Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2020-10-20 Resolution
Item Number: 6.a. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT October 20, 2020 Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign an amendment to the agreement with the Shelter House for case management services funded by the CARES Act. Prepared By: Steven J. Rackis, Housing Administrator, Iowa City Housing Authority Reviewed By: Tracy Hightshoe, Director, Neighborhood and Development Services Erika Kubly, Coordinator, Neighborhood Services Fiscal Impact: Federal CARES Act. Total budget authority = $439,963.97. Total for Shelter House Case Management Services = $139,088. The additional funding will support 2 full-time Case Managers for Calendar Year 2021. Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Agreement Resolution First Amendment to Agreement Executive Summary: The Iowa City Housing Authority (ICHA) has partnered with Shelter House to fund case management services necessary to serve the population receiving Mainstream voucher assistance. Shelter House is an Iowa City non-profit organization that provides shelter for those experiencing homelessness and offers case management and support services to help people address issues that contribute to homelessness, such as life skills support, vocational training, housing placement services and on-site job training. Shelter House has trained case managers with experience working with individuals and families experiencing homelessness to find, establish, and maintain permanent, safe housing through supportive services. Persons receiving Mainstream vouchers often require additional supportive services to stably maintain housing despite rental payments made on their behalf, and during the novel Coronavirus pandemic these needs are only further and significantly amplified. With the increase in the number of Mainstream vouchers, Shelter House and ICHA have determined additional and more dedicated case management services are required to best serve the population. The Housing Authority is able to fund these supportive services and case management expenses with Federal CARES Act funding allocations. Background /Analysis: On November 14, 2019, in the Iowa City Housing Authority was awarded 60 Mainstream Vouchers by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This award allowed the Housing Authority to expand its partnership with Shelter House and agencies participating in the Continuum of Care/Coordinated Entry service delivery system by providing tenant -based rental assistance to support permanent supportive housing options for homeless individuals/households with a disabling condition. On May 18, 2020, HUD notified the Housing Authority that they were eligible for an increase in Mainstream Vouchers and funding as authorized by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act). This notice provides an additional 18 Mainstream Vouchers to support permanent supportive housing options for homeless individuals/households with a disabling condition. This resolution approves $139,088 in additional CARES Act funding. Council approval of the amendment is required because it exceeds the City Manager's spending authority. The initial agreement signed by the City Manager was for $27,000 in CARES Act funds. This resolution also authorizes the City Manager to sign future amendments as needed. ATTACHMENTS: Description Agreement Resolution First Amendment Agreement for Case Management Servicesfor Recipients of Housing Choice Mainstream Vouchers Held by the Public Housing Authority of the City of Iowa City THIS AGREEMENT is made on this 9th day of July, 2020 between the City of Iowa City (hereinafter "City") and the Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services ("Shelter House") of Iowa City. WHEREAS, the City and Shelter House have collaborated to apply for a type of housing voucher called "Mainstream" Housing Choice Vouchers issued by the United States Department for Housing and Urban Development, resulting in the issuance of a number of vouchers available for a targeted population of people exiting homelessness and often served by Shelter House through the Coordinated Entry process; and WHEREAS, persons receiving these vouchers often may require additional supportive services to stably maintain housing despite rental payments made on their behalf, and during the novel coronavirus pandemic, these needs described above are only further and significantly amplified; and WHEREAS Shelter House is an Iowa City non-profit organization that provides shelter for those experiencing homelessness and offers case management and support services to help people address issues that contribute to homelessness, such as life skills support, vocational training, housing placement services and on-site job training; and WHEREAS, Shelter House has trained case managers with experience working with individuals and families experiencing homelessness to find, establish, and maintain permanent, safe housing through supportive services; and WHEREAS, the City has funds available to fund these supportive services and case management expenses as a result of the Federal CARES Act funding directed for this purpose and to increase targeted activity meant for this purpose to address increased needs relating to COVID19; WHEREAS, providing supportive services and case management services is a public purpose; and WHEREAS, the City desires to retain Shelter .House to provide these services. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed between the City and Shelter House: I. Duration and Termination A. Length. The term of this Agreement shall be from July 1, 2020 until .December 31, 2020. B. Termination. The City or Shelter House may terminate this Agreement at anytime for any reason upon providing written notice to the other party with sixty days (60) Page 12 days' notice. Should the City terminate this Agreement, Shelter House shall be paid for all work and services performed up to the time of termination, but not greater than the total fee to be paid herein. I. Services and Fee A. Services Shelter House shall provide supportive case management services as outlined in Exhibit "A" of the job description attached hereto. B. Fee The City shall pay Shelter House $25 per hour up to $1,000 per week to provide case management to the targeted population as described in Section 11. It is anticipated that the total cost shall not exceed $27,000. Shelter House shalt provide an itemized billing statement of staff time incurred on a monthly basis to the City of Iowa City, directed to Steven Rackis, Iowa City Housing Authority. The City shall pay those sums owed to Shelter House within 30 days of receipt of invoice. C. Reports Shelter House shall provide the City with short reports summarizing the services provided including the number of persons assisted and their demographics. The reports shall be provided on or about October 1, 2020 and on or about January 31, 2021 and may be in the form of an email to Steven-R,ck-istu,io�va-c t.org. If the Department of Housing and Urban Development requests additional documentation from the City regarding the expenditure of said CARC'S Act funds, Shelter House shall provide additional documentation as requested by the City. This provision survives the term of this agreement. II. General Terms and Conditions A. Indemnification Shelter House shall indemnify, defend and .hold harmless the City of Iowa City and its officers, employees, and agents from any and all liability, loss, cost, damage, and expense (including reasonable attorney's fees and court costs) resulting from, arising out of, or incurred by reason of any claims, actions, or suits based upon or alleging bodily injury, including death, or property damage arising out of or resulting from Shelter House's operations under this Agreement. B. Anti -Discrimination Shelter House shall not discriminate against any person in employment or public accommodation because of race, religion, color, creed, gender identity, sex, national origin, sexual orientation, mental or physical disability, marital status or age. "Employment" shall include but not be limited to hiring, accepting, registering, classifying, promoting, or referring to employment. "Public accommodation" shall include but not be limited to providing goods, services, facilities, privileges and advantages to the public. Pa.- P 13 C. Independent Contractor Shelter House shall at all times remain an independent contractor with respect to the services to be performed under this Agreement, and nothing contained in this Agreement is intended to, or shall be construed as, creating or establishing the relationship of employer/employee between the parties. Shelter House shall have the rights to control the manner of the work in progress. The City shall be exempt from payment of all Unemployment Compensation, FICA, retirement, life and/or medical insurance and Workers' Compensation Insurance.. as Shcltcr House is an independent contractor. D. Choice of LawNenue The laws of the State of Iowa shall govern and determine all matters arising out of or in connection with this Agreement. Any legal proceeding instituted with respect to this Agreement shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in Johnson County, Iowa. This provision shall not be construed as waiving any immunity to suit or liability in State or Federal court, which may be available to the City. E. Conflict of Interest Upon signing this Agreement, Shelter House acknowledges that Section 362.5 of the Iowa Code prohibits a City officer or employee From having an interest in a contract with the City, and Shelter House hereby certifies that no employee or officer of the City, which includes members of the City Council and City boards and commissions, has an interest, either direct or indirect, in this Agreement, that does not fall within the exceptions to said statutory provision enumerated in Iowa Code section 362.5, as amended. F. Assignment Shelter House shall not assign this Agreement without the City's written consent. Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services Q /Z_ Christi M. Canb . li, Its Executive Director July 9, 2020 Date Approved: -, k:�f� City Attorney's Office City of Iowa Cit Geoff F ity Manager Date �'(0 -dG Position Title: Supportive Services Housing Case Manager Key Responsibilities: 1. Provide case management services to formerly homeless clients who are living in scattered -site housing units so that they maintain housing, and client's health, safety, and welfare needs are met. 2. Build rapport and maintain positive professional relationships with clients, landlords, service providers, and other community partners. 3. Accurately record and maintain client data and statistics including but not limited to demographics, outcome measures, goals, face-to-face notes, medical information, collateral contact and grant -specific requirements, and maintain all client records to ensure accuracy, confidentiality and security in a timely manner. 4. Work within a team of Case Managers to ensure continuity of care, this includes attending team meetings, agency -wide meetings/trainings and frequent communication with the Iowa City Housing Authority. Reports to: Rapid Rehousing Program Manager LKey Responsibility (30% of time): Provide case management services to formerly homeless clients who are living in scattered -site housing units so that clients maintain housing, and client's health, safety, and welfare needs are met. Clients should receive high performing services in accordance with Shelter House policies, mission, vision, and values. So That: • You utilize motivational interviewing, trauma -informed care, and harm reduction models to provide direct services and service coordination to clients. • You operate from a Housing First approach. • You assess client needs, provide appropriate referrals, connect to area resources, and provide the appropriate level of support to each client. • You provide direct care including, but not limited to, independent living skills, employment assistance, budgeting, on-time rental payments and transportation, for clients. • You complete regular check -ins with clients. • You coordinate and monitor designated client services including, but not limited to meetings, appointments, medical follow-up, and hearings. • You develop and maintain knowledge of resources, services and opportunities available to clients. • You deliver high quality crisis intervention and seek appropriate support to assist in difficult or emergency client situations. 2. Key Responsibility (20% of time): Build rapport and maintain positive professional relationships with clients, landlords, service providers, and other community partners. So That: • A trauma -informed workplace is achieved and maintained demonstrating a balance of kindness, competence and care toward self, others with whom we work, and those for whom we provide care. • You deliver high quality crisis intervention and seek appropriate support to assist in difficult or emergency client situations. • You respond to client concerns in a timely manner. • You maintain a high level of professionalism at all times. • You demonstrate a high-level of advocacy for clients within community settings both private and public. • You respond to participant and landlord concerns in a timely manner. • You build positive relationships with community partners to ensure a high level of collaboration to best serve populations served. 3. Key Responsibility (30% of time): Accurately record and maintain documentation, files, and data collection as required by local, state, and federal grants So That: • You obtain the appropriate licensure to access ServicePoint: Homeless Management Information System (HMIS): • Confidentiality in client information is always maintained. • Intake and exit procedures are thoroughly conducted in a timely manner, including any relevant program record keeping programs, ServicePoint HMIS documentation, Housing Choice Voucher documentation and other agency required paperwork. • Appropriate program forms pertinent to client information and confidentiality are organized, as complete as possible, and secure. 4. Key Responsibility (10% of time): Work within a team of Case Managers to ensure continuity of care, this includes attending team meetings, agency -wide meetings/trainings and frequent communication with the Iowa City Housing Authority, So That: • You are actively engaged with department matters, support other staff when crises arise. • You attend and are actively engaged in required agency meetings, such as all -staff and department meetings, and attend and are actively engaged in required trainings. • You work collaboratively with the Iowa City Housing Authority to ensure Mainstream Voucher requirements are fulfilled. • You complete other duties as assigned by the Rapid Rehousing Program Manager. Qualifications: 1. Knowledge, skills and abilities consistent with Bachelor's degree in in human services related field, or minimum one years related experience. 2. Demonstrated knowledge and experience with area services, community partners, and resources. 3. Commitment to operating within a trauma -informed workplace that demonstrates a balance of kindness, competence and care toward self, colleagues, and populations served. 4. Minimum of one-year direct service experience. 5. Proficiency in Windows based computer environment and Microsoft Office Suite. 6. Good written, verbal, and interpersonal communication skills. 7. Possess a valid driver's license and reliable transportation to get to and from work shifts. Prepared by: Susan Dulek, Assistant City Attorney, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5030 RESOLUTION NO. 20-241 Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign an amendment to the agreement with the Shelter House for case management services funded by the CARES Act. Whereas, the City and Shelter House collaborated to apply for a type of housing voucher called "Mainstream" Housing Choice Vouchers issued by the Department for Housing and Urban Development ("HUD"), resulting in the issuance of a number of vouchers available for a targeted population of people exiting homelessness and often served by Shelter House through the Coordinated Entry process; and Whereas, persons receiving these vouchers often require additional supportive services to stably maintain housing despite rental payments made on their behalf, and during the novel coronavirus pandemic these needs described above are only further and significantly amplified; and Whereas, Shelter House has trained case managers with experience working with individuals and families experiencing homelessness to find, establish, and maintain permanent, safe housing through supportive services; and Whereas, the City through the Housing Authority received funds from HUD for supportive services and case management expenses as a result of the CARES Act and entered into the Agreement for Case Management Services for Recipients of Housing Choice Mainstream Vouchers with Shelter House on July 10, 2020; and Whereas, the Housing Authority has received additional CARES Act funds from HUD, and the City desires to increase the case management funding under said agreement. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: The City Manager is authorized to sign the attached First Amendment to the Agreement for Case Management Services for Recipients of Housing Choice Mainstream Vouchers and any necessary amendments. Passed and approved this 20th day of October , 2020. FQI City Attorney's Office (Sue Dulek —10/15/2020) 0' Resolution No. Page 2 20-241 It was moved by Weiner and seconded by Salih the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Prepared by Susan Dulek, Asst. City Attorney, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 355-5030 First Amendment to Agreement for Case Management Services for Recipients of Housing Choice Mainstream Vouchers Whereas, the Agreement for Case Management Services for Recipients of Housing Choice Mainstream Vouchers ("Agreement") between the City of Iowa City ("City") and Shelter House Community Shelter and Transitional Services ("Shelter House") was executed on July 10, 2020; and Whereas, under the Agreement, the City provided $27,000 in CARES Act funds for case management services from July 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020; and Whereas, the City through the Housing Authority has received additional CARES Act funding and desires to increase the case management funding under the Agreement by $112,088 and to extend the term of the services to December 31, 2021. Now, therefore, the City and Shelter House mutually agree to amend the Agreement as follows: Paragraph A of the first provision numbered Part I is deleted and the following new Paragraph A is substituted in lieu thereof: A. Length The term of this Agreement shall be from July 1, 2020 until December 31, 2021. Paragraphs B and C of the second provision numbered Part I are deleted and the following new Paragraphs B and C are substituted in lieu thereof: B. Fee The City shall pay Shelter House an amount not to exceed $27,000 to provide case management to the targeted population of formerly homeless persons now living in scattered -site housing units for the time period from July 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 and an amount not to exceed $112,088 for the time period from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021. Shelter House shall provide an itemized billing statement of staff time incurred on a monthly basis to the City, directed to Steven Rackis, Iowa City Housing Authority. The City shall pay those sums owed to Shelter House within 30 days of receipt of invoice. C. Reports Shelter House shall provide the City with short reports summarizing the services provided including the number of persons assisted and their demographics. The first report shall be provided on or about October 1, 2020 and thereafter on or about February 1, 2021, June 1, 2021, October 1, 2021, and February 1, 2022 and may be in the form of an email to Steven-Rackis0iowa-city oro. If the Department of Housing and Urban Development requests additional documentation from the City regarding the expenditure of said CARES Actfunds, Shelter House shall provide additional documentation as requested by the City. This provision survives the term of this agreement. All other provisions of the Agreement, which do not conflict with this amendment, remain in full force and effect. City of Iowa City Ge ruin Ci Manager /d /C//ir° Date Shelter House Community Shelter and Transitional Services Qk.¢ Z Cristina eCanga Executive Director 10/14/20 Date Approve as tifa /o/ 5/w ity Attorneys Office to Item Number: 6.b. 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY ��.:. -4 in � at COUNCIL ACTION REPORT October 20, 2020 Resolution accepting the work for the Windsor Ridge Drainage Improvement Project. Prepared By: Marri VanDyke, Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: None Recommendations: Staff: Approval C •uu ." Attachments: Engineer's Report Resolution Executive Summary: The Windsor Ridge Drainage Improvement Project has been completed by Carter and Associates, Inc., of Coralville, Iowa, in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by the Engineering Division. The Engineer's Report and Performance and Payment bond are on file with the City Engineer. • Project Estimated Cost: $ 39,900.00 • Project Bid Received: $ 30,580.50 • Project Actual Cost: $ 40,617.50 Background /Analysis: The City had received complaints regarding insufficient drainage at Windsor Ridge Park. In addition, washout from storm water runoff had caused the trail to buckle and become a safety concern. This project installed two manholes, 56 linear feet of storm sewer pipe, and 1,122 linear feet of drain tile to promote better drainage in the area. Repairs to the trail were also necessary in order to meet ADA standards. ATTACHMENTS: Description Engineer's Keport Resolution ENGINEER'S REPORT October 15, 2020 e r 1 ~` ,, CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 - 1826 (319) 356 - 5000 (319) 356 - 5009 FAX www.icgov.org City Clerk Iowa City, Iowa Windsor Ridge Drainage Improvement Project Dear City Clerk: I hereby certify that the Windsor Ridge Drainage Improvement Project has been completed by Carter and Associates, Inc., of Coralville, Iowa, in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications prepared by the Engineering Division. The project was bid as a unit price contract and the final contract price is $40,617.50. There was a total of one change or extra work order for the project as described below: Additional sidewalk and ADA curb ramp $1,595.00 I recommend that the above -referenced improvements be accepted by the City of Iowa City. Sincerely, Jason Havel, P.E. City Engineer Prepared by: Marri VanDyke, Civil Engineer, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 3565044 Resolution No. 20-242 Resolution accepting the work for the Windsor Ridge Drainage Improvement Project Whereas, the Engineering Division has recommended that the work for construction of the Windsor Ridge Drainage Improvement Project as included in a contract between the City of Iowa City and Carter and Associates, Inc., of Coralville, Iowa, dated June 301, 2020, be accepted; and Whereas, the Engineer's Report and the performance, payment and maintenance bond have been filed in the City Engineer's office; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Annual Storm Water Improvements account #M3631: and Whereas, the final contract price is $40,617.50. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that said improvements are hereby accepted by the City of Iowa City, Iowa. Passed and approved this 20th day of October 20 20 S� 4 - Ma or Attest: oved by �. —Q I A'0 f I , 7 0)�L City erk City Attorney's Office — 10/15/2020 It was moved by Weiner and seconded by Salih the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: 1 Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 6.c. CITY OIF IOWA CITY www.icgov.org October 20, 2020 Resolution Approving Final Plat Of West Side Estates, Phase Two Subdivision, Iowa City, Iowa. (SUB20-0002) INA I_Ta:I M I MUTI&V Description Staff Report with Attachments Resolution To: City Council Item: SUB20-0002 Westside Estates NERAL INFORMATION: STAFF REPORT Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner Date: October 20, 2020 Applicant: Watts Group Development Inc. c/o Adam Hahn 425 E. Oakdale Blvd. Coralville, IA 52241 319-338-4100 adam(o)_wattsgroup.com Contact Person: Property Owner: Requested Action: Purpose: Location: Location Map: Ron Amelon MMS Consultants 319-351-8282 r.amelon(abmmsconsultants.net Adam Hahn Watts Group Construction 319-338-4100 adam(o-)_wattsgrou p.com Approval of final plat Westside Estates subdivision; To create 39 residential lots North of Rohret Road and west of Yuma Drive Size: Existing Land Use and Zoning Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Comprehensive Plan: District Plan: Neighborhood Open Space District: File Date: 60 Day Limitation Period: BACKGROUND INFORMATION: K 13.10 Acres Undeveloped, RS -5 — Low Density Single -Family Residential North: RS -5 — Low Density Single -Family Residential RR -1 — Rural Residential South: AR — County Agricultural Residential R — County Residential East: RS -5 — Low Density Single -Family Residential R — County Residential West: A — County Agricultural 2-8 DU/A Southwest District, Public/Private Open Space SW5 August 26, 2020 October 25, 2020 The applicant, Watts Group Development Inc., has submitted a final plat for a 39 -lot, 13.10 -acre subdivision located north of Rohret Road, west of Yuma Drive. The preliminary plat was approved by the City Council on June 16th, 2020. The subject property originally went through the preliminary plat process in 2017. At the time of the original platting, the subdivision was called Country Club Estates Eighth Addition. Preliminary plats expire after 24 months unless the applicant seeks an extension from City Council, so the preliminary plat for Country Club Estates Eighth Addition expired in 2019. At this time, the applicant is seeking approval for the newly named, West Side Estates - Phase Two subdivision. The subject property was rezoned from Interim Development Single -Family Residential (ID -RS) to Low Density Single -Family Residential (RS -5) in 2017. The subject property was rezoned with the following conditions: 1. Upon subdividing any of the property hereby rezoned, the Developer shall enter into a subdivider's agreement with the City for the installation of Rohret Road as a public improvement for the first street that will serve the development (a point approximately 200' west of Lake Shore Drive). 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Developer shall pay 50% of the cost of improving Rohret Road to the western city limits as determined by the City Engineer. A Good Neighbor Meeting and Open House was held in 2017 for the West Side Estates Phase One Subdivision, however, the applicant has chosen not to hold a Good Neighbor Meeting for West Side Estates Phase Two Subdivision. PCD\Staff Reports\sub20-0002 final staff report.dou 3 ANALYSIS: The final plat of Westside Estates — Phase Two is in general compliance with the approval of the preliminary plat and subdivision regulations. Legal papers and construction drawings have been approved by staff. One minor change from the preliminary plat involves the removal of a landscaping easement along the Rohret Road frontage of Lot 81. After additional discussion, staff decided that Lot 81 would not be a double frontage lot, since Slowthower Road, west of Lot 81, is not an improved City street, thereby nullifying the requirement for a landscape buffer along the Lot 81 Rohret Road frontage. Neighborhood Open Space: West Side Estates — Phase Two was originally planned as an additional phase to the adjacent Country Club Estates subdivision. The City's Neighborhood Open Space Ordinance requirement for West Side Estates — Phase Two was satisfied with the dedication of 4.7 acres of parkland as part of the phased subdivision of Country Club Estates. Accordingly, no additional neighborhood open space is required for this subdivision. Traffic Implications: Transportation planning staff found no apparent traffic complications as a result of the proposed subdivision. The private drive behind the residences fronting Rohret Road will have another speed table, in addition to the speed table that was previously installed further east, to help reduce traffic speeds. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: The subject property does not contain any environmentally sensitive areas. Storm Water Management: The previous phase of Country Club Estates was designed to manage stormwater for this development with a stormwater detention basin located north of the subject area. Infrastructure Fees: At the time of final plat approval, the applicant will be required to pay $456.75 per acre for water main extension fees. Rohret Road is a rural cross section with chip seal surface and drainage ditches. When Irving Weber School was built, the City improved Rohret Road to a point approximately 500 feet west of Phoenix Drive. When Country Club Estates Part Three was developed, the developer extended the improvements of Rohret Road up to Lake Shore Drive. As a condition of rezoning the property, the applicant must pay 50% of the cost of improving the street to the western city limits. The City and/or future private development to the south will be responsible for the other 50%. Payment to the City will occur after the final plat is approved. The applicant has submitted a water pressure study demonstrating that water pressure is adequate to serve the proposed subdivision. Payment of these fees has been addressed in the legal papers. NEXT STEPS: Once the final plat has been approved, the applicant can submit its site plan for staff review. The applicant can apply for any necessary building permits. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of SUBO-0002, the final plat of Westside Estate — Phase Il, a 39 -lot, 13.10 -acre residential subdivision located north of Rohret Road and west of Yuma Drive subject PCD\Staff Reports\sub20-0002 final staff report.dou ri to approval of construction drawings and legal papers by the City Engineer and City Attorney. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Final plat Approved by: Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services PCD\Staff Reports\sub20-0002 final staff report.dou FOR COUNTY RECORDER'S USE AREA SUMMARY TABLE 1\4 - 1\4 AREA AREA IN ROW SW - SE SEC 13 2.11 ACRES 0.42 ACRES NW - NE SEC 24 10.99 ACRES 2.67 ACRES TOTAL 13.10 ACRES 3.09 ACRES LOCATION: SUBDIVIDER: A PORTION OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2017097, AND WATTS GROUP DEVELOPMENT INC AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2017095 IN THE SOUTHWEST 425 EAST OAKDALE BOULEVARD #101 QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, CORALVILLE, IOWA 52241 AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST embossed with "MMS" ) QUARTER OF SECTION 24, ALL OF TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, SUBDIVIDER'S ATTORNEY: MICHAEL J. PUGH RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA. 425 EAST OAKDALE BOULEVARD S85"13'02"W SUITE 201 CORALVILLE, IOWA 52241 LAND SURVEYOR: GLEN D. MEISNER P.L.S PROPRIETOR OR OWNER: MMS CONSULTANTS INC. 10 1917 SOUTH GILBERT STREET WATTS GROUP DEVELOPMENT INC IOWA CITY, IOWA, 52240 425 EAST OAKDALE BOULEVARD #101 PHONE: 319-351-8282 CORALVILLE, IOWA 52241 DATE OF SURVEY: DOCUMENT RETURN INFORMATION: 09-29-2017 LAND SURVEYOR FINAL PLAT WEST SIDE ESTATES - PHASE TWO IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA LOT "A" CONTAINS 3.09 ACRES, AND IS TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF IOWA CITY FOR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR ROHRET ROAD, LUKE DRIVE, SEDONA SREET A MINIMUM LOW OPENING HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED FOR YT/ LOTS 55, 64-65, AND 72-74 OF THIS SUBDIVISION. PLEASE REFER TO THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND MLO INFORMATION ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF IOWA CITY ` i FOR THE ELEVATION THAT HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. ;� 0 10 25 50 75 100 �������,GRAPHIC SCALE INFEET ' 1"=100' G3 Y CLUB' CSS'TQ7C�S \ TGA M LaDDO�DOO N IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 54 AT PAGE 2kOF THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSON COUNTY RECORDER'S GFFl&ff i OUT �I � �'------______ ,-' �� �� N69'45'38"E - LOT 13-77gN-��� 38_57, I I B I I , / /A - A {j {j \ � AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2017095 � � � � � A IJ IJ U " N ACCORDANCE 6,099 E WITH THE PLAT / Y Y (M)(Ri A _ - - - POPENE THEREOF RECORDED Y` Y` ��3'C�. 33.47 © ( )( ) �I / IN PLAT �00� �� AT 46 33" �A 99' A=0'04'41" M R SPACE PAGE zl3 OF THE ` N�6' cn 12 R=1411.00' (M)(R) 0) , RECORPS OF THE i ro BE i L ©� 7.57, z \ �� L=1.92' (M)(R) \\�17 DEDICATED O / TO WEST JOHNSON GGUNTY / z 69 68 0 0-W T=0.96' (M)(R)� ` RECORDER'S GFFIGE 6'_ SIDE 4 � 9,625 SF 2' , C=1.92' (M)(R)ESTATE HOMEOWNERS / /� 2 70 A, 9,584 SF �C6=N72'49'13'E (M)(R), �� o ASSOCIATION ` / Ri o� �D 11,893 SF 1 �� c1, - U U DESCRIPTION - WEST SIDE ESTATES - PHASE TWO S56'23'25' � „� �. � �- � � 51.72' C19 0 -s � 7 C20 �� \ A PORTION OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2017097 AND AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2017095 IN THE SOUTHWEST 8 12,125 SF NOTES 0 - CONGRESSIONAL CORNER, FOUND • - PROPERTY CORNER(S), FOUND (as noted) O - PROPERTY CORNERS SET OF THE FIFTH P.M. FOUND SCM (5/8" Iron Pin w/ yellow, plastic LS Cap N6 C2 L13 X29• embossed with "MMS" ) ® - PK NAIL 11,339 SF - PROPERTY &/or BOUNDARY LINES - - - CONGRESSIONAL SECTION LINES S85"13'02"W - RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES - - CENTER LINES 133.33' - LOT LINES, INTERNAL 10 - LOT LINES, PLATTED OR BY DEED - - - - - - - - - - - EASEMENT LINES, WIDTH & PURPOSE NOTED - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING EASEMENT LINES, PURPOSE NOTED R) - RECORDED DIMENSIONS (M) - MEASURED DIMENSIONS C22-1 - CURVE SEGMENT NUMBER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND HUNDREDTHS s Z W �i, O (D I I LS \ 7� 9 4�" A o � 7 &-,t EASEMENT IDENTIFICATION TABLE LABEL DESCRIPTION 7 15.00' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT OF THE FIFTH P.M. FOUND SCM 15.00' WIDE STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT (CENTERED) N6 C2 L13 X29• 15.00' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT (CENTERED) ® 20.00' WIDE STORM SEWER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT (CENTERED) 11,339 SF ACCESS, STORM SEWER, AND SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT © 15.00' WIDE UTILITY AND SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT S85"13'02"W 55.00' WIDE ACCESS, UTILITY, AND SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ® SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT 133.33' 25.00' WIDE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 10 EXISTING ACCESS EASEMENT TO BE VACATED 76 o- s Z W �i, O (D I I LS \ 7� 9 4�" A o � 7 &-,t s G3, o o,,- Q \ �� 60 6 A � A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT i i N (� \ K \ 60GK GI AT PAGE 393 OF THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSOyd NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF u 2 N rnl6 4 74 SECTION CO q� Ss16> OF THE FIFTH P.M. FOUND SCM C26 C25 N6 C2 L13 X29• LI 157 710.19' 0 11,339 SF o � 8.4' 472' S85"13'02"W 10.06 12,339 SF A �� 133.33' 11 s8s13'o2" W o ���/ 76 o- N84°18'55"W N85'13'02"E 110,212 SF 26.93 117.94' POINT S85'13'02'W 73 C24I� 0 F 16.66 N15'47'13"E I1 ,077 SF 90.80 N11'00'10"E L13 I BEGINNING 65.19' �g5"186' 86' 64.83' S47'49'40"W 118 1 O s G3, o o,,- Q \ �� 60 6 A � A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT i i N (� \ K \ 60GK GI AT PAGE 393 OF THE RECORDS OF THE JOHNSOyd NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF u 2 N rnl6 4 74 SECTION M 24-T79N-R7W -V II 10,944 SF OF THE FIFTH P.M. FOUND SCM C26 C25 BOOK 36 AT PAGE LI 157 710.19' 0 11,339 SF o � 8.4' cC 10 o C34 o' 585'13'02"W �- co 147.06 1C28 7 74 SF U�872 9�5CFn 7 1 75 �o u�i� o; L8 G3� 11,339 SF �` S �, 7.84 0 rn S85"13'02"W 10.06 5`�� A �� 133.33' 11 s8s13'o2" W o ���/ 76 o- B N85'13'02"E 110,212 SF 26.93 N83'30'03"W L10 S85'13'02'W N05'37'21"W L11 16.66 N15'47'13"E L12 C17 W _1 COUNTY RECORDERS OFFICE ` IJ Jv a zC16 UO�F5_W O _ �y ' (10 - -77-- 67- �\ � �A \T i / - / - ii67 _V� 8,991 S _C14 65 ,051 SF L4-1 22 71 * '9 9. 15,949 SF L3 19'(MIo cR) .9\' 3sA=1040JL2 1 R=1720.00 �}R)p6� 235 34.86' (M)(R) 2000 0 61 o 3 T=17.43' (M)(R)�f�S8511-"62 9,851 SF 64 63 N 9,759 SF 2 © �N.� c )c) 27 �w � �, � w_ c9 � B=N71'S1'28"E M R 101 10,746 SF A- 9,678 SF C10 / �1' 01 CII C13 C12 � ©oA pRivE KE G_5 T o - � � , LII -0 1 25 11 n11 3.09� C8 O _ :� mac/ p�W 7C5'"�- � o 60 o 9,104�S� FSV o Ai / i UO C4 N 59 �6C3 9,SF 10 UN. 57 9,104 SF CC3 (� 9981 SF _ 9.527 SF 72-12 57CN4 2 00 c� J � I i �3(o _ 2 "W tS. i 72- 439 0 `As o N85"13'02"E 120.001 72 W �7 � �L i 55 �o gA.73' 5705428 / �� �� Y` `1.f� i a "W / i \ YY �o o' 5-79°3T2� -J 8,160 SF o OUTLOT "A" N85'13'02"E / A 60.0' 20.00' P 55,659 SF / 5`j / 5(PRIVATE OPEN SPACE) / 6� g3 0 /� 3 a'�pv'j, %y O� 37.9 I� 4 o u / C5$ 50 `t \ '0 v� ��C� C,()10 8,160 SF m V �� �\ 77 m © N85*13'02 E / �/ 44 y \\ 10 1 � 10,55 I0 0 45 o SF T/ 9, 585'13'02"W 14248' "46, os530 .1to A / o Na5A3'o2"E 47 C, m- 120-00' � 10,901 SF �� , C�b�z 5 48` / �. a rn J 585'13'02"W ` 6�G G s�o �� o- 52 s� , �;° 147.06 I 7 74 SF U�872 9�5CFn S�.L'CO3 �5 �o 79 u�i� o; L8 G3� 50, �` S �, 7.84 0 rn I 11,246 SF 10.06 5`�� A �� O FT,= o O s8s13'o2" W o ���/ 51 ��kP o- B N85'13'02"E 24 -7710)[M -ND LI \J \J 26.93 N83'30'03"W L10 27.19 a rn J I �� 80 �,y, �� o- 52 s� , �;° rn o x11 N x 12,062 SF C29 74 SF U�872 9�5CFn S�.L'CO3 �5 �o O S81°59'53"W 157.19 / . C�� �` S �, 7.84 N77'20'06"E C30 10.06 I I\\I I \V/\V/ l I I\\I I L61 41.91 81 L71 VV J JLL�� -It �f L8 22, 403 SF C31KZJJ / N85'13'02"E 24 -7710)[M -ND LI \J \J Fn 110 i Fn Ffl rj Co rn �' O_ c� . J 1 �© SOUTHWEST CORNER w Z OF THE ��g NORTHWEST QUARTER ; 00 OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER A o OF SECTION 24-T79N-R7W OF THE FIFTH P.M. FOUND 5\8" REBAR W\ YELLOW PLASTIC LS CAP 14675 BOOK 43 AT PAGE 301 LINE SEGMENT TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 15.95 N58'30'00"E L2 12.01 N04'46'58"W 13 6.46 N77'20'06"E L4 7.84 N77'20'06"E L5 10.06 N38'59'35"E L61 41.91 N00'06'51"W L71 28.37 N01 *18'20"W L8 30.14 N85'13'02"E L9 26.93 N83'30'03"W L10 27.19 N05'37'21"W L11 16.66 N15'47'13"E L12 90.80 N11'00'10"E L13 212.88 N04'41'27"W CURVF SFGMFNT TARLF QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, ALL OF TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Beginning at the North Quarter Corner of Section 24, Township 79 North, Range 7 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, and a Point on the West Line of Auditor's Parcel 2017097, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 61 at Page 214 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence N00°06'51"W, along the West Line of said Auditor's Parcel 2017097, a distance of 139.79 feet, to the Northwest Corner thereof; Thence S56°23'25"E, along the North Line of said Auditor's Parcel 2017097, a distance of 51.72 feet, to the Westerly most corner of Auditor's Parcel 2017095, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 61 at Page 213 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence N38°59'35"E, along the Northerly Line of said Auditor's Parcel 2017095, and the North Line of said Auditor's Parcel 2017097, a distance of 134.58 feet; Thence N76°46'33"E, along the North Line of said Auditor's Parcel 2017097, a distance of 223.03 feet; Thence N69°45'38"E, along said North Line, 38.57 feet, to the Northwest Corner of West Side Estates - Phase One, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 61 at Page 393 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence S17°08'27"E, along the West Line of said West Side Estates - Phase One, a distance of 188.90 feet; Thence Northeasterly, 1.92 feet, along said West Line on a 1411.00 foot radius curve, concave Northwesterly, whose 1.92 foot chord bears N72°49'13"E; Thence S17°13'08"E, along said West Line, 123.70 feet; Thence N71°25'19"E, along said West Line, 9.19 feet; Thence S17°33'42"E, along said West Line, 185.49 feet; Thence Northeasterly, 34.86 feet, along said West Line on a 1720.00 foot radius curve, concave Northwesterly, whose 34.86 foot chord bears N71 °51'28"E; thence S18°43'22"E, along said West Line, 130.00 feet; Thence S24°35'25"E, along said West Line, 95.00 feet; Thence S31 °30'24"E, along said West Line, 168.00 feet, to the Southwest Corner thereof, and a Point on the Southerly Line of said Auditor's Parcel 2017097; Thence S58°29'36"W, along said Southerly Line, 186.37 feet; Thence S58°30'23"W, along said Southerly Line, 657.52 feet, to the Southwest Corner thereof; Thence N01°18'20"W, along the West Line of said Auditor's Parcel 2017097, a distance of 974.91 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said West Side Estates - Phase Two contains 13.10 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions or record. 'al\ o \ SISIIONiq� iii �// , OS / \co GLEN =z_ D. =w= =m= -� MEISNER o\ 8165 a\ ''„r, j/111111011/OW SEAL I Notes on this plat are not intended to create any vested private interest in any stated use restriction or covenant or create any third party beneficiaries to any noted use restriction or covenant. EXISTING PROPERTY MONUMENTATION TABLE LABEL DESCRIPTION AO FOUND 5\8" REBAR W\ YELLOW PLASTIC LS CAP 13287 © FOUND P.K. NAIL © FOUND 5\8" REBAR W\ YELLOW PLASTIC LS CAP 8165 CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING Cl 93'06'54" 20.00' 32.50' 21.12' 29.04' S74'56'33"E C19 3'22'04" 1351.00' 79.41' 39.72' 79.40' N77'54'39"E C2 23'36'08" 120.00' 49.43' 25.07' 49.08' S16'35'02"E C20 21'23'32" 180.00' 67.21' 34.00' 66.82' S68'53'55"W C3 88'21'12" 20.00' 30.84' 19.43' 27.87' S39'23'38"W C21 20'44'58" 180.00' 65.19' 32.95' 64.83' S47'49'40"W C4 3'21'23" 1720.00' 100.76' 50.39' 100.74' N81'53'33"E C22 10'32'35" 180.00' 33.12' 16.61' 33.08' S32'10'53"W C5 2'10'49" 1720.00' 65.45' 32.73' 65.45' N79'07'27"E C23 21'13'31" 180.00' 66.68' 33.73' 66.30' S16'17'50"W C6 2'15'08" 1720.00' 67.61' 33.81' 67.61' N76'54'28"E C24 10'28'02" 180.00' 32.88' 16.49' 32.84' S00'27'04"W C7 2'15'08" 1720.00' 67.61' 33.81' 67.61' N74'39'20"E C25 91'44'50" 20.00' 32.03' 20.62' 28.71' N41'05'27"E C8 2'15'08" 1720.00' 67.61' 33.81' 67.61' N72'24'12"E C26 3'34'48" 1660.00' 103.72' 51.88' 103.71' N88'45'16"E C9 2'50'39" 1660.00' 82.41' 41.21' 82.40' N73'51'37"E C27 3'36'57" 1720.00' 108.55' 54.29' 108.53' N88'40'19"E C10 2'50'39" 1660.00' 82.41' 41.21' 82.40' N76'42'17"E C28 88'21'12" 20.00' 30.84' 19.43' 27.87' N48'57'34"W C11 2'50'39" 1660.00' 82.41' 41.21' 82.40' N79'32'56"E C29 3'13'10" 180.00' 10.11' 5.06' 10.11' S06'23'32"E C12 2'29'57" 1660.00' 72.40' 36.21' 72.40' N82'13'15"E C30 21'56'49" 180.00' 68.95' 34.90' 68.53' S18'58'32"E C13 91'44'50" 20.00' 32.03' 20.62' 28.71' S50'39'22"E C31 88'27'19" 20.00' 30.88' 19.47' 27.90' N14'16'43"E C14 84'22'39" 120.00' 176.72' 108.77' 161.18' S37'24'22"W C32 26'42'40" 150.00' 69.93' 35.61' 69.30' S18'08'18"E C15 1'13'38" 1411.00' 30.22' 15.11' 30.22' N78'58'52"E C33 26'43'27" 60.00' 27.99' 14.25' 27.73' N71'51'19"E C16 2'47'36" 1411.00' 68.79' 34.40' 68.78' N76 -58'16"E C34 5'17'39" 1690.00' 156.16' 78.14' 156.10' N87'51'52"E C17 2'42'54" 1411.00' 66.86' 33.44' 66.86' N74 -13'01"E C35 12'46'45" 1690.00' 376.93' 189.25' 376.15' N78'49'40"E C18 3'22'04" 1351.00' 79.41' 39.72' 79.40' N74 -32'35"E C36 84'22'39" 150.00' 220.90' 135.96' 201.47' S37 -24'22"W C37 6'44'08" 1381.00' 162.35' 81.27' 162.25' N76'13'37"E I hereby certify that this land surveying document was prepared and the related survey work was performed by me or under my direct personal supervision and that I am a duly licensed Professional Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Iowa. 20 GLEN D. MEISNER P.L.S. Iowa Lic. No. 8165 My license renewal date is December 31, 20 Pages or sheets covered by this seal: Signed before me this _____ day of _________ ,20___ . -------------------------------------------------- Notary Public, in and for the State of Iowa. PLAT/PLAN APPROVED by the City of Iowa City City Clerk Date: UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS SHOWN HEREON, MAY OR MAY NOT, INCLUDE SANITARY SEWER LINES, AND/OR STORM SEWER LINES, AND/OR WATER LINES; SEE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR DETAILS. UTILITY EASEMENTS, AS SHOWN HEREON, ARE ADEQUATE FOR THE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE FACILITIES REQUIR- ED BY THE FOLLOWING AGENCIES: MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO. Date: CENTURYLINK Date: MEDIACOM Date: EASTERN IOWA LIGHT & POWER Date: -o n L- Mztn��fJfJNND T o� FCA)0 N (�D O O �1Om22CCEET =� , 1 oN fl m 0 �E O ��7C�mmDD�ly CF) tp Z O o F � 0 DZD 70 zoo�mm��-2 (C/)C� 0 r - D LF .6 O U) nz�==OO�zO M mm �O _ OZ z 0 G) Z 0--C)m*-1--200 W 707 < O 0 r CJ)Z y m 7 m cn m D m �C- D ^^ r-4r�(nm2Cn 0 C:CD <� r �� 3 3 D� D r C7 N N 71 r lJ pp o Om nn 0 r m O Z s o m m M O C 0 0� 0� 0 0 0 rn D m 9 a ���4 0DDZC=AO m �� � WCJ) D Cn � z O Z Dp*m�W=m cn mm = �O� m n Z o v� Z zm���DD�D� �� CnnDW D m z z --1 J 0 0 o� m n II v eo N r T Z m C:) N Z -4 r m ITI o o IQ N) cn C -I c7 O m m F rn O n r (n CCD N o C13 W W C/3 W W CD /' I�I�IIII�III�I�II��II�I�NIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIII � 'Doc ID: 027903540044 Type: QEN Kind: SUBDIVISION - --- 1' Recorded: 11/18/2020 at 10:24:26 AM *I I Fee Amt: $222.00 Page 1 of 44 Johnson County Iona n Kim Painter County Recorder BK6137 PG568-611..®'��' CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa C11y, Iowa 52240-1826 (319) 356-5000 STATE OF IOWA ) (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org ) SS JOHIVSON COUNTY ) I, Kellie K. Freehling, City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify that the Resolution attached hereto is a true and correct copy of Resolution No.20-243, which was passed by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at a regular meeting held on the 20th day of October 2020, all as the same appears of record in my office. Also attached are the final legal documents for West Side Estates, Phase Two Subdivision, Iowa City, �- Iowa. Dated at Iowa City, Iowa, this jkday of 12020. Kellid K. Freehling �- City Clerk fires subdivision o- Ck Prepared by: Ray Heitner, Associate Planner, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 3565238 (SUB20-0002) Resolution No. 20-243 Resolution Approving Final Plat Of West Side Estates, Phase Two Subdivision, Iowa City, Iowa. Whereas, the owner, Adam Hahn, filed with the City Clerk the final plat of West Side Estates, Phase Two Subdivision, a 13.10 -acre subdivision consisting of 39 residential lots located north of Rohret Road SW and West of Yuma Drive located in Iowa City, Iowa, Johnson County, Iowa; and Whereas, said subdivision is located on the following -described real estate in Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, to wit: A PORTION OF AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2017097, AND AUDITOR'S PARCEL 2017095 IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 13, AND THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, ALL OF TOWNSHIP 79 NORTH, RANGE 7 WEST, OF THE FIFTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IOWA CITY, JOHNSON COUNTY, IOWA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Beginning at the North Quarter Comer of Section 24, Township 79 North, Range 7 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, Iowa City, Johnson County, Iowa, and a Point on the West Line of Auditor's Parcel 2017097, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 61 at Page 214 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence N00006'51"W, along the West Line of said Auditor's Parcel 2017097, a distance of 139.79 feet, to the Northwest Corner thereof; Thence S56°23'25"E, along the North Line of said Auditor's Parcel 2017097, a distance of 51.72 feet, to the Westerly most comer of Auditor's Parcel 2017095, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 61 at Page 213 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence N38059'35"E, along the Northerly Line of said Auditor's Parcel 2017095, and the North Line of said Auditor's Parcel 2017097, a distance of 134.58 feet; Thence N76046'33"E, along the North Line of said Auditor's Parcel 2017097, a distance of 223.03 feet; Thence N69045'38"E, along said North Line, 38.57 feet, to the Northwest Corner of West Side Estates - Phase One, in accordance with the Plat thereof Recorded in Plat Book 61 at Page 393 of the Records of the Johnson County Recorder's Office; Thence S17°08'27"E, along the West Line of said West Side Estates - Phase One, a distance of 188.90 feet; Thence Northeasterly, 1.92 feet, along said West Line on a 1411.00 foot radius curve, concave Northwesterly, whose 1.92 foot chord bears N72049'1 3"E; Thence S17°13'08"E, along said West Line, 123.70 feet; Thence N71'25'1 9"E, along said West Line, 9.19 feet; Thence S1 7'33'42"E, along said West Line, 185.49 feet; Thence Northeasterly, 34.86 feet, along said West Line on a 1720.00 foot radius curve, concave Northwesterly, whose 34.86 foot chord bears N71°51'28"E; thence S18°43'22"E, along said West Line, 130.00 feet; Thence S24035'25"E, along said West Line, 95.00 feet; Thence S31 °30'24"E, along said West Line, 168.00 feet, to the Southwest Corner thereof, and a Point on the Southerly Line of said Auditor's Parcel 2017097; Thence S58°29'36"W, along said Southerly Line, 186.37 feet; Thence S58°30'23"W, along said Southerly Line, 657.52 feet, to the Southwest Corner thereof; Thence N0101820"W, along the West Line of said Auditor's Parcel 2017097, a distance of 974.91 feet, to the Point of Beginning. Said West Side Estates - Phase Two contains 13.10 Acres, and is subject to easements and restrictions or record. Whereas, the Neighborhood and Development Services Department and the Public Works Department examined the proposed final plat and subdivision, and recommended approval; and Whereas, a dedication has been made to the public, and the subdivision has been made with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the owners and proprietors; and Resolution No. 20-243 Page 2 Whereas, said final plat and subdivision are found to conform with Chapter 354, Code of Iowa (2020) and all other state and local requirements. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: The said final plat and subdivision located on the above-described real estate be and the same are hereby approved. 2. The City accepts the dedication of the streets and easements as provided by law and specifically sets aside portions of the dedicated land, namely streets, as not being open for public access at the time of recording for public safety reasons. The City shall accept dedication of the outlots upon satisfaction of the terms and conditions stated in the Subdivider's Agreement. 3. The City furthermore vacates its interest in the easement indicated as the "existing access easement to be vacated" on the Final Plat, also known as the Access Easement Area described in the Permanent Lift Station and On Site and Off Site Access Easement Agreement recorded in Book 4522, Page 122, seq 76-80 and shown as the °17.00 foot wide ingress and egress easement" attached thereto. 4. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, are hereby authorized and directed, upon approval by the City Attorney, to execute all legal documents relating to said subdivision, and to certify a copy of this resolution, which shall be affixed to the final plat after passage and approval by law. The City Clerk shall record the legal documents and the plat at the office of the County Recorder of Johnson County, Iowa at the expense of the owner/subdivider. Passed and approved this 20th day of Attest: SEN fZ,ved,by 4. "j City Attorney's Office –10/15/2020 It was moved by Weiner and seconded by Salih the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: X x X X x X —x Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 6.d. 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY ��.:. -dry in � at COUNCIL ACTION REPORT October 20, 2020 Resolution accepting the work for the storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water main, and paving public improvements for Tegler Second Subdivision, and declaring public improvements open for public access and use. Prepared By: Josh Slattery, Sr. Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: None Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Engineer's Report Resolution Executive Summary: Tegler Second Subdivision is an 8.56 -acre subdivision located south of Rochester Avenue and east of Eastbury Drive. The subdivision contains two multi -family residential lots and one outlot. Tegler Second Subdivision includes a new public street, Nex Avenue, between Lot 1 and Lot 2, which extends from Rochester Avenue to the south end of Lots 1 and 2. Background /Analysis: The construction of the sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, drainageway, and paving public improvements for Tegler Second Subdivision have been completed in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications on file with the Engineering Division of the City of Iowa City. ATTACHMENTS: Description Engineer's Report Resolution s r rrni, *� CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 - 1826 (319) 356 - 5000 ENGINEER'S REPORT (319) 356 - 5009 FAX www.icgov.org October 14, 2020 Honorable Mayor and City Council Iowa City, Iowa Re: Tegler Second Subdivision Dear Honorable Mayor and Councilpersons: I hereby certify that the construction of the sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water main, and street paving improvements for Tegler Second Subdivision have been completed in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications on file with the Engineering Division of the City of Iowa City. The required maintenance bonds are on file in the City Clerk's Office for the sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water main improvements constructed by Bockenstedt Excavating, Inc. of Iowa City, Iowa and for the paving improvements constructed by Streb Construction Co., Inc. of Coralville, Iowa. I recommend that the above -referenced improvements be accepted by the City of Iowa City. Sincerely, i Jason Havel, .E. City Engineer Prepared by: Josh Slattery, Sr. Civil Engineer, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5149 Resolution No. 20-244 Resolution accepting the work for the storm sewer, sanitary sewer, water main, and paving public improvements for Tegler Second Subdivision, and declaring public improvements open for public access and use Whereas, the Engineering Division has certified that the following improvements have been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the Engineering Division. Sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water main improvements for Tegler Second Subdivision, as constructed by Bockenstedt Excavating, Inc. of Iowa City, Iowa. Paving improvements for Tegler Second Subdivision, as constructed by Streb Construction Co., Inc. of Coralville, Iowa. Whereas, the maintenance bonds have been filed in the City Clerk's office; and Whereas, the City of Iowa City has notified those contractors listed previously of the date on which it will consider acceptance of the aforementioned public improvements; and Whereas, the traffic control signs have been installed. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that said improvements are hereby accepted by the City of Iowa City, Iowa and that all dedications and public improvements previously set aside as not being open for public access are hereby formally accepted and declared open for public access and use. Passed and approved this 20th day of October , 2020 Tx� MayaV roved y Attest: App4. -/ City Clerk City Attorney's Office -10/14/2020 It was moved by Weiner and seconded by Salih adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: X X X X X X Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner the Resolution be tp.A Item Number: 6.e. 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY ��.:. -dry in � at COUNCIL ACTION REPORT October 20, 2020 Resolution accepting the work for the storm sewer, drainageways, sanitary sewer, water main, and paving public improvements for Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, and declaring public improvements open for public access and u se. Prepared By: Josh Slattery, Sr. Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: None Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Engineer's Report Resolution Executive Summary: Tamarack Ridge Subdivision is a 60 -lot, 36.58 -acre residential subdivision located south of Scott Boulevard, about a half -mile east of 1 st Avenue. Tamarack Ridge Subdivision extends Tamarack Trail north from where it currently ends to Scott Boulevard. The subdivision also includes a roughly 500 -foot cul-de-sac street named Buckle Down Circle that comes off Tamarack Trail. Background /Analysis: The construction of the storm sewer, drainageways, sanitary sewer, water main, and street paving improvements for the Tamarack Ridge Subdivision have been completed in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications on file with the Engineering Division of the City of Iowa City. ATTACHMENTS: Description Engineer's Report Resolution I r 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 - 1826 (319) 356 - 5000 ENGINEER'S REPORT (319) 356 - 5009 FAX www.icgov.org October 14, 2020 Honorable Mayor and City Council Iowa City, Iowa Re: Tamarack Ridge Subdivision Dear Honorable Mayor and Councilpersons: I hereby certify that the construction of the sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water main, and street paving improvements for Tamarack Ridge Subdivision have been completed in substantial accordance with the plans and specifications on file with the Engineering Division of the City of Iowa City. The required maintenance bonds are on file in the City Clerk's Office for the sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water main improvements constructed by Cornerstone Excavating, Inc. of Washington, Iowa and for the paving improvements constructed by Streb Construction Co., Inc. of Coralville, Iowa. I recommend that the above -referenced improvements be accepted by the City of Iowa City. Sincerely, J son Havel, P.E. :City Engineer !c f Prepared by: Josh Slattery, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 3565149 Resolution No. 20-245 Resolution accepting the work for the storm sewer, drainageways, sanitary sewer, water main, and paving public improvements for Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, and declaring public improvements open for public access and use Whereas, the Engineering Division has certified that the following improvements have been completed in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the Engineering Division. Sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water main improvements for Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, as constructed by Cornerstone Excavating, Inc. of Washington, Iowa. Paving improvements for Tamarack Ridge Subdivision, as constructed by Streb Construction Co., Inc. of Coralville, Iowa. Whereas, the maintenance bonds have been filed in the City Clerk's office; and Whereas, the City of Iowa City has notified those contractors listed previously of the date on which it will consider acceptance of the aforementioned public improvements; and Whereas, the traffic control signs have been installed. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that said improvements are hereby accepted by the City of Iowa City, Iowa and that all dedications and public improvements previously set aside as not being open for public access are hereby formally accepted and declared open for public access and use. Passed and approved this 20th day of October , 2020 tvtaw-v ' proved 1py Attest: a,,, City Clerk City Attorney's Office - 10/14/2020 It was moved by Taylor and seconded by Thomas the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: X Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 7.a. �r p- CITY OE IOWA CITY www.iogov.org October 20, 2020 Motion setting a public hearing for November 2, 2020 on the Commercial Reuse Exception ordinance to amend Title 14 Zoning to allow exceptions to regulations for existing buildings in certain commercial zoning districts. (REZ20-0006) /_1iU101:ILTA 121Z111&'3 Description Planning & Zoning Commission Packet Planning & Zoning Commission Late Handouts P&Z Minutes a r h CITY OF IOWA CITY CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: October 1, 2020 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Kirk Lehmann, Associate Planner, Neighborhood & Development Services Re: Zoning Code Amendment (REZ20-0006) to allow flexibility for alterations and expansions to existing buildings in lower intensity commercial zones Introduction The City of Iowa City's 2020-2021 Strategic Plan includes a goal to promote an inclusive and resilient economy throughout the city. To reach that goal, the City is taking steps to invigorate neighborhood commercial districts and create new neighborhood commercial nodes which encourage healthy, diverse, and sustainable economic activity. The proposed text amendment to the zoning code (REZ20-0006) addresses one barrier for small-scale commercial areas near developed residential neighborhoods: that some underutilized commercial parcels experience difficulties meeting current zoning regulations due to existing physical constraints. The proposed amendment modifies the Special Provisions section for certain commercial zones (14-2C-8), including the Mixed Use (MU), Commercial Office (CO -1), Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1), Community Commercial (CC -2), Central Business Service (CB -2), and Central Business Support (CB -5) zones. The purpose of the amendment is to provide flexibility from zoning regulations where altering or expanding a building is difficult due to existing building and/or site constraints. In such cases, the Board of Adjustment would be able to waive or modify certain zoning standards by special exception. The proposed amendment is detailed in Attachment 1. Background After City Council adopted the 2020-2021 Strategic Plan, the City received an inquiry from a developer regarding a long -vacant property at 1120 North Dodge Street. Without providing some additional flexibility from zoning regulations, the proposal for the site is impossible to achieve. This prompted City staff to review the zoning code for ways to promote the reuse of this and other similar commercial and/or mixed use sites in lower intensity, neighborhood contexts which are underutilized under the City's current standards. The zoning code contains several mechanisms to adjust standards. Administrative methods include minor modifications (14-4B-1), which allow specified requirements to be modified or waived, and minor adjustments, which are a similar provision in the Riverfront Crossings Form Based Development Standards (14 -2G -7H). The zoning code offers greater flexibility through the special exception process. Special exceptions are heard by the five -member Board of Adjustment, which is appointed by City Council to provide scrutiny where allowed in the zoning code. As a quasi-judicial body, appeals of their decisions must go through the district court. For example, properties designated as an Iowa City historic landmark or registered in the National Register of Historic Places may request a special exception to waive dimensional standards, site development standards, and provisional requirements (14 -2C -11A). For each of these mechanisms, a specific set of approval criteria must be met. October 1, 2020 Page 2 Proposed Amendment: Commercial Reuse Exception Applicability Staff developed the proposed amendment as a special exception that provides similar flexibility to what is allowed for historic properties, but with a commercial focus and without competing against those provisions. It would allow the alteration and expansion of existing structures in specified commercial zones where building and/or site constraints related to the zoning code are present. To avoid incentivizing tear downs, the amendment requires that a project utilizing the exception cannot involve demolition of an existing principal structure, nor can it be used for a property designated as an Iowa City historic landmark or registered in the National Register of Historic Places. In addition, new construction projects are not allowed to request this exception. Because the proposed amendment is intended primarily for use in less intense commercial areas near developed residential neighborhoods, only properties in the following zones are eligible: Mixed Use (MU), Commercial Office (CO -1), Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1), Community Commercial (CC -2), Central Business Service (CB -2), and Central Business Support (CB -5). The following zones are explicitly excluded from requesting an exception through the proposed amendment because they are intended to accommodate higher -intensity uses that do not primarily serve neighboring residential areas: Intensive Commercial (CI -1), Highway Commercial (CH -1), and Central Business (CB -10). Approval Criteria To be approved under the proposed amendment, the Board of Adjustment must find that each requested exception meets the following general approval criteria set forth in 14 -4B -3A: 1) The specific proposed exception will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort or general welfare. 2) The specific proposed exception will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity and will not substantially diminish or impair property values in the neighborhood. 3) Establishment of the specific proposed exception will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district in which such property is located. 4) Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or are being provided. 5) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress or egress designed to minimize traffic congestion on public streets. 6) Except for the specific regulations and standards applicable to the exception being considered, the specific proposed exception, in all other respects, conforms to the applicable regulations or standards of the zone in which it is to be located. 7) The proposed exception will be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City, as amended. In addition, staff proposes the following specific approval criteria to ensure that any exception meets the intent of the amendment while maintaining compatibility with adjacent development: 1) The exception is necessary due to existing building or site constraints that make it difficult to meet that standard. 2) The exception will be compatible with and/or complementary to adjacent development in terms of building mass and scale, relative amount of open space, traffic circulation, general layout, and lighting. 3) The exception will not adversely affect views, noise, stormwater runoff, light and air, and privacy of neighboring properties any more than would a development that satisfies the applicable standard. 4) The exception is not contrary to the intent of the standard. 5) The exception will be in the public interest. October 1, 2020 Page 3 Exceptions Exceptions that could be requested through the proposed amendment cover a variety of dimensional and site development standards. However, while certain use -specific development standards may be waived, the proposed amendment would not permit uses where they are not allowed. Potential exceptions could include modifications or waivers from the following standards: 1) 14-4113-4 Specific Approval Criteria for Provisional Uses and Special Exceptions: Includes specific standards for each use allowed provisionally or by special exception, such as density standards for group living uses and design features for attached single- family dwellings. The proposed amendment excludes minimum separation distance provisions for land uses, such as for drinking establishments or adult businesses. 2) 14-4C-2 Specific Approval Criteria: Includes specific standards for each use allowed on site as an accessory use, such as setbacks for drive-throughs, space limitations for home childcare uses, or size requirements for accessory retail uses. 3) 14-2C-4 Dimensional Requirements: Includes lot size, setbacks, height, lot coverage, floor area ratio, open space, and dwelling unit density. 4) 14-2C-6 Commercial Site Development Standards: Includes parking area setbacks and screening, pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation, and standards for large retail uses in CO -1 and CC -2 zones. 5) 14-2C-7 CN -1 Zone Site Development Standards: Includes building setbacks and orientation, parking area setbacks, location and screening, pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation, and the building-streetscape interface in CN -1 zones. 6) 14-2C-8 Central Business Site Development Standards: Includes building setbacks, and orientation, parking area setbacks, location and screening, pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation, the building-streetscape interface, and bonus provisions in CB -2, and CB -5 zones. 7) 14-2C-9 Site Development Standards in MU Zone: Includes building setbacks materials, and orientation, parking area setbacks, location and screening, pedestrian and vehicular access and circulation, and the building-streetscape interface in MU zones. 8) 14-5 Site Development Standards: Includes general standards for off street parking and loading, signs, access management, intersection visibility standards, landscaping and trees, screening and buffering, outdoor lighting, and performance standards, but the proposed amendment excludes sensitive lands and features or floodplain management. Analysis Numerous commercial areas across Iowa City could benefit from the proposed Commercial Reuse Exception amendment. Figure 1 maps which parcels may be able to utilize the proposed amendment, i.e. they have existing buildings and are in eligible zoning districts. The map illustrates that most neighborhood commercial areas are potentially eligible, including the Northside, Towncrest, Olde Town Village, Iowa City Marketplace, Pepperwood Plaza, and Walden Square. Other individual small-scale commercial uses, such as Deluxe Bakery or the Hilltop Tavern, would also be eligible. However, because the proposed amendment only applies to properties in certain commercial zones, some businesses in residential zones would not be eligible, such as the Design Ranch. As such, other amendments may be required to allow more neighborhood commercial uses across Iowa City. In addition, some commercial areas may be eligible though they are not small-scale or neighborhood oriented. These include businesses in the Northgate Business Park or at the intersection of Highway 218 and Highway 1. In those instances, the ordinance relies on the proposed approval criteria to evaluate intent on a case-by-case basis. The criteria primarily address compatibility with surrounding properties, meeting the intent of the City's standards, and the presence of building or site constraints. In the case of most large-scale commercial uses, staff believes it would be difficult for the applicant to prove to the Board that the requested exception is necessary due to existing constraints. October 1, 2020 Page 4 Figure 1. Map of Potentially Eligible Sites for the Commercial Reuse Exception Legend ® Hkstoric & Conservation Districts Base Zones - Central Business Service (CB -2) - Central Business Support (CB -5) - Community Commercial (CC -2) - Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1) - Commercial Office {00-1) Mixed Use (MU) Consistency with Comprehensive Plan In addition to furthering City Council's strategic plan, the proposed amendment also supports several related goals and strategies from the City's comprehensive plan: • Encourage compact, efficient development that is contiguous and connected to existing neighborhoods to reduce the cost of extending infrastructure and services and to preserve farmland and open space at the edge of the city. • Encourage a healthy mix of independent, locally -owned businesses and national businesses. • Improve the environmental and economic health of the community through efficient use of resources. By allowing flexibility for existing commercial buildings, the proposed amendment efficiently utilizes the City's building stock to promote economic activity throughout the community. Staff intends this exception to be primarily used by local businesses on unique infill lots because many national and international businesses prefer new structures that are more standardized. Adoption will provide an avenue for neighborhood businesses to move to established neighborhoods in Iowa City, or to expand in-place where otherwise they may have to move. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the zoning code be amended as illustrated in Attachment 1 to invigorate neighborhood commercial districts and empower new small neighborhood commercial nodes by allowing the Board of Adjustment to provide flexibility from zoning regulations where altering or expanding a building is difficult due to existing building and/or site constraints in MU, CO -1, CN - 1, CC -2, CB -2, and CB -5 zones. October 1, 2020 Page 5 Attachments 1. Proposed Zoning Code Text Amendments 2. Map of Potentially Eligible Sites for the Commercial Reuse Exception Approved by: 1 Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services Attachment 1 Page 1 Draft Zoning Code Text Underlined text is suggested new language. Strike -through notation indicates language to be deleted. Amend 14-2C-11 as follows: D. Commercial Reuse Exception 1. Purpose. The commercial reuse exception allows the alteration of existing buildings for which the constraints of the building and/or site make it difficult to meet certain zoning code standards. It is intended primarily for use in less intense commercial areas in or near developed residential neighborhoods. 2. Applicability. The exception provides flexibility in the desian and use of existin structures provided the following circumstances are met: a. The exception is requested for an alteration or expansion of an existing building; b. The proiect does not result in the demolition of any existing principal structures; c. The property is not designated as an Iowa City landmark or registered in the National Register of Historic Places; and d. The property is not in a CI -1, CH -1, or CB -10 zone. 3. Waivers. The Board of Adiustment may grant a special exception to waive or modify any approval criteria listed in 14-4B-4 "Specific Approval Criteria for Provisional Uses and Special Exceptions" or 14-4C-2 "Specific Approval Criteria, " or any standard in 14-2C-4 "Dimensional Requirements", 14-2C-6 "Commercial Site Development Standards", 14- 2C-7 "Central Business Site Development Standards", 14-2C-8 "CN -1 Zone Site Development Standards", 14-2C-9 "Site Development Standards in MU Zone", or 14-5 "Site Development Standards. However, waivers and modifications cannot be requested for required minimum distances separating land uses or standards in 14-51 "Sensitive Lands and Features" and 14-5J "Floodplain Management Standards". 4. Aaaroval Criteria. In addition to the aeneral special exception approval criteria set forth in chapter 4, article B of this title, the followinq approval criteria must be met: a. The exception is necessary due to existing building or site constraints that make it difficult to meet that standard. b. The exception will be compatible with and/or complementary to adjacent development in terms of building mass and scale, relative amount of open space, traffic circulation, general layout, and lighting. c. The exception will not adversely affect views, noise, stormwater runoff, light and air, and privacy of neighboring properties any more than would a development that satisfies the applicable standard. d. The exception is not contrary to the intent of the standard. e. The exception will be in the public interest. Amend 14-2C-4 as follows: Dimensional Requirements: The dimensional requirements for the commercial zones are stated in tables 2C -2(a) and 2C -2(b) of this section. The following subsections describe in more detail the regulations for each of the dimensional requirements listed in the tables. Provisional uses and uses allowed by special exception may have specific dimensional requirements not specified in tables 2C -2(a) and 2C -2(b) of this section. Approval criteria for these uses are addressed in chapter 4, article B of this title. Dimensional requirements may be waived or modified for developments approved through the planned development process (see chapter 3, article A, "Planned Development Attachment 1 Page 2 Overlay Zone (OPD)'; of this title) or through the commercial reuse or historic preservation exceptions as outlined in section 14-2C-11, "Special Provisions'; of this article. Amend 14-2C-10 as follows: 14-2C-10 Special Exceptions and Minor Modifications to Site Development Standards: A special exception may be granted to waive or modify certain provisions of section 14-2C-6, 14-2C-7, 14-2C-8, or 14-2C-9 of this article through the commercial reuse or historic preservation exceptions in accordance with section 14-2C-11, "Special Provisions. "-A minor modification to adjust specific provisions of section 14-2C-6, 14-2C- 7, 14-2C-8, or 14-2C-9 of this article, may be requested in either of the qualifying situations listed below. Such requests will be reviewed by the design review committee, the director of planning and community development, and the building official according to the procedures for minor modifications as set forth in chapter 8, article B of this title and must meet the following approval criteria. The following approval criteria are to be applied in lieu of the general approval criteria listed in section 14-4B-1, "Minor Modifications'; of this title: Amend 14-4B-4 as follows: Specific Approval Criteria for Provisional Uses and Special Exceptions: The following uses are listed as provisional uses or special exceptions in one or more of the base zones, unless specifically exempted or superseded by more specific provisions of this title. Provisional uses are permitted, subject to the additional requirements contained in this article. A use listed as a special exception in a base zone is permitted only after approval from the board of adjustment, subject to the approval criteria contained in this section and to the general special exception approval criteria contained in section 14-48- 3 of this article. In addition to the approval criteria listed in this article, all provisional uses and special exceptions are required to meet the regulations of the base zone in which they are located and all other applicable regulations of this title. If a regulation in another part of this title conflicts with a regulation contained in this article, the regulation that is more specific to the situation applies. When regulations are equally specific or when it is unclear which regulation to apply, the more restrictive regulation applies. Amend 14-4C-2 as follows: Specific Approval Criteria: Any accessory uses listed in the following subsections must comply with the conditions listed, unless specifically exempted or superseded by more specific provisions of this title. As noted, some require special exception approval from the Board of Adjustment. If a regulation in the base zone chapter conflicts with a regulation contained in this article, the regulation that is more specific to the situation applies. When regulations are equally specific or when it is unclear which regulation to apply, the more restrictive regulation will govern Amend 14 -5B -2A as follows: Applicability: All signs on private property must be installed, maintained, and/or removed according to the provisions of this article, unless specifically exempted or superseded by more specific provisions of this title. Amend 14 -5C -A as follows: It is unlawful for any person to cut, break, or remove any curb along a street except in compliance with the requirements of this article, or unless specifically exempted or superseded by more specific provisions of this title. Attachment 1 Page 3 Amend 14-5D-2 as follows: Applicability: Lots located at the corner of any street intersection must comply with the requirements of this article, unless specifically exempted or superseded by more specific provisions of this title. Amend 14 -5E -2A as follows: Applicability: No building permit shall be issued for the construction, reconstruction or structural alteration of a building nor shall any use be established or converted nor shall a certificate of occupancy be granted for a use without conformity with the provisions of the tree regulations, unless specifically exempted or superseded by more specific provisions of this title. Amend 14-5F-2 as follows: Applicability: The screening and buffering standards will be applied throughout this title, unless specifically exempted or superseded by more specific provisions of this title, where they will be referenced with the numbers S1, S2, S3, etc. The regulations in this article address materials, placement, layout, and timing of installation. The standards in this article are expressed as minimum standards; additional landscaping and screening materials may be used as long as they do not conflict with the provisions of this article. Amend 14 -5G -2A as follows: Applicability of Provisions: The standards contained in this article apply to all uses in all zones, except for the exemptions listed in subsection B of this section, or unless specifically exempted or superseded by more specific provisions of this title. Amend 14-5H-2 as follows: Applicability: The provisions of this article apply to all uses located within the city of Iowa City, unless specifically exempted or superseded by more specific provisions of this title. Nonconforming development is subject to the provisions of chapter 4, article E, "Nonconforming Situations", of this title Attachment 2: Commercial Reuse Exception Potentially Eligible Properties vt' M N A Created by: Kirk Lehmann Date: September 21, 2020 PA. —m -m-4 1 r t ~ �401�,~ A* CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: October 1, 2020 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, Neighborhood & Development Services Re: Proposed Commercial Reuse Exception Ordinance (REZ20-0006) – Updated Maps Staff has updated the maps identifying the properties that are potentially eligible for the proposed Commercial Reuse Exception Ordinance (REZ20-0006) [Attachment 1]. The original map identified properties that may be able to utilize the proposed by amendment. It included properties located in eligible zoning districts that have existing buildings. This map was provided at a city-wide extent. The updated maps include properties located in eligible zoning districts that have existing buildings, but exclude properties located within historic districts and identified as historic landmarks. These properties are not eligible for the proposed amendment because there is an existing provision in the City's zoning code that allows historic properties to request waivers from development standards. The updated maps include one at a city-wide extent and three for smaller geographic areas. Lastly, the original memo to the Planning and Zoning Commission stated that Deluxe Bakery would be a potentially eligible property. Since Deluxe Bakery is located in a local historic district waivers from development standards could be pursued for this property, but under a different provision within the City's zoning code. Attachments: 1. Updated Maps of Potentially Eligible Sites for the Commercial Reuse Exception Commercial Reuse Exception IN Created by: Kirk Lehmann Potentially Eligible Properties - All Date: September 28, 2020 M Commercial Reuse Exception Created by: Kirk Lehmann Potentially Eligible Properties - Downtown & Northeast Date: September 28, 2020 Commercial Reuse Exception Created by: Kirk Lehmann Potentially Eligible Properties - South Central Date: September 28, 2020 U z a Rp LTJ soon PH F44 %40411 � ! U Legend Eligible Zoning Districts Central Business Service (CB -2) Central Business Support (CB -5) Community Commercial (CC -2) - Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1) Commercial Office (CO -1) Mixed Use (MU) 0 STH ST, sr •r F- U W LU W Y NpWKEYE PARK RD=Q: A INj - 0 W w 3 a x MELROSE AVE `o,44P n� v IN BENTST-1N ST 1 iiiii 1-1 i /(t l z F R'4ij�A�i ESCORT HIGHLAND OR 9 O z O M m � n MINUTES PRELIMINARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OCTOBER 1, 2020 —7:00 PM ELECTRONIC FORMAL MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: Susan Craig, Mike Hensch, Phoebe Martin, Mark Nolte, Mark Signs, Billie Townsend MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Sara Hektoen, Anne Russett OTHERS PRESENT: Electronic Meeting (Pursuant to Iowa Code section 21.8) An electronic meeting was held because a meeting in person is impossible or impractical due to concerns for the health and safety of Commission members, staff and the public presented by COVID-19. RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: By a vote of 6-0 the Commissions recommends that the zoning code be amended as illustrated in the staff report to help invigorate neighborhood commercial districts and empower new small neighborhood commercial nodes by allowing the Board of Adjustment to provide flexibility from zoning regulations in certain commercial zones. By a vote of 6-0 the Commissions recommends to amend Title 14 Zoning to allow parking reductions of up to 50% of the required number of spaces through a minor modification process in the Mixed Use (MU), Commercial Office (CO -1), Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1), Community Commercial (CC -2), Central Business Service (CB -2), and Central Business Support (CB -5) zoning districts. CALL TO ORDER: Hensch called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. Planning and Zoning Commission October 1, 2020 Page 2 of 13 CASE NO. REZ20-0006: Commercial Reuse Exception Ordinance Consideration of the Commercial Reuse Exception Ordinance, which amends Title 14 Zoning to allow exceptions to zoning regulations for alterations and expansions to existing buildings due to building and/or site constraints in the Mixed Use (MU), Commercial Office (CO -1), Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1), Community Commercial (CC -2), Central Business Service (CB -2), and Central Business Support (CB -5) zoning districts. Russett stated in terms of background, the City actually received an inquiry from a developer about a long vacant building located at 1120 North Dodge Street, and what was being proposed required flexibility from the City's zoning regulations. There are also other underutilized commercial properties that have experienced issues meeting zoning regulations due to existing physical and site and building constraints. The proposed amendment would support the reuse of existing buildings by providing flexibility from zoning regulations due to building and site constraints. There is existing flexibility incorporated into the Code now that provides some flexibility from zoning regulations. These are reviewed administratively through the minor modification process. There's also minor adjustments which staff can review in the Riverfront Crossings District and there are also some special exceptions that the Board of Adjustment can review for providing waivers to zoning regulations, particularly for historic properties. Russett explained this proposed amendment would expand upon those existing provisions in the Code. In terms of a summary of the ordinance, the goal is to address barriers for small scale commercial areas that have site constraints by providing flexibility from zoning regulations, so that means flexibility from parking standards, setback, lot coverage, etc. The focus is on lower intensity commercial zones that typically serve neighboring residences. It would allow alteration and expansion of existing structures, it would not allow the demolition of existing principal structures, and it requires the review and approval by the Board of Adjustment through a special exception process and there's specific approval criteria outlined in the draft. Next Russett discussed the applicability of the proposed ordinance, there are certain commercial zones that are eligible and certain zones that are ineligible. She showed there are six eligible zones, which are lower intensity commercial zones. The ineligible zones include Intensive Commercial zones, Highway Commercial, and the Central Business, CB -10 zone. Those three zones are higher intensity and have been excluded because they typically don't provide commercial uses to neighboring residential areas. In addition, the project must result in an alteration or expansion of an existing structure, it can't result in any demolition of a principal structure. Finally, the property cannot be designated as a historic structure and that's because there are existing Code provisions that provide flexibility from zoning regulations for historic structures. In terms of potential waivers, Russett noted the list is pretty extensive. The waivers that could be requested include waivers from specific approval criteria. These are approval criteria for specific land uses, for example, density standards for group living uses or requirements for multifamily uses. Also, approval criteria for accessory uses would be eligible. This includes things like drive setbacks for drive throughs, or size requirements for accessory retail uses, and will also allow waivers from commercial zone dimensional requirements. That includes things like lot size, setbacks, height, open space, as well as site development standards, both commercial site development standards and general site development standards. This includes things like Planning and Zoning Commission October 1, 2020 Page 3 of 13 parking area setbacks, screening, access, and circulation. In terms of general site development standards, this includes things like parking, landscaping, screening, outdoor lighting. Russett stated there are certain waivers that are not eligible for this request and that includes the minimum separation distance standards that are in the Code for drinking establishments, as well as separation distance requirements for adult businesses. Additionally there are sensitive areas ordinance and floodplain management regulations, and waivers from those standards could not be requested through the proposed ordinance. The proposed ordinance also includes a list of specific approval criteria, Russett showed the approval criteria that staff would review the application against as well as the Board of Adjustment. All of these criteria must be met in order for the project to be approved by the Board of Adjustment. The first approval criteria is that the exception is necessary because of existing building or site constraints that make meeting the standard difficult. In addition, the exception must be compatible and/or complimentary to adjacent development in terms of mass and scale, open space, traffic circulation, general layout and lighting. The exception cannot adversely affect views, noise, storm water, light and air privacy from neighboring residences. The exception cannot be contrary to the intent of the standard and it must be in the public interest. Staff reviewed and did an analysis to identify the parcels that would be potentially eligible to request a waiver, and most neighborhood commercial areas are eligible. This includes the Northside Market area, Towncrest, Old Town Village and Pepperwood Plaza. There's also some other pockets of commercial that would also be eligible such as the area on North Dodge, for example, Hilltop Tavern. Russett noted this does not provide any flexibility from standards for businesses that are located in residential zones. She showed a city-wide map that shows some potential eligible properties, they are parcels that have a structure on them and no vacant lots are included and any properties that are historic or located in a historic district have also been excluded. Russett noted they can see from the map that there are some commercial areas that would be eligible that are not what one would think of a small scale or neighborhood oriented commercial. That includes the North Gate Business Park, as well as the intersection of 218 and Highway 1. In these cases, the amendment would rely on the approval criteria which would be evaluated on a case by case basis and they must address any compatibility standards related to surrounding properties. The burden of proof to meet those specific approval criteria is on the applicant and large-scale commercial properties may have a difficult time meeting some of those standards. Staff has reviewed this against the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed amendments supports the City Council's Strategic Plan, as well as several policies within the Comprehensive Plan related to encouraging compact and efficient development and a healthy mix of independent and locally owned businesses, and improving environmental and economic health of the community through efficient use of resources. The flexibility would allow existing commercial buildings to be efficiently utilized to promote economic activity throughout the community. Staff thinks that this would be primarily used by local businesses on unique infill lots. The role of the Commission tonight is to review the proposed zoning code text amendments and its consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and provide a recommendation to City Council. Staff recommends the Zoning Code be amended as illustrated in the staff report to help invigorate neighborhood commercial districts and empower new small neighborhood commercial nodes by allowing the Board of Adjustment to approve flexibility from zoning regulations in certain commercial zones. Planning and Zoning Commission October 1, 2020 Page 4 of 13 Hensch asked if the impetus for this amendment the strategic plan the City Council approved. Russet stated it is a combination of things. They've received inquiries for infill sites over the years that have had a challenging time meeting standards. The most recent one was a request for reusing the building on 1120 North Dodge. Hensch asked if all these waivers have to go to the Board of Adjustment or is there a process where some of the minor modifications can just be administratively approved by staff? Russett replied the existing minor modifications will stay as is in the Code. However, the proposed amendment would require review and approval by the Board of Adjustment through a special exception process. Hensch asked if the maps Russett showed were for illustration purposes only or did they in fact contain all the applicable zones? Russett said they included all of the applicable zones and also removed any properties that were vacant. They wanted to show all those zones that were eligible that had existing structures on them. Hensch also asked about the stormwater waivers and would the Board of Adjustment be able to waive a requirement of the city engineer. Russett stated the stormwater management regulations are in a different title of the Code, and that would not be eligible under the proposed amendment because the stormwater management regulations are not in the Zoning Code. Signs noted Russett mentioned infill several times and are these special exceptions available on an empty lot and not just for reuse in properties that are reusing an existing building. Russett confirmed empty lots are not eligible. Craig questioned how this will affect things in the long term, if someone has a use, they have the property, they get the special exception, and everything goes fine with their commercial enterprise but six years later they're moving on, they've grown and they're going to a new building, or whatever. Is that building then available for a different use or do the people who want to use it for something else now have to come back and get a special exception as well. Russett said this ordinance isn't changing what uses are allowed in these commercial zones, it's just providing flexibility to specific standards, but not uses, and the special exceptions go with the property, not the ownership. Townsend asked if there is a property that's not on this list or map, how can they take advantage of these exceptions. Russett said if something comes available that's meets these requirements and is in an eligible zone with an existing structure and there's no demolition, if they meet the approval criteria, they could request a waiver. Townsend asked if there was a good neighbor held for special exceptions. Russett said it is encouraged and explained there's a public hearing, there's notification, there's signs, very similar to zonings and subdivisions. Hensch opened the public comment. Hearing no comments, Hensch closed the public comment. Nolte moved that the zoning code be amended as illustrated in the staff report to help Planning and Zoning Commission October 1, 2020 Page 5 of 13 invigorate neighborhood commercial districts and empower new small neighborhood commercial nodes by allowing the Board of Adjustment to provide flexibility from zoning regulations in certain commercial zones. Townsend seconded the motion. Hensch noted he really likes this and thinks they need to find a way to work on neighborhood commercial. He hopes this is something that can really help entrepreneurs and developers to be able to reuse some of these properties, particularly in the neighborhood commercial areas. Townsend agreed and noted there are a lot of places that are vacant now and it would be nice to get them filled up. Especially the Marketplace Mall, it is such a big, beautiful mall, and there's nobody in it. Signs agrees that there's a lot of vacant and underutilized properties in quite a few areas and unfortunately, there's a chance that they'll see more vacant properties in the in the near term so making it potentially easier for a new person to come in and start a new business is a positive thing. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. CASE NO. CREZ20-0007: Parking Reduction in Commercial Zones Ordinance Consideration of the Parking Reductions in Commercial Zones Ordinance, which amends Title 14 Zoning to allow parking reductions of up to 50% of the required number of spaces through a minor modification process in the Mixed Use (MU), Commercial Office (CO -1), Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1), Community Commercial (CC -2), Central Business Service (CB -2), and Central Business Support (CB -5) zoning districts. Russett began with background stating this again is related to barriers to infill development and minimum parking requirements can be a barrier to developing and redeveloping infill commercial properties. Russett stated this would apply to vacant lots and the proposed amendment could support the development of vacant infill commercial lots by providing reductions to parking standards. Russett noted there are some existing provisions in the Code that provide reductions to parking standards but there are also gaps, which this amendment is trying to address, the Code often does not apply reductions to multifamily parking for mixed use development in commercial zones and sometimes the reductions are limited to small amounts that wouldn't be beneficial for commercial properties. In terms of a summary of the proposed ordinance, staff is proposing to replace an existing provision in the Code that applies to CN -1 Zones, the Neighborhood Commercial Zone, which was adopted in 1995 and it allowed land banking to reduce parking. Russett noted how that provision is structured is that it allows reduced parking to promote neighborhood commercial uses. It could require that up to 30% of the land that would otherwise be needed for onsite parking remain as open space and then if that area was needed in the future, the City could require the owner to construct the parking. The CN -1 Zone is not heavily utilized throughout the City and staff did a search and couldn't find any examples of this provision ever being used since Item Number: 7.b. �r p- CITY OE IOWA CITY www.iogov.org October 20, 2020 Motion setting a public hearing for November 2, 2020 on an ordinance to amend Title 14 Zoning to allow parking reductions in certain commercial zoning districts. (REZ20-0007) ATTACHMENTS: Description Planning & Zoning Commission Packet Planning & Zoning Commission Late Handouts P&Z Minutes CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM CITY OF IOVVA CITY Date: October 1, 2020 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Kirk Lehmann, Associate Planner, Neighborhood & Development Services Re: Zoning Code Amendment (REZ20-0007) to allow parking reductions in lower intensity commercial zones Introduction The City of Iowa City's 2020-2021 Strategic Plan includes a goal to promote an inclusive and resilient economy throughout the city. To reach that goal, the City is taking steps to invigorate neighborhood commercial districts and create new small neighborhood commercial nodes which encourage healthy, diverse, and sustainable economic activity. The proposed zoning code amendment (REZ20-0007) seeks to further this goal by addressing one barrier for small-scale commercial areas near developed residential neighborhoods: that minimum parking standards can prevent neighborhood commercial development. The proposed amendment replaces a provision that allows parking reductions only in CN -1 zones with one that allows parking reductions in less intense commercial zones, including the following: Mixed Use (MU), Commercial Office (CO -1), Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1), Community Commercial (CC -2), Central Business Service (CB -2), and Central Business Support (CB -5). The proposed amendment is detailed in Attachment 1. Background After City Council adopted the 2020-2021 Strategic Plan, City staff have heard that minimum parking requirements are a constraint to the redevelopment of vacant commercial sites in several other projects. This prompted City staff to review the zoning code for ways to promote the use of other similar sites in lower intensity, neighborhood contexts which were not being utilized under the City's current standards. The zoning code contains several mechanisms to adjust parking standards. Administrative methods include parking reductions by landbanking in CN -1 zones, by allowing compact, scooter, and motorcycle parking, by promoting Liner Buildings in the Riverfront Crossings district, by allowing fees in lieu of parking in the downtown and Riverfront Crossings district for up to 50% of spaces, and by allowing nearby off-site parking in most non-residential zones. The code also includes minor modifications (14-4B-1) from standards which allow the number of parking spaces to be reduced by up to 10% for commercial uses, up to 30% of dwelling units in CB -5 and CB -10 zones provided they are affordable, and up to 50% where parking is shared by non-residential uses with different hours. The code also permits continuing legal nonconforming uses. The code offers even greater flexibility through the special exception process where the Board of Adjustment must find the request to meet all applicable criteria as specified in the code. For example, the code includes special exceptions from standards which allow the number of parking spaces to be reduced by up to 50% where a specific use has unique characteristics or will reduce the ability to use or occupy a historic property; up to 100% for historic buildings or October 1, 2020 Page 2 where nearby off-site parking is guaranteed in residential and CB -10 zones, and from 50% to 100% by allowing fees in lieu of parking in the downtown and Riverfront Crossings district. While these standards cover a variety of situations, they do not allow the reduction of multifamily parking for mixed use developments in commercial zones, nor do they apply in all situations. This is problematic as this can stop infill projects which include new construction and can leave sites vacant in traditional commercial areas. For example, a mixed-use project was discussed for the Franz Pest Control site, but it was not feasible because parking reductions were not available for multi -family units. Similarly,620 South Riverside Drive is a 15,000 square foot vacant parcel with multiple inquiries, but the site cannot be parked as required under current standards due its size and layout. Proaosed Amendment: Parkina Reductions in Commercial Zones The existing provision that would be replaced allows land banking to reduce parking in Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1) zones. As currently written, the City may administratively reduce the minimum parking to promote small scale commercial uses in conveniently located neighborhood shopping areas that serve nearby residents. The City may require that the owner sign an agreement that up to 30% of the land that would otherwise be needed to provide the required amount of parking shall be set aside onsite to provide for the future construction of a parking area if the City determines it is necessary. Because it is restricted to the relatively uncommon CN -1 zone, the provision is underutilized with no current examples of its use since adoption. The goal of the proposed amendment is similar, i.e. to promote small-scale commercial uses in neighborhood shopping areas that primarily serve nearby residential neighborhoods. However, the proposed amendment would expand parking reductions to all zones that can utilize the proposed Commercial Reuse Exception (MU, CO -1, CN -1, CC -2, CB -2, and CB -5 zones), would only waive up to 50% of the required number of spaces, and would not require land banking. In addition, the process would change from Director approval to a minor modification which includes notification of nearby property owners and an administrative hearing. The proposed parking reduction could be utilized for new construction, redevelopment, alteration, or expansion projects that include commercial and/or residential uses. Except for the CN -1 landbanking provision, other parking flexibility offered through the code would remain, including for CB -10 zones downtown. To ensure the amendment meets its purpose, buildings are limited to a 5,000 square foot footprint, which is the maximum typically allowed in CN -1 zones and is scaled appropriately to adjacent house -scale buildings. In addition, the developer must submit a parking demand analysis which demonstrates that the amount of parking proposed will sufficiently meet the development's parking demand. Finally, the proposed amendment maintains protections for historic or potentially historic properties by not allowing reductions for development that results in the demolition of an Iowa City landmark, or a property in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Analysis Numerous commercial areas across Iowa City could benefit from the proposed parking reduction amendment. Figure 1 is a map showing which parcels that are in eligible zoning districts (MU, CO -1, CN -1, CC -2, CB -2, and CB -5). The map indicates that most neighborhood commercial areas are potentially eligible, including the Northside, Towncrest, Olde Town Village, Iowa City Marketplace, Pepperwood Plaza, and Walden Square. The proposed amendment would be especially useful in areas where some commercial lots remain vacant, such as at the southeast corner of Muscatine and 1St Avenue (2229 Muscatine Avenue). However, because the proposed amendment only applies to properties in certain commercial zones, existing businesses in residential zones could not use the proposed amendment. October 1, 2020 Page 3 However, some commercial areas may be eligible though they are not small-scale or neighborhood oriented. These include businesses in the Northgate Business Park or at the intersection of Highway 218 and Highway 1. In those instances, the ordinance relies on the parking study and building size restrictions to ensure the parking reductions are appropriate to the context of each site. Regardless, reducing parking where appropriate to match market realities results in numerous economic and environmental benefits, including reduced costs to business, less stormwater runoff, and more efficient use of the site. Figure 1. Map of Potentially Eligible Sites for Parking Reductions - anwor Al Legend ® Historic & Conservation Districts Base Zones - Central Business Service (CB -2j - Central Business Support(CB-5) - Community Commercial (CC -2) - Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1) - Commercial office (Co -1) - Mixed Use (MU} S t �• �. - - - That said, reducing parking may affect some properties in older parts of the City that already experience some issues related to overflow parking. Most properties near the Northside Marketplace and Mercy Hospital are in commercial zones and could potentially use the proposed parking reduction if they can sufficiently demonstrate through a study that they can accommodate their parking demand. To avoid on -street parking spillover effects near residential properties, the City can include conditions through the minor modification process, such as restricting the number of customers or allowing a lesser parking reduction than the full 50% of spaces. Consistency with Comprehensive Plan In addition to furthering City Council's most recent strategic plan, the amendment also aligns with the City's Climate Action and Adaptation Plan which discusses reducing parking minimums to encourage trips by modes of transportation other than the automobile. Furthermore, the proposed amendment supports several related goals and strategies from the City's comprehensive plan: • Encourage compact, efficient development that is contiguous and connected to existing neighborhoods to reduce the cost of extending infrastructure and services and to preserve farmland and open space at the edge of the city. • Discourage sprawl by promoting small -lot and infill development. October 1, 2020 Page 4 • Improve the environmental and economic health of the community through efficient use of resources. By allowing parking reductions, the proposed amendment efficiently promotes economic activity throughout the community. Staff intends this exception to be primarily used on unique infill lots. The parking reduction also assists businesses which serve surrounding neighbors and consequently attract less automobile traffic. Adoption will provide an avenue for redevelopment of neighborhood mixed and commercial uses on infill sites where room for parking may be limited. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the zoning code be amended as illustrated in Attachment 1 to invigorate neighborhood commercial districts and new small neighborhood commercial nodes by replacing a provision that allows parking reductions from only Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1) zones with a provision that allows parking reductions of up to 50% in MU, CO -1, CN -1, CC -2, CB -2, and CB - 5 zones. Attachments 1. Proposed Zoning Code Text Amendments 2. Full -Sized Map of Potentially Eligible Sites for Parking Reductions Approved by: 1 Danielle Sitzman, AICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services Attachment 1 Page 1 Draft Zoning Code Text Amendments Underlined text is suggested new language. Strike -through notation indicates language to be deleted. Italics indicate notes. Amend 14 -5A -4F as follows (will affect number for subsequent items as well): 2. Minor Modification For Parking_Allowed Reductions For Shared On Site Parking: The building official, in consultation with the Director of Neighborhood and Development Services, may approve a minor modification as specified in section 14-413-1 of this title to reduce the total number of parking spaces required by up to fifty percent (50%) if the uses sharing the parking are not normally open, used, or operated during the same hours. To qualify for a reduction under this provision, a parking demand analysis must be submitted that provides evidence that the amount of parking proposed for the shared parking area will be sufficient to meet the parking demand. This reduction is not allowed for residential uses. 3. Minor Modification For Parkina Reduction in Commercial Zones: The buildina official. in consultation with the Director of Neighborhood and Development Services, may approve a minor modification as specified in 14-413-1 of this title to reduce the total number of parking spaces required by up to fifty percent (50%) if it meets the following standards: a. It must be in a CB -2, CB -5, CC -2, CN -1, CO -1, or MU zone; b. Buildings must be limited to a footprint of 5,000 square feet; c. A parking demand analysis must be submitted that provides evidence that the amount of parking proposed will be sufficient to meet the parking demand, which depending on the complexity of the site, may require an engineered study, as determined by staff; and d. The proposed development must not result in the demolition of a property that is designated as an Iowa City landmark, registered in the National Register of Historic Places. or individually eliaible for the National Reaister of Historic Places. 4. Minor Modification For Parking Reduction In The Central Business Zones: In the CB - 5 and CB -10 Zones, a minor modification may be granted as specified in section 14-46- 1 of this title exempting up to thirty percent (30%) of the total number of dwelling units contained in a building from the minimum parking requirements, provided that those dwelling units are committed to the City's assisted housing program or any other affordable housing program approved by the City. 5. Minor Modification for Commercial Use Parking Reductions. The number of required parking spaces for commercial uses may be reduced up to ten percent (10%). Attachment 1 Page 2 Amend 14-48-1A as follows (will affect number for subsequent items as well): 1. The number of required parking spaces for commercial uses may be reduced up to ten percent (10%). 2. The building official, in consultation with the Director of Planning and G„mm„nity Neighborhood and Development Services, may approve a minor red UGtiGRmodification of up to fifty percent (50%) of the total number of parking spaces required, if the uses sharing the parking are not normally open, used, or operated during the same hours. However, this reduction is not allowed for residential uses. To qualify for a reduction under this provision, a parking demand analysis must be submitted that provides evidence that the amount of parking proposed for the shared parking area will be sufficient to meet the parking demand. 3. The building official, in consultation with the Director of Neighborhood and Development Services, may approve a minor modification as specified in 14-413-1 of this title to reduce the total number of parking spaces required by up to fifty percent (50%) if it meets the following standards: a. It must be in a CB -2, CB -5, CC -2, CN -1, CO -1, or MU zone; b. Buildings must be limited to a footprint of 5,000 square feet; c. A parking demand analvsis must be submitted that provides evidence that the amount of parking proposed will be sufficient to meet the parking demand, which depending on the complexity of the site, may require an engineered study, as determined by staff; and d. The proposed development must not result in the demolition of a property that is designated as an Iowa City landmark, registered in the National Register of Historic Places, or individually eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. 43. In the CB -5 and CB -10 Zones, a minor modification maybe granted exempting up to thirty percent (30%) of the total number of dwelling units contained in a building from the minimum parking requirements; provided that those dwelling units are committed to the City's assisted housing program or any other affordable housing program approved by the City. Attachment 2:Proposed Parking Reduction Properties Zoned CB -2, CB -5, CC -2, CN -1, CO -1, MU 9'7 N Created by: Kirk Lehmann Date: September 23, 2020 .7. . _41kj; is - A "T.021i iw "Y PA. _1 r t t'�~ A* CITY OF IOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Date: October 1, 2020 To: Planning & Zoning Commission From: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, Neighborhood & Development Services Re: Proposed Commercial Parking Reduction Ordinance (REZ20-0007) — Updated Maps Staff has updated the maps identifying the properties that are potentially eligible for the proposed Commercial Parking Reduction Ordinance (REZ20-0007) [Attachment 1]. The original map was provided at a city-wide extent. The updated maps include one at a city- wide extent and three others for smaller geographic areas. Attachments: 1. Updated Maps of Potentially Eligible Sites for Parking Reductions Proposed Parking Reduction Amendment IN Created by: Kirk Lehmann Properties Zoned CB -2, CB -5, CC -2, CN -1, CO -1, MU - All Date: September 28, 2020 M Proposed Parking Reduction Amendment 1V Created by: Kirk Lehmann Properties Zoned CB -2, CB -5, CC -2, CN -1, CO -1, MU - Downtown & Northeast A Date: September 28, 2020 Proposed Parking Reduction Amendment " Created by: Kirk Lehmann Properties Zoned CB -2, CB -5, CC -2, CN -1, CO -1, MU - South Central Date: September 28, 2020 Rp LAMP CAR , NF RAMA -o AG �L O ���RgMP C URV Legend 9 • FINE Base Zones Central Business Service (CB -2) - Central Business Support (CB -5) Community Commercial (CC -2) Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1) Commercial Office (CO -1) Mixed Use (MU) O U W } W Y NppWKEYE PARK RD S �I Q x I' MELROSE AVE v< IPP 4 \00P 9m j0 v s�y�o I MINUTES PRELIMINARY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OCTOBER 1, 2020 —7:00 PM ELECTRONIC FORMAL MEETING MEMBERS PRESENT: Susan Craig, Mike Hensch, Phoebe Martin, Mark Nolte, Mark Signs, Billie Townsend MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Sara Hektoen, Anne Russett OTHERS PRESENT: Electronic Meeting (Pursuant to Iowa Code section 21.8) An electronic meeting was held because a meeting in person is impossible or impractical due to concerns for the health and safety of Commission members, staff and the public presented by COVID-19. RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: By a vote of 6-0 the Commissions recommends that the zoning code be amended as illustrated in the staff report to help invigorate neighborhood commercial districts and empower new small neighborhood commercial nodes by allowing the Board of Adjustment to provide flexibility from zoning regulations in certain commercial zones. By a vote of 6-0 the Commissions recommends to amend Title 14 Zoning to allow parking reductions of up to 50% of the required number of spaces through a minor modification process in the Mixed Use (MU), Commercial Office (CO -1), Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1), Community Commercial (CC -2), Central Business Service (CB -2), and Central Business Support (CB -5) zoning districts. CALL TO ORDER: Hensch called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. Planning and Zoning Commission October 1, 2020 Page 5 of 13 invigorate neighborhood commercial districts and empower new small neighborhood commercial nodes by allowing the Board of Adjustment to provide flexibility from zoning regulations in certain commercial zones. Townsend seconded the motion. Hensch noted he really likes this and thinks they need to find a way to work on neighborhood commercial. He hopes this is something that can really help entrepreneurs and developers to be able to reuse some of these properties, particularly in the neighborhood commercial areas. Townsend agreed and noted there are a lot of places that are vacant now and it would be nice to get them filled up. Especially the Marketplace Mall, it is such a big, beautiful mall, and there's nobody in it. Signs agrees that there's a lot of vacant and underutilized properties in quite a few areas and unfortunately, there's a chance that they'll see more vacant properties in the in the near term so making it potentially easier for a new person to come in and start a new business is a positive thing. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. CASE NO. CREZ20-0007: Parking Reduction in Commercial Zones Ordinance Consideration of the Parking Reductions in Commercial Zones Ordinance, which amends Title 14 Zoning to allow parking reductions of up to 50% of the required number of spaces through a minor modification process in the Mixed Use (MU), Commercial Office (CO -1), Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1), Community Commercial (CC -2), Central Business Service (CB -2), and Central Business Support (CB -5) zoning districts. Russett began with background stating this again is related to barriers to infill development and minimum parking requirements can be a barrier to developing and redeveloping infill commercial properties. Russett stated this would apply to vacant lots and the proposed amendment could support the development of vacant infill commercial lots by providing reductions to parking standards. Russett noted there are some existing provisions in the Code that provide reductions to parking standards but there are also gaps, which this amendment is trying to address, the Code often does not apply reductions to multifamily parking for mixed use development in commercial zones and sometimes the reductions are limited to small amounts that wouldn't be beneficial for commercial properties. In terms of a summary of the proposed ordinance, staff is proposing to replace an existing provision in the Code that applies to CN -1 Zones, the Neighborhood Commercial Zone, which was adopted in 1995 and it allowed land banking to reduce parking. Russett noted how that provision is structured is that it allows reduced parking to promote neighborhood commercial uses. It could require that up to 30% of the land that would otherwise be needed for onsite parking remain as open space and then if that area was needed in the future, the City could require the owner to construct the parking. The CN -1 Zone is not heavily utilized throughout the City and staff did a search and couldn't find any examples of this provision ever being used since Planning and Zoning Commission October 1, 2020 Page 6 of 13 it was adopted in 1995. Therefore, staff is proposing to get rid of that land banking requirement and revise it to allow a reduction that would be available for new construction, redevelopment, alteration or expansion of projects for residential and commercial uses within again, similar to the last ordinance, these lower intensity commercial zones. This would not apply to the Central Business District Zone or Intensive Commercial or Highway Commercial. The parking reductions could be requested for both commercial and residential uses, up to 50% of the required parking could be waived, no land banking would be required and it would be reviewed through the City's minor modification process which is an administrative staff level review but does require notifying neighbors of the request and an administrative hearing. Staff has identified some approval criteria that they think would be appropriate for staff to review in any requests for parking reductions. To ensure that this really assists smaller scale neighborhood commercial buildings, they want to limit the footprint of those buildings to 5000 square feet. They would like the applicant to submit a parking demand analysis that demonstrates the proposed parking will meet the demand. Also the ordinance would protect historic, or potentially historic structures by not allowing their demolition. Again, staff looked at the areas that could be eligible to request a parking reduction and it includes Pepperwood Plaza, Old Town Village and it would also be useful in areas where commercial lots remain vacant, like 2229 Muscatine Avenue and 620 South Riverside Drive. Russett showed a couple maps that showed the parcels that have the eligible zoning district. It includes vacant lots and includes lots with structures on them. Russett noted similar to the last ordinance, there are some commercial areas that are eligible but may not be areas that one would think of as smaller scale commercial, like the North Gate Business Park, and if a request for reduction was requested and it would rely on a case by case review and building size limits that staff would review by each request. Some of the benefits are it would reduce costs of businesses, it could potentially encourage other modes of transportation, it would be less impervious surface and less runoff and a more efficient use of the site. The proposed amendment does support several Comprehensive Goals and strategies as well as the City's Strategic Plan and Climate Action Plan. The role of the Commission is to determine if the proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and make a recommendation to Council. Staff recommends the Commission recommend approval of the proposed ordinance as presented in the staff report. Hensch asked on the parking demand analysis, is that just something as simple as they could just give like a prediction of their parking demands or the historical parking demands, or would they need to retain a consultant to develop that. Russett said it wouldn't be required but the ordinance will give staff flexibility to request a more robust study if they felt it was necessary based on the proposal. Hensch asked if there is anything the MPO does, because they do all that traffic analysis, in terms of a parking analysis or where do those numbers come from. Russett replied the applicant has to provide it. Hensch then asked if there's retail on the first floor and housing units on the second floor is that Planning and Zoning Commission October 1, 2020 Page 7 of 13 taken into consideration to make sure there's enough parking provided for residents, could they decrease those numbers. Russett said the applicant could request a reduction up to 50%. Finally, Hensch asked if the environmental improvement is simply because of the reduction of impervious pavement. Russett replied that is a benefit but it can also potentially mean more people might bike or walk and therefore could be help with emissions if there's less car traffic. Hensch opened the public comment. Having none, Hensch closed the public comment. Craig moved to amend Title 14 Zoning to allow parking reductions of up to 50% of the required number of spaces through a minor modification process in the Mixed Use (MU), Commercial Office (CO -1), Neighborhood Commercial (CN -1), Community Commercial (CC -2), Central Business Service (CB -2), and Central Business Support (CB -5) zoning districts. Townsend seconded the motion. Hensch stated he thinks this is a great idea as he thinks they really need to decrease the amount of concrete and the creation of stormwater runoff and find ways to green the City and this is a way to do it. Martin stated she is always in favor of less parking, because she likes encouraging less driving but also wants to be on record that she hopes the City is also looking at bettering the bike lanes, and some sort of patrol to make sure that cars are respectful of those bike lanes. She really hopes that this spurs a further conversation about making sure that the City does have the connectivity that they've been talking about for years, whether it's pedestrian or bicycle, a further conversation does need to happen. Overall yes, she wants less parking and less concrete but to not forget the big picture. Townsend respectfully disagreed with Martin, for example on Muscatine there is not a lot of places to park, there is a CVS and a Walgreens but as far as on -street parking, there is none for any small business, and biking is not always an option for more mature individuals. She agrees there is a need for both, yes they need safety for bicycles and safety for walking, but also places for those who do still drive to be able to park and not have to walk a mile to get to those businesses. Signs stated he has been on record before expressing his concerns about the continued parking reduction efforts throughout the community. He is not a bike rider but looking at some projects where things have been put in with parking reductions such as what happened on South Gilbert around Big Grove Brewery has caused issues. Also on Summit Street, he has seen issues around Deluxe Bakery when it's busy, therefore a 50% reduction concerns him. A vote was taken and the motion passed 6-0. Item Number: 7.c. �r 1P - CITY OE IOWA CITY www.iogov.org October 20, 2020 Motion setting a public hearing for November 2, 2020 on an ordinance rezoning approximately 0.55 acres of property from Central Business (CB -10) zone to CB -10 with a Historic District Overlay (CB-10/OHD) for property located at 109, 111, 115, 117, and 121 E. College Street (REZ20-02). /_1AIF_TO:ILTA 121ZIII & I Description PZ Staff Report with Attachments PZ Final Minutes r � ,:,® CITY OF IOWA CITY ��'M 4 � T4 MEMORANDUM Date: May 14, 2020 To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Jade Pederson, Planning Intern Re: Designation 109, 111-113, 115, and 117-123 East College Street as Historic Landmarks (REZ20-02) Background: Tailwind College St. IC, LLC has requested that the properties located at 109, 111-113, 115, and 117-123 East College Street, be designated as Iowa City Historic Landmarks. This request is a part of a larger proposed development project that would create a new apartment building on the southern portion of these lots while also preserving the historic storefronts of these buildings. The City of Iowa City is currently working towards nomination of an area in the downtown to be listed as a historic district in the National Register of Historic Places. These subject properties fall within the proposed historic district area. Construction of 109 East College Street (Dooley Block, west bay) started in 1874 for the Dooley Block, a 4 -bay, 2 -story brick building with Late Victorian Romanesque and Italianate fagade details. Since then, the two middle bays have been demolished and the two remaining bays were spilt into separate structures. This particular structure has been home to stores, billiards, and saloons over the years. It is considered key contributing according to the survey done as a part of the nomination process of the Downtown District for its distinctive architectural character and contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City. At 111-113 East College Street, the Sears, Roebuck, & Co. Building was built in 1929 in the place of the two central bays of the original Dooley Block building. These properties were built as a 3 -bay, 2 -story building in a Commercial Brick Front style. Over the years, changes have occurred on the storefront of the structure, however they are recognized as historically appropriate. The 2017 survey done for the Downtown District considered this structure as key contributing for its architectural character and contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City. 115 East College Street is one of the original bays of the Dooley Block. This eastern bay is much like the western bay of the Dooley Block, with Late Victorian Romanesque and Italiante details. This building has undergone storefront and sign band alterations. Since the late 19th Century this structure has housed numerous shops over the years. For its distinctive architectural character and contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City, this building is considered key contributing according to the Downtown District survey for the potential listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Crescent Block, 117-123 East College Street, was built in 1894 as a 4 -bay, 3 -story building. This building utilizes a Commercial Brick Front style and Chicago -style architecture. This structure has since had alteration of the storefronts of the two eastern bays. In 1930, the original entry bay was remodeled to reflect Art Deco styling in a small storefront. This building is associated with a locally significant individual in the commercial and financial history of downtown, C. F. Lovelace. For its architectural character, contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City, and for its association with a locally significant individual, this structure May 14, 2020 Page 2 is considered key contributing by the 2017 Downtown District survey for the potential listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Historic Preservation Commission Review: The Historic Preservation Commission met on May 14, 2020 and conducted a public hearing at which they reviewed and evaluated the historic significance of properties located at 109, 111-113, 115, and 117-123 East College Street. The Commission determined that all the properties meet the requirements for landmark designation and voted to recommend approval of the local landmark designations. Planning and Zoning Commission Review: Landmark designation is a zoning overlay and therefore requires a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission to the City Council. The Commission's role is to review the proposed designation based on its relation to the Comprehensive Plan and the proposed public improvements and plans for the renewal of the area involved. There are two plans that apply to this proposal: 1) the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and 2) the Historic Preservation Plan. These properties fall within the jurisdiction of the Downtown and Riverfront Crossing Master Plan. This plan identifies all these structures as key historic buildings, see figure 1. Objective 1: Protect historic character and key historic buildings, of this plan, encourages the designation of historic resources and local landmarks to preserve the distinct character and ambiance of the downtown area. Figure 1. cx siing —11 bin � p6srq Wldnq J �^ lsiwls ..._— Fdsevq Wi�wgs � Sfo.Si�a#wdrwi . .' _ 1y 11�N�hdtlix� � [err6�s-g y�r«k IWliiy �A.,..., V1A-1MNC91101q ST. Hslak'Jpslk[r[r - G4iLEGE 5T. rZT�14 W -C a ac q The Historic Preservation element of the Comprehensive Plan has two goals that relate to this proposal. Goal 1: Identify historic resources significant to Iowa City's past and Goal 10: Adopt strategies that preserve historic neighborhoods. Specifically, Objective 5 of Goal 1 is satisfied by means of the nomination and pursuit of Local Landmark designation. The designation of these buildings as local landmarks would require review by the Historic Preservation Commission for any future alterations to the exterior of the buildings or requests for new development on the property. Staff Recommendations: Staff recommends the approval of REZ20-02, an application to rezone the properties at 109, 111-113, 115, and 117-121 East College Street from Central Business (CB -10) zone to CB -10 with a Historic District Overlay (CB-10/OHD). May 14, 2020 Page 3 Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Zoning Map 3. Memo to the Historic Preservation Commission Approved by: 1 Da i zman, ICP, Development Services Coordinator Department of Neighborhood and Development Services Date: May 7, 2020 Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 Memorandum To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Jessica Bristow, Historic Preservation Planner Re: Dooley Block (west bay), 109 East College Street Sears Roebuck & Co. Building, 111-113 East College Street Dooley Block (east bay), 115 East College Street Crescent Block, 117-123 East College Street Applicant Brandon Smith of Tailwind College St. IC, LLC, has requested that the properties at 109 East College Street, 111-113 East College Street, 115 East College Street, and 117-123 East College Street be designated as Iowa City Historic Landmarks as part of an overall development project. Designation of the property as an Iowa City Historic Landmark will require Commission approval of any significant changes to the exterior of the building and new development proposed on the landmark properties. Landmark status will also make the property eligible for special exceptions that would allow the Board of Adjustment to waive or modify certain zoning requirements as well as State and Federal Tax Credit funding of rehabilitation work. As part of the 2017 update of the 2001 Survey and Evaluation of the Iowa City Central Business District, completed by AKAY consulting and partially funded by a grant from the National Trust, this group of buildings was evaluated for their contribution to a potential Downtown Historic District. The National Register Nomination of this Downtown Historic District is currently in process and includes these buildings as contributing structures within the district boundary. The site inventory forms updated for the study are included as documentation of each building's significance. Each building will be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission for its eligibility for local landmark designation in individual public hearings at the May 14, 2020 Commission meeting. For local landmark designation, the Commission should determine if each property meets criterion a. and b. and at least one of the criteria c., d., e., or f. for local designation listed below: a. Significant to American and/or Iowa City history, architecture, archaeology and culture; b. Possesses integrity of location, design, setting, materials and workmanship; c. Associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history; d. Associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; e. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; or represents the work of a master; or possesses high artistic values; or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; f. Has yielded or may likely yield information important in prehistory or history. Dooley Block (west bay). 109 East College Street Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 The Dooley Block was a 4 -bay, 2 -story brick building built beginning in ca. 1874 with this bay. In 1929, the middle two bays were razed for the construction of the Sears, Roebuck & Co. building. The west bay at 109 College is one of the outer bays of the original building that remains and extends the full depth of the lot. This bay has functioned as an autonomous building since 1929. The building fagade includes a mixture of Late Victorian Romanesque and Italianate details. For instance, the paneled cornice and brackets are elements of an Italianate style and the semi -circular wood arches with their keystone detail are evident of the Romanesque. At the lower level, the transom was remodeled with the addition of prism glass prior to 1940, the sign band was removed or altered and the store front has been more recently updated. Since 1879 the building has housed numerous uses including stores, billiards, and saloons. While this building remains as only a portion of the original 4 -bay Dooley block, it has functioned individually since 1929 and with the exception of the storefront, has been relatively unaltered since 1940. In the 2017 downtown survey update the building was considered a key contributing resource in the potential downtown historic district eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places for its distinctive architectural character and for its contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City. Based on the information provided in the Site Inventory Form, staff finds that the property meets criteria a, b, c and a and therefore qualifies as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. Recommended Motion: Move to approve the designation of the Dooley Block (west bay), 109 East College Street, as an Iowa City Historic Landmark based on the following criteria for local designation: criteria a, b, c and e. 2 r■, Q hh _\J i Wr a q! �X �m ICA Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 Sears, Roebuck, & Co. Building, 111-113 East College Street The Sears, Roebuck, & Company Building was built in 1929, from central two bays of the flanking Dooley Block. This building style is commonly known as the Commercial Brick Front and is a 3 -bay 2 - story building filling the entire lot. The upper level includes a Chicago style window in each bay with a continuous terra cotta sill. Terra cotta detailing is also found in the coping on the stepped parapet, as stylized pilasters between the windows and as decorative accents in the brickwork above. The storefront originally had an entrance in the central bay with display windows above and a prism -glass transom and sign band above. The storefront today has been remodeled with entrances in the outer bays flanking the central display window and detailed in stone with a Classical Revival influence that is considered sympathetic to the original building. This building is considered a well-preserved example of the 20th century Commercial Brick Front and while the storefront has been altered, the changes are considered historically sympathetic. In the 2017 downtown survey update the building was considered a key contributing resource in the potential downtown historic district eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places for its architectural character and for its contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City. Based on the information provided in the Site Inventory Form, staff finds that the property meets criteria a, b, c and a and therefore qualifies as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. Recommended Motion: Move to approve the designation of the Sears, Roebuck, & Company Building, 111-113 East College Street, as an Iowa City Historic Landmark based on the following criteria for local designation: criteria a, b, c and e. 3 111-113 East College Street, Sears, Roebuck, & Co. Building Dooley Block (east bay), 115 East College Street Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 The Dooley Block was a 4 -bay, 2 -story brick building built beginning in ca. 1874 and concluding with the construction of this bay between 1892 and 1899. In 1929, the middle two bays were razed for the construction of the Sears, Roebuck & Co. building. The east bay at 115 College is one of the outer bays of the original building that remains and extends for much of the depth of the lot. This bay has also functioned as an autonomous building since 1929. Like the west bay, the building fagade includes a mixture of Late Victorian Romanesque and Italianate details. For instance, the paneled cornice and brackets are elements of an Italianate style and the semi -circular wood arches with their keystone detail are evident of the Romanesque. At the lower level, the storefront had been remodeled prior to 2001 to include a series of moldings separating the storefront from the upper story and an entrance to the east side of a modified shop window. Since 2001 the storefront has again been altered, replacing the shop window with four full -glass doors which fold back to open the entire front of the lower level. Since 1895 the building has housed numerous shops. While this building remains as only a portion of the original 4 -bay Dooley block, it has functioned individually since 1929 and with the exception of the storefront and sign band, has been relatively unaltered. In the 2017 downtown survey update the building was considered a key contributing resource in the potential downtown historic district eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places for its distinctive architectural character and for its contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City. Based on the information provided in the Site Inventory Form, staff finds that the property meets criteria a, b, c and a and therefore qualifies as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. Recommended Motion: Move to approve the designation of the Dooley Block (east bay), 115 East College Street, as an Iowa City Historic Landmark based on the following criteria for local designation: criteria a, b, c and e. II Tr Crescent Block, 117-123 East College Street Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 The Crescent Block was built in 1894 as a 4 -bay 3 -story Commercial Brick Front building. Originally three larger bays housed storefronts and the smaller bay at 119 served as the entrance to the upper floors. This entry bay was remodeled in the 1930s with Carrara glass in an Art Deco styling to include a small storefront and the stairs to the upper level. The design includes a curved glass display window and the original wood and glass entrance door and tile floor. The west bay retains the original storefront treatment. The east half of the building was remodeled into a single modern storefront with new brick and an exposed aggregate facing above the individual windows and curved awnings. The first floor projects forward and includes a shallow standing seam roof that separates the storefront -level from the upper levels. At the third floor, the windows are tall, paired double -hung windows centered over each bay. Each pair has a thick stone lintel and two thinner sills. At the second floor, the east -most windows were replaced with large Chicago -style windows and the west include alternating pairs and individual windows of two different sizes. A tall, pressed metal cornice includes a rhythm of large and small brackets. In 1929, the building was occupied by Montgomery Ward who built a farm and home store addition at the back of the lot. This building is considered a moderately well-preserved example of a turn -of -the -century Commercial Brick Front building. The building is also associated with C. F. Lovelace who built the adjacent College Block building as well as other buildings in the downtown and is considered a locally significant individual in the commercial and financial history of downtown. In the 2017 downtown survey update the building was considered a key contributing resource in the potential downtown historic district eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and potentially individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic places. Its unusual style reflects the influence of Chicago -style architecture in Iowa City. The building is also significant for its relationship to local fraternal groups that utilized the third floor. Despite significant modification of the two east storefront bays, the retention of the west storefront and the 1930s Art Deco storefront add to the building's significance. Overall, the building is significant for its architectural character, for its contribution to the history of commerce in Iowa City, and locally, for its association with C. F. Lovelace. Based on the information provided in the Site Inventory Form, staff finds that the property meets criteria a, b, c and a and therefore qualifies as an Iowa City Historic Landmark. Recommended Motion: Move to approve the designation of the Crescent Block, 117-123 East College Street, as an Iowa City Historic Landmark based on the following criteria for local designation: criteria a, b, c, d and e. IJ 117-123 East College Street, Crescent Block Site Inventory Form State Inventory No. 52-0409 New ® Supplemental State Historical Society of Iowa HPart of a district with known boundaries (enter inventory no.) (December 1, 1999) Relationship: ❑ Contributing ❑ Noncontributing ® Contributes to a potential district withet unknown boundaries National Register Status:(any that apply) LJ Listed ❑ De -listed ❑ NHL ❑ DOE 9 -Digit SHPO Review & Compliance Number ❑ Non -Extant (enter year) 1. Name of Property historic name Dooley Block (west bay) other names/site number 2. Location street & number 109 E. College Street city or town Iowa City ❑ vicinity, county Johnson Legal Description: (if Rural)Township Name Township No. Range No. Section Quarter of Quarter (If Urban) Subdivision Original Town Block(s) 82 Lot(s) see full legal 3. State/Federal Agency Certification [Skip this Section] 4. National Park Service Certification [Skip this Section] 5. Classification Catego of Property (Check only one box) Number of Resources within Property building(s) If Non -Eligible Property If Eligible Property, enter number of. - F1 district Enter number of: Contributing Noncontributing ❑ site buildings 1 buildings ❑ structure sites sites ❑ object structures structures objects objects Total 1 Total Name of related project report or multiple property study (Enter "N/A" if the property is not part of a multiple property examination). Title Historical Architectural Data Base Number Iowa City Central Business District Study - 2017 UPDATE 52-127 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) 02E COMMERCE/TRADE/specialty store 02G COMMERCE/TRADE/restaurant 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Materials (Enter categories from instructions) 05B LATE VICTORIAN/Italianate foundation 04 STONE walls 03 BRICK roof other Narrative Description (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" representing your opinion of eligibility after applying relevant National Register criteria) ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended A Property is associated with significant events. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended B Property is associated with the lives of significant persons. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended C Property has distinctive architectural characteristics. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended D Property yields significant information in archaeology or history. County Johnson Address 109 E. College Street Site Number 52-0409 City Iowa City District Number Criteria Considerations ❑ A Owned by a religious institution or used E A reconstructed building, object, or structure. for religious purposes. F A commemorative property. B Removed from its original location. ❑ G Less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past C A birthplace or grave. 50 years. ❑ D A cemetery Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) Significant Dates Construction date 02 ARCHITECTURE 1874 ® check if circa or estimated date Other dates 05 COMMERCE 1929 Significant Person Architect/Builder (Complete if National Register Criterion B is marked above) Architect N/A unknown Builder unknown Narrative Statement of Significance (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography ® See continuation sheet for citations of the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form 10. Geographic Data UTM References (OPTIONAL) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1 2 3 4 ❑ See continuation sheet for additional UTM references or comments 11. Form Prepared By name/title Alexa McDowell, Historian organization AKAY Consulting date 11/2017 street & number 4252 Oakland Avenue telephone 515-491-5432 city or town Minneapolis state MN zip code 55407 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION (Submit the following items with the completed form) FOR ALL PROPERTIES 1. Map: showing the property's location in a town/city or township. 2. Site plan: showing position of buildings and structures on the site in relation to public road(s). 3. Photographs: representative black and white photos. If the photos are taken as part of a survey for which the Society is to be curator of the negatives or color slides, a photo/catalog sheet needs to be included with the negatives/slides and the following needs to be provided below on this particular inventory site: Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken ❑ See continuation sheet or attached photo & slide catalog sheet for list of photo roll or slide entries. ❑ Photos/illustrations without negatives are also in this site inventory file. FOR CERTAIN KINDS OF PROPERTIES, INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING AS WELL 1. Farmstead & District: (List of structures and buildings, known or estimated year built, and contributing or non-contributing status) 2. Barn: a. A sketch of the frame/truss configuration in the form of drawing a typical middle bent of the barn. b. A photograph of the loft showing the frame configuration along one side. c. A sketch floor plan of the interior space arrangements along with the barn's exterior dimensions in feet. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Use Only Below This Line Concur with above survey opinion on National Register eligibility: U Yes H No U More Research Recommended ❑ This is a locally designated property or part of a locally designated district. Comments: Evaluated by (name/title): Date: Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e1 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 7. Property Description The Dooley Block (west bay) is a one -bay, 2 -story, 19- by 150 -ft., brick building that was constructed in ca. 1874. The building is a remnant of the original, which filled the full width of Lot 3 and part of Lot 4. From 1929, at which time the middle two bays of the Dooley Block were razed and replaced by the Sears Roebuck & Co. building, the west bay (109) has beeen — both functionally and visually - an autonomous property. The east bay of the Dooley Block (115) also remains, providing a bookend to the Sears building. As noted in the 2001 survey, this building is located along the 1977 downtown pedestrian mall that extends for several blocks along E. College Street and S. Dubuque Street. As originally platted, College Street had a 100 -ft. width with four 80 -ft. wide lots laid out perpendicular to the street. Twenty -foot wide, east -west alleys bisected the blocks and were presumed to extend along the rear of the buildings. College Street extended from the "Promenade" along the Iowa River east through the downtown, over Ralston Creek, and eventually along the south side of College Green park before it reached the city limits. Today, the "ped mall" is an intimate gathering place, its character resting on the historic buildings that line much of the street, brick landscaping, vegetative canopy, and vibrant retail base. The stylistic character of the Dooley Block reflects the Late Victorian era during which it was constructed. As noted by Svendsen in 2001, the building fagade presents a mixture of the Late Victorian Romanesque and Italianate styles. The paneled wood cornice has returning ends and four large brackets with small dentil-like brackets in between. The upper facade is clad in red brick with elaborate carved wood semi -circular or Romanesque arches over the single and paired 1/1 double -hung windows. Svendsen noted that the storefront had been remodeled "in recent years" with a side entrance and three fixed glass windows for a modified shop window. A series of moldings separates the storefront from the upper story. The 2001 survey also noted that the storefront has a prism -glass transom spanning the full width of the storefront with "new plate glass windows extending to grade." The transom treatment, though not original, predates 1940. No significant alterations of the fagade have been undertaken since the completion of the 2001 survey. The storefront is currently occupied by El Patron, a restaurant/bar. The upper elevation of the Dooley Block (west bay) remains unaltered from 2001, with character -defining features retained including the red brick cladding, ornate Italianate cornice, Roman arched window heads, prism glass transom, and storefront cornice details. As a result, the building retains a generally good level of historic integrity specific to 1929, which marks the year the building was disjoined from the larger Dooley Block and became an autonomous resource. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e2 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 01. View of the fagade, looking south across E. College Street (the Ped Mall) (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e3 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 02. View of the facade, looking SW across E. College Street (the Ped Mall) (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e4 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 8. Statement of Significance As noted, the Dooley Block is a one -bay remnant of the original block building, which filled the full width of Lot 3 and part of Lot 4. The block building was constructed in phases, the westernmost bay (109) dates to ca. 1874, the bay at 111 was in use by 1879, and the east two bays (113 and 115) were constructed in ca.1895. From 1929, when the middle two bays of the Dooley Block were razed and replaced by the Sears Roebuck & Co. building, the remaining west bay has been — both functionally and visually - an autonomous property. The east bay of the Dooley Block (115) also remains, providing a bookend to the Sears building. The building is a moderately well-preserved example of a Late Victorian Italianate style commercial building. Because the building has been disjoined from the original block building for well more than 50 -years, the resource is significant in its post -1929 form as a single, autonomous building. Given this, the Dooley Block is eligible for the National Register under Criterion C. The building is also significant under Criterion A, contributing as it does to our understanding of the history of commerce in Iowa City. As a result, this building is eligible for the National Register as a contributing resource in a potential historic district. It should be noted that additional evaluation of interior integrity may support a case for individual eligibility as an increasingly rare representation of an early commercial building in the Iowa City downtown. Historical Backgroun As noted by Svendsen, Frank Dooley acquired all of Lot 3 in Block 82 in 1867. It is likely that Dooley constructed the westernmost bay of the building in ca. 1874 since the fire insurance map for that year lists the building as vacant. As late as 1918, city directories refer to the building as the "Dooley Block" confirming Dooley's long-standing connection to the building. Property Transfer Records do not show the property changing hands again until 1928 when a referee deed saw the lot sold to W.H. Wagner. The parcel was then divided and this building was transferred to Mary Connell and F.E. Hunzinger a short time later. The property continued to be held by Hunzinger until the 1960s. Figure 01. Fire Insurance Map — 1874 C 0 L 1, 3' E+ 1i - - -W11-1 i—i :N - it'=fir••-"- w r Fra ZI.n1L- J�� m 13 STEL I N G 11, 4) 1 (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1883) J 13 STEL I N G 11, 4) 1 (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1883) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-0409 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e5 Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Figure 02. Fire Insurance Map — 1879 F //L COLLEGE. 191 i q—Xl ,14 —=7 r/ •a.rwr BURL—INGTON (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1883) Figure 03. Fire Insurance Map — 1883 (A COLLEGE � x °h• a ik r Z 0 �D Z s v ICEp j �nra�e,�aaccee.r _ � ■i 4 N r BURLINGTON (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1883) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e6 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Figure 04. Fire Insurance MaiD — 1899 1� rxt ejr dP tt rl� I�i + Ii�� � � I t 4' S.t �f t+...• ' � v� Y •� F ...z •�•ci + a , 117 a l { �'{resat... ti ,.� k.F:•±. •:+ti •_ y., n�— �• r +yJCla T.(SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1899) Figure 05. Fire Insurance Map — 1933 _ '� 3 r Sa,-o . 7'0 0 • as Kiri r �- s•- �� •�w i t s , jA' I� Z s C' o B2 c' 7777I111���� I --'-AF � E. BURLINGTON , tar (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1933) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e7 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Fire insurance maps show the building with a variety of uses through the years: hardware store (1879, 1883, 1888, and 1892); saloon (1899, 1906); pool hall (1912, 1920); store (1926, 1933, and 1970). City directories confirm the presence of the Hazard & Pratt Hardware Store at this location in 1878-79 and the Opera House Exchange, a saloon run by T.J. Kenny, here in 1904. By 1911, Thomas H. Kelley had a saloon here. When prohibition arrived, the business changed to a pool hall or billiards parlor with Henry Musack the proprietor from before World War I through the late 1920s. City directories show the building housed a series of grocers during the 1930s including the Piggly Wiggly Grocers in 1930 and the Self -Serve Grocery from the mid -1930s through World War II. Herbert Holmes and George Rebel also operated meat shops during this time period. After World War II, The Men's Shop clothing store was located here and continued operations until the mid-1960s (Svendsen, 2001). Image 03. Historic Image — North side of E. College Street, looking SW - ca. 1925 (Image courtesy of State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.) In this view of E. College Street, we see the Dooley Block prior to the demolition of its center bays. Though difficult to read in this view, the building name is set on -center just above the upper story windows. The upper fagade at 109 remains much as seen in this view as does that at 115 (see "Dooley Block," 52-01088.) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e8 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 04. Historic Image — North side of E. College Street, looking SW - 1929 (Image courtesy of State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.) In this view of E. College Street, we see the east (115) and west (109) bays of the Dooley Block flanking the 1929 infill of the Sears, Roebuck and Co. building. Note that, by this date, the prism glass storefront transom was part of the fagade at 109 (right). Also, Piggly Wiggly occupied the building. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e9 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 9. Major Bibliographic References (2001) Iowa City city directories. Property Transfer Records, Johnson County Auditor's Office. Tax Assessor's Records, City of Iowa City Assessor. Sanborn maps, 1874, 1879, 1888, 1892, 1899, 1906, 1912, 1920, 1926, 1933, and 1933 updated to 1970. 2017: References Iowa City Public Library. Digital Photograph collection. http://history.icpl.org. Iowa City Then & Now. Publisher unknown. Mansheim, Gerald. Iowa City: an illustrated history. Norfolk, VA: The Donning Company, 1989. State Historical Society of Iowa. Iowa City. Photograph Collection. Slonneger, Marybeth. Finials: A View of Downtown Iowa City. Iowa City: Hand Press, 2015. Svendsen, Marlys A. "Survey and Evaluation of the Central Business District." Prepared for the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission, 2001. Svendsen, Marlys A. "Dooley's Block" 52-04093." Iowa Site Form, 2001. Timeline: 109 E. College Street 1874 Fire insurance map shows a building with a similar footprint on this site (address then being 13); the occupant is noted as "vacant." Lot to the east is vacant, though a staircase is located on the east elevation. 1879 Fire insurance map shows a 2 -section addition to the rear of the building (now addressed at 39), so that the building stretches south to the alley. The occupant is noted as "Hardware" with a warehouse in the rear sections. The adjoining bay (then numbered 40) is in place —the bay embracing the former exterior staircase. The length of the new bay matches the original of the first bay. The sites of the east bays (113 and 115) of the Dooley Block are occupied by small scale buildings. 1883 Fire Insurance Map: No change to 109 (then 110); the space remains occupied by a hardware store with warehouse at rear. A small addition has been made to the rear of 111 (then 112); the building is occupied by a dealer of agricultural implements. The sites of the east bays (113 and 115) of the Dooley Block are occupied by small scale buildings. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet Paae 10 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 1888 Fire Insurance Map: The west bay (now numbered 109) remains occupied by a hardware store with warehouse at rear. 1892 Fire Insurance Map: The west bay remains occupied by a hardware store with warehouse at rear. 1899 Fire Insurance Map: The 4 -bay Dooley Block is in place. 1901 City Directory: "Dooley's Block" at 113-115 E. College Street 1915 City Directory: "Dooley's Block" at 109-115 E. College Street 1925 Historic image documents the original, four -bay configuration of the Dooley Block. 1929 Historic image documents the Sears, Roebuck and Co. building with the Dooley Block bays at 109 and 115 retained. 1933 Fire insurance map confirms the bay at 109 as an autonomous structure due to the removal of the middle two bays. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e11 Site Number 52-0409 Related District Number Dooley Block (west bay) Johnson Name of Property County 109 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 11. Additional Documentation Full Legal Description: Original Town Plat, Block 82, West 19.3' of Lot 3. Assessor: PIN 1010380009 Lat/Long: 41.658860/-91.534107 Parcel Map - 2017 M� (SOURCE: http://iowacity.iowaassessors.com/parcel) Site Inventory Form State Inventory No. 52-04091 ❑ New ® Supplemental State Historical Society of Iowa ❑ Part of a district with known boundaries (enter inventory no.) (December 1, 1999) Relationship: ❑ Contributing ❑ Noncontributing ® Contributes to a potential district withet unknown boundaries National Register Status:(any that apply) LJ Listed ❑ De -listed ❑ NHL ❑ DOE 9 -Digit SHPO Review & Compliance Number ❑ Non -Extant (enter year) 1. Name of Property historic name Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building other names/site number The Field House 2. Location street & number 111-113 East College Street city or town Iowa City ❑ vicinity, county Johnson Legal Description: (if Rural)Township Name Township No. Range No. Section Quarter of Quarter (If Urban) Subdivision Original Town Block(s) 82 Lot(s) see full legal 3. State/Federal Agency Certification [Skip this Section] 4. National Park Service Certification [Skip this Section] 5. Classification Catego of Property (Check only one box) Number of Resources within Property building(s) If Non -Eligible Property If Eligible Property, enter number of. - F1 district Enter number of: Contributing Noncontributing ❑ site buildings 1 buildings ❑ structure sites sites ❑ object structures structures objects objects Total 1 Total Name of related project report or multiple property study (Enter "N/A" if the property is not part of a multiple property examination). Title Historical Architectural Data Base Number Iowa City Central Business District Study - 2017 UPDATE 52-127 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) 02F COMMERCE/TRADE/department store 70 VACANT/NOT IN USE 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Materials (Enter categories from instructions) 09F05 COMMERCIAL/Brick Front foundation 04 STONE walls 03 BRICK roof other 07 TERRA COTTA Narrative Description (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" representing your opinion of eligibility after applying relevant National Register criteria) ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended A Property is associated with significant events. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended B Property is associated with the lives of significant persons. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended C Property has distinctive architectural characteristics. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended D Property yields significant information in archaeology or history. County Johnson Address 111-113 East College Street Site Number 52-04091 City Iowa City District Number Criteria Considerations ❑ A Owned by a religious institution or used ❑ E A reconstructed building, object, or structure. for religious purposes. ❑ F A commemorative property. B Removed from its original location. ❑ G Less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past C A birthplace or grave. 50 years. ❑ D A cemetery Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) 01 ARCHITECTURE 05 COMMERCE Significant Dates Construction date 1929 ❑ check if circa or estimated date Other dates Significant Person Architect/Builder (Complete if National Register Criterion B is marked above) Architect N/A unknown Builder unknown Narrative Statement of Significance (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography ® See continuation sheet for citations of the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form 10. Geographic Data UTM References (OPTIONAL) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1 2 3 4 ❑ See continuation sheet for additional UTM references or comments 11. Form Prepared By name/title Alexa McDowell, Historian organization AKAY Consulting date 11/2017 street & number 4252 Oakland Avenue telephone 515-491-5432 city or town Minneapolis state MN zip code 55407 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION (Submit the following items with the completed form) FOR ALL PROPERTIES 1. Map: showing the property's location in a town/city or township. 2. Site plan: showing position of buildings and structures on the site in relation to public road(s). 3. Photographs: representative black and white photos. If the photos are taken as part of a survey for which the Society is to be curator of the negatives or color slides, a photo/catalog sheet needs to be included with the negatives/slides and the following needs to be provided below on this particular inventory site: Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken ❑ See continuation sheet or attached photo & slide catalog sheet for list of photo roll or slide entries. ❑ Photos/illustrations without negatives are also in this site inventory file. FOR CERTAIN KINDS OF PROPERTIES, INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING AS WELL 1. Farmstead & District: (List of structures and buildings, known or estimated year built, and contributing or non-contributing status) 2. Barn: a. A sketch of the frame/truss configuration in the form of drawing a typical middle bent of the barn. b. A photograph of the loft showing the frame configuration along one side. c. A sketch floor plan of the interior space arrangements along with the barn's exterior dimensions in feet. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Use Only Below This Line Concur with above survey opinion on National Register eligibility: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended ❑ This is a locally designated property or part of a locally designated district. Comments: Evaluated by (name/title): Date: Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04091 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e1 Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City 7. Property Description The Sears, Roebuck & Co. building is situated on a portion of Lot 3 in Block 82. Located on the south side of E. College Street, the building's fagade faces north. As noted in the 2001 evaluation, the building is located along the 1977 downtown pedestrian mall that extends for several blocks along E. College Street and S. Dubuque Street. As originally platted, College Street had a 100 -ft. width with four 80 -ft. wide lots laid out perpendicular to the street. Twenty -foot wide east -west alleys bisected the blocks and were presumed to extend along the rear of the buildings. College Street extended from the "Promenade" along the Iowa River east through the downtown, over Ralston Creek, and eventually along the south side of College Green park before it reached the city limits. Today, the "ped mall" is an intimate gathering place, its character resting on the historic buildings that line much of the street, brick landscaping, vegetative canopy, and vibrant retail base. The building footprint fully occupies the site which, according to the Iowa City assessor, measures 38- by 150 -feet. Built in 1929, the building is a two-story, brick construction in the 20d' century form commonly described as a Commercial Brick Front. The building fagade is clad in pressed brick laid in a Flemish bond with a taupe colored mortar. Typical of commercial properties, the fagade is arranged in a storefront with the transition to the upper fagade marked by a storefront cornice (Image 01). The upper story is organized into three bays, each bay dominated by a Chicago -style window. Each window configuration (one large, fixed pane window flanked by narrower, double -hung windows) features a header of soldier bricks and a running sill of glazed terra cotta. Terra cotta is also used in the coping of the stepped parapet, stylized pilasters that frame the bays, and has relief tiles that provide decorative accents to the brickwork. The brickwork itself is visually interesting and well executed — a large area laid in a basketweave pattern is found over each of the 2nd floor windows (Image 02). Terra cotta tiles are also used in the outer piers of the storefront. Like the upper level, the storefront is divided into three bays. Whereas the original storefront had a center entrance with plate -glass display windows to either side and a multi -part transom with prism glass spanning the front, the storefront today has a central, multi -light display window flanked by recessed openings, each with solid metal double -doors with a single sidelight and transoms above. Although the historic outer storefront piers of brick with terra cotta details are retained, the remainder of the storefront structure is clad in cast stone panels. Constructed to house Sears Roebuck & Co., a national franchise department store, the storefront originally had signage installed in the space immediately beneath the second floor windows as well as a vertical neon blade sign that extended from the beltcourse to parapet level (Image 03). In 2017, the exterior of the Sears, Roebuck & Co. building retains a very good level of historic integrity, despite the alteration of the storefront. This is due in large part to the retention of the historic upper story fagade, which provides the basis of the building's visual character: Chicago -style windows, decorative brickwork, stepped parapet, and terracotta details (some deterioration noted) are all character -defining features which are retained. Further, the existing storefront (the construction date of which is undetermined) incorporates Classical Revival influenced details which are sympathetic to the historic character. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04091 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e2 Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City Image 01. View of the facade (north elevation), looking SE (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Image 02. Detail view of upper facade details (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e3 Site Number 52-04091 Related District Number Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City 8. Statement of Significance As a well-preserved example of a 20"' century Commercial Brick Front building form frequently adopted by national franchise stores prior to World War II, the Sears, Roebuck & Co. building is significant under Criterion C. Though the storefront has sustained significant alterations, those alterations are historically sympathetic. Further, the upper elevation, with its historic character -defining features intact, is well preserved. The building is also significant under Criterion A, contributing as it does to our understanding of the history of commerce in Iowa City, specifically in association with its original occupant, the Sears & Roebuck Co. As a result, this building is eligible for the National Register as a contributing resource in a potential historic district. Historical Backgroun Prior to its construction, the site upon which the Sears Roebuck & Co. building is situated was occupied by the middle two bays of the Dooley Block (ca. 1879 and ca. 1895). Property transfer records show that Frank Dooley acquired all of Lot 3 in Block 82 in 1867 (Svendsen, "Dooley Block," 2001). In ca. 1874 Dooley constructed the westernmost bay (109) of the Dooley Block, with a second bay completed by 1879. In ca. 1895 the remaining bays (now 113 and 115) were added on the east, resulting in a 2 -story, 4 -bay commercial block building in the Late Victorian Italianate style. The east bay (115) and west bay (109) remain today. Figure 01. Fire Insurance Map — 1899 - �° .•.. � I io�rw�unrar� Co. s• 'I . I m•n (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Maps, 1899.) The Dooley Block was constructed in phases. The completed block building (highlighted) first appears on fire insurance maps in 1899. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04091 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e4 Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City Image 03. Historic Image — North side of E. College Street, looking SW - ca. 1925 (Image courtesy of State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.) In this view of E. College Street, we see the Dooley Block prior to the demolition of its middle bays and subsequent construction of the Sears Roebuck building at their place. Though difficult to read in this view, the building name is set on - center just above the upper story windows (indicated). The upper fagades at 115 and 109 remain much as seen in this view (see Dooley Block site forms: 52-01088 and 52-04093). Figure 02. Fire Insurance Map — 1926 COLLEGE O.wr, f Z J f E. %,BURLINGTON (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Maps, 1926.) The footprint of the Dooley Block remains relatively unchanged in the years just prior the construction of Sears Roebuck. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e5 Site Number 52-04091 Related District Number Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City Property transfer records show the property changed hands in 1928 when a referee deed records a sale to W.H. Wagner. The parcel was then divided, with the Sears Roebuck & Co. building constructed on the west portion of the Lot 3 (111-113) and the east bay of the Dooley Block (115) transferred to the Koser Brothers. Lee and George Koser were realtors with Koser Brothers Real Estate (Svendsen, 2001). The west section of the Dooley Block (109, which is located in Block 4), was likewise sold. Sooner thereafter, the two center bays of the Dooley Block were razed and, in 1929, the present building was constructed to house the Sears, Roebuck & Co. department store. At the time Sears Roebuck appeared on E. College Street in Iowa City, the downtown was rich with department stores; the 100 block of E. College Street alone had (in addition to Sears Roebuck), Montgomery Ward & Co. (121-123) and White's Consolidated Stores (114-116). Yetter's was located one block to the north (115-117 E. Washington) and the Strub Co. was situated around the corner (118-122 S. Clinton Street). Figure 03. Fire Insurance Map — 1933 46 0 s s s;s I s s S SAS S � b 8� _ Srw • _ �� � .wAv. �.. _ E- BURLINGTON (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Maps, 1933.) The 1933 fire insurance map documents the Sears Roebuck building (highlighted), noting it as a two-story, double -wide building, which stretched from E. College on the north to the alley at mid -block on the south. The map also notes that the building structure utilized iron columns. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04091 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e6 Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City Image 03. Historic Image: View looking SE along S. Clinton Street —1929 (Image courtesy of State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.) The remnants of the Dooley Block (115) remain at left and (109) at right, with the 20th century Sears Roebuck building complete with Chicago -style windows, providing an interesting visual foil to the Late Victorian architecture that remains intact on the bays of the original block. Figure 04. Advertisement — 1943 Sears, Roebuck and Co. 111-18 E. COLLEGE Retail Phone 4163 Mail Order Phone 9752 Quality, Service and Value 19wa City's Largest Department Store Invites ]Cour Patronage Complete $locks of Finest Merchandise to Please Everyone Ready -to -Wear Domestics Furniture Millinery Lingerie Radios Shoes Hosiery Hardware Men's Department Gloves Refrigerators Washing Machines Linens Stoves Silks Sporting Goods Auto Accessories (SOURCE: City Directory, 1943) Sears Roebuck remained in the building until the 1960s, at which time it relocated to Sycamore Mall in southeast Iowa City. The building was vacant for several years before the Goodwill Budget Store located here in the early 1970s. By 1978 through 2001, it housed The Field House, a restaurant and disco. (Svendsen, 2001). At the time of the present evaluation (October 2017) the building is vacant. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04091 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e7 Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City 9. Major Bibliographic References (2001) Iowa City city directories. Property Transfer Records, Johnson County Auditor's Office. Tax Assessor's Records, City of Iowa City Assessor. Sanborn maps, 1874, 1879, 1888, 1892, 1899, 1906, 1912, 1920, 1926, 1933, and 1933 updated to 1970. 2017: References Iowa City Public Library. Digital Photograph collection. http://history.icpl.org. Iowa City Then & Now. Publisher unknown. Mansheim, Gerald. Iowa City: an illustrated history. Norfolk, VA: The Donning Company, 1989. McDowell, Alexa. "Dooley Block (109): 52-04093." Iowa Site Form, 2017. McDowell, Alexa. "Dooley Block (115): 52-01088." Iowa Site Form, 2017. State Historical Society of Iowa. Iowa City. Photograph Collection. Slonneger, Marybeth. Finials: A View of Downtown Iowa City. Iowa City: Hand Press, 2015. Svendsen, Marlys A. "Survey and Evaluation of the Central Business District." Prepared for the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission, 2001. Svendsen, Marlys A. "Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building: 52-04091." Iowa Site Form, 2001. McDowell, Alexa. "Dooley Block (109): 52-04093." Iowa Site Form, 2017. Timeline: Sears Roebuck & Co. 1926 City Directory (reverse listings) 111 Edward J. Watkins 111-1 /2 Edward L. Murphy 113 No occupant noted 1928 City Directory (reverse listings) 111 Edward J. Watkins 111-1 /2 Radio Doctors 113 Randalls Hardware 1930 City Directory Sears Roebuck & Co. 111-113 E. College Street Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04091 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e8 Sears, Roebuck & Co. Building Johnson Name of Property County 111-113 East College Street Iowa City Address City 11. Additional Documentation Full Legal Description: Original Town Plat, Block 82, East 38.75' of West 58.05' of Lot 3. Assessor: PIN 1010380008 Lat/Long: 41.658660/-91.534022 Parcel Map - 2017 i1 14 I �� , �R��,.� 50' So 6S 1W' � �� N�' •' moon I sI (SOURCE: http://iowacity.iowaassessors.com/parcel.php?gid=344414) Site Inventory Form State Inventory No. 52-01088 ❑ New ® Supplemental State Historical Society of Iowa ❑ Part of a district with known boundaries (enter inventory no.) (December 1, 1999) Relationship: ❑ Contributing ❑ Noncontributing ® Contributes to a potential district withet unknown boundaries National Register Status:(any that apply) LJ Listed ❑ De -listed ❑ NHL ❑ DOE 9 -Digit SHPO Review & Compliance Number ❑ Non -Extant (enter year) 1. Name of Property historic name Dooley Block (east bay) other names/site number Gringo's Mexican Bar & Grill 2. Location street & number 115 E. College Street city or town Iowa City ❑ vicinity, county Johnson Legal Description: (if Rural)Township Name Township No. Range No. Section Quarter of Quarter (If Urban) Subdivision Original Town Block(s) 82 Lot(s) E 22' of 3 3. State/Federal Agency Certification [Skip this Section] 4. National Park Service Certification [Skip this Section] 5. Classification Catego of Property (Check only one box) Number of Resources within Property building(s) If Non -Eligible Property If Eligible Property, enter number of. - F1 district Enter number of: Contributing Noncontributing ❑ site buildings 1 buildings ❑ structure sites sites ❑ object structures structures objects objects Total 1 Total Name of related project report or multiple property study (Enter "N/A" if the property is not part of a multiple property examination). Title Historical Architectural Data Base Number Iowa City Central Business District Study - 2017 UPDATE 52-127 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) 02E COMMERCE/TRADE/specialty store 02G COMMERCE/TRADE/restaurant 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Materials (Enter categories from instructions) 05B LATE VICTORIAN/Italianate foundation 04 STONE walls 03 BRICK roof other Narrative Description (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" representing your opinion of eligibility after applying relevant National Register criteria) ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended A Property is associated with significant events. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended B Property is associated with the lives of significant persons. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended C Property has distinctive architectural characteristics. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended D Property yields significant information in archaeology or history. County Johnson Address 115 E. College Street Site Number 52-01088 City Iowa City District Number Criteria Considerations ❑ A Owned by a religious institution or used ❑ E A reconstructed building, object, or structure. for religious purposes. ❑ F A commemorative property. B Removed from its original location. ❑ G Less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past C A birthplace or grave. 50 years. ❑ D A cemetery Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) 02 ARCHITECTURE 05 COMMERCE Significant Dates Construction date 1895 ® check if circa or estimated date Other dates 1929 Significant Person Architect/Builder (Complete if National Register Criterion B is marked above) Architect unknown Builder unknown Narrative Statement of Significance (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography ® See continuation sheet for citations of the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form 10. Geographic Data UTM References (OPTIONAL) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1 2 3 4 ❑ See continuation sheet for additional UTM references or comments 11. Form Prepared By name/title Alexa McDowell, Historian organization AKAY Consulting date 10/2017 street & number 4252 Oakland Avenue telephone 515-491-5432 city or town Minneapolis state MN zip code 55407 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION (Submit the following items with the completed form) FOR ALL PROPERTIES 1. Map: showing the property's location in a town/city or township. 2. Site plan: showing position of buildings and structures on the site in relation to public road(s). 3. Photographs: representative black and white photos. If the photos are taken as part of a survey for which the Society is to be curator of the negatives or color slides, a photo/catalog sheet needs to be included with the negatives/slides and the following needs to be provided below on this particular inventory site: Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken ❑ See continuation sheet or attached photo & slide catalog sheet for list of photo roll or slide entries. ❑ Photos/illustrations without negatives are also in this site inventory file. FOR CERTAIN KINDS OF PROPERTIES, INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING AS WELL 1. Farmstead & District: (List of structures and buildings, known or estimated year built, and contributing or non-contributing status) 2. Barn: a. A sketch of the frame/truss configuration in the form of drawing a typical middle bent of the barn. b. A photograph of the loft showing the frame configuration along one side. c. A sketch floor plan of the interior space arrangements along with the barn's exterior dimensions in feet. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Use Only Below This Line Concur with above survey opinion on National Register eligibility: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended ❑ This is a locally designated property or part of a locally designated district. Comments: Evaluated by (name/title): Date: Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-01088 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e1 Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 7. Property Description The Dooley Block (east bay) is a one -bay, 2 -story, 22- by 150 -ft., brick building that was constructed sometime between 1892 and 1899. The building is a remnant of the original, which filled the full width of Lot 3 and part of Lot 4. From 1929, at which time the middle two bays of the Dooley Block were razed and replaced by the Sears Roebuck & Co. building, the east bay (115) has beeen — both functionally and visually - an autonomous property. The west bay of the Dooley Block (109) also remains, providing a bookend to the Sears building. As noted in the 2001 survey, this building is located along the 1977 downtown pedestrian mall that extends for several blocks along E. College Street and S. Dubuque Street. As originally platted, College Street had a 100 -ft. width with four 80 -ft. wide lots laid out perpendicular to the street. Twenty -foot wide, east -west alleys bisected the blocks and were presumed to extend along the rear of the buildings. College Street extended from the "Promenade" along the Iowa River east through the downtown, over Ralston Creek, and eventually along the south side of College Green park before it reached the city limits. Today, the "ped mall" is an intimate gathering place, its character resting on the historic buildings that line much of the street, brick landscaping, vegetative canopy, and vibrant retail base. The stylistic character of the Dooley Block reflects the Late Victorian era during which it was constructed. As noted by Svendsen in 2001, the building fagade presents a mixture of the Late Victorian Romanesque and Italianate styles. The paneled wood cornice has returning ends and four large brackets with small dentil-like brackets in between. The upper is clad in red brick with elaborate carved wood semi -circular or Romanesque arches over the single and paired 1/1 double -hung windows. Svendsen noted that the storefront had been remodeled "in recent years" with a side entrance and three fixed glass windows for a modified shop window. A series of moldings separates the storefront from the upper story. The storefront has a plastered cladding with the door recessed beneath a fixed curved awning. At an undetermined time since the 2001 survey, the storefront of the Dooley Block has been altered. The main entrance still remains on the left of the building, the fixed -glass windows have been replaced with four doors that fold back to open the entire front of the store. There is also a side entrance on the right side of the storefront labled as "13.5 College Ave." that leads to the second story. The first story is currently occupied by Graze: Food Guru Dining, and the occupant of the second story is unknown. The upper elevation of the Dooley Block remains unaltered from 2001, with character -defining features retained including the red brick cladding, ornate Italianate cornice, Roman arched window heads, and storefront cornice details. As a result, the building retains a generally good level of historic integrity specific to 1929, which marks the year the building was disjoined from the larger Dooley Block and became an autonomous resource. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-01088 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e2 Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 01. View of the facade, looking south across E. College Street (the Ped Mall) (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-01088 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e3 Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 02. View of the facade, looking SW across E. College Street (the Ped Mall) (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-01088 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e4 Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 8. Statement of Significance As noted, the Dooley Block is a one -bay remnant of the original block building, which filled the full width of Lot 3 and part of Lot 4. The block building was constructed in phases, the west two bays likely pre -date 1874 with the east two bays constructed in ca. 1895. From 1929, when the middle two bays of the Dooley Block were razed and replaced by the Sears Roebuck & Co. building, the remaining east bay has been — both functionally and visually - an autonomous property. The west bay of the Dooley Block (109) also remains, providing a bookend to the Sears building. The building is a moderately well-preserved example of a Late Victorian Italianate style commercial building. Because the building has been disjoined from the original block building for well more than 50 -years, the resource is significant in its post -1929 form as a single, autonomous building. Given this, the Dooley Block is significant under Criterion C. The building is also significant under Criterion A, contributing as it does to our understanding of the history of commerce in Iowa City. As a result, this building is eligible for the National Register as a contributing resource in a potential historic district. It should be noted that additional evaluation of interior integrity may support a case for individual eligibility as an increasingly rare representation of an early commercial building in the Iowa City downtown. Historical Backeround Prior to its construction, the site upon which this bay of the Dooley Block is situated was occupied by a small, one-story "marble shop" with a shed at the rear. Property transfer records show that Frank Dooley acquired all of Lot 3 in Block 82 in 1867 (Svendsen, 2001). Dooley proceeded to construct the west two -bays of the block building (109 and 111), which the 1883 fire insurance map records along with a small, 1 -story "marble shop" with a shed at the rear in on the site of what would become the block's easternmost bay (115). The same footprint appears on subsequent fire insurance maps through 1892; the map in 1899 marks the first time a 2 -story building appears on the site. At that time, a grocer is noted as the occupant. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e5 Site Number 52-01088 Related District Number Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Figure 01. Fire Insurance Map — 1883 LEGE N�ry . if �� I� � ~� � ! a i e ! �+ pe - C- 7 Ac�cr' C S LED 1 I �T�•s�aoGreiY - ; ■I i N e � IY BURLINGTON (D � (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1883) The 1883 fire insurance map notes the presence of the west 2 -bays of the Dooley Block (now 109 and 111) with 113 and 115 still occupied by small-scale buildings. The location of 115 is highlighted in blue with the remaining bays of what would, by ca. 1895 form the entire Dooley Block, highlighted in light blue. Figure 02. Fire Insurance Map — 1892 9 _ .S rr _ .. P_ -VOL -LEGE s,� Y J za- JT• •I� ) i .� F-OuFtLINGTO K ' S (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1892) In 1892 the site upon which the easternmost bay of the Dooley Block (dark blue) was later constructed was occupied by a 1 - story building that was set back from the street. The lighter shading shows the location of the full extent of the site that would, by ca. 1895 be fully occupied by the Dooley Block. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e6 Site Number 52-01088 Related District Number Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Figure 03. Fire Insurance Man — 1899 t -4 n dV W 7 al3 R i1. s i LyH f._ _y t { �s k ' y 1 � r (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1899) By 1899, the remaining bays of the Dooley Block had been completed. The east bay (115) is highlighted in blue with the remaining bays also indicated. Image 03. Historic Image — North side of E. College Street, looking SW - ca. 1925 (Image courtesy of State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.) In this view of E. College Street, we see the Dooley Block prior to the demolition of its center bays. Though difficult to read in this view, the building name is set on -center just above the upper story windows. The upper fagade at 115 remains much as seen in this view as does that at 109 (see "Dooley Block," 52-04093.) 11� a1� lcaac,'r�r'x {h�. ---max`__ x � }i i NI L N dV W 7 al3 R i1. s i LyH f._ _y t { �s k ' y 1 � r (SOURCE: Sanborn Company Fire Insurance Map, 1899) By 1899, the remaining bays of the Dooley Block had been completed. The east bay (115) is highlighted in blue with the remaining bays also indicated. Image 03. Historic Image — North side of E. College Street, looking SW - ca. 1925 (Image courtesy of State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.) In this view of E. College Street, we see the Dooley Block prior to the demolition of its center bays. Though difficult to read in this view, the building name is set on -center just above the upper story windows. The upper fagade at 115 remains much as seen in this view as does that at 109 (see "Dooley Block," 52-04093.) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-01088 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e7 Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 04. Historic Image North side of E. College Street, looking SW - 1929 (Image courtesy of State Historical Society of Iowa, Iowa City.) In this view of E. College Street, we see the east (115) and west (109) bays of the Dooley Block flanking the 1929 infill of the Sears, Roebuck and Co. building. Property transfer records do not show the property changing hands again until 1928 when a referee deed saw the lot sold to W.H. Wagner. The parcel was then divided, with the Sears Roebuck & Co. building constructed on the west portion of the lot (111-113) and this building (115) transferred to the Koser Brothers. Lee and George Koser were realtors with Koser Brothers Real Estate (Svendsen, 2001). City directories indicate that the Barth Brothers, grocers occupied the building in 1901. By 1911, Samuel Kelberg operated a shoemaking business from this address. He and his wife Dora lived on the second floor. In 1918 the business space was vacant and by 1926 Dr. John Mullen had offices here. City directories show the storefront changed frequently beginning in the 1930s: Smith & Hiatt Hardware Store (1930); Oakland Bakery (1934, 1940); Western Auto (1946-1962); Thrift Plan of Iowa City (1967); and Sherwin-Williams Co. Paints (1972). By the late 1970s, Gringo's Mexican Restaurant located here (Svendsen, 2001). At the time of the present evaluation the building was occupied by Graze, a restaurant (2017). Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet m Site Number 52-01088 Related District Number Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 9. Major Bibliographic References (2001) Iowa City city directories. Property Transfer Records, Johnson County Auditor's Office. Tax Assessor's Records, City of Iowa City Assessor. Sanborn maps, 1874, 1879, 1888, 1892, 1899, 1906, 1912, 1920, 1926, 1933, and 1933 updated to 1970. 2017: References Iowa City Public Library. Digital Photograph collection. http://history.icpl.org. Iowa City Then & Now. Publisher unknown. Mansheim, Gerald. Iowa City: an illustrated history. Norfolk, VA: The Donning Company, 1989. State Historical Society of Iowa. Iowa City. Photograph Collection. Slonneger, Marybeth. Finials: A View of Downtown Iowa City. Iowa City: Hand Press, 2015. Svendsen, Marlys A. "Survey and Evaluation of the Central Business District." Prepared for the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission, 2001. Svendsen, Marlys A. "115 E. College Street," 52-01088." Iowa Site Form, 2001. Timeline: 115 E. College Street 1883 Fire insurance map shows small, 1 -story with deep setback and rear shed occupied by a "marble shop" and the west two bays of the Dooley Block (2 -story, interconnected structures with an interior staircase). 1888 Fire insurance map shows small, 1 -story with deep setback and rear shed occupied by a "marble shop" 1892 Fire insurance map shows small, 1 -story with deep setback and 2 rear sheds, occupied by a "marble shop" 1899 Fire insurance map shows a 2 -story, contiguous building sited flush with the neighboring buildings (4 -bay Dooley Block intact) and extending to the south approximately 50 -ft. Occupant: Grocer 1901 City Directory: "Dooley's Block" at 113-115 E. College Street Barth Brothers, grocers 1915 City Directory: "Dooley's Block" at 109-115 E. College Street Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-01088 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e9 Dooley Block (east bay) Johnson Name of Property County 115 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 1920 Fire insurance maps notes no changes to the footprint, but the addition of an interior staircase at the front of the building, along the west wall. Occupant: millinery. 1925 Historic image documents the original, four -bay configuration of the Dooley Block. 1926 Fire insurance maps notes no changes to the footprint, and the interior staircase is retained at the front of the building, along the west wall. A 1 -story, freestanding auto garage is situated south of the building. Occupant: not specified. 11. Additional Documentation Full Legal Description: Original Town Plat, Block 82, Lot 3 east 22 -ft. Assessor: PIN 1010380007 Lat/Long: 41.658883/-91.533901 Parcel Map - 2017 (SOURCE: http://iowacity.iowaassessors.com/parcel.php?gid=344413) Site Inventory Form State Inventory No. 52-04090 ® New ❑ Supplemental State Historical Society of Iowa ❑ Part of a district with known boundaries (enter inventory no.) (December 1, 1999) Relationship: ❑ Contributing ❑ Noncontributing ® Contributes to a potential district withet unknown boundaries National Register Status:(any that apply) LJ Listed ❑ De -listed ❑ NHL ❑ DOE 9 -Digit SHPO Review & Compliance Number ❑ Non -Extant (enter year) 1. Name of Property historic name Crescent Block other names/site number Lovelace -Moon Block 2. Location street & number 117-123 E. College Street city or town Iowa City ❑ vicinity, county Johnson Legal Description: (if Rural)Township Name Township No. Range No. Section Quarter of Quarter (If Urban) Subdivision Original Town Block(s) 82 Lot(s) Lot 2 3. State/Federal Agency Certification [Skip this Section] 4. National Park Service Certification [Skip this Section] 5. Classification Catego of Property (Check only one box) Number of Resources within Property building(s) If Non -Eligible Property If Eligible Property, enter number of. - F1 district Enter number of: Contributing Noncontributing ❑ site buildings 1 buildings ❑ structure sites sites ❑ object structures structures objects objects Total 1 Total Name of related project report or multiple property study (Enter "N/A" if the property is not part of a multiple property examination). Title Historical Architectural Data Base Number Iowa City Central Business District Study - 2017 UPDATE 52-127 6. Function or Use Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) 02E COMMERCE/TRADE/specialty store 02G COMMERCE/TRADE/restaurant 02B COMMERCE/TRADE/professional offices 02E COMMERCE/TRADE/specialty store 03A04 SOCIAL/fraternal hall 7. Description Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Materials (Enter categories from instructions) 09F05 COMMERCIAL/Brick Front foundation 02B COMMERCE/TRADE/professional offices walls 03 BRICK roof other 07 TERRA COTTA Narrative Description (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria (Mark "x" representing your opinion of eligibility after applying relevant National Register criteria) ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended A Property is associated with significant events. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended B Property is associated with the lives of significant persons. ® Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended C Property has distinctive architectural characteristics. ❑ Yes ® No ❑ More Research Recommended D Property yields significant information in archaeology or history. County Johnson Address 117-123 E. College Street Site Number 52-04090 City Iowa City District Number Criteria Considerations ❑ A Owned by a religious institution or used ❑ E A reconstructed building, object, or structure. for religious purposes. ❑ F A commemorative property. B Removed from its original location. ❑ G Less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past C A birthplace or grave. 50 years. ❑ D A cemetery Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) 02 ARCHITECTURE 05 COMMERCE Significant Person (Complete if National Register Criterion B is marked above) Significant Dates Construction date 1894 ❑ check if circa or estimated date Other dates Architect/Builder Architect Builder Narrative Statement of Significance (® SEE CONTINUATION SHEETS, WHICH MUST BE COMPLETED) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibliography ® See continuation sheet for citations of the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form 10. Geographic Data UTM References (OPTIONAL) Zone Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing 1 2 3 4 ❑ See continuation sheet for additional UTM references or comments 11. Form Prepared By name/title Alexa McDowell, Architectural Historian organization AKAY Consulting date 10/2017 street & number 4252 Oakland Avenue telephone 515-491-5432 city or town Minneapolis state MN zip code 55407 ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION (Submit the following items with the completed form) FOR ALL PROPERTIES 1. Map: showing the property's location in a town/city or township. 2. Site plan: showing position of buildings and structures on the site in relation to public road(s). 3. Photographs: representative black and white photos. If the photos are taken as part of a survey for which the Society is to be curator of the negatives or color slides, a photo/catalog sheet needs to be included with the negatives/slides and the following needs to be provided below on this particular inventory site: Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken Roll/slide sheet # Frame/slot # Date Taken ❑ See continuation sheet or attached photo & slide catalog sheet for list of photo roll or slide entries. ❑ Photos/illustrations without negatives are also in this site inventory file. FOR CERTAIN KINDS OF PROPERTIES, INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING AS WELL 1. Farmstead & District: (List of structures and buildings, known or estimated year built, and contributing or non-contributing status) 2. Barn: a. A sketch of the frame/truss configuration in the form of drawing a typical middle bent of the barn. b. A photograph of the loft showing the frame configuration along one side. c. A sketch floor plan of the interior space arrangements along with the barn's exterior dimensions in feet. State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Use Only Below This Line Concur with above survey opinion on National Register eligibility: ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ More Research Recommended ❑ This is a locally designated property or part of a locally designated district. Comments: Evaluated by (name/title): Date: Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04090 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e1 Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 7. Property Description The Crescent Block is a three-story brick building constructed in 1894. The building is an example of a late 19th century Commercial Brick Front building form. Its four bays originally contained three shop spaces with an entrance to the upper floors in the narrow bay (119) to the right of center. This bay now also contains a narrow shop space in addition to the stairs access. The building is clad in a dark brown brick set with reddish tinted mortar. A twin band of corbeled brick extends across the front between the second and third levels. The original pressed metal cornice has widely spaced brackets with smaller brackets evenly spaced in between. The original storefront treatment is retained in the west bay (117). This bay has a recessed entrance set between plate glass display windows and a multi -part transom above. The first floor projects forward from the front fagade and has a shallow, standing -seam metal shed roof separating the first and second floors. An embossed metal cornice spans the transoms connecting to the hipped roof entrance hood above the entrance to the upper levels (119). This space was remodeled in the 1930s with carrara glass elements with Art Deco styling. The design is well-suited for the small size of this bay. The design includes a curved glass display window on the right with bands of black and white glass in the bulkhead and signboard areas. The original wood and glass entrance door and tile floor in the entrance are retained in this space. The east half of the building is now part of a single storefront. The modern design incorporated new brick with a gray exposed aggregate in the section separating the windows from the second floor. The windows have single fixed glass lights and are topped by separate curved, fixed awnings. The entrance is at the far east end. The upper levels of the building have an unusual arrangement of window openings. The third floor windows appear in pairs, are tall and narrow with stone sills, and have a single flat stone lintel above each pair. A pair of windows is centered in each of the original four bays. The windows consist of 1/1 double -hung sash with a transom of equal size above. Windows on the west half of the second level are shorter with a pair of 1/1 sash above the hipped roof entrance bay. The west bay has a pair of 1/1 sash plus transom centered in the bay with shorter 1/1 sash plus transoms on both sides. Fenestration of the east half of the second floor originally mirrored that on the west (Image 05), but in 1929 (likely with Montgomery Ward's move into the building) two large Chicago -style windows were introduced in place of those in the east half of the building (2017). The Chicago - style windows have since been replaced with new sash (the opening is retained). The building is approximately 80 -ft. wide and has an irregular depth. The third floor originally contained a hall space (Svendsen, 2001). In 2017, the building appears as previously described. The building is largely vacant, with only the storefronts at 117 and 119 occupied by Revival, a vintage clothing store. 8. Statement of Significance This building is a moderately well-preserved example of a turn -of -the -century Commercial Brick Front building. Constructed in 1894 under the auspices of C.F. Lovelace, that connection provides an additional avenue for considering significance; Lovelace being associated with the adjacent College Block as well as the construction of other downtown buildings. He also has deep and significant ties to commercial and financial institutions in the city. Although it is unlikely that a case under Criterion B in association with Lovelace should be made for the Crescent Block, certainly that association elevates the general significance of the building. Further, the building is an unusual example of commercial design, with stylistic influences reflecting the influence of Chicago architecture on Iowa City design - an association worth additional consideration. Lovelace's role in the design should also be examined. Finally, as a mixed-use building the Crescent Block has long associations with the history of commerce in downtown Iowa City (including as a professional office space), and to the history of local fraternal groups that utilized the third floor hall. Though portions of the storefront have sustained significant alterations, the retention of a 1930s era Art Deco Style storefront (119) as well as one of the original storefronts Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04090 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e2 Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City (117) gives the Crescent Block added importance. As a result, this building is considered individually eligible for the National Register under Criterion C and likely under Criterion A as well. Retention of a good level of historic integrity on the interior would be important to a successful nomination. The building is counted as a contributing structure in a potential historic district. Image 01. View of the fagade (north) elevation, looking SW across the Ped Mall (E. College Street) (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04090 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e3 Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 02. View of the facade (north) elevation, looking SE across the Ped Mall (E. College Street) (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Image 03. View of the 1930s Art Deco storefront faced in black Carrara glass (Image by AKAY Consulting, August 2017) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04090 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e4 Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Historical Backeround As noted, the Crescent Block is located on the urban renewal era pedestrian mall that extends for several blocks along E. College Street and S. Dubuque Street. As originally platted, College Street had a 100 -ft. width with four 80 -ft. wide lots laid out perpendicular to the street. 20 -ft. wide east -west alleys bisected the blocks and were presumed to extend along the rear of the buildings. College Street extended from the "Promenade" along the Iowa River east through the downtown, over Ralston Creek, and eventually along the south side of College Green park before it reached the city limits (Svendsen, 2001). Property transfer records show this property changing hands in 1890 and 1895 when Manley Moon and Milton Moon each acquired half of Lot 2 in Block 82 from Robert Finkbine and Chancy Lovelace, architects in the partnership of Finkbine and Lovelace (Svendsen, 2001). Lovelace and Moon are responsible for the building's construction in 1894 (2017). When the pending construction was announced in April of that year, the news account noted that work would commence in early May. The 80- by 80 -ft., three-story building would have three "three fine store rooms with modern fronts" on the first floor; offices on the second floor; and the third floor would be fitted for a large hall. Demolition of a brick building on the site was underway the first week in May (2017). At the time the building was under construction, news accounts referred to the property as the Lovelace and Moon Block, but in late December the property owners announced the building would thereafter be known as the Crescent Block; no explanation for the name was given. Lovelace and Moon held the property until 1923 when M.G. Koser, a local real estate agent, acquired the building (2017). City directories and fire insurance maps show the building with a number of retail tenants through the years. In 1899 fire insurance maps show the building with a pharmacy, china and notions store, and hardware store. The 1904 city directory shows the Crescent Pharmacy run by W.W. Morrison (117) and Bruce Moore's hardware store (123). By 1906 a clothing store was in place at 121 joining the drug store and hardware stores already in place. The Elks Club occupied the third floor meeting hall. Five years later, the Crescent Pharmacy continued but A.A. Pickering's Store replaced the clothing store selling "china, glass, queensware, fancy goods and toys" and the Knights of Columbus rented the third floor hall space after the Elks moved to their newly completed building on the southwest corner of Gilbert and Washington streets. The second floor had 10 office suites occupied by lawyers, insurance agents, and abstractors. After World War I and during the 1920s, William Smith and Richard Hiatt operated a hardware store from(121 and a grocery store opened in 123. The pharmacy continued from 117 but with a new name, Morrison's Pharmacy (Svendsen, 2001). In 1929 a major shift came when the Montgomery Ward and Co. department store located in 121-123. Montgomery Ward had their farm store and implement sales in a building located directly to the south fronting onto Burlington Street. They remained the anchor retail tenant in the building until the late 1960s when Goodwill Industries occupied 121-123. By 1940, the Koser Brothers Real Estate Office was located at 119. M.G. Koser owned the building at the time. The drug store space was taken over about the same time by Western Auto and continued through the early 1960s. By the late 1970s the first of several restaurants and/or bars opened in the building - Maxwell's Cocktail Lounge occupied 121-123. In 2000, the Union Bar occupied 121-123 and the Soap Opera specialty soap shop was in 119. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet e5 Site Number 52-04090 Related District Number Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 04. Historic Image — ca. 1910 7 (Source: State Historical Society of Iowa) In this view of the south side of E. College Street, looking east from Clinton we see the Crescent Block at left. At that time, the Dooley Block remained fully intact at center, and the Coldren Opera House/Iowa City State Bank was located on the corner (now the Savings and Loan Building). Image 05. Historic Image — ca. 1925 (Source: State Historical Society of Iowa) Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04090 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet e6 Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City Image 06. Historic Image — ca. 1965 N (Source: Iowa City Public Library) By this time, the 2'6 floor windows of the east two bays had been altered. This likely occurred concurrent with Montgomery Ward's move into the building in 1929. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Site Number 52-04090 Iowa Site Inventory Form Related District Number Continuation Sheet Paae 7 Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 9. Major Bibliographic References (2001) Iowa City city directories. Property Transfer Records, Johnson County Auditor's Office. Tax Assessor's Records, City of Iowa City Assessor. Sanborn maps, 1874, 1879, 1888, 1892, 1899, 1906, 1912, 1920, 1926, 1933, and 1933 updated to 1970. 2017: References Iowa City Public Library. Digital Photograph collection. http://history.icpl.org. Iowa City Then & Now. Publisher unknown. Mansheim, Gerald. Iowa City: an illustrated history. Norfolk, VA: The Donning Company, 1989. State Historical Society of Iowa. Iowa City. Photograph Collection. Slonneger, Marybeth. Finials: A View of Downtown Iowa City. Iowa City: Hand Press, 2015. Svendsen, Marlys A. "Survey and Evaluation of the Central Business District." Prepared for the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission, 2001. Svendsen, Marlys A. "Crescent Block: 52-04090." Iowa Site Form, 2001. Newspapers Iowa City Herald. "Iowa City Improves." April 18, 18 94. Iowa City Herald. "Local News." May 02, 1894. Iowa City Herald. "Iowa City Alive and Moving." May 02, 1894. Iowa City Herald. "Local News." September 22, 1894. Iowa City Herald. "Over the City." November 24, 1894. Iowa City Herald. "The Crescent Block." December 21, 1894. Iowa Department of Cultural Affairs State Historical Society of Iowa Iowa Site Inventory Form Continuation Sheet Page 8 Site Number 52-04090 Related District Number Crescent Block Johnson Name of Property County 117-123 E. College Street Iowa City Address City 11. Additional Documentation Legal Description: Original Town Plat, Block 82, Lot 2 Assessor: PIN 002+1010380005-006 (2 parcels, currently one property owner) Lat/Long: 41.658824/-91.533763 Parcel Map - 2017 COLLEGE 0 Z W N O O0 220 Z J U 212 224 W 228 N N it N � m 102 :D N ABURLINGTON Planning and Zoning Commission May 21, 2020 Page 3 of 13 Hensch closed the public hearing. Parsons moved to approve SUB20-04, an application submitted by Pleasant Valley LP for a preliminary plat of the Pleasant Valley Preserve subdivision, a 7 -lot, 7.6 acre residential subdivision in unincorporated Johnson County. Townsend seconded the motion. Parsons sees no reason not to approve this application. Hensch agrees with Parsons, this is in compliance with the Fringe Area Agreement and he doesn't have any concerns at all about this. Signs agreed, it is pretty straightforward. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. CASE NO. REZ20-02: Applicant: Tailwind College St. IC, LLC Location: 109, 111, 115, and 117-121 E. College Street An application submitted by Tailwind College St. IC, LLC for a rezoning from Central Business (CB -10) zone to CB -10 with a Historic District Overlay (CB-10/OHD) for the properties located at 109, 111, 115, and 117-121 E. College Street. Russett reiterated this is a rezoning application for a historic district overlay for several properties within the Ped Mall on East College Street. She reminded the Commission that these local landmark rezonings ensure the preservation of historic resources in the community and require upon approval that exterior changes to these buildings undergo historic review, which could be a review by the City Preservation Planner or the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). The HPC did review this application at their meeting last week and recommended approval of the landmark designation. Russett added although this item isn't related to the development project, the applicant is seeking to preserve the existing buildings that front East College Street and build a new building behind those historic structures and that review of the development, the new buildings, would be subject to historic review upon approval of this rezoning. Russett next showed an aerial of the site and then the zoning map. All of the area is zoned CB 10, which is the downtown zoning designation. She pointed out property which is currently Martinis is currently a local historic landmark. Russett next went through the properties and showed some current photographs and some historic photographs. First is 109 East College Street, which is the west bay which was constructed in 1874. Next are the central bays of the Dooley Block at 111 through 113 East College Street and the east bay of the Dooley block at 115 East College Street. Next is a historic photograph that shows the Dooley block prior to the demolition of the central bays. The central bays were demolished, and the Sears company built there as a three -bay Planning and Zoning Commission May 21, 2020 Page 4 of 13 building in 1929. Moving on to the Crescent block, 117 and 123 East College Street, which is currently Revival and Union Bar, Russett showed a historic photograph of the Crescent block at the left side of the screen and the Dooley block in the center. Russett pointed out Martinis, which is currently a local historic landmark. Russett noted the storefront at 121 E. College Street was remodeled, so it is not the original facade of the building. It was remodeled in 1930 to reflect an art deco styling, so even though it's not the original facade, it was remodeled during the period of significant, so the art deco storefront is an important feature of this building. Russett noted the next steps after the Planning Commission makes a recommendation, City Council will have a public hearing and if approved, exterior modifications will be subject to the historic review process. Staff does recommend approval of REZ20-02 for a rezoning from Central Business (CB -10) zone to CB -10 with a Historic District Overlay (CB-10/OHD) for the properties located at 109, 111-113, 115, and 117-121 E. College Street. Martin asked how this historic overlay will affect the restaurants there, the current restaurant signage, and patio seating. Is there anything that can negatively impact the current business. Russett replied if they wanted to make any changes to the size or the signs that would be subject to historic review. Martin noted the original Sears sign shown she thinks is far too large for current sign standards, so could someone then decide to put a sign like that up since that was original. Russett replied yes and noted they had a project similar to that on the Historic Preservation Commission agenda last week where a historic sign was larger than the current signage standards and HPC recommended approval of it, but it needs to also get a special exception from the Board of Adjustment to approve the signage size requirements. Martin wanted confirmation they wouldn't see a negative impact on the current businesses because it's just a facade and signage restraints and there could potentially be benefits. Russett replied there's definitely benefits if the buildings become local historic landmarks, there's a grant program that the projects could potentially be eligible for so there are financial resources as well, but only for the exterior of the buildings. Signs noted in the report comments the developer is planning to build a new structure behind the historical structure. From the overview it looks like some of those buildings go all the way back to the alley and so is it okay if they demolish parts of those buildings in the rear. Russett noted that the demolitions would have to be reviewed by the HPC prior to the demolition. Hekteon noted the whole property will be zoned historic, not just the facades. Hensch asked if this historic designation then allows these properties to become eligible for the State Historic property tax credits. Russett noted that was correct. Baker asked about the redevelopment behind the fagade and what regulations kick in controlling the height of the redevelopment and can something go above the current facade behind it higher. Russett said that would have to be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission and staff has reviewed some preliminary designs, and the applicant has already submitted a historic review application. The City Historic Preservation Planner did a sightline study and provided some recommendations on what might work in terms of height but the HPC will make those final decisions. The only reason City Council would be involved in this is if the applicant is seeking TIF funding otherwise Council would not have a say in the project. Planning and Zoning Commission May 21, 2020 Page 5 of 13 Hensch opened the public hearing. Kevin Monson (Neumann Monson Architects) is representing Tailwind and noted this project has been in the works for probably a year and a half and they've had multiple opportunities to review the project with City staff and with the City administration. He noted it's a very complex project and some of these storefronts have been vacant for a very long time and one of the issues with the current size is that local businesses cannot utilize that large of a footprint. With this project for instance the Sears and Roebuck building it is going to be reduced in size to the original footprint of the adjoining Dooley block buildings and thereby making it much more advantageous for local businesses to be able to use that footprint. The Union Bar will be reduced in this project, again, downsizing the size of the building. Additionally the Union Bar has been selling its equipment so there'll be another use for that facility. Monson stated this it is a good project for the Ped Mall to get it alive again and get appropriate businesses back in that block. It's an exciting project but they have a lot of steps to go before they make it happen. Signs asked what they are envisioning, will there be residential in the rear. Monson confirmed that is correct, they are looking at a residential facility. They've been guided by City to the height restriction and their building will be no taller than the Graduate Hotel. He added the beautiful thing about this is there actually will be a garden space between the existing buildings and the new building, so they will be separated and that separation actually helps differentiate the older historic buildings from what is a contemporary building to be placed at the rear of the site. Hensch asked if these buildings facades have all been remodeled, although very long ago, so will the facades have stay as they are now, or any improvements would have to be as close to the original construction prior to remodels. Monson noted the fagades have been greatly altered over the years and stated they are going to be kept as they are now except for the Union Block where the Union Bar is as they would like to restore that section closer to the Montgomery Ward era of the building, rather than the Union Bar era of the building. He noted the upper elevations above the first floor are fairly intact and very similar to the conditions when they were first built, so those will be maintained and restored to continue on that heritage. They will also be following the Secretary of Interior's guidelines for Historic Preservation with the new construction and not match the existing building with the new structure because that would be historically incorrect. The Secretary of Interior guidelines states it is not appropriate and can be confusing for the public as what was there and what wasn't there. Baker asked if they are envisioning the development behind the facade to be as high as the Graduate Hotel. Monson confirmed the guidelines that they've received says they can go no higher than the Graduate Hotel. He noted it's interesting when looking at the sight lines, because of the distance of that building setting back from the Ped Mall, there are very few views of a new building. Because the existing buildings are so close when one is in the Ped Mall there isn't much of a glimpse of anything behind it. Monson also stated they promise not to put any plaid on their building either like the Graduate Hotel did. Townsend asked if Monson has any idea what other businesses would be interested in residing in these buildings. Monson is not sure but they do have a not-for-profit that they've been talking to for over a year about occupying the Crescent Block building, the top floors of it, and that is looking promising. Planning and Zoning Commission May 21, 2020 Page 6 of 13 Signs noted by taking off the back parts of some of those larger buildings they are going to end up with more reasonably sized units as far as potential rentals go. Monson replied that's right and they think it is the right way of preserving downtown but also making it viable. They to restore these buildings and get them back into service and building the buildings behind the current structures is the answer. Dyer asked if the new building have windows on all sides. Monson confirmed it will. Hensch asked if some of the upper floors of the structures are unoccupied presently or have been for some time. Monson confirmed that's correct. Hensch closed the public hearing. Parsons moved to approve REZ20-02, an application submitted by Tailwind College St. IC, LLC for a rezoning from Central Business (CB -10) zone to CB -10 with a Historic District Overlay (CB-10/OHD) for the properties located at 109, 111-113, 115, and 117-121 E. College Street. Baker seconded the motion. Townsend noted her surprise that those buildings weren't on the historic society already. She does wonder what will happen to the ones on the other side of the street and if they are going to try to put those on historic society. Russett mentioned they are working on a nomination to the National Register right now for the entire Downtown District to hopefully be listed in the National Register of Historic Places. Townsend added she would hate to see some funky high rise right across the street. Signs stated it is already there, the one on the corner is a relatively new structure from the 70s or 80s, so part of the blocks already been redone by the Plaza Center One. Signs stated it sounds like an interesting project and a way to maintain the street character in the Ped Mall and take better advantage of the rest of that space. He agrees there's a positive to reducing the size of some of those massive buildings with it'll probably help limit some of the massive uses of those buildings. He is intrigued and thinks there could be some real good things happening there. Hensch supports this application now even more than when he was reading it because he thinks it's very important to maintain the character and history of Iowa City and now learning that a lot of those spaces are unoccupied anyway, that is not the best use to get more people downtown. They need places to live, they need more businesses and more variety of businesses. Plus, this will allow the property to be eligible for tax credits. A vote was taken and the motion passed 7-0. CASE NO. SUB20-05: Applicant: Allen Homes, Inc. Location: East of Scott Blvd and north of American Legion Road Item Number: 10.a. CITY OIF IOWA CITY www.icgov.org October 20, 2020 Resolution approving height bonuses for 305 and 315 E. Prentiss Street and 625 S. Gilbert Street in the Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings zone. (DRC20-00005) ATTACHMENTS: Description Staff memo to City Manager Resolution r � ,:,® CITY OF IOWA CITY ��,M 4 � T4 MEMORANDUM Date: October 20, 2020 To: Geoff Fruin, City Manager From: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, on behalf of the Staff Form -Based Code Committee Re: Level II Design Review — 305 and 315 E. Prentiss Street and 625 S. Gilbert Street (DRC20-00005) Introduction On November 4, 2019, the City Council adopted a rezoning ordinance and conditional zoning agreement for approximately 1.6 acres of land located at 305 and 315 E. Prentiss Street and 625 S. Gilbert Street to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CS). After the rezoning, staff received a design review application, which includes a height bonus request, for the above- mentioned properties. The Staff Form -Based Code Committee has reviewed the plans and determined that the project meets the requirements of the form -based code. Since the applicant submitted a four-story height bonus request for a building that is in total eight -stories, the request requires review by the City Council. Bonus Height Request The applicant has requested four stories of bonus height for a proposed 8 -story residential building. The base maximum height in the RFC -CX zone is four stories, but the maximum bonus height allowed is eight stories through the design review process. The building height bonus provisions in the form -based code for Riverfront Crossings create an incentive for developers to incorporate features that provide a public benefit or that further important goals and objectives of the Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Requests for bonus height are reviewed by the Form -Based Code Committee through the design review process. Up to two stories of bonus height may be approved administratively by staff. Height bonus requests above two stories or transfer of development right requests (e.g. public right-of-way) must be approved by City Council through the Level II design review process. As is shown in Table 1, the applicant is requesting four stories of bonus height by meeting the approval criteria for public art and leadership in energy and environmental design as set forth in 14 -2G -7G of the zoning code. Table 1. Summary of Bonus Height Request Request Type Bonus Height Public Art Floor 5 Leadership and Energy Design Floors 6-8 See Attachments 2, 3, and 4 for the applicant's submission to the Form -Based Code Committee. These attachments include a memo from the applicant regarding the height bonus request, the architectural and site plans, and the landscaping and maintenance plans. The applicant also recently submitted an updated summary of its height bonus request [Attachment 5]. October 14, 2020 Page 2 General Description of the Project The building is proposed on a sloping site on E. Prentiss Street between Ralston Creek and S. Gilbert Street. See Figure 1. Figure 1. Location of Proposed Project E� I n. �� e 72 Building The proposed 8 -story building will include 211 dwelling units and 3 levels of structured parking. The first floor of the building will include parking, as well as a lobby, leasing office, and mailroom. The second level will include parking, amenity and study spaces, and one dwelling unit. Level three will include the final floor of parking. Dwelling units, a fitness room, more amenity space, including an 1,811 square foot courtyard, will be located on floor three. The structured parking on all floors is located behind occupied building space that fronts E. Prentiss Street. Along the Ralston Creek frontage, the parking is proposed to be screened by a mesh parking screening material. Access to the parking is also via E. Prentiss Street. Figure 2 shows a rendering of the northern building fagade. Level 4 will include dwelling units, two interior courtyards, and amenity space with a balcony located at the northwest corner of the building. Level 5-8 include dwelling units and amenity space. Table 2 provides a summary of the building. October 14, 2020 Page 3 Figure 2. E. Prentiss Street Facade Table 2. Building Summary Stories Req u ired/Al lowed 4 max base height 8 max bonus height Proposed 8 Dwelling Units n/a 211 Bedrooms n/a 266 Vehicle Parking 201 203 Bicycle Parking 130 130 Open Space 2,660 sq ft 4,871 sq ft Common Courtyards n/a 536 sq ft Recreational Amenities n/a 2,198 sq ft Creekside Open Space Area The plans also include improvements along Ralston Creek that include walking paths with connections to the building and public sidewalks, enhanced landscaping and stream bank stabilization. The open space area totals 3,060 square feet. More details related to this amenity space are provided below. General Approval Criteria The form -based code requires that projects requesting height bonuses must demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood. Staff Findings: In terms of materials, the applicant has proposed a variety of durable materials, including two types of brick, metal, mesh parking screen, two colors of fiber cement board, lap siding, and ribbed fiber cement panel. The proposed building is located on a sloping site and there are several examples of mid -rise building in the area. To the west of the proposed building, across Ralston Creek, is a 4 -story residential building. To the east is a 3-4 story building. Across the street from the proposed building is a 5 -story mixed-use building. The October 14, 2020 Page 4 applicant provided a massing study that shows how the proposed 8 -story building fits within the context of the neighborhood (see Figure 3 and Attachment 5). The building also incorporates a 10 -foot stepback above the third floor of the building along the E. Prentiss Street facade, which helps to visually reduce the scale of the building. Figure 3. Massing Study — View looking west from Prentiss & Gilbert Streets The City adopted a Climate Action and Adaptation Plan in 2018 and more recently in 2019, the City Council declared a climate crisis. The City's also set carbon emission reduction targets of 45% by 2030 and reaching "net zero" by 2050. Due to the City's climate action goals, staff recommends that the project incorporate three additional sustainability related components, which will demonstrate excellence in building design. In summary these requirements include: 1) that the building be designed, constructed, and maintained to at least LEED Silver standards; 2) installation and maintenance of rooftop solar that generates at least 42,000 kWh annually, and 3) installation and maintenance of only "low flow" plumbing fixtures. Soecific Aaaroval Criteria Public Art To qualify for bonus height for public art the applicant must contribute to the City's public art program equal to 1% of the threshold value of the project. Threshold value is the sum of all construction costs shown on all building permits associated with the project, including site preparation. Funds contributed shall be used for the City's public art within the Riverfront Crossings District as approved by the Public Art Committee. One additional floor of building height may be granted through the public art bonus provision. Staff Findings: The applicant has agreed to make this contribution, which will be formalized in the bonus height resolution. Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design To qualify for bonus height for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design the applicant must demonstrate: October 14, 2020 Page 5 1. That the project is designed to high standards regarding energy efficiency and environmental stewardship, according to LEED or other similar environmental or energy efficiency rating system. In general, the higher the level of energy efficiency or environmental stewardship demonstrated, the greater the bonus. The amount of bonus granted will be based on the overall quality of the project; and/or 2. That the project is designed to minimize the impact of stormwater runoff on the environment through the use of bioswales, rain gardens, greenroofs, rainwater harvesting, and stream bank stabilization and restoration along Ralston Creek or the Iowa River, as described in the Riverfront Crossings District subarea plan adopted in April 2011. Any such green feature(s) must be designed using Best Management Practices and demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City that the design will be successful given applicable factors, such as soil conditions, access to sunlight, topography, etc. A long-term maintenance plan must accompany any proposal for such green features. Up to four additional floors of building height may be granted for projects that meet these requirements. Staff Findings: The applicant has submitted a landscaping plan and a maintenance plan for improvements along Ralston Creek [Attachment 4]. Staff in neighborhood and Development Services, Public Works, and Parks and Recreation reviewed these plans. The landscape plans show 3,060 square feet of open space between Ralston Creek and the building with a 6' wide concrete walk and 6' of grass paving meandering through the open space area. Access to the open space area is provided from the sidewalks along E. Prentiss Street and S. Gilbert Street, the northwest corner of the building, and the first -floor structured parking. At the center of the open space area is a terrace. The plan includes 47 trees from eight different species, 57 shrubs of three different types, and 26,605 square feet of ground cover. Staff in the Parks and Recreation Department have approved of the diversity of plantings. The plans also include two vegetated bioswales. In addition, the applicant submitted drainage exhibits and runoff calculations. The drainage exhibits show that the impervious surface area will be reduced by 725 square feet and runoff will be reduced by approximately 26% from existing conditions. Recommendation Based on the information provided by the applicant, as described above, the Staff Form -based Code Committee finds that the proposal meets the criteria to quality for four stories of bonus height request and recommends approval subject to the following additional requirements: 1. The building shall be designed, constructed, and maintained to at least LEED Silver standards under the National Green Building Standard or the LEED Green Building Rating System. Confirmation of this must be supplied by the developer's architect. Although LEED certification is not required, at least eight points must be achieved from the LEED-NC Optimize Energy Performance credit. 2. The developer must install and maintain rooftop solar to generate at least 42,000 kWh annually. 3. The developer must install and maintain only low flow fixtures in the residential units and common bathrooms. Attachments: 1. Rezoning Ordinance and Conditional Zoning Agreement 2. Memo re: Height Bonus Submittal; March 6, 2020 3. Architectural and Civil Plans 4. Landscaping and Maintenance Plan 5. Height Bonus Summary; October 14, 2020 Doc ID: DINANC600012 Type: GE .N Reco ORDINANCE- - --- — _ — -Recorded: 11/08/2018 at 10:50:06 AM Fee Amt: $62.00 Pape 1 of 12 Johnson county Iowa Kim Painter County Recorder BK5978 Pq1®-21 STATE OF IOWA ) )SS JOHNSON COUNTY ) L r 1 ww��a E ,,r► city of 074 '' M I, Kellie K. Fruehling, City Clerk of Iowa City, Iowa, do hereby certify that the Ordinance attached hereto is a true and correct copy of Ordinance No.19-4809 which was passed by the City Council of Iowa City, Iowa, at a regular meeting held on the 4th day of November, 2019, is a true and correct copy, all as the same appears of record in my office. Dated at Iowa City, Iowa, this 7th day of November 2019. Kellie K. Fruchling City Clerk OR r,N \ord 410 EAST WASI3INGTON STREET • IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240-1826 9 (319) 356-5000 • FAX (319) 356-5009 11,V) Prepared by: Jade Pederson, Planning Intern, 410 t Washington Street, Iowa City, IA 52240; 319-355-5230 (REZ19-07) Ordinance No. 19-4809 An ordinance conditionally rezoning approximately 1.6 acres of land located at 306 and 316 East Prentiss Street and 626 South Gilbert Street, from Intensive Commercial (CI -1) and Community Commercial (CC -2) to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX). (REZ19-07) Whereas, the applicant, Capstone Collegiate Communities, LLC, has requested a rezoning of property located at 305 and 315 East Prentiss Street and 625 South Gilbert Street, from Intensive Commercial (CI -1) and Community Commercial (CC -2) to Riverfront Crossings -Central Crossings (RFC -CX); and Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan has designated this area for general commercial and the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan envisions this area to be redeveloped into a mix of residential and commercial uses; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the proposed rezoning and determined that it complies with the Comprehensive Plan provided that it meets conditions regarding dedication of right- of-way along the west side of S. Gilbert Street, provision of an access easement for City vehicles to access a manhole on the southwest corner of the subject property, provision of an access easement for City access to a sanitary sewer line that runs on the southeast end of the property, improvements to Ralston Creek including removal of invasive trees, stream bank stabilization, tree planting, and dedication of a temporary construction easement for the reconstruction of the Prentiss Street Bridge, and satisfaction of the affordable housing requirements set forth in section 14-2G-8 of the City Code for any new residential development; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2019) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, areas of public need will be met by the acceptance of this ordinance, including the enhancement of pedestrian infrastructure along S. Gilbert St. by creating a buffer between pedestrian and vehicle traffic, City access to public utility infrastructure for repairs and maintenance, Ralston Creek restoration, and affordable housing; and Whereas, the owner and applicant have agreed that the property shall be developed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto to ensure appropriate development in this area of the city. Now, therefore, be it ordained by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Section I Approval. Subject to the Conditional Zoning Agreement attached hereto and incorporated herein, property described below is hereby classified Riverfront Crossings - Central Crossings (RFC -CX): Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Block 21 of County Seat Addition to Iowa City, And that tract lying West of Gilbert Street and North of the Iowa Interstate Railroad described in the deed Book 1967 at Page 279 as Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Lot 1, Block 21, of the County Seat Addition; Thence S00012'59"W, along the Easterly line of said Block 21, 261.17 feet to the Point of Beginning; Thence S89°10'00"E, 22.00 feet; Thence S54057'41"E, 46.02 to the Northwesterly right of way line of Gilbert Street; Thence southwesterly, 80.06 feet, along said right of way line, on a 989.93 foot radius curve, concave southeasterly (chord S32043'18"W, 80.04 feet); Thence N82°21'24"E, 213.00 feet; Thence N0001 2'59"E along the westerly line of said Block 21, of County Seat Addition and its projection thereof, 7.75 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 4, of Block 21; Thence easterly along the southerly boundary of said Lot 4, of Block 21, to the southeast corner thereof; Thence northerly along the easterly line of said Lot 4, of Block 21, to the Point of Beginning hereof. Described area contains 1.60 acres and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. Ordinance No. 19-4809 Page 2 Section II. Zoning Map. The building official is hereby authorized and directed to change the zoning map of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, to conform to this amendment upon the final passage, approval and publication of the ordinance as approved by law. Section III. Conditional Zoning Agreement. The mayor is hereby authorized and directed to sign, and the City Clerk attest, the Conditional Zoning Agreement between the property owner(s) and the City, following passage and approval of this Ordinance, as well as the easement agreements contemplated by the Conditional Zoning Agreement, in a form approve by the City Attorney. Section IV. Certification And Recording. Upon passage and approval of the Ordinance, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to certify a copy of this ordinance and any agreements or other documentation authorized and required by the Conditional Zoning Agreement, and record the same in the Office of the County Recorder, Johnson County, Iowa, at the Owner's expense, upon the final passage, approval and publication of this ordinance, as provided by law. Section V. Repealer. All ordinances and parts of ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section VI. Severability. If any section, provision or part of the Ordinance shall be adjudged to be invalid or unconstitutional, such adjudication shall not affect the validity of the Ordinance as a whole or any section, provision or part thereof not adjudged invalid or unconstitutional. Section VII. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in effect after its final passage, approval and publication, as provided by law. Passed and approved this 4th day of November Mdyor Attest: /ZY 1-13 City Clerk 7App�ved by ,", City Atto rn ey's Office � aer // 2019. Ordinance No. 19-4809 Page 3 It was moved by Mims and seconded by Thomas Ordinance as read be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: Cole Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Throgmorton that the First Consideration 10/15/2019 Voteforpassage: AYES: Salih, Taylor, Teague, Thomas, Throgmorton, Cole, Mims. NAYS: None. ABSENT: None. Second Consideration _ Vote for passage: Date published 11/14/2019 Moved by Mims, seconded by Salih, that the rule requiring ordinances to be considered and voted on for passage at two Council meetings prior to the meeting at which it is to be finally passed be suspended, the second consideration and vote be waived and the ordinance be voted upon for final passage at this time. AYES: Salih, Teague, Thomas, Throgmorton, Cole, Mims. NAYS: Taylor. ABSENT: None. Prepared by: Jade Pederson, Planning Intern, 410 E. Washington, Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5230 (REZ19-07) Conditional Zoning Agreement This agreement is made between the City of Iowa City, Iowa, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "City"), and Boyd Investment Company, LC (hereinafter "Owner"), and Capstone Collegiate Communities, LLC (hereinafter "Applicant"). Whereas, Owner is the legal title holder of approximately 1.6 acres of property located at 305 and 315 East Prentiss Street and 625 South Gilbert Street; and Whereas, Applicant has requested the rezoning of said property from Intensive Commercial (CM) and Community Commercial (CC -2) to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX); and Whereas, development pursuant to this rezoning will cause increased pedestrian use of the area, establish residential development along Ralston Creek; and eliminate the City's current access to its utilities, thus creating public needs not adequately addressed by Iowa City Code of Ordinances, Title 14, the Zoning Code; and Whereas, the conditions established in this agreement address those public needs created by the rezoning, including the need to enhance pedestrian infrastructure along S. Gilbert St.; the need to preserve access to existing utilities; the need to restore Ralston Creek and bridge; and the need to provide affordable housing; and Whereas, the Planning and Zoning Commission has determined that, with appropriate conditions to address these public needs, the requested zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, Iowa Code §414.5 (2019) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change; and Whereas, the Owner acknowledges that certain conditions and restrictions are reasonable to ensure the development of the property is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the above-described public needs; and Whereas, the Owner agrees to develop this property in accordance with the terms and conditions of a Conditional Zoning Agreement. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Boyd Investment Company, LC is the legal title holder of the property legally described as: Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Block 21 of County Seat Addition to Iowa City, And that tract lying West of Gilbert Street and North of the Iowa Interstate Railroad described in the deed Book 1967 at Page 279 as Commencing at the Northeast Corner of Lot 1, Block 21, of the County Seat Addition; Thence S00°12'59"W, along the Easterly line of said Block 21, 261.17 feet to the Point of Beginning; Thence S89010'00"E, 22.00 feet; Thence S54057'41"E, 46.02 to the Northwesterly right of way line of Gilbert Street; Thence southwesterly, 80.06 feet, along said right of way line, on a 989.93 foot radius curve, concave southeasterly (chord S32043'18"W, 80.04 feet); Thence N82021'24"E, 213.00 feet; Thence N00012'59"E along the westerly line of said Block 21, of County Seat Addition and its projection thereof, 7.75 feet to the southwest corner of said Lot 4, of Block 21; Thence easterly along the southerly boundary of said Lot 4, of Block 21, to the southeast corner thereof; Thence northerly along the easterly line of said Lot 4, of Block 21, to the Point of Beginning hereof. Described area contains 1.60 acres and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. 2. The Owner acknowledges that the City wishes to ensure conformance to the principles of the Comprehensive Plan and the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. Further, the parties acknowledge that Iowa Code §414.5 (2019) provides that the City of Iowa City may impose reasonable conditions on granting a rezoning request, over and above the existing regulations, in order to satisfy public needs caused by the requested change. 3. In consideration of the City's rezoning the subject property, Owner and Applicant agree that development of the subject property will conform to all other requirements of the Zoning Code, as well as the following conditions: a. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall dedicate to the City, with no compensation to Owner, the following right-of-way and easements, the exact location of which will be determined upon review and approval of a site plan for any portion of the above-described property: 1. Right-of-way along the west side of South Gilbert Street to accommodate the relocation of a sidewalk along South Gilbert Street so that there is a buffer between the sidewalk and the street. The area to be dedicated shall generally be approximately 20' in width at the southern property line and 0' at the northern property line, as shown on the attached map, in a location to be determined by the City Engineer. The form of such dedication shall be by warranty deed. 2. A 15' wide access easement within the area shown on the attached map for City ingress and egress with vehicles and equipment to access the manhole for the trunk sewer located near the southwest corner of the subject property, in a form of agreement approved by the City Attorney. 3. An approximate 10' wide access easement for City ingress and egress with vehicles and equipment to the sanitary sewer line that runs through the former Maiden Lane right-of-way through the southeast end of the subject property, in a form of agreement approved by the City Attorney. b. Within seven days of the execution this Conditional Zoning Agreement by all parties, Owner shall dedicate to the City, with no compensation to Owner, a temporary construction easement for the area shown on the attached Exhibit A and in a form of agreement approved by the City Attorney. c. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Owner shall design and obtain approval from the City Engineer and City Forester, a plan to improve that portion of Ralston Creek abutting the above-described property. Such improvements shall be completed by Owner at Owner's expense, prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, and shall include, at a minimum: i. Removal of invasive trees; and ii. Stream bank stabilization, including necessary grading and addition of rip -rap. 4. Owner and Applicant acknowledge the requirements of Iowa City Code of Ordinances 14-2G-8, which requires the execution of an affordable housing agreement to satisfy the affordable housing obligations through the provision of on-site owner -occupied dwelling units, on-site rental dwelling units, and/or the payment of a fee in lieu of the remaining dwelling units not provided on-site or as otherwise agreed to between Owner and the City. 5. The Owner and Applicant agree that the conditions contained herein are reasonable conditions to impose on the land under Iowa Code §414.5 (2019), and that said conditions satisfy public needs that are caused by the requested zoning change. 6. The Owner and Applicant agree that in the event the subject property is transferred, sold, redeveloped, or subdivided, all redevelopment will conform with the terms of this Conditional Zoning Agreement. 7. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be deemed to be a covenant running with the land and with title to the land, and shall remain in full force and effect as a covenant with title to the land, unless or until released of record by the City of Iowa City. This agreement shall inure to the benefit of and bind all successors, representatives, and assigns of the parties. 8. The Owner and Applicant agree that nothing in this Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be construed to relieve the Owner or Applicant from complying with all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations. 9. This Conditional Zoning Agreement shall be incorporated by reference into the ordinance rezoning the subject property, and that upon adoption and publication of the ordinance, this agreement shall be recorded in the Johnson County Recorder's Office at the Applicant's expense. [Remainder of this page intentionally left blank.] Dated this ._4th day of November , 2019. City of Iowa City JlmvThrogrgorton, Mayor Attest: Kell e Fruehling, Cit Clerk Approved by: City Attorney's Office State of Iowa ) ss: Johnson County ) Capstone Collegiate Communities, LLC By. QAV1 s tqA16i6e& Boyd ihvestment Compa in 0PPV�".ISEA[ City of Iowa City Acknowledgement: This instrument was acknowledged before me on Q01.1 �h 20� by Jim Throgmorton and Kellie Fruehling as Mayor and City,,Clerk, respectively, of the City of Iowa City. Notary Public in and for (Stamp or Seal)I o z Title (and Rank) of I owa s CHRISTINE OLNEY Commission Number 80622 * My CommisskXi Expires Capstone Collegiate Communities, LLC Acknowledgement: State of -;q "i C,. County of aoc,�tA50yl _ This record was acknowledged before me on C.1-a4tz y 2019 by c„v+ a walk (Name(s) of individual(s)) asy f c Q� eel (type of authority, such as officer or trustee) of Capsto Ilegi to Co munities, LLC. Notary Publicin,06or ffie State of Iowa THOMAS H. QELMAN Commis kn Nwnbw 111593 (Stamp or Seal) * * MY COMMISSION EXPIRES hw SEPTEMBER 22, 2022 My commission expires: 9 (2 2.Z:2 02.2 IIn Dated this \ day of 20_. City of Iowa Citi; Capstone legiate Com ies, LLC l Jim Throgmorton, Ma or By: ` Attest: Boyd Investment Company, LC Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk By: _2�6e(-+f Approved by: / \ (U� City Attorney's O ice City�of Iowa City Acknowledgement: State of low ) ss: Johnson ounty ) This ins rument was acknowledged before me on by Jim Throgmorton and Kellie Fruehliri�-Mayor and City Clerk, respectively,_.of-the City of Iowa City. State of County of NotarV-Pubtic in and for the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) Title (and Rank) Capktone Collegiate Communities, LLC Acknowledgement: This record was acknowledged of&—e me 2019 by _. (Name(s) of in duals}) as (type of authority ,.su as officer or trustee} of Ca one Collegiate Communities, LLC. Notary Public in anNor the State of Iowa (Stamp or Seal) My commission expires: 4 Boyd Investment Company LC Acknowledgement: State of low'g County of�hrt5r is record was acknowledged before me on UC�bIX( b 2019 by l ert +- d (Name(s) of individual(s) as f�lQ eek (type of authority, su_cq as officer or trustee) of Boyd ly{vestment Coyfi ny, L ry Public in and for the State of Iowa r (Stamp or Sea]) K IE K GELNERion Number 182446My commission expires:mmission&Ores BER 08 2019 L20 b ig io K V UNN STREET ♦Y i ru` Cl nOF f Ol1A Cl FY PRENTISS ST €' 15 -foot wide access easement VW s: . 1 't r� Y. _ ` . - 10 -foot wide access easement flzP 15 -foot wide access easement ; Right-cf-way `f d n :� 4 �' AXIOMCONSULTANTS CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL • ELECTRICAL • SURVEY • SPECIALTY MEMORANDUM PROJECT: 315 E Prentiss Street DATE: March 6, 2020 TO: Planning Staff — City of Iowa City TOPIC: Height Bonus Submittal Ms. Russett, On behalf of Capstone Collegiate Communities and the project team, we are pleased to present the attached drawings and following narrative for your consideration regarding the Height Bonus for the 315 E Prentiss Project (305 E. Prentiss, 315 E. Prentiss, and 625 S. Gilbert). The attached plans demonstrate compliance with the Iowa City Zoning Code and a summary of these items is included on the cover sheet (G0.001). The building is classified as a Multi -Dwelling Structure with a Terrace Frontage Type and integrated / underground parking structure, as required by code. Consistent with the Statement of Intent provided on July 2, 2019; we are proposing an 8 -story building and requesting four floors of bonus height via a Level II Review. The two means for height bonus being pursued are: 1 Floor —Public Art (Iowa City Code 14 -2G -7-G-6) The developer is committed to making a contribution in the amount of one percent of the threshold value of the project towards the City of Iowa City's Public Art, in exchange for one floor of height bonus. The threshold value is the sum of all construction costs, including site preparation, shown on building permits associated with the project. Funds contributed are to be allocated by the Public Art Committee for public art within the Riverfront Crossing District. The project team believes the project will improve the aesthetics and pedestrian experience along E. Prentiss Street. The creation of publicly accessible open space between the proposed building and the banks of Ralston Creek may lend itself to creating a location for public art. The team is looking forward to working with the members of the city's public art program to evaluate any opportunities to make the public art more valuable than a check. Placing public art within the public space will add even more of an amenity and incentive to attract additional pedestrian traffic to the banks of Ralston Creek. In addition, the team is looking for opportunities to incorporate art into the project within elements such as handrails and site furnishings. 3 Floors — Height Bonus for Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) (Code 14 -2G -7-G-7) The code allows for the addition of up to four floors of building height for projects that are designed to meet high standards regarding energy efficiency and environmental stewardship, according to LEED or other similar environmental or energy efficiency rating system. In general, the higher the level of energy efficiency or environmental stewardship demonstrated, the greater the bonus. The amount of bonus granted will be based on the overall quality of the project. Bonus height may also be granted for projects that are designed to minimize the impact of stormwater runoff on the environment through the use of bioswales, rain gardens, green roofs, rainwater harvesting, and stream bank stabilization and restoration along Ralston Creek or the Iowa River, as described in the Riverfront Crossings District subarea plan adopted in April 2011. A long-term maintenance plan must accompany any proposal for such green features. AXIOMCONSULTANTS CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL • ELECTRICAL • SURVEY • SPECIALTY The project team believes that this property is uniquely situated to become a catalyst for the development of a pedestrian friendly and inviting space along Ralston Creek. The enhancements to Ralston Creek, the areas within the city right-of-way along Ralston Creek, and the floodway buffers associated with the creek could serve as a greenway between Riverfront Crossings Park located at the south end of the District and E. Prentiss Street. The team would like to see the measures implemented on this project become the template and standard for the numerous properties and projects located along Ralston Creek within Riverfront Crossings. The project team proposes that the project go beyond the minimal measures required by the CZA (removal of invasive species and stream bank stabilization) and Implement a more ambitious plan. This plan includes pedestrian access directly to the waterway and stabilization with native vegetation for a sustainable and natural waterway. These measures could be expanded to include the portion of the west bank of Ralston Creek within the city right-of-way. Further, public education signage or other outreach components could be incorporated. Ralston Creek is an amenity that has been overlooked and ignored for too long and the project team welcomes the opportunity to work with City Staff and City Council to develop the right mix of amenities and improvements to the waterway and adjacent land. The proposed focus areas of these improvements are: Stormwater Management - Reduction of impervious area from existing conditions. - Green roof plantings on two of the level 4 roof courtyards. - Vegetated bioswales to treat roof and reduce site runoff. - Alternative paving systems to reduce impervious area. - Structured parking to reduce impervious area. Ralston Creek Restoration Removal of invasive species and bank stabilization with native vegetation. Restoration of habitat along the banks with use of native trees and shrubs. Water quality improvements within the creek via placement of rock riffles to create shallow pools and to improve oxygenation of the water. Community Engagement Provide pedestrian access to the creek via a limestone boulder terrace. Provide more than 17,000 square feet of open space adjacent to Ralston Creek and access from both E. Prentiss Street and S. Gilbert Street. This space could host a public art installation. Provide a green space on west wall of building to enhance the overall aesthetics and improve the quality of open space. Beyond the creek improvements, our team is committed to achieving sustainable goals by addressing building efficiency while providing a healthy and comfortable experience for our residents. While this can be achieved in many ways, we are considering the following strategies that are most advantageous to Iowa City. These strategies will align with Iowa City's "Climate Action Plan" and provide maximum value within the multifamily housing building type. Site Selection and Transportation - Promote a walkable, urban environment through site selection. - Access to public transportation. - Provide scooter parking. - Provide EV -ready vehicle parking. AXIOMCONSULTANTS CIVIL • STRUCTURAL • MECHANICAL • ELECTRICAL • SURVEY • SPECIALTY Water Efficiency - Manage stormwater runoff through bioswales, green roof courtyards, and alternative paving systems to reduce impervious areas. - Specify low -flow plumbing fixtures to reduce water use. - Sub -meter each unit to monitor and report consumption. Energy Efficiency - Specify efficient mechanical systems based on a collaborative design process to reduce energy loads. - Specify systems that promote the city's commitment to electrification. - Implement building commissioning to ensure proper mechanical equipment installation and operation. - Develop efficient building skin, such as assembly R -values exceeding code minimum requirements and windows with low solar heat gain coefficient (SHGC) and U -factors. Occupant Health and Comfort - Consider zero- and low-VOC interior finish materials. - Provide appropriate glazing with low -UV and high insulated qualities for optimal views and comfort. - Incorporate vegetative screening on parking garage to promote natural vegetation, improve air quality, and provide visual interest. - Select materials to improve acoustical performance of interior spaces. Construction Pollution Prevention Properly dispose of construction waste. Incorporate appropriate measure for erosion and sediment control. Community Engagement - Community education tours of sustainable landscape and building efficiency technology. - Partnerships with local groups. The proposed plan is consistent with Iowa City's Master Plan for River Front Crossings. Our team believes this project will set a new standard for development within the River Front Crossings District and Iowa City as a whole. We look forward to working with City Staff and City Council to deliver an exceptional project. Sincerely, Michael J. etch, PE CONTEXT MAP DEVELOPER CAPSTONE COLLEGIATE COMMUNITIES 431 OFFICE PARK DRIVE 2ND FLOOR BIRMINGHAM, AL 35223 CONTACT: DAVIS MAXWELL PHONE: (205)-414-6400 ARCHITECTURE NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES 3060 PEACHTREE ROAD #600 ATLANTA, GA 30305 CONTACT: MOHAMED MOHSEN PHONE: (404)-365-7600 Y IOWA CITY 315 E PRENTISS ST IOWA CITY, IA 52240 CAPSTONE COLLEGIATE COMMUNITIES CIVIL ENGINEERING* AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 EAST COURT STREET UNIT 03 IOWA CITY, IA 52240 CONTACT: MICHAEL WELCH PHONE: (319)-519-6224 Unit Matrix Unit Type Unit Type Occupancy Bedrooms/Unit Count Bedrooms Unit Mix 120.75 2 Bedroom 45 1.5 per Unit 67.5 3 Bedroom 1 Bedroom S1 Single 1 70 70 76°0 S2 Single 1 4 4 S3 - Type A Single 1 5 5 Al Single 1 10 10 A2 Single 1 5 5 A3 Double 1 67 67 2 Bedroom B1 Double 2 31 62 21% B2 - Type A (IA Cons.) Double 2 2 4 B3 Single/Double 2 9 18 B4 Double 2 3 6 3 Bedroom C1 Single 3 5 15 2% 211 266 Tota is 100'0 Units Bedrooms Parking Calculations Unit Type Count Requirement Req`d Parking 1 Bedroom 161 0.75 per Unit 120.75 2 Bedroom 45 1.5 per Unit 67.5 3 Bedroom 5 2.5 per Unit 12.5 Total Required A3.002 ELEVATIONS- EXTERIOR- BUILDING 201 ro—ta—LProvided 203 Bike Parking Calculations COVER SHEET Count Requirement Req'd Parking Units 211 1 per Unit, 50% after 50 Spaces 130.5 Total Required A1.050 BUILDING PLAN- LEVEL 5-7 130 Total Provided 130 UNIT MIX LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE* LORBERBAUM MCNAIR 8t ASSOCIATES 214 PEERLESS AVENUE BIRMINGHAM, AL 35209 CONTACT: ERIC MCNAIR PHONE: (205)-506-1589 VARIOUS CONSULTANTS DESIGNATED WITH AN ASTERISK " ' (BUT NOT LIMITED TO) ARE UNDER SEPARATE CONTRACTS WITH THE OWNER. HEIGHT PACKAGE SHEET INDEX Sheet Number I Sheet Name G0.001 COVER SHEET A1.010 BUILDING PLAN- LEVEL 1 A1.020 BUILDING PLAN- LEVEL 2 A1.030 BUILDING PLAN- LEVEL 3 A1.040 BUILDING PLAN- LEVEL 4 A1.050 BUILDING PLAN- LEVEL 5-7 A1.060 BUILDING PLAN- LEVEL 6 A1.R00 ROOF PLAN- BUILDING 1 A3.001 ELEVATIONS- EXTERIOR- BUILDING A3.002 ELEVATIONS- EXTERIOR- BUILDING A3.004 BUILDING SECTIONS A3.101 ELEVATIONS- RENDERINGS A3.102 ELEVATIONS- RENDERINGS A3.201 MINOR ADJUSTMENTS A3.202 MATERIALS BOARD A5.101 S AND A UNITS A5.102 B UNITS A5.103 C UNITS ZONING: SUBDISTRICT: CENTRAL CROSSING SUBDISTRICT BUILDING TYPE: MULTI -DWELLING BUILDING FRONTAGE TYPE: PORTICO PARKING TYPE: INTEGRATED STRUCTURE / UNDERGROUND STRUCTURE PROJECT # : 119056 DRAWN BY: TF CHECKED BY: MM NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES SETBACKS PRIMARY SETBACK - PRENTISS ST AND GILBERT ST REQUIRED: 10' MINIMUM PROVIDED: VARIES BETWEEN 10'-12' SIDE SETBACK - RALSTON CREEK REQUIRED: T FROM 30' FLOODWAY BUFFER PROVIDED: VARIES BETWEEN T-10' REAR SETBACK - TRAIN TRACKS REQUIRED: 10' MINIMUM 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W. PROVIDED: VARIES BETWEEN 16'-17' Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30305 REAR SETBACK - ALLEY REQUIRED: 10' MINIMUM T 404 365 7600 PROVIDED: VARIES BETWEEN 10'-14' www.nitesbotton.com BUILDING HEIGHT: 8 STORIES MAXIMUM, USING BONUS HEIGHT PROVISIONS FACADE STEPBACKS: 10' STEPBACK ABOVE 3RD FLOOR ON PRENTISS ST AND GILBERT ST PRIMARY FRONTAGES OPEN SPACE TOTAL REQUIRED: 2,660 SF (10 SF PER BEDROOM) TOTAL PROVIDED: 4,871 SF LEVEL 1 CREEKSIDE AMENTIY: 3,060 SF LEVEL 3 AMENITY COURTYARD: 1,811 SF REFER TO CIVIL PACKAGE FOR OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING COUNT PARKING REQUIRED: 201 SPACES PARKING PROVIDED: 203 SPACES VEHICULAR SPACES: 201 SCOOTER SPACES: 6 (2 VEHICULAR SPACES) BIKE PARKING COUNT BIKES REQUIRED: 130 BIKES BIKES PROVIDED: 130 BIKES BUILDING AMENITY AREA INTERIOR AMENITY: 5,485 SF BUILDING HEIGHT BONUS PROVISIONS REFER TO NARRATIVE CONSTRUCTION TYPE TYPE IIIA CONSTRUCTION (5 LEVELS) OVER TYPE IA CIP CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION (3 LEVELS) No. Description Date 1 HEIGHT BONUS 3/4/20 2 HEIGHT BONUS 5/22/20 3 HEIGHT BONUS 6/26/20 4 HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 5 HEIGHT BONUS 9/16/20 This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shall remain the property of the Architects and shall not be reproduced, published or used in any way without the permission of the Architect. SHEET TITLE: LUV) z 0 U LU LUQ J 0 U W 0 Q U COVER SHEET SHEET NUMBER: G0.001 HEIGHT BONUS z _O H U M N z O U O LL. 0 w N Q w J w H O z CD Ln N N cn Ln � U Z Q Q � O LU U a Lr) M SHEET TITLE: LUV) z 0 U LU LUQ J 0 U W 0 Q U COVER SHEET SHEET NUMBER: G0.001 HEIGHT BONUS z _O H U M N z O U O LL. 0 w N Q w J w H O z 3 A3.001 FLOOR PLAN NOTES RALSTON CREEK I1 -------- ------ ------------------ --- --- ------ --------- ------------ t— — — — ------ - i _ — 30'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" 30'-0" 30'-G' 30'-U' 30'-0" 18'-8" 30'-0" 2'-8" j I j 306-71/2" ---------- — --- -- i ---—--—-------�-- 2 48'-10" A3.004 j I V-9., 15'-3' I F —1 AMPHITHEATER I 30,- REFER TO LANDSCAPE PACAKAGE FOR STYLE SEATING j I 0 DETAILED CREEKSIDE AMENITY LAYOUTS CREEKSIDE AMENITY I I I 3,060 SF I I I I UP I j i I I I I i I L— --� ja i------ — — — — — — — — — — --- ------ ------I II fi o — ' 1 II I_ -52 50 Til i" UTILITY 36 37 38 I 39 41 54 - 48 46 45 44 43 LEASING I I jI / / a OFFICE I (2 - - — - IIL I I 6' CANOPIES ABOVE - REFERER TO I I I 35 C I li MATERIAL BOARD FOR FINISH iati 15'-0"I I I — J OP I I 34 C 5.56% —UP P — - — - — - -- — - — - Q3 0 ELEVATOR LOBBY 4 LOBBY 657- o 32 40 42 55 I E53 51 49 E47 - II III I _iliii RR — J o — iSTAIR 1 = 6 co I I E= 0 II 0 2 I I I 30 25 23 21 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 11 0 0 5� E E 0 TRASH I A3.001 I I C I MAIL Ll I I II I I I l i 29 i I II I I 657{0" i o 28 r, j I I II I I I OPTIONAL I C C C SCOOTER Fh C C FLP I— J I PARKING — I I 27 26 24 22 20 TRASH - -_- ===r o =-- --- __= TRASH --- SERVICE SERVICE ELEC RICAL ELECTRICAL _ 12 10 8 6 4 --- - STAGING �n I I -EE STAIR 2 —J STAIR 3 - I qi - j - �� —_—__ -----—-------- — 7-0" I BIKE ROOM q 26' S" I -657-0 UTILITY METER CAB ELEV� 130 BIKES — _ LOCATIONS - - --------------- ------ - - - 60 LOBBY I I- ----------- - - - T — I\� L_ J ------ +------ —t--------— 657-0" I i L� I ��—J N r I — o � �- - I \ \IST R 5 LOBE M 3.002 AL 657-0" 27-1 _ 0 1/2"- —_ 25'-9 3/4" 36'-9 3/4" 22'-11 1/2" 25'-8 3/4" 11'-2" 25'-8 3/4" 85'-6 3'-6 114"l Y-7 7/8" \ I / 13 \�t -32'-4 7/8--1_ -:7 6' CANOPIES ABOVE - REFER TO - MATERIAL BOARD FOR FINISH ALLEY PROPERTY LINE SETBACKS 1 FLOOR PLAN- LEVEL 1 A1.010 1/16" = V-0" 11 N W w PROJECT # : 119056 DRAWN BY: TF CHECKED BY: MM NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W. Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30305 T 404 365 7600 www.nitesbotton.com No. Description Date 1 HEIGHT BONUS 3/4/20 2 HEIGHT BONUS 5/22/20 3 HEIGHT BONUS 6/26/20 4 HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shall remain the property of the Architects and shall not be reproduced, published or used in any way without the permission of the Architect. SHEET TITLE: BUILDING PLAN - LEVEL 1 SHEET NUMBER: Aw1w) A1.010 PROJECT HEIGHT BONUS NORTH W Z V) cn N N U cn �' LU U Z .. Q Q LU C W O W a T \ U M O LU Z 0 N Q U SHEET TITLE: BUILDING PLAN - LEVEL 1 SHEET NUMBER: Aw1w) A1.010 PROJECT HEIGHT BONUS NORTH FLOOR PLAN NOTES PROJECT # : 119056 RALSTON CREEK DRAWN BY: TF q B C D F G H K L M N p CHECKED BY: MM E i 1 NILES BOLTON A3.001 ASSOCIATES I I I i i 2 A3.004 I I 306-7 1/2" i I 23'-4" 25'-6" 00 I 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W. ASP i I Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30305 I — — —22 � T 404 365 7600 UTILITY I AMENITY' OBELOW / 82PEN TO 81 80 78 76 74 72 70 68 66 64 62 60 58 _ 56 143 141 139 137 135 134 133 132 STUDY / www.nitesbotton.com //7 - I 83 C' I _ _ _ _ — — _ No. Description Date 1 HEIGHT BONUS 3/4/20 84 _ — _ 5.56% /\ 2 HEIGHT BONUS 5/22/20 —__--DN-- — � UP / / 3 HEIGHT BONUS 6/26/20 4 HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 85 +- -� — - >C i0 B4/2 / N 3 - - \00 A3.004 ELEVATOR / QPEN'f0 \ 4 LOBBY / BELOW \ 86 79 77 75 73 71 E69 E67 65 E63 61 59 57 LJ4L[142][140 138 136 \ t -t - — - LAL T — LLA �L- — 1 5 - I — AIR 1 C) b oLiAMENITY M $] ❑❑ N This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and 3 C STUDY shall remain the property of the Architects and shall A3.001 I I TRASH 501 Sf 2 not be reproduced, published or used in any way $$ C 25'-� o without the permission of the Architect. i 94 96 98 100 102 103 104 106 108 110 112 114 116 118 120 121 123 N A3.001 ISERVICE - - - o- - _ - --jI LU i 89 i I C 131 N IPARKING N Z 90 C 130 Z I I 667-0" I C 129 UNIT B2 TYPE A o Q� M- V) C 1226 sf �- N r-4 O Lr)W t� U C C- C C C C C- C -C- l/1 W 91 92 93 95 97 99 101 -- 105 107 109 111 113 115 117 119 u 122 124 125 126 127 128 U Z Q UTILITY / 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SERVI W I ° I MEP . a � � w STAIR 2 9 W U J — qtR 4 STAIR 3 - - O I� O o e 7, e U CA ' ELEV UTILITY M O W / _ _ Z — �' LOBBY MEP 00 OP C/1 KI IrN = —; 27-10 1 /2" 25'-9 3/4" 36'-9 3/4" 48'-81 /4" — 36' 10 3/4" 85' 6 3/4" � I ao - — — U IR5— M P —%` 'OPEN TO 2 --_�— --- - - — BELOW — 77/8' --___ __— — —' - —_- 32'-512., �— __— — — ---_- -- --- S ---------ALLEY- ----------- -- ------ - G B - ----------- -- s, I I A3.002 � 12 3 — — — — — — 1 FLOOR PLAN- LEVEL 2 11 SHEET TITLE: BUILDING PLAN - LEVEL 2 SHEET NUMBER: 1w)� Al 9020 PROJECT HEIGHT BONUS NORTH z O U N z O U O 0 w N Q W J w 1-- 0 O z FLOOR PLAN NOTES PROJECT # : 119056 RALSTON CREEK DRAWN BY: TF q B C D F G H K L M N p CHECKED BY: MM E i 1 NILES BOLTON A3.001 ASSOCIATES I I I i i 2 A3.004 I 306-7 1/2" i I 48'-10" o I 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W. quo i I Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30305 T 404 365 7600 I UTILITY I UNIT A I 171 170 169 I 167 165 163 161 159 157 155 153 151 149 147 145 637sf UNIT S1 UNIT S1 UNIT S1 a www.nitesbotton.com m _ _ - 390 sf — 390 sf 390 sf N I ate 172 C I _ _ _ _ _ _ — — ERVIC FITNESS 1No HEIGHT BONUS 'on 3/4D/20 2 HEIGHT BONUS 5/22/20 173 C _ _ DN—6.48% PLANTED AREA 3 HEIGHT BONUS 6/26/20 4 HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 0174 L ---___ C� I - UNITS1 _ ;C iC B412 - 1 - 390 sf00 A3.004 - - _ _ - ELEVATOR -- 4 I_ LOBBY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -- 5 - 175 168 166 164 162 160 158 156 154 152 150 148 146 t -t - — - — - — -- 4 A3.003 6 I UNIT A3 i „AIR 1 - o "� ❑❑q r This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and 176 3 `— � C shall remain the property of the Architects and shall A3.001 I I PLANTED AREA TRAS 2 not be reproduced, published or used in any way � SERVICE 207 sf without the permission of the Architect. 177 C i 183 185 187 189 191 192 193 195 197 199 201 203 A3.001 I25'-a' a AMENITY COURTYAR UNIT S1 1,811 S N i390 sf N W IPARKING AMEN ITY N Z 1284 sf ~ � 179 I I 678'_8" PRIVATE Z PATIO W C) I szasf UNIT B2 TYPE A b M N fV C C- C n UNIT B1 W N� U � W 180 181 182 184 186 188 190 - 194 196 198 200 202 uP - = U Z Q D D D 0 0 0 D = _, W . I= SERVI / / T -NANCE - - - - -- - STAIR 2 ° a- U J SHOP � AtR - - AIR 3- — � O W J o IIa o-- 01A ELEV — — 26-0" M 0 W CAS LOBBY STORAGE 0 0 LOCKERS Ln 27-10 1/2" 25-9 3/4" 36-9 3/4" — 4-8'-81 /4" 36-10 3/4" 85-6 3/4" -� I - -------- N — - rn I --- - ----_ V 5 00 - - M 3.002 34— — —_— -5" 3'-61/ -- — 13 8" - --------- ---------- - — - ALLEY r-- - S B F -- 1 S� 3 — A3.002 I — - - — — _ 1 FLOOR PLAN- LEVEL 3 -11 SHEET TITLE: A1.030 1/16" = V-0" BUILDING PLAN— LEVEL 3 SHEET NUMBER: 1w)� Al 9030 PROJECT HEIGHT BONUS NORTH z O U Ln z O U O LL 0 w V) Q LLI J LLI H O z FLOOR PLAN NOTES PROJECT # : 119056 RALSTON CREEK DRAWN BY: TF CHECKED BY: MM 1 NILES BOLTON A3.001 ASSOCIATES 42 A3.004 293'-7 1/2" 26-7 1/2" 38'-0" 15-0" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 42'-6" I I I I I I I I I I 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W. I I Suite 600 N fV <V fV N fV lV Atlanta, GA 30305 AMENITY BALCONY q� 625 sf T 404 365 7600 www.nitesbotton.com M n M M o bo No. Description Date T-0" 1 HEIGHT BONUS 3/4/20 rn 2 HEIGHT BONUS 5/22/20 PLANTED AREA PLANTED AREA O PLANTED AREA PLANTED AREA �n o 3 HEIGHT BONUS 6/26/20 LO 48 sf 53 sf M 42 sf 42 sf M r,y r1 i 4 HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 0 UNIT S1 UNIT S1 UNIT S1 N N UNIT S1 c-4 iii B 1 /2 1 COMMON O 390 sf COMMON 390 sf COURTYARD `� M 390 sf COURTYARD 390 sf UNIT Al A3.004 �o _ _ N UNIT A3 231 sf 306 sf ELEVATOR 520 sf 637 sf 5 o LOBBY M UNIT B1 o q UNIT S1 o UNIT S1 N 988 sf 390 sf rn UNIT A3 ;0 2 390 sf UNIT A3 ;0 4 A3.003 6 IR 1 7 637 sf N 637 sf N 3 0 5'_9" This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and in 1 A3.003 3 o shall remain the property of the Architects and shall UNIT S1 not be reproduced, published or used in an wa A3.001 2'_0 A3.003 $ TRASH 2 without the permission of the Architect. y y 390 sf — UNIT S3 TYPE A iv A3.001 — M 494 sf r, UNIT A3 \ UNIT A2 C:) 0� UNIT S1 0 � 637 sf \ !r UNIT S1 0 390 sf N UNIT S1 q 0 / 491 sf 01 3' 0" UNIT S1 0 4'-10 1/4" 390 sf / N N W 390 sf � 420 sf .— 4'-7 1 /2" N PRIVATE C. PRIVATE OPEN TO / N — PATIO PATIO BELOW \ ` Z 533 sf 461 sf PRIVATE C ^ // 1 PATI O UNIT B3 C. iv / � Z PRIVATE 920 f 465 sf O / A �W�// C PATIO LL UNIT A3 UNIT A3 36asf ,� �/ �— N O 637 sf r i � / N W Vi � U 637 sf PLANTED AREA UNIT B1 UNIT B1 UNIT B1 UNIT Al ''� Ln W M PLANTED AREA 921 sf 988 sf 935 sf ^ 988 sf 988 sf °M° 520 sf f—, Q M IID V Q — _ UPLU / ^ N Q L7 OP _ W UNIT S1 TRASH STAIR 2 U J STAIR 3 390 sf STAIR 4 -- O W Q J o--------- — _ lV (V L O - UNIT B1 _ o o � M � O W 988 sf Z o CAB 3 ELEV � LOBB rn O 14'-11" 10'-63/4" 11'-1 3/4" 26'-0" 22'-11 1/2" 26'-0" 10'-6 3/4" 26'-0 3/4" 27-6 3/4" 15'-2" 10'-6" 6'-4" 16'-0" N — —_—_ 2 Q --- IR 5 A3.002 REFER TO LANDSCAPE PACAKAGE FOR U - DETAILED COURTYARD LAYOUTS 0 N 3'-21/4" 46'-0 3/4" SG ALLEY 1 �� 3 A3.002 A3.002 FLOOR PLAN- LEVEL 4 A1.040 = - SHEET TITLE: BUILDING PLAN - LEVEL 4 SHEET NUMBER: ,w)� A to 040 PROJECT HEIGHT BONUS NORTH Z O U z 0 U 0 0 w N a w J LL] H O Z: O O UNIT B1 UNIT S1 UNIT A3 UNIT A3 UNIT A3 UNIT A3 UNIT A3 UNIT A3 UNIT A3 UNIT C1 988 sf 420 sf 637 sf 637 sf 686 sf 637 sf 637 sf 686 sf 637 sf AMENITY 1067 sf 709 sf FLOOR PLAN NOTES RALSTON CREEK 1 A3.001 FN 293'-7 1/2" 26-7 1/2" 38'-0" 15-0" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 42'-6" I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I in n o o i n o i i I SG 'I �S�- 3 A3.002 �1 FLOOR PLAN- LEVEL 5 A1.050 1/16" = V-0" 1 A3.002 W44Will Ak PROJECT NORTH PROJECT # : 119056 DRAWN BY: TF CHECKED BY: MM NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W. Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30305 T 404 365 7600 www.nitesbotton.com No. Description of the Architects and shall Date 1 HEIGHT BONUS 3/4/20 2 HEIGHT BONUS 5/22/20 3 HEIGHT BONUS 6/26/20 4 HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shall remain the property of the Architects and shall not be reproduced, published or used in any way without the permission of the Architect. w z L L/) N cn N U Ln � a w U z a a� w U Oma w O 3:: U M O w - z O a a U SHEET TITLE: BUILDING PLAN - LEVEL 5-7 SHEET NUMBER: Al *050 HEIGHT BONUS FLOOR PLAN NOTES RALSTON CREEK 1 A3.001 FN 293'-7 1/2" 26-7 1/2" 38'-0" 15-0" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 24-6" 42'-6" I I I I I I I I I00 rn n M n rn O t M SG 'I �S�- 3 A3.002 1 FLOOR PLAN- LEVEL 8 A1.080 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 A3.002 W44Will PROJECT NORTH PROJECT # : 119056 DRAWN BY: TF CHECKED BY: MM NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W. Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30305 T 404 365 7600 www.nitesbotton.com No. Description of the Architects and shall Date 1 HEIGHT BONUS 3/4/20 2 HEIGHT BONUS 5/22/20 3 HEIGHT BONUS 6/26/20 4 HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shall remain the property of the Architects and shall not be reproduced, published or used in any way without the permission of the Architect. w z L L/) N cn N U Ln � a w U z a a� w U Oma w O 3:: U M O w - z O a a U SHEET TITLE: BUILDING PLAN - LEVEL 8 SHEET NUMBER: Al 9080 HEIGHT BONUS ROOF NOTES PROJECT # : 119056 DRAWN BY: TF CHECKED BY: MM NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES 2'-6" PARAPET 1'-6" PARAPET 2'-6" PARAPET 1'-6" PARAPET 2'-6" PARAPET 1'-6" PARAPET 2'-6" PARAPET 1'-6" PARAPET 6-0" PARAPET UP ROOF TOP UNITS 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W. Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30305 T 404 365 7600 www.nitesbotton.com 70 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0a 746-0 3/8" a No. Description Date 0 1 HEIGHT BONUS 3/4/20 2 HEIGHT BONUS 5/22/20 ® ® ® ® 3 HEIGHT BONUS 6/26/20 ° ° �s ° ° 4 HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 750'-0 3/8" a g a $ a a a 752'-6 3/8" 4fOl 0 e 0 , This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and o shall remain the property of the Architects and shall not be reproduced, published or used in any way without the permission of the Architect. 4 CL o ° ® 0 oRi cn 9 �0 W a ® ® g 0 KD 0 0 — a ® ® ® ® ® ® z 0 0 0 0 0 C/1 N a cn cV U 0 0 0 0 0 0 NLn w KD 0�� N vza 0 0 w Q a° o LU LU - ------ -------------------------------------------------------------------- - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ U O w z ROOF TOP UNITS 0 749'-6 3/8" V 1' 6" PARAPET 1'-6" PARAPET 1 ROOF PLAN- BUILDING 1 A1.R00 = SHEET TITLE: ROOF PLAN - BUILDING 1 SHEET NUMBER: ,w)� A1. R00 PROJECT HEIGHT BONUS NORTH z O U N z O U uf O 0 w N Q W J w uf H O z LEVEL ROOF ULAL BRICK 2 21.56% FIBER CEMENT 47.27% ACCENT METAL 3.09% TOTAL DOORS AND TRANSPARENT WINDOWS 28.07% �W 6/26/20 3-10" 23-2 1/2" 19'-4 1/4" 24-6" 24-7" 24-5 1/2" 24-5 1/2" 24-7" 24-5 1/2" 24-5 1/2" 15-1" 26-2 1/2" 11'-8 1/2" 26-9" TOWER ELEMENT FACADE BAY FACADE BAY FACADE BAY FACADE BAY FACADE BAY FACADE RAY FACADE BAY FACADE BAY FACADE BAY FACADE BAY ,FACADE BA FACADE BAY 4-41 /4" 3-7 3/4" 3-2 1/2" 3-8 1/2" 3-5 1/2" 3-6 1/2" 3-6 1/2" 3-5 1/2"3_5 1 /2" I 3'-6 1 /2" 3'-6 1 /2" 3'-5 1 /2" I 3-5 1/2" 3-5 1/2" I 2'-5 1/2" '-5 1/4" LEVEL ROOF ULAL WEST FACADE BRICK BRICK 21.56% FIBER CEMENT 47.27% ACCENT METAL 3.09% TOTAL DOORS AND TRANSPARENT WINDOWS 28.07% �W 6/26/20 ���� 8/27/20 LU j Z L/) N FIBER cn N 'r1 U � a w U z I�InNIIII�Il�1N1i Q aLU� w a RIBBED FIBER 11 1! Il it l I 1111 !f fill 1111 Il li 1111 I- 111 1111 1 1111 1111 Ron 1111 1111ME Rill 1111 o fill ■ ■ . 1111 ■ ■ 1111 ME 1111 1111 1111 IIII 1111 !! !1 Ifl!1 Iflfl ■ N Il li U 1111 1 :11 ..1 til!00 ..1 1I I•�•�•� FIBER �4 M CEMENT PANEL w I■` Z '— O I■�■I — lu I�� CORNICE a LEVEL 8 U I■ I■1 I■' �I I■ ■I I■I •• WIN_ 111 11fill itll fl11 M E 1111 111In ff 11 if ll 1111 it ll 11 it ..fill In In 1111 M171 B N Illi 1 11 l lit' f 11 1 1 11 ! CEMENT !111 IIII 1111 1111 11N1 1!111 1111 ■■ II■ NIf — n!!FIBER — — 1.1.1. WEST FACADE BRICK BRICK 21.56% FIBER CEMENT 47.27% ACCENT METAL 3.09% TOTAL DOORS AND TRANSPARENT WINDOWS 28.07% I■I ■I I■ I I■I 1■ i■I ■ � � I� I�I IIII�I II II II 1111 11111 IN111 ..1111.. ..1111 11111.. ..1111 ..fill 1111.. ..Nlll ..1111 1111.. ..1111 1111.. ..1111 MINI ..1111 IIII.. ..II .. I .. ..1111PANEL #2 .. II—FIBER CEMENT - • - - �� II �I 1111 I I i�iii \140 _ I ■I I■I I■ I I � I■I ■I I■I I■ ® I■ ■ � I■I I■I III � � II II Il 10 !!II NIB inn I ..IIII.. ..fME ill ..NRI ..IIN ..IIN 1111.. ..NN1 ..Nil fill 111111 fill.. 11111 NN.. ..1111 11111 INTI ..Nfl 1111111. IN • Kiri I■ � '■I '■ ®I � � � '■ I■I �I I� � � •. ■I IM IIIIf �i °! �f�ll.. ..1111 ..NN ..NN ..Nil IIII.. INN1 ..Nie.,_ 1171110..11111 11 1 1;.. ffl 111111 NO w, _.I���� ..fME f fl ..�i�l IBL I: I I CI .I 4 I _ l; ., :..:...:..... - - .,r ._ - ...y'-,' ie• :eieeec 1111;,v Ili eeec:ell eii:re:a•, r.. I 1 3i^' .:; - - - ::e•. ee • • 1 .... .L :«»....._...».......i ...... ,.,::! ..........�_.. ,. ,.- :-�il: E�:F's,, 1�... :: ...::ice••-:a:C�,;!I ,"_."��. 1�,��7 t!'tE-; EIF�eE'�i_"r.{; — �-:-i -- �� - ----- _ TT '� � II111 1111 � •� '�r \ Nil • � • ` ■ 1 1 1■1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ■■■—■■E�IIia■�■■�. . .r A.r ;. .r ;. .r ;. .r ;. .r ;. .r ;. 1 1 1 1 1 1 .� .moi • • •I •. � _ � _ ��� t�� _ ■■ _ .- i�i iii _ 1111 ®� _ ■�� _ � � • \I I 11 t�� �1 i�� �sls ■�. ■■ �I ■ a 11• 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1' 1, O ■■ i11M. ■ + r ilii CRI .. 11 fill ■®■ i ■■ 1111 PANEL #1 ........................:....... PANEL #2. M ------_FIBER CEMENT ,. �■N� i ii �u ii �� II II II IYill�l II II !' li u . • fill r rr 1 II r ■r Nr II tl II 111, w NN u 1 II IN ME lip II II II _ BRICK IF flr Ill IIII ■ II Nfl rr II �1 IIRIBBED FIBER- ee w iii! u II - -■ -- N� II 11 IICEMENT PANEL �I111 oil IIN 1111: n II "II ■ ii 11111 II II ■GLASS RAILING BRICK CORNICEIlii Ili �11� � II �.11 r N� II 1111 II ■ ■ 11 I' f■■ BRICK ■1N 1MM■MI ■1■ 1M■11M1 1M■■MI EXTERIOR _�_ ■—_-11111_ ■--■■11111111■1I ■11111111■111■111■-1LIGHT FIXTURE \ METAL SPANDREL L Ji■���■i �� - iii _v lollAI •P ; :... r,,_ �_..,�1 � �:■Iwl�l®IIII INA - lam■■I '--g .� ■101 f -� d PERFORATIONS_ 1 sill �I�II � ■ i ■ !�� -� _ = -� - FACADE B FACADE BAY • 1 1 1 1 1� 1 1 1 • 1 r 1 1 1 NORTHFA�ADE BRICK 52.24% FIBER CEMENT 10-81% ACCENT METAL 1.35% GLAZING/OPENINGS 35.60% SOLDIER 1X12 COURSE COURSE TRIM 2 ELEVATION- EXTERIOR- NORTH TRM WALL A3.001 1 / 16" = 1 ,-O:. O O 1X4 1X4 Ln in PERFORATIONS TRIM O O TRIM - - ROWLOCK ROWLOCK SINGLE HUNG SINGLE HUNG FIXED FIXED mTYPICAL:. a .11 11• > 36-4 39/64" • . 20'-0 TOWER ELEMENTCORNICEFIBER CEMENT FIBER CEMENT CORNICE -LEVEL ROO I.I.I L_llllI■_ ISI - _'_ - - - -'— �I = II RIBBED 1 NN 1111 lilt �IIININlllllllll��l►1111EMENT PANEL 11�� lift Ilii ilii llllhiiil l li 1!! 1 1!111 ' 1111 !1111 1111 1111 IIIII.. IIB flit NIB 'I Iii■i ■ :, FIBER CEMENT PANEL #2 ..fif1 ..1 II 11111 1111 fill ..fief I 111E ion BLADE SIGNAGE 1111LEVEL 7 ■i i■ WINDOW1111 none OR OR 11111 IN IN ROSE 1111 BONN Olin lies 11 11111 111111 11 - 1111! !1!1 11!! 1111 IIII 1111 'i■i ICI i■i i■ I 1' �\ 1111 ill! Illi HIM 1111 1111 1111 Inln 1111 11 11111 11111 fill IIII IIIII.. fill 1111 !!!1 11 i■I I■ 11 lig 1. 1'11 1f 11 fflf fill NN Iff11�- fill flfl fill �� - 00 "^ r • , si 7. v�" CANOPY b F FIN • i i ® _ • 1 • 1 � ' 11 • � PROJECT # : 119056 DRAWN BY: TF CHECKED BY: MM NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shall remain the property 3060 Peachtree Rd. N. Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30305 T 404 365 7600 www.nitesbotton.com W. No. Description Date 1 HEIGHT.BONUS... 3/4/20 2 HEIGHT BONUS . 5/22/20 3.. HEIGHT BONUS. 6/26/20 4 . HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 LU This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shall remain the property of the Architects and shall not be reproduced, published or used in any way without the permission of the Architect. LU Z L/) N cn N U � a w U z Q aLU� w a U J a o LD..Lr) . U M w — Z O a U SHEET TITLE: ELEVATIONS- EXTERIOR- 8U.ILDING SHEET NUMBER: A3.001 HEIGHT BONUS 8' 9 5/8" 23'-3 1/2" 26-6 3/8" FACADE BAY FACADE BAY STEPBACK MINOR ADJUSTMENT 4-8 7/8" V-5 7/8" f11 1/2" 8'-9 5/8" S-0" 11'-0 3/4" S-0" 14-4 5/8"3'-0"3'-0" 5-2 1/4" FIBER CEMENT CORNICE LEVEL ROOF `4 742'-10 1 /2 FIBER CEMENT �(714 � d FIBER CEMENT CORNICE PANEL #1 O0 R O N LEVEL 8 731'-8 BLADE SIGNAGE 0 WINDOWLEVEL 7 721'-4 - J o LEVEL 6� ::E 711'-0" ,a o LEVEL 5 700'-8" .. BRICK CORNICE BRICK CORNICE O LEVEL 44 690'-4" METAL SPANDREL C? _ - REFRO T - LEVEL -3A-, 678'-8 � UJ Ln M m OP BRICK #2 CANOPY i LEVEL 2 ......... 66T-0.. EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURE 0 658'-0" I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ �-� 1 AVERAGE GRAD _ 657'-0" -- �-4'-71/2' ' 7-4 3/8" T-0' 2'- 11' 1-1 1 4_1�5'-2 3/8'�_ 7-7 7/8" 6-p" �1 - LEVEL U1 -5'-2 3/8"� I I III [ 653' 0" - -271-7 3/4 - I I 33-4 3/4'— — - I- 1 - -' FACADE BAY 1 1 FACADE 11 1/2"/2" 1 /2" 3 1X12 ELEVATION- EXTERIOR- EAST 1 T -0 1X8 " 3'-0" T-0SOLDIER " T-0" 3' 0" A3.002 1/16" = 1'-101" TRIM TRIM COURSE 1X4 METAL i TRIM b TRIM 1X4 ROWLOCK Irl ROWLOCK Irl TRIM SINGLE HUNG SINGLE HUNG FIXED EAST FACADE BRICK 40.67% FIBER CEMENT 32.64% ACCENT METAL 0,77% GLAZING/CIPENINGS 25.91% 1 11'-6 1 /4" 27-0" W FIBER CEMENT CORNICE — FACADE BAY FACADE BAY LAP SIDING Z PROJECT # : 119056 _ _� - - --- --, - 742'-10 1 /2" DRAW N BY TF L/) N cn N -- ...... N Ln FIBER CEMENT • -• I -�: i �� € all Q -- U z .; a <. Lu. N N w CHECKED BY: MM PANEL #1 E � U J LD.1117) .LU a LEVEL U M W 731'-8" NILES BOLTON O a_ ASSOCIATES U LEVE LBRICK #2 IE II O 721'-4" -- - - LEVEL 6� `-P WINDOW I COURTYARD 711'-0" LEVEL700'-81 LEVEL 4 690'-4" BRICK #1 OP LEVEL 3 678'- 3060 Peachtree Rd. N. W. EXTERIOR LIGHTING FIXTURE o0 Suite 600 CANOPY Atlanta, GA 30305 LEVEL667' o 0.. T 404 365 7600 _ _ _ O AVERAGE GR8'- 657-0" 658' 0" WWW.nilesboltOn.Com ---LEVEL ----�—`_ —I IA I I�I - LEVEL U1 I I I 653' 0" No. Description Date 1_1 II II I [ I I 1 HEIGHT. BONUS... 3/4/20 2 HEIGHT BONUS . 5/22/20 3.. HEIGHT BONUS. 6/26/20 4 . HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 2 ELEVATION- EXTERIOR- EAST 2 2 A3.004 25-8 1/4" 37-1 3/4" 26-1 3/8" 36-8 5/8" 15-0 7/16" 34-0 1/16" oe 01 FACADE BAY FACADE BAY FACADE BAY FACADE BAY FACADE BAY FACADE BAY FIBER CEMENT FIBER CEMENT CORNICE PANEL #1 FIBER CEMENT cV —I. 1 PANEL #1 - - -- -- LEVEL ROOF 742'-10 1/21, — I BRICK CORNICE N - — -- RICK #2 — __ - - - �4 LEVEL 8 'I~ 731'-8" F1 ��. � � i ;. • WINDOW O LEVEL 7 721'-4 Ei k . LEVEL L0 - - - -- _ _ I- -.�. - - COURTYARD COURTYARD � COURTYARD � � � LEVEL 5 L. 700'-8.. fill A. - - - LEVEL 4r 690'-4' 60 c BRICK #1 - GLASS RAILING I SEE 3/A3.002 - - _....._ _ _.. _... _......- 678 8 LEVEL 3 09 _. _ = - 0 LEVEL 2 I o - III III III I I i I III III -LEVEL-4 AVERAGE GRADE 657'-0„ 658'-0".... I II 1 1 1 III III III III CCC�C11 I I II III III II II 111 ICI III i LEVEL Ul - II III^III III III Il II C II 111 III I �[[ I�11 Ill III III 111 I I II 111 III III II� [ [[ 11, I CI [ 111 1 III IIC�I11 111 111�111� I CCI CII [II III II [ [ 1 1 III 11 Ill II1-11 II [ 1 1 I II II C 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 IC- - , II 111 1 1 1 C II II I C II [ I I I�E ! IW I—II! I—I I 11 I I`I 1 ELEVATION- EXTERIOR- EAST 3 A3.002 1/16" = V-0" This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shall remain the property of the Architects and shall not be reproduced, published or used in any way without the permission of the Architect. W Z L/) N cn N U N Ln Q W U z .; a <. Lu. w U J LD.1117) .LU a 0 U M W Z O a_ U SHEET TITLE: ELEVATIONS- EXTERIOR - BUILDING SHEET NUMBER: A3.0 002 HEIGHT BONUS Z O Ln z O L) O 0 w N a LU J LU H O z RALSTON CREEK 2 BUILDING SECTION B A3.004 1/16" = 1'-0" LEVEL ROo 742'-10 1/2" LEVEL731' 8" LEVEL 721' 4" LEVEL711' 0" _ _LEVEL 5 j1 700'-8� LEVEL690'-4" LEVEL678' 8" LEVEL667'-0" LEVE -L4 AVERAGE GRADE 657'-0" 658' 0" LEVELU1 653, 4. PROJECT # : 119056 DRAWN BY: TF CHECKED BY: MM NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W. Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30305 T 404 365 7600 www.nitesbotton.com No. Description Date 1 HEIGHT BONUS 3/4/20 2 HEIGHT BONUS 5/22/20 3 HEIGHT BONUS 6/26/20 4 HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shall remain the property of the Architects and shall not be reproduced, published or used in any way without the permission of the Architect. 1 BUILDING SECTION A A3.004 1/16" = 1'-0" _LEVEL 667'-0" I F�/F�VERAGE GRAD 657'-0" 658-0" LEVEL U1 653'-0" SHEET TITLE: BUILDING SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER: A39 004 HEIGHT BONUS z O U H N z O U ry O 0 w N Q W J W I- O z W - LEVEL OOF N 1/2 742'-10 1 / 2" z N 5� —L = LEVEL731'8' N U LEVEL 7 NLU LN 721' 4" P:a z Q UNITS UNITS UNITS UNITS o Q LU � � - LEVEL 6 j ~ LU 711'-0" V J W J N Q O ------ ------ ------- - o - LEVEL 5 Ir, U 700'-8"0 M W - °�° 0 — z COURTYARD COURTYARD COURTYARD1 0 - - - - - -- _ _ - - - - - - LEVEL 4 `r � 7M690'-4" C/1 o C? - Q TRAIN TRACKS 6.4 MENITY LEVEL 3 U 11 L III I 111 11 111 111 678'-8" 1 BUILDING SECTION A A3.004 1/16" = 1'-0" _LEVEL 667'-0" I F�/F�VERAGE GRAD 657'-0" 658-0" LEVEL U1 653'-0" SHEET TITLE: BUILDING SECTIONS SHEET NUMBER: A39 004 HEIGHT BONUS z O U H N z O U ry O 0 w N Q W J W I- O z PORTICO STANDARDS MINOR ADJUSTMENT PRENTISS ST - WEST CORNER The current proposed design requires a "Minor Adjustment" to the Portico standards set forth in section 14-2G-4, "Frontage Type Standards", of the Iowa City Zoning Ordinance, which states the following: ELEVATION VIEW STEPBACK MINOR ADJUSTMENT GILBERT ST FACADE The current proposed design requires a "Minor Adjustment" to the the facade stepback requirements set forth in section 14-2G-3, "Subdistrict Standards", of the Iowa City Zoning Ordinance, which states the following: PROJECT # : 119056 DRAWN BY: Author CHECKED BY: Checker NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W. Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30305 T 404 365 7600 www.nitesbotton.com No. Description Date 2 HEIGHT BONUS 5/22/20 3 HEIGHT BONUS 6/26/20 4 HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shall remain the property of the Architects and shall not be reproduced, published or used in any way without the permission of the Architect. Porticoes shall be provided at building entries along front building facades and shall consist of an exterior floor area raised eighteen inches (18") c. Building Height And Facade Step Backs: minimum above the elevation of the abutting public sidewalk, and thirty six inches (36") maximum above grade to generally match the interior ground (1) Principal building heights shall be regulated as provided below: floor finished floor elevation. Porticoes may provide access to a central lobby of a multi -unit building or may provide direct access to no more than two (A) In the south downtown subdistrict buildings shall be two (2) stories minimum and eight (8) stories maximum in height above grade. O (2) entrances to individual dwelling units. (B) In the park, south Gilbert and university subdistricts, buildings shall be two (2) stories minimum and six (6) stories maximum in height above N 71 - grade. Single -story buildings may be permitted in midblock locations in the south Gilbert subdistrict. cV Please refer to the diagram above for the current design along E Prentiss facade. Due to the existing grade conditions at that edge, in addition to the (C) Additional building height may be granted through transfer of development rights or through bonus height provisions as set forth in subsection N In finish floor elevation at the ground level being dictated by the flood plain, we are asking for a Minor Adjustment to deviate from the Frontage Type 14 -2G -7G, "Building Height Bonus Provisions", of this article. UQ Standards noted above. (D) Building heights may be further restricted by FAA regulations. ZLLJ ., (2) Upper floor building facades facing and visible from streets, plazas, or parks shall step back ten feet (10') minimum from the lower floor facade Q U-0 IOWA CITY ZONING ORDINANCE as follows: a U 14-2G-7H.3.a-f (A) In the south downtown subdistrict above the fifth floor. 0 � Q (B) In the park, south Gilbert, and university subdistricts above the fourth floor. 3. The FBC Committee may approve deviations from the requirements set forth in section 14-2G-4, "Frontage Type Standards", of this article, to C ( ) At street corners tower elements or similar corner emphasis treatments may be exempt from the step back requirement for u to one facade p y p p q p M 0 accommodate buildings located on steeply sloped sites or within flood hazard zones, where meeting the requirements is impractical or infeasible, or to make bay (maximum 35 feet) as approved by the FBC committee. minor adjustments to elements of a frontage to ensure they are proportional to the scale of a building. If warranted and approved, deviations may include the (D) The required facade step back may be established at a lower floor than stated above, provided it is established at least thirty feet (30') in following: height above grade. a. Floor height of stoops, porticoes, porches or terraces may exceed the maximum; b. The finished ground floor elevation of the building may exceed the maximum; c. Garden walls enclosing terraces or forecourts may exceed the maximum height; Cl. The terrace frontage may be configured as a stepped terrace with two (2) levels above grade; e. Allow additional width and depth for portico frontages in order to create proportional entryways for large multi -dwelling or civic/ institutional buildings; or f. Minor deviations from window coverage standards for storefront frontages on small buildings located on corner lots, where full compliance on both frontages may not be feasible. Please refer to the diagram above, which depicts the current facade design along South Gilbert Street. Due to the programmatic need to have an egress stair at the end of the residential corridors and the limited space/dimensional constraints at that corner of the property, we are asking for a Minor Adjustment to reduce the step back requirement along the facade and allow the exterior wall to align vertically where the stair and elevator shafts are located inside the building. IOWA CITY ZONING ORDINANCE 14-2G-7H.5.a-e 5. The FBC Committee may approve deviations from the facade stepback requirements set forth in section 14-2G-3, "Subdistrict Standards", of this article or building design standards set forth in subsection F of this section, provided the following approval criteria are met: a. The building includes an alternative design solution that equally or better meets the intent of the specific standard being modified; and b. The building is uniquely designed to fit the characteristics of the site and the surrounding neighborhood, is consistent with the goals of the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan or Central District plan, as applicable, and will not detract from or be injurious to other property or improvements in the vicinity; and c. The building demonstrates excellence in architectural design and use of durable materials; and Cl. There are unique characteristics of the site or neighboring properties that lend to alternative design approaches, or that make it difficult or infeasible to meet the requirements; or the proposed building is designed true to a specific architectural style and adherence to the building design standards would be impractical or compromise the building's architectural integrity; and e. For requests for waivers of an upper floor stepback requirement, the building must include an alternative means of visually breaking up the vertical plane of the building. SHEET TITLE: MINOR cn W Z 0 U LU Q LU J 0 W 0 Q U ADJUSTMENTS SHEET NUMBER: A3. 201 HEIGHT BONUS BRICK #1 CHEROKEE BRICK- MODULAR BRICK COLOR- VELOUR DARK GRAY FIBER CEMENT PANEL #1 FIBER CEMENT PANEL, SMOOTH WITH BATTENS COLOR- SW 7065 ARGOS V ■ BRICK #2 CHEROKEE BRICK- MODULAR BRICK COLOR- VELOUR BROWN FIBER CEMENT PANEL #2 FIBER CEMENT PANEL, SMOOTH WITH BATTENS COLOR- SW 7068 GRIZZLE GRAY ACCENT AND CANOPY METAL MAPES ALUMINUM LUMI DECK COLOR- KYNAR SEAWOLF LAP SIDING (COURTYARDS ONLY) FIBER CEMENT PLANK, SMOOTH COLOR- SW 7065 ARGOS MESH PARKING SCREEN GKD METAL FABRICS OMEGA 1550 COLOR- STAINLESS STEEL RIBBED FIBER CEMENT PANEL N ICH I HA RIBBED PANEL COLOR- SW 7069 IRON ORE NOTE: SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED FOR GENERAL DESIGN INTENT AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE PROJECT # : 119056 DRAWN BY: Author CHECKED BY: Checker NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W. Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30305 T 404 365 7600 www.nitesbotton.com No. Description Date 2 HEIGHT BONUS 5/22/20 3 HEIGHT BONUS 6/26/20 4 HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shall remain the property of the Architects and shall not be reproduced, published or used in any way without the permission of the Architect. SHEET TITLE: V) LU Z 5� 5L L 0 U LU LUQ t7 J 0 U W Z 0 cn a Q V MATERIALS BOARD SHEET NUMBER: A3. 202 HEIGHT BONUS z O U H N z O U ry O 0 w N Q W J w H O z 0 V) N N N cn Ln U z Q Q � � O w U Lna M--- 3:: M 0 SHEET TITLE: V) LU Z 5� 5L L 0 U LU LUQ t7 J 0 U W Z 0 cn a Q V MATERIALS BOARD SHEET NUMBER: A3. 202 HEIGHT BONUS z O U H N z O U ry O 0 w N Q W J w H O z O N r, 637 SF GROSS 473 SF NET HABITABLE DOUBLE OCCUPANCY 67 UNITS UNIT A3 24-6" 10'-10 1/8" 3/16" = 1'-0" 494 SF GROSS 311 SF NET HABITABLE SINGLE OCCUPANCY 5 UNITS 19'-0" 17-11 1/2" i 491 SF GROSS 317 SF NET HABITABLE SINGLE OCCUPANCY 5 UNITS 4 UNIT A2 417 SF GROSS 270 SF NET HABITABLE SINGLE OCCUPANCY 4 UNITS 16'-0" 3/16" = 1'-0" 19'-1 3/4" 0 fV M OP bo 520 SF GROSS 363 SF NET HABITABLE SINGLE OCCUPANCY 10 UNITS `MI UNIT Al 3/16" = 1'-0" 390 SF GROSS 246 SF NET HABITAQ SINGLE OCCUPANC 70 UNITS UNIT S3 - TYPE A I L I UNIT S2 M UNIT S1 15-0" 13-11 1/2" (V M 3/16" = 1'-0" A5.101 3/16" = 1'-0"A5.101 3/16" = 1'-0" PROJECT # : 119056 DRAWN BY: TF CHECKED BY: MM NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W. Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30305 T 404 365 7600 www.nitesbotton.com No. Description Date 2 HEIGHT BONUS 5/22/20 3 HEIGHT BONUS 6/26/20 4 HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and shall remain the property of the Architects and shall not be reproduced, published or used in any way without the permission of the Architect. V) w_ z � C L/) N cn N U Ln � Q w U z a Q� w U D w Q O 3:: U O w z O V) a Q U SHEET TITLE: S AND A UNITS SHEET NUMBER: A5.101 HEIGHT BONUS 43'-6" 13'-6" I r --r PROJECT # : 119056 42'-6" C. C. N i DRAWN BY: TF 9'-8" 7-11" N LIVING Of °O BED A CHECKED BY: MM L 110 A 301 SF BED B1 7'-11/2" NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES ® ? �J BATH A �- J r r r pLO u r __ IF- -1 BATH B b __ --JJ 233 SF BATH A/B �1 =____ I- _1 El in BED A --� 0 -� KITCHEN LIVING 104 SF BED B °r° ❑° KITCHEN 235 SF + C. 131 SF ___� I�I I IIO JI BED B2 i -- 746 SF GROSS 920 SF GROSS ❑ C. + L- 470 SF NET HABITABLE 644 SF NET HABITABLE L. f L O O DOUBLE OCCUPANCY SINGLE /DOUBLE OCCUPANCY 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W. 3 UNITS 9 UNITS Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30305 T 404 365 7600 4 UNIT B4 1 UNIT B3 www.nitesbotton.com A5.102 3/16" = 1'-0" A5.102 3/16" = 1'-0" No. Description Date 2 HEIGHT BONUS 5/22/20 3 HEIGHT BONUS 6/26/20 4 HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 45'-10" 38'-0" 12'-3" 11'-7' I I 1161 I I This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and r r r J r r C.1 C. + r shall remain the property of the Architects and shall I not be reproduced, published or used in any way C, C, + I without the permission of the Architect. BED A I T I I I I I 182 SF 7-0 3/4" 1 4'-5" I iV L- BED A C. C. BED B L- iV Ln v LIVING W + C.II LIVING C. / ,n 161 SF 329 SF 161 SF ,r T-1 1/8" / 365 SF BED B 'O 4'-5" 5'-4 3/4" 5'-4 3/4' 4'-5" Z 213 SF I I D5 r J - r-] 1 O L 15'-81/2" 1 0 -- 11 11 --J o N Jr7 77 77 M L N O t/1 N N N U ❑ --- ____- JIM PROJECT # : 119056 DRAWN BY: TF CHECKED BY: MM NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES 3060 Peachtree Rd. N.W. Suite 600 Atlanta, GA 30305 36-3 1/2" T 404 365 7600 8'-2" 8'-6 1/2" www.nitesbotton.com No. Description Date 2 HEIGHT BONUS 5/22/20 ® 3 HEIGHT BONUS 6/26/20 4 HEIGHT BONUS 8/27/20 I i I o O N N L O BATH B BED B 110 SF BED A --- 119 SF LIVING C. 375 SF 00 o " N This drawing, as an instrument of service, is and C. + C. shall remain the property of the Architects and shall I f® not be reproduced, published or used in any way I t L. without the permission of the Architect. BED C BATH C 126 SF C� w BATH AzKITCHEN � 1067 SF GROSS L J D 730 SF NET HABITABLE SINGLE OCCUPANCY O N N O 5 �UNITS- N U ' q_311T — Q W V z a Q � W LU _�� o M O w UNIT C1 z O A5.103 3/16" = 1'-0" � N Q U SHEET TITLE: C UNITS SHEET NUMBER: A5. 103 HEIGHT BONUS 2P5 E PRENTISS I 10 O FISTING SA ITA\RY MANHOLE loot loo' loot EXISTING CURB INTAKE `RIM 646.89 RIM 649.82 ^ -1 NV 42" RCP 635.24 N - INV 15" RCP 646.87 W lk4 INV 42" RCP 635.14 SW I(w6) CNV 15" RCP 646.77 E 0 10 20 S� S) S) ^ EXISTING HES EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE HH 644.63 �s, RALSTON CREEK ° o RIM 655.08 - - - _ S. LI N N STREET MANHOLE LOCKED - - - Z cn.- EXISTING HES J M EL 642.99 o 0(n 2 ° ` 99 V O ^ EXISTING 12 HDPE U rsi-� ri-->r-k E}h-I )i- rs--,• �-'',-� �C big)-,'->i---E � I-I-� i oH� z <0"' >e O T/PIPE 652.17 o 100Y 00Y100 100 100Y 00Y I 00 100Y O (S) CS) N �H) EXISTING STORM INTAKE w Lu -EI M �49�7 z LucmS \� H � 0 \ INV 96" CSP 640.57 NE o 0 0 v "✓ N N N N CP W O O O O T © o� INV 969 9 CSP 940.57 SW �s L 9 Q Lr) .D 00 0000 0 5 oY o EXISTING STORM MANHOLE s00 o A o ° T ��� �� V, V, C o oT to RIM 651.26 % 00 i S Oti Q o B 01 �0 7 100 SOOT 7\7NV 48" RCP 643.21 E 0 Lu Lu Lu z X ti �/ °kD INV 48 RCP 643.11 W z O o 'oor t� = > U U Q s 30 FLOODWAY BUFFER N � u w � ? z O o--� - -- Z OOj w OOT ,100T ,1001 ,100T z LL Ln � "' "' Q - 5 BUILDING SETBACK I o z z w w X DEMOLITION NOTES o w w co ` O ^ x x n n ULu v_, G ^ Q cc REMOVE EXISTING BUILDINGS AND FOUNDATIONS. a a P P O o 1 1 CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS. TO RA I �u ou PAVING REMOVAL AREA. FULL DEPTH SAWCUTS ALONG w m u Q w v B G O ALL AREAS WHERE ADJACENT PAVEMENT REMAINS. AW ^ W 43I O C0 W © REMOVE PORTION OF UTILITY LINE SHOWN AND ASSOCIATED L Lu ^ APPURTANCES. COORDINATE WITH PRIVATE UTILITY IG \ ^N COMPANIES AS REQUIRED. Ln Ey 2 B ^ Op REMOVE WATER SERVICE LINE AND ASSOCIATED VALVES/CURB STOPS. co Ln r4 OH \ \ 00 REMOVE SERVICE TO MAIN. COORDINATE WITH CITY OF IOWA CITY. C \ ( G) CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH CITY OF IOWA CITY TO ASSURE ALL � N O O ^ WATER SERVICE ARE REMOVED. W Q0 A c D I Z > rl � 0 1 � w) � w)� ��� N �' O EXISTING UTILITY/LIGHT POLE TO REMAIN. Luw o \ I © o O REMOVE UTILITY/LIGHT POLE. U \ E TIN S RV R B W _ V z Q o M 2, W ^ ^® © REMOVE TREE. o N a - O 5> S 0 H L w w W IN 4 TE 6 .3 S DU ocn H REMOVE EXISTING FENCING. EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE y RI 6 3. X0 oos s S s T �o A goo coos os 4 �6 _ �o s OI REMOVE BOLLARDS AND OTHER SITE ITEMS. RIM 653.96 0� I 1 CP 6 7 W �i S oos 4 6 6. 0° �bS- to ° -� s EXISTING STORM MANHOLE INV 12 CLAY 646.81 N w) .� s oos � �D) ^ INV 12" CLAY 646.91 S s ' A k\os `° V°s- RIM 655.61 0 2 X INV 12" RCP 651.73 E N (0 Cu o _ MEN�9) _ INV 1299 U RCP 651.69 N --- � J I� ❑) o INV 12" RCP 651.69 N Q O ,�-� ) cc cc) � ) c❑ cc❑ w� � U CO) ❑) ❑) ) CO) ❑) c❑) (CII) C °�a Z c W >- B W O C C❑) o 0 B � o EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE Q w Q� o, N ^ RIM 657.08 ,� z Q T) (ST) CST) �" ® r_ (Y U _ o C/) (SO) S8) z 11S'`115' � EXISTING TO T \° � � EXISTING STORM MANHOLE �, � °ov000000°N S. MAIDEN LAN E - - _ _- _ .. �RIM 657.30Lu RIM 54. 0. 36" RCP 649.20 E W ° \ Z Q = z P 649.48 " RCP 649.1 0 NW EXISTIN STORM GRATE '-'-I Q INV 36 u INV 1 8 , INV18 CP 649.40S ° RIM 656.60 `G6j ) Z 601 S. GILBERT INV 1 RCP 653.02 S Ln O rn \C/s o INV 1 RCP 652.85 W v c°J �e EXISTING STORM PIPE v a_ p o F� INV 8" PVC 664.58 N < <�' - <�> N 330 a ' EXISTING s \ E PRENTISS wo (D 0 m ° STORM INTAKE �jQ F N < a- 0 D o M 655.47 F ° L7^ 0 z N N I- Lu Q N Sep 18, 2020 - 10:12am S:\PROJECTS\180109\05 Design\Civil-Survey\Sheets\180109 - C1.00.dwg 225 E PRENTISS EXISTING RAILROAD RAILS Ci C-) s, TOE OF SLOPE PROPOSED ------- CULVERT WING WALLS --- (FROM CITY PLANS) Q - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — --- LL --------------RALSTON CREEK ^JEISTING AILROAD BRIDGE ABUTMENT \ - o - 00 2 --------------- l� 1 �S, PROPOSED LIMESTONE BOULDER TERRACE WITH STEPS -SEE LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR DETAILS U �j 100Y � W z 1 ooY Q _ 100Y - 10( 100Y -100Y 100Y 100Y 100Y j� W -- 's) ---------- « �s� PROPOSED AIR PAVE SYSTEM FOR 1 ooY 100Y cs) cs) PROPERTY Q o 0 \ cs) cS) —\\ MAINTENANCE ACCESS BOUNDARY O \ -SEE LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR DETAILS %r � V J ` c V T!T �! � �v1 � O IJi H 0 0 0 0 0 �= --'--�---'L__ - 00 o U - - o _ - 000000---'��` �' 0000 TRANSFORMER PAD #2 0 = �\ FLOODWAY/ 000000 000000 0 w or 00000 00000 (FLOODPROOF TO 756.0) \ a I \ STREAM CORRIDOR o 00000 ° 0000 01,6 0 0000 0000 0 0 0 0 0-0-e-" —� I so�Y o° i �S� °0 0000°0°0°0000 000000000000000000 0000000 000000 00 000 0000 - 6 Y 000000000000000000000000000000 0000000 00000coo 0000 0000000 0��- --�-% SCO 500 0000000000000000000000 1 0000000 0000 00 000c fV 000000000000 A,Q000000000 -/- OS 0000 000000( 1 I O^^^^�O 000 000000OOG - �OQ o\ o0 0o Y C) www oOo /� Q D U- 000 * P V) O co ° "Ir '� 30' STREAM \ 5' BUILDING Ll 10°� rn r ;� CORRIDOR BUFFER so. y SETBACK o L Wi o FG = 657.75: IL RAMP 1 FG = 656.50 oma— FG = 653.5 1 z I� w6) Lu W S. LI N N STREET 'L / N o Ln 0 z Lu LJ F RALS TON CREEK o LANDSCAPE PLANTER REQUIRED FOR GRADE SEPARATION TO ® MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN 14' co \500 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN Ln o 39 41 A 52 50 48 46 45 ® 48 LEASING \ III (� ti \ \ u, U- (� OFFICE \ 1 0 \ 0 '❑® '® 0 � J � \ �y 31 0 E PRENTISS 35 \ III Q LLI O O 34 5.56% \ l� � V) LuZ Lu CC) O 33 \C B � \ m 0 � W o a a a © ELEVATOR LOBBY m a - LOBBY cN LOBBY 657:0' I V) LL W O 32 40 42 \ ? \ 53 51 49 47 - d 00 Z _ Q 0 0 — _ RR mm � Ln 00 ® — -- SIfAIR 1 c Ln O U 0 Lu 00 u )o D11\Qq w I \ 25 23 21 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 11 9 7 5 3 2 1 TRASH _ ^ 00 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAIL W) w% W 00 0 o a o a o a o �� \ 0 0 w o \ z U 0 657'-0" o LnI Y Q � \ Q m \ 1� w 0 2 00 "I aw N o N" 0 320 E PRENTISS o �, 0O D SITE PLAN NOTES: co 0 27 26 24 22 20 - \ TRASH UP - --- 10 20 0 I /\ N N r lD zd) J � M D N7 O ` U 0z O O_ X Q O O O O N N N N I O O O O N N N N Q0 r - Ln Ln lD 00 O O O O Lu Lu 1 z z U o 0 >U >U Lu Lu 1 K K > > oz w w 1 > > w w X z z Lu W x m m z z F � � z ED w w U = = N N N N w w > W Q Q W m U 0 w L z rn z `J w U O O Lu Cm G o W Lu Lnsn� Q� 0 O� -- -- SERVICE SERVICE ELECTRICAL TRASH W) n \ ZONING DISTRICT: C TRANSFORMER ° ELECTRICAL == 12 10 © \ _= STAGING 11.2 c LL ��II�� RIVER FRONT CROSSING -CENTRAL CROSSINGS PAD #1\ T Al 3 S I J ^ O 2 FG = 656.5 _ FG = 656.5----- --- FG = 656.5 ro \ FLOOD PLAIN INFORMATION: N 0 bo - 100 -YEAR ELEVATION = 653.0 U 15.61' BIKE ROOM 657'-0" fV RIGHT-OF-WAY i \ ,3 ELEv 130 BIKES 14.35' N 0 _ - « ) \ -- -500-YEAR ELEVATION = 656.0 - DESIGN FLOOD U-) J LOBBYri DEDICATION �❑ �❑ �7--0- �❑ c c❑❑� \ c c❑) ❑) FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS: OU (725 SF) - - I— ! - c❑) Fj - c ❑) - - - c c❑) c CO) < Co) c C[])c Co) - CFI) CO) Z � � i BUILDING FACADE MUST EQUAL AT LEAST 75% OF W >- W -----(co) • ° '; 5 \ CONSTRUCT CURB GAS & ELECTRIC \ /� °° o ff' - FRONTAGE DC z 0 F - T LOBBY AT PROPERTY LINE SS HOUSE METERS oy X50°� soo y ^ ED w CL U Q PRIVATE ALLEY I- cn �C�\_l\\\ 657' " I; PROPERTY SS SS y �50 o E. PRENTISS STREET: Q W a 0 n 656.5 \� FRONTAGE= 195' F L z CL � � BOUNDARY � - _- ® F N Vz aOUPERCENTAGE8� IFACADE ST) SS SS SS Ss S. MAIDEN LANE �C•qO �� S � S -S SS \Lj \ \\\\ \\ o S8) S. GILBERT STREET: Iis)—z�ils ) // v FRONTAGE= 80' 10' EASE ENT poev000\ BUILDING FACADE = 67' F F TURE IDE ALK ^ PERCENTAGE= 84% 06"SG, ^ OPEN SPACE: o AREA REQUIRED: 10 SF PER BEDROOM * 266 BEDS = 2,660 SF 0� 601 S. G I L5 E RT AREA PROVIDED (SF): TCONFORMING ADDITIONAL NON -CONFORMING F S PUBLIC PRIVATE PUBLIC PUBLIC LOCATION OCCUPIED OCCUPIED OCCUPIED UNOCCUPIED TOTAL rc \co FRONT PLAZA --- --- 3,838 1,947 5,785 \ e� O� \ o \ c�> c�> m Fo CREEK SIDE 3,060 16,736 19,796 z LEVEL 3 - COURTYARD "A" 1,811 524 207 2,542 rc� \ LEVEL 4 - COURTYARD "B" --- 926 306 935 2,167 Q S� --- ��' � � � ^ � LEVEL 4 -COURTYARD "C" 901 231 921 2,053 2 � FF ° o ^ TOTAL 4,871 2,351 4,375 20,746 32,343 z W T \ uJ w� N REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS L Sep 18, 2020 - 10:12am S:\PROJECTS\180109\05 Design Civil -Survey Sheets 180109 - C2.00.dwg I • • i� • 'ii TILITY • J,ia 37 • �.� iii 0 z I� w6) Lu W S. LI N N STREET 'L / N o Ln 0 z Lu LJ F RALS TON CREEK o LANDSCAPE PLANTER REQUIRED FOR GRADE SEPARATION TO ® MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN 14' co \500 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN Ln o 39 41 A 52 50 48 46 45 ® 48 LEASING \ III (� ti \ \ u, U- (� OFFICE \ 1 0 \ 0 '❑® '® 0 � J � \ �y 31 0 E PRENTISS 35 \ III Q LLI O O 34 5.56% \ l� � V) LuZ Lu CC) O 33 \C B � \ m 0 � W o a a a © ELEVATOR LOBBY m a - LOBBY cN LOBBY 657:0' I V) LL W O 32 40 42 \ ? \ 53 51 49 47 - d 00 Z _ Q 0 0 — _ RR mm � Ln 00 ® — -- SIfAIR 1 c Ln O U 0 Lu 00 u )o D11\Qq w I \ 25 23 21 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 11 9 7 5 3 2 1 TRASH _ ^ 00 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAIL W) w% W 00 0 o a o a o a o �� \ 0 0 w o \ z U 0 657'-0" o LnI Y Q � \ Q m \ 1� w 0 2 00 "I aw N o N" 0 320 E PRENTISS o �, 0O D SITE PLAN NOTES: co 0 27 26 24 22 20 - \ TRASH UP - --- 10 20 0 I /\ N N r lD zd) J � M D N7 O ` U 0z O O_ X Q O O O O N N N N I O O O O N N N N Q0 r - Ln Ln lD 00 O O O O Lu Lu 1 z z U o 0 >U >U Lu Lu 1 K K > > oz w w 1 > > w w X z z Lu W x m m z z F � � z ED w w U = = N N N N w w > W Q Q W m U 0 w L z rn z `J w U O O Lu Cm G o W Lu Lnsn� Q� 0 O� -- -- SERVICE SERVICE ELECTRICAL TRASH W) n \ ZONING DISTRICT: C TRANSFORMER ° ELECTRICAL == 12 10 © \ _= STAGING 11.2 c LL ��II�� RIVER FRONT CROSSING -CENTRAL CROSSINGS PAD #1\ T Al 3 S I J ^ O 2 FG = 656.5 _ FG = 656.5----- --- FG = 656.5 ro \ FLOOD PLAIN INFORMATION: N 0 bo - 100 -YEAR ELEVATION = 653.0 U 15.61' BIKE ROOM 657'-0" fV RIGHT-OF-WAY i \ ,3 ELEv 130 BIKES 14.35' N 0 _ - « ) \ -- -500-YEAR ELEVATION = 656.0 - DESIGN FLOOD U-) J LOBBYri DEDICATION �❑ �❑ �7--0- �❑ c c❑❑� \ c c❑) ❑) FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS: OU (725 SF) - - I— ! - c❑) Fj - c ❑) - - - c c❑) c CO) < Co) c C[])c Co) - CFI) CO) Z � � i BUILDING FACADE MUST EQUAL AT LEAST 75% OF W >- W -----(co) • ° '; 5 \ CONSTRUCT CURB GAS & ELECTRIC \ /� °° o ff' - FRONTAGE DC z 0 F - T LOBBY AT PROPERTY LINE SS HOUSE METERS oy X50°� soo y ^ ED w CL U Q PRIVATE ALLEY I- cn �C�\_l\\\ 657' " I; PROPERTY SS SS y �50 o E. PRENTISS STREET: Q W a 0 n 656.5 \� FRONTAGE= 195' F L z CL � � BOUNDARY � - _- ® F N Vz aOUPERCENTAGE8� IFACADE ST) SS SS SS Ss S. MAIDEN LANE �C•qO �� S � S -S SS \Lj \ \\\\ \\ o S8) S. GILBERT STREET: Iis)—z�ils ) // v FRONTAGE= 80' 10' EASE ENT poev000\ BUILDING FACADE = 67' F F TURE IDE ALK ^ PERCENTAGE= 84% 06"SG, ^ OPEN SPACE: o AREA REQUIRED: 10 SF PER BEDROOM * 266 BEDS = 2,660 SF 0� 601 S. G I L5 E RT AREA PROVIDED (SF): TCONFORMING ADDITIONAL NON -CONFORMING F S PUBLIC PRIVATE PUBLIC PUBLIC LOCATION OCCUPIED OCCUPIED OCCUPIED UNOCCUPIED TOTAL rc \co FRONT PLAZA --- --- 3,838 1,947 5,785 \ e� O� \ o \ c�> c�> m Fo CREEK SIDE 3,060 16,736 19,796 z LEVEL 3 - COURTYARD "A" 1,811 524 207 2,542 rc� \ LEVEL 4 - COURTYARD "B" --- 926 306 935 2,167 Q S� --- ��' � � � ^ � LEVEL 4 -COURTYARD "C" 901 231 921 2,053 2 � FF ° o ^ TOTAL 4,871 2,351 4,375 20,746 32,343 z W T \ uJ w� N REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS L Sep 18, 2020 - 10:12am S:\PROJECTS\180109\05 Design Civil -Survey Sheets 180109 - C2.00.dwg I TILITY 36 37 38 0 z I� w6) Lu W S. LI N N STREET 'L / N o Ln 0 z Lu LJ F RALS TON CREEK o LANDSCAPE PLANTER REQUIRED FOR GRADE SEPARATION TO ® MEET CITY REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION WITHIN 14' co \500 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN Ln o 39 41 A 52 50 48 46 45 ® 48 LEASING \ III (� ti \ \ u, U- (� OFFICE \ 1 0 \ 0 '❑® '® 0 � J � \ �y 31 0 E PRENTISS 35 \ III Q LLI O O 34 5.56% \ l� � V) LuZ Lu CC) O 33 \C B � \ m 0 � W o a a a © ELEVATOR LOBBY m a - LOBBY cN LOBBY 657:0' I V) LL W O 32 40 42 \ ? \ 53 51 49 47 - d 00 Z _ Q 0 0 — _ RR mm � Ln 00 ® — -- SIfAIR 1 c Ln O U 0 Lu 00 u )o D11\Qq w I \ 25 23 21 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 11 9 7 5 3 2 1 TRASH _ ^ 00 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MAIL W) w% W 00 0 o a o a o a o �� \ 0 0 w o \ z U 0 657'-0" o LnI Y Q � \ Q m \ 1� w 0 2 00 "I aw N o N" 0 320 E PRENTISS o �, 0O D SITE PLAN NOTES: co 0 27 26 24 22 20 - \ TRASH UP - --- 10 20 0 I /\ N N r lD zd) J � M D N7 O ` U 0z O O_ X Q O O O O N N N N I O O O O N N N N Q0 r - Ln Ln lD 00 O O O O Lu Lu 1 z z U o 0 >U >U Lu Lu 1 K K > > oz w w 1 > > w w X z z Lu W x m m z z F � � z ED w w U = = N N N N w w > W Q Q W m U 0 w L z rn z `J w U O O Lu Cm G o W Lu Lnsn� Q� 0 O� -- -- SERVICE SERVICE ELECTRICAL TRASH W) n \ ZONING DISTRICT: C TRANSFORMER ° ELECTRICAL == 12 10 © \ _= STAGING 11.2 c LL ��II�� RIVER FRONT CROSSING -CENTRAL CROSSINGS PAD #1\ T Al 3 S I J ^ O 2 FG = 656.5 _ FG = 656.5----- --- FG = 656.5 ro \ FLOOD PLAIN INFORMATION: N 0 bo - 100 -YEAR ELEVATION = 653.0 U 15.61' BIKE ROOM 657'-0" fV RIGHT-OF-WAY i \ ,3 ELEv 130 BIKES 14.35' N 0 _ - « ) \ -- -500-YEAR ELEVATION = 656.0 - DESIGN FLOOD U-) J LOBBYri DEDICATION �❑ �❑ �7--0- �❑ c c❑❑� \ c c❑) ❑) FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS: OU (725 SF) - - I— ! - c❑) Fj - c ❑) - - - c c❑) c CO) < Co) c C[])c Co) - CFI) CO) Z � � i BUILDING FACADE MUST EQUAL AT LEAST 75% OF W >- W -----(co) • ° '; 5 \ CONSTRUCT CURB GAS & ELECTRIC \ /� °° o ff' - FRONTAGE DC z 0 F - T LOBBY AT PROPERTY LINE SS HOUSE METERS oy X50°� soo y ^ ED w CL U Q PRIVATE ALLEY I- cn �C�\_l\\\ 657' " I; PROPERTY SS SS y �50 o E. PRENTISS STREET: Q W a 0 n 656.5 \� FRONTAGE= 195' F L z CL � � BOUNDARY � - _- ® F N Vz aOUPERCENTAGE8� IFACADE ST) SS SS SS Ss S. MAIDEN LANE �C•qO �� S � S -S SS \Lj \ \\\\ \\ o S8) S. GILBERT STREET: Iis)—z�ils ) // v FRONTAGE= 80' 10' EASE ENT poev000\ BUILDING FACADE = 67' F F TURE IDE ALK ^ PERCENTAGE= 84% 06"SG, ^ OPEN SPACE: o AREA REQUIRED: 10 SF PER BEDROOM * 266 BEDS = 2,660 SF 0� 601 S. G I L5 E RT AREA PROVIDED (SF): TCONFORMING ADDITIONAL NON -CONFORMING F S PUBLIC PRIVATE PUBLIC PUBLIC LOCATION OCCUPIED OCCUPIED OCCUPIED UNOCCUPIED TOTAL rc \co FRONT PLAZA --- --- 3,838 1,947 5,785 \ e� O� \ o \ c�> c�> m Fo CREEK SIDE 3,060 16,736 19,796 z LEVEL 3 - COURTYARD "A" 1,811 524 207 2,542 rc� \ LEVEL 4 - COURTYARD "B" --- 926 306 935 2,167 Q S� --- ��' � � � ^ � LEVEL 4 -COURTYARD "C" 901 231 921 2,053 2 � FF ° o ^ TOTAL 4,871 2,351 4,375 20,746 32,343 z W T \ uJ w� N REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS L Sep 18, 2020 - 10:12am S:\PROJECTS\180109\05 Design Civil -Survey Sheets 180109 - C2.00.dwg I LAN DSCAPE MAINTENANCE PLAN FO R BIOSINALESAN D SU RRO U N DING AREAS ASWITH ANYLANDSCAPED AREA, MAINTENANCE ISTHEKEYTO KEERN G THE PROCESSES FUNCTION ING CORRECTLYAS WELLASENSJRINGTHAT THE AREA STAYSCLEANAND ATTRACTIVE WE HAVE PUT TOGETHERA TYPICAL PLAN BELOW FORPROFOSB:) MAIN TEN ANCEACTMTIESIN THEBIOSJVALES W®ING - METHOD: MAN UALLY BY HAN D. FF;EQUENCY: BI-WEEKLYORMONTHLY DEPENDING ON OFIB?ATIONSSCH®ULE INVASVESAND NON -DESIRABLE PLAN T MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BIOSJVALESBYMECHANICALMEAN SON LY, NO HERBICIDES -SHALL BEAPFLIED TO THESJVALEAREAASTHISMAY DISRU FFTHEBIOLOGICAL PROCESS FOR FILTRATION. WATERING - METHOD: MAN UALLY BY HAN D (OR) AUTOMATICALLY BY SEN SOR FLUENCY: ASN EIEDED DEPENDING ON SOIL MOISTURE TYPICALLY WATERING ISNOT NES® WITHIN THESNALEAREASUNLESSTHERE ISA CON -STENT DRYSPIELLOF CONSECUTIVE DAYS MOISFUREMEFERSZONED TO THESURROUNDING IRRIGATION SYSTEM MAYNEED TO BE INSTALLED IN SNALESTO ALLOW FORIRRIGATION DURINGTHEEEPE:IODS LOW VOLUME SPRAYHEADSAND/ORDRIP TUBING SHOULD BEUTILIZED HERETO MINIMIZERUNOFF. F ERTIUZATION - METHOD: MAN UALLY BY HAN D. FFMUENCY. ASNEEDED DEPENDING ON SOIL FERTILITY TEST. BYDE-GNTHEBIOSNALEBGEN ERALLYCONTAIN NUTRIENTLEVELS (PARTICULARLYNITROGEN) SIGN IRCANTLYHIGH ER THAN N 0 RMAL 30 IL LEVELS THB;aORE, IT IS U N LI KELY THAT 90 IL FERTILITY WILL BEA LIMITIN G FACTO R IN PLANT GROWTH, AND THUS FERTILIZATION WOULD BE UN N ECESSNW. WERECOMMEND TEETINGTHESDILFERTILITY IN THE SNALESANNUALLYORIFPLANT MATE:IALS-IOWSSGNSOFDECLINE IFFERTILIZATION ISNECESSNW APPLYONLY ORGANIC FERTILIZER THAT WILL PROVID E N ECESS4RY N UTRIEN TSWITHOUT DI9:4UPTING SOIL LIFE MULCHING- METHOD: MANUALLY BY HAND. FREQUENCY. EVERY6-12 MONTHSIN FALLAND SPRING. THEMULCH LAYERPROVIDESAN IMPORTANT ROLE IN THEBIORETENTION PROPERTIES FOR REVIOVALOFFOLLUTANTS SUCH ASHEAVYMETALS MULCH LAYERSAREDESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE OVERTIMEADDIN G IMPORTANT NUTRIENTS BACK INTO THESDIL. THESJVALEAREASSHOULD BEVISUALLYIN9:1ECTED MONTHLYTO BNSUFECOMPLEFECOVERAGE BARESPOTS--IOULD BETOUCHEU-UPASNE)ED. REAPPLYA3"MAXIMUM LAYEROF--IREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH EVBRY6 MONTHSTO THESWALEAREAS MULCH SHALL BEDARKBROWN IN COLORAND FREEOFPE�TS TRIMMING OF PLANT MATERIAL - METHOD: MANUALLY BY HAN D. FIRIEEQUE N CY VARIES PER MATMAL; TYPICALLY IN EARLY SPRIN G. TYPICAL PRACTICE ISTO LEAVE ORNAMENTAL GRASSESAND SE® HEADSSTANDINGTO PROVIDE WINTER INTEREST. THEEEPLANTSSHOULD BECUT BACKSEVEIRE-YIN EARLYEPRINGTO ENCOURAGENEW GROWTH. DISEAS® OR DAMAGED PARTS--IOULD BEPRUNED ASTHEYOCCUR TR=AND SHRUBSMAYBEFRUNED FORSHAPEASNE®EU. TRASH & DEBRIS REVIOVAL - METHOD: VISUALLY INSPECT AND REMOVE BY HAN D. FLUENCY: AFTERSIGNIFICANT RAINFALL EVENT, ORBI-WEEi4YORMONTHLYUPON SITE VISIT. STORM WATER RUNOFF FLOWING INTO THE BIOSNALES MAY CARIRYTRASH AND DEBRIS THEBIOSNALE 9-iOULD BE INSPECTED ASPART OFTHEROUTINELAN DSCAPEMAN TEN ANCEFORTH E-TEASWE_LASBYON--TE MAINTENANCE PERSONNEL IMMEDIATB_YAFTBRA-GNIFICANTRAIN EVENTTO ENSURETHEAREASSTAYCLEAN AND KBPTHE\A FROM BECOMING UNSIGHTLY. PET WASTE REMOVAL - METHOD: MAN UALLY BY HAN D. FREQUENCY: IMMEDIATE-YAFTEREACH OCCURRENCE THEREWILL BEA DEJGNATED AREATO WALK PETSON-SITE THAT WILL BELOCATED AWAYFROM THEBIOSNALEAREAS THEREWILL BEPEf STATIONSPROVIDED IN THISAREATO ASST TENANTSIN DI3P7-NG OFTHBRPEfSWASTE TENANTS WILLAGREETO UTILIZETH IS LOCATION ONLYAND CLEAN UPAFTBRTHBRPEfSASPART OFTHBRLEASEAGREE LENT. THEMANAGBVIENT STAFFWILL MAKE TEN ANTSAWAREOFFIN ESTHAT WILL BEASS= IFTHEYDO NOT FOLLOW THEE= RULES IN ADDITION, ON -SITE MAINTENANCEPER93NNELWILL BEP7LICINGTHE BIOSJVALESTO REVIOVEANYPETWASTE THAT MAYOCCURIN THETEAREAS PLANT SCHEDULE TREES QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE 0 5 ARNOLD TULIP POPLAR / LIRIODENDRON TULIPIFERA'ARNOLD' 2.5'CAL.-9'HT. MIN. 1 GAL • 6 DAKOTA PINNACLE ASIAN WHITE BIRCH / BETULA PLATYPHYLLA'FARGO' TM 2.5"CAL.-9'HT. MIN. 20% @ 18" oc U 4 DURA HEAT RIVER BIRCH / BETULA NIGRA'BNMTF' TM 2.5'CAL.-9'HT. MIN. \ SPIKE GAYFEATHER / LIATRIS SPICATA 5 FOREST PANSY REDBUD / CERCIS CANADENSIS 'HEARTS OF GOLD' 2.5'CAL.-9'HT. MIN. CONEFLOWER / RUDBECKIA FULGIDA 1 GAL 6 GREEN GIANT ARBORVITAE / THUJA STANDISHII X PLICATA'GREEN GIANT' 2.5'CAL.-9'HT. MIN. 1 GAL m�� rywo 8 Large INDIAN GRASS / SORGHASTRUM NUTANS 1 GAL 10% @ 24" oc STONECROP / SEDUM SPURIUM FLAT 15% @ 18" oc 0 5 JAPANESE TREE LILAC / SYRINGA RETICULATA 2.5'CAL.-9'HT. MIN. PRO-. CODE 19-012 8 SHADEMASTER LOCUST / GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS 'SHADEMASTER' TM 2.5'CAL.-9'HT. MIN. The distance between Large and Small trees here is a minimum of 18' based on 8 SILVER LINDEN / TILIA TOMENTOSA 2.5'CAL.-9'HT. MIN. 2 Large SHRUBS QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT/SIZE SPACING or 3 Small 13 CHOCOLATE VINE / AKEBIA QUINATA 3 GAL 96" o.c. d LOCATED ON CLIMBING STRUCTURES (GREEN SCREENS) permit design flexibility" 16 EMERALD ARBORVITAE / THUJA OCCIDENTALIS 'EMERALD' 5'-6' HT. 60" o.c. 28 FEATHER REED GRASS / CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA'KARL FOERSTER' 3 GAL 36' o.c. GROUND COVERS QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT/SIZE SPACING PLAN A Y 406 ANDORRA JUNIPER / JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS 'ANDORRA' 3 GAL 24" o.c. 13,007 SF KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS SOD / POA PRATENSIS SQ.FT. L1.0 "CONCERTO" OR SIMILAR 4,158 SF NATIVE GRASS MIX / "LITTLE BUCKAROO" SEED MIX SQ.FT. SEED MIX BY UNITED SEEDS, INC. WWW.UNITEDSEEDS.COM; INSTALL PER MFG. SPECIFICATIONS 9,034 SF STREAM BANK NATIVE SEED MIX / IA-CP23 FLOOD PRONE MIX SQ.FT. SEED MIX PROVIDED BY ION EXCHANGE, INC. (WWW.IONEXCHANGE.COM); INSTALL PER MFG. SPECIFICATIONS STORMWATER TREATMENT PLANT SCHEDULE In BIOSWALE PLANT MIX � Required Provided TUSSOCK SEDGE / CAREX STRICTA 1 GAL 20% @ 18" oc 1 Large/ 40' or 1 RIVER OATS / CHASMANTHIUM LATIFOLIUM 1 GAL 20% @ 18" oc \ SHREVE'S IRIS / IRIS VIRGINICA SHREVEI 1 GAL 20% @ 24" oc \ SPIKE GAYFEATHER / LIATRIS SPICATA 1 GAL 10% @ 18" oc Small / 30' CONEFLOWER / RUDBECKIA FULGIDA 1 GAL 10% @ 18" oc A�j C: LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS / SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM 1 GAL 10% @ 24" oc 8 Large INDIAN GRASS / SORGHASTRUM NUTANS 1 GAL 10% @ 24" oc VEGETATED BIOS/VALE (SEE PLANT SCH EDU LE) CULVERT (SEE CIVIL DWGS) STREAM BANK N ATIVE SEI3) MIX ON — WESTSIDEOFCREE]KISSHOWN FOR REFEFENCE PER LAN DSCAPE PIAN FOR ADJACENT OWNERS PROPOSED EASE -DES81) MIX MATCHESWESF SIDE SPECIRCATIONS(,ca: ANT SCHEDULE) TOTAL O F 6 TABLE & PROPOSE LIMESTONEBOULDER TERRACE with STEPSand FIAGSI-ON E PAVIN G LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS ,US LIMITS O F USAE3LE OPEN SPACE VEGETATES BIOSWALE (SEE: PIAN T SCH E3DU LE) 4,!1 I I 1 GREEN ROOF PLANT MIX � Required Provided COMMON YARROW / ACHILLEA MILLEFOLIUM FLAT 10% @ 18" oc 1 Large/ 40' or 1 BLUE GRAMA GRASS / BOUTELOUA GRACILIS 1 GAL 10% @ 24" oc \ CONEFLOWER / ECHINACEA PURPUREA FLAT 10% @ 18" oc \ SPIKE GAYFEATHER / LIATRIS SPICATA FLAT 10% @ 18" oc Small / 30' LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS / SCHIZACHYRIUM SCOPARIUM 1 GAL 15% @ 24" oc A�j C: STONECROP / SEDUM ALBUM FLAT 15% @ 18" oc 8 Large MIDDENDORFF STONECROP / SEDUM MIDDENDORFFIANUM FLAT 15% @ 18" oc STONECROP / SEDUM SPURIUM FLAT 15% @ 18" oc VEGETATED BIOS/VALE (SEE PLANT SCH EDU LE) CULVERT (SEE CIVIL DWGS) STREAM BANK N ATIVE SEI3) MIX ON — WESTSIDEOFCREE]KISSHOWN FOR REFEFENCE PER LAN DSCAPE PIAN FOR ADJACENT OWNERS PROPOSED EASE -DES81) MIX MATCHESWESF SIDE SPECIRCATIONS(,ca: ANT SCHEDULE) TOTAL O F 6 TABLE & PROPOSE LIMESTONEBOULDER TERRACE with STEPSand FIAGSI-ON E PAVIN G LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS ,US LIMITS O F USAE3LE OPEN SPACE VEGETATES BIOSWALE (SEE: PIAN T SCH E3DU LE) 4,!1 I I 1 / � Required Provided 1 1 Large/ 40' or 1 5 Large 6 Small The site layout does not allow for large trees to meet the minimum distance \ 194.6 1 \ \ I \ Small / 30' Frontage Length Trees / If Required Provided Notes 1 Large/ 40' or 1 5 Large 6 Small The site layout does not allow for large trees to meet the minimum distance East Prentiss 194.6 clearances from the building and still remain within the property line, therefore Small / 30' or 6 Small Trees we went with the single frontage requirements for this area (14 -5E -7-A-1) A�j C: 1 Large/ 40' or 1 8 Large 8 Large Q Ralston Creek 327 Small / 30' or 11 Small Trees PRO-. CODE 19-012 DRAWN BY DEM The distance between Large and Small trees here is a minimum of 18' based on South Gilbert 80.1 1 Large/ 40' or 1 2 Large 1 Large & Code 14 -5E -4-C-3 that states, "the minimum distances between trees, between trees 4-10-20 Small / 30 or 3 Small 2 Small and shrubs, and between shrubs may be reduced b twent ive percent 25% to y y yf� p ( ) 6-25-20 FOR CITY REVIEW 8-27-20 permit design flexibility" — — — \ (co NZ - _::17 '` J �(s7 0 20 40 60 feet 71-=--7�7 SCALE: 1" = 20' NORTH SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN THISDRAWING ISTHEPROPERTY OFLORBD;BAUM McNAIR&ASSOCIATES LLC AND ISNOT TO BEREPRODUC®, CORED, OR ALTS IN WHOLEORIN PART WITHOUT THEAPPROWL OF LORBB;1BAUM McNAIR&ASSOCIATES @ LMA NU Al �a.,apc A,� rP Cl� ro ti' cr s � b ,• Ya `ems /v�• gs ss OCIA,�� www.lorberbaummcnair.com C: L.L 0 A�j C: p Q o -_0 4_0 C (1) L 0 O = ■ >1 A-0 U Q 0 Lo T� M O PRO-. CODE 19-012 DRAWN BY DEM REVIEWED BY DML ISSUED DATE DESCRIPTION 4-10-20 FOR CITY REVIEW 5-22-20 FOR CITY REVIEW 6-25-20 FOR CITY REVIEW 8-27-20 FOR CITY REVIEW REVISIONS PR IMINARY PLAN A Y SH �r L1.0 i 7LF,l ING WITH FIFEITS C� l!1 N Q N C!i N H O M II O PLAN VIBN � j(v) O jv) � M Z ■�■■�■"" ■■1' —1■■■ - I■ ■■■■■■■■B � ■I ■■E-- -A■i■■■ • I■ ■■■■■■■■ES, - •• ■ •• 1 i � �k� Immimiillllllllmminuillllllllmminuillllllllmminua 1`■awl � _. -� a�l��ulrrrll; ul�a�l��ulrrrlllullll�l��ulrirl �lullll�l��ulrirl ■i� I I IIIIWin����iIIIIIIIIWin����IIIIIIIIIIWin��►�iIIIIIIIIWin��ail 1■�-=.011■ �lu�ll�llllll�l��lu�ll n��l��„ � i llllllmm�muollllll • - - � � :- • 1■`:�■ _� Illlllllllllllrrllllllllll Irk■l,71 IIWin,���allll IIIIWin�i�allll IIIIWin��plll0 IIIIWin��m� Role ■ I'I'I, i���,.,�m����nan����n�n1IIII1nn����n�n111111nn������in11 DECO -. N 7 m N tJ) N M Z a0 = M N N Ln Im NOM � N U �N F— F— I C) ■Z 11 —a—WE 1� m N 00 co:,) 1 N m N .■ v t/1 iml:1li a 9111 I MUTift"I rel I [Kel I I MW mi1:, t :io INTRODUCTION Over a year has passed since I first presented the vision of the redevelopment of the properties located at 305 & 315 E. Prentiss and 625 S. Gilbert Street in Iowa City. The project team has worked closely with City Staff to get to the point we are at now and we are very proud of the project we bring to you at this time. Commonly referred to as 315 E Prentiss, the project will continue the re -development efforts underway in River Front Crossings. The project is located on the east bank of Ralston Creek between E Prentiss Street and the Iowa Interstate Railroad. The project will replace the current industrial uses in this area with high -quality, purpose-built, student housing. The new residential tenants will be located close to public transportation, surrounded by highly regarded, locally owned dining establishments, and within a 10 - minute walk of downtown. All parking for the project will be located within the building footprint and the 3rd and 4th levels of the building will feature roof -top terraces, a clubroom, and fitness center for the use by the building occupants. At street level, the banks of Ralston Creek will be stabilized and the floodplain buffer will be enhanced to create publicly accessible open space. Further, a pedestrian walkway will be added along the south side of the property to provide an opportunity for pedestrians on S. Gilbert Street to access Ralston Creek. The Project Team and I look forward to working with the City of Iowa City to create a successful project for the developer and the city. MICHAEL WELCH Project Lead The project team consists of: OWNER / DEVELOPER: CAPSTONE COLLEGIATE COMMUNITIES, LLC OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC PROJECT ARCHITECT: NILES BOLTON ASSOCIATES CIVIL, STRUCTURAL, AND MEP ENGINEER: AXIOM CONSULTANTS, LLC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: LMO PARTNERS Project PROCESS THREE DISTINCT PHASES I i PHASE 1 Rezoning/Height Bonus May 2019—November 2020 The rezoning phase of the project began in May of 2019 with the submission of a rezoning application. A change to the Regulating Plan was approved along with rezoning the property to River Front Crossings—Central Crossings District. The project is now in the Design Review phase seeking a Level II Height Bonus for eight floors. 9 MONTHS PHASE 2 Design December 2020—August 2021 Much work has been completed by the Project Team during the Design Review process. This effort will continue upon the completion of the Design Review process. These efforts will culminate in an approved Site Plan and Building Plans for Foundation Permit in early Spring of 2021 to allow construction to begin in 2021. The Project Team will work closely with city staff throughout the process to streamline the design to the extent possible. 20+ MONTHS PHASE 3 Construction September 2021—August 2023 Construction is expected to begin in Summer 2021 upon the approval of a building and site design. The building is expected to take approximately 18-20 months, including Ralston Creek stabilization and right-of-way improvements. The building should be ready for an August 2023 occupancy. Section i SCALE Scale of BUILDINGS SIMILAR BUILDING SCALE COMPARISON MATRIX The Rise 831 FT The Mansion 620 Dubuque 315 S Prentiss q 538 S Gilbert 736 FT 225 Prentiss 742 FT 601 S Gilbert N v Y 729 FT =3i 710 FT 713 FT v Cr C -- 3 o v I F t� � " I Section diagram illustrating the elevational height of the tallest buildings in the South Downtown and Central Crossings dis- tricts visible along Prentiss, from Gilbert to Dubuque NARRATIVE: 315 E Prentiss will be located near the bottom of the Prentiss Street hill nestled along Ralston Creek in the valley between Gilbert Street and Dubuque Street. The natural rise in the topography surrounding the project site allows for the proposed 8—stories to meld into the neighborhood. The structure will compliment rather than dominate the surrounding buildings. This exhibit shows a number of buildings and how they compare to the proposed construction of the 315 E Prentiss Project. The view of this exhibit is looking direction north with a west -to -east cut through the center of the property. 602 S Dubuque 620 S Dubuque 225 E Prentiss 315 E Prentiss Court & Linn PROJECT DUBUQUE STREET DUBUQUE STREET DUBUQUE PH IV CAPSTONE THE RISE APARTMENTS APARTMENTS PACHA YEAR 2023 (proposed) 2017 2018 2019 2018 STORIES ABOVE 8 (proposed) 4 4 4 15 GRADE 724 FT APPROXIMATE 742 FT 736 FT 710 FT 831 FT NARRATIVE: 315 E Prentiss will be located near the bottom of the Prentiss Street hill nestled along Ralston Creek in the valley between Gilbert Street and Dubuque Street. The natural rise in the topography surrounding the project site allows for the proposed 8—stories to meld into the neighborhood. The structure will compliment rather than dominate the surrounding buildings. This exhibit shows a number of buildings and how they compare to the proposed construction of the 315 E Prentiss Project. The view of this exhibit is looking direction north with a west -to -east cut through the center of the property. Project MASSING CONCEPTUAL STREET -LEVEL VIEW OF SITE PLACEMENT Owl Rendered street -level view looking Southeast from the intersection of Dubuque and Prentiss. Conceptual view showing the project located behind the Dubuque Phase IV—Pacha building at 225 E. Prentiss Street (building at the center of the image in gray). The Dubuque Phase I can be seen at the right of the image. �1r'h 85 fi " nIr .� )l L ml V. �_�O Ir 9, f It NEIGHBORHOOD POINT -of -REFERENCE DIAGRAM: Northeast Corner of Dubuque Street and Prentiss Street Project MASSING CONCEPTUAL STREET -LEVEL VIEW OF SITE PLACEMENT All w Rendered street -level view looking North from the South Gilbert. Conceptual view showing the project located behind the Iowa Interstate Railroad. World of Bikes is located to the left of the image and Kennedy Plaza is right of the image. :w NEIGHBORHOOD POINT -of -REFERENCE DIAGRAM: Intersection of South Gilbert and Maiden Lane Droject MASSING CONCEPTUAL STREET -LEVEL VIEW OF SITE PLACEMENT Rendered street -level looking South from The Rise on Linn Street. Conceptual view showing the project located behind various apartments along Court Street. Proposed building just visible through tree line at right -center of image. Wfi�. u q tt 1 y yy � v. `� f NEIGHBORHOOD POINT -OF -REFERENCE DIAGRAM: The Rise Courtyard along Linn Street Project MASSING CONCEPTUAL STREET -LEVEL VIEW OF SITE PLACEMENT Rendered street -level looking west from the intersection of Prentiss and Gilbert Conceptual view showing the project located behind 601 S Gilbert St. Although the proposed building is substantially larger than the existing building located at 601 S Gilbert Street, the site topography reduces the overall impression of the mass of the building. .z LAN ,ese Me -� Loi ' � l•v� m+ NEIGHBORHOOD POINT -of -REFERENCE DIAGRAM: The intersection of Prentiss and Gilbert HEIGHT BONUS Section c Height BONUS JUSTIFICATION FOR REQUEST REQUEST PER CODE: Per the City of Iowa City Riverfront Crossings District General Requirements, Article G, 14-2G-7, Section G: BUILDING HEIGHT PROVISIONS our team is requesting consideration for: The granting of additional bonus height in the amount of four (4) stories for the proposed building to be constructed at 315 East Prentiss Street. This would allow for construction of one 8 -story structure on the site which is the maximum allowed under the RIVER FRONT CROSSING: CENTRAL CROSSINGS SUB -DISTRICT. The code provides for a number of incentives for developments to incorporate features that provide both public benefits as well as important goals towards furthering the objectives of the overall downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan. This project is eligible in a number of areas and we are specifically requesting to utilize two (2) different means in our overall request. Both of these areas is detailed in the subsequent sections to identify how we aim to achieve the associated goals. PUBLIC ART (14 -2G -7-G-6) HEIGHT BONUS FOR LEADERSHIP IN ENERGY EFFICIENCYAND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (14 -2G -7-G-7) Level II design review will be required for this project. As a result, the requested Height Bonus will be put before both the City's Design Review Committee and the City Council. 13ublic Art 14 -2G -7-G-6 NARRATIVE of ELIGIBILITY: Per item 14 -2G -7-G-6 of the Iowa City code, one additional floor of building height may be granted for a contribution to the City's public art program equal to one percent (1 %) of threshold value of the project. Threshold value is the sum of all construction costs shown on all building permits associated with the project, including site preparation. Funds contributed shall be used by the City for public art within the Riverfront Crossings District as approved by the Public Art Committee. JUSTIFICATION of REQUIREMENTS: The Project Team believes that the project will improve the aesthetics and pedestrian experience along E. Prentiss Street. The creation of publicly accessible open space between the proposed building and the banks of Ralston Creek may lend itself to creating a location for public art. The team is looking forward to working with the members of the city's public art program to evaluate the opportunities to make the public art more than a check written to the city. Placing public art within the public space may add one more amenity and incentive to attract additional pedestrian traffic to the banks of Ralston Creek. REQUESTING: 1 floor Height Bonus for Energy Efficiency and Environmental Stewardship 14.2G -7-G-7 NARRATIVE of ELIGIBILITY.• Per item 14 -2G -7-G-8 of the Iowa City code, up to four (4) additional floors of building height may be granted for projects that are designed to meet high standards with regard to energy efficiency and environmental stewardship, according to LEED or other similar environmental or energy efficiency rating system. In general, the higher the level of energy efficiency or environmental stewardship demonstrated, the greater the bonus. The amount of bonus granted will be based on the overall quality of the project. Bonus height may also be granted for projects that are designed to minimize the impact of stormwater runoff on the environment through the use of bioswales, rain gardens, green roofs, rainwater harvesting, and stream bank stabilization and restoration along Ralston Creek or the Iowa River, as described in the riverfront crossings district subarea plan adopted in April 2011. A long term maintenance plan must accompany any proposal for such green features. JUSTIFICATION of REQUIREMENTS: The Project Team believes that this property is uniquely situated to create a catalyst for the development of a pedestrian friendly and inviting place along Ralston Creek. The enhancements to Ralston Creek, the areas within the city right-of-way along Ralston Creek, and the floodway buffers associated with the waterway could serve as a greenway between Riverfront Crossings Park located at the south end of the District and E. Prentiss Street. The measures implemented on this Project could well be the template and standard for the numerous properties and projects located along Ralston Creek within Riverfront Crossings The Project Team's plan includes the removal of invasive species, pedestrian access directly to the waterway, stabilization with armoring system that allows for vegetation to be intermixed with bank stabilization resulting in a more sustainable and natural waterway, inclusion of public education signage or components, and water quality measures such as bio-swales in the upland areas adjacent to the building. The building design will focus on energy efficiency to achieve a LEED Silver equivalent design. The energy efficiency measures will focus on reduced consumption of water, all -electric appliances where possible, providing designated spaces within the parking area for Electric Vehicles, and solar panels on the roof of the building. Consistent with City requirements, the Project Team will not seek formal LEED certification from the Green Business Certification Institute (GBCI) but will instead work with city staff to self -certify that the building, as constructed, meets the goals established during the design process. The site and building far exceed the code requirements for Open Space. The code required open space for this project is 2,660 sf. The design provides for 4,871 sf of open space that conforms to the code requirements. There is a total of 32,343 sf of open space provided when all the court yards, plaza space, and areas along the creek are included. 18, 683 sf of this space is open to the public! REQUESTING: 3 floors requested (4 allowed) height BONUS SYNOPSIS OF THE REQUEST NARRATIVE of ELIGIBILITY: The City of Iowa City code allows for ten (10) different methods for a developer to request additional height for a project. We are requesting Height Bonus using the two categories listed below. # NAME SECTION ALLOWED REQUESTED JUSTIFICATION 1 Public Art 14 -2G -7-G-6 1 1 1% of threshold value contribution 2 LEED 14 -2G -7-G-7 4 3 LEED Pursuant and Ralston Creek REQUEST NARRATIVE: Our team will be requesting the additional height for this project in order to maximize the site to its full potential. The project is consistent with the Master Plan and will create a strong anchor for the north end of Ralston Creek rehabilitation south of Downtown. REQUEST NUMBERS: 4 total floors requested FLOORS ALLOWED IN BASE ZONE = 4 FLOORS REQUESTED BY BONUS HEIGHT = 4 TOTAL FLOORS PROPOSED ACROSS THE SITE = 8 STAFF PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: 1 r I C04;qui h CITY OF lOVVA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa S2240-1826 (319) 356-5000 (3I9) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org Planning &Zoning Items CITY COUNCIL MEETING OCTOBER 20, 2020 Item 10.a.: 305 & 315 E. Prentiss St and 625 S. Gilbert St— Level II Design Review Bonus Height Request DRC20-05 A resolution approving height bonuses for 305, 315 E Prentiss St, 625 S. Gilbert St. in the Riverfront Crossing— Central Crossings zone. Overview BACKGROUND & BONUS REQUEST PROCESS PROJECT DESCRIPTION REVIEW CRITERIA NEXT STEPS STAFF RECOMMENDATION Downtown & Riverfront Crossings Master Plan (January 2013) Adoption of Form Based Code (June 2014) Zoning Code Regulating Plan Change & Conditionally Rezoned from CI -1 & CC -2 to RFC -CX (November 2019) Level I Design Review -Staff (October 2020) Level II Design Review -Staff recommendation to City Council for Bonus Height request Final Plat -Dedication of Right -of -Way and Construction Drawings for public infrastructure Site Plan Review -City Staff Building Permit -City Staff Development Process GENERAL Annexation Rezoning of Land Plat(s) Design Reviev Height Bonus Request Site Plan Building Permit Construction LEVEL I DESIGN REVIEW -STAFF Staff FBC Committee review of application Riverfront Crossings Master Plan and FBC Standards May grant up to +2 stories in height above base maximum height LEVEL II DESIGN REVIEW -CITY COUNCIL Requests for 3 or more stories of bonus height, or any open space transfers, historic preservation height transfers, or public right-of-way height transfers must be reviewed by City Council Bonus Height Request Applicant has requested 4 stories of bonus height for a single, 8 -story multi -dwelling building Total maximum height (with bonus) in the Central Crossings zone is 8 stories, subject to discretionary review by City Council Base Max. Height 4 stories Total Max. Height w. Bonus 8 stories Bonus Height Request Height 5 Conditional Zoning Agreement Right-of-way along the west side of S. Gilbert Street to accommodate the relocation of a sidewalk along South Gilbert Street so that there is a buffer between the sidewalk and the street, and access easements to sanitary sewer lines south and west sides of property. Temporary construction easements for Prentiss Bridge project Basic Ralston Creek streambank stabilization and invasive vegetation species removal Project Description SITE & LANDSCAPE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Concept Plan ►@hf�BP W. �•� I1 E PREHTISS-ST L RESTORED RIPARIA VEGETATION IRRnPnsED;- I PROPERTY LINE RFTAIN GRADES WITH NATURAL MATERIALS- - FLOODWAY 1 ~ w (FROM CITY MAPPING) 30' FLDDDWAY BUFFER- sTMe jam. yJ-Jld 1- 1, 068Y, LEASING a MAIL (.GROUND LLVLLj : I -IR ROOM a FITNESS rl -RRA(F IFVFI <} MAIN PARKING ACCESS FROM LAS-MLNI 1 L 071 ! 5' FLOODWAY BUFFER SETBACyII_ -I g STORY BUILDING 1 (5 RESJDENT41AL LEVELS. ` OVER 3'PRRKING LEVE PUBLIC WALKWAY (AT GRADE] I- - 'PLAZA (AT GRADE L 1, w. if 'OWA INTERSTATE RAILROAL, ACCESS FROM I t AF h .tel PAPCEL'A'AREA: •I. 1.60 ACRES APARTMENTS: IIB UNITS 1 400 BEDS 7W NSFIUNDAYG 1047 HW15M AY 138, 9W NRSF TOTAL LOBBY, LEASING B NAIL', 1,918 SF CLUBROOM 5 FMES5: 5.5145F PARKING: 259 SPACES PROVIDED [249 RE PARKING RATIO: 1A5 SPACES !UNIT 1 0.65! DCI WE NY 51 Iw Site Plan Project Description i Q i i �•s3.1•{.r':moi it �I� ., m- II - If .� .ter 11 4 „ O n n ^ o _ 1 Stories Dwelling Units Bedrooms Vehicle Parking Bicycle Parking Open Space Common Courtyards Recreational Amenities Required/Allowed Proposed 4 max base height 8 8 max bonus height n/a 211 n/a 266 201 203 130 130 2,660 sq ft 4,871 sq ft n/a 536 sq ft n/a 2,198 sq ft Project Description Proposed Materials o Applicant has proposed to use two types of brick, metal, mesh parking screen, two colors of fiber cement board, lap siding, and ribbed fiber cement panel Sloping Site o Design of terrace and Form Based Code frontage types Ralston Creek Frontage and Flood plain o Floodproofing requirements and minimum floor elevations of ground level floors will be determined during site plan and building plan review Review Criteria GENERAL DESIGN REVIEW PRE -REQUISITE SPECIFIC BONUS HEIGHT CRITERIA CONDITIONAL ZONING AGREEMENT General Design Review Criteria ➢AII requests must meet the approval criteria in the FBC yDemonstrate excellence in building and site design ➢Use high quality building materials, Designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood. General Approval Criteria Excellence in Building & Site Design- Climate Action Criterion The City adopted a Climate Action and Adaptation Plan in 2018 and more recently in 2019, the City Council declared a climate crisis. The City also set carbon emission reduction targets of 45% by 2030 and reaching "net zero" by 2050. Findings • Due to the City's climate action goals, staff recommends that the project incorporate three additional sustainability related components used for other projects since the declaration, which will demonstrate excellence in building design. Specific Approval Criteria PublicArt (1 Additional FloorAllowed) Criterion Financial contribution to the City's Public Art Program equal to 1% of the threshold value (sum of all construction costs shown on building permits) of the project. Funds are used by the City for public art within the Riverfront Crossings District as approved by the Public Art Committee. Findings • Applicant has agreed make this contribution prior to the issuance of a building permit. Specific Approval Criteria Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) (Up to 4 additional floors allowed based on overall quality) Criterion Designed to the high energy efficiency and environmental stewardship standards of the U.S. Green Building Council's LEED program or a similar green building rating system. Or Designed using BMP's to minimize stormwater runoff impacts or stream bank stabilization and restoration of Ralston Creek or Iowa River. Long- term maintenance plan required. Findings • Applicant is proposing to satisfy criteria using stormwater and stream restoration. • A landscape plan has been submitted showing open space including pedestrian walks, terrace, and bioswales. • A maintenance plan has been reviewed and approved by staff. ,a Rezoning Conditions ■ o e e e e ° o e n In 1� In In In In=� II ILII II 1141 II e II IIIIIIaIIIII111Il�lll-'II'I ° ��I_II_II_II_II-II_0-II _ _ 14141141=1141=IIq - 11=11=11=11=11=11=1h11. , = 11=lg11=11=1141=11 lil-�1_11_IK11-11-11-1�1 I-II 11-II=I1=I�=11� _1 11411411411=1141=11� II 11=11=11=n=11=11=11 ° ii 11=11=11=11=II=11=11 0 �L 1 114u 11=u=n IIS n 110 1111 X11 =II„Ib ° - o M'AiYOIrd. Right-of-way along the west side of S. Gilbert Street to accommodate the relocation of a sidewalk along South Gilbert Street so that there is a buffer between the sidewalk and the street, and access easements to sanitary sewer lines south and west sides of property. Temporary construction easements for Prentiss Bridge project ce Basic Ralston Creek streambank stabilization _ > and invasive vegetation e ° P =;,, species removal Downtown & Riverfront Crossings Master Plan (January 2013) Adoption of Form Based Code (June 2014) Zoning Code Regulating Plan Change & Conditionally Rezoned from CI -1 & CC -2 to RFC -CX (November 2019) Level I Design Review -Staff (October 2020) Level II Design Review -Staff recommendation to City Council for Bonus Height request Final Plat -Dedication of Right -of -Way and Construction Drawings for public infrastructure Site Plan Review -City Staff Building Permit -City Staff Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the bonus height request with the following conditions: 1. The project shall be designed and constructed to at least LEED Silver standards under the National Green Building Standards or the LEED Green Building Rating System appropriate to the building type, according to those standards in effect at the time a building permit is issued. The Developer's registered and LEED- accredited architect must verify that the building has been constructed to meet thi! standard, including a list of the point calculation based on actual on-site achievements and a narrative explaining how each point was achieved. Said verification must be satisfactoryto the City Manager or designee prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. LEED certification, however, shall not be required. At least 8 points shall be achieved for the LEED-NC Optimized Energy Performance credit. 2. The buildings shall utilize rooftop solar modules to generate at least 42,000 kWh annually. 3. The buildings shall utilize only "low -flow fixtures" in the residential units and common bathrooms. "Low flow fixtures" shall be those that exceed the City's current code requirements by 20% or a lower percentage if the City Manager or designee determines that 20% is not achievable. STAFF PRESENTATION CONCLUDED � r rrM as � h CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Strect Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www. icgov. o rg DEVELOPER PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: By: Mike Welch, Axiom Consultants _1� 1, 74, CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240- 1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org 315 E PRENTI, CAPSTONE COLLEGIATE COMM 1I -ter AXIOMCONSUL t NTrg NILES BO" TON ASSOCIATES LORBERBAUM MCNAIR & ASSOCIATES I■ ilill�l�ll I I■� � � � vowf � � 1 RONaO■■— 0I wAWL WI9 Unit Matrix 211 266 Totals Units Bedrooms 100% Unit Type Occupancy Bedro=5/Unit Count Bedrooms Unit Mix Count Requirement Req'd Parking 1 bedroom S1 Single 1 70 70 76 52 Sfngle 1 4 4 53 - Type A 5fngle 1 5 5 Al Single 1 10 10 A2 Single T 5 5 A3 Rouble 1 67 67 2 Bedroom Bi Double 2 31 62 21 B2 - Type A (IA Cons.) Double 2 2 4 B3 SingLef DoubLe 2 9 18 BSI Double 2 3 6 3 Bedroom C1 Single 3 5 15 2% 211 266 Totals Units Bedrooms 100% Parking Calculations Bike Parking Calculations Type Count Requirement Req'd Parking Count Requirement Req'd Parking room 161 0.75 per Unit 120,75 Units 211 1 per Unit, 50% after 50 5paces130.5 [2B,droom45 1.5 per Unit 67.5 room5 2.5 per Unit 12.5 Total Required 130 Required Provided 201 203 Total Provided 130 FACADE - NORTH Wul 1 ;�Mlll■ l imQ;Mfizma 1111010 FACADE - NORTHWEST IIIIIN 0101111 IIII ii 11 Ilk II II �,�,I ��I ■�■Jill t L, FACADE - NORTHEAST - SOUTHEAST 11 11 1 OMNI Pi -� Ralston Creek Improvement Concept C3 STUDENT HOUSING SITE - Iowa City, IA .. y PIAN vl�W 133d.LS SSI_LN31:Id WWI 1.HD 1� ot , 0 07 FTf 6 i 7L4 —717 I + f L I Lo jig giffl, Ell E I-mMN -LIIH,; di Q i R �EN SPACE:fN AREA REQUIRED: 10 SF PER BEDROOM 266 BEDS = 2,660 SF AREA PROVIDED (50: CONFORMING ADDITIONAL NON -CONFORMING F J PUBLIC PRIVATE PUBLIC PUBLIC f -f LOCATION OCCUPIED OCCUPIED OCCUPIED UNOCCUPIED TOTAL FRONT PLAZA — --- 3,938 1,947 5,785 CREEKSIDE 3,060 --- --- 16,736 19,796 LEVEL 3 - COURTYARD "A" 1,811 524 --- 207 2,542 LEVEL 4 - COURTYARD " B" --- 926 306 935 2,167 LEVEL 4 - COURTYARD "C" --- 901 231 921 2,053 CIVO'"" se, TOTAL 4,871 2,351 4,375 25,746 32,343 '01 MA I vil Oki 610 The Rine 831 FT TheM3r= =r M CUbma 3115 Prertiss 225 E Prentiss 742 FT 5365 ` 736 FT 774 Prentiss N £+di56iltert ^ _— -10 FT 713 FT — O Nfl G V a Court & Linn m {j Section Jagram ollustrating the ele vabonal he; ght of the taffest bijolcOngs un the South Downtown and Central Grosswngs ,^: v tncts visible along ?reratissr from Gilbert to Dub---que DUBUQUE PH IV 602S Dubuque 620S Dubuque 225 E Prentiss 315 E Prentiss Court & Linn PROJECT DUBUQUE STREET DUBUQUE STREET DUBUQUE PH IV CAPSTONE APARTMENTS APARTMENTS PACHA THE RISE YEAR 2023 (proposed} 20'7 20-8 20'9 2t'' 8 STORIES ABOVE 8 (proposed) 4 4 4 5 GRADE APPROXIMATE 742 FT 724 FT 736 FT - FT 83' FT HEIGHT BUILDING MASSING i C PRESENTATION CONCLUDED ar % 04 CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240-[826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org Prepared by: Anne Russett, Senior Planner, 410 E. Washington St, Iowa City, IA; (DRC20-00005) Resolution No. 20-246 A resolution approving height bonuses for 305 and 315 E. Prentiss Street and 625 S. Gilbert Street in the Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings Zone Whereas, in November 2019, the approximate 1.6 acres of property locally known as 305 and 315 E. Prentiss Street and 625 S. Gilbert Street and legally described as: Lots 1, 2, 3, and 4 of Block 21 of County Seat Addition to Iowa City, And that tract lying West of Gilbert Street and North of the Iowa Interstate Railroad described in the deed Book 1967 at Page 279 as Commencing at the Northeast Comer of Lot 1, Block 21, of the County Seat Addition; Thence S00°12'59"W, along the Easterly line of said Block 21, 261.17 feet to the Point of Beginning; Thence S89°10'00"E, 22.00 feet; Thence S54°57'41 "E, 46.02 to the Northwesterly right of way line of Gilbert Street; Thence southwesterly, 80.06 feet, along said right of way line, on a 989.93 foot radius curve, concave southeasterly (chord S32°43'18"W, 80.04 feet); Thence N82°21'24"E, 213.00 feet; Thence N00012'59"E along the westerly line of said Block 21, of County Seat Addition and its projection thereof, 7.75 feet to the southwest comer of said Lot 4, of Block 21; Thence easterly along the southerly boundary of said Lot 4, of Block 21, to the southeast corner thereof; Thence northerly along the easterly line of said Lot 4, of Block 21, to the Point of Beginning hereof. Described area contains 1.60 acres and is subject to easements and restrictions of record. was rezoned to Riverfront Crossings — Central Crossings (RFC -CX), subject to a conditional zoning agreement recorded in the records of the Johnson County Recorder in Book 5978, Page 10-21; and Whereas, the RFC -CX zone allows four (4) story buildings with the possibility of up to eight (8) stories through the use of one or more height bonuses or transfer of development rights set forth in Iowa City Code of Ordinances 14 -2G -7G intended to incentivize developments that incorporate features that provide a public benefit or that further important goals and objectives of the Downtown and Riverfront Crossings Master Plan; and Whereas, in January 2020, the City received an application for a Level II Design Review for an 8 -story building, which included a request for four (4) stories in height bonuses; and Whereas, the request for the 1 -story public art building height bonus is based upon the developers' willingness to contribute to the City's public art program equal to one percent of the threshold value of the project, as determined by Code Section 14 -2G -7G(6); and Whereas, the request for the 3 -story leadership in energy and environmental design bonus height is based upon the developers' willingness to minimize the impact of stormwater runoff through the improvement and restoration of Ralston Creek; and Whereas, in accordance with the Riverfront Crossings Form -Based code, any request for bonus height shall demonstrate excellence in building and site design, use high-quality building materials, and be designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood; and Whereas, Staff has reviewed the building and site design plans, finds that the plans meet the criteria to quality for 4 -stories of bonus height, and recommends approval; and Whereas, consistent with the Council's declaration of a climate crisis on August 6, 2019, pursuant to Resolution 19-218, and the City's Climate Action and Adaptation Plan, Council finds that constructing and maintaining this project with certain environmentally sustainable features is essential to reaching the adopted IPCC target of a 45% reduction in carbon emissions by 2030 and reaching "net zero' by 2050; and Resolution No. 20-246 Page 2 Whereas, the U.S. Department of Energy defines a net -zero building as one that "produces enough renewable energy to meet its own annual energy consumption requirements, thereby reducing the use of non-renewable energy in the building sector. This definition also applies to campuses, (energy) portfolios, and communities;" and Whereas, Iowa City is one of the fastest growing cities in the state, and any new building should be as efficient as possible; and Whereas, looking to 2050, this development is a good opportunity for the City, along with the business community and developers, to phase in requirements for buildings to produce on-site renewable energy; and Whereas, attention to sustainability and furtherance of the City's climate action goals is essential to a determination by the Council that this project demonstrates excellence in building design and is designed in a manner that contributes to the quality and character of the neighborhood. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that 1. The request for 1 -story of height bonus for the above-described property and project based upon a contribution to the City's public art fund is hereby approved. The amount of the contribution will be determined in accordance with Code Section 14 -2G -7G(6) at the time an application for a building permit is made with the City and shall be paid prior to issuance of any building permit for the above-described property. 2. The request for 3 -stories of height bonus for leadership in energy and environmental design for the above-described property and project is hereby approved subject to the following: a. The improvements and restoration to Ralston Creek shall substantially comply with the site landscape plan [Attachment 1 hereto] and the Conditional Zoning Agreement. b. The project shall be designed and constructed to at least LEED Silver standards under the National Green Building Standards or the LEED Green Building Rating System appropriate to the building type, according to those standards in effect at the time a building permit is issued. The Developer's registered and LEED-accredited architect must verify that the building has been constructed to meet this standard, including a list of the point calculation based on actual on-site achievements and a narrative explaining how each point was achieved. Said verification must be satisfactory to the City Manager or designee prior to issuance of an occupancy permit. LEED certification, however, shall not be required. At least 8 points shall be achieved for the LEED-NC Optimized Energy Performance credit. c. The buildings shall utilize rooftop solar modules to generate at least 42,000 kWh annually. d. The buildings shall utilize only "low -flow fixtures" in the residential units and common bathrooms. "Low flow fixtures" shall be those that exceed the City's current code requirements by 20% or a lower percentage if the City Manager or designee determines that 20% is not achievable. e. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit, the owner shall demonstrate that the building and site improvements have been designed and constructed in accordance with these conditions. f. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the project, the owner shall execute an agreement committing to the above-described conditions, committing to the on- going maintenance thereof and agreeing that a violation of these conditions shall be considered a violation of Iowa City Code of Ordinances, Title 14, Zoning Code and enforced in accordance with Iowa City Code Section 14-7C-5. Said agreement shall Resolution No. ?n-246 Page 3 run with the land and be binding upon the owner, its successors and assigns. The City Manager is hereby granted the authority to execute said agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, and the City Clerk is hereby granted the authority and directed to record said agreement at owner's expense. 3. The Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Iowa City, Iowa are hereby authorized and directed to certify and attest this resolution. 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to record this Resolution and any and all supporting agreements with the Johnson County Recorder at the owner's expense. Passed and approved this 20th day of October —,202(l Mayor: Approved by: I Attest: fl - Kellie Fruehling, City Clerk City Attorney's Office (Sara Greenwood Hektoen - 10/15/2020) Resolution No. 2n-746 Page 4 It was moved by trims and seconded by Salih the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: AYES: NAYS ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner MA XCAFE MAINTENANCE F WI"p4WA6 AND Ng■OUNpND APf/6 AS WITH MY LANDSCAPED AREA. MAINTENANCE LATHE KEY TO KEEPING THE PROCESM FUNCTIONING CORRECTLYM PINI AS ENSURING THAT THE AREA STAYS MAN AND ATTPACTNE. WE HAVE PUT TWETHERATYPICALPLAN BELOW FOR PROPOSED MAINTENANCE ACTNRIES IN THE BACMALES. WHDIrIG-Ek L�FOD:NAN yBYNAND. RMWEN DESIRABLE EPLANT GALL WE E ON D FROM BIOS ALES BY IERBICISANDNONRELIED TO MATE ARESHALLIS REMOVEDFROMEBIOLOI BYMOCESS FOR AGNSONLY. NO HERBICIDES SHALL BE APPLIED TO THE MALE AREA AS THIS MAY DISRUPT THE BIOLOGICAL PROCESS fORFIITgATN)N. YMTERNG-RlrHOp UW WLLY BY HANDIpFAN10NAlG1tLY UYNipE NO NEEDED WITHIN THES ALE ARMFUNL CONSECUWATERINGGNOTNEEDED SZON THE THESURRSUNLESS THERETIAN SYSTEM MA NEED TO CON INSTALLED GAYS. TO MOISTURE METERS 20NEDTOTHE SURROUNDINGS L OINV SYSTEMMAYNEEDTO K TUBI N S O LD BE TO ALLOW FOR IRRIGATION DURING THESE PERIODS LOW VOIUME BPRAY Hp05 ANOIOR DRY' TUNING SHOULD BE UTILIZED HERETO MINIMIZE RUNOFF. 1FRIIIIAlION - RETIYDR MAN WILY BY HAND. NS GEN NFEDFO pIEN FH LFE DRwoN SDL mDULY TEST. BYDESIGN THE BIOSWALETHERFOERALLY CONTAINNUTRIENT LEVELS RARTWWILYNRROGEN) FACTOR THAN NORMAL SOIL LEVELS.ATION WOULD UNLIKELY EUNNECTHATSOB RECOMWILL OF FACTORTIRANT GAKYWH.AND IF PLANT WE RECOMMEND TESTING THE SOIL FERTILRYIN THE ORGAN ANNUALLY OR IF PUNT MATERIAL SHOWS SIGNS RI DECLINE IF FERTILIZATION N NECESSARY, APPLY ONLY ORGANIC FERTILIZER THAT WILL PROVIDE NECESSARY NUTRIENTS WITHOUT DISRUPTING 506 LEE. RMC WIG - YETHOD: MAN W ICY BY HAND. ilYWREO/:EYERY B-12RTNT ROLE AHDSINGING THE MULCH LAYER P MULCH IMPORTANT ROI£NTHE DECOMPOSE PROPERTIES FOR REMOVA OF POLLUTANTS MCHASOTH MELT MULCH IARM AREDESIGNEDBE DTOUECOMPOTEOVER TOP ADDING IMPORTANT COMPLETE BACK INTO THESOIL THESWAYAREASS NEEDS . VDUALLYINSPECTED MONTHLY OF S ENSURE HARDWOOD ECOVERAGE. BARE GOTS SHOULD BE TOUCHED -UPAS NEEDED. RE-AFPDAR 3'OWN IMAXIMUM LAVER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH EVERY 6 MONTHS TO THE SWAB ARKS. MULCH SHALL BE DARK BROWN IN COLORANO FREE Q PESTS. lg■gRHG Of1UNTW1pW-1ETTIOp MANLLALYgY HAND. E ENTXYNBEENDSUDLTYPS nMDIIGTOROID THECALANTS IDTD BE CU ORNAMENTALGRASSFSANDSLED TO FASTANDINGTO PROVIDEWINTFAINTEREST. THEY EANTSSHWID BE CUT BACKYVTHEY IN EARLY SETING TO SHRUM WY NEW GRONRH, DDE M Na DAMAGED PAPTSSHOUW BE PRUNED AS THEY OCCUR. TPEES ANO SHRUBS MqY BE PRUNED TOR SHAPERS NDW D. VW. iOEgI■EDIWA-IEIIEOp YESWMFR9GLJ♦CANS RNiML EYENS0IIlYNHECTANDRBOYERY IMND. TRF: . RFMFNIY OR MONTEIY 110E S11E 161. STORM WATER RUNOFT HE R ROUTINE THE BIOSWAEB MAY C E FORTASH AND DEBR6. THE BIOSWALL MAINTENANCE A INSPICTEDPERSONNEL AS PARTOMEDIAE THE ROUTINE WFICANT E MAINTENANCE FORRET NR AS WELLAS BY ON -NR MNNTEM FROM PERSONNEL UNSIGHTLY. ATERASIGNFX:ANT RAIN EVENTTO FNSURETHEAGSSIAYCIFAN AND NEEP THEM igOM BECOMING UN6IGHRY. . PETIMUE EmpR1L.IREERIp MINMALYRFNAFID. lRlil': MIE MYAFIERD occ TLE THERE WILL BEA DESIGNATED AREA TO WALK PETSON-SRE THATWU BELOCATEDAWAYFROM THE BIOSWAE AREAS. THERE WILL BE PET STATIONS PROWDED N THDARFATOASSIST TENANTSIN DISPOSING OFTHER PER WASTE. TENANTS WRIAGREE TO UTIIZE THIS LOCATION ONLY ANDCLEAN UP AIERTHOR PEISAS PAR Of THELE raa RGIREMENT. THE MANAGEMENT STAFF WILL MMETENANTSAWARE Of FINES THAT WILL BENSESYD IF THEY DO NOTFOLLOW THESE RULES, INMDRION.ON-SREMNNTENANCEPERSONNELWILLYPOIICNGTHEBpSAAFSTOPEMOWE PETWASTE THAT MAY OCCUR IN THEY AREAS. LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS UOPOYDPU■C�I MTSLUVTINE 1 I I I MIES OPEN SPACE 1Z o I F— EAST PRENTISS STREET � E\ T UUI`� IIIIII I I I ,�jUP �9r ISYIQIRPIII 'I l', rr .�I� —I�YIE1E1 dl r1L�lI� 1 IIW iIL�141� ill I��III� 141 t c..::A wa Ill'H el�lll� II': _..e 11. Mil RME PLANT SCHE� II�IIIIIA4[I �',¢ E IILWI �Mii 1 �S _SaI €3.�.xliJl'i� � S. �� FrURage, 411g1h Tfaa,/N ■.n PralMail masO I O' l 5Large 6Slnall eEwhyenel me nlam ko Raveneain uuii uHM`u w $IIItaE/30/'A a6Small w+nuwasx.0 UleyhKeLAW MmJ,UMIN AIfMor emra Ow.r.nrAac«Tmw..w�Axmrlw m.. w. .uws c.�inlcsaxxsNwxw.w IRk .Esau: .,w.muDecwmns..m¢R reixlsnRm' N.s m. • NNauAww..IUMwR,wm..w.0 owawr TIE uEa Trees +wviAssis"Pu"cswwuuscw.vuN ,P6MA�nmrN.mCN.., Easiva rn In— ee-- UMP -W SrKAI -a Iwn A a mmmum of MY bewe ru a �m,R� ww ww R mw a N n,w B0.1 MO°w RAT MargeIS mk,M-M6Caam Rmes,'(hemHPrwm eAro. emnm Il eme.m me RasawllmuxlrwlM®.u. rue Iaelra car 3Small 25ma11 ani u�w e u cx �w woarvicrv�l01W1(B®q ` Owo.wso.yuu.�waw«cm+NnMeHR m. u w YFm aub/cNMURRfdI¢R�ngpA'RN¢rOmiRK ra c ¢RaPOCOV6a wllm,.cvrw4 gaRff aiwalakasewvvvn,u Nocan wx/lmuwn,roms® uxlms®s. xcwwuwlmsNps.cou..� xtt/wov xo re. Mwx.vaawcEcpu LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS UOPOYDPU■C�I MTSLUVTINE 1 I I I MIES OPEN SPACE 1Z o I F— EAST PRENTISS STREET � E\ T UUI`� IIIIII I I I ,�jUP �9r ISYIQIRPIII 'I l', rr .�I� —I�YIE1E1 dl r1L�lI� 1 IIW iIL�141� ill I��III� 141 t c..::A wa Ill'H el�lll� II': _..e 11. Mil RME PLANT SCHE� II�IIIIIA4[I �',¢ E IILWI �Mii 1 �S _SaI €3.�.xliJl'i� � S. �� FrURage, 411g1h Tfaa,/N ■.n PralMail Nota, I O' l 5Large 6Slnall eEwhyenel me nlam ko Raveneain uuii uHM`u w $IIItaE/30/'A a6Small w+nuwasx.0 UleyhKeLAW MmJ,UMIN AIfMor emra vua"`i cu�..a mwscor,uw wn,eInrc M N the yrtIANdremnMIw 1E-7+6lR .uws c.�inlcsaxxsNwxw.w IRk .Esau: ® sta.Raa owi:o`Nra:46OAw ema< KtXGRAMAG-» orli Small Trees +wviAssis"Pu"cswwuuscw.vuN Easiva rn In— ee-- UMP -W SrKAI -a Iwn A a mmmum of MY bewe ru South Gllbett B0.1 MO°w RAT MargeIS mk,M-M6Caam Rmes,'(hemHPrwm eAro. emnm Il eme.m me RasawllmuxlrwlM®.u. rue Iaelra LANDSCAPE CODE REQUIREMENTS UOPOYDPU■C�I MTSLUVTINE 1 I I I MIES OPEN SPACE 1Z o I F— EAST PRENTISS STREET � E\ T UUI`� IIIIII I I I ,�jUP �9r ISYIQIRPIII 'I l', rr .�I� —I�YIE1E1 dl r1L�lI� 1 IIW iIL�141� ill I��III� 141 t c..::A wa Ill'H el�lll� II': _..e 11. Mil RME PLANT SCHE� II�IIIIIA4[I �',¢ E IILWI �Mii 1 �S _SaI €3.�.xliJl'i� � S. �� FrURage, 411g1h Tfaa,/N Required PralMail Nota, I O' l 5Large 6Slnall eEwhyenel me nlam ko Raveneain Fut Prentiss $IIItaE/30/'A a6Small Tree UleyhKeLAW MmJ,UMIN AIfMor emra wn,eInrc M N the yrtIANdremnMIw 1E-7+6lR Ralston Creek 32T 14rge/10'alaarge 8Llrge Small/30' orli Small Trees rn In— ee-- UMP -W SrKAI -a Iwn A a mmmum of MY bewe ru South Gllbett B0.1 Marge/10' cr121 me MargeIS mk,M-M6Caam Rmes,'(hemHPrwm eAro. emnm Il eme.m me Small/30' car 3Small 25ma11 Pnesnne., rueeawrrrnme.mrveu MumYev¢RwrhlAeAxxmlEENlro eR:fAnpaoRav' 3.060 d OCCUPIED OPEN SPACE i "lure" $' w'R"fie° ■ � I \ 1 \ \ I \ I 1 t—SEE ENLARGED VIEW 7' ON SHT. L1.1 E 4I \ I \ I I / =SEE ENLARGED VIEW 70N SHT.1.1.1 EEC I I I I I I \ 41 I' �1 I SEE ENLARGED VIEW TON SHT, L7.1 EO 0 60 NA SCAF: 1' al SITE LANDSCAPE PLAN TIES WA'MN4¢TKfMYgrya LG®\W MWIa/SSCLw16. uL.Wo¢NoiroRmPC4116n.CCMn.M xlFgpn MNllf MaMM YmMWTMN1gI4IXIORnNw�wEV aACttNTFS. CHIN I 4$AUM .4� ,k; O� O� a a SOC1 At www.lovbabawn some nn Of 0 TO i N a- 0 L J '4—A W v / U1 t9 w N O Cl - N a z QELU ¢ co L � 3 aPFCACCIDE IXUWNBY Cp REVIENEDBT I p1 ISSUED DATE I DESCRIPTION 41D01 EORCIIYR R3 E1 FORC 6ISN ORc,. EW B - FRLTnY REVISIONS PRELIMINARY PLAN SHEET L1.0 SCREEN WMLLz6MJ Item Number: 11. 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY ��.:. -dry in � at COUNCIL ACTION REPORT October 20, 2020 Resolution approving project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Sludge Storage Tank Masonry Repair Project, establishing amount of bid security to accompany each bid, directing City Clerk to post notice to bidders, and fixing time and place for receipt of bids. Prepared By: Ben Clark, Sr. Civil Engineer Reviewed By: Jason Havel, City Engineer Ron Knoche, Public Works Director Geoff Fruin, City Manager Fiscal Impact: The estimated cost of construction is $165,000 and will be funded through the Wastewater Administration account # 72720110. Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: N/A Attachments: Picture Resolution Executive Summary: This agenda item continues the bidding process for the Sludge Storage Tank Masonry Repair Project. This project involves repairing a failure of the masonry fagade on Sludge Storage Tank 8801. Background /Analysis: The sludge storage (belt filter press) feed tank is a reinforced concrete tank with a masonry facing and aluminum dome cover that was built during the original south plant construction in 1989. A section of the masonry facing recently failed with a section of the bricks falling to the ground. The masonry facing has suffered from moisture issues, possibly due to the way the original dome cover and flashing system was installed. The project will involve repairs to the masonry, dome cover seal and flashing systems. ATTACHMENTS: Description Picture Resolution .. ,.,� 4 - _- k 0 \� \- . •wj ��+.f - ..:� |\ _ . /�- . lk \ ~ --- §- \-. - \ _ � \ \ , . , > 11-W _ �� � ' r�� ■ . .. �a . . STAFF PRESENTATION TO FOLLOW: 1 r I C04;qui h CITY OF lOVVA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa S2240-1826 (319) 356-5000 (3I9) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org Sludge Storage Tank Masonry Repair Project Wastewater Treatment Facility Ben Clark, PE Senior Engineer Engineering Division Public Works Department CID 340TH ST LOWER WE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY +r ,1O'''WAY 6 $E 6: IUTh sr 1 K N � � -� r4 C m �gS �Trk y,� C m in z. in sl = xie 4EtRoa� a�E\� F E COURT ST h �{•1 BENTON ST m W _ 1 y m � :.4 , +n W } P 6 W LU , 3 $ O OSAGE ST 5W OSAGE ST SW { �� N n rn p� CID 340TH ST LOWER WE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY +r ,1O'''WAY 6 $E SLUDGE ' STORAGE TANK 8801 S JA T %p t4 v --Z" EXISTING SEAM WITH FASTENERS EXISTING DOME SUPPORT FRAMING— EXISTING LOWER DOME SIDE PANEL; SEE NOTE 10 SECURE TO SIDE PANEL WITH STAINLESS STEEL FASTENERS; SEE NOTE 11 NEW DOME ROOF FLASHING; SEE FLASHING SECTION THIS DRAWING VARIES SEE NOTES TOP OF MASONRY TOP OF CONCRETE w � CAVITY WALL FLASHING - 0 q SEALANT w C1 3!4" h WEEP SLOT STAINLESS STEEL DRIP 4" FACE BRICK (MATCH EXISTING) - ADJUSTABLE VENEER ANCHOR PLATES AT 16" ON CENTER (VERTICALLY AND HORIZONTALLY) V RIGID INSULATION; MECHANICALLY FASTEN TO TANK WALL L-L, TYPICAL TOP OF WALL DETAIL �n DOME TENSION BEAM SECURE TOP OF CAVITY WALL FLASHING TO EXISTING CONCRETE TANK WALL WITH FASTENERS AT 16" ON CENTER SECURE CAVITY WALL FLASHING TO EXISTING CONCRETE TANK INNER WALL WITH FASTENERS AT 16" ON CENTER; SET IN BED OF SEALANT EXISTING CONCRETE TANK WALL EXISTING ANCHOR CHANNEL; ABANDON IN PLACE i 9 a ' I a.. e. i a, i i i as i e _ a i � 4 i a < i i b m e i - g . i. i i 8 i a i a i L-L, TYPICAL TOP OF WALL DETAIL �n DOME TENSION BEAM SECURE TOP OF CAVITY WALL FLASHING TO EXISTING CONCRETE TANK WALL WITH FASTENERS AT 16" ON CENTER SECURE CAVITY WALL FLASHING TO EXISTING CONCRETE TANK INNER WALL WITH FASTENERS AT 16" ON CENTER; SET IN BED OF SEALANT EXISTING CONCRETE TANK WALL EXISTING ANCHOR CHANNEL; ABANDON IN PLACE STAFF PRESENTATION CONCLUDED � r rrM as � h CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Strect Iowa City, Iowa 52240-1826 (3 19) 356-5000 (3 19) 356-5009 FAX www. icgov. o rg jt. Prepared by: Ben Clark, Public Works, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240, (319)356-5436 Resolution No. 20-247 Resolution approving project manual and estimate of cost for the construction of the Sludge Storage Tank Masonry Repair Project, establishing amount of bid security to accompany each bid, directing City Clerk to post notice to bidders, and fixing time and place for receipt of bids. Whereas, notice of public hearing on the project manual and estimate of cost for the above-named project was published as required by law, and the hearing thereon held; and Whereas, the City Engineer or designee intends to post notice of the project on the website owned and maintained by the City of Iowa City; and Whereas, funds for this project are available in the Wastewater Administration account # 72720110 Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa that: 1. The project manual and estimate of cost for the above-named project are hereby approved. 2. The amount of bid security to accompany each bid for the construction of the above-named project shall be in the amount of 10% (ten percent) of bid payable to Treasurer, City of Iowa City, Iowa. 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post notice as required in Section 26.3, not less than 13 days and not more than 45 days before the date of the bid letting, which may be satisfied by timely posting notice on the Construction Update Network, operated by the Master Builder of Iowa, and the Iowa League of Cities website. 4. Sealed bids for the above-named project are to be received by the City of Iowa City, Iowa, at the Office of the City Clerk, at the City Hall, before 3:00 p.m. on the 18th day of November, 2020. At that time, the bids will be opened by the City Engineer or his designee, and thereupon referred to the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, for action upon said bids at its next regular meeting, to be held at the Emma J. Harvat Hall, City Hall, Iowa City, Iowa, at 7:00 p.m. on the 1s' day of December, 2020, or at a special meeting called for that purpose. If City Hall is closed to the public due to the health and safety concerns from COVID-19, sealed bids may still be delivered in person on Mondays through Fridays 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. The person delivering the sealed bid may come to the front lobby of City Hall, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, Iowa, and upon arrival telephone the City Clerk at 319/356-5043. 5. City Hall is currently closed to the public because of the COVID-19. If City Hall remains closed to the public, the meeting will be an electronic meeting using the Zoom Meetings Platform. For information on how to participate in the electronic meeting, see www. Icgov.org/councildocs or telephone the City Clerk. Passed and approved this 20th day of October 2020 Resolution No. 20-247 Page 2 Attest: "1a p oved by �{ l "l. / ` ity Attorney's Office —10/14/2020 It was moved by salih and seconded by 'Taylor the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Item Number: 15. AL CITY OF IOWA CITY =�c�- COUNCIL ACTION REPORT October 20, 2020 Resolution approving Amendment #2 to Iowa City's FY20 Annual Action Plan. Prepared By: Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services Coordinator Reviewed By: Tracy Hightshoe, Neighborhood and Development Services Director Fiscal Impact: Iowa City has been awarded $424,128 in CDBG-CV funds through the federal CARES Act. Recommendations: Staff: Approval Commission: Housing and Community Development will review at their October 15th meeting. Attachments: FY20 Annual Action Plan Amendment #2 Resolution Executive Summary: In light of the ongoing severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, Iowa City is interested in making CDBG funding available to program eligible projects and activities. A high priority has been placed on funding for special economic development assistance to businesses, public facilities (new, expanded, retrofitted, etc.), and public services and/or planning (in some limited cases) that would prevent, prepare for and respond to the impact of the pandemic. Background /Analysis: The City of Iowa City proposes Amendment #2 to the FY20 Annual Action Plan to include $424,128 in CDBG-CV dollars allocated in a third round of funding through the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act. Funds will be used to support economic development activities for businesses impacted by COVID-19 including business loans, grants, or technical assistance as well as project delivery for agencies administering these programs. Amendment #1 to the FY20 Annual Action Plan expanded language for public services, public facilities, economic development, and planning/administrative activities to allow available funds to be used for a community response to the COVID-19 pandemic. CDBG-CV funds made available through the first and second rounds of the CARES Act have been allocated to public service activities including emergency housing assistance and assistance for agencies who serve low- and moderate -income residents who have been impacted by COVI D-19. All of the funds for the first round ($410,422) have been allocated and staff is awaiting agreements from the Iowa Economic Development Authority before we can move forward with the second round of funds ($686,610). Council consideration on October 20, 2020 completes a five-day public comment period. Upon approval, staff will submit the amendment to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). ATTACHMENTS: Description Amendment #2 Resolution FY20 Annual Action Plan Substantial Amendment #2 October 20, 2020 In light of the ongoing severity of the COVID-19 pandemic, Iowa City is interested in making CDBG funding available to program eligible projects and activities. A high priority has been placed on funding for special economic development assistance to businesses, public facilities (new, expanded, retrofitted, etc.), and public services and/or planning (in some limited cases) that would prevent, prepare for and respond to the impact of the pandemic. The proposed FY20 Annual Action Plan Amendment #2 allocates $424,128 in CDBG-CV dollars received through the third round of the CARES Act funds to support Economic Development activities. This includes business loans, grants, or technical assistance for businesses impacted by COVID-19, as well as project delivery for agencies administering these programs. The FY20 Annual Action Plan Amendment #1 expanded language for public services, public facilities, economic development, and planning/administrative activities to allow available funds to be used for community response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Funds made available through the first round of CARES Act funding were allocated to public service activities. The City Council will consider this recommendation on October 20, 2020 following a five-day public comment period and an amendment will be submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) subject to City Council approval. Jurisdiction: City of Iowa City, Iowa Contact Person Jurisdiction Web Address: Brianna Gabel http://www.icgov.org/actionplan Community Development Planner 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 319.356.5240 Brianna-Gabel@Iowa-City.org Proposed Amendment AP -15 Expected Resources Priority Table Source of Funds Source Uses of Funds Expected Narrative Description Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Amount Strengthen 2016 2020 Available Citywide Other CDBG-CV Public — federal Other: To prevent, prepare for $410,422 CDBG-CV funds to be used to and respond to the Coronavirus. prevent, prepare for and CDBG; Assisted 9 $834,550 respond to the Coronavirus AP -20 Annual Goals and Objectives Goals Summary Information Sort Order Goal Name Start Year End Year Category Geographic Area Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator Strengthen 2016 2020 Other Citywide Other $50,000 Businesses economic CDBG; Assisted 9 development $424,128 CDBG-CV AP -38 Project Summary Information Project Summary Information 6 Project Name Economic Development Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Strengthen economic development Provide facilities and services in support of the pandemic response Needs Addressed Economic Development Provide facilities and services in support of the pandemic response Funding CDBG: $50,000; CDBG-CV: $424,128 Description Funding to facilitate the creation and expansion of businesses and create new employment opportunities for LMI people. Small business loan program will address the impact of credit access and reduction of capital for business startups or expansion. Funding may also be used to support he community response to the COVID-19 pandemic including a variety of economic development activities including but not limited to loans, loan guarantees, grants, and technical assistance to businesses to alleviate the impact of the outbreak. Target Date 6/30/2020 Estimate the An estimated two businesses will be assisted, with at least one new job number and type of created or retained per $20,000 in assistance through Economic families that will Development CDBG Funds. benefit from the proposed activities Location Funding is available citywide. The exact addresses of projects will not be Description known until applications have been received, processed and funds awarded. Planned Activities Planned activities at this time include: • Provide business loans and/or grants to microenterprises primarily owned by low-income entrepreneurs or businesses that create jobs of which 51% are made available to LMI persons; and/or • Technical assistance to microenterprises primarily owned by low- income entrepreneurs with an emphasis on increasing the childcare capacity within Iowa City. • Business loans, grants, and/or technical assistance for businesses impacted by COVID-19. Public Comments Received with Staff Response The 5 -day public comment period for the FY20 Annual Action Plan Amendment #2 starts October 15, 2020 and ends October 20, 2020. The City Council is holding a public meeting on October 20, 2020. Comments Received: None to date Staff Response: N/A Appendix B - Revised FY20 Persons / Households / HOME Facilities Project Planned activities CDBG Award Award Assisted Shelter House - A2A $ 8,000 NA 700 Domestic Violence Intervention Program - A2A $ 50,000 NA 600 Public Service Activities Neighborhood Centers of Johnson County - A2A $ 55,000 NA 2,000 COVID-19 Response - Public Services $ 519,000 NA 650 DVIP - Shelter Repair $ 120,000 NA 340 Public Facility Activities Old Brick - ADA Improvements $ 36,000 NA 130 Neighborhood and Neighborhood Improvements Set Aside $ 75,000 NA 300 Area Benefits Homeowner/Rental Housing Comprehensive rehabilitation $ 235,000 $ 90,000 22 Rehabilitation MYEP - Rental New Construction $ - $ 186,000 6 Habitat - Homebuyer Assistance $ $ 53,000 2 Successful Living - Rental Acquisition $ $ 173,000 12 Other Housing Activities Successful Living - Rental Rehabilitation $ $ 62,000 5 THF - Rental Rehabilitation $ $ 74,000 2 THF - CHDO Operating $ $ 22,000 NA Economic Development Economic Development Set-aside $ 50,000 NA 2 COVID-19 Response - Business Assistance $ 424,128 NA 22 CDBG Administration $ 227,000 NA NA Administration & Planning HOME Administration NA $ 54,000 NA Total $ 1,799,128 $ 714,000 4,793 i6, Prepared by: Erika Kubly, Neighborhood Services, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 356-5230 Resolution No. 20-248 Resolution approving Amendment #2 to Iowa City's FY20 Annual Action Plan Whereas, HUD requires the City of Iowa City, Iowa to prepare and submit an Annual Action Plan as part of the City's 2016-2020 Consolidated Plan (CITY STEPS) to plan the use of federal funds to assist lower income residents with housing, jobs, public facilities, and public services; and Whereas, Amendment #1 to the FY20 Annual Action Plan added a goal of provision of public facilities and services in support of the pandemic response and incorporates said goal into public services, public facilities, economic development, and administrative and planning activities; and Whereas, the City of Iowa City has been allocated an additional $424,128 in CDBG-CV funds through the federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act; and Whereas, Amendment #2 to the FY20 Annual Action Plan allocates the additional $424,128 in CDBG-CV dollars received through the CARES Act to support economic development activities including business loans, grants, or technical assistance for businesses impacted by COVID-19 as part of a community response to prevent, prepare for and respond to the impact of the pandemic; and Whereas, the City has disseminated information, solicited public input, and held a public meeting on the amendment to the FY20 Annual Action Plan; and Whereas, the amended FY20 Annual Action Plan contains the updated allocation of CDBG and HOME funds attached hereto as Appendix B; and Whereas, the City Council finds that the public interest will be served by the approval of an amendment to Iowa City's FY20 Annual Action Plan and submission to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Now, Therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa, that: 1. Amendment #2 to the City of Iowa City FY20 Annual Action Plan is hereby approved and adopted. 2. The City Council authorizes the City Manager to submit to HUD all necessary certifications or documents related to the submission of the amendment to Iowa City's FY20 Annual Action Plan. Passed and approved this 201 day of October, 2020. Resolution No. 20-248 Page 2 Attest: City Clerk �a Mayor 1' , 4. (7); /- - - City Attorney's Office — 10/15/2020 It was moved by Salih and seconded by Weiner the Resolution be adopted, and upon roll call there were: Ayes: Nays: Absent: x Bergus x Mims x Salih x Taylor x Teague x Thomas x Weiner Kellie Fruehlina From: Maria Padron <marialorena.padron@icloud.com> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 12:59 PM To: Council; Brianna Gabel Late Handouts Distributed Subject: FY20 Annual Action Plan - Substantial Amendment #2 Attachments: Letter to Council - Amendment 2.pdf; ATT00001.htm AA RIK RE: FY20 Annual Action Plan - Substantial Amendment #2 Dear city council, Please find attached my request for this topic. Thank you, Maria Padron 2-0 (Date) Maria Padron Iowa City, IA 52240 (319) 930-9528 marialorena.padron@gmail.com October 19, 2020 City Council 410 E Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240 RE: FY20 Annual Action Plan - Substantial Amendment #2 Honorable Members of the City Council, I am proposing the following changes to the FY20 Annual Action Plan - Substantial Amendment #2: 1. That 50% of the $424,128 funds are allocated for grants for micro -businesses (instead of small businesses) 2. Priority of these grants to micro -businesses owned by communities of color, refugees, immigrants, LGBTQ and other vulnerable populations. 3. Reduce grant amount from the $15,000 proposed to $8,000 in order to be able to help more businesses. 4. 25% of the $424,128 funds to be used to create grants for technical assistance for non-profit organizations, including legacy and emerging agencies. 5. 25% of the $424,128 funds to be used to create a grant program for internet and cell phone bill assistance for residents. Mainly for households with members who are working from home, or where there are kids studying from home. Current utility assistance does not include internet and cell phone bills. Now that residents have been forced to work and study remotely due to COVID19, these utilities are essential. Thank you for your consideration, Maria Padron Page 1 of 1 Item Number: 16. 1 CITY OF IOWA CITY ��.:. -dry in � at COUNCIL ACTION REPORT October 20, 2020 Resolution adopting an assessment schedule of unpaid mowing, clean-up of property, snow removal, sidewalk repair, and stop box repair charges and directing the Clerk to certify the same to the Johnson County Treasurer for collection in the same manner as property taxes. Prepared By: Kellie K. Fruehling, City Clerk Reviewed By: Sue Dulek, Assistant City Attorney Fiscal Impact: No impact Recommendations: Staff: Approval 1 •1 1 • " ► /G1 Attachments: Resolution w/ Exhibits A and B Executive Summary: This resolution is to adopt an assessment schedule for unpaid mowing, property clean-up, snow removal, sidewalk repair, and stop box repair. Background /Analysis: The City has the authority under Iowa Code §364.13B to assess the nuisance abatement costs in the same manner as a property tax. This resolution allows the City Clerk to certify to the Johnson County Treasurer the abatement cost to be assessed against the property. This assessment is being pursued only after the City took many steps to resolve the matter. The City notified the homeowners to abate the nuisance (for example, to remove snow from the sidewalk) and after the homeowner did not take action to abate the nuisance, the City abated the nuisance and billed the owner. After being billed at least twice, these owners still have not paid the abatement costs. The City has sent a letter to the homeowner giving them notice that this resolution would be on the agenda, a copy of which is attached to the resolution. No interest will be charged if the owner pays within 30 days of the first required publication. Attached as an exhibit to the resolution is a list of the properties that will be assessed and the amount that will be assessed. ATTACHMENTS: Description Resolution Exhibit A Exhibit B ! to. Prepared by: Kellie Fruehling, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240-319-356-5040 RESOLUTION NO. 20-249 Resolution adopting an assessment schedule of unpaid mowing, clean-up of property, snow removal, sidewalk repair, and stop box repair charges and directing the Clerk to certify the same to the Johnson County Treasurer for collection in the same manner as property taxes. Whereas, the City Clerk has filed with the City Clerk an assessment schedule providing the amount to be assessed against certain lots for the actual unpaid abatement costs of mowing, cleaning up property, removing snow, repairing sidewalks, and repairing stop boxes in the same manner as property taxes; Whereas, said schedule is attached as Exhibit A to this resolution and incorporated herein by this reference; Whereas, Iowa Code § 364.13B authorizes the City Council to assess against the property said abatement costs in the same manner as property taxes; and Whereas, the City Council finds that the property owners listed in Exhibit A have received a written notice of the date and time of the public hearing on the adoption of said assessment schedule, in substantially the same form attached hereto as Exhibit B. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Iowa City, Iowa: Exhibit A is adopted as the final assessment schedule pursuant to Iowa Code § 384.60(1). The amounts listed in Exhibit A for unpaid mowing charges, clean-up property charges, snow removal charges, sidewalk repair charges and stop box repair charges are confirmed and levied against the properties listed in Exhibit A. All unpaid assessments not paid within thirty (30) days after the first publication of the final assessment schedule shall bear interest at the rate of 9% per annum, commencing on December 3, 2020. Assessments are payable at Johnson Country Treasurer, 13 South Dubuque Street, Iowa City, Iowa. Until December 2, 2020 payment maybe made at the City Clerk, 410 E. Washington Street, Iowa City, Iowa. The City Clerk is hereby directed to certify the schedule as set out in Exhibit A to the Treasurer of Johnson County, Iowa for collection in the same manner as property taxes. The assessment cannot be paid in installments. The City Clerk is further directed to publish notice of the schedule once each week for two consecutive weeks in the manner provided in Iowa Code § 362.3, the first publication of which shall be not more than fifteen (15) days from the date of filing of the final assessment schedule. Passed and approved this 20th day of October '2020. ATTEST A r ved by Y//O,A,iw A (2�lz C ttorney's Office — 1 0/1 512 02 0 It was moved by Mims and seconded by Weiner adopted, and upon roll call there was: AYES: ki suetOrd&ReslAbateRes.dm NAYS: ABSENT: Bergus Mims Salih Taylor Teague Thomas Weiner Resolution be CITY OF IOWA CITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE OF UNPAID WEED REMOVAL, SIDEWALK REPAIR, SNOW REMOVAL, STOP BOX REPAIR, AND PROPERTY CLEANUP Service(s) Date of Cost of Balance Property Address Legal Description Parcel Number Appraised Value Property Owner Rendered Servica(s) Service invoice# Outstanding 911 E IOWA AVE GOVERNOR SQUARE E 80' OF W 160' OF N 160' 1010416003 365 450.00 ANTONIADES CONSTANTINE Snow Removal 2/5/2020 257.00 76784 257.00 410 MELROSE CT BROOKLAND PARK ADDITION LOT 15 1016139005 287 650.00 BARKALOW INVESTMENTS INC Snow Removal 211/2020 365.00 76757 365.00 EAST IOWA CITY W 100' LOT 1 & W 100' OF N 20' LOT 2 BLK BAUGHMAN, NORMA 1931 E COURT ST 37 1014104002 141 520.00 J LIGOOQ RITA K Snow Removal 12020 311.00 76933 311.00 1218 E COLLEGE ST CLARK & BORLANDS ADDITION W 40' OF S 93.3' LOT 8 BLK 2 1011382005 189 650.00 DEVALOLS RORY T Snow Removal 1/28/2020 223.00 76907 223.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) S 45'N 105' OF W 80' OUTLOT 324 N GOVERNOR ST 7 1010184008 133 110.00 FASELT JOHN A & NANCY A Snow Removal 2/212020 245.00 76745 245.00 FORBES, CHRISTOPHER & 3237 LAKE FOREST AVE OAKWOODS ADDITION PART 6 LOT 312 1012185005 189 680.00 MELISSA Snow Removal 21312020 257.00 76630 257.00 301 5 LUCAS ST IOWA CCtt ORIGINAL TOWN N 40' OF E 84' OUTLOT 28 1010484001 151 930.00 H & G PARTNERSHIP Snow Removal 2/6/2020 245.00 76737 245.00 73 HICKORY HEIGHTS LN HICKORY HEIGHTS LOT 9HICKORY HEIGHTS LOT 9 1002428013 719 900.00 HONG DEREK N Snow Removal 2/3/2020 245.00 76637 245.00 202 ELLIS AVE SYVERUD'S SUBD OF PT BLK 4 MANVILLE HGTS LOT EPSILON 1009182003 644 930.00 IOWA ACACIANS Snow Removal 2/5/2020 341.00 76731 341.00 306 WINDSOR DR WINDSOR HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION LOT 10 1011167003 197 960.00 JOSS MARY JANE Snow Removal 2/1/2020 317.00 76738 317.00 69 AMHURST ST COURT HILL SCOTT BOULEVARD ADD PART 6 LOT 82 1012417010 226 410.00 MCDUFFIE WARREN & ADRIANE Snow Removal 2/2/2020 245.00 76634 245.00 314 S 7TH AVE COLLEGE COURT ADDITION LOT 4 BLK 3 1011458006 194 910.00 MILLER CELESTE & SYDNEY Snow Removal 2/3/2020 257.00 76740 257.00 300 WINDSOR DR WINDSOR HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION LOT 11 1011167004 233 710.00 MILLER, MATTHEW RYAN Snow Removal 2020 287.00 76736 287.00 1027 SHERIDAN AVE REGAN'S ADDITION LOT 4 BLK 1 IXC S 68.8' 1014254001 295 380.00 MILLER, MICHAEL J Snow Removal 2/1/2020 343.00 76897 343.00 CHAUTAUQUA HEIGHTS ADDITION LOT 4 BLK 9 & E 20.5' LOT NDIKUMANA, SARAH 819 RIVER ST 3 BLK 9 1009276007 338 200.00 NDIKUMANA AMINI Snow Removal 2020 235.00 76778 235.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) OUTLOT 33 EXC S 170'& S 35' OUTLOT 34 & PT OF VACATED BROWN ST DESC IN BK 870 PG 141 & INCL PT OF VACATED BROWN ST W OF DUBUQUE ST DESC IN BK 137 PG 23 & BK 151 PG 249, IXC ROW DESC IN PHI DELTA THETA HOUSE ASSOC 729 N DUBUQUE ST BK 5473 PG 138 1010203005 802 760.00 OF IOWA CITY Snow Removal 14/2020 245.00 76773 245.00 TCHOMRANA, LYDIE 1658 BURNS AVE HOLLYWOOD MANOR ADDITION PART 5 LOT 195 1023286004 17Y 470.00 NGOY KINGUNYA Snow Removal 2/3/2020 245.00 76921 245.00 BRAVERMAN CENTER SLY 81AT LOT 1 & NLY 9.53' LOT 2 & ELY 65.64' OF S 81.4T LOT 6 & ELY 65.64' OF NLY 9.53' LOT 5 1927 KEOKUK ST BLK 5 1022102002 364 420.00 ITHE MISFITS ISnow Removal 12/3/2020 185.00 76932 185.00 WATER13URY PROPERTY 1814 FLATIRON AVE MOUNT PROSPECT ADDITION PART 3 LOT 143 1023152009 183 640.00 MANAGEMENT LLC Snow Removal 12/3/2020 257.00 1 76925 257.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) 5 45OF W 80' OF N 150' 320 N GOVERNOR ST OLI LOT 7 1010184009 216 760.00 YOUNG CHAD A Snow Removal 12/1/2020 157.00 1 76744 157.00 Dear Property Owner: This is to notify you that the City Council will be considering a resolution on October 20, 2020 that will assess against your property the cost that the City has incurred to do one of the following: unpaid mowing, clean-up of property, snow removal, sidewalk repair, or stop box repair charges. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the bill. If the City Council approves the assessment against your property, the amount will be collected by the Johnson County Treasurer in the same manner as a property tax. The City Council meeting begins at 7:00 pm and will be held via Zoom Meeting Platform. Meeting information will be available on www.icciov.org after 3:00 p.m. October 15th. If you want to challenge the assessment, you are advised to attend the City Council meeting. You may also submit a letter or email to the City Council. The mailing address is: City Council, % City Clerk, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 and the email address is council -iowa-city.org Please note that all communication with City Council is a public record. If you pay the amount due in full before the City Council meeting, the resolution will not include an assessment against your property. You can make the payment by mailing or coming in person to the City Clerk's office, 410 East Washington Street, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. If property is assessed and the amount is not paid within the specified 30 days, interest will accrue at a rate set by the City Council. If you have any questions about the resolution, please contact my office at 356-5041. Sincerely, Kellie Fruehling City Clerk Enc. Copy to: Accounting Division-w/enc. Exhibit B `ISI ti CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Sircct Iowa City. Iowa 52240-1826 October 13, 2020 {3 356 -sono {3119) 41 356-5009 FAX «Property_Qwner» www. icgov. org «Mailing_Address)) «City)), <(State)) «ZIP)) Dear Property Owner: This is to notify you that the City Council will be considering a resolution on October 20, 2020 that will assess against your property the cost that the City has incurred to do one of the following: unpaid mowing, clean-up of property, snow removal, sidewalk repair, or stop box repair charges. Enclosed for your information is a copy of the bill. If the City Council approves the assessment against your property, the amount will be collected by the Johnson County Treasurer in the same manner as a property tax. The City Council meeting begins at 7:00 pm and will be held via Zoom Meeting Platform. Meeting information will be available on www.icciov.org after 3:00 p.m. October 15th. If you want to challenge the assessment, you are advised to attend the City Council meeting. You may also submit a letter or email to the City Council. The mailing address is: City Council, % City Clerk, 410 E. Washington St., Iowa City, IA 52240 and the email address is council -iowa-city.org Please note that all communication with City Council is a public record. If you pay the amount due in full before the City Council meeting, the resolution will not include an assessment against your property. You can make the payment by mailing or coming in person to the City Clerk's office, 410 East Washington Street, between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. If property is assessed and the amount is not paid within the specified 30 days, interest will accrue at a rate set by the City Council. If you have any questions about the resolution, please contact my office at 356-5041. Sincerely, Kellie Fruehling City Clerk Enc. Copy to: Accounting Division-w/enc. ExhibitA - as aF 1011420 CITY OF IOWA CITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE OF UNPAID WEED REMOVAL. SIDEWALK REPAIR. SNOW REMOVAL. STOP BOX REPAIR. AND PROPERTY CLEANUP M, Service(s) Date of Cost of Balance Property Address Legal Description Parcel Number Appraised Value Property Owner Rendered Service(s) Service invoice # Outstanding OHL'S SUBDIVISION THAT PART OF LOT 4 AS DESC IN BK 397 1910 LOWER MUSCATINE PG 210 EXC THAT LAND CONVEYED TO CITY OF IOWA CITY RD FOR ROW IN BK 4759 PG 797 1014458005 650 080.00 1910 LOWER MUSCATINE LLC Snow Removal 1/28/2020 874.00 76929 874.00 L'S SUBDIVISION THAT PART OF LOT 4 AS DESC IN BK 397 1910 LOWER MUSCATINE PG 10 EXC THAT LAND CONVEYED TO CITY OF IOWA CITY RD FOR W IN BK 4759 PG 797 1014458005 650 080.00 1910 LOWER MUSCATINE LLC Snow Removal 2/1412020 S 287.00 76930 287.00 YAKISFNSTATES SUBDIVISION LOT 2 EXC THAT LAND CON TO CITY OF IOWA CITY FOR ROW AS DESC IN BK 1312 SPRUCE ST 4733 PG 92 1014321004 182 010.00 712 REAL ESTATE PARTNERS LLC Snow Removal 1/20/2020 283.00 76912 283.00 YAKISH ESFA SUBDIVISION LOT 2 EXC THAT LAND CONVEYED TO OF IOWA CITY FOR ROW AS DESC IN BK 1312 SPRUCE ST 4733 PG 925 1014321004 182 010.00 712 REAL ESTATE PARTNERS LLC Snow Removal 2/14/20201 245.00 7wa--r$ 7w1 --r$ 245.00 911 E IOWA AVE GOVERNOR 5 UARE EX OF W 160' OF N 160' 1010416003 365 450.00 ANTONIADES CONSTANTINE Snow Removal 21512020 257.00 6784 5 257.00 410 MELROSE CT BROOKLAND PARK ADDrrNN LOT 15 1016139005 287 650.00 BARKALOW INVESTMENTS INC Snow Removal 2/1/2020 365 76757 365.00 EAST IOWA CITY W 100' LO & W 100' OF N 20' LOT 2 BLK BAUGHMAN, NORMA 1931 E COURT ST 37 1014104002 14Y 520.00 J LIGOCKI RITA K Snow Removal 21112020 311.00 76933 311.00 2733 WAYNE AVE TOWNCREST ADDITION PART 3 LO BUC 5 1013314001 189 770.00 COFFIN DREW J Snow Removal 1/2 20 330.00 76517 330.00 2733 WAYNE AVE TOWNCREST ADDITION PART 3 LOT5 1013314001 189 770.00 COFFIN DREW J Snow Removal 4/2020 266.00 76516 266.00 1218 E COLLEGE ST CLARK & BORLANDS ADDITION W 40' OF 3.3' LOT 8 BLK 2 1011382005 189 650.00 DEVALOIS RORY T Snow Rem 1 282020 223.00 76907 223.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) S 45'N 105' W 80' OUTLOT 324 N GOVERNOR ST 7 1010184008 133 110.00 FASELT JOHN A & NANCY ARemoval 21212020 245.00 76745 5 245.00 FORBES, CHRISTOPHER & 3237 LAKE FOREST AVE OAKWOODS ADDITION PART 6 LOT 312 1012165005 189 680.00 MELISSA Snow Removal 213/2020 257.00 76630 257.00 3015 LUCAS ST IOWA CITY ORIGINAL TOWN N 40' OF E 84' OUTLOT 28 1010484001 151 930.00 H & G PARTNERSHIP Snow Removal 216/2020 245.00 76737 245.00 1825 HOLLYWOOD CT MOUNT PROSPECT ADDITION PART 4 LOT 179 1023126033 174 880.00 HARRIS SHAWW Snow Removeal 2/3/2020 227.00 76926 127.00 PLUM GROVE ACRES SUBDIVISION, PART THREE LOT B SIC S 65'& IXC BEG NE COR LOT B; N 85 DEG W 50.4' TO I L 1406 KEOKUK ST KEOKUK ST; N 92.5'' S 1 DEG W 92.5' TO POB 1015479 137 540.00 H CHARLES E Snow Removal 2/2/2020 245.00 76916 245.00 73 HICKORY HEIGHTS W HICKORY HEIGHTS LOT 9HICKORY HEIGHTS LOT 9 1002428013 719,900.0D, ONG DEREK N Snow Removal 2/3/2020 245.00 76637 245.00 202 ELLIS AVE SYVERUD'S SUBD OF FT BLK 4 MANVILLE HGTS LOT EPSILON 1009182003 644 9 . 0 IOWA ACACIANS Snow Removal 2/5/2020 341.00 76731 341.00 2354 JESSUP CIR MACBRIDE ADDITION PART 2 LOT 49 1017205021 190.00 IMA PROPERTIES LLC Snow Removal 2 2 2020 1407.00 76507 407.00 306 WINDSOR DR WINDSOR HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION LOT 10 1011167003 19 0.00 JOSS MARY JANE Snow Removal 2/1/2020 317.00 76738 317.00 69 AMHURST ST COURT HILL SCOTT BOULEVARD ADD PART 6 LOT 82 1012417010 226 410. MCDUFFIE WARREN & ADRIANE Snow Removal 21212020 $ 245.00 76634 245.00 314 S 7TH AVE COLLEGE COURT ADDITION LOT 4 BLK 3 101145 ER CELESTE & SYDNEY Snow Removal 2/312020 257.00 76740 257.00 300 WINDSOR DR WINDSOR HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION LOT 11 10 67004 MI MATTHEW RYAN Snow Removal 2/1/2020 $ 287.00 76736 287.00 1027 SHERIDAN AVE REGAN'S ADDITION LOT 4 BLK 1 EXC 5 b8.8' 014254001 MILLER. ELI Snow Removal 2/1/2020 343.00 76897 343.00 CHAUTAUQUA HEIGHTS ADDITION LOT 4 BLK 9 & E 20.5 NDIKUMANA, jqON, 819 RIVER ST 3 BLK 9 1009276007 NDIKUMAN AMI Snow Removal 2/2/2020 $ 235.00 76778 235.00 1812 WINDSOR CT WINDSOR HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION LOT 3 EXC 2.S 1011166005 NELSON SARAH JANE Snow Removal 2/1/2020 245.00 76924 245.00 1902 KATHLIN DR PENNY BRYN ADDITION PART 2 LOT 28 1017429001 NEUBAUER IRENE Snow Removal 21ZR020 287.00 76928 287.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN} OUTLOT C S 170'& S 35' OUTLOT 34 & PT OF VACATED BR0 DESC IN BK 870 PG 141 & INCL PT OF VACATED BR ST W OF DUBUQUE ST DESC IN BK 137 PG 23& B 1 PG 249, EXC ROW DESC IN PHI DELTA THETA HOUSE ASSOC 729 N DUBUQUE ST BK 5473, PG 138 1010203005 802 760.00 OF IOWA CITY Snow Removal 2 020 $ 245.00 76773 245.00 203 OBERLIN ST CA KWOODS ADDITI PART 6 LOT 245 1012403005 202 050.00 PRIMER CLEM & LISA Snow Removal 2/6/20 245.00 76733 245.00 525 S LUCAS ST OAK HILL ADDITION N 30' LOT 8 & S 10' LOT 7 1015104017 181 350.00 SIAM LISA & ELIZABETH G Snow Removal 213/2020 .00 76764 257.00 TCHOMBANA, LYDIE 1658 BURNS AVE HOLLYWOOD MANOR ADDITION PART 5 LOT 195 1023286004 171470.00 NGOY KINGUNYA Snow Removal 2/3/2020 245.00 1 245.00 BRAVERMAN CENTER SLY 81.47' LOT 1 & NLY 9.53' LOT 2 & ELY 65.64 OF S 81.47' LOT 6 & ELY 65.64' OF NLY 9.53' LOT 5 1927 KEOKUK ST BLK 5 1022102002 364 420.00 THE MISFITS Snow Removal 2/3/2020 185.00 76932 185.00 WATERBURY PROPERTY Snow Removal 1814 FLATIRON AVE MOUNT PROSPECT ADDITION PART 3 LOT 143 1023152009 183 640.00 MANAGEMENT LLC 213 2020 257.00 76925 257.00 1131 3RD AVE EAST IOWA CITY S SO' LOT 8 & 5 50' OF E 30' LOT 7 BLK 28 1014406012 203 720.00 WITTIG, WILLIAM L & NELDA M ISnow Removal 2/6/2020 278.00 76906 278.00 IOWA Ul Y (ORIGINAL TOWN) S 45' OF W 80' OF N 150' 320 N GOVERNOR ST OUTLOT 7 1010184009 216 760.00 YOUNG CHAD A Snow Removal .211/2020 157.00 76744 157.00 Late Handouts Distributed /C)— 2-0 — 2-0 (Date) :rIII- A75W 1! CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 5 2240-1 826 (319) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org City Council Agenda — October 20, 2020 — Regular Formal Meeting Information submitted between distribution of packet on Thursday and close of business on Tuesday. Late Handout(s): Regular Agenda Item 16 Assessment Schedule (See revised Exhibit A) Exhibit A CITY OF IOWA CITY ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE OF UNPAID WEED REMOVAL. SIDEWALK REPAIR. SNOW REMOVAL. STOP BOX REPAIR. AND PROPERTY CLEANUP _1;;FILe Late Handouts Distributed Ib -2 -0 -ZD fn�f„t Service(s) Date of Cost of Balance Property Address Legal Description Parcel Number Appraised Value Property Owner Rendered Service(s) Service Invoice # Outstanding OH12S SUBDMSION THAT PART OF LOT 4 AS DESC IN BK 397 1910 LOWER MUSCATINE PG 210 EXC THAT LAND CONVEYED TO CITY OF IOWA CITY RD FOR ROW IN BK 47 1014458005 650 080.00 1910 LOWER MUSCATINE LLC Snow Removal 1/28/2020 4.00 76429 874.00 OH12S SUBDMSION THAT PART OF LOT 4 AS DESC IN BK 397 1910 LOWER MU TINE PG 210 EXC THAT LAND CONVEYED TO CITY OF IOWA CITY RD FOR ROW IN SK 4759 PG 797 1014458005 650 080.00 1910 LOWER MUSCATINE LLC Snow Removal 14 2020 287.00 76930 287.00 911 E IOWA AVE GOVERNOR SQUARE E 80' OF W 160' OF N 160' 1010416003 365 450.00 ANTONIADES CONSTANTINE Snow Rera@051 2/5/2020 257.00 76784 257.00 410 MELROSE CT BR KLAND PARK ADDITION LOT 15 1016139005 287 650.00 BARKALOW INVESTMENTS INC Sno movai Z11/2020 365.00 76757 365.00 EAST I A CITY W 100' LOT Y & W YDO' OF N 20' LOT 2 BLK RAUGHMAN, NORMA 1931 E COURT ST 37 1014104002 141 520.00 J LIGOCKI RITA K now Removal 2/V2020 2020 311.00 76933 311.00 2733 WAYNE AVE TOWNCREST ITION PART 3 LOT 6 BLK 5 1013314001 189 770.00 COFFIN DREW J Snow Removal 1/29/2020 330.00 76517 330.00 2733 WAYNE AVE TOWNCREST ADD ON PART 3 LOT 6 BLK 5 1013314001 189 770.00 COFFIN DREW J Snow Removal 2/14/2020 266.00 76516 266.00 1218 E COLLEGE ST CLARK & BORLANDS ffiRITION W 40' OF 5 93.3' LOT 8 BLK 2 1011382005 184 650.00 DEVALOIS RORY Snow Removal 1128/2020 223.00 76907 223.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL) 545' N 105' OF W 80' OUTLOT 324 N GOVERNOR ST 7-TOI 1010184008 133 110.00 FASELT 3001 A & NANCY A Snow Removal 2020 245.00 76745 245.00 FORBES HRISTOPHERIt 3237 LAKE FOREST AVE OAKWOODS ADDITION PART 6 LOT 1012185005 189 680.00 MEL19A Snow Removal 2/3/2020 257.00 76630 257.00 3015 LUCAS ST IOWA CITY ORIGINAL TOWN N 40' OF M OUTLOT 28 1010484001 151930.00 G PARTNERSHIP Snow Removal .2/612020 245.00 76737 245.00 1825 HOLLYWOOD CT MOUNT PROSPECT ADDITION PART 4 LOT 1701, 1023126033 174,880.0(l, ARRIS, SHAWN A Snow Removeal 213(2020 227.00 76926 127.00 PLUM GROVE ACRES SUBDIVISION, PART THREE T B IXC S 65'& EXC BEG NE COR LOT B; N 85 DEG W 50.4' TO 1406 KEOKUK ST KEOKUK ST; N 92.5` S 1 DEG W 92.5' TO POB 1015479001 1 540.00 HEATH CHARLES E Snow Removal 21212020 245.00 76916 245.00 73 HICKORY HEIGHTS LN HICKORY HEIGHTS LOT 9HICKORY HEIGHTS LOT 9 002428013 19 900.00 HONG DEREK N Snow Removal 213/2020 245.00 76637 245.00 202 ELLIS AVE SYVERUD'S SURD OF PT BLK 4 MANVILLE HNOT EPSILON 10OW,82003 644 430.00 IOWA ACACIANS Snow Removal 215/2020 341.00 76731 341.00 2354 JESSUP CIR MACBRIDE ADDITION PART 2 LOT 49 1017205NU IMA PROPERTIES LLC Snow Removal ZM2020 $407.00 76507 407.00 306 WINDSOR DR WINDSOR HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION LOT 10 101116700 197 960.00 JOSS MARY JANE Snow Removal 211/2020 317.00 76738 317.00 69 AMHURSF SF COURT HILL SCOTT BOULEVARD ADD PART 6 LOT 82 1012417 0 t 26.4 0.00 MCDUFFIE WARREN & ADRIANE Snow Removal 2/2/2020 245.00 76634 245.00 314 S 7TH AVE COLLEGE COURT ADDITION LOT 4 BLK 3 1011 006 1 0.00 MILLER CELESTE & SYDNEY Snow Removal 2/3/2020 257.00 76740 257.00 300 WINDSOR DR WINDSOR HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION LOT 11 1 167004 233 71 . MILLER MATTHEW RYAN Snow Removal12/1/2020 287.00 76736 287.00 1027 SHERIDAN AVE REGAN'S ADDITION LOT 4 BLK 1 EXC 5 68.8' 14254001 295 380.00 R. MICHAEL J Snow Removal Z11/2020 343.00 76897 343.00 CHALTAUQUA HEIGHTS ADDITION LOT 4 BLK 9 & E 20.5' LO NDI NA, SARAH 819 RIVER ST 3 BLK 9 1009276007 338 200.00 NDIKUMA AMINI Snow Removal 2/2/2020 235.00 76778 235.00 1812 WINDSOR CT WINDSOR HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITION LOT 3 IXC W 22. ' 1011166005 222 660.00 NELSON SA NE Snow Removal 2/1/2020 245.00 76924 245.00 1902 KATHLIN DR PENNY BRYN ADDITION PART 2 LOT 28 1017429001 204 720.00 NEUBAUER IRENE Snow Removal 2/2/2020 287.00 76928 287.00 0'&S35' IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) OUTL/DE OUTLOT 34 & PT OF VACATED BROWK 870 PG 141 & INCL PT OF VACATED BROWN QUE ST DESC IN BK 137 PG 23 & BK 151 PG DESC IN PHI DELTA THETA HOUSE ASSOC 729 N DUBUQUE ST BK 5473 PG 138 1010203005 802 760.00 OF IOWA CITY Snow Rem 2114/2020 245.00 76773 245.00 203 OBERLIN ST OAKWOODS ADDITION PART 6 L 45 1012403005 202 050.00 PRIMER CLEM & USA Snow Removal 2020 245.00 76733 245.00 525 S LUCAS ST OAK HILL ADDITION N 30' LOT 510' LOT 7 1015104017 181 350.00 SIAM USA & ELIZABETH G Snow Removal 2 3 257.00 76764 257.00 TCHOMBANA, LYDIE 1658 BURNS AVE HOLLYWOOD MANOR ADD ON PART 5 LOT 195 1023286004 171470.00 NGOY KINGUNYA Snow Removal 2/3/2020 245.00' 245.00 BRAVERMAN CENTER 1.47' LOT 1 & NLY 9.53' LOT 2 & ELY 65.64' OF 5 81.47' OT 6 & ELY 65.64' OF NLY 9.53' LOT 5 1927 KEOKUK ST BLK 5 1022102002 364 420.OD THE MISFITS Snow Removal 2 3 2020 185.00 76932 185.00 WATERBURY PROPERTY 1814 FLATIRON AVE MOUNT PROSPECT ADDITION PART 3 LOT 143 1023152009 183 640.00 MANAGEMENT LLC Snow Removal 2/3/2020 257.00 76925 257.00 1131 3RD AVE EAST IOWA CITY S 50' LOT 8 & 5 50' OF E 30' LOT 7 BLK 28 1014406012 203 720.00 IWITTIG, WILLIAM L & NELDA M Snow Removal 2/6/2020 278.00 76906 278.00 IOWA CITY (ORIGINAL TOWN) 5 45' OF W 80' OF N 150' 320 N GOVERNOR ST OUTLOT 7 1 1010184009 216 760.00 YOUNG CHAD A Snow Removal 2/112020 157.00 1 76744 157.00 Late Handouts Distributed Ib -2 -0 -ZD fn�f„t Kellie Fruehling From: Kellie Fruehling Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 2:59 PM To: 'Clem's Yahoo'; Council Subject: RE: Challenge of assessment for COM20-0038 Mr. Primer, Late Handouts Distributed 203 Oberlin St. Iowa City IA 52245 Case# 10— 19— 2-0 (Date) Because you dispute the assessment, your invoice/property will be removed from consideration at the Council meeting on October 20 and placed on the following Council meeting, which is Monday, Nov. 2. Note that the next meeting is a Monday and not the typical Tuesday. At the Council meeting on Monday, Nov. 2, you will have the opportunity to speak to Council and explain why you believe the property should not be assessed. You do not need to participate and appear at the Oct. 20 meeting. I should add that any other property owner who disputes the proposed assessment will have their property moved to the Nov. 2 agenda as well. Thank you Kellie Fruehling, CMC City Clerk office: 319-356-5041 410 E Washington St, Iowa City, IA 52240 WWW.ICGOV.ORG -----Original Message ----- From: Clem's Yahoo <cpsdll@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 1:59 PM To: Council <Council@iowa-city.org> Cc: cpsdll@yahoo.com Subject: Challenge of assessment for 203 Oberlin St. Iowa City IA 52245 Case# COM20-0038 To whom it may concern I Clem Primer the owner of the residence at 203 Oberlin St. Iowa City, IA would like to submit a challenge of assessment for the address listed above. This is regarding snow removal charged by the City on 02-o6-2020. Case #COM20-00308. Thank you for your time and consideration on this matter. Regards, Clem Primer BS,NRP 203 Oberlin St. Iowa City, IA 52245 This email is from an external source.