Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-08-17 Bd Comm minutes3b 1 MINUTES Final HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION JUNE 10, 2010 EMMA J. HARVAT HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Esther Baker, Thomas Baldridge, Pam Michaud, Ginalie Swaim, Dana Thomann, Alicia Trimble, Frank Wagner , MEMBERS ABSENT: Kent Ackerson, William Downing, David McMahon STAFF PRESENT: Christina Kuecker OTHERS PRESENT: Rose Persaud RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (become effective only after separate Council action) None. CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Trimble called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA: There was none. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: 214 S. Summit Street. Kuecker said this application is to cover the built-in gutters on the house. She stated that the gutters have failed and are causing some water damage to the house. Kuecker said the applicant would like to cover them and roof over it, causing a slight change in the roof slope at the location of the built-in gutters. Kuecker said the guidelines recommend that when covering built-in gutters that the roof slope not be changed. She said, however, that the revised guidelines, which have been voted on favorably by the Commission but not yet voted on by City Council, take that into account, and now allow for a slight alteration of the roof slope at the gutter. Kuecker said, given the vote by the Commission on the revised guidelines and the fact that the slight change will be minimally noticed from the street, staff is recommending approval of the application as submitted. Kuecker showed aclose-up photograph of the gutters. She also showed the illustration from the revised handbook that shows the after image of the slope change at the gutter. Baldridge said that because this house has such an interesting history, he feels that anything that maintains it in good shape is appropriate. MOTION: Wagner moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the application for 214 South Summit Street, as presented in the application. Baker seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (Ackerson, Downing, and McMahon absent). 522 Rundell Street. Wagner announced that since he was the contractor for this project he would be abstaining from the Commission's discussion. Kuecker said that this project is an addition to the rear of the property. She said this is a Moffitt house built in 1929. Kuecker stated that the addition will not be visible from the front of the house. She said it will line up flush with the side of the house with a slight bump out that will not extend any farther than the chimney extends. Kuecker said it will be in the approximate location of the deck. Historic Preservation Commission June 10, 2010 Page 2 Kuecker showed the floor plan for the addition. She said it would be an enclosed family room/bathroom with a screened porch addition. Kuecker showed the rear elevation and the side elevation with the chimney and the small bump out. She said that the other side would have the door to both the screened porch and the living room. Kuecker said the addition is designed to match the details of the original house. She stated that the siding will be fiber cement board to match the siding on the house. Kuecker said bargeboards, soffits, eaves, frieze boards, and other trim will match the house. She said the windows will be metal-clad wood windows to match the existing windows. Kuecker said the screens will be metal screens with wood frames, and the steps and handrails will be constructed of wood. Kuecker stated that the guidelines allow for additions and new porches, provided the addition is compatible with the historic house. She said that in staff's opinion, this addition has been designed to be compatible with the historic features of the house. Kuecker said staff believes the impact on the house will be minimal and recommends approval of the project with the conditions that: the foundation of the addition match the existing foundation, the porch piers being of masonry, and skirting being installed in the space between the porch piers. Wagner said that the back of the house is going to be a hip roof. He said it will come out to match the line of the angle so that it will have a hip to match the rest of the house. Wagner said that the bump out is actually sort of a Moffit-esque thing that is mimicking the chimney. He said that the upper sashes on the original house are three lights, and thus the new windows will have three lights. Wagner said that the only other thing is that the owners would to change the location of the two doors. He said that if one steps back, it looks crowded right there with both doors. Wagner said he would like to take the screen door, move it all the way over to the end, and then just extend that little porch all the way there. He said one would still come up that way and come into the main addition, but that way those two doors are not right next to each other. Wagner said this would be very similar to the screened in porch approved for 629 Oakland. Wagner said that underneath the existing asbestos siding, which is not the original siding, there is wood, clapboard siding. Wagner said they are going to put fiber cement board of the same reveal on the addition, in the hopes that some day the main house will be taken back to the original. Persaud, one of the owners of the house, said that she would be interested in finding out what the original siding looks like. She said that she has not seen all of it but has seen a section of it. Persaud said she likes it but questioned how a person would know if it is in decent shape and if a person would want to take off all of the siding to get to it. Kuecker said there is not a good way to know. Trimble suggested that many people just randomly sample different parts of the house to see what each side looks like. Baldridge said that one can probably tell by where the existing shows wear or is influenced by the elements. He said that what is underneath it has been subject to the same kind of issues. He said that if one does not see anything that shows much wear, that is a good thing. Kuecker added that many people just end up taking a risk. Michaud asked Wagner if they would be reusing the patio doors. Wagner responded that those doors are not original but were put on in the 70s or 80s, and they are in bad shape. Michaud said that they should consider how the doors swing in order to provide for the most flexible use of the space. Wagner added that the doors from the dining room into the addition will be interior French doors, and the doors from the addition to the screened porch will be exterior. He said they are open to suggestions regarding the style of those exterior doors. MOTION: Baker moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the application for 522 Rundell Street as proposed, with the following conditions: the foundation of the addition matching the existing foundation; the porch piers being masonry; porch skirting being installed in the space between the porch piers; the rear door to the screened porch being appropriate to the style of the house and done in consultation with staff; the end of the roof over the screened porch being hipped; and the screen door being moved to the rear of the Historic Preservation Commission June 10, 2010 Page 3 screened porch with the outside deck being extended to the rear of the addition. Swaim seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 6-0, (Wagner abstaining and Ackerson, Downing, and McMahon absent). 517 South Governor Street. Kuecker said this is an application to change the windows in the peak of the house. She showed a photograph of one of the windows and said that the owners would like to change it and the one on the opposite side in the same location in order to provide ventilation and allow for alonger-lasting roof. Kuecker said the owners want to take out the windows and install screens with wood louvers on the exterior. Kuecker said the contractor has said that soffit vents are not an option on this house because of the way the roof is constructed and there would not be adequate airflow between the soffits and the roof sheathing. She said she found examples of houses of a similar style that either did not have anything in that gabled peak or had wood-louvered vents like those being proposed. Kuecker said that staff recommends approval of the proposal as presented in the application. Michaud said she thought the third floor was finished. Kuecker said there is not a third floor. She said that the windows are in asmall-unfinished attic. Kuecker said the only thing that would be different is that the windows would be removed, leaving all the trim, and there would be screens with wood louvers on the outside. She said the wood louvers are primarily to keep the rain from getting in during a heavy wind. Wagner asked if there is just a ceiling access to get up there. Kuecker said she believed so. Kuecker said there is not enough room to finish the space there. Baldridge asked if there is a similar window on the dormer in front. Kuecker said she believes it is a round vent. Michaud asked if just the top part of the window could be louvered, and Kuecker said it looks more appropriate to do the whole thing. She said the owners plan to use wood louvers and paint them to match the house. MOTION: Wagner moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the application for 517 South Governor, as presented. Baldridge seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (Ackerson, Downing, and McMahon absent). 1111 E. Burlington Street. Kuecker stated that this application was withdrawn. OTHER: Kuecker said that the statewide historic preservation conference will be held in Red Oak on September 17`x' through the 19~'. She said the City should be able to sponsor at least one and perhaps two Commission members to attend. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 6:25 p.m. Minutes submitted by Anne Schulte Z O fN N O V Z O F- Q W N W a' a U CC O _N p O V W m W V Z p Z W Q N i ~ r r r r = ~ i r r ~ O i ' ~ r ~ ~ _ ~ ~ i N ~ , i ~ ~ ~ ` ~ O p X X ~ ~ X ~ X X X X cc N X X X X W O X ~ W O W O X X ~ X X X X X X = X ~ X X X X X X X X X ~ X X X ~ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z M N ; ~ X ~ X O X X X ~ ~ X X X X X ~ X X X X X a ~( M ~- N M •- ~ N O N ~ M N ~ ~ W rn N M rn N M rn N M rn N M rn N M rn N M rn N M rn N M rn N M rn N M rn N M rn N M H W a z Y Z O W ~ a Q = W L7 p p a m W F' W W a m J 3 ~ Z o o a Z J ~ Q ~ w Q p Z Q ~ ~ ~ a D ~ = ~ ~ W ~ ~ O 0 a J Q Z C7 Q 3 m Q p Z Q ~ = E- V J Q J ~ ~ ~ Y Z li W C9 Q 3 0 0 N c a~ N d a E 0 v C'1 ~ o ~Z ~ U p~ ~ ~ N ~ c Ng v~i~m QZ o n„Z w ~ u 'o z I 3b 2 MINUTES Final HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAY 27, 2010 EMMA J. HARVAT HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Kent Ackerson, Esther Baker, Thomas Baldridge, William Downing„ Pam Michaud, Alicia Trimble, Frank Wagner MEMBERS ABSENT: David McMahon, Ginalie Swaim, Dana Thomann STAFF PRESENT: Christina Kuecker OTHERS PRESENT: Brian Arnold, Tracy Barkalow, Jeri Hobart, Tom Hobart, Pat Naughton, John Reynolds, Judy Polumbaum RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (become effective only after sepazate Council action) There was none. CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Trimble called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANYTHING NOT ON THE AGENDA: There was none. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: 618 Deazborn Street. Kuecker said the applicant is seeking approval of an application to install a rear deck. Michaud inquired about the style for the reaz door of the property. Kuecker explained this has not typically been a concern in Conservation Districts. Michaud said she was concerned about the safety of the deck, particularly the interior comers of the deck. The applicant, Pat Naughton, explained this design feature is meant for placing a permanent grill so the corners would not be exposed. MOTION: Ackerson moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the application for a deck at 618 Brown Street, as proposed in the application. Downing seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 6-0 (McMahon, Swaim, Thomann, Wanner, absent). 619 Brown Street. Kuecker said that the applicant is seeking approval of a 4'x9' addition on the east side of the house. The proposed materials match the house. There is currently a cellar door entry where the addition is to be constructed. The addition would be a one story bump-out on the original structure. Kuecker said it is Staff s opinion that the addition matches the historic characteristics of the house and recommends approval as presented. Michaud asked whether or not the exit would remain. The applicant, John Reynolds, said an exit would remain and explained the history of this portion of the house. Reynolds said the bump-out would not go past the existing bump- out MOTION: Michaud moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the application for an addition at 619 Brown Street, as proposed in the application. Baker seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (McMahon, Swaim, Thomann absent). Historic Preservation Commission May 27, 2010 Page 2 1205 Sevmour Avenue. Kuecker said the applicant was seeking approval to remove lap wood siding and replace with wood shingle siding. The house next door has shingle siding and they were probably identical when built. Kuecker said the owner had a photograph of the original shingle siding and would like to use similar siding on the home. Kuecker said staff recommends approval as submitted. Michaud asked if the siding was cedar. The applicant, Jeri Hobart, said it was redwood because other materials had problems keeping paint. MOTION: Wagner moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the siding replacement project at 1205 Seymour Avenue as proposed in the application. Baldridge seconded the motion. Michaud added that if the proper salvage could be found, the applicants should have the option to repair the siding with salvage materials. The applicant said they would consider looking for salvage materials, but added that redwood has tendency to split. The applicant said the moisture barriers on old houses are not very good, so replacement seems necessary. Michaud asked whether or not they would be re-insulating. The applicant said this was the second time they have sided the house and improved the moisture barriers as best they could. MOTION: Michaud moved to amend the motion to allow the applicant to use salvage materials if they could be found. Baker seconded the motion. The amendment carried on a vote of 7-0 (McMahon, Swaim, Thomann absent). The amended motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (Thomann, Swaim, McMahon absent). 630 North Dodee Street. Kuecker said the applicant was seeking approval of an application to add three dormers to the property and to install a cellar door on the north side of the property. Kuecker said that two f the dormers would face Ronalds Street and one would face the rear of the property. Kuecker said that the guidelines allow for dormers in that are compatible with the architectural style. She elaborated on the guidelines and stated that the dormers met most of the requirements. Kuecker said the dormers should have a roof pitch similar to that of the house. Kuecker said that, in staff's opinion, the dormers would be compatible with the vernacular Queen Anne style of the house, however the 6/12 pitch as shown appear too shallow compared to the 12/12 pitch of the house. Kuecker said an 8/12 or 12/12 gable pitch would be more appropriate. Kuecker said the applicant is also proposing a below grade cellar door on the north side of the house. She said a set of stairs would lead to the door, with a set of cellar doors covering the stairs and entrance. Kuecker said the applicant had selected a cellar door style to use and would explain the choice and location of the door to the Commission. Kuecker said that it is staff's opinion that the cellar door meets the guidelines and would have a minimal impact on the historic integrity of the house. Kuecker said staff recommends approval contrary to the deferment recommended in the packet. She said that staff recommend approval of the dormer project with the condition that the dormer roof had the same overhang and detail as the existing roof, the dormer pitch be changed to at least a 8/12 pitch, but not to exceed and 12/12, the dormer siding and trim match the existing siding and trim, the windows be solid wood or metal clad, and that windows be subject to staff approval. The applicant, Judy Polumbaum, gave a presentation about how her home flooded in 2008. She said she was in the 500 year flood plain and was eligible for the second round of buyouts. Polumbaum said she did not want to go through another flood again and accepted the buy out. Polumbaum said she was surprised her new home was in a historic district and that it was located near a commercial area as well. She said she is happy to be a contributor to the district, but was unaware of the designation. She began working on the house three days before receiving notice that the building permit required HPC approval. Polumbaum said there was a history of additions to the house, including a porch. She explained that due to size constraints and location of utilities, the rear of the house could not accommodate a cellar door. Polumbaum said the existing cellar stairs are original to the house and are very steep, making another cellar entrance desirable in order for the cellar to be usable. She said that construction stopped after the historic status was made known to her and has halted construction for six weeks. She pointed to such non-historic additions to the house like the greenhouse window and radon pipe. Historic Preservation Commission May 27, 2010 Page 3 Polumbaum pointed out the location of the dormers on a photograph. She said that she has already stuccoed the basement to make it dry and usable before construction. She said that the additions would make the house more livable and visually appealing. She said Brian Arnold would comment on the additions. Arnold said the windows are not egress windows. Wagner asked if the radon pipe would go in front of the dormer windows which would not be allowed. Arnold said he would need to check on that. Arnold said he chose the casement window because it would be consistent in size with the rest of the house. Michaud said the more window area in the attic would be better in terms of light and emergency. Michaud said she has a cellar door bulkhead like the one proposed. She said a dark paint color would help the cellar door recede. She said that having itpre-colored would save on paint in the future. Baldridge asked if they could move to approve without seeing the drawings of the steeper pitched dormers. Kuecker said that she recommends at least an 8/12 pitch, but didn't necessarily need to see the drawings. Michaud recommended a single window on the rear dormer to match the width of the window below. Arnold said that they would consider it prior to construction. Kuecker said that based on the meeting the windows should still be subject to staff approval based on the information gleaned during the meeting. Ackerson inquired about the pitch change on the rear window. Kuecker said the pitch should be consistent for all the dormers. Kuecker said a 6/12 would not be common on a Queen Anne style. MOTION: Michaud moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the application for 630 Dodge Street, with the stipulation that the three roof dormers be closer to an 8/12 pitch with a single window in the northwest dormer and appropriately sized windows for the other dormers, subject to staff approval. Michaud moved to approve the cellar door as proposed. Wagner seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (McMahon. Swaim, Thomann absent). 841-845 Maeeard Street Kuecker said this was an application for siding replacement. She said it is anon-historic home on the end of Maggard Street and the applicant would like to place vinyl siding on the property. Kuecker said the guidelines make an exception for the siding of non-contributing properties within a conservation district. She said these stipulations were included in the staff report. Kuecker said that historic features need to be maintained and not removed. She said in staff's opinion the project meets the exceptions laid out in the guidelines and since this is a building from the 1980's vinyl siding will not impact the historic integrity of the house or neighborhood. Kuecker said staff recommends approval. Michaud said she went by and looked at the property. Michaud said that they often recommend that non- contributing homes be renovated to look more historic using fiber cement board. She said it might be more durable than vinyl. Barkalow said he planned to use vinyl and that both neighboring homes have vinyl siding. He said that vinyl siding is also desirable from a cost standpoint and for a clean look. Barkalow said he put a new roof on the property a few years prior and mentioned the historic review process for a deck installed at a nearby property. Michaud asked whether the 837 Maggard property was right next door, Barkalow responded yes. Kuecker said the commission would get to 837 next. Michaud said it might not make sense for one building to have vinyl siding just because it was newer. Kuecker said they were to be discussed separately. Wagner asked if the existing siding was steel. Barkalow said he wasn't certain. Ackerson said that over the long term, vinyl is not the best investment. Barkalow said that vinyl has worked out well for him so far and anything needing paint wouldn't last as long. Michaud asked Barkalow to address the moisture issue further. Downing said that is more of an issue for older homes, particularly when insulation gets wet. Michaud asked whether the windows would be trimmed off with vinyl. Barkalow said yes. MOTION: Downing moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the application for 841-845 Maggard as proposed in the application. Baker seconded the motion. Historic Preservation Commission May 27, 2010 Page 4 Wagner said there is an exception for non-contributing properties, even though he does not like it. Wagner said a similar property on the comer of Dodge and Washington used cement board siding that is looking really good and would last forever. He recommended that Barkalow look at this example as an option that might also be cost effective. Michaud said that cement board holds color well too. Michaud asked if a shorter reveal would make the property look a little less 1980's. Barkalow said he would look into it. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (McMahon Swaim, Thomann absent). 837 Maseard Street Kuecker said the applicant is seeking approval to put vinyl siding on this property, which is non-contributing. She said the reasons that it is non-contributing are the wide replacement siding and alteration to the front porch. She said the owner replaced the porch with a more historically appropriate porch, although not historically accurate. Kuecker said there are exceptions for non-contributing properties in conservation districts that allow for synthetic siding provided that historic features are retained, the synthetic siding is similar to historic siding, and wood siding is not removed. She said that these exceptions are intended to provide additional flexibility in cases where a proposed construction project does not significantly affect the architectural character of a historic structure. Kuecker said that this property is non-contributing because of the current application of synthetic siding and this project would serve to perpetuate the nonconformity of the property. She said staff believes that the existing asbestos siding should be removed and if there is wood siding underneath, it should be restored. If not, staff recommends installation a 3-5 inch reveal lap cement board siding with a minimum of a 4 inch trim around all windows and doors. Barkalow said he wanted to point out that the front porch was removed because it was collapsing and was not something he wanted to do specifically. He said he had spoken with the adjacent property owner who said he wanted to see the property cleaned up, sided, and moved along. Barkalow said there is a large apartment complex across the street and doesn't think it would upset the tenants there. He said from a cost standpoint, it wouldn't be feasible to renovate or modify the property to any greater an extent after installing a new roof and porch. Michaud said she walked by the property and saw numerous layers on the structure. She said those would have to be taken off anyway. Michaud said she saw asphalt and slate that would have to be removed prior to vinyl installation. Barkalow said the contactors didn't think there would be any problem putting siding on and was not aware of the layers described by Michaud. Michaud said it was visible in the back of the house. Michaud said Barkalow had been buying properties like crazy this year and assumed he had a lot of them around town. She said this would average out so Barkalow could do what need to be done with a smaller house. Barkalow said that he wasn't sure what his other properties had to do with the one in question. Michaud said her point was that cost probably is not the issue. Kuecker said that cost should not enter the discussion; rather, the commission should look to the guidelines to judge appropriateness. Michaud inquired which department would decide how many layers are allowed under new siding. Kuecker said she did not know if there was a limit and that would be something to be dealt with by the Building Department. Downing said there are some building code limitations regarding the subject, but did not know detail. Downing asked the age of the original construction of the home and deck. Michaud inquired about the deck. Barkalow said the deck was collapsing and needed to be replaced and cost more than a standard deck. He said he didn't want to over spend on one property, especially one that had not seen investment in a long time. He said the neighboring properties have vinyl siding and the house is located at dead end so he thought that this case would be a good exception. Barkalow said it would be cost efficient and would make the area look better. Wagner said there are principles of historic preservation that the Commission is trying to maintain and does not want to go against the principles for this exception. Wagner stated that the same reasons and guidelines for granting the exception for the previous property make it difficult to grant an exception for this property. Kuecker said that the Commission has approved vinyl siding on non-contributing properties; however, they were non-contributing for a variety of other reasons. She said this property was non-contributing because of the siding. Trimble asked Kuecker to speculate the age of the property. Kuecker said she would guess around 1910. Michaud asked how the top railing was allowed to be constructed on the upper deck. Kuecker explained the history and said this deck was essentially replicating what was there before. Barkalow said it is the main access to the upper unit. Downing said the baluster looks a lot better than it did before. Historic Preservation Commission May 27, 2010 Page 5 Bazkalow said that all that was required from the- city now is that he simply paint the property. He said his intent would be to paint if the vinyl siding was not allowed. Downing asked if Barkalow would consider pricing other alternatives. Barkalow said that other options were not financial practical in light of the asbestos on the exterior. Michaud said that Barkalow should repair the front to make it cohesive to the rest of the house and required about the availably of asbestos siding. Bazkalow said that he did not believe that there was a way to match that exterior. MOTION: Downing moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the application for 837 Maggard as proposed in the application. Baker seconded the motion. The motion failed on a vote of 0-7 (McMahon. Swaim, Thomann absent).. MOTION: Downing moved to approve a certificate of appropriateness for the application of siding for 837 Maggard with 3 to 5 inch reveal lap cement board siding with a minimum of a 4 inch trim around all windows and doors if it can be proved that any existing siding or original siding underneath cannot be repaired. Baker seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (McMahon. Swaim, Thomann absent . CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES FOR APRIL 8, 2010. MOTION: Wagner moved to approve the minutes of the Historic Preservation Commission's April 8, 2010 meeting, as written. Baker seconded the motion. The motion carried on a vote of 7-0 (McMahon Swaim. Thomann absent). OTHER: Wagner said the Commission might consider an award for anon-contributing property on Washington and Dodge that installed cement board siding. He said the results were very good. Wagner said it was good to use these materials even on non-contributing properties. Kuecker said she attended a corridor CLG meeting about disaster recovery and wanted to let the commission know that Iowa City was doing something right compared to other municipalities. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Minutes submitted by Jake Rosenberg Z O N N ~~ ~~ 00 V V O~ Q V O •- ~ Z O ~ Q N W ~ NZ W W ~ ~ a va oc 0 T r ~ , , , 1 1 1 l" r ~ 1 r ~ 1 1 ~ N ~ , i ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ i ~ i r i ~ ~ N X X X X ; ~ X ; ~ ~ X X M r' X X X X ~ X X ~ X ~ X X x x x x x x x o x x x M ~ Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z o x o x o x x x o o x o x x x x o x x x x x a X M ~ N M ~ ~ N O N ~ M N ~ W O N M O N M O N M O N M O N M O N M O N M O N M O N M O N M O N M O N M H Q z Y Z ~ OC V Q Q G = LLI o ~ Q m W ~ N W OC Q m J ~ Z Z O o Q Z J Y Z ~ w ~ Q D O = ~ ~ ~ a o Q V ~ W ~ O O a J Q Z C9 ~ ~ cn Q D Z Q _ ~ V Q ui m ~_ ~ ~ Y W ~ Z C7 Q ~ E 2 0 vd ~ o ~? ~ X ~~ C C N ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~,aQZ o a.Qn nZ \ ~ u XOOZ S w Y 3b 3 MINUTES APPROVED IOWA CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT JUNE 9, 2010-5:15 PM EMMA J. HARVAT HALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Robert Anderson, Barbara Eckstein, Will Jennings, Caroline Sheerin, Le Ann Tyson MEMBERS EXCUSED: None STAFF PRESENT: Sarah Walz, Sara Greenwood Hektoen OTHERS PRESENT: None RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL: None. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Caroline Sheerin at 5:15 p.m. ROLL CALL: Anderson, Eckstein, Jennings, Sheerin, Tyson An opening statement was read by the Chair outlining the role and purpose of the Board and the procedures governing the proceedings. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES FOR MAY 12T" 2010: SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS: Eckstein offered three grammatical corrections and asked for clarification on a content point. Walz and Greenwood Hektoen advised Eckstein to seek clarification on the point later in the meeting when the public hearing for that topic was opened. Jennings motioned to accept the minutes with Eckstein's changes. Iowa City Board of Adjustment June 9, 2010 Page 2 of 3 Eckstein seconded. A vote was taken and the motion to approve the minutes was passed 5-0. EXC10-00004: An application submitted by Nila Haug and Dennis Nowotny for a special exception to allow a Bed and Breakfast Inn to operate in the Central Business Service (CB-2) zone at 511 E. Washington Street. Walz explained that this item had been deferred from last month to this month to give the applicant time to resolve permit issues. Walz said that the permit issues have not been resolved. She said that the applicant has requested a deferral until such time as the permit issues can be brought to resolution. Walz said that staff supports the deferral. She said she has advised the applicant to notify her when the issues are resolved. At that time, Walz will again place the item on the Board's agenda. Eckstein motioned to defer the application until such time as the applicant wishes to move forward with it. Tyson seconded. The motion to defer carried 5-0. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT INFORMATION: Walz asked if all Board members will be available for the scheduled July 2010 meeting. Sheerin said she would be present. Jennings said he would not be present. Eckstein said she had to check, but she believed she would not be available. Tyson said she was not sure and would have to check. Anderson said he believed he would be available. Walz said there is an application for the July meeting, but it appears to be a pretty straight forward application. She said she would check with the applicant as to whether or not they would be comfortable moving forward with only three Board members present, as athree-member vote would require unanimous approval. Jennings said that if there was a substantial matter before the Board that required his presence he could see about adjusting his plans. ADJOURNMENT: Jennings motioned to adjourn. Tyson seconded. A vote was taken and the motion carried 5-0 (Sheerin not present). The meeting adjourned at 5:25 p.m. C Q w O m N L V V L s ~+ 0 N O M O O O~ W x x x x x N x x x ~ x x x x x x x x x x x M x x x o x N ' , x o x x x VI N ~' V1 M - ~ i ~ ~X O o O o 0 ~ W o O o 0 0 O C C • ~ ~ ~ ~ s C ~ ~ ~ Z Q . ~ c as H ~ E • c ~ '~ ~ ~ ~ m 3 u N xux ~ W ~ c c ~ N N ~ Q Q N C .~ a cd C .G 4l O c '~ td s ~--~ .a L L (d G7 v s ao c ._ -v -v a~ .y L L •L N .... L .0 c E •~, ~ v ~ ~ ~ 0 Z Z w_ X O O Z Y 3b 4 Airport Commission July 1, 2010 MINUTES FINAL IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION July 1, 2010 - 6:00 P.M. AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING Members Present: Howard Horan, Minnetta Gardinier, Greg Farris, Steve Crane, Jose Assouline Members Absent: Staff Present: Sue Dulek, Michael Tharp Others Present: RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL• (to become effective only after separate Council actionl: None CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Horan called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION/ACTION: FAA/IDOT Projects - AECOM -David Hughes a. Runway 7/25 & 12/30 1. Consider a resolution accepting improvements to Runway 7-25 and Runway 12-30 -- Tharp noted that this was deferred from the June meeting and that they had not been able to coordinate the necessary work with the contractor. Tharp noted that this would be deferred until the July regular meeting. b. 2010 Pavement Rehab 1. Consider a resolution setting a public hearing on for the plans, specifications, form of contract, and estimate on cost for the construction of FY2010 Pavement Rehabilitation project, and directing city clerk to publish notices of said hearing, and directing the chairperson to place said plans on file for public inspection -- Farris moved the resolution seconded by Crane Tharp noted that he had received the plans and specifications. Gardinier asked if this project would be completed this calendar yet to which Tharp responded it would. Horan called the question. Motion carried 5-0 ADJOURN: Meeting Adjourned at 6:03pm CHAIRPERSON DATE N 0 .y _y ~o o~ U N ~~ aT Q -'~ Z ~ O~ ~V ~wa,o O V N VZ~ Q W aZ>- ~w QQ `"~ x x x x X ti ti X ~ X >C cc o f N 0 X X X X ~ I N X X X ~ x O i ~I W W O X X X ' O ~I X X X X M ~ I X >C >C ;. X X N rl N x x X X x M ~ ~ N ~ N O ~ al W X ~ ~- ~ r- .- ~- ~- F- W M M M M M M M c ~' u~ N ~ ~ ca m m ~ c U m ~ ~ ~ __ ~ ~ ~~ c c a n m W d x c E c ~ d ~ y d d ~ lE aa~z°z° a II II p II II )CO~Z YI Airport Commission tune 17, 2010 Page 1 MINUTES IOWA CITY AIRPORT COMMISSION JUNE 17, 2010 - 6:00 P.M. AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING Members Present: Howard Horan, Jose Assouline, Greg Farris Members Absent: Minnetta Gardinier, Steve Crane Staff Present: Sue Dulek, Michael Tharp Others Present: Matt Wolford, David Hughes, Phillip Wolford 3b 5 FINAL RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL• Ito become effective only after separate Council action): None CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Horan called the meeting to order at 6:02 P.M. APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES: Minutes from the May 20, 2010, meeting was reviewed. Assouline moved to approve the minutes of the May 20, 2010; seconded by Horan. Motion carried 2-0; Farris abstained, Gardinier and Crane absent. PUBLIC DISCUSSION: None. ITEMS FOR DISCUSSION/ACTION: a. Aviation Commerce Park - Dulek discussed a delay with the closing of the Lot #10 sale. The buyer wanted to make sure the construction plans would be approved by the FAA prior to closing. Dulek noted the amended agreement provides that the Buyer must submit an FAA Airspace study application by August 18 and close within 14 days of approval or the city could terminate the purchase agreement. Tharp distributed an activity report submitted by the Realtor. b. FAA/IDOT Projects - AECOM -David Hughes a. Runway 7/25 & 12/30 -Hughes stated that they weren't ready to accept the Runway reconstruction project yet. Hughes and Tharp met with an FAA inspector to do a final review of the ARRA portion of the project. Hughes stated that during the walkthrough there were a couple of items that still needed to be completed and that he would bring these to the contractor's attention. Hughes discussed some of the punch list items that were remaining to be completed. c. Executive Session -Farris made the motion to adjourn to Executive Session to discuss strategy with counsel in matters that are presently in litigation or where litigation is imminent where its disclosure would be likely to prejudice or Airport Commission June 17, 2010 Page 2 disadvantage the position of the governmental body in that litigation; seconded by Assouline. Motion carried 3-0; Gardinier and Crane absent. The Commission went into Executive Session at 6:10 and returned to open session at 6:19. i. Obstruction Mitigation -Hughes stated that they are working on closing out this project. He further explained what they are working on to finalize things for the FAA's report. ii. 2010 Pavement Rehab -Hughes reviewed some concerns with the Commission regarding pavement projects and how these projects will impact the Airport. He explained the various pavement projects, noting which areas will get patch work and which areas may need closure in order to complete the project. Hughes noted that they will be running into football season with some of these projects, and he added that they have talked with Jet Air about the best way to approach this, for the least amount of disruption. Hughes stated that in looking at the projects again today, they are probably over the amount of State funds that are allocated for this project. He further explained the conditions they are currently seeing in the various pavements, and how this has changed since the original bid was made. Hughes then responded to Members' questions regarding pavement projects. Horan noted that they need to be most responsive to Jet Air and how things will affect their operations. Farris moved to defer the resolution setting a public hearing to the July 1gt meeting, for the plans, specifications, form of contract, and estimate on cost for the construction of FY2010 Pavement Rehabilitation project, and directing City Clerk to publish notices of said hearing, and directing the chairperson to place said plans on file for public inspection; seconded by Assouline. Motion carried 3-0; Gardinier and Crane absent. d. Building H -University of Iowa Hangar Expansion -Tharp noted that the hangar work is finished and documentation has been received. He recommended the Airport Commission accept the work. i. Consider a resolution accepting improvements to Building H - Farris moved to accept the resolution; seconded by Assouline. Motion carried 3-0; Gardinier and Crane absent. e. 2011 Air Race Classic -Tharp noted that Gardinier is on her way to the 2010 Air Race Classic. He did note that he made a call the other day to the Fort Myers, Florida, Airport manager to see how they deal with the race and to introduce himself. f. Corporate Hangar "L" -Tharp noted that Members received a memo regarding this in their packet. He noted that the 2011 Aviation program does contain a recommendation to award Iowa City $200,000 for the hangar construction. He added that this is about $50,000 less than he had hoped. He asked the Commission for their guidance on how much of the land sale proceeds they want to put into this project. The overall project budget is $900,000. Tharp further explained the financing for this project, noting several scenarios for making up this gap. The discussion turned to the cost for hangars, and the various sizes that would be best utilized. Tharp brought Assouline up to date on the Commission's plans for this hangar. Airport Commission June 17, 2010 Page 3 g. Airport "Operations": Strategic Plan Implementation; Budget; Management - Tharp spoke first to the water heater issue. He noted that the options are to either spend upwards of $3,000 on a 40-gallon electric water heater that needs new wiring, or to spend $700 on a 20-gallon water heater that plugs into a regular outlet. Members agreed that the 20-gallon setup will work. Tharp also brought up a need to have the windows resealed, noting that he has one bid so far for $4,600. Farris made the motion to authorize Tharp, with the Chair's approval, to contract with a company to reseal the terminal windows; seconded by Assouline. Motion carried 3-0; Gardinier and Crane absent. Tharp noted that last month's open house saw about 600 visitors. He added that Congressman Loebsack was one of the visitors, and that he was able to speak with the congressman briefly. Tharp also noted that the carpets on the first floor are slated to be replaced. He is working with the City purchasing department on this. The discussion turned to the type of floor coverings they should use. h. FBO /Iowa Flight Training /Whirlybird Reports -Matt Wolford spoke to the Members, sharing a maintenance report with them. He noted that they have been doing a lot of mowing this season. He added that the open house was a success for them, as well. Wolford and Tharp both noted that Tony Stewart's jet landed at the Airport today. Phillip Wolford also commented on the open house's success. He added that overall things are slowly picking up in the industry. A brief discussion ensued about the air conditioning in the terminal building. i. Subcommittees' Reports -Horan noted that Members received a subcommittee list in their packet. He also added that in regards to the south commercial area, he believes this is an opportunity for them and that they should start giving some thought to the long- range planning for this area. Commission Members' Reports -Farris noted that he talked to the folks at the Summer of the Arts and that he would like to do a tour of the Airport with them to give them some ideas on using the Airport for one of their venues. Assouline noted that he attended the open house, and he shared some ideas on getting more traffic to the Airport. k. Staff Report -None. SET NEXT REGULAR MEETING FOR: The next regular meeting will be Thursday, July 15, 2010 at 6:00 P.M. at the Airport Terminal building. A special meeting will be held Thursday, July 1, 2010, at 6:00 P.M. to set the above- mentioned public hearing. ADJOURN: The meeting adjourned at 7:36 P.M. Farris made the motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:36 P.M.; seconded by Assouline. Motion carried 3-0; Gardinier and Crane absent. c 0 N ~o U NO ~ ,~-, v o. v ~ c a a Z D O~ N ~ O O V N V Z Q W aZ QQ ti X ~ X X t0 NI ~ X X X X ~ ) N X X X ~ X `~ r~l W ~ W ~ X ~ X X ' ~ I X X X ~ ~ X i M ~ I X X X X X N ~I N X X X ~ ; X X ~- ~ ; M to - ~ r- N r- ~ ~ N r- O ~ Q X ~ . W r r r r r r r - W 1 M M M M M M M O . N ~ ~ ~ ~ c~ a~ • ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ Q L.L ~ C L ~° ~ ' ^ V) Z O ~ c~ CC t0 a~ o N ~ u~ G C / V _ ''~^^ L V Q ~ T= ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ a m N y K G E ~ C C ~ ~ N d d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O O aQQzz II II II II II XOW OZ ~I W Y MINUTES HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION June 15, 2010 LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL APPROVED 3b 6 Members Present: Dell Briggs, Fernando Mena-Carrasco, Wangui Gathua, Howard Cowen, Connie Cuttell, Dianne Day. Members Absent: Martha Lubaroff, Corey Stoglin, Yolanda Spears. Staff Present: Stefanie Bowers. Others Present: Megan Cendrowski. RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: (to become effective only after separate Council action): None. CALL TO ORDER Chair Briggs called the meeting to order at 6:05 p.m. PUBLIC COMMENT OF ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: Cendrowski introduced herself as a journalism student who was assigned to attend a City Board/Commission meeting. CONSIDERATION OF THE MINUTES OF THE Mav 18, 2010 MEETING: Cuttell, moved to approve. Gathua seconded. The motion passed 6-0. ADA TRAINING There will be a training held on October 6th. Two Commissioners will be needed to volunteer for the program. STRENGTHENING LATINO/A COMMUNITIES PROGRAM Commissioners will co-sponsor this event being held in the fall. Cowen, moved to approve. Gathua seconded. The motion passed 6-0. 4TH FEST PARADE Lubaroff and Gathua will participate in this event. PRIDE DAY The University of Iowa Center for Human Rights will assist the Commission at this event by sitting at the vendor table and providing handouts to the public. BREAKFAST KEYNOTE SPEAKER Commissioners selected two possible speakers for the Breakfast back to the Commission at the July meeting. Day moved to approve. Cuttell seconded. The motion passed 6-0. Bowers will check their availability and report SUBCOMMITTEE UPDATES Briggs reported (Cowen and Stoglin) that the program on police and civilians that was scheduled for July will be held sometime later this year. Cuttell reported (Day and Gathua) a program on immigration is being planned for a future date. The program will specifically look at employment. Mena-Carrasco reported (Lubaroff and Spears) the sub committee has not had a chance to meet up and will report at the July meeting. Human Rights Commission June 15, 2010 Page 2 of 3 DOCUMENTARY WRITER PRESENTATION Commissioners felt it was a good film and that perhaps they can use the film in conjunction with the Speaker's Bureau. SPEAKER'S BUREAU Day updated Commissioners on correspondence she received from Nick Stuber. Bowers and Day will follow up with Stuber concerning the time commitment for the trainings. DIVERSITY DIALOGUE CIRCLES Dialogue Circles will be held in the future whether they are held this summer depends on whether staff can find trained volunteers to assist with the Circles. REPORTS OF COMMISSIONERS Gathua reported on two immigration programs that were recently held and of which she attended. Day reminded Commissioners of a program being held on the 17th of the month at the Senior Center on Sanctuary Cities. ADJOURNMENT Day moved to adjourn. Howard seconded. The motion passed 6-0 at 19:06. Human Rights Commission June 15, 2010 Page 3 of 3 Human Rights Commission ATTENDANCE RECORD 2010 IMeetina Datel NAME TERM EXP. 1/19 2/16 3/16 4/20 5/18 6/15 7/20 8/17 9/21 10/19 11/16 12/21 Dell Briggs 1/1/11 X X O/E X X X Yolanda Spears 1/1/11 X O/E X X O/E O/E Corey Stoglin 1/1/11 O/E O/E X O/E X O/E Dianne Day 1/1/12 X X X O/E X X Wangui Gathua 1/1/12 X O/E O/E X X X Martha Lubaroff 1/1112 X X X X X O/E Howard Cowen 1/1/13 X X X X O/E X Constance Goeb- Cuttell 1/1/13 X O/E X X X X Fernando Mena- Carrasco 1/1/13 X X O/E X X X KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused NM = No meeting/No Quorum R =Resigned - = Not a Member 3b 7 MINUTES APPROVED PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MAY 12, 2010 - 5:00 p.m. BECKWITH BOATHOUSE MEETING ROOM Members Present: David Bourgeois, Clay Claussen, Lorin Ditzler, Craig Gustaveson, Aaron Krohmer, Margaret Loomer, John Westefeld Members Absent: Maggie Elliott, Jerry Raaz Staff Present: Mike Moran, Terry Robinson, Marcia Bollinger, Iowa City Planning Department Others Present: Andy Dudler, Ann Dudler, John Richmond, Steve Schuette, Ryan O'Leary CALL TO ORDER Meeting was called to order at 5 p.m. by Chairman Gustaveson. RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: Moved by Bourgeois, seconded by Westefeld, to support the four PIN Grant proposals related to Parks and Recreation which include workshops at Grant Wood Gym, staff for roller skating at Grant Wood Gvm, Grant Wood Neighborhood Association Harvest Party and the North Market Square Park Grand Opening Motion passed 7-0 with Elliott and Raaz being absent. OTHER FORMAL ACTION TAKEN: Moved by Westefeld, seconded by Krohmer to approve the April 7, 2010 Parks and Recreation Commission minutes as written. Motion passed 7-0 with Elliott and Raaz being absent. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ANY ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA: None PIN GRANT APPLICATIONS Marcia Bollinger was present at tonight's meeting to review the proposed PIN grants with the Commission. Before reviewing those, however, she announced that there will be a grand opening dedication of the Wetherby Splash Pad scheduled for Tuesday, June 8, ceremony starting at 5:30. Party in the Park will follow at 6:30.. Bollinger then went on to review the Program for Improving Neighborhoods (PIN) Grant Applications. There are four grant proposals that were related to Parks and Recreation. The following information copied from a May 6, 2010 memo written by Marcia Bollinger, Neighborhood Services Coordinator. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 12, 2010 Page 2 of 11 Workshops at Grant Wood Gym - $950.00 -Grant Wood Neighborhood Association - these workshops provide educational opportunities for residents to learn about various subjects. Previous workshops have included babysitting training, home alone after school, house painting techniques, curb appeal with the Master Gardeners, etc. The workshop themes are determined by the residents. Funds are used for honorariums, door prizes and other costs. Staff for Roller Skating at Grant Wood Gym - $2000 -Grant Wood Neighborhood Association - 68 pairs of roller skates, purchased through last year's PIN grant program and a United Way grant, have been purchased and are available. These funds would ensure that staffing is available for at least 2 roller skating parties per month at the Grant Wood Gym. Harvest Party - $950 -Grant Wood Neighborhood Association -this annual event has become a tradition in the neighborhood and provides free family fun including costume contests, jumpy castles, door prizes, haunted house and a free meal. These funds will be used to purchase food and treats for over 400 families that have regularly attended. North Market Square Park Grand Opening - $500 - Northside Neighborhood Association -funds will be used to host a grand opening of North Market Square Park once the renovation project is complete in fall of 2010. Bollinger asked if there were any comments or concerns from Commission. None noted. Loomer asked how involved Grant Wood School has been in these projects. Bollinger said that they work hand-in-hand with the school administration. She further mentioned that workshops and roller skating are scheduled at the same time so that parents can drop their kids off and then attend a workshop. Moved by Bourgeois, seconded by Westefeld, to support the four PIN grant proposals related to Parks and Recreation which include workshops at Grant Wood Gvm, staff for roller skating at Grant Wood Gvm, Grant Wood Neighborhood Association Harvest Party and the North Market Square Park Grand Opening. Motion passed 7-0 with Elliott and Raaz being absent. OPTIMIST CLUB FUNDRAISER: Ryan O'Leary was present at tonight's meeting to discuss ideas for the Optimist Club. He noted that the Optimist Club of Iowa City has been in existence for about 61 years and for about 45 of those have been selling holiday trees at the Dairy Queen. They typically raise about $25,000 a year and donate every dollar to youth oriented programs. The Optimist Club is proposing that rather than signs being put in place to commemorate their donations, they would like to plant symbolic trees in these areas and then perhaps a bolder with an inscription. Their request for proposal includes planting a .couple of evergreens at the entrance to Napoleon Park and then this fall as renovations happen in College Green Park would like to plant a couple of trees near the play structure. Next year they would like to look at planting trees at Boys Baseball PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 12, 2010 Page 3 of 11 and probably out a Kent Park where they previously built an education center. It is also their hopes over the next few years to earmark donations for projects like North Market Square and the Terry Trueblood Recreation Area. They would like to do a larger project such as planting 20-30 trees at TTRA. O'Leary asked for feedback from Commission. Gustaveson said that he thinks it is a great idea. Westefeld agreed. Gustaveson sees the Optimist Group doing this for several years to come and expressed his thanks to the Optimist Club and all that they have done for the Community. AFFILIATE GROUP DISCUSSION: Moran presented the affiliate group proposal to Council at their work session a couple of weeks prior to this meeting. At that time there were very few questions from Council. At the Council Meeting on Tuesday, Boys Baseball and Kickers were both in attendance and presented their concerns. At that time Council determined that it was necessary for there to be more dialogue regarding this policy. They asked that Moran schedule a meeting between Council and the Parks and Recreation Commission. Moran feels that with their limited number of meetings in the summer, this may be difficult to do. Therefore he proposed that instead the Commission meet again with the affiliate groups individually and report back to Council. Bourgeois, who was also at the Council meeting, said that he was surprised by the Council's suggestion considering all the time and effort that has already been put in place by staff and Commission. Gustaveson expressed his disappointment in the newspaper article which he felt accused Commission and staff of not listening to the affiliate groups. Gustaveson feels that it is quite the opposite, that the groups are not listening to staff and Commission. He noted that the Commission and staff have been working on this proposal for nearly a year, have met with those groups that expressed their concerns, and have made accommodations for those groups based on their statements. He feels that at some point, staff and Commission have to say that these facilities belong to the City and that there are costs involved in maintaining them. Ditzler asked Commission if there is something that the group should do to respond from a PR standpoint as it seems that the problem is perception. Moran acknowledged that there is a good relationship between the City and most of these groups. However, staff often talks only with a couple of individuals from a group and never to the entire group. Therefore, many are getting bits and pieces of information and not all of it is correct. He further noted that while Council is in agreement that there is a need for a fee structure, they are not sure that the process is yet complete. Ditzler asked if that opinion was based on what Moran had told them or what they were hearing from the affiliate groups present at their Council meeting. Moran feels it was based on what they heard from the groups. Ditzler believes that the proposal to meet with these groups is a good idea. Gustaveson said that he would rather that the groups come to a Commission meeting and address the entire group. He also feels that writing an editorial for the opinion page explaining all the details of the proposal is a good idea. Claussen said that he was offended by some of the comments made in the paper. He would request that the Press Citizen reporter talk to the Commission and staff as well. Moran reported that some of the groups still have angst about donating a large amount of money, i.e. $50,000 to put in lights, and then only getting one year of credit. Kickers PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 12, 2010 Page 4 of 11 has donated over $417,000 over many years and so feels that that should count for something more than just one year of facility usage. Moran acknowledged that it is difficult to know where to draw the line when it comes to donations and getting free facility usage based on that donation. Krohmer asked if it would be possible to send out a request for information to affiliate groups asking them for their membership statistics, specifically if they give scholarships and also for resident status, finding out what percentage are Iowa City residents and what percentage are nonresidents. Krohmer stated that the question he receives from the public most is why are tax payers paying for maintenance of facilities that are being used mostly by nonresidents. Having the exact numbers would help in answering this question. Gustaveson said that he too would be interested in finding out which of these groups offer scholarships. Ditzler wants to be sure that the groups understand that by us asking for this information, we are not changing the proposed policy. Krohmer said that he sees it as just an extension of a request we have already made. If they don't have numbers available, he does not expect them to look at every registration form to gather the information. He doesn't want them to spend that kind of time on getting those numbers. He would just like to be able to answer that question when asked. Westefeld asked how many affiliate groups there are. Moran reported 17. Westefeld then asked how many of the 17 are unhappy about this proposal. Moran stated that none of them are happy about paying a fee; however, the most unhappy is Boys Baseball, Girls Softball, Kickers and Camera Club. The rest of them know about it and Moran has spoken to them but they did not attend a meeting. Westefeld asked why they are upset, is it primarily how much it is or is it just having to pay a fee of any kind. Moran says that he feels it is more philosophical, that they are used to not paying anything for these facilities. Schuette stated that the City and Girls Softball are partners who worked together to create and improve the program and the facility. It was their understanding that the City would maintain the facility and that Girls Softball would operate the program. Now it is the perception of many that one partner is charging the other partner for doing their half. Even though the proposed fee is only 10% of the full cost, the perception is why has Girls Softball done this for so many years if they are going to be lumped in with all of the other affiliate groups that do not donate money to the City. Krohmer agrees there is a value to the City for that service but there is a greater value to the families that are actually participating and this is where he can't comfortably ask tax payers that aren't participating in these programs to fully fund the maintenance for the families that are participating. He also thinks they are great programs so does not want to push them out of existence so there needs to be some level of agreement that allows both the people who are paying property taxes and don't use these facilities to feel it is a good relationship that allows the programs to continue in a way that also serves their community. The numbers are where there seems to be a disagreement. Gustaveson said that Commission did address this by making the caveat that when a group makes a donation to the City the fee would be waived. Moran noted his concern that if they assign a level of donation to receive free use of the facilities, then some groups may decide to donate a much lesser amount than in the past. Krohmer said PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 12, 2010 Page5of11 that this, however, would not be in the best interest of the kids. Krohmer also noted that Boys Baseball talks as if they have proprietary control of the fields. Moran stated that this is• not the case, the land is owned by the City. O'Leary stated that as a member of the public he suggests that staff and Commission develop a plan that is fair and equitable to those who do donate. Claussen said that one of the problems is communication because the information is being filtered. He still talks to people on the street that think they are going to be charged 40% of the full facility use fee. There is some misinformation being given and it is helping some of these people get leverage. Gustaveson said that O'Leary made a good point and appreciates his comments. He said that from his standpoint, what we are trying to do is put the groups on an even playing field for those who donate and those who do not donate to the City. Krohmer wondered why the Commission keeps talking about perception and hurt feelings - if a group is already giving large amounts of money to the City, what negative effect would having to pay $2700 annually have on them. He further noted that tax payers are paying money to keep these fields maintained and that the users certainly should be able to pay 10% of the fee which he sees as a token amount. Ditzler summarized the discussion to this point as follows. She said that so far Commission talked about writing an editorial for the opinion page describing the proposed policy in detail. The Commission also talked of having the groups return to the Commission. She does not feel it makes sense to have the groups return to the Commission as this has already been done and it will most likely be the same discussion as before. Krohmer doesn't see any reason to meet with the groups. He would, however, like to send out the request for information. He also said that until Commission has some idea of what Council wants the group to do, everything else is just moving in circles. He feels that Commission should meet with Council if that is what Council suggested. Moran said that while they may want to meet with Council eventually, initially Commission should give them their plan of action and then schedule a meeting later if they still feel it is necessary. Westefeld said he would be fine with additional meetings but it would be important for both the benefit of the affiliate groups and the Commission to be very clear on what the goals are of these meetings. Moran said that he would follow up with a letter to Council letting them know the plan and invite one or two of them to attend these group meetings if interested. Gustaveson asked if this meeting with affiliate groups should be a special meeting to devote their time to just this one subject. Bourgeois thinks that Commission will just hear a repeat of what has already been presented by these groups. However, meeting with the individual groups would allow Commission the opportunity to detail the plan with them. Ditzler thinks that the most efficient way to handle this situation is to respond to those groups that are upset. She does not see it as a good use of time to have them return with the same conversations as before. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 12, 2010 Page 6 of 11 Schuette expressed that he feels that Commission should meet and have a dialogue with groups again. He feels it would be more productive to meet with the individual groups, rather than inviting them to a Commission meeting where there is not the opportunity to talk in detail. He believes this would allow for the City and Girls Softball for instance, to come to an agreement. Gustaveson summarized that it appears that it is the consensus of the Commission that 1) Moran will meet with the different affiliate groups individually , 2) Commission will write a letter to the editor clarifying the Commissions and staffs position. 3) Moran will write a letter to the Council explaining this plan. Moran noted that Commission members are welcome to attend these group meetings as well. Moved by Ditzler, seconded by Westefeld, for Mike Moran and a Commission Member to meet with the different affiliate groups individually, for Commission to_write a letter to the editor and for Moran to write a letter to Council explaining this plan Passed 7-0 with Elliott and Raaz being absent. Schuette noted that Girls Softball has had a good partnership with the City and the City is under fire. As the Girls Softball Board sees these two groups as partners, they are concerned about the best way to handle this. They want to help the City by doing something positive. One suggestion was to possibly name something in Terry Trueblood's memory. Their desire is to work through this and maintain the good relationship they have with the City. DOGPAC CONTRACT: Moran noted that the DogPAC contract is due for negotiation in June. Staff and DogPAC have already discussed the contract. It is the desire of both staff and DogPAC to hire staff to man the dog parks to assist with monitoring of the tag sales etc. While they haven't worked out all the details, the thought is that the wages for this position would come directly from dog park revenues. Whatever is left after that would be split again (90/10) between the City and DogPAC. Moran reported that in roughly running the numbers, if they paid staff $10/hr, 40 hours a week, it would cost about $36,500 for the year for both parks. The reported revenue for last year from tags was $38,000. The Legal Department is working on the contract. This contract will come up for a vote at the June Commission meeting. Andy Dudler stated that the hours may be scaled back a bit depending on the heavier populated times at the dog parks. Moran suggested that the hours be varied so that the public would not know exactly when staff is present, giving them the opportunity to go to the park when no one is there and perhaps not pay the entry fee. However, Anne Dudler thought that if this person was going to be selling tags etc., that there would be a need to have them there at consistent times. Discussions will continue regarding this. Krohmer asked why the City would continue to split the revenue after paying for the staff costs. He feels that since this is a City facility, that the entire amount of revenue should go to the City. He stated that he will oppose any contract that continues to financially support DogPAC with City revenue. He feels that it is necessary to thoroughly examine why the City continues to fund this organization. Gustaveson expressed his disagreement with Krohmer's statements. Gustaveson said that his fee for DogPAC tags is no different than someone signing up to play baseball, that it is a user fee and he wants his money to go back to DogPAC as a dog park user PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 12, 2010 Page 7 of 11 to put in the park benches and trees, and the development of future parks. He also said that one of the reasons these are called public parks is that tax dollars support some of it, whether it is a basketball court, tennis court, or soccer fields. Some of that money is coming back to support that. He suggested that perhaps DogPAC collect the money directly and then that becomes their money and leave it up to them to decide what to do with it. Ditzler sees it as being similar as these other affiliate groups, in that they provide a service that the City is not able to provide. The service is having a place for dogs to run. Krohmer does not see what service DogPAC provides. Gustaveson noted that there would not be a dog park if it wasn't for DogPAC. He feels it is no different than Kickers or anyone else getting a program going, and that DogPAC was instrumental in getting these parks built. Moran noted that the contract will come to Commission in June for a vote. Andy Dudler said that he does appreciate Krohmer's concern and thinks it is valid. However, he further noted that it is important to keep in mind that the money isn't going anywhere else so it is benefitting everybody. Ann Dudler reported that Rita's Ranch was $32,000 so if there is a desire to open another neighborhood dog park, it will take a substantial amount of money. The increase in revenue this quarter comes from the work of volunteers from DogPAC sitting at the entrances, talking to people, educating them and letting them know where and how to get their tags. Westefeld noted that the challenge is how to balance these relationships and figure out what is the Commission's role verses the groups role and what is fair and what is equitable. The main finding is that there is more to that decision than just money. Gustaveson exited the meeting at 6:15 p.m. for a visitation. Andy Dudler noted that their future direction is looking at Willow Creek Park for the next neighborhood dog park and there are people who are interested in donating substantial amounts of money to help that happen. LAND ACQUISITION DISCUSSION: Moran reported that the following are information items only - no need for action by the Commission at this time. Mackinaw Village: Moran noted that Casey Boyd owns this property. He has proposed to the Planning Department that he donate lots 40 through 46 to the City. These properties are next to the interstate. Staff feels that this would only mean more maintenance hours for them. Moran said there might be more interest if he were offering land on the other side of the trail that would then allow for trail expansion. Krohmer suggested that perhaps Project Green could help in planting several trees on this land making it a natural area. Claussen noted that being a realtor himself, he sees the benefit for the developer to donate this land as it would not be sellable property. Robinson said that City Code says that we have to mow this property. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 12, 2010 Page 8 of 11 Terra Verde: This property is near Rochester Avenue. The developer is looking at donating Outlot A which is densely covered in trees, very wet, and has a number of issues. Pending at this time. Chadek Property: This property is located directly south of City High School on Court St. The Chadek family currently lives at 515 Third Ave. Moran met with the three daughters and they wanted to know if the City would be interested in the property. When Carl Chadek passed away his will stated that the business had to be gone from the property by the end of this year. The grandson (Mike) has taken the business over and he has found property out of town in the county. The daughters are now trying to figure out what to do with this property. They have been approached by a couple of realtors to see if they want to subdivide and build on it. Moran asked if Carl had wanted anything specific for the property. The daughter said no but that he liked to garden and would probably approve of garden plots placed on this property. Moran asked them if they were interested in donating or selling the land. They are interested in selling the land. They are going to get it appraised. The last appraisal was done in 2001 and was $291,000. It is estimated that a new appraisal will likely come in between $450,000 and $500,000 if appraised for a subdivision. If it was appraised as parkland it would be appraised at a lesser amount. It is a five-acre piece of land and would make an excellent neighborhood park. Krohmer noted that the Planning Department has identified it as one of the key pieces of parkland that they want to acquire. Moran will ask the family for a parkland appraisal to see the difference and will then negotiate. Krohmer noted that it would not just be the Parks and Recreation Department involved, that it would also be the Planning Department as they have identified it in their Master Plan. COMMISSION TIME/SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS: Claussen noted that he believes that Commission would not want the affiliate groups going to Council and that it would be better resolved by working with these groups individually. Robinson reported that he was told at a meeting regarding the Boys Baseball property, that the City doesn't own it, that it is theirs. Robinson started doing research on this through staff files and the assessor's office. He found that the largest portion of the property was sold to the City for $1. It does not say anything in the transaction that it must be used for baseball, it just says that it was sold to the City. Mary Villhauer believes that there was a caveat put on that property that it was to be used for Boys Baseball and that is not the case. Westefeld asked about the history of the sign that says priority for all diamonds will be given to Boys Baseball. Robinson said that was put up so that when those other than boys baseball participants are refused use of the fields, they can refer them to this sign. Moran stated that this has become an issue when Boys Baseball reserves all of the fields whether they are needed or not. He feels that it is situations like these where a memorandum of understanding will be very helpful. Krohmer discussed his idea of allowing public artists to bid on projects for the City. He met with an individual with the U of I's Sculpture/Ceramics Department. They came up with two different ideas: 1) for asculpture -the idea is to essentially work out a program with the University Art Department that has grad students and undergrad PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 12, 2010 Page 9 of 11 students going out into the community to find an area where they would like to place a piece of public art. They would then come before the Commission with a design proposal and their ideas for financing the project. Artists would not be expected to be compensated as this would be part of the learning process for them. 2) Ceramics -the idea is to simply sit down with the Ceramics Department and perhaps a person who handles classes at the Recreation Center and discuss ways that we can start combining resources. Possibly do a class through the Recreation Department and possibly firing things made by the classes at the Recreation Center, etc. Krohmer wants to get the majority of the Commission to approve this idea before he moves forward. Krohmer also noted that the Art Department is getting some pressure to get involved with the Community and this is one of the ways they would like to do it. Ditzler asked if there would need to be discussion with the Public Art Commission. Krohmer said that that would have to be worked out as well. Westefeld feels that continuing to have a dialogue about this is fine with him feeling that it is important to partner with the University on multiple levels. Loomer thinks that when it reaches a good point that it needs to be put on the Commission agenda. Bourgeois supports the idea. Ditzler noted that partnering with the University on projects is something that was in the Master Plan as well. CHAIRS REPORT: No report. DIRECTORS REPORT: Naming Policy: Dale Helling has asked that Moran and one Commission member as well as the Library Board of Trustees and a member of the Animal Foundation meet and discuss and rewrite the policy. He will then present to Helling and Council for approval. Moran announced that Cindy Coffin, Therapeutic Recreation Specialist with the Iowa City Recreation Division received the IPRA Professional of the Year award which was renamed the Trueblood/Slattery Award. Moran announced that the Wetherby Splash Pad dedication will take place on June 8. It will open on May 28. North Market Square: Steve Ford from Confluence turned in plans for North Market Square. This will go out to bid this summer. The goal is to have project finished by September 15. Kickers: Statue dedication on Saturday, May 15 at 10:00 a.m. The Trueblood family will be present. These statues are located next to the north side concession building. Robinson reported that the ballfield budget for FY10 is $162,850. This is what is paid for staff to maintain the fields. These include two fields at Kickers, fields at Napoleon, Mercer and City Park. The soccer budget for FY10 is $119,317. Information item only. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 12, 2010 Page 10 of 11 TTRA: Presentation by Snyder & Associates in June to report phases and budget. Westside Recreation: Staff went to the Iowa City School District to talk about Crossings Elementary School and express interest in a shared use agreement between the City and the school. However, Coralville has since decided that they are going to provide water and sewer, therefore, that building will stay within the Coralville City Limits. Moran withdrew the proposal at this point. Park Use Ordinance: This will be an item on the June 1 City Council Agenda. There has never been an ordinance allowing staff to regulate who can and cannot sell items etc. in the parks. This ordinance will allow authority to the Parks and Recreation Director to make these decisions. Farmers Market: Staff has been approached by Kurt Friese on behalf a group who would like to pursue the possibility of a year round farmers market by acquiring a new location for such. Moran told them that at this time the City will not be involved, however, will help gather information etc. if needed. The June Commission meeting will be held at the Beckwith Boathouse Conference Room. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Westefeld seconded by Bourgeois to adiourn the meeting at 7:00 p.m. Motion passed 6-0 with Elliott, Gustaveson, and Raaz being absent. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION May 12, 2010 Page 11 of 11 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION ATTENDANCE RECORD YEAR 2010 NAME {h M O O ~ N O ~ ~- M O O TERM .= N N M ~ an m n ao °' ° ~ .- EXPIRES David 1/1/11 O/E O/E O/E X X X Bourgeois Clay 1/1/14 X X X X X X Claussen Lorin 1/1/13 O/E X X X O/E X Ditzler Maggie 1/1/13 X X O/E X X O/E Elliott Craig 1/1/11 X X X X X X Gustaves on Aaron 1/1/13 X O/E X X O/E X Krohmer Margaret 1/1/12 X O/E O/E X X X Loomer Jerry Raaz 1/1/12 X O/E X X X O/E John 1/1/14 O/E X X X X X Westefeld KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = AbsentlExcused NM = No meeting LQ = No meeting due to lack of quorum * = Not a member at this time Approved Minutes 3b 8 June 2010 MINUTES SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION JUNE 17, 2010 ROOM 208, IOWA CITY/JOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR CENTER Members Present: Merce Bem-Klug, Chuck Felling, Jay Honohan, Michael Lensing, Sarah Maiers, Jean Martin Members Absent: Staff Present: Linda Kopping, Emily Light, Michelle Buhman Others Present: Richard Vaughan, Sarah Terkosky RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: None. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 4:00 PM. Jay Honohan chaired the meeting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM MAY 20, 2010 MEETING: Felling pointed out a spelling correction for the last name "Pugh" in the minutes. Motion: To accept the minutes from the May Z0, 2010 meeting with the correction. Motion carried on a vote of 6/0. MartiNMaiers. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. COMMISSION ASSIGNMENTS: Honohan will visit the City Counal to report on the June meeting. Lensing will report to the Board of Supervisors, and Kopping wilt attend with him. IDENTIFY NEXT ACTION STEPS IN UPDATING THE NUTRITION PROGRAM LEASE: Kopping said Craig Buhman should return to work within a few weeks and will develop the list of equipment the Senior Center will take responsibility for Approved Minutes June 2010 maintaining. She hopes to have the list by the next Commission meeting. After the list is developed, a meeting will be scheduled with Elder Services. REPORT ON RECOMMENDATIONS RELATED TO THE FUTURE OPERATION OF THE ELDERCRAFT GIFT SHOP FROM THE SHOP'S VOLUNTEER LEADERS: Kopping reported that the volunteer managers of the Eldercraft Gift Shop, Jo Hensch and Carol Case, asked to meet with Senior Center staff last week to discuss the future of the shop. They talked about the history of the shop and the measures that had been taken to increase sales, such as moving the shop to the second floor of the Center. They said despite these efforts, business has not improved. The managers provided the staff with sales figures for calendar years 2007-2009. From 2007 to 2008, the shop's gross revenue declined slightly. From 2008 to 2009, it declined significantly. Kopping gathered information on the Senior Center's revenue from craft shop commissions for fiscal years 2006-2010. She said it had consistently totaled over $700 annually until FY09, at which point it dropped to $504. For FY10 (to date), the shop has produced $608 in commission revenue for the Senior Center. Kopping pointed out that the shop does not exist simply to make money for the Senior Center, but to provide meaningful volunteer opportunities for senior participants. In January -May of 2010, there were 135 days the shop could potentially been open, but it was only staffed 79 of those days. There were no sales on 26 of the 79 days the shop was open. Since January, the shop has only sold $1014 in merchandise, and the Senior Center has collected only $163 in commissions. Staffing the shop is the biggest problem. The consignors have been asked to help staff the shop numerous times over the years, and the Senior Center has made quarterly appeals for shop volunteers in every program guide. These efforts have had little success. The bulk of volunteer staffing in the gift shop has come from students. When the students are gone, the shop is generally closed. The volunteers who do staff the shop complain of boredom. They say that they generally end up sitting in the room alone and do nothing. Kopping said if the purpose of the gift shop is to provide volunteers an opportunity for valuable service and social contact, it is not succeeding. The Commission discussed possibilities for alternative sales opportunities. Lensing suggested having a Senior Center craft display case in the public library's used book store and splitting sales revenue. Approved Minutes June 2010 Martin asked if the consignors would be willing to pitch in if leveraged with the risk of dosing. Kopping said they haven't responded to these appeals in the past. Maiers noted that there are major space limitations at the Senior Center, and a room cannot sit unused. Lensing said it may be better to have large craft sales events a few times a year. Kopping said that she has the impression that many of the consignors are not Senior Center members. Vaughan asked if anyone tracks who is purchasing items in the shop, and what they are purchasing. Kopping said the volunteer managers have expressed that they feel the craft shop has run its course. She said this is not a phenomenon exclusive to our senior center. Senior center gift/kxaft shops have been dosing widely across the country. Felling suggested more promotion and signage could attract new customers and volunteers. He said that nothing will diminish business more than inconsistent hours of operation. Kopping said it has always been the Senior Center's policy not to open the shop if we don't have volunteers. Kopping, Light, Case, and Hensch derided together upon the recommendation to close the Eldercraft Gift Shop. A meeting will be held on June 23 to discuss the recommendation with the shop's volunteers. signage will be posted around the building to inform Senior Center participants of this issue. Staff will report on the feedback from the June 23 meeting with volunteers, and the volunteers, consignors, and other interested parties will be invited to share their opinions at the July Commission meeting. Kopping said she would like the Commission to approve her recommendation to close the Eldercraft Gift Shop at the July Commission meeting, if they are so inclined. Kopping said there will be discussion about alternative craft events that do not require daily sales, staffing, and space. Some suggestions have included Senior Center partiapation in the craft sales at the Sycamore Mall, Rec Center, Farmer's Market, etc. The Senior Center would also produce large-scale arts and craft sales on-site, possibly in conjunction with the Iowa Arts Fest and the holiday season. Maiers suggested have sales in conjunction with the Gallery Walks. Bem-Klug offered the possibility of modeling our shop after the Sioux City Senior Center's gift shop. She said it is basically asecond-hand store to which items are donated for resale. She said this has been a highly successful fundraising outlet Approved Minutes June 2010 for the Sioux City Senior Center. Our shop could still accept craFt consignments, as long as they sell successfully. Kopping said if some other kind of shop format were to be pursued, she would still like to close it and clear it out first. We would need an opportunity to build something new from scratch. Buhman noted that the shop was originally created, in part, as an outreach program for homebound seniors. The shop was intended to provide them with opportunities to make and sell their crafts, even if they were not able to travel to the Center. If many of the consignors are homebound seniors, they may have valid reasons for not joining the Senior Center or volunteering in the shop. Maiers asked how many of the consignors are actually homebound seniors? Buhman said that may be something to look into during the next month. REPORT ON ELDER SERVICES' PLAN TO RELOCATE THE RSVP OFFICE AND DISCUSSION OF FUTURE USE OF THE ROOM: Kopping said that Mary Wiemann notfied her that Elder Services would relocate the RSVP office and the nutrition director's office out of the Senior Center. Wiemann is consolidating their offices with the Elder Services office on First Avenue to save on overhead costs such as phone and intemet charges. Room 103 of the Senior Center, which currently houses the RSVP and nutrition director offices, will be vacated as of July 31, 2010. Kopping said that given the high ceilings in room 103, it would make a great aerobics room, which would reduce pressure on room G13. Such a conversion would occur in FY12 and involve the removal of the counters and other unnecessary structures, as well as the installation of an aerobic floor, mirrors, and dance bars. In the meantime, room 103 would be used as amulti-purpose classroom for overflow programming. Buhman said we are running out of programming space at peak times. Room G13 is one of the busiest rooms, and it is even difficult to find enough time to clean the room properly. Membership is growing, and classes are filling up. More participants are being pu# on waiting lists and getting turned away from classes. The Commission discussed several other possibilities for room use. FRIENDS OF THE CENTER UPDATE: Honohan said Friends of the Center now has a complete board. Louise Gisolfi agreed to join. Honohan will schedule a meeting on a Thursday during the noon hour. This is for the convenience of the people that work. Kopping will be attending FOTC meetings on her personal time. Approved Minutes June 2010 Kopping said she had an interesting call from the City of Iowa City accountants who wanted to see the 2009 tax re#um and board lis# for Friends of the Center. She said that Friends of the Center is an entirely separate entity from the Senior Center, but they wanted the information anyway. Maiers said the relationship between Friends of the Center and the Iowa City Senior Center subject us to some strange rules (since the. organization exists to support a City entity). The UI Senior College donated $500 to Friends of the Center in recognition of the Senior Center's partnership. Michelle Buhman worked with the Senior College to provide programming space and promotion after they were displaced by the flood of 2008. The Senior College said they enjoyed the ease of working with the Center. Kopping said this shows we're building stronger community links, and Buhman deserves credit for fostering this relationship. OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW: Maiers said that her co-worker told her that she enjoyed the band camp. Buhman pointed out the economic impact the band camp participants had on the downtown area. Kopping said this is an example of how the Senior Center promotes and supports the community. A lot of money was spent on food and hotels during the week of the camp. Kopping reported on staffing at the Senior Center. We no longer have a temporary maintenance worker. Corbin is doing a good job keeping the building cleaned and maintained. Emily Light was hired as Community Outreach Specialist. The position will include work with volunteer programs, marketing, website and social media activities, and intergenerational community programs. The Operations Assistant position was advertised internally. There was only one applicant, so the search will be expanded to the public. Kopping is hoping to hire someone very soon. The staff is working on prioritizing the recommendations generated by the self- assessmen# process. The shower repairs are progressing slowly. All of the necessary materials have been located. There will supposedly be a worker here within a week or so to complete the repairs. Kopping is hoping the showers will be finished by the next Commission meeting. The roof replacement project brought a bid $30,000 lower than the engineer estimated. The roof replacement wilt be funded through general ligation bonds, so there will be no repayment plan on this project. Kopping said all of the Senior Center's interfund loans should be repaid by 2013. Approved Minutes June 2010 The Commission discussed the participant fee structures and potential changes. Honohan said we should review all fees, including membership, class fees, parking fees, and instructor fees. There may not be changes, but it is good to review occasionally. The City Council and the public like to see that participants are contributing to the operation of the Center. The membership fee has not been increased since it was implemented in 2003. Recommendations for changes would be made to City Council, and if they are reasonable, the recommendations would likely be accepted. Honohan wants to create a committee to review fees. Honohan, Maiers, and Felling volunteered to work with Kopping to review fees. Hopefully the committee will have a report by July or August. COMMISSION DISCUSSION: Board of Supervisors Report on the May Meeting: Honohan visited the board and reported on the band camp, scholarship fees, and answered questions from the board. Rettig asked about complaints about the code of conduct, including the issues of personal hygiene and rules about petitioning. Honohan responded that he felt the code of conduct was in good shape and is similar to those of the rec center and the library. City Council Report on the April Meeting: No one attended the City Council meeting this month. Rose Hanson was appointed to the Commission. Light noted that the volunteer appreciation breakfast will be held on June 25, and the Commission is invited to attend and help with the event. ADJOURNMENT: Motion: To Adjourn. Motion carried on a vote of 6/0. Maiers/Bern-Klug. m ' zOOx n ~ m „ u u u ZZDD~ 0 0 ~ N ~'~»~ ~mm~~ ~ 3 X ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ' ~ d = ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m ~ ~ ' ~ „ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 m w m w w w w w w w O ~ N O O N N ~ m x m x x x x x x m x x x x w x x x x x x x A x x x m x x x N x x x x x x o x x x x x x c~ ' ~ ' N i ~ N ~ O ~ D t~ ~ ~ ~ N a, o 00 ~' 3 N 0 a -o `-o C 3 ~ ~D ~p Na 03 o~ c c~ N Approved Minutes 3 b 9 May 2010 MINUTES SENIOR CENTER COMMISSION MAY 20, 2010 ROOM 208, IOWA CITY/JOHNSON COUNTY SENIOR CENTER Members Present: Merce Bern-Klug, Chuck Felling, Jay Honohan, Sarah Maiers, Jean Martin, Michael Lensing Members Absent: Staff Present: Linda Kopping, Emily Light Others Present: RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: None. CALL TO ORDER: The meeting was called to order at 4:00 PM. Jay Honohan chaired the meeting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FROM APRIL 22 2010 MEETING: Motion: To accept the minutes from the Apri122, 2010 meeting. Motion carried on a vote of 6/0. Martin/Maiers. PUBLIC DISCUSSION OF ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA: None. COMMISSION ASSIGNMENTS: Honohan will report to the City Council in June. Bem-bug will report to the Board of Supervisors, and Kopping will attend with her. DISCUSSION OF NUTRITION PROGRAM LEASE: Honohan said the committee has not yet discussed the specifics of a new lease to present to the City of Iowa City Legal Department and Eider Senrices. Kopping asked maintenance worker Craig Buhman to draw up a list of equipment he thinks would be appropriate for the Senior Center to maintain, i.e. things that are physically attached to the building. Approved Minutes May 2010 CONSIDERATION OF THE PROPOSED POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CODE OF CONDUCT AND ACTIONS TO TAKE WHEN THE CODE IS VIOLATED- Honohan summarized areas that have been revised in the code of conduct. He removed the language that directly instructs staff members how to speak to policy violators. He also added language stating that a policy violator should receive a copy of the incident report related to their violation. Honohan added timelines in the appeal process, and added the step of review by the executive committee of the Senior Center Commission before review by the city manager. The Commission discussed whether a fourth offense (or a violation resulting in police removal) should have a 30-day or 60-day suspension. The Commission decided the fourth offense (or a violation resulting in police removal) will be a mandatory 30-day suspension. The Commission deaded to change the third offense to a mandatory 14-day suspension. Motion: To approve the code of conduct and disciplinary process as amended. Motion carried on a vote of G/0. Lensing/Felling. RECONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED CERAMIC STUDIO GUIDELINES AND POL_ Kopping said that the Senior Center staff decided to implement a ceramics room user fee to cover the cost of materials. The cost is $20/quarter for each user. Given the Center's current policy, if aloes-income person wants to use the ceramics room, the entire fee would be waived. Motion: To accept the proposed ceramics studio guidelines and policies. Motion carried on a vote of 6/0. Maiers/Martin. UPDATE ON BOARD APPOINTMENTS FOR FRIENDS OF THE CENTER: Honohan said that the initial list of nominees has been exhausted, and the board is still one person short. Lensing suggested Louise Gisolfi. Felling suggested Theresa Carbrey. Lensing suggested Don Carstensen. Honohan suggested Joe Pugh. Kopping suggested Jim Curry. Honohan will pursue these suggestions. Kopping has developed an informal system for tracking donations to Friends of the Cerrter, but she would like something more offidal. Honohan suggested hiring Steve Kuhl at Greenwood and Crim to create a system. Honohan said as soon as the board reaches nine members, the board will make quids progress in setting up the basic functions. Approved Minutes May 2090 OPERATIONAL OVERVIEW: Kopping reported that the showers in the weight room have been non functional for months, and the problem has been determined. McComas-Latina will pay for the repairs because of an installation problem. They say the showers should be fixed within a month; Kopping suspects it may be longer. Kopping hired Hung Le to work as a temporary maintenance person while Craig is on medical leave and on light duty. Kopping said she is trying to replace the Volunteer Specialist. She has updated the job description and renamed the position Community Outreach Specialist. The person will be responsible for volunteer programming, promotion of the Senior Center, including irrtergenerational programming, marketing, website management, and social media. Three internal applicants have applied and will be interviewed. Kopping has asked someone from the Personnel Department to sit in on interviews. Bern-Klug asked if there will be an external search. Kopping said it will depend on how the intemal interviews go. Lensing asked about income breakdown of members. Light said we are currently not tracking this information, except for including a question on the partiapant surveys that are conducted every few years. Honohan said someone in his Spanish class suggested diarging a small fee for partiapants in flee classes, as payment for use of the facility. Lensing said it could be worded as a "suggested payment." Maiers said she thinks there would be objections to this because members already pay annual membership fees and taxes. Honohan pointed out that many instructors already collect fees. Felling said those fees are to pay instructors for their services, and a portion of the fees collected are paid to the Senior Center for use of the faality. Kopping said there has been talk in the past about a registration fee of $5/class. Discussions have not resulted in any changes. Kopping said a lot of Senior Centers charge small registration fees for ead~ program. Many center managers believe paying a small participation fee causes people to perceive the program as more important and tends to increase actual participation. Kopping suggested telling members who express willingness to pay higher fees that the Center wants to keep fees as low as possible, but would certainly welcome donations to help support operational expenses. Approved Minutes May 2010 The Commission briefly discussed registration fees and asked Kopping to come up with a rough estimate of how much revenue could be generated from registration fees. Maiers said she would rather raise the membership fee than add on registration fees to classes that are currently free. Light said that some have suggested adding fees to access the fitness rooms. Honohan asked to put an item on next month's agenda involving "fee opportunities." He said we haven't made any changes in a while, except for parking fees. Kopping reported that the Senior Center staff is prioritizing the self-assessment committee recommendations, and will create an action plan from those priorities. Felling said one of the members was impressed by the inclusion of the self- assessment recommendations in the program guide. Kopping said someone contacted her to use the report as a model forconducting aself-assessment of an organization with which he was affiliated. COMMISSION DISCUSSION: Board of Supervisors Report on the April Meeting: Honohan reported to the board of supervisors at their last meeting. City Council Report on the April Mee#ing: Maiers had a scheduling conflict and did not attend. Honohan asked if the City Council has advertised for the vacant Commission position. Kopping said yes, and she has spoken with a Senior Center member who is interested in applying. ADJOURNMENT: Motion: To Adjourn. Motion carried on a vote of 6/0. MaierslBem-Klug. m ~zOOX u ~ m u u u n ZZDD~ 0 o N N N ~ ~ ~ y m ~ N ~~11 " .7+. ~ rr X ~ ~ n ~- (n ~ ~- f7 ~ Z n ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ m ~ ~ a m ~ o ~ ~ ~ o N ~ ~ O 3 N - f p C < 7 ~ 3 ~ _ ~ W 01 tin tn, ~ (~ ~ 3 ~ cfl N N N N N N ~ N ~ W W W W ~ ~ W m ~ ~ ~ ~ a X ~ N ~ O O N ~ N m x m x x x x N X X ~ X X X X w x x x x x x x X X X m X X X N ;Ixlxlxlxlxlx J 0 N N O ~ ~A ~ ~ 3• o ~~ o O O a~ 3 a -~ -v 0 <D 3a ~ 3 N 3 O ~ •i <p O N 3b~ MINUTES YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION April 12, 2010 - 7:00 PM HARVART HALL, CITY HALL Members Present: Zach Wahls, Luan Heywood, Gary Black, Jerry Gao Members Absent: Alexandra Timerius Staff Present: Marian Karr, Ross Wilburn Others Present: None CALL TO ORDER: FINAL The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m. Luan Heywood chaired the meeting. ELECTION OF OFFICERS: The Commission postponed the election of officers by one more month due to Timerius' absence. Wahls motioned to postpone the election of officers until May. Gao seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously, 410. MINUTES: Wahls motioned to approve the March 8 minutes. Gao seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously, 410. VACANCY UPDATE: The Commission briefly discussed the vacancy situation, one at Tate and one for Regina. Karr reported that she had been contacted by a Regina student interested in the vacancy. Black reported that he had successfully put fliers up in Regina, so hopefully, the Regina vacancy will be filled by the next meeting. Black stated he will continue his efforts with Tate. Heywood reported that it's likely she'll be around for the rest of her term, and Gao said that the likelihood of him being around the rest of the year is increasing for him well. YOUTH ADVISORY COMMISSION April 12, 2010 Page 2 of 3 BUDGET: The Commission briefly discussed the budget. $1,000 still remains in the budget for Youth Empowerment Grants, and There have been no expenditures since the last meeting. Wilburn noted that $250 remained in the Global Village budget as well and suggested the possibility of having the Commission fund a youth group at the Global Village. Black said he would contact the Summer of the Arts and see if they had any ideas. Karr volunteered contact information. Karr mentioned that sooner, rather than later, YAC might want to update the Grant application/process and guidelines. Gao and Wahls will look over everything and bring a list of suggestions to the Commission at the next meeting. SUBCOMMITTEE APPOINTMENTS: Gao agreed to serve on the Website & Advertising and Grant Programming Committees. CITY COUNCIL UPDATE: Wilburn mentioned that the 21-only policy will be in effect June 1. He then briefly ran through the options that may soon be facing council. He also reported that the 18-only initiative was now, essentially, off the table. MEETING SCHEDULE: The next meeting will be Monday, May 3rd at 7:00. ADJOURNMENT: Wahls motioned to adjourn. Black seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously, 4/0, 7:40 p.m. Z O ~O ~~ ~U OWo+; V ~ o p ~U~ _ NaW a~i OZr~ aW HQ O ~ X X ~ X x M X X X X N ~ X X X X ~ i ~ i ~ i ° ~ Z ~ Z ~ Z ~ Z ' ~ ~ d W X ~ W r r ,_ M N r O r ` N r r r ` N r O r M N r r- v- M N r r r M N r O r M N ~- w z ~ E 0 d O 3Z d v ~~ ~ ~ m ~~~~ ~ ~ m £ A N y n aaz°z° II II ~ II I XOpZ w Y sa i~ IOWA CITY TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION FINAL MONDAY, JUNE 26, 2010--5:30 P.M. CITY CABLE TV OFFICE, 10 S. LINN ST.-TOWER PLACE PARKING FACILITY MEMBERS PRESENT: Laura Bergus, Hans Hoerschelman, Gary Hagen MEMBERS ABSENT: Robert Kemp, Saul Mekies STAFF PRESENT: Mike Brau, Bob Hardy OTHERS PRESENT: Josh Goding, Beth Fisher, Kevin Hoyland RECOMMENDATIONS TO CITY COUNCIL None at this time. SUMMARY OF DISCUSSION Goding reported PATV won an award from the Hometown Video Festival sponsored by the Alliance for Community Media for staff-assisted program called "Lesson One" on Braille produced for the Old Capital Chapter of the National Association of the Blind. Hardy said that a bill was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives awhile back that would protect local access channels. The bill now has 15 sponsors. Anew organization, American Community Television, has been formed. It is made up of people who have been involved in lobbying on community television issues in the past. The City Cable TV Division has joined the organization and given money to support their efforts. Hardy said the City did not send letters regarding the CAP Act to Iowa members of Congress in the past, but letters may need to be sent in the future. Hagen said that the Commission might wish to contact the new superintendent and inform him of the potential and opportunities the school district channel offers. Hardy said he will oversee preparation of a short memo to the superintendent. Hoyland said he will be working with Ty Coleman to prepare written materials for the school district's librarians explaining how they might utilize the school channel. Hardy said Bergus has been added to the Triennial Review service committee. Hardy said he hopes to send the service committee materials this week. Hagen noted that the Triennial Review is over a year late. Hardy said it should be done shortly. Bergus asked if the Commission would do another review in a year when it would be scheduled or three years after the current review is finished. Hardy said there may be an option to conduct every 6 years and he will look into that option. Hardy said Brau reviewed Mediacom's filing and found a number of errors. Those errors miscalculated the maximum permitted rate too high by $0.50. Mediacom subsequently refilled and corrected their errors but also included retransmission consent fees, which they had not previously done. The new maximum permitted rate is $14.22 and the operator-selected rate is $12.95. Brau said that the basic tier rate in the unincorporated areas of Johnson County is $25. Bergus said in North Liberty, which has a competitive operator, the rate is around $17. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Bergus moved and Hagen seconded a motion to approve the amended May 24, 2010 minutes. The motion passed unanimously. ANNOUNCEMENTS OF COMMISSIONERS None. SHORT PUBLIC ANNOUNCEMENTS None. CONSUMER ISSUES Hardy referred to the complaint report in the meeting packet and said that all four complaints had been resolved. MEDIACOM REPORT Hardy said Grassley informed him that he would be unable to attend the meeting. Hoerschelman noted that there is an effort by the CEO to take Mediacom private. Brau said that the experts cited in trade journals do not expect private ownership to have any impact on the operations of the company. Hoyland said getting digital converter boxes for the school district will need to be investigated. Hardy said he will ask Grassley about converter boxes for the schools. UNIVERSITY OF IOWA REPORT No representative was present. KIRKWOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE Kirkwood provided a written report. PATV REPORT Goding reported PATV staff shot footage at Artsfest and will edit it into three or four programs. Footage from Trekfest was recorded and there are plans to record Jazz Fest. A program created in association with Access to Independence was recently completed. PATV won an award from the Hometown Video Festival sponsored by the Alliance for Community Media for staff-assisted program called "Lesson One" on Braille produced for the Old Capital Chapter of the National Association of the Blind. The board of directors will meet July 15 at 7 p.m. The next guidelines workshop will be July 11 at 2:30. Uptown Bill's will begin leasing the top level of the PATV facility August 1. Construction work has already begun. PATV expects many of the programs at Uptown Bill's to be carried on PATV. SENIOR CENTER REPORT No representative was present. LIBRARY REPORT Fisher reported that June is expected to be a slower month. Eight children's programs are planned. In July fourteen children's programs are planned and four adult programs. Several programs will be generated by the author in residence events. ICCSD REPORT Hoyland reported the schools had some equipment problems that have now been fixed. A couple of the school district meetings had to be recorded using just one camera. Both the City High and West High graduation ceremonies were recorded and cablecast on the school channel. Two new programs, one from Twain and one from the City High parent organization, were generated by the request for programs initiative. Hagen said that the Commission might wish to contact the new superintendent and inform him of the potential and opportunities the school district channel offers. Hardy said he will oversee preparation of a short memo to the superintendent. Hoyland said he will be working with Ty Coleman to prepare written materials for the school district's librarians explaining how they might utilize the school channel. CITY CHANNEL REPORT Hardy reported that next Community Voice IC People program will feature a woman who has become a Catholic priest. The At Home program has featured all City Councilors except Ross Wilburn. After all City Council members are recorded other local city officials may be interviewed. The Johnson County Historical Society is this month's notable nonprofit. The Iowa City Pride festival will be featured on the Community Voice. The Community Television Service recently recorded programs on Alzheimer's for the AARP and a program for the National Alliance for the Mentally Ill. Agrant-writing workshop presented by the Community Foundation will be recorded in the near future. The Media Unit recorded another episode of the police program, Community Beat, the Human Rights Commission Youth Human Rights Awards, a program on riding the bus, and the ground breaking ceremony for the eastside recycling center. An interactive computer application created for the Housing Authority and the Iowa City Association of Realtors that instructs potential home buyers on how to qualify for loans was recently completed. It is based on a series of video programs previously produced. An application for the Google infrastructure initiative has been filed. The organization's website is icabc.org. Bergus noted that the City of Detroit filed a lawsuit challenging Michigan's state franchising law. STATE LEGISLATION Hardy said he has asked the legal department to determine if Iowa City would be protected from losing its municipal franchise if a competitor indicates an intent to provide service. CAP ACT Hardy said that a bill was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives awhile back that would protect local access channels. The bill now has 15 sponsors. Anew organization, American Community Television has been formed. It is made of people who have been involved in lobbying on community television issues in the past. The Iowa City Cable TV Division has joined the organization and given them money to support them. Hardy said the City did not send letters to Iowa members of Congress in the past, but letters may need to be sent in the future. ICCSD PROGRAMMING SUPPORT Hardy said Hoyland covered this topic earlier in the meeting. TRIENNIAL REVIEW Hardy said Bergus has been added to the service committee. Hardy said he will be sending the service committee materials hopefully this week. Hagen noted that the Triennial Review is over a year late. Hardy said it should be done shortly. Bergus asked if the Commission will do another review in a year when it would be scheduled or three years after the current review is finished. Hardy said there might be an option to conduct every 6 years and he will look into that option. MEDIACOM RATE REVIEW Hardy said Brau reviewed Mediacom's filing and found a number of errors. Those errors miscalculated the maximum permitted rate to high by $0.50. Mediacom subsequently refilled and corrected their errors but also included retransmission consent fees, which they had not previously done. The new maximum permitted rate is $14.22 and the operator-selected rate is $12.95. Brau said that the basic tier rate in the unincorporated areas of Johnson County is $25. Bergus said in North Liberty, which has a competitive operator, the rate is around $17. ADJOURNMENT Hoerschelman moved and Bergus seconded a motion to adjourn. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 6:35. Michael Brau Cable TV Administrative Aide TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 12 MONTH ATTENDANCE RECORD July 2008 to CURRENT Meetin Date Hoerschelman Saul Meikes Bob Kemp Gordon Gary Hagen 7/28/Og X X X X X 8/25/08 X X X o/c X 9/23/08 x x x x X 10.27/08 X X X o/c X 11/24/08 Did not meet 12/15/08 X X X X X 1 /26/09 X X X X o/c 2/243/09 X' x o/c o/c X Laura Bergus 4/27/09 X X X X X 6/1/09 x x x vacant X 6/22!09 X X X X Mekies 7/27/Og X X X o/c x 8/24/09 X X X X X 9/28/09 X X X X X 10/24/09 x x xx olc 11 /23/09 x x o/c x X 1 /25/10 X X X o/c o/c 2/22/10 X X o/c X o/c 4/26/10 X X o/c X o/c 5/24/10 X X 0 X X 6/28/10 X x 0 X o/c 7/26/10 X x 0 o/c x (X)=Present (O) =Absent (O/C) = Absent/Called (Excused) FINAL/APPROVED POLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD MINUTES -July 21, 2010 CALL TO ORDER: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Chair Donald King called the meeting to order at 5:32 P.M. Royceann Porter, Peter Jochimsen Joseph Treloar Staff Catherine Pugh and Kellie Tuttle Captain Wyss, Officer Schwindt and Officer Smithey of the ICPD RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL (1) Accept PCRB Report on Complaint #10-01 Ot3-7 7-1 U 3b 12 INTRODUCTION OF NEW MEMBER King introduced Peter Jochimsen who was appointed by the City Council at the May 10th meeting and term started July 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Motion by Porter and seconded by Jochimsen to adopt the consent calendar as presented or amended. • Minutes of the meeting on 05/11/10 • Minutes of the meeting on 06/24/10 • Minutes of the meeting on 07/13/10 • ICPD General Order #08-01 (Conducted Energy Devices) • ICPD General Order #99-09 (Vehicle Crashes) • ICPD Quarterly/Summary Report (Quarter 2) - IAIR/PCRB, 2010 • ICPD Department Memo #10-15 (March-April 2010 Use of Force Review) • ICPD Use of Force Report -March 2010 ICPD Use of Force Report -April 2010 • ICPD P.A.U.L.A. Report -May 2010 • ICPD P.A.U.L.A. Report -June 2010 Motion carried, 3/0, Treloar absent. CONSIDER REQUEST FROM PCRB LEGAL COUNSEL FOR FEE INCREASE EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1, 2010 Motion by Jochimsen, seconded by Porter to approve the request from PCRB Legal Counsel for a fee increase effective September 1, 2010. Motion carried, 3/0, Treloar absent. NEW BUSINESS PCRB Annual Report -The Board reviewed the draft and agreed to add more information under Presentations. Tuttle will include a 2"d draft in the next meeting packet. PCRB July 21, 2010 Page 2 OLD BUSINESS Update Complaint Forms -King confirmed the changes requested and will have a draft ready for the next meeting packet. Comprehensive Review of PCRB Ordinance By-Laws, SOP's - Motion by Jochimsen, seconded by Porter to defer until January 2011, due to the change in members and the upcoming schedule including the annual forum. Motion carried, 3/0, Treloar absent. Motion to accept ICPD General Order 01-01 (Racial Profiling) -. Motion by Jochimsen, seconded by Porter to defer until January 2011, due to the change in members and the upcoming schedule including the annual forum. Motion carried, 3/0, Treloar absent. PUBLIC DISCUSSION None. BOARD INFORMATION None. STAFF INFORMATION EXECUTIVE SESSION Tuttle asked the Board to review the member contact sheet and let her know of any changes. Motion by Porter and seconded by Jochimsen to adjourn into Executive Session based on Section 21.5(1)(a) of the Code of Iowa to review or discuss records which are required or authorized by state or federal law to be kept confidential or to be kept confidential as a condition for that government body's possession or continued receipt of federal funds, and 22.7(11) personal information in confidential personnel records of public bodies including but not limited to cities, boards of supervisors and school districts, and 22-7(5) police officer investigative reports, except where disclosure is authorized elsewhere in the Code; and 22.7(18) Communications not required by law, rule or procedure that are made to a government body or to any of its employees by identified persons outside of government, to the extent that the government body receiving those communications from such persons outside of government could reasonably believe that those persons would be discouraged from making them to that government body if they were available for general public examination. Motion carried, 3/0, Treloar absent. Open session adjourned at 5:56 P.M. PCRB July 21, 2010 Page 3 REGULAR SESSION Returned to open session at 6:19 P.M. Motion by Porter, seconded by Jochimsen to forward the Public Report as amended for PCRB Complaint #10-01 to City Council. Motion carried, 3/0, Treloar absent. Motion by Porter, seconded by Jochimsen to set the level of review for PCRB Complaint #10-03 to 8-8-7 (B)(1)(a), On the record with no additional investigation. Motion carried, 3/0, Treloar absent. TENTATIVE MEETING SCHEDULE and FUTURE AGENDAS (subject to change) • August 10, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm • September 14, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm • October 12, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm • November 9, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm ADJOURNMENT Motion for adjournment by Porter, seconded by Jochimsen. Motion carried, 3/0, Treloar absent. Meeting adjourned at 6:30 P.M. ~C i 7 O 0 ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~D "~" ~~ a. -Ct -cY b7d o g ~ o O ~~ p ~ g ~ ~ ~ e o ? =e O C ~ ~ ~• z e o " "! ~ C3 y = ` ~ ~ ~~ ~ QQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ - ~-. ~ .r ~-. ~ ~ ih b W N N W W N i i i z z z z N ~ ~ 3 ~ N i i i ~ X ~ J Q j ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ A W C~] A O `" ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ z z z 3 = 3 ° 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ,'C ~ ~C iC i A [~ 7 ~ J _ ~ yC' yC ~'C = W [ 7 J i i i i i i ~ i i i ~ i i i ~ i i i i ~ F"3 H Cri ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ z ~~ d o r~ ~~ O b r ~I CZ bC v -:u POLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD A Board of the City of Iowa City 410 East Washington Street Iowa City, IA 52240-1826 (319) 356-5041 N G7 C, c -. July 21, 2010 ~' ~ ~ ~L~ . ~~ r.~ ~~ To: City Council jr'- ~' 1 _,.,~ .{ , Complainant ~ `a ~ ~' i ~ Dale Helling, Interim City Manager r, ~' Sam Hargadine, Chief of Police m £~;, Officer(s) involved in complaint F From: Police Citizen's Review Board Re: Investigation of PCRB Complaint #10-01 This is the Report of the Police Citizens Review Board's (the "Board") review of the investigation of Complaint PCRB#10-01(the "Complaint"). BOARD'S RESPONSIBILITY Under the City Code of the City of Iowa City, Section 8-8-7B (2), the Board's job is to review the Police Chiefs Report ("Report") of his investigation of a complaint. The City Code requires the Board to apply a "reasonable basis" standard of review to the Report and to "give deference" to the Report because of the Police Chief s professional expertise", Section 8-8-7 B (2). While the City Code directs the Board to make "Findings of Fact", it also requires that the Board recommend that ~~ the Police Chief reverse or modify his findings only if these findings are unsupported by substantial evidence', are "unreasonable, arbitrary or capricious" or are "contrary to a Police Department policy or practice, or any Federal, State or local law", Section 8-8-7 B (2) a, b, c. BOARD'S PROCEDURE The Complaint was initiated by the Complainant on February 11, 2010. As required by Section 8- 8-5 (B) of the City Code, the Complaint was referred to the Chief of Police for investigation. The Chief s Report was completed on May 10, 2010 and was filed with the City Clerk on May 10, 2010. The Board met to consider the Chiefs Report on May 11, 2010, July 13, 2010 and July 21, 2010. At the May 11~' meeting the Board voted to review the Chief s Report in accordance with Section 8- 8-7 (B) (1) (d), Request additional investigation by the Police Chief or City Manager, or request police assistance in the Board's own investigation. FINDINGS OF FACT: On February 6, 2010 at 2342 hours, Officer A responded to a fight call at the VFW on Highway 6 West as a backup officer. When he arrived, he noticed the complainant being lead away by other people. He described her as being very agitated, yelling profanities, and displaying obscene gestures. Officer A believed that she was involved in the fight call. Officer A grabbed hold of her arm to place her under arrest and she resisted this and failed to place her hands behind her back. Officer A then grabbed both arms and placed her in handcuffs. Complainant was charged with Disorderly Conduct and Interference with Official Acts. ALLEGATION: Complainant alleges that Officer A used excessive force while placing her under arrest. An investigation was conducted with video/audio recordings and interviews of the officers involved. Complainant was contacted and agreed to an interview on February 23, 2010, but failed to make the appointment. She also failed to respond to future requests to meet. Witnesses were identified and contact was initiated by the investigators but no response was received. The audio portion of the incident was reviewed and Complainant could be heard yelling when Officer A arrived. Officer A instructed the Complainant a number of times to put her hands on the car, and later to put her hands behind her back. There is no indication of profanity from Officer A. There is also no indication that Complainant's head was hit against the car. No sound or indication of camera movement was detected. At no time does Officer A say that he is"going to make an example out of her," as she claims in her statement. Complainant claims that her rights were never read to her. Officer A did not question Complainant about the incident so Miranda Rights were not necessary. Upon reviewing the video/audio portions and interviews with Officers involved, there is no evidence that excessive use of force was used. NOT SUSTAINED N O E._2 Q '? ~„ « C ~.m f V 0 N ~ t y f C,) _~ FINAL/APPROVED 3b 13 POLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD MINUTES -July 13, 2010 CALL TO ORDER: Chair Donald King called the meeting to order at 12:05 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Joseph Treloar, Peter Jochimsen MEMBERS ABSENT: Royceann Porter STAFF PRESENT: Kellie Tuttle OTHERS PRESENT: None RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL None. EXECUTIVE SESSION Motion by Treloar and seconded by Jochimsen to adjourn into Executive Session based on Section 21.5(1)(a) of the Code of Iowa to review or discuss records which are required or authorized by state or federal law to be kept confidential or to be kept confidential as a condition for that government body's possession or continued receipt of federal funds, and 22.7(11) personal information in confidential personnel records of public bodies including but not limited to cities, boards of supervisors and school districts, and 22-7(5) police officer investigative reports, except where disclosure is authorized elsewhere in the Code; and 22.7(18) Communications not required by law, rule or procedure that are made to a government body or to any of its employees by identified persons outside of government, to the extent that the government body receiving those communications from such persons outside of government could reasonably believe that those persons would be discouraged from making them to that government body if they were available for general public examination. Motion carried, 3/0, Porter absent. Open session adjourned at 12:06 P.M. REGULAR SESSION Returned to open session at 12:32 P.M. TENTATIVE MEETING SCHEDULE and FUTURE AGENDAS (subject to change) • July 21, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm • August 10, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm • September 14, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm • October 12, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm ADJOURNMENT Motion for adjournment by Jochimsen, seconded by Treloar. Motion carried, 3/0, Porter absent. Meeting adjourned at 12:33 P.M. ;C 7~OyC zz~~ro o ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ fD ~' ~~ ~ rj ~D a ~GC ~CY oo ~~d ~~ o d W~ - ~ O fD O~ ,t oes n ,~ -, A y o = ~ y 7 ~ ~ '+ ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ a ~ ~~ ~_ ~ ~ -d w N N w w N i i i ~ X ~ ~ ~,' ~ ~ ~ z z z N i i ~ ~ ~ ~ N i i i ~ ~ ~ J 0 ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ W ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A W A O 1 ~ _ ~C ~C yC U P7 ~ z ~ z z z ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o °~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ yC DC ~ w y ~' ,~ n C7 o Cri o O b r F~1 A Y~I H O Y u FINALlAPPROVED CALL TO ORDER: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Chair Donald King called the meeting to order at 12:02 P.M. Royceann Porter, Joseph Treloar Vershawn Young Kellie Tuttle None RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL None. 3b 14 EXECUTIVE SESSION Motion by Treloar and seconded by Porter to adjourn into Executive Session based on Section 21.5(1)(a) of the Code of Iowa to review or discuss records which are required or authorized by state or federal law to be kept confidential or to be kept confidential as a condition for that government body's possession or continued receipt of federal funds, and 22.7(11) personal information in confidential personnel records of public bodies including but not limited to cities, boards of supervisors and school districts, and 22-7(5) police officer investigative reports, except where disclosure is authorized elsewhere in the Code; and 22.7(18) Communications not required by law, rule or procedure that are made to a government body or to any of its employees by identified persons outside of government, to the extent that the government body receiving those communications from such persons outside of government could reasonably believe that those persons would be discouraged from making them to that government body if they were available for general public examination. Motion carried, 3/0, Young absent. Open session adjourned at 12:03 P.M. REGULAR SESSION Returned to open session at 12:29 P.M. POLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD MINUTES -June 24, 2010 Motion by Treloar, seconded by Porter to set the level of review for PCRB Complaint #10-01 to 8-8-7 (B)(1)(d), Request additional investigation by the Police Chief or City Manager, or request police assistance in the Board's own investigation. Motion carried, 3/0, Young absent. Motion by Treloar, seconded by Porter to direct staff to request additional information from the Police Chief regarding PCRB Complaint #10-01. Motion carried, 3/0, Young absent. PCRB June 24, 2010 Page 2 TENTATIVE MEETING SCHEDULE and FUTURE AGENDAS (subject to change) • July 13, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm (Rescheduled to July 21, 2010) • July 21, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm • August 10, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm • September 14, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm • October 12, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm Motion by Porter, seconded by Treloar to move the July 13th meeting date to July 21St due to report deadlines. Motion carried, 3/0, Young absent. ADJOURNMENT Motion for adjournment by Porter, seconded by Treloar. Motion carried, 3/0, Young absent. Meeting adjourned at 12:33 P.M. :C i ~ Oj 0 O ~ C C ~ ~ ~ y y ~/' ~ ~ ~ ~ fD ~' °Q a ~~ -ca o 0 0~ ; o o ~'~ O~ O C . , A eD ~ A~ O ~ 1 ~ ~ ' p ~ aroma °'. `~° ~~ ~ 9 d~~ a -~i Y y ~ 7 QQ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ b7 ~ W N N W W ^' N 77 ra r+ i i i ~ X z ~ ~ z z z N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 3 N i i i ~ ~ ~ J 0 ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ O "' ~ ~ ~ ~ k .. ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ z z ~ z z ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ o O1 i i i ~ i i i i ~ i i ~ i i i ~ i i i ~ ~ i i i ~ y y ~ d ~ ~Y ~n d ~~ ~~ O b 0 r n n C FINAL/APPROVED POLICE CITIZENS REVIEW BOARD MINUTES -May 11, 2010 CALL TO ORDER: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Chair Donald King called the meeting to order at 5:30 P.M. Janie Braverman, Royceann Porter (5:34p), Joseph Treloar Vershawn Young Staff Catherine Pugh and Kellie Tuttle Captain Richard Wyss and Officer David Schwindt of the ICPD RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL None. 3b 15 INTRODUCTION OF NEW MEMBER King announced that Peter Jochimsen was appointed by the City Council at the May 10tH meeting and that his term would begin July 1. CONSENT CALENDAR Motion by Braverman and seconded by Treloar to adopt the consent calendar as presented or amended. • Minutes of the meeting on 04/13/10 • Minutes of the meeting on 04/15/10 • ICPD SOG#10-01 (Spanish Language Education) • ICPD General Order #99-05 (Use of Force) • ICPD P.A.U.L.A. Report -April 2010 Motion carried, 3/0, Porter and Young absent. King wanted to clarify that in General Order 99-05 (Use of Force), section V (Procedures - Less Lethal Force), item D that if a person is actively combative, medical treatment would not be offered. Wyss stated that if it was for a chemical irritant only, treatment is not offered unless the person is non-combative. In the same section under item C(3) Treloar wanted to know why nylon leg restraints were used instead of metal ones. Wyss explained that the metal ones were not available to them and that the nylon is easier to use. NEW BUSINESS Discussion of Conflict of Interest -Pugh went over abstaining if you have a conflict of interest. If a Member has a conflict of interest, they may abstain from the vote but they must give the reason for the conflict. Pugh also noted that the Board does not have a mechanism to force a Member to vote if they do not have a valid reason to abstain. Pugh explained what City Council has in place for such cases. Any changes the Board would want to make would be a by-law change and would have to get City Council approval. Update Complaint Forms -The Board discussed making the complaint forms and information available more user friendly so that the Board gets all the information they need when the complaint is filed. Braverman suggested explaining personal knowledge PCRB May 11, 2010 Page 2 somewhere on the form and offer assistance on filling out the form. King and Treloar will work on making some changes and bring them back to the Board at its next meeting. OLD BUSINESS Comprehensive Review of PCRB Ordinance By-Laws, SOP's -Pugh revised the mediation letters that go to the Chief, Officer, and complainant so that the message is clearer that all parties must agree before mediation can take place. Treloar did some research on other review Boards. The information will be e-mailed to Members for discussion at the next meeting and available on the City website. Motion to accept ICPD General Order 01-01 (Racial Profiling) -Braverman suggested carrying this over until July until the final decisions are made to any suggested changes on the ordinance, by-law, or SOP. PUBLIC DISCUSSION None. BOARD INFORMATION None. STAFF INFORMATION None. EXECUTIVE SESSION Motion by Treloar and seconded by Porter to adjourn into Executive Session based on Section 21.5(1)(a) of the Code of Iowa to review or discuss records which are required or authorized by state or federal law to be kept confidential or to be kept confidential as a condition for that government body's possession or continued receipt of federal funds, and 22.7(11) personal information in confidential personnel records of public bodies including but not limited to cities, boards of supervisors and school districts, and 22-7(5) police officer investigative reports, except where disclosure is authorized elsewhere in the Code; and 22.7(18) Communications not required by law, rule or procedure that are made to a government body or to any of its employees by identified persons outside of government, to the extent that the government body receiving those communications from such persons outside of government could reasonably believe that those persons would be discouraged from making them to that government body if they were available for general public examination. Motion carried, 4/0, Young absent. Open session adjourned at 6:07 P.M. REGULAR SESSION Returned to open session at 6:16 P.M. Motion by Braverman, seconded by Treloar to request 30-day extension for PCRB Complaint #10-01, due to timelines and scheduling. Motion carried, 4/0, Young absent. PCRB May 11, 2010 Page 3 TENTATIVE MEETING SCHEDULE and FUTURE AGENDAS (subject to change) • June 8, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm • July 13, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm • August 10, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm • September 14, 2010, 5:30 PM, Lobby Conference Rm King will have to check his schedule in August to see if there's a conflict. The Board will be one member short in June. With Young preparing to move he will not be available for the meeting. ADJOURNMENT Motion for adjournment by Treloar, seconded by Braverman. Motion carried, 4/0, Young absent. Meeting adjourned at 6:21 P.M. 7~0>C zz~~b °~~~A y ~ ~ ~ ~D ~' "! fD o~ o 0 C o ; o d ~~ ~ ~ ~ n e o p y ~ O C = ~ ~• f D 3 " J ^~ N °" '` 3 ~ 7 ~ ~~ w w N b N N o ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N i i ~ ~ ~ k ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... , '~, y y ~ ~ d ~ ~ z ~• ~, ~ ~ ~~ ~~ o b Q ~I n 0 3b 16 MINUTES APPROVED IOWA CITY BOARD OF APPEALS MONDAY, MAY 3, 2010 LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM, CITY HALL 410 E. WASHINGTON STREET IOWA CITY, IA MEMBERS PRESENT: John Roffman, Steve Buckman, Andrea French, Scott McDonough, Matt Neumiller MEMBERS ABSENT: Chad Campion STAFF PRESENT: Tim Hennes (Sr. Building Inspector), Doug Boothroy (Director, Housing and Inspection Services), Sue Dulek (Asst. City Attorney) John Grier (Fire Marshall), Jann Ream (Code Enforcement Assistant acting as minute taker) OTHERS PRESENT: Joan Tiemeyer, Iowa City Homebuilders Association RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL: Recommended by a unanimous vote (5-0) to proceed with the adoption of an amendment to Title 17 of the City Code -Building and Housing, Section R313.1 - to change the effective date from January 1, 2010 to January 3, 2011. CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Roffman called the meeting to order at 4:07. The new BOA member, Matt Neumiller was introduced. Elections for board officers commenced. Motion: McDonough moved to elect John Roffman as board chairperson. French seconded. Vote: Roffman was elected board chairperson by a 5-0 unanimous vote. Motion: Roffman moved to elect Steve Buckman board vice-chairperson. McDonough seconded. Vote: Buckman was elected board vice-chairperson by a 5-0 unanimous vote. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES: Minutes from the November 2, 2009 meeting were reviewed. McDonough moved to approve the minutes. French seconded. Minutes were approved by a 5-0 unanimous vote. Discussion and possible recommendation to Council regarding an amendment to section R313 of the 2009 International Residential Code. Board of Appeals May 3, 2010 Page2of2 Hennes explained that the current building code amendment concerning the protection of light weight construction in single family and duplex dwellings was adopted based on the premise that the State of Iowa was going to adopt sprinkling requirements for these dwellings with a delayed effective of January 1, 2013 when they adopted the 2009 International Residential Code. The State of Iowa, however, did not adapt the sprinkling requirements at all. There have been inspection issues and questions concerning the enforcement of the code and the Iowa City Homebuilders have asked that staff look into the issue again. Staff would like some time to have a committee (comprised of builders, truss manufacturers, fire fighters and inspection staff) evaluate the existing code and either propose a new code amendment or have the effective date of the existing amendment changed to January 3, 2011 if nothing new is decided. Joan Tiemeyer stated that the Iowa City Homebuilders Association submitted a letter to the Board stating that they support a review committee and hope that the Board would support an amendment for a delayed effective date in order to allow the committee some time to work. Motion: Buckman moved that the Board recommend to City Council that Section R313.1 be amended so that the effective date is changed from January 1, 2010 to January 3, 2011. McDonough seconded. Discussion: Hennes stated that some of the issues that will be discussed with the committee are what the State did adopt and the fact that truss manufactures are stating that new solid sawn lumber has a quicker burn time that older dimensional lumber so it probably isn't fair to single out light weight (TGI} construction. Roffman asked if any builders have already installed protection on lightweight construction. Hennes stated yes. Hennes also stated that this proposal would align Iowa City with what otherjurisdictions are doing concerning this issue. Vote: The motion was approved by a unanimous vote of 5-0. ADJOURNMENT: McDonough moved to adjourn the meeting. Neumiller seconded. The meeting adjourned at 4:17 PM. ~%' ~~' Date N ~ ~ O ~ v Q ~ Q d O ~ ~ -p ~ ~ m +~'~ Q 0 d D 0 0 z 0 r V O r a d N 0 o~ Q 0 ' X X X X X X 0 ~ ~ ~ Z 0 X X X X O X o ` ~ Z 0 ~ ` ~ ~ v Z 0 ~ ~ ~ Z W 0 ~ Z tp W ~ N I~ H M O 0 0 0 0 0 0 X N 1 N N N N N \ "~ W ~ r M N r M N ~ M f~ r M N r M N ~ M f~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H p L U O ~ p w cu m ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~_' E Q Y ~ ~ p a C "' ~ Z ~ LL p 0 p p ~ N ~ p fC m ~ ~ ~ U N Z ~ ~ N Z p p ~ c ~ ~ v v L ~ W a n ~ ii ii W ii ~ c ii a? cn Q p ~ cn U ~ Y X O O Z ~~c~~ MINUTES-FINAL CITY OF IOWA CITY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION July 27, 2010 - 8:15AM LOBBY CONFERENCE ROOM -CITY HALL Members Present: Lyra Dickerson, William Cook and Elizabeth Cummings Members Absent: None Staff Present: Karen Jennings, Captain Matt Johnson, Deputy Fire Chief Roger Jensen and Jane Molony Others Present: None RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL (become effective only after separate Council action): None CALL TO ORDER: Meeting called to order at 8:15 a.m. Lyra Dickerson chaired the meeting. CERTIFICATION OF PROMOTIONAL LISTS FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT: Jennings provided the lists to commissioners for review. The first item of business was certification of the Police Captain promotional list. Cook moved to approve the list as proposed, Cummings seconded the motion and all were in favor. The second item of business was certification of the Police Lieutenant promotional list. Cummings moved to approve the list as proposed, Cook seconded the motion and all were in favor. The third item of business was certification of the Police Sergeant promotional list. Cook moved to approve the list as proposed, Cummings seconded the motion and all were in favor. ENTRY LEVEL FIREFIGHTER TESTING: The Commission viewed a short video introducing them to CPAT (Candidate Physical Ability Test) which was recommended for use as the physical fitness test in entry-level Firefighter testing. This test was developed by the International Association of Firefighters and International Association of Fire Chiefs Fire Service Joint Labor Management Wellness Task Force. Cook made a motion to approve the firefighter recruitment and testing process as proposed, Cummings seconded the motion, and the motion was carried unanimously. OLD BUSINESS: Jennings stated the police promotionals went well and that the consultant and assessors commented that Iowa City Police staff tested was, as a group, the highest quality they have assessed. NEW BUSINESS: None ADJOURNMENT: Cook moved to adjourn, Cummings seconded and the meeting was adjourned at 8:21 a.m. Board/Commission: Civil Service Commission ATTENDANCE RECORD YEAR 2010 (Mpptina Datel NAME TERM EXPIRES 3/3110 4114/10 7/27110 L ra Dickerson 4/7/14 X X X Bill Cook 4/1/13 X X X Elizabeth Cummins 4/4/12 X O X KEY: X = Present O = Absent O/E = Absent/Excused NM = No Meeting --- = Not a Member