The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-13-2022 Historic Preservation Commissionlowd City Historic Preservdtion Commission Thursday C,)40 ), January 13, 2022 n,O 5:30 p.m. 0 C", - � �IIIEI, r C I�I1l91FiICI•L�JIIV� wV ,^i L 1 1 w, ir n1 - ` C ?2 Emma Harvat Hall City Hall Cl vvd,dm,HPast&fC, —F,-do, c IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Thursday, January 13, 2022 City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street Emma J. Harvat Hall 5:30 p.m. Agenda A) Call to Order B) Roll Call C) Public discussion of anything not on the agenda D) Certificate of Appropriateness HPC21-0114: 2525 Highlander Place — Local Historic Landmark (entrance canopy reconstruction and rehabilitation) E) Discussion of Historic Preservation Plan priorities and annual work plan F) Report on Certificates issued by Chair and Staff Minor Review —Staff review 1. HPC21-0113: 604 Ronalds Street — Brown Street Historic District (roof material replacement) 2. HPC21-0115: 116 South Dodge Street — College Green Historic District (roof material replacement) 3. HPC21-0116: 610 East Jefferson Street — Local Historic Landmark (roof material replacement) 4. HPC21-0118: 507 North Linn Street — Northside Historic District (roof material replacement) Intermediate Review —Chair and Staff review 1. HPC21-0095: 823 Bowery Street — Governor -Lucas Street Conservation District (foundation replacement, rear entry stoop, basement access doors) 2. HPC21-0117: 119 East College Street — Local Historic Landmark (Commercial Signage) G) Consideration of Minutes for November 18, 2021 H) Consideration of Minutes for December 9, 2021 I) Commission Discussion City Park Pool J) Commission Information Annual Report K) Adjournment If you will need disability -related accommodations in order to participate in this meeting, please contact Jessica Bristow, Urban Planning, at 319-356-5243 or at jessica-Bristow@iowa-city.org. Early requests are strongly encouraged to allow sufficient time to meet your access needs. Staff Report January 5, 2022 Historic Review for HPC21-0114: 2525 Highlander Place District: I-80 Corridor Classification: Local Historic Landmark The applicant, Slingshot Architecture, is requesting approval for a proposed demolition and alteration project at 2525 Highlander Place, the Highlander Supper Club and Convention Center, a Local Historic Landmark property in the I-80 Corridor. The project consists of the reconstruction of the west -facing entry canopy, the removal of the modern portions of the south -facing entry canopy and its return to its original configuration, the exposure of the original west -facing clerestory windows, the installation of cedar shingles on the mansard cornice and the replacement of the sliding glass doors in the hotel rooms and the replacement of the west entry door. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines: 4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Altera tions 4.3 Doors 4.7 Mass and Rooflines 4.8 Masonry 4.10 Porches 4.13 Windows 5.0 Guidelines for Additions 5.1 Expansion of the Building Footprint 7.0 Guidelines for Demolition 7.1 Demolition of Whole Structures or Significant Features 10.0 Secretary, ofthe Interior's Standards for Reba bilitation Staff Comments The Highlander Supper Club was built in 1967 and the Convention Center, a part of the original concept, was added in 1973. The original Supper Club is a single -story building to the west end of the complex. The Convention Center addition includes the central section with ballroom, two wings of rooms to the east and the pool and courtyard between them enclosed under a roof. The brown brick -clad Supper Club features a mansard cornice and stone entry wall. Four steel columns that were original canopy supports also remain. The Convention Center addition is clad in similar brick with a heavy cornice band and a rhythm of large glass sections separated by brick pilasters. The lobby vestibule is clad in the same stone as the entry wall on the earlier Supper Club. The hotel wings have a similar treatment with the lower portion of the wall also clad in brick and the pattern encompassing two stories. The original hotel room windows have been replaced. The pool addition has an operable glass wall opening on to a grass courtyard between the hotel wings. A two-story cafe with penthouse opens onto the west end of the enclosed pool area as do some of the hotel rooms. Proposal The applicant is proposing to reconstruct the missing west entry canopy as part of a larger rehabilitation of the Supper Club utilizing State Historic Tax Credits. The existing brick base and steel columns will be cleaned and repaired as necessary. EIFS material (similar to a synthetic stucco) will be removed from the clerestory windows over the stone -clad west entry. The existing wood -frame, amber -glass windows will be exposed and repaired as necessary. The existing entry door will be replaced with a new storefront (a glazing system) entry and transom with the soffit above at the original full height. The exterior brick and stone cladding will be repaired as needed. The black plywood cladding at the mansard cornice and vaulted roof above will be removed. See sheets AD101 and AD201 for this work. The mansard cornice, vaulted roof, and vaulted roof soffit will be clad in new cedar shingles. The roof will be covered in a new roof membrane over insulation See sheets A202, A301, A504 for this work. The west entrance canopy will be reconstructed following the original design as closely as possible. An original drawing is included for reference on sheet A301. The canopy detail drawings are shown on sheet A503 and A504. The new canopy will have the original pan -like profile with upturned outside edges mirroring the angle of the vaulted roof beyond. The new canopy will include scuppers, a commercial built-in gutter system similar to the original canopy. At the south entry canopy to the Convention Center, the EIFS panel covering over the canopy will be removed exposing the original stone cladding on the canopy. The brick column surrounds will be removed exposing original steel columns. The stone cladding will be replaced to match only if necessary. At the south end, the canopy projection will be rebuilt to match the original overhang as closely as possible (3/A505). The steel columns with be clad in GFRC, a glass, fiber -reinforced concrete because it is more durable than the original metal cladding and the vehicle route is in a close proximity to the columns. See drawings AD201, A202, A302, A505 and A506 for this work. For the rest of the building, little work remains. The sliding glass doors between the rooms and the exterior courtyard will be replaced with the project. See sheets AD202 A201 for this work. Otherwise, all other work was completed prior to the landmark designation. Replacement of the room windows will occur with a future project. Historic Preservation Guidelines Section 4.3 Doors recommends replacing badly deteriorated doors with new doors or salvaged doors that are similar in size, material, style, and appearance. It is disallowed to install sliding patio doors if they were not original to the building or consistent with the architectural style. It is also disallowed to block down door openings to accommodate standard door sizes. Section 4.7 Mass and Rooflines recommends replacing a special historic shingle with one of a similar style when the old shingles need replacing. Original roof pitches and spans should be preserved. Section 4.8 Masonry states that sandblasting and water blasting historic masonry is disallowed. Replacement masonry units should appear similar to the existing masonry units in color, texture and size. Mortar should be similar in hardness to the original mortar. Section 4.13 Windows recommends preserving historic windows by repairing sashes and frames. Windows should not be removed or closed if they detract from the overall fenestration pattern. Section 4.10 Porches is included since this section relates most -closely to the work on the entry canopies. This section recommends repairing historic porches and conserving as much of the historic material as possible. Badly deteriorated components should be replaced with new ones that match the historic components in design and material. Missing balustrades (or other elements) should be constructed using historic photographs if available. It is disallowed to remove a front porch or change the original roof pitch. Section 5.1 Expansion of the building footprint is included here because, like the porch section above, it includes language related to the canopy reconstruction. The section recommends constructing new porches that are consistent with eth historic building or similar to porches of the same architectural style. It is also recommended to preserve significant historic materials and features of the original structure. Section 7.1 Demolition of Whole Structures or Significant features recommends removing additions or alterations that are not historic and that significantly detract from the building's historic character. It is disallowed to remove any historic architectural feature... that is significant to the architectural character and style of the building. Staff Review and Recommendation As we can see from the guidelines, several aspects of past work on the building would have been disallowed if the building had been a landmark at that time: removing the west canopy, covering the clerestory windows, replacing the cedar shingles with plywood, shortening and covering the south canopy and its columns. This project addresses these issues by removing the later alterations and reconstructing missing canopy features. In Staffs opinion, this project is appropriate and will help the building regain some of the historic character that the Commission found eligible for preservation and local landmark designation. Since the guidelines are written specifically for much older residential buildings, their relationship to this more modern commercial building is not as clear as typical Commission reviews. Staff finds that the work can still be reviewed for approval utilizing the guidelines. Specifically, the work follows the recommendations of the guidelines as described: The original brick and stone will be cleaned and repaired as needed. This brick is more modern than most brick found in our historic districts but will still be cleaned appropriately with any damaged brick replaced to match the existing including matching mortar joints. The existing mansard cladding which appears to be painted plywood or particle board, will be removed and cedar shingles to match the original cladding will be installed. The EIFS cladding over the west clerestory windows will be removed, exposing the original glass and restoring this element of the window patterning which is an integral part of the architectural detailing at the west entry. Utilizing the original steel columns that remain, the west entry canopy will be reconstructed following the evidence in photographs and original drawings. The south canopy which had been covered in brick with heavy brick piers and an arched fascia will exposed through the removal of the brick cladding. The end of the canopy which projected beyond the columns to the south originally, will be reconstructed as close as possible to its original proportions. The original columns were square steel columns. The current proposal includes thin square columns, similar to the original proportions, but clad in a fiber -reinforced cement that will be painted black. This material would be considered a customary material for commercial applications. It can be smooth like the original metal but should perform better with salt, weather and automobiles. Staff recommends approval of this change to the original material. At the Supper Club entry door, drawing 1 /A503 shows that a lower soffit constructed above the door will be removed and the original Glu-lam beam will be exposed over the door transom. A new storefront of paired doors with transom above will be installed in the opening at the original height. At the individual hotel rooms, the sliding glass doors, will be replaced with new sliding glass doors. The guidelines disallow sliding glass doors unless they were original to the building or part of the architectural style. It is likely that the building original had sliding glass doors. This type of door is popular in hotel locations at a balcony or courtyard. In addition, sliding glass doors became popular and were used widely during the 1960s and 1970s when the building is built. Staff finds there use here appropriate. Finally, staff finds that the project follows the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation which are included in Section 10 and are the basis for the development of the guidelines originally. In particular, the guidelines which staff finds relevant to the project are as follows: 1. A property shall be used for its historic purpose or be placed in a new use that requires minimal change to the defining characteristics of the building and its site and environment. 2. The historic character of a property shall be retained and preserved. The removal of historic materials or alteration of features and spaces that characterize a property shall be avoided. 5. Distinctive features, finishes, and construction techniques or examples of craftsmanship that characterize a property shall be preserved. 6. Deteriorated historic features shall be repaired rather than replaced. Where the severity of deterioration requires replacement of a distinctive feature, the new feature shall match the old in design, color, texture, and other visual qualities and, where possible, materials. Replacement of missing features shall be substantiated by documentary, physical, or pictorial evidence. Recommended Motion Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 2525 Highlander Place as presented in the staff report qua}j AI-4 F Highlander Supper Club and Convention Center- location map S - MM � r Hotel and Convention Center- 1975 aerial Highlander Supper Club — west elevation Highlander Supper Club — west elevation IF s 1975 advertisement Original south entry canopy THE HIGHLANDER HOTEL AND FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT 2525 N. DODGE ST. CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS VICINITY MAP Moo N o;r=..- PROJECT TEAM OWNER: HIGHLANDER HOTEL ANGELA HARRINGTON ARCHITECT: SLINGSHOT ARCHITECTURE 305 EAST COURT AVE DES MOINES, IOWA 50309 PHONE: (515) 243-0074 CONTACT: STEVE MILLER STRUCTURAL: RAKER RHODES ENGINEERING 4717 GRAND AVE DES MOINES, IA50312 515-277-0275 CONTACT: MITCH WANTOCK MEP ENGINEER: AXIOM CONSULTANTS 60 EAST COURT STREET - UNIT 03 IOWA CITY, IOWA 6220 319-519-6220 CONTACT: JOE LOMHEIM ARCHITECTURAL INDEX G.100 TITLE SHEET/ GENERAL INFO 2021.11.11 G.200 GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS 2021.11.19 G.201 GENERAL NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS G.300 CODE STUDY 2021.11.19 ADA01 DEMO SUPPER CLUB PLAN 2021.11.19 AD.201 DEMO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2021.11.19 AD.202 DEMO COURTYARD ELEVATIONS 2021.11.19 A.101 LEVEL 1 OVERALL PLAN 2021.11.19 A.102 SUPPER CLUB BASEMENT PLAN AND RCP 2021.11.19 A.103 SUPPER CLUB PLAN 2021.11.19 A.104 SUPPER CLUB RCP 2021.11.19 A.105 SUPPER CLUB FINISH PLAN 2021.11.19 A.201 COURTYARD ELEVATIONS 2021.11.19 A.202 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 2021.11.19 A.301 BUILDING SECTIONS 2021.11.19 A.302 BUILDING SECTIONS 2021.11.19 A.401 FAMILY ENTERTAINMENT 2021.11.19 A.402 PUBLIC RESTROOMS 2021.11.19 A.403 FITNESS ROOM 2021.11.19 A.404 DINING ROOM 2021.11.19 A.405 CASEWORK DETAILS 2021.11.19 A.501 WINDOW DETAILS 2021.11.19 A.502 DOOR DETAILS 2021.11.19 A.503 SECTION DETAILS 2021.11.19 A.504 SUPPER CLUB SECTION DETAILS 2021.11.19 A.505 SOUTH CANOPY SECTION DETAILS 2021.11.19 A.506 SOUTH CANOPY DETAILS 2021.11.19 STRUCTURALINDEX S.001 STRUCTURAL NOTES 2021.11.19 S.301 FRAMING PLAN 2021.11.19 S.302 FRAMING PLAN 2021.11.19 5.401 FRAMING DETAILS 2021.11.19 5.402 FRAMING DETAILS 2021.11.19 MIRE INDEX MG.000 MECHANICAL & PLUMBING NOTES & SYMBOLS 2021.11.19 FD.101 FIRE PROTECTION DEMOLITION PLAN 2021.11.19 F.101 FIRE PROTECTION PLANS 2021.11.19 F.501 FIRE PROTECTION DETAILS AND SCHEDULES 2021.11.19 P.101 PLUMBING PLAN 2021.11.19 MD.101 MECHANICAL HVAC DEMOLITION PLANS 2021.11.19 M.101 MECHANICAL HVAC PLANS 2021.11.19 M.501 MECHANICAL DETAILS 2021.11.19 M.502 MECHANICAL SCHEDULES 2021.11.19 M.601 MECHANICAL SPECIFICATIONS 2021.11.19 M.601 MECHANICAL SPEC IFICAT IDNS (CON.) 2021.11.19 EG.000 ELECTRICAL NOTES AND SYMBOLS 2021.11.19 ED.101 ELECTRICAL DEMO PLAN 2021.11.19 E.101 ELECTRICAL PLANS 2021.11.19 E.111 LIGHTING PLANS 2021.11.19 E.201 ROOF POWER PLAN 2021.11.19 E.202 ROOF DEMO POWER PLAN 2021.11.19 E.601 ELECTRICAL SPECIFICATIONS 2021.11.19 I HEREBY CERTIFY THATTHIS ENGINEERING DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT PERSONAL SUPERVISION AND THAT I AMA DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF IOWA, JOE C. 11152021 LOMHEM 24116 JOE CLO . MHEIM,P.E. LICENSE NUMBER 24116 DATE i MY LICENSE RENEWAL DATE IS DECEMBER 31, 2022. ALL T'% "P", "M" & "E" SHEETS FIRE PROTECTION, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL PAGES OR SHEETSCOVERED BYTHIS SEAL: HVAC, ELECTRICAL POWER AND LIGHTING I hereby certify that the portion of this technical aubmieaion tlescdbetl below was preparetl by ma or antler my a"w FEBS/G tlisupervision antl responsible chage.lam atluly regiateretl engineer antler the laws of Ne state of Q,O ea" Myliaenae a:pbea lz.al zozz. _ z0[y;' Mitchel Want , Iowa License P26829 MITCHEL v A.mm canawanta, WANTOCK;== Pages or sheets covered by this seal: S SERIES SHEETS Big - Data issued: 11.19.2021 I hereby certify that the portion & this technical submission described below was prepared by me or under my �E$SiD di�ea supervision antl responsible charge. I am A duly registered architect oM., the laws of the state of �`Q`• •• "ytOr `o= Ovid Voss, AIA, levee L-ea 4.148 slmgsnota�deowre,Voss =w, go u : 06148 10 'l a signaare '• •. •/OWA:' Pages or sheets covered by this seal: ASERIES SHEETS Dataisseetl: 11.19.2021 W 0 to J co N � W to oa 2 0� W 2 Z U N N 2021.01 CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 Z _O U H u) Z O U O LL TITLE SHEET / GENERAL INFO G.100 PROPOSED RENOVATION j I L I A I DEMO OVERALL PLAN - SUPPER CLUB D.10 SCALE: W = I - DEMO KEYNOTES 1. DEMO WALL 2. DEMO DOOR 3. PAINTED WALLS AND TRIM 4. DEMO SOFFIT AND BULKHEAD 5. REMOVE GLASS/WOOD DOOR AND WINDOW 6. CHANDELIERS MOVED FROM SUPPER CLUB TO BALLROOM 7. DEMO EXISTING CHECK -IN DESK 8. DEMO WOOD CANOPY 9. DEMO EXTERIOR GLAZING WALL AND DOORS 10. DEMO BRICK MASONRY PIERS. STEEL COLUMN TO REMAIN. 11. REMOVE EXISTING FLOOR FINISH, HATCHED AREA. 12. DEMO EXISTING SLIDING GLASS DOORS. 13. INFILL DUMBWAITER OPENING 14. WIDEN EXISTING WALL OPENING 15. DEMO WALL FOR NEW OPENING DEMO KEY DEMO EXISTING FLOOR FINISH HISTORIC REHABILITATION Z THIS REHABILITATION PROJECT IS RECEIVING STATE HISTORIC TAX CREDITS. 0 ALL WORK IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE AND THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, AND MUST MEET THE "SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS FOR HISTORIC REHABILITATION'. HISTORIC WORK SCOPE IS DEFINED IN THE FAX CREDIT APPLICATION PART 2(AND ANY AMENDMENTS). REFER TO SECTION 013591 Y� IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, DO NOT REMOVE,DAMAGE, OR ALTER ANY BUILDING ELEMENT NOT SPECIFICALLY INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS TO BE IMPACTED 0 U 0 LL I➢YS[-S CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 PAUF DEMO SUPPER CLUB PLAN AD.101 4 DEMO SUPPER CLUB SOUTH ELEVATION D.20 SCALE ar 1 . 1 1 1 1 -_ aE a= 1 1 1 1 r e ..i Imo IS I---------------- 1' E: . 1 i 1 Fg re Iil PIIIJ 1 1 1 �� i E 0 1 o r a. I. i, �� eel-�--e 1 III�--III i e 1. it o u_ �� o.��1 � . r.. 1 .a .IIJ e i�� 1 1..�� i�� IIJ I 11�I DEMO HOTEL SOUTH ELEVATION - NO DEMO AD.20 Y SCALE 3ro2•= 1 0- j PROPOSED RENOVATION 1 .22,_o„A — - — 4 POOL ROOF BEARING e _ _ - _ _ _ _ I I 115I I I 1 1 DEMO SUPPER CLUB WEST ELEVATION 1AD.20 Y SCALE 1124 47 PROPOSED RENOVATION (- —1) DEMO SUPPER CLUB NORTH ELEVATION �D.20Y SCALE S/3T'- 1'-0° EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES DEMO 1. EXISTING STONE MASONRY- EVALUATE CONDITION AND REPAIR AS REQUIRED, MASONRY WORK TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BRIEFS. 2. EXISTING BRICK MASONRY- EVALUATE CONDITION AND REPAIR AS REQUIRED, MASONRY WORK TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BRIEFS. 3. EXISTING CANOPY BASE TO REMAIN, REPAIR BRICK MASONRY WORK TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BRIEFS. 4. EXISTING COLUMNS TO REMAIN, REMOVE EXISTING WOOD DETAILING SURROUNDS. 5. EXISTING STRUCTURAL HEADER. PAINT X, SEE SPEC. 6. REMOVE EXISTING BEAM EMBEDDED IN STRUCTURE. CUT STONE ALONG GROUT JOINTS AND REMOVE AS NECESSARY. NEW GROUT COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING. 7. DEMO EXISTING FLASHING 8. DEMO ALL EXISTING EXTERIOR BLACK FACIA SIDING TO STRUCTURE. 9. STRIP ROOFING MEMBRANE TO STRUCTURE. 10.DEMO EIFIS PANELING OVER 5/8" SHEATHING AND WOOD BLOCKING. 11.EXISTING GLASS GABLE FRONT - UNCOVER AND CAREFULLY REMOVE ANY ATTACHED ELEMENTS TO MULLIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT TO INSPECT EXTENT OF REPAIR. 12.DEMO WOOD BLOCKING 13.REMOVE PRE -FINISHED SHEETMETAL COPING OVER 2X WOOD BLOCKING 14.REMOVE NON HISTORIC GUTTERS? 15.DEMO MASONRY COLUMN SURROUNDS 16.INFILL WALL/STOREFRONT REMOVED FOR INSTALL OF NEW STOREFRONT AND OPERABLE GARAGE DOOR. 17.REMOVE EXISTING SLIDING DOOR, NON HISTORIC 18.REMOVE EXISTING DOUBLE DOOR 19.PREP AND PAINT EXISTING DOOR 20.EXISTING NON HISTORIC MASONRY MECHANICAL SCREEN WALL TO REMAIN. 21.EXISTING STEEL COLUMNS WITHIN MASONRY PIER TO REMAIN. 22.REMOVE EXISTING CEMENT BOARD INFILL PANELS/ FRAMING. 23.EXISTING METAL PANEL TO REMAIN AND PAINT. HISTORIC REHABILITATION Z O H U In Z O U w O 11 Ln J M N E �Ln � oa E o� u zLn C N3 cm O N — rra.>i CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 DEMO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AD.201 PROPOSED RENOVATION (-�1 DEMO HOTEL NORTH COURTYARD ELEVATION 1%D.20?' SCALE:3132"= 1-4- (a) DEMO HOTEL SOUTH COURTYARD ELEVATION D.20 SCALE:3132"= 1'-1 PROPOSED RENOVATION DEMO HOTEL NORTH ELEVATION - NO DEMO SCALE: 3132' = 1'-0' PROPOSED RENOVATION EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES DEMO 1. EXISTING STONE MASONRY- EVALUATE CONDITION AND REPAIR AS REQUIRED, MASONRY WORK TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BRIEFS. 2. EXISTING BRICK MASONRY- EVALUATE CONDITION AND REPAIR AS REQUIRED, MASONRY WORK TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BRIEFS. 3. EXISTING CANOPY BASE TO REMAIN, REPAIR BRICK MASONRY WORK TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BRIEFS, 4, EXISTING COLUMNS TO REMAIN, REMOVE EXISTING WOOD DETAILING SURROUNDS. 5. EXISTING STRUCTURAL HEADER. PAINT X, SEE SPEC. 6. REMOVE EXISTING BEAM EMBEDDED IN STRUCTURE. CUT STONE ALONG GROUT JOINTS AND REMOVE AS NECESSARY. NEW GROUT COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING. 7. DEMO EXISTING FLASHING 8. DEMO ALL EXISTING EXTERIOR BLACK FACIA SIDING TO STRUCTURE. 9. STRIP ROOFING MEMBRANE TO STRUCTURE. 10.DEMO EIFIS PANELING OVER 5/8" SHEATHING AND WOOD BLOCKING. 11.EXISTING GLASS GABLE FRONT- UNCOVER AND CAREFULLY REMOVE ANY ATTACHED ELEMENTS TO MULLIONS. NOTIFY ARCHITECT TO INSPECT EXTENT OF REPAIR. 12.DEMO WOOD BLOCKING 13.REMOVE PRE -FINISHED SHEETMETAL COPING OVER 2X WOOD BLOCKING 14.REMOVE NON HISTORIC GUTTERS? 15.DEMO MASONRY COLUMN SURROUNDS 16.INFILL WALL/STOREFRONT REMOVED FOR INSTALL OF NEW STOREFRONT AND OPERABLE GARAGE DOOR. 17.REMOVE EXISTING SLIDING DOOR, NON HISTORIC 18.REMOVE EXISTING DOUBLE DOOR 19.PREP AND PAINT EXISTING DOOR 20.EXISTING NON HISTORIC MASONRY MECHANICAL SCREEN WALL TO REMAIN. 21.EXISTING STEEL COLUMNS WITHIN MASONRY PIER TO REMAIN. 22.REMOVE EXISTING CEMENT BOARD INFILL PANELS/FRAMING. 23.EXISTING METAL PANEL TO REMAIN AND PAINT. HISTORIC REHABILITATION Z _0 H U H U) Z 0 U w 0 LL I➢YS[-S CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 DEMO COURTYARD ELEVATIONS AD.202 PROPOSED RENOVATION j LEVEL 1 OVERALL PLAN 101 SCALE. 1:19fi.09 T RENOVATION LEGEND PROPOSED RENOVATION HISTORIC REHABILITATION THIS REHABILITATION PROJECT IS RECEIVING STATE HISTORIC TAX CREDITS. 0 ALLWORKISSUBJECTTO REVIEW BYTHE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE AND THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, AND MUST MEETTHE "SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS FOR HISTORIC REHABILITATION'. HISTORIC WORK SCOPE IS DEFINED IN THE TAX CREDIT APPLICATION PART 2(AND ANY AMENDMENTS). REFER TO SECTION 013591 Y� IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, DO NOT REMOVE,DAMAGE, ORALTERANY BUILDING ELEMENT NOT Z SPECIFICALLY INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS TO BE IMPACTED. O U 0 1L w QM I➢YS[-S CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 LEVEL 1 OVERALLPLAN A.101 PROPOSED RENOVATION 1 C PROPOSED PLAN - SUPPER CLUB SCALE: 1l8" = 1' 0- FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTES 1. NEW DOOR 2. NEW WALL 3. NEW ARCH OPENING 4. NEW SLIDING GLASS DOOR 5. NEW PLUMBING FIXTURES 6. NEW TOILET PARTITIONS 7. EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO REMAIN. 8. EXISTING CONCRETE PATIO TO REMAIN. 9. REPAIR/REPLACE STONE CAP ON BRICK KNEE WALL. 10. REPAIRIREPLACE 2x12 WOOD POST, PAINT WOOD AND STEEL COLUMN. 11. NEW BANQUET/BOOTH SEATING 12.30" HIGH FIXED WOOD SHELVING/WALL 13. EXISTING MASONRY MECHANICAL WALL TO REMAIN. 14. PICKLE BALL COURT WITH PERIMETER 8' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE. 15. CONCRETE INFILL OF EXISTING DUMBWAITER 16. REPAIR CASED OPENING AT DOOR REMOVAL RENOVATION LEGEND PROPOSED RENOVATION HISTORIC REHABILITATION Z THIS REHABILITATION PROJECT IS RECEIVING STATE HISTORIC TAX CREDITS. 0 ALL WORK IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE AND THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, AND MUST MEET THE "SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS FOR HISTORIC REHABILITATION'. HISTORIC WORK SCOPE IS DEFINED IN THE TAX CREDIT APPLICATION PART 2(AND ANY AMENDMENTS). REFER TO SECTION 013591 Y� INTHEPROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, DO NOT REMOVE,DAMAGE, ORALTERANY BUILDING ELEMENT NOT SPECIFICALLY INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS TO BE IMPACTED. O U w 0 LL I➢YS[-S CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 SUPPER CLUB PLAN A.103 PROPOSED RENOVATION s HOTEL NORTH COURTYARD ELEVATION .2D1 SCALE: 3132"= 1'-0" HOTEL SOUTH COURTYARD ELEVATION SCALE:3132"= 1'-0" PROPOSED RENOVATION ➢I�� a s C - -------------- - -- r o - _ •w�•.o•�Q s�� -- ----------------- l •o•oa•o.. ❑❑I❑ s❑❑❑ m ❑�❑❑�}1 _ f sse - s immill I HOTEL NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3132" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES 1. EXISTING STONE MASONRY- EVALUATE CONDITION AND REPAIR AS REQUIRED, MASONRY WORK TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BRIEFS. 2. EXISTING NORMAN BRICK MASONRY - REPAIR/REPOINT DETERIORATED MORTAR AS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PRESERVATION BRIEF 2 (REPOINTING MORTAR JOINTS IN HISTORIC MASONRY). 3. NEW CEDAR SHAKES - CLASS C FIRE RATING 4. NEW 2"x8"JOISTS AT 24"O.C. 5. NEW 5/8" PLYWOOD 6. DRIP FLASHING PAINT BLACK 7. 1" x 8" CEDAR SHAKES - CLASS C FIRE RATING 8. 1/4" CEDAR BREATHER 9. NEW 5 1/4" x 14 5/8" x 28' - 8" GLU-LAM BEAM 10.NEW 5 1/4" x 14 5/8" x 32' - 0" GLU-LAM BEAM 11.INSPECT GLU-LAM HEADER, FINISH, SAND SMOOTH AND RESEAL WITH CLEAR VARNISH. 12.REMOVE EXISTING BEAM EMBEDDED IN STRUCTURE. CUT STONE ALONG GROUT JOINTS AND REMOVE AS NECESSARY. NEW GROUT COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING. 13.2" X 6" BEVELED 14.3 ROWS OF MED. CEDAR SHAKES W/ BUTTS IN LINE - CLASS C FIRE RATING PROPOSED RENOVATION 15, EXISTING CANOPY BASE TO REMAIN, REPAIR MASONRY WORK TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BRIEFS. 16, EXISTING COLUMNS TO REMAIN, REMOVE EXISTING WOOD DETAILING SURROUNDS. 17, EXISTING CITADEL PANEL 15 HEADER WITH PEBBLE TEXTURE -REMOVE BLACK PAINT, PAINT (RED) TO MATCH EXISTING 18. EXISTING ENTRY CANOPY STRUCTURE TO REMAIN, SEE EXPANDED PLANS AND ELEVATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 1s. NEW TRIM 2" x 6" TRIM BOARD zo. FLASHING - SEE SPEC z1. CANOPY BEAM 22. SCUPPER 23. EXISTING STONE CAP AND BRICK BASE - REPAIR/REPOINT DETERIORATED MORTAR AS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PRESERVATION BRIEF 2 (REPOINTING MORTAR JOINTS IN HISTORIC MASONRY). 2, AMBER GLASS GABLE FRONT WITH WOOD MULLIONS TO MATCH HISTORIC IF DAMAGED. 25, GABLE WALL- REMOVE BLACK PAINT, LAP SIDING TO MATCH HISTORIC za. REPAIR/ REPAINT EXISTING COLUMNS 27, REMOVE BLACK PANELING AT CANOPY za. NEW PANELING AT CANOPY TO MATCH EXISTING 29. EXTEND SECTION OF CANOPY as. NEW PATIO RAILING 31. REFINISHED GLASS GABLE FRONT 32. EXISTING STRUCTURE TO REMAIN 33. NEW STOREFRONT - SEE SCHEDULE ..EXISTING PLYWOOD SOFFIT, REPAIR AND REPLACE AS REQUIRED. 35, NEW EPDM WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE as. NEW BATT INSULATION 37. NEW 5/8" GYP SHEATHING ae. NEW WINDOWS IN EXISTING WOOD FRAMES as. NEW GARAGE DOORS AT EXISTING OPENINGS. <s. EXISTING CEILING PAINT AND REFINISH. 41, NEW SLIDING DOOR az. NEW INFILL WALL AND STOREFRONT 43. NEW OPERABLE GARAGE DOORS a . EXISTING PAINTED METAL PANEL. 45. EXISTING DOWNSPOUT TO REMAIN HISTORIC REHABILITATION Z _O H U H N Z O U O LL O I➢YS[-S CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 COURTYARD ELEVATIONS A.201 a SUPPER CLUB SOUTH ELEVATION 2O2 SCALE: 3/32" = 1 I I I _ - III limit IN It F HOTEL SOUTH ELEVATION (NO WORK) A.202 SCALE:3I32"= 1'-W PROPOSED RENOVATION I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — — _ _ — _ _ — — _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3 _ _ _ 3 I S B I 2 - lb 19 • 2 . 1 2.., 13 (a_)SUPPER CLUB WEST ELEVATION 202 SCALE:3/32"= 1'-0- PROPOSED RENOVATION SUPPER CLUB NORTH ELEVATION A.2O2 SCALE:3/32"= 1'-0' EXTERIOR ELEVATION KEYNOTES 1. EXISTING STONE MASONRY- EVALUATE CONDITION AND REPAIR AS REQUIRED, MASONRY WORK TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BRIEFS. 2. EXISTING NORMAN BRICK MASONRY- REPAIRIREPOINT DETERIORATE[ MORTAR AS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PRESERVATION BRIEF 2 (REPOINTING MORTAR JOINTS IN HISTORIC MASONRY). 3. NEW CEDAR SHAKES- CLASS C FIRE RATING 4. NEW 2'. W JOISTS AT 2:' O.C. 5. NEW 5I8' PLYWOOD 6. DRIP FLASHING PAINT BLACK T. 1- x 8' CEDAR SHAKES - CLASS C FIRE RATING 6, 11CCEDAR BREATHER 9. NEW 5114" x 14 5/8" x 28' - 8' GLU-LAM BEAM 10.NEW 5114' x 14 B/8` x 32- 0' GLU-LAM BEAM 11. INSPECT GLU-LAM HEADER, FINISH, SAND SMOOTH AND RESEAL WITH CLEAR VARNISH. 12.REMOVE EXISTING BEAM EMBEDDED IN STRUCTURE. CUT STONE ALONG GROUT JOINTS AND REMOVEAS NECESSARY NEW GROUT COLOR TO MATCH EXISTING. 13. 2' X 6" BEVELED 14.3 ROWS OF MED. CEDAR SHAKES WI BUTTS IN LINE - CLASS C FIRE RATING 15. EXISTING CANOPY BASE TO REMAIN, REPAIR MASONRY WORK TO COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE HISTORIC PRESERVATION BRIEFS. 16.EXISTING COLUMNS TO REMAIN, REMOVE EXISTING WOOD DETAILING SURROUNDS. 17. EXISTING CITADEL PANEL 15 HEADER WITH PEBBLF TEXTURE - REMOVE BLACK PAINT, PAINT (RED) TO MATCH EXISTING 18 EXISTING ENTRY CANOPY STRUCTURE TO REMAIN, SEE EXPANDED PIANS AND ELEVATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 19 NEW TRIM 2' x fi"TRIM BOARD 20. FLASHING -SEE SPEC 21. CANOPY BEAM 22. SCUPPER 23. EXISTING STONE CAPAND BRICK BASE - REPAIRIREPOINT DETERIORATED MORTARAS REQUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PRESERVATION BRIEF 2 (REPOINTING MORTAR JOINTS IN HISTORIC MASONRY). 24. AMBER GLASS GABLE FRONT WITH WOOD MULLIONS TO MATCH HISTORIC IF DAMAGED, 25. GABLE WALL - REMOVE BLACK PAINT, LAP SIDING TO MATCH HISTORIC 28. REPAIR/ REPAINT EXISTING COLUMNS 27, REMOVE BLACK PANELING AT CANOPY 28. NEW PANELING AT CANOPY TO MATCH EXISTING 29. EXTEND SECTION OF CANOPY ::.EXISTING PLYWOOD SOFFIT, REPAIR AND REPLACEAS REQUIRED, 35.NEW EPDM WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE 36.NEW BAR INSULATION 3T.NEW 5/8' GYP SHEATHING 38 NEW WINDOWS IN EXISTING WOOD FRAMES 39. NEW GARAGE DOORS AT EXISTING OPENINGS. 40. EXISTING CEILING PAINTAND REFINISH. 41.NEW SLIDING DOOR 42 NEW INFILL WALLAND STOREFRONT 43 NEW OPERABLE GARAGE DOORS 4: EXISTING PAINTED METAL PANEL. -EXISTING DOWNSPOUTTO REMAIN HISTORIC REHABILITATION THIS REHABILITATION PROJECT IS RECEIVING STATE HISTORIC TA%CREDITS, ALL WORK IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE AND THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, AND MUST MEETTHE 'SECRETANY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS FOR HISTORIC eILITATION". HISTORIC WORK SCOPE IS DEFINED IN THE TAX CREDIT APPLICATION PART 2(MD ANY AMENDMENTS). REFER TO SECTION 013591 IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. DO NOT REMOVE, DAMAGE. ORALTERANY BUILDING ELEMENT NOT SPECIFICALLY INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS TO BE IMPACTED. Z SW L LZ r w LW r Z W CJ_ C a 0 Z J LW r 0 2 W a J 1n N W N U' oa 2 0� W Z U 2 N F_ N CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A.202 SINGLE PLY ROOF MEMBRANE 4" RIGID INSULATION GRAVEL STOP AND FLASHING CEDAR SHAKES FELT PAINT EXISTING T & G DECKING ARCHED GLULAM BEYOND 2" RIGID INSULATION EXISTING 1 1/2" DECK EXISTING NAILER TOP OF BEAM EXISTING JOIST EXISTING WOOD SLATS TO BE PAINTED NEW TRACK LIGHTING EXISTING 30 WF STEEL BEAM EXISTING 2x SOFFIT NAILERS TRIM BOARD TO MATCH GLULAM FINISH NEW SUSPENDED 2X2 CEILING TILES SUPPER CLUB CANOPY SECTION SUPPER CLUB ROOF SECTION .3D, SCALE:3MB— 1'-0" \A.30y SCALE r = r-0' SUPPER CLUB SECTION A.301 SCALE:3/16"= V-0" SUPPER CLUB SECTION A SCALE X16— 1'-0" SECTION KEYNOTES 1. WALNUT WAINSCOT 2. PAINTED GYPSUM BOARD FINISH 3. ACCENT WALL COVERING 4. STORAGE DIVIDER, WALNUT FINISH 5. WALL TILE 6. TILE ACCENT ON THE UNDERSIDE OF THE OPENING 7. ARTWORK DISPLAY 8. NEUTRAL TONE ON TONE WALL COVERING 9. EXISTING BEAM TO BE STRIPED AND STAINED 10. EXISTING VAULTED WOOD CEILING, PAINTED 11. WALL BASE 12. LOWERED CEILING, 2X2" CEILING TILES 13. CHANDELIER 14. TV SCREEN WALL HISTORIC REHABILITATION Z THIS REHABILITATION PROJECT IS RECEIVING STATE HISTORIC TAX CREDITS. 0 ALL WORK IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE AND THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, AND MUST MEET THE "SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS FOR HISTORIC REHABILITATION'. HISTORIC WORK SCOPE IS DEFINED IN THE FAX CREDIT APPLICATION PART 2(AND ANY AMENDMENTS). REFER TO SECTION 013591 N IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, DO NOT REMOVE,DAMAGE, OR ALTER ANY BUILDING ELEMENT NOT Z SPECIFICALLY INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS TO BE IMPACTED. 0 U 0 ILL. x➢YS[-S CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 BUILDING SECTIONS A.301 CEDAR SHAKES FELT EXISTING 3/4" PLYWOOD EXISTING 2X4 FLAT EXISTING NOTCHED 2X4 NAILER EXISTING 1X FINISH BOARD EXISTING 2X NAILER EXISTING DOWNSPOUT EXISTING FILLER STRIP EXISTING BRICK FACE SUPPER CLUB ROOF OVERHANG SECTION 3D2 SCALE: 1" = 1'-0' +12'-91/2"A' _ _ _ SUPPER ROOF BEARINGY SOUTH CANOPY SECTION A A.302 SCALE:3116- 1'-0" +27-l' ROOFA SOUTH CANOPY SECTION B 302 SCALE:3I16"= 1'-0" HISTORIC REHABILITATION Z THIS REHABILITATION PROJECT IS RECEIVING STATE HISTORIC TAX CREDITS. 0 ALLWORKISSUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE AND THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, AND MUST MEETTHE U "SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR'S STANDARDS FOR HISTORIC REHABILITATION'. HISTORIC WORK SCOPE IS DEFINED IN THE TAX CREDIT APPLICATION PART 2(AND ANY AMENDMENTS). REFER TO SECTION 013591 N IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, DO NOT REMOVE,DAMAGE, ORALTERANY BUILDING ELEMENT NOT Z SPECIFICALLY INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS TO BE IMPACTED. 0 U 0: 0 11 w QM I➢YS[-S CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 BUILDING SECTIONS A.302 -O SUPPER CLUB TRANSOM HEAD 501 SCALE: 3" = 1'-0" COVERUP EIFS FINISH TO BE REMOVED. PROTECT EXISTING GLASS AND WOOD MULLION FRAMING, TYP. POS AMBER GLASS AND FRAMING TO REMAIN AT ALL LOCATIONS EXISTING FLUORESCENT STRIP LIGHT TO BE REPLACED WITH LED STRIP IN EXISTING LOCATION, TYP. r3--� SUPPER CLUB TRANSOM JAMB A.501 SCALE: 3" = 1'4" COVERUP EIFS FINISH TO BE REMOVED. PROTECT EXISTING GLASS AND WOOD MULLION FRAMING, TYR POS AMBER GLASS AND FRAMING TO REMAIN TERMINATION BAR Wl SEALANTS COUNTER FLASHING EXISTING WALL CONDITION RETURN ROOF MEMBRANE V.I.F. 8" MINIMUM NEW CANOPY STRUCTURE TO MATCH ORIGINAL CANOPY. PROTECT TRANSOM WINDOW DURING CONSTRUCTION. Q SUPPER CLUB TRANSOM SILL A.501 SCALE: 3" = i'-0° W 2 w QM cov co N W N UQ O� Z V LO 04 j N > N 2021.01 CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 WINDOW DETAILS A.501 DOOR SCHEDULE MARK TYPE DESCRIPTION W HT THK MATL GLZ FRAME MATL FRAME LIE III ILS FIRE RATING HW SET COMMENTS 100 D HOTEL ROOM SLIDING DOOR 6'-0" 61-6' 1 3/4" 101 A ENTRY DOOR 7'-0" 7'-0" 1 3/4" 1 101A A ENTRY DOOR (VESTIBULE) 7'-0" 7'-0" 13/4" 1 102 B FITNESS ENTRY T-0" 6'-6" 1 3/4" 2 103 C FITNESS SECONDARY T-0" 6'41' 1 3/4" 3 104 C STORAGE ENTRY 3'-0" 6-6' 1 3/4" 4 105 C DINING ROOM T-0" 6'-8" 1 3/4" 5 SEE \ _EpuLE 2__ ,_ SEE SEE IGT 7 2' 1 SCX" 'I E'�T'� b TYPE A TYPE B TYPE C TYPE D ALUM DOOR WD DOOR & HM WD DOOR & HM ALUM SLIDING &FRAME FRAME FRAME DOOR &FRAME DOOR TYPES A-5D2 SCALE:114" = lW" SUPPER CLUB ENTRY DOOR A-5D2 SCALE:12" = 1'-0" NEW ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOOR CONTINUOUS SEALANT BOTH SIDES EXISTING DOUBLE BRICK WALL EXISTING STONE VENEER r7 -� JAMB @ ENTRY A-5o2 ,o HEAD @ ENTRY 5D2 SCA E: Y u u FERKR INTERIOR NEW ALUMINUM STOREFRONT DOOR &THRESHOLD EXISTING EXTERIOR NEW WALK OFF CARPET FINISH FLOOR FINISH SILL @ ENTRY A.502 SCALE: 3' = 1'4)" � SLIDING DOOR ELEVATION A.5D2 SCALE: 112" = 1'-0" INTERIOR ......... -------- ......-1.,-.--- r3--� JAMB @ SLIDING DOOR A-5o2 SCAUE:3" = 1'-P INTERIOR = POOL/EXTERIOR HEAD @ SLIDING DOOR A.502 ECALE:3' = 1'-0" INTERIOR EXISTING FINISHED FLOOR SILL @ SLIDING DOOR .5D2 SCALE: 3" = l'-0" CONTINUOUS SEALANT BOTH SIDES SHIM AS NECESSARY ALUMINUM SLIDING DOOR ALUMINUM SLIDING DOOR & THRESHOLD; THRESHOLD TO MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS THRESHOLD SET IN TWO CONTINUOUS BEADS OF SEALANT - EXISTING FINISHED FLOOR J mN LU N � ❑a O � W Z U 2 N N 2021.01 CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 Z _O U DOOR DETAILS Z O A.502 wu O LL 5 SCUPPER FRONT DETAIL A.503 SCALE:3' = 1'-0" PREFINISHED SHEET METAL TRIM STRIPPED INTO MEMBRANE ROOFING 20 GAPREFINISHED SHEET METAL 24 GA G.I. FLASHING BLOCKING 518" PLYWOOD TRIM BOARD TO MATCH FASCIA FOLD OVER EDGE ------------------ 2'-8" LT. GA. STEEL BEAM: SEE STRUCTURAL 1 X.8 CEDAR SOFFIT BOARDS SCUPPER SIDE DETAIL A.503 SCALE: 3" = 1' o SUPPER CLUB CANOPY SECTION � DEMO SUPPER CLUB CANOPY SECTION SUPPER CLUB CANOPY COLUMN SECTION A.503 SCALE = ra' A.503 SCALE: 3l4" = I"" 503 SCALE: -' = 1'-P Z _O U Z O U w O LL QW M I➢YS[-S CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 SECTION DETAILS A.503 STRIP IN DRIP ED DRIP ED LT. GA. STEEL BEAM: SEE SINGLE PLY WEATI 1X8C PRE -FIN FUM CANOPY EYEBROW DETAIL 504 SCALE: W = l'-0" VAULTED CANOPY SECTION 4 SCALE: 1112'= 1'-0" REPLACE EXISTING 2x12, PAINT PING STEEL POST, SANWREPAINT SUMP BEYOND. SEE DETAIL 20GA. PREFINISHED SHEET METAL, BLACK NEW GLULAM BEAM MODIFY EXISTING STEEL POST BY REMOVING 6" LENGTH AND INSTALL NEW GALVANIZED STEEL SADDLE, PAINT 5 SUPPER CLUB CANOPY COLUMN PLAN DETAIL SUPPER CLUB CANOPY COLUMN DETAIL A.5O4 SCALE: W = 1'." A.5O4 SCALE: 1 112"= l'-0" MEMBRANE :R BETWEEN ,MS; SEE STRUCTURAL :LASS C FIRE RATING 1 X 8 CEDAR SOFFIT BOARDS rl, :D ARCHED GLU-LAM, PAINT WEATHER BARRIER '.IP FLASHING, BLACK, fHER BARRIER NEW GLU-LAM BEAM , SLOPE TO DRAIN i/8'/FOOT :ING MEMBRANE EXISTING STEEL COLUMN, SAND/REPAINT SUPPER CLUB CANOPY SECTION 5O4 SCALE: 11/2'= 1'-0' i CEDAR SHAKES AT VAULTED ROOF BEYOND I /I 1 X 8 CEDAR FASCIA BOARDS I MT L FLASHING STRIPPED INTO ROOF MEMBRANE -SINGLE PLY ROOFING MEMBRANE CEDAR SHAKES - CLASS C FIRE RATING 5/8" PLYWOOD GA. METAL BEAMS: SEE STRUCTURAL FINISHED DRIP FLASHING, BLACK, :D INTO WEATHER BARRIER Z _0 U H Z 0 U w 0 1 w QM I➢YS[-S CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 SUPPER CLUB SECTION DETAILS A.504 REMOVE POST-POS PARAPETAND PREPARE FOR ADDITION TO CANOPY CAREFULLY REMOVE POST-POS EIFS COVERUP AND EXTERIOR SHEATHING TO REVEAL EXISTING STONE PANEL, TYR EXISTING STRUCTURE TO REMAIN DEMO EXISTING SOFFIT BOARD DEMO POST-POS COLUMN WRAP (BRICK VENEER, METAL TIES, AND METAL STUDS) TO RETURN TO ROB STEEL COLUMN CONDITION AT ALL CANOPY LOCATIONS. PROTECT STEEL COLUMN DURING DEMO WORKAND PREP FOR NEW PAINT, TYR ALL SIDES EXISTING STEEL COLUMN TO REMAIN; PROTECT. __4 EXISTING STEEL COLUMN TO L— _—� REMAIN; PROTECT. I— J DEMO POST-POS COLUMN WRAP (BRICK VENEER, METALTIES, AND _ METAL STUDS) TO RETURN TO ROB STEEL COLUMN CONDITION I_ ALL CANOPY LOCATIONS. _�AT PROTECT STEEL COLUMN DURING DEMO WORKAND PREP FOR NEW PAINT, TYR ALL SIDES DEMO SOUTH CANOPY SECTION END .505 SCALE: 1" = I - CAREFULLY REMOVE POST-POS EIFS COVERUP AND EXTERIOR SHEATHING TO REVEAL EXISTING STONE PANEL, TYR ROB STONE PANEL CLADDING TO REMAIN. REVIEW CONDITION AND REPLACE IN -KIND ONLYAS NECESSARY TYP. EXISTING STRUCTURE TO REMAIN DEMO EXISTING SOFFIT BOARD DEMO POST-POS COLUMN WRAP (BRICK VENEER, METAL TIES, AND METAL STUDS) TO RETURN TO ROB STEEL COLUMN CONDITION AT ALL CANOPY LOCATIONS. PROTECT STEEL COLUMN DURING DEMO WORK AND PREP FOR NEW DEMO SOUTH CANOPY SECTION SIDE A.505 SCALE: V = 1'-0' EXISTING STEEL COLUMN TO REMAIN FRAMING TO FASTEN COLUMN WRAP GFRC COLUMN WRAP 4" CONCRETE PIER SOUTH CANOPY SECTION END 505 SCALE:1" = 1'-0' SOUTH CANOPY SECTION SIDE A.505 sCALe V = I'." 4 i-------� A.506 PATCH IN EPDM ROOFING AND INSTALL NEW PREFINISHED METAL COPING OVER STONE PANEL. ROB STONE PANEL CLADDING TO REMAIN. REVIEW CONDITION AND REPLACE IN -KIND ONLY AS NECESSARY TYR NEW PREFINISHED METAL COPING CAP NEW ROOFING AND METAL DECKING ON STEEL BEAM NEW STONE PANEL CLADDING TO MATCH EXISTING ROB STONE CLADDING (ADJACENT). ATTACH TO METAL STUD FRAMING HUNG FROM NEW STEEL BEAM STRUCTURE NEW STEEL BEAM; SEE STRUCTURAL NEW EXTERIOR GYPSUM BOARD OVER METAL FRAMING; FINISH FLUSH WITH B.O. STONE PANEL Z _O U H Z O U w O LL QW M I➢YS[-S CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 SOUTH CANOPY SECTION DETAILS A.505 STEEL CHANNEL: SEE STRUCTURAL GFRC COLUMN WRAP, PAINTE METAL STUD FRAMING EXISTING STEEL COLUMN V.I.F. SOUTH CANOPY COLUMN DETAIL A.rJ�s SCALE: 1112"= 1'-0" OUS CLEAT BLOCKING R 16" O.C. LY MEMBRANE ROOFING NE PANEL TO MATCH EXISTING SOUTH CANOPY END FLASHING DETAIL S06 SCALE: 3' = 1'-0" Lvi_v JI v L____---F J I11 T - -�:�_' J �) II ri --TI �. IF- - - -Tr- L v_ _v JL _ _ _ _ J L _ _ _ _ SOUTH CANOPY COLUMN DEMO DETAIL SCALE: 11/'= 1'.0" 'ONTINUOUS CLEAT =ASTENER 16" O.C. TINGLE PLY MEMBRANE ROOFING X[STING STONE PANEL SOUTH CANOPY SIDE FLASHING DETAIL A.506 SCALE:3" = 1'-0" DEMO POST-POS COLUMN WRAP V V V V v (BRICK VENEER, METAL TIES, AND METAL STUDS) TO RETURN TO =i-1-� -- - -JI �� IL----'-1-F-� POS STEEL COLUMN CONDITION AT ALL CANOPY LOCATIONS. �) ,rT---T�-_===T---TT �) D RING CPREP C) III''I --I IIIIPAINT, FOROLUMN DEMO WORK AND EW TYR ALL SIDES JF L POS STEEL COLUMN TO C) II II REMAIN, APPLY NEW PAINT, TVP. I II I� --- -- - - - - ,I .� �. IF - - - -- - --- - l ccc II ccc FL J4 ccc II C CC L v_ _ - Jl _ _ _ _ J L _ _ _ _ Jl _ _ _ _ J z _O U H z O U N w O 1, sri[i CONSTUCTION DOCUMENTS 2021.11.19 N. SOUTH CANOPY DETAILS A.506 Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 Memorandum Date: January 6, 2021 To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Jessica Bristow, Historic Preservation Planner Re: 2022 Work Plan The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) requires the Commission to submit a Work Plan annually as part of our Certified Local Government agreement. For last year's work plan an effort had been made to align the work with the broader goals of the City Council as outlined in the Strategic Plan. The Strategic Plan intends to foster a more inclusive, just, and sustainable Iowa City by prioritizing the physical, mental, and economic well-being of all residents. • Advance Social Justice, Racial Equity, and Human Rights • Demonstrate Leadership in Climate Action • Strengthen Community Engagement and Intergovernmental Relations • Invest in Public Infrastructure, Facilities and Fiscal Reserves • Foster Healthy Neighborhoods and Affordable Housing Throughout the City • Enhance Community Mobility for All Residents • Promote an Inclusive and Resilient Economy Throughout the City The new City Council will develop a new strategic plan in the coming months. The current plan is included for the Commission's reference. Following discussion and update of work plan progress, the Commission's workplan will be reviewed for approval at the February Commission meeting. Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 2021 Historic Preservation Work Plan The Historic Preservation Commission annually updates its work plan. This year we aligned our work around the goals that the City Council outlined in the Strategic Plan. Advance Social Justice, Racial Equity, and Human Rights Recent Accomplishments Civil Rights Grant. This two-part project with grant funding from the National Park Service was completed with the successful listing in the National Register of Historic Places of both the Tate Arms and the Iowa Federation Home, two important sites in Iowa City's Civil Rights History. Educational signage and digital online materials were also created. The research and information from the project will continue to be used in future presentations to educate and inform the public. Short Term Goals Get clarity from the City Council on staffing a subcommittee charged with telling the full history of Iowa City. Staff and the Commission should discuss the purpose and make-up of the subcommittee, as well as specific goals and actions of this endeavor. Online Heritage Map: Several local landmarks and historic resources within existing historic districts tell a story of Iowa City's historic efforts to advance social justice, racial equality, and human rights. We should tell those stories and allow citizens to see the physical structures connected with the historic struggles for justice. Long Term Goal Partner with Parks and Recreation Commission, Public Art Commission, Lucas Farms Neighborhood, and other community organizations to make Oak Grove Park a public space that honors the site's heritage. The park, originally owned by the railroad, was home to many Mexican immigrants who lived in company -owned housing, old boxcars. Many of those immigrants moved into the surrounding neighborhood. When the City sold Elm Grove Park, near the Johnson County Administration Building, it bought the land where Oak Grove Park now sits. The park is currently scheduled for major renovation in 2026 or 2027 which provides plenty of time for us to investigate outside funding sources and develop a community plan that makes it a public space both for the neighborhood but also the City. Demonstrate Leadership in Climate Action Good preservation is about using the least invasive measures first and then working up to removal and replacement only if necessary. This tactic values embodied energy and minimizes construction waste. Ongoing Work One of the fundamental principles of historic preservation is to preserve, reuse, and adapt rather than demolish and create waste. Our work and previous commission's work has kept immeasurable tons out of landfills. Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 Short Term Goals We need to continue to advocate that embodied energy is worth valuing. Currently the Climate Action Committee does not take this into consideration. We should continue to advocate to fix this. While what we've saved from landfills is immeasurable, embodied energy in existing materials is still measurable. Provide resources for energy efficiency, repair, and maintenance of older homes on the City's website. Structures built before World War II, used different methods of construction compared to construction of today. Trying to modernize an old structure with modern technologies often isn't the right approach. Sometimes it's the wrong approach. There are significant ways to increase energy efficiency in older homes that are minimally invasive. There are ways to repair and maintain a home and keep resources out of the landfill. Other organizations have already documented these. We should just find a way to make them available for more citizens. Contribute to the discussion on demolition. As the Climate Action Commission considers how to deal with demolition, we should contribute. And so should other commissions. If we're serious about climate change, we should be serious about demolition and the waste it produces. The cost to the environment, even considering dumping fees, doesn't match the $50 fee. Some cities are discussing removing demolition by right. Rather than just paying for a demolition fee, citizens are given an opportunity to evaluate the new structure - and make sure the new structure aligns with our expressed values - do we get affordable housing, is it energy efficient, are there significant elements of history of the building that should be valued? Long Term Goal Develop a disaster preparedness guide for preservation. As the effects of climate change manifest themselves in more natural disasters, we need to be prepared. The 2020 derecho, followed the 2008 floods, and the 2006 tornado. The City earned national awards for its work around the 2006 tornado. The commission and city staff should develop a playbook for when a disaster hits (because one will again). The goal would be to more rapidly know how to provide support to those dealing with a disaster. Strengthen Community Engagement and Intergovernmental Relations The Commission, as a Certified Local Government, is the place for intergovernmental relations success. We work with SHPO and the National Parks Service, who oversees historic sites across the country. We also are trying to engage cross -departmentally with other commissions where our work overlaps. Ongoing work Annual Historic Preservation Awards: The annual awards program highlights successful preservation work within the community and the expertise of contractors and consultants. As one of the Commission's main forms of community outreach, the awards are a high priority every year and attract an audience of about 100 people. The annual awards have been moved to May to coincide with Preservation Month activities. The awards will require Commission involvement for nominating properties and for work on the awards sub -committee producing the awards. We will continue to partner with Johnson County Historic Preservation Commission. Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 New Commissioner Recruitment: With three vacant positions, we should recruit new commissioners. Short Term Goals Meeting with Realtors: The first of perhaps an annual meeting with Realtors to help them understand the benefits of historic districts and what the trade-offs are. The Homebuilders often feel like they are the ones who have to tell new property owners about historic districts. Increased Digital online presence: The City has valuable resources and information on historic properties in several different formats. Currently the ability for the public to access this information is dependent upon the format of the information. Digitizing hardcopy information and combining it with existing digital information in a searchable online database would make this information about city history more available for property owners and researchers. The City is considering a revamp of its website, we should try to partner when this happens. Invest in Public Infrastructure, Facilities and Fiscal Reserves The city assets need care and occasionally reinvestment. Doing a little work along the way helps avoid urgent situations down the road. Recent Accomplishments Three City -owned assets on the National Historic Register became local landmarks: The Old Post Office (now the Senior Center); the Old Settler's Cabins in City Park, and the Ned Ashton House. The Old Settler's Cabins were also rehabilitated. Short Term Goals Follow-up on the commission's request to City Staff on the Montgomery -Butler House. In May 2020 the Commission requested that staff from the Planning Department, Public Works, and Parks help develop a working group to map out the work of this city -owned historic asset. In 1998, as part of a Memorandum of Agreement for the development of the new water plant, the City mothballed the Montgomery/Butler House, a significant historic resource, for roughly $70,000. Summit Street Monument: In 2019 the consultant, Atlas Preservation, completed the "Summit Street Monument Assessment and Conservation Options Plan" that was financed in part through a Certified Local Government Grant. Given the ongoing deterioration of the monument, the Commission will review the options and recommend an appropriate action to City Council. Enhance Community Mobility for All Residents These are largely transit and transportation related goals. Many preservationists are sympathetic to these issues. Historic neighborhoods were designed to accommodate pedestrians, transit, and modes of transportation that aren't car -reliant. The Commission should consider how we might engage on this when opportunities arise. Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 Foster Healthy Neighborhood and Affordable Housing Throughout the City Many older neighborhoods, that are now historic districts, were designed with mobility, neighborhood commercial nodes, and a variety of housing types in one neighborhood. Ongoing work The core work is protecting healthy neighborhoods. Many of the districts were developed out of a response to unhealthy developments in these areas that motivated the neighborhoods to take action. We help provide stability and provide a platform for reinvestment. Historic Preservation Fund. With the implementation of the fund in FY 2018, the Fund has approved 28 grants or loans improving 25 properties. This is a popular program which has helped property owners maintain the historic character of their properties and has helped keep valuable material out of the landfill. Be ready to partner with neighborhoods interested in historic preservation. There's been some interest in the past, particularly the Lucas Farms -Kirkwood Avenue area with reconnaissance surveys and our job is to be ready and willing partners. Short Term Goals Advocate for the continuation or growth of the UniverCity Program. The success of the program has helped stabilize historic neighborhoods and provide affordable housing. Long Term Goal Work to get form -based code for areas that are adjacent to or are surrounded by historic districts. The exchange between the public and developers in form -based code is that the code would allow for different uses which the public would need to accommodate, but in turn they would get more certainty about community values such as walkability, affordability, and the look and feel of the neighborhood. Developers get more flexibility in use in exchange for requirements in form. The areas that are adjacent to, or surrounded by, historic districts often are areas where development disagreements happen. Form -based code in these areas would help reduce some of that friction and would align with goals set by council and staff. Promote an Inclusive and Resilient Economy Throughout the City Preserving our physical heritage is an asset to an inclusive and resilient economy. Preservation is a tool for economic growth. The preservation work done in our districts is often done by smaller local businesses, and potential for growth opportunities exist in smart deconstruction and trade development for contractors who have specific skills related to older homes. Recent Successes The Tailwinds development on College St. This development is an exciting mix of the historic and new. We have several historic commercial buildings saved and new development. The Highlander is making an old structure vibrant by reviving its history. Their efforts to become a local landmark as part of these efforts should be supported. They intend to take advantage of tax credits. Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 Short Term Goals Downtown National Register Historic District. This is scheduled to be reviewed by the State Nomination Committee in February. This has been a long -sought goal. For consideration Revolving loans for tax credits: In talking to Downtown property owners, some of them expressed concern about the timeline of tax credits. They are available on the backend, but often cash is needed up front. The idea would be to create a 12-18 month loan option to bridge the immediate construction needs until project completion when the tax credits are available. Transfer of Development Rights Revisit: The previous council opted to not consider a specific TDR proposal that was developed on a tight timeline. We have had two (or maybe three) new council members since then. A new TDR proposal could be developed without the constraints of making them work for a specific property so they could benefit the whole community. Opt in incentives for local landmarks in commercial zones. One of the challenges I have heard about local landmarks or historic districts with primarily commercial buildings is that the needs of the building may be different than residential properties. Often, more flexibility is needed to make old buildings work. As a city, we can incentivize all kinds of things we value, there's no reason why commercial landmark properties can't be part of that mix. Long Term Goals Consider partners on a historic trades mentorship program. Dubuque's HEART program is a model example of this - training high school students in trades related to preservation, while transforming blighted neighborhoods (largely historic) back into livable and walkable neighborhoods and helping young people achieve goals of graduation and career training. Those who have been through the program often start small businesses in the trades they have learned. Ongoing Administration of Our Work Short Term Goals Update of the College Green Historic District. In 2016, the Commission approved the relocation of the Houser -Metzger House from 422 Iowa Avenue to 623 College Street where the contributing structure had been damaged beyond repair by fire and water. In order for the relocated house to be considered contributing to the Historic District, an amendment to the National Register -listed district is required as a first step. This amendment will be reviewed by the Commission following revision by staff and the District representative. Update of the Iowa City Preservation Handbook (Maps): The most recent version of the handbook was updated in 2010 and does not include several recent changes and needs to be reviewed for accuracy. Since many properties have changed status (for example, a non- contributing property has become contributing because of siding removal and porch rehabilitation) in the past ten years, the maps, which are the basis for review -type, application Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 of exceptions, and in some cases eligibility of the Historic Preservation Fund, are outdated. The full Commission would review and approve updated maps. Long-term goal One of the at -large positions of the commission is reserved for a professional in the industry. In a recent meeting between the Home Builder Association, your chair, and several city staff members, they suggested that one of the at -large positions be designated for a professional builder, tradesperson, or architect (or perhaps preservationist). Frank Wagner served three terms. Quentin Pitzen currently does this work. We could define this at -large position for someone who does this work professionally. Preserve our Heritage Our history belongs to all of us. We owe it to ourselves and future generations of Iowa Citians that we preserve the physical aspects of this history and make sure our shared history isn't forgotten. This work often encompasses multiple areas of the priorities set by Council. Our shared heritage is worth preserving as its own goal. Recent Successes: Sanxay-Gilmore House. The University has a plan to move, restore, and use this house. Cochran -Dennis House is a local landmark. The compromise proposal has been approved by council. Self-starting landmarks: We've had several that we've helped shepherd through the process. We should continue conversations with interested property owners. And be mindful of opportunities that present themselves. Short Term Goal 2040 Waterfront Drive Intensive Survey: Funded in part through a Certified Local Government Grant, an intensive survey of the property at 2040 Waterfront Drive was completed. The final document will be provided to the Commission and the property owner for their review in the coming months. Long Term Goals Evaluation of Mid-century Modern Housing Stock: Since these properties have reached historic status, Commissions across the country are developing plans for how to evaluate them. In Iowa City, many of the areas where they are concentrated have not been reviewed but could begin with reconnaissance -level surveys in future years. MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION THE CENTER — ASSEMBLY ROOM November 18, 2021 MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: PRELIMINARY Margaret Beck, Kevin Boyd, Sharon DeGraw, Cecile Kuenzli, Kevin Larson, Noah Stork, Frank Wagner Carl Brown, Jordan Sellergren, Deanna Thomann Jessica Bristow None RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (become effective only after separate Council action) CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Boyd called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS: HPC21-0100: 812 Church Street — Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation District (deck, window, and door changes) Bristow said this house was re -built after a 1933 fire, and it has synthetic siding and a one-story addition with a gable roof on the back with a deck and a small bump -out. She said part of the proposal is to remove the door from the bump out to turn it into a first -floor bathroom. She said the applicants would add a window that matches the proportions and structure of the current historic windows on the front of the house. A sliding door would replace the rear window in the house to the west of the bump out. Bristow said Staff recommends granting the exception for the sliding door because it is already on the rear of the 1978 addition and further up the hill so it is not as visible. She said they also want to replace the sliding window in the kitchen with a double -hung window. They would also replace two others windows further south in this wall as well. From work on the interior, they found the framing of the original windows in that location and would like to install windows that fit that. On the east side, Bristow said they propose separating the double -hung windows in the bedroom, which Staff supports. She said the applicants also have a desire to get rid of all of the deck in the back in order to maximize their space, so they propose tucking the deck into the notch between the bump out and the house. She said Staff would like for the Commission to grant an exception to their required 8" setback from the west wall of the house, and that the rest of the deck drawings could be approved in a future staff review project or with new drawings as part of this project. Wagner asked what types of windows will be in the bedroom. Bristow said one of the windows will be a casement window egress. MOTION: DeGraw moved to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 812 Church Street as presented in the application with the following conditions: window and door product information is approved by Staff and deck drawings are approved by Staff. Wagner seconded. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0. HPC21-0101: 1101 Kirkwood Avenue — Local Historic Landmark (enclosure of rear entry porch and kitchen window changes) Bristow said several of the historic changes within the house were complicated and hard to see. She talked through past alterations to the house and how they were visible. She said the porch was originally Italianate like the house and wrapped around the side of the house, but it is now deeper and does not extend even to the corner of the house. She said it now has some thicker and simpler columns and a differing door configuration from the original. She said some of the kitchen windows have been altered and are smaller and have a different trim than the historic windows. Bristow said for the current project the applicants wish to fully enclose the area in the back that was originally an open porch but has been enclosed with storm windows. The new area will create a mudroom and a larger overall space for the pantry. She said they also propose moving some windows that are currently at the interior wall to this porch area. This pair of windows will be moved to the first -floor south wall where there is currently one window. The new wall enclosure will include a door but no window. Bristow showed a drawing with a window and without to show how each fit in the space.. Kuenzli asked if the existing window in the pantry would be wider than the new door within the new space. Bristow said yes, that the door would be smaller because the existing historic window is larger than a typical door opening. MOTION: Wagner moved to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 1001 Kirkwood Avenue as presented in the application with the following conditions: door product information is approved by Staff. DeGraw seconded. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0. REPORT ON CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY CHAIR AND STAFF: Certificate of No Material Effect — Chair and Staff Review HPC21-0089: 427 Brown Street — Brown Street Historic District (porch railing replacement) Bristow said the non -historic porch railing is rotting, so it is being replaced. HPC21-0096: 414 Brown Street — Brown Street Historic District and Local Landmark (windowsill replacement) Bristow said one windowsill is rotting on the brick house so it is being replaced. HPC21-0020: 1519 Center Avenue — Dearborn Street Conservation District (tuck -pointing, masonry repair, soffit and fascia repair) Bristow said the work will mainly be done on the chimney but also a bit on the main house. The soffit repair is above the front door. HPC21-0104: 125-127 East College Street— Local Historic Landmark (window cloud signs) Bristow said these are a few sign applications that have been approved. This one involves vinyl window signs which will not impact the historic building Minor Review — Staff Review HPC21-0084: 728 East Washington Street — College Hill Conservation District (new rear deck and railings) Bristow said they are rebuilding the deck at this sorority house to follow the guidelines. HPC21-0098: 200 South Summit Street — East College Street Historic District (roof shingle replacement) Bristow said this house has been re -roofed with new shingles. HPC21-0097: 531 Clark Street — Clark Street Conservation District (roof repair and shingle replacement, skylight installation) Bristow said the large two-story addition on the back was damaged by a falling tree, so that is being repaired with the addition of skylights in the roof. HPC21-0105: 125-127 East College Street— Local Historic Landmark (protecting blade sign) Bristow said this building will also have a new projecting sign, along with the other approved sign applications (window clings). HPC21-0108: 727 Rundell Street — Longfellow Historic District (window replacement) Bristow said someone had replaced all of the windows on the house with inappropriate windows at one point in time. Those have been replaced again. The current project is the result of current issues they are having with the repair company for the two original windows on the house. New sashes were approved for these kitchen windows. Intermediate Review — Chair and Staff Review HPC21-01013: 741 Oakland Avenue — Longfellow Historic District (new porch pier) Bristow said a porch pier was being added to this porch at an area where a previous owner had enclosed part of the porch to have an enclosed entryway but had not added a support for the corner of the house. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 14, 2021. MOTION: Beck moved to approve the minutes from October 14, 2021. DeGraw seconded. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0. COMMISSION INFORMATION: Bristow said the Commission occasionally does Section 106 reviews, and she said she recently received one that involves adding some cellular equipment around Kinnick stadium for possible tailgating purposes. She said one part involves replacing the existing utility pole (in the Melrose Historic District) with a new wooden pole and attaching some equipment to it, and Staff said that it does not have an adverse effect on the historic district. Bristow said if the Commission wished to have further discussion on it, she could put it on their next agenda. The Commission did not request to review it further Boyd said Mrs. Kirkwood (1101 Kirkwood property), long after her husband died, came out in favor of women's suffrage very early when there was a movement to try and get that passed, which he said was just an interesting note of history he wanted to share. Boyd said he met with a member of Parks and Recreation to talk about the Montgomery -Butler House, so he is going to attend their meeting in January to ensure that their proposal is similar to the Commission's about finding a use for it. DeGraw said someone in her neighborhood asked if City Park pool was considered historic Boyd said they could add that to a future agenda for further discussion. ADJOURNMENT: DeGraw moved to adjourn the meeting. Wagner seconded. Meeting was adjourned at 6:16 p.m HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD 2020-2021 TERM 02/11 03/11 04/08 05/13 06/10 7/08 7/21 8/12 9/09 10/14 11/18 NAME EXP. BECK, 6/30/24 -- -- -- -- -- X X X X X X MARGARET BOYD, KEVIN 6/30/23 X X X X X X X X X X X BROWN, 6/30/23 X X X X O/E X O/E X X O/E O/E CARL BURFORD, 6/30/21 X X X X X -- -- -- -- -- -- HELEN DEGRAW, 6/30/22 X X X X X O/E O/E X X X X SHARON KUENZLI, 6/30/22 X X X X X X X O/E X X X CECILE KIPLE, LYNDI 6/30/22 X X X X X X -- -- -- -- -- LARSON, 6/30/24 __ __ __ __ __ X X O/E X O/E X KEVIN PITZEN, 6/30/21 X X O/E X X QUENTIN SELLERGREN, 6/30/22 X X X X O/E X X X X X O/E JORDAN STORK, NOAH 6/30/24 -- -- -- -- -- X X X O/E X X THOMANN, 6/30/23 -- -- -- -- -- O/E X X O/E X O/E DEANNA WAGNER, X X X X FRANK WU, AUSTIN 6/30/23 O/E O/E O/E X X -- -- -- -- -- -- KEY: X = Present 0 = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused --- = Not a Member MINUTES HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION EMMA J. HARVAT HALL December 9, 2021 MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: PRELIMINARY Margaret Beck, Kevin Boyd, Carl Brown, Cecile Kuenzli, Kevin Larson, Jordan Sellergren, Noah Stork, Frank Wagner Sharon DeGraw, Deanna Thomann Jessica Bristow None RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (become effective only after separate Council action) CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Boyd called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS: HPC21-0107: 738 Rundell Street — Longfellow Historic District (alteration and new outbuildin construction) Bristow said this property is a Moffit House, side -gabled cottage with an attached garage. She said the project is to increase the overall interior space and convert the interior garage into a living area. However, she said if the garage is converted and there is no longer a designated parking space, then the driveway cannot remain there according to City Code. She said Staff recommends, if the conversion of the garage is approved, not to have the outbuilding remain looking like a garage but rather incorporate it into the rest of the house because there will no longer be a driveway leading to this portion of the house. Bristow said the proposal is to remove the extension added to the front wall at the garage, fill in the wall framing flush with the rest of the wall, and create a stucco finish at the base of the wall to match the foundation. She said the rest of the wall would be covered with shingled -siding, and a window or a pair of double -hung windows would be installed. Since City Code requires a parking space added and the Commission would be approving the removal of the existing garage, Staff recommends building a new one at the alley. She said the applicants also wanted to replace the front door due to its cosmetic issues, and she said Staff would recommend it if they could find a good match for the new door. Kuenzli asked if it is necessary to install two windows on the front of house instead of just one, since she thinks the single is more aesthetically pleasing. Bristow said that was up to the Commission to decide. The application did not have measured drawings to show the change and Photoshop mockups were made to show the change. Two versions were made. Bristow showed the two options. Boyd asked which door was damaged and in need of repair. Bristow said the front door is the one that is damaged. The rear door the applicant's have requested replacing and reusing the door on the new garage. Bristow said staff recommends retaining the historic rear door on the house (adding a storm door as necessary) and putting a new door on the new garage. Brown asked why the original proposal included the installation of two windows. Bristow said that was the only option she had discussed with the applicant. Drawings would illustrate this but the submitted drawing were not to scale. MOTION: Sellergren moved to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 738 Rundell Street as presented in the staff report with the following conditions: drawings for the deck are submitted for staff approval, the rear door on the house remains at the house and a new door is installed in the garage, the garage windows are revised to smaller double or single -hung wood or metal -clad wood windows, all window and door product information is approved by Staff. Wagner seconded. The Commission did not vote. DeGraw asked if a paired window configuration could be used for the windows on the front of the house. Bristow said it could, but she wouldn't recommend that size of window shown on the back of the house. Bristow said it would be difficult to adhere to the guidelines if they did that because of the condition that new windows follow the historic window patterning, but it might be possible. DeGraw said she could picture a single, slightly larger window in that place to help improve the overall balance. Bristow said that the Commission could certainly add a condition for one window or at least leave that possibility open for the applicants to decide. Kuenzli and Wagner said that they liked the idea of the single window better than the double. Larson asked if the fagade of the existing garage is set back from the fagade of the house. Bristow said that it is. MOTION: Sellergren amended her previous motion of approving the Certificate of Appropriateness at 738 Rundell Street with all the previous conditions plus the addition of either one or two windows that will be centered on the wall in the existing garage area. Beck seconded. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0. HPC21-0111: 538 South Gilbert Street — Local Historic Landmark (permanent ADA accessibility ramp) Bristow said this house has had quite a history — she said it was owned by the county for a bit and it underwent several changes. She said this house is a large Italianate house with a hipped roof, slightly projecting gables, a two-story wing with simplified details, and an enclosed porch. She further discussed the architecture of the house and its changes over time. She said Public Space One has purchased the house, so it will become a public space, which means that it needs to be permanently ADA accessible. The guidelines allow for temporary ramps under staff review. Bristow said the ramp installation will be permanent, so it is coming before the Commission for review. Bristow said they will remove the steps from the side of the rear entry porch and extend the stoop to the south and then to the east. The stoop will have stairs and then a ramp that extends north towards the parking area. She said Staff recommended the railing on the ramp be a simple square spindle because the railings currently on the house would not meet current code requirements or would not considered appropriate once they were enlarged to meet the height requirement for the ramp. She said Staff also suggested that the area under the ramp (that is greater than 18 inches and behind the main house) also be enclosed with skirting to match the rest of the house. Kuenzli asked if the building was also a Local Landmark since it is on the National Historic Register. Bristow said it is and that is why the Commission is reviewing it. MOTION: Sellergren moved to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 538 Gilbert Street as presented in the staff report. Brown seconded. The motion carried on a vote of 8-0. REPORT ON CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY CHAIR AND STAFF: Minor Review — Staff Review HPC21-0112: 1111 Sheridan Avenue — Longfellow Historic District (new railing for steps to street Bristow said the applicants are doing a simplified version of what had been approved for the front porch in the past. Intermediate Review — Chair and Staff Review HPC21-0080: 121 and 125 East College Street — Local Historic Landmarks (minor changes to a prior COA) Bristow said there were several minor changes to the development that were brought back for review. Changes include the wall area infill on the back of both buildings where several approved openings will be omitted. On the front of the Crescent Block the sign band was not as assumed prior to demolition so a new metal panel treatment in the area was approved. HPC21-0109: 814 Bowery Street — Governor -Lucas Street Conservation District (demolition of non -historic entry canopy) Bristow said the entry canopy at the 1960 addition was rebuilt without a permit, and it is being removed now since the owner does not want to build it to match the adjacent canopy or an alternative approvable design. COMMISSION INFORMATION: Bristow said she will be out of town for a few days in the upcoming weeks. She also said that they have now had 115 applications so far this year, which is the most they have ever had. ADJOURNMENT: Brown moved to adjourn the meeting. Beck seconded. Meeting was adjourned at 6:27 p.m. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD 2020-2021 TERM 03/11 04/08 05/13 06/10 7/08 7/21 8/12 9/09 10/14 11/18 12/9 NAME EXP. BECK, 6/30/24 -- -- -- -- X X X X X X X MARGARET BOYD, KEVIN 6/30/23 X X X X X X X X X X X BROWN, 6/30/23 X X X O/E X O/E X X O/E O/E X CARL BURFORD, 6/30/21 X X X X -- -- -- -- -- HELEN DEGRAW, 6/30/22 X X X X O/E O/E X X X X O/E SHARON KUENZLI, 6/30/22 X X X X X X O/E X X X X CECILE KIPLE, LYNDI 6/30/22 X X X X X -- -- -- -- -- -- LARSON, 6/30/24 __ __ __ __ X X O/E X O/E X X KEVIN PITZEN, 6/30/21 X O/E X X QUENTIN SELLERGREN, 6/30/22 X X X O/E X X X X X O/E X JORDAN STORK, NOAH 6/30/24 -- -- -- -- X X X O/E X X X THOMANN, 6/30/23 -- -- -- -- O/E X X O/E X O/E O/E DEANNA WAGNER, -- X X X X X FRANK WU, AUSTIN 6/30/23 O/E O/E X X -- -- -- -- -- -- -- KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused --- = Not a Member Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 Memorandum Date: January 6, 2021 To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Jessica Bristow, Historic Preservation Planner Re: City Park Pool and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan At the November 18, 2021 Historic Preservation Commission meeting, the Chair of the Commission requested that staff provide information about City Park Pool and the current Master Plan Project for the Commission's information. City Park Pool was dedicated June 26, 1949. Ned Ashton, whose house at 820 Park Road is a local Historic Landmark, was the engineer for the pool. A page from Ashton's scrapbook is included as an attachment to this memorandum. In addition, several pages from Irving Weber, written for the occasion of the pool's 30`h Anniversary in 1979 are also included for background information. The pool has been altered over time, including the removal of the below -grade viewing window. Following this background information, staff has included the press release, dated November 22, 2021 from Parks and Recreation Director Juli Seydell Johnson, addresssing the current status of their Master Planning process. More information about the project can be found at the website at the end of the press release • Ned Ashton. was the engineer for the 1949 Iowa City Park swimming pool, City Park Pool celebrates its roots rr.aathhen na p� t Construction workers, in June 1949, put the ftnishln6 touches on the L1ty Park Peol In Iowa City. 60 years By Rob Daniel lanceafyl LLtaen Mandan ernlsaidshe henthceravi�iuqFwk wl t end untie in Iowa CLLY ehen the CityPark Pool opined 1n n that The rtem Wa[atood oat tothe letth theable dd &d of memories t' �ex� � 1�a slid Yt wa Y the Plus erW, and they were dnang Tnat feentrew excepeonel for Wattbrte" 60 ears of C,'s, Park Pool u� °°°"1 M9e °led m ea Part of rerwr dmu W Y Ify GhV0d Pool in 1966. The city iiaelf will cele. ■ M Pail Pool Is Wobiatint the 6oth amhwsary Of orate the 50th arudyw%ary a if a cm Mbar and Ot oPenin{NLtYt+r. what as oPerdrg of the pool with a party June& Warr mAtplks of the The betutntng of the pool came after the passage pod? You M YjbW phda M hers WM at 9ie Cdy of a bond by wtare on Sept. 4, 1941, accoNiry w Pak Pod W onunNprwt✓�sn.twn. Irving w'eber's "Iowa City — iWtane &' The pool9 Wod {{'giber aalwdaeeaJed with k,e utuet of ® S6F MORE Vow a phdo gaOxy dCiry Park Pod eight -Year d 1�y5 with Wough Ina years at" ,Kes°'memn See POOL, SA P001 If you 90 From 1A a Mat 60th Punk= Party of Ong of Ctry Pad u,e pool frna4y open Pn wd. June 11, 1918, came wvh an ■MMIUAPMAx bweax in mate from the ■ Cat Ra(uW spin rat o�ri@�'Is 7M762,60o bond to a Is $3 a parfon. Iowa City Press -Citizen Tuesday, May 19, 2009 r • Underground viewing area of the pool. r .s • Dedication ceremony Article 278 Park pool to mark 30 years (Ran July 14, 1979) The City Park swimming pool cel- ebrates its 30th anniversary this Sunday. The $136,925 pool was opened to the public June 11, 1949, with the dedication program two weeks later on June 26, 1949. It didn't come easily. Many long delays were encountered, including World War II, before the first swim- mer swam its 50-meter Length, and the first Tied Crossclass of beginners mastered the technique of staying afloat. Actually it was eight years from the time the voters of Iowa City had voted favorably, 1329 to 581, Sept. 4, 1941, on the first bond issue, $62,500, until the pool finally was in operation. Preliminary architect's plans were drawn and it was hoped the pool would be open by June 1, 1942. Then three months afterthe bond election, the bombing of Pearl Har- bor and World War II shelved the project indefinitely -"placed it on the back burner.,' Project revived The pool project was revived in 1947, and on Aug. 11 of that year, a petition with 1372 signers was pre- sented tothe City Council bya group of mothers, headed by Mrs. William H. Olson, requesting a special elec- tion to vote on a second bond pro- posal, this one for $50,000 to aug- ment the already existing $62,500. The election, held Oct. 7, 1947, also carried. The two bond elections totaled $112,500. The difference between the $136,000-plus cost of the pool, and the bond issues, some $25,000 was covered by $12,000 raised by the Community Dads Club, and a transfer of money from other city accounts, including $2,500 from Li- quor Tax Funds. Four locations The location of the pool, wisely, was not tied in with either of the bond elections. While City Park was the logical location, costwise and from many other angles, there were differences of opinion as to where it should be placed, and the City Council, scheduled a hearing for Oct. 20, 1947, to get the consensus of the citizens. It was a heated three-hour hear- ing with the Council Chambers in the old City Hall packed. People were standing in the aisles, in the doorways and sitting on the window ledges. Great was the interest and enthusiasm forthe pool and its loca- tion. Four locations were suggested: 117 Copyright Iowa City Host Moon Lions Club Mike McConnel of Hills and daughter Kelly enjoy the City Perk Pool, which marks its 30th anniversary Sunday. 1. Brawn Street playground; 2. Area people gave their opinions, and af- immediately to the north of Shrader ter lengthy debate, the City Park site Athletic Field (north of Longfellow was chosen, and the meeting ended School); 3. Obtain land from the on a surprisingly friendly note. Odd Fellows 23-acre site east of Mayer Freston loser presided Iowa City; or 4. City Park. and the City Council at the time Many prominent, knowledgeable consisted of Max Hawkins, Clark 118 Copyright Iowa City Host Moon Lions Club Mighell, Frank Fryauf, William Crandrath, Charles Smith, James W. Jones and James Callahan. Ned L. Ashton was the consulting engi- neer on the project. Robert Lee, superintendent of recreation since 1951, says the pool has stood the test of the years ex- cellently, and has not required ma- jor repairs or overhaul. The addition of a sun deck at the south end has been the only change. The pool has always been ex- tremely popular, both with children and adults. The peak year in atten- dance, before either Mercer or Coralville outdoor pools were built, was 1964 when 94,208 went through the turnstiles. Attendance in 1978 was 63,728. Can the opening week- end in 1949, 2,439 used the pool - in the first day and a half, The current pool staff includes JudyOlson, aquatic supervisor, Tab Ray, pool manager; Sue Roach, assistant manager and Jere Haefner, Sue Knoedel, Heidi John- son, KariJordahl, Mike Manchester, Ellen Prediger, Holly Seidenstitk, Ralph Tyler and Dianne Dolezal, guards. A program will be presented Sunday commemorating the 30th birthday of the pool. Sunday program The schedule: 2:30 p.m, - Presentation of time capsule, to be opened on the pool's 50th birthday in 1999. It is to be buried on the grassy mound just south of the pool and will contain pictures of current pool staff, a pic- ture of the pool, a 1979 Recreation Department program, a 1979 sea- son pass, a Red Gross swimming class schedule and a copy of this article. 3:00 p.m. - Jere Haefner, one of the lifeguards, will present his third annual clown performance. "The Banana Man," to help celebrate the 30th birthday party. There will be an attendance prize drawing for all using the pool that day. A special award will go to Mr. Donald Johnson, the pool's most devoted patron in 1979. She is there, rain or shine. Admission to the pro- gram is free. Historical Side Light - "It's an ill wind that blows no good," as the saying goes. The delay in con= strutting the City Park Pool resulted in many improvements in the final pool The original plans were patterned after the Ellis Park Pool in Cedar Rapids, which was 50 meters in length, 25 yards wide, with two so- called "semi -circular teaching bulges" at the shallow end. With the long delay, the local swimming pool committee appointed in the late thirties, consisting of University of Iowa Swimming Coach, Q.A. Armbruster, Ned L. Ashton, Consulting Engineer, J. Edgar Frame, Recreation Department Di- rector at the time, and Irvine B. Weber had met with regularity dur- ing the delay, improving and updat- ing the plans. The pool was changed to the present T shape, with two-thirds of the total pool area devoted to shal- low water, for beginners and non- 119 Copyright Iowa City Host Moon Lions Club swimmers but so arranged to pro- vide a 50 meter long course, and a 25 yard short course, for swimming meets. The committee's emphasis was directed to the beginner and non -swimmer. The result was the most utilitarian pool in the midwest when completed and, according to Bob Lee, it still is considered one of the better outdoor pools after 30 years. During the 8 year delay, the swimming pool committee made other important changes. The diving boards and deep water area were changed to the south end - open towards Park Road. The bath house then was located at the north end, so that the deck area to the basket pick-up area and locker rooms were kept dry by the sun. One of the special innovations was no roof on the two bath houses, with the sun keeping it dry and more pleasant. There was one unexpected plus in the delay. Between September 1941 and August 1947, by the time the project got started once again, $23,500 of the bands had been paid off. Interest rates on that issue were the unbelievable 2 to 2 314%p rate. Comments on the Iowa City Swimming Pool on its 30th Anni- versary - by Norwood C. (Bud) Louis II; "I have been asked by Irving Weber, Iowa City historian, to jot down a fever of my memories of the pool since I worked on it during construction in the summer of 1948. In a few lines you will see why I was chosen from the many men who worked on it. I guess my story would have to begin in 1934 when I was 5 years old and my parents took me to the old "Big Dipper" in the park to take swimming lessons from Larry Criswald of Iowa athletic fame. I finally caught on and enjoyed swimming in the old pool, even though it took the first year of in- struction to get me to put my head under water. My next memory was that I had a large white button on my Model Ain 1941 that said "Vote Yes Sept. 4 for a swimming pool." I may still find that button. Then came the war and was gone until the spring of 1945. 1 did two things when I came home - I started Pharmacy School and worked for McGreedy Construction Company during the summers. Working for McCreedy was al- ways exciting. The first summer we built a heat tunnel north of the union and I got buried in a cave-in one day. Later that summer we chased off union organizers with pick handles while putting up those temporary barracks that were to be used only five years. The big time came the first week after school in 1948. M.D. McGreedy looked through his transit and told his brother, Harry McGreedy to lower the nail he was holding against a tree one inch, and then drive it. in. That nail was put in the tree which still stands near the southeast cor- ner of the deep end. It was to be the water line in the pool and the point from which we worked during the entire jab. Next came a man - I think his name was Lynus Schnoebelen - who was to blow out the stumps iWi7 Copyright Iowa City Host Moon Lions Club where the trees had been felled for the pool. This was to be quite a day. The big tree near the shoulder of the deep end on the west side took 36 sticks of dynamite, and also took out some windows along Park Road. Dean Zopf will remember this as his home was directly south of the tree. Later it was my task to chop out the remaining roots of that tree so we could form up that corner. I think I worked a week on it. The forms we used were not steel, but a plastic - coated plywood. We had the hole dug and the large drain pipe run down to the river when we left for the 4th of July holiday in 1948. The record will show that we had a big rain on the 4th, and upon returning the next day, we found the hole full of muddy water. Someone had not thought to leave the large valve open in the deep end. This is my big moment, and the reason I have been asked to relate this story. Someone had to go under this muddy water and turn that valve open to drain the area so we could get ready to pour the concrete base. I thought I had learned not to vol- unteer from the Army, but somehow when they told me that I would for- ever be the first one in the pool, decided it was worth it. I'm glad it wasn't too deep, as it was like going into a thick malted milk. I thought when I came up from opening the valve that I would be allowed to go home and change, but instead I was invited to start scooping up the mud into 55-gallon barrels. Bill and Chuck McCreedy got in on that, too. dick McCreedy, oldest son of M.D. and present owner of the company, was off at school and missed all of the fun. In those days Iowa City had only one concrete company and this was a bad situation. They were al- ways in a hurry and demanded at least three wheelbarrows, or more, ready to unload. I mentioned that we ran the drain to the riverand this meant that a few more trees had to be removed from the path of the large drain pipe.. It was during this phase of the job that I first met B.J. Lambert, who was a famous engineer with the University and the City. He was acting as an advisor on the job and I guess he figured he was to advise clear down to the lowly laborers because he asked if he could chop down a tree and show us how it was done "in the old days." This led to a discussion of how much stronger men were in the 1920s than they were in the 40s. He told us a story that I have never forgotten. It seems that he was the head engineer on the Burlington Street Bridge i.n the 1920s and on a certain day the railroad called to say that they had spotted a gondola car of gravel for him down by Hummers Grocery, but that they needed the car back the next day. Since it was Saturday noon and all the men had left but one, he found himself in a predicament. The man remaining was Iowa's All American tackle, duke Slater, who had been working on the bridge that summer to keep in shape. B.J. said Duke told him he would help out and he went to the tool house and got a # 12 grain scoop (14 is the biggest) and he climbed into the rail car. The only comment B.J. Lambert said after 121 Copyright Iowa City Host Moon Lions Club that was 'a steady stream of gravel came over the side of that car all afternoon and he had it empty by dark.' understand that the following year a man climbed the fence the night before the pool officially opened to be the first one in, but he was one year late. He did have thinner water to swim in that I did." (July 15, 1979) 122 Copyright Iowa City Host Moon Lions Club 1/6/22, 2:28 PM Thank you for providing feedback for the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Master Plan I City of Iowa City :OVID-19 & VACCIN CITY GOVERNMENT SERVICES PAYMENT NEWS & MEDIA CALENDAR REPORT A CONCERN CLIMATE ACTION Ciry°f IOWA CITY A UNESCO CITY OF LITERATURE Q Search this site Search Home / News Thank you for pt-uviding feedback for the Iowa City Parks and RPr�rpaflnn Master Plan Iowa City Parks and Recreation has wrapped up the first phase of public engagement for the Gather Here Recreation Master Plan. During the first phase, the department collected public feedback through in -person planned and pop-up events, passive feedback opportunities, and through online surveys and discussion boards. Over 1,000 responses were received. The first engagement phase also included a series of community focus groups. Additionally, a statistically valid survey has been mailed to 400 random Iowa City residences. These mailed surveys are an integral part of the master planning process and the public is encouraged to participate. Your survey feedback will help shape the future of Iowa City recreation. A second engagement phase will be introduced this winter and will enable residents the opportunity to provide additional comment. All information compiled during the engagement phase will be used to create the Gather Here Recreation Master Plan. The plan will provide guidance for future facility improvements and recreation programming in the following areas: • Existing recreation facilities o City Park Pool o Mercer Park Aquatic Center and Scanlon Gym o Robert A. Lee Community Recreation Center • Outdoor sports fields • Recreation activities, programs, and events Select Language https://www.icgov.org/news/thank-you-providing-feedback-iowa-city-parks-and-recreation-master-plan 1 /4 1/6/22, 2:28 PM Thank you for providing feedback for the Iowa City Parks and Recreation Master Plan I City of Iowa City The final plan will be available for public review in 2022. Feedback from the community is critical to the development of the master plan. This process does not include parks, trails, and playgrounds as they were a part of the 2017 Gather Here Park Master Plan. Please visit icgov.org/Recreation to learn more about the master plan project phases and opportunities to share feedback through online forums and surveys. G Date of publication Monday, November 22, 2021 S Contact Juli Seydell Johnson Director of Parks and Recreation 319-356-5104 Juli-SJohnson@iowa-city.org Department Parks and Recreation f1W1Uq0tin1-8+V� Quick links City Code City Council Commodities, services, consulting bids _....................................................................................................................... Construction project bids Fire Iowa City Public Library Job Openings Online payments and services Parking and transportation Select Language https://www.icgov.org/news/thank-you-providing-feedback-iowa-city-parks-and-recreation-master-plan 2/4