Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-12-2023 agenda packet Thursday January 12, 2023 5:30 p.m. Emma Harvat Hall City Hall IOWA CITY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Thursday, January 12, 2023 City Hall, 410 E. Washington Street Emma J. Harvat Hall 5:30 p.m. Agenda A) Call to Order B) Roll Call C) Public discussion of anything not on the agenda D) Certificate of Appropriateness HPC22-0089: 804 Iowa Avenue – College Hill Conservation District (window and door replacements) E) Review of 2022 Historic Preservation Commission Work Plan F) Report on Certificates issued by Chair and Staff Certificate of No Material Effect – Chair and Staff review HPC22-0086: 422 Grant Street – Longfellow Historic District (exterior wall repair) HPC22-0087: 418 Brown Street – Brown Street Historic District (siding replacement on modern building) Minor Review –Staff review 1. HPC22-0078: 730 North Linn Street – Brown Street Historic District (site stair replacement) 2. HPC22-0079: 610 North Johnson Street – Goosetown/Horace Mann Conservation District (handrail installation) 3. HPC21-0064: 520 South Governor Street – Governor-Lucas Street Conservation District (solar panel installation) 4. HPC22-0068: 1214 Sheridan Avenue – Longfellow Historic District (overhead door replacements) 5. HPC22-0084: 401 Brown Street – Brown Street Historic District (rear deck repairs) 6. HPC22-0083: 517 South Lucas Street – Governor-Lucas Street Conservation District (front step replacement) 7. HPC22-0088: 607 Oakland Avenue – Longfellow Historic District (roof replacement, change to metal) Intermediate Review – Chair and Staff review HPC22-0081: 829 Kirkwood Avenue – Local Historic Landmark (minor changes to a previous COA) G) Consideration of Minutes for November 10, 2022 H) Commission Information I) Adjournment If you will need disability-related accommodations in order to participate in this meeting, please contact Jessica Bristow, Urban Planning, at 319-356-5243 or at jessica-bristow@iowa-city.org. Early requests are strongly encouraged to allow sufficient time to meet your access needs. Staff Report January 4, 2023 Historic Review for HPC22-0089: 804 Iowa Avenue District: College Hill Conservation District Classification: Contributing The applicant, Streamline Architects, is requesting approval for a proposed alteration project at 804 Iowa Avenue, a Contributing property in the College Hill Conservation District. The project consists of the replacement of the first-floor windows in the historic portion of the house. Applicable Regulations and Guidelines: 4.0 Iowa City Historic Preservation Guidelines for Alterations 4.3 Doors 4.11 Siding 4.13 Windows Staff Comments This three-story rectangular house with a hipped roof has some Tudor Revival stylistic elements. A pair of steeply pitched front gables interrupt the eaves line. A gable hood is centered above the front entrance, and a shed roofed dormer runs the length of the building on each side. The first floor is brick veneer, the remaining floors stuccoed. The remaining historic windows are 8-over-one double-hung with four-light transoms above the ones on the south elevation which are also grouped in threes. A large addition in the right-hand rear forms an "ell" and consists of a gabled roof and a pair of shed dormers, the eastern dormer flows with that of the original structure. A second-floor balcony forms a verandah on the west side. This 1966 addition was designed by architect J Bradley Rust. In 2016, the Commission approved alterations to the basement of the 1966 addition, including the replacement of some non-historic windows. No other work has been reviewed since the Conservation District was formed in 2003. The applicant is proposing to replace the remaining first-floor windows in the historic portion of the house. This includes the two west-facing double-hung windows, the two east-facing double-hung windows, and six south-facing double hung windows and transoms above. The two sidelights for the front door will also be replaced. They will also replace the pair of historic French Doors in the SW corner of the house and one window in the rear addition. They propose to replace the windows with Pella Reserve Traditional. The proposal information includes aluminum coil stock in a brown color. Staff assumes the intention is to cover the original wood trim around and between windows with this material. They propose to replace the existing single light side-lights on the main door to 15-lite panels. Section 4.3 Doors of the guidelines recommends repairing historic doors rather than replacing them. It is recommended to replace badly deteriorated doors with new or salvaged doors that are similar in size, material, style, and appearance. Section 4.11 Siding of the guidelines states that it is disallowed to cover historic trim such as door and window trim, skirt and frieze boards, and corner boards. It is also disallowed to remove them. Covering historic trim is also disallowed when the application of synthetic siding is approvable by exception. It is recommended to repair historic wood siding and trim. Section 4.13 Windows of the guidelines recommends preserving historic windows by repairing sashes and frames and retaining historic window frames and replacing badly deteriorated sashes with new sashes that match the historic ones. It is recommended to replace badly deteriorated windows with new ones that match the type, size, sash width, trim, use of divided lights, and overall appearance of the historic windows. Using new wood windows to replace deteriorated historic wood windows is recommended, although the use of metal-clad, solid wood windows is acceptable. All replacement windows and trim must accept paint. Typically, sashes will be finished in a dark color, either black or dark green. Divided lights may be true or simulated. Simulated divided lights may be created with muntin bars that are permanently adhered to both sides of the glass, preferably with spacer bars between the panes of insulating glass. The section describes windows as follows: Windows are one of the most important elements that define a building’s architectural character. Important window characteristics and elements include the window type, size, proportion, trim—lintels, sills, decorative hoods and pediments, pattern of divided lights, mullions, sash and decorative glass. Most often, historic windows are double-hung, but casements were occasionally used. Except for small decorative windows, historic windows are generally taller than they are wide, and the lower and upper floor windows are often aligned vertically. The Commission recommends repair of historic windows before replacement is considered, and requires documentation of the extent of deterioration in order to approve replacement of windows. Prior to 2015, door slabs could be replaced in all properties without historic review. Ordinance no. 15-4631 amended section 105.2 of the IBC and IRC to include review of street-facing doors for landmark properties and properties in historic districts, not conservation districts (#17). For the historic French Doors, if the exterior trim is not removed or covered (which would require historic review approval) the replacement of the door slabs does not require historic review and approval. Therefore, review of the French Doors will not be included in this review. It is assumed that their historic exterior trim will remain. In Staff’s opinion, the historic windows included in this project are in good condition. Some windows may not open and close as expected because of past paint applications or stops that need to be adjusted. The interior trim above the south-facing windows in the east portion of the house appears to have experienced some movement over time that caused the paint to crack at the joint. No impact to the windows was found. Minimal repair could be completed for the windows to function properly. Alternatively, they could undergo a complete rehabilitation and weather-stripping so that they would be in a “like new” condition. The inoperable transoms are in excellent condition. Staff recommends that this portion of the project is not approved. The proposal included the replacement of the windows on either side of the main door with 15-lite windows that do not match the existing single-light configuration. While the front door has been changed from the tongue-and-groove original door, there is no evidence that the current single-light windows are not the historic configuration. The 1966 drawing provides the oldest representation of the façade of the building that is currently known. Unless historic images can be found to provide documentation that the windows were historically different from the existing configuration and the 1966 drawing, staff does not recommend approval of a window that does not follow the guidelines: matching the existing use of divided lights, if the Commission approves window replacement on this façade. The window in the rear addition on the west side is likely not a historic window. This portion of the building was added in 1966. The drawings for the 1966 project show this window as an 8-over-one double-hung window matching the windows in the historic portion of the house. The window is currently a one-over-one double hung window with wired glass. Because the window is not historic, staff recommends approval of its replacement with an 8-over-one double hung window to match the historic windows. Any type of glass may be used. The French Doors do not fall under the Commission’s purview, so they are not included in the recommended motion. As an important part of the historic character of the house, staff recommends that the owner consider repair of this pair of doors rather than replacement. And if beyond repair, replacing the doors in-kind. While the application did not state that trim would be replaced or covered in the project, aluminum coil stock, which is used in modern construction to cover other trims, is included in the project. The guidelines disallow covering any trim with any material. Staff recommends that covering any trim on the building is not approved. Replacement windows and doors should reuse existing trim and replace in-kind if beyond repair. Similarly, if ganged or paired windows are replaced, the new windows should not be installed in the same opening but retain the original size and configuration. Any weight pocket should remain with its exterior trim even if it no longer holds weights. Recommended Motions (Motions must be made in the affirmative and then voted down if the application is being denied.) Replacement of windows as proposed and covering trim: Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 804 Iowa Avenue as presented in the application. Alternative Selective window replacement and window repair approval: Move to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 804 Iowa Avenue, replacing the rear window on the west elevation with the window proposed in the application, retaining wood trim and repairing the remaining wood windows, retaining wood trim. 804 Iowa Avenue- South Elevation 804 Iowa Avenue- Southeast corner 804 Iowa Avenue- South Elevation Detail- windows to the west of the front door 804 Iowa Avenue – example of paired windows in building (not included in project) – first floor north elevation (over basement stair) 804 Iowa Avenue- transom and trim detail- interior of front windows east of front door 804 Iowa Avenue – Detail of above transom trim 804 Iowa Avenue- Front door detail 804 Iowa Avenue – 1966 South Elevation drawing detail 804 Iowa Avenue – 1966 West Elevation drawing detail (rear window to be replaced noted) DN DN UP DN DN DN DN D DOG TROT DRIVEWAY PATIO OPEN TO BELOW A500 2 4 3 1 A50016 A500 11 A500 5 A501 3 A501 5 A500 7 8 1 24 6 7 8 6 12 10 9 15 14 13 315 SF 101 PARLOUR 128 SF 102 LOBBY 438 SF 103 LOUNGE 129 SF 1173 Room 61 SF 100 VESTIBULE www.streamlinearchitects.com Project number Date Drawn by Checked by STREAMLINE ARCHITECTS, P.L.C. ANDREW DASSO, AIA 575 12TH AVENUE EAST MOLINE, IL 61244 (563) 345-2724 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPROJECT MANAGER (XXX) XXX-XXXX name@streamlinearchitects.com COPYRIGHT © 202212/20/2022 10:58:38 AMA101 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 20-096CHI OMEGA SORORITY12/20/2022 Author CheckerINTERIOR REMODEL &WINDOW REPLACEMENT804 Iowa AveIowa City, IA 52240NO. DESCRIPTION DATE 1/4" = 1'-0"1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW, REPLACE WITH NEW WINDOW. REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW, REPLACE WITH NEW WINDOW. REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW, REPLACE WITH NEW WINDOW. REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW, REPLACE WITH NEW WINDOW. EXISTING DOOR TO REMAIN REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW, REPLACE WITH NEW WINDOW. REMOVE EXISTING PATIO DOORS, REPLACE WITH NEW PATIO DOORS. REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW, REPLACE WITH NEW WINDOW. REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW, REPLACE WITH NEW WINDOW. Jobsite Location: Sales Branch Location: These drawings are based on our interpretation of the information provided to us. They are submitted for final approval of the individual** responsible for the project and are not intended to create any warranty or other liability. The user** is responsible for compliance with applicable building codes or other regulations and determining the suitability of the suggestions for the particular application, including the final design of reinforcement, flashing, and sealant systems for all window and door installations. ** building owner, architect, contractor, installer and/or consumer Description: Project Name:Quote Name: Room Location: Iowa City, IA Chi Omega Sorority Piano Room Side Pella® Reserve, Traditional, Double Hung, 37 X 59, Brown 10 14500 WINDOWS BY PELLA 6/20 Rough Opening:3' 1 3/4" X 4' 11 3/4" Scaling:1/2" = 1' Viewed from the Exterior 15665012Quote Number: Line Number:Quote Qty:2 Performance Information: U-Factor 0.26, SHGC 0.25, VLT 0.46, CPD PEL-N-232-00279-00001, Performance Class CW, PG 50, Calculated Positive DP Rating 50, Calculated Negative DP Rating 50, Year Rated 08|11, Clear Opening Width 33.625, Clear Opening Height 25.062, Clear Opening Area 5.852151, Egress Meets Typical 5.7 sqft (E) (United States Only) Customer Approval Form: Signature:Date: Of1Pag 11Printed On: 6/20/2022 Customer Approval Form: Signature:Date: Jobsite Location: Sales Branch Location: These drawings are based on our interpretation of the information provided to us. They are submitted for final approval of the individual** responsible for the project and are not intended to create any warranty or other liability. The user** is responsible for compliance with applicable building codes or other regulations and determining the suitability of the suggestions for the particular application, including the final design of reinforcement, flashing, and sealant systems for all window and door installations. ** building owner, architect, contractor, installer and/or consumer Description: Project Name:Quote Name: Room Location: Iowa City, IA Chi Omega Sorority Piano Room Front Pella® Reserve, Traditional, Double Hung, 35.5 X 57.5, Brown 15 14500 WINDOWS BY PELLA 6/20 Rough Opening:3' 0 1/4" X 4' 10 1/4" Scaling:1/2" = 1' Viewed from the Exterior 15665012Quote Number: Line Number:Quote Qty:3 Performance Information: U-Factor 0.26, SHGC 0.25, VLT 0.46, CPD PEL-N-232-00279-00001, Performance Class CW, PG 50, Calculated Positive DP Rating 50, Calculated Negative DP Rating 50, Year Rated 08|11, Clear Opening Width 32.125, Clear Opening Height 24.312, Clear Opening Area 5.423771, Egress Meets Typical for ground floor 5.0 sqft (E1) (United States Only) Of2Pag 11Printed On: 6/20/2022 Customer Approval Form: Signature:Date: Jobsite Location: Sales Branch Location: These drawings are based on our interpretation of the information provided to us. They are submitted for final approval of the individual** responsible for the project and are not intended to create any warranty or other liability. The user** is responsible for compliance with applicable building codes or other regulations and determining the suitability of the suggestions for the particular application, including the final design of reinforcement, flashing, and sealant systems for all window and door installations. ** building owner, architect, contractor, installer and/or consumer Description: Project Name:Quote Name: Room Location: Iowa City, IA Chi Omega Sorority Piano Room Front Pella® Reserve, Traditional, Sash Set, Fixed, 35.5 X 11, Brown 20 14500 WINDOWS BY PELLA 6/20 Rough Opening:3' 0 1/4" X 0' 11 3/4" Scaling:1/2" = 1' Viewed from the Exterior 15665012Quote Number: Line Number:Quote Qty:3 Performance Information: U-Factor 0.25, SHGC 0.26, VLT 0.48, CPD PEL-N-1-53769-00001, Performance Class CW, PG 50, Calculated Positive DP Rating 50, Calculated Negative DP Rating 50, Year Rated 11 Of3Pag 11Printed On: 6/20/2022 Customer Approval Form: Signature:Date: Jobsite Location: Sales Branch Location: These drawings are based on our interpretation of the information provided to us. They are submitted for final approval of the individual** responsible for the project and are not intended to create any warranty or other liability. The user** is responsible for compliance with applicable building codes or other regulations and determining the suitability of the suggestions for the particular application, including the final design of reinforcement, flashing, and sealant systems for all window and door installations. ** building owner, architect, contractor, installer and/or consumer Description: Project Name:Quote Name: Room Location: Iowa City, IA Chi Omega Sorority Foyer Pella® Reserve, Traditional, Sash Set, Fixed, 28.5 X 73.5, Brown 25 14500 WINDOWS BY PELLA 6/20 Rough Opening:2' 5 1/4" X 6' 2 1/4" Scaling:1/2" = 1' Viewed from the Exterior 15665012Quote Number: Line Number:Quote Qty:2 Performance Information: U-Factor 0.25, SHGC 0.26, VLT 0.48, CPD PEL-N-1-53769-00001, Performance Class CW, PG 50, Calculated Positive DP Rating 50, Calculated Negative DP Rating 50, Year Rated 11 Of4Pag 11Printed On: 6/20/2022 Customer Approval Form: Signature:Date: Jobsite Location: Sales Branch Location: These drawings are based on our interpretation of the information provided to us. They are submitted for final approval of the individual** responsible for the project and are not intended to create any warranty or other liability. The user** is responsible for compliance with applicable building codes or other regulations and determining the suitability of the suggestions for the particular application, including the final design of reinforcement, flashing, and sealant systems for all window and door installations. ** building owner, architect, contractor, installer and/or consumer Description: Project Name:Quote Name: Room Location: Iowa City, IA Chi Omega Sorority Sitting Room Pella® Reserve, Traditional, Double Hung, 35.5 X 57.5, Brown 30 14500 WINDOWS BY PELLA 6/20 Rough Opening:3' 0 1/4" X 4' 10 1/4" Scaling:1/2" = 1' Viewed from the Exterior 15665012Quote Number: Line Number:Quote Qty:3 Performance Information: U-Factor 0.26, SHGC 0.25, VLT 0.46, CPD PEL-N-232-00279-00001, Performance Class CW, PG 50, Calculated Positive DP Rating 50, Calculated Negative DP Rating 50, Year Rated 08|11, Clear Opening Width 32.125, Clear Opening Height 24.312, Clear Opening Area 5.423771, Egress Meets Typical for ground floor 5.0 sqft (E1) (United States Only) Of5Pag 11Printed On: 6/20/2022 Customer Approval Form: Signature:Date: Jobsite Location: Sales Branch Location: These drawings are based on our interpretation of the information provided to us. They are submitted for final approval of the individual** responsible for the project and are not intended to create any warranty or other liability. The user** is responsible for compliance with applicable building codes or other regulations and determining the suitability of the suggestions for the particular application, including the final design of reinforcement, flashing, and sealant systems for all window and door installations. ** building owner, architect, contractor, installer and/or consumer Description: Project Name:Quote Name: Room Location: Iowa City, IA Chi Omega Sorority Sitting Room Pella® Reserve, Traditional, Sash Set, Fixed, 35.5 X 11, Brown 35 14500 WINDOWS BY PELLA 6/20 Rough Opening:3' 0 1/4" X 0' 11 3/4" Scaling:1/2" = 1' Viewed from the Exterior 15665012Quote Number: Line Number:Quote Qty:3 Performance Information: U-Factor 0.25, SHGC 0.26, VLT 0.48, CPD PEL-N-1-53769-00001, Performance Class CW, PG 50, Calculated Positive DP Rating 50, Calculated Negative DP Rating 50, Year Rated 11 Of6Pag 11Printed On: 6/20/2022 Customer Approval Form: Signature:Date: Jobsite Location: Sales Branch Location: These drawings are based on our interpretation of the information provided to us. They are submitted for final approval of the individual** responsible for the project and are not intended to create any warranty or other liability. The user** is responsible for compliance with applicable building codes or other regulations and determining the suitability of the suggestions for the particular application, including the final design of reinforcement, flashing, and sealant systems for all window and door installations. ** building owner, architect, contractor, installer and/or consumer Description: Project Name:Quote Name: Room Location: Iowa City, IA Chi Omega Sorority Sitting Room Pella® Reserve, Traditional, Double Hung, 25 X 58.5, Brown 40 14500 WINDOWS BY PELLA 6/20 Rough Opening:2' 1 3/4" X 4' 11 1/4" Scaling:1/2" = 1' Viewed from the Exterior 15665012Quote Number: Line Number:Quote Qty:2 Performance Information: U-Factor 0.26, SHGC 0.25, VLT 0.46, CPD PEL-N-232-00279-00001, Performance Class CW, PG 50, Calculated Positive DP Rating 50, Calculated Negative DP Rating 50, Year Rated 08|11, Clear Opening Width 21.625, Clear Opening Height 24.812, Clear Opening Area 3.726108, Egress Does not meet typical United States egress, but may comply with local code requirements Of7Pag 11Printed On: 6/20/2022 Customer Approval Form: Signature:Date: Jobsite Location: Sales Branch Location: These drawings are based on our interpretation of the information provided to us. They are submitted for final approval of the individual** responsible for the project and are not intended to create any warranty or other liability. The user** is responsible for compliance with applicable building codes or other regulations and determining the suitability of the suggestions for the particular application, including the final design of reinforcement, flashing, and sealant systems for all window and door installations. ** building owner, architect, contractor, installer and/or consumer Description: Project Name:Quote Name: Room Location: Iowa City, IA Chi Omega Sorority Sitting Room Pella® Reserve, Traditional, Double Inswing Door, Active / Passive, 62 X 85, Brown 45 14500 WINDOWS BY PELLA 6/20 Rough Opening:5' 2 3/4" X 7' 1 1/2" Scaling:1/2" = 1' Viewed from the Exterior 15665012Quote Number: Line Number:Quote Qty:1 Performance Information: U-Factor 0.25, SHGC 0.18, VLT 0.33, CPD PEL-N-218-07971-00001, Performance Class LC, PG 55, Calculated Positive DP Rating 55, Calculated Negative DP Rating 70, Year Rated 11 Of8Pag 11Printed On: 6/20/2022 Customer Approval Form: Signature:Date: Jobsite Location: Sales Branch Location: These drawings are based on our interpretation of the information provided to us. They are submitted for final approval of the individual** responsible for the project and are not intended to create any warranty or other liability. The user** is responsible for compliance with applicable building codes or other regulations and determining the suitability of the suggestions for the particular application, including the final design of reinforcement, flashing, and sealant systems for all window and door installations. ** building owner, architect, contractor, installer and/or consumer Description: Project Name:Quote Name: Room Location: Iowa City, IA Chi Omega Sorority Back Foyer Pella® Reserve, Traditional, Double Hung, 41 X 55.5, Brown 50 14500 WINDOWS BY PELLA 6/20 Rough Opening:3' 5 3/4" X 4' 8 1/4" Scaling:1/2" = 1' Viewed from the Exterior 15665012Quote Number: Line Number:Quote Qty:1 Performance Information: U-Factor 0.26, SHGC 0.25, VLT 0.45, CPD PEL-N-232-00283-00001, Performance Class CW, PG 50, Calculated Positive DP Rating 50, Calculated Negative DP Rating 50, Year Rated 08|11, Clear Opening Width 37.625, Clear Opening Height 23.312, Clear Opening Area 6.09107, Egress Does not meet typical United States egress, but may comply with local code requirements Of9Pag 11Printed On: 6/20/2022 Customer Approval Form: Signature:Date: Jobsite Location: Sales Branch Location: These drawings are based on our interpretation of the information provided to us. They are submitted for final approval of the individual** responsible for the project and are not intended to create any warranty or other liability. The user** is responsible for compliance with applicable building codes or other regulations and determining the suitability of the suggestions for the particular application, including the final design of reinforcement, flashing, and sealant systems for all window and door installations. ** building owner, architect, contractor, installer and/or consumer Description: Project Name:Quote Name: Room Location: Iowa City, IA Chi Omega Sorority Brown Coil 24" wide Aluminum Coil, Length: 600, Brown 55 14500 WINDOWS BY PELLA 6/20 Rough Opening: Scaling:1/2" = 1' Viewed from the Exterior 15665012Quote Number: Line Number:Quote Qty:2 Of10Pag 11Printed On: 6/20/2022 Customer Approval Form: Signature:Date: Jobsite Location: Sales Branch Location: These drawings are based on our interpretation of the information provided to us. They are submitted for final approval of the individual** responsible for the project and are not intended to create any warranty or other liability. The user** is responsible for compliance with applicable building codes or other regulations and determining the suitability of the suggestions for the particular application, including the final design of reinforcement, flashing, and sealant systems for all window and door installations. ** building owner, architect, contractor, installer and/or consumer Description: Project Name:Quote Name: Room Location: Iowa City, IA Chi Omega Sorority None Assigned 2 3/8" w/kerf Solid Jamb Extension, Length: 96, Unfinished Wood. Wood Type: Pine 60 14500 WINDOWS BY PELLA 6/20 Rough Opening: Scaling:1/2" = 1' Viewed from the Exterior 15665012Quote Number: Line Number:Quote Qty:48 Of11Pag 11Printed On: 6/20/2022 W-HG-2Pella 2022 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.Pella.com Pella® Reserve™ Traditional Hung Window (—) = Not Available (1) Maximum performance for single unit when glazed with the appropriate glass thickness. See Design Data pages in this section for specific product performance class and grade values. (2) Published performance data for air infiltration is determined by testing a minimum of four (4) products of NFRC model size. Testing is conducted in accordance with ASTM E283. Air infiltration ratings for products will differ by size. The performance data does not apply to combination assemblies unless noted. Actual product performance may vary for a number of reasons including installation and product care. (3) The higher the level, the greater the product’s ability to resist forced entry. (4) Glazing configurations may result in higher operational forces (5) ASTM E 1425 defines standard sizes for acoustical testing. Ratings achieved at that size are representative of all sizes of the same configuration. Other Performance Criteria Forced Entry Resistance Level (Minimum Security Grade) 3 10 Operating Force (lb) Initiate Motion / Maintain Motion (of Hallmark tested size and glazing) 4 40/45 Air/Water/Structural Performance 1 Meets or Exceeds AAMA / WDMA Ratings H-CW30 - CW50 Hallmark Certified Air Infiltration (cfm / ft 2 of frame @ 1.57 psf wind pressure) 2 0.11 Water Resistance 4.6 – 7.5 psf Design Pressure 30 – 50 psf Size and Performance Data Sound Transmission Class / Outdoor-Indoor Transmission Class Product Frame Size Tested 5 Glazing System STC Rating OITC RatingOverall Glazing Thickness Exterior Glass Thickness Interior Glass Thickness Third Pane Thickness Reserve Clad Double-Hung Window WITH INTEGRAL GRILLES 45" x 65"11/16"2.5 mm 2.5 mm —29 26 45" x 65"11/16"3 mm 5 mm —34 30 45" x 65"11/16"3 mm 6 mm Laminated —35 30 WITHOUT GRILLES 45" x 65"11/16"2.5 mm 2.5 mm —28 24 45" x 65"11/16"3 mm 5 mm —32 28 45" x 65"11/16"3 mm 6 mm Laminated —33 28 W-HG-10Pella 2022 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.Pella.com Pella® Reserve™ Traditional Hung Window 2" 1/2" Wood Exterior - Wood Interior Putty Glaze and Ogee Grilles 7/8"5/8"1 1/4" Clad Exterior - Wood Interior Putty Glaze and Ogee Grilles 7/8"5/8"1 1/4" Grilles-Between-the-Glass ®Traditional Style Collection - Integral Light Technology Clad Exterior - Wood Interior Ogee Grilles 2" 1 1/4"7/8" Contoured Grille 3/4" Interior wood ILT grilles available in Pine, Mahogany or Douglas Fir to match complete unit. Exterior wood ILT grilles available in Pine or Mahogany to match complete unit. Grille Profiles W-HG-30Pella 2022 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.Pella.com Pella® Reserve™ Traditional Hung Window (1) Contact your local Pella sales representative for current designs and color options. (2) Available in clear or Low-E insulating glass only. (3) Tan, Brown and Putty Interior GBG colors are available in single-tone (Brown/Brown, Tan/Tan or Putty/Putty). Other interior colors are also available with Tan or Brown exterior. (4) Appearance of exterior grille color will vary depending on Low-E coating on glass. (5) Full screens are available on units ≤ 96" height. (6) Integrated Rolscreen only available on sizes ≥ 34" tall and 21" wide, and ≤ 84" tall and 48" wide. Frame • Select softwood, immersion treated with Pella’s EnduraGuard® wood protection formula in accordance with WDMA I.S.-4. The EnduraGuard formula includes three active ingredients for protection against the effects of moisture, decay, stains from mold and mildew. Plus, an additional ingredient adds protection against termite damage. • Interior exposed surfaces are [clear pine] [mahogany] [douglas fir]. • Exterior surfaces are clad with aluminum. • Components are assembled with screws, staples and concealed corner locks. • Overall frame depth is 5" (127mm) for a wall depth of 3-11/16" (94mm). • Optional factory applied jamb extensions available between 3-13/16" (97mm) and 9-3/16" (233mm). • Vinyl jamb liner with wood / clad inserts. • Optional factory installed fold-out installation fins with flexible fin corners. • Optional factory-applied EnduraClad® exterior trim. Sash • Select softwood, immersion treated with Pella’s EnduraGuard® wood protection formula in accordance with WDMA I.S.-4. The EnduraGuard formula includes three active ingredients for protection against the effects of moisture, decay, stains from mold and mildew. Plus, an additional ingredient adds protection against termite damage. • Interior exposed surfaces are [clear pine] [mahogany] [douglas fir]. Any curved member may have visible finger-jointed surfaces. • Exterior surfaces are clad with extruded aluminum butt-jointed at all corners of the sash with through-stile construction and sealed. • Corners mortised and tenoned, glued and secured with metal fasteners. • Sash thickness is 1-7/8" (47mm). • Double-Hung: Upper sash has surface-mounted wash locks for easy tilt-in cleaning] [Single-Hung: Fixed upper sash has surface-mounted wash locks] [Arch Head units have no wash locks]. • Lower sash has concealed wash locks in lower check rail allowing sash to tilt in for easy cleaning. • Simulated-Hung units have non-operable upper and lower sashes. • Sash exterior profile is [ogee] [putty glaze], interior profile is ogee. Weatherstripping • Water-stop santoprene-wrapped foam at head and sill. • Thermoplastic elastomer bulb with slip-coating set into lower sash for tight contact at check rail. • Vinyl-wrapped foam inserted into jamb liner to seal against sides of sash. Glazing System • Quality float glass complying with ASTM C 1036. • Custom and high altitude glazing available. • Silicone-glazed dual-pane 13/16" dual-seal insulating glass [[annealed] [tempered]], [[clear] [[Advanced Low-E] [SunDefense™ Low-E] [NaturalSun Low-E] [AdvancedComfort Low-E] with argon]] [[bronze] [gray] [green] Advanced Low-E [with Argon]] [obscure] [Reflective Bronze]. – or – • Silicone-glazed dual-pane 13/16" dual-seal [[annealed] [tempered]] non-impact laminated glass [[clear] [[Advanced Low-E] [SunDefense Low-E] with Argon]] [[bronze] [gray] [green] Advanced Low-E [with argon]]. Exterior • Aluminum-clad exteriors shall be finished with EnduraClad® protective finish, in a multi-step, baked-on finish. ƒColor is [standard] [feature] [custom] 1. – or – • Aluminum-clad exteriors shall be finished with EnduraClad Plus protective finish with 70% fluoropolymer resin in a multi-step, baked-on finish. ƒColor is [standard] [feature] [custom] 1. Interior • [Unfinished, ready for site finishing] [factory primed with one coat acrylic latex] [pine: factory prefinished [paint] [stain] 1]. Hardware • Galvanized block-and-tackle balances are connected to self-locking balance shoes which are connected to the sashes using zinc die cast terminals and concealed within the frame. • Sash lock is [standard (cam-action)] [historic spoon-style] [air-conditioner lock] [simulated lock (Single-piece lock ties upper and lower sash together. When removed lower sash becomes operable)]. Two sash locks on units with frame width 37" and greater. • Optional sash lift furnished for field installation. Two lifts on units with frame width 37" and greater. • Hardware finish is [baked enamel [Champagne] [White] [Brown] [Matte Black]] [Satin Brass] [Satin Nickel] [Oil-rubbed Bronze] [Distressed Bronze] [Distressed Nickel]. Optional Products Sash • Exterior sash lugs ƒOptional factory applied accessory. Exterior finish is [Standard 1] [Custom 1]. Grilles • Integral Light Technology® grilles ƒInterior grilles are [5/8"] [7/8"] [1-1/4"] [2"] ogee profile that are solid [pine] [mahogany] [douglas fir]. Interior surfaces are [unfinished, ready for site finishing] [factory primed] [pine: factory prefinished [paint] [stain] 1]. ƒExterior grilles are [5/8" putty glaze profile] [7/8" [putty glaze] [ogee] profile] [1-1/4" [putty glaze] [ogee] profile] [2" ogee profile] that are extruded aluminum. ƒPatterns are [Traditional] [Prairie] [Top Row] [New England] [Victorian]. ƒInsulating glass contains non-glare spacer between the panes of glass. ƒGrilles are adhered to both sides of the insulating glass with VHB acrylic adhesive tape and aligned with the non-glare spacer. – or – • Grilles-Between-the-Glass 2 ƒInsulating glass contains 3/4" contoured aluminum grilles permanently installed between two panes of glass. ƒPatterns are [Traditional] [9-Lite Prairie] [Cross] [Top Row] ƒInterior color is [White] [Tan 3] [Brown 3 ] [Putty 3] [Black] [Ivory] [Harvest] [Cordovan] [Brickstone]. ƒExterior color 4 is [standard] 1. Screens • Integrated Rolscreen® (for rectangular units only) 6 ƒRetractable screen integrated into [lower sash] [both upper and lower sash]. Screen rollers are fixed and concealed within the frame, screen is held to the sash by magnets which release when the bottom sash is tilted for cleaning, and when the upper sash is opened past 18". ƒInView Screen cloth, black vinyl-coated 18/18 mesh fiberglass screen cloth complying with ASTM D 3656 and the performance requirements of SMA 1201. – or – • InView™ screens ƒ[Half-Size] [Full-Size 4 ] black vinyl-coated 18/18 mesh fiberglass screen cloth complying with the performance requirements of SMA 1201, set in a [standard roll-form] [premium extruded] aluminum frame fitted to outside of window, supplied complete with all necessary hardware. ƒFull screen spreader bar placed on units > 37" width or > 65" height. ƒScreen frame finish is [standard screen: baked enamel] [premium extruded: baked enamel], color to match window cladding. Hardware • Optional factory applied limited opening device available for vent units in stainless steel; nominal 3-3/4" opening. Limiting device concealed from view. • Optional factory applied window opening control device. Device allows window to open less than 4" with normal operation, with a release mechanism that allows the sash to open completely. Complies with ASTM F2090-10. Sensors • Optional factory installed integrated security sensors available in vent units. Detailed Product Description - Aluminum-Clad Exterior W-HG-36Pella 2022 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.Pella.com Pella® Reserve™ Traditional Hung Window Scale 3" = 1' 0" All dimensions are approximate.[47]1 7/8"[48] 1 7/8" [74] 2 15/16"[48]1 7/8"[38] 1 1/2" [75] 2 15/16"[48]1 7/8"[75] 2 15/16" [39] 1 1/2" [47] 1 7/8"[48]1 7/8"[104]4 1/8"Shown Custom 3" Bottom Rail Fixed Double Hung[72]2 13/16"FRAME HEIGHT[19]3/4"[77]3"[127] 5" [19] 3/4" FRAME WIDTH [19] 3/4" [31] 1 3/16"[33]1 5/16"[94]3 11/16"Installation Fin Optional Fold-out units with unequal sash. Dimension required for ordering CHECKRAIL HEIGHT[27] 1 1/16" FRAME WIDTH[127]5"[27] 1 1/16" FRAME WIDTH[33]1 5/16"[34] 1 5/16"[94]3 11/16"Installation Fin Optional Fold-out [40]1 9/16"[47]1 7/8"[127] 5"FRAME HEIGHT[51]2"[72]2 13/16"[107]4 1/4"[78]3 1/16"[39]1 9/16"[48] 1 7/8" [48] 1 7/8" FJ FH FS VS VH LJ UJ CR FH FIXED HEAD FJ FIXED JAMB FS FIXED SILL UPPER JAMBSUJ LOWER JAMBSLJ VS VENT SILL CHECK RAILCR VH VENT HEAD Unit Sections - Aluminum-Clad Putty Glaze Exterior Profile W-HG-37Pella 2022 Architectural Design Manual | Division 08 – Openings | Windows and Doors | www.Pella.com Pella® Reserve™ Traditional Hung Window Scale 3" = 1' 0" All dimensions are approximate. See supporting document Combination Recommendations, for mullion limitations and reinforcing requirements. LX VENT / LX VENT VERTICAL JOINING MULLION TRANSOM / VENT HORIZONTAL JOINING MULLION LX VENT / FIXED VERTICAL JOINING MULLION[72]2 13/16"[48]1 7/8"[47] 1 7/8" [74] 2 15/16"[47]1 7/8"[48] 1 7/8" FRAME WIDTH [19] 3/4"[33]1 5/16"[94]3 11/16"Installation Fin Optional Fold-outFRAME HEIGHT[19]3/4"[19] 3/4" TS TJ TH TRANSOM HEADTH TRANSOM JAMBTJ TRANSOM SILLTS Unit Sections - Aluminum-Clad Putty Glaze Exterior Profile Typical Joining Mullions Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 Memorandum Date: January 5, 2023 To: Historic Preservation Commission From: Jessica Bristow, Historic Preservation Planner Re: 2023 Work Plan The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) requires the Commission to submit a Work Plan annually as part of our Certified Local Government agreement. The 2022 Work Plan is provided to the Commission to facilitate discussion and update of work plan progress. The Commission’s work plan for 2023 will be updated and then reviewed for approval at the February Commission meeting with the annual report. Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 2022 Historic Preservation Work Plan The Historic Preservation Commission annually updates its work plan. This year we aligned our work around the goals that the City Council outlined in the Strategic Plan. Advance Social Justice, Racial Equity, and Human Rights Long Term Goal Partner with Parks and Recreation Commission, Public Art Commission, Lucas Farms Neighborhood, and other community organizations to make Oak Grove Park a public space that honors the site’s heritage. The park, originally owned by the railroad, was home to many Mexican immigrants who lived in company-owned housing, old boxcars. Many of those immigrants moved into the surrounding neighborhood. When the City sold Elm Grove Park, near the Johnson County Administration Building, it bought the land where Oak Grove Park now sits. The park is currently scheduled for major renovation in 2026 or 2027 which provides plenty of time for us to investigate outside funding sources and develop a community plan that makes it a public space both for the neighborhood but also the City. Long Term Goal Online Heritage Map: Several local landmarks and historic resources within existing historic districts tell a story of Iowa City’s historic efforts to advance social justice, racial equality, and human rights. We should tell those stories and allow citizens to see the physical structures connected with the historic struggles for justice. Demonstrate Leadership in Climate Action Good preservation is about using the least invasive measures first and then working up to removal and replacement only if necessary. This tactic values embodied energy and minimizes construction waste. Ongoing Work One of the fundamental principles of historic preservation is to preserve, reuse, and adapt rather than demolish and create waste. Our work and previous commission’s work has kept immeasurable tons out of landfills. We need to continue to advocate that embodied energy is worth valuing. Currently the Climate Action Committee does not take this into consideration. We should continue to advocate to fix this. While what we’ve saved from landfills is immeasurable, embodied energy in existing materials is still measurable. 2022 Goal Contribute to the discussion on demolition. As the Climate Action Commission considers how to deal with demolition, we should contribute. And so should other commissions. If we’re serious about climate change, we should be serious about demolition and the waste it produces. The cost to the environment, even considering dumping fees, doesn’t match the $50 fee. Some Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 cities are discussing removing demolition by right. Rather than just paying for a demolition fee, citizens are given an opportunity to evaluate the new structure - and make sure the new structure aligns with our expressed values - do we get affordable housing, is it energy efficient, are there significant elements of history of the building that should be valued? Long Term Goal Provide resources for energy efficiency, repair, and maintenance of older homes on the City’s website. Structures built before World War II, used different methods of construction compared to construction of today. Trying to modernize an old structure with modern technologies often isn’t the right approach. Sometimes it’s the wrong approach. There are significant ways to increase energy efficiency in older homes that are minimally invasive. There are ways to repair and maintain a home and keep resources out of the landfill. Other organizations have already documented these. We should just find a way to make them available for more citizens. Develop a disaster preparedness guide for preservation. As the effects of climate change manifest themselves in more natural disasters, we need to be prepared. The 2020 derecho, followed the 2008 floods, and the 2006 tornado. The City earned national awards for its work around the 2006 tornado. The commission and city staff should develop a playbook for when a disaster hits (because one will again). The goal would be to more rapidly know how to provide support to those dealing with a disaster. Strengthen Community Engagement and Intergovernmental Relations The Commission, as a Certified Local Government, is the place for intergovernmental relations success. We work with SHPO and the National Parks Service, who oversees historic sites across the country. We also are trying to engage cross-departmentally with other commissions where our work overlaps. Ongoing work Annual Historic Preservation Awards: The annual awards program highlights successful preservation work within the community and the expertise of contractors and consultants. As one of the Commission’s main forms of community outreach, the awards are a high priority every year and attract an audience of about 100 people. The annual awards have been moved to May to coincide with Preservation Month activities. The awards will require Commission involvement for nominating properties and for work on the awards sub-committee producing the awards. We will continue to partner with Johnson County Historic Preservation Commission. New Commissioner Recruitment: With vacant positions, we should recruit new commissioners. Long Term Goal Increased Digital online presence: The City has valuable resources and information on historic properties in several different formats. Currently the ability for the public to access this information is dependent upon the format of the information. Digitizing hardcopy information and combining it with existing digital information in a searchable online database would make this information about city history more available for property owners and researchers. The City is considering a revamp of its website, we should try to partner when this happens. Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 Invest in Public Infrastructure, Facilities and Fiscal Reserves The city assets need care and occasionally reinvestment. Doing a little work along the way helps avoid urgent situations down the road. 2022 Goals Follow-up on the commission’s request to City Staff on the Montgomery-Butler House. In May 2020 the Commission requested that staff from the Planning Department, Public Works, and Parks help develop a working group to map out the work of this city-owned historic asset. In 1998, as part of a Memorandum of Agreement for the development of the new water plant, the City mothballed the Montgomery/Butler House, a significant historic resource, for roughly $70,000. Summit Street Monument: In 2019 the consultant, Atlas Preservation, completed the “Summit Street Monument Assessment and Conservation Options Plan” that was financed in part through a Certified Local Government Grant. Given the ongoing deterioration of the monument, the Commission will review the options and recommend an appropriate action to City Council. Enhance Community Mobility for All Residents These are largely transit and transportation related goals. Many preservationists are sympathetic to these issues. Historic neighborhoods were designed to accommodate pedestrians, transit, and modes of transportation that aren’t car-reliant. The Commission should consider how we might engage on this when opportunities arise. Foster Healthy Neighborhood and Affordable Housing Throughout the City Many older neighborhoods, that are now historic districts, were designed with mobility, neighborhood commercial nodes, and a variety of housing types in one neighborhood. Ongoing work The core work is protecting healthy neighborhoods. Many of the districts were developed out of a response to unhealthy developments in these areas that motivated the neighborhoods to take action. We help provide stability and provide a platform for reinvestment. Historic Preservation Fund. With the implementation of the fund in FY 2018, the Fund has approved 28 grants or loans improving 25 properties. This is a popular program which has helped property owners maintain the historic character of their properties and has helped keep valuable material out of the landfill. Be ready to partner with neighborhoods interested in historic preservation. There’s been some interest in the past, particularly the Lucas Farms-Kirkwood Avenue area with reconnaissance surveys and our job is to be ready and willing partners. Long Term Goal Work to get form-based code for areas that are adjacent to or are surrounded by historic districts. The exchange between the public and developers in form-based code is that the code would allow for different uses which the public would need to accommodate, but in turn they Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 would get more certainty about community values such as walkability, affordability, and the look and feel of the neighborhood. Developers get more flexibility in use in exchange for requirements in form. The areas that are adjacent to, or surrounded by, historic districts often are areas where development disagreements happen. Form-based code in these areas would help reduce some of that friction and would align with goals set by council and staff. Promote an Inclusive and Resilient Economy Throughout the City Preserving our physical heritage is an asset to an inclusive and resilient economy. Preservation is a tool for economic growth. The preservation work done in our districts is often done by smaller local businesses, and potential for growth opportunities exist in smart deconstruction and trade development for contractors who have specific skills related to older homes. Recent Successes Downtown National Register Historic District. This district was listed in the National Register of Historic Places in June of 2021 following 5 years of grant-funded study and Nomination work by a historic preservation consultant. 2022 Goals Opt in incentives for local landmarks in commercial zones. The City has told us to be proactive as it relates to Historic Preservation The Downtown District and the Commission Chair partnered on a proactive way to preserve commercial build Gins. As a city, we can incentivize all kinds of things we value, there’s no reason why commercial landmark properties can’t be part of that mix. Long Term Goals Transfer of Development Rights Revisit: The previous council opted to not consider a specific TDR proposal that was developed on a tight timeline. We have had two (or maybe three) new council members since then. A new TDR proposal could be developed without the constraints of making them work for a specific property so they could benefit the whole community. Consider partners on a historic trades mentorship program. Dubuque’s HEART program is a model example of this - training high school students in trades related to preservation, while transforming blighted neighborhoods (largely historic) back into livable and walkable neighborhoods and helping young people achieve goals of graduation and career training. Those who have been through the program often start small businesses in the trades they have learned. Ongoing Administration of Our Work 2022 Goals Update of the College Green Historic District: In 2016, the Commission approved the relocation of the Houser-Metzger House from 422 Iowa Avenue to 623 College Street where the contributing structure had been damaged beyond repair by fire and water. In order for the relocated house to be considered contributing to the Historic District, an amendment to the Iowa City Historic Preservation Commission City Hall, 410 E Washington Street, Iowa City. IA. 52240 National Register-listed district is required as a first step. This amendment will be reviewed by the Commission following revision by staff and the District representative. Update of the Iowa City Preservation Handbook Maps: The most recent version of the handbook was updated in 2010 and does not include several recent changes and needs to be reviewed for accuracy. Since many properties have changed status (for example, a non- contributing property has become contributing because of siding removal and porch rehabilitation) in the past ten years, the maps, which are the basis for review-type, application of exceptions, and in some cases eligibility of the Historic Preservation Fund, are outdated. The full Commission would review and approve updated maps. A plan was outlined with City staff but with limited staff time this has not moved forward. Preserve our Heritage Our history belongs to all of us. We owe it to ourselves and future generations of Iowa Citians that we preserve the physical aspects of this history and make sure our shared history isn’t forgotten. This work often encompasses multiple areas of the priorities set by Council. Our shared heritage is worth preserving as its own goal. 2022 Goal Sanxay-Gilmore House. The University had a plan to move, restore, and use this house. It no longer does. The oldest house in the original city boundaries deserves to be saved. Short Term Goal 2040 Waterfront Drive Intensive Survey: Funded in part through a Certified Local Government Grant, an intensive survey of the property at 2040 Waterfront Drive was completed. The final document will be provided to the Commission and the property owner for their review in the coming months. Long Term Goals Evaluation of Mid-century Modern Housing Stock: Since these properties have reached historic status, Commissions across the country are developing plans for how to evaluate them. In Iowa City, many of the areas where they are concentrated have not been reviewed but could begin with reconnaissance-level surveys in future years. MINUTES PRELIMINARY HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION NOVEMBER 10, 2022 EMMA HARVAT HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Margaret Beck, Kevin Boyd, Carl Brown, Jordan Sellergren, Noah Stork, Deanna Thomann, Nicole Villanueva, Christine Welu- Reynolds MEMBERS ABSENT: Frank Wagner STAFF PRESENT: Jessica Bristow, Anne Russett OTHERS PRESENT: Simon Andrew, G.T Karr, James Carey, Kara Whalen RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (become effective only after separate Council action) CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Boyd called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA: There was none. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS: 529 East College Street Stork recused himself from review of this project because it is his residence. Boyd noted that since Brown had not arrived, with Stork recused, the Commission does not have a quorum to proceed on the review of this project. MOTION: Beck moved to change the order of the agenda switching items D and E providing time for Brown to arrive so that the item does not need to be deferred to the next meeting. Welu- Reynolds seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0. RONALDS STREET DISCUSSION Anne Russett provided a background on the project, showing slides. Carl Brown arrived during the presentation. Simon Andrew, representing the Housing Fellowship, said they held a good neighbor meeting, and they had a constructive conversation. The neighbors seemed to be split about whether they preferred one building or two to be built on the property. He thanked the city for working with them and expressed his gratitude that the student building project is coming back. He discussed the two options including the accessory dwelling unit with Option 2. An ADU at a rental property would take a City Code Change. He said one of the goals with coming to the Commission is to see which option they might prefer, knowing that the ADU required additional changes which may have unintended consequences to think through. Karr, representing the homebuilders, also spoke about the good neighbor meeting. He stated that they had an aggressive timeline, and they are anxious to see which option will be preferred. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION November 10, 2022 Page 2 of 6 Boyd raised concern about the attached garage since they are not recommended. He said he was concerned about how large it is too. Karr explained that the area in question would not be all garage and not as big a footprint as it appears on the drawing. There would be living space in the lower level too. Thomann asked about garage parking for both units in Option 2. Karr said that the ADU has a parking pad. Karr discussed option 2 and the ability to have an accessible bedroom. Karr said that they will work with staff on the design and then the Commission will be able to see how the design will follow the guidelines and the materials they use on the exterior will fit the guidelines too. Brown asked why they chose an attached garage over detached, and Karr replied that it would use less building materials. Karr said that they did not want to build a garage because it is a waste of space. Bristow confirmed that the garage could be closer to the alley property line. She said that there was a garage built in the next block with an ADU and the 5-foot setback on the alley is all that is required. Karr said the sewer easement is difficult. Welu-Reynolds said that Option 2 with a garage, bathroom and bedroom all near each other was really nice in a historic neighborhood for someone with disabilities and a big benefit. She like the aesthetics with Option 2. It also breaks up the parking in the back. She also thought a 5- bedroom house is huge for the neighborhood. Beck felt that the crowding of the houses in Option 1 would impact the feeling of the neighborhood. She thought that the distance to parking was large. Karr spoke again about the ADU and the code change. Boyd said that type of code change will leave the neighborhoods open to the negative impacts for the owners who view the neighborhood as revenue only. Boyd said he had concerns about the attached garage but now that he sees it more as below grade, it could be more attractive from an ADA compliance standpoint. Boyd said the ADU is his concern. James Carey, who owns the property across the alley from the property, said he wasn’t invited to the good neighbor meeting, and has some reservations about the project. He said another neighbor also didn’t get to come. He said he has no issues with the ownership of the property and supports them and creating affordable housing. He said that he doesn’t understand why the two options are treated like absolutes. Carey asked why there isn’t an Option 3 that is just a house since there was just a house before. Carey said that this is still a development and the Commission should still treat them like a developer. He said that if he was the owner and came to the Commission with these two options, he would expect them to be rejected by the Commission. He said that he doesn’t think that the option with two houses fit the mass of the properties in the surrounding neighborhood. He thinks it would lead to many other requests to divide the lots. Carey said he didn’t understand the need for a dwelling unit in the back. He said that now that can only be done when the property is owner-occupied. He said the condition of the alley is poor. He said he doesn’t understand why there needs to be two houses on the lot (with an ADU). He said he feels like it is important to bring that idea of a single house on the lot to the forefront. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION November 10, 2022 Page 3 of 6 Thomann said that the site plan with the house at the front and the building at the back fits the character of the neighborhood. She said she liked Option 2 but she wants to know if the rear building would look like a garage or a house. Boyd said it would need to follow the guidelines. Welu-Reynolds said she appreciated hearing from a neighbor because they will be impacted by the project every day. She said she likes Option 2 better just because it is less. Boyd said he did not have a concern with the split lot because historically the original lots were often divided. He said the scale does not concern him. He said he is concerned with the fact the guidelines don’t support an ADU that is not a garage and with what this code change could do. He is concerned about the attached garage because of the guidelines. Brown said he likes Option 1 because it doesn’t have the curb cut and cars pulling through the pedestrian right of way. He said what he does like about Option 2 is that it preserves the lot size. Brown does wonder why there is not an option with a dwelling in front and a garage in back. He said he would like to see Option 3. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 529 East College Street Noah Stork recused himself since he is the owner of the property. Bristow described the property as an early four-square with Queen Anne elements and classical details. The application is to replace the metal roof, removing the chimney, and the remaining built-in gutters. There is some deterioration on the roof edges and other places. The chimney is barely visible so would not be considered a significant architectural change. There is not enough evidence of deterioration for staff to recommend removal of the porch gutters. Whalen spoke and said there is water damage on the porch, but they had not really included the porch in the roof replacement talks with the contractor. The main roof leaks in the house, around the chimney too. She also said that the roofers recommend replacing the roof. MOTION: Reynolds moved to approve a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project at 529 E College as presented in the application, with the following conditions: If the chimney is still in use it is retained and repaired, evidence of deterioration and the inability to repair the porch and roof is provided, and the internal gutters on the porch remain and are repaired as needed. Villanueva seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (Stork recused) REPORT ON CERTIFICATES ISSUED BY CHAIR AND STAFF: Certificate of No Material Effect – Chair and Staff Review 930 East College Street Concrete porch floor replacement HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION November 10, 2022 Page 4 of 6 615 South Governor Foundation repair and replacement. Minor Review – Staff Review 513 Grant Street Small deck pad added 111 East College Street Approved sign installation 1033 Woodlawn Avenue Solar array installation 326 North Johnson Added entry stoop to the back door 721 Oakland Avenue Siding replacement on rear of building 817 East Burlington Street Rear skylight installation 1531 Center Avenue Front concrete steps and railing replacement 704 Clark Street Garage overhead door replacement with a flat panel door 422 Grant Street Rear deck replacement Intermediate Review – Chair and Staff Review 1011 Woodlawn Avenue Front and partial front façade demolition due to fire. The house is not a complete loss, but more work will need to be done. The insurance company agreed to a selected demolition. More changes will be coming to the commission as repairs progress. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR OCTOBER 13, 2022: MOTION: Sellegren moved to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission’s October 13, 2022, meeting, as written. Beck seconded the motion. Motion carried on a vote of 8-0. COMMISSION DISCUSSION: All agreed that the Historic Preservation Awards Ceremony went well. Bristow played a video created by City Channel 4 highlighting Public Space One. Boyd thanked everyone for their collaborated efforts. HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION November 10, 2022 Page 5 of 6 ADJOURNMENT: Brown moved to adjourn the meeting and Sellegren seconded. The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 pm. Minutes submitted by Kathy Fitzpatrick HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION November 10, 2022 Page 6 of 6 HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD 2022-2023 NAME TERM EXP. 12/9 01/13 2/15 3/10 4/14 5/12 6/9 7/14 8/11 9/8 10/13 11/10 BECK, MARGARET 6/30/24 X X X X -- X O/E O/E X X O/E X BOYD, KEVIN 6/30/23 X X O/E X X X X X X X X X BROWN, CARL 6/30/23 X O/E O/E X X O/E X X O/E X X X DEGRAW, SHARON 6/30/22 O/E X X X X X X -- -- -- -- -- ECKHARDT, COLE 6/30/24 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- X X -- KUENZLI, CECILE 6/30/22 X X O/E X X X X -- -- -- -- -- LARSON, KEVIN 6/30/24 X O X O -- X X X O/E O/E O -- SELLERGREN, JORDAN 6/30/22 X X X X X X X O/E O/E X X X STORK, NOAH 6/30/24 X X X O/E X O/E X X X X X X THOMANN, DEANNA 6/30/23 O/E X X O/E X X O/E X X X X X VILLANUEVA, NICOLE 6/30/25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- X X O/E O/E X WAGNER, FRANK 6/30/23 X X X X -- X X X X O/E X O/E WELU- REYNOLDS, CHRISTINA 6/30/25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- X X X O/E X KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused --- = Not a member