Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-05-10 Correspondence3f 1 Dear Iowa City Council Members, I am writing to ask you to reconsider your decision about passing the 21- ordinance. I'm currently atwenty-year-old student at the University of Iowa. On the weekends, I really enjoy the privilege of being able to go downtown to the bars. I, along with countless other students, don't go to the bars to get drunk. Igo to the bars for the entertainment that they provide -mainly the music, the dancing, and the social aspect. Not all students go to the bars in order to get drunk, and passing the 21- ordinace won't stop the ones who do. The students who are giving the entire UI community a bad name by binge drinking will find a place to drink regardless of whether or not the ordinance is passed. If the ordinance is passed, there will simply be more fake ID's and more house parties. Also, the underage drinkers aren't the only people who binge drink downtown. There are plenty of overage students who get drunk at the bars as well. Passing a 21-ordinance won't help these people. If you really want to stop the binge drinking problem in Iowa City, there has to be a better way. To stop binge drinking, the city needs to target all binge drinkers, not just the underage ones. The people who will be most hurt by the 21-ordinance are the non-drinkers, bars, and the city itself. Non-drinkers, like myself, will lose the opportunity to see countless musicians. The bars will lose revenue; many of them may even go out of business. The city itself will also lose revenue. It will be much more difficult ~ a ~ police officers to issue tickets if the drinkers are spread throughout th;cam~ n ity.~_n _'~ -~ -~- ~ ~ u rather than all within a few blocks of each other. ~ ~-: c.~ ~ - ~;, ~.. .- P •+.. ~: It really isn't fair for the city council to pass this law without letting the public vote on the issue. The public voted against a 21-ordinace just a few years ago. Making it a law without the consent of the public will make the city council seem undemocratic. Please reconsider passing the 21-ordinance before the public gets the chance to vote. Sincerely, Kristin Dwyer ~a~~-$ N C7 O ...; . r~ ..~ sa`yix. .,,, cm zvem ..~ ~ ~ U ry . ~ r--*~ .np Page 1 of 2 Marian Karr From: Brian J Flanagan [worda1 @wordassociation1.net] Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:20 PM To: Council Subject: Drunken binges To the Members of the City Council of Iowa City, Hello! I hope this finds you well. I am along-time resident of Iowa City. Perhaps I should also mention in passing that I am a freelance writer and part-time Irish politician -- although I have heretofore focused on meddling in national and international affairs.* I have been following the discussion regarding our wayward students and the'21-only' measure. I was watching Mayor Hayek on the local news the other day, for example. He was telling his interviewer that Iowa City is a "destination city" for youthful hooligans intent on getting hammered. This got me to thinking: Since these inebriated ne'er-do-wells are already flowing in our direction, why not provide them with safe, sober, and profitable means of diverting themselves? Clearly, this would also benefit our own youthful wastrels, who might conceivably learn along the way that, technically speaking, one need not be trashed in order to have a good time. In this wise, I would like to suggest we look into building an IMAX theater in Iowa City. As you are no doubt aware, we lost the venue in Cedar Rapids, owing to the flood. This leaves the nearest one in Davenport -- and who wants to go there? Beyond such blockbusters as Avatar and Star Trek, there are also terrific nature films to be had, as well as a film about the Hubble, and so this project has a clear educational feature. Affordable concerts are another possibility. Our Jazz Fest is well attended, of course, as are our other open air attractions, but indoor offerings are somewhat limited -- but less at the mercy of the elements. Well, I don't know what kids like to do these days, aside from getting sloshed, and so I will leave off here with suggestions. Poets are like scientists in their knowledge of consequences. On the down side, then ... I am not a lawyer, but did work in a law library, in my youth. When it was slow, as it often was, I would read the law. So it was that I learned that we are responsible for the foreseeable consequences of our actions. I fear, therefore, that it will be "on you," as they say, when our underage miscreants OD on whatever concoctions they partake of nowadays -- and fail to promptly receive the medical care they need. As I write this, I am reminded of a fine young friend (Brian LaGro), who was attacked here last summer and who, had the police not quickly intervened, would have either died or been rendered comatose. Clearly, this kind of timely assistance would be much more difficult should these kinds of incidents occur beyond the downtown area. (I am also informed by one of their own that most of the police are against the ordinance.) Thus, my thoughts for today. Thank you for your time and consideration. Wishing you the best 4/26/2010 Page 2 of 2 of continued success. Sincere regards, Brian J Flanagan Word Association *It is for this reason, I suppose, that Mahmoud Ahmadinejad now follows me on Twitter. Leaving us with two world-class lunatics in one boat. What's the worst that could happen? 4/26/2010 Dear Mayor Hayek, I want to thank you for pushing the 21 ordinance through. I am a huge supporter of the initiative and I believe you are absolutely doing the right thing. Your naysayers can say what they want, but they can not deny there is binge drinking problem here in Iowa City. As a student at the University of Iowa and former fraternity president, I have witnessed it first hand the past three years. With the sexual assaults of about two years ago, to the male on male violence of last year, there have been times when I would not venture downtown by myself. Downtown can be a"scary place, and after enjoying the relaxed feel of it this past summer, it should never be that way. Yourself and members of city council have tried to rein in the drinking to the best of your abilities, and 1 applaud the effort. I thought the 500 foot rule was a good step toward curbing the issue, yet new bars are not the real problem. The PAULA ratio law was another great measure, it is unfortunate the way it turned out. I saw real results in the way bars would police themselves after the Council denied the first license because of it. Yet, the results disappeared after the State stepped in. I have only thought of one other solution to hold bars accountable; why not fine a bar the same amount of money a citizen is fined if caught drinking underage on the premise? I understand it is the citizen who is breaking the law, but it is also the bar that is letting them. There is a consequence if you let people smoke marijuana in your house, could the same not be said for letting people break the law in a bar? The owners may say it is impossible to police this themselves, but I counter with that is the risk you take letting 19/20 year olds into your bar. If the 21 ordinance is defeated in November, which I pray it does not, looking into what communities like Lincoln, Nebraska and Panama City Beach, FL, both communities that allow underage people into bars, do to curb underage drinking in bars would be beneficial. The bar owners are more concerned with the size of their wallets rather than the age of their patrons, if the Council makes it so these are one in the same, real changes will come about. While this ordinance will not change the drinking habits of many, it is a step in the right direction. House parties will spring up, yet the police force will able to divert attention to them. After writing a few tickets, the parties will die down. Underage students will find other places to drink, but not in large groups. As with Eastern Illinois University, overtime the binge drinking rates will begin to fall. It is because of your efforts, and your change in opinion, that this will happen. Thank you for starting this initiative before another student dies. Sincere y, N L! d Greg Mittelman ----~~"::~ ~'~ ~ ._r ~.... Former President of Sigma Nu ` ~ f"' ~ ~ 1 @"~ 630 N. Dubuque St. ~~:~ ~ ' = '"~" ~,.~, Iowa City, IA 52245 ~ -- Page 1 of 1 Marian Karr From: Jon Shelness [shelness@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:36 PM To: Council Subject: Are Police Ready For House Party Increase? Dear Councilors: I am generally concerned by police tactics when dealing with alcohol consumption by college- age students. By my estimation, there have now been nearly 300 alcohol-fueled riots (not small brawls, but large-scale disruptions by thousands of students) on college campuses beginning in 1985, the year after the drinking age went up. Interviews with officers who have responded to riots suggest that police can escalate-or even initiate- conflict by treating all members of a disruptive gathering as equally dangerous. www cops usdoi Gov/files/ric/Publications/student party.pdf Here are two university professors who are experts in mass gatherings Andrew Martin www.sociology.ohio-state.edu/awm David Schweingruber www.public.iastate.edu/~dschwein In the aftermath of the 2004 Veishea riot, a task force report was issued including the following from the executive summary. Six [universities] reported that police action was a factor [in riots]. This is the link to the 2004 Veishea Task Force Report http•//www public iastate.edu/~dschwein/riotreport.pdf I think that there is a legitimate justice issue in play as those 18-20 feel that it is their right to drink, but the community wants a reduction in drunken disruptions. In light of this, the police must strike a balance. On Thursday, Apri122, 2010, Regina Zilbermints wrote an article in the Daily Iowan entitled, "Police ready if house parties increase." In the article, she wrote college campuses where police directed more officers to "party patrols" and cracked down on drunk driving, drinking wasn't displaced. Instead, the students started self- policing, and the number ofalcohol-related issues decreased This is the link to the original research: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.~ov/pmc/articles/PMC2701100 Another way that the community and the students can meet halfway might be through the creation of a community court that could be placed on the pedestrian mall. We have community policing in Iowa, so maybe the time has come for some court innovation as well. Here are a couple of websites. www.courtinnovation.or~ www ojp usdoj og v/nij/topics/courts/restorative-justice/welcome.htm Here is my website http://sites.~,oogle.com/site/shelness Thank you so much for your time and careful consideration, Jon Shelness Des Moines 4/26/2010 3f 2 Marian Karr From: Rick Fosse Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 6:22 PM To: sknodole@hotmail.com Cc: Council; Bud Stockman Subject: FW: Bike lane on Jefferson Sheila: Thanks for your a-mail about the bike lane on East Jefferson. Our fo-ks will be out to sweep it again in the next day or two. They were out earlier this year, but the spring rains wash sand back onto the street from nearby streets that have not been swept yet. It takes about seven weeks to complete the first sweeping of all the streets in Iowa City. Bike lanes are one of the priorities to sweep first and that makes them most vulnerable to sand from other streets washing back onto them. It is always a difficult balance between re- sweeping and working to sweep all the streets for the first time. Thanks for binging this to our attention Rick Fosse Public Works Director From: Sheila Knoploh [mailto:sknodole@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 3:29 PM To: Council Subject: FW: Bike lane on Jefferson Hello Council members, I live on the 900 block of E. Jefferson and my kids and I have been riding our bikes every day since it started getting nice in March. But the bike lane on Jefferson has been neglected. As you can see by my pictures, there are places where it's full of sand from this winter and even a couple of dead squirrels. Over two weeks ago the south side of the street where the cars park was swept. The north side where the bike lane is located has yet to be cleaned. Things like sand and debree make it dangerous when turning the corner or riding with speed. In some places there is only a foot & a half of clear lane for riding in, making for precarious bike-riding conditions. Please have the street crews clear the bike lanes, they should be done way before anything else since people ride bikes all through the winter. They certainly should have priority over the side of the street where the cars are parked. What's the point of having these lanes if we're not going to take care of them and keep them safe for cyclists? - Sheila Knoploh-Odole 921 E. Jefferson Iowa City Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:37:02 -0500 From: sknodole@hotmail.com To: sknodole@hotmail.com Subject: Bike lane on Jefferson -- Sent from my Palm Pre 4/26/2010 6 __^ tl y _~ N ik,sl - ~YI~ yyyy~ i ~~. ,{ 4µ . y. ~° t a ~ A'NY'!. I ~ ~ _ ~ I +t ~ u r ~~~'''''''''``` 1i ~.~ + ~~ ~~. .. _ ~' ~ ~-..4. 4 •MI } r - - --- _.. ~ .._ ~ 4 ,. _- _i .e ~- ~ .i ~~' ~ w ,_._. - r _„~ ~. ... _ _. .. - ~.;.e, - wk - - -~ F.. - .__ * ~.r .. ~ t ~ :; ~~ '' ~~. - s.~ ~ .. - _ ~ ~ '"' .,. 64.E ~ ~~ \ ~`•- ' ' ~, ' i v ~~ ~~ Nc ?a., ~~ ~' ~ ~. _ ~ , ~ ~ ~ F ti ..,+~.__ _ ,.t ta.. ,,`mow.,:: ~" 1 ~ ql .f L - ~ i r 6 .. .. - ; _~._-. ~~vv ~8 r s - ~v z - *~~. "fi"r ~' ~ d ,. ~ ~ ~_ ~ , ~t ~r, y r~ ~ ~ a r ~ 4 ~ ~ J ~ ri _ z+~+' ~ x .~ l ~ rµ4 ,'Yk` ~~~ 4r d ` .. ~," ,~ ~. _ - . ~r „a '.+s~'.cw d .h 'a'~.-~ 1 ~"isi ''ar + ~ ~k'. w ~- _ ~° +~ Pin ~ .n a~..;r t n k.. ~ ~ +•.:~f ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ - ~. s °a,~ '°rC d l _ # 1 e ~ e ~~~~~ ,'r i t., '~ fir` ," „ "~ dv ~~F 1~ {. ~ 1 y{ ',L~_e r 1 , , {F { s ,. ~_. 4 f ~y Y ~. if ~ L ...a !`A i~+ a c d ~ sY _ rl.'b ~ _ _ r ~ ~,.µµ y1~ h .jam:. _ ~ _ ~t_ ., I ~. y .. ` ~ ~., a.Y_ . , ,. , • •~ y ~ v Tj ` " ~ y i ~~~: c ~., _' x'°~, ~a ~^ ~~ ';,iA aF ~ .. t x' ~r ,~~~ ~ {',<< ~y.q ~_ ~ iy" _ _ _ """_. ~ but r ~,r ~ ~ r ~;~ ~a ,y . ~,~, -, ~~i;~~llllN _ 3r' A '~~,, r ~ ~ ~ ~ , }~" a tee.. '~ :Y. -•~ . . ,, ~.'s A * ~ ,. ., ~~, ~ ., ~' Tfi .. 'tea 7~ ~ .t. _.~.:~ , ~ 61.x; .^R~R b~ A,f I ~, ~ "., '„ . ,. - `A„ ~~`+'f s. f ~rY Y f ~ i~ ~~ ~~~~~° i ,~. p Oyu d 1; . +BWa _q ff 1_i ~f t#f~ A'~ 3 1, q - D "d,Y,~ , . „ '~ ~' it f,~ ~ ~ ~'~ _ _ _ 1~ ''IIIRRR ~ 111~~_ ~ L yP 1~ 1 A i c -0 •. T ^.~ '` t W "~ t~ ' i ~ aria ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ! t r ~I° L .j~ Ld ~y a s 7 :n ~, - ;tn Sd ;~ X' ~ c" { . ~. ., ~H .Y. I ? ~~ ,~, ,~.. ti~ X17" ",i i'~ ~' ~ 8 .~~ ay ~' ,~4d T7f,~^" t f R ~.~-; ~ ~~ ~~ ~`~~' ~~~r~~~ `gyp ~ ~ s ` f ~~, ~ ,..a .~ r . '~ . { .. p ~ "~ _ e ~'~. , . F ~+." F r. ~ ... ~. f-. ~ 4 r y d e ~~wi "~~"~ ~ - tom' i~'~'~ JA .v A'~'w" i ~' ~ • ,. f F s 4 ~~ ~a£` _ ~- S'i .~ a f ra . '.rx$ '' ~tl a a 6 ~ .» t ~ e r~ a' '~e _ ~ s,i '~ s f ~ a q pp ~ k tir ~~'atS ~Y. f'!, R1{t{rF i`' 4 ~~'1r' { :~~ .~ o ~` I~ ~,~i y ~ _ _ :.' e :~~}'~ of P~+`-~'^~a",~''~t"'~` ~Iq1 ~~~~,. , !~T ~~, "sr', _ ~~`-. , f a _ < "t'',~, ~~"~~ ~"' "~' ^~!~'` . 777 ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~~' ~ _ . -~~, _ ~" r /~ ice. P 4 ~, F r~~~ y t~ i ` 2~ ~~J.~ .~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 11'x, f r ~+". ~.' ` . , J 1' j' 1 i~ + r 91F ~ F ' ~* •~, .pyh ,.,f e ~, s _ '~' _,~ _ _ ,:. . , ~~ _- ~ . . ~, ,.,,,~¢ ., .: - _v - K~~ ._. ~~ ~, .;. _ :. ~,{. - ~~. fay ~} ^...:.» ~,~, T' ~y ~..y$ ^ W , 4• I . .., ...~ Y' s ~k `q _:. _ , . n _ y.k .. ~a Y~ , ' ~ A ~~~, ~ y, r, SI ~. - ~ .. _ S r ~y - J .'~~T*:. 4 -.. '. ' " ~ .. ~ _ M.. 4 ' m f 5. *- _ ~ a ~ r ~. ~ ~ ~'• ~~ ~' ~ '~~, '~'" s w ~w, b` ry'c r ~ ~ ` ~ ~ I .~ , ,... .r{ „~~., z ~ mss" w , ~~'1 _ Ty ak _~~ ` -. ,. i. ~i ~ ~ 7T 1 ~, ~ ~ ` .dam .~- ~~ L^$e ~ '~ ~+.._, ~ - w1 ~ ,~~ .Y t l ~ 5 fi`, .~Y r ..~ :' a ~4 ' ~t ' ~ ` to -i A c~, ., ~, r~ ', r + , ~~ '~!~ ~u A,,, ~ efwPtq ", '~.. ., e 4 4 ~w 'S ~ .S.-Y ti ~° ~ ~ a .T' 3 ° - ~s ,,.-~ a 'l ~ ~ x... p. , . _ - ,~ i~ + > -x ,i _ 'a _. . . 4e.~st~ -~_ _ _ ~: ~,. ~ `.a- '., _ ,~ `,. si 1' ~ ~ ~-.fo ~ ~1 ~.. .. - r. ~.~...~ -ez.,... "„-aa.. Tel ; i m ,a..« s .~. .,~ ~ -_. m • ,- ~j ~, ~ - T _,.." .. ' .~,. , .,~. ~~, ~.~ r ~ - ~ +I" -`' 1 .,~; a~.y w~. y~ • ~f '~, + 4 \ '~ ~ ~ .y ~~ ~~•h 3 it ,ti. `- - ..: ~'s~ - ~% ' F~rP~a.,F fi+~ ~ ] `Ai iw =A1~.a°~ ~J 1 ~ 1.'r ~ _ ' ?'yyY.~ . °~ ~~r. _,. t ~ :~~)ic_'~~f •~ r~~r ~~~ i° .. _ -, ,yam 'm! _ " .~ Y 5~~ .. -. , b ~ y ~'! q2 :~ `„ k ~. _ ~ -~. - -.+ f~ .; i.' ..~ i R _ a. ~ i RAY ~,~..,f h $ '~„ w _ r ' al' .~~5~4 a~ - _ ~ ~ ~ "F ~qq "~~ .1 .~ ~- _ 4 -r e- ~ y~y,.... r ,M 0 ~~. ~ y , ~ ~ <`~ Nil,,. §7 ~ ~4. ~ ~~ • ~~+^~ ~%~+x _ - ~ - ~~~ TTT a_~ "i4$ ~ ,~' fir;:, ~' ,' ~ ~~~ . ~ .,;,' F ~~ y _ ~,> : k~ ~' -r , t y~ ~t}~ r 1 ~~w u A 1~'+ 7 ! ~ r ~vk o~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~~, ~ 4 r ~ +- F +i7' ~ ~ 4J ~ 'S 4F b /'y-rY... 3~ ~M^~"~aP ~ ,! ~s~ 1.. ~ ''YT # ~`°+~a~°" ~ 'r„ v ~., . ,y, a '~ ~4 _ S ~ r T. ak ~ ~ ~ w , ~ , ~~,. c, av"f ~ ire ^ s ~ ~ iL,;~k 4~it~4.~+7 ~ -r 4 ,~ .. 'y\1 S ~ dry ~„ '~:.1 ~T}t' ~ -. ... •• .yE 1~~'e` ~ ~~ t ~I-cr S ~ e ", ~ } x t 1~ sS a~ WAY r+~y+~' `~ ~, yy -a +`. ~ ^ '~ k.~,;; ~' g t ,h ~~rat~f fir} ~~. _ ~ ~. ,_ _.•:. , ` ~ { .. r ~. ~ W„ w" .~ fax '~ °" ~S r ~ r m ;. r r ~ °~ a - -- ~+~ $~ e '. rte" . '~"' ,~ g i r' , b. +'k ~. r- ~ ~ ~ ~~~ w ~. r. m a •~ ~r ~~ - --' ~ +~ itl - - - +4• ,~, - - _ __ rt - _ti - _ ..... - _- - - _.,..~ .~.:. rte,,. - '~ - ... .. i4 ~ t F - }.. . -' +o r `'~ r ,.e; r ~,~'~' ,~ .~ , ,z ,~ ,,. ~^~, . . -- i ~ ~ ±1~~9 a d~ (~ '~?c ~~~~ fRV~r~,t4~~ ~`4+~u+~ rT ~{rL.... '4 _ ~y X11 k 'f .d i~ fa~ 41~ r ~ ~ a ~~~n ;G,p~*~ 'j~f~ ~~' e ~~dy.~~ ; ~'. ~ a-ti"' a ~.^~' xs~ti ~ ~t ~Y u a ~ ~ n y n ~. 4 / 'r~t~~ r r r -'~ ~b - ` - ~a ~~ utz` r .r ,J.+e. rt a q 4~ ro Y ~4F4e R~ V~ 5,a~~ ~I k ~a1~1 YA ~ ~ ' .. h A ~ ti._. ~~..as yf ~ r~~~ ~y a i~~~ ~~ s,arpa"'~ ~ C. ' ~`~`~w ~ ~ ; +. ~*,~ ~,pa ~C~gr ' r:a~ ~ , f 9~~b *l'~, ' .t,~ ~g•--_~ . _ { ' _ ,~ ~ ,.. „ _, < _ •_ -. - „, .;~ ~. ~ _ , , ~. -r ' a ., . « ,~ ~ ,° . V, .. " -- ~. .. ,_'d t ~ + ._ , < . ~- ~ r . ,~ ,- ,:, .. , ... ;: M la 't .~ .. + '~ t +~ k ° X ~4 5 w ~ ~ Y ~~ y .. k a r ri. •, l ° t F to .fie, .~. _ i't i J ~.. a .. '~ ' d '' ~' x w r .. W i lr r _ t _E '-. . _,. .. ~' .;. w _ _ i .' ~ ~ ~ .:. ~. _ ~ 4 .... ~ r '. Y ti ~ t T 7 r ~~ .. ¢ p. ~ n r ... .. - t ~~ a .. s ~ _ .' ~, -,.r. {ti a k.. ~~r ~ e.. ti ~' s . ~~ 'r ~' ~ rW 45 ~~ ~~ . Y [,.~. ~ & "~" ~ T '" ..ALL ,~ :.. . Y ~ _. q ~ ~ y,.. 3~e A _ _ f. '4 ..t 1t R ~. fir, ~ .. x+N ~ + k ,~.,`"~ w ~ yr ' ~ `~ ~ ..~' ~ .: a ~ ~~ '. •, _s k r ,~ ~ F ;~k f' *~ ~ ~ ~ + ... ~ '~.."°'"' r , ~ sy'~ yti arty ~' ~ ~ ~'tr J"" ~~~~~y. ,~is~''C°; f _~ .q'tia.~.d.^ ~ - ~~~ ~ '`m~ k r ; r ~ d~;~, $~ 7'~A ~` ~~ ~~..~.~ ~ t, '1 - r i _ _ yF ~'kg ~ b " ^` r '. ~ ~~ ~ `ay'e II J; ~iF Mir ~ °~ ~, .~ ~ i. ^~F ~'^ ~~ „~, t ~ - ,. ,., ,~ __ z_4 _ __ _ - ~~ - ~- - _i s ',. _ ~--~..._.~„__~__ - -tee ~ ~F: -" " -e -_ ~ --..~ -~, _ . ~^"' .~ i : -'~ .,~-~. Y_ _ ''.fem..: ~,. ~~-...__ :'. ~' ~i`- . ..... .. .:.. yes., - ,w _ -Y _ ~. .. 4 - +,~:y.?'~...- ~ •,~y t _ y~+yl Z~'3. e { J i .q ~, ... "".~'w~,.~.'=?fyi~~~ '°'Xfw.. . r="~w w ~~ ~' c F ~ `~. ~ ~ - ~ I "t i w k R ''F LL'., ~ d ~ 4_!t ~~""~ct$'s ~e ~ RF ~ ~ 6r1e . wy -~ ~~-' ~aa' t x ' : ~£ y r tier' ~T .'9 ',~y ~r fi~~ ~ ~- x.~ p.,~y, -+„~, W ~ ~.~ ;.: .+,t-ate ~, ;p ,'.a'^~nr -mob e "'~~{1,.,~ ~'~'~.,~r d ~ ~. ~ ~5, i~ lei ~ i-i,~-r~ ~. x ~ } ff ~ ~ ~ «~ i~rl},ply' v`~4.~ ~`~ ~ -.fy~•. _* - fly #sV°f~ }di ~~ a/,p'~nir~~'°'k. l~ ~Y c"" I Tr ~ ~i".' AAy ir[ +. c....~'' rv~ J4 ~~ ~~ ' ... !y ~ 'lr `. ~9 1 ~d Yd'~ ~~'"'•s...... „fey f ~ - : 4 s s d U5-1 U-1 U 3f(3) Marian Karr From: O'Reilly, Shannon S [shannon-oreilly@uiowa.edu] Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2010 6:49 PM To: Council Subject: Boycott Arizona! Dear Council Members, I'm sure you are aware of the horrendously racist anti-immigrant legislation passed in Arizona last week. It flies in the face of American values like freedom and multiculturalism, and bears not a passing resemblance to identity checkpoints at use in police states worldwide. This legislation encourages racial profiling, harsh treatment, and anti-immigrant sentiment by allowing police to stop anyone who "looks like" an immigrant. Even Governor Jan Brewer could not state explicitly what she believed an illegal immigrant "looked like"-- or perhaps she was too afraid of backlash for any racial reasons she might name. If the Arizona legislature and executives will not act to restore justice, I believe it is up to the rest of the United States to demonstrate that we will not support such policies through our support of their state. I am writing to urge you to join the City of San Francisco in boycotting the state of Arizona, and all companies based in Arizona. San Francisco is working to terminate all arrangements and contracts with Arizona and Arizona-based companies, and I would support attempts by Iowa City to do the same. A somewhat short list of companies can be found at http://arizona-boycott.org/. While the companies may not have voted for the measure, loss of revenue hurts both them and the state-- and I am sure that pressure from companies for financial reasons would have a great effect on the Arizona government. Sincerely, Shannon O'Reilly 200 South Summit Street, Iowa City, IA 52240 1 3f 4 Marian Karr From: John Yapp Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 8:24 AM To: 'cpirnat@mchsi.com' Cc: Dale Helling; '"City Council; Darian Nagle-Gamma Sam Hargadine Subject: N riverside Drive speed limit Hello Mr Pirnat -your email regarding N Riverside Drive speed limits has been copied to me for a response. The State and City code state that the speed limit in residential areas is 25 MPH; we typically only add speed limit signs when there is a change in the speed limit, which is why there is a 25 MPH Speed Limit sign for northbound traffic on N Riverside Drive (for traffic turning off of Highway 6), but not one for traffic turning off of Park Road (which is also 25 MPH). In contrast, No Parking designations can (and often do) change every few hundred feet, hence the need for more frequent signage. That said, the area of N Riverside Drive may undergo significant change depending on the University's decisions regarding the design of the Hancher site, and the Music School location. We will re-evaluate the speed limit and traffic control in this area as the University's plans become solidified. Thanks for the note, John Yapp, Transportation Planner It is of about speed limit sign on N Riverside Dr going south. As was brought up to police and the city, they assume everyone knows what the speed limit is in town. When the police write numerous tickets in one area (which take their time from preventing real crime) it is time to do something about the problem. As on Riverside drive and streets all over town, Riverside has 10 no parking signs, and 1 speed sign . This is the same in our neighbor hood except we have 20 no parking to 2 speed limit sign. This goes for most of the streets in town, so cost is not the issue. The police and the city believe it is a cost issue, well lets inform the citizens of the cost of all the no parking signs. Put in to law no parking on Riverside Dr. and other streets ,take the signs down so tickets can be written. We should assume people also know about no parking. Seems parking is a priority over speed limits. Those who speed when it is posted should be ticketed. cliff pirnat 705 manor dr Iowa city,ia 5/6/2010 Page 1 of 1 Marian Karr From: cliff pirnat [cpirnat@mchsi.com~ Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 1:44 PM To: Darian Nagle-Gamma John Yapp; Sam Hargadine; Matt Hayek; Council Subject: N riverside dr. Darian ,hope it was you i that called me earlier. It is of course about speed limit sign on N Riverside Dr going south. As was brought up the police and the city assumes everyone knows what the speed limit is in town. When the police write numerous tickets in one area (which take their time from preventing real crime) it is time to do something about the problem. As on Riverside drive and streets all over town, Riverside has 10 no parking signs, and 1 speed sign . This goes for most of the streets in town, so cost is not the issue. Put in to law no parking on Riverside Dr. and take the signs down so tickets can be written. Seems parking is a priority over speed limits. cliff pirnat 705 manor dr iowa city,ia 4/29/2010 Page 1 of 1 Marian Karr From: cliff pirnat [cpirnat@mchsi.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 9:29 AM To: Darian Nagle-Gamma Council; matt-hyek@iowa-city.org; Sam Hargadine; John Yapp Subject: speed signs It is of about speed limit sign on N Riverside Dr going south. As was brought up to police and the city, they assume everyone knows what the speed limit is in town. When the police write numerous tickets in one area (which take their time from preventing real crime) it is time to do something about the problem. As on Riverside drive and streets all over town, Riverside has 10 no parking signs, and 1 speed sign . This is the same in our neighbor hood except we have 20 no parking to 2 speed limit sign. This goes for most of the streets in town, so cost is not the issue. The police and the city believe it is a cost issue, well lets inform the citizens of the cost of all the no parking signs. Put in to law no parking on Riverside Dr. and other streets ,take the signs down so tickets can be written. We should assume people also know about no parking. Seems parking is a priority over speed limits. Those who speed when it is posted should be ticketed. cliff pirnat 705 manor dr iowa city,ia 5/4/2010 3f(5) Marian Karr From: Nick Jackson [Jackson.Nick@iccsd.k12.ia.us] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 2:03 PM To: Council Subject: Proposed Rental Fees for Iowa City Boys Baseball Attachments: Email from Mike Moran.doc; Original game schedule proposal.doc; 2nd proposal and rejection.doc; 3rd proposal for games and rejection.doc ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ Email from Mike Original game 2nd proposal and 3rd proposal for Moran.doc (36 ... schedule proposa... rejection.doc... games and rej... Dear City Council Members, My name is Nick Jackson and I am the Vice-President of Iowa City Boys Baseball. I have held this position for the past 5 years and before that I was the Head umpire, a title I still hold. What I do for the league is gather all of our applications and enter into our database, create teams and schedules, take care of equipment distribution and upkeep, train our umpires, and help run the day to day operations. Regretfully I was not able to attend the Council Meeting when the topic of possible field rental costs was discussed but I was able to watch it on TV and I would like to respond to a few points if I may. The first issue that I would like to address is the scheduling. I have always tried to get our schedules to the Parks & Recreation Department as soon as I know how many teams we will have for the season. The problem that we have run into the past few years is that the schedules we have submitted have been rejected by Mike Moran and Jeff Sears which forced me to go back and change our schedule sometimes 3 or 4 different times which leads to a delay in the finalization. In fact for this 2010 season I sent Mike Moran our practice schedule on May 13, 2009 ( I have attached that email along with emails from this year about game scheduling). I also gave him 2 dates that we would need access to our clubhouse in order to hand out equipment and uniforms ( those dates were also sent to them earlier this year and have been posted on our website). Even though these dates were made to known to him almost a year ago, Mike and Jeff still scheduled a tournament for May 1st and told us that we would not be able to use our own building to hand out our team uniforms( they told us on April 27th) Instead we had to use the Parks & Rec building located by the pond in Lower City Park. As you can see it takes us a little bit longer to finalize our game schedules because we are forced to continuously go back and reconfigure them. This brings me to the second issue. A few years ago Mike Moran attended one of our board meetings and we discussed ways to alter our schedules so that more diamonds would be available to rent out to other outside organizations. We came to the conclusion that we, Iowa City Boys Baseball, would do our best to schedule our games in a way that would allow Mike the maximum number of diamonds available for outside rentals. In return Mike would notify us as to when an outside organization requested usage of a majority or all of the diamonds so that any potential scheduling conflicts could be resolved as early as possible. From that night until now there has been no communication about field requests other than when we ask for usage of the fields and are denied because they have already been rented. I have asked both Mike Moran and Jeff Sears multiple times this year what the sign in front of the ball diamonds which reads "Iowa City Boys Baseball has precedence for use of all 8 diamonds" means if the diamonds are given to other groups before we even have a chance to request them. I have not received a response. Lastly I would like to talk about the actual proposed rental fees. Iowa City Boys Baseball was never approached by anyone from Parks & Rec to discuss the idea of paying rent for usage of the fields. we were sent a letter inviting us to attend their meeting where they told us 'this is what is going to happen whether we like it or not'. Shortly after that Terry Robinson attended one of our board meetings a gave us some paperwork outlining the 5 year plan. It stated that the lst year we would pay 10~ of the rental fee and that would increase each year by lOg until we reached 50°s in year 5. We were also told that this only applied to GAMES not practices because there is no field prep involved in a practice so there would be no rental fee. At no time were we asked for input into the proposal we were simply told `this is what's going to happen.' I do understand that a 1 lot of time and money is put into maintaining the fields and that since Iowa City Boys Baseball is using the diamonds we should give something in return. I would like to point out however that for years we as an organization maintained the fields and paid for usage of the lights until we were approached by the Parks & Rec Department who volunteered to help us by taking care of that for us. I also do not understand how the Parks & Rec Department can rent out the diamonds which we built (paid for and installed fencing, backstops, dugouts, & lights) but we do not get anything in return. I know that it was discussed that the funds to pay for field maintenance and labor, and the funds to improve facilities come from different areas. we were told by the Parks & Rec that installing more lights would not be a problem however we have been asking for that for a couple of years now. We asked to have at least 1 more diamond lighted, to have diamond 8 rotated and an outfield fence put in, and to have a diamond enclosed and a mound put in. I would not have a problem paying rental fees if the Parks & Rec are going to take care of the facility upgrades that we request to enhance our game play both during our season and during our postseason tournament play which involves groups from around the state of Iowa and also from other states in the Midwest Region. I am curious to know why if Iowa City Boys Baseball paid for and installed lights (a $45,000 - $50,000 cost) to improve the facility, that would then translate into only 1 year of rental fees credit? Why would we want to spend that much money instead of paying the proposed rental fees which would only amount to roughly $700 for this season? Again I do understand that something should be worked out between the Parks & Rec Department and Iowa City Boys Baseball but it seems to me that aside from rental fees, each year they are trying to take more control of our program and tell us what to do instead of sitting down with us and coming to a resolution that everyone is happy with. I would like to thank you for the time you have put into the proposal of rental fees for affiliate organizations and the time you have taken to read and consider my thoughts and concerns. Thank you again. Nick Jackson Vice-President Iowa City Boys Baseball 622 E. Jefferson St. Iowa City, IA 52245 2 From : Mike Moran <Mike-Moran@iowa-city.org> Subject : RE: reserving diamonds for next year To : sxdxmxfx@mchsi.com Cc : Terry Robinson <Terry-Robinson@iowa-city.org>, Joe Wagner <Joe-Wagner@iowa- city.org>, Jeff Sears <Jeff-Sears@iowa-city.org> Wed, May 13, 2009 10:41 AM Nick, thanks for this information, I will certainly put this in the file for when we meet again at the beginning of next year, similar to when we met this year to discuss everyone's plan for the upcoming season. Since you really don't have any idea how many children you will have to accommodate and we don't know how many fields we will need to accommodate all of our requests (and hopefully, no more water this year) when we get together next year we can put forth our plan of action. If you need any thing else please feel free to contact us. If you have any further ideas about next year, please feel free to pass those along as well! thanks Michael Moran CPRP Superintendent of Recreation Iowa City Parks and Recreation Department 220 S. Gilbert St. Iowa City, Iowa 52240 319-356-5100 From: sxdxmxfx@mchsi.com [mailto:sxdxmxfx@mchsi.com] Sent: Friday, May 08, 2009 12:45 PM To: Mike Moran Subject: reserving diamonds for next year Mike we would like to reserve diamonds #1 - #8 at City Park for practices in April of 2010. When we get to the point next year where we know which teams will be on which diamonds we will let you know but I can guarantee that we will use all 8 diamonds each night. Here is what we would like: April 5th -April 9th S:OOpm - 8:OOpm , # 1 - #8 April 10th 10:00am - 6:30pm , #1 - #8 April 12th -April 16th S:OOpm - B:OOpm , #1 - #8 April 17th 10:00am - 6:30pm , # 1 - #8 April 19th - Apri123rd S:OOpm - 8:OOpm , #1 - #8 Apri124th 10:00am - 6:30pm , #1 - #8 Apri125th -April 30th S:OOpm - 8:OOpm , #1 - #8 We would also need to be able to use our clubhouse on April 3rd to hand out equipment and on May 1st to hand out uniforms so please keep that in mind. Thank you. Nick From : Jeff Sears <Jeff-Sears@iowa-city.org> Subject : RE: ICBB Schedules To : sxdxmxfx@mchsi.com Cc : Mike Moran <Mike-Moran@iowa-city.org> Mon, Apr 05, 2010 03:12 PM Nick After talking to Mike, we feel we need to get the actual schedules from you so we can review them against your number of participants. Your field usage request is for more time than last year's but your number of players is lower than last year. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: sxdxmxfx@mchsi.com [mailto:sxdxmxfx@mchsi.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 2:46 PM To: Jeff Sears Subject: Re: ICBB Schedules Hey Jeff it's Nick from ICBB. Here is our updated practice schedule as well as our game schedule and other dates that we would like to have. Practice Schedule -Diamonds #1 - #7, Mon-Fri, 5:30-8:30/ April 12-April 16, Apri119-Apri123, and Apri126-April 30 Game Schedule -Diamond #1 5:30 game, 7:00 game Diamond #2 5:30 game, 7:00 game Diamond #3 5:30 game M & Th, Practice T, W, & F (starts at 5:30) Diamond #4 5:30 game M & Th, Practice T, W, & F (starts at 5:30) Diamond #5 5:30 game, 7:00 game Diamond #6 5:30 game Diamond #7 Practice (starts at 5:30) Diamond #8 Practice (starts at 5:30) As soon as I get the team rotation for Home & Away I will send you the finalized copy that all the teams will get. Other Dates - We will need access to the Clubhouse on April 10th and May 1st to hand out equipment and uniforms We will need 4 diamonds for the 24th (preferably #1, #4, #3, #6) Thanks again Jeff for working with us to help make everything work great this season. Nick ----- Original Message ----- From: Jeff-sears@iowa-city.org To: sxdxmxfx@mchsi.com Sent: Mon, 29 Mar 201010:03:02 -0500 (CDT) Subject: ICBB Practice Schedules practice permit attached. The sooner I can get the game schedule the better. Thanks Jeff From : Jeff Sears <Jeff-Sears@iowa-city.org> Subject : need detailed ICBB schedules To : sxdxmxfx@mchsi.com, icbb@mchsi.com Cc : Mike Moran <Mike-Moran@iowa-city.org>, Terry Robinson <Terry-Robinson@iowa- city.org>, Joe Wagner <Joe-Wagner@iowa-city.org> Tue, Apr 06, 2010 04:38 PM Bill and Nick I need a more detailed schedule from your organization than the one someone dropped off at the main office this afternoon. A practice schedule and a game schedule for each of your 4 divisions like last year would be ideal. I can't properly enter your organization into the reservation computer without them and time is quickly evaporating. We also have a concern with the direction your field usage request is taking. I looked at the # of teams you had last year and found that you are down across the board this year, but your field usage request has increased. Seniors went down from 10 to 8, Juniors from 12 to 8, Pitching Machine from 14 to 12, and T-ball from 6 to 4. With your current numbers and every team playing 2 games one week and 3 the next (like last year) you can use 5 fields and create a game schedule that is quite accommodating. Remember consolidation is the key to keeping your fees down for next year. When you have just one game on a field and practice times that no one uses that will eventually cost you more. If you need help in creating an acceptable schedule we can certainly arrange a meeting and help you. The Parks and Recreation Department is in a situation where we need to have the most efficient usage of our fields by all organizations, yours and outside groups included. If you have questions or concerns feel free to call myself or Mike. Thanks Jeff »»»»»»»»»»> Jeff Sears, CPRP Program Supervisor Iowa City Recreation Division 220 S. Gilbert Street Iowa City, IA 52240 319-356-5100 319-356-5487 fax From : Jeff Sears <Jeff-Sears@iowa-city.org> Subject : need detailed ICBB schedules To : sxdxmxfx@mchsi.com, icbb@mchsi.com Cc : Mike Moran <Mike-Moran@iowa-city.org>, Terry Robinson <Terry-Robinson@iowa- city.org>, Joe Wagner <Joe-Wagner@iowa-city.org> Tue, Apr 06, 2010 04:38 PM Bill and Nick I need a more detailed schedule from your organization than the one someone dropped off at the main office this afternoon. A practice schedule and a game schedule for each of your 4 divisions like last year would be ideal. I can't properly enter your organization into the reservation computer without them and time is quickly evaporating. We also have a concern with the direction your field usage request is taking. I looked at the # of teams you had last year and found that you are down across the board this year, but your field usage request has increased. Seniors went down from 10 to 8, Juniors from 12 to 8, Pitching Machine from 14 to 12, and T-ball from 6 to 4. With your current numbers and every team playing 2 games one week and 3 the next (like last year) you can use 5 fields and create a game schedule that is quite accommodating. Remember consolidation is the key to keeping your fees down for next year. When you have just one game on a field and practice times that no one uses that will eventually cost you more. If you need help in creating an acceptable schedule we can certainly arrange a meeting and help you. The Parks and Recreation Department is in a situation where we need to have the most efficient usage of our fields by all organizations, yours and outside groups included. If you have questions or concerns feel free to call myself or Mike. Thanks Jeff »»»»»»»»»»> Jeff Sears, CPRP Program Supervisor Iowa City Recreation Division 220 S. Gilbert Street Iowa City, IA 52240 319-356-5100 319-356-5487 fax www. icgov. orQ »»»»»»»»»»> From : Jeff Sears <Jeff-Sears@iowa-city.org> Subject : RE: Please review and approve. To : Bill Graf <bngraf@mchsi.com>, Mike Moran <Mike-Moran@iowa-city.org>, Joe Wagner <Joe-Wagner@iowa-city.org>, Terry Robinson <Terry-Robinson@iowa-city.org> Cc : Bob Cotton <bob.cotton@yahoo.com>, Frank Wagner <frankfwagnerphd@yahoo.com>, Luke Villhauer <luke.villhauer@gmail.com>, Mike Moore <Moore.Mike@iccsd.k12.ia.us>, Phil Rocca <Pmrocca@mchsi.com>, Skip Sherlock <skipandmyrna@gmail.com>, Nick Jackson <sxdxmxfx@mchsi. com> Wed, Apr 07, 2010 09:00 AM Bill Your organization's footprint last year was 6 fields. You have fewer players and as a result fewer teams this year but your request expanded to all 8 fields? That is the issue we see. The way your organization has scheduled practices in the past (every field -all day -every day and then no one uses them) is no longer acceptable. We see this practice as place-holding with the intention of keeping others off the fields. In today's society and with all its related issues, the Parks and Recreation Department can no longer have fields sit idle when there are people willing and waiting to use them. Kickers' has their coaches contact us directly for practice times and we feel that is the way your group will need to approach this season and subsequent seasons. In addition, no other affiliate group holds fields for practices during their game season like you are proposing. Mike is more than willing to come to your next meeting to discuss this or feel free to call him at the office. Thanks Jeff From: Bill Graf [mailto:bngraf@mchsi.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 11:52 PM To: Jeff Sears Cc: Bob Cotton; Frank Wagner; Luke Villhauer; Mike Moore; Phil Rocca; Skip Sherlock; Nick Jackson Subject: Please review and approve. Importance: High Dear Jeff I believe Nick has already taken care of our needs for our practice schedule. Below is a matrix that shows you our needs for the diamonds for the regular season starting Monday May 3 and going through Thursday July 1. I believe this is the same plan that Nick sent to you yesterday. I just formatted it slightly different, Monda Tuesda Wednesda Thursda Frid a 5:30 7:00 5:30 7:00 5:30 7:00 5:30 7:00 5:30 7:00 JR Game Sr Game JR Game Sr Game JR Game Sr Game JR Game Sr Game JR Game Sr Game JR Game Sr Game JR Game Sr Game JR Game Sr Game JR Game Sr Game JR Game Sr Game T-Ball Game Practice 1 Practice 1 Practice 2 Practice 3 Practice 4 T-Ball Game Practice 5 ~ T-Ball Game Practice 6 Practice 7 Practice 8 Practice 9 Practice 10 T-Ball Game Practice 11 F~ PM Game PM Game PM Game PM Game PM Game PM Game PM Game PM Game PM Game PM Game PM Game Practice 12 PM Game Practice 13 PM Game Practice 14 PM Game Practice 15 PM Game Practice16 ' Practice 17 Practice 18 Practice 19 Practice 20 Practice 21 Practice 22 Practice 23 Practice 24 fi~OP Practice 25 Practice 26 Practice 27 Practice 28 Practice 29 Practice 30 Practice 31 Practice 32 ~4F Division # Teams Avg Games er week Practices er week Sr 8 2.5 1 Jr 8 2.5 1 PM 12 2,5 1 T-ball 4 2 1 32 You will note from the recap above that each Sr, Jr, and PM team will play on the average 2.5 games per week which is the same as last year and T-ball will play 2 games per week. Also the same as last year. In addition each team will have the opportunity to practice once a week. We will emphasis to all managers that they will need to sign up to practice at least by Thursday of the week prior to the week in which they would like to practice. We will pack the practices in as much as we can and we will notify you of the diamonds on Friday that we will no be using on the following week. If after a few weeks it appears that we are not fully utilizing the practice diamonds we will be happy to review the situation and release the fields to the open category. We feel the above schedule is very reasonable and appreciate your acceptance. All of our coaches last year asked for practices during the season and since our numbers our somewhat down it appears that we will be able to accommodate this need. If you do not approve the above schedule please state your specific reasons why in detail and please be very clear in the return a-mail and copy the entire ICBB board. As I said I see no reason for this plan not being acceptable. Thanks for your time. Bill Iowa City Boys Baseball Page 1 of 2 Marian Karr From: MurphyGeerdes [mg9425@mchsi.coml Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 10:17 AM To: Council Subject: Dump the Proposal to charge fees to Iowa City Boys Baseball and Kickers This correspondence will become a public record. Dear City Council Members, As a taxpayer and voter, I am appalled that the City proposes to charge Kickers and Iowa City Boys Baseball a user fee. Both organizations have done a tremendous amount to further youth participation in baseball and soccer over the years plus they have donated countless goods and volunteer hours toward improving the parks. These organizations are unique and superior in that they encourage players of all skill levels and economic means to play. The same cannot be said of every other league. My own boys have played infield and outfield positions over the years and been allowed their turn at bat. Frankly, I am concerned that the high dollar leagues, which focus on the players perceived as having better playing abilities and/or parents with the means to pay to play, will dominate youth sports in Iowa City and eliminate opportunities for players of all income demographics to play. Preference ought to be given to those organizations that have 1) made substantial donations of time, goods, and services over the years, 2) provided all players equivalent playing time, and 3) actively encouraged children of all economic means to play. If the city cannot provide the parks free of charge to these organizations, the city should reimburse these leagues for the time, goods, and services provided in the past. I am very surprised that the city has not done more to support these organizations in the past. Charging these organizations a user fee because the city has failed to control expenses is petty. Anyone who examines the list of city staff salaries can see areas of excess. Perhaps it's time to consider bringing city salaries, which are out of alignment with the private sector, back into alignment and benchmark the number of city staff positions against similarly sized cities. You could also contract with outside service providers to perform some of the services currently performed by city personnel. At a minimum, the feasibility of outsourcing ought to be looked for many of the duties of the Parks and Recreation Department. As a taxpayer, I would appreciate the City Council taking a more proactive role to make the city better control its expenses, including labor expenses, rather than to charge Iowa City Boys Baseball and Kickers a user fee. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, 5/3/2010 Page 2 of 2 Mary M. Murphy Mary M. Murphy 890 Park Place Iowa City, Iowa 52246 319/354-2375 Mg9425@mchsi.com 5/3/2010 3f 6 DREP~/`~ CP~TCHER GREG ROCKOW Land P~gent 10 City Council City of Iowa City -- 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 52240 Councilors: I am a real estate broker in Iowa City. The City of Iowa City owns three (3) parcels of land in the northeast quadrant of College and Gilbert Streets. Enclosed is a plat showing the properties outlined in red. I am working with a group of investors that would like to acquire those properties should the City be interested in selling. . Please let me know your thoughts on this matter. So that there is no misunderstanding Iwould look to the City for a fee should a sale to this group result. Sincerely, Dream Catcher ~ ~~~ Greg Rockow GR:IIr Enclosure Cc: GI, Dale Helling:acting City Manager N 0 [~ O ~ c. e7-~ w ;~ c~ M`~q, ~~ ~ -~ .~-' C..? ca 319=338=3010 P O. 13ox 1591 ~ Iowa City, Ifs 52244 Johnson County GAS Online ~cr-w~-.. - --. _ .-- --°--- r ~--- SEASH012E HALL- - 1 30B 301 442 414 422 1430 5~U 528 402 1 6 I _ o- IU4V,4 ~+~E ~~ ~- -~ - I r1a'Unitarian Universalist Sacioty a •,. rli I 10 I I 50:5 571 I l13 ~ ;" ~ 10 1410 I 507 513 517 523 rl~i r(. 14 rC':eBaf1', ~7 1 •~ i. w I I I 18 I .- r!a ,... ~ I 22, .I I I ~ ~ I ,~ ~ 11 I I I 7 ti ~' 28 I 320 328 33032 1 410 I 212 520 15 I I I I s I I sea ~~'' I~~ I E WASHINGTUrd 5T - Leg~nd 14WA C17Y I I I 529 I, l I ~+ Legend 702 I;, 319 1325 ~ ~ I I ~ 505 1511 517 521 ,f . Highlighted I`. I I I I I ~ I I 109 Feature I I I C Polikical j --"' - ~ ~ I ~~"' ^ Boundaris6 try I ~ I I -~t I I 713 Gantarlines 122 1312 X20 31 i' I 508 I 5181 522 I 408 Cantarilna Cabals Trinity Epfsco;pal Church 404 I i I I 528 parcel Lines . - - _.~..~=_ Pataol Laf E CULLEC,E Si Pa;ocl :--- rs `' I I I I "~- I I I I I x, 200 ru I 325 505 1507 515 527 I fi' Vineyard ommunity Church of Iowa City ~j -220 220 220 220 223 j ~l I 225 I ~! 3101 320 504 510 1522 304 I 340 I 'ohnson Cvuntyylcwa 2010 ~ ~~ ~ I • rv b (~ s • ° ~rO Wq~ b 'csri t~'~'j `' J :~ C_.) C.7 3f 7 Marian Karr From: Sarah Swisher (Sarah.Swisher@iccsd.k12.ia.us] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 9:20 PM To: Jerry Arganbright; Council Cc: Patti Fields; Gayle Klouda; Cooper, Mike; Cilek, Toni Lee D; Michael Shaw; Tuyet Dorau Subject: RE: note Thank you Jerry for the reality check. I would like to come by this week, if any board member might have time (I do not, but I need to come over to West) I haven't toured the school since I starting serving on the board. Next week would work, too. Thank you for the invitation, you have every reason to be proud of your students. I am proud of them, too. ACT is going to have to start making new tests just for the West and City kids! Thank you for everything you do for your kids, but I also thank you for you steadfast "global" outlook on our community. We are very lucky to have you. Sarah From: Jerry Arganbright Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 3:58 To: councilc~iowa-city.org Cc: Patti Fields; Gayle Klouda; Swisher; Tuyet Dorau Subject: note Iowa City Council members, PM Cooper, Mike; Cilek, Toni Lee D; Michael Shaw; Sarah After attending the Monday evening meeting on the topic of school redistricting, I wanted to share a few thoughts regarding the information conveyed through the forum. As we all know, impressions and perceptions of any school can become reality for those who process information that may be askew. After reflecting on the comments shared in the meeting, I wanted you to be aware of the following: * West High has become increasingly diverse both socio-economically and ethnically over the past decade. We have 29 ~ minority enrollment and over 20 % of our students on free/reduced lunch. When some depict our high school as a "school of affluence" and lacking diversity, that image is not one that fits with West High. * When patrons of our school community advocate for moving specific groups of students from West High to City High for the purpose of overall school improvement, I fail to see how such a decision influences school quality. I assess the quality of our high school on the effect we have on the students who we have enrolled, not on the composition of our student body. If one believes moving certain groups of students to City from West will result in improving the image of City High, then you would have to assume it would have a negative affect on the image at West High. I do not believe this to be the case, but this is the hypothesis one would draw from this position. * I do not believe the City Council or the school board can guarantee "equal high schools." There are a multitude of factors involved in any high school organization including the past history, culture, faculty expertise, student needs, school goals and priorities, and internal school decisions that influence both the educational program and it's quality as judged by parents, students, and the community at large. These differences will exist between our high schools regardless what group or groups of kids are moved to City High. As you referenced in your comments Monday night, managing our impending high school enrollment growth is a very complicated issue for the school board. As I shared as a member of the redistricting committee, I support the school board making a decision 1 centered on logic, reasonableness, financial prudence, and one that acknowledges the geography of our school district. In my opinion, some of the scenarios being promoted will place our parents and students in the community in untenable positions. while the local paper referenced all council members reside in the City High attendance area, I have always appreciated your support for our efforts at West High. I also offer a standing invitation to you to visit West whenever your schedules permit. While it has been many years, I still appreciate the stop light we have in our west entranceway.....a past story. Thank you. Jerry Arganbright CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email communication, including attachments, is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521, is confidential, and may be legally privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient or believe you received this communication in error, please reply to the sender indicating that fact and delete the copy you received. In addition, retention, dissemination, distribution, copying, or otherwise use of the information contained in this communication is strictly prohibited unless expressly approved by the sender. Thank you. 2 Page 1 of 1 Marian Karr From: Lynnette Ammar [Ira316@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 10:13 AM To: Council Subject: City-West issue for government Dear Council, It seems the data would suggest that what our community is facing is not a City vs. West issue, but rather Iowa City vs. North Liberty and Coralville. The growth that the ICCSD has experienced is not occurring on "the west side." It is occurring in Coralville and North Liberty. As a government perhaps you should explore the reasons for this. Why are new young families attracted to North Liberty? The fact is that North Liberty and Coralville are the locations for all new schools. Wickham Elementary, Van Allen Elementary, Garner Elementary, and North Central Jr. High. None of these schools are in Iowa City. The residents are not of Iowa City. Is it possible to incorporate the county and share resources? The University of Iowa sustains our local economy with employment, yet it puts an incredible drain on the City of Iowa City because it does not contribute to the tax base. We have a problem. But it is not eastside-westside, it is Iowa City vs. Coralville and North Liberty. Sincerely, Lynnette Ammar The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and a-mail from your inbox. Get started. 5/4/2010 Page 1 of 1 Marian Karr From: Emily Farber (emilymfarber@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 9:50 AM To: patti.fields@iccsd.k12.ia.us; sarah.swisher@iccsd.k12.ia.us; gayle.klouda@iccsd.k12.ia.us; mike.cooper@iccsd.k12.ia.us; Michael.Shaw@iccsd.k12.ia.us; tuyet.dorau@iccsd.k12.ia.us; toni.cilek@iccsd.k12.ia.us; plugge.lane@iccsd.k12.ia.us; Ann Feldmann; Council Subject: Re: I support redistricting scenairo 4F and here's why I was very happy to read about the IC City Council opposing the building of a third high school at this time. I think that most people agree that eventually the ICCSD will grow to the point of being able to support a third high school, and while it might be '"convenient" for that time to be now, it just doesn't currently make sense fiscally or student number-wise. The district's highs school numbers are dropping. History has shown that growing elementary numbers don't directly mean the same thing at the HS level. The fact remains that there is plenty of open space at City. It seems disingenuous to cut resources at City and West to help fund a building that isn't currently needed for student numbers, and which does nothing to balance FRL numbers across the district's high schools, and in fact, only widens the divide. Arguments about interstate travel and commute times are simply red herrings to disguise the ugly truth about parents and students with entitlement issues (and that's putting it in polite terms). Using community email and phone calls as a way to get a feel for the "will" of the community is completely flawed on several fronts--one, there was never an official request for another round of community input though email and telephone, two, the community ALREADY made their most valued criteria known (and 4F meets more of those criteria than 4D), and finally, the "squeaky wheel" here seems to be Wickham parents. Just because they are, as a whole, affluent and vocal, does that mean they get to drive the decision for everyone else? As an Iowa City native, CHS graduate ('93) and mother of four children (Shimek) I admit I am interested in protecting the interests of the east side. However, I strongly believe 4F is the best current choice DISTRICT- WIDE. West's programing would take a huge hit if a third school becomes areality--you simply can't take 600 students out of that school and expect everything to remain the same. Argenbright said so himself! City High is not a ghetto and attitudes promoting that should not be tolerated--it's one of the reasons why FRL numbers must be equalized. North corridor parents don't have a "right" to a 3rd high school because of SILO money. That money was for district-wide infrastructure, not a HS, and as it is already, Coralville and NL have received the lion's share of that money. Community growth is not only happening in C-ville and NL--there are many new developments in the works on the east side that will attract young families. Instead of creating a school that will slowly grow from a ninth grade center with limited opportunities for students and that take resources away from our current high schools, why not focus on creating balance between our two excellent schools? I urge you to fairly consider the merits of BOTH scenarios based upon the four criteria set fourth by the community and educator polling and then choose the option that best meets those interests, while at the same time considering our district's financial situation, and student numbers. I think logic points to 4F. Thank you for all your hard work, Emily Farber 5/4/2010 Page 1 of 1 Marian Karr From: Jone Johnson [tljmj5@mchsi.coml Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2010 10:08 AM To: Council Subject: Redistricting Financials This correspondence will become a public record. Dr. Plugge confirmed on May 4th that the numbers being used (from. RSP consultant report p. 39 on the IGCSD website...or p. 57 paper copy) are the correct ones. Scenario 4f = $977,072 Scenario 4d = $1,116,852 to $1,196,852 1 believe the IC planner reported $1.74 million dollars for 4d to the city council at the May 3rd Special Session. The $1..74 million dollar number is f:or a 9-12 High School serving 600 students. That number (1.74 million) is listed on the last page of the hard copy that was handed out on Monday night, May 3r`~ at Iowa City Council Special Session on Redistricting. That number is not correct for 4d. JoncJohnson Redistricting Committee Member 5/5/2010 Marian Karr From: Tuyet Dorau [Tuyet.Dorau@iccsd.k12.ia.us] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 9:26 AM To: MurphyGeerdes; Council Subject: RE: In support of a third high school Dear Ms. Geerdes: Thank you for taking the time to contact us. The City of Iowa City Council did their due diligence by listening to their constituents just like the City of Coralville City Council. Coralville City Council also sent the BOE a letter however theirs was in support of a 3rd high school. As governmental bodies I believe we need to work collaboratively together. The BOE is in a unique situation where our constituents are not exclusive to one municipality or another. It is for this reason that I believe the BOE can and must work to bring all of the governmental bodies together to plan for our collective future. Warmest Regards, Tuyet Dorau Iowa City Community School District From: MurphyGeerdes [mg9425C~mchsi.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2010 9:10 AM To: council@iowa-city.org Cc: redistricting; Toni Cilek; Mike Cooper; Tuyet Dorau; Patti Fields; Gayle Klouda; Michael Shaw; Sarah Swisher Subject: In support of a third high school This correspondence will become a public record. Dear Council Members: My husband, Gregg Geerdes, and I are in full agreement of the school board's support for a third high school and are appalled that the Iowa City Council is even considering drafting a letter to the Iowa City School Board indicating its lack of support for a third high school. We strongly support, as do many others we know, building a third high school or a facility that can transition into a third high school. 1. As graduates of small high schools, we have no objections to high schools of different sizes and believe that course rigor and differentiated instruction matter more than the number of course offerings. Many successful knowledgeable adults have been and will be the product of high schools of 800 people or less. Further, technology will continue to make it easier to provide course offering in future years. Legally, there is no requirement that district high schools be equal in number and type of course offerings. 2. The Iowa City and North Corridor area will expand beyond 2014; and we would not like to see the opportunity to build a third high school be foreclosed by additions to current high schools. 3. Given that student behavior in the classroom has deteriorated over the last couple of decades, we are concerned about the practical aspects of managing a mega-high school. 4. While some students will do well in any size school, others may thrive in a large environment or a small environment. Amid opportunities for leadership and athletics recreational athletic opportunities abound to have more students be able to play on t] to play in an expensive competitive feeder high school. size high school of 800 students will provide that a larger high school cannot. While in this town, it would be great, for example, zeir high school's baseball team without having team for a better chance of playing baseball in 5. Given the gross overall deterioration in Iowa City since I first came here for law school in 1985, I have no faith in the planning department of Iowa City. The council's attention would be better directed toward working with the school district to identify land in the downtown area that could someday be used for a new elementary school (what about Horace Mann site combined with the land that is likely to be available in the future around it?) or turning the town into a destination for retirees with discretionary income or creating large office space for a downtown non-university employer rather than small offices. 6. Having examined the finances of the Iowa City Community School District, I am comfortable that there is money to build the third high school as promised prior to the SILO vote and to operate it. Frankly, I am very concerned that the council has been unduly influenced by a very vocal minority of voters who are willing to protect the status quo at the expense of the district's future and strongly encourage you not to send a letter to the school board. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Mary M. Murphy Mary M. Murphy 890 Park Place Iowa City, Iowa 52246 319/354-2375 mg9425@mchsi.com 2 Page l of'1 ~~ / Marian Karr From: John Macatee [jrmacatee@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:07 AM To: Cilek, Toni; Cooper, Mike; Fields, Patti; Klouda, Gayle; Shaw, Michael; Swisher, Sarah; Tuyet, Dorau Cc: Council Subject: letter sent to the Press-Citizen Opinion Editor on 5/5/10 re accidents commuting to City and West High Schools Attachments: 10 re accidents commuting to City and West High Schools.pages Dear School Board and City Council members, Please read my letter below (both copied and attached) that I sent to the Press-Citizen Opinion Editor yesterday. Thank you for your time and effort in trying to find a sensible solution to this dilemma. Dear Opinion Editor, Please consider printing this letter. I read the front page article in the Press-Citizen this morning about the public forum about redistricting last night. It sounded like a lively discussion. Thanks John Macatee, D.O. 15 White Oak Place Iowa City, IA 52245 A repeated argument that has been made by those who want a third high school is that the drive from North Liberty and surrounding areas to City and West High Schools would involve dangerous drives on I- 80. Several excellent studies by JCCOG (Johnson County Council of Governments Transportation Planning Division) have been done recently which clearly show that most collisions involving cars, bikes, or pedestrians occur on non-interstate roads as the intersection of Burlington and Gilbert Streets, as well as along Highway 6 and Coral Ridge Avenue. Many were caused by cars following too close behind other cars. You can read these studies via the following links: http~//www_jccog orq/docs/file/transportation/RouteComparison.pdf, and http~//www iccoq orq/docs/file/transportation/TrafficCollisionReport.pdf. If the proponents of a third high school were aware of the basic facts of these statistics and studies, perhaps they would be less fearful of their kids getting injured or killed driving along the interstate and they would feel more comfortable with the thought of their kids commuting to City or West High School. We have two beautiful daughters who will be going to City High School in the coming years. We are also concerned and a bit nervous about the possibility of us (or our kids when they start driving!) getting into accidents on the way to school. As parents, we can ourselves be good driving examples, e.g. not speeding, using safety belts, not using hand-held devices as cell phones, no drinking and driving. We should expect responsible driving behavior from our teenage kids and impose strict penalties for irresponsible driving. We can supervise novice drivers and ensure the mechanical safety of any car used by a teenager. A good website about safe teen driving has been created by the CDC: "Teen Drivers" at this link: http~//www cdc qov/motorvehiclesafety/teen drivers/index.html. Another good article, "Teenagers Behind the Wheel" by Dr. Moshe Ipp is at this link: http://www.utoronto.ca/kids/teensl.htm. 5/6/2010 Page 1 of 1 Marian Karr From: Marian Karr Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:24 AM To: 'jrmacatee@gmail.com' Subject: FW: letter sent to the Press-Citizen Opinion Editor on 5/5/10 re accidents commuting to City and West High Schools Attachments: 10 re accidents commuting to City and West High Schools.pages Thank you for your correspondence. However, I am unable to print your attachment. If you resubmit the attachment in Word form I will distribute with your letter. If I do not receive it the email letter will be distributed with no attachment. Thank you. Marian Karr City Clerk From: John Macatee [mailto:jrmacatee@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:07 AM To: Cilek, Toni; Cooper, Mike; Fields, Patti; Klouda, Gayle; Shaw, Michael; Swisher, Sarah; Tuyet, Dorau Cc: Council Subject: letter sent to the Press-Citizen Opinion Editor on 5/5/10 re accidents commuting to City and West High Schools Dear School Board and City Council members, Please read my letter below (both copied and attached) that I sent to the Press-Citizen Opinion Editor yesterday. Thank you for your time and effort in trying to find a sensible solution to this dilemma. Dear Opinion Editor, Please consider printing this letter. I read the front page article in the Press-Citizen this morning about the public forum about redistricting last night. It sounded like a lively discussion. Thanks John Macatee, D.O. 15 White Oak Place Iowa City, IA 52245 A repeated argument that has been made by those who want a third high school is that the drive from North Liberty and surrounding areas to City and West High Schools would involve dangerous drives on I- 80. Several excellent studies by JCCOG (Johnson County Council of Governments Transportation Planning Division) have been done recently which clearly show that most collisions involving cars, bikes, or pedestrians occur on non-interstate roads as the intersection of Burlington and Gilbert Streets, as well as along Highway 6 and Coral Ridge Avenue. Many were caused by cars following too close behind other cars. You can read these studies via the following links: http~//www ~ccog org/docs/file/transportation/RouteComparison.pdf, and http~//www~jccog orq/docs/file/transportation/TrafficCollisionReport.pdf. If the proponents of a third high school were aware of the basic facts of these statistics and studies, perhaps they would be less fearful of their kids getting injured or killed driving along the interstate and they would feel more comfortable with the thought of their kids commuting to City or West High School. We have two beautiful daughters who will be going to City High School in the coming years. We are also concerned and a bit nervous about the possibility of us (or our kids when they start driving!) getting into accidents on the way to school. As parents, we can ourselves be good driving examples, e.g. not speeding, using safety belts, not using hand-held devices as cell phones, no drinking and driving. We should expect responsible driving behavior from our teenage kids and impose strict penalties for irresponsible driving. We can supervise novice drivers and ensure the mechanical safety of any car used by a teenager. A good website about safe teen driving has been created by the CDC: "Teen Drivers" at this link: http~//www cdc qov/motorvehiclesafety/teen drivers/index.html. Another good article, "Teenagers Behind the Wheel" by Dr. Moshe Ipp is at this link: http~//www utoronto calkids/teens1.htm. 5/6/2010 Page 1 of 1 3 ~' C 7~~ Marian Karr From: Julie Eisele [julieeisele@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 9:09 PM To: Council; sarah.swisher@iccsd.kl2.ia.us; mike.cooper@iccsd.k12.ia.us; tuyet.dorau@iccsd.k12.ia.us; patti.fields@iccsd.k12.ia.us; gayle.klouda@iccsd.k12.ia.us; toni.cilek@iccsd.k12.ia.us; michael.shaw@iccsd.k12.ia.us Subject: It's logic, not image Regarding the correspondence dated May 4 to the school board and the Iowa City Council from Jerry Arganbright (published at the Gazetteonline.com), and specifically his statement that "If one believes moving certain students to City High will help its image, you will have to assume it would have a negative affect on the image at West High": The suggestion to move kids to City High has been made primarily to address space issues, and to best use our existing resources without adding new buildings at this time. In fact, I have heard Mr. Arganbright voice serious concerns at a public meeting about capacity issues at his school. don't know anyone who wants to move kids for the purpose "of overall school improvement." Balance in population and demographics (to a reasonable degree, and to maintain continued equitable programming at both schools) -- yes. Improvement - no. Speaking for myself and other 4F proponents, we think our school is already great; we just want to ensure that it stays strong and maintains opportunities for all kids throughout the spectrum of abilities and needs. Comments that were made about City High's image on Monday night were intended to raise awareness about our school and counter arguments against moving kids to City High -negative statements that were made at public meetings in the past, by parents, and were cited as reasons to avoid boundary changes. Speaking for myself, I was trying to inform worried, misinformed parents that City High is a great school and that their fear is misplaced. I was not insisting that we need West High students to shore up the school's "image" and I want to clarify that, since the point was obviously lost on some. Anyone who wants to help City High's image can (and should) call people out on rude and wrong generalizations that are voiced about the school. Furthermore, there should be no reason to fear a plan that would simply balance FRL between our two regional, comprehensive high schools. Changing FRL from 20 to 23 percent would likely hurt neither a West High's image nor its programming, in my opinion. I urge the school board to consider 4F or a similar plan that would make the best use of existing space and would not require the immediate or even near-future need to purchase land and break ground on a new facility, while hamstringing the redistricting process. And my own personal preference would be that Twain Elementary continues feed into City High. Thank you for your time and efforts. Julie Eisele The New Busy is not the too busy. Combine all your a-mail accounts with Hotmail. Get busy. 5/7/2010 05-10-10 3f 8 Marian Karr From: WalkerCL04@aol.com Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:33 AM To: Council; Dale Helling Subject: Just to make sure you know To the members of the City Council and the City Manager: I assume you have been informed by this time about the civil rights case that I filed last October related to discriminatory policies at the Senior Center compared to policies at the Iowa City Recreation Center. Since some of the city staff including the legal staff know the details, it would be reasonable to think you were informed. I have written about the case in the "On The Record" at the Press Citizen website and in my Press Citizen biog. I also posted a link to the full text of my Request for Reconsideration after the Davenport Civil Rights Commission sided with the city and issued a No Probable Cause decision on the case. If you were not informed of that, you can find a copy of the request by following this link: http~//seniorsonguard tripod com/regreconsideration.html I believe that the Davenport Civil Rights Commission did not adequately investigate the case. But even with this favorable finding for the city, I find it hard to understand why any of you would allow the staff at the senior center to do what I have addressed. Charlotte Walker 4/23/2010 3f 9 Marian Karr From: RussUPS@aol.com Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2010 4:04 PM To: Council Subject: thoughts for the May 10th meeting I live on Westbury Courtin Olde Towne Village on the east side of Iowa City. I'm upset with Housing and Community Development Commission and City Council when it comes to how it handles CDBG funds and HOME funds. For these reasons I think the HCDC and City Council should reconsider the affordable housing issue. 1) There is NO Citizen Participation in my opinion and a lot of others out here feel the same way. By the time I (or we) found out the truth what was going out here permits were already issued or they (THF) was to far into the process. Nobody in this subdivision (business or commercial) were made aware of this project or given a chance to ask questions. 2) The loss of tax revenue with these projects are HUGE and will only get worse if you proceed on this same course. According to the Assessors office the City of Iowa City currently has $14.5 million dollars in assessed low rent property. Of that the city only collects $313,000.00. A potential loss of over $2 million in revenue. The investors that own these properties get a 75% discount on their property taxes. There aren't enough taxes paid by these properties to pay for the services the city provides them. 3) In your City Steps Program 2011-2015 it's noted in Market Barriers, that the high cost of land is just one of many financial problems that face people who want to purchase a home, but then again Iowa City is somewhat land locked. The University of Iowa has about 40% of the property in this town that is exempt. Between City owned property and other tax exempt property, that puts a already heavy burden on the those properties being taxed. Also in a recent article in the Press-Citizen noting its #2 ranking for Best Small Places for Business and Careers. But out of 184 communities it fell short in cost of living and economic growth, 103 and 126. It did say that the median household income was $50,934 which is down from your City Steps Program which stated the median family income was $76,000. Speaking with bankers in this area, they tell me it very difficult for someone making either one of these salaries to afford a home. But it is these same people who have saved money to purchase a nice home only to face higher taxes to make up the difference in loss revenue along with the businesses. 4) Why do these homes have to be built brand new? What % of homes purchased under this program are houses currently on the market? Why can't pre-existing be bought and renovated? With the money that's going to be pumped into the lots and units next to me, someone would have more buying power buying pre-existing homes. 5) The real question is how do you improve the cost of living and economic growth in Iowa City, support our infrastructure and still support tax reduced programs without effecting current businesses and homeowners with the tax increase to make up the difference? I think HCDC and City Council should look at the financial impact in relationship to increased property taxes it has on our businesses and residential areas. 6) The HCDC and the City Council should work with the School District when it comes to where homes or property is purchased for these projects so you don't saturate any certain school(s) with to many kids that are involved with the free lunch program. That seems to be a side effect with this program and one of the obstacles in the redistricting process also. Russell Haught 319-351-5315 5/3/2010 Page 1 of 1 Marian Karr From: Regenia Bailey (bailey@avalon.net] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 9:17 PM To: Marian Karr Subject: FW: follow up on Olde Towne Village housing plans ----Original Message----- From: Lauren Adele Naeve [mailto:trackrocksld@yahoo.comj Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 3:55 PM To: matt-hayek@iowa-city.org; regenia-bailey@iowa-city.org; Connie-champion@iowa-city.org; ross- wilburn@iowa-city.org; terry-dickens@iowa-city.org; susan-mims@iowa-city.org; mike-wright@iowa- city.org Subject: follow up on Olde Towne Village housing plans Dear Mayor Hayek and members of city council, My husband and I along with the support of many of our neighbors and businesses sent a letter to you with concerns of development plans by The Greater Iowa City Housing Fellowship. Coincidentally, back around the first of March (shortly after our letter was received) there were a few items on your city council meeting agenda concerning inclusionary vs. exclusionary zoning and land purchase requests by the Housing Fellowship in the Towncrest area on Muscatine Ave. At that point we spoke with a few of you thinking this might also be our chance to speak about our issues with the development in our area but we were told that this was just a coincidence these things were on the agenda so close to our letter being sent and that we could discuss our issue sometime in April. We are just writing you to follow up and hope to get a chance to meet with you in person as a group to discuss our thoughts about the development in our neighborhood. We feel like the water issue with the hill side is still a major issue as after most yards were dry to the bone with no rain for three weeks in April and this location to be built on has holes filled a foot deep with water. I am assuming you have seen the plans for the site and they include some very huge(inter-state highway style) retaining walls and not to mention the extreme costs going into this project to cut into the hillside and get the area anchored. The money and taxes just seem to be too extreme and the area totally unfit to build. We would love for you each to please take a few minutes and drive by this area where they intend to build. The site plans and scale of design just honestly seem totally impossible to squeeze into this small, water logged hillside. We also feel like we as middle class families are really taking on a huge burden with taxes on our properties to allow projects like these and this one most importantly which is going to cost WELL over what it should to build those four units. The burden we are taking on in our own personal property taxes is about enough to drive all good working class families out as we all can't hardly afford to live here. We would also like to know if you personally are familiar with the new City Steps program and what does this mean now for housing with this program passing. We would love to talk this over in person or to meet with each and all of you. We really are just concerned for the well-being of Iowa city and our neighborhood and just wanted to follow up with some of our concerns and just keep communication open. Thanks so much for your time and attention on this issue. We truly appreciate your efforts and expertise put into making Iowa City a better and great place to live and raise our families. Sincerely, Lauren and John Naeve Lauren's cell 314-265-8216 John's cell 319-621-1744 4/3 0/2010 State Farm® Providing Insurance and Financial Services Home Office, Bloomington, Illinois 61710 April 21, 2010 Mayor Matt Hayek 410 E. Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Mayor Hayek: STATE FARM n ~~ INSURANCE Lincoln Operations Center, North 222 South 84th Street P.O. Box 82542 Lincoln, NE 68501=9835 Recently, it came to our attention that a petition was submitted to the City Council earlier this year in opposition to a proposed housing development in the Old Towne Village area of Iowa City. am writing to clarify for you and your colleagues that the individual who signed the petition on behalf of "State Farm" was not authorized to do so and did not seek approval from State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, or its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively "State Farm"), before signing. State Farm has a proud record of working at the national and local levels to build safer, stronger and better educated communities. Our commitment includes a long-standing focus on neighborhoods in need, investments in affordable housing developments and support for classes designed to help individuals become first- time homeowners. I apologize for any confusion this misunderstanding may have caused. Thank you. Respectfully, ~, a a ~ n ° ~ ~:; ~ 3> ~; ~ Sara Taulbee o: ~ -~, ~~`~'~ Public Affairs Manager, Heartland Zone ~;au -°- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ~==: :~~ cn ~, iterling Codifiers, Inc. Chapter 3 DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES 2-3-1: EMPLOYMENT; EXCEPTIONS: Page 1 of 3 -~~ Cmt~ ~~~~ . ~L -~~ ~~~~ C A. It shall be unlawful for any employer to refuse to hire, accept, register, Gassify, promote or refer for employment, or to otherwise discriminate in employment against any other person or to discharge any employee because of age, color, creed, disability, gender identity, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex or sexual orientation. (Ord. 03-4105, 12-16-2003) B. It shall be unlawful for any labor organization to refuse to admit to membership, apprenticeship or training an applicant, to expel any member, or to otherwise discriminate against any applicant for membership, apprenticeship or training or any member in the privileges, rights or benefits of such membership, apprenticeship or training because of age, color, creed, disability, gender identity, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex or sexual orientation of such applicant or member. C. It shall be unlawful for any employer, employment agency, labor organization or the employees or members thereof to directly or indirectly advertise or in any other manner indicate or publicize that individuals are unwelcome, objectionable or not solicited for employment or membership because of age, color, creed, disability, gender identity, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex or sal orientation. (Ord. 95-3697, 11-7-1995) ~ c+ ~ ~ ~ *'t G D. Employment policies relating to pregnancy and childbirth shall be governed by the following: :-? -~~ --. 1. A written or unwritten employment policy or practice which excludes from employment applicants or employes ~iecause~of the ~ employee's pregnancy is a prima facie violation of this title. ~' ~ 2. Disabilities caused or contributed to by the employee's pregnancy, miscarriage, childbirth and recovery therefrom ;ire, fox all job re fed purposes, temporary disabilities and shall be treated as such under any health or temporary disability insurance or sick~eave plan available in connection with employment or any written or unwritten employment policies andpractices involving terms srni conditions of employment as applied to other temporary disabilities. ~~" It shall be unlawful for any person to solicit or require as a condition of employment of any employee or prospective employee a test for the presence of the antibody to the human immunodeficiency virus. An agreement between an employer, employment agency, labor organization or their employees, agents or members and an employee or prospective employee concerning employment, pay or benefits to an employee or prospective employee in return for taking a test for the presence of the antibody to the human immunodeficiency virus, is prohibited. The prohibitions of this subsection do not apply if the state epidemiologist determines and the director of public health declares through the utilization of guidelines established by the center for disease control of the United States department of health and human services, that a person with a condition related to acquired immune deficiency syndrome poses a significant risk of transmission of the human immunodeficiency virus to other persons in a specific occupation. F. The following are exempted from the provisions of this section: 1. Any bona fide religious institution or its educational facility, association, corporation or society with respect to any qualifications for employment based on religion when such qualifications are related to a bona fide religious purpose. A religious qualification for instructional personnel or an administrative officer, serving in a supervisory capacity of a bona fide religious educational facility or religious institution shall be presumed to be a bona fide occupational qualification. (Ord. 94-3647, 11-8-1994) 2. An employer or employment agency which chooses to offer employment or advertise for employment to only the disabled or elderly. Any such employment or offer of employment shall not discriminate among the disabled or elderly on the basis of age, color, creed, disability, gender identity, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex or sexual orientation. (Ord. 95-3697, 11-7-1995) 3. The employment of individuals for work within the home of the employer if the employer or members of the family reside therein during such employment. 4. The employment of individuals to render personal service to the person of the employer or members of the employer's family. (Ord. 94- 3647,11-8-1994) 5. The employment on the basis of sex in those certain instances where sex is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of a particular business or enterprise. The bona fide occupational qualification shall be interpreted narrowly. (Ord. 03-4105, 12-16-2003) 6. A state or federal program designed to benefit a specific age classification which serves a bona fide public purpose. (Ord. 94-3647, 11-8- 1994) 7. The employment on the basis of disability in those certain instances where presence of disability is a bona fide occupational qualification reasonably necessary to the normal operation of a particular business or enterprise. The bona fide occupational qualification shall be interpreted narrowly. (Ord. 03-4105, 12-16-2003) http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/getBookData.php?id=&chapter_id=7351 &key... 5/10/2010 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 2 of 3 8. Any employer who regularly employs less than four (4) individuals. For purposes of this section, individuals who are members of the employer's family shall not be counted as employees. (Ord. 08-4312, 8-11-2008) 2-3-2: PUBLIC ACCOMMODATION; EXCEPTIONS: A. It shall be unlawful for any person to deny any other person the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages of any place of public accommodation because of age, color, creed, disability, gender identity, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex or sexual orientation. This section shall not apply to discounts for services or accommodations based upon age. (Ord. 00- 3950, 11-7-2000) B. It shall be unlawful to directly or indirectly advertise or in any other manner indicate or publicize that the patronage of persons is unwelcome, objectionable or not solicited because of age, color, creed, disability, gender identity, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex or sexual orientation. (Ord. 95-3697, 11-7-1995) C. This section shall not apply to any bona fide religious institution with respect to any qualifications the institution may impose based on religion when such qualifications are related to a bona fide religious purpose. (Ord. 94-3647, 11-8-1994) D. Public accommodations may be designated specifically for the elderly and disabled. However, public accommodations may not be restricted among the elderly and disabled on the basis of age, color, creed, disability, gender identity, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex or sexual orientation. (Ord. 95-3697, 11-7-1995) 2-3-3: CREDIT TRANSACTIONS; EXCEPTIONS: A. Consumer Credit: It shall be unlawful for any creditor to refuse to enter into any consumer credit transaction or to impose finance charges or other terms or conditions more onerous than those regularly extended by that creditor to consumers of similar economic backgrounds because of age, color, creed, disability, gender identity, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex or sexual orientation. B. Extension Of Credit: It shall be unlawful for any person authorized or licensed to do business in this state pursuant to chapter 524, 533, 534, 536, or 536A of the code of Iowa, as amended, to refuse to loan or to extend credit or to impose terms or conditions more onerous than those regularly extended to persons of similar economic backgrounds because of age, color, creed, disability, gender identity, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex or sexual orientation. C. Insurance: 1. It shall be unlawful for any creditor to refuse to offer credit, life or health and accident insurance because of age, color, creed, disability, gender identity, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex or sexual orientation. Refusal by a creditor to offer credit, life or health and accident insurance based upon the age or physical disability of the consumer shall not be an unfair or discriminatory r~ctice if such denial is based solely upon bona fide underwriting considerations not prohibited by title XIII, subtitle 1, code of Iowa, as amended. (Ord. 95-3697, 11-7-1995) -- ~, _. ._, 2. The provisions of this section shall not be construed by negative implication or otherwise to narrow or restrict apy.~bl~r pr~srisions of t~i¢ title. (Ord. 94-3647, 11-8-1994) .s~~ -! ,~„~, C`? --~:: -i ~ ~ ~~ 2-3-4: EDUCATION: ~----~ c~ ~~: ~ -~° s- A. It shall be an unfair or discriminatory practice for any educational institution to discriminate on the basis of age,color, creed, disability, gender identity, marital status, national origin, race, religion, sex or sexual orientation in any program or activity. Such discriminatory practices shall include, but not be limited to, the following practices: 1. Exclusion of a person or persons from participation in, denial of the benefits of, or subject to discrimination in any academic, extracurricular, research, occupational training or other program or activity. 2. Denial of comparable opportunity in intramural and interscholastic athletic programs. 3. Discrimination among persons in employment and the conditions of employment. http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/getBookData.php?id=&chapter_id=7351 &key... 5/10/2010 Sterling Codifiers, Inc. Page 3 of 3 4. On the basis of sex, the application of any rule concerning the actual or potential parental, family or marital status of a person, or the exclusion of any person from any program or activity or employment because of pregnancy or related conditions dependent upon the physician's diagnosis and certification. (Ord. 95-3697, 11-7-1995) B. For the purpose of this section, "educational institution" includes any preschool, elementary, secondary or merged area school, area education agency or postsecondary college and their governing boards, with the exception that this section shall not include the University of Iowa or any other educational division of the state. C. This section does not prohibit an educational institution from maintaining separate toilet facilities, locker rooms or living facilities for the different sexes so long as comparable facilities are provided. Nothing in this section shall be construed as prohibiting any bona fide religious institution from imposing qualifications based on religion when such qualifications are related to a bona fide religious purpose or any institution from admitting students of only one sex. (Ord. 94-3647, 11-8-1994) 2-3-5: AIDING OR ABETTING; RETALIATION; INTIMIDATION: It shall be an unfair or discriminatory practice for: A. Any person to intentionally aid, abet, compel or coerce another person to engage in any of the practices declared unfair or discriminatory by this title. B. Any person to discriminate against another person because such person has either lawfully opposed any discriminatory practice forbidden by this title, obeyed the provisions of this title, or has filed a complaint, testified, or assisted in any proceeding under this title. (Ord. 94-3647, 11 -8-1994) C. Any person to coerce, intimidate, threaten, or interferewith any person in the exercise or enjoyment of, or on account of his or her having exercised or enjoyed, or encouraged any other person in the exercise or enjoyment of, any right granted or protected by section 2-3-1, 2-3- 2, 2-3-3, or 2-3-4 of this chapter, section 22-5-1-1 or 2-5-3 of this title. (Ord. 97-3785, 5-20-1997) N C3 Y , „ '~ b ]~' „ ,~ ~ ~ ~~~~ 6,...... "s~°°~ .r..• _,. ~ ., , ,.-.. ^~ , .~ http://www.sterlingcodifiers.com/codebook/getBookData.php?id=&chapter_id=7351 &key... 5/10/2010