HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-08-17 TranscriptionPage 1
ITEM 2. PROCLAMATIONS.
a) Get Moving for Healthy Kids Day -August 29, 2010
Hayek: (reads proclamation)
Karr: Here to accept the proclamation is Colleen Davis. (applause)
Davis: ...couple words here. You pretty much said everything that I wanted to say,
so...(laughter). Um, the...the primary goal is just to motivate children and their
families to get moving and um, I'm a full-time working, outside the home mom,
and we...we're very busy and it's really hard to sometimes get our kids moving
and uh, so we're just trying to get...get children and their families to move a little
bit more. So...keep...keep it fun and active, and um, so we want this to
(mumbled) activity to build, um, to build activity with kids and families by
showing them that an active lifestyle is not only critical, but is a lot of fun. So,
the other, um, point is just build awareness about the program that's in the Iowa
City School District that helps, um, under-insured, uninsurable children and the
families get medical attention, and um, also we really want to thank our sponsors
that have helped get this event off the ground and to keep the program, um,
sustainable. So...that's...that's it, and you can register at the
http•//communityfoundationotjohnsoncounty.ors/ um, you can register up to six
family members per registration. That way, um, otherwise we've got, um,
registrations, um, through the Iowa City School District and at the, um, the Iowa
City Rec Center and the Coralville Rec Center and the North Liberty Rec Center
and the libraries, the surrounding libraries. So, thank you very much!
Hayek: Thank you.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 2
ITEM 2. PROCLAMATIONS.
b) Social Security - Go Green, Go Online, Going Strong at 75 Day -August
14, 2010
Hayek: We have another proclamation concerning Social Security, uh, they're not here to
accept it so 1 will dispense with the `whereases' and go straight to the cut of it.
(reads proclamation) And before we move on. It's not exactly on the agenda, uh,
want to, uh, we regularly recognize employees of the City who have put a lot of
service in, uh, on behalf of the organization and the community, and want to
recognize Dale Helling, uh, tonight. Um...we don't usually do this and...but
we've got a certificate for him, uh, signed by the entire City Council and it says:
City of Iowa City presents this certificate of recognition to Dale Helling in
appreciation of 35 years of service with the City of Iowa City. Uh, Dale, you are
one of the most respected professionals in the community, both within the
building and out in the public, and I speak for everyone I know when I
congratulate you on...on this incredible milestone.
Helling: Thank you very much! I didn't realize I was that old! (laughter and applause)
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 3
ITEM 4. COMMUNITY COMMENT (ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA).
Hayek: This is the, uh, time this evening where we provide an opportunity to the public
to, uh, address the City Council concerning items that are not on the agenda. If
there's something you'd like to bring to our attention, uh, sign up and...and form
a queue and stand at the podium, and give you up to five minutes and uh, we'll
listen to what you have to say. Is there anyone who would like to address the
Council?
Clark: Hello. My name is Jimmy Clark. Uh, I'm one of the founders of Stadium Club
and we're here to, uh, speak to you on our behalf. Uh, our presence here today is
to present the facts as they pertain to the Stadium Club and its application for a
temporary use permit and liquor license, and the subsequent denial of both. We
would like to clarify the main issues discussed in the work session last night, and
we would also point out a few facts that were excluded from the meeting last
night. Based on comments made at the work session last night, it is apparent to us
that some City officials have confused the Stadium Club as the actual property
owners, which is a mistake. We feel that the denial of our permit application was
based upon this erroneous portrayal. Here are the pertinent facts in the matter.
Number one, the Stadium Club was formed in March of 2010. We initially
contacted the City Housing Department to inquire about permits and/or
ordinances needed to host an event such as this at the time. We asked the City
official what will we have to do in order to hold an event, similar to the Magic
Bus, on the same site. Are there any permits required? The response from the
City official was, and I quote, "No. It is afree-for-all in that area. Nothing is
enforced and is like a carnival in that area on game day." This is also supported
from the packet that we presented to you folks last night on several occasions.
Uh...point two, uh, Miss Eleanor Dilkes, the City Attorney, attributed all property
improvements to the Stadium Club. She cited that the Stadium Club paved the
backyard and installed new fencing. She cited these actions by the Stadium Club
as the cause for the City to react. That is flat wrong! The property is owned by
Outside Properties LLC, not the Stadium Club. Clearly two separate entities! It
was at the sole discretion and expense of Outside Properties LLC to pave the
backyard and install the new fencing. The improvements were made to make the
property safer for the tenants' daily usage and to allow easier access for
maintenance vehicles during the winter. The improvements were not made by the
Stadium Club, nor, and I reiterate, by the Stadium Club. Number three, the code
violation cited in the denial was directed towards Outside Properties LLC, and our
understanding...it's our understanding that on Friday, August 13th, Outside
Properties LLC and Mr. Boothroy met in person to discuss the violation and have
come to an informal resolution. Again, the code violation is an issue for the
property owners, not the Stadium Club.
Barkalow: Hello, my name is Tracy Barkalow. I just want to take a minute and point out, uh,
two main issues, uh, that I had with the denial. Uh, the paved backyard issue, uh,
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 4
paving of your backyard meets all City code requirements. You can, per City
code, pave your entire backyard and there are no restrictions per City code stating
that you cannot do this. That is a legal use currently in the City code. Also like to
point out that the fence issue, um, the fence meets all City codes and standards
and requirements, as well, um, we took a disrepaired fence and replaced it on the
property, um, and we did that, uh, basically just to better improve the property and
make it a little bit nicer to look at.
Clark: Okay, moving forward, uh, to uh, point four here. Uh, the events similar nature to
what we have proposed at 817 have been occurring for nearly 20 years with police
awareness, little or no code enforcement, and in plain public view. The Stadium
Club complied with any and all City requirements regarding the temporary use
permit and the required liquor license. The same permit and license that we...we
were told were not necessary in March. We are one of only two groups required
to obtain a temporary use permit amidst the hundreds of various commercial
entities on and around Melrose Avenue on game days, such as food and
merchandise vendors and private property owners, profiting from tailgate
properties on their own property. Number five, unlike the Magic Bus' proposed
new location and subsequent public concern for the nearby residents, we have no
public resistance to our location. Additionally, our two access points are on
public streets. We feel we have equal if not more adequate emergency access to
our site as compared to other locations, such as Kinnick Society parking lot,
which is directly across the street from the party, or the ped mall downtown.
Number six, in our business plan... our business plan submitted to the City during
the application process, we stressed that the Stadium Club would be 21-only for
the duration of the entire day. We further indicated that security personnel would
be on hand to monitor all activities. Beer was to not be freely dispensed, but
individually served to better monitor individuals' consumption. In our opinion,
these steps would make the Stadium Club a safer and more responsible tailgating
event, compared to any other unsupervised ones. Number seven, in our
conclusion here, with the facts that we've stated today and the spirit and fairness
in equal enforcement of City code, we are asking the City Council to use your
authority to approve our temporary use permit and liquor license to allow us to
hold our planned event. We further suggest that the City Council impose a
moratorium, not allowing any changes on all commercial entities conducting
business on game day near Kinnick Stadium for this upcoming football season. It
is clear that the City needs to put in an ordinance in effect to address
commercialized entities on game day, citywide, and to fairly and equally regulate
them to...to everyone. We as members of the Stadium Club would be more than
happy to assist the City on any new ordinances that address this issue. It is our
understanding that the property owners intend to submit agame-day overlay
ordinance to the City shortly, and to address this in a more formalized manner.
Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. We look forward to
City Council's guidance and direction, and let us know any way we can help.
Thank you. (several talking away from mic)
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 5
Dilkes: Um...as you know, we can't have a discussion among Council and...and Mr.
Barkalow, uh, and Mr. Clark, but...Mayor Pro Tem who was leading the
discussion last night asked that I add a few facts to, um, what you've been told.
There are a number of facts that distinguish the Stadium Club, both from the
Magic Bus that operated at the former site, and the other temporary game-day
uses that occur along, uh, Melrose Avenue. First of all, um, these gentlemen are
not conducting a fundraiser for charity. This has been envisioned as afor-profit
venture from the start. Um, we have a number of communications with the City
that document that. Number two, it's frankly irrelevant who paved the site. Um,
817 Melrose, the former site of the Magic Bus, has been paved. Also, the
connection to 5 Triangle Place, the neighboring property, has been paved, fenced,
and not simply improved for the tenants of those properties, but rather striped and
numbered for 22 parking spaces. I'd also note that Mr. Barkalow, I believe, is not
only a member of the Stadium Club, or a partner in the Stadium Club, but is also
one of the owners of the property. And indeed, it was Mr. Barkalow and Mr.
Clark, not this Mr. Clark, but Mr. Jeff Clark, one of the owners of the property,
who had the initial dealings with the City in connection with the Stadium Club.
Next thing that I...that I think is important is that parking has been advertised for
this site, both on Mr. Barkalow's web site and on Craigslist, commercial parking
in a residential zone at this site. In addition, the property...we have the property
leases in our file. The Stadium Club is renting 817 Melrose for $5,000 per game
and 5 Triangle Place for $3,200 per game. In addition, Mr. Barkalow has
advertised cabana rental, including abig-screen TV and wait staff, during the
games, for $7,000 per year. As we said earlier, and as I said again last night, the
movement of the Magic Bus into the neighborhood, combined with the intensive
commercial and for-profit use that is being proposed by the Stadium Club
distinguish Stadium Club very significantly from the other uses that occur on
Melrose Avenue and required action by the City.
Hayek: Anybody else wishing to address... (unable to hear person speaking away from
mic). Why don't we wait and see if others...want to address the Council. Is there
anyone else wishing to address the Council, uh, on items that are not on the
agenda? So, Clark, I'll allow you up to...to address the Council, but this is not a
dialogue so there's not going to be a back and forth, and to the extent the Council
however wants to take this up in a discussion format, Mr. Barkalow can do the
same thing, and we need to schedule that for a work session at an upcoming
meeting.
Barkalow: Sure. I'll just make some brief...quick comments...to Eleanor's response. As
you can see on our business plan, we are a, uh, a charitable organization. We will
be donating 100% of the proceeds to charity. That is in our business plan, and
that has been on our business plan and expressed to the City since day one. Um,
and Ms. Eleanor pointed out its irrelevant who paved the site. I don't think it is.
If you look at the articles and the facts, uh, Mr. Boothroy and...and Eleanor have
pointed out that the, uh, the paving of the parking lot and the fencing have been
the main issues and the main reason for the City citation, uh, in conjunction with
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 6
us leasing parking at that location. Uh, that is not an action that was taken by the
Stadium Club, and yes, I am one of the owners of the property, as well as one of
the owners of the Stadium Club. Uh, my partners manage the property with me,
uh, we have put City parking, or available parking just like the other 100
properties in the area, uh, up. We did put a for lease sign up. We were cited for
this. Uh, we have met with Mr. Boothroy and addressed these issues and we have
come to a conclusion with Mr. Boothroy, um, on a resolution for that citation, and
um, our opinion. He told us on Friday that we had to put some bollards in and a
few things, and we have agreed to do that. Uh, and I guess the cabanas and the
TV's, it's all about game day so, uh, that's all I have to say.
Hayek: Thank you.
Dilkes: I can't...I can't help but make one more point, and that is that the Stadium Club
has been organized as anLLC, afor-profit LLC, with the Secretary of State, not a
not-for-profit entity.
Hayek: Anyone from the public on community comment before I move on? Okay, we'll
move on.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 7
ITEM 6. ADOPTING AMENDED FYll ANNUAL ACTION PLAN WHICH IS A
SUB-PART OF IOWA CITY'S 2011-2015 CONSOLIDATED PLAN (CITY
STEPS) AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT SAID
AMENDED PLAN TO USE CDBG DISASTER RECOVERY PROGRAM
INCOME FOR THE WEST SIDE LEVEE.
a) PUBLIC HEARING
Hayek: This is a public hearing and resolution regarding an amendment to the FY11
annual action plan to use approximately $1.9 million in anticipated CDBG
Disaster Recovery Housing Fund Program income, along with anticipated I-Jobs'
funds to construct a levee between McCollister Boulevard and the Crandic
Railroad tracks, along the west side of the Iowa River to protect businesses and
two mobile home parks. This is a public hearing. (bangs gavel) Public hearing is
open. Public hearing is closed. (bangs gavel)
b) CONSIDER A RESOLUTION
Bailey: Move the resolution.
Dickens: Second.
Hayek: Moved by Bailey, seconded by Dickens. Discussion? Roll call. Item carries 6-0.
Karr: Motion to accept correspondence.
Wright: So moved.
Mims: Second.
Hayek: Moved by Wright, seconded by Mims. Discussion? All those in favor say aye.
Opposed say nay. Motion carries 6-0.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 8
ITEM 9. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 5, ENTITLED
"BUSINESS AND LICENSE REGULATIONS," CHAPTER 1, ENTITLED
"GENERAL LICENSING PROVISIONS," AND CHAPTER 2 ENTITLED
"TAXICABS," TO CLARIFY REVOCATION PROCEDURES, RATE
PROVISIONS, AND DRIVER BADGE PROVISIONS TO PLACE
RESPONSIBILITY FOR ISSUANCE OF AN IDENTIFICATION CARD
AND DRIVER LIABILITY INSURANCE ON THE TAXICAB BUSINESS
(FIRST CONSIDERATION)
Hayek: Items 8 and 9, we need a motion before we get to them to reverse them.
Mims: So moved.
Bailey: Second.
Hayek: Moved to reverse items 8 and 9 by Mims, seconded by Bailey. Discussion? All
those in favor say aye. Opposed say nay. Motion carries 6-0. Okay. Item 9.
Bailey: Move first consideration.
Dickens: Second.
Hayek: Moved by Bailey, seconded by Dickens. Discussion? If there are members of the
public who would like to address us on either item 8 or 9, now would be the
appropriate time to...to talk to us. Those issues overlap and so we'll just take all
the discussion on the front end.
Bradley: You answered my question for me, uh, as far as...I'll cover everything I have to
say right now. Uh, my name is Roger Bradley. I'm the manager of Yellow Cab
of Iowa City. I'm a 20-year resident of Iowa City. Um, first of all, I want to
thank you for, uh, considering amending the taxicab code in the City of Iowa
City, uh, as you probably know, we feel that it's a necessary thing to do. Um, it
takes a lot of work, but certainly appreciate it. Um, the first thing I would like to
say, and there's a lot of things in here that we certainly agree with, uh, you have
correspondence from me to that effect. Uh, there are a couple of issues I do want
to address. The first one being about rates. Um, in my correspondence to you,
um, I mention that Iowa City is a unique place, versus other cities and towns in
Iowa. Um, under the proposed changes, no other rates other than distance and
time, uh, would be allowed. Um, you know, you can have a rate based on
distance and/or time, you know, combination of such, but everything else would
be disallowed. Uh, we feel that this is a little over-reaching. Um, there are a
couple of reasons why. Uh, the first reason would be a... a good segment of our
business, um, has to do with, uh, package delivery and some courier services, in
which, um, we charge a certain flat fee for. Uh, if we take a package from, and
this is both home delivery...delivery and commercial. We have many accounts to
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 9
this effect. Um, what we do is we charge, you know, the distance, which would
be the meter, and to simplify it and clarify it and be able to tell our customers this
is what you can expect, we just simply for a package delivery we add on $3.00.
Um, if we were to do this, you know, on time, um, it would be a little difficult.
Uh, let's say we picked up a prescription at a pharmacy and took it to a, uh,
assisted living facility. Um, it would be almost impossible to take it out of the car
and deliver it to the building and know exactly how much time we're taking doing
it, because the driver would want to be paid for what their worth. You could get
into that building and wait five minutes before somebody comes down to accept
the package. Uh, the meter is out in the car. You can't take the meter with us.
Um, so this is why we simply say, you know, we're going to charge $3.00 for a
package delivery. Um, you know, this is a significant portion of our business.
Um, and this ordinance as written doesn't really allow us to do that. So we would
probably be in a little bit of a...we wouldn't know what to do, um, it's very
simple just to say $3.00 and uh, you know, it's kind of like we just base it on that
and...and you know, if it takes a little bit of time or a lot of time, I mean, we just
kind of...you know, it was just a basic rate that we've always dealt with. Um,
another thing about rates is...we charge currently a $2.00, uh, charge to make a
stop. Now consider if you were, uh, if you didn't have your own vehicle to get
around in. A lot of customers...which alot of our customers don't, uh, they take
a trip from point A to point B, but they wish to make a stop at say a convenient
store. And, they want to pick up something. Uh, right now we just simply charge
$2.00 and we give them five minutes to take care of their business. Uh, once
again the reason we do this is because $2.00 seems like a nice even rate. The
consumer knows what to expect. Uh, if we...we could easily turn on our meters,
and do it by time, but if we did it at our current rates, afive-minute stop would be
$3.75 instead of $2.00. So right away you would be...we would have to, you
know, the consumer would be paying more...as...as the ordinance is amended.
Um, you know, that would be a rate increase. We don't feel good about that. We
certainly want to avoid doing that, um...and let's keep in mind that, uh, you
know, one of the...you know, once again one of the reasons we do this is also so
the consumer knows. You know, it's $2.00. Um, really with these stops, you
know, we want... in one sense we want to encourage people to take a taxi if they
have some business to do and they have to run out and make a quick stop. On the
other hand, the reason we give t hem five minutes is because instead of 15 is
because if it's going to take them a long time we would just rather have them go
do their business and then call a cab again, and we could be there in ten minutes
and pick them up and...and that sort of thing. So, the, you know, so we give them
five minutes, it's a nice flat rate. This doesn't allow for that. We would like you
to reconsider, you know, some sort of language that would include this. This is a,
making a stop is a very common event. It is not rare at all! Um...you know, and
once again we wish to avoid any price hike to the consumer. Um, another issue
with rates...has to do with special event rates. Currently we charge a, Yellow
Cab charges a special event rate. It is $4.00 per person. We charge it only for
University of Iowa home football games. Um, the reason we do this is because if
you were to do something a combination of, uh, you know, time and distance, and
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 10
keep in mind these are days when we get stuck in traffic. Uh, my written
correspondence indicates that our expenses go way up, uh, we're burning a lot of
fuel waiting in traffic. Uh, we have double dispatching on those days. We have a
mechanic on duty to, you know, minor repairs, keep the cars on the road, uh, so
our...our expenses go up. Um, if, you know, when you consider the hotels in our
area, the greater Iowa City-Coralville area, um, it is far easier for the consumer to
know, once again, just like the other thing I was talking about. It's far easier to
tell them it's $4.00 per person, you know, and that deals with waiting in traffic
and that sort of thing, um, it gives them a much firmer idea of what to expect, as
far as, you know, how much is it going to cost me to get from the Marriott to the
football game. Um, so we...you know, there's a long history of us charging that
rate. Now Yellow Cab only charges that on home football games. So we are
talking six or seven days out of 365. Um, it...it's...we find that our customers,
especially our tourists, the people from out of town, you know, they appreciate
knowing that it's just going to be a certain amount and, you know, not
unpredictable because you know some...sometimes you get lucky. Sometimes
you pick somebody up at a hotel, you know, for some reason the lights, you
know, you hit everything just right and you can get there a little faster. Other
times, you know, it's a 30-minute trip to go two miles, you know, and I think we
all have experienced game-day traffic. Um, so you know, we feel that if we
didn't have this rate it would hurt our ability to make a firm price, you know, the
customers, they wouldn't know. Uh, we feel it actually would hurt tourism a little
bit, you know, hurt the out of town visitor, and we, and our industry, we want to
protect that as much as we can. Um... since we only charge it six or seven times,
you know, times a year based on the home games, uh, perhaps you could
eliminate special event rates and simply say `Iowa home football game rate.'
That way there's no confusion as to what a special event is. Um, obviously if you
say, use the language `special event,' um, you know, anything could be a special
event. A gymnastics meet, you know, which traffic-wise just simply does not
compare to a home football game. Um...
Hayek: You're going to need to wrap it up, Mr. Bradley.
Bradley: Okay, uh, one final thing I have, um, is we would, uh, one thing that's not in here,
um, is...color scheme issues. Iowa City used to have these. We would like you
to consider reinstating that. I handed out, I gave it to Marian, some copies of a
photograph from the Cedar Rapids' Gazette in late February. They did an article
about cab price gouging. Um, I invite you to look at the top picture, on that...on
that, uh, page and if you could tell me what cab company that white van is, um,
please do, because it is not clear from that picture. A color scheme idea helps the
consumer. It helps us brand our business, and if there's problems, it helps people
identify what cab you're getting into, and...and I believe I know which cab
company that is, but I'm in the business. So...um...that's all I have. If you have
any questions...
Hayek: Thanks, Mr. Bradley. Any questions from Council? Okay.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 11
Bradley: Thank you.
Hayek: Yes!
Karr: Mr. Mayor, if I could just a...a couple of...of things. Um, Mr. Bradley
mentioned the proposal that we are talking about, rates will be based on time,
distance or a combination thereof, and a rate based on distance include destination
rates, so certainly any destination rates would be, uh, available. All other rates,
charges, or fees, except for extra rider stipulations and clean-up rates, are
prohibited. So the current proposal does allow for some exceptions, extra ride
and clean-up rates, and certainly if Council is so inclined, we certainly could
discuss, uh, a courier or package rates, but would like to also note that, um, the
Yellow Cab rates, delivery is $3.00 plus mileage as...as Roger indicated, and then
additional packages are 50-cents each. Um, there is the per-stop indicated on...on
his rate card, but the special event rates is quoted on the rate card as $4.00 a
person, unless the mileage and passenger is greater, and I think those type of
confusion, unless type of statements have been the issue and one of the reasons
that, uh, we were looking at taxi meters. Certainly you could take a look at, um,
exceptions to that, but the more exceptions, the more interpretation you get to
that. But certainly we can talk about that.
Hayek: Anyone else on, uh, either item 8 or item 9? (unable to hear person away from
mic) Don't worry! You're not the first. Just come up to the podium and (both
talking)
Prior: I'm Marialyce Prior and the only person I've spoken to about this was Regenia, at
length, about a year ago, and um, as far as the colors, that's important to me
because before I was involved with Yellow Cab, uh, my daughter being a student
here in Iowa City, uh, was kicked out of a cab with a few of her friends because
someone had double-called and we were able to identify who did that. They were
basically let out a mile out of town and I have no alliance when it comes to this
anymore because it was Yellow Cab that did it to us, along with Old Capitol, and
I don't feel like things like that should be happening, but the students in this
situation knew (noises on mic) who the companies were just because of the
colors, and the names on the side. Since I've been involved in this, my daughter
and several other students from the University and Kirkwood have come to me
with complaints, expecting me to process them and come to you, go to the Police,
or go with them, and I can't do all that, and there have been some very serious
things that have taken place and I'm going to spare the time, but it has been
harassment, threat, price gouging, and being kicked out of the cab inappropriately,
and refusing to turn on the meter when asked to by one of the patrons. Um, I feel
like when I talked with two of these people, they didn't know what cab they were
in. It was one of the `white' cabs. It took a while. We were able to track one
down. Personally I feel the colors are important, simply for safety. So that when
these students are out drinking and partying and coming in from towns outside of
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 12
Iowa City and coming in with a cab, they need to know whose cab they're in. I
feel like the cab companies should be giving a receipt with name and time and
price, distance. It should not be asked if you want a receipt. You should
automatically give them a receipt. Don't ask them if they want a receipt. It
should be the cab company's obligation to get a receipt in their hand, so they have
some documentation if they lose their purse, uh, their cell phone, uh, they felt like
they've been disrespected, whatever. I feel that the colors and these receipts,
something to give these out-of-towners and new students, something to hold onto,
and I also feel like having gone through parent-student orientation myself a
couple times, they talk about all kinds of things at those. Um, rape, what to do,
where to go, how to handle it. I feel like the University should take some
responsibility also and educate (coughing) their students as far as how the rules go
with the cab industry and what to expect as far as rights and, you know, where to
report incidences. This one incident I'm thinking of is very serious, and uh, she
really didn't know for three days where to go or how to process it, and I think that
should be part of the University's education process, and I guess that's it. That's
all I can think of right now, but I'm thinking more safety and, you know, for all
the cabs. I don't care if it's Yellow, Marco's, or any of the smaller ones. So, um,
that's my point and I don't know what to do with this (laughter). Can I just leave
my name up here with this or...
Karr: It's a sticky, if you take the back off and stick it right on the...the, uh, book that's
there.
Prior: I see now! If I wasn't so nervous I probably (several talking and laughing) Well,
the pen isn't working anymore. You know who I am. Marialyce Prior so...the
pen quit on me so...I'm...I can try it one more time.. Oh! (mumbled)
Hayek: Thank you. Anyone else on this, or the other item?
Paterno: Um, hello, I'm Mark Paterno with Marco's Taxi. Um, just quickly, I think a lot
of the motivation behind even bringing up taxi ordinances again is, um, we've all
heard about the, some severe cases of price gouging over the last year or two, um,
I think a lot of it comes to...comes down to, one of our drivers called it a hobby,
kind of like a hobbyist taxi driver or hobbyist taxi company. I think it's too easy
to open a taxi company or even, you know, just have the financial motivation of
going out late nights only or the weekends or the games or what have you, that
they don't take the pride, care... and pride that most of the, you know, most of us,
you know, nine out often of the companies are doing a great job and...and
following all the rules. It's just that...that little bit that's giving a bad rap to
everybody, um, for example, the color scheme. I just can't think of a good reason
why all the cars wouldn't be required to have the same color. I mean, I just I
really...if you're going to operate a professional company in the city like that,
especially taxis, they should be, you know, the same, um, repercussions. I don't
know the specifics, but there's no...there's no repercussions it seems like. I think
that the, you know, somebody can be proven of price gouging, the company
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 13
should bear a huge financial burden and that driver too. You know, um, I don't
see why not. There'd be a lot more motivation hit the pocketbook, get them to
follow the rules, um, let's see...four cars minimum, I mean, I don't think
that...you know, I think it should be five or six actually, um, so I mean I support
that. I guess just make it a little hazder, uh, to open this type of company. The
numbers, I don't know the exacts, but the number of companies and number of
cars in the city has doubled, at least in the last ten years. I could be off on that.
Um, there's just too many cabs. I mean, there's just a lot...there's a lot of cab
companies. There's no limit in sight, um...it's just too much for this market.
When you have that many people competing over a limited amount of money, you
know, they'll do what they have to do to maximize that. That's very unfortunate
for a lot of people. Thank you for your time.
Hayek: Thank you. Anyone else?
Stoddard: My name's Dave Stoddard. I own Yellow Cab of Iowa City. I'd like to follow up
with what Mazco said there. Um, the color scheme was taken away a few yeazs
ago, and I think that added to why we have so many cab companies started up.
The, uh, cost barrier to get into this industry has been lowered so much that
anybody living on Barlett Road can jump in with a car or two, put stickers on it,
put bubbles on it, and run as a company. Um, if you go up on Barlett Road and
drive azound during the week, you'll see six, eight of the companies sitting right
there, living in government subsidized housing, competing with actual companies
that aze trying to make ends meet. The other thing I'd like to bring up is, um, the
events rate. I would like the...the homecoming games, traffic gets horrendous, as
you guys all know when you go to `em. We would like to see not a special
events' rate, but at least a home game rate that we can charge to cover our costs.
Just like hotels raise their rates, airlines raise their rates during, uh, holidays,
Greyhound raised their rates -they're all transportation and they're all in
competition. They're all regulated and we need to have the same thing. Thank
you.
Hayek: Anyone else? Council?
Champion: I just want to clarify something, Marian. You can have a destination rate, isn't
that correct?
Karr: Absolutely!
Champion: Like you say an airport, it'll cost you $40.
Karr: Yes.
Champion: Or $50, whatever. So, would the football game be a destination?
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 14
Karr: Yes. I believe the question would be, um, for instance, would it be downtown to
Kinnick Stadium. That could be a destination. The Marriott, you'd have to have
a beginning and an end for a destination.
Champion: Oh. You couldn't just say from Iowa City to the Airport, or from...Coralville to
the Airport.
Karr: Sure, you could. Yes.
Champion: So, I mean, cause you couldn't use my address on (both talking)
Karr: No, you could not. Sure, you could do that.
Champion: But you could do from Coralville to Kinnick Stadium is $4.00 per person on
home football games.
Karr: Yes.
Champion: So that...
Mims: But could that rate be different on a home football game day than it is on any
other day?
Karr: As long as the rate card makes that distinction, yes.
Champion: Yes it could.
Karr: But again I go back to what we...I thought the intention was utilization of the taxi
meters, but we did allow for destinations like the Airport, um, any destination that
they wish to include on their rate card is authorized by this res...by this
ordinance.
Stoddard: And then (mumbled) going to the game, but once the game's over, everybody's
going in different directions. So then you lose the destination. Some people are
coming downtown, some are going to the Marriott, some (both talking)
Karr: It doesn't work in reverse. From Kinnick Stadium (both talking) well, but then,
Connie would say then from Kinnick Stadium back to Iowa City. If you don't
have anything going out, then why doesn't it work coming back?
Stoddard: But going out you don't have a destination. It could be somebody's house.
Karr: But you're picking them up at the house to begin with to Kinnick.
Stoddard: But we may not get the same person there (both talking) going back.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 15
Karr: Yes. Correct.
Champion: But it could be from Kinnick to Coralville, Kinnick to Iowa City, Kinnick to
North...I mean, it sounds more complicated. We can talk more about it,
but...um, I just wanted to clarify that, because I thought that we could have a
destination rate and that...we could, I don't know.
Karr: Again, I go back to what their rate card says now, and perhaps Dave or Roger,
you'd be saying something different. Right now it's athletic and special event
rates $4.00 a person, unless mileage and passengers is greater.
Stoddard: And the reason for that is, um, you pick somebody up way in North Liberty, you
only charge them $4.00 a head, one person, they go to Kinnick Stadium. So then
the mileage would be greater.
Karr: And see, that's the problem with destination rates (both talking)
Stoddard: ...we're going over multiple communities too.
Karr: Oh, I understand that that's what happens with people being confused about the
rates. You charged him $4.00 but you charged me $6.00.
Stoddard: Right.
Karr: And that's...I understand!
Wright: That's where we'll need some discussion about the destination, or the special
events rate, that the whole thing started to implode on itself.
Stoddard: And really what we're asking is six or seven days out of 365. It's...that's the
only time this town really gets confusing and the traffic jams us up. You know.
Hayek: Okay. At this point let's just restrict the conversation to Council. We've got to
make some decisions on this and...and move forward. What would you guys like
to do?
Champion: I also like the idea of, um, the package delivery having a separate rate. I don't
have any objection (several talking) as long as there's not a person involved.
Karr: And I think again that's no problem working that language into the current
proposal at all. Adding a stipulation for...packages.
Mims: And stops. How do people feel about that? I mean, I don't have a problem
(several talking)
Dickens: I guess we're just looking for some consistency (several talking)
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 16
Bailey: ...problem with the meters though. I mean, so do...if we stop and there's a stop
rate, do you stop the meter, and then (both talking)
Champion: Yes. They restart it when they come back. I think.
Dickens: With a $2.00 charge.
Karr: That...that would be the question.
Bailey: Then I'd say don't accommodate that. Just go with the meter rate.
Hayek: We can't be all things to all people here, and the intent of this was to impose some
structure that was lacking before, at the request of...of the industry, and I think
this goes a very long way toward addressing that. Um...it sounds like some of the
things that have been voiced tonight are actually, uh, permissible under... as
written, but once we get too far beyond that, then we're entering into sort of
(several talking)
Bailey: ...meters and then once again we're coming back, well, he didn't start it or...or
actually started it before I got out of the store, you know. Then we're going back
to the gouging and the complaint, the difficulty. I mean, that's my concern is...is
consistency. That's what got us here.
Champion: Okay, so we all agree though there could be a package charge or...courier. Okay.
Bailey: Do we have to define package?
Champion: (several talking) not a person delivery! Drugs from the drug store?
Dickens: Why was the color scheme taken out, or is there...
Karr: There's a long history to that. Um, couple...couple of stories. Uh, primarily
there...there was no problem with Police or my office or equipment, uh, that I'm
aware of, with the theory behind and the advantages of a color scheme. What
came to pass, however, was when we had a number of companies...we literally
ran out of colors, and we had companies who thought they owned the color. So if
it was red and white, nobody else could use red, and nobody else could use white.
And nobody else could use the same combination of colors. What we really ran
into, however, was originally when...when some of the smaller companies
started, it's expense to paint a car. And, often they would try and buy cars that
were the same color, so they could buy a different shade of red, but it would be
red. And, then they would put white lettering on it and then you were coming
back to, is it your red or his orange, or and it became very, very...then we got
some very poor paint jobs (laughter) that I think may have washed off in a rain
storm (laughter)
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 17
Champion: Call them magic marker!
Karr: And so, um, the other thing we found is that even car companies, even the car, the
companies that had the very good vehicles and kept them up-to-date, the
companies weren't making the same colors. So even when they ordered newer
vehicles, say every two years, they were unable to match the vehicles. So they
came up with a different variation of colors. So it does require, and I think
probably all of the individuals who spoke this evening regarding would know it
does require them maintaining and painting it, in order to keep that uniform color
scheme. So based on that a number of years ago it was abandoned for the sake
of...more cabs on the street.
Hayek: It seems to me that...that the identification and the signage additions to this
proposed ordinance go a long way toward...
Karr: Well, I'd like to note that the current ordinance hasn't changed as far as the
requirement. The lettering is required on each side of the vehicle. All four sides
of the vehicle, at least two inches in height. Now, I can't attest to the vehicle in
the picture, except the side door is open. One can only guess that if the side door
were closed, the lettering would be on the side of the door. It's just not on the
door, on the outside, it's on the inside door.
Hayek: Right.
Karr: Um...they are required...we added a requirement for a lighted dome, and that's
the light you see at the top that identifies it as a taxi. Um, we also had a time
where individuals who are color blind, the colors make little or no difference to
them. It's the visibility of the signage. Uh, the rate card must be prominently
displayed in the vehicle, and the name of the company is on the rate card.
Mims: Well, and I think also our increase in the number of vehicles to start a business
goes towards that as well, as well as the signage issue.
Champion: You have to have four (several talking)
Mims: I mean, I like the idea of the color scheme, but I see where the issues are too with
that, so...
Champion: And isn't part of the new requirement, they have to be available 24-hours a day,
seven days a week?
Karr: At least one of the four vehicles must be is the proposal.
Wright: And office dispatched. So I think that's going to go a long ways to take care of
some of the fly-by-night operations that we've got going.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 18
Karr: I know that will help a great deal in our enforcement, as well, to locate the...the
owner in a timely fashion, as well.
Hayek: Okay. So, what do we do? We've got this discussion of (both talking)
Karr: You have the proposal before you on two ordinances, one of them goes into
effect, um, as quickly as possible with publication. It'll be at least two Council
meetings. Um, the other one would go into effect with the next licensing year,
March 1 of 11, um, the first one you'll be voting on, item 9, makes some changes
regarding, um, driver, um, requirements and basically rates is the primary
function of the first one you'll be voting on. The second one is more of what we
talked about, the dispatching, the office, the 24/7, the four vehicles, the taxi meter,
and that would be your second vote, and that would go into effect March 1.
Champion: Okay. What about, um, can we add, can we still vote on 9 if we add' the
possibility of a courier fee. That's not a major change, is it?
Karr: Um, I think we can amend it on the floor tonight and make the necessary language
change, so you could go ahead with first consideration and then we'll provide you
with a revised ordinance for your second consideration. And that is on the floor
right now. We have a motion, so we could entertain any motions to amend that
you would wish to do, for item 9 at this time.
Wright: I move to amend item 9 to, uh, include the possibility of a package delivery fee.
Champion: I second that.
Hayek: Moved by Wright and seconded by .Champion. Discussion? All those in favor
say aye. Opposed say nay. I believe that was a 7-0 vote. Okay. Any other
amendments? Any further discussion? Roll call, please. Item passes 7-0.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 19
ITEM S. CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 5, ENTITLED
"BUSINESS AND LICENSE REGULATIONS," CHAPTER 2, ENTITLED
"TAXICABS," BY REPEALING SUBSECTIONS 5-2-2, "TAXICAB
BUSINESS LICENSE; VEHICLE DECALS," AND 5-2-4, "VEHICLE
INSPECTION REQUIRED," IN THEIR ENTIRETY AND REPLACING
THEM WITH NEW SUBSECTIONS; AND AMENDING 5-2-7 TO
PROVIDE PROVISIONS FOR RATE CHANGES (FIRST
CONSIDERATION)
Bailey: Move first consideration.
Dickens: Second.
Hayek: Moved by Bailey, seconded by Dickens. Discussion? Roll call, please. Item
passes 7-0.
Karr: Motion to accept correspondence.
Wilburn: So moved.
Wright: Second.
Hayek: Moved by...
Wilburn: Wilburn!
Hayek: Wilburn, seconded by Wright. Discussion? All those in favor say aye. Opposed
say nay. Motion carries.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 20
ITEM 16. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN AND THE CITY CLERK TO
ATTEST A CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PARKS
DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT.
Hayek: Uh, the Engineer's estimate was $110,500. Uh, Public Works and Engineering
recommends awarding the contract to Apex Construction of Iowa City. They
came in at $136,000.
Wright: That broke our trend of (both talking) bids coming in below the estimates. And
I'll move adoption!
Dickens: Second.
Hayek: Moved by Wright, seconded by Dickens. Discussion?
Bailey: Do we have any sense of why...the bids are not particularly close to the estimate?
Helling: Yeah, Mike checked on (several talking)
Moran: It's a remodel of the Park Maintenance building and so what the, uh, they thought
was that the cost got away from them a little bit because they were unsure of what
they were going to find when they tear the ceiling out, reput the rafters in, and put
the ceiling back in. So, that...that's what they're attributing the higher prices to.
Bailey: Cautious bids.
Moran: Yeah.
Bailey: Yeah, thanks, Mike.
Helling: Generally when bids come in high too, if you look at them and they're consistent,
then that's a fair indication that we estimated low, and on these the top three bids
are within, you know, um, what...$8,000, yeah, $8,000. (several talking)
Hayek: Further discussion? Roll call, please. Item passes 7-0.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 21
ITEM 17. CONSIDER A RESOLUTION ADOPTING AN ASSESSMENT
SCHEDULE OF UNPAID MOWING, CLEAN-UP OF PROPERTY, SNOW
REMOVAL, SIDEWALK REPAIR, AND STOP BOX REPAIR CHARGES
AND DIRECTING THE CLERK TO CERTIFY THE SAME TO THE
JOHNSON COUNTY TREASURER FOR COLLECTION IN THE SAME
MANNER AS PROPERTY TAXES.
Bailey: Move the resolution.
Wright: Second.
Hayek: Moved by Bailey, seconded by Wright. Discussion? Yeah, there are two items
before us, as we know, and we'll take up the first one now.
Ford: Good evening. Mayor Hayek and Members of the City Council, my name is Don
Ford and I'm here tonight representing the Willowbrooke Pointe Condominium
Association located at the corner of Mormon Trek and Benton Street. I am the
Association Secretary and I'm here tonight with Sharon Pickens, our Vice
President, and Fern Davis, our Treasurer. You have correspondence from the
Association President Mark Meary, who regrets that he can't join us tonight
because of prior out-of--town commitments. The Association is contesting a
sidewalk snow removal bill of $475 from this past winter. The sidewalk in
question is on the north side of Benton Street. According to the City's complaint
log, a complaint was made on January 29th. We've attached weather reports
showing that there were no snow storms during this time and in fact the City law
states that the snow in question was blown snow not storm snow. However, the
Association questions how a City subcontractor can claim that it took six hours of
work and 22 bags of ice melt, totaling $475, to clear the sidewalk. Our own
contractor can do this for $95 per cleaning, and that includes the snow...the
removal of storm snow, not just blown snow. In addition, the majority of our
Association consists of retirees who are very observant, and none of them recalls
any persons, other than our regular snow removal service, working on the Benton
Street sidewalk. Therefore, we respectfully submit that the City should question
its subcontractor on the legitimacy of this work and on these charges. We also
respectfully request that the Association not be charged for this work, but if we
absolutely must be charged, then we respectfully submit that the charges should
be $95, which is what our own contractor would have charged, rather than the
$475 charged by the City's subcontractor. We thank the City Council for its time
and now I will answer any of your questions.
Hayek: Any questions for the representative?
Champion: No, I don't have any questions for you. Thank you.
Ford: All right. Thank you.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 22
Hayek: Staff is here and can present their side of the story, so to speak. Who would like
to hear from Jann?
Ream: I'm Jann Ream. I'm the Code Enforcement Assistant and I work in Housing and
Inspection Services. And I help basically coordinate all of the, uh, snow removal
enforcement that the City does on private sidewalks during the winter. Um, in
this particular instance, um, this property had been cited earlier in the season, um,
for not shoveling that sidewalk. Um, and our policy is...is, in that particular case,
um, even though it wasn't noted in the log, um, you know, we do hundreds of
these, our inspectors get lost sometimes. But, obviously he went back and it had
been shoveled. They were in compliance. So nothing more was done. Um, we
got a second complaint, and I will say that this is a heavily walked sidewalk and
um, this is definitely a sidewalk that we get complaints about, um, if it's not
cleaner. We got a second complaint. Our inspector went out, and noted that it
looked like it had been cleared, but it had drifted back in. Um, we...made the
determination that this was natural accumulation and because it was the second
verifiable offense for the season, we ordered that... sent a work order out to our
contractor to clear it. Um, in terms of the expense, um...I'm not sure what I can
do to address that. It's 600-feet of sidewalk. It's a lot of sidewalk. Um, their
contractor obviously has given them a very good price, um, I... can't speak to the
condition of the sidewalk when our contractor got out there. They do use a lot of
ice melt, um, simply, um, to make the clearing of the (mumbled) as it can possibly
be. So that's really all the information I have (mumbled)
Bailey: And we do know that our subcontractor cleared the walk, correct?
Ream: Yes. We do have a photograph that the subcontractor took, after they cleared it.
As I explained in the memo, this was the first season we've experimented with
having our contractor take a picture before and after. We have several crews that
go out. Others who are, I would say for 90% of the places that were cleared, we
did get before and after pictures, but occasionally they just forgot, and they didn't
take a before picture. But we do have our inspector's, uh, written notes that it was
drifted in.
Bailey: Okay. Thank you.
Champion: So the Association was not given an opportunity to have this done by their own
contractor? Is that what you were saying?
Ream: It was the second violation of the season, so no. If we go out and we verify a
second violation, we just simply work order it. They received a notice in
December reminding them of what the ordinance requires and that letter that's
sent out to them, um, also emphasizes that that is the only notice that they will get
for the winter.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 23
Hayek: And that...that's policy?
Ream: That is policy that has been adopted by Council.
Champion: (mumbled)
Mims: And so snow has blown back in, that is considered natural and the property
owner's responsible, but if it's...(both talking)
Ream: Snow plow snow it is not.
Mims: ...it is not.
Ream: Right. And that is, um, State code, I believe.
Dilkes: State code only allows us to require removal of natural accumulation. So blown
snow is blown naturally by the wind, whereas snow plowed snow is a machine
that (mumbled) distinction.
Wright: And this was probably some snow plow snow, as well as drifting.
Ream: Our, um, inspector's notes stated that it looked like they had cleared the sidewalk
and some of what they had cleared was probably snow plow snow. So his
observation was that it was a cleared sidewalk that had drifted back in.
Dilkes: And I can add that I think that Housing and Inspection Department does a pretty
good job with not enforcing when it's snow plowed snow, because we get
complaints from walkers who want us to require people to remove the snow
plowed snow and...and we tell them we can't do that.
Ream: We do try to be very aware of that. All of the inspectors that go out know to look
for that. Because I've been doing this for 12 years, I know the sidewalks that
every year I know all the sidewalks in town that will typically be snow plow
snow, and we do have sidewalks that run right along the street, um, Kimball Road
is a good example of that. Uh, so if I get a complaint about Kimball Road, when I
send the inspector out this is what you need to look for. If it's snow plow snow
we need to note that and we cannot (mumbled)
Hayek: What would the Council like to do on this?
Champion: Seems like a lot of money to me!
Wright: (mumbled) standard charge. We didn't...it's a huge section of sidewalk (several
talking)
Hayek: Two football fields long.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 24
Bailey: Yeah, it's a lot of sidewalk.
Champion: That is a lot of sidewalk!
Wright: Actually I have a...I'm sorry, Jann. Go ahead.
Ream: Well, one suggestion is, I mean, there was....it's not the Association hadn't been
making an effort to try to keep the sidewalk clear. Um, at the very least perhaps
we could, um, relieve them of the $75 administrative fee.
Dickens: I guess I would go for that. I just know I live on north Dodge Street and I'm
battling the State plows on a regular basis, and I try to (both talking) yes, and I try
to do the park land on both sides of me to help out the City and it's a constant
battle. The State plows don't go the speed limit and they're blowing it. As much
as I work...I know it's a constant battle, so it's very tough, but I would...I would
go for the reducing the $75 administrative fee. (several talking)
Champion: Well, I think the organization does try to keep the sidewalks clean (mumbled)
very detailed letter, um...I think there are sidewalks that are used in town,
probably get more complaints than other sidewalks.
Ream: Yes.
Champion: Um, but I'm not going to say we should change the policy, but at least a phone
call to say you have until tomorrow morning to clear the sidewalk. No? It just
doesn't seem...
Ream: The difficulty, Connie, is that... especially after several snow storms, we're
literally dealing with hundreds of complaints. And, the...we get that a lot, you
know, you've got my number. Why can't you call me? Well...there's only so
many of us, and if we...if we do it for one then we should do it for everybody.
Champion: Right, right. I know. Okay.
Hayek: You're talking about a change to policy. Tonight we've got to decide this case as
applied to our existing policy.
Champion: I know. I just like to change things now! (laughter)
Wright: Some day we'll get you the magic wand!
Champion: I may (both talking)
Bailey: Use that magic wand on, um, sidewalks and get them all plowed! (laughter) For
all of us!
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 25
Champion: All right. Well, I'd like to not charge them the administrative fee.
Hayek: Sounds like there's interest in that. (several talking) Okay, but otherwise...assess
it? (several talking)
Karr: So we're going to amend Willowbrooke Lane by removing the administrative fee.
Bailey: So moved.
Mims: Second.
Karr: Well do we want to wait for the other one (several talking)
Hayek: Yeah.
Karr: Is there anyone here for the other property?
Hayek: There's a second item, 808 E. Davenport Street. Is anyone here, uh, for that item?
Okay. All right. So, at this time we could entertain a motion to amend.
Champion: So moved...to amend, to remove the $75 administrative fee from the
Association...Willowbrooke Pointe...fees.
Bailey: Second.
Hayek: Moved by Champion, seconded by Bailey. Discussion? All those in favor say
aye. Opposed say nay. Motion carries 7-0. Any further discussion on the
underlying resolution? Okay. Roll call, please. Item passes 7-0.
Karr: I'm sorry, could I have a motion to accept correspondence?
Wilburn: So moved.
Champion: Second.
Hayek: Moved by Wilburn, seconded by Champion. Discussion? All those in favor say
aye. Opposed say nay. Motion carries.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal. Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 26
ITEM 21. CITY COUNCIL INFORMATION.
Hayek: Start with Ms. Mims.
Mims: Nothing.
Champion: Um, I don't have anything special. I just wanted to ask and find out by the next
work session when the elevators in the ramp on Dubuque Street are going to...I
know they're scheduled for new elevators, cause those elevators are really slow
and creaky, frequently will not open on the...a floor, and the floors in terrible
shape, and it's kind of an embarrassment. I'm embarrassed to use it, but I use it
anyway!
Helling: Let me find out what the scheduling is on that.
Champion: Yeah, I know they're going to be replaced (both talking)
Helling: ...and doing some other work.
Wright: Sand in the City this weekend. (several talking) One more event for downtown.
It's a lot of fun.
Champion: I know! I won't be here and it's so great. (several talking)
Wright: And uh, if you're...even if you're not going to come down to play in the sand, it's
fun to just come down and watch.
Hayek: Mr. Wilburn?
Wilburn: This Thursday, August 19th, will be the start of the 2010-2011 Iowa City
Community School District, as well as Regina, and please exercise caution when
you're travelling. Watch out for the kiddos as they're walking around, and please
exercise patience with all the construction and the buses that are going on. Want
to make sure everybody's safe for that first day of school.
Bailey: In addition to the first day of school, we know that we have a lot of new people
moving to the community and I have noticed the traffic is moving a little bit
slower, so I want to underline what Ross said about exercising a little bit of
patience as we drive throughout community. It's a nice time of year, but it can be
a challenge to all of us. And I do want to sort of underscore what we did at the
beginning of the meeting and thank Dale for his tremendous service to the City.
It's great to work with you, Dale! Somebody so committed to this community.
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 27
Dickens: I just want to welcome all the new students to Iowa City, the big kids. They're
the ones you have to watch out for cause they'll walk out in front of you in the
streets. Um, and (laughter) all the teachers get ready. It's another year!
Hayek: Only thing I have is that a little birdie told me today that it's uh, Connie
Champion's birthday! And uh, in lieu of leading the entire crowd in a rousing
rendition of Happy Birthday I'll just say "Happy Birthday".....(several talking)
Champion: Thank you, thank you!
Hayek: 49! (laughter)
Champion: How `bout 149? Then they'll say "She looks great!" (laughter)
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.
Page 28
ITEM 22. REPORT ON ITEMS FROM CITY STAFF.
a) City Manager
Hayek: City Manager?
Helling: Yeah, kind of caught me by surprise at the beginning of the meeting, but I just
want to say that the recognition that you gave me is certainly a source of pride for
me, and will continue to be all my life working in this community and for city
councils and staff and every...everybody else that I've had the opportunity to
work for and work with, and let the record show that I was 12 years old when I
started (laughter)
This represents only a reasonably accurate transcription of the regular formal Iowa City
City Council meeting of August 17, 2010.