Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRVAP FY24 A2A ResponsesOctober 7, 2022 FY24 Legacy Aid to Agencies HCDC Question and Answer (Q&A) Session Instructions The Q&A session provides an opportunity for commissioners to ask clarifying questions about the applications submitted through United Way. Please provide written responses to the questions attached. Written responses must be received by City staff no later than October 13, 2022 to be included in the October HCDC packet. Written responses can be directed to Brianna Thul at bthul@iowa-city.org or dropped off at City Hall (410 E Washington Street). Responses may also be mailed but must be received by the deadline to be included. Agencies are encouraged to attend the October 20, 2022 HCDC meeting, but should be aware that the purpose of the meeting is for HCDC to discuss the written answers submitted in advance. Agencies will not be asked to present their application. This adjustment is intended to gather the information required to accurately score submissions, while also promoting the effective use of time and resources for both agencies, and commissioners. Tentative Timeline September 15, 2022 Applications are due to United Way by 5pm. September 16, 2022 Staff will share the submissions with HCDC as soon as they are available from United Way – likely September 16, 2022. September 30, 2022 Staff will provide HCDC summary sheets with suggestions for questions (provides staff about 2 weeks to prepare). October 6, 2022 Written questions due to staff (provides HCDC about 3 weeks to review submissions). Questions should be relevant to the scoring criteria established in advance. October 7, 2022 Staff to compile and send questions from HCDC with written answers due October 13, 2022 (provides about 1 week for agencies to respond in writing). If HCDC does not have questions for an applicant, staff will inform the agency. October 14, 2022 HCDC packet posted with written responses from agencies (provides about 1 week for HCDC to review responses). October 20, 2022 HCDC Q&A Discussion Session. HCDC will discuss questions and answers for each agency. October 7, 2022 Agency: RVAP Questions: 1. Does RVAP have a plan to increase revenue and/or decrease expenses – perhaps through a strategic plan? Yes, with the continued cuts in funding from our state and federal governments each year, RVAP is working to diversify our funding streams. The vast majority of our budget supports staffing, so our focus is and will continue to be on people – the amazing people who dedicate their lives to advance RVAP’s mission, and on the people we are privileged to know and support along their healing journeys. The continued financial support from local municipalities through Aid to Agencies funding is critical to our sustainability as we strive to provide our critical services throughout the community. Additionally, this financial investment demonstrates through meaningful action that our community leaders recognize sexual violence as an issue that needs and deserves attention, support, and financial resources. With the goal of establishing a sustainable strategy for diversifying our funding stream, prioritizing our programming, and increasing access to services we began the steps of developing a new five-year strategic plan this past Spring as we invited four experts from throughout the country to assess our program and provide guidance to our team. This departmental program review process is empowering RVAP to critically evaluate our organizational structure, programming, financial sustainability, and ultimately our impact and effectiveness in the communities we serve through a lens of continuous improvement. The four reviewers were: (1) Dr. Erin Stresow (Assistant Director, UI Diversity Resources) (2) Rosa Beltré (Executive Director of the Ohio Alliance to End Sexual Violence) (3) Tana Fedewa (Director of the Michigan State University Center for Survivors) (4) Sue Prochaszca (former director of Tristate Coalition, the agency that provided SA & DV services to victims/survivors in Southeast Iowa prior to 2014) In May of this year these leaders met with all RVAP staff and many stakeholders and collaborative partners to familiarize themselves with our work. In July this committee presented our team with a report that clearly evaluates the strengths and weaknesses they recognized, and our team is spending time this fall to integrate this guidance into a five-year strategic plan for future action and improvement. 2. Why did RVAP report only two years of demographic data? I apologize as this was an administrative oversight on my part. We have new staff supporting these reports, and I did not make sure they recognized that FY23 demographics were to be added as a projection rather than actual data as we reported for FY21 and FY22. Thank you for pointing this out. Here are our projections for FY23: October 7, 2022 Gender *FY23 Male 725 Female 1100 Non-binary 175 Race Asian 75 Black or African American 375 American Indian or Alaska native 5 Multiple Races 145 White 950 Other 450 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 Ethnicity Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origin 250 Not of Hispanic, Latino or Spanish origin 1750 Age 0-5 10 6-17 1500 18-29 225 30-61 250 62-75 15 75+ Years 0 Area Median Income <30% AMI 0 <50% AMI 0 <80% AMI 0 >80% AMI 0 October 7, 2022 Geographic Location Johnson County (Combined, unduplicated) 2000 Iowa City 1100 Coralville 400 North Liberty 400 *projected data