than 5
stories.
1
John Yapp, Developilent Services Coordinator
r
.r=
' . -4CITY OF IOWA CITY
Z-- MEMORANDUM
Date: October 13, 2017
To: Planning & Zoning Commission
From: Jann Ream, Code Enforcement Specialist
Re: Consider approval of amendments to City Code Sections 14-513-4E, Illumination
Requirements, City Code Section 14-5B-8A&B, Signs permitted in ID, OPD and Residential
zones and 14 -5B -8E to increase the size and type of signs for institutional uses; and Sign
Standards in the CB zones, and the South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park,
South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic trim cap letters for signs
above the fifth story
Introduction:
Residential zones: Over the past several months, several Religious Group Assembly uses in various
residential zones have applied for sign permits or inquired about what type of signage their church would
be allowed to install. Review of the sign code has revealed that signage for these uses in residential
zones is limited both in size and number of signs permitted. So much so that a majority of churches in
residential zones have existing signage that does not comply with our current code. Staff finds that both
the existing signage and the requested signage is not unreasonable, and therefore recommends
approval of the amendments.
CB and certain Riverfront Crossings zones: In October of 2016, the Planning and Zoning Commission
considered and approved several amendments to the Iowa City Sign Regulations in order to better
implement the recommendations of the Downtown District Storefront and Signage Guidelines and to
bring the sign code into compliance with a U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding the regulation of
signage. This was a significant revision of the sign code regulations and, with any significant revision, the
application of those changes can reveal unforeseen consequences and unwarranted limitations for
certain situations.
History/Background:
Residential Zones: Currently, in residential zones, signage for an Institutional Use such as a church
(Religious Group Assembly) is limited to one (1) sign from the following sign types: facia (wall sign),
awning, canopy or monument. In the single-family zones, facia signs are limited to four (4) square feet
and monument signs are limited to twelve (12) square feet per side. In multi -family zones, facia signs are
limited to twelve (12) square feet and monument signs are limited to twenty-four (24) square feet per
side. Churches in single family zones are not uncommon and most have both a monument sign and a
sign on the building wall which is not in compliance with the current code. (Note: the symbol of a cross is
not considered signage.) An exterior wall of a church sanctuary is generally a large wall of more than one
story. Most churches in residential zones are non-compliant with the sign code and already have larger
signs.
October 13, 2017
Page 2
Additionally, design trends for newly built churches include larger sites that incorporate retaining walls or
masonry walls at the entrance to the site. Masonry wall signs are currently not permitted in residential
zones but could be an appropriate sign type in certain situations.
Illumination Requirements: Internal illumination for signs is not permitted in residential zones. This makes
sense for single family zones and even for most multi -family zones. An internally lit cabinet can be
distracting and out of place in most residential zones.
The PRM zone is a high-density multi -family zone. There are just a few areas in Iowa City with this
zoning designation: along the N. Clinton—N. Dubuque street corridor between Davenport and Jefferson,
south of Highway 6 West near Carver Hawkeye arena and small pockets south of Burlington Street in the
Riverfront Crossing district (likely to be rezoned to a Riverfront Crossings zoning designation upon
redevelopment). Two recent sign permit applications were for Religious Group Assembly uses in the
PRM zone in the N. Clinton—N. Dubuque corridor. In both instances, the religious uses found the
maximum allowed size (24sf) for a new monument sign to be acceptable but were unhappy to learn the
new sign could not be internally illuminated — especially since the new signs were replacing existing
internally illuminated monument signs. Internal illumination for a sign for an institutional use in a PRM
zone would most likely only occur in the N. Clinton -N. Dubuque street corridor. Given the proximity of
commercial uses and the fact that these institutional uses have had internally illuminated signs for many
years without any complaints, it seems reasonable to allow Institutional Uses internally illuminated signs
but only in PRM zones.
CB and certain Riverfront Crossings Zones: The new sign code amendments have been in place for
several months and, as with any broad change to zoning regulations, deficiencies are revealed when
applied to real world situations. The regulation under consideration is the prohibition of plastic trim cap
channel letters. Attached is a specification sheet that demonstrates what constitutes a plastic trim cap
letter. The prohibition of this type of channel letter was a recommendation incorporated in the Downtown
District Storefront and Signage Guidelines and then amended into the city's sign code. The design and
fabrication of plastic trim cap letters necessitates that they are a large letter and geared toward vehicular
traffic. This type of letter was considered inappropriate for the pedestrian oriented downtown storefronts.
Both staff and the design firm hired to create the storefront and sign guidelines for the downtown district
believed that prohibiting this ubiquitous sign type downtown would stimulate better and more creative
signage for downtown storefronts. However, not every building in the CB zones is a small pedestrian
oriented storefront. Additionally, the sign regulations for the CB zones also apply to several Riverfront
Crossings subdistricts (South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East
Side Mixed Use subdistricts). Development in the Riverfront Crossings- South Downtown includes two
high rise hotels and a high rise condominium building. Additionally, the Sheraton Hotel on City Plaza will
be re -branding itself in the coming year. These uses lend themselves to a larger sign appropriate to the
building size and the use. Attached are examples of proposed signs for these uses — all of which include
plastic trim cap channel letters. The proposed signage is appropriate to these taller buildings and is
typical of what is allowed in other jurisdictions. Given that the size of the signs is now controlled by the
fagade width, staff believes allowing trim cap channel letters in these limited situations is acceptable.
Recommendation: Staff recommends amending the sign code as follows:
For Residential, ID and OPD zones: 1) allow two (2) signs for Institutional Uses in ID, OPD and
residential zones; 2) Add masonry wall signs to the type of sign allowed for Institutional Uses; 3) increase
the maximum fascia sign size for Institutional Uses in single family zones to twelve (12) square feet; 4)
allow internal illumination for one (1) sign for an Institutional Use in PRM zones.
October 13, 2017
Page 3
For CB zones and certain Riverfront Crossings Zones: Allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the
fifth floor in CB zones and those Riverfront Crossings that are regulated in the same manner as the CB
zones, but only when the building is more than 5 stories.
-7 ,,4 -
John Yapp, Development Sdrvices Coordinator
A. Sign Standards For ID And OPD Zones:
1. Permitted Signs:
a. Single-family uses and two-family uses are not allowed to install permanent signs, except for one
small identification building sign and one integral sign, as specified in table 5B-1 of this section.
b. Signage for nonresidential uses in the ID -RS and ID -RM zones are permitted one identification sign.
The identification sign may be one of the following types: fascia, awning, canopy or monument sign.
For-ilnstitutional uses are permitted two identification signs from the following types: fascia awning
canopy, monument or masonry wall sign. The -One sign for an institutional use may also include
copy announcing its services or activities. (Ord. 08-4319, 11-3-2008; amd. Ord. 16-4685, 11-15-
2016)
c. Signage for nonresidential uses in the ID -C, ID -I, and ID -RP zones must comply with the sign
regulations contained in subsection C, "Sign Standards In CO -1, CN -1 And MU Zones", of this
section.
d. Residential uses in any OPD zone are permitted signage in accordance with the requirements of the
underlying residential zone. Nonresidential uses approved as part of a planned development are
permitted signage in accordance with the sign regulations contained in subsection C, "Sign
Standards In CO -1, CN -1 And MU Zones", of this section.
2. Sign Specifications And Provisions:
a. All signs for residential uses in the ID and OPD zones are subject to the standards specified in table
5B-1 of this section.
b. All signs in the ID -RS and ID -RM zones are subject to the standards specified in table 513-1 of this
section.
c. All signs for nonresidential uses in the ID -C, ID -I, and ID -RP zones are subject to the standards
specified in table 5B-2 of this section.
d. In the OPD zone, all signs for nonresidential uses approved as part of a planned development are
subject to the standards specified in table 5B-2 of this section. (Ord. 08-4319, 11-3-2008)
B. Sign Standards For All Residential Zones:
1. Permitted Signs:
a. Principal uses, other than single-family uses and two-family uses, are permitted one identification
sign. The identification sign may be one of the following types: fascia, awning, canopy or monument
sign. Fir Institutional uses are permitted two identification signs from the following sign types: fascia
awning canopy, monument and masonry wall sign. the One sign for an institutional use may also
include copy announcing its services or activities.
Parks and open space uses are permitted entranceway signs as specified in table 5B-1 of this
section.
c. Single-family uses and two-family uses are not allowed to install permanent signs, except for one
small identification building sign and one integral sign as specified in table 5B-1 of this section.
d. One monument sign is permitted at each street entrance of a subdivision or development of two (2)
acres or more. The maximum sign area is thirty two (32) square feet per side - may be double faced
for a total of sixty four (64) square feet - maximum height is five feet (5'). All other monument signs
are permitted as specified in table 5B-1 of this section.
2. Sign Specifications And Provisions: All signs in residential zones are subject to the standards
specified in table 56-1 of this section.
Table 513-1: Sign Specifications And Provisions
In Residential And The ID And OPD Zones
Permitted
Maximum
Maximum Height And
Signs
Zone
Sign Area
Special Provisions
Awning
ID -RS, RR -1,
12 sq. ft. or 25% of
Maximum height: Top of
signs'
RS -5, RS -8,
awning surface,
first story
RS -12, RNS-
whichever is less
12, ID -RM,
Limited to identification
RM -12, RM-
only
20, RNS-20,
RM -44,
Not allowed for single -
PRM
family and two-family
uses
Canopy ID -RS, RR -1, Sign cannot exceed 90%
signs RS -5, RS -8, of street -facing canopy
RS -12, RNS- length and no more than
12, ID -RM, 15 inches in height
RM -12, RM -
20, RNS-20,
RM -44,
PRM
Signs may be mounted on
the face of the canopy,
upright on the top of the
canopy or underneath the
canopy. Signs mounted
on the face of the canopy
may not extend beyond
the edges of the canopy.
Signs mounted on the top
of the canopy or
underneath the canopy
must consist of individual
letter forms and may not
extend more than 15" in
height above or below the
canopy. The bottom of the
canopy or any letter forms
attached underneath the
canopy must be, at
minimum 8' above the
level of the adjacent grade
Canopy signs may not be
illuminated
Directional ID -RS, RR -1, 2 sq. ft. per face
signs RS -5, RS -8,
RS -12, RNS- May be double faced for
12, ID -RM, total area of 4 sq. ft.
RM -12, RM -
20, RNS-20,
RM -44,
PRM
Entranceway Allowed for For signs located above Maximum height: 20'
signs parks and
or across the top of the
open space
subject archway, the
Up to 1 sign per facade of
uses in any
area of the sign may not
the subject archway
residential
exceed 25% of the area
zone, ID
delineated by the subject
The sign may not contain
zone, or OPD
archway
changeable copy
zone
For a sign located on the
Sign copy may not extend
side of the archway, the
beyond the edges of the
area of the sign may not
entranceway structure
exceed 33% of the
surface area of the side
Minimum clearance height
of the archway support
is 10' for entranceway
on which the sign is
signs across driveways
located. (See section 14-
and 8' for entranceway
5B-7, "Measurement
signs across walkways
Standards", of this
Entranceway signs are
article.)
not allowed if the subject
lot or tract already has a
Not allowed for single-
family and two-family
uses
ID -RM, RM- 24 sq. ft. per sign face Maximum height: 5'
12, RM -20,
RNS-20, RM- 'May be double faced for Limited to identification
44, PRM a total area of 48 sq. ft. only, except as allowed
monument sign located at
the subject entrance
Fascia
ID -RS, RR -1,
4 sq. ft.
Maximum height: Top of
signs
RS -5, RS -8,
Institutional uses are
first story
RS -12, RNS-
allowed 12 sq. ft.
12
Limited to identification
only, except as allowed
ID -RM, RM-
12 sq. ft.
for institutional uses
12, RM -20,
RNS-20, RM-
Not allowed for single -
44, PRM
family and two-family
uses
Integral signs
ID -RS, RR -1,
2 sq. ft.
Up to 1 of these signs is
RS -5, RS -8,
allowed per building
RS -12, RNS-
12, ID -RM,
No permit is required
RM -12, RM -
20, RNS-20,
RM -44,
PRM
Masonry Wall
ID -RS, RR -1,
12 sq. ft.
1 f less than the height of
signs
RS -5, RS -8,
the masonry wall.
RS -12, RNS-
12, ID -RM,
Limited to institutional
RM -12, RM
uses.
20,RNS-
20,RM-44,
PRM
Monument
ID -RS, RR -1,
12 sq. ft. per sign face
Maximum height: 5'
signs'
RS -5, RS -8,
RS -12, RNS-
May be double faced for
Limited to identification
12
a total area of 24 sq. ft.
only, except as allowed
for institutional uses
Not allowed for single-
family and two-family
uses
ID -RM, RM- 24 sq. ft. per sign face Maximum height: 5'
12, RM -20,
RNS-20, RM- 'May be double faced for Limited to identification
44, PRM a total area of 48 sq. ft. only, except as allowed
Small ID -RS, RR -1, 2 sq. ft.
identification RS -5, RS -8,
signs RS -12, RNS-
12, ID -RM,
RM -12, RM -
20, RNS-20,
RM -44,
PRM
for institutional uses
Not allowed for single-
family and two-family
uses
The sign must be a
building sign
Up to 1 of these signs is
allowed per building
No permit is required
Note:
1. Only 1 sign is permitted; 1 fascia sign, 1 awning sign, 1 canopy sign, or 1 monument sign excel)t
for institutional uses. (See subsections Alb and B1 a of this section.)
E. Illumination Requirements: Illuminated signs must conform to the following requirements: (Ord.
08-4319, 11-3-2008)
1. Except for signs in the ID and residential zones, all permitted signs may be internally or externally
illuminated. All signs permitted in the ID and residential zones may only be externally illuminated
with white light except that, in the PRM zone, one sign for an institutional use may be internally
illuminated. (Ord. 08-4319, 11-3-2008; amd. Ord. 16-4685, 11-15-2016)
2. Illumination through the use of exposed lamps or inert gas tubes is allowed, provided the exposed
lamp does not exceed eleven (11) watts or that an inert gas tube does not draw more than sixty (60)
milliamps. When inside frosted lamps or exposed lamps with a diffusing screen are used, no lamp
shall exceed twenty five (25) watts.
3. Illumination through the use of LEDs is allowed only as specified for electronic changeable copy. All
signs using LEDs must have installed ambient light monitors and must at all times allow such
monitors to automatically adjust the brightness level of the electronic sign based on ambient light
conditions. At no time shall the sign be operated at a brightness level greater than the
manufacturer's recommended levels. The electronic changeable copy must be monochromatic. It
must utilize a dark background with only the message or image lit in a single color.
4. Artificial external light sources used to illuminate a sign face must be located and shielded such that
the bulb is not directly visible from any adjacent residentially zoned property or public right of way
and must use a narrow cone of light that does not extend beyond the illuminated sign face.
5. Illumination on a property, including illumination from signs, must not exceed 0.5 initial horizontal
foot-candle and 2.0 initial maximum foot-candles as measured at any point along a property
boundary that is adjacent to or across the street from properties that are zoned residential, CN -1, or
CO -1.
6. All illuminated signs are subject to the provisions of the electrical code, including any permit fees.
7. Permit applications for electronic changeable copy signs must include a copy of the manufacturer's
operating manual, including any recommended standards for brightness and other display
operations.
8. For electronic changeable copy signs, whether the sign is programmed from the site or from a
remote location, the computer interface that programs the sign shall be made available to city staff
for inspection upon request. If the computer interface is not immediately available, the sign shall
cease operation until such program can be provided. (Ord. 08-4319, 11-3-2008)
E. Sign Standards In C13-2, CB -5 And CB -10 Zones:
1. All signs in the CB -2, CB -5 and CB -10 Zones are subject to the standards specified in table 513-4 of
this section.
2. The maximum sign area for each type of sign, special provisions, and any restrictions on the number
of signs allowed are specified in table 56-4 of this section. Unless specifically limited in table 5B-4 of
this section, any number of signs may be installed.
3. Signage for residential uses must comply with the requirements for residential uses in the RM Zones
as stated in table 513-1 of this section.
4. Cabinet signs where the entire face of the cabinet is internally illuminated are prohibited, and
+Internally illuminated plastic trim cap letters are prohibited except as specifically allowed for fascia
signs in Table 5B-4. (Ord. 16-4685, 11-15-2016)
Table 56-4: Sign Specifications And
Provisions In The C13-2, CB -5 And CB -10 Zones
Permitted
- Signs
Awning
signs
Maximum Maximum
Sign Area Height Provisions
25% of awning surface I Top edge of first I Each storefront is
i story awning i allowed up to a total of 3
signs from the following
sign types: canopy
signs, awning signs, and
projecting signs. Awning
signs are only allowed
Ion first story awnings
Banner Same allowances as
projecting upper level projecting
signs signs
I
!Same
restrictions as
upper level
projecting
signs
Note: See subsection
14 -3C -3C of this title for
awning and canopy
design standards
Only permitted on
multiuse buildings where
access to uses is
primarily through a
common lobby from the
street such as an indoor
shopping mall or where
a single use occupies a
;large multi -story building
0
Standards",of this
article.)
{
Fascia signs Square footage equal to
1.5 times the length of i
,the sign wall
Flags --
I
i
Freestanding '2 sq. ft. per linear foot of
signs lot frontage, not to
exceed 40 sq. ft. per
sign face
20'
across walkways
An entranceway sign is
not allowed if the
property has a masonry
!wall sign, monument
'sign, or freestanding
i sign
No longer than 90% of
the length of the sign
wall, sign band or
storefront, whichever is
most applicable to the
location of the sign
Back lit cabinet signs,
where the entire face is
illuminated, are
prohibited
Internally illuminated
plastic trip cap letter
forms are prohibited
except for buildings of
more than 5 stories
when the sign is above
theYstory.
Limited to identification
only -
!—I additional flag may be
Idisplayed in conjunction
with any city, county,
I state or federal flags
No permit is required
Allowed only in the CB -2 ;
Zone i
Only 1 freestanding sign
is allowed per lot
Allowed only through
approval of a minor
Channel Letter Trim -cap
Channel Letter Trim -cap
CHANNEL LETTER TRIM- CAP is the most widely
used signage material in the world. It is first-class
aluminum coated with plastic, which enjoys the
features of firm, elastic and seamless.
It can be easily made into any channel fetter and
logo. It has thoroughly changed the static effect of
traditional crone signs, cutting down the cost and
time involved and improving the level of signage
making. 20mm(J shape) and 26mm(Arrow shape)
are available.
Width 20mm13/4'I 45M1150feetl/Boll
JT -301A
Black
I
JT -305A
Bed
JT -306A
Blue
JT -307A
Green
- 1_
JT -30A
Chrome
JT -309A
Gold
JT -3122A
Purple
JT -313A
Yellow
H -314A
Orange
Jr -315A
Who,
JT -316A
Brown
JT -317A
Gray
Width 26mm11'1 45M1150feee4io9
LM -301 Black
LM 305 Red
LM -306 Blue
LM -307 Green
LM -306 Chrome
LM -309 Gold
LM -312 White
LM -313 Yellow
LM -314 Orange
LM -315 Purple
LM -316 Brown
LM -317 Gray
Trim -cap roll
Trim cap samples
Are you looking for wider than 26mm trim cap? Our Channel Letter Coil - Letteasy°
should be suit to your needs for channel letter making.
Aluminum Channel Letter Coil - Letteasy®
Find out the products at http://www, pansign.com/products-49. htm for more details
SIGN
PI-MLWINAM Lli t
Lgtltkm;LED
Vag, MO
DeSerlplbn Face-Ut (gcryttj
FaceWor:White
Pelum CO., Pa#o M.
M 'edp:&ack
MaM6etl.rt Furan to wall
a I. ILLIIMINMED Lo00
LFPNtID¢ LED
Yt*ag' m
0eecrlptlon. FacHlt Ih Yllcl
Face Callao W011a wI1n Renslsl+rt Wry1
All Flal SWNca Iaee M[9 W.)
Return Cabr: RaMt ID Mack, Fac.
MMcap COM: Pa'ml M Match Fac.
IBM.PatlDm Poal1 to wall
3M LCOLORS
1:3630-015 Yellow
z 3630-23 Mack
3:3630-14 kaniMal orange
4: 3636311 Emnle, BWe
5:3630-1416 tight Beige
6:3630-115 Light LIme Ye6Dw
1:3630-141 Mhl European Blue
8:3630-136 LIme leen
Li
pappose6 Payv✓em 1N131
33 W
PIWRtl rdw rMw sml
H YAT T IP L AF IE
lel PI
09kP00[0CK
Rise Hyatt
Iowa city. M
Seale: 11/,eF
Iran
Imlw n ..
c6NFMM cuDRs
Hawaii
I m.
,.n••.�Wywxalon
uv. aa•lanf
3M kaa6 t Various
«-01
I LSI rAn
w
79295
COl
xww�-ue.
QW, HYATT PLACE
EXTERIOR SIGNAGE
BRANDING
Site ID / Center No.: Iowa City , IA
Location Name: Hyatt Place a1 Iowa Cay
Street: 435 South Linn Street
City, State: Iowa Cay, w
ZIP: 52240
EI A E C G D
MIVf_i it ; i %i
ni_.......__________________________________________________________________________MIN.
W �' __ll__1.1____V-A77—FLAC-
<
_-�
K (l
FRONT VIEW
MODEL2
"COLOR DETAIL"
.
BLACK: SERIES 250622
3M 3630-22
YELLOW : SERIES 2500-2244A
3M VT -0719
■ LAVENDER SERIES 2500-3148
AVERY A9460 -T
■ BLUE a SERIES 2500-2529
3M 3630-147
® PISTACHIO t SERIES 2500.2157
3M 3&'10-149
ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LOGO & LETTERS
ORANGE: SERIES 250D B4
3M 3630.84
LINE GREEN: SERIES 2100-948
®
SPRING GREEN:
SERIES 2500.2498 (3M 3M166) LVd B9N d
SERIES 25002202 (3M VPM) LVd Gnm
(1 LAYER OF EACH)
UGHr BLUE ALWAYS APPLIED
AS A DIFFUSER FORTHE LOGO
EARLON BLACK ISTSURFACE aW PERF. VINYL [:] FILLER: ALUMINUMAWDIMSA1YRIMH
MODEL #2
19" 6 5116-12 112-1
2314-
3 112"
3314"
8"
19'-101/2"
16 3/8" 1
3T
1111=1125 3/8" 8 7/16" 3 3/8' 1
35/8-
4 518"
5"
10 518
26'-6"
22"
56'
33 3/4' 11 1/4-14 112'
4 3/4"
6 118"
6112•
14 1/4"
354"
28 7/8"
100'
36" 38"2 518" 5"
5 1/2"
6 7/8"
7 1/2"
39'-9"
32 3/4"
126'
'-�- 42 114" 14" 5 1/2"
6"
7314"
8 1/8"
17 3/4"
4q'.2"
36"
156'
50 518" 61916. 6 518"
71/4"
9 3116"
10"
21 3/8" 53'-1/8"
44"
224'
56' 189116' 7 3/8"
7 718" 10 5116' 10 7/8"
23 9116 58'-61/8
47 718"
274'
•I 63 3/8' 21' 8 318"
9°
115/8".
12 114" 26 5/8
66'3"
541/8'
350'
REMOTE
SMALL LOGO (1919" t�45")")
a
E_a HYATT PLACE
EXTERIOR SIGNAGE
BRANDING
Site ID / Center No.:
Iowa City , IA
Location Name:
Byatt Place at town City
Street:
435 South Linn Street
City, State:
Iowa Ciry, to
.�-S•
Zip:
52240
.�-S•
4%
Y; 14'
'lzg
�N
•'- --------- ----
T
FIUER fAB.fR0N.B61•TWC,LIUM.
,
SOCNO HERO. SS. SCREW
SPTIN fINISN.
;nx jM
PIT
WYEIFDlO D51•a1KP111M. &1[REN,
fr
FIMMORNNIFDKIMINIIMMlWam
E TO FILLER
NSmE WJMEDPEFIECTNF WHITE
•.I- � Si
CLVRIE6;T@ SR
Cl&PJ9.41 STNP
OE6'M.h, G
GVOLAND EM WOW
DHXTOFA CE E
ER
SCRADMEOTC
1LSiK.UMDFACE iR01A
-I
EEL
GMEDON
G
15PMH.CLFOa MSTSUR
2E VINYL FIRST SURFAACE
FIRST SURFACE
CE
SSURFACE
_'t•
ONfW315UPfACE
�•
ESEE COLOR OEFPM1.
RFACE SEE
F°X'a
�.1:':
SWK�EEMOR
SEEODLORDETM9
.,IF D.
►
xn EER
,m wsaFODT
I=10MXS
IN,&Kx V LG ILUM014ua SWER
*PuueDFSWNmlaox
x
f:
-
av;Ilmam;Nuwa
' V • •
XYR: MR14RI:TrtPaPOCF Ny
•
MHIEIH1,6ioolt
•a"
tm lVL®SPER f00F
E
3
,caLEax aeN.FiwuiLNPFPDOF
ac a Lc
r •
,.vWEa, RDIIE
�r :c.
v,&,nenaaaFFcwuccawr
haE,raxwrrolfnT
aNcaEc',TaRs
mmaL +.o. NVi1E
'a',
`•
FIL fC
w
aSpIWG Na.fRONDON'MCI1W.
SLE(OR OL
uwu,.aKLEIOR eouM
' �:G.
FuuFX
T
NTEE[unv
PNNIFD IiLWINUV MICO&ED SPTM FINSX
Karam IC6RXElED.TO
' � L.:
il15t ILYM. EJfA1NG
'i P610F! W ISYED VRHIF
_f.L '
a4D1lEf
wta w9HFn
H•axala. NDIIOORO6f fNnE/FA
9.a.aDLi X„X'L6.µD
itSiEXFAS
O,6T45! HI0.L{
nah: anchor supplieC by omens
SECTION EOOO
SECTION LETTERS
NTS
NTS
MINUTES PRELIMINARY
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
NOVEMBER 2, 2017 — 7:00 PM — FORMAL MEETING
EMMA J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Carolyn Dyer, Ann Freerks, Mike Hensch, Phoebe Martin, Max
Parsons, Mark Signs, Jodie Theobald
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT: Sara Hektoen, Jann Ream
OTHERS PRESENT:
RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL:
By a vote of 7-0 the Commission recommends approval of an amendment to City Code
Sections 14 -5B -8E Sign Standards in the Central Business zones, and the South Downtown,
University, Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow
plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth story.
CALL TO ORDER:
Freerks called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA:
None.
CODE AMENDMENT:
Discussion of amendment to City Code Sections 14 -513 -BE Sign Standards in the Central
Business zones, and the South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert
and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth
story and discussion of internal illumination on upper stories of high-rise buildings.
Ream noted that the Commission requested more information on illumination on the high-rise
building signs. So Ream prepared a map to show where the existing high-rise buildings are and
also where others are proposed or already built. The map shows how the high-rise buildings
are concentrated in the downtown and south downtown Riverfront Crossings area. Next Ream
spent time walking the areas and driving in her car to get an idea of the viewsheds for these
high-rise buildings from surrounding neighborhoods. She showed some Google images (not all
completely up-to-date) and pictures she took herself to give the Commission some idea of what
the viewsheds look like. Ream found that the buildings skyline are exclusively visual from the
arterial streets (Burlington, Gilbert, Dubuque, Clinton and Washington Streets). There is a small
area while on Riverside Drive where one can look across the river and see the buildings. Ream
also noted that due to the topography (and vegetation) of the area and the existing buildings in
the area the viewsheds of the high-rise buildings can change drastically (from completely
Planning and Zoning Commission
November 2, 2017 — Formal Meeting
Page 2 of 4
obscured to viewable in half a block). Ream added that when viewing the MidWestOne
Building, the sign on that building would not be allowed in the new zoning standards, it would be
at least one-third smaller.
Freerks asked about the 1.5 times the size of the side of the building standard for signs and is
that for each side or the building as a whole. Ream stated it is for each side, each sign wall is
treated separately.
Freeks stated her appreciation that Reams went out and walked and drove the area to be able
to show the Commission a real feel for how the area looks.
Ream stated as requested she looked at what other communities allow and one of the things
that surprised her was how many communities allowed roof signs, and illumination of roof signs.
She looked at four communities in Iowa, cities of a fairly similar size, plus she looked at both
Burlington Vermont and Boulder Colorado because they are both of similar size and university
towns with similar ped mall areas. Neither of those two communities allow high-rise buildings.
The tallest building in Boulder allowed is 55 feet (5 stories) and in Burlington it is 65 feet.
Hektoen added that the issue of illumination is not pending application so if there is a majority of
commissioners that wish to pursue this further it could be added to the worklist and proceed
from there.
Freerks opened the public discussion.
Seeing no one Freerks closed the public discussion
Hensch moved to recommend approval of an amendment to City Code Sections 14 -5B -8E
Sign Standards in the Central Business zones, and the South Downtown, University,
Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow
plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth story.
Martin seconded the motion.
Freerks understands the amendment was to allow the plastic trim caps but wanted to use the
opportunity to learn more and open the conversation and to let City Council know that some of
the commissioners have concerns or thoughts of how it might affect things in the future.
Freerks would rather plan than react.
Theobald noted that she likes the community of Lacrosse Wisconsin and how they have created
their riverfront. However at this point Iowa City is already further down the road and these
conversations should have been at the beginning. In Lacrosse it appears there is a historic
overlay over the entire downtown and all the signs must be wood or metal and cannot be backlit
to be kept with the historic nature of the buildings.
Ream noted that Dubuque Iowa had the same requirements.
Signs stated he was intrigued by Ream's comment that Boulder does not allow high-rises and
has building limits of 55 feet. His thought was that "ship has sailed" here in Iowa City, we have
driven the prices of land up so high that one cannot afford to not build up high. Signs feels the
City will see more and more high-rises because of that new reality. Ream added that Boulder
passed their height ordinance in 1971.
Planning and Zoning Commission
November 2, 2017 — Formal Meeting
Page 3 of 4
Hektoen added that in the context of affordable housing Boulder has a pretty serious affordable
housing crisis.
A vote was taken and the motion carried 7-0.
CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: OCTOBER 19, 2017
Theobald moved to approve the meeting minutes of October 19, 2017.
Parsons seconded the motion.
A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0.
PLANNING AND ZONING INFORMATION:
Freerks noted that in the Staff memo there were a number of places where it stated
"Commission Chair expressed" or "Commission Chair requested" and asked that in the future
that is not used so there doesn't appear to be a bias or so that others will not be afraid to say
something or ask something in fear of being "called out" in a memo. She added this is a place
for information and that the Commission collectively works as a group. The meeting minutes
will indicated individual's statements and opinions.
Signs noted he will be absent for the December 7 meeting.
Martin will be absent December 21 and January 4.
ADJOURNMENT:
Signs moved to adjourn.
Martin seconded.
A vote was taken and motion carried 7-0.
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 19, 2017—Formal Meeting
Page 15 of 21
homes in Iowa City. There just are not enough. Huge numbers of people who work at The
University of Iowa live far away which makes for long commutes and excessive use of cars.
Iowa City really does need housing like this that is affordable. She is prepared to vote for
deferral, but is not opposed to the concept.
Parsons also agrees with the concept, but his one concern might be the flow from multi -family to
single-family. Overall this is a great concept and just needs a little more detail. He is leaning
toward voting for this rezoning, but if they did decide to defer, he is open to discuss some more
of those ideas to work out the kinks. Parsons stated he also thinks the intersection at Gilbert
Street and McCollister Boulevard should be improved before any development happens
because it is a busy intersection.
Parsons noted that the P&Z review limitation period expires before their next meeting and asked
how that would affect things if they deferred consideration of the rezoning.. Freerks said the
applicant could waive the limitation period. She reminded the commission that a three/three vote
would be a denial. Hektoen confirmed that four votes in favor of a rezoning is required for
approval. Freerks noted that the motion was to approve, but it could be withdrawn. Theobald
said she supports the application, but knows good things often come with further scrutiny, so
she could go along with deferral. Freerks said she didn't want the application to languish, but
that it warranted further examination to make sure it was consistent with the comprehensive
plan. She asked if Hensch wanted to withdraw his motion and allow another meeting to allow
more time for the developer to address some of the concerns. Hensch indicated that he would
not withdraw his motion.
A vote was taken and the motion failed with a 3-3 vote. (Freerks, Martin, Dyer opposed).
Signs rejoined the meeting.
CODE AMENDMENT:
Discussion of amendments to City Code Sections 14 -5B -4E, Illumination Requirements, City
Code Section 14-5B-8A&B, Signs permitted in Interim Development, Overlay Planned
Development, and Residential zones and 14 -5B -8E to increase the size and type of signs for
institutional uses and to allow internal illumination in the Planned High Density Multifamily zone;
and Sign Standards in the Central Business zones, and the South Downtown, University,
Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic
trim cap letters for signs above the fifth story.
Ream noted that the application is a long description for some very simple concepts they wish
to change in the Code. Most of the requests have been from religious institutions, both existing
and new churches, that brought to light some inadequacies in the Sign Code. As explained in
the memo a facia sign in most residential zones was limited to four square feet and only one
sign was allowed. Most of the churches in Iowa City do not comply with the Sign Code, and not
that permits were issued in error, permits were just never issued. However with the construction
of some new churches and inquiries on what signage could be done it was apparent to Ream
that adjustment needed to be made to the Sign Code. The proposed change is not great, 12
square feet is not a large sign but having a 12 square foot sign on the wall of the church and a
monument sign out closer to the roadway seems to be reasonable.
The second major change is due to having a couple of institutional uses in a PRM zone, which
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting
Page 16 of 21
is technically a residential zone. One example is in a high density area near The University of
Iowa and the Northside Marketplace and they were requesting internal illumination for their
small monument signs. One church already had their monument sign internally illuminated for
20 years and when they requested to update and get a new sign they were told it could not be
internally illuminated because it was in a residential zone. However there was no issue for the
20 previous years so the request is to allow internal illumination in PRM zones for institutional
uses only. Ream stated there are only three PRM zones in Iowa City, one over by Carver
Hawkeye Arena and there are no institutional uses there. The other area is in the Riverfront
Crossing District south of Burlington Street and currently there are no institutional uses there
now and if one is built in the future the area would be rezoned Riverfront Crossings which would
allow illuminated signage. So this change will really only affect one PRM zone at this time and
there are two institutional uses in that zone both of which have asked for their monument sign to
be internally illuminated.
Ream reminded the Commission that there was a major revision to the Sign Code last year for
the Downtown Districts based on a consultant group recommending new Downtown District
Storefront and Signage Guidelines. Based on the recommendations for the Downtown Zones
there was a certain type of channel letter that was prohibited (plastic trim cap channel letters).
This recommendation was based on small pedestrian oriented storefronts in the downtown
areas. When that change was made Staff forgot about two things. One, the Riverfront
Crossings Districts, by reference, use the CB Sign requirements. Secondly, not everything that
is going on in the Riverfront Crossings Zone is going to be pedestrian oriented storefronts.
There are three major hotels being built and the Sheraton Hotel is about to be rebranded. Staff
felt that for these large multi -story buildings channel letter signage is appropriate.
Staff recommends amending the sign code as follows:
• For Residential, ID and OPD zones: 1) allow two (2) signs for Institutional Uses in ID,
OPD and residential zones; 2) Add masonry wall signs to the type of sign allowed for
Institutional Uses; 3) increase the maximum fascia sign size for Institutional Uses in
single family zones to twelve (12) square feet; 4) allow internal illumination for one (1)
sign for an Institutional Use in PRM zones.
• For CB zones and certain Riverfront Crossings Zones: Allow plastic trim cap letters for
signs above the fifth floor in CB zones and those Riverfront Crossings that are regulated
in the same manner as the CB zones, but only when the building is more than 5 stories.
Freerks expressed her concern with the illumination of signs about five stories and would like to
know how many places in the area will have such signage. She is afraid it could become light
pollution. Her concern is if the need is for wayfinding, but it's not like it would be hard to
navigate throughout downtown Iowa City to get where one needs. It is understandable in a city
like Cedar Rapids where one needs to be able to see the signage from the interstate but that is
not the case in Iowa City.
Hensch agreed and commented that the way people find things such as hotels in modern
society is through smart phones and GPS.
Ream reminded the Commission that at one time the City's sign allowance was 15% of a sign
wall, so on a 14 story building that is 100 feet wide. Freerks disagreed because at that time
there were no 14 story buildings so this is really starting over and a blank slate. Ream agreed
and noted that the City specifically changed that requirement to prevent the sides of those
buildings from becoming billboards. So now the allowance is 1.5 times the width or length of the
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting
Page 17 of 21
side wall. Therefore they have reduced greatly the size of the sign that could be done. Ream
also stated that the plastic trim cap is not the only way to illuminate a channel letter, so by
saying we cannot use the plastic trim cap letters does not mean it will stop the illumination or
fear of light pollution.
Freerks asked if at this time there are any illuminated signs above the fifth floor in any of the CB
zones and Ream confirmed there is not at this time. Freerks is concerned about the impact.
Perhaps there could be language that states the signage cannot be on the side of a building
where residential neighborhoods would see it. She feels illumination of signs this high on
buildings will change the character of downtown.
Freerks opened the public discussion.
Douci Brown (Gloria Dei Lutheran Church) thanked the Commission for their time and
consideration. Gloria Dei has been located at the corner of Dubuque and Market Streets since
1855 when it was first known as First English Lutheran Church. In 1961 the building burnt down
and was replaced by the existing structure. Sometime after that in the 1990's they installed a
sign on the property facing outwards towards the corner of Market and Dubuque Streets, it is a
backlit sign. Brown is unsure if it was grandfathered in or what process allowed it. Gloria Dei's
location in Iowa City has been cherished by past and present members of the Iowa City
community through visits on Sunday morning and social media. They continue to enjoy
connecting with people who remember going to church here as a child, where they were
married, where they celebrated baptism and confirmation, or attended during their college
years. One of their oldest members, having completed a lifetime of mission work, joins them
from Asia every week on their Facebook Live broadcast.
They are committed to open their doors to new and existing members and past and present and
future. A year ago, in 2016, Gloria Dei reaffirmed their commitment to remain in the downtown
Iowa City area with a $1 million renovation project. The project included updating their electric,
HVAC, and sound systems along with updating their classrooms and lounge areas. Most
critically they updated their kitchen facilities. They use this updated kitchen for their culinary
ministry with the goal of providing food and community events for the Iowa City area. They
believe and remain committed to their role and presence in downtown Iowa City. Most recently
they hosted a pig roast which raised $3,000 and half the proceeds to benefit world hunger relief
and the other half to local food banks.
While churches across the country are experiencing a decline in membership, Gloria Dei's
membership remains steady. As a part of their communications outreach they have also
expanded their digital role in reaching out to the community as well (smart phones). In the past
years they have updated their website, established active social media channels with Facebook,
Twitter, YouTube and other channels. Being in the downtown area over the years has proven to
be challenging at times. Their identity is being lost in the maze of buildings that are evolving
around them. It is difficult for anyone to know who they are and what they are by their physical
location. If one is driving downtown on Dubuque Street they might not even notice the building
or the building sign set back on the property. Their focus on providing an updated sign is to
help them reach out into the community, their intent is with a new backlit sign to provide a fresh
look to the property and to engage the community to let them know the doors are open and
welcoming. Brown thanked the City Staff for all their efforts on the church's behalf and
appreciate the willingness to review their present circumstances.
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting
Page 18 of 21
Freerks thanked Brown for keeping Gloria Dei in the downtown community area
Freerks closed the public discussion
The Commission discussed approving part of the recommendations but allowing for more
discussion and comment on the allowance of plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth
floor.
Signs moved to recommend amendments to City Code Sections 14 -5B -4E,
Illumination Requirements, City Code Section 14-5B-BA&B, Signs permitted in Interim
Development, Overlay Planned Development, and Residential zones.
Parsons seconded the motion.
Signs explained that his motion is to allow the Staff recommendation for Residential, ID and
OPD zones: 1) allow two (2) signs for Institutional Uses in ID, OPD and residential zones; 2)
Add masonry wall signs to the type of sign allowed for Institutional Uses; 3) increase the
maximum fascia sign size for Institutional Uses in single family zones to twelve (12) square feet;
4) allow internal illumination for one (1) sign for an Institutional Use in PRM zones.
Freerks agrees with this and is in favor.
Parsons feels that signs are more for advertising and people really use smart phones for
navigating.
A vote was taken and the motion carried 7-0.
Theobald moved to defer a decision on the Staff recommendation for CB zones and
certain Riverfront Crossings Zones: Allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth
floor in CB zones and those Riverfront Crossings that are regulated in the same manner
as the CB zones, but only when the building is more than 5 stories.
Parsons seconded the motion.
Ream asked for clarification on what the Commission would like this amendment to be. Freerks
noted she feels there needs to be more discussion regarding allowing large lit signs on 15 story
buildings. Ream stated that the signs are already allowed, this amendment was just to allow a
certain type of channel letter that isn't currently allowed. Freerks noted her concern is not
knowing how frequently this type of signage can occur, it sounds like it could be over the whole
area if it were redeveloped with five story and taller buildings. Ream said she can inform the
Commission where they see these types of signs being requested and it's mainly for hotels and
tall large one -tenant buildings (such as the MidWestOne Building). So how many signs would
be requested depends on how much of such development would occur in that area. Right now
the only controls are the size of 1.5 times the fagade length and the type of channel letter that is
allowed. Freerks agreed, but noted that could allow for a 34 foot sign on the hotel so perhaps
this is the time to discuss how signage is really used and what is necessary but yet won't be
light pollution.
Martin asked if there has ever been cases where lit signs had to be shut off by a certain time of
night. Ream said it hasn't ever been in the City Ordinances. Signs agreed that would be an
Planning and Zoning Commission
October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting
Page 19 of 21
interesting concept. Ream noted that a hotel would say that their guests arrive at all times of
day/night. Martin added that she does rely on signs to find places, especially at night when it is
hard to use her phone.
Pat McAllister (Nesper Signs) noted that the issue is allowing trim cap that has nothing to do
with illumination. Trim cap only defines how the edge of the letter will be done, and with higher
elevations one will not be able to see if it is plastic or metal trim cap, the plastic is just easier to
form the letters. As far as illumination goes, according to Code there are all types of illumination
allowed and that is a different topic for a different time.
Signs noted that when looking at the big picture of what downtown is transitioning to with the
taller buildings and more urban look he has less of an issue with signs and illumination. The
light pollution issue goes with an urban area and living in an urban environment means dealing
with urban issued.
Freerks understands that point but also wants to make sure it is palpable for the surrounding
neighborhoods. There needs to be a balance. Freerks is interested in knowing how
communities the size of Iowa City (not Des Moines or Cedar Rapids) address their lighting
standards on taller structures.
Signs would also like to see a map that would indicated what areas are affected by tall building
signage.
Miklo stated this issue would be placed on the next agenda for discussion.
A vote was taken and motion carried 7-0.
CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: OCTOBER 5, 2017
Parsons moved to approve the meeting minutes of October 5, 2017.
Signs seconded the motion.
A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0.
PLANNING AND ZONING INFORMATION:
Theobald asked about the fireworks sales item discussed at the last meeting and questioned
the area on the west side that isn't zoned industrial but has a temporary industrial permit (the
old Menards) would that be able to be a fireworks sales area. Miklo said it would not.
Freerks would like to re -implementing work session meetings prior to major items such as
tonight so the Commission has time to ask more questions and get more details before
decisions are made.
ADJOURNMENT:
Signs moved to adjourn.
Prepared by Jann Ream, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240: 319-356-5120
Ordinance No.
An Ordinance Amending Title 14, Zoning Code, Article 513, Sign
Regulations, to Broaden the Sign Allowance and Illumination
Requirements for Institutional Uses in Resid ntial, ID and OPD zones,
and To Allow Plastic Trim Cap Channel Lett e s for Signs above the 5th
Story on High Rise Buildings.
Whereas, it is the pu ose of the Zoning Code Sign Re lations to enhance and protect the
physical appearance an safety of the community, to pr ect property values and the character
of neighborhoods, and to\signs;
wa City's areas of tural, historic, and scenic beauty; and
Whereas, the Sign Regulrther intended to rovide fair and equitable treatment for all
sign users; to allow for ign; to encour ge economic development; to distinguish
between areas designed auto oriented ommerce and areas designed for residential
living or pedestrian orierce; and to tablish a reasonable period of time for the
elimination of nonconford
Whereas, the Sign Regulations seek to allow dequate communication through signage while
encouraging aesthetic quality and creativi in a design, location, size and purpose of all signs;
to establish limitations on signs that are app riate to the land, building or use to which they are
appurtenant and are adequate for their int ded purpose while balancing the individual and
community interests.
Whereas, to achieve these purposes, it is easona to allow trim cap letters on signs above the
5'" story in CB and certain Riverfront Cro sings zone and
Whereas, to achieve these purpos
residential zones to have two signs,
square feet, and allow internal illumir
Whereas, the Planning and Zoning
ordinance and recommends apprq
Whereas, these amendments
interest.
s It is reasonab to allow Institutional uses in certain
cluding a mason .wall sign, allow fascia signs up to 12
(tion for one sign; an
immission has reviewed the proposed changes to the sign
and
the purpose of the sign regt{lations and are in the public
Now, therefore, be it ordain by the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that:
Section 1. Approval. The ode of Ordinances of the City of Iowa City is hereby amended as
follows:
A. Amend Title 14, Zoning Code, Chapter 5, Site Development Standards.Articl", Sign
Regulations, Section 8, Signs Permitted by Zone by: 0
~'
1. Deleting A(1)b and replacing it with the following:
-1C")M
ter'
r
CDa
M
r
^a
Institutional uses in ID -RS and ID -RM zones are permitted two identification signs from
the following types: fascia, awning, canopy, monument or masonry wall sign. One sign
for an institutional use may also include copy announcing its services or activities. All
other nonresidential uses in the ID -RS and ID -RM zones are permitted one identification
sign from the following types: fascia, awning, canopy or monument sign.
2. Deleting 9(1 a and replacing it with the following;
Principal uses, of r than single-family uses and two-family uses, are permitted one
identification sign fr the following types: fascia, awning, canopy or monument sign.
Institutional uses are ermitted two identification signs from the following sign types:
fascia, awning, canopy, onument or masonry wall sign. One sign for an institutional
use may also include cop nnouncing its services or activities.
3. Amending Table 5B -1 -
Zones by:
a. Deleting the Fascia
and Provisions in Residential, ID and OPD
and replacing it %*ith the following:
Fascia FIDRS, RR -1, RS -5, 4 sq. except
signs' -8, RS -12, RNS- Institution I uses are
allowed 1 sq. ft.
ID -RM, RM -12, RM- 12 sq.
20, RNS-20, RM -44,
PRM
b. Inserting the following after "Integral
height: Top of first
Limited to identification only,
except as allowed for institutional
uses
Not allowed for single-family and
two-family uses
Masonry ID -RS, RR-1,RS-5, 12 sq. 1ft ss than the height of the
Wall signs RS-8,RS-12, RNS- mas my wall.
12, ID -RM, RM -12,
RM -20, RNS-20, Limite to institutional uses.
RM -44, PRM
xc o
c. Deleting foo/atth of the table and replacing it NSe f�owirFg-
1. See suband B(1)a of this section for th ;trMb�of si&V
allowed.4. Deleting E(4) and ree following:
Cabinet signs where the entire face of the cabinet is internally illuminated are prohibited.
Internally illuminated plastic trim cap letters are prohibited, except as specifically allowed
in Table 56-4.
5. Amending Table 56-4, "Sign Specifications and Provisions in the CB -2, CB -5 and CB -
10 Zones" by deleting the Fascia sign section and replacing it with the following:
Fascia signs Square footage equal
to 1.5 times the length
of the sign wall
B. Amend Title 14, Zoning Code, Cl
Regulations, Section 4, Construc
and replacing it with the following:
No longer than 90% of the
length of the sign wall, sign
band or storefront, whichever
is most applicable to the
location of the sign
Back lit cabinet signs, where
the entire face is illuminated,
are prohibited
Internally illuminated plastic
trim cap letter forms are
prohibited except for buildings
of more than 5 stories when
the sign is above the 51" story.
Limited to identification only.
Development Standards, Article B, Sign
tenance Requirements by deleting E(1)
1. Except for signs in the ID an esidential zones, all permitted signs may be
internally or externally illuminate All signs permitted in ID and residential zones
may only be externally illuminat d ith white light, except that institutional uses in
the PRM zone may have one gni ernallyt illuminated.
Section II. Repealer. All ordinances and pa s of ordi ances in conflict with the provisions of this
Ordinance are hereby repealed.
Section III. Severability. If anYlaw.
section/provision or pa of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to
be invalid or unconstitutiondication shall not ffect the validity of the Ord1dance as a
whole or any section, provihereof not adjudi ted invalid or uncctHstitutional.
c� .
Section IV. Effective Date. ce shall be in effec after its final pass, aorova4."d
publication, as provided by `--c..) m r
Passed and approved thisf , 2017. s
6a
Mayor
Appy'bved�l�sc�
ATTEST: ��yyr ./d
City Clerk c-Gity Attorney's Office ll /�/�7
Mi
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the City Council
of Iowa City will hold a public hearing on the 1g'^
day of December, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. in the
Emma J. Harvat Hall of the Iowa City City Hall,
410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa, or if
said meeting is cancelled, at the next meeting of
the City Council thereafter as posted by the City
Clerk; at which hearing the Council will consider
a Resolution Authorizing Conveyance of 521
South Governor Street, also described as Lot 12,
except the South 20 feet of Block 1, Berryhill's
2"d Subdivision, Iowa City, Iowa, to an income -
eligible family.
A copy of the proposed resolution is on file
for public examination in the office of the City
Clerk, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa. Persons wishing
to make their views known for Council
consideration are encouraged to appear at the
above-mentioned time and place.
KELLIE K. FRUEHLING, CITY CLERK
'=1 CITY OF IOWA CI
�`�rum
'S COUNCIL ACTION REP 5
December 5, 2017
Resolution setting public hearing for December 19, 2017, on a proposal
to convey a single-family home located at 521 South Governor Street.
Prepared By: Lucy Joseph, NDS Code Enforcement Specialist
Reviewed By: Tracy Hightshoe, Interim Director, Neighborhood & Development
Services
Fiscal Impact: The sales price of the home is $225,000. There will be no impact on the
general fund for ongoing operating expenses.
Recommendations: Staff: Approval of the sale of 521 S. Governor (UniverCity
Neighborhood Partnership Program home)
Commission: NA
Attachments: Photos of 521 S. Governor
Executive Summary:
On December 19, 2017, City Council will hold a public hearing and vote on a resolution
authorizing the conveyance of 521 S. Governor as part of the UniverCity Neighborhood
Partnership Program. Once this home is sold, this will be the 591 home sold under the program.
Background / Analysis:
Under the UniverCity Neighborhood Partnership Program, the City proposes to sell 521 S.
Governor Street for $225,000. The City purchased the home for $200,000. City funds were
used to rehabilitate and sell the home to an eligible homebuyer. Renovations included electrical
work, plumbing, repainted interior walls, insulation in the attic, new light fixtures, carpeting on
stairs and bedrooms, updated bathrooms, buffed and cleaned the wood floors in the dining and
living room, and new cabinets and counters in the kitchen. The cost of renovations (up to
$50,000) is not included in the sale price. The home is required to be owner -occupied for 30
years.
Built in 1910, this house has 2,084 square feet of living space, includes four bedrooms, two
bathrooms, detached two -car garage and a large backyard.
This home is located on a street where there is a mix of owner -occupied and rental properties.
The renovated home will be an asset to the neighborhood and community. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution to authorize the conveyance of 521 S. Governor St. as part of the
UniverCity Neighborhood Partnership program.
CITY OF IOWA CITY
COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
521 S. Governor- Before Renovations
521 S. Governor -After Renovations
7—
Prepared by: Susan Dulek, Assistant City Attorney, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5030
RESOLUTION NO.
Resolution authorizing conveys ce of a single family
home located at 521 South Gover or Street.
Whereas, the UniverCity Neighborhood Partne hip Program is a joint effort between the
Un*'
'ty of Iowa and the City to encourage h me ownership and reinvestment in designated
neigh- oods surrounding the University of I a; and
Whereas, th City purchases rental units I ted in designated neighborhoods surrounding the
University of to , rehabilitates them, and hen sells them to income -eligible buyers; and
Whereas, the City p chased and re bilitated a single family home located at 521 South
Governor Street, Iowa ; and
Whereas, the City has rece ed n offer to purchase 521 South Governor Street for the
principal sum of $225,000; and
Whereas, on December 5, 201 , the ity Council adopted a Resolution proposing to convey its
interest in 521 South Gover r Street, uthorizing public notice of the proposed conveyance,
and setting the date and tim for the public earing; and
Whereas, following the blic hearing on the p posed conveyance, the City Council finds that
the conveyance is in th public interest.
Now, therefore, be it esolved by the City Council of the ity of Iowa City, Iowa, that:
1. Upon the irection of the City Attomey, the Mayor and the City Clerk are authorized to
execute warranty deed conveying the City's interest in 521 South Govemor Street,
legally ascribed as Lot 12, except the South 20 feet in Block 1, Berryhill's Second
Additi , Iowa City, Iowa.
2. The ity Attorney is hereby authorized to deliver said warranty deed and to carry out any
a,,94ons necessary to consummate the conveyance required by law.
ro
o_
C-)-<
r
Gm
-o
m
O
tV
M
A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PLANS,
SPECIFICATIONS, FORM OF CONTRACT
AND ESTIMATED COST FOR HAPPY
HOLLOW PARK RESTROOM AND SHELTER
REPLACEMENT PROJECT 2018 IN THE CITY
OF IOWA CITY, IOWA
TO ALL TAXPAYERS OF THE CITY OF IOWA CITY,
IOWA, AND TO OTHER INTERESTED PERSONS:
Public notice is hereby given that the City Council of
the City of Iowa City, Iowa, will conduct a public hearing
on plans, specifications, form of contract and estimated
cost for the construction of the Happy Hollow Park
Restroom and Shelter Replacement Project in said City
at 7 p.m. on the 19th day of December, 2017, said
meeting to be held in the Emma J. Harvat Hall in City
Hall in said City, or if said meeting is cancelled, at the
next meeting of the City Council thereafter as posted
by the City Clerk.
Said plans, specifications, form of contract and
estimated cost are now on file in the office of the City
Clerk in City Hall in Iowa City, Iowa, and may be
inspected by any interested persons.
Any interested persons may appear at said meeting
of the City Council for the purpose of making objections
to and comments concerning said plans, specifications,
contract or the cost of making said improvement.
This notice is given by order of the City Council of
the City of Iowa City, Iowa and as provided by law.
KELLIE FRUEHLING, CITY CLERK
CITY OF IOWA CI,
COUNCIL ACTION REPO
December 5, 2017
Resolution setting a public hearing on December 19, 2017 on plans,
specifications, form of contract, and estimate of cost for the construction
of the Happy Hollow Park Restroom and Shelter Replacement 2018
Project, directing City Clerk to publish notice of said hearing, and
_directing the City Engineer to place said plans on file for public inspection.
Prepared By: Dave Panos — Senior Civil Engineer
Reviewed By: Juli Seydell Johnson — Parks & Recreation Director
Kumi Moms — Facilities Manager
Geoff Fruin — City Manager
Fiscal Impact: The estimated cost for this project is $220,000 and will be funded with
CIP projects R4192 and R4130.
Recommendations: Staff: Approval
Commission: Park Commission reviewed project and recommended
approval on March 8, 2017. Historic Preservation Commission
reviewed and approved project on April 13, 2017.
Attachments: Resolution, Shelter and Restroom Renderings
Executive Summary:
This agenda item begins the process to rebid the Happy Hollow Restroom and Shelter
Replacement Construction Project 2017.
Background / Analysis:
This project replaces an aging combination restroom, shelter and storage structure at Happy
Hollow Park with a restroom and shelter. A neighborhood meeting was held on May 25, 2016
with approximately 25 residents attending. The design of the restroom and shelter includes
increased physical accessibility. In addition, the architectural features and finish choices fit
the character of the historic neighborhood surrounding the park.
This project was bid on July 12, 2017. The five bids received on July 12, 2017 were rejected
due to lowest bid being 39% over cost estimate. After review of the bids and discussions with
the Consultant, a determination was made that the original construction cost estimate was
inaccurate at $182,000.
After rejecting bids, the consultant and city staff re-evaluated design and schedule in an
attempt to reduce pricing to the budget level while maintaining the integrity of the original
facility aesthetics. The changes were discussed with City Historic Preservation staff, Chair of
the Historic Preservation Commission and local contractors previously bidding on the project.
The project was modified in five different areas to help reduce costs.
Schedule — The new project schedule allows the project to be rebid at a favorable time with a
longer schedule to help provide more competitive pricing. ,
1 = i
rt III SIL
CITY OF IOWA CITY
COUNCIL ACTION REPORT
Roofing — Specified material manufacturer changed to a lighter gauge. The roof systems will
remain as flat panel standing seam roof for both restroom and shelter facility. Estimated
savings are minimal, however provide for more competitive estimates.
Shelter Column and Truss Material — Project bid documents were changed to remove the
requirement for Glue Laminated structural elements, and now allow for construction with
standard dimensional treated lumber. This will allow more competitive bid pricing for the park
pavilion structure. Estimated savings range is between $15-000 - $20,000.
Shelter Column Connections - Exposed bracket connections are included in the base bid.
The project bid form will include an alternate for concealed brackets. Exposed connections
are more standard in park shelter packages. Estimated savings is between $2,500 - $3,000.
This was determined after staff discussed with contractors that previously bid this project.
Shelter Column Fascia — Exposed concrete columns for the park pavilion will be included in
the base bid. The base bid will include alternates for two fascia products.
Concrete Masonry Units (CMU) Fascia
• Natural Stone Fascia (Anamosa Limestone) — Similar to the restroom fascia as shown
below in the rendering of the restroom. The stone fascia can be added later to the pavilion
UNCIL ACTION
Natural stone fascia will remain in the base bid for the restroom facility. Estimated savings for
removal of stone fascia from park shelter is $4,500.
Project Timeline:
Set Public Hearing — December 5, 2017
Hold Public Hearing — December 19, 2017
Bid Letting — January 30, 2018
Award Date — February 6, 2018
Construction Start — February 26, 2018
o
1.7
• Schedule — The new project schedule allows the project to be rebid at a favorable time with a
longer construction schedule to help provide more competitive pricing.
• Roofing — Specified material manufacturer changed to a lighter gauge. The roof systems will
remain as be flat panel standing seam roof for both restroom and shelter facility.
• Shelter Column and Truss Material —Project bid documents were changed to remove the
requirement for Glue Laminated structural elements, and now allow for construction with standard
dimensional treated lumber. This will allow more competitive bid pricing for the park pavilion
structure.
• Shelter Column Connections - Exposed bracket connections are included in the base bid. The
project bid form will include an alternate for concealed brackets. Exposed connections are more
standard in park shelter packages.
• Shelter Column Fascia — Exposed concrete columns for the park pavilion will be included in the
base bid. The base bid will include alternates for two fascia products.