Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-07-12 Correspondence4c 1 ~:,.. --- CITY OFIOWA CITY MEMORANDUM Housing and Inspection Services Inspection Report Liquor/Beer License Applications Applicant: EI Cactus Authentic Mexican cuisine Doing Business As: EI Cactus Authentic Mexican Cuisine Site Address: 1921 Keokuk Street H.I.S. must approve or disapprove the application for a liquor license. The Iowa City Building Official ()approves (x) disapproves the license application. Signature: ~~ Date:__ ~ /~cS / Reason for disapproval: Failure to obtain required permits for remodeling work being done on the premises Outdoor Service Area ( )yes (x) no Dance Floor present: ()yes (x) no Size: ^~„®~ CITY QF IOWA CIT 4(1 ~ ~~~~~~~ ~w~~~ RAND U ~ ~M~J Date: June 25, 2010 To: City Clerk and City Council From: Kent Ralston, Acting Traffic Engineering Planner Re: Item for July 12`h, 2010 City Council meeting; Removal of (1) NO PARKING HERE TO CORNER sign and installation of (1) STOP sign on the northeast corner of the intersection of South Linn Street and East Harrison Street. As directed by Title 9, Chapter 1, Section 36 of the City Code, this is to advise the City Council of the following action: Action: Pursuant to Section 9-1-3A (5,10), remove (1) NO PARKING HERE TO CORNER sign and install (1) STOP sign on the northeast corner of the intersection of South Linn Street and East Harrison Street. Comment: This action is being taken to assign the right of way at the intersection of Linn Street and Harrison Street. ~~ ~~ per ~.~, ~ ....., , Y `:~ ~: .. ~.__ f a - , :~ ~v ~.~-- c; ; ~ ~~ F.e~.. ~~q~ N ~ ! ~ d,,,,-p ~..... rrassTSn i_1 -a7~~~ ~~,®~ CITY CJF [OWA CITY 4 2 ~ ~~~~~~~ RAC EMS M Date: June 25, 2010 To: City Clerk and City Council From: Kent Ralston, Acting Traffic Engineering Planner Re: Item for July 12'h, 2010 City Council meeting; Installation of (1) STOP sign at the northeast corner of the intersection of Highland Court and South Gilbert Court. As directed by Title 9, Chapter 1, Section 3B of the City Code, this is to advise the City Council of the following action: Action: Pursuant to Section 9-1-3A (5), install (1) STOP sign at the northeast corner of the intersection of Highland Court and South Gilbert Court. Comment: This action is being taken to assign the right of way at the intersection of Highland Court and Gilbert Court. ~.4' (V ,f ,m,,m ~ i ~ -~ ;~ ~ n .s ~, ' _ ^-° ;_, ._~. ~.~J ~~®~ CITY CAF IOWA CIT 4 3 M EM4 Date: June 24th, 2010 To: City Clerk From: Darian Nagle-Gamm, JCCOG Traffic Engineering Planner Re: Item for July 12th, 2010 City Council meeting; Installation of (2) STOP signs on the northwest and southeast corners of the easternmost intersection of Wintergreen Drive and Jamie Lane, (1) STOP sign on the southeast corner of Wintergreen Drive and Richmond Lane, and (1) STOP sign on the southeast corner of the westernmost intersection of Wintergreen Drive and Jamie Lane As directed by Title 9, Chapter 1, Section 3B of the City Code, this is to advise the City Council of the following action. Action: Pursuant to Section 9-1-3A (5); Install (2) STOP signs on the northwest and southeast corners of the easternmost intersection of Wintergreen Drive and Jamie Lane, (1) STOP sign on the southeast corner of Wintergreen Drive and Richmond Lane, and (1) STOP sign on the southeast corner of the westernmost intersection of Wintergreen Drive and Jamie Lane Comment: This action is being taken to assign right of way at the intersections. u -r; ~ ..~., ., - A r' ~ a .~ ~ ~ r~ fir, ~; c ~..,.,., T ., ~,°- `~7 ^~®~ CITY OF t~WR CITY 4 4 :rm~'~~ ,~®,,-;~ N D ~ ~ EM(JRA M Date: June 10, 2010 To: City Clerk From: Darian Nagle-Gamm, JCCOG Traffic Engineering Planner Re: Item for July 12th, 2010 City Council meeting; Establishment of a 6 AM - 12 PM Farmer's Market Saturday TOW-AWAY ZONE for the metered parking spaces on the north side of the 400 block of East Washington Street. As directed by Title 9, Chapter 1, Section 36 of the City Code, this is to advise the City Council of the following action. Action: Pursuant to Section 9-1-3A (10); Establish a 6 AM - 12 PM Farmer's Market Saturday TOW- AWAY ZONE for the metered parking spaces on the north side of the 400 block of East Washington Street. Comment: This action is being taken to clarify that from 6AM - 12AM on Farmer's Market Saturday mornings, vehicles parked in these metered spaces may be towed. N ~ O ~w,na•a X81 o ~'^y.._ _ '~~ h~y~ ~ ~ G ~ a C ;t - ~ -t ~-f, `,l 4 5 Marian Karr From: Dale Helling Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 2:12 PM To: 'mwheilman@gmail.com' Cc: '"City Council Subject: FW: Visitor Complaint Regarding Gnats Attachments: Gnat Complaint.pdf Dear Mr. Heilman, Thank you for your email to the City Council regarding gnats. Your message will be forwarded to Council for official acceptance as part of their consent agenda for an upcoming meeting. Please see below a response I received from the Johnson County Public Health Department, including links to information from the Iowa State University Department of Entomology that provides some general information about gnats. As is indicated, there are really not any effective means for eliminating these pests, which are more prevalent in the spring and early summer. The City of Iowa City has not attempted any such measures in the past and none are planned this year. On the up side, their numbers apparently diminish as the summer progresses. Let's hope that will happen this year. I hope this information is helpful. Regards, Dale Dale E. Helling Interim City Manager (319) 356-5013 dale-hellinp aC~.iowa-city. orp From: Erin Pettypiece [mailto:epettypiece@co.johnson.ia.us] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 10:35 AM To: Dale Helling Subject: Gnats Hi Dale, Please see the link below from some information on gnats htto://www. ipm. iastate.edu/ipm/iiin/blackfl. html This article may not be referring to the exact insect that the complainant was referencing. If not they can utilized the section on the left hand side of the website to see if the Iowa state university provides information on the insect the are interested in learning more about or they can return to the insect information homepage http~//www ipm iastate.edu/ipm/iiin/ to find more information there. Thanks, ~'v~zn ~e~t'~~iece Environmental Health Specialist Johnson County Public Health 855 S Dubuque Street Iowa City, IA 52240 Tel 319.356.6040 ext. 5881 6/25/2010 Page 2 of 2 Fax 319.356.6044 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential or privileged information and is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or entity to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this a-mail in error, please delete it from your system. From: Mike Heilman [mailto:mwheilman@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, June 11, 2010 3:47 PM To: Council Subject: Visitor Complaint Regarding Gnats Hello Council Members, Please see the attached complaint and forward to the appropriate contacts. I am hoping that someone from the Council, City Manager's office, or other administrative offices will assist in getting this issue on the agenda so that appropriate action can be taken. Thanks! Kind Regards, Mike Heilman 6/25/2010 City of Iowa City 410 E Washington St. Iowa City, IA 52240 Dear Sir or Madam: I am currently residing in Iowa City for a summer program at the University of Iowa. During my time in Iowa City, I have been and will be riding the CamBus daily. As a result, I have noticed an infestation of gnats that is so extreme that it has created a public nuisance. I am a visitor here who was looking to pursue a graduate education in this city; however, the extremity of these gnats has reached a level that detracts from the Iowa City experience. More importantly, because there are so many gnats it has made myself, among many others, reconsider the option of public transportation or walking as viable modes of transportation. In order for Iowa City to facilitate a memorable experience for summer visitors, the city should implement efforts aimed at population reduction of these "gnats". Additionally, by not controlling for this population the inadvertent consequence is that people are discouraged from returning to Iowa City and from "green" modes of transportation because of the constant inconvenience of simply being outside. I would not have submitted a complaint for something as silly as "gnats" if it were not a serious issue, but the gnat problem impacts a substantial composite of the population and impacts every person who walks, rides a bike, or takes the bus. I suspect that anyone who has stood at a bus stop or went on a walk recently would share similar feelings as I do on this subject. I know that many of my contemporaries share this same feeling of discontent and therefore we respectfully request that the city implement some measures aimed at resolving the pending issues of the gnats. Although, with ignorance, I assume that the flood in 2008 influenced the population of gnats, I have not been to a city with such a pest problem, and after this experience, it is one so severe and constant that I would advise anyone to consider alternative modes of transportation rather than deal with the imminent threat of gnats. Thank you for your time and for your consideration of this complaint. Kind Regards, Aggrieved bus-riders 4 6 Marian Karr From: bmccusker@mchsi.com Sent: Saturday, June 12, 2010 11:36 AM To: Council Subject: Fwd: Scott Blvd. Traffic Noise Dear City Council, I have been in frequent contact with Mr. Ron Knoche, City Engineer, in regards to possible solutions to minimize the impact of truck noise on Scott Blvd. Our property, located at 94 Heron Circle, is adjacent to Scott Blvd. and subject to the ever increasing noise level, especially from the 800+ trucks/day. To help decrease the decibel level of vehicular noise, would it be possible to re-route the truck traffic and/or consider an ordinance amending Title 9, Chapter 7 to restrict Scott Blvd. to local traffic only? Alternate Truck Routes I would like to suggest are the truck traffic from the east take the West Branch exit #254...Highway X30...Highway 6...to the Industrial Park. The trucks from the west could take the Exit 239A off of I-80....Highway 218...Highway 6...to the Industrial Park. The total miles and time from the east would be 13.2 miles/17 minutes(vs. 10.4 miles/16 minutes taking Scott Blvd.)and 10.7 miles/13 minutes from the west(vs. 13.2 miles/16 minutes taking Scott Blvd.). Clearly this demonstrates minimal advantage for trucks to be traveling through the residential areas via Scott Blvd. I would appreciate your input on this most distressing situation. Thank you. Bradley A. McCusker 94 Heron Circle Iowa City, IA 52245 ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: bmccuskerCmchsi.com To: "Ron-Knoche" <Ron-KnocheCiowa-city.org> Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 4:56:49 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Scott Blvd. Mr. Knoche, As the volume of truck traffic increases on Scott Blvd., do you know if there are future plans to develop an alternative truck route? I discussed this same issue with a city official about 5 years ago and it was suggested then, that Taft Avenue would become the next truck route. This individual thought the work would begin in 5-10 years. So far, I haven't seen any activity to suggest this. Another question I have is why is Scott Blvd. exempt from the 5-ton weight restriction on city streets (City Code 9-7-4)? Not only are these heavy trucks horrendously loud, but they are causing significant damage to the roads and probable collateral damage to sidewalks and home foundations. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration to these questions/concerns. Brad McCusker 4 7 Marian Karr From: Kathryn Johansen Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:21 PM To: 'Mitchell Swanson' Cc: ''City Council Subject: RE: Refueling Assistance for drivers with Disabilities. Hello Mitchell, Thank you for your email communication to the City Council. Council members do not receive their emails directly. Your message will be forwarded to them and accepted as official correspondence at the next Council meeting. If you wish to speak with Council members directly, please visit our website at www.icgov.orq. Click on the link to City Council and there you will find names, phone numbers, and addresses of all seven Council members. Thank you again for writing, Mitchell. Sincerely, Kathi Johansen Administrative Assistant to the City Manager 319 356-5010 From: Mitchell Swanson [mailto:mswanson6l@frontiernet.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 1:54 PM To: Council Subject: FW: Refueling Assistance for drivers with Disabilities. .. _ From: Mitchell Swanson [mailto:mswanson6l@frontiernet.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 9:45 AM To: 'ross-Wilburn@iowa-city.org' Cc:'Scott Gill';'patrick hughes' Subject: Refueling Assistance for drivers with Disabilities. Mayor Wilburn, I am with an organization advocating for refueling assistance for drivers with disabilities and seniors. Twenty years ago the ADA was passed and ironically that is when we started experiencing the disappearance of full- service gas. This leaves those of us with disabilities and many seniors the question of how we are to get our gas. Recently I have met with Scott Gill at Independent Living and we also filmed an informative segment for PMN. We would like to meet with you and demonstrate these difficulties and discuss the solution. We are available the end of next week or the week of the 28th 6/16/2010 Page 2 of 2 Please view this youtube News segment from KWQC in Davenport. http•//www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uw nSNOA6JU Thank you for your time, Mitchell Swanson 6/16/2010 4 8 Marian Karr From: Regenia Bailey [bailey@avalon.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 12:14 AM To: Marian Karr Subject: FW: Boy's & Girl's Club For South East Side of Iowa City From: Beatrice Boltz [mailto:beatrice.boltz@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 14, 2010 10:51 PM To: matt-hayek@iowa-city.org; ross-Wilburn@iowa-city.org; regenia-bailey@iowa-city.org; susan- mims@iowa-city.org; mike-Wright@iowa-city.org Subject: Boy's & Girl's Club For South East Side of Iowa City Dear City Counsel, I want a Boy's & Girl's Club established in South East Iowa City. I think the children there do not have enough resources. I am very passionate about this. I have posted a video about it on you tube: http•//www youtube com/watch?v=6kGMaPHBTZ~ . I am looking for investors. Do you all have any ideas? This would be a very expensive project. However, the city is beginning to pay a high price for the restlessness of the youth is spreading into the streets with vandalism, armed robberies, drug dealing, home invasions. you name it, you know... this investment would have great returns. Could the city fund it? Please let me know. In the love of our youth, Beatrice Boltz BEATRICE ANNA BOLTZ EMAIL: beatrice.boltz(cr~,~mail.com Instant Messaging: beatrice.boltz~yahoo.com http•//www.myspace.com/beatriceboltz htt~//www.facebook.com/beatriceboltz http • //www.twitter. com/beatriceboltz -I have over 3,000 tweets, Follow me! http://www.allvoices.com -Beatrice Boltz -I've written many articles 4 this site! ! http•//www youtube.com/user/beatriceboltz http•//www associatedcontent.com -search: "Iowa City's Beautiful Downtown" I wrote the article! ! WORLD PEACE & LOVE TO YOU!! _) _) _) 6/15/2010 4 9 Marian Karr From: James Surratt [jamessurratt55@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 4:06 AM Subject: 9-5 shift steadily vanishes This article appeared in Newsweek Magazine: http~//www newsweek com/2010/06/25/the-vanishine-9-to-5- .o~ b.html If this is true, it is becoming increasingly necessarily for the City Council to insure that services such as mass transit become more reliable in being on time to meet the needs of the unconventional scheduled employees throughout the day. Routes such as the Lakeside and Towncrest Routes are not currently meeting that standard, meaning that more service to those routes or areas of town need to be addressed as they are finding it difficult to stay on schedule with the heavy demand for service causing the busses to not arriving downtown on time to insure consistent connections to other areas of town. This is not just a rush hour phenomena. It goes throughout the day. This is all due to low income families populating those areas that are 80% reliant upon mass transit to meet their transportation needs. Jim Surratt, MTO 133 Arabian Court Iowa City, IA 52240 319-351-4717 (for verification) 7/6/2010 4 10 June 21, 2010 To The Iowa City Council, Hello, my name is Kate Coyle and I coordinated the Iowa City Nuclear Weapons Free Zone ordinance back in 1985. The purpose of this letter today is to ask that you again send foreign countries a copy of the ordinance as was legislated in the year of 1985. I would like it with a cover letter stating that it is being resent to commemorate the 25 year anniversary. Also, I want it made clear in this cover letter "that the presence of nuclear weapons facilities within Iowa City and the world is in direct conflict with the maintenance of the world's public health, safety, morals, economic well-being and general welfare." (Section 2 of the ordinance.) In Section 5 of the ordinance it states: "Upon adoption of this ordinance, the City Council of Iowa City shall officially notify Iowa City's Congressional Representatives and Senators, the President of the United States and recognized leaders of the Soviet Union, Great Britain, France, the People's Republic of China, India and any further nuclear weapons states of the contents of this initiative." The state of the world today is such that many more countries now have nuclear weapon capability. Please see to it that these countries like Iran, Persia, etc. get letters too. This is what is meant when the ordinance states: "and any further nuclear weapon s states." ~. .~ ~r-~raq Respectfully Submitted, ~~ Kate Coy e l ~ ~~' ~..~ ;' ~~-:~ ~ W ' C1"i _ ~!°,::t 1 a ~~ i~~ :i9 ~ `~,' Y Where can I go to 4 11) get more information? City Of Ann Arbor • For a full copy of the ordinance, please Phosphorus Ordinance go to www a21?ov.org/green or call the and Lawn Fertilizers Fertilizer Program Administrator at 734-997-1596. • • Your Washtenaw County MSLT Eve Extension office can also help with questions regarding lawn care, N e e phosphorus and soil testing. Call the yO u Master Gardener Hotline at 734-997- 1819. ' To Know. • You can learn more about the Huron River and its tributaries by going to the Huron River Watershed Council's website at www.hrwc.or~. 1` ~ ~ 1 l ~ ~ ~ ` ~~ / ~ f I / f ~ l \ ~~ ~f 26-0-3 ~/ ; GF AN/y q9 `' ~ ,~ ~ City of 0 Ann Arbor -- Public Services ~----~ ~ ti//CHIGP _ pHoSPHoRUS t FREE Huron FERTiLIZ.'ER River Watershed Council Protectiy~ the rives since 1965 1100 N. Main Street Suite 210 `''E ~~ Ann Arbor, M148104 ~Q ~Vtr~ T ROt (734) 769-5123 ~~ ~~ www.hrwc.org s, ~~~~~- ~~ ~r. ~ ~ ~~= `~~ 'r~ k ~i' . What is phosphorus? ''y"`1LJ~`~. GAEEN~GRo Phosphorus is a nutrient FERTCtZER that stimulates root growth 1~~,~/~ in plants. Phosphorus is ~! r11 naturally abundant in 26 _ ~ - 3 southeast Michigan soils. The necessary level of phosphorus for healthy ZERO pHoSPHoRuS plant growth readily affixes to the soil. Plants are very efficient and effective at drawing phosphorus out of the soil. If we don't need to add phosphorus to our lawns, why is it in fertilizers? It is one of the three macronutrients plants need, along with potassium and nitrogen. Because most fertilizer is manufactured for national distribution, phosphorus is included in the product regardless of the phosphorus content of the soils in the location of use. How do I know which fertilizer is okay to apply? Check the label. On the bag, you will see a series of three numbers. The first number indicates nitrogen, which is used to promote top growth. The middle number indicates phosphorus, which is used for root growth. The last number indicates potassium, for strong stems and disease resistance. To comply with the ordinance, the middle number must read "0" which means there is no phosphorus in the product. In general, check the turf grass fertilizers for zero phosphorus, and avoid "lawn and garden" fertilizers, which are very high in phosphorus. What is the penalty for applying phosphorus fertilizers? Each violation of the ordinance will be a civil infraction punishable by a fine up to $1,000, and not less than $250. Why did the City of Ann Arbor ban phosphorus in lawn fertilizer? The city is under a federal mandate to reduce phosphorus levels in the Huron River by 50 percent in order to meet water quality standards. Runoff from residential lawn fertilization is the primary source of phosphorus entering the Huron River. By limiting the unnecessary application of phosphorus to lawns, the city can reduce the amount of phosphorus entering the river by 22 percent! To achieve that goal, the City of Ann Arbor passed an ordinance to eliminate the use of phosphorus in manufactured lawn fertilizers, effective January 2007. Why is phosphorus bad for the Huron River? During normal watering or rainstorms, unnecessary phosphorus applied to lawns is washed into street stormdrains, which empty directly into local creeks and the Huron River - no filters, no treatment process. Once in the River, the extra phosphorus promotes the rapid growth of algae, which in turn crowds out beneficial water plants. As the algae dies off, the decaying process depletes the water of oxygen, harming fish and insects. If the problem becomes severe enough, lakes become clogged with "pea soup" and scum, and fish kills can result. If I don't live along the river, why does this matter to me? The Huron River is the source of up to 90% of the City of Ann Arbor's water supply. The re- mainingwater comes from a series of municipal wells. When you help protect the Huron River, you also help protect the water you use every day for drinking, cooking, bathing, laundry, gardening and other household activities. ` ~ V Is there ever a time when I can apply phosphorus in lawn fertilizer? The ordinance applies only to manufactured lawn fertilizers containing phosphorus. The following are exempt from the phosphorus ban: • Garden and tree fertilizers. • Newly seeded or sodded lawns, limited to the first season of growing or the first four mowings only. (Most landscapers will add phosphorus at the time of seeding or sodding, which should be sufficient.) • Lawns where a soil test indicates inadequate phosphorus levels. The soil test must demonstrate the level of phosphorus to be less than or equal to 10 parts per million, in which case phosphorus may be applied in the amount and ratio specified by the soil test. What else do I need to know about the ordinance? Fertilizer of any type may not be applied: • On any impervious surfaces (sidewalks, drives, etc.). If fertilizer does spill onto impervious surfaces, you must sweep it up within one hour of the application period. • Within 25 feet of any wetland, watercourse, stormwater retention or detention basin. • Within any natural features open space as defined in Chapter 55. • Prior to April 1 or after November 15. What else should I know about lawn fertilizers? Once you have selected the no-phosphorus fertilizer product you prefer, remember: • Store fertilizer in its original container in a dry, cool place prior to application. • Fertilizer is an asset to your lawn, but you must be careful to keep it on your lawn and out of the storm drain system. Sweep up any spills immediately, including any granules on sidewalks and driveways. Never apply fertilizer right before a heavy rainstorm. Clean walks with a broom, not a hose. Remember, fertilizer that washes off your yard and into the street enters the stormdrain system, which is a direct connection to local creeks and the Huron River. • Apply less fertilizer, less often. If you fertilize just once each year, fall is the best time to apply it because it helps your lawn repair itself and prepare for optimal growth in the spring. • Take proper care of your lawn and you can reduce or eliminate the need for fertilizer. Keep your lawn at least three inches tall, and never cut more than 1/3 of the blade each time you mow. Taller grass has deeper, healthier roots, is more drought tolerant, and prevents weed infestations. When you do cut the grass, mulch the clippings back into your lawn. Mulching adds nitrogen and organic matter, which is necessary to prevent soil compaction. ~ ~ ~ r ' ,~ 4 12 Marian Karr From: Fournier, Ronald F MVR [Ronald.F.Fournier@usace.army.mil] Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 11:55 AM To: iowalive9; Coraville Mayor; Council; Chuck Wieneke 4; DON KARR (al); JUSTIN SHIELDS 5; KRIS GULICK 1; Monica Vernon 2; PAT SHEY 3; RON CORBETT; RON CORBETT; TOM PODZIMEK (al) Cc: JOE WINTERS; Maren.Stoflet@noaa.gov Subject: NWS Cedar River @ Cedar Rapids River Forecast My apologies for including everyone in this a-mail, but I wanted to provide a direct link to the NWS forecasts for Cedar Rapids if you didn't already have it: http~//www2 mvr usace army mil/WaterControl/shefgraph-forecast2 cfm?sid=CID14&fid=CID14&dt=S&d=7 Ron Ron Fournier Chief, Corporate Communications U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Rock Island Rock Island, IL 61204-2004 (309) 794-5274 ronald.f.fournier@usace.army.mil _ From: iowalive9 [mailto:iowalive9@q.com] Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 11:44 AM To: Fournier, Ronald F MVR; 'Coraville Mayor'; 'Iowa City Council'; 'Chuck Wieneke 4'; 'DON KARR (al)'; 'JUSTIN SHIELDS 5'; 'KRIS GULICK 1'; 'Monica Vernon 2'; 'PAT SHEY 3'; 'RON CORBETT'; 'RON CORBETT'; 'TOM PODZIMEK (al)' Cc: 'JOE WINTERS'; Maren.Stoflet@noaa.gov Subject: RE: 5 INCHES OF RAIN EXPECTED FOR MARSHALLTOWN & WATERLOO AREAS Greetings, Ron- Thank you very much for the information. Where can we find Cedar River Level forecasts for Cedar Rapids? We obviously have more concern for additional rain upstream from the dam, than does the Corps or NWS at this time. We hope our expectations are wrong!! Sincerely, lowalive ----Original Message----- From: Fournier, Ronald F MVR [mailto:Ronald.F.Fournier@usace.army.milJ Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 10:48 AM To: iowalive9; Coraville Mayor; Iowa City Council; Chuck Wieneke 4; DON KARR (al); JUSTIN SHIELDS 5; KRIS GULICK 1; Monica Vernon 2; PAT SHEY 3; RON CORBETT; RON CORBETT; TOM PODZIMEK (al) Cc: JOE WINTERS; Maren.Stoflet@noaa.gov Subject: RE: 5 INCHES OF RAIN EXPECTED FOR MARSHALLTOWN & WATERLOO AREAS 7/2/2010 Page 1 of 3 Marian Karr From: iowalive9 [iowalive9@q.com] Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 11:44 AM To: 'Fournier, Ronald F MVR'; 'Coraville Mayor'; Council; 'Chuck Wieneke 4'; 'DON KARR (al)'; 'JUSTIN SHIELDS 5'; 'KRIS GULICK 1'; 'Monica Vernon 2'; 'PAT SHEY 3'; 'RON CORBETT'; 'RON CORBETT'; 'TOM PODZIMEK (al)' Cc: 'JOE WINTERS'; Maren.Stoflet@noaa.gov Subject: RE: 5 INCHES OF RAIN EXPECTED FOR MARSHALLTOWN & WATERLOO AREAS Greetings, Ron- Thank you very much for the information. Where can we find Cedar River Level forecasts for Cedar Rapids? We obviously have more concern for additional rain upstream from the dam, than does the Corps or NWS at this time. We hope our expectations are wrong!! Sincerely, lowalive ----Original Message----- From: Fournier, Ronald F MVR [mailto:Ronald.F.Fournier@usace.army.milJ Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 10:48 AM To: iowalive9; Coraville Mayor; Iowa City Council; Chuck Wieneke 4; DON KARR (al); JUSTIN SHIELDS 5; KRIS GULICK 1; Monica Vernon 2; PAT SHEY 3; RON CORBETT; RON CORBETT; TOM PODZIMEK (al) Cc: JOE WINTERS; Maren.Stoflet@noaa.gov Subject: RE: 5 INCHES OF RAIN EXPECTED FOR MARSHALLTOWN & WATERLOO AREAS FYI. Coralville Lake is currently at elevation 704.0 feet and slowly rising, using 56.5% of its available flood storage. The lake is forecast to peak on 9 July near 705.5 feet (spillway crest is 712.0 feet) using 66% of its available flood storage. The outflow was 8,000 cfs and is expected to hold there for the entire forecast period. The forecast can be found at http://www2. mvr. usace.army. mil/WaterControl/Districts/MVR/Forecast/corforecas t.html. Thanks, Ron Ron Fournier Chief, Corporate Communications U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Rock Island Rock Island, IL 61204-2004 (309) 794-5274 7/2/2010 Page 1 of 3 Marian Karr From: iowalive9 [iowalive9@q.com] Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 9:05 AM To: Coraville Mayor; Council; 'Chuck Wieneke 4'; 'DON KARR (al)'; 'JUSTIN SHIELDS 5'; 'KRIS GULICK 1'; 'Monica Vernon 2'; 'PAT SHEY 3'; 'RON CORBETT'; RON CORBETT; 'TOM PODZIMEK (al)' Cc: JOE WINTERS; CORPS OF ENGINEERS REP.; Maren.Stoflet@noaa.gov Subject: 5 INCHES OF RAIN EXPECTED FOR MARSHALLTOWN & WATERLOO AREAS Greetings, Affected Mayors and Councils: C. L. 999 Having successfully warned people the Swine Flu Pandemic projections were a hoax at the time, it appears timely to warn folks of lowalive's expectations for about 5 inches of rain to fall in the Marshalltown and Waterloo areas within the next 3 to 4 days. This should raise the Coralville reservoir level to about 714 feet on July 10. The Cedar River crest in Cedar Rapids should reach about 13 feet. Iowa City should see a crest of at least 24 feet. Here are the latest, comparable National Weather Service and Corps of Engineer's forecasts at this time. The Cedar River level for Cedar Rapids was not found. Cor~~lville lake Reservoir .Carps Fare+Cast jCenti~l Time Zone) Ctlr~w,tl~ lv~ke R+~servair ~b6 7t3~ c Ch Jb2 Ica oo:oo aJOO oo:o~ OQ~ 53ui2tl1U 9J~2G1tl 13Ju1:314 1 Juf 2t3tQ .. Currcar! Sr.+[ja ' ' ftx~ Frxrat d R!C Sp9l Nan l" Ht~sf 1"° US Army Corps of Errg3nee~s .°$ock lsl~tttj i) strict - Water t~ontr of tenter - y~,~nt:~ct vs 7/2/2010 Page 2 of 3 Getialr River at Cedar F~-r1is, IA - Nefianal Wernher Service ~'nrecast (Central TinYe Zone) Cedar Rivet at Cedar Fall's, Ir"1 J5 d ~ c 85 + aotx3 a ~; tau°~t~ en:®a uo,oo oe:o~ ect:ao 26 Jtu+ 2T396 FB Jun 2(17 R 313 Jtna 209i? Z Ju4 26th A JuE 20i6 8 Jul 269i} 8 Ju4 2Qi4 " Cunent Staya ' ` Ftaucynal Ydea~r SerWicr Fa^ec*sl d Flood Stage f: On `' t)M Reoord High Stage On ~' Off Htstoria Ytar None . View Graph US Army Corirs of Engineers - Roci,~:.sland Oistriet -'Water t.orttrai ~.enTer - ~4rtr~~c~ v~ Iowa River at lava City, IA -Rational Weather Service Forectist [Ce~>IZtral Thee Zone} bt7wfa Riv~:r at lovu~ City, tPt 2B 7Q C SIJ i5 i €~ 06:04 ~J:(753 46:46 46:06 D0:(74 Ct6:OQ 26 Jun z49 C4 2tS 3trn 21394 34 Jun X396 2 lut 26957 4 Jud Zit I C7 ti J~ 269(3 " . Current Stage ' , Ftatannal tVaatt~e SerAse l=txecast d US Arrnv Cores of Enr#ineers -Tack Isian~l District -,Water Cc~irtrol Cerr#er _ Carrta~et 1is Flood Stage f* t7n ~ qit Ete~oatd High Staga Hdstaoc Yesr Flom ~ Uew Graph Incidentally, the avg.lntegrity Index Level for the Corps of Engineer's management of the Coralville 7/2/2010 Page 3 of 3 Reservoir, for the year-to-date is 470-which is well above the significant level of 300! The comparable levels for the C. R. Gazette and Cedar Rapids City Council are 180 & 45 respectively. The Linn County Emergency Management Agency is 160. Sincerely, lowalive 7/2/2010 07-12-10 4 13 Marian Karr From: Mike Wright Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 4:33 PM To: Marian Karr Subject: FW: Interview for The Daily Iowan -----Original Message----- From: Claire Perlman [mailto:claireperlman@gmail.com] Sent: Tue 7/6/2010 12:14 AM To: Matt Hayek; Regenia Bailey; Mike Wright; Ross Wilburn; Susan Mims Subject: Interview for The Daily Iowan Hi, I'm writing an article on the site for the new animal shelter, and I was hoping to talk to you about that process. Is there a time tomorrow that I could call you? Or if you would prefer to answer by email, I can send you the questions. We would like to have the story run on Wednesday, so if you could get back to me as soon as possible I would really appreciate it! Thank you! Claire Perlman 1 4 14 Marian Karr From: Cambridge Place Apts [cambridgeplaceapts@mchsi.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 2:57 PM To: Council Subject: property tax issue Council Members, I am writing to inquire as to why the City of Iowa City is allowing more condo's to be built and rented out. The Westgate Villas were built as condo's and I was told that when the person that came from the city for our appraisal was here at our apartment complex. I was assured that they would be condos and not rentals. As of today, July 6, 2010, there is a for rent sign posted in front of the building. When I called about the rentals available, I was told that Vern Folken owns multiple units and is renting them for between $1300 and $1500 each. This is very upsetting to me, as I pay over $90000 a year in property taxes for my apartment complex and people can come in and put up so called condos and circumvent the property taxes. I just cannot understand why you keep allowing this to continue. These type of practices are going to put me out of business. Our property taxes have risen from about $40000 per year to over $90000 per year in less than 15 years. My rent income has not doubled in that time, but people who build these condos continue to get away with avoiding paying their fair share in property taxes. How can you own multiple condos and rent them all out without it being considered commercial property? This issue needs solved, as these type of multi-family units cut drastically into the city's budget when they do not pay the same commercial property taxes the rest of us are required to. Mary Kay Adams, Owner, Cambridge Place Apartments Clark Adams, Manager, Cambridge Place Apartments 1 Page 1 of 1 Marian Karr ~t5~~-J From: Theodore Lensing [tlens2020@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 4:34 PM To: Council Subject: Enforce the Ped Mall Smoking Ban So I have to ask: is the new complete ban on smoking in the pedestrian mall just some political stunt? There are now fewer no-smoking signs posted than before the area was expanded, and the law is no better unenforced than it was before the expansion. And by no better I mean the law is not enforced at all. Since the partial ban went into effect, I've never seen a police officer issue a ticket or even a warning, but I have seen well over 50 smokers. Seeing 2-3 separate smokers during one walk- through in the afternoon was not uncommon. I've personally called to report smokers, and I've asked staff at the Library to call about smokers, but I've never seen seen a police officer even respond to a call to give a warning. I stopped trying to contact the police about it when it was clear the people answering really didn't care to hear about people smoking next to the kids. It's also not a manpower problem since during that same time I've seen 15 or so bicycle riders on the ped mall area, and half a dozen of them were stopped and ticketed. One officer even cut off a cyclist with atire-screeching stop in order to catch him for a ticket. Clearly that one ticket was really important. I suspect ticket revenue from just the smokers I've seen would easily justify the time to patrol the area. Instead it seems only some laws get enforced downtown. I have nice photos of the hundreds of cigarette butts piled throughout the non-smoking areas that showed up after the snowmelt this Spring. That made it painfully obvious how unenforced the partial ban was. Does the police need an example stack of photos of smokers sitting next to no-smoking signs to get them to do their job? What's it going to take? Today a friend of mine saw a City Council member smoking in the ped mall just this afternoon. What a great example that sets. I didn't see her personally, and sure maybe he misidentified her, but you can at least be sure I will carry my camera around more now that I've heard that. It was the "last straw" that generated this complaint. I'm sick of this "above the law" garbage. If the law's not going to be enforced, just cut it from the code so no one has any expectation of clean air. I want to use businesses downtown, but if it's not going to change I'll drive elsewhere instead. 7/8/2010 ~_,--"r.®~r CITY of Iowa CITY 15 ~~~~~~ ,~®,~~~ RA ~ D U ~ ~E~CJ DATE: June 28, 2010 TO: Mayor and City Council \1 FROM: Marian K. Karr, City Clerk RE: Referendum Petition changing bar entry age from nineteen (19) years of age to "legal age" A referendum petition was filed by Raj Patel late Tuesday, May 11th seeking to repeal the recent ordinance (Ordinance No. 10-4388) changing the bar entry age to the "legal age". Pursuant to our City Charter the petition must be filed with the City Clerk at one filing and must contain on its face at least 2,500 signatures of registered Iowa City voters. The petition filed May 11th contained over 3,300 signatures on its face. A current voter registration list was obtained from the Johnson County Auditor and the City Clerk's office began the verification process (Attachment A), which must be completed within 20 days. After 156 hours of review a "Certificate of Insufficiency" (Attachment B) was mailed to Mr. Patel by registered mail on May 29th notifying the petitioner that 1273 signatures were verified, and an additional 1227 were necessary to make the required 2500 signatures required by City Charter. Mr. Patel filed a "Notice of Intent to Amend" on June 1St and submitted a supplemental petition on the deadline date of June 15. On its face the supplemental petition contained 3300 signatures exceeding the shortage of 1227 required to meet the 2,500 total. The same verification process outlined in Exhibit A was followed. A total of 97 staff hours was spent on verifying an additional 1688 signatures on the supplemental petition. A "Certificate of Sufficiency" (Exhibit C) was mailed to Mr. Patel by registered mail on June 25. Attachments U:21 petition710memo.doc EXHIBIT A PROCEDURES FOR VERIFICATION OF INITIATIVE/REFEREMDUM PETITION FILING May 2010 • Accept if "on its face" signatures reach required total (Tally number indicated on cover affidavits); and meets the June 7, 2007 deadline (110 days before general election) • Order voter list (active and non active) from Auditor's office, including address and birthdate • Verify each affidavit to the voter list to ensure each circulator was a qualified elector, "check off' near their name at the top of circulator cover sheet to indicate they are registered. Do not "x" them off voter roll; they may sign petition and will be counted later. Do not accept entire petition if circulator notarized own affidavit. Do not accept entire petition if circulator sheet is not notarized Do not accept entire petition if they are not registered. If the circulator name appears on the voter rolls with a different address check to see if the circulator signed their own petition and included a birthdate. With a birthdate you may be able to verify the petition. If the circulator name appears on the voter rolls with a different address check to see if the circulator signed their own petition and included a birthdate. If they did not sign their petition, or did not include a birthdate, you can not count the entire petition. Do accept if notary mistakenly wrote own name in notary box. (Not going to penalize the circulator and/or petitioners for the mistake of notary) • Discount all out of town addresses unless: A birthdate that can be used to verify the person is still registered in IC • All other verification follows established 4-24-00 procedures attached. S:initiative/procedureforcounting.doc 4-24-00 If the name and address match, count it. (Birthdate is optional) If the name and address differ but there is a birthdate that can be verified with the voter rolls, count it. (Had situations where the petition address is outside of IC but WITH the birthdate able to verify. Appears individual moved outside of IC but did not change their address and is still a registered voter here.) If the name and address differ, and there is no birthdate given, cross it off. An "x" next to the name of the petition means it counts. For each "x" on the petition there should be an "x" on the voter roll. (This allows for a check for duplicate signatures.) Duplicate signatures are indicated on the petition by crossing off a name and "dup" in the margin. Shortened or abbreviated names are counted if the address and/or birthdate match the voter rolls. (i.e. Kathy for Kathleen, etc.) If birthdate was incorrect but names and address match, count it as birthdate is optional. Illegible names or questions leave blank and Marian will make final determination. Exhibit B :~.:.®~f ~~ ~,,.• City ~-~ ~ ~ CERTIFICATE OF INSUFFICIENCY STATE OF IOWA ) SS COUNTY OF JOHNSON ) I, Marian K. Karr, City Clerk, do hereby certify that I have examined the petition submitted by Raj Patel on May 11, 2010, which proposed that Ordinance No. 10-4388, which amended the bar entry age from nineteen (19) years of age to the "legal age", which is currently twenty-one (21) years of age, be repealed and I find that it is insufficient because it does not contain the required number of valid signatures. A total of 2,500 valid signatures are required and the petition contained only 1273 valid signatures (short 1227 of the requirement). Pursuant to Section 7.04(A) of the Charter a copy of this certificate shall be sent by registered mail to the petitioner. The petitioner may file a notice of intention to amend his petition within two days (2) days after receiving a copy of this certificate. Petitioner may file a supplementary petition upon additional papers within fifteen (15) days after receiving a copy of this certificate. The petition may only be amended once for lack of the required number of valid signatures. Supplementary petitions shall comply with the requirements of Subsections B & C of Section 7.03, Home Rule Charter of the City of Iowa City, and within fifteen (15) days after it is filed, the City Clerk shall complete a certificate as to the sufficiency of the petition as amended. Witness my hand this 29`" day of May, 2010. ~~~ Mar K. Karr, City Clerk Subscribed in my presence and sworn to before me by Marian K. Karr this 29`" day of May, 2010. ~~ ~ ; -, 3 Notary Public in and for Johnson County, Iowa 410 EAST WASHINGTON STREET • IOWA CITY, IOWA 52240-1826 • (319) 356-5041 • FAX (319) 356-5497 r EXHIBIT C +~~®~~ :.III~~~ ~~ ~Qar~1l CITY OF IOWA CITY 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, Iowa 5 2240- 1 82 6 (319) 356-5000 (319) 356-5009 FAX www.icgov.org CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY STATE OF IOWA ) SS COUNTY OF JOHNSON ) I, Marian K. Karr, City Clerk, do hereby certify that I have examined the supplemental petition submitted by Raj Patel on June 15, 2010, which proposed that Ordinance No. 10-4388, which amended the bar entry age from nineteen (19) years of age to the "legal age", which is currently twenty-one (21) years of age, be repealed and I find that it is sufficient as defined by Article VII, Home Rule Charter of the City of Iowa City. The supplemental petition required 1227 verified signatures. Valid signatures of 1688 qualified voters were verified bringing the total number of certified valid signatures to 2961. Witness my hand this 24th day of June, 2010. ~~ Mari K. Karr, City Clerk Subscribed in my presence and sworn to before me by Marian K. Karr this 24th day of June, 2010. o a~"~ s SONDRAE FORT ~ ~~~ `~ z ~ Commission Number 159791 Notary Public in and for Johnson County, Iowa My Commission F-tcpires aw ~ s ~ a,~ Marian Karr From: John Deeth [jdeeth@mchsi.com] .. Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:26 PM To: Council Cc: joe.bolkcom@legis.state.ia.us; robert.dvorsky@legis.state.ia.us; vicki.lensing@legis.state.ia.us; mary.mascher@legis.state.ia.us; david.jacoby@legis.state.ia.us; tomlarkin14@hotmail.com; dleshtz@ia.net Subject: bar ordinance I urge Council to respect the wishes of the public, as expressed in the record turnout 2007 city election and again in this year's petition process, and reverse the ill-advised 21 bar ordinance. As you know, this option is available as an alternative to an election. I also urge Council to lobby our legislators for a more realistic drinking age law. We cannot effectively combat the very real problem of alcohol abuse until we recognize the rights and wishes of our young adults. As a matter of principle, the legal drinking age should be more consistent with other ages of majority. Sincerely, John Deeth 313 West Benton St. 1 '~ I ~ ' i Brandt Heitman '~` - ~ ~' ' brandt.heitman~a gmail.com ~ I 1{' ~! Matt Hayek and the Iowa City city councir`~ ~ ~~ ' ~-`^'y ~ '•;~ ~ ~ • Before this letter is disregarded, I would hkeyo}~~~ ar~e~~ a,chance to present my case against the new bar ordinance. I am speaking out because the detas~s of the new bar law in Iowa City have recently been brought to my attention. I have some concerns to address, and keep in mind these are valid points, not complaints. The first concern is that this will lead to many more problems within the city and university. The second is that the fine is quite excessive for the "crime." To address the first concern, it seems as though the city has not thought about the consequences of this new ordinance. Most people are worried about the downtown "atmosphere" and whether the bars will be okay from their loss of income. My concern is more toward the underage men and women who have had their main source of entertainment taken away. By not allowing those under 21 into the bars, the city is pushing these individuals out of a controlled, public atmosphere and forcing them to find alternative ways to keep themselves entertained. The house party scene will expand and make police enforce a larger unsupervised area. The bars can be taken from the students but they will still manage to get alcohol and find ways to break the law. These house parties will be less supervised than the bars which will decrease the security and increase the dangers and risks of the students. Walking home in the city at night can be very dangerous, especially in a less public, not well lit area. Right now most students don't walk home because the taxis provide a great service to those going to the bars, but if students attend house parties it will be less convenient for the cabs to run their services. This will increase the number of drunk drivers and cause more dangers to the students and public. These were the main concerns I had with the safety and well being of the city and students of the university, but I feel the real crime with this new ordinance is that the punishment is completely unreasonable and does not fit the "crime." First of all, it is not a crime to be in a public establishment that serves alcohol. Does this mean a person under the age of 21 cannot be in Buffalo Wild Wings after 10 PM to watch a game with his dad because they serve alcohol and have a bar? It seems quite unreasonable to keep someone out of an establishment when he or she does not cause harm to anyone in that establishment. The smoking ban in public places seems to be a very similar law. There are, however, two major differences between these two laws. One is that smoking in a public establishment can be very harmful to the health of those around the smoker, whereas a minor's presence in a bar after 10 PM has no harmful affect on anyone. For some reason, though, these two "crimes" have very different consequences for those committing it. According to the law: For violations described in section 142D.9, subsection 1, the scheduled fine is fifty dollars, and is a civil penalty, and the criminal penalty surcharge under section 911.1 shall not be added to the penalty, and the court costs pursuant to section 805.9, subsection 6, shall not be imposed. This means that a smoker, who by the way is killing those around him with second hand smoke, is only fined fifty dollars, but a minor is fined 735 dollars for merely being present in a public establishment and not harming anyone. According to the 8a' amendment "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted." If a minor gets a fine of 330 dollars, for actually possessing alcohol, which can be harmful, why should that same minor receive a 735 dollar ticket for being in a public establishment? This is just one example of many. Running a red light, speeding, and public intoxication are just a few other violations that carry a lesser fine, but let me add that they all pose a greater danger to the violator and others than being underage in a bar. I could go on and on with this argument, but it is quite obvious that the fine is, to quote the Constitution, "excessive." I ask that you, or whoever has the ability, lessen the unconstitutional fine of any tickets that have been issued and any future tickets for reasons that have been stated above. It is clear that this new ordinance will create more danger to the city and students. Along with the danger it imposes, it is also unconstitutional to place this excessive fine on those not harming anyone around them. Thank you for your time and consideration, and I would love to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, Brandt Heitman ~~; ~~a~; ~~ ~' ~..~ N ~~ > ~; ;,,,,, Marian Karr From: Kopriva, Elizabeth A [elizabeth-kopriva@uiowa.edu] Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 4:06 PM To: Council Subject: 21 ordinance Since the 21 ordinance passed, me and my fellow employees have all lost our jobs. This ordinance has killed business for taxis and bars, and is completely unnecessary. Thanks to this, I have lost a job that I depend on. Now I'm struggling to pay rent, and borrowing money from my parents that they can't really afford to give me. Since no where downtown is getting any business, I can't find another job. This ordinance is a horrible decision that is affecting all of us negatively. Underage drinking is a fact, and you have to accept it. Whether its downtown, or at a house party, underage people are going to drink. At least downtown it can be supervised, and make sure nobody gets hurt. This is absolutely not the case at house parties. You have the option to repeal this on July 12th, and to keep this horrible law in effect will only further drinking in other areas, as well as put more people out of jobs. The economy is horrible, and if you actually cared about the residents of Iowa city, you wouldn't put a law into effect that leads to people losing their jobs. Do what is needed and repeal this law. This has been a horrible decision by the Iowa city council. As I previously said, the job that i really needed has been taken away from me strictly because of the 21 ordinance. I needed that job. I cannot find another one. My dad has health problems and my parents can barely pay their own bills, let alone the ones they have to cover for me now. Please admit that you have made a poor decision, and make this right on July 12 when you have the chance. 1