Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-01-02 OrdinancePrepared by: Sarah Walz, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-356-5239 (REZ17-00016) Ordinance No. Ordinance rezoning approximately 3.6 acres of property from Neighborhood Public (P1) to Planned Development Overlay Neighborhood Public (OPD/P1) zone located at 300 Teeters Court (REZ17-00016) Whereas, the applicant, Iowa City Community School District, has requested a rezoning of property located at 300 Teeters Court from Neighborhood Public (P-1) zone to Planned Development Overlay/Neighborhood Public (OPD/P1); and Whereas, the proposed rezoning will allow further grading of a previously altered protected slope to enable an expansion of Lincoln Elementary School; and Whereas, the "neighborhood principles" included in the Comprehensive Plan, lists neighborhood schools, and specifically elementary schools, as an integral part of healthy, sustainable neighborhoods that serve as a focal point for community gathering and neighborhood identity; and Whereas, the preservation and improvement of neighborhood schools is a goal of the City Council's strategic plan; and Whereas, the proposed addition to Lincoln Elementary School extends the life of one of Iowa City's oldest neighborhood schools by preserving limited outdoor play space, providing ADA accessibility to all portions of the building and property, and improving traffic circulation to the site; and Whereas, the applicant has submitted information indicating that the subject protected slope had been previously altered; and Whereas, the applicant has presented information demonstrating that the proposed development activity will not undermine the stability of the slope; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the proposed rezoning and associated Sensitive Areas Development Plan, attached hereto and by reference made part of this document, and has recommended approval; and Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I Approval. Property described below is hereby reclassified from its current zoning designation of Neighborhood Public (P1) to Planned Development Overlay Neighborhood Public (OPD/P1) zone Chautauqua Heights Addition Bilk 6, Except lots 5-9 (Lincoln Elementary) Section II. Zoning Map. The Building Inspector is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance by law. Section Ill. Certification And Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance and to record the same, at the office of the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa, at the owners expense, all as provided by law. Section IV. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section V. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VI. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this day of 20_ Mayor Approved by: Ordinance No. Page 2 Attest: fiV City Clerk City Attorney's Office �� J Ordinance No. Page It was moved by and seconded by_ Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Botchway Cole Mims Salih Taylor Thomas Throgmorton that the First Consideration 01/02/18 Voteforpassage: AYES: Cole, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Thomas, Throgmorton. NAYS: None. ABSTAINED: Botchway. ABSENT: None. Second Consideration _ Vote for passage: Date published 56 Prepared by Jann Ream, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240: 319-356-5120 Ordinance No. 18-4735 An Ordinance Amending Title 14, Zoning Code, Article 56, Sign Regulations, to Broaden the Sign Allowance and Illumination Requirements for Institutional Uses in Residential, ID and OPD zones, and To Allow Plastic Trim Cap Channel Letters for Signs above the 5th Story on High Rise Buildings. Whereas, it is the purpose of the Zoning Code Sign Regulations to enhance and protect the physical appearance and safety of the community, to protect property values and the character of neighborhoods, and to preserve Iowa City's areas of natural, historic, and scenic beauty; and Whereas, the Sign Regulations are further intended to provide fair and equitable treatment for all sign users; to allow for creative design; to encourage economic development; to distinguish between areas designed primarily for auto oriented commerce and areas designed for residential living or pedestrian oriented commerce; and to establish a reasonable period of time for the elimination of nonconforming signs; and Whereas, the Sign Regulations seek to allow adequate communication through signage while encouraging aesthetic quality and creativity in the design, location, size and purpose of all signs; to establish limitations on signs that are appropriate to the land, building or use to which they are appurtenant and are adequate for their intended purpose while balancing the individual and community interests. Whereas, to achieve these purposes, it is reasonable to allow trim cap letters on signs above the 5' story in CB and certain Riverfront Crossings zones, and Whereas, to achieve these purposes, it is reasonable to allow Institutional uses in certain residential zones to have two signs, including a masonry wall sign, allow fascia signs up to 12 square feet, and allow internal illumination for one sign; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the proposed changes to the sign ordinance and recommends approval; and Whereas, these amendments satisfy the purpose of the sign regulations and are in the public interest. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: Section 1. Approval. The Code of Ordinances of the City of Iowa City is hereby amended as follows: A. Amend Title 14, Zoning Code, Chapter 5, Site Development Standards, Article B, Sign Regulations, Section 8, Signs Permitted by Zone by: 1. Deleting A(1)b and replacing it with the following: Institutional uses in ID -RS and ID -RM zones are permitted two identification signs from the following types: fascia, awning, canopy, monument or masonry wall sign. One sign for an institutional use may also include copy announcing its services or activities. All other nonresidential uses in the ID -RS and ID -RM zones are permitted one identification sign from the following types: fascia, awning, canopy or monument sign. 2. Deleting B(1)a and replacing it with the following; Principal uses, other than single-family uses and two-family uses, are permitted one identification sign from the following types: fascia, awning, canopy or monument sign. Institutional uses are permitted two identification signs from the following sign types: fascia, awning, canopy, monument or masonry wall sign. One sign for an institutional use may also include copy announcing its services or activities. 3. Amending Table 513-1- Sign Specifications and Provisions in Residential, ID and OPD Zones by: a. Deleting the Fascia sign section and replacing it with the following: Fascia ID -RS, RR -1, RS -5, signs' R2 -8, RS -12, RNS- 4 sq. ft., except Institutional uses are allowed 12 sq. ft. ID -RM, RM -12, RM- 12 sq. ft. 20, RNS-20, RM -44, PRM b. Inserting the following after "Integral signs': height: Top of first Limited to identification only, except as allowed for institutional uses Not allowed for single-family and ti two-family uses Masonry RD RS, RR-1,RS-5, 12 sq. ft. 1 f less than the height of the Wall signs RS-8,RS-12, RNS- masonry wall. 12, ID -RM, RM -12, RM -20, RNS-20, Limited to institutional uses. RM -44, PRM c. Deleting footnote at the end of the table and replacing it with the following: 1. See subsections A(1)b and B(1)a of this section for the number of signs allowed. 4. Deleting E(4) and replacing it with the following: Cabinet signs where the entire face of the cabinet is internally illuminated are prohibited. Internally illuminated plastic trim cap letters are prohibited, except as specifically allowed in Table 513-4. 5. Amending Table 5B-4, "Sign Specifications and Provisions in the CB -2, CB -5 and CB - 10 Zones" by deleting the Fascia sign section and replacing it with the following: rFascia signs Square footage equal to 1.5 times the length of the sign wall B. Amend Title 14, Zoning Code, Chapter 5, Regulations, Section 4, Construction and and replacing it with the following: No longer than 90% of the length of the sign wall, sign band or storefront, whichever is most applicable to the location of the sign Back lit cabinet signs, where the entire face is illuminated, are prohibited Internally illuminated plastic trim cap letter forms are prohibited except for buildings of more than 5 stories when the sign is above the 5t' story. Limited to identification only. Site Development Standards, Article B, Sign Maintenance Requirements by deleting E(1) 1. Except for signs in the ID and residential zones, all permitted signs may be internally or externally illuminated. All signs permitted in ID and residential zones may only be externally illuminated with white light, except that institutional uses in the PRM zone may have one sign internally illuminated. Section II. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section III. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudicated invalid or unconstitutional. Section IV. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this 2nd day of January , 20'18. :4= Ma r Ap/'Vved b� ATTES Cit Clerk ity Attorney's Office Ordinance No. 18-4735 Page 4 It was moved by Mims and seconded by Thomas Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: I M11 NAYS: ABSENT: Botchway Cole Mims Salih Taylor Thomas Throgmorton First Consideration 12/19/17 Voteforpassage: AYES: Dickens, Mims, Taylor, Thomas, Throgmorton, Botchway, Cole. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Second Consideration _ Vote for passage: that the Date published 01/11/18 Moved by Mims, seconded by Salih, that the rule requiring ordinances to be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, the second consideration and vote be waived and the ordinance be voted upon for final passage at this time. AYES: Mims, Salih, Taylor, Thomas, Throgmorton, Botchway, Cole. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. r r `l .per 01-02-18 CITY OF IO'VVA CITY 5b X� MEMORANDUM Date: October 27. 2017 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Jann Ream, Code Enforcement Specialist Re: Continue discussion of an amendment to City Code Section 14-513-8E, Sign Standards in the Central Business zones, and the South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth story and discussion of internal illumination on upper stories of high rise buildings. Introduction: During the Planning & Zoning Commission's October 19, 2017 meeting, the commission voted to separate approval of the proposed amendments to the sign code and to consider the proposed amendment to CB zones and certain delineated Riverfront Crossings zones at the next meeting. The commission chair, requested more information concerning how other municipalities similar to Iowa City regulate signage on high rise buildings. History/Background: The memo for the October 19, 2017 meeting explained the circumstances for staffs recommendation that plastic trim cap letters be permitted above the 5t' story of a building in the CB and certain Riverfront Crossings zones. During discussion, the commission was informed that the code allows illumination, either external or internal, for wall (fascia) signs no matter where they are placed on the building. The proposal before the commission was to allow plastic trim cap letters as a sign type for wall (fascia) signs when they are above the 5th story of a building. Currently, that type of channel letter is prohibited in CB and certain Riverfront Crossings zones because they are not appropriate for pedestrian oriented storefronts. The commission chair expressed concern about the illumination of these letters on the high rise buildings downtown and in Riverfront Crossings. The chair requested information on how other municipalities, similar in size and type to Iowa City, regulate this signage. Several municipalities were researched with the results as follows: Davenport: Population -102,612 Lighting is not specifically regulated in Davenport except for a maximum brightness in candelas (foot- candles). The height of wall (fascia) signs in the downtown is not limited and they can be internally illuminated. Roof signs are permitted and a roof sign is allowed on a building of any height and can be internally illuminated. Dubuque: Population — 58,531 In general, there is no height limit for wall (facia) signs and internal illumination is allowed. Dubuque has very few high rise buildings. Most of their downtown is a historic district where signage is heavily regulated — internal illumination on any sign in the historic district is not permitted. Cedar Falls: population — 41,390 Cedar Falls has no typical high rise buildings in their downtown area. Their sign code does not regulate lighting except to ban flashing or animated signage and making sure that any light (except for that emanating from the sign itself) does not reflect onto adjoining premises. They allow roof signs and wall (fascia) signs are allowed to cover up to 33% of the sign wall. Sioux City, IA: Population 102,612 Sioux City allows roof signs but not in their downtown area. Wall (fascia) signs have no height limit and allow internal illumination anywhere within the city. Size of wall signs is determined by street frontage. October 27, 2017 Page 2 Staff has determined that not all internally illuminated channel letters are trim cap letters so sign installers and their clients do have alternatives. Recommendation: Staff recommends amending the sign code as follows: For CB zones: Allow plastic trim cap letters in CB zones but only when the building is more than 5 stories. 7 4l John Yapp, Develop ent Services Coordinator I �'�CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: October 13, 2017 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Jann Ream, Code Enforcement Specialist Re: Consider approval of amendments to City Code Sections 14-513-4E, Illumination Requirements, City Code Section 14-513-BA8&13, Signs permitted in ID, OPD and Residential zones and 14-513-8E to increase the size and type of signs for institutional uses; and Sign Standards in the CB zones, and the South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth story Introduction: Residential zones: Over the past several months, several Religious Group Assembly uses in various residential zones have applied for sign permits or inquired about what type of signage their church would be allowed to install. Review of the sign code has revealed that signage for these uses in residential zones is limited both in size and number of signs permitted. So much so that a majority of churches in residential zones have existing signage that does not comply with our current code. Staff finds that both the existing signage and the requested signage is not unreasonable, and therefore recommends approval of the amendments. CB and certain Riverfront Crossings zones: In October of 2016, the Planning and Zoning Commission considered and approved several amendments to the Iowa City Sign Regulations in order to better implement the recommendations of the Downtown District Storefront and Signage Guidelines and to bring the sign code into compliance with a U.S. Supreme Court decision regarding the regulation of. signage. This was a significant revision of the sign code regulations and, with any significant revision, the application of those changes can reveal unforeseen consequences and unwarranted limitations for certain situations. History/Background: Residential Zones: Currently, in residential zones, signage for an Institutional Use such as a church (Religious Group Assembly) is limited to one (1) sign from the following sign types: facia (wall sign), awning, canopy or monument. In the single-family zones, facia signs are limited to four (4) square feet and monument signs are limited to twelve (12) square feet per side. In multi -family zones, facia signs are limited to twelve (12) square feet and monument signs are limited to twenty-four (24) square feet per side. Churches in single family zones are not uncommon and most have both a monument sign and a sign on the building wall which is not in compliance with the current code. (Note: the symbol of a cross is not considered signage.) An exterior wall of a church sanctuary is generally a large wall of more than one story. Most churches in residential zones are non-compliant with the sign code and already have larger signs. October 13, 2017 Page 2 Additionally, design trends for newly built churches include larger sites that incorporate retaining walls or masonry walls at the entrance to the site. Masonry wall signs are currently not permitted in residential zones but could be an appropriate sign type in certain situations. Illumination Requirements: Internal illumination for signs is not permitted in residential zones. This makes sense for single family zones and even for most multi -family zones. An internally lit cabinet can be distracting and out of place in most residential zones. The PRM zone is a high-density multi -family zone. There are just a few areas in Iowa City with this zoning designation: along the N. Clinton—N. Dubuque street corridor between Davenport and Jefferson, south of Highway 6 West near Carver Hawkeye arena and small pockets south of Burlington Street in the Riverfront Crossing district (likely to be rezoned to a Riverfront Crossings zoning designation upon redevelopment). Two recent sign permit applications were for Religious Group Assembly uses in the PRM zone in the N. Clinton—N. Dubuque corridor. In both instances, the religious uses found the maximum allowed size (24sf) for a new monument sign to be acceptable but were unhappy to learn the new sign could not be internally illuminated — especially since the new signs were replacing existing internally illuminated monument signs. Internal illumination for a sign for an institutional use in a PRM zone would most likely only occur in the N. Clinton -N. Dubuque street corridor. Given the proximity of commercial uses and the fact that these institutional uses have had internally illuminated signs for many years without any complaints, it seems reasonable to allow Institutional Uses internally illuminated signs but only in PRM zones. CB and certain Riverfront Crossings Zones: The new sign code amendments have been in place for several months and, as with any broad change to zoning regulations, deficiencies are revealed when applied to real world situations. The regulation under consideration is the prohibition of plastic trim cap channel letters. Attached is a specification sheet that demonstrates what constitutes a plastic trim cap letter. The prohibition of this type of channel letter was a recommendation incorporated in the Downtown District Storefront and Signage Guidelines and then amended into the city's sign code. The design and fabrication of plastic trim cap letters necessitates that they are a large letter and geared toward vehicular traffic. This type of letter was considered inappropriate for the pedestrian oriented downtown storefronts. Both staff and the design firm hired to create the storefront and sign guidelines for the downtown district believed that prohibiting this ubiquitous sign type downtown would stimulate better and more creative signage for downtown storefronts. However, not every building in the CB zones is a small pedestrian oriented storefront. Additionally, the sign regulations for the CB zones also apply to several Riverfront Crossings subdistricts (South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts). Development in the Riverfront Crossings- South Downtown includes two high rise hotels and a high rise condominium building. Additionally, the Sheraton Hotel on City Plaza will be re -branding itself in the coming year. These uses lend themselves to a larger sign appropriate to the building size and the use. Attached are examples of proposed signs for these uses — all of which include plastic trim cap channel letters. The proposed signage is appropriate to these taller buildings and is typical of what is allowed in other jurisdictions. Given that the size of the signs is now controlled by the fagade width, staff believes allowing trim cap channel letters in these limited situations is acceptable. Recommendation: Staff recommends amending the sign code as follows: For Residential, ID and OPD zones: 1) allow two (2) signs for Institutional Uses in ID, OPD and residential zones; 2) Add masonry wall signs to the type of sign allowed for Institutional Uses; 3) increase the maximum fascia sign size for Institutional Uses in single family zones to twelve (12) square feet; 4) allow internal illumination for one (1) sign for an Institutional Use in PRM zones. October 13, 2017 Page 3 For CB zones and certain Riverfront Crossings Zones: Allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth floor in CB zones and those Riverfront Crossings that are regulated in the same manner as the CB zones, but only when the building is more than 5 stories. John Yapp, Development Sdrvices Coordinator A. Sign Standards For ID And OPD Zones: 1. Permitted Signs: a. Single-family uses and two-family uses are not allowed to install permanent signs, except for one small identification building sign and one integral sign, as specified in table 513-1 of this section. b. Signage for nonresidential uses in the ID -RS and ID -RM zones are permitted one identification sign. The identification sign may be one of the following types: fascia, awning, canopy or monument sign. For-ilnstitutional uses are permitted two identification signs from the following types: fascia, awning, canopy, tT� monument or masonry wall sign. --One sign for an institutional use may also include copy announcing its services or activities. (Ord. 08-4319, 11-3-2008; amd. Ord. 16-4685, 11-15- 2016) c. Signage for nonresidential uses in the ID -C, ID -1, and ID -RP zones must comply with the sign regulations contained in subsection C, "Sign Standards In CO -1, CN -1 And MU Zones", of this section. d. Residential uses in any OPD zone are permitted signage in accordance with the requirements of the underlying residential zone. Nonresidential uses approved as part of a planned development are permitted signage in accordance with the sign regulations contained in subsection C, "Sign Standards In CO -1, CN -1 And MU Zones", of this section. 2. Sign Specifications And Provisions: a. All signs for residential uses in the ID and OPD zones are subject to the standards specified in table 5B-1 of this section. b. All signs in the ID -RS and ID -RM zones are subject to the standards specified in table 5B-1 of this section. c. All signs for nonresidential uses in the ID -C, ID -I, and ID -RP zones are subject to the standards specified in table 513-2 of this section. d. In the OPD zone, all signs for nonresidential uses approved as part of a planned development are subject to the standards specified in table 56-2 of this section. (Ord. 08-4319, 11-3-2008) B. Sign Standards For All Residential Zones: 1. Permitted Signs: Principal uses, other than single-family uses and two-family uses, are permitted one identification sign. The identification sign may be one of the following types: fascia, awning, canopy or monument sign. €er Institutional uses are permitted two identification signs from the following sign types: fascia awning, canopy, monument and masonry wall sign. the One sign for an institutional use may also include copy announcing its services or activities. b. Parks and open space uses are permitted entranceway signs as specified in table 5B-1 of this section. c. Single-family uses and two-family uses are not allowed to install permanent signs, except for one small identification building sign and one integral sign as specified in table 513-1 of this section. d. One monument sign is permitted at each street entrance of a subdivision or development of two (2) acres or more. The maximum sign area is thirty two (32) square feet per side - may be double faced for a total of sixty four (64) square feet - maximum height is five feet (5). All other monument signs are permitted as specified in table 58-1 of this section. 2. Sign Specifications And Provisions: All signs in residential zones are subject to the standards specified in table 56-1 of this section. Table 5B-1: Sign Specifications And Provisions In Residential And The ID And OPD Zones Permitted Signs Awning signs' Canopy signs Zone ID -RS, RR -1, RS -5, RS -8, RS -12, RNS- 12, ID -RM, RM -12, RM - 20, RNS-20, RM -44, PRM ID -RS, RR -1, RS -5, RS -8, RS -12, RNS- 12, ID -RM, RM -12, RM - 20, RNS-20, RM -44, PRM Maximum Sign Area 12 sq. ft. or 25% of awning surface, whichever is less Sign cannot exceed 90% of street -facing canopy length and no more than 15 inches in height Maximum Height And Special Provisions Maximum height: Top of first story Limited to identification only Not allowed for single- family and two-family uses Signs may be mounted on the face of the canopy, upright on the top of the canopy or underneath the canopy. Signs mounted on the face of the canopy may not extend beyond the edges of the canopy. Signs mounted on the top of the canopy or underneath the canopy must consist of individual letter forms and may not extend more than 15" in height above or below the canopy. The bottom of the canopy or any letter forms attached underneath the canopy must be, at minimum 8' above the level of the adjacent grade Canopy signs may not be illuminated Directional ID -RS, RR -1, 2 sq. ft. per face signs RS -5, RS -8, RS -12, RNS- May be double faced for 12, ID -RM, total area of 4 sq. ft. RM -12, RM - 20, RNS-20, RM -44, PRM Entranceway Allowed for For signs located above Maximum height: 20' signs parks and or across the top of the open space subject archway, the Up to 1 sign per facade of uses in any area of the sign may not the subject archway residential exceed 25% of the area zone, ID delineated by the subject The sign may not contain zone, or OPD archway changeable copy zone For a sign located on the Sign copy may not extend side of the archway, the beyond the edges of the area of the sign may not entranceway structure exceed 33% of the surface area of the side Minimum clearance height of the archway support is 10' for entranceway on which the sign is signs across driveways located. (See section 14- and 8' for entranceway 5B-7, "Measurement signs across walkways Standards", of this Entranceway signs are article.) not allowed if the subject lot or tract already has a Not allowed for single- family and two-family uses ID -RM, RM- 24 sq. ft. per sign face Maximum height: 5' 12, RM -20, RNS-20, RM- May be double faced for ` Limited to identification 44, PRM a total area of 48 sq. ft. 'only, except as allowed monument sign located at the subject entrance Fascia ID -RS, RR -1, 4 sq. ft. Maximum height: Top of signs RS -5, RS -8, Institutional uses are first story RS -12, RNS- allowed 12 sq. ft. 12 Limited to identification only, except as allowed ID RM, RM- 12 sq. ft. ;for institutional uses 12, RM -20, RNS-20, RM- Not allowed for single - 44, PRM family and two-family uses Integral signs ID -RS, RR -1, 2 sq. ft. Up to 1 of these signs is RS -5, RS -8, allowed per building RS -12, RNS- 12, ID -RM, No permit is required RM -12, RM - 20, RNS-20, RM -44, PRM Masonry Wall ID -RS, RR -1, 12 sq. ft. 1 f less than the height of signs RS -5, RS -8, the masonry wall. RS -12. RNS- 12, ID -RM, Limited to institutional RM -12. RM- uses. 20.RNS- 20,RM-44, PRM Monument ID -RS, RR -1, 12 sq. ft. per sign face Maximum height: 5' signs' RS -5, RS -8, RS -12, RNS- May be double faced for Limited to identification 12 a total area of 24 sq. ft. only, except as allowed for institutional uses Not allowed for single- family and two-family uses ID -RM, RM- 24 sq. ft. per sign face Maximum height: 5' 12, RM -20, RNS-20, RM- May be double faced for ` Limited to identification 44, PRM a total area of 48 sq. ft. 'only, except as allowed Small ID -RS, RR -1, identification RS -5, RS -8, signs RS -12, RNS- 12, ID -RM, RM -12, RM - 20, RNS-20, RM -44, PRM 2 sq. ft. for institutional uses Not allowed for single- family and two-family uses The sign must be a building sign Up to 1 of these signs is allowed per building No permit is required Note: 1. Only 1 sign is permitted; 1 fascia sign, 1 awning sign, 1 canopy sign, or 1 monument sign except for institutional uses (See subsections Alb and B1a of this section.) E. Illumination Requirements: Illuminated signs must conform to the following requirements: (Ord. 08-4319, 11-3-2008) Except for signs in the ID and residential zones, all permitted signs may be internally or externally illuminated. All signs permitted in the ID and residential zones may only be externally illuminated with white light except that, in the PRM zone, one sign for an institutional use may be internally illuminated. (Ord. 08-4319, 11-3-2008; amd. Ord. 16-4685, 11-15-2016) 2. Illumination through the use of exposed lamps or inert gas tubes is allowed, provided the exposed lamp does not exceed eleven (11) watts or that an inert gas tube does not draw more than sixty (60) milliamps. When inside frosted lamps or exposed lamps with a diffusing screen are used, no lamp shall exceed twenty five (25) watts. Illumination through the use of LEDs is allowed only as specified for electronic changeable copy. All signs using LEDs must have installed ambient light monitors and must at all times allow such monitors to automatically adjust the brightness level of the electronic sign based on ambient light conditions. At no time shall the sign be operated at a brightness level greater than the manufacturer's recommended levels. The electronic changeable copy must be monochromatic. It must utilize a dark background with only the message or image lit in a single color. 4. Artificial external light sources used to illuminate a sign face must be located and shielded such that the bulb is not directly visible from any adjacent residentially zoned property or public right of way and must use a narrow cone of light that does not extend beyond the illuminated sign face. 5. Illumination on a property, including illumination from signs, must not exceed 0.5 initial horizontal foot-candle and 2.0 initial maximum foot-candles as measured at any point along a property boundary that is adjacent to or across the street from properties that are zoned residential, CN -1, or CO -1. 6. All illuminated signs are subject to the provisions of the electrical code, including any permit fees. 7. Permit applications for electronic changeable copy signs must include a copy of the manufacturer's operating manual, including any recommended standards for brightness and other display operations. 8. For electronic changeable copy signs, whether the sign is programmed from the site or from a remote location, the computer interface that programs the sign shall be made available to city staff for inspection upon request. If the computer interface is not immediately available, the sign shall cease operation until such program can be provided. (Ord. 08-4319, 11-3-2008) E. Sign Standards In CB -2, C13-5 And CB -10 Zones: 1. All signs in the C13-2, C13-5 and CB -10 Zones are subject to the standards specified in table 513-4 of this section. 2. The maximum sign area for each type of sign, special provisions, and any restrictions on the number of signs allowed are specified in table 5B-4 of this section. Unless specifically limited in table 513-4 of this section, any number of signs may be installed. 3. Signage for residential uses must comply with the requirements for residential uses in the RM Zones as stated in table 56-1 of this section. 4. Cabinet signs where the entire face of the cabinet is internally illuminated are prohibited. and ilnternally illuminated plastic trim cap letters are prohibited except as specifically allowed for fascia signs in Table 56-4 (Ord. 16-4685, 11-15-2016) Table 513-4: Sign Specifications And Provisions In The CB -2, CB -5 And CB -10 Zones Permitted Signs Awning signs Banner projecting signs Maximum Maximum Sign Area j Height 25% of awning surface Same allowances as I upper level projecting signs Top edge of first story awning Same restrictions as upper level projecting i signs Provisions 1 Each storefront is allowed up to a total of 3 signs from the following sign types: canopy signs, awning signs, and projecting signs. Awning signs are only allowed on first story awnings Note: See subsection 14 -3C -3C of this title for awning and canopy design standards Only permitted on multiuse buildings where access to uses is primarily through a common lobby from the street such as an indoor shopping mall or where a single use occupies a large multi -story building Standards"; of this article.) Fascia signs Square footage equal to 1.5 times the length of the sign wall Flags -- i i Freestanding 12 sq. ft per linear foot of signs lot frontage, not to exceed 40 sq. ft. per sign face 20' across walkways An entranceway sign is not allowed if the property has a masonry wall sign, monument sign, or freestanding sign No longer than 90% of 'the length of the sign wall, sign band or storefront, whichever is most applicable to the location of the sign Back lit cabinet signs, where the entire face is illuminated, are prohibited Internally illuminated plastic trip cap letter forms are prohibited exceat for buildings of i more than 5 stories ' when the sign is above p the P story. Limited to identification only. 1 additional flag may be i displayed in conjunction with any city, county, state or federal flags + No permit is required (Allowed only in the CB -2 IZone Only 1 freestanding sign is allowed per lot Allowed only through approval of a minor Channel Letter Trim -cap Channel Letter Trim -cap CHANNEL LETTER TRIM- CAP is the most widely used signage material in the world. It is first-class aluminum coated with plastic, which enjoys the features of firm, elastic and seamless. It can be easily made into any channel letter and logo. It has thoroughly changed the static effect of traditional crone signs, cutting down the cost and time involved and improving the level of signage making. 20mm(J shape) and 26mm(Arrow shape) are available. Width 20mm1314'1 46M11508e0lRoll - - JT -301A Mack JT -305A Red JT -306A aloe _ JT -307A Green JT -308A Chrome JT -309A Gold JT -312A Purple JT -313A Yellow JT -314A Omnge JT -316A Whae JT -316A Brown JT -317A Gray Widtl126mmn'1 45Mn SMetO toff Lk4301 Black LM -305 Red LM -306 Blue LM -307 Green LM -308 Chrome UX309 Gold LW312 Whhe 1A4313 Yellow LW314 Orange LM -315 Purple LM -316 &own LW317 Gray Trim -cap roll Trim cap samples Are you looking for wider than 26mm trim cap? Our Channel Letter Coil - Letteasy° should be suit to your needs for channel letter making. Aluminum Channel Letter Coil - Letteasy® Find out the products at http://www, pansign.com/products-49. htm for more details SIGN SPECIFICATIONS TAI .6tBA11Wie6Lflle83 Li6hllrq LW j WIM6a 3Bp oe.MMolbReavuiAcrNki iRf Mer:NMN I 1Mnm Cala: PeMtBMck I 61nww10ob:6Mck 1 MMalMbrt rALurro RaW , I61-ILLBM6MRUt tWh LIED voBepeM BeawMAl Fae it JAarykl Na tear. MMe.mn T.Itlrnrt NRN Aaabd Nat 6uiMee Ilea Mee eeawl Netun Celv:. 10 MMcn aaae3 TMmap CMd:6MM ro Meth Races MataletloRAwn roxaB 3M ML CAMS 1:3630-016 M!66.a L 3836-V BMCe 3:363X74 elaeaual pang 4:363 311Baw616&ue 4:38 14SUpll Bepe e: 383X118 Ilrtrt'/ebw h.383p101ught66At Fumpem Blue 6:3836-13BUme 8lem em66sed day New lll>BI 61066666 MBtlt Vi6N rMrS-1 rT H YA T T P L A F F= m MI i�P�BLOCKI 0➢IPA Rise HyaH bwa Clty.IA 8ea8BM uR• R��RgMI 4 Ya 1 smaLo�na. VBrlous LL -01 i C6 Lelttan ' 79295 col W.fNT•be.. cw HYATT PLACE EXTERIOR SIGNAGE BRANDING Site ID / Center No.: Iowa City , IA Location Name: Hyatt Place at Iowa City Street: 435 South Linn Street City, State: Iowa City, IA Zip: 52240 EI A E C 0 D IE 9 f H � t W-------------------------------------------------------------------- I. eilr� � ] w I _�A°a--�-----1�_I _ _C r I --el FRONT VIEW MODEL "COLOR DETAIL" ■ BLACK; SERIES 2590-22 3M 3630-22 YIELLOW [ SERIES 2500-2244A 3M VF0719 ■ LAVENDER O SERIES 2500-3146 AVERY AB/60-T BLUE, SERIES 25902529 3A13630147 PISTACHIO r SERIES 2WO-2157 3M 3530.149 ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LOGO $ LETTERS ORANGE t SERIES 2500-M 3M 369084 LINE ARM a SERIES 2100-M ® APRINO GIVEN r SERIES M440 (361 9510150 LVII e6• S SERER 25802202 (3M MISS) LVd Seen (1IAVROFe'«5 UGIT 8111E ALWAYS APPLIED AS A DFRISER FOR THE POGO ® ARLON LACK /S154RFACE LAI'PERF.VWYL 0 FILLERr ALMVANAIJOD®SAINR MODEL #2 19' 5118'F318- 23/4' 31W 33/4' 8" 19'-101/2'116 3/8- 37 • 25 3/8' 8 7/16' 35V 4518- 5- 105/8' 26'-6" 22" 56' 3/4' 1114' 4314' 61/8" 6112' 141/4" 35'4" 287/8" 100' 3f 38' 2 5/8'51R' 6 7/8' 7 Irt 39'-9' 32 3/4' 126' • 2 1/4' 14' 6' 7 314' 81/8' 17 3/4 44•-2' 36' 156' 50 518' 615116' 7114' 9 3116' 10' 21 318 53"118" M' 224' 56' 8 W6' 7 718" 10 5/16' 10 718" 23 9116 58'•5 IN 47 718' 274' • 63 318' 21" 83/8- 9" 11518" 12114" 26 5/8' 667T 54 118' 350' "F • • (a HYATT PLACE EXTERIOR SIGNAGE BRANDING Site ID / Center No.: Iowa City , IA Location Name: Hyatt Piam at tows city Street: 435 South Linn Street City, State: Iowa city, IA Zip: 52240 .. Y�T+rIf Y%'trt,� `Y,,L•�yP �'��#�..,�t;:.. _., a Y.. .., L _._ ..._ L41%' it a t N r S iNlEa fAB. fiLO1FJN'1MCAlGLL ♦' RDUNDNEAO SS SCKW YNNIFDUWM_MMI00®MTWFWSH PAI ' TQ MAT nIVETEe 10 N1 AIKKIM.aW{NG PAINTED iO'MATCN FILLER NSOE FAIrlIEDRFF4ELINFY.}EIE '•'-Fa Y�.� CLFM LEIJNSNN AM WYZ•}i Crt6.®•I9SCK CEYENOE➢MO 1, EDGE •• ., "'SCI�YFDTEF DA 11?TW. NJtOm FACE fI9. iPOAI yg' VFF&AFTE ONFIRSTSEELFACE ! .1W iWLCLFMNU$IWO -' Eµt V'NYL AFPLIEOON FlRST SURFACE (♦ :y.. ;'t W VWYE MMTS WACF • �BUWACE. SEE COLOR OETAR. HY.a1RE1V �� .. BEECOLORBETAIe VMlE LED.. • 1. LUN . K. FOOT � Fll'{AA%1'LG NI[!%MBP/iEA TVNVOt MnCM POa jf: M.T9DIM WNL y • ` RW[:MO4FOA1F61VROOF PPR tm Ll[BBP6i TOOT � . � 2Raw..i RRAMFPFANF L6 ' YA1w®1 NDE Y5M16MFD6rETN1FCgWf ATfMMtlEOFPMr MOWMIBrOM _ AN RX" tLL !••V • 11EAwG FAB. FaaMOOW'aELW 4uFLw_[IbLEaMI + l.� "' 4Y.t1YMRFYB "• :'M• FNFOFLAl.RN1YAN➢DffO MIIN FWW _ ''BFIQAMDWKIFDI0 '•). • Af NW. MfM9 Fm RILPIED WIIF ' • . �• T9P'wA ]rriwc A•' 31 X CLG NONLCRROSKFATTENEA 5.6.YY9{}1 W'LO.MO 41FWG4F gTEwFAS Mae: lMDI{ Fwe.:.RwT ngpoaa By oUen SECTON LOGO tECFrOFt LEFFEna NTS FRS it FAM MINUTES PRELIMINARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION NOVEMBER 2, 2017 — 7:00 PM — FORMAL MEETING EMMA J. HARVAT HALL, CITY HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Carolyn Dyer, Ann Freerks, Mike Hensch, Phoebe Martin, Max Parsons, Mark Signs, Jodie Theobald MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Sara Hektoen, Jann Ream OTHERS PRESENT: RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: By a vote of 7-0 the Commission recommends approval of an amendment to City Code Sections 14 -5B -8E Sign Standards in the Central Business zones, and the South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth story. • •-6 Freerks called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. CODE AMENDMENT: Discussion of amendment to City Code Sections 14-513-8E Sign Standards in the Central Business zones, and the South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth story and discussion of internal illumination on upper stories of high-rise buildings. Ream noted that the Commission requested more information on illumination on the high-rise building signs. So Ream prepared a map to show where the existing high-rise buildings are and also where others are proposed or already built. The map shows how the high-rise buildings are concentrated in the downtown and south downtown Riverfront Crossings area. Next Ream spent time walking the areas and driving in her car to get an idea of the viewsheds for these high-rise buildings from surrounding neighborhoods. She showed some Google images (not all completely up-to-date) and pictures she took herself to give the Commission some idea of what the viewsheds look like. Ream found that the buildings skyline are exclusively visual from the arterial streets (Burlington, Gilbert, Dubuque, Clinton and Washington Streets). There is a small area while on Riverside Drive where one can look across the river and see the buildings. Ream also noted that due to the topography (and vegetation) of the area and the existing buildings in the area the viewsheds of the high-rise buildings can change drastically (from completely Planning and Zoning Commission November 2, 2017 —Formal Meeting Page 2 of 4 obscured to viewable in half a block). Ream added that when viewing the MidWestOne Building, the sign on that building would not be allowed in the new zoning standards, it would be at least one-third smaller. Freerks asked about the 1.5 times the size of the side of the building standard for signs and is that for each side or the building as a whole. Ream stated it is for each side, each sign wall is treated separately. Freeks stated her appreciation that Reams went out and walked and drove the area to be able to show the Commission a real feel for how the area looks. Ream stated as requested she looked at what other communities allow and one of the things that surprised her was how many communities allowed roof signs, and illumination of roof signs. She looked at four communities in Iowa, cities of a fairly similar size, plus she looked at both Burlington Vermont and Boulder Colorado because they are both of similar size and university towns with similar ped mall areas. Neither of those two communities allow high-rise buildings. The tallest building in Boulder allowed is 55 feet (5 stories) and in Burlington it is 65 feet. Hektoen added that the issue of illumination is not pending application so if there is a majority of commissioners that wish to pursue this further it could be added to the worklist and proceed from there. Freerks opened the public discussion Seeing no one Freerks closed the public discussion Hensch moved to recommend approval of an amendment to City Code Sections 14-513-8E Sign Standards in the Central Business zones, and the South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth story. Martin seconded the motion. Freerks understands the amendment was to allow the plastic trim caps but wanted to use the opportunity to learn more and open the conversation and to let City Council know that some of the commissioners have concerns or thoughts of how it might affect things in the future. Freerks would rather plan than react. Theobald noted that she likes the community of Lacrosse Wisconsin and how they have created their riverfront. However at this point Iowa City is already further down the road and these conversations should have been at the beginning. In Lacrosse it appears there is a historic overlay over the entire downtown and all the signs must be wood or metal and cannot be backlit to be kept with the historic nature of the buildings. Ream noted that Dubuque Iowa had the same requirements. Signs stated he was intrigued by Ream's comment that Boulder does not allow high-rises and has building limits of 55 feet. His thought was that "ship has sailed" here in Iowa City, we have driven the prices of land up so high that one cannot afford to not build up high. Signs feels the City will see more and more high-rises because of that new reality. Ream added that Boulder passed their height ordinance in 1971. Planning and Zoning Commission November 2, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 3 of 4 Hektoen added that in the context of affordable housing Boulder has a pretty serious affordable housing crisis. A vote was taken and the motion carried 7-0. CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: OCTOBER 19, 2017 Theobald moved to approve the meeting minutes of October 19, 2017. Parsons seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. PLANNING AND ZONING INFORMATION: Freerks noted that in the Staff memo there were a number of places where it stated "Commission Chair expressed" or "Commission Chair requested" and asked that in the future that is not used so there doesn't appear to be a bias or so that others will not be afraid to say something or ask something in fear of being "called out" in a memo. She added this is a place for information and that the Commission collectively works as a group. The meeting minutes will indicated individual's statements and opinions. Signs noted he will be absent for the December 7 meeting. Martin will be absent December 21 and January 4. ADJOURNMENT: Signs moved to adjourn Martin seconded. A vote was taken and motion carried 7-0. Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017—Formal Meeting Page 15 of 21 homes in Iowa City. There just are not enough. Huge numbers of people who work at The University of Iowa live far away which makes for long commutes and excessive use of cars. Iowa City really does need housing like this that is affordable. She is prepared to vote for deferral, but is not opposed to the concept. Parsons also agrees with the concept, but his one concern might be the flow from multi -family to single-family. Overall this is a great concept and just needs a little more detail. He is leaning toward voting for this rezoning, but if they did decide to defer, he is open to discuss some more of those ideas to work out the kinks. Parsons stated he also thinks the intersection at Gilbert Street and McCollister Boulevard should be improved before any development happens because it is a busy intersection. Parsons noted that the P&Z review limitation period expires before their next meeting and asked how that would affect things if they deferred consideration of the rezoning.. Freerks said the applicant could waive the limitation period. She reminded the commission that a three/three vote would be a denial. Hektoen confirmed that four votes in favor of a rezoning is required for approval. Freerks noted that the motion was to approve, but it could be withdrawn. Theobald said she supports the application, but knows good things often come with further scrutiny, so she could go along with deferral. Freerks said she didn't want the application to languish, but that it warranted further examination to make sure it was consistent with the comprehensive plan. She asked if Hensch wanted to withdraw his motion and allow another meeting to allow more time for the developer to address some of the concerns. Hensch indicated that he would not withdraw his motion. A vote was taken and the motion failed with a 3-3 vote. (Freerks, Martin, Dyer opposed). Signs rejoined the meeting. CODE AMENDMENT: Discussion of amendments to City Code Sections 14 -5B -4E, Illumination Requirements, City Code Section 14-5B-8A&B, Signs permitted in Interim Development, Overlay Planned Development, and Residential zones and 14-513-8E to increase the size and type of signs for institutional uses and to allow internal illumination in the Planned High Density Multifamily zone; and Sign Standards in the Central Business zones, and the South Downtown, University, Central Crossings, Park, South Gilbert and East Side Mixed Use subdistricts to allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth story. Ream noted that the application is a long description for some very simple concepts they wish to change in the Code. Most of the requests have been from religious institutions, both existing and new churches, that brought to light some inadequacies in the Sign Code. As explained in the memo a facia sign in most residential zones was limited to four square feet and only one sign was allowed. Most of the churches in Iowa City do not comply with the Sign Code, and not that permits were issued in error, permits were just never issued. However with the construction of some new churches and inquiries on what signage could be done it was apparent to Ream that adjustment needed to be made to the Sign Code. The proposed change is not great, 12 square feet is not a large sign but having a 12 square foot sign on the wall of the church and a monument sign out closer to the roadway seems to be reasonable. The second major change is due to having a couple of institutional uses in a PRM zone, which Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 16 of 21 is technically a residential zone. One example is in a high density area near The University of Iowa and the Northside Marketplace and they were requesting internal illumination for their small monument signs. One church already had their monument sign internally illuminated for 20 years and when they requested to update and get a new sign they were told it could not be internally illuminated because it was in a residential zone. However there was no issue for the 20 previous years so the request is to allow internal illumination in PRM zones for institutional uses only. Ream stated there are only three PRM zones in Iowa City, one over by Carver Hawkeye Arena and there are no institutional uses there. The other area is in the Riverfront Crossing District south of Burlington Street and currently there are no institutional uses there now and if one is built in the future the area would be rezoned Riverfront Crossings which would allow illuminated signage. So this change will really only affect one PRM zone at this time and there are two institutional uses in that zone both of which have asked for their monument sign to be internally illuminated. Ream reminded the Commission that there was a major revision to the Sign Code last year for the Downtown Districts based on a consultant group recommending new Downtown District Storefront and Signage Guidelines. Based on the recommendations for the Downtown Zones there was a certain type of channel letter that was prohibited (plastic trim cap channel letters). This recommendation was based on small pedestrian oriented storefronts in the downtown areas. When that change was made Staff forgot about two things. One, the Riverfront Crossings Districts, by reference, use the CB Sign requirements. Secondly, not everything that is going on in the Riverfront Crossings Zone is going to be pedestrian oriented storefronts. There are three major hotels being built and the Sheraton Hotel is about to be rebranded. Staff felt that for these large multi -story buildings channel letter signage is appropriate. Staff recommends amending the sign code as follows: • For Residential, ID and OPD zones: 1) allow two (2) signs for Institutional Uses in ID, OPD and residential zones; 2) Add masonry wall signs to the type of sign allowed for Institutional Uses; 3) increase the maximum fascia sign -size for Institutional Uses in single family zones to twelve (12) square feet; 4) allow internal illumination for one (1) sign for an Institutional Use in PRM zones. • For CB zones and certain Riverfront Crossings Zones: Allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth floor in CB zones and those Riverfront Crossings that are regulated in the same manner as the CB zones, but only when the building is more than 5 stories. Freerks expressed her concern with the illumination of signs about five stories and would like to know how many places in the area will have such signage. She is afraid it could become light pollution. Her concern is if the need is for wayfinding, but it's not like it would be hard to navigate throughout downtown Iowa City to get where one needs. It is understandable in a city like Cedar Rapids where one needs to be able to see the signage from the interstate but that is not the case in Iowa City. Hensch agreed and commented that the way people find things such as hotels in modern society is through smart phones and GPS. Ream reminded the Commission that at one time the City's sign allowance was 15% of a sign wall, so on a 14 story building that is 100 feet wide. Freerks disagreed because at that time there were no 14 story buildings so this is really starting over and a blank slate. Ream agreed and noted that the City specifically changed that requirement to prevent the sides of those buildings from becoming billboards. So now the allowance is 1.5 times the width or length of the Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 17 of 21 side wall. Therefore they have reduced greatly the size of the sign that could be done. Ream also stated that the plastic trim cap is not the only way to illuminate a channel letter, so by saying we cannot use the plastic trim cap letters does not mean it will stop the illumination or fear of light pollution. Freerks asked if at this time there are any illuminated signs above the fifth floor in any of the CB zones and Ream confirmed there is not at this time. Freerks is concerned about the impact. Perhaps there could be language that states the signage cannot be on the side of a building where residential neighborhoods would see it. She feels illumination of signs this high on buildings will change the character of downtown. Freerks opened the public discussion. Doug Brown (Gloria Dei Lutheran Church) thanked the Commission for their time and consideration. Gloria Dei has been located at the corner of Dubuque and Market Streets since - 1855 when it was first known as First English Lutheran Church. In 1961 the building burnt down and was replaced by the existing structure. Sometime after that in the 1990's they installed a sign on the property facing outwards towards the corner of Market and Dubuque Streets, it is a backlit sign. Brown is unsure if it was grandfathered in or what process allowed it. Gloria Dei's location in Iowa City has been cherished by past and present members of the Iowa City community through visits on Sunday morning and social media. They continue to enjoy connecting with people who remember going to church here as a child, where they were married, where they celebrated baptism and confirmation, or attended during their college years. One of their oldest members, having completed a lifetime of mission work, joins them from Asia every week on their Facebook Live broadcast. They are committed to open their doors to new and existing members and past and present and future. A year ago, in 2016, Gloria Dei reaffirmed their commitment to remain in the downtown Iowa City area with a $1 million renovation project. The project included updating their electric, HVAC, and sound systems along with updating their classrooms and lounge areas. Most critically they updated their kitchen facilities. They use this updated kitchen for their culinary ministry with the goal of providing food and community events for the Iowa City area. They believe and remain committed to their role and presence in downtown Iowa City. Most recently they hosted a pig roast which raised $3,000 and half the proceeds to benefit world hunger relief and the other half to local food banks. While churches across the country are experiencing a decline in membership, Gloria Dei's membership remains steady. As a part of their communications outreach they have also expanded their digital role in reaching out to the community as well (smart phones). In the past years they have updated their website, established active social media channels with Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other channels. Being in the downtown area over the years has proven to be challenging at times. Their identity is being lost in the maze of buildings that are evolving around them. It is difficult for anyone to know who they are and what they are by their physical location. If one is driving downtown on Dubuque Street they might not even notice the building or the building sign set back on the property. Their focus on providing an updated sign is to help them reach out into the community, their intent is with a new backlit sign to provide a fresh look to the property and to engage the community to let them know the doors are open and welcoming. Brown thanked the City Staff for all their efforts on the church's behalf and appreciate the willingness to review their present circumstances. Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 18 of 21 Freerks thanked Brown for keeping Gloria Dei in the downtown community area Freerks closed the public discussion The Commission discussed approving part of the recommendations but allowing for more discussion and comment on the allowance of plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth floor. Signs moved to recommend amendments to City Code Sections 14-56-4E, Illumination Requirements, City Code Section 14-5B-BA&B, Signs permitted in Interim Development, Overlay Planned Development, and Residential zones. Parsons seconded the motion. Signs explained that his motion is to allow the Staff recommendation for Residential, ID and OPD zones: 1) allow two (2) signs for Institutional Uses in ID, OPD and residential zones; 2) Add masonry wall signs to the type of sign allowed for Institutional Uses; 3) increase the maximum fascia sign size for Institutional Uses in single family zones to twelve (12) square feet; 4) allow internal illumination for one (1) sign for an Institutional Use in PRM zones. Freerks agrees with this and is in favor. Parsons feels that signs are more for advertising and people really use smart phones for navigating. A vote was taken and the motion carried 7-0. Theobald moved to defer a decision on the Staff recommendation for CB zones and certain Riverfront Crossings Zones: Allow plastic trim cap letters for signs above the fifth floor in CB zones and those Riverfront Crossings that are regulated in the same manner as the CB zones, but only when the building is more than 5 stories. Parsons seconded the motion. Ream asked for clarification on what the Commission would like this amendment to be. Freerks noted she feels there needs to be more discussion regarding allowing large lit signs on 15 story buildings. Ream stated that the signs are already allowed, this amendment was just to allow a certain type of channel letter that isn't currently allowed. Freerks noted her concern is not knowing how frequently this type of signage can occur, it sounds like it could be over the whole area if it were redeveloped with five story and taller buildings. Ream said she can inform the Commission where they see these types of signs being requested and it's mainly for hotels and tall large one -tenant buildings (such as the MidWestOne Building). So how many signs would be requested depends on how much of such development would occur in that area. Right now the only controls are the size of 1.5 times the fagade length and the type of channel letter that is allowed. Freerks agreed, but noted that could allow fora 34 foot sign on the hotel so perhaps this is the time to discuss how signage is really used and what is necessary but yet won't be light pollution. Martin asked if there has ever been cases where lit signs had to be shut off by a certain time of night. Ream said it hasn't ever been in the City Ordinances. Signs agreed that would be an Planning and Zoning Commission October 19, 2017 — Formal Meeting Page 19 of 21 interesting concept. Ream noted that a hotel would say that their guests arrive at all times of day/night. Martin added that she does rely on signs to find places, especially at night when it is hard to use her phone. Pat McAllister (Nesper Signs) noted that the issue is allowing trim cap that has nothing to do with illumination. Trim cap only defines how the edge of the letter will be done, and with higher elevations one will not be able to see if it is plastic or metal trim cap, the plastic is just easier to form the letters. As far as illumination goes, according to Code there are all types of illumination allowed and that is a different topic for a different time. Signs noted that when looking at the big picture of what downtown is transitioning to with the taller buildings and more urban look he has less of an issue with signs and illumination. The light pollution issue goes with an urban area and living in an urban environment means dealing with urban issued. Freerks understands that point but also wants to make sure it is palpable for the surrounding neighborhoods. There needs to be a balance. Freerks is interested in knowing how communities the size of Iowa City (not Des Moines or Cedar Rapids) address their lighting standards on taller structures. Signs would also like to see a map that would indicated what areas are affected by tall building signage. Miklo stated this issue would be placed on the next agenda for discussion. A vote was taken and motion carried 7-0. CONSIDERATION OF MEETING MINUTES: OCTOBER 5. 2017 Parsons moved to approve the meeting minutes of October 5, 2017. Signs seconded the motion. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. PLANNING AND ZONING INFORMATION: Theobald asked about the fireworks sales item discussed at the last meeting and questioned the area on the west side that isn't zoned industrial but has a temporary industrial permit (the old Menards) would that be able to be a fireworks sales area. Miklo said it would not. Freerks would like to re -implementing work session meetings prior to major items such as tonight so the Commission has time to ask more questions and get more details before decisions are made. ADJOURNMENT: Signs moved to adjourn. lM'6 MIN 11u1 Ilii ii EXISTING HIGH RISE BUILDINGS: Ecumenical Towers 259 Iowa (AKAR building) Jefferson Hotel Plaza Towers 201 @ Park Sheraton Century Link Midwest One Hilton Garden UNDER CONSTRUCTION OR PROPOSED The Chauncy The Rise 7 S. Linn Element (Hieronymous property) 316 S. Madison St Legend Untitled Map \ Washington St near College Green Park �V �. �, Hawk City Productions n. 000 �Ga i1 ✓x rer W n. 4A .. �1�_i 1 _lU� n I 'MINS"Ili �if ��l l�l� i�.,, �.�1� � q .�,�, i MtlMrrJ .. �" � _� � � �� n y e "�`. �t Yf i �t � 4 � .;, � ���� .� -- �� fk A /30 I E1 W. �l Alw 201 i k. fill -lit f r. , •q •+ aaw� area a4a '.\Ia E• Jeff@f5( 1_ (.,,I 0/A r 2017/10/30 iIa��11 �1+r �31`Y mm 2017/10/30 few. � — 'y��7y.' • * �4 Val ol ,d pan&,C—.com . a�frt..:� �n.MN rner mmau warm. x� rm.ror svmmx ExMla III upn[eo. Cn.nmr umr Vr DsV �p rau m.vur<e�ra..nml Lnmr my oNW.r svBelrc .1 mer 1. mort a CriC enn elnp Xacnlnc ,.,J "j, opw coowl r.N SIpn SW Vu[x CXMINFIIm f C. p r '+� NC• flit iCI. umM6xCllt iy` 1 01 .tl , M.BnRk 5M1w1 �in a h XOItletl Oerspex .M1Vm1911v a 1er::1"::,1'1 If MCI-a'ial ue-. LVmlmacmce jil r xlOnx ri­n.q:-i nVc. EMbpIVmF<xMF Meleverdr�gna�x- 9-).N A— n DI air ana'a.l,. u01mn0 lx i.lre 0pmmr uMI xmne,- Iusf... LN—.,: ]6mn: „I .._. .rov: I- amu x.,m KIWI rucsmN.r wpnwels NIKILNpxy ANLL COrwl CNk $M1wl tlumN �rTlm- r op IIVNHI MMS WII WMNIWN rmar.ue Nen NIDI LRGr are wp ue+els N.INw Nan xnvn da» «pva. w..r L.„, eoa. ranm5m .�..rase.la N. wurrruw.aumm xr..r m.rlr,. 5^ Alumen Returns 1 Siam Neal U.L. Appr Electsobt tlauslmi M 1'4' Drain Mo erylie 1^ Trim Cap `r Prepared by: Stefanie Bowers, Human Rights Coordinator, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 3565022 ORDINANCE NO. 18-4736 Ordinance amending Title 2, entitled "Human Rights," Chapter 1, entitled, "Definitions," to exclude small employers from the definition of employer, matching State code. Whereas, the Human Rights Ordinance (Title 2 City Code) presently defines an employer as a person who employs one or more employees; Whereas, State law currently exempts as an "employer' any person who regularly employs less than four individuals ("small employers"); Whereas, when the Human Rights Ordinance was updated in August 2008 to remove small employers from liability in employment discrimination claims, the definition of "employer" was not modified; Whereas, the Human Rights Department believes the change should be made so the definition of "employer" mirrors the State; and Whereas, it is in the best interest of the City to adopt this amendment. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I. Amendments. 1. Title 2, entitled "Human Rights," Chapter 1, entitled "General Provisions," Section 1, entitled "Definitions" is hereby amended, removing .the words "who employs one or more employees," as follows: Employer: Includes any person, wherever situated, who solicits individuals within the city to apply for employment within the city or elsewhere. The term includes the city itself, and to the extent not inconsistent with state law, all other political subdivisions, public corporations, governmental units conducting any activity within the city and public agencies or corporations. Section II. Repealer. All Ordinances and parts of Ordinances in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section III. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section IV. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this 2nd day of January , 2018. 42n 4<- ;gss�� MAVOR Approved by: ATTES12eCet CITY CLERK City Attorney's Office —1�- Ordinance No. 18-4736 Page 3 It was moved by Mims and seconded by Thomas that the Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS ClUIRTIM Botchway Cole Mims Salih Taylor Thomas Throgmorton First Consideration 12/19/17 Vote, for passage: AYES: Thomas, Throgmorton, Botchway, Cole, Dickens, Mims, Taylor. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Second Consideration _ Vote for passage: Date published 01/11/18 Moved by Mims, seconded by Taylor, that the rule requiring ordinances to be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, the second consideration and vote be waived and -the ordinance be voted upon for final passage at this time. AYES: Throgmorton, Botchway, Cole, Mims, Salih, Taylor, Thomas. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. r 1 CITY OF IOWA CI1-02-18 �r� COUNCIL ACTION REPO December 19, 2017 Ordinance amending Title 2 entitled "Human Rights," Chapter 1, entitled "Definitions" to exclude small employers from the definition of employer, matching State code. Prepared By: Stefanie Bowers, Human Rights Coordinator Reviewed By: Geoff Fruin, City Manager Sue Dulek, Assistant City Attorney Fiscal Impact: None Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: None Attachments: Ordinance Executive Summary: The current Human Rights ordinance does not include a small employer exemption in its definition of "employer". State code includes such an exemption. The Human Rights ordinance was updated in August of 2008 to reflect this exemption in the area of employment discrimination but the definition of an employer was never updated to reflect this exemption. The Human Rights Department wishes to mirror this change in the definition of employer.